The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutWetland Review for BLD2009-00087 - PLN General - 3/23/2009 DECEIVED USSE« & AssociATFS APR 0 7 2009 WHANds - Udh[E • SEPTic DESigNs MCC D - PLANNING March 23, 2009 Mr. Timothy Bovey -r; 12536 Southeast 70'' Street L��tv( b CI Newcastle, Washington 98056 RE: Wetland review of 7490 East Grapeview Loop Road, Mason County Parcel #122295002040 Dear Mr. Bovey: This letter report discusses the wetland review completed at your request on a 0.27 acre project site located northeast of Shelton, near Allyn in Mason County, Washington. The field review was completed during two site visits, in March of 2009. The purpose of this wetland review was to determine if any wetlands are present on or near the project site which would be regulated by the Mason County Resource Ordinance, Chapter 17.01.070. This review was requested in conjunction with the development of a single family residence on the property. Mason County has determined that wetlands or streams may be present on or near the project site, and may encumber the site with wetlands or wetland buffer. Site analysis was conducted by Mason County beginning in 2002, and continuing through March of 2009. As part of that analysis, a letter dated March 4, 2009,prepared by Mr. Allan Borden, Planner for Mason County, outlines the outstanding items remaining to resolve wetland-related issues on the project. Wetland determinations were made using observable vegetation,hydrology, and soils in accordance with the Corps of Engineers 1987 Wetland Delineation Manual, and the 1997 Washington State Wetlands Delineation Manual. The project site is located in the northeast quarter of Section 29, Township 22 North, Range 1 West, W.M. The project area is made up of one tax parcel, Mason County parcel #122295002040. The project site is roughly a rectangular shaped area located approximately 1 mile south of the town of Allyn. 1414 MCCORkIE Rd SE • OIyMPiA, WAShiNGTON 98501 0 PRONE: (360) 352-1 526 • FAX: (360) 3 52-1 558 Mr.Bovey March 23,2009 Page 2 The project site is bounded by single family residential development on the north and south, and by Grapeview Loop Road on the west. Case Inlet is located to the east of the project site. General land use in the vicinity of the project site is single family residential development,recreational properties, and properties managed for timber production. Access to the site is from Grapeview Loop Road. Existing development on the project site consists of an existing well located in the southwestern portion of the site. The western half of the property has been filled. Topography of the site is generally sloping downward from west to east, although much of the site is relatively flat. There is a very slight downward slope to the east, extending offsite to Case Inlet. Soils on the project site are mapped in the Natural Resource Conservation Service (MRCS) Soil Survey of Mason County Area, Washington as Sinclair shotty loam, 5-15 percent slopes. The Sinclair series is described as moderately well drained. This series is not classified as a hydric soil by the NRCS. Soils across the project site appear to be inconsistent with the NRCS description. While the western half of the site is fill material, soils in the eastern portion are indicative of seasonal saturation. Within these areas, soils are generally IOYR 2/2 or IOYR 3/1 muck or silt loam to at least 16 inches in depth. Redoximorphic features including common distinct 7.5YR 4/6 mottles, as well as oxidized rhizospheres were observed within 12 inches of the soil surface in mineral soils evaluated in this portion of the site. Vegetation in the western half of the site consists of grasses and forbs that have become established on the fill material. Species observed in the eastern portion of the site are indicative of seasonal saturation. Species observed in this area include: red alder, cattail, common horsetail, soft rush,Nootka rose, subarctic ladyfern,and Himalayan blackberry. The area is essentially dominated by forbs and scattered shrubs,with the only trees on the parcel being a cluster of red alder in the southeastern portion of the site. Hydrology or indicators of hydrology within 12 inches of the soil surface was observed across the eastern portion of the site. Indicators of hydrology which were observed included: water stained leaves, and oxidized root zones and iron soft masses in the upper portion of the soil profile. In addition, saturation within 4-6 inches of the soil surface was observed across the eastern half of the site. Hydrology on the site appears to be the result of seepage, sheet flow, and groundwater from offsite to the west. Drainage from this area extends offsite to the east, draining across the tidelands into Case Inlet. As a result of site evaluation,a single wetland area was observed onsite which would be regulated by Mason County. The wetland dominates the eastern half of the site, but does not extend offsite to the north or south, likely due to past filling activities associated with existing residential development on adjacent properties. The wetland is a palustrine emergent persistent seasonally saturated slope system,that would best be rated as a Category III wetland by Mason County. Although it is adjacent to the shoreline of Case . 1 Mr.Bovey March 23,2009 Page 3 Inlet, it is not an estuarine wetland,and the water source is freshwater supplied by groundwater seepage from the sloping areas west of the site. Category III wetlands require an 80 foot buffer from the delineated edge of the wetland, under Mason County Resource Ordinance, Chapter 17.01.070D (based on the proposed high intensity land use). As shown on the attached site plan, the required 80 foot wetland buffer would encumber nearly the entire site with wetland or wetland buffer. To allow reasonable use of the site (development of a single family residence), Mason County will allow reduction of the wetland buffer to facilitate the development of a single family residence on the site. As part of the buffer reduction,the applicant will complete enhancement of the wetland and reduced buffer through vegetation plantings and invasive species removal. Some Himalayan blackberry is present within the wetland area to be enhanced. Individual blackberry plants should be completely grubbed out by hand and removed to prevent spreading or resprouting of blackberry. Soils within the disturbed area are mainly muck or silt loam which will prevent loss of revegetation from drought during the summer dry season. Soils should be well suited to the revegetation work, and do not need to be amended prior to planting. Although the area will naturally revegetate over time, some revegetation of the area is proposed. This will help to accelerate the revegetation of the area, and enhance wetland and shoreline functions. Typical buffer functions include: water quality functions, screening of the shoreline from adjacent land uses, and providing wildlife habitat and connectivity for a variety of species. The proposed buffer restoration plan for this project is to establish additional native shrubs within the onsite wetland area,and establish a narrow buffer on the existing fill material. Water quality functions will be maintained through the establishment of native woody vegetation within the wetland area. This will increase root structure within the wetland,providing for increased infiltration, sediment trapping, and soil formation. Wildlife habitat within the wetland will be enhanced by the establishment of tree and shrub vegetation. Himalayan blackberry within the planting area is also of concern for the establishment of low growing species. The best long term solution to suppress blackberry is through the establishment of a shade canopy. Deciduous species have been selected, and will provide the initial framework for coniferous species to ultimately become established. Plantings proposed are native species, and have been selected based on site conditions(soils,moisture levels,and light), and will provide an initial framework where other native species can become established within wetland area. Mr.Bovey March 23,2009 Page 4 Very few native trees and shrubs are currently present in the planting area, and will be left undisturbed. Plantings will be randomly spread throughout the disturbed area to replicate natural conditions,as shown on the site plan. The proposed area to be planted, as well as the species to be utilized, are shown on the attached planting plan. Proposed species to be used include: red alder,Nootka rose,hard hack, and Sitka willow. These species are all present in the vicinity of the planting area, and are well suited to the site. Plantings will be container plants, and will be obtained from a local source in Western Washington. Planting will be completed during the wetter, colder months (November through March)to assure maximum survival and viability. Due to the relative simplicity of this project,planting and maintenance work can be completed by the property owner of their designee. Existing blackberry,which is present in the proposed revegetation area,will be removed by pulling prior to planting. Invasive species will be controlled by pulling or cutting,using hand tools (machetes, shovels)or hand held power tools (weed wackers). The focus of the maintenance will be to assure maximum survival of plantings. Plantings should become established, and will ultimately suppress invasive species. The main species of concern on this site is Himalayan blackberry. Planted species will be monitored for at least one year following planting. Survival at the end of the first growing season should meet or exceed 80 percent. Volunteer native, woody species which become established within the buffer can be included in this total. If this success standard is not met,measures will be taken to meet this goal (additional plantings,maintenance, and monitoring). Contingency actions that may be necessary should be apparent by the end of the first growing season following planting. Monitoring will be completed by the property or their representative. Monitoring will consist of at least two visits the first year to evaluate the site for plant survival, vigor, and assure that invasive species are being controlled. Vandalism or other damage should also be addressed. Any deficiencies should be noted and reported to Thurston County following the first growing season. I ounty has final authority in determination of wetlands boundaries, categories, ers on this site. Should you have any questions,please feel free to call me at -3607 s&Associates,LLC Attachment: Site map/Planting Plan,Wetland Rating Form Wetland name or number A— WETLAND RATING FORM-WESTERN WASHINGTON Version 2-Updated July 2006 to increase accuracy and reproducibility among users Name of wetland (if known): .�'E,.� lAL ` ' `1. Dat ,of site visit: 1-'�lP-�.Lt ` � Rated by Trained by Ecology? Yes—No— Date of traininaQ'�- SEC: _TWNSHP: RNGE: Is S/T/R in Appendix D? Yes_ No Map of wetland unit: Figure Estimated size SUMMARY OF RATING Category based on FUNCTIONS provided by wetland I II III yC IV Score for Water Quality Functions Ito Category I = Score>=70 Category II = - Score for Hydrologic Functions Cj Category III �S7coree 0- Score for Habitat Functions i Cateaory IV 30 TOTAL score for Functions Category based on SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS of wetland I II Does not Apply Final Category (choose the "highest" category from above) ` I Summary of basic information about the wetland unit Wetland Daiflias Sper"I Wetland G ass Clbaracter s es use f R n Estuarine De ressional Natural Heritage Wetland Riverine Bo I Lake-fringe Mature Forest Slope Old Growth Forest Flats Coastal Lagoon Freshwater Tidal Interdunal None of the above Check if unit has multiple HGM classes present Wetland Rating Form—western Washington 1 August 2004 version 2 Wetland name or number Does the wetland unit being rated meet any of the criteria below? If you answer YES to any of the questions below you will need to protect the wetland according to the regulations regarding the special characteristics found in the wetland. Check List for Wetlands That May Need AAA Tonal P --otection YES NO (in additio SP 1. Has the wetland unit been documented as a habitat for any Federally listed Threatened or Endangered animal or plant species(TIE species)? For the purposes of this rating system, "documented"means the wetland is on the Y, appropriate state or federal database. SP2.Has the wetland unit been documented as habitat for any State listed Threatened or Endangered animal species? For the purposes of this rating system, "documented"means the wetland is on the appropriate state database. Note: Wetlands with State listed plant species are categorized as Category I Natural Heritage Wetlands see p. 19 of data form). SP3. Does the wetland unit contain individuals of Priority species listed by the WDFW for the state? SP4. Does the wetland unit have a local significance in addition to its functions? For example,the wetland has been identified in the Shoreline Master Program,the Critical Areas Ordinance, or in a local management plan as ` having special significance. To complete the next part of the data sheet you will need to determine the Hvdrogeomorphic Class of the wetland beingrated ated. The hydrogeomorphic classification groups wetlands into those that function in similar ways. This simplifies the questions needed to answer how well the wetland functions. The Hydrogeomorphic Class of a wetland can be determined using the key below. See p.24 for more detailed instructions on classifying wetlands. Wetland Rating Form—western Washington 2 August 2004 version 2 Wetland name or number S Ships W--*dd5Q WAn-,R 1<JAL1TY FUNCTIONS IONS = Indicators that the wedand unit functions Io box) - S S 1. Does the wetland unit have the potential to improve water quality? (see p.64) S S 1.1 Characteristics of average slope of unit: Slope is l%or less(a 1%slope has a 1 foot vertical drop in elevation for every 100 ft horizontal distance) points=3 Slope is 1%- 2% potnts-2 Slope is 2%- 5% potnts = 1 Slope is greater than 5% points=0 S S 1.2 The soil 2 inches below the surface (or duff layer)is clay or organic (use NRCS defin' ' _3 S - 3 0i NO=0 points Figure - teristics of the veg etation in the wetland that trap sediments and po llutants: 9 ure S S 1.3 Charac Choose the points appropriate for the description that best fits the vegetation in the wetland. Dense vegetation means you have trouble seeing the soil surface (>75% cover), and uncut means not grazed or mowed and plants are higher than 6 inches. Dense,uncut,herbaceous vegetation>90%of the wetland area points=6 Dense,uncut,herbaceous vegetation> 1/2 of area pm - Dense,woody, vegetation> '/2 of area points=2 Dense, uncut,herbaceous vegetation> 1/4 of area points= l Does not meet any of the criteria above for vegetation points=0 Aerial photo or map with vegetation polygons S Total for S 1 Add the points in the boxes above _ 9 — S S 2. Does the wetland unit have the opportunity to improve water quality? (see p.67) Answer YES if you know or believe there are pollutants in groundwater or surface water coming into the wetland that would otherwise reduce water quality in streams, lakes or groundwater downgradient from the wetland. Note which of the following conditions provide the sources of pollutants. A unit may have pollutants coming from several sources, but any single source would qualify as opportunity. — Grazing in the wetland or within 150ft — Untreated stormwater discharges to wetland — Tilled fields, logging,or orchards within 150 feet of wetland multiplier Residential, urban areas,or golf courses are within 150 ft upslope of wetland — Other YES rkultiplier i 2 NO multiplier is 1 S TOTAL-Water Quality Functions Multiply the score from S 1 by S2 Add score to table on . 1 Comments Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 11 August 2004 version 2 Wetland name or number DWO GIC TUNCTiONS - i cators tharthe wetland unit functions0 verox) riedwte food n .and wram erosion S 3. Does the wetland unit have the potential to reduce flooding and stream (see p.68) erosion? S S 3.1 Characteristics of vegetation that reduce the velocity of surface flows during storms. Choose the points appropriate for the description that best fit conditions in the wetland. (stems of plants should be thick enough (usually> 1/8in), or dense enough, to remain erect during surface flows) Dense, uncut, rigid vegetation covers >90%of the area of the wetland. points=6 Dense, uncut, rigid vegetation> 1/2 area of wetland Jf Dense,uncut, rigid vegetation> 1/4 area points=11 More than 1/4 of area is grazed,mowed, tilled or vegetation is not rigid points=0 S S 3.2 Characteristics of slope wetland that holds back small amounts of flood flows: The slope wetland has small surface depressions that can retain water over at least 10%of its area. YES oints-2 O . Points= S Add the points in the boxes above 1 S S 4. Does the wetland have the onportunity to reduce flooding and erosion? see p. 70) Is the wetland in a landscape position where the reduction in water velocity it provides helps protect downstream property and aquatic resources from flooding or excessive and/or erosive flows? Note which of the following conditions apply. — Wetland has surface runoff that drains to a river or stream that has flooding problems multiplier — Other (Answer NO if the major source of water is controlled by a reservoir(e.g. wetland is a seep that is on the downstream si YES multiplier is 2 NO multiplier is 1 S TOTAL - Hydro ons Multiply the score from S 3 by S 4 3 Add score to table on p. 1 Comments Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 12 August 2004 version 2 L . Wetland name or number 1%ese questions 4Wty io wo4a wf aift 4GHeMsses. tyalow .HABITAT F C"'O S-lndicators wit fractions to provide hnpc+r#a.W Imbita pow) H 1. Does the wetland unit have the potential to provide habitat for many species? H 1.1 Vegetation structure(seep. 72) Figure_ Check the types of vegetation classes present (as defined by Cowardin)-Size threshold for each class is 'V4 acre or more than 10%of the area if unit is smaller than 2.5 acres. Aquatic bed Emergent plants Scrub/shrub(areas where shrubs have>30%cover) Forested(areas where trees have>30%cover) If the unit has a forested class check if The forested class has 3 out of 5 strata(canopy,sub-canopy, shrubs, herbaceous, moss/ground-cover)that each cover 20%within the forested polygon Add the number of vegetation structures that qualify. If you have: 4 structures or more points=4 Map of Cowardin vegetation classes 3 structures points=2 c points= 1 s ruc apoints=0 H 1.2. Hydroperiods(see p. 73) Figure_ Check the types of water regimes (hydroperiods)present within the wetland. The water regime has to cover more than 10%of the wetland or %acre to count. (see text for descriptions of hydroperiods) Permanently flooded or inundated 4 or more types present points=3 Seasonally flooded or inundated 3 t points=2 Occasionally flooded or inundated nt point= 1 �-Saturated only points=0 Permanently flowing stream or river in,or adjacent to,the Seasonally flowing stream in,or adjacent to,the wetland Lake-fringe wetland =2 points Freshwater tidal wetland=2 points Map of hydroperiods H 1.3. Richness of Plant Species(seep. 75) Count the number of plant species in the wetland that cover at least 10 W. (different patches of the same species can be combined to meet the size threshold) You do not have to name the species. Do not include Eurasian Milfoil, reed canarygrass,purple loosestrife, Canadian Thistle If you counted: > l9 species points=2 List species below if you want to: �Iq ie points= 1 s points=0 Total for page 2— Wetland Rating Form—western Washington 13 August 2004 version 2 Wetland name or number H 1.4. IntersQersion of habitats(seep. 76) igure— Decide from the diagrams below whether interspersion between Cowardin vegetation classes(described in H 1.1),or the classes and unvegetated areas(can include open water or mudflats)is high,medium, low,or none. o None=0 Po in Low= l point Moderate=2 points [riparian braided channels] High =3 points NOTE: If you have four or more classes or three vegetation classes and open water the rating is always"high". Use map of Cowardin vegetation classes H 1.5. S12ecial Habitat Features: (seep. 77) Check the habitat features that are present in the wetland. The number of checks is the number of points you put into the next column. Large,downed,woody debris within the wetland(>4in. diameter and 6 ft long). Standing snags(diameter at the bottom>4 inches)in the wetland Undercut banks are present for at least 6.6 ft(2m)and/or overhanging vegetation extends at least 3.3 ft(Im)over a stream(or ditch)in,or contiguous with the unit,for at least 33 ft (10m) Stable steep banks of fine material that might be used by beaver or muskrat for denning (>30degree slope)OR signs of recent beaver activity are present(cut shrubs or trees that have not yet turned grey/brown) At least'/a acre of thin-stemmed persistent vegetation or woody branches are present in areas that are permanently or seasonally inundated(structures for egg-laying by amphibians) Invasive plants cover less than 25%of the wetland area in each stratum of plants NOTE. The 20%stated in early printings of the manual on page 78 is an error. lam__ H 1.TOTAL Score - potential for providing habitat j Add the scores from H1.1, H1.2 H1.3, H1.4, HIS Comments Wetland Rating Form—western Washington 14 August 2004 version 2 Wetland name or number H 2. Does the wetland unit have the opportunity to provide habitat for many species? H 2.1 Buffers (seep. 80) Figure_ Choose the description that best represents condition of buffer of wetland unit. The highest scoring criterion that applies to the wetland is to be used in the rating. See text for definition of "undisturbed." 100 in(330ft)of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas,rocky areas,or open water >95% of circumference. No structures are within the undisturbed part of buffer. (relatively undisturbed also means no-grazing,no landscaping,no daily human use) Points=5 100 in(330 ft)of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas,rocky areas,or open water > 50% circumference. Points=4 — 50 in (170ft)of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas,rocky areas, or open water>95% circumference. Points=4 100 in(330ft)of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas,or open water>25% circumference, . Points=3 — 50 in (170ft)of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas,rocky areas, or open water for> 50%circumference. Points=3 If buffer does not meet any of the criteria above — No paved areas(except paved trails)or buildings within 25 in(80ft) of wetland>95% circumference. Light to moderate grazing, or lawns are OK. Points=2 — No paved areas or buildings within 50m of wetland for>50%circumference. Light to moderate grazing, or lawns are OK. Points=2 — Heavy grazing in buffer. Points= 1 — Vegetated buffers are<2m wide(6.6ft)for more than 95%of the circumference(e.g.tilled fields,paving,basalt bedrock extend to edge of wetland Points=0. — Buffer does not meet any of the criteria above. Points= 1 Aerial photo showing buffers H 2.2 Corridors and Connections(seep. 81) H 2.2.1 Is the wetland part of a relatively undisturbed and unbroken vegetated corridor (either riparian or upland)that is at least 150 ft wide,has at least 30%cover of shrubs, forest or native undisturbed prairie,that connects to estuaries, other wetlands or undisturbed uplands that are at least 250 acres in size? (dams in riparian corridors,heavily used gravel roads,paved roads, are considered breaks in the corridor). YES=4 points (go to H 2.3) NO=go to H 2.2.2 H 2.2.2 Is the wetland part of a relatively undisturbed and unbroken vegetated corridor (either riparian or upland)that is at least 50ft wide,has at least 30%cover of shrubs or forest, and connects to estuaries, other wetlands or undisturbed uplands that are at least 25 acres in size? OR a Lake-fringe wetland, if it does not have an undisturbed corridor as in the question above s o to H 2.3) NO=H 2.2.3 YES r=2 point H 2.2.3 Is the wet within 5 mi(8km)of a brackish or salt water estuary OR within 3 mi of a large field or pasture(>40 acres)OR within 1 mi of a lake greater than 20 acres? .� YES=1 point NO=0 points Total for page Wetland Rating Form—western Washington 15 August 2004 version 2 Wetland name or number H 2.3 Near or adjacent to other priority habitats listed by WDFW(see p.82) Which of the following priority habitats are within 330ft(100m)of the wetland unit?NOTE:the connections do not have to be relatively undisturbed. These are DFW definitions. Check with your local DFW biologist if there are any questions. Riparian: The area adjacent to aquatic systems with flowing water that contains elements of both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems which mutually influence each other. Aspen Stands: Pure or mixed stands of aspen greater than 0.8 ha(2 acres). Cliffs: Greater than 7.6 m(25 ft)high and occurring below 5000 ft. Old-growth forests: (Old-growth west of Cascade crest)Stands of at least 2 tree species, forming a multi-layered canopy with occasional small openings;with at least 20 trees/ha(8 trees/acre)> 81 cm(32 in)dbh or>200 years of age. Mature forests: Stands with average diameters exceeding 53 cm(21 in)dbh; crown cover may be less that 100%;crown cover may be less that 100%;decay,decadence,numbers of snags,and quantity of large downed material is generally less than that found in old- growth; 80-200 years old west of the Cascade crest. Prairies: Relatively undisturbed areas(as indicated by dominance of native plants)where grasses and/or forbs form the natural climax plant community. Talus:Homogenous areas of rock rubble ranging in average size 0.15-2.0 m(0.5 -6.5 ft), composed of basalt,andesite,and/or sedimentary rock,including riprap slides and mine tailings.May be associated with cliffs. Caves: A naturally occurring cavity,recess,void,or system of interconnected passages Oregon white Oak: Woodlands Stands of pure oak or oak/conifer associations where canopy coverage of the oak component of the stand is 25%. Urban Natural Open Space: A priority species resides within or is adjacent to the open space and uses it for breeding and/or regular feeding; and/or the open space functions as a corridor connecting other priority habitats,especially those that would otherwise be isolated;and/or the open space is an isolated remnant of natural habitat larger than 4 ha(10 acres)and is surrounded by urban development. stuary/Estuary-like: Deepwater tidal habitats and adjacent tidal wetlands,usually semi- enclosed by land but with open,partly obstructed or sporadic access to the open ocean,and in which ocean water is at least occasionally diluted by freshwater runoff from the land. The salinity may be periodically increased above that of the open ocean by evaporation. Along some low-energy coastlines there is appreciable dilution of sea water.Estuarine habitat extends upstream and landward to where ocean-derived salts measure less than �' `0.5ppt.during the period of average annual low flow.Includes both estuaries and lagoons. arine/Estuarine Shorelines: Shorelines include the intertidal and subtidal zones of beaches,and may also include the backshore and adjacent components of the terrestrial landscape(e.g.,cliffs,snags,mature trees,dunes,meadows)that are important to shoreline associated fish and wildlife and that contribute to shoreline function(e.g.,sand/rock/log recruitment,nutrient contribution,erosion control). If wetland has 3 or more priority habitats=4 points If wetland has 2 priority habitats= n If wetland has 1 priority habi =�-! a No habitats=0 points Note:All vegetated wetlands are byriority habitat but are not included in this list. Nearby wetlands are addressed in question H 2.4 Wetland Rating Form—western Washington 16 August 2004 version 2 Wetland name or number H 2.4 Wetland Landscape (choose the one description of the landscape around the wetland that best fits) (seep. 84) There are at least 3 other wetlands within ''/2 mile,and the connections between them are relatively undisturbed(light grazing between wetlands OK, as is lake shore with some boating, but connections should NOT be bisected by paved roads,fill,fields, or other development. points=5 The wetland is Lake-fringe on a lake with little disturbance and there are 3 other lake-fringe wetlands within ''/2 mile points =5 There are at least 3 other wetlands within '/2 mile,BUT the connections between them _ disturbed — The wetland is Lake-fringe on a lake with disturbance and there are 3 other lake-fringe wetland within '/2 mile points= 3 There is at least 1 wetland within'/2 mile. points=2 There are no wetlands within '/2 mile. points=0 H 2. TOTAL Score- opportunity for providing habitat ,�C) Add the scores from H2.I,H2.2, H2.3, H2.4 TOTAL for H 1 from page 14 Total Score for Habitat Functions —add the points for H 1, H 2 and record the result on . 1 Wetland Rating Form—western Washington 17 August 2004 version 2 Wetland and Buffer Enhancement Area Planting Schedule �k-'P VAA Species Size Condition Quantity Spacing L3—I%t)b Red alder 2-3' Container or bare root 7 Q 10' on center ^L Nootka rose 2-3' Container or bare root 11 ❑ 10' on center " ' Hard hack 2-3' Container or bare root 11 Q 10' on center Sitka willow 2-3' Container or bare root 10 0 10' on center 1 El { ❑ ' Lit ❑ ® ? 1C . 01 z lof d