HomeMy WebLinkAboutHMP - HMP Habitat Managment Plan - 9/30/2016 The Wetland Corpse
Wetland Delineation • Habitat Management Plans • Riparian Restoration • Mitigation • Biological Evaluation
PARCEL 12229-22-00280 HABITAT MANAGEMENT PLAN
17719
RECEIVEDEast Highway 3
Allyn, Wa 98524
SEP 2 7 2016
615 W- Alder Street Prepared for:
Ryann Sharer
PO Box 754
Allyn,Wa 98524
Prepared by:
Heather Lane and Lee Boad
September 2016
PO Box 2854, Belfair,WA 98528 cell:36o-62o-o618,Office:360-372-2421 e-mail:wetlandcorps@hotmaii.com
The kletland Corps
Wetland Delineation - Habitat Management Plans • Riparian Restoration • Mitigation • Biological Evaluation
PARCEL 12229-22-00280 HABITAT MANAGEMENT PLAN
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION...................................................................................................1
2.0 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION ...............................................................................................2
3.0 APPLICABLE SETBACKS..................................................................................................3
4.0 DESCRIPTION OF HABITAT AND SPECIES.................................................................3
5.0 ANALYSIS OF EFFECTS ....................................................................................................4
6.0 BUFFER ENHANCEMENT.................................................................................................6
7.0 MONITORING.......................................................................................................................8
8.0 SUMMARY.............................................................................................................................8
Figures
Figure 1. Site Vicinity Map
Figure 2. Site Plan
Figure 3. National Wetland Inventory Map
Figure 4. Mason County Soil Survey Map
Figure 5. Department of Natural Resources Water Resource Map
PO Box 2854, Belfair,WA 98528 cell:36o-62o-o618,Office:360-372-2421 e-mail:wetiandcorps@hotmail.com
The Wetland Corps
Wetland Delineation • Habitat Management Plans - Riparian Restoration • Mitigation • Biological Evaluation
September,2016 Page 1
PARCEL 12229-22-00280 HABITAT MANAGEMENT PLAN
Allyn,Washington
1.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The details of a Habitat Management Plan for the proposed stream buffer reduction which will
allow for the construction of a 1768 square foot SFR near a type F stream are addressed in this
report. The property is located at 17719 East Highway 3, in Allyn, Mason County, Washington.
The property is found in the northwest 1/4 of Section 29 Township 22 North, Range 1 West (See
Figure 1. Site Vicinity Map). The parcel occupies .7 acres, and contains a 1472 square foot SFR
currently located approximately 90-feet from the stream, at the nearest point.
The stream is located east of the property boundary, and parallels the eastern property line. Type
F streams in Mason County require a buffer of 150-feet with an additional 15-foot building ,
setback; this buffer occupies nearly the entire property with the exception of th westernmost p S
edge. This proposal will require the buffer of a type F stream be reduced to feet at the
narrowest point to allow for the construction of a 1768 square foot SFR. This ui ding will be 1Zf��t�
located further from the stream than the existing building to be removed. This is the farthest
distance from the stream that is feasible given access requirements and configuration of the
property. The majority of the stream buffer within the parcel includes the mobile home,
outbuildings and open lawn. Mitigation includes enhancing and restoring the proposed buffer by
removing the existing SFR and planting the buffer with shrub and overstory plantings.
From a habitat standpoint, this project meets the Mason County Resource Ordinance (MCRO)
criteria for a buffer reduction due to the following circumstances:
1) The proposed construction will be further from the stream than the existing house to be
removed.
2) The existing use of the property is single-family residential.
3) The mitigation proposed will result in higher quality riparian habitat conditions than what
currently exist.
The objectives of this HUT are as follows:
■ To evaluate the potential adverse effects to critical area functions as well as fish and wildlife
habitat resulting from the proposed project. Emphasis is placed on the possible loss of
habitat for any listed species found to be residing in the vicinity of the parcel.
■ To identify appropriate mitigation measures that could be implemented to improve the
function and value of the proposed type F stream buffer, congruent with the project proposal.
PO Box 2854, Belfair,WA 98528 cell:36o-62o-o618,Office:360-372-2421 e-mail:wetlandcorps@hotmail.com
Parcel 12229-22-00280 HMP
September 2016
Page 2
2.0 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
The parcel is accessed off of State Route 3 in Allyn. It is bordered to the north and south east
and west by residential parcels of varying size and shape. The type F stream,known as Sherwood
Creek, meanders just beyond the eastern property boundary. According to WAC 16.222.031,the
stream contains fishbearing habitat because the average width of the channel is greater than 2-
feet, and the stream is located along a gradient of less than 16 percent. The stream is also
mapped as a fishbearing stream by the DNR Water Resources Map (See Figure 5. WA DNR
Water Resource Map). The stream drains westerly to eventually enter into Case Inlet.
r"._ 17o
s �
�.r s
p h
Photo 1.Subject property according to Mason County GIS.
The property is occupied by relatively flat landscape, containing little native vegetation as it is
mostly maintained as lawn area.
2.01 Review of Existing Information
Preliminary information was gathered on the project site prior to the field review. General
information sources included: 1974 United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) National
Wetland Inventory (NWI) maps (See Figure 3. NWI Map), the Soil Survey of Mason County
PO Box 2854, Belf air,WA 98528 cell:36o-62o-o618,Office:360-372-2421 e-mail:wetiandcorps@hotmaii.com
Parcel 12229-22-00280 HMT
September 2016
Page 3
Area, Washington (USDA, 1951) (See Figure 4. Mason County Soil Survey Map), and Mason
County's critical areas regulations.
3.0 APPLICABLE SETBACKS
The parcel is within the jurisdiction of Mason County. Ordinance 17.01.010 identifies Fish and
Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas adopted by Mason County.
The applicable setback for this project is as follows:
Habitat Type Buffer Building Setback from Buffer
Type F Stream 150' 15'
4.0 DESCRIPTION OF HABITAT AND SPECIES
4.1 Puget Sound Chinook(Oncorhynchus tshawytsha)-Threatened
Listed as threatened since March 24, 1999 adult Puget Sound Chinook spawn in several rivers
and streams flowing into Puget Sound. Suitable habitat may be present within this stream
although there is no managed chinook stock documented.No impacts to Puget Sound Chinook or
associated habitat are predicted with the proposed project. No impacts to aquatic habitat are
expected to occur with the proposed project. No impacts to water quality are predicted with
proposed mitigation.
4.2 Bull Trout(Salvelinus malma)-Threatened
Bull trout typically inhabit very cold, clear headwater streams at high elevations that are
supported by snowmelt. For spawning and early rearing, bull trout require loose, clear gravel,
relatively free of fine sediments.
No bull trout have been documented within the type F stream. No impacts to bull trout are
expected to result from this project.
4.3 Puget Sound Steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss)-Threatened
Listed as Threatened since May 2007, Puget Sound Stealhead spawn in several streams
throughout Puget Sound. Spawning usually occurs in moderate to steep gradient sections of
streams, usually in heads of riffles or the tails of pools where hydraulic conditions are conducive
to intragravel flow. Side channels and the anterior portions of islands are also used. Spawn
timing for summer steelhead runs typically ranges from mid May through October while winter
run steelhead are present from December through May. Adequate cover from predation, water
temperature, and spawning gravel are important factors for instream habitat, while little is
currently known about specific marine habitat requirements.
The stream does support suitable steelhead habitat. The recommendations provided in this report
are intended to protect water quality and enhance the riparian corridor, improving the overall
health of the stream and wildlife utilization of the site. The proposed project will not adversely
impact the type F stream, and should result in better conditions than what currently exist within
PO Box 2854, Belfair,WA 98528 cell:36o-620-0618,Office:360-372-2421 e-mail:wetlandcorps@hotmaii.com
Parcel 12229-22-00280 HMP
September 2016
Page 4
the riparian corridor. No impacts to Puget Sound Steelhead are predicted to result from this
project.
4.4 Marbled Murrelet(Brachyramphus marmoratus)-Threatened
Marbled Murrelets are typically associated with coastal habitats and nest in old-growth forests.
Murrelets may fly as far as 50 miles inland to nest, however the average distance is roughly 5-
miles from nest to sea. It is only during the summer breeding months that they are commonly
found inland. During non-nesting seasons they live at sea. Murrelets require tall mossy trees in
coniferous old growth forests with cavities on thick branches where they can construct a cup nest
20-40 meters above the forest floor.
Murreletts have been documented laying eggs on rocky ground habitats only when a sufficient
forest is unavailable. There are no documented nesting sites surrounding the project site. No
potential nesting trees are within the project area. This project will have no adverse impact on
Marbled Murrelet given there are no documented nesting sites or potential nesting trees in the
vicinity of the project area.
4.5 Northern Spotted Owl(Stria occidentalis caurina)-Threatened
Spotted owls require a large amount of land for their nesting and hunting grounds; pairs may
occupy up to 58 sq. km. They are territorial and do not migrate, but they may shift their ranges
slightly in response to seasonal changes
Suitable spotted owl habitat includes trees relatively large in diameter, multi-layered forest
canopy with a moderate to high canopy closure in overstory,midstory, and understory, large,tall,
live trees with cavities, broken tops, mistletoe, or platforms of branches capable of holding
accumulated organic matter suitable for use as a nest. Dead standing trees and fallen decayed
trees supporting abundant populations of prey species are critical to spotted owl populations.
Currently there are no spotted owl nesting sites documented in proximity to the project site.
As spotted owls are currently not present, and the project does not require the removal of any
forested components, no impacts to spotted owl or their habitat are expected result from the
proposed project. Proposed mitigation is expected to result in a net benefit of vegetative
abundance and diversity within the proposed stream buffer,which could eventually be utilized by
Northern Spotted Owl.
5.0 ANALYSIS OF EFFECTS
The project entails reducing the type F stream buffer to 125 feet. This is the furthest distance
from the stream buffer that development can occur given the constraints of the property. The
majority of the stream buffer within the proposed project area is devoid of native riparian
vegetation as it has been maintained as a flat lawn area. The proposed mitigation entails restoring
and enhancing the proposed stream buffer to a higher quality habitat condition than what
currently exists onsite.
PO Box 2854,Belfair,WA 98528 cell:36o-62o-o618,Office:360-372-2421 e-mail:wetlandcorps@hotmaii.com
Parcel 12229-22-00280 H?dP
September 2016
Page 5
5.1 Vegetation Disturbance
This project does not require removal of any native trees within the stream buffer. The
recommended planting of native vegetation described in Section 6.1 and 6.2 will result in a net
increase of vegetation abundance and diversity within the site.
5.2 Designated Critical Habitat for Salmonids
According to NOAA Fisheries Northwest Region Critical Habitat Designations for West Coast
Salmon and Steelhead in Washington - August 2005, Designated Critical Habitat for Salmonids
is within the vicinity of the parcel. None of the proposed actions are likely to destroy or
adversely modify designated critical habitat. Actions described in this plan are not expected to
jeopardize the continued existence of any listed species.
5.3 Noise Pollution
A slight increase in noise from construction activities is likely to occur during daylight
construction hours. No nesting sites are located within the radii of concern that would be
impacted by noise associated with the proposed project.
5.4 Temporary Increase in Sediment and Turbidity during Construction
The proposed work has the potential to temporarily increase turbidity and suspended sediment
within the project area. Best Management Practices have been recommended in Section 6.3 to
minimize the adverse effects to sediment supply and turbidity during project implementation.
5.5 Light and Glare
Given the existing use of the property, the proposed project is not likely result in an increase in
light and glare.
PO Box 2854, Belfair,WA 98528 cell:36o-62o-o618,Office:360-372-2421 e-mail:wetlandcorps@hotmail.com
Parcel 12229-22-00280 HW ,
September 2016
Page 6
6.0 BUFFER ENHANCEMENT
This project entails reducing the required 150-foot stream buffer to accommodate the proposed
construction. The existing home and all debris associated with the structure will be removed and
taken off site. Following the building removal, a 2000 square foot area of stream buffer currently
occupied by lawn area will be planted with native trees and shrubs. This area will be identified
as the Mitigation Area shown in Figure 2. The stream buffer will then be monitored for presence
of invasive species, and the success or failure of the new vegetation.
These recommendations are more specifically addressed in the sections that follow.
6.1 Planting
Restoration Zone
It is recommended that the Restoration Zone be planted with both trees and shrubs to provide a
diverse, multi-layer vegetative community within the stream buffer. The restoration of a
moderately dense forest and shrub community within this portion of the stream buffer is intended
to improve wildlife utilization and riparian function of the site as well as establish a vegetative
screen between the proposed development and stream.
The following is a list of suggested species to be used for replanting within the Restoration Zone.
The species have been chosen based on their presence within surrounding undisturbed forested
areas,tolerance to moist conditions, and light requirements. It is recommended that potted plants
be used as opposed to bare root seedlings. Comments associated with each species from the
Species Selection Guide from the Sound Native Plants website (www.soundnativeplants.com)
are provided.
Trees
Douglas Fir(Pseudotsuga menziesii)2-gallon Fast growing
Big Leaf Maple(Acer macrophyllum)2-gallon Fast growing,versatile
Cascara(Rhamnus purshiana) 2-gallon Versatile
Western red cedar(Thuja plicata)2-gallon Shade tolerant
Shrubs
Pacific ninebark(Physocarpus capitatus) 1-gallon Versatile
Snowberry(Symphoricarpos albus) 1-gallon Very versatile
Thimbleberry(Rubus parvijlorus) 1-gallon Versatile
Vine maple(Acer circinatum) 1-gallon Slower growing, a survivor
Ocean spray(Holodiscus discolor) 1-gallon Versatile
PO Box 2854, Belfair,WA 98528 cell:36o-62o-o618,Office:360-372-2421 e-mail:wetiandcorps@hotmaii.com
Parcel 12229-22-00280 1HAP
September 2016
Page 7
6.2 Native Planting Guidelines
It is recommended that plantings be installed within the identified Mitigation Area to achieve the
following densities. A minimum of 1 tree species and five shrub species from the above list are
recommended.
trees- 10' on center
shrubs- 5' on center
These densities will provide a moderately dense, structurally diverse plant community within the
mitigation zone. It is recommended that installation be done as single trees and or clusters of
three shrubs, on approximate 10-foot centers. The planting will alternate between 5 trees + 3
shrub clusters or 4 trees + 4 shrub clusters throughout the mitigation zone. Any volunteer or
existing native vegetation can be counted towards target densities. To fulfill the above mentioned
planting density recommendation, the Restoration Zone will be planted with 20 trees and 60
shrubs.
Typically, planting should occur during winter dormancy. The optimum time for planting is
during February and March, however, the need to complete the project in a timely manner may
call for planting to occur outside optimum time periods. No machinery earthwork will be
necessary to implement this portion of the enhancement plan; planting holes for specified
vegetation installation will be hand dug. No additional clearing or grading should be necessary
for site enhancement. All installed vegetation shall be marked with colored flagging to facilitate
monitoring inspections. The monitoring program is outlined in Section 7.0 to insure project
effectiveness.
6.3 Best Management Practices
Recommended Best Management Practices for this project are as follows:
• Perform excavation and site preparation work during dry weather.
• Install silt fencing between the work area and the stream to prevent erosion and siltation of
waters(See diagram below).
• Minimize amount of erodible soils at any given time to the maximum extent feasible.
• Check all equipment daily for leaks. Refueling and lubrication of equipment should occur off
site. Do not store any fuel,lubricants,chemicals,or hazardous substances outside overnight
within the project area.
• Do not apply any chemicals when there is a possibility of rain.
• Comply with all permits and requirements of governing authority.
PO Box 2854, Belfair,WA 98528 cell:36o-62o-o618,Office:360-372-2421 e-mail:wetlandcorps@hotmail.com
Parcel 12229-22-00280 TRAP
September 2016
Page 8
4'HIGH
CONSTRUCTION
STEEL POST FENCE
K rf
LO OTT
10 Fr MAX SPACING WITH
WIRE SUPPORT FENCE
6 FT MAX SPACING WITHOUT
WIRE SUPPORT FENCE
FILTER FABRIC
PONDING HT.
/FILTER FSpgEggRIC
STEEL POST / 0 UPSTREAARELY
!!! SIDE OF POST.
RUNOFF
T _
2" MIN.
4"x6"TRENCH
WITH COMPACTED
BACKFlLL
Recommended Silt Fencing
7.0 MONITORING
Monitoring of the site will begin the first fall following project implementation and maintained
on a seasonal basis. The information gathered will provide the following: 1) condition of plant
species within the stream buffer; 2) the use of the site by wildlife species; 3) any disturbance
caused by the project and its effect on the protected zone and associated aquatic habitat; 4) any
occurrence of exotic species within the restoration zone; 5) any corrective measures that may be
deemed necessary to provide desired conditions. This monitoring will be in effect for the
duration of five years. The information gathered will be provided in an annual report and
submitted to the Director of Mason County Department of Community Development.
8.0 SUMMARY
This report proposes a stream buffer reduction to allow for the construction of an SFR occupying
1716 square feet,proposed 125-feet from the type F stream. The existing building to be removed
is located 90-feet from the stream. The stream meets criteria for a Type F stream requiring a
150-foot buffer with additional 15-foot building setback. This buffer encompasses nearly the
entire parcel. Mitigation entails removing the existing SFR and restoring the proposed stream
buffer to improve the function, value, and overall functional width of the riparian corridor, while
allowing development within a portion of the MCRO required 150-foot stream buffer.
PO Box 2854, Belfair,WA 98528 cell:36o-62o-o618,Office:360-372-2421 e-mail:wetlandcorps@hotmail.com
Parcel 12229-22-00280 HMP
September 2016
Page 9
Enhancement/restoration recommendations within the proposed stream buffer entails removing
the existing house and planting native trees and shrubs within a designated Mitigation Area,
which will occupy 2000 square feet. See Figure 2. Site Map for the approximate location of the
Mitigation Area.
Best Management Practices have been identified to avoid, minimize, and mitigate for impacts
associated with the proposed project. No impacts to water quality or stream habitat are predicted.
We trust this information is sufficient for your needs at this time. Thank you for choosing The
Wetland Corps as our environmental consultant. If you have an questions feel free to call.
iP Y Y Y
Respectfully submitted,
Lee Boad
Senior Ecologist
/)4,k&4�
Heather Lane
Staff Wetland&Natural Resource Specialist
PO Box 2854,Belf air,WA 98528 cell:36o-62o-o618,Office:360-372-2421 e-mail:wetlandcorps@hotmail.com
REFERENCES
Audobon WatchList. http;Haudobon2.org/webapp/watchlist/viewSpecies.
Knutson, K.L., and V.L.Nae£ 1997. Management recommendations for
Washington's priority habitats: riparian. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Olympia. 181
pp.
Native Plants for Kitsap County. ftp://kcMpub3.co.kitsgp.wa.us/pw/sw/Native
Policy of Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife and Western Washington
Treaty Tribes Concerning Wild Salmonids. Adopted by Washington Fish and Wildlife
Commission,1997.
Washington State Department of Ecology; William Symington Lake Habitat Analysis. 1998.
PO Box 2854,Belfair,WA 98528 cell:36o-62o-o618,Office:360-372-2421 e-mail:wetlandcorps@hotmaii.com
z IE r y�r o Or !!,!
CO
cv'
:71 Lake
Anderson Y r,
J �
Lji l
E3
,�.A.
)An
nt?E'! DI
Approximate
Site Location
Rd
a,
a
y
°4 Catfish
1:18,056 c>
Lake '� C,ills
3 Content may not reflect Rational Geograph.ic's current reap R
FIGURE 1. SITE VICINITY MAP
Project: Parcel 12229-22-00280 HMP
THE WETLAND CORPS Project Number: TWC 16 0086
Client: Ryan Sharer
Location: Allyn,Wa
Date: 9/2016
s�++ JIIt• •��
, s
rrQ _
WOW
.e.
r L ,
"- t �mot: ~ .� • ��,
Jr
y"
..t
l
1,
Mitigation Area
Circled in Red
FrK
#1,
+ P
LEGEND i
h)E-i3tinc hwr to 6s rmnoecd.
b[pr3posec site of new name
c)taLatior,,of sceptic tank,
D:LoCBtkir ni dra:nfiula. r
E Lo:acn of hell.
F�N' testenn ProFerty I ne,
G)hen-reur pta e`rf line.
H)Western creekfront prnptrey Ina.
q Sc-ithern property line,
I Prop+rty lire lout.(Cornar]
tl Tcs}I shed,(To he rnr e]
4J paad access'Dri.L-Aay'(In orange)
A)Center a°creek.IDark Blue Lint)
'1]Suap hllleld4(Furpk Lmr)
7;Ter-oc-4 h'llad-ltlthr Slue alne)
P)Parking s.
Q)Ife t•glsk er.
FIGURE 2. SITE MAP
Project: Parcel 12229-22-00280 HMP
Project Number: TWC 16 0086
_ Client: Ryan Sharer
THE WETLAND CORPS Location: Allyn,Wa
Date: 9/2016
Pr
E_E1.1IF
JV
i E_Eh•.1IF
. - • � r
Approximate
Parcel Location ` tt� ,
:L,514
US.FFsA and Wildlife Service,Nationat Standards and Support Team.wc,,I..
Figure adapted from the Figure 3. NWI Map
NWI Mapping Website
Section 29 Township 22 North Range 1 West
FIGURE 3. NWI WETLANDS MAP
Project: Parcel 12229-22-00280 HMP
Project Number: TWC 16 0086
THE WETLAND CORPS Client: Ryan Sharer
Location: Allyn, Wa
Date: 9/2016
Mason County,Washington(WA645) y r
Map Map Unit Name Acres Percent '7t 'f x it A i' } 'f ' V-. • r q'
Unit in of AOI j ti tier
Symbol AOI * Ilk
Ab Alderwood gravelly sandy 3.7 23.7/o
loam,8 to 15 percent slopes {
Ac Alderwood gravelly sandy 5.0 32.3% Y k Y << A*
loam,15 to 30 percent ., t �•
Slopes ` ,i'" m � h # � •"���r.
Bd Bellingham silt loam,0 to 3 0.2 1.0%
percent slopes
Ea Edmonds fine sandy loam,0 0.1 0.7°10 ' '► '% ` "5!
to 2 percent slopes
Ed Everett gravelly loamy sand, 2.3 14.7°h "ilk -IVO ,
0 to 5 percent slopes
Jc Juno loamy sand,0 to 3 3.8 24.5°!0
percent slopes
Tn Tidal marsh,0 to 2 percent 0.5 3.1 to , ► y .``•s �
slopes
Totals for A of Intel 15.6 100.0%rea
FIGURE 4. MASON COUNTY SOIL SURVEY
Project: Parcel 12229-22-00280 HMP
Project Number: TWC 16 0086
Client: Ryan Sharer
THE WETLAND CORPS Location: Allyn,Wa
Date: 9/2016
15 Lake Anderson s Puget sounr
�1I
Approximate
Parcel Location
r r
o son I•oat
to o2a (
Esd,HERE,DeLorme,NGA,USGS,NPS
„
Water Bodies
Flats/Gravel Bars
Ice
® Man Made Features
Open Water
�r Wet Area
Streams
Streams
— Type S
— Type F
— T)pe N, Np,Ns
U,unknown
X,non-typed perWAC 222-16
Project: Parcel 12229-22-00280 HMP
Project Number: TWC 16 0086
Client: Ryan Sharer
Location: Allyn,Wa
THE WETLAND CORPS Date: 9/2016