Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDDR2014-00009 Hearing - DDR Letters / Memos - 6/10/2014 CASEINDEX Michael and Kathy Eacrett Event Venue Cottage Industry Special Use Permit DDR2014-000009 Exhibit# Date Description 1 June 10, 2014 Staff Report 2 May 28, 2014 Special Use Application 3 May 28, 2014 Supplemental Information and Responses 4 May 28, 2014 Vicinity and Layout Maps 5 Aril 21, 2014 Site Aerials with parcel numbers 6 May 28, 2014 Traffic and Parking Stud 7 May 28, 2014 Title Research on Easement 8 May 28, 2014 Letters of Support provided by Applicants 9 March to May 2014 Letters of Comment sent to Community Development 10 Aril 21, 2014 Notice of Application 11 Aril 29, 2014 Notice of Application Hearing Rescheduled 12 May 30, 2014 Affidavit of Posting HEARING DATE: June 10, 2014 1:00 pm Eacrett event venue SUP case index t l 3 4 5 6 MASON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT In re: the matter of 8 ) No. DDR 2014-00009 9 Application of Kathy and Michael Eacrett for a) to CONTESTANTS HEARING Special Use Permit for Parcel No. 12108-11- 00010. ) MEMORANDUM ) 11 CONTESTANTS,Chris Phillips,Vicki Phillips, Michael and Julie Creighton, and 12 Gordon and Heather Benjamin, Janet and Nancy Brandrud, Karol Mehan, and Lori Norman 13 appeal by and through their attorney of record, CHRISTOPHER M. CONSTANTINE, and 14 submit the following Hearing Memorandum on issues raised in this matter. 15 1 h 1. Argument. A: The proposal fails to meet the criteria for approval of a Special Use Permit under 1 % Mason County Code 17.05.044. 18 Mason County Code 17.05.044 provides as follows: 19 Decision criteria. The review of special use permit applications shall be in 20 accordance with the following criteria: 21 Any application for a special use permit shall not be approved unless an affirmative finding with regard to each of these 22 criteria is made. (1) That the proposed use will not be detrimental to the public 2 3 health, safety and welfare; 24 (2)That the proposed use is consistent and compatible with the intent.of the comprehensive plan; 25 CONTESTANTS' HEARING MEMORANDUM 1 OF COUNSEL,Inc.,P.S. P.O.Box 7125 Tacoma,WA 98417-0125 (253)752-7850;(253)383-3544(FAX) (3)That the proposed use will not introduce hazardous conditions 1 at the site that cannot be mitigated through appropriate measures to protect adjacent properties and the community at large; 2 (4)That the proposed use is served by adequate public facilities which are in place, or planned as a condition of approval or as an identified item in the county's capital facilities plan; Q (5) That the proposed use will not have a significant impact upon existing uses on adjacent lands; and (6) If located outside an urban growth area,that the proposed use will not result in the need to extend urban services. h The application for special use permit submitted by the Eacretts fails to satisfy MCC 17.05.044 in one or more of the following respects: 9 • The application is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan policies on cottage 10 industries within rural areas. See Exhibits. 11 • Specifically, RU 524A states that: "A cottage industry shall not be disruptive to the use 12 of adjacent properties. No equipment or process shall be used in such home occupations 13 which creates excessive noise, vibration, glare,fumes, odors, or electrical interference 14 detectable to the normal senses off the property." The application violates this policy 15 16 in numerous ways: 17 o The application involves the use of"portable bathrooms" on site and mere feet 18 from adjacent properties;the applicant has not disclosed,nor has the County 1 conditioned, how long the facilities will remain on site and how frequently they 20 will be removed. Anything short of removing the toilets immediately following 21 each event will undoubtedly lead to increased odors off-site; 22 23 o The application calls for use of live or recorded music that will go on until as late 24 as 10:00 pm during events. This certainly constitutes"equipment'that will be 25 used to create excessive"noise" detectable to those off the property. CONTESTANTS'HEARING MEMORANDUM 2 OF COUNSEL,Inc.,P.S. P.O.Box 7125 Tacoma,WA 98417-0125 (253)752-7850;(253)383-3544(FAX) o The application fails to disclose how it will deal with other glare or electrical 1 interference impacts to off-site residents,and the County's approval fails to apply 3 conditions regarding the same. a • RU 524A also states that"There shall be no alterations to the outside appearance of the buildings ... or other visible evidence of the conduct ofsuch cottage industry(Emphasis E, added)." 8 o 100-120 people regularly attending outdoor events, combined with the chairs, 9 food service facilities, DJ and/or band equipment, lighting, etc. will provide 10 ample"visible evidence"of the conduct of this cottage industry. i� B: The County must require approval of a shoreline permit for this use to legally proceed. 3 • The proposed wedding/event venue is located entirely within shoreline jurisdiction(200' landward of the ordinary high water mark). See Exhibit. 16 • The area is currently designated as"Urban" in the County's Shoreline Master Program. 17 See Exhibit. 18 • The proposed area for parking lies partially within and partially outside of shoreline 19 jurisdiction. 20 21 • The County is processing the request as a"cottage industry"requiring a special use 22 permit. 23 • Mason County's Shoreline Master Program, Chapter 17.50 Mason County Code, 24 specifically defines cottage industries within shoreline jurisdiction as"Substantial 25 CONTESTANTS' HEARING MEMORANDUM 3 OF COUNSEL,Inc.,P.S. P.O.Box 7125 Tacoma,WA 98417-0125 (253)752-7850;(253)383-3544(FAX) J Development"and requires such uses to obtain a"Conditional Use Permit." Specifically, i 2 Mason County Code 17.50.060 states that: o "Cottage industries are considered as residential use and minor commercial 4 development and are Substantial Development under this Master Program."AN 5 F, o "Cottage Industries must comply with all applicable County Ordinances and require a Conditional Use Permit." 8 • Furthermore,the Master Program's use table (MCC 17.50.050)provides that Commercial 9 uses that are"non-water dependent/with waterfront"are Conditional Uses. At best,the jo proposed use is"water enjoyment", but it is not"water dependent." See MCC 17.50.060 it ("Water dependent commercial uses are those commercial activities that cannot exist in 12 other than a waterfront location and are dependent on the water by reason of the 1 ., intrinsic nature of its operation."). There is no question that the use will be"waterfront," 15 as the proposal is for the use to occur directly behind a bluff that drops all the way down 16 to the water. 17 • As a result,the County should have required both a Shoreline Substantial Development 18 Permit and a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit under the current Master Program. 19 20 • s to have conceded the applicability of the Master Program. We Even the County appear pp y g 21 do not have a copy because the County is still processing the public records request, but 22 Mr. Borden sent the applicants a letter stating: 23 24 25 CONTESTANTS'HEARING MEMORANDUM 4 OF COUNSEL,Inc.,P.S. P.O.Box 7125 Tacoma,WA 98417-0125 (253)752-7850,(253)383-3544(FAX) o "In addition, since the property fronts on Case Inlet, this review needs to include 1 compliance with the Mason Co. Shoreline Master Program chapter on Commercial Development." See Exhibit. o Neither the applicant's supporting materials nor the County's Staff Report address 5 any of the Conditional Use criteria, including an analysis of the cumulative 6 impacts of granting similar requests in the area. • The County cannot argue that no Conditional Use Permit is required because there is no 9 associated"development" in order for the use to occur. Such an argument is incorrect. 10 Ecology regulations specifically define"Conditional Use"as "a use, development, or 11 substantial development which is classified as a conditional use or is not classified in the 12 applicable master program." WAC 173-27-030. The proposal in this case clearly meets this 13 definition. 14 15 o 3: The proposal is not SEPA exempt. 16 • The Staff Report states that the proposal is exempt from environmental review under 1 is WAC 197-11-800(1)(c). 19 • This section of Ecology's SEPA guidelines simply references local government's abilities 20 to raise their levels of"exempt"development up to maximum specified levels. 21 22 • The County has adopted such thresholds for categorical exemptions in Mason County 23 Code 8.16.020(a). However, both Ecology's and the County's SEPA regulations for 24 exempt levels of minor new"construction"apply to"construction"NOT new proposed 25 CONTESTANTS'HEARING MEMORANDUM 5 OF COUNSEL,Inc.,P.S. P.O.Box 7125 Tacoma,WA 98417-0125 (253)752-7850;(253)383-3544(FAX) uses. As a result,the applicant should have submitted a SEPA Checklist and the County 1 should have issued a SEPA threshold determination associated with the project proposal. • The proposal does not fit under any other categorical exemptions. 2. Deficiencies in the Staff Report do not support issuance of a special use permit. Contestants point out the following deficiencies in the Staff Report: -, Paragraph VII B (1) (b)recites that other owners in the area have frequently used their s own adjacent properties to provide for parking and access for special gatherings. The cited 9 example of the Benjamins' hosting of a weeding in 2013 involving approximately 200 attendees 10 is misleading, as that event was an isolated incident, and was not a commercial activity. 11 12 Paragraph VII B (1) (e) (i) (1)recites that only one recorded easement for ingress and 13 egress was granted to Marjorie Uhlman. This ignores other recorded easements. See Exhibits. l Q 15 Paragraph VII B (1) (e) (i) (1)recites that the Creightons have a separate and distinct 16 access route that completely avoids Buckingham Lane and that the applicants are unaware of any 17 easement rights of record granted to the Creightons regarding Buckingham Lane. Neither 18 statement is accurate. 19 Paragraph VII B (1) (e) (iii)recites that noise levels will be maintained that those 20 reasonably associated with a family gathering, picnic ,reunion event. The Staff Report leaves 21 22 noise levels ambiguous. 23 24 25 CONTESTANTS' HEARING MEMORANDUM 6 OF COUNSEL,Inc.,P.S. P.O.Box 7125 Tacoma,WA 98417-0125 (253)752-7850;(253)383-3544(FAX) Paragraph VII B (2) Staff Response recites that applicant states that the commercial land 1 use proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan 3. Any special use permit granted to the Eacretts should include reasonable conditions to y address the concerns raised by Contestants. If the decision is made to grant the Eacretts the proposed special use permit, reasonable c 6 conditions should be placed upon the permit to address the concerns. Among those concerns are 7 side set-backs and required screening to reduce the impact of the proposed activity upon 8 adjoining properties, restrictions on lighting and noise,hours of operation, consumption of 9 alcoholic beverages, 10 4. Conclusion 11 Special Use Permit No. DDR 2014-00009 should be denied. Alternatively, if the permit i 12 13 granted,reasonable conditions should be placed thereon that adequately address the concerns 14 raised above. 15 Jstoppthet. fully submitt , 16 -------------- --- 17 Constantine WSBA 11650 Attorney for Contestants 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONTESTANTS'HEARING MEMORANDUM 7 OF COUNSEL,Inc.,P.S. P.0.Box 7125 Tacoma,WA 98417-0125 (253)752-7850;(253)383-3544(FAX) TO: Mason County Hearings Examiner FROM: Planning Staff— Allan Borden • ahb@co.mason.wa.us RE: Special Use Permit(DDR2014-00009)to establish special event venue for family gatherings and weddings on a Rural Residential 5 property southwest of the Allyn WA. HEARING DATE: June 10, 2014 1:00 pm JUNE 9 2014 ADDENDUM TO STAFF REPORT The following analysis shall be included in the review and evaluation of a special use permit for the establishment of a special event venue for family gatherings and weddings without structural improvements on subject Stretch Island property in the Rural Residential 5 zone. This section follows the Special Use Permit DDR2014-00009 evaluation of Sections A. to C. presented previously D. SHORELINE CONDITIONAL USE ANALYSIS. This proposal requires a Conditional Use Permit, as the proposal is a commercial land use that is non-water dependent with aspects of water-oriented land use. Mason County Shoreline Master Program Chapter 7.16.040 (Commercial Development) and Chapter 7.28.010(Conditional Uses) guides review of this proposal. Applicable Commercial Development Policies are: 1. Commercial development on shorelines should be encouraged to provide physical and/or visual access to the shoreline,and other opportunities for the public to enjoy the shoreline. The proposed event venue land use is within the 200 ft. deep area for shoreline management and is setback at least 45 feet from the shoreline ordinary high water mark and back from the 30 ft. high bluff. The land use is associated with the owners' residential use of the property. The proposed activities are along the access road and parking area, so the use provides visual access to the shoreline views, rather than physical access to the shoreline (no direct access by stairs to the beach exists). 2. Multiple use concepts which include open space and recreation should be encouraged in commercial development. The proposal uses the residence and adjacent areas situated adjacent to the saltwater shoreline of Case Inlet as a water-oriented use that is an amenity to the venue for family special events that are held at limited occasions during set periods during the year. Temporary structures may be used to shelter family groups during the event. 3. Commercial development should be aesthetically compatible with the surrounding area. Structures should not significantly impact views from the upland properties,public roadways, or the water. Eacrett SUP staff report addendum 1 The subject property is nearby to other residential properties and the existing residence with landscaping present is very similar to the residences in the vicinity. Temporary structures may be used to shelter family groups during individual events; these structures will offer a good view of Case Inlet without affecting the views from nearby properties. 4. The location of commercial developments along shorelines should ensure the protection of natural areas or systems identified as having geological,ecological,biological, or cultural significance. The existing residence is setback 45 feet from Case Inlet and the event activities will be more than 50 feet from slopes and shoreline of Case Inlet. The setbacks will be assets offered by the event venue enterprise. 5. Commercial developments should be encouraged to locate inland from the shoreline area, unless they are dependent on a shoreline location. Commercial developments should be discouraged over water or in marshes,bogs, swamps,and wetlands. The proposal includes the 45 to 50 foot residential setback from the shoreline high water mark and the location of the parking area is greater than 100 feet. This location enables residents and visitors opportunities to enjoy the shoreline nearby to a residential structure and setback from saltwater critical areas. 6. New commercial development in shoreline areas should be encouraged to locate in those areas with existing commercial uses in a manner that will minimize sprawl and inefficient use of shoreline areas. The site is within an area of existing residential land uses at the north end of Stretch Island. Existing commercial land uses are situated to the west(0.40 miles) or to the north (L 0 miles) in the Grapeview Hamlet. The proposed uses of temporary structures and parking areas are located away from the shoreline itself. (Exhibit 4). 7. Parking facilities should be placed inland, away from the immediate water's edge and recreational beaches. Proposed parking areas are adequate for the intended land use and situated on the property near the access road side of the existing residence (Exhibit 4 and 5), and over 100 feet from the saltwater shoreline. 8. Commercial development should be designed and located to minimize impacts of noise and/or light generated by the development upon adjacent properties. Commercial developments which generate significant noise impacts should be discouraged. The proposed event venue land use is on a residential property larger than adjacent properties. The activities of this use will occur during daylight hours, and limited to dates and times that will be known by all property owners along Eckert Rd. and Buckingham Ln. Physical access to the shoreline will not be provided(no direct access by stairs to the beach exists). Applicable Commercial Development Use Regulations are: 1. The County shall utilize the following information in its review of commercial development proposals: Eacrett SUP staff report addendum 2 nature of the activity; venue for family events using temporary structures and parking in grassy field on owners'property.. need for shore frontage; water-oriented use to enjoy views of Case Inlet. special considerations for enhancing the relationship of the activity to the shoreline; written and digital brochure information should promote the saltwater shoreline as an asset. provisions for public visual or physical access to the shoreline; emphasize values of shoreline and the views on-site in information brochures. provisions to ensure that the development will not cause severe adverse environmental impacts; plans to offer limited parking for events and encourage respect for adjacent residential properties. provisions to mitigate any significant noise impacts; limit timing of events and hours of operation. provisions to mitigate light or glare impacts. Security lighting will be shrouded or directed down to ground. 2. Commercial development may be permitted in the shoreline area in the following descending order of priority:water-dependent,water-related,and water-oriented. The commercial land use on the property will laid out as a water-oriented use. The property's location will take advantage of north views to the Case Inlet shoreline. 3.Parking and loading areas shall be located well away from the immediate water's edge and beaches,unless there is no other practical location for parking. Parking and landscaping plans shall be reviewed for compliance with all applicable county ordinances. Parking will be on-site in a grassy area on the subject property at more than 100 feet from the shoreline. Perimeter vegetation will be maintained or enhanced along the road. 5.Water supply and waste facilities shall comply with the strictest established guidelines, standards,and regulations. Individual water and septic systems are already connected on the property. The proposal will include provided sani-can service and proper hand-washing facilities for each event. 6.New commercial development shall be located adjacent to existing commercial developments whenever possible. The proposed event venue land use is on a 1.82 acre Rural Residential 5 property larger than adjacent properties. 7.New or expanded structures shall not extend more than 35 feet in height above average grade level. Structure height will be no more than 1 S feet on the site, which is in conformance with the Rural Residential S zone (Sec. 17.04.224). 8. Commercial development adjacent to aquaculture operations shall practice strict pollution control procedures. Private tidelands are nearby to the location of this proposal; no commercial operations are known to exist close enough to be affected by this request. 9. Commercial developments shall be located and designed to minimize noise impacts to adjacent properties. The site proposal will use existing separation and vegetation buffering to adjacent residential properties;parking and musical activities will be setback at greater distances. Eacrett SUP staff report addendum 3 CONDITIONAL USE EVALUATION As part of the standards of Chapter 7.28.010, uses which are classified or set forth in the Master Program as conditional uses may be authorized provided the applicant can demonstrate all of the following: 1. "The proposed use will be consistent with the policies of RCW 90.58 and the policies of the Master Program." The policies of the Shoreline Management Act RCW 90.58 emphasize that coordinated land use planning is necessary in order to protect the public interest associated with the shorelines of the state, while enabling a range of compatible land use activities to occur (from residential, to commercial, to recreational uses). The applicant has proposed an event venue land use that is suitable for the Rural Area, as long as the activities of this use will occur during daylight hours, the parking area is established, and a schedule of limited dates and times will be known by all property owners along Eckert Rd. and Buckingham Ln. The event venue is consistent with these shoreline policies. 2. "The proposed use will not interfere with the normal public use of the shoreline." The proposed event venue use is situated on the "upland"side of the shoreline bluff and has a 50 foot setbackfrom the Case Inlet shoreline situated to the north. As there is no direct access to the beach by stairs, the intended use will not interfere with the public use of the shoreline and nearshore beach areas. 3. "The proposed use of the site and design of the project will be compatible with other permitted uses in the area." With the limitations noted above, the scope of the proposed event venue is compatible with the existing residential land uses. It is important in the evaluation of the proposal to have the parking and event layout determined, the activities confined to daylight hours, and a schedule of events known to area residents. 4. "The proposed use will cause no unreasonable adverse effects to the shoreline environment in which it is located." With the proposed 50 foot shoreline setback and no activities along the shoreline, no adverse impacts to the shoreline or other critical areas are anticipated. As the residence has existed for over 60 years, limited access to the saltwater shoreline will continue at public access to the east and the vegetation buffer along the bluff will be maintained by the native plantings between the buildings and the saltwater area. 5. "That the Public interest suffers no substantial detrimental effect." With the limitations on daylight hours,parking on-site, and event scheduling noted above, the public interest in the shoreline suffers no detrimental effect, since shoreline access is not altered and shoreline views from the property are included as part of the event venue proposed land use. I. Evaluations. The applicant has proposed the establishment of a special event venue for family gatherings and weddings without structural improvements on subject Stretch Island Eacrett SUP staff report addendum 4 property in the Rural Residential 5 zone. With the existing 50-foot shoreline setback and maintained buffer along shoreline bluff,the proposed event venue use will not interfere with the public use of the nearby Case Inlet shoreline(direct access to the beach will be limited). With the limits discussed previously,this land use is compatible with existing residential land uses along the Case Inlet shoreline. No adverse impacts to the shoreline are anticipated from this accessory land use. The public interest in the shoreline suffers no detrimental effect as existing shoreline access is not limited and shoreline views from the property are part of the event venue proposed land use. Staff finds the proposal is consistent with Mason County Shoreline Master Program Conditional Use Permit standards and a decision should include certain review conditions. As designed,this proposal is consistent with the Shoreline Management Act and with Mason County Shoreline Master Program Chapter 7.16.040 (Commercial Development) and Chapter 7.24.010 (Conditional Uses) standards, subject to the following three conditions in addition to the four original conditions of the Special Use Permit review: 5) The proposed project shall be consistent with all policies and provisions of the Shoreline Management Act, its rules, and the standards of the Mason County Shoreline Master Program. 6) The applicant shall meet the standards of the Conditional Use Permit review, including proper standards under the Rural Residential 5 zone (Sec. 17.04.224) for setbacks,height, site coverage, and parking needs for the land uses proposed. 7) The applicant shall use best management practices to prevent debris and runoff from entering the waters (fresh and saltwater)of the State during property maintenance Eacrett SUP staff report addendum 5 Mason County Department of Planning Building I * 411 N. 51h Street * P.O. Box 279 Shelton,Washington 98584 * (360) 427-9670 TO: Mason County Hearings Examiner FROM: Planning Staff— Allan Borden • ahb@co.mason.wa.us RE: Special Use Permit(DDR2014-00009) to establish special event venue for family gatherings and weddings on a Rural Residential 5 property southwest of the Allyn WA. HEARING DATE: June 10, 2014 1:00 pm STAFF REPORT I. Project Description. This report evaluates the establishment of a special event venue for family gatherings and weddings without structural improvements on subject property in the Rural Residential 5 zone 0.6 miles east of the Grapeview WA. A Special Use Permit is necessary(Exhibit#2) as part of the public review required by the Mason County Development Regulations standards (Sec. 17.03.021)to evaluate the nature and scope of the proposed land use on Rural Residential 5 Lands in this area of Mason County, including traffic,parking area, noise, and screening aspects. II. Applicant. Michael and Kathy Eacrett. III. Property Location. At 80 E Buckingham Ln., Grapeview; 0.6 miles east of Grapeview WA. (Exhibit 43); Parcel 12108-11-00010 within the northeast 1/4 of Section 8 Township 21N., Range 1 W. in Mason County Washington. IV. Evaluations. A. Characteristics of the site. The subject parcel is 1.82 acres in size and has a private easement(Buckingham Ln.) crossing between the two residence on the north and the garage and shed on the south. The well house is near the south property line, and septic system is east of the residence (Exhibit#4 and#5). The property has 170 feet along the shoreline bluff on Case Inlet and the grass area next to the garage is 220 feet east to west. General topography of the site is less than 10 percent slope to the 30-foot high bluff to the saltwater. B. Characteristics of the area. (some photos shown in Exhibit 46) NORTH: Rural Area/Rural Residential 5 zone and Case Inlet saltwater area. EAST, SOUTH, AND WEST:Rural Area/Rural Residential 5 zone; residential and open space agriculture land uses. Eckert Rd. is a key transportation route in the area between Stretch Island and Grapeview Loop Rd. is just to the east and south; Grapeview Loop Rd. continues to the north to the Allyn area. Eacrett event venue SUP staff report 1 C. Resource Ordinance Designation. To the north of the proposal area,the shoreline of Case Inlet along Stretch Island with appropriate buffers (from 20 to 100 feet) and 15-ft. building setback that apply to the review for potential development. D. Comprehensive Plan Designation/Zoning. The Mason County Comprehensive Plan designation for the site is Rural Lands 0.5 mile from the Grapeview Hamlet area. The zoning of the property is Rural Residential 5,and cottage industries may be permitted land uses in this zone following Special Use Permit approval. V. SEPA Compliance. This proposed land use is SEPA exempt per WAC 197-11-800.1(c); but the proposed land use would result in some anticipated impacts (additional buildings, more sewage demand,more traffic, additional noise). VI. Other Required Permits. If the proposal is approved, a site plan for the land use(s) [event activities and parking area],days and hours of operation, and other guidelines stated in the public hearing will be part of the conditions of decision. A building permit will be required if a structure is proposed or modified. VII. Public Notification of Hearing.The Notice of Application(Exhibit 47) was published in the Mason County Journal for two weeks on April 3 and 10, 2014. On April 30, 2014 a Notice of Application was posted at three sites and the local post office. This notice was mailed to neighboring property owners within 300 feet on April 9, 2014. An Affidavit of Posting of the notices was completed on May 30,2014 (Exhibit#8). To date,ten letters of comments have been received during this review. VH1. Analysis. The following additional information is required for analyzing the proposal, preparing the necessary conditions, and providing consistency with dimensional and performance standards relevant county regulations. The applicants have applied for the review of a Special Use Permit(Exhibit 42)to enable the applicants to use their residential property on a limited basis as an event venue for weddings and family events. A. Mason County Development Regulations, Section 17.03.021 This special provision of the Cottage Industries section states that the proposed use may accommodate an area for parking for residents and employees;but if additional area for parking for use by the public/customers is needed, or there is traffic,noise, or screening issues,the application and evaluation of a Special Use Permit is required. Staff Response: Since the Applicants propose the need for a parking area for 54 standard and two handicap parking stalls, a Special Use Permit is required. A Special Use Permit application was submitted by the applicants and includes supplemental information for consideration in their request(Exhibit#2). Their responses to permit criteria provide supportive information about the location and vicinity, the purpose of the event venue use proposed, the operation of the event proceedings, the parking provided, and traffic anticipated on the subject parcel. Eacrett event venue SUP staff report 2 B. Applicable Special Use Review Criteria (MCDR 1.05.046): 1) Will the proposed use be detrimental to public health, safety, and welfare? a. No detrimental impacts to the public health, safety, or welfare will result from the proposed use. The subject parcel, 12108-11-00010,has been in the Eacrett family for many decades. Applicant Mike Eacrett's great great grandfather,Adam Eckert,was the second family to purchase land on Stretch Island over 100 years ago. The applicants,Mike and Kathy Eacrett, are fifth-generation residents of the subject parcel, and to applicants' knowledge are the only full-time residents in the vicinity. The subject parcel was historically used as the site of the Grapeview community post office,with the public accessing the property by ferry to reach the post office. The site has historically served as a gathering place for families and groups commemorating special events, such as weddings and family reunions. The site is uniquely well-suited to accommodate such gatherings. In addition to offering views of the water,the site is unusually large and includes an extensive open flat portion of land that is well-configured to accommodate all parking and vehicle access needs with no adverse traffic or parking impacts imposed on adjacent parcels. b. Other owners in the area have frequently utilized their own adjacent properties and the subject site to provide for parking and access purposes for special event gatherings. For example, in August 2013,Heather and Gordon Benjamin,owners of parcel 12108-11-00020,hosted a wedding that involved approximately 200 attendees, and successfully accommodated parking and traffic issues. c. The proposed use would involve intermittent use of the subject property throughout the year,with use never to exceed 1 to 2 weekends per month, and with use frequency anticipated to be far less frequent during all non-summer months. Out of courtesy to adjacent owners who may be engaging in holiday celebrations/gatherings, events will not occur on weekends associated with the following holidays:Memorial Day; 4t'of July; and Labor Day weekend. d. Use will involve approximately 8-10 weddings total,held throughout the summer months,with approximately 50-75 individuals attending half of the wedding events; and with approximately 100— 120 individuals attending the other half of the wedding events. Other small family gatherings and other social events may occur on intermittent weekends throughout the year,with approximately 10—3 0 individuals attending such events in the spring, fall, and holiday seasons. Eacrett event venue SUP staff report 3 e. It appears that the primary issues that warrant analysis include traffic,parking; and view and noise impacts. i. Traffic and parking issues are comprehensively addressed in the Level 1 Traffic and Parking Letter dated May 25, 2014,prepared by professional engineer Mark Jacobs,PE,PTOE, Jake Traffic Engineering,Inc. The report is attached hereto, analyzes traffic and parking issues, and concludes that the proposed use would have minimal traffic and parking effects. The proposal provides for a minimum of 54 well-designed parking stalls and ingress/egress route that are all properly accommodated upon the subject parcel. The report summarizes peak hour and daily trips on the relevant roadways, and draws an analogy between the proposed use and that of an operational church(with peak use occurring during the weekends). Significantly,the report concludes that the proposed use will generate less traffic over the course of a year than other potential cottage industry uses (for example,home-based artist studio, or home based professional office). The report concludes that traffic effect will be minimal;that the roadway has more than ample capacity to accommodate the occasional proposed events;and will generate less than 5%increase in existing traffic. 1. It is significant to note that the entire portion of roadway that is characterized as an"easement"/"access road"(Buckingham Lane) is actually located upon the applicant's own property and is owned by the applicants themselves. The applicants have conducted title research to determine whether any easement interests have been granted to other adjacent properties on Buckingham Lane. This research reveals only one grant of easement,by grantor Shirley Eacrett(applicants' predecessor in interest),to Mar orie Uhlman, granting a perpetual non-exclusive easement for ingress and egress over the applicants' subject property to serve Uhlman's parcels (easement recorded as Mason County Auditor File No. 1879490). This Qrant of easement would not restrict the applicants' proposed use of the"easement"/"access road"(Buckingham Lane) and applicants' research has revealed no other road maintenance or easement agreement that would impair applicants' ability to utilize Buckingham Lane as proposed. The primary project opponents, Mike and Julie Creighton(parcel 12108-11-90061)have a completely separate and distinct access route that entirely avoids the subject Buckingham Lane and that provides access to the Creighton property.Applicants are unaware of any easement rights of record granted to Creighton regarding subject Buckingham Lane, and are unaware of any element in the Mason County Code or regulation that would vest Creighton or other opponents with grounds to complain about alleged impacts to the condition of the surface of Buckingham Lane. Eacrett event venue SUP staff report 4 ii. View impacts appear to be minimal, based on an analysis of an aerial depiction of the subject shoreline and adjacent properties. The event site is located on an upland lawn on parcel 12108-11-00010. There is no beach access provided, and the subject patio area is located on upland a significant distance from the shoreline. The patio use area is located immediately to the East of the applicants' existing residential structure. The adjacent parcel immediately to the West of the subject site,parcel 12108-75-00 is actually owned by the project applicants (Eacretts), and there is no substantial view impact that will result to that parcel, or other parcels to the West. The residential structure on the parcel immediately to the East of the subject site (12108-11-00020, Heather and Gordon Benjamin), is designed so that the Benjamin' porch and view portion of their home faces away from the proposed site, and any view impacts to this property or others to the East would be minimal. The proposed use will be intermittent, temporary, and not involve any structural improvements, as all events will take place on an existing outdoor patio area. iii. Noise levels will be maintained at those reasonably associated with a family gathering,picnic, reunion event. All music will conclude by 10:00 pm. 2) Will the proposed use be consistent and compatible with the intent of the Comprehensive Plan? a. Yes. The Comprehensive Plan contemplates approval of cottage industries. In the Rural Areas, features of the rural landscape should be dominant. The subject proposal satisfies this policy, as there is no new structural improvement proposed, and the subject use preserves open rural pastures and water views. The subject proposal preserves the rural character and is in-keeping with historical community and family gatherings on this rural property. The proposal comports with the policies set forth in the Comprehensive Plan; traffic and parking impacts have been studied pursuant to the Comprehensive Plan policy and have been determined to be non-significant. Low Impact Cottage Industries such as the current proposal are encouraged in order to provide economic and recreational opportunities outside of the RAC's, Hamlets and UGAs. Staff Response: The applicant states that this commercial land use proposal is consistent with GMA policies supporting protection of the environment, existing land uses,future residential land uses and rural character away from the urban growth areas. The Comprehensive Plan policies below are used for review: General Policies in the Rural Area: RU-500 In Rural Areas,features of the rural landscape should be dominant. Uses other than farms,pastures,farm buildings,forestry, wood lots, and other resource-related industries, should be buffered or screened from public rights-of-ways and adjacent properties. Eacrett event venue SUP staff report 5 RU-505 Other uses that should be allowed in Rural Areas include tourism, horticulture, low profile recreation, home-based businesses and cottage industries accessory to a primary residential use, and other small scale businesses. RU-512 Adjacent residential uses and non-residential uses in the Rural Area should be buffered or screened from each other. Existing uses will not be required to provide buffers or screens, except in the case of the expansion or intensification of use. Cottle Industry within the Rural Area RU 523 Foster low impact cottage industries in the rural area in order to accommodate economic and employment opportunities outside of RAC's, Hamlets and UGA's. RU524A Permit cottage industries conducted as an accessory use within a single family dwelling or building accessory to a dwelling and which are wholly incidental and subordinate to the residential use of the property throughout the unincorporated portions of the County subject to the following criteria: Cottage industry is defined as limited small scale commercial or industrial activities including fabrication or production of goods or provision of services which are conducted without adverse impacts on the surrounding environment. The scale of the operation is considerably less than would require an outright rezone to industrial or commercial districts. Cottage industries are permitted in order to provide opportunities to supplement a family income, start up a business, or establish a work place at home. A cottage industry shall not grow beyond the scale permitted for such activities unless it is moved to a location designated for commercial or industrial uses. RU-532 Recreational and tourist uses and isolated small-scale businesses should be allowed to be developed in the Rural Areas,provided that: they do not require urban levels of government service, they do not conflict with natural resource based uses, they are compatible with surrounding rural uses, any public services or facilities provided for the development shall be limited to that necessary for the development and shall not be provided in a manner which permits low-density sprawl, and critical areas are protected. Staff Response: The policies noted above provide the standards to evaluate the location of this proposed small-scale commercial use so that the project will not be contrary to the goals of the Comprehensive Plan and that development standards (setbacks, building size, area of coverage) under the Rural Residential 5 zone cottage industry land use will protect the existing critical areas as well as the present and future land development in the vicinity of this proposal. 3) Will the proposed use introduce hazardous conditions, at the site, that cannot be mitigated through appropriate measures to protect adjacent properties and the community at large? a. No,the proposed use will not introduce any hazardous conditions. Eacrett event venue SUP staff report 6 4) Is the proposed use served by adequate public facilities,which are in place, planned as a condition of approval or as an identified item in the County's Capital Facilities Plan? a. Yes. Use periods will be limited to a Friday(setup), Saturday(event), and Sunday (clean-up)block,with portable drinking water,hand sanitization, garbage and restroom stations to be provided in sufficient quantity to service attendees. 5) Will the proposed use have a significant impact upon existing uses on adjacent lands? a. No, see response to question 1. 6) If located outside of an Urban Growth Area,will the proposal result in the need to extend urban services? a. No urban services will be required to accommodate the use,as use periods will be Limited to a Friday (setup), Saturday(event), and Sunday (clean-up)block,with portable drinking water,hand sanitization, garbage and restroom stations to be provided in sufficient quantity to service attendees. C. Applicable Title 15 Review Criteria: Per section 15.09.050 (C)(1-3),the Hearing Examiner shall review a proposed development according to the following criteria. 1. The development does not conflict with the Comprehensive Plan and meets the requirements and intent of the Mason County Code, especially Title 6, 8, and 16. Staff Response: To address each Title: Title 6—Adequate septic and water service shall be provided for this land use on the subject property. If the special use permit is approved, these services will need to support the services associated with the event venue land use and provided to proper state health standards. Title 8 - The proposal will be located outside of stream, shoreline, wetland, or landslide hazard critical areas and buffers. No special studies are needed for the review of this proposal. Title 16—Existing lots of record are owned by the applicants. No modification or combination of lots is necessary to propose the event venue and parking land use areas. 2. The development does not impact the public health, safety and welfare and is in the public interest. Staff Response: The proposed project will provide safe access to the property, parking on the property, and the proper water and sanitation upgraded with the new land use. As a condition of review,perimeter plantings near structures and fencing adjacent to property lines may screen the proposed land uses from adjacent residential and non-residential land uses. 3. The development does not lower the level of service of transportation and/or neighborhood park facilities below the minimum standards established within the Comprehensive Plan. Eacrett event venue SUP staff report 7 Staff Response: The anticipated traffic from the proposed commercial land use (analysis in the parking and traffic study provided Exhibit) is estimated to generate low to moderate amounts of vehicle traffic, but not cause increased demand or problems to levels of transportation services in the vicinity. Neighborhood park facilities would not be required for this land use and the minimum standards for parks established within the Comprehensive Plan will not be lowered. IX. Project Analysis: Based upon the review of these policies and regulations,the proposed event venue and parking land use as a cottage industry conforms to the Mason County Development Regulations and the Comprehensive Plan. M Conclusions. As proposed,the project is consistent with the Mason County Development Regulations. Staff recommends approval subject to the following conditions: 1) The site plan for the proposed event venue shall include the layout of existing residences, outbuildings, septic system,wellhead,proposed parking configuration, and use areas for the events (temporary tents, sari-cans, food serving areas). 2) Adequate parking areas shall be provided for these land uses located on the subject property;parking plan includes 54 parking stalls [1 stall per 3 visitors at an event; equals 160 visitors for large events] with maneuvering aisles. 3) A schedule of events planned on the subject property shall be available to-the surrounding property owners;the timing, size, and number of events shall comply with the scope presented by the applicants'project description. 4) The services provided to the event venue shall meet the Mason County Public Health standards for water, sanitation,and food services XI. Choices of Action. A. Approve. B. Approve with conditions. C. Deny without prejudice (reapplication or resubmittal may be considered). Eacrett event venue SUP staff report 8 MASON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 426 W Cedar Street/P.O.Box 279, Shelton,WA 98584 360.427.9670 Ext.352 Mason County Permit Center Use. DDR 2014—ON09 ❑ Special Use Permit: $1,135 Date Rcvd: ❑ Public Hearing: $2,005 or $670 for ADU's RECEIVED MAY 2 8 2014 426 W. CM AR STD Special Use Application A Special Use is one that possesses unique characteristics due to size, nature, intensity of use, technological processes involved, demands upon public services, relationship to surrounding lands, or other factors. The purpose of this application is to provide for adequate oversight and review of such development proposals, in order to assure that such uses are developed in harmony with surrounding land uses, and in a manner consistent with the intent of the Development Regulations for Mason County; Ordinance No. 82-96. Acceptance of this application by Mason County does not guarantee approval of request. Type of Special Use Permit: ❑ Communications Tower ❑ Accessory Dwelling Unit ❑ Oversize Construction Other: Applicant Name Kathy Ea.CrP—t_t Property Owners Mike & Kathy Eaerett Mailing Address 80 E. Buckingham Lane, Grapeview, WA. 98546 Phone 1 360-801 -7560 Phone 2 360-271 -9956 Email Kathyeacrett @yahoo.com Site Address 20 F_ Buckingham Lane, Grapeview, WA. 98546 TazParcel# 1 21 Q8_11 —0001 0 - Legal Description TR 1 Goyt. Lot 9 Project Description Spec-i a1 Event Venue. See project description attached C�d ig I:\Comnuuiiri DevelopmenfTAOSP£C'IAL USE Updated 1012012 Pie 1 of 3 Please provide a site plan that includes the following: 1. Indicate Scale and North Arrow. 2. Property line dimensions,easements, and right-of-ways. 3. The location of all existing and proposed structures. Include square footage of existing and proposed structures. 4. Setback distance, in feet from all property lines and structures. 5. Existing and proposed road access to and from the site. 6. Parking spaces. 7. Location of on-site sewage tanks and drainfields. 8. Location of drinking water supply. Include location on the proposed site and surrounding parcels. 9. Steep bluffs,wetlands,streams, and bodies of water. 10. Surface and storm water run-off routes. On a separate piece of paper(#of pages: ),state your reasons for requesting a Special Use Permit and be sure to address the following six criteria. Your request will be evaluated based on these criteria. 1. Will the proposed use be detrimental to public health,safety, and welfare? 2. Will the proposed use be consistent and compatible with the intent of the Comprehensive Plan? 3. Will the proposed use introduce hazardous conditions,at the site,that cannot be mitigated through appropriate measures to protect adjacent properties and the community at large? 4. Is the proposed use served by adequate public facilities,which are in place,planned as a condition of approval or as an identified item in the County's Capital Facilities Plan? 5. Will the proposed use have a significant impact upon existing uses on adjacent lands? 6. If located outside of an Urban Growth Area, will the proposal result in the need to extend urban services? ❑ Provide a list(preferably printed on mailing labels or legal sized envelopes)of all property owners' mailing addresses within 300 feet of your parcel boundaries. Addresses are to be obtained from the Mason County Assessor's Office,Bldg. 1. Applicant's Signature L L' i Dati LTommunitv Development;PAOSPECIAL USE Updated ltU2012 Rage 2 of 3 �g MASON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 426 W Cedar Street/P.O.Box 279, Shelton,WA 98584 360.427.9670 Ext.352 Publication Cost Agreement Publication cost is the responsibility of the applicant. Final permit processing will not occur until advertising fees have been paid to the newspaper by the applicant. The Shelton-Mason County Journal will bill the applicant directly. I /WE understand that I/WE must sign and date the attached acknowledgment indicating and that I / WE understand that is MY / OUR responsibility. I / WE must submit the signed page as part of application in order for it to be considered as complete. Mike Eacrett Signature of Property Owner Date Print Name OR Si re of Ap t Date Print Name T:.Conunnnin 1)c�clopmcntiPAC.'ISPT CI:1T,L.-ST Updated 10/2012 Paae 3 of March 2014 We are requesting a Special Use Permit for the following reasons. We have a piece of property on Stretch Island in Grapeview. We would like to offer our property as a place for people to get married, or to have a reception, or a birthday party or a time just to enjoy family and friends. For our guests to make happy memories that will last a lifetime! This property has been in our family for over 100 years and we would like to share it with others. These events will be limited as it is an outside venue and weather will be a factor. • Traffic would occur 30 —45 minutes prior to the event and 30 - 60 minutes ending the event. • We would let our neighbors know scheduled event dates and starting times. • We will attend every event to make sure things flow smoothly. • We will have 2 parking attendants so guests know how to enter and exit. • We will bring in 2 portable bathrooms for each event. • Monitoring the last 3 summers the biggest traffic time on our road is the week of the 4th of July. We will not schedule any events during that time frame around the 4th. Wo, sL) Jo -E Q APPROVED SFTE �rtf ED TC) BE OFF SME H,4f�i�cStlE!E3 Tt�APPRU�dAL r�l uU r ALL E'S-1 1r i.-.1 S Jl3:f. ,:•!4.r:�-.v .-J R"l� �A ;• '`� h. {(j=/��_ `/(7/�/� E, I C) ......... c? aQ4TF I 0 Q , - 'cz- 7-�� Karol Hagman Mehan G. Gordon & Heather J. Benjamin 665 Elk Springs Drive 2716 22nd Avenue Court NW Glenwood Springs, CO. 81601-9425 Gig Harbor, WA. 98335-7973 Ellison Land & Logging, LLC Loretta Laberge Trust 1505 La Coronilla Drive 780 E. Eckert Road Santa Barbara, CA. 93109-1715 Grapeview, WA. 98546-9602 Patricia H. Garton Life Estate Steven F. Eacrett c/o Michael Benson 18405 68th Avenue W. 12101 30th Street NE Lynnwood, WA. 98037 Lake Stevens, WA. 98258-8425 Marjorie J. Uhlman Lori J. Norman P.O. Box 248 P.O. Box 32956 Grapeview, WA. 98546-0248 Juneau, AK 99803-2956 Richard M. & Julie C. Creighton Christopher J. &Vicki L. Phillips P.O. Box 464 12402 Hallstrom Dr. NW Grapeview, WA. 98546-0464 Gig Harbor, WA. 98332 Clarendon N. Allen, IV Jeanne Brandrud 35123 27th Avenue S. 11556 Greenwood Avenue N. Ste #304 Federal Way, WA. 98003-9107 Seattle, Wa. 98133-8673 McKinlay-Barnes Rvcbl Lvg Trst David M. & Shirley Lacy T f 5 17207 NE 22nd Court 6339 Chinook Drive Redmond, WA. 98052-6002 Clinton, WA. 98236-9126 Chris L. Lincecum Janice C. Jutilla 16062 SE 4th Street 4018 E. J Street Bellevue, WA. 98008-4809 Tacoma, WA. 98404-2935 Elizabeth H. Barth 490 Double Hill Road Eastsound, WA. 98245 DDR2014-00009 EACRETT—SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION PROJECT DESCRIPTION Special Event Venue—Weddings—Family Gatherings.No proposed structural improvements. The proposed use would involve intermittent use of the subject property throughout the year, with use never to exceed 1 to 2 weekends per month, and with use frequency anticipated to be far less frequent during all non-summer months. Out of courtesy to adjacent owners who may be engaging in holiday celebrations/gatherings, events will not occur on weekends associated with the following holidays: Memorial Day; 4"'of July; and Labor Day weekend.Use will involve approximately 8-10 weddings total per calendar year, held throughout the summer months, with approximately 50-75 individuals attending half of the wedding events; and with approximately 100— 120 individuals attending the other half of the wedding events. Other small family gatherings and other social events may occur on intermittent weekends throughout the year, with approximately 10—30 individuals attending such events in the spring, fall, and holiday seasons. 1) Will the proposed use be detrimental to public health, safety, and welfare? a. No detrimental impacts to the public health, safety, or welfare will result from the proposed use. The subject parcel, 12108-11-00010, has been in the Eacrett family for many decades. Applicant Mike Eacrett's great great grandfather,Adam Eckert,was the second family to purchase land on Stretch Island over 100 years ago. The applicants,Mike and Kathy Eacrett, are fifth-generation residents of the subject parcel, and to applicants' knowledge are the only full-time residents in the vicinity. The subject parcel was historically used as the site of the Grapeview community post office, with the public accessing the property by ferry to reach the post office. The site has historically served as a gathering place for families and groups commemorating special events, such as weddings and family reunions. The site is uniquely well-suited to accommodate such gatherings. In addition to offering views of the water,the site is unusually large and includes an extensive open flat portion of land that is well-configured to accommodate all parking and vehicle access needs with no adverse traffic or parking impacts imposed on adjacent parcels. b. Other owners in the area have frequently utilized their own adjacent properties and the subject site to provide for parking and access purposes for special event gatherings. For example, in August 2013, Heather and Gordon Benjamin, owners of parcel 12108-11-00020,hosted a wedding that involved approximately 200 attendees, and successfully accommodated parking and traffic issues. c. The proposed use would involve intermittent use of the subject property throughout the year,with use never to exceed 1 to 2 weekends per month, and with use frequency anticipated to be far less frequent during all non-summer months. Out of courtesy to adjacent owners who may be engaging in holiday celebrations/gatherings, events will not occur on weekends associated with the following holidays: Memorial Day; 4t'of July; and Labor Day weekend. d. Use will involve approximately 8-10 weddings total,held throughout the summer months,with approximately 50-75 individuals attending half of the wedding events; and with approximately 100— 120 individuals attending the other half of the wedding events. Other small family gatherings and other social events may occur on intermittent weekends throughout the year, with approximately 10—30 individuals attending such events in the spring, fall, and holiday seasons. e. It appears that the primary issues that warrant analysis include traffic,parking, and view and noise impacts. i. Traffic and parking issues are comprehensively addressed in the Level 1 Traffic and Parking Letter dated May 25,2014,prepared by professional engineer Mark Jacobs, PE, PTOE, Jake Traffic Engineering, Inc. The report is attached hereto, analyzes traffic and parking issues, and concludes that the proposed use would have minimal traffic and parking effects. The proposal provides for a minimum of 54 well-designed parking stalls and ingress/egress route that are all properly accommodated upon the subject parcel. The report summarizes peak hour and daily trips on the relevant roadways, and draws an analogy between the proposed use and that of an operational church(with peak use occurring during the weekends). Significantly, the report concludes that the proposed use will generate less traffic over the course of a year than other potential cottage industry uses(for example,home-based artist studio, or home based professional office). The report concludes that traffic effect will be minimal;that the roadway has more than ample capacity to accommodate the occasional proposed events; and will generate less than 5%increase in existing traffic. 1. It is significant to note that the entire portion of roadway that is characterized as an"easement"/"access road"(Buckingham Lane) is actually located upon the applicant's own property and is owned by the applicants themselves. The applicants have conducted title research to determine whether any easement interests have been granted to other adjacent properties on Buckingham Lane. This research reveals only one grant of easement,by grantor Shirley Eacrett(applicants' predecessor in interest),to Marjorie Uhlman, granting a perpetual non-exclusive easement for ingress and egress over the applicants' subject property to serve Uhlman's parcels (easement recorded as Mason County Auditor File No. 1879490). This grant of easement would not restrict the applicants' proposed 2 7Y use of the"easement"/"access road" (Buckingham Lane) and applicants' research has revealed no other road maintenance or easement agreement that would impair applicants' ability to utilize Buckingham Lane as proposed. The primary project opponents, Mike and Julie Creighton(parcel 12108-11-90061)have a completely separate and distinct access route that entirely avoids the subject Buckingham Lane and that provides access to the Creighton property. Applicants are unaware of any easement rights of record granted to Creightons regarding subject Buckingham Lane, and are unaware of any element in the Mason County Code or regulations that would vest Creightons or other opponents with grounds to complain about alleged impacts to the condition of the surface of Buckingham Lane. ii. View impacts appear to be minimal, based on an analysis of an aerial depiction of the subject shoreline and adjacent properties. The event site is located on an upland lawn on parcel 12108-11-00010. There is no beach access provided, and the subject patio area is located on upland a significant distance from the shoreline. The patio use area is located immediately to the East of the applicants' existing residential structure. The adjacent parcel immediately to the West of the subject site,parcel 12108-75-00 is actually owned by the project applicants (Eacretts), and there is no substantial view impact that will result to that parcel, or other parcels to the West. The residential structure on the parcel immediately to the East of the subject site (12108-11-00020,Heather and Gordon Benjamin), is designed so that the Benjamin' porch and view portion of their home faces away from the proposed site, and any view impacts to this property or others to the East would be minimal. The proposed use will be intermittent,temporary,and not involve any structural improvements, as all events will take place on an existing outdoor patio area. iii. Noise levels will be maintained at those reasonably associated with a family gathering,picnic,reunion event. All music will conclude by 10:00 pm. 2) Will the proposed use be consistent and compatible with the intent of the Comprehensive Plan? a. Yes. The Comprehensive Plan contemplates approval of cottage industries. In the Rural Areas, features of the rural landscape should be dominant. The subject proposal satisfies this policy, as there is no new structural improvement proposed, and the subject use preserves open rural pastures and water views. The subject proposal preserves the rural character and is in-keeping with historical community and family gatherings on this rural property. The proposal comports with the policies set forth in the Comprehensive Plan;traffic and parking impacts have 3 3�r� been studied pursuant to the Comprehensive Plan policy and have been determined to be non-significant. Low Impact Cottage Industries such as the current proposal are encouraged in order to provide economic and recreational opportunities outside of the RAC's, Hamlets and UGAs. 3) Will the proposed use introduce hazardous conditions, at the site, that cannot be mitigated through appropriate measures to protect adjacent properties and the community at large? a. No, the proposed use will not introduce any hazardous conditions. 4) Is the proposed use served by adequate public facilities,which are in place, planned as a condition of approval or as an identified item in the County's Capital Facilities Plan? a. Yes. Use periods will be limited to a Friday (setup), Saturday (event), and Sunday (clean-up) block, with portable drinking water, hand sanitization, garbage and restroom stations to be provided in sufficient quantity to service attendees. 5) Will the proposed use have a significant impact upon existing uses on adjacent lands? a. No, see response to question 1. 6) If located outside of an Urban Growth Area,will the proposal result in the need to extend urban services? a. No urban services will be required to accommodate the use, as use periods will be limited to a Friday (setup), Saturday (event), and Sunday (clean-up) block, with portable drinking water, hand sanitization, garbage and restroom stations to be provided in sufficient quantity to service attendees. L I (T Project: Buckingham Lane Event Facility - Mason County i Location: 80 E. Buckingham Lane L� NORTH E CEDAR ST _ { Grass Lake 3 m t F W CL � W 'W ;. CREST OR . ..-� W Lako Ander one - 7W4NJN r/.:LS 40. ' a _ 1 �Khoebr Lake NW, ....GO _' do C�1 £'SPC �O. a r 1 I QO GO 2320 RD GO 2274 RD f_J � - �a�.. 3: / F�.r Project Site 'fGO,145% Trasklake -- W4'ONLGne .3' j" o. i G072 qO m ry p i ry 1 1 QV m t!o;CP Y R - �r;ru�r�ctiew_ AP r-V L GO 2082 RO ':•DPP k � � I �Ir - .. ..-.- .1 •�-.r �L• r fr v:: QUO.--co_..- L--.;.r.„ 1• `.r�p ��.s �j Base Map obtained from Mason County GIS ` .l -� EYATESRO i59?2ft JTE, Inc. BUCKINGHAM LANE EVENT FACILITY - MASON COUNTY FIGURE 1 LEVEL I TRAFFIC AND PARKING LETTER Reprint in Color Only VICINITY MAP `lz • f� u NORTH C. ". , +;Y , ,e �" • Base Map obtained from Mason County GIS 1 •r '1Y r Facility Event F a ,_. - PP v r rrr r n- r Il'"N h �,, ) � �.., ,'.,', •.I wAVAIL& r 4* 4 . r Rl* • 1 1 fM • � 150ft S Q BUCKINGHAM LANE EVENT FACILITY - MASON COUNTY JTE, Inc. TRAFFIC AND PARKING LETTER FIGURE 2 Reprint In color only CONCEPTUAL PARKING AND CIRCULATION N. N j ♦4 ` t " j+rt" At i t rA Xj 21NR1W ��t� �'ra `,.»y',�•4• •�, fi._� tom, ...'f;�-- kf' �•`� �(.1.# ., • ,�f �,� IL *414 AM Aw AS *• Al ���. M!!' \ ��'� .-Y�v .� / � ,�� .�r�r ,...�,� r� +4,t f � �' yak;► .. �._....,.,...•«,......, :.4.1'� ��'� � 'ounce: E ri, Digit�alGlobe,GeoE�e,�i-cubed, SD , USG=,AE�X, e apping, erogrid, IG IGF, is�topo, a d t e GIS User Community N 1 inch = 100 feet / W E , . 1 inch = 0 miles S 121081190061 121081190062 121081190061 121081190040 121089999999 121081190062 121081100030 121081190050 121081190040 121081170730 I _ � 121081100010 121081100030 4 t 121081100020 121081100010 121081100011 �B(jc�iNGh'q 121081100080 MAN 121081100090 121092200010 II 121081100100 121081100080 121087500080 � z'�► ' "^� •-• 121089999999 w '" 1 �•' �N +.+ n.�: 121092200012 j 121087500050 �•—�-~,.. ' •„ w 121081100080 *�; ;,�;,�, ENRON Age foil • ai'wwn.�.r J!4'Y...�..,..t�.,y.,•y„r.• �� 1 w4 ...w r �`C w� . '�.► - a.. . Y« ��G� 1210878----- • M,E.ri, Digi@ gbbe,a@ft, ,wuwe LED USGS,AIM Ge6 appin.g, erogrid, I I F, s i _,topo, d Ghe G15 User Co unit. N 1 inch = 100 feet j 1 inch = 0 miles S �%Xv�cYJ1� � TRAFFIC / PARKING REPORT Mason County BUCKINGHAM LANE EVENT FACILITY LEVEL I TRAFFIC AND PARKING LETTER May 25, 2014 (�� , h•. - �} _ram---,-_... _....... •' . Jake Traffic Engineering, Inc. Mark J. Jacobs, PE, PTOE, President 2614 39th Ave SW - Seattle, WA 98116 - 2503 Tel. 206.762.1978 -Cell 206.799.5692 E-mail jaketraffic@comcast.net r ti. i It . Jake Traffic Engineering, Inc. . Mark J. Jacobs, PE, PTOE L President 2614 39L" Ave. SW -Seattle, WA 98116 -2503 C` Tel. 206.762.1978 - Cell 206.799.5692 L-mail jakeirai{t�comtas!.net May 25, 2014 BUCKINGHAM LANE EVENT FACILITY Attn: Mike and Kathy Eacrett 80 E. Buckingham Ln. Grapeview,WA 98546 Re: Buckingham Lane Event Facility - Mason County Special Use Permit Level I Traffic and Parking Letter Dear Mr. and Mrs. Eacrett, I have prepared this Level I Traffic Letter for the proposed Buckingham Lane Event Facility project at 80 E. Buckingham Ln. Grapeview,WA 98546, in Mason County. The proposed project is to use an existing seasonal residence for occasional special events. I understand the proposal as follows: The proposed use is for a special event facility that will be used periodically for a variety of uses,such as weddings, parties, etc. These events will be held throughout the year. Events will begin to increase in the spring and peak in the summer where there will be an event 1 to 2 weekends a month excluding the Memorial Day,4th of July and Labor Day weekends. The events will begin to decline in the fall with sporadic events during the holiday season in the winter. There will be approximately 8-10 weddings on weekends in the summer with approximately 50-75 people attending half of those events and approximately 100- 120 people attending the other half. There will be approximately 10-15 smaller events of a variety with approximately 10-30 people attending during the spring and fall seasons. There will possibly be holiday events during the winter on the weekends with most likely 10-30 people attending each.Although possible, these latter events are more unlikely as poor roadway conditions caused by ice and/or snow are unpredictable for long-term event planning. Mason County Code Section 17.03.021 Cottage Industries is noted as follows: Unless noted by an asterisk(*)any use shown in FIGURE 17.03.020 is permitted in any development area as a home-based occupation, or as a cottage industry. The activity shall comply with the criteria in RU-524A,and shall be required to obtain a special use permit unless they comply with the following standards: A.Parking areas shall accommodate residents and employees only,any provision for additional parking shall require a Special Use Permit. B. The outdoor storage of merchandise or materials is allowed if they are not visible to the public from off the site. L'-nrcteu filn:�0td J25 Bum+rrtl'urr.Wrici.cnl h'nla Polnl W.sfrnw PLLC-Mnen Counglfic.me'u IaneEvantle"(A 0i;-ran:Lm N L' COI np-._n:';r��w G•iY^w BUCKINGHAM LANE EVENT FACILITY Attn: Mike and Kathy Eacrett May 25, 2014 Page-2- C.A cottage industry shall involve the owner or lessee of the property who shall reside within the dwelling unit,and shall not employ on the premises more than five(5) nonresidents. A temporary increase in the number of employees is permitted to accommodate a business that is seasonal in nature.However, not more than five additional persons shall be employed on a temporary basis(up to six weeks)without a Special Use Permit. D. More than one business may be allowed,in or on the same premises provided that all of the criteria are met for all business combined. E. There shall be no alterations to the outside appearance of the buildings or premises that are not consistent with the residential use of the property,or other visible evidence of the conduct of such cottage industry,other than one sign no larger than 12 square feet. F. No equipment or process shall be used in such home occupations which creates noise, vibration,glare, fumes,odors, or electrical interference detectable to the normal senses off the property. G.The cottage industry shall not create an increase of 5%or more in local traffic. The proposed Buckingham Lane Lodge project would not generate traffic during the traditional weekday PM peak hour. The traffic would occur before and after the occasional events on Saturdays and Sundays. The summary and conclusions are on page six of this letter. PROJECT INFORMATION Figure 1 is a vicinity map showing the location of the proposed site and surrounding road network. Below is an aerial image of the project site obtained from the Mason County GIS. Project Site j E ISLAND CRESTAD -: =✓��HCH'�M�,� �� oi` 1 _'_�_._ mot...• IUD c-irgeh EiibW:<o:l.eW npfn lv Ev<at Cenfn-P.oDrn w:tnnw.CIIC-4atao Cpunt�BvcWn9MmlineEreMunNyLm111nNklNh OW BUCKINGHAM LANE EVENT FACILITY Attn: Mike and Kathy Eacrett May 25, 2014 Page-3- Figure 2 shows a preliminary site plan I conceptually sketched based on information provided by the project team. Access to the site is provided via E. Buckingham Lane that has access to E. Eckert Road. The existing open area to the southwest of the facility structure can accommodate 50 cars(designed as back-in stalls), likely more if needed. In addition,4- parking spots (2-handicap and 2-caterer/event sponsor) immediately in front of the buildings are provided. Event attendees would enter the parking area on the west end to find parking and exit the parking to the east. This area provides appropriate turn around space. In total the facility would have a minimum of 54 stalls. EXISTING ENVIRONMENT Proiect Site The project site is located on parcel #121081100010 Road System The primary road serving the project is E. Eckert Road, E Eckert Road near the site is a low volume and speed road about 12' wide with 4 to 6' of shoulder space for about 1/4 mile and then it widens out to about 18' west of E.Vineyard Crest Road. And west of Stretch Island Road South about 20' of paved width exist and is marked with yellow centerline striping. Traffic Volumes Mason County Transportation Element, o r November 2005 provides transportation d N information. Figure Vill-1-3 provides the `� ? Average Daily Traffic Volumes on roads in the County for 2000 and (2025). The f/ �.��1Q4� Project Site pertinent portion of the Figure is depicted °' 1f - 4� I to the right. The County information does not show rPr Y 2Q�� x data for roadways on Stretch Island. From the available data the volumes would be substantially less than on Grapeview Loop Road. n Review of aerial data indicates E. Eckert Road east of E.Vineyard Crest Road serves 10 single family residences. A typical SFDU generates about 1-PM peak hour trip and 10 daily trips on a typical weekday. On a weekend day about 9 to 10 daily trips are generated. Thus E. Eckert Road near the site serves roughly 100 vehicles per day. Traffic Operational Review The average daily traffic capacity of a 2-lane roadway exceeds 10,000 ADT. Further,a typical 2-lane road has a peak hour capacity of 1,000 vehicles per hour(at Level of Service C c-weXa n;:,aoi<oz5-ea,�n.:.,.e.e:rr,e.om.n<ee:wo„ae,vue u.•o,eo..,•,e.ev,.¢n,mwe.e.,..a,am iewnr..n.a..:.,eee JTE, Inc. BUCKINGHAM LANE EVENT FACILITY Attn: Mike and Kathy Eacrett May 25, 2014 Page-4- operations,that is typically considered very good Traffic Operation by Traffic Engineers during peak time periods). The capacity of the short section (about 1/4 mile)of E. Eckert Road east of E.Vineyard Road is estimated at a minimum of 2,500 ADT Review of the available traffic data shows that the traffic volumes are well below capacity. TRIP GENERATION AND DISTRIBUTION Definitions A vehicle trip is defined as a single or one direction vehicle movement with either the origin or destination (exiting or entering) inside the study site. Traffic generated by development projects consists of the following types of trips: Pass-By Trips: Trips made as intermediate stops on the way from an origin to a primary trip destination. Diverted Linked Trips: Trips attracted from the traffic volume on roadways within the vicinity of the generator but require a diversion from that roadway to another roadway to gain access to the site. Captured Trips: Site trips shared by more than one land use in a multi-use development. Primary Trips: Trips made for the specific purpose of using the services of the project. Trip Generation The Trip Generation Manual identifies rates and equations for various land uses. The manual does not contain rates or equations for an Events Facility type use as that of the Buckingham Lane Lodge. A Recreational Community Center land use is identified, however, this type of land uses incorporates activities such as basketball,weightlifting,swimming, etc., thus does not reflect the Buckingham Lane Lodge use. The Buckingham Lane Facility provides space for meetings/conferences during the week and events such as weddings during the weekend. The space usage is similar to a Church in many ways. The Buckingham Lane Event Facility activities generally reflect the uses of a Church land use; except no worship services are provided. Church incorporates(besides worship service) functions such as meetings,socializing, birthdays,weddings,etc.similar to that of the Buckingham Lane Event Facility. The peak typically occurs during the weekend (Friday - Sunday)as it houses the larger activities. A church type use also usually peaks during the weekends. Thus for comparisons purposes I have used the rates depicted for a Church land use. The rates for a Church land use for both on Saturday and Sunday were investigated. Table 1 shows the calculated vehicular trips generated by the proposed project during an average weekday and during the street traffic peak hours. The trip generation is calculated b(t I C-Reea Fka\S'_3<03 .i,i6ivm lase E.ent Cexei f1o4eM1W 1Mrea PIAC MaFe.Csim,\M1 COL R k'L'-*%O rEx COLOW 1��'1'�)KLI' JTE, Inc. BUCKINGHAM LANE EVENT FACILITY Attn: Mike and Kathy Eacrett May 25, 2014 Page-5- using average trip rates in the Trip Generation for Church (ITE Land Use Code 560). All site trips made by all vehicles for all purposes, including commuter, visitor,and service and delivery vehicle trips are included in the trip generation values. The rates identified for a Church use on Sunday for the peak hour are calculated to be 73 peak hour trips that could occur during one of the infrequent larger event. The daily traffic during a large gathering would be about 108 trips that include the guests and vendors of the event programming. Typical site events have 10 to 30 people in attendance and would have significantly less traffic. Jake Traffic Engineering, Inc. has conducted prior research regarding Event Facilities. The research documented vehicle occupancy of patrons attending events such as a wedding. The results of the data collected indentified that three guests per car is the typical. Using this data,(~1 car per 3 people),and each car represents one enter and one exit,thus the total number of trips by guests could be projected at 80 that is generally consistent with the 73 projected using ITE data. Therefore the Buckingham Lane Event Facility project would generate 73 to 80 peak hour trips during an infrequent large event on a weekend and have 108 ADT. The typical site events are significantly smaller and would have less traffic. The annual average traffic that would be generated by the facility activities is estimated at 1,170 total daily trips(10-events with 100 attendees+ 15 events with 20 attendees)over the course of a year. As a comparison a home based Artist studio providing a 500' of gallery space(ITE LUC 814 Specialty Retail)would generate 7,458 total daily trips over the course of an entire year(261 weekdays x 44.32 ADT/1,000 sf x 0.5 sf+ 52 Saturday days x 42.04 ADT/1,000 sf x 0.5 sf+ 52 Sunday days x 22.36 ADT/1,000 sf x 0.5 sf). Similarly a 500'Architect, Engineer or other professional studio (ITE LUC 710 General Office Building)would generate 1,524 total trips throughout the year. The proposed Buckingham Lane Event Facility would generate less traffic over the course of a year than other potential uses. The traffic effect would be minimal;the roadway has more than ample capacity to accommodate the occasional events proposed of the Buckingham Lane Event Facility.The annual average traffic effect of the facility would be less than other potential Cottage Industry activities such as an Artist Studio or professional office space. The total existing traffic on E. Eckert Road near the site is about 36,500 trips per year. Five percent of this total is 1,825 trips per year. The event facility projects to generate about 1,170 trips per year that is less than 5%of the existing traffic. Parkin The ITE Parking Generation 4th Edition provides projected parking demand for a variety of land uses. Using the ITE LUC for Church,as discussed prior, per attendee I project the Parking Demand for a 120 attendance event at 54 vehicles. The Buckingham Lane Event Facility proposes to have 54 parking stalls. Thus the site would have sufficient parking. C 1-?re,etl fiba�3GSn 03S&.c¢n6nam W+f Erom feT. e4ert W bl'rvo.VLLL Miam G,vnrylan[k�hmlmM1+miaMry I tvNIT.HiA,ntr poe JTE, Inc. BUCKINGHAM LANE EVENT FACILITY Attn: Mike and Kathy Eacrett May 25, 2014 Page-6- SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS This letter has identified the existing traffic volume,site trip and parking generation and reviewed the site access. Based on my review the proposed Buckingham Lane Event Facility would have minimal traffic and parking effect and should be allowed by the County. The proposed project would need to be constructed in conformance to applicable County requirements. If you have any questions you can contact me at 206.762.1978 or email me at jaketraffic@comcast.com. WAS11" Very truly yours, �O 257 ' Mark J.Jacobs, PE, PTOE, President GN T R JAKE TRAFFIC ENGINEERING, INC. DS�•Zl^• 2�1`f MJJ: mjj EXPIRES 4I3IZ Dl6 C%rPrgenF-%701i G15--5l+an Lana fveM Cmtp NPUeiIW 11—Mt Munn Cwm,Ru[emfMmunBvm/Pulry{ I)TnMCLMer tloc Colas COM CI.L-; JTE, Inc. i VEHICULAR TRIP GENERATION TABLE 1 BUCKINGHAM LANE EVENT FACILITY - MASON COUNTY LEVEL I TRAFFIC AND PARKING LETTER �TIM�EPEIR�10DD TRIP RATE TRIPS ENT�RING�TR�IPSEX�ITING TOTAL Church(ITE Land Use Code 560, 120 people) Saturday Daily Trips T=0.90X 54(50%) 54(50%) 108 Saturday Peak Hour T=0.60X 31(43%) 41(57%) 72 Sunday Peak Hour T=0.61X 31(43%) 42(57%) 73 T=trips X=#of attendees A vehicle trip is defined as a single or one direction vehicle movement with either the origin or destination (existing or entering) inside the study site. The above trip generation values account for all the site trips made by all vehicles for all purposes, including commuter,visitor, recreation,and service and delivery vehicle trip c-nq.a rn.,�o:aon eod,A:o.u.c,emuenw n�w--n LLC-Maaencauny C( Rr'Va+ev ex ff a Project: Buckingham Lane Event Facility - Mason County fl Location: 80 E. Buckingham Lane Li NORTH E CEDAR ST ,a � - j o _ I NOR-JHSNOPER ~ i w S + +pp IL 2, m O - O .G O ECRESTOR w i .�t t.kctt La ke - Le eAnderson V Q 41 o, MW fbnd vola .40 GO 2320 RD r oft GD 2274 RD �A pp0, 3 0C Project Site Vf 14 'OD 10A- Task Lak O AMU oti-Lalwo�Q`� __ =W Gp zaoD Ro ��h�o A o—a^��o , i 6 a'- x a' -_ - -- 'c EGRAP� W 00 O- W op0 9 O?�p� P < .`BARD k' 3 GD 2082 RO A:- �} Base Niap obtained from CO N Mason County GIs •.t r EYATESRp 15912ft JTE, Inc BUCKINGHAM LANE EVENT FACILITY - MASON COUNTY FIGURE 1 LEVEL I TRAFFIC AND PARKING LETTER Reprint in Color Only VICINITY MAP 10(�� lip _f..p.i 'r NORTH '4 ` �" y ;• "'� ':'' Base Map obtained from �.�,� • r r Mason County GIS .. • ' } - `' �,�. ' h. :. •: V'�•� Event Facility Ld 15Qft � BUCKINGHAM LANE EVENT FACILITY - MASON COUNTY ATE, Inc. TRAFFIC AND PARKING LETTER FIGURE 2 Reprint in Color Only CONCEPTUAL PARKING AND CIRCULATION n_ TITLE RESEARCH REGARDING EASEMENT �l� Filed for Record at Request of WA R.E.EXCISE TAX Steve Dixon PLLC OCT O 4 2�{O6 104 Tremont Street,Suite 201 O�I`� u Port Orchard,WA 98366 EXEMN r= USA FRAZIER -ins Treas., Mason County _ EASEMENT Abbrev.Legal: Gov't Lot 9,Bect.8,Tn 21 N,R 1 W W.M a Assessor's TPN: 12308-11-90040 12108-11-00030 12 108-1 1-000 10 Additional legal description is on Page 2 and 3 of this Document. FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION of TEN DOLLARS ($10.00), in hand paid, the benefits X derived and to be derived by the Grantor herein,and other good and valuable consideration,receipt 8 whereof is hereby acknowledged,Grantor,SHIRLEY D.EACRETT,Trustee of the Robert F.Eacrett Tax Credit Trust,established in his last will and testament dated April 28, 1994,and admitted to Probate on March 7,2003,in Island County Superior Court Cause#03-4-00040-1,hereby conveys and warrants to the Grantee,MARJORIE G:UHLMAN,a single woman,her heirs,successors and assigns, a perpetual, non-exclusive easement for ingress and egress, over and across the real property described in Exhibit A,attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein. The owner of the land benefitted by the easement shall have the right to gravel and/or pave the easement area. This easement does not allow for the parking of vehicles. The property benefitted by this easement is described in Exhibit B attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein.This easement shall run with the land benefitted and burdened thereby.The rights granted by this easement shall not include the right to disturb any existing structures. ell DATED thisl7 day of L ys,2006. SHIRLEY D.OtACRETT STATE OF WASHINGTON ) Lss COUNTY OF. puy. —) On this day personally appeared before me SIMMEY D.EACRETT,to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument,and acknowledged that she signed the same as her free and voluntary act and deed,for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. {� GIVEN under seal this day of 6UAJ 2006. *0701, NOTARY in and fo fate of �~ Washington,residing at �tI016 My commission expires: del isuuaun� 1 (IIIII III IIIIIII IIIII IIIII(I IIII��II I (IIII I I1 IIII 1879490P SITA DIXON M&MT 34.00 Muon Co, WA EXHIBIT A A 15.00 foot easement for ingress, egress and utilities over under and across portion of Government Lot 9 of Section 8,Township 21 North,Range 1 West,W.M.,Mason County,Washington,and lying 7.50 feet on either side of the centerline particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at the Northeast comer of Government Lot 9 of Section 8,Township 21 North, Range 1 West,W.M.; thence South 02° 17' 00" West, along the East line of said Government Lot 9, 210.35 feet;thence North 63° 02' 15"West, 17.61 feet to a pont on . the West right-of-way line of Stretch Island Road and the POINT OF BEGINNING of the herein described centerline; thence, continue, North 63" 02' 15" West, along said centerline, 10.78 feet; thence, continue along said centerline,North 55° 17' 52"West, 31.95 feet; and North 67°42'23"West,97.21 feet;and North 64' 37'34"West, 89.80 feet; and North 62° 28' 03" West, 28.45 feet; and North 70"34'01"West,22.14 feet;and North 73'55'39"West,27.17 feet; and North 70'38'32"West,32.83 feet;and North 69"38' 17"West, 28.42 feet; and North 57° 01' 01"West, 24.95 feet; and North 44°56' 59"West,30.57 feet;and North 59° 13'48"West, 15.94 feet to a driveway intersection hereinafter referred to as "Point A"; thence, continue along said centerline, North 68° 44' 26" West, 18.94 feet; and North 78° 52' 04" West, 53.21 feet; and North 23'04' IS"East,61.82 feet to a point on the South line of Assessor's Parcel Number 12108-11-90040 and the TERMINUS of the said centerline. TOGETHER WITH a 15.00 foot easement for ingress, egress and utilities over,under,and across that portion of Government Lot 9 of Section 8,Township 21 North,Range 1 West,W.M.,Mason County, Washington, and lying 7.50 feet on either side of the centerline particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the afurementioned driveway intersection referred to as"Point A";thence North 04° 15' 12" East,along the centerline of said driveway,46.61 feet to a point on the South line of Assessor's Parcel Number 12108-11-00030 and the TERMINUS of the said centerline. 2 3l� 1 1 IIIIIII III IIIII IIII IIII 187g49O 2 P IIIIIII DIIIIIIIIII IIIII IIII III EFkSm 34.00 Hawn Co SIEVE Il(OH , NR EXHIBIT B A tract of land situate in Government Lot Nine(9),Section Eight(8), Township Twenty One (21) North, Range One (1) West, W.M., in Mason County,Washington,particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast corner of said Government Lot 9; thence run North 66°00'West along the meander line a distance of 411.66 feet to the true point of beginning of the tract of land hereby conveyed;thence run South 28° 45' West 130.80 feet;thence run North 69'30'West 45.72 feet;thence run North 11*37'Eastl36.13 feet;thence run South 66'00'East 86.05 feet,more or less,to the said true point of beginning. A tract of land situate in Government Lot Nine(9),Section Eight(8), Township Twenty One North (21), Range One (1) West, W.M., in Mason County,Washington,particularly as follows: Commencing at the Northeast corner of said Government Lot 9; thence running North 66° 00' West 342.66 feet to the point of beginning of the tract of land hereby described;thence South 24°57' West 138.70 feet;thence North 62°42'West 78.53 feet;thence North 28° 45' East 134.80 feet to an intersection with the adjusted meander line; thence South 66° 00' East, along said adjusted meander line,69.00 feet,more or less,to the point of beginning. Together with a perpetual non-exclusive easement over and across an existing roadway beginning at the County Road and continuing West to the above described land. v �.Yhtk t v LETTERS OF SUPPORT FOR APPLICATION On Friday, May 23, 2014 1:27 PM,george kenny<Bknwman@yahoo.com>wrote: To whom it may concern, Having been the owner of the Chainsaw Carving outlet in Allyn for over 20 years, I have had the pleasure of meeting and interacting with many of the established business in the area, many like Keith Chamberlain of Ornamental Stone, and Tom Farmer, of Farmers oysters, have become some of my best friends. So too now is Kathy and Mike Eacrett of Stretch Island, having met Kathy some 10 years ago when she worked for Gene Jaurez as director of the nail salon. I, having a background in customer service and sales was introduced to her to do a presentation to some new hires, I found her to be of the upmost character and the ethics standard she required of her staff was unsurpassed.The community has rallied around her and Mike with their introduction of a beautiful new business on the island,The North Mason Chamber who hosted a grand opening was impressed with the low impact on the natural surroundings and keeping a historical theme which the island is famous for. The Eacrett family has owned this property since the island has been inhabited, and I think it would do the island proud to have Kathy and Mike continue in moving forward with their business, and the community as a whole gives their support,Thank you,George Kenny, Owner, George Kenny School of Chainsaw Carving/ Bear in a Box/Top of the Cork wine tasting. �l3 May 23rd 2014 Mason County Department of Community Development We would like to address the notice of the special use permitt that Kathy and Mike Eacrett are applying on 80 E Buckingham Lane Grapeview WA 98546. We live approximately 1.5 miles from their property. We have known the Eacretts for several years. Mike's great, great, grandfather Adam Eckert was the second family to purchase land on Stretch Island over 100 years ago, which is now in the town of Grapeview. Mike and Kathy are 5th generation to live on Buckingham Lane. We no personally how excited they are to be able share their property with others. We think their idea of a Wedding Venue and Family Celebration Venue is a wonderful idea and would be a great asset to our community. They have our complete support Bill and Barb McFarland �l3 Karol Hagman Mehan G. Gordon & Heather J. Benjamin 665 Elk Springs Drive 2716 22nd Avenue Court NW Glenwood Springs, CO. 81601-9425 Gig Harbor, WA. 98335-7973 Ellison Land & Logging, LLC Loretta Laberge Trust 1505 La Coronilla Drive 780 E. Eckert Road Santa Barbara, CA. 93109-1715 Grapeview, WA. 98546-9602 Patricia H. Garton Life Estate Steven F. Eacrett c/o Michael Benson 18405 68th Avenue W. 12101 30th Street NE Lynnwood, WA. 98037 Lake Stevens, WA. 98258-8425 Marjorie J. Uhlman Lori J. Norman P.O. Box 248 P.O. Box 32956 Grapeview, WA. 98546-0248 Juneau, AK 99803-2956 Richard M. & Julie C. Creighton Christopher J. & Vicki L. Phillips P.O. Box 464 12402 Hallstrom Dr. NW Grapeview, WA. 98546-0464 Gig Harbor, WA. 98332 Clarendon N. Allen, IV Jeanne Brandrud 35123 27th Avenue S. 11556 Greenwood Avenue N. Ste #304 Federal Way, WA. 98003-9107 Seattle, Wa. 98133-8673 McKinlay-Barnes Rvcbl Lvg Trst David M. & Shirley Lacy 17207 NE 22nd Court 6339 Chinook Drive Redmond, WA. 98052-6002 Clinton, WA. 98236-9126 Chris L. Lincecum Janice C. Jutilla 16062 SE 4tn Street 4018 E. J Street Bellevue, WA. 98008-4809 Tacoma, WA. 98404-2935 Elizabeth H. Barth 490 Double Hill Road Eastsound, WA. 98245 +*�,, Melody Peterson Property Record Card Mason County Assessor 12108-75-00080/ 2014 411 N 5TH ST Active PO BOX J Shelton,WA 98584 r� 360-427-9670 x491 III) II II II II II I II II I I II II I II + 3 0 0 0 0 + 3 1 2 5 8 8 1 + Parcel Information Ownership Information Parcel Number: 12108-75-00080 Current: HAGMAN MEHAN,KAROL Legal: TRACT 8 OF SURVEY 1/115 Address: 665 ELK SPRINGS DR Address 2: Situs: City,St,Zip: GLENWOOD SPRINGS CO 816019425 Market Value Assessed Value Property Classification Land Value: 53,200 Land Value: 53,200 District: 0080-Tax District 0080 Impr Value: Impr Value: 0 Neighborhood: Reval 1 Perm Crop Value: 0 Perm Crop Value: 0 DOR Code: 91 -Undeveloped-Land Total Value: 53,200 Total Value: 53,200 Ex Code: Open Space: 0 Frozen Value: 0 Exemption: OSP Date: Taxable Value: 53,200 Total Acres: 5.05000 Misc Assessments Misc Assessment Acres Conservation District 88-015 Dry Acres: Timber Acres: DNR 1 Irrigated Acres: DNR Acres: _ 5.0500 Fire District 88-020 Other Acres: PC Acres: Lake District 88-010 ISite Acres: Total Acres: 0.00 Events Multiple Owners Date I Event Type I User I EventlD Name HAGMAN MEHAN,KAROL 100 Sales History Date Book/Page Instrument Type Grantor Grantee Qualification Sale Price 7/29/2011 1977126 QCD HAGMEN ETAL,JOE L HAGMAN MEHAN,KAROL 0 10/16/2007 1907741 WD KAROL HAGMAN MEHAN,TR KAROL HAGMAN MEHAN Yes 0 8/14/2007 1903297 QCD KAROL HAGMAN MEHAN,TR BETTE B HAGMAN,A 1/2 INTEREST Yes 0 8/14/2007 1903298 WD BETTE B HAGMAN KAROL HAGMAN MEHAN,TR LV TR BETTE Yes 0 HAGMAN 9/16/2004 1820056 QCD JOE L&BETTE B HAGMAN OE L HAGMAN&BETTE B HAGMAN,EA 1/2INT Yes 0 9/16/2004 1 1820057 1 QCD BETTE B HAGMAN 7R-OL HAGMAN MEHAN,1/2 INT,TRSTE' Yes 0 Historic Valuation Information Year Billed Owner Improvements Land Perm Crop Total Exempt Taxable Taxes 2013 HAGMAN MEHAN.KAROL 0 50.400 0 50A00 0 50,400 433,71 2012 HAGMEN ETAL,JOE L 0 56,000 0 56,000 0 56,000 435.17 2011 HAGMEN ETAL,JOE L 0 58,965 0 58,965 0 58,965 422.20 2010 HAGMEN ETAL,JOE L 0 58,965 0 58,965 0 58,965 425.44 2009 HAGMEN ETAL,JOE L 0 58,965 0 58,965 0 58,965 421.42 2008 HAGMEN ETAL,JOE L 0 58,965 0 58,965 0 58,965 464,37 J 300001 PropertyRecordCard www.terrascan.com Property Record Card Printed on 3/19/2014 10:49:00 AM Page 1 of 1 Melody Peterson Property Record Card Mason County Assessor 12108-75-00070/2014 411 N 5TH ST Active Shelton,WA 584 60-42277-9670 9 9 �IIII (II III IIII II II II III II I I I II( I�111 Parcel Information Ownership Information Parcel Number: 12108-75-00070 Current: MEHAN,KAROL L Legal: TRACT 7 OF SURVEY 1/115 Address: 1665 ELK SPRINGS DR Address 2: Situs: City,St,Zip: GLENWOOD SPRINGS CO 816019425 Market Value Assessed Value Property Classification Land Value: 53,200 Land Value: 53,200 District: 0080-Tax District 0080 Impr Value: Impr Value: 0 Neighborhood: Reval 1 Perm Crop Value: 0 Perm Crop Value: 0 DOR Code: 91 -Undeveloped-Land Total Value: 53,200 Total Value: 53,200 Ex Code: Open Space: 0 Frozen Value: 0 Exemption: OSP Date: ITaxable Value: 53,200 Total Acres: 5.12000 Misc Assessments Misc Assessment Acres Conservation District 88-015 Dry Acres: Timber Acres: DNR 1 Irrigated Acres: DNR Acres: 5.1200 Fire District 88-020 Other Acres: PC Acres: Lake District 88-010 Site Acres: ITotal Acres: 0.00 Events IMultiple Owners Date Event Type User EventlD I Nance % MEHAN.KAROL L 100 Sales History Date Book/Page Instrument Type Grantor Grantee Qualification Sale Price 2/14/2007 1889180 QCD MARTIN L MEHAN KAROL L MEHAN Yes G 12/16/1991 536684 AFF DOROTHY KAHN ZELTZER SOLOMON ZELTZER Yes 0 4/21/1989 492821 WD ROBERT F ELLISON ET UX SOL ZELTZER ET UX Yes 0 4/17/1989 492614 WD SOL ZELTZER ET UX MARTIN L MEHAN ET UX Yes 21,000 Historic Valuation Information Year Billed Owner Improvements Land Perm Crop Total Exempt Taxable Taxes 2013 MEHAN,KAROL L 0 50,400 0 50,400 0 50,400 433.71 2012 MEHAN,KAROL L 0 56,000 0 56,000 0 56,000 435.17 2011 MEHAN,KAROL L 0 58,965 0 58,965 0 58,965 422.20 2010 MEHAN,KAROL L 0 58,965 0 58,965 0 58,965 425.44 2009 MEHAN,KAROL L 0 58,965 0 58,965 0 58,965 421.42 2008 IMEHAN,KAROL L 1 01 58,965 01 58,965 0 58,965 464.37 300001 PropertyRecordCard www.terrascan.com Property Record Card Printed on 3/19/2014 11:59:13 AM Page 1 of 1 Melody Peterson Property Record Card Mason County Assessor 12108-75-00050/2014 t i 411 N 5TH ST Active t", P O BOX J Shelton,WA 98584 Ny 360-427-9670 x491 IIII II III II II II I IIIII I II I III I II • 3 0 0 0 0 + 3 1 2 5 8 7 8 Parcel Information Ownership Information Parcel Number: 12108-75-00050 Current: BENJAMIN,G GORDON&HEATHER J Legal: TRACT 5 OF SURVEY 1/115 Address: 2716 22ND AVE CT NW Address 2: Situs: City,St,Zip: GIG HARBOR WA 983357973 Market Value Assessed Value Property Classification Land Value: 52,530 Land Value: 52,530 District: 0080-Tax District 0080 Impr Value: 1,260 Impr Value: 1,260 Neighborhood: Reval 1 Perm Crop Value: 0 Perm Crop Value: 0 DOR Code: 91 -Undeveloped-Land Total Value: 53,790 Total Value: 53,790 Ex Code: Open Space: 0 Frozen Value: 0 Exemption: OSP Date: Taxable Value: 53,790 Total Acres: 4.67000 Misc Assessments Misc Assessment Acres Conservation District 88-015 Dry Acres: Timber Acres: DNR 1 Irrigated Acres: DNR Acres: 0.0000 Fire District 88-020 Other Acres: PC Acres: Lake District 88-010 Site Acres: I ITotal Acres: 0.00 Events Multiple Owners Date Event Type I User EventlD Name % BENJAMIN,G GORDON&HEATHER J 100 Sales History Date I Book/Page Instrument Type Grantor F Grantee Qualification gale Price 3/23/2006 1863491 WD C H SOMERS/C H SOMERS,TR` Yes 0 3/15/1993 561348 WD MABEL HANSEN:H&M BRANCH C HARLEY SOMERS PROFIT SHARING PLN Yes 30,000 8 TRS 1/27/1983 487446 QCD METROPOLITAN MORG/SEC CO I JONATHON W.THIESSEN Yes 0 Historic Valuation Information Year Billed Owner Improvements Land Perm Crop Total Exempt Taxable Taxes 2013 BENJAMIN,G GORDON&HEATHER J 1,260 49,765 0 51,025 0 51,025 438.87 2012 BENJAMIN,G GORDON&HEATHER J 1,200 55295 0 56,495 0 56,495 438,86 2011 BENJAMIN,G GORDON&HEATHER J 0 55,295 0 55,295 0 55,295 397,35 2010 BENJAMIN,G GORDON&HEATHER J 0 55,295 0 55,295 0 55,295 400.38 2009 BENJAMIN,G GORDON&HEATHER J 0 55,295 0 55,295 0 55,295 396.62 2008 BENJAMIN,G GORDON&HEATHER J 1 0 55,295 01 55,2951 01 55,295 436,89 X 300001 PropertyRecordCard www.terrascan.com Property Record Card Printed on 3/19/2014 10:49:40 AM Page 1 of 1 Melody Peterson Property Record Card Mason County Assessor 12108-78-00010/2014 411 N 5TH ST Active 60 42277-9 70 9 584 9 II II II II II II II I I(II I I I II I I�I Parcel Information Ownership Information Parcel Number: 12108-78-00010 Current: I ELLISON LAND&LOGGING LLC Legal: TR 1 OF SURV 11/150 Address: 1505 LA CORONILLA DR Address 2: Situ;: City,St,Zip: I SANTA BARBARA CA 931091715 Market Value Assessed Value Property Classification Land Value: 61,750 Land Value: 61,750 District: 0080-Tax District 0080 Impr Value: Impr Value: 0 Neighborhood: Reval 1 Perm Crop Value: 0 Perm Crop Value: 0 DOR Code: 91 -Undeveloped-Land Total Value: 61,750 Total Value: 61,750 Ex Code: Open Space: 0 Frozen Value: 0 Exemption: OSP Date: Taxable Value: 61,750 Total Acres: 5.00000 Misc Assessments Misc Assessment Acres Conservation District 88-015 Dry Acres: Timber Acres: DNR 1 Irrigated Acres: DNR Acres: 5.0000 Fire District 88-020 Other Acres: PC Acres: Lake District 88-010 Site Acres: Total Acres: 0.00 Events Multiple Owners Date Event Type User EventlD Name % F C_'SON LAND&LOGGING LLC 100 Sales History Date Book/Page Instrument Type Grantor Grantee Qualification ;ale Price 2/17/2009 1934669 QCD ERIN JENSEN/HEIDI WINSTON ELLISON LAND&LOGGING LLC 1/3 INT Yes 0 2/10/2009 1934399 TRDE RICHARD W JENSEN TRUSTEE BONNIE J JENSEN 1/3 INT Yes 0 2/10/2009 1934400 QCD BONNIE J JENSEN ERIN K JENSEN&HEIDI A WINSTON 1/3 INT Yes 0 12/31/2008 1932693 TRDE RICHARD W JENSEN TRUSTEE ELLISON LAND&LOGGING LLC 1/3 INT Yes 0 12/31/2008 1932692 TRDE RICHARD JENSEN TRUSTEE ELLISON LAND&LOGGING LLC 1/3 INT Yes 0 9/28/2004 1820965 WD I KATHRYN ELLISON,TRUSTEE RICHARD W JENSE,TRSTE KATHRYN Yes 0 ELLISON' 6/26/2000 1713568 WD KATHRYN ELLISON KATHRYN ELLISON TRUSTEE KATHRYN Yes 0 ELLISON' 6/26/2000 1713567 WD KATHRYN ELLISON TRUSTEE KATHRYN ELLISON Yes 0 9/25/1996 634722 OCD &KATHRYN ELLISON RV B Ej ROBERTF-KATHRYNELLISON TRUST Yes 0 Historic Valuation Information Year Billed Owner Improvements Land Perm Crop Total Exempt Taxable Taxes 2013 ELLISON LAND&LOGGING LLC 0 58,500 0 58,500 0 58,500 500,54 2012 ELLISON LAND&LOGGING LLC 0 65,000 0 65,000 0 65,000 502.24 2011 ELLISON LAND&LOGGING LLC 0 72,500 0 72,500 0 72,500 513.85 2010 ELLISON LAND&LOGGING LLC 0 72,500 0 72,500 0 72,500 517,83 2009 ELLISON LAND&LOGGING LLC 0 72,500 0 72,500 0 72,500 512.90 2008 JENSEN TRUSTEE,RICHARD W 01 72,500 01 72,5001 01 72,5001 565.71 300001 PropertyRecordCard www.terrascan.com Property Record Card Printed on 3/19/2014 11:00:26 AM Page 1 of 1 Melody Peterson Property Record Card Mason County Assessor 12109-22-00012/ 2014 411 N 5TH ST Active Shelton,WA 60-422 584 9670 99 IIII II II II III III II I II III II( II I II A + 3 0 0 0 0 + 3 1 2 5 9 1 8 + Parcel Information Ownership Information Parcel Number: 12109-22-00012 Current: LABERGE TRS,LORETTA Legal: TRACT 1-13 OF GOVT LOT 1 Address: LORETTA LABERGE REV LV TR Address 2: 780 E ECKERT RD Situs: 1780 E ECKERT RD GRAPEVIEW City,St,Zip: GRAPEVIEW WA 985469602 Market Value Assessed Value Property Classification Land Value: 76,195 Land Value: 76,195 District: 0080-Tax District 0080 Impr Value: 143,390 Impr Value: 143,390 Neighborhood: Reval 1 Perm Crop Value: 0 Perm Crop Value: O DOR Code: 19-Residential-Vacation and Cabin Total Value: 219,585 Total Value: 219,585 Ex Code: Open Space: 0 1 Frozen Value: 0 Exemption: OSP Date: T Taxable Value: 219,585 Total Acres: 2.50000 Misc Assessments Misc Assessment Acres Conservation District 88-015 Dry Acres: Timber Acres: DNR 1 Irrigated Acres: DNR Acres: 0.0000 Fire District 88-020 Other Acres: PC Acres: Lake District 88-010 Site Acres: Total Acres: 0,00 Events Multiple Owners Date Event Type user EventlD I Name h LABERGE TRS.LORETTA 100 Sales History Date Book/Page Instrument Type Grantor Grantee Qualification Sale Price 7/2/2012 1991635 AFF LABERGE TRS.LORETT: 6/18/2012 1990827 DC LABERGE TRS,LORETTA 0 1/29/2007 1887956 QCD LORETTA LABERGE LORETTA LABERGE77=Z5F REV LIVYes 0 TRUST 1!7/1991 520716 AFF DONALD V ANDERSON ETAL LORETTA LABERGE Yes 20000 10/16/1986 491401 DC GENE L LABERGE Yes 0 11/12/1965 458403 1 CPA DONA JEAN LABERGE AND LORETTA MAY LABERGE HIS WIFE Yes 0 Historic Valuation Information Year Billed Owner Improvements Land Perm Crop Total Exempt Taxable Taxers 2013 LABERGE TRS,LORETTA 143,390 72,185 215,575 0 215,575 1,796.43 2012 LABERGE TRS,LORETTA 164,825 80,205 0 245,030 0 245,030 1,843,70 2011 LABERGE TRS,LORETTA 191,290 90,375 0 281,665 0 281,665 1,930,27 2010 LABERGE TRS,LORETTA 191,290 90,375 0 281,665 0 281,665 1,945.73 2009 LABERGE TRS,LORETTA 191,290 90,375 0 281,665 0 211,665 1,926.57 2008 LABERGE TRS,LORETTA 191,290 90,375 0 281,665 0 281,665 2,131,71 J 300001 PropertyRecordCard www.terrascan.com Property Record Card Printed on 3/19/2014 11:01:16 AM Page 1 of 1 Melody Peterson Property Record Card Mason County Assessor 12109-22-00010/2014 411 N 5TH ST Active PO BOX J Shelton,WA 98584 "' .>•' 360-427-9670 x491 �I II II II II II II I IIII III III I I II�I Parcel Information Ownership Information Parcel Number: 12109-22-00010 Current: GARTON LIFE ESTATE,PATRICIA H Legal: TR 1 OF GOVT LOT 1*TAX 1-A';TAX 700B TAX 696' Address: C/O MICHAEL BENSON Address 2: 18405 68TH AVE W Situs: 1800 E ECKERT RD GRAPEVIEW City,St,zip: LYNNWOOD WA 98037 Market Value Assessed Value Property Classification Land Value: 252,700 Land Value: 252,700 District: 0080-Tax District 0080 Impr Value: 77,775 Impr Value: 77,775 Neighborhood: Reval 1 Perm Crop Value: 0 Perm Crop Value: 0 DOR Code: 18-Residential-All other Total Value: 330,475 Total Value: 330,475 Ex Code: Open Space: 0 Frozen Value: 175,395 Exemption: OSP Date: Taxable Value: 70,160 Total Acres: 1.25000 Misc Assessments Misc Assessment Acres Conservation District 88-015 Dry Acres: Timber Acres: DNR 1 Irrigated Acres: DNR Acres: 0.0000 Fire District 88-020 Other Acres: PC Acres: Lake District 88-010 Site Acres: Total Acres: 0.00 Events Multiple Owners Date Event Type User EventlD Name % 12/18/2012 Senior/Disability Exemption Application Patti 589421 GARTON LIFE ESTATE,PATRICIA H 100 MILAM ETAL,LINDA G 0 Sales History Date Book/Page Instrument Type Grantor t Grantee I Qualification Sale Price 4/28/2010 1956484 OCD STEVENS,BONNIE J STEVENS FAMILY TRUST No 0 10/21/1994 597333 AFF GERALD L GARTON PATRICIA H GARTON Yes 0 9/13/1993 572195 OCD PEGGY PATRICIA SELLS LINDA MILAM,BONNIE STEVENS,M BENSON Yes 0 Historic Valuation Information Year Billed Owner Improvements Land Perm Crop Total Exempt Taxable Taxes 2013 GARTON LIFE ESTATE,PATRICIA H 77,775 239,400 0 317.175 0 70.160 518.08 2012 MILAM ET AL,LINDA G 86,340 266,000 0 352,340 0 70,160 477.60 2011 MILAM ETAL LINDA G 101,730 266.000 0 367,730 0 70,160 441.16 2010 GARTON LIFE ESTATE,PATRICIA H 101,730 266,000 0 367,730 0 70,160 454.54 2009 GARTON LIFE ESTATE,PATRICIA H 101,730 266,000 0 367,730 0 70,160 447.69 2008 GARTON LIFE ESTATE,PATRICIA H 1 101,730 266,0001 01 367,7301 01 70,160 493.11 300001 PropertyRecordCard www.terrascan.com Property Record Card Printed on 3/19/2014 11:01:47 AM Page 1 of 1 Melody Peterson Property Record Card Mason County Assessor 1210$-11-70730/ 2014 411 N 5TH ST Active PO BOX J Shelton,WA 98584 360-427-9670 x491 III II II II II II I) I II IIIIII I (I II Parcel Information Ownership Information Parcel Number: 12108-11-70730 Current: BENJAMIN,G GORDON&HEATHER J Legal: TAX 1173 BLA MC#99 2 000181 SEE S26/233 Address: 2716 22ND AVE CT NW Address 2: Situs: City,St,Zip: GIG HARBOR WA 983357973 Market Value Assessed Value Property Classification Land Value: 125 Land Value: 125 District: 0080-Tax District 0080 Impr Value: Impr Value: 0 Neighborhood: Reval 1 Perm Crop Value: 0 Perm Crop Value: 0 DOR Code: 91 -Undeveloped-Land Total Value: 125 Total Value: 125 Ex Code: Open Space: 0 Frozen Value: 0 Exemption: OSP Date: Taxable Value: 0 Total Acres: 0.00000 Misc Assessments Misc Assessment Acres Conservation District 88-015 Dry Acres: Timber Acres: DNR 1 Irrigated Acres: DNR Acres: Fire District 88-020 Other Acres: PC Acres: Lake District 88-010 Site Acres: Total Acres: 0.00 Events Multiple Owners Date Event Type user EventlD Name % BENJAMIN.G GORDON&HEATHER J 100 Sales History Date Book/Page Instrument Type Grantor Grantee Qualification Sale Price 3/23/2006 1863491 WD C H SOMERS/C H SOMERS.TR` HEATHER Yes 0 8/15/2000 1716497 OCD HARLEY SOMERS JOE L&BETTE B HAGMAN Yes 0 7/28/1993 569323 WD MABEL H HANSEN C HARLEY SOMERS Yes 0 8/11/1968 340547 WD DAISY M BUSH MABEL H HANSEN Yes 0 Historic Valuation Information Year I Billed Owner Improvements Land Perm Crop Total I Exemo I Taxablo I on 2013 BENJAMIN,G GORDON&HEATHER J '.25c 120 0 0 0.00 2012 BENJAMIN,G GORDON&HEATHER J 01 1301 0 1301 01 0.00 2011 BENJAMIN,G GORDON&HEATHER J 01 1301 01 1301 01 1301 5.00 2010 BENJAMIN,G GORDON&HEATHER J 01 1301 01 1301 01 01 5.00 J 300001 PropertyRecordCard www.terrascan.com Property Record Card Printed on 3/19/2014 10:47:59 AM Page 1 of 1 Melody Peterson Property Record Card Mason County Assessor 12108-11-00100/2014 411 N 5TH ST Active / PO BOX J y Shelton,WA 98584 'y`—!• 360-427-9670 x491IIII III IIII II I II II II III II I I I IIII �I * 3 0 0 0 0 + 3 1 2 5 5 8 3 * Parcel Information Ownership Information Parcel Number: 12108-11-00100 Current: BENJAMIN,G GORDON&HEATHER J Legal: TRACT 10 OF GOVT LOT 9 BLA MC#99 2 000181 S Address: 2716 22ND AVE CT NW 22/45&26/233 M.0 JUDGMENT#96-2-00499-9 AF#1768835 Address 2: Situs: City,St,Zip: GIG HARBOR WA 983357973 Market Value Assessed Value Property Classification Land Value: 4,275 Land Value: 4,275 District: 0080-Tax District 0080 Impr Value: Impr Value: 0 Neighborhood: Reval 1 Perm Crop Value: 0 Perm Crop Value: 0 DOR Code: 91 -Undeveloped-Land Total Value: 4,275 Total Value: 4,275 Ex Code: Open Space: 0 Frozen Value: 0 Exemption: OSP Date: Taxable Value: 4,275 Total Acres: 0.48000 Misc Assessments Misc Assessment Acres Conservation District 88-015 Dry Acres: Timber Acres: DNR 1 Irrigated Acres: DNR Acres: Fire District 88-020 Other Acres: PC Acres: Lake District 88-010 Site Acres: I I Total Acres: 0.00 Events Multiple Owners Date Event Type User EventlD Name y. BENJAMIN.G GORDON&HEATHER J 100 Sales History Date Book/Page Instrument Type Grantor Grantee oua1Mcatlon Sale Prim 3/23/2006 1863491 WD C H SOMERS/C H SOMERS,TR' Yes 0 7/28/1993 569321 QCD ROBERT F EACRETT MABEL H HANSEN Yes 0 7/28/1993 569323 WD MABEL H HANSEN C HARLEY SOMERS Yes 250,000 3/2/1972 561901 WD ANNA E.EACRETT MABEL H.HANSEN Yes 0 Historic Valuation Information Year Billed Owner Improvements Land Perm Crop Total Exempt Taxable Taxes 2013 BENJAMIN.G GORDON&HEATHER J 0 4,050 0 4,050 0 4,050 33.41 2012 BENJAMIN,G GORDON&HEATHER J 0 4,500 0 4,500 0 4,500 33.53 2011 BENJAMIN,G GORDON&HEATHER J 0 12,000 0 12,000 0 12,000 86.26 2010 BENJAMIN,G GORDON&HEATHER J 0 12,000 0 12,000 0 12,000 86,92 2009 BENJAMIN,G GORDON&HEATHER J 0 12,000 0 12,000 0 12,000 86.10 2008 BENJAMIN,G GORDON&HEATHER J 0 12,000 01 12,000 01 12,000 94,84 X 300001 PropertyRecordCard www.terrascan.com Property Record Card Printed on 3/19/2014 10:50:21 AM Page 1 of 1 = ; Melody Peterson Property Record Card Mason County Assessor 12108-11-00080/2014 411 N 5TH ST Active P O BOX J Shelton,WA 98584 N y` 1 360-427-9670 x491 I�III II IIII IIIIIII III II I IIIII I�I I�IIII I��I + 3 0 0 D 0 + 3 1 2 5 5 e 1 w Parcel Information Ownership Information Parcel Number: 12108-11-00080 Current: HAGMAN MEHAN, KAROL Legal: TRS 7-8 OF G.L.9&TAX 70OC-1 -S 26/233 Address: 1665 ELK SPRINGS DR Address 2: Situs: 120 E BUCKINGHAM LN GRAPEVIEW City,St,Zip: GLENWOOD SPRINGS CO 816019425 Market Value Assessed Value Property Classification Land Value: 110,295 Land Value: 110,295 District: 0080-Tax District 0080 Impr Value: 135,305 Impr Value: 135,305 Neighborhood: Reval 1 Perm Crop Value: 0 Perm Crop Value: 0 DOR Code: 18-Residential-All other Total Value: 245,600 Total Value: 245,600 Ex Code: Open Space: 0 Frozen Value: 0 Exemption: OSP Date: Taxable Value: 245,600 Total Acres: 0.61000 Misc Assessments Misc Assessment Acres Conservation District 88-015 Dry Acres: Timber Acres: DNR 1 Irrigated Acres: DNR Acres: Fire District 88-020 Other Acres: PC Acres: Lake District 88-010 Site Acres: Total Acres: 0.00 Events Multiple Owners Date Event Type User EventiD Name % HAGMAN MEHAN.KAROL 100 Sales History Date Book/Page Instrument Type Grantor Grantee Quallocation sale Price 7/29/2011 1977126 QCD HAGMEN ETAL,JOE L HAGMAN MEHAN,KAROL 0 10/16/2007 1907741 WD KAROL HAGMAN MEHAN,TR KAROL HAGMAN MEHAN Yes 0 8/14/2007 1903297 QCD KAROL HAGMAN MEHAN,TR BETTE B HAGMAN,A 1/2 INTEREST Yes 0 8/14/2007 1903298 WD BETTE B HAGMAN KAROL HAGMAN MEHAN,TR LV TR BETTE Yes 0 HAGMAN 9/16/2004 1820056 QCD JOE L&BETTE B HAGMAN OE L HAGMAN&BETTE B HAGMAN,EA 112 INTYes 0 9/16/2004 1 1820057 IQCD I BETTE B HAGMAN 17ROL HAGMAN MEHAN,1/2 INT,TRSTE' Yes 0 8/15/2000 1 1716496 1 QCD JOE L&BETTE B HAGMAN I HARLEY SOMERS Yes 0 Historic Valuation Information Year Billed Owner Improvements Land Perm Crop Total Exempt Taxable Taxes 2013 HAGMAN MEHAN.KAROL 135.305 104,490 0 239,795 0 239,795 1,978.35 2012 HAGMEN ET AL,JOE L 154,325 116,100 0 270,425 0 270,425 2,015,03 2011 HAGMEN ET AL,JOE L 116,310 129,000 0 245,310 0 245,310 1,666.18 2010 HAGMEN ETAL,JOE L 116,310 129,000 0 245,310 0 245,310 1,679.66 2009 HAGMEN ET AL,JOE L 116,310 129,000 0 245,310 0 245,310 1,662.96 2008 HAGMEN ET AL,JOE L 116,310 129,000 no 245,310 01 245,3101 1,841.61 i_..I 300001 PropertyRecordCard www.terrascan.com Property Record Card Printed on 3/19/2014 10:50:59 AM Page 1 of 1 Melody Peterson Property Record Card Mason County Assessor 12108-11-00090/ 2014 411 N 5TH ST Active P0 BOX J Shelton,WA 584 3 0-4279670 99 IIII II II II II II I II IIIIIIIIIIIINI * 3 0 0 0 0 + 3 t 2 5 5 8 2 h Parcel Information Ownership Information Parcel Number: 12108-11-00090 Current: HAGMAN MEHAN, KAROL Legal: TRACT 9 OF GOVT LOT 9 Address: 665 ELK SPRINGS DR Address 2: Situs: City,St,Zip: GLENWOOD SPRINGS CO 816019425 Market Value Assessed Value Property Classification Land Value: 475 Land Value: 475 District: 0080-Tax District 0080 Impr Value: Impr Value: 0 Neighborhood: Reval 1 Perm Crop Value: 0 Perm Crop Value: 0 DOR Code: 91 -Undeveloped-Land Total Value: 475 Total Value: 475 Ex Code: Open Space: 0 Frozen Value: 0 Exemption: OSP Date: Taxable Value: 0 Total Acres: 0.09000 Misc Assessments Misc Assessment Acres Conservation District 88-015 Dry Acres: Timber Acres: DNR 1 Irrigated Acres: DNR Acres: Fire District 88-020 Other Acres: PC Acres: Lake District 88-010 Site Acres: Total Acres: 0.00 Events Multiple Owners Date Event Type User EventlD Name h HAGMAN MEHAN,KAROL 100 Sales History Date Book/Page Instrument Type Grantor Grantee Qualification Sale Price 7/29/2011 1977126 QCD HAGMEN ETAL.JOE L HAGMAN MEHAN.KAROL 0 10/16/2007 1907741 WD KAROL HAGMAN MEHAN,TR KAROL HAGMAN MEHAN Yes 0 8/14/2007 1903298 WD BETTE B HAGMAN HAGMANHAGMANA LV Yes 0 8/14/2007 1903297 QCD KAROL HAGMAN MEHAN,TR BETTE B HAGMAN,A 1/2 INTEREST Yes 0 9/16/2004 1 1820057 1 QCD BETTE B HAGMAN 7701-HAGMAN MEHAN,1/2 INT,TRSTE' Yes 0 J AN HA A A 1 Yes 0 9/16/2004 1820056 QCD JOE L&BETTE 8 HAGMAN INT Historic Valuation Information Year Billed Owner Improvements Land Perm Crop Total Exempt Taxable Taxes 2013 HAGMAN MEHAN,KAROL 0 450 0 450 0 0 0.00 E20O9 HAGMEN ET AL,JOE L 0 500 0 500 0 500 3.73 HAGMEN ET AL,JOE L 0 500 0 500 0 500 8,39 HAGMEN ET AL,JOE L 0 500 0 500 0 500 8,42 HAGMEN ETAL,JOE L 0 500 0 500 0 500 8,38 HAGMEN ET AL,JOE L 01 701 01 5001 01 500 8.74 300001 PropertyRecordCard www.terrascan.com Property Record Card Printed on 3/19/2014 10:51:31 AM Page 1 of 1 Melody Peterson Property Record Card Mason County Assessor 12108-11-00011 / 2014 411 N 5TH ST Active Shelton, 60-422 9 70 9 9584 II II II II II II III (I II I I I III I �I « 3 0 0 0 0 + 3 1 2 5 5 7 8 « Parcel Information Ownership Information Parcel Number: 12108-11-00011 Current: EACRETT,STEVEN F Legal: TRACT 1-A OF GOVT LOT 9 M.0 JUDGMENT AF Address: 12101 30TH STREET NE #1768835 Address 2: Situs: 1811 E ECKERT RD GRAPEVIEW City,St,Zip: LAKE STEVENS WA 98258-8425 Market Value Assessed Value Property Classification Land Value: 161,595 Land Value: 161,595 District: 0080-Tax District 0080 Impr Value: 115,825 Impr Value: 115,825 Neighborhood: Reval 1 Perm Crop Value: 0 Perm Crop Value: 0 DOR Code: 18-Residential-All other Total Value: 277,420 Total Value: 277,420 Ex Code: Open Space: 0 Frozen Value: 0 Exemption: OSP Date: Taxable Value: 277,420 Total Acres: 0.24000 Misc Assessments Misc Assessment Acres Conservation District 88-015 Dry Acres: Timber Acres: DNR 1 Irrigated Acres: DNR Acres: Fire District 88-020 Other Acres: PC Acres: Lake District 88-010 Site Acres: Total Acres: 0,00 Events Multiple Owners Date Event Type User EventlD I Name % EACRETT.STEVEN F 100 Sales History Date Book/Page Instrument Type Grantor Grantee Qualification Sale Price 12/1/2010 1966662 PRD EACRETT,SHIRLEY D EACRETT.STEVEN F �'o 0 9/19/2003 1792974 PRD SHIRLEY EACRETT,PR EST` SHIRLEY D EACRETT Yes 0 10/16/1987 473337 JQCD JANNE L EACRETT ETAL ROBERT F.&SHIRLEY MAE EACRETT Yes 0 Historic Valuation Information Year Billed Owner Improvements land Perm Crop Total Exempt Taxable Taxes 2013 EACRETT,STEVEN F 115.825 153.090 0 268.915 0 268.915 2.218.60 2012 EACRETT,STEVEN F 133,640 170,100 0 303,740 0 303,740 2,263,27 2011 EACRETT,STEVEN F 138,610 189,000 0 327,610 0 327,610 2,223.50 2010 EACRETT,SHIRLEY C 138.610 189,000 0 327,610 0 327,610 2,241.49 2009 EACRETT,SHIRLEY D 138,610 189,000 0 327,610 0 162,365 2,219.19 2008 EACRETT,SHIRLEY D 138,610 189,000 0 327,6(1101 0 327,610 1,093,18 u 300001 PropertyRecordCard www.terrascan.com Property Record Card Printed on 3/19/2014 10:52:15 AM Page 1 of 1 Melody Peterson Property Record Card Mason County Assessor 12108-11-00020/2014 x 411 N 5TH ST Active PO BOX J I 3 0-Shelton,7-9670 x 9184 IIII II II II II II II II II I I I III I NI Parcel Information Ownership Information Parcel Number: 12108-11-00020 Current: BENJAMIN,G GORDON&HEATHER J Legal: TRACT 2 OF GOVT LOT 9&TAX 700-C.EX 700 C-1 BLA Address: 2716 22ND AVE CT NW MC#99-2-00018-1 S 26/233 M.C.JUDGMENT#96-2-00499-9 AF Address 2: Al 79RAIR Situs: 150 E BUCKINGHAM LN GRAPEVIEW City,St,Zip: GIG HARBOR WA 983357973 Market Value Assessed Value Property Classification Land Value: 133,380 Land Value: 133,380 District: 0080-Tax District 0080 Impr Value: 252,115 Impr Value: 252,115 Neighborhood: Reval 1 Perm Crop Value: 0 Perm Crop Value: 0 DOR Code: 18-Residential-All other Total Value: 385,495 Total Value: 385,495 Ex Code: Open Space: 0 Frozen Value: 0 Exemption: OSP Date: Taxable Value: 385,495 Total Acres: 0.29000 Misc Assessments Misc Assessment Acres Conservation District 88-015 Dry Acres: Timber Acres: DNR 1 Irrigated Acres: DNR Acres: Fire District 88-020 Other Acres: PC Acres: Lake District 88-010 Site Acres: Total Acres: 0.00 Events Multiple Owners Date Event Type User EventID I Name % BENJAMIN.G GORDON&HEATHER J 100 Sales History Date Book/Page Instrument Type Grantor Grantee Qualification Sale Price 3/23/2006 1863491 WD C H SOMERS/C H SOMERS.TR' Yes 665,000 8/15/2000 1716497 OCD HARLEY SOMERS JOE L&BETTE B HAGMAN Yes 0 7/28/1993 569323 WD MABEL H HANSEN IC HARLEY SOMERS Yes 0 Historic Valuation Information Year Billed Owner Improvements Land Perm Crop Total Exempt Taxable Taxes 2013 BENJAMIN,G GORDON&HEATHER J 252,115 126,360 0 378,475 0 378,475 3,122.49 2012 BENJAMIN,G GORDON&HEATHER J 240,110 140,400 0 380,510 0 380,510 2,835.31 2011 BENJAMIN,G GORDON&HEATHER J 333,015 156,000 0 489,015 0 489,015 3,316,50 2010 BENJAMIN,G GORDON&HEATHER J 333,015 156,000 0 489,015 0 489,015 3,343.35 2009 BENJAMIN,G GORDON&HEATHER J 333,015 156,000 0 489,015 0 489,015 3,310.07 2008 BENJAMIN,G GORDON&HEATHER J 333,015 156,000 01 489,015 01 489,0151 3,666.22 J 300001 PropertyRecordCard www.terrascan.com Property Record Card Printed on 3/19/2014 10:52:43 AM Page 1 of 1 Melody Peterson Property Record Card Mason County Assessor 12108-11-00030/2014 I 411 N STH ST Active POBOXJ r� Shelton,WA 98584 I u II N u I:.` �.:;r,;•. 360-427-9670 x491 II II I III II III uIl I II I I III III IBIII I III R 3 0 0 0 0 + 3 1 2 5 5 8 0 + Parcel Information Ownership Information Parcel Number: 12108-11-00030 Current: UHLMAN,MARJORIE J Legal: TR 3 OF GOVT LOT 9 S 31/184 Address: PO BOX 248 Address 2: Situs: 140 E BUCKINGHAM LN GRAPEVIEW City,St,Zip: GRAPEVIEW WA 985460248 Market Value Assessed Value Property Classification Land Value: 176,985 Land Value: 176,985 District: 0080-Tax District 0080 Impr Value: 83,375 Impr Value: 83,375 Neighborhood: Reval 1 Perm Crop Value: 0 Perm Crop Value: 0 DOR Code: 18-Residential-All other Total Value: 260,360 Total Value: 260,360 Ex Code: Open Space: 0 Frozen Value: 0 Exemption: OSP Date: Taxable Value: 260,360 Total Acres: 0.23000 Misc Assessments Misc Assessment Acres Conservation District 88-015 Dry Acres: Timber Acres: DNR 1 Irrigated Acres: DNR Acres: Fire District 88-020 Other Acres: PC Acres: Lake District 88-010 Site Acres: Total Acres: 0.00 Events IMultipleOwnem Date Event Type User EventlD I Name % UHLMAN,MARJORIE J 100 Sales History Date Book/Page Instrument Type Grantor Grantee I Qualtttcatlen I sale Price 6/29/1999 1701232 JDC NEIL DENNIS UHLMAN I MARJORIE J(SURVIVING SPOUSE) Yes 0 Historic Valuation Information Year Billed Owner Improvements Land Perm Crop Total Exempt Taxable Taxes 2013 UHLMAN,MARJORIE J 83,375 167,670 0 251,045 0 251,045 2,071.17 2012 UHLMAN,MARJORIE J 94,755 186,300 0 281.055 0 281,055 2,094.23 2011 UHLMAN,MARJORIE J 99,490 207,000 0 306,490 0 306,490 2,080.48 2010 UHLMAN,MARJORIE J 99,490 207,000 0 306,490 0 306,490 2,097.31 2009 UHLMAN,MARJORIE J 99,490 207,000 0 306,490 0 306,490 2,076.45 2008 UHLMAN,MARJORIE J 99,490 2071000 0 306,4901 0 306,490 2,299,67 300001 PropertyRecordCard www.terrascan.com Property Record Card Printed on 3/19/2014 10:53:12 AM Page 1 of 1 Melody Peterson Property Record Card Mason County Assessor 12108-11-90040/2014 a: 411 N 5TH ST Active ! P O BOX JT;; Shelton, N NN uu W 3 0-427 9 0 9 584 9 IIIII III �I�I�� I II�I III�IIIIIII�I�I�II� + 3 0 0 0 0 + 3 1 2 5 5 8 5 + Parcel Information Ownership Information Parcel Number: 12108-11-90040 Current: NORMAN,LORI J Legal: TRACT 4 OF GOVT LOT 9 S 31/184 Address: PO BOX 32956 Address 2: Situs: 1170 E BUCKINGHAM LN GRAPEVIEW City,St,zip: JUNEAU AK 998032956 Market Value Assessed Value Property Classification Land Value: 159,030 Land Value: 159,030 District: 0080-Tax District 0080 Impr Value: 142,945 Impr Value: 142,945 Neighborhood: Reval 1 Perm Crop Value: 0 Perm Crop Value: 0 DOR Code: 18-Residential-All other Total Value: 301,975 Total Value: 301,975 Ex Code: Open Space: 0 Frozen Value: 0 Exemption: OSP Date: Taxable Value: 301,975 Total Acres: 0.21000 Misc Assessments Misc Assessment Acmes Conservation District 88-015 Dry Acres: Timber Acres: DNR 1 Irrigated Acres: DNR Acres: Fire District 88-020 Other Acres: PC Acres: Lake District 88-010 Site Acres: Total Acres: 0.00 Events Multiple Owners Date Event Type User EventlD Name % NORMAN,LORI J 100 Sales History Date Book/Page Instrument Type Grantor Grantee I Quam—c tlon Sale prim 3/23/2007 1892196 QCD MARJORIE J UHLMAN LORI J NORMAN Yes 0 2/14/2007 1889744 QCD MARJORIE J UHLMAN I LORI J NORMAN Yes 0 5/13/2005 1637436 WD ROBERT&BILLIE BUCKINGHAM MARJORIE J UHLMAN Yes 120,000 Historic Valuation Information Year Billed Owner Improvements Land Perm Crop Total Exempt Taxable Taxes 2013 NORMAN,LORI J 142.945 150,660 0 293,605 0 293.605 2.422.29 2012 NORMAN,LORI J 163,425 167,400 0 330,825 0 330,825 2,465,09 2011 NORMAN,LORI J 169,150 186,000 0 355.150 0 355,150 2,409.99 2010 NORMAN,LORI J 169,150 186,000 0 355,150 0 355,150 2,429,49 2009 NORMAN,LORI J 169,150 186,000 0 355,150 0 355,150 2,405.32 2008 NORMAN,LORI J 24,500 186,000 0 210,500 0 210,500 1,581.00 �X 300001 PropertyRecordCard www.terrascan.com Property Record Card Printed on 3/19/2014 10:54:03 AM Page 1 of 1 Melody Peterson Property Record Card Mason County Assessor 12108-11-90050/ 2014 411 N 5TH ST Active PO BOX J Shelton,WA98584 360-427-9670 x491 .. III II II � IIII II I IIIIIIIII IIII II Parcel Information Ownership Information Parcel Number: 12108-11-90050 Current: CREIGHTON,RICHARD M&JULIE C Legal: TR 5&11 OF GOVT LOT 9 LOTS:A&B OF SP#175 Address: APO BOX 464 PCL 1 OF BLA#91-48 Address 2: Situs: 1180 E BUCKINGHAM LN GRAPEVIEW City,St,zip: GRAPEVIEW WA 985460464 Market Value Assessed Value Property Classification Land Value: 241,110 Land Value: 241,110 District: 0080-Tax District 0080 Impr Value: 533,855 Impr Value: 533,855 Neighborhood: Reval 1 Perm Crop Value: 0 Perm Crop Value: 0 DOR Code: 18-Residential-All other Total Value: 774,965 Total Value: 774,965 Ex Code: Open Space: 0 Frozen Value: 0 Exemption: OSP Date: Taxable Value: 774,965 Total Acres: 0.58000 Misc Assessments Misc Assessment Acres Conservation District 88-015 Dry Acres: Timber Acres: DNR 1 Irrigated Acres: DNR Acres: Fire District 88-020 Other Acres: PC Acres: Lake District 88-010 Site Acres: Total Acres: 0.00 Events Multiple Owners Date Event Type User EventlD Name % 1/15/2013 IParcel Permit Bruce 592904 CREIGHTON,RICHARD M&JULIE C 100 Sales History Date I Book/Page Instrument Type Grantor Grantee QualMeatlon Is Price 6/19/2007 1 1898976 IWD I D GONZALEZ&J O'ROURKE RICHARD M&JULIE C CREIGHTON H/W Yes 1,082,000 2/11/1999 1 684425 1 WD STEPHEN&RITA ANDERSON DAVID E&RITA M O'ROURKE Yes 0 Historic Valuation Information Year Billed Owner ImprovemerksM2882,,,000)0 Perm Crop Total Exempt Taxable Taxes 2013 CREIGHTON,RICHARD M&JULIE C 533,855 0 762,275 0 762,275 6,288.90 2012 CREIGHTON,RICHARD M&JULIE C 628,795 0 882,595 0 882.595 6,576,51 2011 CREIGHTON,RICHARD M&JULIE C 639,680 0 921,680 0 921,680 6,246.40 2010 CREIGHTON.RICHARD M&JULIE C 639,680 0 921,680 0 921,680 6,297,01 2009 CREIGHTON,RICHARD M&JULIE C 639.680 0 921,680 0 921,680 6,234.30 2008 CREIGHTON,RICHARD M&JULIE C 639,6811 01 921,680 0 921,680 6,905.56 x 300001 PropertyRecordCard www.terrascan.com Property Record Card Printed on 3/19/2014 10:54:33 AM Page 1 of 1 Melody Peterson Property Record Card Mason County Assessor 12108-11-90062/2014 411 N 5TH ST Active P O BOX J II IIN�I IHI All 3 0-427n9 70 9 584 9 III III IIII NI II II I IIIII I IIIIII III I II * 3 0 0 0 0 + 3 1 2 5 5 8 8 Parcel Information Ownership Information Parcel Number: 12108-11-90062 Current: CREIGHTON ET AL,R MICHAEL&JULIE C Legal: LOT B OF SP#248 PTN GL 9&GL 5 Address: CHRISTOPHER J&VICKI L PHILLIPS Address 2: PO BOX 464 Situs: City,St,Zip: GRAPEVIEW WA 98546 Market Value Assessed Value Property Classification Land Value: 166,725 Land Value: 166,725 District: 0080-Tax District 0080 Impr Value: Impr Value: 0 Neighborhood: Reval 1 Perm Crop Value: 0 Perm Crop Value: 0 DOR Code: 91 -Undeveloped-Land Total Value: 166,725 Total Value: 166,725 Ex Code: Open Space: 0 Frozen Value: 0 Exemption: OSP Date: Taxable Value: 166,725 Total Acres: 0.40000 Misc Assessments Misc Assessment Acres Conservation District 88-015 Dry Acres: Timber Acres: DNR 1 Irrigated Acres: DNR Acres: 0.0000 Fire District 88-020 Other Acres: PC Acres: Lake District 88-010 Site Acres: Total Acres: 0.00 Events Multiple Owners Date I Event Type User EverdlD Name % CRE IGHTON ET AL,R MICHAEL&JULIE C 100 Sales History Date Book/Page Instrument Type Grantor Grantee Ounimcation Sale Price 12/6/2013 2018347 SWD GONZALEZ ET UX,DAVID E CREIGHTON ET AL,R MICHAEL&JULIE C Yes 220,000 Historic Valuation Information Year Billed Owner Improvements Land Perm Crop Total Exempt Taxable Taxes 2013 GONZALEZ ET UX,DAVID E 0 157,950 0 157,950 0 157,950 1,321.02 2012 GONZALEZ ET UX,DAVID E 0 175,500 0 175,500 0 175,500 1,325.61 2011 GONZALEZ ET UX.DAVID E 0 225,000 0 225,000 0 225,000 1,546.55 2010 GONZALEZ ET UX,DAVID E 0 225,000 0 225,000 0 225,000 1,558,90 2009 GONZALEZ ET UX,DAVID E 0 225,000 0 225,000 0 225,000 1,543.59 2008 GONZALEZ ET UX,DAVID E 0 225,000 0 225,000 0 225,000 1,707.46 Ix 300001 PropertyRecordCard www.terrascan.com Property Record Card Printed on 3/19/2014 10:55:18 AM Page 1 of 1 Melody Peterson Property Record Card Mason County Assessor 12108-11-90061 / 2014 411 N 5TH ST Active X J 91 BO9 6 0 98584 60 II II II II II II II I I I II I I I I( II�I Parcel Information Ownership Information Parcel Number: 12108-11-90061 Current: PHILLIPS,CHRISTOPHER J&VICKI L Legal: LOT A OF SP#248 PTN GL 9&GL 5 Address: 12402 HALLSTROM DR NW Address 2: Situs: 1220 E BUCKINGHAM LN,GRAPEVIEW City,St,Zip: GIG HARBOR WA 98332 Market Value Assessed Value Property Classification Land Value: 166,725 Land Value: 166,725 District: 0080-Tax District 0080 Impr Value: 4,200 Impr Value: 4,200 Neighborhood: Reval 1 Perm Crop Value: 0 Perm Crop Value: 0 DOR Code: 91 -Undeveloped-Land Total Value: 170,925 Total Value: 170,925 Ex Code: Open Space: 0 Frozen Value: 0 Exemption: OSP Date: Taxable Value: 170,925 Total Acres: 0.47000 Misc Assessments Misc Assessment Acres Conservation District 88-015 Dry Acres: Timber Acres: DNR 1 Irrigated Acres: DNR Acres: 0.0000 Fire District 88-020 Other Acres: PC Acres: Lake District 88-010 Site Acres: j Total Acres: 0.00 Events Multiple Owners Date Event Type User EventlD Hanle IPHILLIPS,CHRISTOPHER J&VICKI L 100 Sales History Date Book/Page Instnxnent Type Grantor Grantee CwlMeatlon Sale Plies 5/17/2011 1974070 JWD GONZALEZ ET UX.DAVID E I PHILLIPS.CHRISTOPHER J&VICKI L Yes 220,000 Historic Valuation Information Year Billed Owner Improvements Land Perm Crop Tetal Exempt Taxable Taxes 2013 PHILLIPS,CHRISTOPHER J&VICKI L 4,200 157,950 0 162,150 0 162.150 1,355.67 2012 PHILLIPS,CHRISTOPHER J&VICKI L 4,000 175,500 0 179,500 0 179,500 1,355.41 2011 GONZALEZ ET UX,DAVID E 0 225,000 0 225,000 0 225,000 1,546.55 2010 GONZALEZ ET UX,DAVID E 0 225.000 0 225,000 0 225,000 1,558.90 2009 GONZALEZ ET UX,DAVID E 0 225,000 0 225,000 0 225,000 1,543.59 2008 GONZALEZ ET UX,DAVID E 0 225,000 01 225,000 01 225,000 1,707,46 300001 PropertyRecordCard www.terrascan.com Property Record Card Printed on 3/19/2014 10:56:06 AM Page 1 of 1 Melody Peterson Property Record Card Mason County Assessor 12105-44-90010/2014 411 N 5TH ST Active Bo 9670 x495 360 �I II III IIII I II II II IIII II I III I I I I III�I w 3 0 0 0 0 + 3 1 2 4 9 2 4 w Parcel Information Ownership Information Parcel Number: 12105-44-90010 Current: CREIGHTON,RICHARD M&JULIE C Legal: TRACT 1 OF GOVT LOT 5 TAX 547 B-2 LOT:C OF SP#248 Address: PO BOX 464 AF#318546 Address 2: Situs: I City,St,Zip: GRAPEVIEW WA 985460464 Market Value Assessed Value Property Classification Land Value: 90 Land Value: 90 District: 0080-Tax District 0080 Impr Value: Impr Value: 0 Neighborhood: Reval 1 Perm Crop Value: 0 Perm Crop Value: 0 DOR Code: 91 -Undeveloped-Land Total Value: g0 Total Value: g0 Ex Code: Open Space: 0 Frozen Value: 0 Exemption: OSP Date: Taxable Value: 0 Total Acres: 0.00000 Mist;Assessments Misc Assessment Acres Conservation District 88-015 Dry Acres: Timber Acres: DNR 1 Irrigated Acres: DNR Acres: Fire District 88-020 Other Acres: PC Acres: Lake District 88-010 ISite Acres: Total Acres: 0.00 Events Multiple Owners Date Event Type User EventlD I CREIGHTON,RICHARD M&JULIE C 100 Sales History Date Book/Page Imtrumerlt Type Grantor Grantee CAseN ason SW Prke 6/19/2007 1898976 WD D GONZALEZ&J O'ROURKE RICHARD M&JULIE C CREIGHTON H/W Yes 0 _+_ 2/11/1999 684425 WD STEPHEN&RITA ANDERSON D&IID GONZALEZ-JACQUELINE O'ROURKE Yes 630,000 Historic Valuation Information Year I Billed Owner I vements Land Perm Crop IF Total Exenwt I Taxable I Tamm 2013 CREIGHTON,RICHARD M&JULIE C 0 901 01 90 ol ol 0.00 2012 CREIGHTON,RICHARD M&JULIE C 01 901 0 90 0 01 0,00 2011 ICREIGHTON,RICHARD M&JULIE C I ol 901 ol 901 ol 901 5.00 2010 1 CREIGHTON,RICHARD M&JULIE C 1 01 901 01 �9x01 0 0 5.00 u 300001 PropertyRecordCard www.terrascan.com Property Record Card Printed on 3/19/2014 10:59:25 AM Page 1 of 1 . -� :.. Melody Peterson Property Record Card Mason County Assessor 12108-75-90040/2014 411 N 5TH ST Active 1 PO BOX J 1 Y+ Shelton,WA 98584 TA 360-427-9670 x491 III I IIIIII II II III I IIIIII IIIIIIII II II Parcel Information Ownership Information Parcel Number: 12108-75-90040 Current: ALLEN IV,CLARENDON N Legal: TRACT 4&TL OF SURVEY 1/115 EX LOT: 1 OF SP 94 Address: 35123 27TH AVE S AF#295386 Address 2: Situs: City,St,Zip: FEDERAL WAY WA 980039107 Market Value Assessed Value Property Classification Land Value: 213,750 Land Value: 213,750 District: 0080-Tax District 0080 Impr Value: 29,770 Impr Value: 29,770 Neighborhood: Reval 1 Perm Crop Value: 0 Perm Crop Value: 0 DOR Code: 19-Residential-Vacation and Cabin Total Value: 243,520 Total Value: 243,520 Ex Code: Open Space: 0 Frozen Value: 0 Exemption: OSP Date: Taxable Value: 243,520 Total Acres: 0.94000 Misc Assessments Misc Assessment Acres Conservation District 88-015 Dry Acres: Timber Acres: DNR 1 Irrigated Acres: DNR Acres: Fire District 88-020 Other Acres: PC Acres: Lake District 88-010 Site Acres: Total Acres: 0.00 Events Multiple Owners Date Event Type user EventlD Name % ALLEN IV,CLARENDON N Sales History Date Book/Page Instrument Type Grantor Grantee I OtialMcation Sale Price 12/29/2010 1967993 SWD ALLEN ETAL SONJA JEAN ALLEN IV,CLARENDON N No 179 166 2/9/2010 1954362 QCD ALLEN ETAL,BERNADENE ALLEN ETAL,SONJA JEAN No C 6/3/2008 1921611 OCD CLARENDON N ALLEN CLARENSON N ALLEN,TR C ALLEN LIVING Yes 0 TR 8/1/2002 1760882 AFF BERNADENE ALLEN BERNADENE ALLEN,TRUSTEE Yes 0 BERNADENE ALLEN AND CLARENDON 9/28/1976 593395 WD FRANK&JEAN MAYER A BLELEN Yes 0 Historic Valuation Information Year Billed Owner Improvements Land Perm Crop Total Exempt Taxable Taxes 2013 ALLEN IV,CLARENDON N 29,770 202,500 0 232,270 0 232,270 1,916.27 2012 ALLEN IV,CLARENDON N 28,350 225,000 0 253,350 0 253,350 1,887.80 2011 ALLEN ETAL,SONJA JEAN 27,115 250,000 0 277,115 0 277,115 1,881.56 2010 ALLEN ETAL,BERNADENE 27,115 250,000 0 277,115 0 277,115 1,896.78 2009 ALLEN ETAL,BERNADENE 27,115 250,000 0 277,115 0 277,115 1,877.91 20" ALLEN ETAL,BERNADENE 27,115 250,000 0 277,1151 0 277,115 2,079.74 300001 PropertyRecordCard www.terrascan.com Property Record Card Printed on 3/19/2014 10:56:32 AM Page 1 of 1 Melody Peterson Property Record Card Mason County Assessor 12108-75-90041 /2014 � 411 N 5TH ST Active .. P O BOX J '. 7. Shelton,WA 98584 360-427-9670 x491 IIIII III III IIIIII II IIIIII III IIIIIIIIIIII�I '• � 3 0 0 0 0 + 3 1 2 5 8 9 1 � Parcel Information Ownership Information Parcel Number: 12108-75-90041 Current: BRANDRUD,JEANNE Legal: TRACT 4-A&TL OF S 1/115 S 25/224LOT:2 OF SP#94,AF Address: #304 #295386 Address 2: 11556 GREENWOOD AVE N Situs: 151 E ISLAND CREST RD GRAPEVIEW City,St,Zip: SEATTLE WA 981338673 Market Value Assessed Value Property Class cation Land Value: 171,000 Land Value: 171,000 District: 0080-Tax District 0080 Impr Value: 198,145 Impr Value: 198,145 Neighborhood: Reval 1 Perm Crop Value: 0 Perm Crop Value: 0 DOR Code: 18-Residential-All other Total Value: 369,145 Total Value: 369,145 Ex Code: Open Space: 0 Frozen Value: 0 Exemption: OSP Date: Taxable Value: 369.145 Total Acres: 0.94000 Misc Assessments Misc Assessment Acres Conservation District 88-015 Dry Acres: Timber Acres: DNR 1 Irrigated Acres: DNR Acres: Fire District 88-020 Other Acres: PC Acres: Lake District 88-010 Site Acres: Total Acres: 0.00 Events Multiple Owners Data Event Type User EventlD I Name % BRANDRUD,JEANNE 100 Sales History Date I Book/Page Instrument Type Grantor Grantee Otwiflcatkm I Sale Price 5/24/2007 1897040 AFF HAROLD W BRANDRUD,DEC'D JEAN M BRANDRUD,SURVIVING SPOUSEYes 0 12/22/19991 1703915 JDC HAROLD W BRANDRUD JEANNE BRANDRUD(SURV SPOUSE) Yes 0 Historic Valuation Information Year Billed Owner Improvements Land Pe:Crop Total Ex Taxable Taxes2013 BRANDRUD,JEANNE 198,145 162,000 360,145 0 360,145 2,971.26 2012 BRANDRUD,JEANNE 229,640 180,000 409,640 0 409,640 3,052.36 2011 BRANDRUD,JEANNE 248,545 200,000 448,545 0 448,545 3,042.44 2010 BRANDRUD,JEANNE 248,545 200,000 448,545 0 448,545 3.067.07 2009 BRANDRUD,JEANNE 248,545 200,000 448,545 0 448,545 3,036.55 2008 BRANDRUD,JEANNE 248,545 200,000 0 448,545 0 448,545 3,363.22 j 300001 PropertyRecordCard www.terrascan.com Property Record Card Printed on 3/19/2014 10:57:02 AM Page 1 of 1 Melody Peterson Property Record Card Mason County Assessor 12108-75-90042 / 2014 411 N STH ST Active PO BOX JShelton,WA I IiI 7"Y* 584 3 0-427 9670 9 9 AI II II II II (I II II ( I I II I I I I I I I II Parcel Information Ownership Information Parcel Number: 12108-75-90042 Current: MCKINLAY-BARNES RVCBL LVG TRST Legal: TRACT 46&TL OF S 1/115 LOT:3 OF SP#94 AF Address: 17207 NE 22ND CT #295836 Address 2: Situs: 141 E ISLAND CREST RD GRAPEVIEW City,St,Zip: REDMOND WA 980526002 Market Value Assessed Value Property Classification Land Value: 237,500 Land Value: 237,500 District: 0080-Tax District 0080 Impr Value: 152,070 Impr Value: 152,070 Neighborhood: Reval 1 Perm Crop Value: 0 Perm Crop Value: 0 DOR Code: 18-Residential-All other Total Value: 389,570 Total Value: 389,570 Ex Code: Open Space: 0 Frozen Value: 0 Exemption: OSP Date: Taxable Value: 389,570 Total Acres: 0.89000 Misc Assessments Misc Assessment Acres Conservation District 88-015 Dry Acres: Timber Acres: DNR 1 Irrigated Acres: DNR Acres: Fire District 88-020 Other Acres: PC Acres: Lake District 88-010 Site Acres: Total Acres: 0.00 Events Multiple Owners Date Event Type User EventlD Name % MCKINLAY-BARNES RVCBL L.VG TRST 100 Sales History Date Book/Page Instrument Type Grantor Grantee Qualification Sale Price 3/23/2001 1729050 WD KENNETH&CAROLYN HAYES TRUSTLA - A L Yes 295.000 Historic Valuation Information Year Billed Owner Improvements Land Perm Crop Total Exempt Taxable Taxes 2013 MCKINLAY-BARNES RVCBL LVG TRST 123,720 225,000 0 348,720 0 348.720 2,877.00 2012 MCKINLAY-BARNES RVCBL LVG TRST 147,290 250,000 0 397,290 0 397290 2,960.34 2011 MCKINLAY-BARNES RVCBL LVG TRST 176,505 250,000 0 426,505 0 426,505 2,893.19 2010 MCKINLAY-BARNES RVCBL LVG TRST 176,505 250,000 0 426,505 0 426,505 2,916.61 2009 MCKINLAY-BARNES RVCBL LVG TRST 176.505 250,000 0 426,505 0 426,505 2,887.59 2008 MCKINLAY-BARNES RVCBL LVG TRST 1 176,505 250,000 01 426,5051 01 426,5051 3,198.21 Ix 300001 PropertyRecordCard www.terrascan.com Property Record Card Printed on 3/19/2014 10:57:36 AM Page 1 of 1 Melody Peterson Property Record Card Mason County Assessor 12108-75-90043 / 2014 411 N 5TH ST Active P O BOX J II AAII Shelton,WA 584 3 0-427 9670 9 9 MI II II IIII II II II I I I II I II I I I II I II * 3 0 0 0 0 + 3 1 2 5 8 9 3 * Parcel Information Ownership Information Parcel Number: 12108-75-90043 Current: LACY,DAVID M&SHIRLEY Legal: TRACT 4-C&TL OF SURVEY 1/115 LOT:4 OF SP#94 AF Address: 6339 CHINOOK DR #259386 Address 2: Situs: City,St,Zip: CLINTON WA 982369126 Market Value Assessed Value Property Classification Land Value: 163,875 Land Value: 163,875 District: 0080-Tax District 0080 Impr Value: Impr Value: 0 Neighborhood: Reval 1 Perm Crop Value: 0 Perm Crop Value: 0 DOR Code: 91 -Undeveloped-Land Total Value: 163,875 Total Value: 163,875 Ex Code: Open Space: 0 Frozen Value: 0 Exemption: OSP Date: Taxable Value: 163,875 Total Acres: 0.98000 Misc Assessments Misc Assessment Acres Conservation District 88-015 Dry Acres: Timber Acres: DNR 1 Irrigated Acres: DNR Acres: 0.0000 Fire District 88-020 Other Acres: PC Acres: Lake District 188-0101 Site Acres: Total Acres: 0.00 Events Multiple Owners Date Event Type User EventiD I Name % LACY,DAVE-%J&SHIRLEY 130 Sales History Date Book/Page Instrument Type Grantor Grantee Qualification Sale Price 471008 I A 7, LARRY G MCKEAN ET UX DAVID&SHIRLEY LACY Yes 0 Historic Valuation Information Year Billed Owner Improvements Land Perm Crop Total Exempt Taxable Taxes 2013 LACY,DAVID M&SHIRLEY a 155,250 155,250 0 155.250 1298,74 2012 LACY,DAVID M&SHIRLEY 0 172,500 0 172,500 0 172,500 1,303.26 2011 LACY,DAVID M&SHIRLEY 0 172,500 0 172,500 0 172,500 1,191.03 2010 LACY,DAVID M&SHIRLEY 0 172,500 0 172,500 0 172,500 11200,50 2009 LACY,DAVID M&SHIRLEY 0 172,500 0 172,500 0 172,500 1,188.77 2008 LACY,DAVID M&SHIRLEY 01 172,500 0 172,500 01 172,5001 1,314.40 LX 300001 PropertyRecordCard www.terrascan.com Property Record Card Printed on 3/19/2014 10:58:39 AM Page 1 of 1 Melody Peterson Property Record Card Mason County Assessor 12108-75-90030/ 2014 411 N 5TH ST Active :N P O BOX J Shelton,0-27-9 70 9 9 584 II II II II II II II I I I II I I I I I I I NI 11 Parcel Information Ownership Information Parcel Number: 12108-75-90030 Current: LINCECUM,CHRIS L Legal: TR 3&TL EX OF SURVEY 1/115 LOT:5 OF SP#99 AF Address: 16062 SE 4TH ST #295719 Address 2: Situs: City,St,Zip: BELLEVUE WA 980084809 Market Value Assessed Value Property Classification Land Value: 130,625 Land Value: 130,625 District: 0080-Tax District 0080 Impr Value: Impr Value: 0 Neighborhood: Reval 1 Perm Crop Value: 0 Perm Crop Value: 0 DOR Code: 91 -Undeveloped-Land Total Value: 130,625 Total Value: 130,625 Ex Code: Open Space: 0 Frozen Value: 0 Exemption: OSP Date: Taxable Value: 130,625 Total Acres: 0.97000 Misc Assessments Misc Assessment Acres Conservation District 88-015 Dry Acres: Timber Acres: DNR 1 Irrigated Acres: DNR Acres: 0.0000 Fire District 88-020 Other Acres: PC Acres: Lake District 88-0101 Site Acres: Total Acres: 0.00 Events Multiple Owners Date Event Type User EventlD Name % LINCECUM,CHRIS L 100 Sales History Date Book/Page Instrument Type Grantor Grantee Qualification sale Price 8/19/2005 1845950 OCD CHRIS&JACALYN�iNCC.CUM CHRIS L LINCECUM Yes 0 10/5/2000 1719912 PRO CHRIST L LINCECUM EXEC` CHRIS L LINECECUM&JACALYN K Yes 0 LINCECUM 8/1/1988 483926 IWD_ LARRY G.MCKEAN ET UX L=0 H.&VIOLA J.LINCECUM Yes 0 Historic Valuation Information Year Billed Owner Improvements Land Perm Crop Total Exempt Taxable Taxes 2013 LINCECUM,CHRIS L 0 123.750 0 123,750 0 123,750 1,038.86 2012 LINCECUM,CHRIS 1. 0 137,500 0 137,500 0 137,500 1,042.46 2011 LINCECUM,CHRIS 0 137,500 0 137,500 0 137,500 954.02 2010 LINCECUM,CHRIS 0 137,500 0 137,500 0 137,500 961_57 2009 LINCECUM,CHRIS L 0 137,500 0 137,500 0 137,500 952.21 2008 LINCECUM,CHRIS L 0 137,500 0 137,500 01 137,5001 1,052.35 300001 PropertyRecordCard www.terrasr-an.com Property Record Card Printed on 3/19/2014 12:08:53 PM Page 1 of 1 Melody Peterson Property Record Card i� Mason County Assessor 12108-75-90031 / 2014 411 N 5TH ST Active PO BOX J Shelton,WA 98584 360-427-9670 x491 11�11 jj� jj� jj� jj�� II I I I II I I I I II�I Parcel Information Ownership Information Parcel Number: 12108-75-90031 Current: JUTILLA,JANICE C Legal: TRACT 3-A&TL OF SURVEY 1/115 LOT:6 OF SP#99 AF Address: 4018 E J ST #295719 Address 2: Situs: 1117 E ISLAND CREST RD GRAPEVIEW City,St,Zip: TACOMA WA 984042935 Market Value Assessed Value Property Classification Land Value: 128,250 Land Value: 128,250 District: 0080-Tax District 0080 Impr Value: 78,210 Impr Value: 78,210 Neighborhood: Reval 1 Perm Crop Value: 0 Perm Crop Value: 0 DOR Code: 18-Residential-All other Total Value: 206,460 Total Value: 206,460 Ex Code: Open Space: 0 Frozen Value: 0 Exemption: OSP Date: Taxable Value: 206,460 Total Acres: 0.97000 Misc Assessments Misc Assessment Acres Conservation District 88-015 Dry Acres: Timber Acres: DNR 1 Irrigated Acres: DNR Acres: 0.0000 Fire District 88-020 Other Acres: PC Acres: Lake District 88-010 Site Acres: Total Acres: 0.00 Events Multiple Owners Date Event Type User EventlD Name JU-ILLA.JANICE C 100 Sales History Date Book/Page Instrument Type Grantor Grantee Qualification Sale Price 8/13/1997 651215 WD WM D&HEATHER L COHEN JANICE C JUTILLA Yes 125.000 6/28/1990 510968 WD GERALD E THOMAS ET UX I WILLIAM D COHEN ET UX(HEATHER L) Yes 49,500 6/151 990 579858 WD GERALD&LAURA THOMAS I WILLIAM D.&HEATHER L.COHEN Yes 0 Historic Valuation Information Year Billed Owner Improvements Land Perm Crop Tatty Exempt Taxable Taxes 2013 JUTILLA,JANICE C 78.210 121.500 0 199,710 0 199,710 1,665,54 2012 JUTILLA,JANICE C 86,855 135,000 0 221,855 0 221,855 1,671.02 2011 JUTILLA,JANICE C 91,930 135,000 0 226,930 0 226,930 1,559.62 2010 JUTILLA,JANICE C 91,930 135,000 0 226,930 0 226,930 1,572,08 2009 JUTILLA,JANICE C 91,930 135,000 0 226,930 0 226,930 1,556.64 2008 JUTILLA,JANICE C 91,930 135,000 01 226,970 01 226,9301 1,721_91 300001 PropertyRecordCard www.terrascan.com Property Record Card Printed on 3/19/2014 11:57:15 AM Page 1 of 1 Melody Peterson Property Record Card Mason County Assessor 12108-75-90032/2014 a. y 411 N 5TH ST Active PO BOX J III 3Shelton,WA 0-427 9670 x495� II II�I�I�I�II III II Ilalll I� �u��� Parcel Information Ownership Information Parcel Number: 12108-75-90032 Current: BARTH,ELIZABETH H Legal: TRACT 3-B&TL OF SURVEY 1/115 LOT:7 OF SP#99 AF Address: 490 DOUBLE HILL RD #295719 Address 2: Situs: 1115 E ISLAND CREST RD GRAPEVIEW City,St,Zip: EASTSOUND WA 98245 Market Value Assessed Value Property Classification Land Value: 125,875 Land Value: 125,875 District: 0080-Tax District 0080 Impr Value: 189,795 Impr Value: 189,795 Neighborhood: Reval 1 Perm Crop Value: 0 Perm Crop Value: 0 DOR Code: 18-Residential-All other Total Value: 315,670 1 Total Value: 315,670 Ex Code: Open Space: 0 1 Frozen Value: 0 Exemption: OSP Date: ITaxable Value: 315,670 Total Acres: 0.95000 Misc Assessments Misc Assessment Acres Conservation District 88-015 Dry Acres: Timber Acres: DNR 1 Irrigated Acres: DNR Acres: 0.0000 Fire District 88-020 Other Acres: PC Acres: Lake District 88-0101 Site Acres: Total Acres: 0.00 Events Multiple Owners Data Event Type User EventlD Name % 1/24/2014 SalesT-ac-- _-H I� 1ilG Sales History Date Book/Page Instrument Type Grantor Grantee Qualification Sale Price 2/10/2014 2020870 SWD JELINEK,TERI L BARTH,ELIZABE-H i1 336,000 4/29/2005 1836316 QCD JEFFREY P JELINEK TERI L JELINEK Yes 190,000 6/8/1998 668693 WD DAVE SMETHRS;LESLIE SPIER JEFFREY P JELINEK Yes 272,000 9/22/1995 614356 WD DAVID C&PAULA MARIETTE DAVID G SMETHERS&LESLIE L SPIERH&W Yes 277,950 6/19/1992 579332 WD SIDNEY E&RUTH H SMITH DAVID C&PAULA J MARIETTE Yes 69,500 6/19/1992 546405 JWD SIDNEY E&RUTH H SMITH DAVID C&PAULA J MARIETTE Yes 0 6/19/1992 579332 WD SIDNEY E&RUTH H SMITH DAVID C&PAULA J MARIETTE Yes 0 6/19/1992 546405 IWD SIDNEY E&RUTH H SMITH I DAVID C&PAULA J MARIETTE Yes 69,500 8/23/1988 484779 JWD LARRY MCKEAN ET UX I SIDNEY&RUTH SMITH Yes 0 Historic Valuation Information Year Billed Owner Improvements Land Perm Crop Total Exempt Taxable Taxes 2013 JELINEK,TERI L 189,795 119,250 309,045 0 309,045 2,56T58 2012 JELINEK,TERI L 219,695 132,500 0 352,195 0 352,195 2,642.22 2011 JELINEK,TERI L 256,135 132,500 0 388,635 0 388,635 2,654,65 2010 JELINEK,TERI L 256,135 132,500 0 388,635 0 388,635 2,675.99 2009 JELINEK,TERI L 256,135 132,500 0 388,635 0 388,635 2,649.54 2008 JELINEK,TERI L 256,135 132,500 01 388,635 01 388,635 2,932.58 A 300001 PropertyRecordCard www.terrascan.com Property Record Card Printed on 3/19/2014 11:57:37 AM Page 1 of 1 � 4L:> � t 2z 14 �� l o 6 C( 6 o O T U U-3 S o kkaj v aL.04z"-3, is A Lkr f-1\ r, , s Lsr �l Y)m Lk o 1 :� 0&1 naV, gmIVA n� 1 � r (tiS C� Y Yoh? V vS Yh gJAIL ohs cL�� bs C.vim5 F' ftz am e� d t�s E vvl a i'r hoc YL2 c �r 4��-4 --b ,� 1 � , � .h��, LGh do Yt— ►� 5 M cam►n4-0.I n f_c� t- o ril L mW r\jQ-"-S ah. uC ►k aM Lark a YLkc sSA Yt- 0. YS rn oYe Y(f k tF4 Ol 1 pro 0 t� rexul 0,rJ OcAu1r k/\u -6)v-0 b o-+k ck-I f 4 OL IV\ .rra� hbm� 65 oh ' lam ha 5.c�_ an r, 1-o 0A Cri Gx YK5 r _ 4- kaI-s ) h vast t s C_oo-S L,3 111 y c 1-b 55 t u 441 y cw o 14 L Oj w�1 41:<- f- rs1 c� ova � r ��.i� its �l<<���ci1 ► 5�-1 . Q9 6 S &OVI li,Fir .5T.. Richard W. Jensen Manager m Ellison Land & Logging, LLC 1505 La Coronilla Drive Santa Barbara, CA 93109 RECEIVED MAY 062014 Mason County 426 .Wi cEDAR ST Department of Community Development Planning Division s Ref: DDR 2014-00009 P.0 Box 279 r Shelton, WA 93584 Richard W. Jensen, Manager RECEIV7!) Ellison Land & Logging, LLC MAY 0 6 �(; 4 1505 La Coronilla Drive 426 Wi CEDAR ST Santa Barbara, CA 93109 May 2, 2014 Mason County Department of Community Development Planning Division P.0 Box 279 Shelton,WA 93584 Re: DDR 2014-00009 Special Use Proposal Some of the assumptions regarding the Special Use Permit seem incomplete or inadequate if alcohol and/or amplification at the event are to be involved. For venue or park facilities here where I live, there are concerns that are always considered. They are: 1. Toilet facilities need to be adequate for the crowd size or many participants will simply use the bushes or adjacent properties. 2. Temporary toilet facilities in a neighborhood are not particularly attractive and can reduce the value of property nearby. 3. Parking needs to be planned/constructed with adequate lanes and space for cars so they can come and go before and after the event without everyone else having to move their cars. 4. Although sod fields may be suitable for parking in dry periods, they are less suitable when it has been raining or the ground is moist for a long period. 5. Music, if amplified, can be heard for long distances across water and/or P g valleys. Unamplified music is best for neighbors and suitable to small gatherings. 6. A specific shut-down time is a must for public gatherings where alcohol is being served or it will go longer than originally intended. I am not familiar with the conditions placed on facilities in residential areas in Mason County, but here we use a"conditional use permit" which allows the appropriate agency-usually the planning department-to withdraw the permit if the conditions are violated. Open-ended authorizations on potential problem areas are not recommended. The materials sent by the applicant are a little difficult to follow because they aren't to scale„ but suggest they may not be suitable for a small neighborhood on a narrow (9 foot) private road. I would suggest you condition the proposal as follows: 1. No amplified music 2. Hours during daylight only, no portable or permanent venue lighting. 3. Parking be suitable for the proposed largest audience using about 2.3 occupants per car as the average occupancy. 4. Parking overflow may not take place on Buckingham Road. Adequate clearance on Buckingham road should be sufficient for a fire truck/emergency vehicle to pass. S. If temporary toilets are to be used,the number provided should be appropriate for the crowd size and length of the event. Effluent from the toilets should be removed within a day of the event to minimize odor. 6. Permanent toilet facilities should be planned -with hand-washing facilities. 7. Food handling facilities should be sufficient for the number of people participating in the event. Best wishes in your attempt to minimize the negative effects of such an event venue in a residential area while providing a pleasant venue as described by the Eachrett's. Sincerely, -cha Dense nager Ellison and an ogging, LLC E 580 Ecke oad, Grapeview, WA 97546 Cc: Kathy Eacrett 80 Buckingham Lane Grapeview, WA 98546 June 1, 2014 RECEIVED To: Kristin French �UN 0 4 �Q�4 kfrench(&RWJPLLC.com From: Michael Benson 426 W. CEDAR ST RE: Kathy Eacrett Special Use Permit at 80 Buckingham Lane My name is Michael Benson and I own the property on North Stretch Island, at East 800 Eckert Road,jointly with my two sisters. Our property was our grandparent's home, and lies at the top of Buckingham Lane, approximately 300 ft. from the Eacrett house. I was born in 1955 and raised on Stretch Island until the age of 12. I lived in the house just above E. 800 Eckert Rd. and attended Grapeview School when it was located above the Fair Harbor Marina. Orin Buckingham was my school bus driver, for whom Buckingham Lane is now named. My grandfather Harry Hillman started the Island Belle Grape Juice Company on the island in the 1930's. My parents sold our 1000 ft. beach property that we have always called "The Point", with it's tidal lagoon, to the State Of Washington in 1967 so that it could become the Marine State Park it is today. As a boy, I played in every house or property on Buckingham Lane, and I have known every resident there since the 1950's. I've continued to work and recreate on Stretch Island, my love and concern for it is deeply rooted. No one in this discussion could care more about the condition and quality of life on our end of the island than I do. Five years ago, Kathy Eacrett moved to the island and married her high school sweetheart, Mike Eacrett, who I've known since we were toddlers. When Kathy arrived, the property at 80 Buckingham was un-maintained and badly deteriorated, with pealing paint, piles of rusting vehicles, motorcycles, appliances and household junk littering the south side of the lane. But from the very moment Kathy moved in, the clean-up began and it has continued ever since with her remodeling, painting, decorating, and artful landscaping in an appropriate "beach theme". She's transformed a mess into a cheerful, well- manicured property we can all enjoy. It would seem that owners in the vicinity of 80 Buckingham Lane would all appreciate seeing such a well-restored property next to theirs, and would be grateful to Kathy for her work. Along with her boundless work ethic and eye for artistic detail, Kathy has displayed graciousness, warmth of heart, and a genuine caring spirit that has impressed all she has worked closely with. She delivered tender, thoughtful, personal care to our 92 year old mother in our home for over a year. As we got to know Kathy, we recognized superb integrity and a skill to understand and accept people just as they are, in a non judgmental way. She is smart. She has zero arrogance or ego problems. She has gained our trust and confidence that she will strive do the right thing, and always be aware of our family's needs. She always keeps a watchful eye on the neighborhood...even notifying others and us when something looks askew, out of place, or broken. When we lost our gardener, Kathy took over for us and has kept our property beautifully maintained, All put together, these qualities have assured us that anything Kathy Eacrett endeavors to do will be done with perfection, and with a respect for the needs and concerns of those around her. Over my life span, I have seen many events on all of the Buckingham Lane properties. They include: hundreds of visitors to the vineyards on fall weekend "U-pick" days, seasonal grape-stomping events, wedding receptions and ceremonies, political fund-raisers, anniversaries, family re-unions, volunteer firemen's picnics, school reunions, professional and academic gatherings, and even an historical centennial open house at the original Adam Eckert homestead. All of these events passed without unreasonable disturbances. Even though traffic increased along the county road approaching the lane, it did not result in conditions that would warrant denial of the proposal or that imposed any unreasonable burden or impact on area owners. Sometimes the sounds of laughter or voices raised for announcements were heard, but always in an expected window of time and appropriate to the event. Most of these events were much more loosely organized and regulated than Kathy's weddings would be yet even so, they created no great impact. I personally went through the process of obtaining a conditional use permit from the City Of Ocean Shores for 14 years, when we ran a vacation rental home there. Through that process, I came to understand the concerns our neighbors had for their community, and I learned how to achieve satisfactory results for all. So I can understand Kathy's closest neighbors have natural concerns about hosted weddings nearby. I'm sure these would include: vehicle traffic and parking, noise level, and guest behavior, all of which are common issues in residential zones. But I would urge them to have faith in Kathy, as our family does, and give the process time to work itself out to a proper end result. I have every confidence that Kathy not only understands their concerns, but will also organize her events in such a way that she addresses them to the satisfaction of all. In particular, she has already addressed our only concern about vehicle congestion, by clearing a large area on the southwest of their property where all guest vehicles can park without impacting the adjoining properties, and by agreeing to provide appropriate signage for adjacent private access ways. Some Stretch Island residents might not know this about Kathy, but during her 25 year tenure with Gene Juarez Salons as a lead manager/educator and event designer, she organized high-end events for Bill & Melinda Gates, and for many large Gene Juarez events. Melinda actually specifically hired Kathy to put on a spa show inside their Medina home for best friends and Microsoft wives. That level of quality had to be the absolute best, if you know anything about the Gate's appetite for perfection! Her spa design and layout for the Gene Juarez Salon was featured in a national magazine article. High quality event planning and coordination is one of her.strongest professional skill sets, which means organization, style and grace will be components of her wedding events. In my profession, I have attended and participated in a number of social events, including weddings and other gatherings. I have observed such functions held in residential locations like Buckingham Lane and events held in Bill Gates' residences. When such events are well organized, managed and regulated, the events can be quite successful and at the same time compatible with residential neighborhood surroundings. Detailed consultation and coordination between management and the event clients ensures regulations are clearly understood and implemented. The organizational skills possessed by the venue manager are critical. On this point, Kathy and I have conferred, and I couldn't be more comfortable with her carrying out that duty meticulously. Her "people skills," acute attention to detail, and personal work ethic assure me that we, her / neighbors, will be respected, and her clients will be well served. If I could ask for a perfect neighbor to have for life, a person that I could depend on, respect, and enjoy in friendship, that neighbor would be Kathy Eacrett. For all she has added to our neighborhood, I would truly hate to ever see her leave. I'm sure others agree. So without reservation, I recommend that she be granted the conditional use permit as applied for, so that she may have the opportunity to fulfill her own goals as well as her promises to our neighborhood. Sincerely, Michael Benson 425-778-3031 18405 68+h Ave. W. Lynnwood, WA 98037 mb�a,michaelbensonband.com 3/� 111h.1(,1111,11rurl".1lddilIfifli11111111 s °,.'.0, a"a i Mi. % fir#c"I'lltr1:.�:. 96S86�(h bvuiadoirj 69t,Xoo Ot i r ,V-N Ir9 ) �r1 Mr.Allen Borden APR 2 2 2014 Mason County Dept.of Community Development 126 W. CEDAR ST PO Box 279 Shelton,WA 98584 Re: Special Use Permit Application For Kathy&Michael Eacrett 80 E Buckingham Lane Grapeview,WA Parcel# 1 2 1 08-1 1-0001 0 Dear Mr.Borden, We were dismayed to learn that Kathy and Michael Eacrett wish to pursue their outdoor event business, Stretch Island Paradise. As we live adjacent to their property,we strongly believe we will be negatively impacted by commercial use of said property. We purchased our home,situated on a quiet,rural lane on Stretch Island,in June 2007. Our tranquil setting on a small,residential island is ideal. Thus,the proposed development is very disheartening. Unfortunately,we will be out of the country on May 13`"and unable to express our comments at the public hearing. Therefore,this letter will address our very real concerns. Other than the Eacretts,we are the only full-time residents on Buckingham Lane. The Lane is a narrow, gravel road in poor repair(see photo)that serves as the sole access to our property. The traffic generated by this proposal will most certainly have significant,negative impact on the Lane,as well as the island's rural county roads in general. The Eacrett's website,www.stretchislandparadise.com,states they can accommodate"a large party for hundreds". This is a tremendous cause for concern. Attached are photos of a"small"(Kathy's words) August 2013 wedding reception they booked. Where will"hundreds"park? Will we be able to come and go from our driveway during these events? Will our driveway become a turn around spot for vehicles pre and/or post event? Will emergency vehicles be able to access homes on the lane? Personal security is a major concern as we are quite secluded at the end of this private lane. A commercial event venue would introduce large numbers of non-residents to the area. In particular,we can foresee wandering guests,seeking access to and/or from the beach,trespassing on our property. The Eacrett's property does not have direct beach access. Noise is always a serious issue regarding outdoor events,increased by amplification of ceremonies and music. Currently,loud music and narration carries from Fair Harbor Marina weddings,over a mile away. Coming from a neighboring property,it could be extremely intolerable. The Eacretts informed us of their intent to use portable restroom facilities on their property for the outdoor events. We feel this would be unsightly and possibly odorous. Regarding the Special Use Permit as a"Cottage Industry"(17.03.021),we believe the Eacrett's request does not meet the requirements under sections A,F,G,and possibly C. A. Parking demands will far exceed the needs of residents and employees(the website states"a large wedding for hundreds or a small intimate gathering"). F. Noise and possible cooking odors from an outdoor event will surely be above an acceptable limit for a residential neighborhood. G. Local traffic will vastly surpass an increase of 5%. There are only seven owners on Buckingham Lane and,of those,only two are full-time residents(Eacretts and us). All vehicles must access Buckingham Lane via E.Eckert Rd.,also a narrow,one-lane road with no parking capabilities. t— C. The addition of catering service could well exceed this limitation and add to parking congestion (the website states"your vendors will be managed..."). In addition to the above specifics,we feel the"Cottage Industry"designation does not adequately address the issue of alcoholic beverages on site and the potential for loud and/or unruly guests at an outdoor venue. In conclusion,we encourage denial of the Special Use Permit. In our opinion,a business of this nature is not appropriate for Stretch Island in general or the residential neighborhood of Buckingham Lane in particular. Thank you for your consideration of our concerns. Please notify us of action taken regarding this application. SincereI GC04-- M e&Julie Cr ton 180 E Buckingham Lane Grapeview,WA 98546 �I cyb cQ RECEIVED MAY 0 5 2014 426 W. CEDAR ST1 99S.'e40'.27S—=S- RECEIVED MAY 0 5 2014 ATTN: Mason County Hearing Examiner 426 W. CEDAR ST, In reference to special use permit application#2014-00009 by: Kathy and Mike Eacrett 80 E. Buckingham Lane Grapeview, WA My name is Clarendon Nepere Allen IV, Second generation owner of 161 E. Island Crest. Dr Grapeview WA My property is adjacent to the proposed parking area PARCEL NUMBER 12108-75-90040 My concerns are many; SAFETY, ACCESS, TRAFFIC, NOISE, PRIVACY and TRESPASSING. 1. Safety- Party goers vs. Residents 2. Access- Fire and Police access 3. Traffic-These are small unimproved easements that we use. 4. Noise -This is a residential area 5. Trespassing -Car traffic and foot traffic trying to access beach. I hope these issues are addressed, they are my main concerns. Sincerely, Clarendon Allen L `(;AA 58 1 � X\\Q"\ . Lori June 9, 2014 Mason County Department of Development PO Box 279 Shelton,WA 98584 Re: Public Hearing for Application DDR2014-00009 Special Use Permit To Whom It May Concern: My husband and I own property on the north end of Stretch Island (E 141 Island Crest Road). We received the information about the commercial entertainment venue proposed in our neighborhood at 80 Buckingham Lane. While Case Inlet is a lovely place to host a wedding,we have concerns that events that bring 50+ cars (and their associated passengers) to the area will have a significant impact on the area: - Traffic: the neighborhood roads are narrow. The ingress and egress of 50+ cars (per their design man) before, during and after the event will be difficult, no matter how many parking attendants they have hired. - Noise: By design, these would be outdoor events. This means that the noise of the event is shared with all the neighbors,whether we want it or not. We have experienced the noise when they have hosted events before. I cannot imagine having to live next door to someone else's party weekend after weekend. - Control: I have recently learned that during recent events hosted on the site, overflow cars have been directed to park on our road. Our road is a single lane, private road, maintained by a select few landowners. It abuts the western edge of their property, but is not a through road. Any use by other than the owners is totally unacceptable. I am also a bit concerned that the venue has been advertising, although I understand the permitting process has not been approved. I hope that you will take our comments, and those of our other neighbors, into consideration. Our time on the island is important,too, Sincerely, Diana Barnes Michael McKinlay E 141 Island Crest Road, Grapeview 17207 NE 22°d Ct, Redmond i 5/29/14 https://mail-attachment.googleusercontent.com/attachment/u/0/?ui=2&ik=I8fOb44243&view=att&th=146... RECEIVED JUN 0 4 2014 426 W: CEDAR ST, Mason County Dept of Community Development: In regards to the special use permit requested for the property located at 80 E Buckingham Lane, Grapeview WA. The above mentioned property has been in the Eckert/Eacrett family since 1890. During that time it has been used for many events. Family reunions, community gatherings, and, much to the chagrin of my Grandmother, many Democratic fundraisers. (Grandma was a staunch Republican). None of these events were ever a hindrance or nuisance to any of the neighbors. The applicants own a 2 acre parcel of land adjacent to the property that would provide ample parking, so no one would have to park along side of Buckingham Lane. The most recent event held in the neighborhood was a wedding located next door to the east of the applicants property. Because they did not have ample parking space, there were cars parked on the side of the road during the event. Other than that, there did not seem to be any issues imposed on the neighbors. Since Kathy Eacrett, wife of Mike, arrived on the island and made the above mentioned address her permanent home, she has performed vast improvements on the property. Landscaping the grounds, painting both residences, and improving the overall look of the properties. She has also provided landscaping for many residents in the neighborhood, as well as providing care for one of the older residents. She is definitely an asset to the neighborhood. It is my opinion that this particular business venture would be a positive undertaking. Providing a beautiful setting for newlyweds to create lasting memories, while in no way imposing on any of the neighbors. If you have any concerns or questions, please feel free to call me or my wife at 425-397-6143. Sincere Mtev Eacrett ` EAC - Kathleen Mary Eacrett https:Hmail-attachment.googleusercontent.com/attachment/u/O/?u i=2&ik=18f0b44243&view=att&th=146... 1/1 This is in regards to the Eacrett (12108-11-00010) property on Buckingham Lane on Stretch Island in Grapeview. I would like to voice my concern on their intent to get a special use permit to turn their property into a wedding venue. The portion of Eckert Rd from the intersection of Stretch Island Rd and Eckert Rd to the corner where Buckingham Lane begins, which is approximately % mile, services approximately 13 homes. This portion of the road is very narrow, and to have two cars driving in opposite directions on the road one car must end up driving in the grass. The narrow unpaved private road (Buckingham Lane) that the Eacretts own runs straight through the property and services 6 additional residents other than the Eacrett's home and Vacation Rental. One concern is this is a dead end road, and at this time approximately 10 vehicles use this road. The increase in traffic could be 10 fold on any particular day. The wedding venue is planned to be in northeast corner of their property while the parking will be in the southwest corner of their property so the wedding party and guest will need to walk back and forth past private homes to get to the wedding venue. In addition the parking area is a grassy area of land and has poor drainage and often pools up with water after a heavy rain. In regards to noise: Currently there are weddings at the Fair Harbor Marina and most evenings that there is a wedding reception most of us on the north end of Stretch Island can sing along with the music that is playing at the Marina. Sound over the water carries extensively and this plan for a wedding venue will not only affect the neighbors of the Eacretts but at the very least most of the residents who live on the east side of Treasure Island. Another concern is the value of our property decreasing due to having a business such as this on Buckingham Lane. Thank you for considering all of these issues. Lori Norman 170 E Buckingham Lane C.J. Phillips SEATTLE WA 981 12402 Hallstrom Dr.NW Gig Harbor,WA 98332 . USA 16 APR 2014 PCB! 1 T �^w�,��► FOREV � A5-0.1 otoij 6 . x 7 9 (/ mil ,, W,4 9 s� RECEIVED APR 17 2014 426 WI CEDAR Sri =95a4 C 9 I� Mr.Christopher J.Phillips -r. 'f)W-t� '�,,��A.�+ � •- �4"'*�-. z A( ---x'" 12402 Hallstrom Dr NW OLYM PIA WA Gig Harbor,WA 98332 RECEIVED A". AUG 0 4 2014 c" av- ,����,- 426 W: CEDAR ST: NOTIFY SENDER OF NEW ADDRESS ' MASON COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 426 W CEDAR ST i SHEL TON WA 985 84-3 462 BC: 98584346226 *2626-01917-01-t34 � `'i�'a►�3��� �1i0����1{��i��itfl��n I�t�lfl,ll�i���fliiii��f��1����fi�11��fI�! -s A Mr.Christopher I Phillips SEATTLE ti A 981 12402HallstromDrNW Gig Harbor,WA 98332 07 APR 2014 PM IT RECEIVED • FOREVER APR 0 8 2014 426 W: CEDAR ST; 0 d 7� =_ii:3�=;r;=+:�:=��:c�•S !'ii,,,yl,Illlly�Iiililllillll+„ii�,�,,,i,,,i„yyfii,�=J�"j�lil Mr.Christopher J.Phillips 12402 Hallstrom Dr NW Gig Harbor,WA 98332 July 29,2014 Mr. Allan Borden RECEIVED Senior Planner Mason County Department of Community Development AUG 0 4 2014 PO Box 279 Shelton, WA 98584 426 W. CEDAR STI Incident related to Event Venue land-use violations,Stretch Island Parcel 1 21 08-1 1-0001 0 Dear Mr. Borden, I apologize in advance for a lengthy letter, but I wish to report the following incident related to the ongoing issue of unauthorized, non-permitted wedding events being held at the Eacrett residential property on Stretch Island in Mason County.This incident pertains to both the county's enforcement efforts and any future consideration of the applicants'special use permits. I am frustrated to have to report this incident because it involves a situation, which, under normal circumstances, should be easily resolved among neighbors and county officials within the standard land-use review process. However, I do not want to be intimidated by any individual who opposes by my own rights as property owner to express my views as part of the county's public land-use hearing process. Incident: 5:30 pm on Saturday July 26, 2014 During the early hours of a wedding event being hosted at the Eacrett property, I was working on my nearby property, 220 Buckingham Lane(parcel#12108 11 90062). 1 was standing on a ladder painting the south wall of a storage shed when I was approached unexpectedly by Mike Eacrett. He was standing on my neighbor Clad Allen's adjacent lot to the west of my property and spoke to me from Mr.Allen's property, about 10-15 feet from where I was painting. Mike asked me about my understanding of the south property line on my lot, which is clearly marked by recent surveyed corner markers. I acknowledged that I do indeed know where my south property line is located, and we both agreed that the markers were visible and clear. Mike then asked me to stop maintaining or improving (mowing,weed-eating or filling of gravel pot holes)on his adjacent property, including a shared private easement, which exists on his property just south of my lot. This easement is recorded on my deed and is the assigned easement for ingress/egress and utilities for my property. I told him that I had mowed a grassy portion of the easement dead-end area(about 20 x 20 feet)at the same time I had mowed the field grass on my lot. I agreed to stop mowing that area if he would prefer the grass to grow tall. He agreed that was his preference, and that if easement maintenance was needed for potholes, I should let him handle that sort of maintenance. I also explained that I would continue to use the designated easement and a related gravel lane as access to my property,as per the easement. Again, he agreed that my"coming and going"was appropriate use of the easement. I felt the issue was resolved. However, Mike then began an extended string of sharp accusations unrelated to the easement. He became visibly angry and said he was going to start enforcing his property rights more strictly in response to the fact that most of his neighbors had opposed the recent Eacrett special use proposal for a home-based, cottage industry wedding venue at their home during summer weekends. He accused me of"joining a mob"that had resulted in"crushing his wife's dreams."He said the current wedding event(4pm-10pm, and being hosted at the Eacrett home despite a June 3,2014 Mason County planning letter advising that such weddings were not permitted)was not noisy and was not creating any sort of traffic conflict on Buckingham Lane. He criticized me for helping to defeat the special use permit for such events, regardless of the fact that the Eacretts had earlier withdrawn their application for the permit after the county's land-use hearing was conducted and an opinion from the hearing examiner was pending. I told Mike that I had expressed my personal views at the hearing, and I did not wish to convey any ill will toward any of my neighbors.This was my statement during the June hearing,too. Mike then criticized my views based on my limited weekend use of my property, implying that my weekends of recreation and peace and quiet were subordinate to other residential and commercial land uses.Again, I explained that I had spoken at the land use hearing because I wanted to voice my individual opinion and protect my own property rights and property values under the correct permitting process. I explained that my opposition was directed against an incompatible use, not against any individuals. He dismissed my views and repeated that I was responsible for"joining the mob"that hurt his wife. Mike went on to say that he and his wife would be resubmitting their proposal and in a loud,threatening tone, he said, "I'll give you one more chance"to change your views on the plan. I told him that I would watch for any such proposal and would evaluate it on my own under the same concerns and planning codes. He continued his threatening tone by saying that if the neighbors continued to oppose the wedding event venue, he would open a livestock pig farm, including peacocks and other obnoxious operations that would create more of an impact than weddings. He said he could do that sort of farming without a permit. I did not know how to respond, but stayed calm despite his yelling at me. I tried to diffuse his anger by suggesting that I wanted to build a small wood-rail fence along my south property line, and I asked whether that would create any problem for him. He said such a fence would not impact him. He then returned to his wedding event on his property. My neighboring property owner Clad Allen arrived at his property about halfway through this incident and eventually escorted Mike off the Allen property, without incident. My wife Vicki also joined me for part of this conversation when she heard a louder-than-normal conversation near our shed. Other than this incident,the unauthorized wedding event created disturbing noise(thumping bass and rock- pop)from DJ music during the 7:30-9:30 time period, as anticipated —well after Mike's visit to my property. And a small group from the wedding smoked cigarettes and partied by some of the cars parked in the Eacrett's field after the music stopped. I did not engage with anyone from the wedding party, other than to wave at one person who was walking her dog during a break in the party. This incident and the continued determination by one property owner to conduct non-permitted event use at the expense of neighboring property owners only reinforce my concerns that this situation requires clear, timely and unequivocal enforcement of county land-use provisions. Please help address and resolve this matter according to appropriate county land-use authority. Sinc y, Chris Phillips View from my property of Eacrett adjacent field as parking area during July 26, 2014 wedding event. June 9, 2014 Mason County Department of Development P.O. Box 279 Shelton, WA 98584 Re: Public Hearing for Application DDR2014-00009 Special Use Permit: Eacrett To Whom It May Concern: am writing on behalf of my mother, Jeanne M. Brandrud; my sister, Janet Brandrud, who lives in California and is POA for my mother; and myself. We have been coming over to this quiet, peaceful, and secluded Stretch Island beach for more than 55 years. My parents bought the property at 151 E. Island Crest Rd. in the 1970's and built their dream home. Now that dream risks being shattered by the noise of loud music, people celebrating, and cars traveling down a narrow and pot-holed dirt road. We access our property down a one-lane road that ends at Clarendon Allen's property and butts up to the parking area where Eacretts' guests will park. I have never seen that road used to access Eacretts' property, but Kathy Eacrett is now telling the neighbors on Buckingham Lane to use our road instead of Buckingham Lane. I have no doubt Eacretts will offer the alternative access of our road rather than Buckingham Lane to the wedding party and their guests. It is full of potholes and deeply rutted. In addition to noise and traffic, we are concerned about vandalism on the beach. None of the properties have fences that will keep anyone out. Guests can easily walk and stumble on someone else's property. If loud events take place, our property values will go down. Who would want to buy a home when they can't seek the peace and quiet they need, especially during summer, when the events will take place? In addition, homeowners will incur substantial costs to fence their properties and maintain their roads. There are no commercial ventures on the Island. Our properties are zoned rural and residential. This area will not accommodate large events. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, #,/ Nancy Brandrud i5_/ g SE �s S� l� 9�0�� Mr. Allen Borden Mason County Dept. of Community Development PO Box 279 Shelton WA 98584 Re: Special Use Permit Application For Michael & Kathy Eacrett, Parcel# 12108-11-00010 80 E. Buckingham Lane Grapeview,WA Dear Mr. Borden, We are writing this letter with extreme disappointment in the idea of the Eacretts pursuing their business as wedding/event venue, at the above mentioned location. I, Sherry, have been coming to, and enjoying Stretch Island since 1967, when my parents purchased a property located on Wilkes Road. I have enjoyed the peace and tranquility, ever since. In 1994, 1 met my(then future) husband, Maarten. He was a Dutch citizen, residing in Holland. Upon his first visit to me, we vacationed on Stretch Island. I will never forget his words..... "Some day, I like to live here!" So impressed was he, with the quiet tranquility, that even he, in Holland, had never experienced. After marrying and residing in Holland for nearly 10 years, we were finally able to make his (and my) dream come true. We moved with our son to America—but most importantly, to beautiful Stretch Island. We live at E 31 Wilkes Road, which is next to the bridge. We enjoy watching the activities, yet sometimes don't enjoy EVERYTHING we see. One of those days was when we witnessed (and filed a police report, which you may wish to read up on) Michael Eacrett and his friends, illegally placing a "Bobcat" machine ON the beach, across from us, on the mainland's south side of the bridge. There, he was proceeding to pile a flatbed trailer full of the very large driftwood logs,from the beach. Those logs are the only manor of protection to the County Road from the Fall and Winter storms. I approached him, saying that what they were doing could not be legal (especially with heavy machinery on the beach) and was told that "they could take whatever the_they wanted, anytime they wanted to". This was clearly a man who doesn't"play by the rules". After they left with their load, we drove down near their residence, to see they had dumped all of the log driftwood, at their home. This is now used for decoration for their business venture. Our main concern though, is the fact that we have loved living in a small, cozy community. For the most part, things are quiet. It is unusually active on holiday weekends and such, which can also bring extra frustration. Living next to the bridge, extra traffic means more traffic in our own driveway, people using it to park or simply using our circular driveway as their own personal 'turnaround'. The day that the Eacrett's hosted a wedding last summer, was a prime example. The traffic and noise over the bridge was extreme that evening. We could tell exactly when the event'must have ended' as many cars raced down the hill above us, and flew over the bridge. That sort of traffic is NOT what we are looking for, here on Stretch. Nor do we wish to encounter the possible intoxicated guests or trespassers. We plead the denial of Mr. and Mrs. Eacrett's Special Use Permit. We believe that a business of this sort, will only cause many problems to so many current residents. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Sherry and Maarten van Dijk E. 31 Wilkes Road (PO Box 158) Grapeview, WA 98546 - - ��'--"�-�■.mow, v ew G, --- apepewew WA 98546-0592 TACOMA — QLYMPIA CE WA 983 •"" 18 APR 2014 PM 1 T `"— ,,.�° APR 2 12014 40717 d26 W_ CEDART. r April 7, 2014 DECEIVED Mr.Allan Borden Mason County Department of Community Development APR 2 12014 PO Box 279 Shelton,WA 98584 M C C D - PLANNING Re: Special Use Permit Application Kathy&Michael Eacrett Dear Mr. Borden, We are writing to express our dismay regarding the above referenced and urge you to deny said application. We are very familiar with Buckingham Lane,as a family member and now a friend live at the end of this road. As you know this is a private, unpaved road residential in character. It is our understanding that the Eacretts plan on hosting weddings and other functions that would not only disturb the residents with excessive noise but would also bring many more vehicles onto this road. Presently,the road is full of many potholes and the status of this road will only become worse. We have lived on Stretch Island since 1996 and have certainly seen an influx of traffic over the bridge for one reason or another and allowing this permit will add much more traffic to the island as a whole. We also live at the end of a private road and have to constantly put up with beach seekers and/or sight seers who have no compunction about using our driveway as a turnaround,even though the road is posted that there is no through. Certainly,the using of others driveways as a turnaround would become a problem for the other residents on Buckingham Lane, as well. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Nancy . ontgome James D. Montgom ry PO Box 592 E 151 Wilkes Rd. Grapeview,WA 98546 360-275-7280 SELL'OCCHIO HOME aE..,ATT+}.:E V.,'N"4,. '.f 1435 ELLIOTT AVE.WEST SEATTLE,WA 98119 � JAPR 201.4 FW IF, t tJ / /�► M Oo. Qe� �mr-7 IV F D A R SA4 0 Al W/Z 1 / 9'^=--e4 3 April 9, 2014 Mason County Department of Community Development: I am writing to your department to object to the approval of the proposed Special Usage Permit being applied for by Kathy and Michael Eacrett residing at 80 E. Buckingham Lane, Grapeview WA. As a resident of Stretch Island, I am concerned about the increased traffic, lack of adequate parking, invasion of privacy and general disruption to our island. The address in question does not seem to meet the requirements identified in M.C.C. 17.03.021. Our island is a residential area for citizens that wish privacy and serenity and the idea of a commercial enterprise operating an "Event" venue with music and catering does not fit the profile of what we have had or want on the island. Our roads are rural and small and from looking at the actual site it does not provide for adequate parking, turn-arounds etc. for event guests without impacting the neighbors in the immediate area. I respectfully request that you consider my objection when evaluating the approval of the Special Usage Permit being considered for Kathy and Michael Eacrett. Additionally I request to be notified of the action taken on the application. Sinccrely Yours, Patricia Wills Mailing Address E 113 Stretch Island Road North 904 East Miller St. # 3 Grapeview, WA. 98546 Seattle, WA. 98102 RECEIVED APR 2 5 2€14 MCCD- PLANNING l NI'll11l$1rl1ilt11(ifIIr,filflr°lii'Uh11, 1.-lf s_`s.:-z=--,tPases i ILT IW03:) cM qZb WOZ 0 C 8dV 4_A;3038 f RECEIVED APR 3 0 20% 426 W: CEDAR Sa C Harley Somers P O Box 414 Grapeview April 29, 2014 Mason County Department of Community Developement Allan Borden P O Box 279 Shelton, Wa. 98584 Dear Allan: I believe that cottage industries are a great idea, but not when when noise, traffic, and trespass would change the essence of the neighborhood. I urge you to deny the special use permit on Buckingham Lane. Sincerely U 1 Page IofI Allan Borden - Re: Question Received from the Mason County Website - From: Barbara Adkins To: Lori Norman Date: 3/3/2014 9:17 AM Subject: Re: Question Received from the Mason County Website - CC: Allan Borden Ms. Norman - This application is for a special use permit to allow weddings at the property. It will be scheduled for a public hearing to allow for public testimony, such as yours. Allan Borden is the planner assigned to this case and I've copied him on this email. Thank you, Barbara Barbara A. Adkins, AICP, Director Department of Community Development Post Office Box 279 Shelton, WA 98584 360/427-9670 ext. 286 Email: BarbarA@co.mason.wa.us >>> <Ijnorman@gci.net> 3/2/2014 6:16 PM >>> From: Lori Norman Dept Sent To: Planning Dept Message:I would like to find out what my family needs to do to voice our opinions and concerns about case #DDR2014-00009 an application to allow wedding venues on Buckingham Ln. (c5- file:///C:/Users/ahb/AppData/LocaUTemp/XPgrpwise/531448A6Masomnail l... 3/3/2014 April 5,2014 RE C E it v D Mason County Department of Community Development APR U 8 PO Box 279 �25 W. CEDAR ST Shelton,WA 98584 j Request for notification of action by the Mason County Hearing Examiner Please include me in notification of action or decision pertaining to the following application for Special Use Permit on Stretch Island. Pusue NoTI" U5= Own.tlmo u nrcay yann:nit KW' an: 1aicM41 F.,-'. In& ,yFhwln ti 6 IRO arGW!:.*} d.+.tlhfmtlra i,r,It., Qn:pw(Y dit- fl:'�! ato4w,M[4�«.,1 tlrt eCi:1cY:nrt 4:r 4 ten' 11$(1 r;ar:((bt latl!b•M.,Vwn al. C,Ivtl.R -2 N•!'n1'nal�}+jt�r W!'G4 wwtt`YI :)ra rpi4Nin y+GRe rr ay or.:a4 nn tlrd a3n✓4n I-1#" rile Innr:&n.'dr. Uec•P -:1 Pith' w of a 1.o2a —i aaxo Farms Fenderr.atr C zana"aWu+p TOMIna !AL�1ar Ptayram 2mmar=al as:C/]Y-a11 Statr�DFdS, ro ayerala a caaago 1't• d16ay er— :n a11s—,:re a]pscam met =ty lot a rp,Kal i...FDMA W'd Nca Na pack j rP9 /11CW O—C awr'aal a,'tna Carroty H=1 irt�Fan,rtµv` Pn:y.l N:aTC,cr if1Qa11�;t'J7� . 11.42 aC uaa'DtlRCs� 2Q = =YCUI�•am 1.n.Covr.4,+ TJA t::.:,rnn n P•o,-:.:r .Aang . B.crn7rwm lNnn v rn4 mi Y Ejw rid r- aM of tlld• 40-1:xt a mlai Q= ]'3=UOOn: 'M111.1 1`4 mrtaoa:l 1 e ira M&WOE.. I at Sam 9,7]amsFla a^I N_ FanQa 1 W.P Mazan ]:.rLy YJaslrng2r. Vd FlC[Czad CYva eamoT iz SUaleCt A Sa is Uan ,2erml:IaY ewwv 1}.Q5.3sp1 arc 6aait C]JTJ �-4'M Colfax Rag.:lowe V: Caw-: arc G'o Wa=w LaanN S 161-a M^".am Po> ZL =ncl1'C4 'rf NTr-CfCry i3c'ralcGmattt rtn-rt rit A v;** ntlp+i+y tl:',Fy,N 1aN� r ar Jr to S4-1A.o 1na4P >t ISy b:�/4 tyr yGnYJ rGli�/ i, al l)..n& it-- -1 IN MAf)(,`N 4:41)mr1 CFPAC•'JJFNT OF va.MMUNIT`' t]S:ELOFUENT F(J. WX M - `J"RroN, Yla it'.:d'1'°rt:,tm++w•r lwiod ii A bnsl 1+3"to 111" Ira+.oral .,y44 d a.N•xt, :coj' :nal am* at=tcman, LcynA a' at hi].•n..Ca is ADM 1.2.M14 'Mrm smmar.. ,.JI to a_ 01.W aF V 11"n C= at tv Hoann;S =xmmaar coal[ aaa•rq 'fit Via? 13,2@14; 1 Do PM, in iWe Ca eaialnq tirm:,xy.r- VW❑+aar•Gmn a1 4'1 aJa Flip 31. :n Cc'e+uG-as GTKb d�.'T.JYr ay7•ar;:g. ...Ic;>cci ta^ rWlfaa :nlymnl Gu. -y+) tt;++ll•rV as a'+.wtkul z b[M l min 4.r'rer C'rrY]nTBrlal ra,+mt ]•S AN,iI 3.1@21 0 21�s Sincerely, Chris Phillips Mailing Address: 12402 Hallstrom Drive NW,Gig Harbor,WA 98332 Ph:253.617.8382 Mason County Property Address: 220 Buckingham Lane, Grapeview,WA April 15,2014 RECEIVED Mason County Department of Community Development APR 17 2014 PO Box 279 426 W. CEDAR STi Shelton, WA 98584 ATTN.MASON COUNT HEARING EXAMINER Reference to: Special Use Permit Application by Kathy and Michael Eacrett, Wedding Venue, 80 E. Buckingham Lane, Grapeview,WA on Stretch Island. To the Hearing Examiner: Please accept this written comment for your consideration of the above-referenced Special Permit Application. My wife and I are private owners of undeveloped property(94 feet of waterfront) located at 220 Buckingham Lane,approximately 300 feet west of the subject residential property, and immediately north of and adjacent to undeveloped property also owned by the applicants. See assessor's map on pg. 2. Background We purchased our property(parcel 12108-11-90061) in 2011 and enjoy it as a seasonal and weekend get-away for camping, quiet recreation and kayaking,with future plans to build a beach cabin or possibly our retirement residence. We are members and supporters of the Grapeview Community Association. Our primary residence is in Gig Harbor, WA,and we searched throughout South Puget Sound and elsewhere before fording this serene residential setting on Stretch Island. Proposed Special Use In considering the proposed Nfedding venue on the north shoreline of Stretch Island,we would urge you to address or mitigate several critical issues: 1. Environmental impact—When guests gather for events, even as temporary visitors,the influx can stress existing septic and water systems unless sufficient commercial-grade utilities are in place. The natural systems in an island waterfront environment are especially vulnerable to being overtaxed by a surge of people who rely on systems designed for less intense residential use. 2. Noise—Weddings commonly consist of a brief ceremony followed by an extended celebration and reception,including amplified music, dancing, food,drink,and socializing. Frankly, a good wedding means a good party,but these activities are by definition incompatible with a quiet,residential row of waterfront homes where any large gathering would likely occur outdoors rather than in the a reception hall. If any commercial event gatherings are permitted in this area,responsible mitigation should include specific and enforced limits on the numbers of people,number of events,hours of event operation and allowable noise levels, so as to be fully compatible with others' property rights and the existing peaceful and pleasant residential use of the area. 3. Parking,traffic and road maintenance—The proposed use would occur in a residential area served by a narrow county road, followed by a private, one-lane asphalt/gravel lane that terminates in a dead end on a private easement without a public turn-around or cul-de-sac. The existingroad surface is,at best barely sufficient for light residential use and access for basic � Y g home services. Turn-arounds occur on private driveways. Higher traffic beyond light residential use should require conditions involving road improvement and maintenance sufficient to mitigate for event-related traffic loads. We believe the applicants propose using their undeveloped property immediately south of our lot for occasional event parking. Having installed a light gravel access drive along the private easement to our lot,we are concerned that occasional higher traffic volumes will erode and compromise the gravel surface we have installed in the easement. We also are concerned that foot traffic from such a parking area may come across our lot to the private beach. If the event location does not allow for beach access,we can anticipate that guests will seek out other private property as access to the beach. Our fear is this could lead to trespass issues or worse. 4. Public safety and access—Events,even when well managed, sometimes result in accidents, medical issues, altercations and property damage. We urge you to consider appropriate access and the service burden for fire,police and medical first-responders as part of any requirement for any event-related use. Demands on these public services can be increased by event-related I activities when compared to existing light residential use. Review by public safety officials to determine specific access,code compliance and safety requirements would be prudent. In short,we want to be good neighbors, but this proposed Special Use appears to conflict with the existing and intended residential use and character of our Stretch Island community. We appreciate your consideration of these issues in your review of the application. Res fully, Chris and Vicki Phil ips 12402 Hallstrom Drive NW Gig Harbor, WA 98332 Ph: 253-851-5696 tt � r � � � � 1, ° ,`► Gravel accesslane I a via easement �N �r 0 37dR April 7, 2014 e RECEIVED Mr.Allan Borden Mason County Department of Community Development APR 2 12014 PO Box 279 Shelton,WA 98584 M C C D - PLANNING Re: Special Use Permit Application Kathy&Michael Eacrett Dear Mr. Borden, We are writing to express our dismay regarding the above referenced and urge you to deny said application. We are very familiar with Buckingham Lane,as a family member and now a friend live at the end of this road. As you know this is a private, unpaved road residential in character. It is our understanding that the Eacretts plan on hosting weddings and other functions that would not only disturb the residents with excessive noise but would also bring many more vehicles onto this road. Presently,the road is full of many potholes and the status of this road will only become worse. We have lived on Stretch Island since 1996 and have certainly seen an influx of traffic over the bridge for one reason or another and allowing this permit will add much more traffic to the island as a whole. We also live at the end of a private road and have to constantly put up with beach seekers and/or sight seers who have no compunction about using our driveway as a turnaround,even though the road is posted that there is no through. Certainly,the using of others driveways as a turnaround would become a problem for the other residents on Buckingham Lane, as well. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Nancy ontgomery James D. Montgom ry PO Box 592 E 151 Wilkes Rd. Grapeview,WA 98546 360-275-7280 April 9, 2014 Mason County Department of Community Development: I am writing to your department to object to the approval of the proposed Special Usage Permit being applied for by Kathy and Michael Eacrett residing at 80 E. Buckingham Lane, Grapeview WA. As a resident of Stretch Island, I am concerned about the increased traffic, lack of adequate parking, invasion of privacy and general disruption to our island. The address in question does not seem to meet the requirements identified in M.C.C. 17.03.021. Our island is a residential area for citizens that wish privacy and serenity and the idea of a commercial enterprise operating an "Event" venue with music and catering does not fit the profile of what we have had or want on the island. Our roads are rural and small and from looking at the actual site it does not provide for adequate parking, turn-arounds etc. for event guests without impacting the neighbors in the immediate area. I respectfully request that you consider my objection when evaluating the approval of the Special Usage Permit being considered for Kathy and Michael Eacrett. Additionally I request to be notified of the action taken on the application. Sinc ely Yours, W C;C� Patricia Wills Mailing Address E 113 Stretch Island Road North 904 East Miller St. # 3 Grapeview, WA. 98546 Seattle, WA. 98102 E RECIVED APR 2 5 2014 MCCD-PLANNING �`� RECEIVED APR 302 426 W, CEDAR S T! C Harley Somers P O Box 414 Grapeview April 29, 2014 Mason County Department of Community Developement Allan Borden P 0 Box 279 Shelton, Wa. 98584 Dear Allan: I believe that cottage industries are a great idea, but not when when noise,traffic, and trespass would change the essence of the neighborhood. I urge you to deny the special use permit on Buckingham Lane. Sincerely n (fit- F CC) NN S APR 3 0 20A 426 Wj CEDAR STi iI iaa?f a=a a$: i1 i l �!t :{a!;}=:-iilj� li;:}3�-'-�� '•�;; i RECEIVED MAY 0 5 2014 ATTN: Mason County Hearing Examiner 426 W. CEDAR STi In reference to special use permit application #2014-00009 by: Kathy and Mike Eacrett 80 E. Buckingham Lane Grapeview, WA My name is Clarendon Nepere Allen IV, Second generation owner of 161 E. Island Crest. Dr Grapeview WA My property is adjacent to the proposed parking area PARCEL NUMBER 12108-75-90040 My concerns are many; SAFETY, ACCESS, TRAFFIC, NOISE, PRIVACY and TRESPASSING. 1. Safety- Party goers vs. Residents 2. Access- Fire and Police access 3. Traffic-These are small unimproved easements that we use. 4. Noise-This is a residential area 5. Trespassing -Car traffic and foot traffic trying to access beach. I hope these issues are addressed, they are my main concerns. Sincerely, Clarendon Allen 5 1J L +t�aA l � RECEIVED MAY 0 5 2014 ATTN-. Mason County Hearing Examiner dab W. CEDAR STj In reference to special use permit application #2014-00009 by: Kathy and Mike Eacrett 80 E. Buckingham Lane Grapeview, WA My name is Clarendon Nepere Allen IV, Second generation owner of 161 E. Island Crest. Dr Grapeview WA My property is adjacent to the proposed parking area PARCEL NUMBER 12108-75-90040 My concerns are many; SAFETY, ACCESS, TRAFFIC, NOISE, PRIVACY and TRESPASSING. 1. Safety- Party goers vs. Residents 2. Access- Fire and Police access 3. Traffic-These are small unimproved easements that we use. 4. Noise-This is a residential area 5. Trespassing - Car traffic and foot traffic trying to access beach. I hope these issues are addressed, they are my main concerns. Sincerely, Clarendon Allen \ 5 gj { .a�\ • Lem cSG,� C�u.C\ RECEIVE MAY 0 5 2014 426 W. CEDAR s1 -- ill IIlI1 i, t�i±�fl�1`r�l'i1ri14i`;i`rli}r�liijr!I�II _ _ i f= 1•i:rrlr' i Richard W. Jensen, Manager RECFIV70 Ellison Land &Logging, LLC MAY 0 5 1505 La Coronilla Drive Alb Wi CEO AR Barbara, CA 93109 AR ST; May 2, 2014 Mason County Department of Community Development Planning Division P.0 Box 279 Shelton, WA 93584 Re: DDR 2014-00009 Special Use Proposal Some of the assumptions regarding the Special Use Permit seem incomplete or inadequate if alcohol and/or amplification at the event are to be involved. For venue or park facilities here where I live, there are concerns that are always considered. They are: 1. Toilet facilities need to be adequate for the crowd size or many participants will simply use the bushes or adjacent properties. 2. Temporary toilet facilities in a neighborhood are not particularly attractive and can reduce the value of property nearby. 3. Parking needs to be planned/constructed with adequate lanes and space for cars so they can come and go before and after the event without everyone else having to move their cars. 4. Although sod fields may be suitable for parking in dry periods,they are less suitable when it has been raining or the ground is moist for a long period. S. Music, if amplified, can be heard for long distances across water and/or valleys. Unamplified music is best for neighbors and suitable to small gatherings. 6. A specific shut-down time is a must for public gatherings where alcohol is being served or it will go longer than originally intended. I am not familiar with the conditions placed on facilities in residential areas in Mason County, but here we use a "conditional use permit" which allows the appropriate agency-usually the planning department-to withdraw the permit if the conditions are violated. Open-ended authorizations on potential problem areas are not recommended. The materials sent by the applicant area little difficult to follow because they aren't to scale„ but suggest they may not be suitable for a small neighborhood on a narrow C9 foot) private road. 1 would suggest you condition the proposal as follows: 1. No amplified music 2. Hours during daylight only, no portable or permanent venue lighting. �ill 3. Parking be suitable for the proposed largest audience using about 2.3 occupants per car as the average occupancy. 4. Parking overflow may not take place on Buckingham Road. Adequate clearance on Buckingham road should be sufficient for a fire truck/emergency vehicle to pass. 5. If temporary toilets are to be used,the number provided should be appropriate for the crowd size and length of the event Effluent from the toilets should be removed within a day of the event to minimize odor. 6. Permanent toilet facilities should be planned -with hand-washing facilities. 7. Food handling facilities should be sufficient for the number of people participating in the event. Best wishes in your attempt to minimize the negative effects of such an event venue in a residential area while providing a pleasant venue as described by the Eachrett's. Sincerely, lic_h' jen en, nager Ellison and an ogging, LLC E 580 Ecke oad, Grapeview, WA 97546 Cc: Kathy Eacrett 80 Buckingham Lane Grapeview,WA 98546 Page 1 of 1 Mary Wagner - Re: "To Allan Borden Reg: the Eckert Venue on Stretch Island" From: Mary Wagner To: Hansen, Patty Date: 5/9/2014 12:36 PM Subject: Re: "To Allan Borden Reg:the Eckert Venue on Stretch Island" Good Afternoon Ms. Hansen - I wanted to write and let you know that I am in receipt of your e-mail, and I have printed and forwarded a copy of it to Mr.Allan Borden. Should you have any questions or require any further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you! Mary K. Wagner Mason County Community Development P.O. Box 279 Shelton, WA. 98584-0186 (360) 427-9670 Ext. 355 maryw@co.mason.wa.us >>> Patty Hansen <patty@ hhandj.com> 5/9/2014 12:18 PM >>> Hello, We are very concerned about the possiblity of an event venue on the North end of Stretch Island.Among our concerns: increased car traffic, parking, and noise, which carries and is amplified so near the water.There is already an event venue as well as a marina serving this area -- an additional facility and the attendant disruptions to this rural residential community would be most unwelcome. Sincerely, Patricia Hansen t s file:///C:/Users/MARYW/AppData/Local/Temp/XPgrpwise/536CCBC I-�-Maso=ai1100138 .. 5/9/2014 Page 1 of 2 Mary Wagner - Re: "To Allan Borden reg: the Eacrett Venue on Stretch Island" y From: Mary Wagner To: Stone,Teresa Date: 5/9/2014 11:31 AM Subject Re: "To Allan Borden reg:the Eacrett Venue on Stretch Island" Good Morning Ms. Stone: I just wanted to let you know I am in receipt of your e-mail and have printed and forwarded a copy of it to Mr. Borden. Thank you, and please do not hesitate to contact me should you have any questions or wish to express any further comments. Thank you! Mary K. Wagner Mason County Community Development P.O. Box 279 Shelton, WA. 98584-0186 (360) 427-9670 Ext. 355 maryw@co.mason.wa.us >>> Teresa Stone <teresastone@wavecable.com> 5/9/2014 11:27 AM >>> Dear Allan, I strongly object to a commercial use event center venue on Stretch Island as proposed by Kathy and Mike Eacrett.I cannot imagine the impact on the specific location and certainly the close neighbors,just in terms of water, sewage, road use, parking, garbage, noise and general disturbance of what is a very peaceful area.I do not believe anyone who chose to live on this island wants an event center within a mile let alone next door. When our son and his bride were married on our property, with about 100 guests,we rented porta-potties, arranged for extra garbage disposal, invited neighbors to the reception part of the day (and they came!), asked them if we could use parts of their property for parking, made sure the private/shared drive coming in was in good condition, they in turn graciously assured us they would not run lawn mowers, chain saws, etc and they all kept their pets indoors.It was a lovely day for all concerned, friends, family and neighbors. But this was a one time deal, not an everyday thing. Close neighbors on Buckingham Lane cannot be expected to do these same things on an on-going basis. Even though we do not live immediately adjacent to the Eacrett property we do not want the additional traffic on the island nor the wear and tear on the water, sewage, etc.And we do not want a bunch of"lookey lous" wandering around.This is a neighborhood watch community on the whole island and the last thing we heed is an increase in the number of folks we stop and say"Can I help you?"which is standard procedure when there is I�� t file:///C:/Users/MARYW/AppData/Local/Temp/XPgrpwise/536CBC75Masonmai110013 83... 5/9/2014 Page 2 of 2 an unknown vehicle on our road.We are at E 141 Keen Rd. One of the reasons we moved here was because it is quiet and a safe place to walk. More traffic "checking out the island" is not on our wish list! I strongly doubt all wedding invitations are going to say"Please come straight to the venue and leave the same way. Other residents do not welcome tourists on their private roads." I strongly urge you to refuse this permit request. Teresa Stone E 141 Keen Road Stretch Island 360 275 5505 l � S file:///C:/Users/MARYW/AppData/Local/Temp/XPgrpwise/536CBC75Maso=ail 10013 83... 5/9/2014 Page 1 of 1 Mary Wagner - Re: EACRETT VENUE ON STRETCH ISLAND From: Mary Wagner To: Thatcher, Ethel Date: 5/12/2014 7:59 AM Subject: Re: EACRETT VENUE ON STRETCH ISLAND Ms. Thatcher- I am writing to let you know that I am in receipt of your e-mail, and I will forward this on to Mr. Borden. Thank you! Mary K. Wagner Mason County Community Development P.O. Box 279 Shelton, WA. 98584-0186 (360) 427-9670 Ext. 355 maryw@co.mason.wa.us >>> Ethel Thatcher <ethel@wisetree.us> 5/10/2014 6:41 PM >>> To:Allan Borden Regarding: The Eacrett Venue on Stretch Island Parcel number 12108-11-00010 E Buckingham Lane I've been in the Grapeview area since 1985. I've lived on Stretch Island since 2000 and am very much opposed to having any events that would attract numbers of people and cars on our residential Stretch Island! Sincerely, Ethel G. Thatcher P.O. Box 461 Grapeview, WA 98546 file:///C:/Users/N ARYW/AppData/LocaUTemp/XPgrpwise/53707F52Maso=ai11001383... 5/12/2014 MASON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Planning Division P.O.Box 279, Shelton,WA 98584 (360)427-9670 DDR2014-00009 NOTICE OF SPECIAL USE PERMIT. Notice is hereby given that Kathy and Michael Eacrett,who are the applicants of the proposed development on the property described below,has filed an application for a Special Use Permit for the development of- Review of event outdoor venue proposal on residential property on the north end of Stretch Island along Case Inlet; Special Use Permit public review on a 1.82 ac. property zoned Rural Residential 5 zone and using Shoreline Master Program commercial development standards. To operate a cottage industry enterprise in this zone,the applicant must apply for a Special Use Permit and receive public hearing review and approval by the County Hearing Examiner. Parcel Number: 12108-11-00010 (1.82 ac.) Site Address: 80 E Buckingham Ln., Grapeview WA. Location of Project: Along Buckingham Lane at the end of Eckert Rd. on the northeast side of Stretch Island; at nearly 0.6 miles east of Grapeview;within the northeast 1/4 of the northeast 1/4 of Section 8, Township 21 N.,Range 1 W. in Mason County Washington. Said proposed development is subject to Special Use Permit review(M.C.C. 17.05.040) and associated Mason County Development Regulations standards and the Mason County Shoreline Master Program standards for commercial development standards. Any person desiring to express their view or to be notified of the action taken on the application should notify in writing of their interest to: MASON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PO BOX 279 SHELTON,WA 98584 The comment period is at least 10 days from the final date of publication given pursuant to M.C.C. 15.07.030 (public notice). Final date of publication,posting or mailing of notice is April 10,2014. Written comments will be accepted up to the date of the Hearings Examiner public hearing Tuesday May 13, 2014; 1:00 PM. in Mason Co. Building I Commissioners' Chambers at 411 No. Fifth St. in Shelton. Contact this office at(360)427-9670, ext. 365 for further information. This construction proposal is exempt from further environmental review per WAC 197-11-800(l)(c). EAt h� MASON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Planning Division P.O.Box 279, Shelton,WA 98584 (360) 427-9670 DDP2014-00009 NOTICE OF SPECIAL USE PERMIT RESCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that Kathy and Michael Eacrett,who are the applicants of the proposed development on the property described below,has filed an application for a Special Use Permit for the development of: Review of event outdoor venue proposal on residential property on the north end of Stretch Island along Case Inlet; Special Use Permit public review on a 1.82 ac. property zoned Rural Residential 5 zone and using Shoreline Master Program commercial development standards. To operate a cottage industry enterprise in this zone,the applicant must apply for a Special Use Permit and receive public hearing review and approval by the County Hearing Examiner. RESCHEDULED HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING DATE TUESDAY DUNE 10, 2014 AT 1:00 PM in Mason County Bldg.I,411 No. Fifth St. Shelton. Parcel Number: 12108-11-00010 (1.82 ac.) Site Address: 80 E Buckingham Ln., Grapeview WA. Location of Project: Along Buckingham Lane at the end of Eckert Rd. on the northeast side of Stretch Island; at nearly 0.6 miles east of Grapeview;within the northeast 1/4 of the northeast 1/4 of Section 8, Township 21 N.,Range 1 W. in Mason County Washington. Said proposed development is subject to Special Use Permit review(M.C.C. 17.05.040) and associated Mason County Development Regulations standards and the Mason County Shoreline Master Program standards for commercial development standards. Any person desiring to express their view or to be notified of the action taken on the application should notify in writing of their interest to: MASON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PO BOX 279 SHELTON,WA 98584 The comment period is at least 10 days from the final date of publication given pursuant to M.C.C. 15.07.030 (public notice). Final date of publication,posting or mailing of notice was April 10, 2014. Written comments will be accepted up to the date of the Hearings Examiner public hearing Tuesday June 10,2014; 1:00 PM. in Mason Co. Building I Commissioners' Chambers at 411 No. Fifth St. in Shelton. Contact this office at (360) 427-9670, ext. 365 for further information. This construction proposal is exempt from further environmental review per WAC 197-11-800(1)(c). MASON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Planning Division P.O. Box 279, Shelton,WA 98584 (360) 427-9670 DDR2014-00009 NOTICE OF SPECIAL USE PERMIT. Notice is hereby given that Kathy and Michael Eacrett, who are the applicants of the proposed development on the property described below,has filed an application for a Special Use Permit for the development of: Review of event outdoor venue proposal on residential property on the north end of Stretch Island along Case Inlet; Special Use Permit public review on a 1.82 ac. property zoned Rural Residential 5 zone and using Shoreline Master Program commercial development standards. To operate a cottage industry enterprise in this zone,the applicant must apply for a Special Use Permit and receive public hearing review and approval by the County Hearing Examiner. Parcel Number: 12108-11-00010 (1.82 ac.) Site Address: 80 E Buckingham Ln., Grapeview WA. Location of Project: Along Buckingham Lane at the end of Eckert Rd. on the northeast side of Stretch Island; at nearly 0.6 miles east of Grapeview; within the northeast 1/4 of the northeast 1/4 of Section 8, Township 21 N., Range 1 W. in Mason County Washington. Said proposed development is subject to Special Use Permit review(M.C.C. 17.05.040)and associated Mason County Development Regulations standards and the Mason County Shoreline Master Program standards for commercial development standards. Any person desiring to express their view or to be notified of the action taken on the application should notify in writing of their interest to: MASON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PO BOX 279 SHELTON,WA 98584 The comment period is at least 10 days from the final date of publication given pursuant to M.C.C. 15.07.030 (public notice). Final date of publication,posting or mailing of notice is April 10, 2014. Written comments will be accepted up to the date of the Hearings Examiner public hearing Tuesday May 13, 2014; 1:00 PM. in Mason Co. Building I Commissioners' Chambers at 411 No. Fifth St. in Shelton. Contact this office at(360)427-9670, ext. 365 for further information. This construction proposal is exempt from further environmental review per WAC 197-11-800(l)(c). AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE � f 5W. c4 .0000q STATE OF.WASHINGTON ) ss. COUNTY OF MASON ) ~ do hereby certify that I posted `7' copies of the attache on IIdl�y of 2019-�- in 'public places.as follows: one at one at one at t -ckee dw- Off In witness whereof, the party g a has signed this Affidavit of Posting Notice this Bay ofXek� , 20 By. Address: © �� STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss COUNTY OF MASON ) Subscribed and sworn to me this(-M day of 20—� Notary Public State of Washington OEBBERA COKER Nota Public for the State of Washington lillY COMMISSION EXPIRE' ry »nsi2o,a ng at as-c�y� Coves Commission pires 11-15-�;DI f f v)c skw4— sc -f,C, s I /VY /f /1 L� re CO/r�a v-X, AL,l, l J , FI, (Vs 3o4ja-rs-4� r ikJ Pe-S.Jf Ll re S 4� re-cork, Se p�e ;Lg4'— 7 s— r 4 7 J 'T •�r Y R'�37F 813 KENNE7N J.OYLER �h CIVIL CNOIN[LN O LAND IUR V[VOR ' ..{ ,-. �� • P,O,nu.225E Renton,ws DROSS ... - i EA3L•IE\T DESCRIPTION t }�, : �;{ F .5 An easement for ingress, e,;rass and utilities over and across an existing drivewny 10 toot in width as said driveway (:. now exists on ground, over that portion of Cov3rnment Lot 9, CA � •`' '� °� Suction 8, Township 21 North, Range 1 Nest, W. A?., Mason, t County, Washington, the centar line of said driveway irhieh L.4. is generally described as follows: Beginning at a point on �- :�• I the westerly margin of County Road No.64501 160 foot more or i E:. lees south of the northeast corner of said 0o•+orrment Lot 9; • thence running in a northuestorly direction along said j !': = driveway to a torminous at a point North 660001 West 495.66 feet and South 11"37' West 176 -oet more or loss from the Mt' t:ortheast corner of aaid Government Lot 9, vno ' 9 q e4 YaS �x L C <Z L A�_ �...s 9 52�'•L� a� � �'�'S�"A S:.irtgiltS.*i.+.L........_....._....._....._.. .. .QSTEPS b ' , : :%•.; ,�i� STATE OF WASIiINGTON,) COUNTY OF MASON. ) P •:'s I the undersigned, a NotaryPublic in and for the State oS ,` R ' Washington, duly commissioned, do hereby certify that on this 4th day i t of September, 1975 personally appeared before me ANNA L. EACRGTT to To known to be the individual described in and who executed the within • instrument, and acknowledged that she signed and sealed the same as her ,.. �. free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes therein, f mentioned. Given under my hand and official seal the day and year above written. Notary Public in and fob the State of r Washington, residing at Shelton a t i `r REED, FRA!&.c;IS REE137 807 �1 '- 3US8IIb 0733 69)W+2. 6J/'r.COT T y 1 V ; s u9,SEC 9, TZI0,R� �. /•,1,99"z9vv /2¢•60' 6hbrt Plat " "Ng . r:.t r✓lf C �J %p..rorcd.....��../.8�2�Z..L.. ......._....._._.._.__ C` A ��na Ce,c s jr Yi' 1 P2OPo5Ep Sc/BO/V/S/pAl Of A T/ts)GT Cr- 615k/D e,?eu.AJED 8 Y Y l , ,�qc4 s'✓O;c6 DUNc4Aj Nq c: REEL j j�FRAWS g6/f J 1 121087590043 121087590042 121087590041 121087590030 121087590040 _ 121081190061 121081190062 121081190040 121089999999 121081190061 121081190062 121081100030 121081190050 121081190040 121081170730 121081100010 121087590043 121087590042 121087590040 121081100030 121087590041 121087590030 MPT3 100010 F@� 121081100020 121081100011 CR O .,. _. , ck/ G 121081100080 Es�� N yqM 121092200010 t. '`" 121081100100 121081100080 121087500080 121092200012 - - 121081100080 121087500050 121087500070 M. VALIM999999 0111 800010 r- 121087800020 Source: E-sri, ©igitalGlobe, GeoE=,ye, i-cubed, =D , USGS,AE�X, Get appin.g, erogrid, IGN, IGF, wissfiopo, a d the GIS ser Co u it. 000 o y 1 inch 150 feet W l E 1 inch = 0 miles S 7 „y Aw „!.• E MI AND CREST RD .s K/NGyq 3 M� s* ' O �r l a x r 1 x• W , M � �""5 �' �.� �� � �, �� _,{a,.1{;: !- a. to �,. •�y J , > � i KERT EEC RD 0 IG , IGF, isstopo„a d fhe c 9• se •mmrrTu try N 1 inch =400 feet W E f (J 1 inch 0 miles s (6v oaMoor vewe March 2014 We are requesting a Special Use Permit for the following reasons. We have a piece of property on Stretch Island in Grapeview. We would like to offer our property as a place for people to get married, or to have a reception, or a birthday party or a time just to enjoy family and friends. For our guests to make happy memories that will last a lifetime! This property has been in our family for over 100 ears and we would like p p y y y o d e to share it with others. These events will be limited as it is an outside venue and weather will be a factor. • Traffic would occur 30 —45 minutes prior to the event and 30 - 60 minutes ending the event. • We would let our neighbors know scheduled event dates and starting times. • We will attend every event to make sure things flow smoothly. • We will have 2 parking attendants so guests know how to enter and exit. P 9 • We will bring in 2 portable bathrooms for each event. • Monitoring the last 3 summers the biggest traffic time on our road is the week of the 4th of July. We will not schedule any events during that time frame around the 4tn. Project: Buckingham Lane Event Facility - Mason County Location: 80 E. Buckingham Lane NORTH E CEDAR S7 HSHORERD E CREST DR NKlfet:La l(c h, * {n N 00 C Vfiocln�La ko ,��`. �q r �pp °1 00 Wry nwuPond �y M1�M1�po Pp°�a�us � oN fP Et PGA GO 2320 RD 0� GO 2274 RD 3 CID /1� Project Site GD 7-. Qo / y4T 0�O ,GDgA50RD Tra a sk[ hr�° Afason Lace Py� = ' . arn O tie 4`! ?°; p- Vo o°� fz QO X �'90 2400 RD 1 : Z �O� GO A G c FGRAp�t£WW` UO O ryp'O U ��p��1t4 P S v GO 2082 RD 4V O � h 00 CO rU O �■r� Base Map obtained from y ` Mason County GIS U EYATES RD p 'S9'lit JTE, Inc. BUCKINGHAM LANE EVENT FACILITY - MASON COUNTY FIGURE 1 LEVEL I TRAFFIC AND PARKING LETTER Reprint in Color Only VICINITY MAP Pilo a NORTH r _ Base Map obtained from ' Mason County(i1S �s i r 4 i� �� � , • Event y • , t P F&UC_ r f' gMZV " 'h ?,. r�_ +t" L� 4 w• X ,, I� _ ` ox' •` s 4 '`sp 150ft r BUCKINGHAM LANE EVENT FACILITY - MASON COUNTY JTE, Inc. TRAFFIC AND PARKING LETTER FIGURE 2 Reprint in color Only CONCEPTUAL PARKING AND CIRCULATION TRAFFIC / PARKING REPORT t` j. Mason County BUCKINGHAM LANE EVENT FACILITY LEVEL I TRAFFIC AND PARKING LETTER May 25, 2014 `'A l I Traffic Engineering, . Jake T Inc. Mark J. Jacobs, PE, PTOE, President 2614 39t''Ave SW - Seattle, WA 98116 - 2503 Tel. 206.762.1978-Cell 206.799.5692 E-mail jaketrafFic@comcast.net ,' I . Jake Traffic Engineering, Inc. . Mark J. Jacobs, PE, PTOE President 2614 391h Ave. SW -Seattle, WA 98116 - 2503 Tel. 206.162.1918 - Cell 206.799.5692 F-maii laketraffic@comcast.net May 25, 2014 BUCKINGHAM LANE EVENT FACILITY Attn: Mike and Kathy Eacrett 80 E. Buckingham Ln. Grapeview,WA 98546 Re: Buckingham Lane Event Facility - Mason County Special Use Permit Level I Traffic and Parking Letter Dear Mr. and Mrs. Eacrett, I have prepared this Level I Traffic Letter for the proposed Buckingham Lane Event Facility project at 80 E. Buckingham Ln.Grapeview,WA 98546, in Mason County. The proposed project is to use an existing seasonal residence for occasional special events. I understand the proposal as follows: The proposed use is for a special event facility that will be used periodically for a variety of uses, such as weddings,parties, etc. These events will be held throughout the year. Events will begin to increase in the spring and peak in the summer where there will be an event 1 to 2 weekends a month excluding the Memorial Day,4th of July and Labor Day weekends. The events will begin to decline in the fall with sporadic events during the holiday season in the winter. There will be approximately 8-10 weddings on weekends in the summer with approximately 50-75 people attending half of those events and approximately 100- 120 people attending the other half. There will be approximately 10-15 smaller events of a variety with approximately 10-30 people attending during the spring and fall seasons. There will possibly be holiday events during the winter on the weekends with most likely 10-30 people attending each.Although possible, these latter events are more unlikely as poor roadway conditions caused by ice and/or snow are unpredictable for long-term event planning. Mason County Code Section 17.03.021 Cottage Industries is noted as follows: Unless noted by an asterisk(*)any use shown in FIGURE 17.03.020 is permitted in any development area as a home-based occupation, or as a cottage industry. The activity shall comply with the criteria in RU-524A,and shall be required to obtain a special use permit unless they comply with the following standards: A.Parking areas shall accommodate residents and employees only,any provision for additional parking shall require a Special Use Permit. B. The outdoor storage of merchandise or materials is allowed if they are not visible to the public from off the site. C-ire,.tt rlec2pld OYv BwnP.ml+.<Ev<m ernrn.aoo�r w:cnn.o PLLe M.mne.umy\6u<xwp..m,nucw,u,ainrytn<iln o 1 Y CN_,: J g Es Inc. BUCKINGHAM LANE EVENT FACILITY Attn: Mike and Kathy Eacrett May 25, 2014 Page-2- C.A cottage industry shall involve the owner or lessee of the property who shall reside within the dwelling unit,and shall not employ on the premises more than five(5) nonresidents. A temporary increase in the number of employees is permitted to accommodate a business that is seasonal in nature.However, not more than five additional persons shall be employed on a temporary basis(up to six weeks)without a Special Use Permit. D. More than one business may be allowed, in or on the same premises provided that all of the criteria are met for all business combined. E. There shall be no alterations to the outside appearance of the buildings or premises that are not consistent with the residential use of the property,or other visible evidence of the conduct of such cottage industry,other than one sign no larger than 12 square feet. F. No equipment or process shall be used in such home occupations which creates noise, vibration,glare, fumes,odors, or electrical interference detectable to the normal senses off the property. G. The cottage industry shall not create an increase of 5%or more in local traffic. The proposed Buckingham Lane Lodge project would not generate traffic during the traditional weekday PM peak hour. The traffic would occur before and after the occasional events on Saturdays and Sundays. The summary and conclusions are on page six of this letter. PROJECT INFORMATION Figure 1 is a vicinity map showing the location of the proposed site and surrounding road network. Below is an aerial image of the project site obtained from the Mason County GIS. Project Site w , f Ni Sri �l t\^Agan lils\]034 0]5-Bn.�,rn lM Erem Umw FMm w;tmo VIIC 4a!on Cwnt/\BK.+pMmuneberUu,enµrNi11ra1flctMs Eoa JTE, Inc. BUCKINGHAM LANE EVENT FACILITY Attn: Mike and Kathy Eacrett May 25, 2014 Page-3- Figure 2 shows a preliminary site plan I conceptually sketched based on information provided by the project team. Access to the site is provided via E. Buckingham Lane that has access to E. Eckert Road. The existing open area to the southwest of the facility structure can accommodate 50 cars(designed as back-in stalls),likely more if needed. In addition, 4- parking spots(2-handicap and 2-caterer/event sponsor) immediately in front of the buildings are provided. Event attendees would enter the parking area on the west end to find parking and exit the parking to the east. This area provides appropriate turn around space. In total the facility would have a minimum of 54 stalls. EXISTING ENVIRONMENT Project Site The project site is located on parcel #121081100010 Road System The primary road serving the project is E. Eckert Road, E Eckert Road near the site is a low volume and speed road about 12' wide with 4 to 6'of shoulder space for about 1/4 mile and then it widens out to about 18' west of E.Vineyard Crest Road. And west of Stretch Island Road South about 20' of paved width exist and is marked with yellow centerline striping. Traffic Volumes Mason County Transportation Element, snw �a c November 2005 provides transportation ° ^' information. Figure VIII-1-3 provides the �t ��a ' Average Daily Traffic Volumes on roads in 4 ( } the County for 2000 and (2025). The 6��1d�� 'Project Site pertinent portion of the Figure is depicted 1 to the right. 12-��Oli +� The County information does not show I � r.cr RC � data for roadways on Stretch Island. From 1Q,49Q� Q the available data the volumes would be substantially less than on Grapeview Loop o Gr�Fy"ram Road. Review of aerial data indicates E. Eckert Road east of E.Vineyard Crest Road serves 10 single family residences. A typical SFDU generates about 1-PM peak hour trip and 10 daily trips on a typical weekday. On a weekend day about 9 to 10 daily trips are generated. Thus E. Eckert Road near the site serves roughly 100 vehicles per day. Traffic Operational Review The average daily traffic capacity of a 2-lane roadway exceeds 10,000 ADT. Further,a typical 2-lane road has a peak hour capacity of 1,000 vehicles per hour(at Level of Service C CV..' 1-2011V5—ng-1...E.v.1 Cana+ MIC .+e..- ,,, JTE, Inc. BUCKINGHAM LANE EVENT FACILITY Attn: Mike and Kathy Eacrett May 25, 2014 Page-4- operations,that is typically considered very good Traffic Operation by Traffic Engineers during peak time periods). The capacity of the short section (about 1/4 mile)of E. Eckert Road east of E.Vineyard Road is estimated at a minimum of 2,500 ADT Review of the available traffic data shows that the traffic volumes are well below capacity. TRIP GENERATION AND DISTRIBUTION Definitions A vehicle trip is defined as a single or one direction vehicle movement with either the origin or destination (exiting or entering) inside the study site. Traffic generated by development projects consists of the following types of trips: Pass-By Trips: Trips made as intermediate stops on the way from an origin to a primary trip destination. Diverted Linked Trips: Trips attracted from the traffic volume on roadways within the vicinity of the generator but require a diversion from that roadway to another roadway to gain access to the site. Captured Trips: Site trips shared by more than one land use in a multi-use development. Primary Trips: Trips made for the specific purpose of using the services of the project. Trip Generation The Trip Generation Manual identifies rates and equations for various land uses. The manual does not contain rates or equations for an Events Facility type use as that of the Buckingham Lane Lodge. A Recreational Community Center land use is identified, however, this type of land uses incorporates activities such as basketball,weightlifting,swimming,etc., thus does not reflect the Buckingham Lane Lodge use. The Buckingham Lane Facility provides space for meetings/conferences during the week and events such as weddings during the weekend. The space usage is similar to a Church in many ways. The Buckingham Lane Event Facility activities generally reflect the uses of a Church land use; except no worship services are provided. Church incorporates(besides worship service) functions such as meetings,socializing, birthdays,weddings,etc.similar to that of the Buckingham Lane Event Facility. The peak typically occurs during the weekend (Friday - Sunday)as it houses the larger activities. A church type use also usually peaks during the weekends. Thus for comparisons purposes I have used the rates depicted for a Church land use. The rates for a Church land use for both on Saturday and Sunday were investigated. Table 1 shows the calculated vehicular trips generated by the proposed project during an average weekday and during the street traffic peak hours. The trip generation is calculated C\'RepGFk+\301c 03 &rY+{Erm lanc EronlCeaa PoOertW bKso.PLLC Mrar Gou.y\B.Nv�nrianrErrnthuOLORI01!O tur Enc COL OR;Y}i�Y+"1�1 Y JTE, Inc. BUCKINGHAM LANE EVENT FACILITY Attn: Mike and Kathy Eacrett May 25, 2014 Page-5- using average trip rates in the Trip Generation for Church (ITE Land Use Code 560). All site trips made by all vehicles for all purposes, including commuter,visitor,and service and delivery vehicle trips are included in the trip generation values. The rates identified for a Church use on Sunday for the peak hour are calculated to be 73 peak hour trips that could occur during one of the infrequent larger event. The daily traffic during a large gathering would be about 108 trips that include the guests and vendors of the event programming. Typi cal site events have 10 to 30 people in attendance and would have significantly nificantl less traffic. Jake Traffic Engineering, Inc. has conducted prior research regarding Event Facilities. The research documented vehicle occupancy of patrons attending events such as a wedding. The results of the data collected indentified that three guests per car is the typical. Using this data,(-1 car per 3 people),and each car represents one enter and one exit,thus the total number of trips by guests could be projected at 80 that is generally consistent with the 73 projected using ITE data. Therefore the Buckingham Lane Event Facility project would generate 73 to 80 peak hour trips during an infrequent large event on a weekend and have 108 ADT. The typical site events are significantly smaller and would have less traffic. The annual average traffic that would be generated by the facility activities is estimated at 1,170 total daily trips(10-events with 100 attendees + 15-events with 20 attendees)over the course of a year. As a comparison a home based Artist studio providing a 500' of gallery space(ITE LUC 814 Specialty Retail)would generate 7,458 total daily trips over the course of an entire year(261 weekdays x 44.32 ADT/1,000 sf x 0.5 sf+ 52 Saturday days x 42.04 ADT/1,000 sf x 0.5 sf+ 52 Sunday days x 22.36 ADT/1,000 sf x 0.5 sf). Similarly a 500'Architect, Engineer or other professional studio(ITE LUC 710 General Office Building)would generate 1,524 total trips throughout the year. The proposed Buckingham Lane Event Facility would generate less traffic over the course of a year than other potential uses. The traffic effect would be minimal;the roadway has more than ample capacity to accommodate the occasional events proposed of the Buckingham Lane Event Facility.The annual average traffic effect of the facility would be less than other potential Cottage Industry activities such as an Artist Studio or professional office space. The total existing traffic on E. Eckert Road near the site is about 36,500 trips per year. Five percent of this total is 1,825 trips per year. The event facility projects to generate about 1,170 trips per year that is less than 5%of the existing traffic. Parkin The ITE Parking Generation 4th Edition provides projected parking demand for a variety of land uses. Using the ITE LUC for Church,as discussed prior, per attendee I project the Parking Demand for a 120 attendance event at 54 vehicles. The Buckingham Lane Event Facility proposes to have 54 parking stalls. Thus the site would have sufficient parking. ' C\-P.afetl i,MnJola 011Bua'xrr`Iram Nne EraMfe+ar-RaoinWlNrio pLLtM,sanf M9ucvgnimUniEvwiablrytavNlTrifRilatM Oa< i:JLON;OPA nMiA JTE, Inc. BUCKINGHAM LANE EVENT FACILITY Attn: Mike and Kathy Eacrett May 25, 2014 Page-6- SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS h existing traffic volume site trip and parking generation and This letter has identified the g reviewed the site access. Based on my review the proposed Buckingham Lane Event Facility would have minimal traffic and parking effect and should be allowed by the County. The proposed project would need to be constructed in conformance to applicable County requirements. If you have any questions you can contact me at 206.762.1978 or email me at iaketraffic@comcast.com. lJ 3. J'4 WAS11 �� �c� p Very truly yours. Mark J.Jacobs, PE, PTOE, President ST REO JAKE TRAFFIC ENGINEERING, INC. MJJ: mjj EXPIRES 4/3/ ,0/ c-na.n r,inVo:.can-euymgn,n un.e..mciiw.aoo..rwpr.uo vuc COOLORLOR Cf)r'�'4.,oceunNR�«ngn.mr.e.Ev.mr.nun.M O eac NI.v JTE, Inc. VEHICULAR TRIP GENERATION TABLE 1 BUCKINGHAM LANE EVENT FACILITY- MASON COUNTY LEVEL I TRAFFIC AND PARKING LETTER TIME PERIOD TRIP RATE TRIPS ENTERING TRIPS EXITING TOTAL Church(ITE Land Use Code 560, 120 people) Saturday Daily Trips T= 0.90X 54(50%) 54(50%) 108 Saturday Peak Hour T= 0.60X 31(43%) 41(57%) 72 Sunday Peak Hour T= 0.61X 31(43%) 42(57%) 73 T=trips X= # of attendees A vehicle trip is defined as a single or one direction vehicle movement with either the origin or destination (existing or entering) inside the study site. The above trip generation values account for all the site trips made by all vehicles for all purposes, including commuter,visitor, recreation,and service and delivery vehicle trip c,-nq«:Fno V ova on.e._«rohm«,..[.=M ce.wr oaten w,an,.w.Luc-r..e.c.u.y amKn.mu..c..+uuena i..as nwvaoua oo. CpL Cot ri)P1'pNl Y June 3,2014 RECEIVED Mr.Allen Borden JUN 0 5 2014 Mason County Dept.of Community Development 426 W. CEDAR S-F. PO Box 279 Shelton,WA 98584 Re:Special Use Permit Application Applicants: Kathy&Michael Eacrett Parcel# 12108-11-00010 80 E Buckingham Lane Grapeview,WA Dear Mr.Borden, We are writing to express our concerns regarding the permit application submitted by Kathy&Michael Eacrett to conduct a wedding/event venue on their property. We own the three adjacent parcels to the east of their property. This includes the waterfront lot that abuts the proposed venue location,the lot that abuts their garage/outbuilding and the vineyard that borders the road to the east and the southern boundary of their proposed parking area. We learned of their intent last year and expressed our concern at that time. To date,they have held several Chamber of Commerce gatherings to introduce their business to the community as well as one wedding reception in August 2013. They have announced in the newspaper and online that they can host"100s" and have the intention of opening a bed and breakfast as well.We understand they have multiple events already booked for this summer despite the lack of valid permits. This is a residential area—zoned Rural Residential 5. We bought our house in 2006 and have invested a substantial amount of money in improvements so that we may enjoy is as a summer vacation home. It is a peaceful and tranquil community. Due to work and family obligations,a majority of our time spent in our lovely home is in the summer. This is also prime wedding and outdoor event time in the Pacific Northwest. We fear that if this permit is approved,it will change the essence of this community and destroy the tranquility previously known to the islanders—both part-time and full-time residents. The proposed business venture will have a significant impact on the existing uses on adjacent lands. Specifically,our concerns are as follows: 1. Noise:As can be noted on the pictures included,the grass area directly next to our home is the proposed venue area. A tent will not protect against noise travel.We are too close in proximity to enjoy any reprieve from a party—it is an open area on both sides of the fence. Not to mention how sound travels due to the water. The noise will not just be an issue for us but for a good number of homes along the bay. 2. Privacy:Our homes are separated by a lattice fence that decreases to 30"in height 30'feet from the bank--which is by no means a sound or privacy barrier.We will lose all privacy prior to and during their events. We will not be able to enjoy the tranquility and solitude we seek inside nor outside of our home.Despite the claims on the Eacrett's application,our house has numerous view windows that face their property and overlook their property toward the water and the Olympics, as seen in the attached pictures. 3. Safety:The increase in traffic is is both a safety and trespassing issue. The Eacretts proposed venue sight and proposed parking is on the other side of our property. All traffic must cross between our house and our orchard along a segment of the roadway that we maintain. We often have small children and animals at our home and we fear for their safety as their guests come and go. Additionally,our orchard is an open field. If all traffic is not directed to the Eacrett property, cars will attempt to park in our orchard. We have experienced this with both of their Chamber Events and reception. There were no attendants to direct the clients to the Eacretts property—we were forced to direct them ourselves. ��ll Additionally,the county road that runs next to our vineyard is,at most,one lane and a half wide, and the road in front of our home is one lane. This is both dangerous and can lead to damage to our property as people pull over to let another car pass. It also may make it difficult for emergency vehicles to gain access if an emergency occurs. The claim the traffic to our road will only increase by 5%over the entire year is spurious. The traffic on each and every event day will increase by several hundred percent over a usual weekend day. These summer weekend days are precious and can not be averaged out over the entire year. 4. Trespassing:Because of the close proximity of our homes,and the Eacrett's lack of access to the beach,we fear their guests will simply step from their patio over our short fence and use our stairs. This is privacy as well as a liability issue. This has been an ongoing problem since we purchased the property and will only get worse with more people on site. 5. Venue location:The statements in the application that the venue patio is immediately to the east of their residential structure and that the venue is not within view of our property are false. The patio abuts our fence and deck landing at the top of our stairs. The patio is at the extreme northeast margin of their property as far as possible in that direction from their house.There is insufficient setback from our property and the bank.The patio actually overhangs the steep bluff to the beach due to a landslide that occurred over the winter that also destroyed the supports to our stairs rendering them unsafe and impassible. According to a geotechnical survey,the Eacrett's unpermitted landscaping likely contributed to the slide. 6. Setbacks: In the permit application the setbacks to our properties are not addressed. The patio,as above,abuts our deck and the portable toilets are pictured abutting our fence to our orchard. The fence line that borders their proposed venue area and patio is less than 10 feet from our home,as seen in the attached pictures. 7. Financial impact:Finally,the establishment of a commercial event facility immediately adjacent to our property will undoubtedly negatively impact our property value and the property values of our near neighbors. It is difficult to compensate for or predict the extent of such damages. 8. Easement:We have a perpetual,non-exclusive easement for roadway and utility purposes across the existing private roadway(Buckingham Lane)adjoining our land as set forth in instruments recorded March 22, 1946,Auditor's file No. 114104,and recorded March 21, 1972,Auditor's File No.267833. There is also a maintenance agreement in place for our portion of the roadway dated July 10, 1993. It is true that we hosted a private wedding for our close personal friends on our property in 2013. We had approximately 100 guests,not the 200 that their application claims. We used the waterside yard for an hour and held the reception in our vineyard well away from our neighbors. We notified the neighbors well in advance of the event. This was a rare occasion for us that we gave as a gift to close friends,it was not a business deal and there certainly was no payment in any form received by us. Three weeks prior to the wedding,we learned from other neighbors that the Eacretts had scheduled a wedding reception on their lawn on the same date and at the same time. We approached the Eacretts and offered to coordinate timing and tried to openly discuss any way we could mitigate the damage to both parties. They were unwilling to coordinate in any way. The parking situation was untenable and the talking and picture taking of their paid patrons interrupted our ceremony. In short,it was a disaster. This is an extremely difficult and uncomfortable situation to be in with our neighbors. We do not want to stand in the way of their personal happiness or their enjoyment of their property. We understand why they love it so much,for many of the same reasons we love our home and land. It is a beautiful,pristine place, an escape from the turmoil of busy society. We hope that they can appreciate our desire to preserve that peaceful natural setting. Unfortunately,we cannot stand by while our lifestyle,home,property(not to mention property values)are directly affected in this negative manner. Sincerely, Gordon and Heather Benjamin 50 East Buckingham Lane Grapeview,WA 98546 2 J Parcel# 12108-11-00020, 12108-11-00100, 12108-75-00050 WARRANTY DEED Vol. 98Deeds, page 4 A JUNO 2' * ? mar. 22 1946 at 2:29 PM 9 426T,104 sty.. Fob. 28, 1946 Rf_ f,._•._YCE ^ The Grantors, Walter O.Eckert and Augusta Eckert,husband ard wife now and at the time of acq title to the within described r e, for and in cons of the sum of $10.00 * convey and warrant to e Carroll D.Bush and Daisy M.Bush,husband and wi`t,the f of described ;a r e situated in the Cou;}ty of Mason,State of Washington,towit: ` A tract of land situated in Government Lot 9, Section 8, Town- ship 21 North,Range Z rTest,W.I�.,particularly described as follows: AU Commencing at the meander corner for fractional Sections 8 � ;s and 9, said Township and P,ange,said corner betnt the Northeast ' ? coria of Government Lot 9,said Section 8• thence North 68°30' West, i r along themeander line, a distance of 70.a5 feet to the true point of beginning of the tract of land hereby conveyed- thence South 2017' West a distances of 141.69 feet;thence South U0 16' East a distance { of 80.00 feet to a poii_t on the Seetion line between Sections 8 ad 9,acd to a point on the center line of the County oad; thence South j 2017' West,along the line between said Sections 8 and 9,anithe 1 center line of said Co:mty Road, a distance of 47.07 feet;thence North 66-16, Wett,alotIg the North line of the existing private roadway, 245.10 feet;thence North 230;3' West a distance of 172.00 feet to an intersection with tie government meander line; thence South 68030' East,along said meander line, a distance of 96.70 feet, more or less,to the said true point of beginning,containing 0.64 <, acres,more or less,subject to riont-ol'-,r:ay for County Road,together with right to use private roadway on the South. i Also, all that portion of a tract of 2.00 lineal chains of second-classt tidelands,formerly owned by the State of Washington, y and conveyed by the State to Adaa Eckert by deedsx recorded in j Volume 10 of Deeds,page 267, under Auditor's File No.12622,and in y Volume 46 of Deeds, page 581,under Auditor's File No.51741,situate in front of,adjacent to or abutting upon the above described upland � and extending to the line of extreme low tide,subject to exceptions T . x +, and reservations as contained in t)m deeds from the State. gk This deed is executed and delivered to the grantees in fulfill- ment and in full satisfaction of the terms and conditions of a car- �y^ +rS:31Ei tain contract forthe sale and Purchase of said r e wherein the grantors are the vendors and the grantees are th vendees bearing date th e : c'4c 23rd day of February,1945,and ;:he warranties of this deed do not extend subsequent to said date, .', Dated * * Walter O.Eckert (SEAL) i ? c' State $1.50 Federal $1.65 Augusta Eckert (SEAL) t f Ack Feb. 28, 1946, by Walter O.Eckert and Augusta Eckert, j husband and wife,before Alden C.Bayley, NP in and for the State )K: 1 of Wash,res at Shelton therein. (Notarial Seal) =:r tail to: Mr. Carroll D.Bush, Grapeview,Wn. 11410 WARRANTY DEED Vol. 98 Deeds,page 5 ,p ge /i 3/ Mar. 23, 1946 at 9:53 AM Mar. 20, 1945 u: The Grantor, George A.Betz, a widower .of Placerville,California, for and in cons of the sum of $10.00 and other good and valuable cons to him * * receipt whereof is hereby ack,conveys and warrants !� to Bruce Pagel and Lorraine Pagel,husband and wife,the fol described ' r e situated in Mason Countyjfashiaton,to-wit: t. 3lcR ft�E� 4i a REAL ESTATE CuNTRACTIN +� TiiIS CONTRACT, made and entered into this �j- oav of ?parch 1972, F . z between Anna E. Eacrett, owner in her own separate rir.ht of the follo;ainir described real estate, hereinafter called the seller, and Isabel I'., dansen, r s a widow, hereinafter cnl.led the purchaser. y+ FlIV!Z33X.T11: The seller entrees to sell to the purchaser and 'the �s Purchaser nprees to purchase of the ;seller the following described real estate si tasted in Mason County, 4ashinr:ton, to-wit: t k ,, 1 A tract of land situate in Government Lot 9, Section 8, Township 21 C{5 r North, Rnnre 1 West, VI.M., Particularly described a:; follows: t M,:ME'.7CING at the Northeast corner of said Government Lot 9; thence I , South 2`17' Vgist, along the East line of said lot, 293.04 feet; thence 2'^ South 57°1F' hest 83.16 feet to a Point on the Westerly right-of-vray liner�� r of the County Road; thence North 61`29 nest 100 feet to the Southwesterly corner of it tract of land heretofore conveyed to Darrell Long and Jeanne B. Lonr, husband and wife, by deed recorded-November 10, 1959, in Volume 195 of Deeds, gage 512, under Auditor's File Ie. lbl222, and the'poio,t of beginning of the tract of land hereby described; thence North 18 13 East, ?' along the Westerly line of said Long treat, 125.7 feet, more or leas, to the Southerly line of the existing private roadway; thence North 66`16, ;R 1I Bt, along the Southerly line of said private"roadway, 192 feet; thence • r;'r South 18`13' West 125.7 feet, more or less, to a point North 61'29' 'West of but F r the point of beginning; thence South 61°29'East 192 feet, more or less, to r Othe point of beginning, excepting therefrom road rights-of-way. J. TOGETHER WITH a perpetual non-exclusive easement for roadway and utility, � Jt purposes over and across the existing private roadway adjoining the abovea 4x described '_and on the ,North, to provide ingress to a:d egress from the above described land to the County Road on the East. } k{ <� THE ThrMS AND CONDITIONS of this contract are as follows: 1. The purchase price is $5,000.00. of which 4500.00 has bee. paid, tiff { x' receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, and the balance of 34,500.00 iz to be paid in monthly installments of $50.00, or more, per moat.1 cor.,mcs:cinx k I April 1972. Interest is to accrue on the unpaid bance at tc:c rate off,: az ice.: p al ..;. x, ^rE y 7�b per annum from the date hereof and ehall be includad in th[ aforesaid ;S� t c monthly payments. ' I �v 2. The purchaser may enter into possession immeuia.e}y, on ::.e { ! signing of this contract. 299 ;M t, J aK 3. The purchaser has inspected the property and arruaz co scent file same in its present condition and has satisfied herself as .o ti.e loeat{or. " r h�{•� .a F � :::.�.�:` ,:vim _a.„ +' t Of the boundary lines thereof. 4 J y ) B.FRANKLIN HcUSTON ATTOgMpCY „/ 4•.i� 1 - - .[•LOp. • we.t«.''.t „L_ . RE hl_ VED jam, RL L f�:'�4`J 120 5 2014 t � 1 w . 426 W. k1 CEo,4 R 4. The seller arreea to execute :a warranty deed in favor of the Onurchaner to the uremises above described, the some to be delivurud to the ? r : purchaser upon full eompliones by the purchaser with the agreemorlts herein, ' provided, however, the +_ - p , seller dohs not :.arrant against lions o_ defects o_ r.' title occurring subsequent to the date hereof. i 5. In the event the purchaser shall fail to makt: payments as herein provided, then the seller shall have a right to declare this contract forfeited rand at an end and the seller shall retitin all sums paid up to the a r x k time of such forfeiture ac agreed compensation for the broach of this contract 11 and in such event all of the ri.*hts and interest of the purc seer shall revert(iY _i Fa IA- r to and revert in the seller without any act of re-entry. ji4 �{a�SA44 b. This contract shall be binding upon and of benefit to the heirs, ji+ t ,; executors, administrators and assigns of the parties hereto, it being under- ,d stood that the purchaser is bound by the terms hereof: but no assignment of this contract or any part thereof by the purchaser shall be binding or valid 1. x r upon the seller without the written consent of the seller to such assignment hereto. x ,t , .. having been first obtained and either endorsed hereon or attuc�aed ho o. g "r. IH 17ITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have signed and coaled this contract a=` ' the day and year first above written. 4 �.c.:.: N'.K!'>2:..:ail ... • L U.ri.Tl Seller it L ! y eurchaser � JUfiN D.CULE f Yd�•' C k ti u - B.FRANKLIN HEUSTON �gg�, ATTO�NCY 7 t A• 41 79Fw. fivJ yy ' "rt STATE OF WASHINGTON ) COUNTY OF MASON ) I, the undersigned, a notary public in and Tar the State of I:isitln�.tor. �'• hereby certify that on this 1 dn;r of 4iarch, 1972, personally ap ptaired ,. before me .Anne E. Eacrett, to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrumr.nt and acknowledged that she Signed and sealed the spine as her free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses 1 and nurooses therein mentioned. , GIVEN under my hand and official seal the day and year last above i{ written. , a � w i .1 �F'r V11.fl 1'�`r I V ��AaC�.,I..�`•;'lt! P : �-W.r�yF' E ?lot Public it, and for t q Si 4 ,- ' fi at%�A of ICashington, residing. ;V n17 �, r•„ .. a.tee"'�ui�l Y :'•`;t,•!•a * '12 0 21 Nef 12: 09 s PeftSI OF 1 ZY . 7,.a,v 1 M f�'�' �{f1•CCfLGlasv"' 4 , a a Asp i tr } B.FRANItI.IN FiEU5TON 7 1 tea 4�•�". ATTOw [Y �t S �•S i'?t•. .. �ttr.c r.w. e.tc.ar.rsa 1. l Lam; g39 rwc�taa.wtt..wo.rur. ;: . Clll/ fir.� ��;;�,�.'•'_. . . _ .' r-Ir � .L •� �a�asr_M�o� o. 2:q )%land��J� ;ZT- se=Tdxe uoTssTeuoo Aye -favior7 buTPT6a.z 'uOIbuTgs ;o 'J'�0 3ij�pC'D eava V so j ptty u gpd S0 7F7 •E66T ' 30 Avp 0 eTq-4 T"N TaTOT;,=0 PUS Puwq Am sOPun NYAIO •p1uOTWOO uTOMMM sesodand Pus: Been eqa 20; 'POOP put: 409 A•zv4unToA pUa esij SIR sv aims sqj POLBTS 3H avq'4 PGBPOT140UXO t puce 'WBatugOuT 6uTo6O-ZO; Pus uTIMTrs SIM pOattaexO OqA puv UT pOgTsaesp TvnPTATPttT OXM vq M uwotnt Os 04 992MOS x3'I M 'O ON sso;Oq POiOeddv ATTteuos.zed ASP, sTtp uo Ouao7 uoSVIN_saai 3`dH :1N3?I()Cl t xOWHM M do &LY.LS �sst Ba inr_ - M®RI,hum ��ax3 uvap wnr«mow �itnvotAAv '£66T ;O Awp��- eTIM CRZtta •040JOq POg0v34v rY IIgIHX8u uo PagTXOOOP puvT ;O 9Te3ivd eqz 0-4 sOTITI Otn tr4TA tms TTvge puv 'subTsev puv 920e690on9 'O-ITOt7 SW 'PeubTOJOCKM OtM uOdn buTPuTO Oq TT1egs WJOWSOabv sTVS 'gaPTA Ptn uOT!ZWWT 3uese2d BaT UT POgPvo= PTve uTvluTvR Oa PeaTdTT Oct TTvgs VOu6TS-Mtm etri Aq epvm Avrpvoz OtM oa aau*w*j%oadwT Auto •£66T 'ST Oussr MBTxe aT uvtn xelaeq .To o} Tvttbe uoTaTPuoa v UT POuTnuTVM Oq TTnis AvwpvoJ eQ•T• 'ATAega,ION POpusa]re „Y ZIQIHX4« 30 NT Ts02vd« ;O euTT ATseasOH OtT; jO ATz04892 BOTT VOTgN 'f£8L9¢ Pug VOTtTT .sox OTTJ s,ioaTPnY =eptm pOp=Oasz sWOwnsgsuT UT PIagTIosOP Wsatesve Oqq jo uoT:&Jod antra uT9auTtn o- 8826v Agesett esop peu6Teamptm Otp lxmojxwul 'mom 'ATIOU:4-10x POPuOaxO uY SIHIHX••4« ;Q ul TOOXvd« ;0 OUTT AT3M9014 etm 3O ATiOaBv3 "OTT tMTttw 3083utM uOTI-70d IMP 'XTTTMmT3T0sdw I.W . 1I62HXH« uO P"Ts08Op Azaedozd etM 6ujoTAxes pvoi Ot4 =o uoTaiod avtM aOJ suoTBTAozd OOuvttsZUTyu tt9TTgv4sO 04 satIBIA gtcu DB '81f3UHA •puvT ;o sTOozvd pOgTXMMP OAogv et£y 04 auvusl.mddv 9T ££BL9t Puv V01VII `sox eTTA s,soaTpnV sOpun rwp1009a slusImA49" uT PogTADeOP sv 'A—Pvoz 6uT4sTxo uv ssosov puv xano 'BOT4TTT1n puv Avhpvoa aoj 4uguesys Tvn4ediod 9 'BYH-daHM i •oaesOq petPva;v my SISI}DtS« 000 tswOTTO; SO PORT=Dssp ATsoTnOT,4svd 'yuvT ;o sTeo=Od owl ;o %*Uft* et(; sT 'gd x0v ow oa pOasOjOJ .Iea;vuTOJOq 'uvs OT6uTe v 18UN08 XY'ZM ', 'STRUM OOLULLS13N IIFIVc9S 90'd L090S1.Z90ZTS9G0t Oi b08j £0:6T L66T-8T-Cr i i b OF/ q d s.aTdxs uoTasTmvoa _.. 3v 6UTPT992 'u0g0uTg9VM Io 1110+ •�g�S • AOJ PUT UT 1176ad AHVIOX Of w oT d/a 47utl- 0 Io AvPp� sTXM Tv Pu TvTOTUO v Puvtt At s 61;KM 'NZAI0 uu lV� •PouoTzuem uT•.I•tM sssodand it M seen otm iol 'peep mm 2av AMMUftTOA IN" seal UIRUL sg •Qg• •ga P•ubTI ASNZ IMM P•bP•TAWUX0v pus 'gnsvn=:1,suT buT0beA0J Pug uT94TA st:, ps4n0sxs ogm puv uT p•gTaos•D sivnPTATPuT •g1 eq 01 uMoux am oa ="DV8 BOQoc 2w ;kz-lxrms pus LLX-&)V3 SIOK, U imaoil •v eso;eq peavoddv ATTemosaed AvP STtn up t R'oirm ,tn xa,mna7 ( NOWN M J0 KILVIS �V SQQO a" IRS vu slodw Sit't.ucl •uTsssct PsvTvMUD-� suoTmTAoad a0uvu6quTvm sgq ;o Aug oa J,L3Xm buT;vbTTgo Avw Aug uT sv Patugsuoo eq Tjvgs uTsasg bUN40H •;usmssys PsgTAO"P •Aogv n Aq Ps—A03 MMT etM OZ 9T3T3 91M tMIA unz TTvgs Puv 'subTvsv Pug s.zosssasns 'saTett sToyy 'PsubTG"Vun 0= uodn buTPuTQ •Q TTvgs qussuaa sTMI •9ubTs6v Puv 22029000ns 'saTsg sTg 'gHxkw Aq Au^pvos PegTsossP wAi"* 9tM Io souvusauTvm; stM oa lussuoo .xTstM buTAsAuoo go ssodand aim aoI ATatos 3u80n00P sTgq ;0 u0Tan0sx• stM uT uTO� Ageaett OP 'CCOL9L Puv 40TM •sox eTTJ s,aogTM avpun Papzoae.x B1uelnt.1g191rT uT PsgTsoeop 3usmosys Aq Peasgemous P".1 •Q4 Io •s+two sv ',y UDVZ sg oq Psaas;sa asq;vuTs.I•R '*IT^ Puv Pu"sng 'J.L&RDV+X SQaOa BVN A17HIHS Pug WXWV3 SIDMA JAM609 PsuaTs21Put► OU (• oa) Imm"mt soxvxzlxlvx nnoll Lge� QuL aAL L S 133N ('JsL0d L090SLz90ZTS960T Ol WMU t3:6T i66t-9T-NTfj ' � 1 . REEL 511 FR 10 C CEI d'El) JUN 0 5 ?014 EXHIBIT "A" 426 W CEDAR ST. IN MASON COUNTY, WASHINGTON Order No. 65387 d 65387-A PARCEL 1: A tract of land situate in Government lot nine (9), Section eight (8) Township twentyone (21) North, Range one (1) West, W.M., particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at the Northeast corner of said Government Lot nine (9); thence South 2017' West, along the East line of said Government Lot nine (9), 293.04 feet; thence South 57018' West 83.16 feet to a point on the Westerly right-of-way line of Eckert County Road No. 64500; thence North 61029' West 100 feet to the Southwesterly corner of a tract of land heretofore conveyed to Darrell Long and Jeanne E. Long, husband and wife, by deed recorded November 10, 1959, in Volume 195 of Deeds, page 512, Auditor's File No. 181222, and the POINT OF BEGINNING of the tract of land hereby described; thence North 18013' East, along the Westerly line of said Long tract, 125.7 feet, more or less, to the Southerly line of the existing private roadway; thence North 66016' West, along the Southerly ling of said private roadway, 192 feet; thence South 18013' West 125.7 feet, more i or less, to a point North 61029' West of the point of beginning; thence South 61029' East 192 feet, more or less, to the POINT OF BEGINNING; excepting therefrom road rights-of-way. Parcel No. 12108 11 00100. PARCEL 2: A tract of land situate in Government Lot nine (9), Section eight (8), Township twentyone (21) North, Range one (I) West, W.M_ particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the meander line North 68030' West 127.55 feet from the meander corner common to Sections eight (8) and nine (9), said Township and Range; thence North 68030' West 48 feet, more or less, to the Northwest corner of a tract of land conveyed to Carroll D. Bush and Daisy M. Bush, husband and wife, by deed recorded March 22, 1946, in Volume 98 of Deeds, page 629, Auditor's file No. 114104; thence South 23033' West 172 feet to the North line of the existing private roadway; thence South 66016' East along said Northerly line of private roadway, 96 feet, more or less, to the Southwesterly corner of a tract of land conveyed to Joe L. Hagman and Bette B. Hagman, husband and wife, by deed recorded July 18, 1968, Auditor's File No. 235849; thence Northeasterly, along the Westerly line of said Hagman tract, to the POINT OF BEGINNING. TOGETHER WITH all tidelands as conveyed by the State of Washington by deeds dated July 21, 1902, June 6, 1911 and April 23, 1946, and recorded under Auditor's File Nos. 12622, 51741 and 235387, respectively, lying in front of, adjacent to and abutting on said property. EXCEPTING therefrom, road rights-of-way. �1/ Parcel Nos. 12108 11 00020 and 12108 11 70730. cws-o-- Wok( lA , �� Ov ' USA N� - T J v Tk� 1 1 �-- f " C i MW . . .......... if ` _ ear � �e,�f•� .�i', ,��fi.�, .` ..��t� •� t � ^�, aa. , w+ JUN 0 5 2014 426 W. CEDAR ST. -- is rift r-- RECI,:IVE JUN 0 5 2014 C) LLJ 111 N r 111 ). qs ,� 4„<+r ".�+ V_ � - .'� _ • a may. .A JUN 0 5 2014 426 W, CEDAR ST. ` _ , A r -y 1 :• • 13 a' �' w-�' vg�. t'4 � s � ♦'per• .tom. r A r-- AZI �J row 777 W. r _ • * S+ "'���t+ r' +t _• jam, "w�'"'-4 „r 4y� 1t . d + (R r • � ! ,, r M C �,� ��'-!/�' -'� •.% �4�+� ham.. •d Y X`� Y•'i',�- s�Z y � ti � 9� S 426 Aol ,. • .: �.> � +,ram, �, -� f �r �' �t� i.I+ .- ,f/,� �.1J � f -1 �r •,� � � � . ,` i ��r� • � � ��1 ��� "�;"� • � ��j1 _ ri.L ,may r TIT, 'lip y� 7 •, AL � i ewp A0!" # f ' v 7, 11 . i - t. r r „ y _it r�� •{"�do ft 'i � � wR'r�ti+E ,t .r`' t ,r � •. � r � r i4' ■r Nlsr�r28esesees �. seasr i swassss� � seems SSSs�rns Issssis■ rrrR was Names Senegal assarrsroirrr� rssararr� •teellsr sssrSma■ Isesessst i jsssasss s gMason% lssessssia rssasss 'snit •seeress iease'k 1 ,. r • srrs ago see ssssew less r!, as � it a4A -� _x s ail l yupZae���"7 " l iL�o � Cr9 esne�wict�o�c ,�rmnd�( l� Gra� ° p+&V4 Gie,4 co#Ajein" � pi i� �-� �✓u�c MC>MP Wzs/i2d6 P&ae(, wdvk''�N'�y IB ✓�b�ce „arw�e � �w�7�4 !u rweRfPara �sp�7�i �Fhr/M� w^tpRc/s co�+me, . v�•,eu� �le�w� �+uUje �uyh`a�e �Fi�wt¢ wa-2 uCla�r�4/�G�.P q� � ecekh T U� fj" Ise i Ven4(9��' � �'�r,�c'f✓�eeo{�r e Jim Bna�j�!��i�rr 5 Vag k -e, � at6-m Vtv a/ze 4W qr-�e,� -ate oxluGz�2� �rnr�cc:�( � c Pl�.eey� pt�,nU01AAa4<1 V�yf/q ��i ccl'�CLM a4-6 A% eA � '� d2 c��y" �o, , 52W4 MCA 0 , or .o4,q At�^Ad--- _ . MGM f'7 , s�), o6d wVe-r SMA 1�e*hwrle-i &4vma-et OfA Ae 1 OhIMA44 PM4JJa�A� lwzez� LA 61�o�2ac� Sue �u� vvUl died✓�Vors�d.��v orb M Me I /vva 410p, �u /1�ti�t1 exe �✓�- try i�,� P4�1