HomeMy WebLinkAboutSPI2013-00054 - SPI Inspections - 7/24/2013r
• PZON STgT MASON COUNTY
A o CA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
S N =_ Planning Division
o Y y P O Box 279, Shelton, WA 98584
�° (360)427-9670
1864
Site Inspection
July 24, 2013
TIMOTHY PEI ZEL
11890 E STATE ROUTE 106
UNION WA 98592
Case No.: SP12013-00054
Parcel No.: 122171200010
Project Description: PLANNING PRE-INSPECTION TO DETERMINE LOCATION
OF 2 STORY,1100 SQ FT SFR
Dear Applicant:
Pursuant to your application, a site pre-inspection (SPI) was performed on your property. Below
you will find comments made regarding the proposed development and its critical values.
In some cases, setbacks for development from shorelines, steep slopes, streams, and wetlands
must be included in your specific proposal; these setbacks are included as part of the comments
listed below.
This information is based on County and State regulations as they exist to date. These
regulations may change and may affect the requirements for development of the subject property.
Please contact me at(360) 427-9670, ext. 365 if you have questions.
Sincerely,
Allan Borden
Land Use Planner
Mason County Planning Department
7/2412013 Page 1 of 4 SP12013-00054
Site Inspection
7/24/2013 Case No.: SP12013-00054
Comments: Inspection for Tim Pelzel on July 17, 2013:
The applicant requested a pre-inspection on portions of this 1.86
acre property along North Bay & Case Inlet and North Bay Rd.
(county) near Allyn [PN: 12217-12-00010 and 12217-12-00012] to
propose a new small cabin in relation to the existing wetland and
associated buffer. A slope at less than 5 percent is oriented
towards the bay and open water wetland. The wetland conditions
border the property and much of the vegetation buffers are intact.
The applicant wishes to develop a small footprint cabin on the
property near the wetland following county development
standards. These findings state regulations in effect at the time of
inspection, unless noted otherwise.
Development Regulations standards:
_Y_ The site is in Rural Residential 5 zone. Standard building
setbacks are 25-foot front yard setback, and 20-foot side property
line and rear yard setbacks. These setbacks are measured from
structures above grade such as roof overhangs, stairs, balconies,
decks, heat pumps, storage buildings, and fuel tanks.
_Y_ An administrative variance may be requested to reduce
these setback distances from property lines, to as low as 5 feet
(side yard) or 10 feet (front yard), if the shape or features of the
property constrain development from the proper setbacks. This
process requires application and review at the time of the building
permit submittal.
Resource Ordinance Standards:
_N_ Slope or Landslide hazards: Slopes less than 8 percent
adjacent to or within 300 feet of a proposed project were
observed. The applicant does not need a geologic special report
during development review.
_Y_ Shoreline setbacks: The Mason County Shoreline Master
Program and Mason County Resource Ordinance setbacks
applied to the site. The area shoreline designation is Rural
Environment. The proposed development on the subject parcel
would need to comply with Resource Ordinance 100 foot setback
from the ordinary high water mark (equal to the vegetation change
from low-growing plants to tree and shrub vegetation as you move
from the saltwater area to the lands adjacent to the state
highway).
7/24/2013 Page 2 of 4 SP12013-00054
Site Inspection
7/24/2013 Case No.: SP12013-00054
Stream setbacks: The stream to the north is not typed, and
not subject to the Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas
Chapter (17.01.110) of the Mason County Resource Ordinance
standards. But a separation distance of 50 feet from the stream
to the site development would assure minimal impacts to the
stream that is entering the saltwater and wetland area. Much of
this distance is on the property to the north.
Wetland critical area: Planning staff confirmed that certain
wetlands, soil conditions, and associated connecting drainages,
are located on the subject parcel. These critical areas are
regulated under Mason County's Wetlands Chapter 17.01.070 of
the Mason County Resource Ordinance. These wetland
conditions extend through much of the lowest elevations of the
subject parcel. The wetlands are likely a mosaic of Category II or
I wetlands with moderate plant diversity and subsurface flow into
and out of the subject parcel. As part of the proposal review, you
typically would need to have a qualified biologist (a list is on the
website) prepare a wetland report that delineates the wetland
edge, characterizes the wetland category, and determines the
proper vegetation buffer using the information from this Wetlands
chapter. Development near the wetlands shall have the
determined vegetative buffer, and buildings must be set back an
additional 15 feet from the outer edge of that buffer.
_Y_ The wetland and the vegetation buffer are currently intact
with some trails existing through them. For view improvement,
some tree limbs in the buffer may be trimmed on a limited basis in
accordance with the Wetland chapter standards.
_Y Due to the potential impacts to the vegetation buffer adjacent
to the wetland, a Mason Environmental Permit (MEP) review must
be completed PRIOR to any development evaluation and
additional clearing is done; NO CLEARING should take place
within the 100 feet closest to the wetland, unless other
recommended actions are made in the MEP review. When
planning the location of all proposed improvements or removing
further vegetation for development, consider the proper buffer and
setback from the wetland edge in that site plan.
Staff and the applicant discussed the locations of a proposed
small cabin (two-story with small footprint) in the flat area near
North Bay Rd. in regard to wetland areas to the east at 100 to 120
feet distance. The connection to North Bay sewer and use of the
existing driveway access will minimize the area of potential
development to the building and parking area within 70 to 80 feet
7/24/2013 Page 3 of 4 SP12013-00054
Site Inspection
7/24/2013 Case No.: SP12013-00054
from the North Bay Rd. alignment, as well as the review of the
MEP.
General process: Future site development must include a site
plan, showing all setbacks from property lines, slopes, and
existing and proposed improvements; this site plan will be needed
for the building permit application and the wetland study review.
Specific County Code standards for future development may be
found at the County website address http-//www.co.mason.wa.us.
If you have any questions please feel free to call. Thank you.
712412013 Page 4 of 4 SP12013-00054
JULrRJECEIVED
17 H13 SPI 613 - noo5�
_ li'1c.LJ
MA�rh'EO�l11�1�F S _ ACCEPTED BY
PLANNING DEPT. PRE-INSPECTION APPLICATI((;
PLEASE PRINT n $255.00 Fee Required
j� N ►J �1
1. Site Address:
Owner: \ �2ACa-/'�Applicant:
Owner Address: 1411 S Applicant Address: 1&36
City- c 0 m Cc_ St-WAzip g City: -/ n i w_ St�, Zip
Phone: ( ) day Phone: �1 2-4J t'R_ y
Phone: ( ) evening Phone: ( ) evening
Email Address: Email Address:
2. Parcel Ws 1'2Z1-7- - J'Z_-_ QCX) 10 127. 1-7- 12- f a
Legal Description: ,(
3. Purpose of Pre-Inspection:
4. Use of building:
5. Do any of the following exist on or adjacent to property?: slope ( ) saltwater lake ( ) river ( )
pond ( ) wetland ( ) seasonal runoff( ) other( stream( ) seasonal creek( )
Directions to Site:
If the information is incomplete, then Mason County must disclaim any errors resulting from deficiencies in the original
application. Pre-inspection reports remain valid only until development changes occur in the vicinity,which affect the lot
evaluated in this inspection,or the laws regulating development of the site change after the time of inspection.
9�
Applicant Signature: Date: -7— l_]
If you would like to be on site during inspection,please check here:
Return application to: Department of Community Development, Planning Division
P.O.Box 186
Shelton,WA 98584
Please include a$255.00 check or money order payable to Mason County Treasurer.
MORE ON BACK SIDE
I:\Community Development\PAC\SPI\2012 Pre-Inspection.doc
4!AN, 3. 2006 2:40PNLom-jRE_USA_GIG_HAR80R 3�5500-27 -4022 TNO: 346303,P__2 F-484
ozlor
ao
28
Yw':... I r Mjc,a,.tCA1ssT n 6 ivy r y ': 'J
..
'o CIA
t O
0MR
` > � �-1• rh�N �r ec a M �• r V �•
' YFrr�•' � �` �Alr �
IL
f ,••r. ter. a +r*- �h ��M�t'� '_ ��_,,
SSA "'i �. •� � 'i
0 �?�H H1•�tbN .' �
-10 1dbd jV u
•7,7jo Nn Hoos)
ZOO: :L If AYYnNVr
X.3 OddY'M Sb }Q3 [13waN-ntn
-AbMHOfH 31YIS. - -�
NOS vri IV] w M
122084480291
C+
1 I
122084300000 wt"� Ir4
lap
V
.� . t »_ 22,
P, wirl, 1 221 71 1 80290
12217,1280510
12217.1200010
a+� a 3 J 0000,..AA,�jf ��� •.,� � s'r�.
ol
'�d > .ate �.R `R, r; .,..i.n��'•, � ,� t. 4f ' .fir. 0
'. ! ° p
r , ': .♦° 122170060000
`��++�� �,.;.� ��E�': r�` s`r'g" _ •` tl .�,�[12217120001.2 � �
l�
r'
122171180290
12217,1200011
122171200110
-
_
217.1290512
t= rr
;.ham 1290030
,s
1 2 2 1 71 200040
Wr
217.1290511., r
v
��F "lows. s� _
.._. � �,ya,�;ti . '•y is i xJ`y'jw� ij rj:
_�}, + ..� -.- � �w �,•� _ 122171190050
N
1 inch = 100 feet
W E
1 inch = 0 miles
A ft I y o voL-a-7-P3 Its
° _ sef�PUY n�asl a LEGAL DESGYtIP110N
17 �D4L-n-- - - - - --- - -- -- - - -- - - -- -� - base- �y PARCEL I
THAT PART OF THE NORTH HALF OF GOVT LOT 1 OF SEC 11 T22N,RIW _
I W.M. IN MASON COUNTY. WASHINGTON. LYING EASTERLY OF SECONDARY
STATE HIGHWAY NO. 14-8 AND SOUTHERLY OF TRACT CONVEYED TO L.L.
CURL BY DEED DATED JUNE 27114, 1951 AND RECORDED IN VOLUME 164
N1,f/ I '-` `^`y OF DEEDS.PAGE 504.
-1r91� T� a EXCEP FIND THEREFROM THE SOUTH.700 FEET.
�- I U/I-NAMED LREEN AS YA jN�
JANuutr slsr.IaOa. O / ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 12217 12 00010.
(SMW LNE OF LL Ac
I PARCEL 2
THAT PART OF THE NORTH 100 FEET OF THE SOUTH 300 FEET OF THE
NORTH HALF OF GOUT LOT I OF SEC 17, T22N,RIW, W.M.IN MASON
SCALE: 1'-50 FEET Is COUNTY, WASHINGTON.LYING EASTERLY OF SECONDARY STATE
HIGHWAY NO. 14-8
0 25 50 T00 I 1 1 �I -JF g ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 12217 12 00011
BASIS OF BEARING
VOLUME 28 OF SURVEYS, PAGE 208. I I \ ,,�fd14E!<•
RECORDS OF MASON COUNTY
WASHINGTON
\ _
\\ \ j0 A PAR 1,
1� - - - -se9•Ja•ut en.w - \ _ Y e9• a' ce.�e sleZ
e1 20 _
LII \ PARCEL 2 j
REFERENCE SURVEYS C\\\\'�\.,
11 5—,by Cb,- C,.N•n
NC AW4 W.IM
10 01SM—AYGRAKI
2( Surrey by Gr Gr•1w1, r •••Ste.
c ME Mrc1r 20.1—ti
Volume 10 0l Sw»p.Paq.1J2. —�— — K _ 202 22 91.16
SA9'3 14545"E 193.59
J.rn r.y J.n°
.e 1
1 J..19e9
Volwn.11 of Swap.P.,199. I \IPAALM CAP
4) S.-Y by Wo W Sp-III. / yy
.crJ.e r.bruory 1e,1990 Yi g \,A 1 WSOF°W
V.Iwn.14.l Sw P. 112. Ip \N £\ \+ \
SKI r.y by A.F.Hmu l
a.a 1/.y 29.2001 n v.b.m• y / \ Z\ \Z F�
1e.l Swwp,Po9.ZOO / • ;
°l Swwy 6y A I.Ilommme 509'J11s F 91ae! -~+� ~; Se9'32'457 J01.70 .G
..r0.0 A1n•I..2001 n Vdum. \ \ ,•' \Z EDGE aF \�•
1I o/Swv.p,Pap 110 \ \
�;. � � 1 KOE IA IION
flb 20 \ \
< es0 Nor.mbr 11 1 YI ,
Vw_.27 0l Swr• 9.72. \
\ BALANCED AO IENI MEMOIR
lrlE PER WASW CTCW IYENf
1 \ ar r1sN AND NLMwfarE
119fi.9J - - - - - - - - - _ - - 1/1 GO2 ee
JY�s'f IJOa 49 sWm 1/ rTTOT� --O•-��FGuo s/e�Rum
set
I �
serY�bl� 171a'nJ -- - - - - - - --�T w - - - -- - - - - - -
D -
-'- - - - - - - - - - - - OOVTLOT2 - - - —
40-FOUND J 1/4"ALUM CAP 1 EQUIPMENT& PROCEDURE
WA DEPT OF FISH k WILDLIFE
OR AS NOTED FlEST ON TRAVERSE W1ANDLI RATE
S TI LEICA J'TOTAL
CHAIN
•-SET 5/8'REBAR W/PLASTIC THIS SURVEY MEETS OR EXCEEDS
CAP LS/28237 THE MINIMUM SURVEY STANDARDS
0-FOUND 5/8"B&C LS/18918 ESTABLISHED PER W.A.C. 332-1.70-090.
AUDITOR'S CERTIFICATE SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE G_BEcg SURVEY FOR AGATE LAND SURVEYING
,J 4•A r.,,AYr p PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR
FILED FOR RECORD THIS DAY O L Jl_.2002 THIS MAP CORRECTLY REPRESENTS A SURVEY MADE BY pr;V�' ERNESTO IULIANO 2680 E.AGATE RD. -P.O. BOX 248
ATAL;arLy. IN VOL2_7 OF SURVEYS PG.11v ME OR UNDER uY DIRECTION IN CONFORMANCE MIN rn'� IN SHELTON,WA. 98584 - (360)426-4172
THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SURVEY RECORDING ACT AT
AT THE REQUEST OF STONEY G.BB OL__L DRAWN BYDATE:2/7/2002 NO,2221
THE REQUEST OF GOV'T LOT 1 (NW 1/4, NE 1/4)
E....I.lull-9 I DDgcembb 2001 r?r744M...Jy� YWlOER SCALE:1 INCH- 50' SHEET: I OF I
COUNTY AUDITOR /.A_. E I,L�/,t/l( °A�.t 610 6111 SEC 17, T22N, R1 W, W.M. CHECKED BY
4L)/1 E�7 CERTIFICATE NO. 28237 C��¢ S.G.B.•M. FILE N0:222I Julbno.dwp
AUDITGR S 1111 NO. BY
AV " L} 3g I VOL. Arl PG. r7a,,
A SURVEY IN GOVERNMENT LOT 1 OF
SECTION 17 , TOWNSHIP 22 NORTH ,
m'.��E 1 WEST , W . M .
fOUNO V.E.NCORNE!
H ID.I.pp TN MEANDER CINRMER 10].a0 g J\\ \
Ntl717xY
PROJECTED PER, - CALCIILAIC NE AHKR CORNER
V IRUK 26 E I (MtlaB'h SFA IE YAP Dx.aO KR VDLUNE 26 Df �\Y
SURVLYS Pa 206 SURVEYS PG.206 .fUAVBYaI'f ClRT1PIGTB 0I w's
� —� N+.mm[a,.alr•p•...nl..[w»r A.[I[fr In.a w..mY ev.�R� 4�G,,t =�,171
M a S««..ft—dmg.ATI al
R[W.0.1 ...BK1.KRA._........................................
3 h 1 -.111AY,..................
\ IAOI�ND B.NOIIIRf
Qn Y+ �-•. DYIYNN[Ma.......JtlN.....................
N 1/2 GOV.LOT 1 '1
DRIVE VAYI f.1MB R 1/ IBU IdM(NT
KR VRIK !BD
h CI 716.80 y,}d .
8 a I,it 8
L-.a°I g PARCEL E A
a/D'IQBRR ND W 100' 0' 100' 200'
seB7YwJY .o Q, I1107•er41•E }�
SCALE: 1' 100'
_ fR ELF liJ 1 _. MERIDIAN d SUBDIVISION
0 IE BASED ON VOLUME 26 PG. 208
OF SURVEYS
11/ 46 6`O DESCRIPTION
7. LOB , IN7S.0 A}06 PARCEL 1•
\g N71 e. T.Y TRACTS 1 ANB d Or SHd1I IRE NO.IBJD.AS
T �1`-- RECORDS JAMWY f.I9RI.UMER AUD17MS
TIESGOVERNMENT
N NT LOT
AND KING A.P ITO ION K22
FW1D R'AXLE �. NORTH.R NI LOi 1,T.WK.
N MASON
COO II
^ N 71'iWY[ G� NORTH.RANGE 1 VEST.VN.W IMSON[al[Nir,
/�/) DK, vAS I EL ANl
PARCEL
THAT PARI Dr THE SOUTH Itl fEET Or THE
�I NODYI'lJ'W NTR 1IT 112 OF GOVERNMENT LOT 1 OF SECTION
7 tl• JI.Ip 17,IOVNSHIP Id NORTH,RANGE 1 VEST.WN,
Al MASON COUNTY.WASHINGTON.LYING
'i EASTERLY Q SECONDARY STATE HIGHWAY 1a
y; H-B
T7 TOWNSHIP Of 2 NORTH.R LOT 1 E T,WK.N
4• ? 17. ASCO d2 ME«IH.RANGE 1 WEST,V.N.
IN INNN WHINY,G ASHIA PONTTON.K"IKOFEET AS
fOUT Or K POINT 1 AT A POIN aLI FEET
OUT Or A POINT NN EC MOTH LIME Of
1 SAID LET VEST De]FEC1 fRON THE
fMANNENt KINDER CORNER CpRR)1 TO
SUNNING B AND Ir,SAID 0 INS EASTERLY
A AND RANGE,
c Z 7 Or SECONNNING DARY STATE HIGHWAY HIGHWAY NO S14-1 Y LINE
LKK[NORTHWESTERLY iCRLr ALONG SAID EASTERLY
\\\\\Y LIME E ORTHWHIGHWAY 10 A POINT CST Of THE
POINT Or BEGINNING OF THIS DESCAIPTION
S2§VS'38"E TICK C EAST TO SAID POINT Of INGINNINO,IN
SV.CORNER Df JSD7 MASON COUNTY,WASHINGTON.
GOVCRNCNI LOT 1 S 49'/4b77 #?Iasi
07aN 389.57
NV.WIDER or \
GOVERNMENT LOT B
LEGEND
PROPERTY LINE
}1 (XXX) RECORDED BEARING h DISTANCE
q o CORNERS FOUND AS NOTED
gh • SET 5/8-REBAR AND PLASTIC CAP LS /18918
OREST LAND SURVEYS AUOITOR'a INDEXING DATA
AUDTTUA'1 cERnFlure
Hwl 1«r«aa InL....�.1.._ ...mY,L..M.QY:......,x001,__.*.+!.QZ.(i ti . RICHAl1D B. MOIIRIS P.L.S. Nw 1/.
...._. - ,. . .. _._ _. 17
. ._. .... rnwae•�F-- •• pBo)Ax7-xJo sEc1aN _
so.
... _.. MASTIBMTIRf veser.. .
►.RA....N:R�..........W...W!!�!�......ol Pwa.._7R�..M Nf rpwa a 2 ALIBI RJ7AENT ... ...[• K 1/.
S dS:aaj)F) a71d VOLUFOUNME PERJoe
/710.eJ) OF U R 21
PG 2[0 D.J.H. S171xi.1)1 11/7D01
RICHMD B.NORRIS ` x.a7a Nf ilpv[ri
5w77'D7'E IOU ./PROCEDURE: R.B.N
........ „.,,. ..... FERMe a IY2'ALUM. /F TO7AL STATION k E.D.N. R 1 w,w.N.
YASDH Caun17 Audlla MEMMCNT 7a00 T xx N.
/FIELD TRAVERSE I'-100'
Fu
l
1-4
Tin t�l --
(��o Nam;
-- ------------- -
Zz-c v aoMo
f gm
ve, Oew tlA�
lam(
Information for permit: SPI2004-00232 Page 1 of 4
The swimming beaches at the Port of Allyn have been closed because of high bacteria
counts. No swimming, no wading, and shelfishing is not advised. Water sampling will
continue next week.
MASON COUNTY
Washington
Government • Information Services
EmploymentMason CoLitnty Home ,. map
Codes&Regulations Community Unks Visit Mason CoLinty Search our Site Advisory Boards Emall Us
Building Dept w Some information /cases may not be displayed
r This information may be outdated and inaccurate
Planning dept i Information is only for the unincoporated areas of Mason County and
may only show items since April 1st, 1992
Environmental w Please contact the Permit Center (360) 427-9670 ext 352 to verify
Health Dept any information
N This information was last updated: 07/08/2013 at 3:03 pm
Records P Building permits are NOT ready to issue until Case Status is APP
New Search and an activity "Approved for Issuance" is listed
Assessor/ Information for Permit: SP12004-00232
Treasurer Case SP12004-
ParcelInformation Number 00232 ERNESTOIULIANO
Case Status FIN Applicant 992 E. NORTH BAY RD.
Parcel 122171200010 BELFAIR WA 98528
Number
Project 1190 E NORTH BAY RD ALLYN
Address
Valuation $ 0.00
Description WHAT CAN I BUILD, PAVE AND WHERE. SFR,
GARAG, DEC, WELL HOUSE, PATHS
Activities
Date Date Assigned Done
Description Assigned Done Status To By
SPI Letter- Field 10/20/2004 RAM
Review
A field inspection of the subject property was conducted on 8/31/04 to assess critical
areas issues relevant to future development of the parcel.
The property is comprised of three tracts east of North Bay Road and has frontage on
Case Inlet. The parcels contain large sections of critical areas and many different
regulations affect its potential development. Regulatory restrictions for this tract are
extensive. Few areas on the property, if any, are unencumbered by wetlands.
The property is characterized by mature Red Cedar(Thuja plicata), Red Alder(Alnus
rubra), Big-leaf Maple (Acer macrophyllum) and Western Hemlock (Tsuga
http://www.co.mason.wa.us/permits/main.php?caseno=SPI2004-00232 7/8/2013
• Information for permit: SPI2004-00232 Page 2 of 4
heterophylla). Understory vegetation is primarily Salmonberry (Rubus spectabilis),
Sala[ (Gaultheria shallon) and Devil' Club (Oplopanax horridus). Herbaceous
vegetation is primarily Horsetail (Equisetum sp.), Skunk Cabbage (Lysichiton
americanum), and May Lilly (Maianthemum dilatum). The majority of the parcel was
saturated to the surface at the time of inspection. Soils evinced a dark chroma. The
Mason County Soil Survey identifies the soils as Everett gravelly sandy loam but field
characteristics are more typical of the McMurray Peat unit mapped just to the north of
the subject parcel. Based on these features the majority of the parcel meets the
criteria for a biological wetland per the provisions of the Mason County Shoreline
Master Program (SMP). Use Regulation #4 of Section 7.16.080, the Residential
Development chapter of the SMP, notes that landfill for residential development...in
biological wetlands is prohibited.
Other regulations apply but it is significant to note the prohibitive nature of the SMP
language. Per the Mason Resource Ordinance, the shoreline setback for any
structure is 100 feet from the Ordinary High Water Mark(OHWM) of Case Inlet. This
setback consists of an undisturbed 100' vegetative buffer. Encroachment into this
setback woud require a variance from the Resource Ordinance. A Habitat
Management Plan (HMP), prepared by a qualified biologist, would be required to
support the variance request. The HMP addresses impacts to the buffer and offers
measures to preserve and protect the buffer or mitigate impacts. A copy of the Fish
and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas chapter is enclosed. It includes details on the
contents of an HMP. The stream located near the north property boundary also
requires setbacks. The stream appears to be a non-fishbearing drainage but
confirmation of this by a qualified biologist is necessary. If the stream is a perennial,
non fish-bearing stream the setback is 115' (100'vegetative buffer+ 15' building
setback). If the stream contains fish the setback is 165' (150' vegetative buffer+ 15'
building setback).
In addition, the Wetlands chapter of the Resource Ordinance also has application for
this parcel. However, given the prohibitive nature of the Shoreline regulations, the
Wetlands chapter may be superceded. Such a tract may be a candidate for
acquisition by a local conservation group. Please contact me if you wish more
information about such groups in the Allyn area.
If you wish more detailed information about the variance application process and
procedures associated with variance review, please contact me. If you have
questions or require clarification on these issues, please contact me.
SPI Letter- Field 09/08/2004 DONE RAM RAM
Review
A field inspection of the subject property was conducted on 8/31/04 to assess critical
areas issues relevant to future development of the parcel.
The property is comprised of three tracts east of North Bay Road and has frontage on
Case Inlet. The parcels contain large sections of critical areas and many different
regulations affect its potential development. Regulatory restrictions for this tract are
extensive. Few areas on the property, if any, are unencumbered by wetlands.
The property is characterized by mature Red Cedar (Thuja plicata), Red Alder (Alnus
rubra), Big-leaf Maple (Acer macrophyllum) and Western Hemlock (Tsuga
heterophylla). Understory vegetation is primarily Salmonberry (Rubus spectabilis),
Salal (Gaultheria shallon) and Devil' Club (Oplopanax horridus). Herbaceous
vegetation is primarily Horsetail (Equisetum sp.), Skunk Cabbage (Lysichiton
http://www.co.mason.wa.us/permits/main.php?caseno=SPI2004-00232 7/8/2013
I
Information for permit: SPI2004-00232 Page 3 of 4
americanum), and May Lilly (Maianthemum dilatum). The majority of the parcel was
saturated to the surface at the time of inspection. Soils evinced a dark chroma. The
Mason County Soil Survey identifies the soils as Everett gravelly sandy loam but field
characteristics are more typical of the McMurray Peat unit mapped just to the north of
the subject parcel. Based on these features the majority of the parcel meets the
criteria for a biological wetland per the provisions of the Mason County Shoreline
Master Program (SMP). Use Regulation #4 of Section 7.16.080, the Residential
Development chapter of the SMP, notes that landfill for residential development...in
biological wetlands is prohibited.
9
Other regulations apply but it is significant to note the prohibitive nature of the SMP
language. Per the Mason Resource Ordinance, the shoreline setback for any
structure is 100 feet from the Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM) of Case Inlet. This
setback consists of an undisturbed 100' vegetative buffer. Encroachment into this
setback woud require a variance from the Resource Ordinance. A Habitat
Management Plan (HMP), prepared by a qualified biologist, would be required to
support the variance request. The HMP addresses impacts to the buffer and offers
measures to preserve and protect the buffer or mitigate impacts. A copy of the Fish
and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas chapter is enclosed. It includes details on the
contents of an HMP. The stream located near the north property boundary also
requires setbacks. The stream appears to be a non-fishbearing drainage but
confirmation of this by a qualified biologist is necessary. If the stream is a perennial,
non fish-bearing stream the setback is 115' (100' vegetative buffer+ 15' building
setback). If the stream contains fish the setback is 165' (150' vegetative buffer+ 15'
building setback).
In addition, the Wetlands chapter of the Resource Ordinance also has application for
this parcel. However, given the prohibitive nature of the Shoreline regulations, the
Wetlands chapter may be superceded. Such a tract may be a candidate for
acquisition by a local conservation group. Please contact me if you wish more
information about such groups in the Allyn area.
If you wish more detailed information about the variance application process and
procedures associated with variance review, please contact me. If you have
questions or require clarification on these issues, please contact me.
Site Inspection 08/20/2004 08/31/2004 DONE AHB RAM
See SPI letter.
Application 08/20/2004 08/20/2004 DONE KS
Received
Permit Fees
Fee Type D mount Amount Paid
Site Inspection Fee $ 205.00 $ 205.00
http://www.co.mason.wa.us/permits/main.php?caseno=SPI2004-00232 7/8/2013
Information for permit: SPI2004-00232 Page 4 of 4
Total Fees: $ 205.00 $ 205.00
Amount Outstanding: $ 0.00
Conditions
No conditions on this case
This information was last updated: 07/08/2013 at 3:03 pm
Information may be inaccurate and outdated.
Please refer to the Permit Center to verify any information
Building Planning, Environmental
Disclaimer Search our Site
Home Home Health Home
http://www.co.mason.wa.us/permits/main.php?caseno=SPI2004-00232 7/8/2013