Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
SEPA Commercial Proposal 3/4/03, 12/09/02 - SEP Application - 3/18/2003
APR-09-2003 WED 02: 18 PM DOE SW REGIONAL OFFICE FAX NU, MUU(b3Ub F. U1 6TApA,OF STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY P.O. Box 47775-Olympia, Washington 98504.7775 • (360)407-6300 April 9, 2003 Your address Mr. Rick Mraz Is in the Mason County Department of Community T)evelopment PO Box 279 Shelton, WA 98584 "T �--A watershed Dear Mr. Mraz: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the mitigated determination of nonsignificance for the Krueger West SR-3 Commercial Parcel project(SEP203-00025), located at 23381 NE SR 3 Belfair, as proposed by Rick Krueger. We reviewed the environmental checklist and have the following comments: Erosion control measures must be in place prior to any clearing, grading, or construction. These control measures must be effective to prevent soil from being carried into Surface water by stormwater runoff. Sand, silt, and soil will damage aquatic habitat and are considered pollutants, Any discharge of sediment-laden runoff or other pollutants to waters of the state is in violation of Chapter 90.48, Water Pollution Control, and WAC 173-20 1 A, Water Quality Standards for Surface Waters of the State of Washington, and is subject to enforcement action. Proper disposal of construction debris must be on land in such a manner that debris cannot enter the wetland or cause water quality degradation of state waters, Stormweaer Management Manual for the Puget,Sound Basin (WA Dept. of Ecology, 1992)recommends that removal of vegetation should be minimized and that any areas disturbed should be restored within two days between October I and April 30,and within seven days between May I and September 30. If you have any questions Or would like to respond to these comments, please call Ms. Kerry Carroll with the Water Quality Program at(360)407-6294. Sincerely, ........ f Post-it*Fax Note 7671 Date 1pagoes1111 From /119-R14111- Jeri Berube co. Apt. Co, Administrative Coordinator -� hone* Phone Southwest Regional Office Fax#442 7 Fax 0 JB:le(03-1765) cc: Michael F. Wnek, Agent for applicant Kcrry Carroll, SWRO/WQ RECEIVED KRUEGER WEST SR-3 COMMERCIAL PARCEL MAR 18 2003 SEPA CHECKLIST 426 W. CEDAR ST., MARCH 04, 2003 MASON COUNTY o lin DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING - - MAR D 1 A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable. KRUEGER WEST SR-3 COMMERCIAL PARCEL 2. Name of applicant: RICK KRUEGER 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: APPLICANT: OWNER: AGENT: RICK KRUEGER LES & BETTY KRUEGER MICHAEL F. WNEK, P.E. P.O. BOX 548 14241 E. ST HWY 106 CONSULTING CIVIL ENG. BELFAIR, WA 98528 BELFAIR, WA 98528 1665 NW SHERWOOD DR 360-731-8013 BREMERTON, WA 98311 360-692-3802 4. Date checklist prepared: MARCH 04, 2003 5. Agency requesting checklist: MASON COUNTY 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): 2003 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. NO 2 Environmental (SEPA) Checklist Page 3 of 15 EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. None 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. None 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Grading and Building Permits 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description). This is a 1.75 acre commercial site. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. Tax Lot# 12332-504)0008 The Lot is Directly to the West of Romance Bill Road on SR3. Legal The North half of tract 4, Sam B Theler's Home and Gardin tracts, as per plat recorded in volume 4,Page 20, records of Mason County Washington Environmental (SEPA) Checklist Page 4 of 15 EVALUATION FOR B. Environemental Elements AGENCY USE ONLY 1. Earth a. General description of the site (check one): [-I flat Q✓ rolling ❑hilly 0 steep slopes (mountainous []other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 30% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? if you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Clay, Sand. and Gravel. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so,describe. No e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. The site is to be leveled off in the front for more desirable access. Approximately 3000 cy of fill will be used. The fill will be of similer type and will be imported for accross the road,within 1000'. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. No. All silt and erosion control measures will be adhered to. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or building)? 60% h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Silt fencing and landscaping Environmental (SEPA) Checklist Page 5 of 15 EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. None b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any. None 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Yes, the western end of the parcel has been classified as a wetland. See "Wetland Evaluation" by Forestech, LLC; attached. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) of the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. The Mason County Resource Ordinance requires a 125' Wetland Vegetation Area from the defined wetland. The project proposes to use the area beyond 100' for stormwater management, as allowed per the Ordinance. This will require the 100' area to be enhanced; see attached "Mitigation Plan for Impact on Wetland Vegetation Area" 03-07-03, Forestech LLC. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None Environmental (SEPA) Checklist Page 6 of 15 EVALUATION FOR 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or AGENCY USE ONLY diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. None 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. None 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. None b. Ground 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Yes, storm runoff will be infiltrated. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural;etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. Domestic Sewage Storm Runoff Environmental (SEPA) Checklist Page 7 of 15 EVALUATION FOR c. Water Runoff(including storm water): AGENCY USE ONLY 1) Describe the source of runoff(including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Storm Runoff flows to Infiltration Pond 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. Yes, Debris, sediments, and oil drippings from parking area. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Ronoff quantity controls: Infiltration Pond Runoff quality controls: Biofiltration Swale 4. Plants a. Check types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous trees: alder Omaple ❑aspen Flother evergreen trees: ©fir O cedar Opine other Oshrubs Ograss ❑pasture ❑crop or grain wet soil plants: ❑cattail ❑buttercup ❑bullrush ❑skunk cabbage ❑other water plants: ❑water lily ❑eelgrass ❑mino ❑other other types of vegetation: Environmental (SEPA) Checklist Page 8 of 15 EVALUATION FOR b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? AGENCY USE ONLY 0.7 acres of grass will be filled over. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any. The western most portion of the lot will have as many remaning trees as possible left in place. 5. Animals a. Check box for any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: Elhawk El heron eagle F,lsongbirds []other Mammals: Q✓ deer El bear ❑elk ❑beaver ❑other Fish: ❑bass (salmon ❑trout ❑shellfish ❑herring F--j other b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Not Sure. d_ Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any. None Environmental (SEPA) Checklist Page 9 of 15 6. Energy and Natural Resources EVALUATION FOR a. What kinds of energy(electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar)will AGENCY USE ONLY be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating,manufacturing, etc. Electric and Natural gas for heating. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any. Energy effecent materials will be used in the construction of the building. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? if so, describe. None 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required_ None 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None Environmental (SEPA) Checklist Page 10 of 15 b. Noise EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may effect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? None 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. None 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Undeveloped b. Has the site been used for agriculture? if so, describe. No c. Describe any structures on the site. None d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? None Environmental (SEPA) Checklist Page 11 of 15 e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? EVALUATION FOR Commercial AGENCY USE ONLY f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Commercial g. if applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive"area? if so,specify. No i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? la j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts,if any: None 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Project is compatible with Projected Land use Plans. Environmental (SEPA) Checklist Page 12 of 15 EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None c_ Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? 33 ft b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: None Environmental (SEPA) Checklist Page 13 of 15 EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? None b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? None c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: None 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? None b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None Environmental (SEPA) Checklist Page 14 of 15 EVALUATION FOR 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation AGENCY USE ONLY a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. . None b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. State Route 3 b. Is site currently served by public transit? If no, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Not Sure c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? 43 New 0 Eliminated d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). None Environmental (SEPA) Checklist Page 15 of 15 EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No f. Now many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. General Office Building 710 4,045 sf 112 trips per day Apartments 220 5 units 35 trips per day Total = 147 trips per day g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: None 15. Public Services a_ Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None 16. Utilities Check utilities currently available at the site: [Z✓ electricity ►[natural gas water refuse service []telephone =sanitary sewer F-1 septic system []other C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: MICHAEL F. WNEK, P.E. PROJECT CIVIL ENGINEER Date Submitted: MARCH 04, 2003 T 23 N, R 1 W, W.M. NORTH a o` v � 19 20 g 21 O y {i C Ml�ROAD e�P� z q =_ SAND HILL 25 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL d y4L n D )28 OO U 30 29Z 0- 0 <Q H BELF R U S kv ROJECT OCAl10N 32 33 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL »:>`>CANAL::> VICINI�MAP LEGAL DESCRIPTION SCALE: 1" = 3000' Tax #12332-50-00008 The North half of Tract 4, Sam B. Theler's Home & Garden Tracts, as per plat recorded in Volume 4 of Plats, Page 20, records of Mason County, Washington. SECTION 32, T 23 N, R 1 W, W.M. uwEorrl ei3AR3 w>fwn,Rr & �`-�0. 123V-Lo-Domt ROCKERY RETAINING WALLS AnF raRsww uC ot/ny �: P•d mwdRaAL(rALW' REWIRED FOR BUILDING +A ll •, PERMIT,NOT REWIRED FOR / '.S'B7'�o71T RIME NT.r GENERAL SITE GRADING577 wAu nr.r % BR LAI 4. IS 78'teAClj� ;�p; Lg st � o� q' • •,/ � I Yea I R — -- -- -- -- --YS ,`'�7f+'k\�•;:<:� ' /�� n M a8a gg8 U iv l.- f '•-.. FIE"T ACCESS - - / :7/ v j,'. -� •..•_••.'`� \',�,;.`• -GVIK w.NI xr-R wAL Nr-La / rR,/121I1-so-oDop[ ror whew N•ru.Innv a /t . q5_ HUUeVG m'wRFA S<I VFSE 50-OmOp 'sMoLAOE roRx m U / •/ T•AOM no•I or rrxr..son B. TMo',Aame t eoe•n M PA Av.'FEA 1pRYALr oY REStAUN1UL a K (RP x 1lAAv J, W I fA Ra v'p/RI r«oe•e F VdOm•.•I%1.v C 9.uO 1(4rA p'MAAFA•er gL LIwRII rNb tABIL -rcntT / �r, vG.2o. rLXETrtw uc aAa , /, � � �• .«oro.or brow,co..nlx wA'rinUlm. y�3['R/� PwOCdDUR6 t EVUP10'M' STANDARD CIVIL LEGEND KAUEGER WEST SR-3 COMMERCIAL PARCEL '". s X "al PROJECT DATA S=BENCN Y slme�a nw wwa•.Im FOPcm r Fold slol:o, , 8 E)aSDNG S ERQEffi 'Il u DESQtlPna ASSESSORS KCOIIM M.: 12332 50 ODDDe � e P c �9,..°' � 1-�L.U2-i10�"oPa 1.mN.num,toneu�e,u.of.•Ilw rra -�tt GORIER EA...6162 NGST L919 e • SURSET CCARiCt PoRY ONX-: LEE L BETTY AU— d • SUB", -U' 'M LESS MXI 11111 E.ST. .106 0 e SIORY GYCX EN(71PE 1.2) BE.I..RR 9852E A E S _e CALF .A 1VET APILIf.VR: pIO�BOML5IB CONSULTANTS F '• C ' $AVIARY YAwVAE BELFAIP,NA 98518 c v --our Y • FRE I SEX-I1Dw plECrax CCNPRENEMSIVE Pw; BELFATR URBAN AS. i FIRE %RT GRAPHIC SCALE T Y .AI-VALVE t BW PRO][CT TYPE: GRAD-A DRAINAGE MR FUTURE COINERCIAL IS'RLOPX-T BE • RAY-YFY[P B lar TOTAL AcP : 1.1/KRFS t RELL O O UTUT,POLE DEVELOPMENT ACREAGE: IA3 KRLs t ROLE AAXOtlR BJFEER T-$: 156E SITE ILAR-tEI (M TET 1 �• -i( STREET UOIY/YEIAL POIF FROPoSED LAND USE -CATE 7 IV IEOMER-TYPE 1) I wX b M1 D--T1 STREET UCI/KOp M Opxp[rE P¢E - • E =R P-E5 Al SE[BUFFER YARD TABLE Etl p 1UU,, Y-( IVOLwTED) PANNING: IEEE SITE PI NOTBEI mm Yln-7( MNER) OIFTCE CIA NT EF 0 11150 -27 STALLSALLEPIONE`LEE i awi O �7VHDESrALL APART E 5 UNITS 0 2 Ek III STAL. - -IT STALLS N 11 m O � YAlBO,R 11 RARAIND STALL T SIMIW _ y mu:u 0 b I \ PA1fY-T.-INGS < aP-pTANACE ilUtt LWE•a uTI„rlc u U BELFfP RATES DST0.1CT 11 SEEttRN A SEP IC fFXfE-X000 FIRE USNESTCW i ROOQPT.ALL FIPC IRE-CONRY OISTPICT/} YI --�-�- ��� FAAMPAII ............ .. PAAEIEXL FINE ___ �.,U`E BUFFER YARD TABLE: —E-—U USE-urcDRr n I ,7Rc rrPE a �j PLPN 1 R-IDD------ ' �9'CF�_ O1PdwG BUFFLP ETO. -OFOSEO UXDER- ...:�_.•.5$?4C?......... �'2�-- NNiQA-PRIMARY AO.IACEXT ADJ.PROP.AD,1.PWP.YARD BUFFER BUFFER CANOPY STORY VNIERYF➢41F -IRTI USE USE-BE TYPE UUTX XI DTX _I. 'RIES 'RC- BBRUBS RI ER v A ..._.._.:..........._,...... 0-RESSMM COxrpw 01 © Q BLYLYIG -TN CM."KART I' B 10' 10.0' RERS 1 1 3 0 <1 A¢ILKY PAVEMENT EAST C01lERCIK IV a 10' I.5' - 1 1 3 0 u 2 FI _ SWTX SESIOE-I- III C 15' 1.1. 1e1 2 1 L 0 GR '1'-'' O4YF15UIIFAq ESTRGRICULTUK I D }0' N/A' KNE W. W. N/A NA QMOTES: FOKA[lE ''� (b)501 BUFFER XIUTM KOUCTIpI PROPoSEO,6'STOCILAUL I RE RCUIREDBUFFER -PREPERY LINE. E Ibl TxEPE Nr LL BE x0 vOPlt XITx2N l00'01 xEST PPOPERn LIRE.K BU n%a pUE,LRI-URE Uld FFER WARRANTED. __ 4 UI[ ; PRLP-n Ix(wlArtNl/PROEcr) SITE PLAN ARE PR ------ -- AS B.I.E.-wAr ur THESE BANS ARE FRONDED FOR 11E 17VADWC,STORY RUNOFF CONTROLS,h EROSION CONTROLS -___/• EASEMENTI T-Ir-ur F012 THE SITE. FUTURE BUILDINGS,PARKING AREAS,A BUFFER YARDS ARE SHOT«FOR INFORMATION V. BIAwYBT ONLY TO ASSURE GRADING CAN SUPPORT FUTURE DEVELOPMENT. FINAL DE+ELOPIIENT OF THE STE SOE—.A—Rn VILL REWIRE A BULEAC PERMIT AND OTHER POSSIBLE PONITS Z 0 DA M Q 3 "RE- mE-DErmuous e 8 mEE a sRLe.uMDscAPnc "/° TPFFIYE UTILITY ABREVIATiONS BE Br BUUP A L P1�IpIE j W °Y OC IA ALPL-i AnL GAS !n OV4RNEA)PLVEF Y Dr 5 'AW1Rd-YAK TELLnwnE T SERER IRE$ 0 1] 51 Sip}«SCNER /� 1 wATEA a.,r..4,.a ^-I SECTION 32, T 23 N, R 1 W, W.M. GRAPFOC SCALE e Infer) �2WV y, v. N, v. ;` - E•E1,IEMOTAC7 ^ :• ''; :?� ;�: ,f; _....... - �'�•7 y W W ••ti2110 EL N S� 4 W W i i /\ . _ +n--�116 Ir vER/r—n' —• L // W �m n ' r• N. i ,I. / 10C LwnEr I - ///%M� '/� '•, Y In J� 4 m E 125• k 0 Y dIN �-'AP � � ' o/ W Nr i i 62L GB .FE 1.RA0+� ON. // L) pI. •AYCIIY MIW AND ROW lF O��— — n--n— n-- _ o/ / K S fu y �E RIY 91 ) +'IJT.E9 l 6 — ——n——n O / % ] I l.f.J7. (E S •6i n N. i i i i ti too LF dIJSIY•1!E SF I /E;320 WJ II GB R rlr+E I // W/IN 92E0 TEE /e ♦$�Il JR� 52.25 PINED CRA tf I / Ey 9tl, SErARnv FENCE n I W.��.o c / z IF IF CLEARING IS LMN Eic 91}AIF ' 7// YY� /�/A`.•,�'�i `\�`�' 1•/6 1.20 ACRES pp ,�. LE.}�R�� ♦� $q O r YI' T• \\a LE IQ I7 R j/ / �: �n,,A •----� 125• It 100 f 1Y•MAINT ACCESSit rwi;,i 76 O M. ENO EX CHAIN /i LINA"FENCf GENERAL NOTE: STORK NOTES 1.ALL Ca451Rucn�N-"ALL K IN ACCOROANGE 1NM ME 1.THE NFEaAnON POn 9FALL Y IE➢T OFF-LINE ONTE - - _- SEE HOR] Ym,FFRIIUZFR.Y..U. LATEST 111"M 1NE"SlONGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF ME p1aEEF In19 FULLY S"ADWLED:rD YnRPII 'O00 b TRANSPCRTAIION STANOARO SPEanuno4s FOR.DAD, BRIDGE.AND MUNICIPAL CONSTRUCTION(NSDOT).AMC THESE $LAAON rMW MEPOn. CND� w O PUNS I ME WfAOAlIOx POND IS XSOED TO PDRERM N NAIA O AY (IT)AARE/.wARSL suo(wI SA.& IF ,.py 'O•t`¢ �.N. z 2.ME LOCATION Of UNDEMAWNO UTEInES s"G.N IS BASED THEY-OR TYPES ARE.11..IN ME PNO U 1 � G•F�t��. a,.A. >- M ABOVE GROUND FEATURES FOUND N NE fIFiD.AND AS SNOW ON ME RANI IT YLL REONIRE MAT ME RHFERNMATOl coMPEED MON RECORD DRAYNGS. ME Poo IE R--NTo AN AREA rM wIT SOL& N•off? PER PLW - b b € PR I10R for cpW NE ONG NCININ NNdaNE E NUMBER FpRAIIWs OR AT TIE STORY snhM BE RE-O9GxEO. pa�� �2J!1 I ME ROrtOY CA055 SL OF IN K ILNL ME BOTTOM o b� A �P�6). YDM a"A"Is sINIW d ME—I u"nutt Lac•na"s IS:I-Boo-A2.-ssss. >�nENRLMAnd Pan DE.1 IS BASED d TIE �" _ �.ME BO THAT s—ENAUL BE INLD YM A—o.Ndts d w.d Dcis N I EXAll—E —AREAS AU.NTUNE OT IE "' - E'LEARING&EROGON CONTROL NOTES RE-OSION OF ME—A—_mNO.(OMAMI,• ].NE SAME Tv1Au B[YEDED.FERIuaD.AND YLEom AcmmN4 TO ME aENpNc uYIM s"Au RE. aAU Y)I'ST Ys . -e'OYRRT vAus — a PROPERTI'UNE AYRAMW ARG 0 AOE(ON-M) J� TK IOU.— PRrMR.fE C SOUTH: OMRTY UNE 1IR NEA 010 ALRE(d-m) PROMDE NLL M.OF I! �.`: ; TALL FFSaC(HlA NIAGER.OFAW) NEOHTM PRE ON PLAN MEFESS/EGRESS AREA 2Di PEIRRRH RYE W oPERtt YME OTH BA9rI AIRA l.»AOE(foi.Wda1MDM-1 Los WITS aD.0 ; Y.THE FOLLOWNG EROSION CONTROL FEATURES ARE TILE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE �P,wN APPIICAIId RAM(PER 1000 Sf.) 666 -Ri SEED MROUGN OCTOBER]I. COMSMUCFCN OUTSIDE OF TWS ] _Rum(lo-2o-ml J O U REWIRED FOR COMSMUCnON TROY APNL]aM GRADWG NOTES (Nor ro scuEl LL 4 ig TINE MANE MAY REWIRE ADOTIONAL YEASYNKS. I.PROECI ORAONG CONTOURS E SPOT E ATIOIS SNOYI ARE FRNS1 GRAM[(FC) b YES HOOD PIBFA YNAfN R I(]CdsrRuctld EN_ z"FROIA N fAYEMfNT AREAS swLRAtt I-)IS 0.5'aLa.a.sED dA¢ R.ME CdIMC1O1 MAY BE REGIME➢To PROAOE TIE LYNrc wSPECTON � 2� € 2 APWOWAh GADRI41LAxnrES r� rTN DOCUYE"r•rld FOR TIE SEm NEXTUE USED Q alAllpfl P EEA dl- .—C S S[RRn O TK—SEAAD BE PEIEORYEO SETYEEN MARC"I-MAY g PI ELL.R,9pp CI(LEI N-PIAtE EJPNE(D BT 21i) 15 ON Nlal-i 13-OCl(IBfR 1 A60RON4 10 WSD01 11AR0ARD d O tEYPdKi IE1NL GRADE TO GPONAFYIS Mroh-A-Cr --'",_'... RE YES"SUPPORT N- YECIREA110NS YEN ME EYCFPTION MAT SEEDING MAY BE PERFORl. —FERE EN FUAa c;lMNAET NO FDA,TYPICAL S Ac%xii S FENCE POR SILT PRON YAY 16-AUOISI 1+E RNRand 1S PROMOED. O ].PROPO-m fIPONT TO BC{RON PAN4-ON 1K CASs MOF O SR-Y L�yE Q IT SN I K STA O UN Fa!uF WARRO ALLI ROW 12112-SO-00002 FILTER FABRICS NAY BE 04RTED W RY IT 91ALL BE STABIBED YM.'-E O aIARRY SP41I C D[PM. 12112-50-00012 Y TER FABRIC FE"CE IS AOIIGENT SDOEI) Of RE SYAIE W1 S—FREE A MON0E0 MA1 ME SPo MEEK �J Q. TO PROP.LNE MC YID N NE SROf1aROSE u-hD ARE AT M E TIE 500 IS DER Q RED,iORI}E AXD YUd All HARE SOLI PM h4PdNa 5®Yi iE"I'H ON VEGET•TION 2 � A'"� SEIDEO RAN111G 11IE APRIOPNAh SEED rxRME AT ME NIXI AVKABIf Q GENERAL SOIL NOTES RETAINING WALL NOTES I.PA4NG SHAM NOT C UNEE TIE BR OMATI N sNA.B locmu a Q _ nE SEED NAS—TED NW PRODUOD AT.AST 1 NOES O dD+/IX Z Z ME PIT—.RALLS Onw ON MEET C-1 ARE""A"IN DE iWH 9h OtER m OF ME SRHE SUEACE. 1.TIC YAritltt O ME—IS—SED O ET[IETT OIAMDLT DEVELOPUENT,ANO 00 NOT NEW r0 RE EONSM M a NE STE ORAOME 12- "- Q Q SNNY Lau(ON OR SP). E—AO A. BURR BOTTOM OF FILTER F,..N 'Z DETAIL (� MATERIAL IN 8-.12- 1 ONE sLL LOG_PEmnRYm FON n9S PRIME TNENc"12-NRO BIOSWALE 90E U./It(NO"'E"TABEL FaMD) THE'MAT""' a• N. N.T.S. EL.1-IL 33 "'1 .01 EL 2N]-D_210"".I-AND(L) STNHWOO BETTEl1A OR ¢¢ El_25O-a aO SAND•aAVFLL DGr/ol SEPIPOPARY SEED NI%: o N EOUNALENT•i 6'-0 O.C. Z FL 238-a 1E0 SAND•gAYF1 GR'/a1 PPOPoRTION PEPCEIrt PGCENT Q, 1 .011 FOUND 9REAR NATERIAl1 AS ME 10 SOE LOGS "" RT NEIGNT PUR[rt GEIMINATTON SILTATION FENCE f t on: NY-IYAhD FON ME SEP.OESIOl Br AMERICAN fN4M.lY1G L7lIW.07/b7/PI R[TrcaP A..1NRI ]0Y 9]I 90\ (NOT TO SCALE) ' Q Lj RETENnaN E VMWE y ELEL`ATia SXI AS ANNUAL REE M—N.rvllf—I 40% 981 906 YYIROUII _ y I 25 �O RC SdO0p1� CHEWINGCOE FES Ihuu.t lobe cOONutf j P0Y 11, 90% 40 26 651 CFF 661 Cr RJ+xawvn.MU-1 4RYRN,,or Ro4tl loxu � 22 1.9J6 CCtF 1,959 CF Win DUTCH—ITtlf911m1 la 91, .1 EMPIRES 0>t]0 Y 2R J,9J0 1,9 Cr 29 6,616 CF 6,110 CF �•-Wu'>•' —2 KRUEGER WEST SR-3 COMMERCIAL PARCEL SEPA CHECKLIST December 9, 2002 MASON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING t 1 A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable. KRUEGER WEST SR-3 COMMERCIAL PARCEL 2. Name of applicant: RICK KRUEGER 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: APPLICANT: OWNER: AGENT: RICK KRUEGER LES & BETTY KRUEGER MICHAEL F. WNEK, P.E. P.O. BOX 548 14241 E. ST HWY 106 CONSULTING CIVIL ENG. BELFAIR, WA 98528 BELFAIR, WA 98528 1665 NW SHERWOOD DR 360-731-8013 BREMERTON, WA 98311 360-692-3802 4. Date checklist prepared: 12-09-02 5. Agency requesting checklist: MASON COUNTY 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): 2003 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. NO Environmental (SEPA) Checklist Page 3 of 15 EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. None 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. None 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Grading and Building Permits 11. Give brief,complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description). This is a 1.75 acre commercial site. 12_ Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map,if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. Tax Lot# 12332-50-00008 The Lot is Directly to the West of Romance Hill Road on SR3. Legal The North half of tract 4, Sam B Theler's Home and Gardin tracts,as per plat recorded in volume 4, Page 20, records of Mason County Washington I Environmental (SEPA)Checklist Page 4 of 15 EVALUATION FOR B. Environemental Elements AGENCY USE ONLY 1. Earth a. General description of the site (check one): [l flat Q✓ rolling ❑hilly steep slopes 0 mountainous ❑other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 30% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Clay, Sand, and Gravel. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. The site is to be leveled off in the front for more desirable access. Approximately 3000 cy of fill will be used. The fill will be of similes type and will be imported for accross the road. within 1000'. f. Gould erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? 1f so, generally describe. No. All silt and erosion control measures will be adhered to. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or building)? 60% h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Silt fencing and landscaping Environmental (SEPA) Checklist Page 5 of 15 EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke)during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. None b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any. None 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Yes, the western end of the parcel has been classified as a wetland. See "Wetland Evaluation" by Forestech, LLC; attached. There will be no construction within 50' of the wetland boundary. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) of the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. None 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None Environmental (SEPA) Checklist Page 6 of 15 EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. None 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. None 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. None b. Ground 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Yes, storm runoff will be infiltrated. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. Domestic Sewage Storm Runoff i Environmental (SEPA) Checklist Page 7 of 15 EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY c. Water Runoff(including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff(including storm water)and method of collection and disposal, if any(include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so,describe. Storm Runoff flows to Infiltration Pond 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. Yes, Debris, sediments,and oil drippings from parking area. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Ronoff quantity controls: Infiltration Pond Runoff quality controls: Biofiltration Swale 4. Plants a. Check types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous trees: ❑✓ alder maple ❑aspen ❑other evergreen trees: M fir 0 cedar ❑pine n other Oshrubs pgrass ❑pasture ❑crop or grain wet soil plants: ❑cattail ❑buttercup ❑bullrush ❑skunk cabbage ❑other water plants: ❑water lily ❑eelgrass ❑milfoil ❑other other types of vegetation: Environmental (SEPA) Checklist Page 8 of 15 EVALUATION FOR b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? AGENCY USE ONLY 0.7 acres of grass will be filled over. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any. The western most portion of the lot will have as many remaning trees as possible left in place. 5. Animals a. Check box for any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: Mhawk ❑heron E✓ eagle Osongbirds other Mammals: M✓ deer El bear ❑elk Q beaver ❑other Fish: ❑bass Fisaimon ❑trout ❑shellfish ❑herring 0 other b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Not Sure. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any. None Environmental (SEPA) Checklist Page 9 of 15 6. Energyand Natural Resources EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY a. What kinds of energy(electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar)will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electric and Natural gas for heating. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any. Energy effecent materials will be used in the construction of the building. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? if so, describe. None 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None Environmental (SEPA)Checklist Page 10 of 15 b. Noise EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may effect your project(for example: traffic,equipment,operation,other)? None 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic,construction,operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. None 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any- None 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Undeveloped b. Has the site been used for agriculture? if so, describe. No c. Describe any structures on the site. None d. Will any structures be demolished? 1f so,what? None Environmental (SEPA) Checklist Page 11 of 15 e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY Commercial f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Commercial g. if applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive"area? If so, specify. No i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? to j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts,if any: None 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Project is compatible with Projected Land use Plans. Environmental (SEPA)Checklist Page 12 of 15 EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None b. Approximately how many units,if any,would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle,or low-income housing. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts,if any: None 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas;what is the principal exterior building materials) proposed? 33 ft b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: None Environmental (SEPA) Checklist Page 13 of 15 EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? None b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? None c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: None 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? None b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None Environmental (SEPA) Checklist Page 14 of 15 EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. . None b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. State Route 3 b. Is site currently served by public transit? If no, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Not Sure c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? 43 New 0 Eliminated d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). None Environmental (SEPA) Checklist Page 15 of 15 EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. General Office Building 710 4,045 sf 112 trips per day -Apartments 220 5 units 35 trips per day Total = 147 trips per day g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: None 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None 16. Utilities Check utilities currently available at the site: _✓ electricity =natural gas [7water P-1 refuse service [,telephone =sanitary sewer F-I septic system Mother C. Signature The above answer are a and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that i le gency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: G L_ F, WhIE):/— Date Submitted: 1 Z,-09 -200 Z ,� •'.: • f i ,6, ,; c: .� �. ... '. S. I_ :,,, — . . =� ._, , . _ ' - _ _ ;�' _ •� .�i '� - . . z: 4 �. • Ei: T .. �.. rof _ .rt ... ... n. -•"� 1i � �. ,.� T 23 N, R 1 W, W.M. NORTH o oe c 19 20 LL, 21 0 AND H'4 i q _ SAND HILL a 1 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL d r Gy j OO 00 30 29 28 Z 0- 0 < N R SP e U T ROJECT OCA110N e ` 31 ,.c��``''` 32 33 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ::...........CANAL .................. VICINITY MAP LEGAL DESCRIPTION SCAU: 1' = 3000' Tax #12332-50-00008 The North half of Tract 4, Sam B. Theler's Home & Garden Tracts, as per plat recorded in Volume 4 of Plats, Page 20, records of Mason County, Washington. GRAPHIC SCALE SECTION 32, T 23 N, R 1 W, W.M. APPROXIMATE RE7LAND BOUNDARY PER FOR£S1ECH ILC. 12119102 "R"IF W ` PROPOSED FIRE 4 .ff r Cw7 m��., HYDRANT 6'EMERGENCY °°O°': ) PP i � ... i/ �AID / 4"' A, 0: �3 OUELEE ) EL 18.0 L.E. Ja0 RIP-RAPA TO TIC; I ti, la .I-n—_n FNNRA o/ s+�T I n DTD!AS Lf rat. —••_ / I . J). (E $1 `�r •' y y W W w LF J• 81 /.E.'.JZO p JN C.B.312 E9K w/ my TEE' / RLM 16 % 2 t cB q/ FE..9.IJ(Naw) /•!°// / /i %I A �R _ VANED GRAM - ( C CEEARiNG GIN/15 3` I RIW 49.0 d a •' / 4 p I.JJ ACRES 2 x� LE 113 W W!y ffnnJ END Q°S.(E 18 Ni ` RMF.1.9 r. y y f7LYE'FBRiC FENCE 42.48 / j �• I I I y �, W W W w W . ' 12•M NT A ESS A/ RIM:3116 /� / rE W. �E O mu ENO ER CHAIN LINK FENCE GENERAL NOTES: STORM NOTES: --- - SEE NOR 2 SHE.FERTILIZER,a MLER 1.ALL CONSTRUCITON SMALL E IN ACCOROANCE MM ME I.RIE ME RA—POD 91ALL RE—I OF--UNRL .o LArzST EDITION OE ME RASNNGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF IIE PRO,ECT SIR IS IDLY STMIIURD M NDRZE r`•' c_i TIEN15PORTATION STWOMID SPECIFICATIONS FOR ADAO. SETATId MMN T1E"RO. NOGE.AND NUNICIPAL CONSTRUCTION(rSDOT);AND THESE PLANS. Z.nE INRMAIWx POrD(S EROIFD ro PRE(1RY N �9f.0 'g NAME R.-(U'+)AN).COARSF SAKE(SP)SORS 2.ME LOCATIO9 OF UNDERGROUND URLMES SHORN IS RASED M(SE YJIL TYPE$AE NOT rWNO N RE POD UYWT f�,�j°�' ! (}A I ON ABOVE WOUND FEATURES FWND IN ME FIELD,AND AS 5>IOM d 111E RAILS Il RL IIEWRE MAT Mf ,<.°p RF o INFORMATION CORJFILEO FROM KL RAMNGS. THE POD EE—FED ALTO AR AEA rIT11 SOIAOE SDRS `tl' �f y 1,"NE ODIIOI CROSS SL Of 31 9WL BE LzmL TIE BOrTOI COIMACTW SHALL N RIFY UNOERW LNO UTILITY LMARONS OR MAT TIE STOAT VISION RE LIE-DESE-D. OF SINE rs 41I.ON THE BINS. PR MIR TO COMMENCING YIORR. THE PHONE NUMBER FM p�I' NTLITY LOCATIONS IS:1-000-424-5555. 1 FIE AFATRATWM POD CESgI 6 BASES ON RE AC[ 6 FOLLOENG SU-N ARY NFARE O OPMIRT 12"ANAL. - T.RE BIOr1lOAlId SNNE RILL TIE MM A MNYUM OF A—ES - OF TYPE'A'iOPSR ODNG TO,—11 SfAMDMD—TON' CLEARING kEROSION CONTROL NOTES: �'M NOT EXCEED MESE AREAS RILL x"F EOIRIE A _ _ W E-cc"ORE SIORM RINRF CONTRA(WART"'a -e'OW.SPALLs >ME SHALE 91ALI E sf[DED.FERTua".ATD MUDEp AccDAdNc ra lE ESEEI,NO. G 0.iNE CLEARNc UMIrs SHALL BE: WAUM SISIEMS. MNR' SEID IAx1LE: Y It EAST:PROPERTY LINE IYPRNOIS AREA On ARE IDX TALL I LI((ALTA WTMER,MAW) PROPERTY �p SO, LINE PERMW AE S A ISO AOIE(d_M) PROADE FULL rIDM ON 20R PERENNIAL RYC �(L NEST:SNO—ON RAN LAN—/EGRESS AREA 1.MRrz A— NRM.PROMRtt LONE IOrAL BASH Awl. 1.25 AOE(ROE RERNOIS) IPRIC+IXN RATE(PER 1000.1.) CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE FM« 516E SEER a.ME F0.LOMNNG EROwON CONTROL FEATURES ARE 111E GRAINING NOTES ux I_%TON o-2o-m) J MINIMUM REOLAED FR CONSTRUCTION FROM APNIL WTH NO i0 SCALE) SO�.NCYW IAACN MRWW OCTORER Jt, WNE—FON OUTSIDE R MIS I.PROECI BARD ORroINS R SPOT DEYA—S 9gM1 AR DNd RAE(IG) `LR TINE FRAME MAY RROLNRE ADOTIONAL MEASURES EIEYATON, M PAVEMdf AREAS M.-(SG)IS D.5'BELON INIVHm BADE r-�I ARE CRiPIGTOR Nv E RFORED IO PPOAE ME CWxTY Ix9PECiR I CORTMJCMI dOAx¢ E ArvRmMAArz OF—OI.wTIES MM OOOIIENITAIId FR ME SEED YIXRKE 115E0. RS O S SfEOPIG O FINE SYAIt N. E AEwRMEO IETREEN MARCH I-MAY Q SETATRN FENCE WT. I.000(Y __-.._.._._... FLL.A.AR,(Y NET N-FLAK WAMILD RY 2W IS R AUTOR 1R-DINE EXI t IN T, C 10 rS00i SIAMOMD n ( SECM1IGIXM MM rAIE fXOPRd THAT SEEING MAY RE RRFRNIO O 1EIPOIARY ERR.RIDE TO GIdRASINS EPoRF-lAOO CY NONE..IN SUPPWL "' �, •/1 FROM YAY ION-AUGUVT IA K IRMGARd IS FRONDED. (j 0 Q RTR E+RRIC iE910E MET RANKER,iYPEAL 5 UlODASNS a PROPO4D..RF TOE RM PARCELS d THE EAST SEE O SIN-S: FENCE ITT, FAORRRSCSr Y RE OUInED w ";NMM' G/ N.N,,,,.,I e.VIRRIG Or THE$1NE Ml E N1ORD AROWED MAI 111E sR IEErs J 4 m cOFEMM OF RAND fR NNIDINICF Aoc SS ROOD 12J11-So-00002 FENCAERWS IDJACENT M SEED MlllllE SPEOFICAl10Ns LISTED AROVE.R IF M SR 5 TIER © 1--•L--12 Y I R FABRIC r OR LNE rrNLYNt SETTEE wM THE APFlIR9ATE SEED LERTIOE M ME NEAT AVARAlf LIJ Q IT SHALL E STABuaD MM A'-R'O WARNY SOAUS,6'EPM. MATERIAL I IEGETATDN 2 , C7 Q Q SEED.FERTILIZE.AW MEd All BAE SOLS RR TENCORNNY SEED MX ; RIMING lIL1E Q�.U A T PAEED HALL Nor ATR dlE OE OODL1REAST SrAIE rs F OOm R RUNNING WALL NOTES MASHED s < trl _.._-- s N� �NDA mWIXTD AT ItAsr 2 NOES OF RowIN ZQ(D GENERAL SOIL N07ES T E RET—ruts sN"M R E NCET C-T AE N¢ N RE RIM SIR aocx 12' I} 1.11E MAARITY O RE 9rz IS CO -R EXfEETT RAVELLT OFAfl(PYENi,AND W NOT NEED TO E(WSTRIWIM WRING TIE SITE RAONG F i DETAIL OU sAxDY LONA(W R En a RANAIE PNAE RAN, �¢Rana a.IiR" Z BIOSWALE11 z ONE SOL LOG rOEONEo FOR MS cL AATNNE HAT;KO MN. N.I.s. O m LOGE,DD.ATw IAEL ra,ro) (-N LL TIO-a MA TR9OL 2'.2'WOW POSTS. CL w-R]SO LOAMY SAND(9A) YEMPDPARY SEED MI:(: SF NXI`RO-Rf1TEN/OR Z O EL ESO-TT 23 8 SAND a RAYFL((GAL/W EWNALENT AT"'-0 O.C. EL 23.8-a nO SAxO a RAVEL(GY/W� PR PORTION PERCENT PEEENT Q will J 4/IN FEUD SIME.ER MAIERMS L LIE 10 SOON LOOS ewE BI E[Ri NPIT2 4(w(INN}IR SILTATION FENCE (NOT TO SCALE) �y NVfSTWAIm FOR M SEPT",ESId BY ANNRTAN ENOEf]xNG CDR.0]RR/M PEDTOP IAgtortla albel IDS 929 RETFNRON POND VOLUMES ANN"AE RYE(.kl-xultEoruM 40% 9a, SIDS EaxTnuM 1R-aD m , ELE"A1IOR NLNINUN AS -- ONaL W REW IPEO STIR" CNERIM PCRCUE JRRtoca IRb,.c—ta ll /01 91% R01 SC 2S O Cf O CP IJaAlrtoxn, VAa"m, RR4t1 26 :V CF 1, t ARM." SIB 0 21 9,9B1 CP B.111 C oP B14 CP MITE OTTH CLOVER(TFifoli.) 101 9a1 90A e.m C—Z SECTION 32, T 23 N, R 1 W. W.M. / /,� ;,•/ aN.rN.. Iw1_so-waw ROCKERY RETAINING WALLS vrA AT AURA.S A- cOHMEAUAL lv"u"p REOUIRED FOR BUILDING PERMIT,NOT REOUIRED FOR • =Se7w0'IIt nAU Nr-a GENERAL SITE GRADING .N. . 3` „7.9J' % Z� M^y / 79 I •c y /'/ i/ d Y Y of IY- W N a F - ` ` • N8710Y1-W A!:/ •/�/// l 'N �� � tECAL DmICRrPTlaN N� STORM CONTROL POND SIZED FOR sp0.19' rEvt Hr.a' •` `, mN/ravl-so-000ne a1Au Nr-,v �,Ls" FIRST STAGE OF PROPOSED FUTURE vm-so-000a! ( ✓':'/ < ��''' .• _ m.No.rn nnP of v«e..som e.m.r«,Nam.s en.wn REGIONAL STORM TREATMENT SYSTEM IIEESopIMt an AC 'sr.ERAOE JO1Ei:xa0 w ry FR.cNN,n //1/I-l�: ��`+< Wnr<«waw n vwm9.9r PrPr9.r+ny.ao. 52 BUFFER No BaE tom'[ntt ,^; / iat,l•1, " Marl,n/N9,an Cava%Nb,:nM9ran. PANNUOUR6&EQIA17 MT fi ST6.NDARD CIVIL LEGEND KRUEGER WEST SR-3 COMMMERCIAL PARCEL 0, ,,,, ./,n ards,aa. ada.« a PROJECT DATA slrs N�cx \ Y«,. I,,,,,ry a„e,,NF,aaN.,rwle-1,.,,.r A,-,A:: 9 Ems= m5w-ll ARSEBSOR!ACCWxT ro.: lxl3x 50 0o00t - O[of-X G W-1]P-09a PROPERTY CORNER DARNER; L[9 L BLTiT RRVEGER EHr.-BI61 NGro r919 R[Y OL ROL PONT AE S g 6 SURREY I.T.B CASE HELP C.ST.NNW.lO6 C e STORY CAT'S'.(TSPE 1 1) BCLFAIR.YA 98518 ® 'TERM AREA GREY APPLFCA,R: RICR iOIUEGER CONSULTANTS VERT P.O.SEE 54B SANITARY YAIIMOIF BELFAIR,NA 9852B ca .ANYT SEVER 1.B.1— COIIPRENENSIVE PLAN: BELFAIR URBAR AREAFAINE GRAPHIC SCALE " Y rATCRR yALYEr.BUX PROJECT TYPE: GPAOING L..".GE FOR FUTURE CBAMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT IS B YEF METER I BON TOTAL ACREAGE: 1.Ta AGREE B Q • rfl1 —INSERT ACREAGE: 1.33 ACRES f IN UTILITY RODE AACHHUU, BUFFER TAROS:(SEE SITE PLAN NOTES) 1- I-I0 P. ~ D--0. S 6/,& ROLE P'0(E PROPoSED LAX.USE -CRTEGORI IV(CpaERC2AL TTPE 11 "^ AL SEE BUFFER TARO TABLE <� PPER VALLL iRANSFORu(R(POLE YOLOTED) PAPPING: IEEE SITE PLAN NOTE O m "UTY—,(OAR-POKER) OFFICE a,0A5 SF !11150 2T STALLS m 1FIEAgNE PEDCSTY APARTMENTS 5 UNITS!1 G -10 STALLS 8 5 E N PEpESiLL TOTAL.31 STALLS 3 B g GAS Y(IFA PAPIQNO STALL SNUB) W GAS VALRE FRONT: ,i q a sA AABO. o roTAL: 3 - m PAV 1 uARgNGS UTILITIES: k: q U� 3;1� OPEN ORAINAGE CHANNEL RATER BELFAIR WATER DISTRICT 11 LYY IA(E(•11 UTU,Y ASPHIA,YY15) SBNER tND1VIDIAL ON-SITE SEPTIC PENCE-MIE POKER RASBI COU T WD 13 _ _..-• -�- iDHE-11 NB .HE tUIREST fF11a-ROOD YALL E SON UOUNTR'DISTRACT.2 QaFjCpNQap1TN PO.D R G WARD YI GRA(YENT EDGE BI................... ................... AVR EDGE BUFFER YARD TABLE: Pxomsc0 L.wo USE-cnrEG.RT ry lEuerel P TYPE II MI mr ALR <__-__Pwnnxcs PER lDo•------> •YMIlr�IpN arT(x UN.EP- i Ij a BUFF STD. PROPoSED PRaARY 1—ADJ,PROP.A. PROP.EAR.ED BUFFER—PER CANOPY STOR2 CONTOUR-BTFRYEDIAIE PROPERTY USE USE CUSS TYPE 'YOUR MIDTN FENCING TREES TREES SHRUBS EVERGREEN . OEPRE331013 CULOLB j ' BEDR10 MORTAR C 2BI.VACANT 3V B 10 10.05'' XONE I : l W ■ EAU} I IV B ID' T, xaE 1 1 3 0 m ` C w BIFJTN MES RCS IR[DBR3AL til C IS' T,5' lel 2 H 6 0 _ €;ao -" R>IfM —,EL SURFACE MOST AGRCTLTURL 1 0 2U' N/A' NONE N/A NIA N/A N/A (1 q • 5+'.4.[hy NOTES: Q ^ x +©' WNCIETE 91GPAIIT lal 5oa NO PER PIT—RLBN:TION PROPDSED,6•STOCPUNE PENCE REQUIRED ON PRO LINE. S(CTp LYE IDI THERE WILL BE NO YORR WITHIN 100-OF WEST PROPERTY LINE,NO BUFFER NARAANFE. n/N g1AR,FiM SECIIOLA lRE �— nH yl(ImNM UNE a_TE PLAN NOTES: PROPdtt lIE(ADMC'ENL/PROECT) rani-ar-RA,ux( TE RA MS AMS ARE PIEOMOFD FOR THE GRADING.STORY RUIOFY CONTROLS.III EROSIN CONTROLS Start-OF-RAY FOR THE STE. FUTURE BUILDINGS,PARKING AREAS,k BUFFER YARDS ARE SIOMN FOR INFORMATION C — --- [[AYUOI MIN[ ONLY TO ASSURE GRADING CAN SUPPORT FUTURE DEVELOPMENT. FINK DEVELOPMENT OF THE SITE ANY ® R/I SEE CIPLOum(rtT WILL REQUIRE A BUILDING PERMIT AND OTHER POSSIBLE PERMITS �rl��r! :Myy/IBE DA,UY -9N' •A9/�' ,mF-eaesER J 6 CJ C:T TREE-EccE S d U OR SHRUB,LAN--U LA3 TREIUN[UTILITY ABREVIATIONS c"—PO'ER p PEE N«A �i ry a YNITURIAM R. CABUE 0.LHIRE.rtmHKv Ei,R.w sANYART OR sr w a s(Am PI�i rATm _. _ C-1 03-04-2003 08:12 FROM-RICK KRUEGER +360-275-0237 T-198 P 001/002 F-832 www,littleforest_ors; ForestechL.L.C. www.hazardtree_com 9857 Miami Beach Road NW, Seabecl, WA 98380 Phone/Fax: (360) 830-5564 Wetland Evaluation Parcel Number 123325000008 Located in the NW'/4 - NE 1A S 32-T 23N-R 01 W W.M. Mason County, Washington February 27, 2003 This report addresses the general extent and quality of wetlands on the above mentioned parcel of land located in Belfair, Mason County, Washington, further described as the North half of tract 4, Sam B. Theler's home and garden tracts, as per Plat recorded in Volume 4 of Plats, page 20, records of Mason County,Washington. The subject wetland meets the criteria for a Category I Wetland based upon the following. Mason County Resource Ordinance states that the Washington State Wetland Identification and Delineation Manual shall serve as the technical resource guide in determining if an area possesses hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils, and/or wetland hydrology. The Mason County Ordinance also lists `mature forested wetlands" as Category I Wetlands. The Washington State Department of Ecology's Manual also lists mature forested wetlands as Category I Wetlands and further describes such wetlands as consisting of 80 years old evergreen trees or 50 year old deciduous trees comprising 50% of the upper forest canopy. A visit was made on December 19, 2002_ The intent of the evaluation was to identify or confirm if any wetlands existed on the parcel. Wetland areas were identified using the criteria as per the Washington State Department of Ecology publication entitled Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual, March 1997. It was concluded that wetlands did exist along the Western edge of the property_ A second visit was made on February 25, 2003 to determine the extent and the category of the existing wetland. The category was determined using the guidelines established in State of Washington Department of Ecology's Washington State Wetlands Rating Systems, Western Washington_ August 1993. The wetlands meet the criteria for a category I wetland, based on it's qualifications as a`mature forested wetland". The immediate area is forested with western red cedar (T. plicata), bigleaf maple (A. macrophyllum) and red alder (A. rubra). The understory is occupied by salmonberry (R. 03-04-2003 08:12 FROM-RICK KRUEGER +360-275-0237 T-198 P.002/002 F-832 spectabilis), buttercup (Ranunculus spp), skunk cabbage (L. amencanum), wild ginger (A. hookeri) and sedge (Carex L.). The upper forest canopy consists of 80% mature hardwoods (Red Alder and Big leaf Maple) and 20%mature conifer(Western Red Cedar and Western Hemlock)_ The topography slopes at about 15% from State Highway 3, the eastern extent of the property,to about 30 to 60 feet from the western extent of the property where the slope changes to about 5% and the soil changes from Upland to Wetland. There is some interspersion of the Everett soils and the Mukilteo peat where they intersect. This is affected by the character of the soils and the effects of the slopes. The wetland soil gradually changes from interspersion to Mukilteo peat off site. The U.S.D.A. Soil Conservation Service mapped the soils in 1951_ This parcel occurs in a transition between the Everett gravelly sandy loam and the Mukilteo peat soil series. The Mukilteo peat was confirmed as the soil delineation of wetland occurring along the western edge of the property. No on the ground mapping of the wetland area was done as this was beyond the scope of the intent of this evaluation. Blue flagging was used to identify the Eastern extent of the wetland as it relates to this property from the South property line to the North property line. The parcel of land and the relation to the wetland was delineated on State aerial photographs as well as on MRCS soil maps. Confirmation of the property lines as well as the field evaluation of soils, water and vegetation were done on site. Conclusion - About 90 percent of this parcel shows uplands conditions and does not show wetland conditions. The Western edge of the property enters a larger wetland system that extends off-site. The soil changes from Everett gravelly sandy loam to Mukilteo peat with interspersion occurring within 30 to 60 feet East of the West property line. This report reflects my best professional judgment regarding my observations of the soils, water and vegetation, and their application to the guidelines and manuals mentioned. Earl Kong r Wetland Specialist Forestech LLC 9857 Miami Beach Road NW. Seabeck,WA 98380 (360)830-5564 ww.littleforest.org Krueger West SR 3 Commercial Parcel Mitigation plan for impact on wetland vegetation area March 7, 2003 Parcel # 123325000008 Mason County, Washington Mason County Resource Ordinance 17.01.070 provides that Storm-water Management Facilities are a permitted use in a Wetland Vegetation area, provided that restoration, creation or enhancement of the wetlands and their vegetation areas occur, in order to offset any resulting impacts. Encroachment into the vegetation area shall be the minimum necessary and will be permitted only within the outer twenty five (25) feet. This plan proposes restoration and enhancement activities to offset any resulting impact resulting from an Infiltration pond and Bioswale, partly occurring within the outer twenty-five (25) feet of the wetland vegetation area, of the Category I wetland on the above mentioned parcel. The area of consideration is a 100 feet Wetland Vegetation Area, occupying about 0.32 acres. The topography departs the wetland in an easterly direction at a gradient of 15 percent slope for about ten feet then continues at a five percent gradient for the rest of the area under consideration. The site is sparsely vegetated in all layers with some exposed bare ground. Inventory of the over-story trees on the site comprises of big-leaf maple - eleven trees, western red cedar- eleven trees, and western hemlock— four trees. The twenty- six trees on the site equates to about 80 trees per acre. This is well below the amount of trees necessary for the site to be considered minimally stocked. Based on the soils and available moisture, the site should be stocked with at least 200 trees per acre. An additional 40 trees would be necessary to bring the 0.32 acres up to an acceptable stocking level. A few young trees (western red cedar and red alder) exist in the under- story. Ground species includes salmonberry, himalayan blackberry, trailing blackberry, stinging nettle, yellow violet, wild ginger, Bleeding heart, mullein and buttercup. The project site and immediate vicinity contains the following invasive species. English ivy, Scotch broom, holly and thistle. The soil occupying the site is the "Everett gravelly, sandy loam". This soil series consists of somewhat excessively drained, pale-brown gravelly soils. It developed in assorted glacial till and outwash material. The soil is droughty because the loose gravel and sandy subsoil offer little resistance to the downward movement of water. The capacity of the surface soil to hold available moisture is low. As a forest soil, its productivity is rated as Site Class 4. Douglas fir, which is used as the index for soil productivity should grow to between 80 and 90 feet tall in fifty years. (For site class 1, Douglas fir should grow to between 140 feet and 150 feet, and for site class 5 between 60 and 70 feet). The limiting factor for this soil its it's inability to hold water during the summer months. In summary, the site in its present state is less than desirable for a"Wetland Vegetation Area"protecting a"Category 1 Wetland". The exposed soil along with the availability of invasive species on and around the immediate area leaves the site open to invasion by the undesirable plants. Mass wasting is not a threat. The soil is somewhat unstable on steeper slopes, but because of the low gradient existing at this site,the chance of a mass wasting event is slim. Surface erosion could occur during a severe storm event such as "rain on snow"when surface-water runoff is high. Because of the low stocking, the trees occupying the site have developed large crowns,the amount of shade they are providing will effect any reforestation effort, as some trees need more light to grow properly. This site should be improved so as to 1, decrease surface erosion potential, 2, provide temperature stability and 3, improve the site for the support of wildlife by providing additional food and cover. Wildlife in the vicinity typifies those species native to Western Washington. Wildlife "species of concern" (monitored for survival or classed as sensitive, threatened or endangered) are found in the area, although not specifically found in this immediate vicinity, are the Great Blue Heron, Turkey Vulture, Osprey, Bald eagle, Pileated Woodpecker, Western Bluebird, Vaux's Swift and Pacific Water Shrew. No nest sites were found in the immediate vicinity of this Wetland Vegetation Area. The Wetland Vegetation Area can be improved by manipulating the site so as to create a desired future condition of a native forest with several layers. An over-story and an intermediate layer of native trees supported by an under-story of native brush species and herbaceous plants. This can be accomplished by: 1- Treat the invasive or undesirable species (blackberries, ivy, scotch broom, holly and thistle)by removing those existing on the site and reducing those occurring immediately off-site. 2- Interplant 40 to 60 shade tolerant conifer seedlings, four to six feet tall, among the existing trees on the site. The seedlings should be distributed so that the area is well covered with the combined existing trees and the planted stock. Suggested shade tolerant species are western red cedar, western hemlock, and grand fir. Along the edge of the site where light is available some Douglas fir should be planted for added diversity. 3- Plant various shrub species such as salal, huckleberries, Indian plum, rhododendron, ocean-spray and crab-apple. This planting should also be well distributed. 4- The existing herbaceous plants on the site represents herbs occurring in similar areas around the wetland in consideration. With care they will increase their coverage of the site in a short time. Additional plantings of sword fern should benefit the site by providing added surface erosion protection. 5- The site should be monitored annually for three to five years to ensure that the re- forestation effort is successful. The implementation of the above mentioned recommendations for improvements to the Wetland Vegetation Area should result in a forested area with a desired future condition That would 1, increase the protection and the integrity of the wetland of concern and 2, enhance wildlife by providing"cover", including hiding, resting and thermal. Planting a diverse list of brush species also provide food. The common practices used in forest management are primarily focused on soil fertility, species selection,manipulation of growing space and crop production and protection. Because of the sensitive nature of this Wetland Vegetation Area,this plan is focused primarily on species selection and the manipulation of growing space. The analysis, conclusions, and recommendations presented in this report are based on conditions observed in the field and my best professional judgment. Earl Kong March 11, 2003 Forester/Wetland specialist Forestech LLC Krueger West SR 3 Commercial parcel Mitigation plan for impact on wetland vegetation area Map locating existing trees 1 ' 1- N �_V - 40 , M LAG EN O a�� m �l OVER5TOR`l VEGUMTION © ,'� ► i + • i �' -W E5TERN RED CEDAR -WESTERN HEMLOCK BIGLEAF MAPLE . Forestech LLC Krueger West SR 3 Commercial parcel Mitigation plan for impact on wetland vegetation area Scientific name of plants mentioned in this report Trees Bigleaf maple—Acer macrophyllum Douglas fir—Pseudotsuga menziesii Grand fir—Abies grandis Red alder—Alnus rubra Western hemlock—Tsuga heterophylla Western red cedar—Thuja plicata shrubs Crab apple—Malus diversifolia Himalayan blackberry—Rubus discolor Huckleberry—Vaccinium ovatum Oceanspray— Holodiscus discolor Oregon grape—Mahonia nervosa Rhododendron—Rhododendron Macrophyllum Salal—Gaultheria shallon Salmonberry—Rubus spectabalis Scotch broom—Cytisus scoparius Trailing blackberry—Rubus ursinus herbs Bleeding heart—Dicentra Formosa Buttercup— Ranunculus repens Mullein—Verbascum thapsus Stinging nettle—Urtica dioica Thistle—Cirsium - arvense Wild ginger—Asarum caudatum Yellow violet—Viola sempervirens