HomeMy WebLinkAboutDDR2016-00154 ADU Hearing - DDR Letters / Memos - 2/20/2017 February 23, 2017
Notice of Decision
Austin-Talley
Case: DDR2016-00154
Applicant: Peter Austin and Jacquelyn Talley
Notice is hereby given that Peter Austin and Jacquelyn Talley who are the
applicants for the above-referenced Special Use Permit Request and the
Development Regulations Variance,has been granted the Permit and the Variance.
The request was approved pursuant to the Mason County Development
Regulations,specifically for the construction of a 1,000 square foot home to be used
as an Accessory Dwelling Unit.
This is a final County decision. No further appeals to the County are available.
Appeal may be made to Superior Court or the appropriate administrative agency as
regulations apply. It is the appellant's responsibility to meet all legal requirements of
any appeal process.
If you have questions or require clarification on these issues please contact Kell
McAboy,Land-Use Planner with Mason County at 360-427-9670 x365.
I
BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR MASON COUNTY
2
Emily Terrell, Hearing Examiner
J
RE: Peter Austin&Jacquelyn
4 Talley
5 FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS
Development Regulation OF LAW AND FINAL DECISION
6 Variance
7 DDR2016-00154
8 INTRODUCTION
9
The applicants request a variance to the 150-foot maximum distance restriction
10 between the primary and accessory dwelling unit for a proposed 1,000sf accessory
dwelling unit (ADU)located at 5511 E. State Route 302, Belfair, WA. On January 30,
11 2017, the hearing examiner granted a Special Use Permit to construct the ADU
subject to conditions, including a condition to successfully obtain a variance to the
12 distance requirement. The variance is approved.
13 ORAL TESTIMONY
14
Kell McAboy, Mason County planner, summarized the staff report.
15
16 EXHIBITS
17 Ex. 1-7 identified in the staff report were admitted into the record.
18 FINDINGS OF FACT
19 Procedural:
20
1. Applicant. The applicants are Peter Austin and Jacquelyn Talley.
21
2. Hearing. A hearing on the application was held on February 8, 2017 at
22 1:00 p.m., in the Mason County Board of Commissioners meeting room.
23 Substantive:
24
3. Site/Proposal Description. The applicants recently received approval by
25 the Mason County Hearing Examiner for a Special Use Permit to construct a 1,000sf
Development Regulation Variance P. 1 Findings, Conclusions and Decision
accessory dwelling unit (ADU) at 5511 E. State Route 302, Belfair, WA (Ex. 7). The
1 subject parcel is 1.76 acres in size and is currently developed with a residence that is
owned by the applicants. The ADU is intended for family use. The applicants wish to
construct the ADU 185 feet from the primary residence.
4. Characteristics of the Area. Case Inlet is located to the west. Residential
4 development exists to the east, north and south.
5 5. Adverse Impacts. As described in the January 30, 2017 Special Use
6 Permit approval by the Mason County Hearing Examiner (Ex. 7), adopted herein as if
set forth in full, there are no adverse impacts associated with the proposal.
7
6. Necessity of Variance. The Mason County code limits the maximum
8 distance from the primary residence to the ADU to 150 feet without a variance. The
site is moderately sloped from east to west at around a 15% grade. The lot's
9 topography is such that a natural bench exists 185 feet from the primary residence
10 (Ex. 3). Construction of the ADU on top of the bench would be more ecologically
sensitive, reduce cut and fill and would avoid unnecessary construction costs relative
11 to constructing the ADU on the sloped area closer to the primary residence. The extra
distance between the structures will not adversely affect neighboring properties. The
12 proposed ADU meets all other development regulations.
13 CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
14
Procedural:
15
1. Authority of Hearing Examiner. MCC 15.03.050(9) provides the
16 Examiner with the authority to review and act upon development regulation variance
17 applications.
18 Substantive:
1 2. Zoning_Designation. The parcel is zoned Rural Residential 5 (RR-5).
20 3. Review Criteria and Application. The variance criteria for the ADU
21 setback variance is governed by MCC 15.09.057. Applicable criteria are quoted
below in italics and applied through corresponding conclusions of law.
22
MCC 15.09.057(l): The strict application of the bulk, dimensional or performance
23 standards precludes or significantly interferes with a reasonable use of the property
24 not otherwise prohibited by county regulations.
25
Development Regulation Variance p. 2 Findings, Conclusions and Decision
4. An accessory dwelling unit is authorized in the RR-5 zoning district and is
therefore considered a reasonable use of property in that zoning district. As noted in
the staff report, the Mason County code allows ADUs to be greater than 150 feet
when converting existing structures, but not for new structures. As described in FOF
6, strict application of the code would require the applicant to construct the ADU in a
sloped area of the subject property which would be unnecessarily expensive and less
4 ecologically sensitive then allowing them to construct the ADU 35 feet farther away
on a natural bench. Had this been an existing building, the applicants could have
legally converted it at the proposed location without the need for a variance. The
6 requested setback is the minimum distance necessary to allow the applicants to utilize
the slope's natural topography. All other aspects of the development code are met.
7 This criterion is satisfied.
8 MCC 15.09.057(2): The hardship which serves as the basis for the granting of the
variance is specifically related to the property of the applicant, and is the result of
9 unique conditions such as irregular lot shape, size, or natural features in the
10 application of the County Regulations, and not,for example,from deed restrictions or
the applicant's own action.
11
5. The need for the variances is completely attributable to the unique features
12 of the property, specifically the steep and benched topography. This criterion is
satisfied.
13
14 MCC 15.09.057(3): The design of the project will be compatible with other permitted
activities in the area and will not cause adverse effects to adjacent properties or the
15 environment.
16 6. The property is surrounded by single-family homes. As determined in
Finding of Fact No. 5 and as conditioned, the requested variances will not create any
17 significant adverse impacts to adjacent uses or the environment.
18
MCC 15.09.057(4): The variance authorized does not constitute a grant of special
19 privilege not enjoyed by the other properties in the area, and will be the minimum
necessary to afford relief.
20
21 7. The ADU is a reasonable and allowed use of the property. Its proposed
placement is similar to others in the County. The variance allows for the use of the
natural topography and reduces impacts to the land while reducing cut/fill and
construction costs. The additional setback distance causes no detrimental impact to
23 neighboring properties. The proposed ADU complies with all other Mason County
development codes. The increased distance is the minimum required to afford relief
24 by allowing the applicants to utilize the natural benched topography of their property.
25
Granting the variance does not constitute a grant of special privilege.
Development Regulation Variance p. 3 Findings, Conclusions and Decision
I MCC 15.09.057(5): The public interest will suffer no substantial detrimental effect.
8. As determined in Finding of Fact No. 5, as conditioned by the January 30,
3 2017 Special Use Permit approval (Ex. 7), the variance will not adversely affect the
environment or adjoining uses while allowing for a reasonable use of the subject
4 property. The public interest will suffer no substantial detrimental effect.
5 MCC 15.09.057(6): No variance shall be granted unless the owner otherwise lacks a
6 reasonable use of the land. Such variance shall be consistent with the Mason County
Comprehensive Plan, Development Regulations, Resource Ordinance and other
7 County ordinances, and with the Growth Management Act. Mere loss in value only
shall not justify a variance.
8
9. As previously noted, the proposed setback distance from the primary residence to
9 the ADU is the minimum necessary to permit construction of the ADU while
10 respecting the site's topography. Consequently, the applicant currently has less than
minimum reasonable use, which is construed as lacking a reasonable use. Further,
11 other than the regulation subject to the variance request, the proposal is consistent
with all applicable regulations and the Growth Management Act.
12
13 Generic Permitting Criteria
14 MCC 15.09.055(C): Required Review: The Hearing Examiner shall review
proposed development according to the following criteria:
15
1. The development does not conflict with the Comprehensive Plan and meets
16 the requirements and intent of the Mason County Code, especially Title 6, 8, and 16.
17 2. Development does not impact the public health, safety and welfare and is
18 in the public interest.
19 3. Development does not lower the level of service of transportation andlor
neighborhood park facilities below the minimum standards established within the
20 Comprehensive Plan.
21 10. The project complies with all of the County regulations specified in the
22 criteria above except for the setback regulation subject to the variance request. No
subdivision of land is proposed, consistency with health regulations will be assured
23 during building permit review and the proposal is exempt from the State
Environmental Policy Act. Since the proposal has no adverse impacts, it does not
24 impact the public health, safety and welfare. The proposal will not lower level of
25
service standards for transportation and neighborhood park facilities.
Development Regulation Variance p. 4 Findings, Conclusions and Decision
DECISION
1
2 The variance is approved.
Dated this 20th day of February, 2017.
5
6 Emily Terrell
Mason County Hearing Examiner
7
8 APPEAL
9 The variance decisions are final and may be appealed to superior court as outlined in
10 the Washington State Land Use Petition Act, Chapter 36.70C RCW.
1 1 CHANGE IN VALUATION
12 Notice is given pursuant to RCW 36.70B.130 that property owners who are affected
by this decision may request a change in valuation for property tax purposes
13 notwithstanding any program of revaluation.
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Development Regulation Variance p. 5 Findings, Conclusions and Decision
CASE INDEX
Austin-Talley
DDR2016-00154
Exhibit# Date Description
1 January 31, 2017 Staff Report
2 January 25, 2017 Variance Permit Application
3 December 6, 2016 Site plans
4 January 25, 2017 Notice of Application and Public Hearing for Variance
5 January 25, 2017 Affidavit of Posting Notice
6 January 25, 2017 Mailing list of properties within 300 feet
7 January 30, 2017 Hearing Examiner Decision approving ADU-Special Use
Permit
Mason County
Department of Planning
Building VIII * 615 W. Alder Street
Shelton,Washington 98584 * (360) 427-9670
January 31, 2017
TO: Mason County Hearings Examiner
FROM: Planning Staff—Kell McAboy; 360.427.9670 ext. 365; kmcaboy@co.mason.wa.us
RE: Development Regulations Variance(DDR2016-00154)for placing an Accessory
Dwelling Unit(ADU) greater than 150 feet from the main residence.
STAFF REPORT
I. Introduction. This report evaluates a proposal for a Variance for placing an approved
ADU greater than 150 feet from the Single Family Residence (SFR). The completed unit
will be 185 feet from the SFR. Staff recommends approval of the Development
Regulations Variance.
II. Applicant. Peter Austin and JacQuelyn Talley.
III. Property Location. 5511 E. State Route 302; Belfair, WA 98528.
Parcel# 12233-50-00032
Austin-Talley DDR2016-00154 Page 1 of 5
IV. Project Description. The proposal is to construct a detached ADU on a 1.76 acre parcel
with an existing SFR that is 185 feet from the proposal. See site plan(Exhibit 3).
V. Evaluations.
A. Characteristics of the site. The 1.76 acre lot is approximately 150' wide X 515' deep
located adjacent to SR 302 and Case Inlet to the west and residential development to
the east,north and south. Currently the property is developed with the primary
residence and an appurtenant shed/well house structure. See site plan(Exhibit 3).
The site is moderately sloped from east to west around 15%with natural "benching"
with flat area to accommodate the ADU.No Geotechnical Assessment will be
required prior to permit approval.
B. Characteristics of the area. The area is characterized by low-density rural residential
development in an area zoned as Rural Residential 5 on SR 302 upland from Case
Inlet.
C. Shoreline Desi ng_ation. Not Applicable.
D. Comprehensive Plan Desi ng ation/Zoning. The Mason County Comprehensive Plan
designation for the site is Rural and the zoning is Rural Residential 5.
VI. SEPA Compliance. Project is SEPA exempt per WAC 197-11-800 (1)(b)(i).
VII. Other Permits/Approvals. The proposal will require Mason County Building Permit for
the construction of the ADU(BLD2016-01191). An approved Special Use Permit was
granted for the ADU on January 30, 2017 (Exhibit 7).
VIII. Analysis.
A Comprehensive Plan Review: Type III review for permit applications require that the
Hearing Examiner evaluate the proposal for consistency with the County's Development
Code, adopted plans and regulations. The Hearing Examiner shall review the proposal
according to the following criteria:
1) The development does not conflict with the Comprehensive Plan and meets
the requirements and intent of the Mason County Code, especially Title 6, 8
and 16. The development does not conflict with the Comprehensive Plan and
meets all the requirements and intent of the Mason County Code.
2) The development does not impact the public health, safety and welfare and is
in the public interest. The development proposal will not impact the public
health, safety or welfare.
3) The development does not lower the level of service of transportation and/or
neighborhood park facilities below the minimum standards established within
the Comprehensive Plan. The development proposal will not lower the LOS
for transportation or neighborhood parkfacilities.
Austin-Talley DDR2016-00154 Page 2 of 5
This proposal received a Special Use Permit on January 30, 2017 due to the requirements
of the Mason County Development Regulations, dated June 2, 2009, section 17.03.029.
Applicable Development Regulations as listed under section 17.03.029 are:
A. The ADU shall be subject to a special use permit, unless in the shoreline
jurisdiction it is subject to a shoreline permit.
B. The owner of the ADU must reside on the lot in either the principal residence or
ADU.
C. The ADU shall be located within 150 feet of the principal residence or shall be a
conversion of an existing detached structure (i.e. garage).
D. The ADU shall not exceed 80%of the square footage of the habitable area of the
primary residence or 1,000 square feet, whichever is smaller.
E. All setback requirements must be met by the ADU.
F. All applicable health district standards for water and sewer must be met by the
ADU.
G. No recreational vehicles shall be allowed as ADUs.
H. Only one ADU is allowed on any property.
I. An additional off-street parking space must be provided for the ADU.
The ADU as proposed meets all of the above criteria A—I with exception to C. The
proposed distance is 185 feet due to the existing contours of the property and the
subsequent "benching". This increase in distance will allow for the ADU to be
constructed on existing flat area of the property without additional, unnecessary grading.
Staff supports this request and encourages approval under the Variance criteria
addressed in this report. This distance will not adversely affect neighboring properties.
Variance Criteria
Mason County Development Regulations address Variances,the"Purpose"of which is
set forth in Section 17.05.031. Section 17.05.035 addresses "Findings Required for
Approval of a Variance"per Title 15,the Mason County Development Code(15.09.057).
Variances from the bulk and dimension requirements of the Development Regulations
may be allowed as follows. The County must document with written findings compliance
or noncompliance with the variance criteria.
Findings.
1. That the strict application of the bulk, dimensional or performance standards
precludes or significantly interferes with a reasonable use of the property not
otherwise prohibited by County regulations;
The strict application of the 150 foot maximum setback of the proposed ADU to the
existing SFR would require significant excavation into a "benched"slope. An
additional 35 feet for a total of 185 foot setback to the SFR would allow the natural
contours of the property to be utilized.
2. That the hardship which serves as a basis for the granting of the variance is
specifically related to the property of the applicant, and is the result of unique
Austin-Talley DDR2016-00154 Page 3 of 5
conditions such as irregular lot shape, size or natural features and the application of
the County regulations, and not, for example from deed restrictions or the applicant's
own actions;
The hardship is directly related to the lots natural features, constrained by the
contours of the property.
3. That the design of the project will be compatible with other permitted activities in the
area and will not cause adverse effects to adjacent properties or the environment;
The proposed ADU meets all of the other ADU criteria and standard Development
Regulations and is compatible with other permitted activities in the area. The
increase of 35'from the SFR will not cause adverse effects.
4. That the variance authorized does not constitute a grant of special privilege not
enjoyed by the other properties in the area, and will be the minimum necessary to
afford relief,
Although this is new construction, the regulations allow ADUs to be greater than 150
feet when converting existing structures, so there are similarly established ADUs in
the County and this does not grant a special privilege. The additional 35 feet is the
minimum distance required to construct the ADU at the top of the benched slope on
flat ground.
5. That the public interest will suffer no substantial detrimental effect;
The proposal will not cause detrimental effect. The parcel is large enough to
accommodate the increase of 35 feet without impacting any neighboring property.
6. No variance shall be granted unless the owner otherwise lacks a reasonable use of the
land. Such variance shall be consistent with the Mason County Comprehensive Plan,
Development Regulations, Resource Ordinance and other county ordinances, and
with the Growth Management Act. Mere loss in value only shall not justify a
variance.
An ADU is a reasonable and allowed use of the property. Without the granting of the
Variance, significant cost associated with the excavation and removal of material will
be required. This is unreasonable given the alternative to increase the setback
distance, which has no detrimental effect to the environment or neighboring
properties.
The proposal is consistent with the Mason County Comprehensive Plan, Development
Regulations (with the exception of the proposed increased setback from the SFR), the
Growth Management Act and all other county ordinances.
Project Analysis: Based upon these policies, regulations and variance criteria,the
project conforms to the policies,use regulations and variance criteria of the Mason
County Development Regulations with regards to ADUs including the proposed 185 feet
Austin-Talley DDR2016-00154 Page 4 of 5
of separation(MCC 17.03.029 C.). Staff recommends approving the additional 35 feet
due to the existing contours and avoidance of unnecessary grading.
IX. Conclusions. As designed the project is consistent, with exception to MCC 17.03.029
C., with the Mason County Development Regulations. Staff recommends approval of
the Variance request to increase the distance to a total of 185 feet.
X. Choices of Action.
1. Approve.
2. Approve with conditions.
3. Deny with prejudice (reapplication of resubmittal is not allowed for one year).
4. Remand for further proceedings and/or evidentiary hearing in accordance with
Section 15.09.090 of Title 15.
Austin-Talley DDR2016-00154 Page 5 of 5
A IM 6i d- 2
MASON COUNTY COMMUNITY SERVICES
615 W.Alder Street, Shelton, WA 98584 -- - -- - - --- ---- -
360.427.9670 Ext.352 Mason County Permit Center Use:
DDR o?0/CQ - tip 154
j Special Use Permit: $1,135 Date Rcvd:
Public Hearing: $2,005 or EEAF)
RECEIVED
DEC 12 2016
615 W. Alder Street
Special Use Application
A Special Use is one that possesses unique characteristics due to size, nature, intensity of use,
technological processes involved, demands upon public services, relationship to surrounding lands, or
other factors. The purpose of this application is to provide for adequate oversight and review of such
development proposals, in order to assure that such uses are developed in harmony with surrounding
land uses, and in a manner consistent with the intent of the Development Regulations for Mason County;
Ordinance No. 82-96. Acceptance of this application by Mason County does not guarantee approval of
request.
Type of Special Use Permit: ❑ Communications Tower &I Accessory Dwelling Unit
❑ Oversize Construction ❑ Other:
Applicant Name _Pe-key A 0S41_tl'> -J at-Q J et L5 n 10,UP--/
Property Owners
Mailing Address 5.5-1 1 ff _S- 4e-
Phone 1 640 55d a_t9311 Phone 2 a3g_-fit$' q 9(00 Email
-6-c�uel�ns
Site Address 6 5-/I C S-(CJ& ,kb 04 e - ;t l7 Q� 4t C� 1JJCC CJ 9 5vR
Tax Parcel# v�a a 3a-_S�>
Legal Description 01,fnAQ LC. ShQCes
Project Description AbU ?rG)e-c- -LoD_oU be - +o -U�e `�t se d.5 Ct fer4ej
' -or VaCA+tnn ( omes ,_eon o,r AiR- 9*3 e-�c. bed
n o,�'-
(LA A t n 4U4 v to y CASS 4.S 6- _Ino me �s o 2 CA real v e r S_..
Updated 02i2016 Page 1 of 3
❑ Please provide a site plan that includes the following:
1. Indicate Scale and North Arrow.
2. Property line dimensions, easements,and right-of-ways.
3. The location of all existing and proposed structures. Include square footage of existing and proposed
structures.
4. Setback distance, in feet from all property lines and structures.
5. Existing and proposed road access to and from the site.
6. Parking spaces.
7. Location of on-site sewage tanks and drainfields.
8. Location of drinking water supply. Include location on the proposed site and surrounding parcels.
9. Steep bluffs, wetlands, streams, and bodies of water.
10. Surface and storm water run-off routes.
❑ On a separate piece of paper(#of pages: ),state your reasons for requesting a Special
Use Permit and be sure to address the following six criteria. Your request will be evaluated based on
these criteria.
1. Will the proposed use be detrimental to public health, safety, and welfare?
2. Will the proposed use be consistent and compatible with the intent of the Comprehensive Plan?
3. Will the proposed use introduce hazardous conditions,at the site,that cannot be mitigated through
appropriate measures to protect adjacent properties and the community at large?
4. Is the proposed use served by adequate public facilities, which are in place, planned as a condition of
approval or as an identified item in the County's Capital Facilities Plan?
5. Will the proposed use have a significant impact upon existing uses on adjacent lands?
6. If located outside of an Urban Growth Area, will the proposal result in the need to extend urban
services?
❑ Provide a list(preferably printed on mailing labels or legal sized envelopes)of all property owners'
mailing addresses within 300 feet of your parcel boundaries. Addresses are to be obtained from the
Mason County Assessor's Office, Bldg. 1.
Applicant's Signature 6 Date 1 f Zp
t;l)datcd 02 2016 Page 2 of 3
'® Development Regulations Variance: $1,135.00 Mason County Permit Center Use:
❑ Subdivision and Plats Variance: $1,135.00 DDR �,D((P -OO ISH_
K Public Hearing: $2,005 /
❑ Habitat Management Plan Review: $445.00 Date Rcvd
Applicant will also be billed for advertising costs.
MASON COUNTY
COMMUNITY SERVICES
615 W.Alder Street,Shelton,WA 98584
APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE
Mason County Code Title 15, Section 15.09.057 VARIANCE CRITERIA states that variances from the bulk and
dimension requirements of the Resource Ordinance or the Development Regulations(zoning regulations)may be
allowed if written findings show compliance with the variance criteria. The burden is on the applicant to prove that
each of the criteria is met. A public hearing accompanies Variances and application for a Variance does not
guarantee approval. A variance is an application for a special"exception to the rule".
Type of Variance Requested:
Development Regulations ❑ Subdivisions and Plats
Applicant Name h - 16L U em Email p C�`rP�/lTY'a/' gIMQ!VK
Mailing Address 5 5 I I s 3o Z t 4u 1/. A ! 5 M �°
Phone Number I (Aty ZS 5 2 2-0 (P Phone Number 2
Site Address 5S H WA 9�S La
Tax Parcel# 22 3 3 - S Q - C)0 0 3 Z
Legal Description C)k NA p I c— v(eS VJ vryd tYACc4- t Le
Property Owner Names ?e—tU( A- s 1 i ►n,_&J J a t— i1 e,ky-�
Project Description _ —W�,)e.S;Vlg a If I L1 q Gt� U1i1�4 y L- 6-1-, a-pF VWe�
_Pvt lA I �S � rtY0 nA �Xi 'tnj S 1�[e w1 ti Ee.Si& L
On a separate piece of paper,please address the following:
1. Describe the specific modification from the terms of the Chapter required.
2. Describe the reasons for the variance.
3. No variance shall be granted unless the County makes findings of fact showing that certain circumstances exist.
Please address each of the following standards and how the proposal pertains to these circumstances.
a. That the strict application of the bulk,dimensional or performance standards precludes or significantly
interferes with a reasonable use of the property not otherwise prohibited by County regulations;
b. That the hardship which serves as a basis for the granting of the variance is specifically related to the
property of the applicant,and is the result of unique conditions such as irregular lot shape, size,or natural
I:\Community Development\PAC-Permit Assistance Center\PLANNING\Variance\Zoning VARIANCE\2016 Development
Regs Variance Application.doc
features and the application of the County regulations,and not,for example,from deed restrictions or the
applicant's own actions;
c. That the design of the project will be compatible with other permitted activities in the area and will not
cause adverse effects to adjacent properties or the environment;
d. That the variance authorized does not constitute a grant of special privilege not enjoyed by the other
properties in the area,and will be the minimum necessary to afford relief;
e. That the public interest will suffer no substantial detrimental effect;
f. No variance shall be granted unless the owner otherwise lacks a reasonable use of the land. Such variance
shall be consistent with the Mason County Comprehensive Plan,Development Regulations,Resource
Ordinance and other county ordinances, and with the Growth Management Act. Mere loss in value only
shall not justify a variance.
#of Pages Attached:
Applicant(s) Signature �P P, S I�CLI AL, US- +-_(ZAk 11 P Date
I:\Community Development\PAC-Permit Assistance Center\PLANNING\Variance\Zoning VARIANCE\2016 Development
Regs Variance Application.doc
We are applying for a Special Use Permit V
in order to consruct an ADU on our property
at 5511 E State Route 302 Belfair.
We are in a somewhat isolated area, planning for
a vacation rental and are looking forward to meeting
vacationers from other parts of the country.
It is expected at some point we will use it to house a caretc-
to assist us in our later years.
It is not expeced this proposed use will be detrimental
to public health, safety and welfare.
We expect the proposed use will be consistent and
compatible wih the intent of the Comprehensive Plan
The proposed use will not introduce hazardous conditions
at the site that cannot be mitigated through appropriate
measures to protect adjacent properties and the
community at large
The proposed use is not served by public facilities and exi�
private facilities are as identified in the County's
Capital Facilities Plan
The proposed use will make no signicant impact
upon exisitng uses on adjacent lands
It is expected the proposed use is outside the Urban
Growth Area and will not result in the need to extend
urban srvices
s�
L{
�Jl
/ ADJACENT S.F.R.
ELE
20' 'tIA
/ 154'+_ / ELE. ELE. l
4 60' LE NORTH ELE.
_ P.L.N89a12'12'W 518.88' 100'
IXIST. \ SETBACK 11NE
2 'N I / �SNED SEWFR IINES-F'
EXISTING
j `•I to i I ,CARPORT/ DMVEL IMNEWAY%� \\ \W \ ,WKC
O 4 IIp J I I I 2 EXISTIN RESIDENCPROE• PUI m.. \ - / o.
.. 1000
j 2 I 1398 A.O.UP S0.FT. /OSED /O xl g SO.FT. I \ >< 30' \ 4b \
! I TANK cy� DECK 5 C SQ.FT. /
ROOF AREAAREA9 0.FT D_B'O" % / RFS\ iqy \Is'Y '^I d
m 1PUMP j
f
TAN
% •1 , 1\ �'" \ Exisnrrc /
a O�� IPnaxlNc / \ 'R 5511 E STA ROUTE J02
Site PIOn Requirements Checklist \ �I / / e NroP BELFAIR WAS INGiON 98528 \ \ NF/ �98•
N/A Nulrlear 1 2 23 3-50-00032 ` .FARM Nc t,; J // 1NC PARCEL/1 33-50-00032
A Genarpl Property Pmperty Inforelptbn: Exist ___ _ _ 1 9ETBACK LINE_
T«ID NumMr arN PNp.rb AEblr CUES ' _ \ C V C BUCxTOP D vEWAT NEW UCKTDP - AY
Prep.rly Ib«ena em.n.l«. ,owER�oLE ELE. ---{
O.wtlon. I a°Peer 4' LE. \
ay..tlen of n mr°I area°°. \ELE.
❑ °sbPe°ni:°ta ietlW-4- 60� 80,\
on °r.o.ene>it.Pl.n pela
❑ �,��.:°d, g� �,°ed SITE PLAN
pxblea°puNer
B ul. g Property Impbroveme;te:
❑ N T S
❑ :ang of.INaaili nMin N;na�I.r T
❑ � �°IM�o�9�iaa�b,
❑ Y.�i tang.I a tin«a nCaq�li°IC IINmm,
xall! °II
❑ Y•. rHwge��e'eama M.,`lulilin°°M 1
r«WM m.n
❑ Llity Ilm.«i.fing.eta,«..I e11tl
C PmP°eA Property Improvement,: PROPOSED A.D.U. 1000 SQ. FT. PETER & JACQUELYN AUSTIN
COVERED ENTRY PORCH 47 SQ. FT. 5511 E STATE ROUTE 302
° ��";ODy'.op� ^�°;.e1e;ln: DECK 572 SQ. FT. BELFAIR WASHINGTON 98528
° 10 TOTAL ROOF AREA 1359 SQ. FT. PARCEL #12233-50-00032
❑ °I Pn°n a alm am„�
nPee° rn ayal
❑ w m =IN SITE PLAN
%n. 12/06/16
Peter & J00que&n Austin IPAGE 1
SITE PLAN I of 1
122281300050
122287500020 122287500020
122284280301
122284100020
I
122288888888 122284100020
I
I
t
12228410OD501 122284100050
122284270740 122284100030 122284100030 1
122284100031 122284100040
122284100031
,
122288888888 122284100000 i
122280060000 122284100000
,
f
122288888888
122284400010 122284400010 122335000034
I
122288888888 ,
t
122335000036
122284400030 122284400030
122284400040 122284400040 !
I
122284470250 1 22284400070 122335000037
122284400060 122284400050
122284490024
335000042
122284490024 122335000041 122
122288 88888 8 122335000040
1222844702 22284490023IL122284490021
122284490023 122335000038
122284490022 122284490022 , °{
122335000031 122335000039 `
1222 888888 122288888888 122335D00031 }
122335000046 122335000046 122335000030 122335000035
122335000029
22338888888
122335000027 122339999999
1 _ 122335090011 3
122335000003 122335000014
122335000009
122335000004 `>
122335000005 122335000023 122335000020
122335000044 122335000022 122335000016
122335000045 122335000024 122335000021 122335000013 122335090012
122335000025 122335000018 122335000015 122335000011
422335000043 122335000019
122335000017 122335000008
122335000006
122335000007 122331170010
I
t
j
��our�eJE n�ig�a� lobs G� e�Ea�rt�s�aGeographic ,CN�E��/ irbus DS,
122288888888 122284400010 1.22284400010; 122335000036
122288888888 122284400030 y
i .A 122284460030
122284400040
m 122284400040
N _
122284400070 122284400070 122335000037
122284470250 I 1.T _
122284400050
122284400060 122284400060--
122284490024
122284490024
122288888888 I
" 122280060000 122335000040 I ,
122284470251 122284490023
\ 122284490023 122284490021
122335000038
122284490022 122284490022
I
122335000033
22N 1W
122335000039
122335000031
122288888888 122288888888
122335000031
122335000046
122335000046 `' 122335000030 122335000035
122335000029---.---
122335000027
122339999999
122338688888
122335000003
122335000004 122335000020
i
122335000025 122335000024 122335000022 122335000021 I 122335000018 122335000016
122335000023 122335000019
122335000005 Z
O
' Y
122335000044 0
MASON COUNTY
AL COMMUNITY SERVICES
Building,Planning,Environmental Health,Community Health
NOTICE OF APPLICATION FOR
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS VARIANCE AND
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Notice is hereby given that Peter Austin and Jacquelyn Talley have filed an application for a
Development Regulations Variance number DDR2016-00154 for the construction of an accessory
dwelling unit (ADU). The Variance is requested to increase the maximum 150' distance from the main
residence to 185'due to the natural contours of the property.
Site Address and Project Location: 5511 E.State Route 302; Belfair,WA 98528
Parcel Number: 12233-50-00032
Date of Application: January 25, 2017
A PUBLIC HEARING will be held by the Mason County Hearings Examiner regarding the proposed project
on Wednesday, February 8, 2017 at 1:00 p.m. in the Commissioner's Chambers Building I,411 North
Fifth Street,Shelton,WA. If special accommodations are needed, contact the Commissioner's Office,
(360)427-9670.
Any person desiring to express their views or to be notified of the action taken on the application should
come to the public hearing on February 8, 2017 or send comments to Kell McAboy, Land Use Planner,
Mason County Dept. of Community Development, 615 W. Alder St, Shelton,WA 98584 or
kmcabov@co.mason.wa.us.
The proposal is SEPA exempt per WAC 197-11-800 (1)(b)(i).
Please contact Kell McAboy of the Mason County Dept. of Community Development at(360)427-9670
ext. 365,or at the address listed above, with questions regarding this permit application.
Public Health Community Development
(Community Health/Environmental Health) (Permit Assistance Center/Building/Planning)
415 N.6th Street—Shelton,WA 98584 615 W.Alder Street—Shelton,WA 98584
Shelton:360-427-9670,Ext.400 Shelton:360-427-9670,Ext.352
Belfair:360-275-4467,Ext.400 Belfair:360-275-4467,Ext.352
Elma:360-482-5269,Ext.400 Elma:360-482-5269,Ext.352
AFFMAT OF POSTING NOTICE
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
ss.
COUNTY OF MASON
f A `"C do hereby certify that I posted copies of
the attached fl cc—197 )
on2�day bfj-6, , �v 20� in 'Z- public places as follows:
one at_76&
one at
one at
In witness whereof, the party has signed this Affidavit of Posting Notice this'Z5: day
of v-\
By:
Address:
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
ss.
COUNTY OF MASON
Subscribed and sworn to me thisig day of _ /WJA44/1 20
j'11111111trpf"
v'i INS
ary Public for the tat of ashington
NOTAI?y 6:; esiding at_ Xt
Commission Expires
(PA PUBLIC
:A*
I'A
OP
1141111 VAN
lie(Pr")
,c ab;!A- 1-c
SELFORS, JOHN & LISA MECHAM, MICHAEL R r
PO BOX 644 1828 212TH AVE SE l �� i lz- l u� 1r-I
VAUGHN, WA 98394 SAMMAMISH WA 98075
SUDAC, KEITH S ANDREWS, DAVID L
5655 E STATE ROUTE 302 7123 108TH ST NW
BELFAIR, WA 98528 GIG HARBOR WA
HEWITT, CHARLES W & JEAN CONGER ET AL, TERRI
PO BOX 1842 5303 S 380TH ST
BELFAIR WA 98528 AUBURN WA 98001
HAYS, DON & KAREN O'CONNOR TRS, DENIS W & HILDUR
2481 NW 141ST PLACE 9931 W. RIVERSIDE DR. APT. 1409
PORTLAND OR 97229 BOTHELL WA 98011
BELL, DONNA M JOHNSTON, RICHARD M & SHARON I
5671 E STATE ROUTE 302 4214 SUNSET BCH
BELFAIR, WA 98528 TACOMA WA 98466
BOTTCHER, LANCE & KELSEY OARS, GREGORY L
5653 E STATE ROUTE 302 811 SPRAGUE ST
BELFAIR WA 98528 EDMONDS WA 98020
WOODWORTH, MILES M & KARON R
PO BOX 790
BELFAIR WA 98528
LIND ET AL, JERRY ALLEN
5630 E STATE ROUTE 302
BELFAIR WA 98528
OUTCALT, TERENCE L & EMILY M
5632 E STATE ROUTE 302
BELFAIR WA 98528
STEINGREBE, CARL E & JEAN E
5660 E STATE ROUTE 302
BELFAIR WA 98528
LINDA WHITSON
P0 BOX 3
WHITE SALMON WA 98672
WICKLUND, JOANNE L
5662 E STATE ROUTE 302
BELFAIR WA 98528
�V�l •cJl
1
BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR MASON COUNTY
2
Phil Olbrechts,Hearing Examiner
J
4 RE: Peter Austin and Jacquelyn FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS
5 Talley OF LAW AND FINAL DECISION
6 Special Use Permit
#DDR2016-00154
7
8 INTRODUCTION
9 The applicants seek a special use permit ("SUP") to construct a 1000 square foot
10 accessory dwelling unit("ADU") at 5511 E. State Route 302; Belfair, WA. The SUP
is approved with conditions, including a condition that the applicant successfully
1 1 obtain a variance to a code requirement that the ADU be located within 150 feet of
the primary residence.
12
1 ORAL TESTIMONY
14 Kell McAboy,Mason County planning staff, summarized the staff report.
15
Charles Hewitt, neighbor, testified that he and his wife support the application. The
16 sale of the property has helped address a pollution problem associated with the
applicant's septic system that threatens North Bay. The sale of the property and
17 approval of the ADU will ensure that the septic system is fixed. The ADU will be
18 good for property value which is good for the neighbors and the tax base.
19 Christopher DeBoer, Ms. Talley's son, testified that the neighbors are in favor of the
property.
20
21 EXHIBITS
22
The seven exhibits identified in the January 11, 2017 staff report were admitted into
2; the record during the hearing. The Google aerial map of the project site was admitted
as Ex. 8.
24
25 I. Applicant. The applicants are Peter Austin and Jacquelyn Talley.
2. Hearing. A hearing was held on the application on January 25, 2017, at
1:00 p.m., in the Mason County Board of Commissioners Meeting Chambers.
SUP/ADU P. 1 Findings, Conclusions and Decision
Substantive:
1
2 3. Site/Proposal Description. The applicants seek a special use permit ("SUP") to
construct a 1000 square foot accessory dwelling unit("ADU") at 5511 E. State Route
302; Belfair, WA. The subject parcel is 1.76 acres in size and is currently developed
with a residence that is owned by the applicants. The ADU is intended for family use
4 and will be located about 185 feet from the existing residence. The site is moderately
sloped from east to west around 15%.
6 4. Characteristics of the Area. Case Inlet is located to the west and
residential development to the east,north and south.
7
5. Adverse Impacts of Proposed Use. As conditioned, there are no adverse
8 impacts associate with the proposal. The addition of the ADU is compatible with the
9 residential development of the area and the increase in density will not be noticeable
given the relatively large lots of the area and the fact that the Ex. 7 Google aerial map
10 shows that the ADU would be obscured from views by a significant number of trees
that surround the proposed ADU building site. Beyond compatibility, building
I 1 permit review will assure code compliant septic and water to serve the site. As
testified by a neighbor, the ADU application has served as an impetus to fix the
12 currently failing septic system, which the neighbor asserts has been a pollution threat
I to North Bay. The proposal will be served by adequate roads given the minimal
increase in density and the determination in the staff report that the proposal will not
14 lower level of service for transportation below adopted levels. The staff report also
notes that the proposal will not create any hazardous conditions and nothing from the
1 administrative record suggests otherwise. Staff have also determined that the
proposal meets all applicable parking and setback requirements, which is confirmed
16 by the site plan,Ex. 3.
17
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
18
Procedural:
19
20 1. Authority of Hearing Examiner. MCC 15.03.050(10) and 17.05.42
provide the Examiner with the authority to review and act upon Special Use Permits.
21
Substantive:
22
2 3 2. Zoning. The area is zoned as Rural Residential 5.
24 3. Review Criteria and Application. MCC 17.03.029 governs ADUs in rural
lands. Under MCC 17.03.029, ADUs in rural lands shall be subject to a Special Use
25 Permit, unless located in the shoreline jurisdiction, in which case they are subject to a
shoreline permit. The proposed ADU is not within 200 feet of a shoreline and,
therefore, shall not be reviewed per the Shoreline Master Program policies and use
regulations. The review criteria for the Special Use Permit application are governed
SUP/ADU p. 2 Findings, Conclusions and Decision
by MCC 17.05.044. These criteria, in addition to miscellaneous criteria applicable to
1 all hearing examiner decisions, are quoted and addressed below.
2 MCC 17.05.044 SPECIAL USE REVIEW CRITERIA:
3
(1) That the proposed use will not be detrimental to the public health, safety and
• 4 welfare.
5 4. There are no significant adverse impacts associated with the proposal as
6 determined in Finding of Fact No. 5. Given these factors, there will be no
detrimental impact to the public health, safety, and welfare.
7
(2) That the proposed use is consistent and compatible with the intent of the
8 Comprehensive Plan.
9 5. The ADU is consistent and compatible with the intent of the
10 Comprehensive Plan. Chapter 9 of the Mason County Comprehensive plan provides
that ADUs should be permitted "when minimal impact would occur to surrounding
I I areas. The cumulative impact of like structures on neighboring properties must be
considered. " As determined in Finding of Fact No. 5, the proposal will not create
12 any significant adverse impacts. Given the minimal nature of the impacts, it is further
determined that even if several similar proposals were approved the cumulative
13 impact would be nominal.
14
(3) That the proposed use will not introduce hazardous conditions at the site that
15 cannot be mitigated through appropriate measures to protect adjacent properties and
the community at large.
16
6. As determined in Finding of Fact No. 5, the proposal will not create an},
1 hazardous conditions.
18
(4) That the proposed use is served by adequate public facilities which are in place,
19 or planned as a condition of approval or as an identified item in the County's Capital
Facilities Plan.
20
21 7. As determined in Finding of Fact No. 5, the proposal will be served by
adequate public facilities.
22
(5) That the proposed use will not have a significant impact upon existing uses on
23 adjacent lands.
24 8. As determined in Findings of Fact No. 5, no significant impacts are
25 expected to result from this proposal, including impacts on adjoining properties.
(6) If located outside an Urban Growth Area, that the proposed use will not result in
the need to extend urban services.
SUP/ADU p. 3 Findings, Conclusions and Decision
9. As determined in Finding of Fact No. 5, the proposal will be served by
adequate public facilities and none of these facilities includes a need to extend urban
services.
MISCELLANEOUS CRITERIA FOR ALL HEARING EXAMINER REVIEW:
4
MCC 15.09.055(C): Required Review: The Hearing Examiner shall review
5 proposed development according to the following criteria:
6 1. The development does not conflict with the Comprehensive Plan and meets
7 the requirements and intent of the Mason County Code, especially Title 6, 8, and 16.
8 2. Development does not impact the public health, safety and welfare and is
9 in the public interest.
10 3. Development does not lower the level of service of transportation and/or
neighborhood park facilities below the minimum standards established within the
I I Comprehensive Plan.
12 10. There is nothing in the record to suggest any compliance issues with the
Mason County Code, including Title 6 and 8 as building code review will ensure that
13 proper sewer and water facilities will be available and the proposal is SEPA exempt
14 pursuant to WAC 197-11-800(1)(b). The project is not subject to Title 16 which only
governs subdivisions. As previously determined, the proposal does not conflict with
15 the comprehensive plan. As confirmed by staff in the staff report, the proposed ADU
with one additional family should not lower the level of service of transportation
16 and/or neighborhood park facilities below the minimum standards established within
17 the Comprehensive Plan. The project will also have no adverse impact upon health,
safety and welfare since it will not create any significant adverse impacts as
18 determined in Finding of Fact No. 5.
19 The ADU meets the specific requirements for ADUs in rural lands as laid out in MCC
17.03.029 except that the proposal is located more than 150 feet from the principle
20 residence, which is prohibited by MCC 17.03.029(3). All other MCC 17.03.029
criteria are met because the owner of the proposed ADU will occupy the primary
21 residence; the size of the ADU is less than 1000 square feet and is less than 80% of
22 the primary residence; only one ADU will result from the project; and the ADU will
be served by adequate water and septic. The proposal complies with applicable
23 setback standards as it is proposed 55 feet from the side property line and the setback
in the RR5 district is 20 feet per MCC 17.04.223(d). The proposal also provides for
24 one additional parking spot as required by MCC 17.03.029(I) since MMC 17.04.2226
2 requires two parking spaces per single-family residence in the RR5 district and the
site plan shows ample space for three or more spaces.
DECISION
SUP/ADU p.4 Findings, Conclusions and Decision
1 The proposed ADU is consistent with all applicable SUP standards as outlined above
subject to the following conditions:
1) The ADU shall either be moved from its proposed location to within 150
feet of the primary residence or the applicant shall obtain a variance to MCC
4 17.03.029(3) to locate the ADU more than 150 feet from the primary
residence.
5
6 2) The owner of the ADU must reside on the lot in either the principal residence
or ADU.
7
8 Dated this 30th day of January,2017.
9
10
1 1
12 Hearing Examiner
Mason County
13
14 APPEAL
15 The decision of the Hearing Examiner is final and may be appealed to superior court
16 as outlined by the Washington State Land Use Petition Act, Chapter 36.70C RCW.
17 CHANGE IN VALUATION
18 Notice is given pursuant to RCW 36.70B.130 that property owners who are affected
19 by this decision may request a change in valuation for property tax purposes
notwithstanding any program of revaluation.
20
21
22
23
24
25
SUP/ADU p. 5 Findings, Conclusions and Decision
til �
0ef
0 111\
0 CASE INDEX
3 Austin-Talley
DDR2016-00154
Exhibit# Date Description
1 January 11, 2017 Staff Report
2 December 12, 2016 Special Use Permit Application
3 December 6, 2016 Site plans
4 December 19, 2016 Notice of Application and Public Hearing for Variance
5 December 27, 2016 Affidavit of Posting Notice
6 December 27, 2016 Mailing list of properties within 300 feet
7 December 29, 2016 Public Notice Publication
Mason County
Department of Planning
Building VIII x 615 W. Alder Street
Shelton,Washington 98584 X (360) 427-9670
January 11, 2017
TO: Mason County Hearings Examiner
FROM: Planning Staff—Kell McAboy; 360.427.9670 ext. 365; kmcaboy@co.mason.wa.us
RE: Special Use Permit (DDR2016-00154) for placement of an Accessory Dwelling Unit
STAFF REPORT
I. Introduction. This report evaluates a proposal for the construction of an Accessory
Dwelling Unit. The completed unit will be 1,000 square feet of living space. Staff
recommends approval of the Special Use Permit.
II. Applicant. Peter Austin and JacQuelyn Talley.
III. Property Location. 5511 E. State Route 302; Belfair, WA 98528.
Parcel # 12233-50-00032
Austin-Talley DDR2016-00154 Pagel of 4
IV. Project Description. The proposal is to construct a 1,000 square foot detached
Accessory Dwelling Unit on a 1.76 acre parcel with an existing main residence that is
1,398 square feet. See site plan(Exhibit 3).
V. Evaluations.
A. Characteristics of the site. The 1.76 acre lot is approximately 150' wide X 515' deep
located adjacent to SR 302 and Case Inlet to the west and residential development to
the east,north and south. Currently the property is developed with the primary
residence and an appurtenant shed/well house structure. See site plan (Exhibit 3).
The site is moderately sloped from east to west around 15%.No Geotechnical
Assessment will be required prior to permit approval.
B. Characteristics of the area. The area is characterized by low-density rural residential
development in an area zoned as Rural Residential 5 on SR 302 upland from Case
Inlet.
C. Shoreline Designation. Not Applicable.
D. Comprehensive Plan Desi ng ation/Zoning. The Mason County Comprehensive Plan
designation for the site is Rural and the zoning is Rural Residential 5.
VI. SEPA Compliance. Project is SEPA exempt per WAC 197-11-800 (1)(b)(i).
VII. Other Permits/Approvals. The proposal will require Mason County Building Permit for
the residential (ADU)construction(BLD2016-01191). A Notice of Application and
Public Hearing(Exhibit 4)was posted in the Mason County Journal on 12/29/2016 and
01/05/2017 (Exhibit 7).Notice was posted on site on 12/19/2016 (Exhibit 5) and mailed
to neighboring properties on 12/27/2016 (Exhibit 6). One phone call inquiry was made to
staff by a neighbor, no comments received as of the date of this report.
VIII. Analysis.
A Comprehensive Plan Review: Type III review for permit applications require that the
Hearing Examiner evaluate the proposal for consistency with the County's Development
Code, adopted plans and regulations. The Hearing Examiner shall review the proposal
according to the following criteria:
1) The development does not conflict with the Comprehensive Plan and meets
the requirements and intent of the Mason County Code, especially Title 6, 8
and 16. The development does not conflict with the Comprehensive Plan and
meets all the requirements and intent of the Mason County Code.
2) The development does not impact the public health, safety and welfare and is
in the public interest. The development proposal will not impact the public
health, safety or welfare.
3) The development does not lower the level of service of transportation and/or
neighborhood park facilities below the minimum standards established within
the Comprehensive Plan. The development proposal will not lower the LOS
for transportation or neighborhood park facilities.
Austin-Talley DDR2016-00154 Page 2 of 4
This proposal requires a Special Use Permit due to the requirements of the Mason County
Development Regulations, dated June 2, 2009, section 17.03.029.
Applicable Development Regulations as listed under section 17.03.029 are:
A. The ADU shall be subject to a special use permit, unless in the shoreline
jurisdiction it is subject to a shoreline permit.
B. The owner of the ADU must reside on the lot in either the principal residence or
ADU.
C. The ADU shall be located within 150 feet of the principal residence or shall be a
conversion of an existing detached structure (i.e. garage).
D. The ADU shall not exceed 80%of the square footage of the habitable area of the
primary residence or 1,000 square feet,whichever is smaller.
E. All setback requirements must be met by the ADU.
F. All applicable health district standards for water and sewer must be met by the
ADU.
G. No recreational vehicles shall be allowed as ADUs.
H. Only one ADU is allowed on any property.
I. An additional off-street parking space must be provided for the ADU.
The ADU as proposed meets all of the above criteria A —I with exception to C. The
proposed distance is 185 feet due to the existing contours of the property and the
subsequent "benching". This increase in distance will allow for the ADU to be
constructed on existing flat area of the property without additional, unnecessary grading.
Staff supports this request and encourages approval. This distance will not adversely
affect neighboring properties.
Applicable Special Use review criteria:
1. Will the proposed use be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare?
The placement of the AD U meets all county setbacks and assures adequate off street
parking. No potential detrimental effects have been identified.
2. Will the proposed use be consistent and compatible with the intent of the Comprehensive
Plan?
The proposed use is consistent and compatible with the Comprehensive Plan. Rural
Residential 5 zoning does allow for one ADUper parcel.
3. Will the proposed use introduce hazardous conditions at the site that cannot be mitigated
through appropriate measures to protect adjacent properties and the community at large?
No hazardous conditions are expected as a result of the proposal.
4. Is the proposed use served by adequate public facilities, which are in place, or planned as
a condition of approval or as an identified item in the County's Capital Facilities Plan?
Public facilities, which are in place, are currently adequate to serve the proposed ADU.
The project will not lower the level of service of transportation or neighborhood park
facilities below applicable minimum standards.
Austin-Talley DDR2016-00154 Page 3 of 4
5. Will the proposed use have a significant impact upon existing uses on adjacent lands?
There will be no significant impact upon existing adjacent land uses. Adjacent land uses
are residential. The 1.76 acre parcel is slightly larger than the average residential lot in
the vicinity and provides adequate space for the ADU.
6. If located outside an Urban Growth Area,will the proposal result in the need to extend
urban services?
The addition of an AD would not result in a need to extend urban services.
Project Analysis: Based upon these policies and regulations, the project conforms to the
policies and use regulations of the Mason County Development Regulations with regards
to Accessory Dwelling Units with the exception of the proposed 185 feet of separation
(MCC 17.03.029 C.). Staff recommends allowing the additional 35 feet due to the
existing contours and avoidance of unnecessary grading.
IX. Conclusions. As designed the project is consistent,with exception to MCC 17.03.029
C.,with the Mason County Development Regulations. Staff recommends approval
including to the exceptional distance requirement.
X. Choices of Action.
1. Approve.
2. Approve with conditions.
3. Deny with prejudice (reapplication of resubmittal is not allowed for one year).
4. Remand for further proceedings and/or evidentiary hearing in accordance with
Section 15.09.090 of Title 15.
Austin-Talley DDR2016-00154 Page 4 of 4
;�b+— Lk
NOTICE OF APPLICATION
FOR SPECIAL USE PERMIT AND
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Notice is hereby given that Peter Austin and Jacquelyn Talley have filed an application
for a Special Use Permit number DDR2016-00154 for the construction of an accessory
dwelling unit(ADU). This permit is required because of the requirements of the Mason
County Development Regulations, Section 17.03.029. The ADU must meet the
dimensional and other requirements of this section for approval.
Site Address and Project Location: 5511 E. State Route 302; Belfair,WA 98528
Parcel Number: 12233-50-00032
Date of Application: December 12,2016
A PUBLIC HEARING will be held by the Mason County Hearings Examiner regarding
the proposed project on Wednesday,January 25,2017 at 1:00 p.m. in the
Commissioner's Chambers Building I,411 North Fifth Street, Shelton, WA. If special
accommodations are needed,contact the Commissioner's Office, (360)427-9670.
Any person desiring to express their views or to be notified of the action taken on the
application should come to the public hearing on January 25, 2017 or send comments to
Kell McAboy, Land Use Planner, Mason County Dept. of Community Development, 615
W. Alder St, Shelton,WA 98584 or kmcaboy@co.mason.wa.us.
The proposal is SEPA exempt per WAC 197-11-800 (1)(b)(i).
Please contact Kell McAboy of the Mason County Dept. of Community Development at
(360)427-9670 ext. 365,or at the address listed above,with questions regarding this
permit application.
AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
) ss.
COUNTY OF MASON )
I, do hereby certify that I posted 2,_ copies of
the attached p �1' Ge
on day of 20_L(C_ in public places as follows.
one at �-, S [ � � � S� �O Z� [`�l-�%+✓
one at V�Q
one at
In witness whereof, the party has signed this Affidavit of Posting Notice this day
of �)2C Pew., l- , 20L(,O .
By:
Address: (a k 5 W • �- ���1� - g1..a�-} ��s ��'J
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
ss.
COUNTY OF MASON )
Subscribed and sworn to me this day of / , 20
\g11111111111//
,,r.•�`�\.�.,�M s.... q��•,,_ Noliry Public for e Sta of Washington
F�esiding at //�'►
tior
= ARy � P Commission Expires �
'��BLIC
1,2
WA S
of � zs��7
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE OF APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL
USE PERMIT AND NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEAR-
ING Notice is hereby given that Peter Austin and
Jacquelyn Talley have filed an application for a
Special Use Permit number DDR2016-00154 for
the construction of an accessory dwelling unit
(ADU). This permit is required because of the
requirements of the Mason County Development
Regulations, Section 17.03.029. The ADU must
meet the dimensional and other requirements of
this section for approval. Site Address and Proj-
ect Location: 5511 E. State Route 302; Belfair,
WA 98528 Parcel Number: 12233-50-00032
Date of Application:December 12,2016 A PUB-
LIC HEARING will be held by the Mason County
Hearings Examiner regarding the proposed proj-
ect on Wednesday, January 25, 2017 at 1:00
p.m. in the Commissioner's Chambers Building
I,411 North Fifth Street, Shelton, WA. If special
accommodations are needed, contact the Com-
missioner's Office, (360) 427-9670. Any person
desiring to express their views or to be notified
of the action taken on the application should
come to the public hearing on January 25, 2017
or send comments to Kell McAboy, Land Use
Planner, Mason County Dept.of Community De-
velopment, 615 W.Alder St,Shelton,WA 98584
or kmcaboy@co.mason.wa.us. The proposal
is SEPA exempt per WAC 197-11-800 (1)(b)(i).
Please contact Kell McAboy of the Mason County
Dept. of Community Development at(360) 427-
9670 ext.365,or at the address listed above,with
questions regarding this permit application.
9176 December 29.January 5 2t
�(12/27/2016) Kelly McAboy-Re: Public Notice: Talley Page 1J
From: Shelton-Mason County Journal <jlegals@masoncounty.com>
To: Kelly McAboy <KMCAboy@co.mason.wa.us>
Date: 12/26/2016 9:49 AM
Subject: Re: Public Notice: Talley
The total is$198 and the legal number is 9176.
> On Dec 23, 2016, at 12:42 PM, Kelly McAboy <KMCAboy@co.mason.wa.us>wrote:
> <Valley-Notice of App.docx>
MASON COUNTY COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
615 W.Alder St- Shelton, WA 98584
360.427.9670 Ext. 352
Publication Cost Agreement
Publication cost is the responsibility of the applicant. Final permit processing will not occur until
advertising fees have been paid to the newspaper by the applicant. The Shelton-Mason County Journal
will bill the applicant directly.
I / WE understand that I / WE must sign and date the attached acknowledgment indicating and that I /
WE understanq that is MY / OUR responsibility. I / WE must submit the signed page as part of
appl' in o er for 't to be considered as complete.
Signatur Prop Owner D Print Name
OR
Signature of Applicant Date Print Name
I plated 02�'_016 Page 3 cif 3
SPECIAL USE PERMIT CHECKLIST
Application received and logged: 2- l t 2(Zp ( (P
-?C,54e8 :(,., f l4�l �
Legal Journal:
l2�19(2o�te �
Legal notice posted and mailed: t2l 2'T�Zt9i�
Shelton UGA notice: A
SEPA: Circulated on: N A
Other permits or variances: f4,-( - R8- so l lQ —0 l lei
Hearing date: u-&-r v).. Z5, 2l l"7
Packets to HEX: t t -7,0 t
Decision:
Notice of Final Decision sent: 20 l—1
Appeal '
Notes:
LA
QS
CADocuments and Settings\gbm\Local Settings\Temp\SUP CHECKLIST.doc.ram