Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSPI2010-00081 - SPI Inspections - 11/24/2010 r � oN-STATE MASON COUNTY o Py A o N DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT N Planning Division o v Y P O Box 279, Shelton, WA 98584 (360)427-9670 1864 Site Inspection November 24, 2010 TO BE KEPT IN THE DAYTON MALTBY PARCEL FILE 1701 SUNSET DRIVE TACOMA WA 98465 Case No.: SP12010-00081 ZI goo Parcel No.: 122282100080 Project Description: Determine setback for home construction Dear Applicant: Pursuant to your application, a site pre-inspection (SPI) was performed on your property. Below you will find comments made regarding the proposed development and its critical values. In some cases, setbacks for development from shorelines, steep slopes, streams, and wetlands must be included in your specific proposal; these setbacks are included as part of the comments listed below. This information is based on County and State regulations as they exist to date. These regulations may change and may affect the requirements for development of the subject property. Please contact me at (360) 427-9670, ext. 365 if you have questions. Sincerely, A-V­Z� Allan Borden Land Use Planner Mason County Planning Department 11/24/2010 Page 1 of 4 SP12010-00081 Site Inspection 11/24/2010 Case No.: SP12010-00081 Comments: Pre-inspection for Dayton Maltby on Nov. 3, 2010: The pre-inspection was made to evaluate the proposed new residence on a 0.50 acre parcel located along Case Inlet and State Route 302. The parcel has much of the shrub and tree cover removed on the property and is maintained in lawn. A concrete bulkhead with boat ramp protects along the slightly curved bank and the beach is accessed by inset stairs at the bulkhead. The proposed structure would be located at the proper setbacks based upon this inspection. These findings state regulations in effect at inspection time, unless noted otherwise [NOTE: the Shoreline Setbacks stated below]. Development Regulations standards: _Y_ The site is in Rural Residential 5 zone. Standard building setbacks are 25-foot front yard setback, and 20-foot side property line and rear yard setbacks. These setbacks are measured from structures above grade such as roof overhangs, stairs, balconies, decks, heat pumps, storage buildings, and fuel tanks. _Y_ An exception is made for lots less than 100 feet in width, where side yard setbacks are equal to 10 percent of the lot width, but no less than 5 feet; this property has a 10 ft. side yard setback, depending on proposed building footprint. _Y_ An administrative variance may be requested to reduce these setback distances from property lines, to as low as 5 feet (side yard), if the size, shape, or features of the property constrain development from the proper setbacks. This process requires application and review at the time of the building permit submittal. Shoreline Setback standards- -Y— Shoreline setbacks: The shoreline designation for Case Inlet is Urban Environment per the Mason County Shoreline Master Program and development setbacks would be determined by the Mason County Resource Ordinance. On March 2, 2010, the Washington Legislature passed a law that has determined that the county Resource Ordinance development standards do apply to proposals within 200 feet of the OHWM (shoreline management area). The shoreline setback is typically determined by drawing a line across the subject property from each of the rooflines of adjacent neighboring residences, and measuring the distances from roof projection closest to the shoreline to the ordinary high water mark (OHWM) of the shoreline. Any portion 11/24/2010 Page 2 of 4 SP12010-00081 w Site Inspection 11/24/2010 Case No.: SP12010-00081 of the new structure, including decks, balconies, and rooflines, must be behind this common line. Shoreward of this common line for 15 feet toward the shoreline is an area that may be used for lawns, patios or landscaping (development at grade level). From that point toward the shoreline is considered to be a required vegetated buffer that must remain and is regulated by the Mason County Resource Ordinance Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas Chapter. Within this chapter are those activities listed that can be done both with and without a Mason Environmental Permit; proposed tree limbing and limited cutting of trees in the buffer for view improvement are reviewed by the area permit planner prior to starting these type of activities. The applicant requested the inspection to assure what setbacks from the shoreline and side property lines would apply in the proposal for a new residence. Staff and the applicant located the measuring tape along this diagonal site line from the roof eave of the residence to the south (whose deck cover is 29 feet from their bulkhead) to the roof eave of the residence to the north (that is 92 feet from the north end of their bulkhead). The ends of the line were marked with red survey tape on stakes along the subject property lines. Staff measured the setback of this common line at the north end of the parcel (the side where the shoreline side of lot 00060 is situated) as 83 feet 7 inches from the top of the concrete bulkhead. Staff measured the setback of this common line at the south end of the parcel (the side where the shoreline side of lot 01001 is situated) as 42 feet 2 inches from the corner of the concrete bulkhead to the south. A proposed new residence would need to be located behind this view line; the 15-foot building setback needed is situated along this common line and is within the shoreline distance from the top the bulkhead on the property. Your drawing (received on Nov. 15, 2010) showing these distances is included with these findings. Two precautions for site development on this property should be noted: 1) that the siting of new buildings and structures shall be located so that further shoreline protection measures are not needed in the future; and 2) a setback determination may change if the adjacent property owners submit applications and are granted permits for new or remodeled residences established at proper shoreline setbacks. Other Resource Ordinance Standards: 11/24/2010 Page 3 of 4 SP12010-00081 . w Site Inspection 11/24/2010 Case No.: SP12010-00081 _N_ Wetland critical area: Planning staff confirmed that the parcel does not contain certain wetlands, which are regulated under Mason County's Wetlands chapter 17.01.070 of the Mason County Resource Ordinance. The observed vegetation is associated with the shoreline area; so the applicant will not need a wetlands special report during development review. _N Stream setbacks: No seasonal or perennial drainage flows through the subject property. The proposed development is greater than 200 feet from the any stream management area covered by the standards of this critical area. _N_ Slope or Landslide hazards: Slopes that are less than 15 percent are observed within 300 feet of a proposed project on the property. For the present proposal, no geologic study will be needed to review the proposal. You would need to confirm with the Environmental Health Department what their septic system standards are to make sure about the adequacy of supplying a septic disposal for the proposed development. General process: Future development must include a site plan, showing setbacks from property lines, shoreline, driveway, road, and existing and proposed improvements; this site plan will be needed for building permit application submittal and review. Specific County Codes standards for future development may be found at the County website address http-//www.co.mason.wa.us. If you have any questions please feel free to call. Thank you. 11/24/2010 Page 4 of 4 SP12010-00081 STATFo MASON COUNTY o P A o 4- DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT F o N Z Planning Division 7 N y ti P O Box 279, Shelton, WA 98584 (360)427-9670 1864 Site Inspection December 01, 2010 DAYTON MALTBY 1701 SUNSET DRIVE TO BE KEPT IN TIC TACOMA WA 98465 P Case No.: SP12010-00081 Parcel No.: 122282100080 Project Description: Determine setback for home construction Dear Applicant: Pursuant to your application, a site pre-inspection (SPI) was performed on your property. Below you will find comments made regarding the proposed development and its critical values. In some cases, setbacks for development from shorelines, steep slopes, streams, and wetlands must be included in your specific proposal; these setbacks are included as part of the comments listed below. This information is based on County and State regulations as they exist to date. These regulations may change and may affect the requirements for development of the subject property. Please contact me at (360) 427-9670, ext. 365 if you have questions. Sincerely, `Allan Borden Land Use Planner Mason County Planning Department 12/1/2010 Page 1 of 3 SP12010-00081 Site Inspection 12/1/2010 Case No.: SP12010-00081 Comments: Additional information for Dayton Maltby on December 1, 2010: The Nov. 3, 2010 pre-inspection was made to evaluate the proposed new residence on a 0.50 acre parcel located along Case Inlet and State Route 302. You asked for further clarification of the findings sent to you on Nov. 24, 2010: Shoreline Setback standards: _Y_ Shoreline setbacks: The shoreline designation for Case Inlet is Urban Environment per the Mason County Shoreline Master Program and development setbacks would be determined by the Mason County Resource Ordinance. On March 2, 2010, the Washington Legislature passed a law that has determined that the county Resource Ordinance development standards do apply to proposals within 200 feet of the OHWM (shoreline management area). The shoreline setback is typically determined by drawing a line across the subject property from each of the rooflines of adjacent neighboring residences, and measuring the distances from roof projection closest to the shoreline to the ordinary high water mark (OHWM) of the shoreline. Any portion of the new structure, including elevated decks, balconies, and rooflines, must be behind this common line. Shoreward of this common line for 15 feet toward the shoreline is an area that may be used for lawns, patios or landscaping (development at grade level), and for decks no higher than 30 inches above grade. From that point toward the shoreline is considered to be a required vegetated buffer that must remain and is regulated by the Mason County Resource Ordinance Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas Chapter. Within this chapter are those activities listed that can be done both with and without a Mason Environmental Permit; proposed tree limbing and limited cutting of trees in the buffer for view improvement are reviewed by the area permit planner prior to starting these type of activities. The subject property already has a lawn area established in this vegetation buffer from the bulkhead back to where a residence would be proposed; maintenance of this lawn area is allowed within the Resource Ordinance standards. The applicant requested the inspection to assure what setbacks from the shoreline and side property lines would apply in the proposal for a new residence. Staff and the applicant located the measuring tape along this diagonal site line from the roof eave of the residence to the south (whose deck cover is 29 feet from their bulkhead) to the roof eave of the residence to the north (that is 92 12/1/2010 Page 2 of 3 SP12010-00081 Site Inspection 12/1/2010 Case No.: SP12010-00081 feet from the north end of their bulkhead). The ends of the line were marked with red survey tape on stakes along the subject property lines. Staff measured the setback of this common line at the north end of the parcel (the side where the shoreline side of lot 00060 is situated) as 83 feet 7 inches from the top of the concrete bulkhead. Staff measured the setback of this common line at the south end of the parcel (the side where the shoreline side of lot 01001 is situated) as 42 feet 2 inches from the corner of the concrete bulkhead to the south. A proposed new residence would need to be located behind this view line; the 15-foot building setback needed is situated along this common line and is within the shoreline distance from the top the bulkhead on the property. Your drawing (received on Nov. 15, 2010) showing these distances is included with these findings. Two precautions for site development on this property should be noted: 1) that the siting of new buildings and structures shall be located so that further shoreline protection measures are not needed in the future; and 2) a setback determination may change if the adjacent property owners submit applications and are granted permits for new or remodeled residences established at proper shoreline setbacks. You would need to confirm with the Environmental Health Department and with the Utilities and Waste Management Department what the sewer system standards are to make sure about the adequacy of supplying proper sewer disposal for the proposed development. General process: Future development must include a site plan, showing setbacks from property lines, shoreline, driveway, road, and existing and proposed improvements; this site plan will be needed for building permit application submittal and review. Specific County Codes standards for future development may be found at the County website address http-//www.co.mason.wa.us. If you have any questions please feel free to call. Thank you. 12/1/2010 Page 3 of 3 SP12010-00081 NORTH PROPERTY LINE . PROPOSED CONCRETE BULKHEAD Q OWNER: DAYTON MALTBY @ 4540 E i� SR 302 STAIRS /76 �.vC,.eE55 nn� EG.QasS Ola/�y) O 8' \ ti �l7 ( � WELL L� MHHTper$/ C3 S .� F,oG.� p��w 4 � v LLJ _Z W � yD. N SLOPED RAMP SCALE: V'=20' wv ADJACENT CONCRETE BULKHEAD OWNER: VERNON HAUGE cY / n IA l/"v �ti P1 AL-F ,8 °/ B UI1_ DIIVG Si �--E- RECENED -- � -2--1 00080 r NOV 16 2010 ---���� ���" l � � �-._ __ -- y o STRTEo v z 3 d 2 MCCD - PLANNING BEL. I=AJR I - p6F- rntPi ROPOS D l -� F VIA Lit I l `b MASON COUNTY PLANNING DEPT. PRE—INSPECTION APPLICATION PLEASE PRINT $255.00 Fee Required 1. Owner: A'/7-7/,/ q,L-73 V Applicant: ]�:01/7-a1v M ,q c .lam �/ Site Address: Lz/Seio .54 3u z y1c-7V4) Applicant Address: /7o i 5uy5tF 7 Owner Address: /7 o i S o vs e i i-)1:2 City: St"-A Zip 98y6 S— City: St "/A Zip 9Ff�/GSr Phone: 53 _ 6-6 S' - 7-/0 1 day Phone: -74/0 1 day c- �'_ e ZS'7 : / Phone ) evening Planner: "�_n+ b p Email Address: Co /t:Te/J 57'/c /4z SMP Comp.Plan Type of Use /S/'VTm ff/� c o Water Body. �-1/ 2. Parcel No. /,2 2 Z 8 - �7_ 1 - G o 0 9 0 Parcel No. - - Legal Description: T R S o f C 0 y> ,<.% / E X w o i' /-/ u-y ,3 0 3. Purpose of Pre-Inspection: D g7 z r•, • ,,e SET 13/W_-i1 s 4. Use of building: /yv E (L i v, 5. Do any of the following exist on or adjacent to property?: slope( ) saltwater o() lake ) river pond( ) wetland ) seasonal runoff( ) other ) stream( ) seasonal creek( ) Directions to Site: �I -YU 5 O (//C76/Z oS. 'V4 L.L/=N a If the information is incomplete, then Mason County must disclaim any errors resulting from deficiencies in the original application. Pre-inspection reports remain valid only until development changes occur in the vicinity which affect the lot evaluated in this inspection,or the laws regulating development of the site change after the time of inspection. Applicant Signature: �l Date: If you would like to be on site during inspection,please check here: Return application to: Department of Community Development,Planning Division P.O.Box 186 Shelton,WA 98584 (360)427-9670 Please include a$255 .00 check or money order payable to Mason County Treasurer When completed,this form becomes part of the parcel file. FOR OFFICE USE ONLY:Accepted by: I fno Datelto - iG=i o MORE ON BACK SIDE Revised: 12/30/08 1/9/2018 Case Activity Listing 2:15:44PM Case #: SP12010-00081 PLANNWG P14 Parcel #: 122282100080 1�!1�!L�I Description: Determine setback for home construction Assigned Done Activity Description Date 1 Date 2 Date 3 Hold Disp To By IJpdated Updated By SPIA600 SPI Letter-Field Review 1 1/24/2010 None DONL' AHB 1 1/24/2010 A1111 Pre-inspection for Dayton Maltby on Nov.3,2010: The pre-inspection was made to evaluate the proposed new residence on a 0.50 acre parcel located along Case Inlet and State Route 302. The parcel has much of the shrub and tree cover removed on the property and is maintained in lawn. A concrete bulkhead with boat ramp protects along the slightly curved bank and the beach is accessed by inset stairs at the bulkhead. The proposed structure would be located at the proper setbacks based upon this inspection. These findings state regulations in effect at inspection time,unless noted otherwise[NOTE:the Shoreline Setbacks stated below]. Development Regulations standards: _Y_ The site is in Rural Residential 5 zone. Standard building setbacks are 25-foot front yard setback,and 20-foot side property line and rear yard setbacks. These setbacks are measured from structures above grade such as roof overhangs,stairs,balconies,decks,heat pumps,storage buildings,and fuel tanks. _Y_ An exception is made for lots less than 100 feet in width,where side yard setbacks are equal to 10 percent of the lot width,but no less than 5 feet;this property has a 10 ft.side yard setback,depending on proposed building footprint. _Y_ An administrative variance may be requested to reduce these setback distances from property lines,to as low as 5 feet(side yard),if the size,shape,or features of the property constrain development from the proper setbacks. This process requires application and review at the time of the building permit submittal. Shoreline Setback standards: _Y_Shoreline setbacks: The shoreline designation for Case Inlet is Urban Environment per the Mason County Shoreline Master Program and development setbacks would be determined by the Mason County Resource Ordinance. On March 2,2010,the Washington Legislature passed a law that has determined that the county Resource Ordinance development standards do apply to proposals within 200 feet of the OHWM(shoreline management area). The shoreline setback is typically determined by drawing a line across the subject property from each of the rooflines of adjacent neighboring residences,and measuring the distances from roof projection closest to the shoreline to the ordinary high water mark(OHWM)of the shoreline. Any portion of the new structure,including decks,balconies,and rooflines, must be behind this common line. Shoreward of this common line for 15 feet toward the shoreline is an area that may be used for lawns,patios or landscaping(development at grade level). From that point toward the shoreline is considered to be a required vegetated buffer that must remain and is regulated by the Mason County Resource Ordinance Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas Chapter. Within this chapter are those activities listed that can be done both with and without a Mason Environmental Permit;proposed tree limbing and limited cutting of trees in the buffer for view improvement are reviewed by the area permit planner prior to starting these type of activities. The applicant requested the inspection to assure what setbacks from the shoreline and side property lines would apply in the proposal for a new residence. Staff and the applicant located the measuring tape along this diagonal site line from the roof eave of thelresidence to the south(whose deck cover is 29 feet from their bulkhead)to the roof eave of the residence to the north(that is 92 feet from the north endbf their bulkhead).The ends of the line were marked with red survey tape on stakes along the subject property lines. Staff measured the setback of this common line at the north end of the parcel(the side where the shoreline side of lot 00060 is situated)as 83 feet 7 inches from the top of the concrete bulkhead. Staff measured the setback of this common line at the south end of the parcel(the side where the shoreline side of lot 01001 is situated)as 42 feet 2 inches from the corner of the concrete bulkhead to the south. A proposed new residence would need to be located behind this view line;the 15-foot building setback needed is situated along this common line and is within the shoreline distance from the top the bulkhead on the property. Your drawing(received on Nov. 15,2010)showing these distances is included with these findings. Two precautions for site development on this property should be noted: 1)that the siting of new buildings and structures shall be located so that further shoreline protection measures are not needed in the future;and Page 2 of 4 CneActivity..rpt 1/9/2018 Case Activity Listing 2:15:44PM Case #: SPI2010-00081 �� Parcel#: 122282100080 Description: Determine setback for home construction Assigned Done Activity Description Date 1 Date 2 Date 3 Hold Disp To By Updated Updated By 2)a setback determination may change if the adjacent property owners submit applications and are granted permits for new or remodeled residences established at proper shoreline setbacks. Other Resource Ordinance Standards: _N Wetland critical area: Planning staff confirmed that the parcel does not contain certain wetlands,which are regulated under Mason County's Wetlands chapter 17.01.070 of the Mason County Resource Ordinance. The observed vegetation is associated with the shoreline area;so the applicant will not need a wetlands special report during development review. _N_ Stream setbacks: No seasonal or perennial drainage flows through the subject property. The proposed development is greater than 200 feet from the any stream management area covered by the standards of this critical area. N_ Slope or Landslide hazards: Slopes that are less than 15 percent are observed within 300 feet of a proposed project on the property. For the present proposal,no geologic study will be needed to review the proposal. You would need to confirm with the Environmental Health Department what their septic system standards are to make sure about the adequacy of supplying a septic disposal for the proposed development. General process: Future development must include a site plan,showing setbacks from property lines,shoreline,driveway,road,and existing and proposed improvements;this site plan will be needed for building permit application submittal and review. Specific County Codes standards for future development may be found at the County website address http://www.co.mason.wa.us. If you have any questions please feel free to call. Thank you. Page 3 of 4 CaseActivity..rpt 122282190043 122282100040 122282100040 122282190042 ��� y io m 122282100051 ALML G1 m 0 N 122282100070 122280060000 T22 RI 28 ri doom 122282100060 '" _' 122282100081 T22N R1 W 1222s21 000so a w . ;' :, 122285002902 y '6 122285001002 - ° - .. 122282180298 122282180294 12228500So��ce: Esri, +igial e, rth t rGeographic ,room irbus DS. USDA, USGS, ero and the M Lbw Co unity alp. l�l /Jaw.. �6r S