Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutGRD2003-00002 4500 cy - GRD Permit / Conditions - 5/15/2003 iENDER: COMPLETE THIS SECTION COWLETE THIS SECTION ON DELIVERY ■ Complete items 1,2,and 3.Also complete A. Signature item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. ❑Agent ■ Print your name and address on the reverse X ❑Addressee so that we can return the card to you. B. eeelvexf b (PH Name) C. Date of Defve ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, - j � : h> or on the front if space permits. f�1 L( L (2. L' 1 1. Article Addressed to: D. Is delivery address different from item 1? ❑Yes If YES,enter delivery address below: ❑ No RICK KRUEGER p"OX 548 _3�S.eerrvice Type ( 4ELFIAR ,V�'A t �'certified Mail ❑ Express Mail �^ � egistered ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise J{ J" O ❑ Insured Mail ❑ C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery?(Extra Fee) ❑Yes 2. Article Number 7005 0390 0004 9500 5904 (transfer from service label) -- PS Form 3811. February 2004 Domestic Retum RecelDt �o�scsm�-nn-�sa UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE First-Class Mail Postage&Fees Paid USPS Permit No.G-10 • Sender: Please print your name, address, and ZIP+4 in this box • M. C. OMMUNItY MKOPMENi P. J. Box 186 Shelton, WA 98 J , Inspection Line (360)427-7262 INT YI' n ! I G LOP ME T ?hone: (350'1427-9670, ext. 352 'ason County e!dg. 3 426 I.N. Cedar P.O. Box 186 Shelton. WA 98584 LAND MODIFICATION BUILDING PERMIT GRD2003-00002 OWNER RICK KRUEGER /2003 /27 RECEIVED 1 COi'T UR KP.UEGE AND KFJEGER LICENSE EXP: ISSUED: /27/2003 ENGINEER: LICENSE: EXP: EXPIRES: S;T= 'C`DES" L3 l NE S T TE POUTE 3 BELFAIR rARCEL 123325000008 ' Fr 'L ^c==7IPT!-)N 0AP�- B. THELEP'S HOME & GAP. TRS TR 4 !� 1/2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: DIRECTIONS TO SITE: FiC -;id grade of 4500 CY _ , ,_ T �I�_ 3 i-J F, -1.,:;NCE HIL RC INTERSECTION, BELFAIR Not Applici, )l•. as SEPA? Yes Cubic Yards 4,500.00 FEES Type By Date Amount Receipt Grading Permit Fee TLG 5/8/2003 $252.50 B12003000 Grading Plan Check Fee TLG 5/8/2003 $49.25 612003000 Public Works Review TLG 5/8/2003 $73.00 612003000 Public Works Review TLG 5/8/2003 $73.00 812003000 Total $447.75 GRD2003-00002 Please refer to 'he following oacelsl for conditions of this oermR 1 of 4 � f Inspection Line (360)427-7262 0 I T Phone: (360)427-9670, ext.352 .1ason County Bldg. 3 426 'A'. Cedar P.O. Box 186 Shelton, WA 98584 i� LAND MO-dFICATION BUILDING PERMIT GRD2003-00002 OWNER: RICK KRUEGER RECEIVED: 1/27/2003 COFITR; C iOR: ' KRUEGL« AND KRULGEk LICENSE: EXP: ISSUED: 5/15/2003 ENGINEER: LICENSE: EXP: EXPIRES: S;Tr ^.DDRESS:. 233E', NE S1,'.Tf= ROUTE 3 BELFAIR PARCEL NUMBER, 123325000008 LEGAL DESCRIPTION SAM B. TH`=LIM'S HOME GAR TRS TR 4 N 1/2 C PROJECT DESCRIPTION: DIRECTIONS TO SITE: Fill and grade of 4500 CY _ : 'JJi= T SI `7 JF -,k3 AT f 1'uP:,ANCE HIL RD INTERSECTION, BELFAIR Shoreir - "�- Not Ahl,li::<,!)I+ Area Graded SEPA?: Yes Cubic Yards. 4,500.00 FEES Type By Date Amount Receipt Grading Permit Fee TLG 5/8/2003 $252.50 B12003000 Grading Plan Check Fee TLG 5/8/2003 $49.25 B12003000 Public Works Review TLG 5/8/2003 $73.00 B12003000 Public Works Review TLG 5/8/2003 $73.00 612003000 Total $447.75 GRD2003-00002 Please refer to the following page(s)for conditions of this permit 1 of 4 ,C)NDTMINE FOR �n u_tJU::-00OG 2 y MEP2003-00011. A copy of the - ectorr si;e inspections. X ,.�.-1.=mer,t 3til rn of the I wetland restoration. X - - st�rlrnvatei plan. X - - ---- :IId ;.it ✓ested against regulatory by the appioval of this permit. X_ -, r n i, ;i ".irlir•1.111 lid JarCelit .ic '1nXl(Tllll l densltv.X --- REINSNECTION -f_..,,. 'r.J..J Ji+ - � �.. �:� - J ' �- ' -- � -I nE ��-DISC",- ' ''�'�' � •� I -- - ''�"'� JNIFOR(�l SUILDING CODE WILL BE ASSESSED IF OWNER TRACT DR FAILS TO POST ADDRESS ON SITE PRIOR TO REQUESTING INSPECTiGNS. X °) Grading shall comply with Mason County Grading Standards, Chapter 33 in its entirely. Grading Inspection requirements as listed in Section 3317.1 through and including 3313.2 shall be complied with and provided to Mason County. Setbacks from propery boundaries shall comply with Section 3314'1 o gh 3314.3 and other setbacks as required per Mason County Department of Community Development. X 9) Fill that is being imported from separate parcels within Mason County as the result of grading or excavation, are required to obtain or already have valid Land Modification (Grading) permits if the amount exceeds 200 cubic yards per parcel prior to commencement of grading/excavation activities or must b Iss ed a letter of permit exemption, if qualified, from the building official and planning department. X V. of GRD2003-00002 Please refer to the following page(s)for conditions of this permit 2 of 4 CONDITIONS FOR G R D 2�')0 3-00 Qo 2 i) Tl e yrac' ny peir it is subje"!.. I( ;", ern it for thF: :;,; ,; i sip.; ifically MEP2003-00011. A copy of the �11111t IUI condlticn� Shall be in l_ .' II it tt, hijil i!'lil Ins Pectoi_` eiming site inspections. X_ - nfiim the implementation of the wetland restoration. X stonnwater plan. X 4) Structures c,i o I vel ,; '.d t,i;s purwiit and are not vested against regulatory Changes by the approval of this permit. X_ 5) All fills shall he compactiA to a minirnun-1 of 90 percent of maximum density.X Pi7kTY. MASON COUNTY BUILDING DEPARTMIEN i- f0 Fvi� ANY 61 I E INSPECTIONS. A REINSPECTION FEE, BASED ON RATES AS ADOP -ED 6Y THE JUi ISUi:;i THE 1997 UNIFORM BUILDING CODE WILL BE ASSESSED IF OWNS TRACTOR FAILS TO POST ADDRESS ON SITE PRIOR TO REQUESTING INSPECTIONS. X 8) Grading shall comply with Mason County Grading Standards, Chapter 33 in its entirety. Grading Inspection requirements as listed in Section 3317.1 through and including 3318.2 shall be complied with and provided to Mason County. Setbacks from propery boundaries shall comply with Section 3314.1 gh 3314.3 and other setbacks as required per Mason County Department of Community Development. X 9) Fill that is being imported from separate parcels within Mason County as the result of grading or excavation, are required to obtain or already have valid Land Modification (Grading) permits if the amount exceeds 200 cubic yards per parcel prior to commencement of grading/excavation activities or must b is ed a letter of permit exemption, if qualified, from the building official and planning department. X GRD2003-00002 Please refer to the following page(s)for conditions of this permit. 2 of 4 �goN - CoU Tp MASON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Mason County Bldg. III, 426 West Cedar Street -- - PO Box 186, Shelton, WA 98584 1854 www.co.mason.wa.us (360)427-9670 Belfair(360)275-4467 Elma (360)482-5269 August 22, 2005 Rick Krueger PO Box 548 Belfair, WA 98528 RE- GRD2003-00002 Dear Rick, Mason County permit records for the above proposal indicate that the permit is on a Hold Status. The grading permit was initially issued on 5/15/03. On 11/12/03, a revision to relocate an existing storm retention pond from the east side of the highway to the project parcel was received. I spoke with you by phone on January 21 , 2005, and at that time you stated that Hal Parks had been inspecting the project and that you would submit reports prior to the expiration date of 7/21/05. 1 have not received any reports for this project and the permit is expired. We also discussed that the revision was never approved and additional information for submittal would be required. On April 15, 2005, 1 spoke with you about the revised plans that were received on March 17, 2005 and faxed a copy of Mason County Public Works review comments dated April 7, 2005 stating more information was noted as being necessary to complete and approve the revised plans. That information was provided and the most recent comments by Mason County Public Works, dated May 6, 2005 are attached showing two additional items needed to close the permit along with the engineered inspection reports As noted, "until the legal aspects of the proposal (stormwater easements and O & M Covenants) are satisfied, the proposed property permitting and development should not be allowed to proceed." This should be addressed immediately as any work that may have occurred which is inconsistent with the approved plans issued on 5/15/03 could be subject to enforcement action. I would encourage you to make contact with Alan Tahja of Mason County Public Works to resolve the easement and O & M Covenants issues at your earliest convenience. Alan will be leaving County employment effective August 31, 2005 and I would like to see this matter resolved prior to that if possible. If you should have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (360)427-9670 ext 356. Since y ey Building Inspect / ode E forcement Cc- Property File Alan Tahja, MCPW Hydraulics Engineer + f STAB pc C !y A° ' MASON COUNTY S N S r2 r N Y oy PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR/COUNTY ROAD ENGINEER U64 Shelton,Washington 98584 DATE: April 7t', 2005 INTER-DEPARTMENTAL COMMUNICATIONS TO: Tami Griffey, PAC—Building Official FROM: Alan A. Tahja, P/W- Co. Hydr. Engr. SUBJ: SSP & Grading Review Comments NAME: Krueger(a,Belfair Laundromat GRD2003-00002 Tami, A drainage report(dated 3/8/05) and concrete block gravity retaining wall calculations have been received by Public Works for the Krueger commercial property identified as Mason County Tax Parcel No. 12332-50-00008. The gravity retaining wall calculations appear to be appropriate and acceptable. I've done my own stormwater runoff simulation, which closely matches the project engineer's results. My analysis indicates that the 6 month storm, and the 2 year 24 hour event storms are both completely infiltrated, assuming the engineer's claimed percolation rate is realized. My calculations indicate that during a 100 year storm event,the peak discharge will be 2.904 cfs compared to the engineer's rate of 2.957 cfs. When I split this discharge rate between the wide crested weir and infiltration through the pond bottom, it indicated that 0.3746 cfs was being infiltrated through the pond bottom, and that 2.5295 cfs was being discharged over the weir. My analysis also indicates that the pre-developed discharge rate is about 1.40 cfs for the combined basins. The project engineer has made an unsubstantiated claim that becatRe the receiving wetland for the runoff from this property drains to Lynch Cove, that"no runoff ug_ antitX controls are necessary for the project development." I do not feel this should be accepted as justification for relieving the engineer from analyzing the potential impact to the receiving wetland that the project's elevated stormwater runoff delivery rates might produce. A second troubling issue is the infiltration rate claimed for the subject property, and the design of the pond floor with only 1' of separation provided between the pond floor to the underlying seasonal water table. The engineer has identified the site soils as being mainly gravelly sandy loams, but he has used a"sand"texture class with no modifiers for modeling purposes. The table the engineer used as a reference for claiming his infiltration rate lists Loamy Sands as having an infiltration rate of 2.41 inches per hour, and the same table lists Sandy Loams as having an infiltration rate of 1.02 inches per hour. Having only a 1' vadose zone means that once this 1' File: H:\WP\Stratwtr\Reviews\Krueger-W-Sr3-2.doc zone is filled with water,the only direction the groundwater will be able to flow in will be horizontally through a much smaller area than the pond floor. To summarize,the ecology block wall designs appear to be acceptable, but I am of the opinion that the stormwater pond will fall short of meeting the design expectations, that the engineer should revisit the issues I've raised, and that the project should not be allowed to proceed until satisfactory answers to these issues have been received and found acceptable to the County. Please feel free to contact me at County extension 461 if you have any questions regarding these comments, or if you feel any features need further discussion or attention. Sin rely, A an A. Tahja File: H:\WP\Strmwtr\Reviews\Krueger-W-Sr3-2.doc 9-as- oS �radu2q Plan$ �racrla9e �cp�� e4)oy v Ole* ; In lGr er 6ytntv a e4D of ��� f ,by ART s cc� )P/anis V'Wel - �rrn�ne�2f t 6 cards MSCA7 0 MASON COUNTY o n°U r: PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR/COUNTY ROAD ENGINEER Y 0 T Z Shelton,Washington 98584 Ny Y 1864 DATE: May 6 h, 2005 INTER-DEPARTMENTAL COMMUNICATIONS TO: Tami Griffey, PAC—Building Official FROM: Alan A. Tahja, P/W-Co. Hydr. Engr. SUBJ: SSP &Grading Review Comments NAME: Krueger na Belfair Laundromat GRD2003-00002 A revised drainage report(dated 4/25/05)and concrete block gravity retaining wall calculations have been received by Public Works for the Krueger commercial property identified as Mason County Tax Parcel No. 12332-50-00008. The gravity retaining wall calculations appear to be appropriate and acceptable. The new drainage report addresses the issues raised in my review dated April 7 h,2005,and at this time I feel the proposed stormwater management features may be considered adequate,but another issue has come to my attention that still needs to be completed. In my review responses of earlier drainage plans prepared for the"Old Laundrymat Site",an Operation and Maintenance(O&M)Covenant was requested to be prepared,recorded,and a copy of the recorded covenant delivered to Public Works for monitoring and administration. A search of my records finds a view easement(Mason County Auditor's File No. 1730408)that was created and recorded, but no recorded O&M Covenant for any stormwater features can be found.An unrecorded O&M Covenant (unsigned and un-recorded)was found in my files along with an un-recorded Storm Drainage Easement. The Storm Drainage Easement includes a clause that reserves to the underlying owners the right to relocate or reconfigure the infiltration system(s)which the drainage plan currently under review accomplishes. Since the stormwater retention pond being reviewed replaces the retention pond already in use, it seems like an appropriate time to complete the establishment of an easement and operation and maintenance documents to replace the ones which don't appear to have ever been created or recorded. To summarize,the ecology block wall designs appear to be acceptable, and the proposed"Drainage Report"appears adequate,but an easement needs to be created which establishes the County's right to a portion of the stormwater retention pond's capacity,and an Operation and Maintenance Covenant needs to be created to perpetuate the agreed on maintenance obligation(s).Until the legal aspects of the proposal (stormwater easements and O&M Covenants)are satisfied,the proposed property permitting and development should not be allowed to proceed. Please feel free to contact me at County extension 461 if you have any questions regarding these comments, or if you feel any features need further discussion or attention. Sincerely, +1j . a ja File: H: \WP\St=wtr\Rev!ews\Krueger-W-Sr3-3.doc oil FORM MUST BE COMPLETED IN INK ^ ✓'��`��/^� PLEASE PRESS HARD PERMIT NO GRID MASON COUNTY LAND MODIFICATION PERMIT APPLICATION f 426 W.CedarfP.O.Box 196,Shetton,WA 98584 Shelton 360 427-9670 Belfalr 360 275-4467 Elma 60 825268 Seattle 206 64-6968 APPLICANT INFORMATION CONTRACTOR INFORMATION Owner Rill >`fz0E4E*, Contractor Name Mailing Address P•o. Bo Mal S City State %jj$ Zip Code 965.28 Cit State WiA Zip Code Phone(3bD) !131-$0130ther Ph.(36Q)275-9415 Ph. - her Ph. Lien/Title Holder Contractor Re .# i Address Expiration ENGINEER INFORMATION Name M ICOAE�L F• W 9E:V: / P.E. Phone( 360 ) 692—3852- Address 6 E State_W& _Zip Code PARCEL INFORMATION-12 digit Tax Parcel No. 12337- 1 50 / 00008 Fire District 2. Legal Description Aor-N I/%- T9Ac_,T4 SAM Tj} L-IfE2.IS Y"AE Cahn-DEila 7il V4_�7_0 Site Address(include street name and city h4o A>D9ESS A6616.li ON TAX RI✓C� Directions to site: C44 L,,IES-r 5 I ECXI c14 I BlIz-I.- s I F_ Will timber be cut and sold in parcel preparation?(Yes/No)_ lJO ?� Is your property within 200'of the following:Body of Water(Name) Saltwater �J Lake River/Creek Pond Wetland K_Seasonal Runoff Stream Slopes or (��! Bluffs compressible s Soft oils TYPE OF JOB-Excavation Filling ✓ Grading Total size of area ctc�e l.33 Size of area to be cleared on slopes over 10% O.10 Ail Estimated amount of cubic yards 4.Sb0 G`f Describe Work 69-AD10 G bRA11JPC.E FAR �t37l�RE CDMNEfLCi{4l�DEV I LAND MODIFICATION INFORMATION 2 YES NO IZ33 -50-ooOcs2.. � 00012 Will fill be brought on site? If yes,source PgoP0� ACP-OSS ❑ Will excavated materials be taken off site? If yes,destination ❑ Ill- Does fill contain potential hazardous materials? ❑ 13_ Has a soils report been completed on site? If yes,include copy. ❑ Elf- Will proposal result in redirection of any surface water runoff onto adjacent properties? ❑ [I' Will proposed work alter where storm water or ground water enters or exits the site? 0 [ Will quality,quantity or velocity of storm/ground water be altered? Will runoff be collected/controlled by interceptors, curtain drains or other collection devices? ❑ 6 �/ Will the land be replanted upon completion? 0- ❑ Z G Will the proposal result in slopes steeper than those currently on site? 0 r j Is the site within 200'of a designated shoreline? � c�O NOTICE: THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL 3 VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 180 DAYS OR IF �� v CONSTRUCTION WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 180 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER THE WORK IS COMMENCED. PROOF OF CONTINUATION OF WORK IS BY MEANS OF A PROGRESS INSPECTION. The owner or agent on owner's behalf,represents that the information provided is accurate and grants employees of Mason County access to the above described property and structures for review and inspection of this project. Acknowledgment of such is by signature below: OWNER AFFIDAVIT-I certify that I am exempt from the requirements of CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT-I certify that I am currently registered as a Itration Law RCW 16.27 and am aware of the cont the State of Washington and that I am aware of the nts for which this permit is issued and that all work or nance r uirements regulating the work for which this permitisissuedmance therewith. No changes shall be made without a d all work hall be done in conformance therewith. No anges ail 1 be ade trout first fain ng approvalDate 1 �- X A FOR OFOCLOL11USE BEY ND THIS P Accepted by Date Submittal Amount Due Receipt No DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW ve oe"'Eo C NDITION CODES Building Department ��i f Planning Department Public Works Department Fire Marshal G� FEES Grading Permit Fee .� Site Inspection Plan Review Fee q a 5 OtherVick-nrl j t a Public Works Fee Pre-Paid at Submittal Violation Fee TOTAL FEES 5/8/2003 Conditions Associated With 11:26:48AM T I D E M A R K Case#: GRD2003-00002 COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC. Permit Condition Status VI)dated item# Code Title Status Changed By Tag Date l;y 1) 1 MASON ENVIRONMENTAL PERMIT NOT MET 5/2/2003 IZ;Z�1 The grading permit is subject to the conditions of the Mason Environmental Permit for the same project, specifically MEP2003-00011. A copy of the permit and conditions shall be made available to building inspectors during site inspections. X 2) 100 PLANNING DEPARTMENT SITE INSPECT NOT MET 5/2/2003 RAM Prior to final approval,a site inspection shall be conducted by the Mason County Planning Department staff to confirm the implementation of the wetland restoration. X 3) 1 O&M COVENANT NOT MET 5/2/2003 RAM An operations and maintenance covenant must be filed with the Mason County Public Works Department for the stormwater plan. X 4) 1 BUILDING NOT VESTED OR PERMITTED NOT MET 5/8/2003 TLG Structures or other development and/or improvements shown on the site plan are not approved by this permit and are not vested against regulatory changes by the approval of this permit. X 5) 152 FILL COMPACTION NOT MET 5/8/2003 TLG All fills shall be compacted to a minimum of 90 percent of maximum density.X 6) 153 GENERAL CHAPTER 33 NOT MET 5/8/2003 TLG ALL CLEARING,CUTTING,GRADING,EXCAVATING,TERRACING,FILLING AND SIMILIAR WORK WILL BE REGULATED BY THE REQUIREMENTS PURSUANT TO THE MASON COUNTY GRADING PERMIT STANDARDS ADOPTED BY RESOLUTION 141-96X 7) 1002 POST ADDRESS NOT MET 5/8/2003 TLG PURSUANT TO 1997 UNIFORM BUILDING CODE, ALL SITES MUST HAVE APPROVED NUMBERS OR ADDRESSES PROVIDED IN SUCH A POSITION AS TO BE PLAINLY VISIBLE AND LEGIBLE FROM THE STREET OR ROAD FRONTING THE PROPERTY. MASON COUNTY BUILDING DEPARTMENT REQUIRES THAT THIS BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO CALLING FOR ANY SITE INSPECTIONS. A REINSPECTION FEE,BASED ON RATES AS ADOPTED BY THE JURISDICTION AND THE 1997 UNIFORM BUILDING CODE WILL BE ASSESSED IF OWNER/CONTRACTOR FAILS TO POST ADDRESS ON SITE PRIOR TO REQUESTING INSPECTIONS. X 8) 1 REPORTS AND INSPECTIONS NOT MET 5/8/2003 TLG Grading shall comply with Mason County Grading Standards, Chapter 33 in its entirety.Grading Inspection requirements as listed in Section 3317.1 through and including 3318.2 shall be complied with and provided to Mason County. Setbacks from propery boundaries shall comply with Section 3314.1 through 3314.3 and other setbacks as required per Mason County Department of Community Development. X 9) 1 IMPORT FILL NOT MET 5/8/2003 TLG Fill that is being imported from separate parcels within Mason County as the result of grading or excavation, are required to obtain or already have valid Land Modification(Grading)permits if the amount exceeds 200 cubic yards per parcel prior to commencement of grading/excavation activities or must be issued a letter of permit exemption, if qualified,from the building official and planning department. X Page l of 2 CaseConditions..rpt 5/8/2003 Conditions Associated With 11:26:48AM8AM T I D E M A R K Case #: GRD2003-00002 COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC. Permit Condition Status pdated item# Code Title Status Changed By Tag Date B}' 10) 1 PERMIT LIMITATIONS NOT MET 5/8/2003 TLG This permit is approved for preliminary site grading,drainage and erosion control only. No structures or other improvements. Separate permits are required for retaining walls. X 11) 1 PUBLIC WORKS COMMENTS' NOT MET 5/8/2003 TLG Attached to plans is IDC dated 2/7/03 listing(4)criteria to be addressed for the final design of site development. This information is being provided to the applicant for preparation of that submittal. Page 2 of 2 CaseConditions..rpt 7], Michael F. Wnek, P.E. Consulting Civil Engineer -• .d� iVG 1665 NW Sherwood Drive, Bremerton, WA 98311, 360-692-3802 � LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL auoo� TO RICK Az DATE October 10, 2003 Mason County Dept. of Com. Dev. L P.O. Box 279 PROJ. NO 291 00 Shelton, WA 98584 RE: Krueger West SR-3 Commercial Parcel ! z The following attached drawings and documents are submitted for your review. COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 4 08-26-03 - CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS C-1, C-2 Revision 2 4 08-26-03 - CONSTRUCTION DRAWING W-1 2 08-26-03 - Drainage Report Amendment No. 1 COMMENTS: This information is submitted as a revision of the current Land Modification Permit. The owners propose to relocate an existing storm retention pond from the east side of the highway to the project parcel-, by increasing the size of the project pond. A Utility Permit has been submitted concurrently to Washington State Department of Transportation. If there are any questions, or if additional information is required, please contact me at 360-692-3802. BY: MICHEAL F.WNEK, P.E. cc. Rick Krueger 288\History\TRANSM IT_10-10-03_RM.doc Michael F. Wnek, P.E. I Consulting Civil Engineer 1665 NW Sherwood Drive, Bremerton, WA 98311, 360-692-3802 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL TO RICK MRAZ DATE March 11 , 2005 Mason County Dept. of Com. Dev. PROJ, NO. 288 RE Krueger West SR-3 Commercial Parcel, GRD2003-00002 The following attached drawings & reports are submitted for your review. COPIES DATE NO DESCRIPTION 4 03-08-05 - CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS C-1, C-2, C-3, W-1 2 03-08-05 - DRAINAGE REPORT 2 03-08-05 - CONCRETE BLOCK GRAVITY RETAINING WALL CALCULATIONS COMMENTS: The drawings have been revised to increase the building size, and increase the amount of fill the parcel can utilize. The drainage report has been revised per Alan Tahja's comment letter of 11-18-03. Retaining wall construction has been added to the project; design calculations are attached, as well as the new construction drawing C-3. RECEIVED BY 4k MAR 17 M5 MICH AL F.WNEK, P.E. 426 W. CEDAR STq cc: Rick Krueger v L A I,- C:\CivilEng\288\History\TRANSMIT-03-14-05—RM.doc Michael F. Wnek, P.E. Consulting Civil Engineer 1665 NW Sherwood Drive, Bremerton, WA 98311, 360-692-3802 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL TO: TAMI GRIFFEY DATE: April 25, 2005 Mason County Dept. of Com. Dev. PROJ, NO 288 RE Krueger West SR-3 Commercial Parcel, GRD2003-00002 The following attached drawings & reports are submitted for your review. COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 4 04-25-05 - CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS C-1 , C-2, C-3, W-1 2 04-25-05 - DRAINAGE REPORT COMMENTS' The drawings & drainage report have been revised to address Alan Tahja's comment letter of 04-07-05, specifically: - developed release rates from the pond have been reduced to the existing condition or below. - soils information has been coordinated & revised between the drawings & the report, so as to clarify the design parameters used. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me at 360-692-3802. BY: MAY 0 2 2-05 MI HEAL F. WNEK.. P.E. PERMIT ASSISTANCE CENTER cc: Rick Krueger RECEIVED MAY 0 2 2005, 426 W: CEDAR ST: C:\CivilEng\288\History\TRANSMIT-04-25-05—TG.doc FORM MUST BE COMPLETED IN INK PERMIT NO.. GRD -Da PLEASE PRESS HARD MASON COUNTY LAND MODIFICATION PERMIT APPLICATION 426 W.Cedar/P.O.Box 186,Shelton,WA 98584 Shelton 060 427-9670 Belfalr 760 275J467 Elms 760 2-5269 Seattle 206 64-6969 APPLICANT INFORMATION CONTRACTOR INFORMATION Owner Rlc-K )r_'W_0E4EA Contractor Name F Mailing Address P,o, 8o Maili s _ City BEL-FA1 R State�(� Zip Code - City tateWkA Zip Code Phone(3(cp) !131-B013other Ph.(3b0)2'7g-94)5 Ph. - her Ph. Lien/Title Holder Contractor Re .# Address Expiration / I ENGINEER INFORMATION Name M ICNAEL F_ W 1IEKa P.E. Phone( 360 ) bg2-3f3b2 Address ?lp�S �W 6HERVIOL� DfZIV State__Vl�_Zip Code 98311 J I PARCEL INFORMATION-12 digit Tax Parcel No. j 2332 / Sb I CiCK)05 Fire District 2. Legal Description rtorT1l V -- 7"C-T4 SAM E? THEL-ER.IS I," GltRDEa T - 4 72x> Site Address(include street name and city No k.Sb16.WED OIJ TAX RE4.142,DS Directions to site: ON WEST Srr>E OF AT PL;i"W-E WLI_ ROAD Ih1Tu�P-SECTI Bt.l-Fh`F_ �-��qq�� t I Will timber be cut and sold in parcel preparation?(Yes/No)J.IO �J�� Is your property within 200'of the following:Body of Water(Name) Saltwater 4 K� Lake River;Creek Pond Wetland )(, Seasonal Runoff Stream Slopes or n� Bluffs Soft compressible soils TYPE OF JOB-Excavation Filling ✓ Grading Total size of area CLcr_e I 33 i Size of area to be cleared on slopes over 10% C>•10 ACRE Estimated amount of cubic yards 4 _SOO GY Describe Work CaRAD1►JG Jt, DRAIIJPC.E EpFZ FLrWRE CDMME(tCtAL�DEV, i LAND MODIFICATION INFORMATION YES NO IZ332—SD—000ti2- * 000l'Z I Will fill be brought on site? If yes,source PF� A JF-OSS 5PP 3— 9-- ❑ Will excavated materials be taken off site? If yes,destination ❑ 0`_ Does fill contain potential hazardous materials? ❑ Q_ Has a soils report been completed on site? If yes, include copy. ❑ B_ Will proposal result in redirection of any surface water runoff onto adjacent properties, ❑ ®' Will proposed work alter where storm water or ground water enters or exits the site? ❑ r9__ ❑ Q ✓�> /� Will quality,quantity or velocity of storm/ground water be altered? C Will runoff be collected/controlled by interceptors, curtain drains or other collection devices? ❑ 6 f// Will the land be replanted upon completion? 0 Will the proposal result in slopes steeper than those currently on site? ❑ Is the site within 200'of a designated shoreline? NOTICE: THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL b.VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 180 DAYS OR IF CONSTRUCTION WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 180 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER THE WORK IS COMMENCED. PROOF OF CONTINUATION OF WORK IS BY MEANS OF A PROGRESS INSPECTION. The owner or agent on owner's behall,represents that the f, information provided is accurate and grants employees of Mason County access to the above described property and structures for review and inspection of this project- Acknowledgment of such is by signature below: OWNER AFFIDAVIT-I certify that I am exempt from the requirements of CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT-[certify that I am currently registered as a %theor Registration Law RCW 18.27 and am aware of the con the State of Washington and that I am aware of the uirements for which this penn4 is issued and that all work or nance r uirements regulating the work for which this permit is Issued conformance therewith. No changes shall be made without a d all work hall be done in conformance therewith. No angesalappro be ade hour first taining approval Date 1 X A FOR OFF CIAL SE BEY ND THIS P Accepted by Date Submittal Amount Due Receipt No. DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW APPROVED DENIED CONDITION CODES Building Department Planning Department Public Works Department Fire Marshal FEES Grading Permit Fee Site Inspection Plan Review Fee Other icU-lf)I j eff. Q Public Works Fee Pre-Paid at Submittal Violation Fee TOTAL FEES �°N-STgT�° MASON COUNTY �P c DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AL S° Planning Division o Y �? P O Box 279, Shelton,WA 98584 °� �,o~ (360)427-9670 1864 NOTIFICATION OF INCOMPLETE APPLICATION February 04, 2003 RICK KRUEGER P.O. BOX 548 BELFAIR WA 98528 Parcel No.: 123325000008 Project Description: GRADING Dear Applicant: You have submitted a permit application (case no. GRD2003-00002)for proposed construction or development in the county. Upon review of your application, I have determined that the contents of the application are incomplete or do not provide enough detail for review. Therefore, review of your application will not proceed until the necessary information is provided (see the comment section of this letter for details.) Once the information is submitted and the application is complete, I will continue to process your application accordingly. Please contact me at(360) 427-9670, ext. 577 if you have questions. Sincerely, I Rick Mraz Land Use Planner Mason County Planning Department 2/4/2003 1 of 2 GRD2003-00002 NOTIFICATION OF INCOMPLETE APPLICATION 2/4/2003 Case No.: GRD2003-00002 Comments: A field inspection of the subject property was conducted on 2/3/03 to assess critical areas issues relevant to a proposed grading project. An environmental checklist pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) was included in the grading permit application. The checklist referenced a wetland report, however, no wetland report was included. The field inspection noted that wetland conditions exist on or near-adajcent to the subject property. The Mason County Resource Ordinance requires setbacks from wetlands. The size of the setback depends on the category of wetland. In order to determine the appropriate setback for jurisdictional wetlands, they must be typed and delineated. Please send a copy of any relevant information you posses about the wetlands affecting this proposal. A copy of the Wetland chapter of the Resource Ordinance and a list of wetland consultants is enclosed for your convenience. If you have questions or require clarification on these issues, please contact me. 2/4/2003 2 of 2 GRD2003-00002 MASON COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR/COUNTY ROAD ENGINEER Shelton,Washington 98584 DATE:November 18t', 2003 INTER-DEPARTMENTAL COMMUNICATIONS TO: Rick Mraz, DCD—Building Inspector FROM: Alan A. Tahja, P/W- Co. Hydr. Engr. Work Order: PLG-03 SUBJ: Stormwater Plan Review NAME: Krueger k Belfair-Old Laundromat GRD2003-00002 Rick, In February of this year, grading for the Krueger West SR-3 Commercial Parcel in Belfair was reviewed, and stormwater management was conceptually reviewed. The current designs submitted for consideration appear to represent a probable final level of development. The original Drainage Report(Preliminary No.3 stamped 3/30/98) reviewed for the plat was consulted,and the claimed runoff from the original Basin#5 was verified. An attempt to locate the soil log location referred to in the current submittal was unsuccessful. The soil log holes may all have been on the original plat parcel, so there exists a possibility that a soil log of the subject property does not exist. Infiltration rates used in arriving at the claimed retention volumes used a vertical separation between the bottom of the infiltration pond and the underlying restrictive layer (water table or hardpan) of 10 feet. In the pond's original location, 10' may have been available, but the new pond location is several feet lower than the original pond, and it appears that ten feet below the proposed pond is close to the water table elevation that can be expected in the area of the wetland immediately west of the proposed pond. In my February IDC, I indicated that additional stormwater review would be needed when plans for delivering offsite stormwater runoff to the property became more formal. With project planning progressing toward serving offsite properties' stormwater requirements, it seems appropriate to request that the stormwater design assumptions and analysis be requested. With the development of the Hood Canal Heights Roads and plat properties spanning several years, the information pertaining to the current proposed property development is becoming very fragmented. A complete Stormwater Site Plan for this proposal should be requested of the applicant. Referring to history files and other projects makes it difficult to analyze the proposed stormwater control facilities, and will make it difficult in the future to verify that the stormwater retention pond is performing as predicted. An Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Covenant will be required to be created, signed by the facility's owner, recorded with the County Auditor's office, and a copy delivered to Public Works for monitoring and administration. File:H.IWPIStrmwtr1Reviews1Krueger.doc 'may In summary, the proposed design and layout of the proposed property development appears conceptually acceptable, but a Stormwater Site Plan unique to this property and designed to accommodate the anticipated runoff from the Hood Canal Heights should be developed, and supporting information(soil logs &bore locations,perc rates, level pool routing results, etc.) should be submitted for County review and approval. Because the subject property was not part of the original development, a new O&M Covenant will need to be created which covers the new stormwater facilities and functions. Please feel free to contact me at County extension 461 regarding these comments, or if you feel additional features or concerns need further consideration. Sinc rely, Van A. Tahja L File:H.I WMStrmwtr1Reviews1Krueger.doc MASON COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR/COUNTY ROAD ENGINEER Shehom Wuhington 98584 DATE: April 181h, 2003 INTER-DEPARTMENTAL COMMUNICATIONS TO: Rick Mraz, DCD - Planner FROM: Alan A. Tahja, P/W - Co. Hydr. Engr. WO# PLG-03 SUBJ: Stormwater Site Plan(SSP) Review . NAME: Krueger W SR-3 Comme Q0 10 GRD2003-00002 Rick, Public Works' review of the Stormwater Site Plan (SSP) prepared for the proposed commercial development of the Rick Krueger property on the west side of SR-3 in Belfair has been completed. The proposed permanent and temporary stormwater control features comply with minimum County requirements, and may be considered acceptable for mitigating anticipated stormwater runoff impacts. The stormwater retention pond is not dimensioned on the plan sheets. The ponds length and width should be called out on the plans. 5' x 78' was used in checking the engineer's analysis, and was found to provide ample volume. In addition to dimensioning the retention pond, the applicant will be required to prepare and record a Stormwater facilities Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Covenant, and deliver a copy of the recorded covenant to Public Works for monitoring and administration. Attached please find a blank copy of the O&M Covenant form the County uses to satisfy this requirement. In summary, the proposed Stormwater Site Plan appears acceptable with the addition of a missing dimension, and the filing and delivery of an O&M Covenant to Public Works. Please feel free to contact me at County extension 461 if you have any questions regarding these comments, or if you feel other issues need further attention. c rely, SiX k. __&a Al n A. Tahja Attached: O&M Covenant Form ' n • .:� �� �e�u,r�eo� ��� se�5. .1 c,J©L'o Cl'(gee � a vGo File: H:\WP� RMWTR\REVIEWS\Krueger-W-Sr3.doc PNt1'�; rc� acx�3- o00 o a Numbers' PArieded CF. R A gwdzed br. Date: Type of Wodc V.f w (G n4 2 T CHARGE TO.- NAME AGENCY/COMPANY BIWNG ADDRESS PHONE u s-7 Pub. Works Person to Charge: (a a i n w.rK>•::u•`:.�`"rr:\ .. `S_ U4tt4�:nc-. .:;.. . _.et:;r). _:o;.: : >.:..eo\ .ettx:m!—d•:eiieer: �trMe!nvaK:cuG:erf:(,.....-...,. (C)- Project Time Line: (from-to dates) i1 e TO Project Start date: -Q EsftWod Flnfsh Osbr APP mo I : 2 ESTIMATED TOTAL VS: ! 5 � COST ESTIMATE 7 (0) Pitt enp4oy'4 i Rrte Hours a;M Etin4t1 TOTAL i ,�ft.k 73 StlY>I EM TOTAL ft EQWMENT USED: MATERIAL US ED- (F) /actual Cast BARS: PROJ f: DATE Em*y" Hours Frhioe TOTAL i EQWMENT USED: a e vild TOTa!-VS MATERIAL USED: TOTAL ALL (G) BILLED DATE INV/ PAID DATE RECI C}J MASON COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR/COUNTY ROAD ENGINEER Shelton,Washington 98584 DATE: February 71h. 2003 INTER-DEPARTMENTAL COMMUNICATIONS TO: Tami Griffey, PAC—Building Inspector FROM: Alan A. Tahja, P/W- Co.Hydr. Eng. Work Order: BLD-03 SUBJ: -Grading& Strmwtr Plan Review NAME: Krueger @ Belfair-Old Laundromat GRD2003-00002 Tami, I've reviewed the plans &&WPregg-Yingthe Krue er West SR-3 Commercial Parcel in P Y S Belfair,and offer the following comments and observations; The plans appear to portray two levels of development. One level appears to be an intermediate grading plan with the site graded with 2:1 slopes and the stormwater drainage system (pond, swale, collection system, & catch basins)constructed. The plan sheet portraying this phase of site development includes temporary Erosion and Sediment(E&S) control features and notes which should be implemented as presented. A more highly developed plan for the site includes a proposed building area, formal parking areas, and rock retaining walls. The grading plan sheet with temporary E&S features appears acceptable, and I would estimate the grading volume to be between 500 and 1000 cubic yards 9f material. The more highly developed plan for the site raises a couple issues. They do not appear to be of great significance, but should be addressed in the final design. (1) The catch basin(s) in each of the three proposed parking areas should be equipped with emergency spill control oil water separators. (2) A safety curb or barrier will be needed between the back upper and lower parking areas (separated by the 6' high rock wall). (3) Pam Denton from the County's Environmental Health Department informed me that a 30' minimum separation is required between a septic drainfield and a surface runoff conveyance. continued File.H.IWAGradinglKrueger.doc (A) Uate: —/—&-403 (E) Work Ord er PERMIT#:��00 _"-w2 Numb Requested by: D, Authorized by: Date: JAN 1 2003 Type of Work: M, �0�_PUB no CHARGE TO: RKS NAME AGENCY/COMPANY BILLING ADDRESS PHONE (s) Pub. Works Persrn in Charge: rJ (C) Pmjed Time Line: (from - to dates) TO m Project Stag date: Z Esdrnated Fnlsh Date: m° e Noun: on_ ESTIMATED TOTAL$'S: 73 �----- _ COST ESTIMATE vl (D) Date __ EmooyK S Rate our O ubtos Fringe — —t TOTALS z_ 3 so _ 73 — 0� UNIT RAM TOTAL S5 EQUIPMENT USED: MATERIAL USED: (17 Actual Cast s BARS: PROJ DATE Enp4oyee WORKED tlarrx S Rate Hours SuNoW EC]Io TOT/_S l EQUIPMENT USED: Clate Unit F2te TOTAL S'S MATERIAL USED: TOTAL ALL (G) BILLED DATE__INV i PAID DATE REC./—�_C}# t • (4) The height of the proposed rock retaining walls dictates that they be designed and stamped by an engineer. If and when the stormwater facilities are constructed and put into service, an Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Covenant will be required to be created, signed by the facility's owner, recorded with the County Auditor's office, and a copy delivered to Public Works for monitoring and administration. In terms of reviewing the plans for grading concerns,no obvious concerns arise. The stormwater features promoted on sheet C-2 are oversized for the immediate property, and appear adequate. Delivery of off-site flows to stormwater treatment and disposal features on the subject property will need to be reviewed when they are more formally developed. Please feel free to contact me at County extension 461 regarding these comments,or if you feel additional features or concerns need further consideration. Sine ly, A&A. Tahja cc: RAM File:H:I WPI Grading)Krueger.doc 4/17/03 Krueger W SR3 Commercial site Stormwater retention analysis REMARKCMD 10 NORMAL RMKHEADING 12 [Summary Report of all RLPool Data] LSTEND DISPLAYPRECIPS BASLIST2 [B-001] Using [TYPElA] As [6 month] [B-001] Using [TYPElA] As [2 yr] [B-001] Using [TYPElA] As [100 yr] LSTEND BASLIST [TYPElA] as [6 month] DETAILED [B-001] LSTEND HYDLIST SUMMARY [6mo] [2yr] [100yr] LSTEND STORLIST [TraPond] LSTEND DISCHLIST [PndNwier] [R-Pnd] [OvrFlw Wier] LSTEND 6 month Match Q: 0.2016 cfs Peak Out Q: 0.2017 cfs - Peak Stg: 25.86 ft-Active Vol: 529.92 cf 2 yr MatchQ=PeakQ= 0.6809 cfs Peak Out Q: 0.2958 cfs- Peak Stg: 26.52 ft-Active Vol: 1214.32 cf 100 yr MatchQ=PeakQ= 1.5291 cfs Peak Out Q: 0.6235 cfs - Peak Stg: 28.03 ft-Active Vol: 3794.71 cf 6' wide overflow Wier @ 28.00 elevation 5' x 78' Trap Pond w/ 3:1 SS 10" per hour (6 min per inch) infiltration (includes FS = 2 ) Krueger W SR3 Commercial site Stormwater retention analysis REMARKCMD 10 NORMAL RMKHEADING 12 [Summary Report of all RLPool Data] LSTEND DISPLAYPRECIPS BASLIST2 [B-001] Using [TYPElA] As [6 month] [B-001] Using [TYPElA] As [2 yr] [B-001] Using [TYPElA] As [100 yr] LSTEND BASLIST [TYPElA] as [6 month] DETAILED [B-001] LSTEND HYDLIST SUMMARY [6mo] [2yr] [100yr] LSTEND STORLIST [TraPond] LSTEND DISCHLIST [PndNwier] [R-Pnd] [OvrFlw Wier] LSTEND 6 month Match Q: 0.2016 cfs Peak Out Q: 0.2017 cfs - Peak Stg: 25.86 ft-Active Vol: 529.92 cf 2 yr MatchQ=PeakQ= 0.6809 cfs Peak Out Q: 0.2958 cfs - Peak Stg: 26.52 ft-Active Vol: 1214.32 cf 100 yr MatchQ=PeakQ= 1.5291 cfs Peak Out Q: 0.6235 cfs - Peak Stg: 28.03 ft-Active Vol: 3794.71 cf t 1Z) _ J--17-03