Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDDR2015-00011 Hearing - DDR Letters / Memos - 11/25/2015 Mason County Department of Community Development 426 West Cedar St. Shelton, Washington 98584 (360) 427-9670 April 13, 2015 Notice of Decision Cases: DDR2015-00011 Special Use Permit TO BE KEPT IN THE Applicant: Andrew and Virginia Boughal. PARCEL FILE Notice is hereby given that Andrew and Virginia Boughal, who are the applicants for the above-referenced Mason County Special Use Permit request, have been granted approval of that Special Use Permit. The request was reviewed on March 25, 2015 by the Mason County Hearing Examiner and approved on this date, pursuant to the Mason County Title 17.05.044 Special Use Permit review criteria, specifically to evaluating a proposed accessory dwelling unit on the subject parcel (PN 12229-43- 00010) in the Rural Residential 5 zone at 1 .3 miles south of the Allyn Urban Growth Area. The proposal was exempt from SEPA review per WAC 197-11-800 (1 ). This is a final County decision. No further appeals to the County are available. Appeal of this decision may be made to Superior Court or the appropriate administrative agency as regulations apply. It is the appellant's responsibility to meet all legal requirements of any appeal process. Time Limit for Action. Per the Mason County Code Title 15 - Development Code - No permit authorizing construction shall extend for a term of more than five years. If actual construction of a development for which a permit has been granted has not begun within two years after the approval, the Hearing Examiner shall review the permit and upon a showing of good cause, may extend the initial two year period by permit for one year. Otherwise, the permit terminates; PROVIDED that no permit shall be extended unless the applicant has requested such review and extension before the Hearing Examiner PRIOR to the expiration date. Work on approved project must begin by April 2017. This permit expires April 13, 2020. If you have questions or require clarification on these issues, please contact Allan Borden, Senior Planner with Mason County Dept. of Community Development at 360-427-9670 x365 1 BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR MASON COUNTY Phil Olbrechts, Hearing Examiner 4 RE: Andrew and Virginia Boughal FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND FINAL DECISION Special Use Permit 6 4DDR2015-00011 7 INTRODUCTION 8 9 The applicants seek a special use permit (SUP) for to convert an existing residence located on top of a garage to an accessory dwelling unit (ADU) at 6980 E Grapeview 10 Loop Rd. Allyn. The SUP is approved with conditions. 1 1 ORAL TESTIMONY 12 Allan Borden, Mason County planning staff, summarized the staff report. 1 14 EXHIBITS 1 The eight exhibits identified in the "case index" to the March 25, 2015 staff report were admitted into the record during the hearing. 16 FINDINGS OF FACT 17 Procedural: 18 1. Applicant. The applicants are Andrew and Virginia Boughal. 19 20 2. Hearing. A hearing was held on the application on March 25, 2015, at 1:00 p.m., in the Mason County Board of Commissioners Meeting Chambers. 21 �2 Substantive: 23 3. Site/Proposal Description. The applicants seek a special use permit (SUP) for to convert an existing residence located on top of a garage to an accessory 24 dwelling unit (ADU) at 6980 E Grapeview Loop Rd. Allyn. The proposed ADU is located on a 5.67 acre parcel of property. The septic and water connections and 25 driveway are now existing. A 4,355 square foot primary residence (two-story), approved in June 2014 and now under construction, is located approximately 140 feet to the east of the existing small residence and garage structure. See site plan in the application(Exhibit 6). SUP/ADU P. 1 Findings, Conclusions and Decision I - - 1 The owner will be in the principal residence on the property. The size of the proposed ADU is 982 sq. ft. in habitable area, or 23% of the primary residence size (Exhibit 2). 4 The proposed ADU is 85 feet from the north property line, 76 feet from the south property line and 700 feet from Grapeview Loop road. The proposed ADU has sewer and water that staff have found compliant with health district standards. No 6 recreational vehicle will provide the proposed ADU structure. Once approved, the proposed ADU will be the only ADU structure on the property. A parking area for 7 the proposed ADU already exists and will be next to the existing garage structure. 8 The parcel is 289 feet wide at the road, 1160 to 1250 feet deep on the sides and is sloped at less than 15 percent to the north (Exhibit 6). The primary residence is 9 nearly 1,000 feet from Grapeview Loop Rd. A barn and shop are situated 400 feet 10 from the road. A driveway connects all buildings on the property. 11 4. Characteristics of the Area. The area is characterized by medium-density 12 rural residential development (one dwelling per five acres) already in an area zoned as Rural Residential 5. The vicinity (Exhibit 3) is 1.3 miles south of Allyn and 13 accessed by the paved roads (Grapeview Loop Rd.). Nearly every parcel in this part 14 of Mason County shoreline has a residence, garage, or agricultural building (Exhibit 4). 1� 16 5. Adverse Impacts of Proposed Use. According to the information provided by staff in its report and testimony, there does not appear to be an impact on 1 surrounding properties for traffic, parking, or drainage. This is apparent from the site 18 plan and aerial photograph, which diagram the surrounding area adjacent to the subject parcel Exhibits 3 and 4 . The neighboring parcels are relatively all laze and J P ( ) � gP Y g 19 the subject ADU would be shielded from adjoining properties by extensive vegetation. Given the spacing of homes on those parcels that are developed, the 20 increase in density proposed by the applicant should not be noticeable to surrounding 1 residences. Consistent with this, no comments from the public at large have been received. Sewer and water connections are already in service and the staff reports that the proposal will not lower level of service standards below adopted minimums for parks or transportation facilities. Given these factors, the proposal creates no 2; discernable adverse impacts. 24 CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Procedural: SUP / ADU p. 2 Findings, Conclusions and Decision 1. Authority of Hearing Examiner. MCC 15.03.050(10) and 17.05.42 1 provide the Examiner with the authority to review and act upon Special Use Permits. 2 Substantive: 3 2. Zoning. The area is zoned as Rural Residential 5. 4 5 3. Review Criteria and Application. MCC 17.03.029 governs ADUs in rural lands. Under MCC 17.03.029, ADUs in rural lands shall be subject to a Special Use 6 Permit, unless they are located in the shoreline jurisdiction, in which case they are subject to a shoreline permit. The proposed ADU is not within 200 feet of the 7 shoreline and, therefore, shall not be reviewed per the Shoreline Master Program policies and use regulations. The review criteria for the Special Use Permit 8 application are governed by MCC 17.05.044. These criteria, in addition to 9 miscellaneous criteria for all Hearing Examiner decisions, are quoted and addressed below. 10 MCC 17.05.044 SPECIAL USE REVIEW CRITERIA: 11 (1) That the proposed use will not be detrimental to the public health, safety and 12 welfare. 13 4. There are no significant adverse impacts associated with the proposal as 1.1 determined in Finding of Fact No. 5. Given these factors, there will be no detrimental impact to the public health, safety, and welfare as a result of the proposed 1 ADU. 16 (2) That the proposed use is consistent and compatible with the intent of the 17 Comprehensive Plan. 18 5. The ADU is consistent and compatible with the intent of the Comprehensive Plan. Chapter 9 of the Mason County Comprehensive plan provides 19 that ADUs should be permitted "when minimal impact would occur to surrounding areas. The cumulative impact of like structures on neighboring properties must be �0 considered. " As noted in the Findings of Fact, the size of the proposed ADU is ,1 relatively small, but it will be in an area characterized by relatively large lots compared to the size of the ADU being proposed. Due to the large lot sizes, no adverse cumulative impacts are anticipated. As further found, the ADU will not create any adverse impacts and hence will have minimal impacts on surrounding areas. Given these factors,the approval of other ADUs in the area also will not create 24 any cumulative adverse impacts. (3) That the proposed use will not introduce hazardous conditions at the site that cannot be mitigated through appropriate measures to protect adjacent properties and the community at large. SUP /ADU p. 3 Findings, Conclusions and Decision 6. No hazardous conditions are expected, nor have any been identified as a 1 result of the proposed ADU. No adjacent properties, nor the community at large, will be impacted by the introduction of hazardous conditions from the ADU. (4) That the proposed use is served by adequate public facilities which are in place, or planned as a condition of approval or as an identified item in the County's Capital 4 Facilities Plan. 5 7. As determined in Finding of Fact No. 5, individual water and septic 6 systems are in place to serve the proposed ADU. According to the staff report, the addition of an ADU should not lower the level of service of transportation or 7 neighborhood park facilities below applicable minimum standards and there is no evidence to the contrary. The criterion is met. 8 (5) That the proposed use will not have a significant impact upon existing uses on 9 adjacent lands. 10 8 As determined in Findings of Fact No. 5, no significant impacts are 11 expected to result from this proposal,including impacts on adjoining properties. 12 (6) If located outside an Urban Growth Area, that the proposed use will not result in the need to extend urban services. 13 14 9. The addition of an ADU and its use by a single family should not result in a need to extend urban services. The site is accessed from existing roads. The ADU 15 will be served by individual septic system and water. Therefore, the project will not result in the need to extend urban services. 16 MISCELLANEOUS CRITERIA FOR ALL HEARING EXAMINER REVIEW: 17 18 MCC 15.09.055(C): Required Review: The Hearing Examiner shall review proposed development according to the following criteria: 19 1. The development does not conflict with the Comprehensive Plan and meets 20 the requirements and intent of the Mason County Code, especially Title 6, 8, and 16. 21 2. Development does not impact the public health, safety and welfare and is 22 in the public interest. 23 3. Development does not lower the level of service of transportation and/or neighborhood park facilities below the minimum standards established within the 24 Comprehensive Plan. 25 10. According to staff, the proposed development complies with the Mason County Code, including Title 6 and 8. The project is not subject to Title 16 which only governs subdivisions. As confirmed by staff in the staff report, the proposed SLrP / ADL1 p. 4 Findings, Conclusions and Decision ADU with one additional family should not lower the level of service of 1 transportation and/or neighborhood park facilities below the minimum standards 2 established within the Comprehensive Plan. The project will also have no adverse impact upon health, safety and welfare since it will not create any significant adverse 3 impacts as determined in Finding of Fact No. 5. 4 The ADU meets the specific requirements for ADUs in rural lands as laid out in MCC 17.03.029 because the owner of the proposed ADU will occupy the primary 5 residence; the size of the ADU is less than 1000 square feet and is less than 80% of 6 the primary residence; only one ADU will result from the project; adequate parking is provided for the ADU; the ADU is located within 150 feet of the primary residence; 7 according to staff all setback requirements are satisfied; and the ADU is already served by County approved water and septic. 8 DECISION 9 10 The proposed ADU is consistent with all applicable SUP standards as outlined above and is approved. 11 Dated this 9th day of April, 2015. 12 13 i 14 .... : l5 Hearing Examiner 16 Mason County 17 APPEAL 18 19 The decision of the Hearing Examiner is final and may be appealed to superior court as outlined by the Washington State Land Use Petition Act, Chapter 36.70C RCW. 20 CHANGE IN VALUATION 21 Notice is given pursuant to RCW 36.70B.130 that property owners who are affected 22 by this decision may request a change in valuation for property tax purposes 23 notwithstanding any program of revaluation. 24 25 SUP/ADU p. 5 Findings, Conclusions and Decision CASEINDEX Andrew and Virginia Boughal Accessory Dwelling Unit Special Use Permit DDR2015-00011 Exhibit# Date Description 1 March 25, 2015 Staff Report 2 February 11, 2015 Special Use Application 3 February 25, 2015 Proposal Vicinity 4 February 25, 2015 Site Location 5 February 25, 2015 Site Aerial with parcel numbers 6 February 11, 2015 Site Plan 7 March 4, 2015 Site Photos of existing garage/ residence 8 February 26, 2015 Notice of Application 9 March 16, 2015 Affidavit of Posting Boughal ADU DDR2015-00011 case index Mason County Department of Community Development Building III * 426 West Cedar Street Shelton,Washington 98584 * (360) 427-9670 March 25, 2015 TO: Mason County Hearings Examiner FROM: Planning Staff—Allan Borden; 360.427.9670 ext. 363; ahb _co.mason.wa.us RE: Special Use Permit(DDR2015-00011) for review of existing second-story living area (existing garage on first floor)as an Accessory Dwelling Unit. STAFF REPORT I. Introduction. This report evaluates a proposal to review an existing structure (existing garage on first floor and small residence on second floor)as an Accessory Dwelling Unit on a 5.67-acre property. The completed unit will be 982 square feet in area. Staff finds all review standards for the Special Use Permit are met. II. Applicant. Andrew and Virginia Boughal. III. Property Location. 6980 E Grapeview Loop Rd. Allyn, WA.; Parcel # 12229-43-00010. IV. Project Description. An application for Special Use Permit was received on February 11,2015 to review an existing residence built in 2008 (982 sq. ft. area) as an Accessory Dwelling Unit on a 5.67-acre property (Exhibit 2). The septic and water connections and driveway are now existing. The existing 4.355 square foot primary residence (two-story), approved in June 2014 and now under construction, is located approximately 140 feet to the east of the existing small residence and garage structure. See site plan in the application(Exhibit 6). V. Evaluations. A. Characteristics of the site. The parcel is 289 feet wide at the road, 1160 to 1250 feet deep on the sides and is sloped at less than 15 percent to the north(Exhibit 6). The primary residence is nearly 1,000 feet from Grapeview Loop Rd. A barn and shop are situated 400 feet from the road. A driveway connects all buildings on the property. This Special Use Permit request will evaluate the use of the small second- floor residence as an Accessory Dwelling Unit on the subject property. B. Characteristics of the area. The area is characterized by medium-density rural residential development(one dwelling per five acres) already in an area zoned as Rural Residential 5. The vicinity(Exhibit 3) is 1.3 miles south of Allyn and accessed by the paved roads (Grapeview Loop Rd.). Nearly every parcel in this part of Mason County shoreline has a residence, garage, or agricultural building(Exhibit 4). Boughal ADU staff report DDR2015-00011 1 C. Shoreline Designation. Urban Shoreline along Case inlet is along the east portion of the subject property. D. Comprehensive Plan Designation/Zoning. The Mason County Comprehensive Plan designation for the site is Rural and the zoning is Rural Residential 5. VI. SEPA Compliance. Project is SEPA exempt per WAC 197-11-800 (1)(b)(i). VII. Other Permits/Approvals. The proposal will not require a Mason County Building Permit(the residence is constructed). Approval of the ADU request will address the provisions of residential density. A Notice of Application and Public Hearing(Exhibit 8) was placed in the Mason County Journal on February 26 and March 5, 2015,posted on site on March 4, 2015, and mailed to neighboring properties on February 24, 2015. An Affidavit of Posting is included as Exhibit 9. VIII. Analysis. The proposal requires a Special Use Permit(Exhibit 2)per the requirements of Mason County Development Regulations, M.C.C. 17.03.029 Accessory Dwelling Units. The applicable Development Regulations standards are: A. The ADU shall be subject to a special use permit, unless in the shoreline jurisdiction it is subject to a shoreline permit. The site is outside of shoreline jurisdiction (Exhibit 5), so a Special Use Permit review is the subject of this public hearing. B. The owner of the ADU must reside on the lot in either the principal residence or ADU. The owner is residing on the property, and the principal residence is still under construction. C. The ADU shall be located within 150 feet of the principal residence or shall be a conversion of an existing detached structure (i.e. garage). The garage and small residence where the ADU is proposed is 140 feet from the primary residence. D. The ADU shall not exceed 80% of the square footage of the habitable area of the primary residence or 1,000 square feet, whichever is smaller. The size of the proposed ADU is 982 sq.ft in habitable area, or 25%of the primary residence size (Exhibit 2). E. All setback requirements must be met by the ADU. The existing garage and small residence structure is 85 feet from the north property line, 76 feet from the south property line, and 700 feet from Grapeview Loop Rd. (Exhibit 5). F. All applicable health district standards for water& sewer must be met by the ADU. The existing garage and small residence has one bedroom and two bathrooms and proper water and septic connections. G. No recreational vehicles shall be allowed as ADUs. No recreational vehicle will provide the proposed AD U structure. H. Only one ADU is allowed on any property. Once approved, the proposed ADU will be the only ADU structure on the property. Boughal ADU staff report DDR2015-00011 2 I. An additional off-street parking space must be provided for the ADU. The parking area for the proposed ADU is existing and will be next to the existing garage structure. The ADU as proposed(982 sq ft. livin area) meets all of the above criteria A —I. Applicable Special Use review criteria: 1. Will the proposed use be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare? The review of the existing garage and small residence structure as an ADU meets all county setbacks, assures adequate off street parking, and is provided with proper septic and water services. No potential detrimental effects have been identified. 2. Will the proposed use be consistent and compatible with the intent of the Comprehensive Plan? The proposed residential land use is consistent and compatible with the Comprehensive Plan. Rural Residential 5 zoning standards does allow for one ADUper parcel. 3. Will the proposed use introduce hazardous conditions at the site that cannot be mitigated through appropriate measures to protect adjacent properties and the community at large? No hazardous conditions are expected as a result of the review of the garage and small residence as an accessory residence. Due to adequate setbacks, no impacts to neighboring properties are anticipated(Exhibit 2). 4. Is the proposed use served by adequate public facilities,which are in place, or planned as a condition of approval or as an identified item in the County's Capital Facilities Plan? No public facilities are present in the vicinity; individual water and septic systems are in place to serve the proposed ADU. The project will not lower the level of service of transportation or neighborhood parkfacilities below applicable minimum standards. 5. Will the proposed use have a significant impact upon existing uses on adjacent lands? The proposed accessory garage and small residence dwelling unit adjacent to the two- story residence will have no significant impact upon existing adjacent residential land uses or vacant lots (Exhibit 7). The review will make the existing development conform to the Rural Residential 5 standards. 6. If located outside an Urban Growth Area,will the proposal result in the need to extend urban services? The review of the existing garage and small residence as an Accessory Dwelling Unit would not result in a need to extend urban services to this location. Project Analysis: Based upon these policies and regulations,this review conforms as noted to the use regulations of the Mason County Development Regulations in regard to the Accessory Dwelling Unit standards. IX. Conclusions. As designed,the proposed accessory dwelling unit(garage and small residence) is consistent with the Mason County Development Regulations. Staff finds all review standards, including Special Use Permit, are met. Boughal ADU staff report DDR2015-00011 3 X. Choices of Action. 1. Approval of the SUP request. 2. Denial of the SUP request. 3. Conditional approval of the SUP request. 4. Postpone the decision for further information. Bough ADU staff report DDR2015-00011 4 1+ 2---- MASON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 426 W Cedar Street/P.O. Box 279, Shelton,WA 98584 360.427.9670 Ext. 352 Mason County Permit Center Use: DDR 2 D 1,5 - 00011 Special Use Permit: $1,135 Date Rcvd: Public Hearing: $2,005 or $670 for ADU's RECEMD FB i i 2M 426 W. CEDAR ST. Special Use Application A Special Use is one that possesses unique characteristics due to size, nature, intensity of use, technological processes involved, demands upon public services, relationship to surrounding lands, or other factors. The purpose of this application is to provide for adequate oversight and review of such development proposals, in order to assure that such uses are developed in harmony with surrounding land uses, and in a manner consistent with the intent of the Development Regulations for Mason County; Ordinance No. 82-96. Acceptance of this application by Mason County does not guarantee approval of request. Type of Special Use Permit: ❑ Communications Tower Accessory Dwelling Unit ❑ Oversize Construction ❑ Other: Applicant Name ____k Q-rLW (A{ G-ka-L Property Owners P101 r--0-y) Q i'1 d 1 r ci i n i a- B©U-a Lj Mailing Address PO BeX 9994 Allyn , UJ H C1 3 s a 4 Phone 1 3 0-a~`f-q I A� Phone 2 S�I-`7�I9- Il�g$ Email bolAAajar Q M Sr)-toM Site Address ('9 $0 E. G irqj2!E-V1 Euo l 0013 � 1411 V n W q Tax Parcel# taaG - 43 - 0 od 10 Legal Description P e. LA of 6 L.A -It ®) -46 1" -T/1 T 1\i S LJ SE Project Description r"1'n DJQ rP s id iW o- ( S «"ux rch-f l y u.ridir- tonl frt.L t' n . Special Us;e- P ► m #4 reg ct-es- -p-d •-FQ r- r? o ute r s;12,ba� Q Xt&4i , ADar-tMknf IGa ra qP 4a A hQ s4a4k5 A hLD a007 1907) 1::Communit;•Devc1opmetitTAC`•.SPECIAL USE Updatcd 10.-2012 Page 1 of 3 Special Use Permit Criteria Andrew and Virginia Boughal Tax Parcel#12229-43-00010 1. Will the proposed use be detrimental to public health, safety and welfare? a. The proposed ADU has an approved onsite septic system. No hazardous materials or activities are present or performed on the site. There will be no impact on transportation networks. The creation of this ADU will have no impact on public services. 2. Will the proposed use be consistent and compatible with the intent of the Comprehensive Plan? a. Mason County Comprehensive Plan (updated 2005) established by the Growth Management Act was reviewed and the proposed Special Use Permit is compatible with that plan. The proposed ADU will have no impact on capital facilities, i.e.water, waste disposal,justice facilities of unincorporated Allyn. The proposed ADU resides in Rural Residential Area 5 of unincorporated Allyn. Therefore, the proposed ADU is compatible with the Comprehensive Plan Mission Statement. 3. Will the proposed use introduce hazardous conditions, at the site that cannot be mitigated through appropriate measures to protect adjacent properties and the community at large? a. The current living facility was constructed under Mason County building permit in 2008. We propose conversion of that living facility to ADU status with the completion of our new home on the property, which is currently under construction. The approval of the Special Use Permit will introduce no new or additional hazardous conditions, air quality or water quality at the site or surrounding properties. 4. Is the proposed use served by adequate public facilities which are in place, planned as a condition of approval or as an identified item in the County Capital Facilities Plan? a. The proposed ADU is connected to an approved private septic system. Water is provided to the ADU by an approved private two party water system. Mason County PUD3 has inspected the site and approved power upgrades are in place. The proposed Special Use Permit will require no additional County Capital Facilities upgrades or burden. 5. Will the proposed use have a significant impact on existing uses on adjacent lands? a. The proposed ADU is located on 5.71 acres zoned Rural Residential 5 and fits the best and highest use of the property as a private residence. The property is located outside of the Urban Growth Area boundaries of unincorporated Allyn. The Special Use Permit will have no impact on existing residences on adjacent lands. 6. If located outside of an Urban Growth Area, will the proposal result in the need to extend urban services? a. The property is located outside of the Urban Growth Area boundaries of unincorporated Allyn. The proposed ADU is connected to an approved private septic system. Water is provided to the ADU by an approved private two party water system. Mason County PUD3 has inspected the site and approved power upgrades are in place. No urban services will need to be extended to accommodate the Special Use Permit. Zl l IIII"Ills'If'II"IIIII'IIIII�I�l�1�11111��11111'Il'lll��lll�ll�l ANDREW & VIRGINIA BOUGHAL P O BOX 999 ALLYN WA 98524-0999 111�I�III"IIIII"'IIII"IIII'llllll'II'IIIII�I'II'III""'I'II11 ��Ii���ll�llll"II'11111111111111111111'II'II'II"I""'111111111 III'11�1111�11��111111111111"IIII"1�1111111111111'Ill'Illlll"' STEVEN E & SHERYL A ROSE LARRY D & CHERYLPL CRADNRE CHRISTOPHP O BOX USAN H CRIBBS P O BOX 1215 14412 W TRADING 1293 ALLYN WA 98524-1215 SUN CITY WEST AZ 85375 ALLYN WA 98524-1293 IIIII"IIIIIIII'I'II��ILi111111111--1,11111111111111111I111'III 1111111111,1-1,1,IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIiI'll"1111111 III IIIIIIIIIIIII II'I'III'II'd II'1"IIIIIIII'1'llI111111111.11111111'1111"llllll GERALD J & HELEN M POPELKA GLENN & SANDRA POPELKA SARAH KELLY P O BOX 908 P O BOX 198 8536 CASHIO STREET ALLYN WA 98524-0908 ALLYN WA 98524-0198 LOS ANGELES, CA 90035 11'1111111111'I'111111111"111'1111-11111II'1111111111111I111" 111111111"I 11111111111'1'1'1'11111111111'.111,11111"'llll'111111'11 NORBERT L & LISA M VAN DAM PATRICIA C KARMAN SCOTT P & JENNIFER A GRIFFIN 5716 61STAVE NE P O BOX 1297 P O BOX 361 SEATTLE WA 98105-2038 ALLYN WA 98524-1297 ALLYN WA 98524-0361 w gt%ERWOOD CREEK K RD ODp;RD E GRPp� J� O NOTTINGHAM LN i T22NR1 W U > w OF O ff _ J C w Z� W Q ✓� 1, j 1 4U% i / 1 i I E NELSON RD r ^ N �rtC(Kt+tf 1 inch = 600 feet I VJ E Fj�L 6114i1 1 inch = 0 miles jg60 C. � i� , L I �--4� E BAY HEIGHTS DR 0 w O U U J _J W y; i 4 .t x 1 rPm f \ Q� E NELSON RD 0 z or J z�ource: E ri, DigitalGlobe, �eoEye, i-cubed, U=D , USES, E�X, wGet aPping, erogrid, IGN, IGP,s i s4opo, and the GIS U er Co uniU N 1 inch = 300 feet W E �j0 Uq 1 inch = 0 miles J S 122291380312 12229410000( - "' ' 122294200050 -Na 122294200030 �� �� ', OOQ 122294200031 -- 122294100020 122294100020 �v 122290060010 122294200042 _:. +' � `�`� 122294200040 122294100010 � 122294100010 p k {122294190110 �� 122294190120 122294100011 122294300000 122294300010 122294300010 122294400000 ' y �► ,air 122294480110 122298888888 122294400010 E NELSON RD 122294400020 122294400020 122290060010 122294400030 122294400030 122294300020 � Z 122294400130 � 122294400130 J W Z w 122294400040 "` 122294400040 122294300030 122294400041 � 2''n" Source: Digital�I• i-c e@ft@, ubed, D US pjq t � ', GetmapPing�,C'F,§erogrid, , I�P,s isstopo,and theGIS2Use��Go�mmunit� N 1 inch = 200 feet W _� E 1 inch = 0 miles S icl y�afl L'i(-lea1! CIO 14R,�� i i Flow vq�IL 10 SO Zj) 7ILI d Tqkf Aft;i Ira.!?L.,L� t eel /GGe 1 � At— Awc ram• i CY�rabIo) � r &1RGt4 A>J � 1 01 ak NNW !^ 34 r !f Ni" � , 1 .sir.{•(������ Ala �"F4' + 'll �"`.' ! u r _ MASON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Planning Division P.O. Box 279, Shelton,WA 98584 (360) 427-9670 DDR2015-00011 NOTICE OF SPECIAL USE PERMIT. Notice is hereby given that the Andrew and Virginia Boughal,who are the owners of the described property below,has filed an application for a Special Use Permit for the development of.- Review of existing 982 sq. ft. residential structure as an accessory dwelling unit on the second floor of a garage permitted in early 2008; sited on a property zoned Rural Residential 5 zone. To complete this review,the applicant must receive approval through a Special Use Permit public review and hearing by the County Hearings Examiner. Parcel Number: 1222943-00010 (5.67 ac.) Site Address: 6980 E Grapeview Loop Rd., Allyn WA. Location of Project: East of Grapeview Loop Rd. and 1.0 mile south of Allyn;within the southeast 1/4 of Section 29, Township 22 N.,Range 1 W. in Mason County Washington. Said proposed development is subject to Special Use Permit review(M.C.C. 17.05.040) and associated Mason County Development Regulations standards. Any person desiring to express their view or to be notified of the action taken on the application should notify in writing of their interest to: MASON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PO BOX 279 SHELTON,WA 98584 The comment period is at least 10 days from the final date of publication given pursuant to M.C.C. 15.07.030 (public notice). Final date of publication,posting or mailing of notice is March 6, 2015. Written comments will be accepted up to the date of the Hearings Examiner public hearing Tuesday March 25, 2015; 1:00 PM in Mason County Bldg. One, 411 N. Fifth St. Shelton WA. Contact this office at(360) 427-9670, ext. 365 for further information. This construction proposal is exempt from further environmental review per WAC 197-11-800(1)(c). AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE STATE OF.WASHINGTON ) v ss. COUNTY OF MASON ) I,. �itJ''�� certifythat I posted copies of l � do hereb y the attached on K day of 20 in public places.as follows: one at one at � one at In witness whereof, s sig ned this Affidavit of Posting Notice this day G� /� the party ha J. of ��� `' 0 15 . By. Address: STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss.. COUNTY OF MASON ) Subscribed and sworn tome this /�p day of Notary Public (IL— � State of Washin,tou DEBBERA C.OKER ry Public for he State of Washington W COMMISSION EXPIRES Residing at I`111tborl NOVEMBER 15, 2018 Commission Expires i.