Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
SHR2002-00013 Hearing - SHR Letters / Memos - 7/23/2002
Mason County Board of County Commissioners Public Hearing — July 23, 2002 Findings of Fact Alderbrook Inn Shoreline Substantial Development Permit No. SHR2002-00013 I. This is a proposal to extend existing 6in HDPE plastic sewer outfall pipe an additional 1500 linear feet into Hood Canal. Existing outfall ends 1150 ft waterward of the bulkhead in front of Alderbrook Inn, and discharges into approx 60ft of water. The pipe will lie on the canal bed. The new terminus will be in approximately 155ft depth of water (new total length of outfall pipe 2650ft). . II. A Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance was issued on June 13, 2002. The comment period ended on June 28, 2002. One comment was received from Washington State Department of Health. HI. The proposal will require Hydraulic Project Approval from Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife, US Army Corps of Engineers approval, Washington State Department of Ecology Water Quality concurrence, and review by the Washington State Department of Health. IV. This proposal requires a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit due to the cost exceeding $5,000 per Section 7.13.010 and state law. V. The project conforms to the Shoreline Master Program bulk, dimensional and performance standards. FROM THE PRECEDING FACTS, this project is consistent with the Mason County Shoreline Master Program Chapter 7.16A70, 7.16.020 and 7.24.010. The Board approves the permit, subject to the following conditions: Conditions for SBR2002-00013 2. Prior to construction, applicant shall obtain all necessary federal, state and local permits for this project. 5. Debris or deleterious material resulting from construction shall be removed from the beach area and project site and shall not be allowed to enter waters of the state. 6. Water quality is not to be degraded to the detriment of the aquatic environment as a result of this project. 6 7. Applicant shall work directly with Washington State Department of Health to ensure that the specific siting of the extended outfall terminus meets their location requirements relative to the new 300 yard closure zone proposed by them. At minimum this may mean moving the terminus slightly east, as necessary to ensure a minimum distance of 300 yards from the minus 70ft depth contour. 2 3- C72 Chair U Date (Mason County Board of County Commissioners public hearing July 23, 2002- SHR2002-00013) 7 " MASON COUNTY r r— DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMEN"1' ��,61�C/,y Gti�S Courthouse Annex P.O. Box 279, Shelton, WA 98584 f, / (360)427-9670 THE SHORELINE PERMIT APPLICATION PERMIT NO. SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT _ a f SHORELINE VARIANCE DATE RECEIVED SHORELINE CONDITIONAL USE The Washington State Shoreline Management Act(RCW 90.58)requires that substantial developments within designated shorelines of the state comply with its administrative procedures(WAC 173-14)and the provisions of the Mason County Shoreline Management Master Program. The purpose of this Act and local program is to protect the state's shoreline resources.'The program requires that substantial development(any development of which the total cost or fair market value exceeds$2,500 or materially interferes with the normal public use of the water or shorelines of the State)be reviewed with the goals, policies, and performance standards established in the Master Program. Answer all questions completely. Attach any additional information that may further describe the proposed development. Incomplete applications will b'e/returned. / /J n '' ? APPLICANT: �fJY� r/Qft Ale- ADDRESS: OIL /�il�flGt/l1y/ �OC/J (Street) (City) (State) (Zip) TELEPHONE: (Home):—A' 7-6/yam (Business): AUTHORIZED �� � REPRESENTATIVE: /Vc7�`1WAI ..&� &Z' ADDRESS: /S9_3 (Street) (City) (State) (Zip) TELEPHONE: (Home): 5/,i7-6/y7 (Business): 9.7A--6693 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION General Location(include property address, water body and associated wetlands--identify the name of the shoreline): f�/l/��brtr� LAW E 7d90 /�/.i�/,LJ4u /06 C/aiya, !r/os/ �is'S5'� ��DO� Alll Legal Description(include section, township,and range to the nearest quarter, quarter section or latitude and longitude to the nearest minute. Projects located in open water areas away from land shall provide a longitude location): Include all parcel numbers. S.k1 'A ��J`;an 3-3T tti a .2 ��..K 3 � Sw.�y de�cJi 7' /G-// tx A161/As OWNERSHIP Applicant Cwner ./ Lessee Purchaser (Identify)_Other Owner: 41derirdaIC 114 k-pe 106 (Street) (City) (State) (Zip' (Revised 8/99) .eline Permit Application DEVELOPMENT DESCRIPTION Development(identify and describe the proposed project, including the type of materials to be used, construction methods, principal dimensions,and other pertinent information): 0,01 �t a Lea , i Use(identify current use of property with existing improvements: Reason for requesting development: `-P ���. . ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I hereby declare, to the best of my knowledge and belief,the foregoing information and all attached information is true and correct. (Applicant or Authorized Representative) r `� (Date) TO BE COMPLETED BY LOCAL OFFICIAL _ ______ Identify and describe existing features of the site and surrounding area. If proposed structures will exceed a height of 35 feet above the existing grade level, indicate the location of any residential units that will have an obstructed view. If a Conditional Use or Variance is requested, make reference to the appropriate section in the Master Program. (Revised 1/95) MASON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Planning Mason County Bldg. 1 411 N.5th P.O.Box 279 Shelton,WA 98584 (360) 427-9670 Belfair (360) 275-4467 Elma (360) 482-5269 Seattle (206) 464-6968 July 23, 2002 TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Planning Staff—Pam Bennett-Cumming RE: Shoreline Substantial Development Permit no. SHR2002-00013 STAFF REPORT I Introduction. This report evaluates an existing sewer outfall extension located adjacent to the south shore of the Hood Canal. H Applicant. The applicant is Alderbrook Inn/Resort. Their representative is Nathan Stout. III. Property location. 7101 E Highway 106, located just east of the Union Post Office. Portion of the southwest quarter of Section 33, Township 22 North, Range 3 West, W.M. IV. Project Description. Alderbrook Inn proposal to extend existing 61n HDPE plastic sewer outfall pipe an additional 1500 linear feet into Hood Canal. Existing outfall ends 1150 ft waterward of the bulkhead in front of Alderbrook Inn, and discharges into approx 60ft of water. The pipe will lie on the canal bed. The new terminus will be in approximately 155ft depth of water(new total length of outfall pipe 2650ft). Purpose of extension is to convey treated wastewater into deeper water, thereby potentially opening up the existing shellfish beds for possibility of commercial harvest. V. Evaluations. A. Characteristics of the site: The upland shoreline site is located on the south shore of Hood Canal, between the shoreline and State Highway 106. The site is developed as an inn/resort, the grounds are landscaped. A stream flows through the center of the developed area. The actual sewage treatment plant is located on the landward side of Highway 106. The existing outfall pipe exits the upland at the easterly side of the site, and extends directly waterward to an approximate depth of 60ft. B. Characteristics of the area. The area adjacent to the Alderbrook site is mainly single family residences, some lots have existing bulkheads. Some lots in the general area have floating docks, or piers, ramps and/or floats (see photographs). 1 Dalby Creek lies to the west. The sloping upland on the southern side of Highway 106 is mainly forested. C. Shoreline designation. The shoreline designation for the upland and to 10 fathoms in depth is Urban Commercial. Beyond 10 fathoms the shoreline designation is Natural. Hood Canal shoreline is a Shoreline of Statewide Significance. D. Mason County Development Regulations. The upland land use designation is Rural Tourism. VI. SEPA Compliance. A Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance was issued on June 13, 2002. The comment period ended on June 28, 2002. One comment was received from Department of Health regarding the location of the outfall outlet location (letter attached). The applicant has indicated that the provisions noted by Department of Health will be utilized in the siting of the outfall outlet. VU. Other Comments. To date no other comments have been received. V 1H. Other Permits. The proposal will require Hydraulic Project Approval from Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife, US Army Corps of Engineers approval, Washington State Department of Ecology Water Quality concurrence, and review by the Washington State Department of Health. IX. Analysis: The proposed extension requires a Substantial Development Permit because the value is greater than $5 000. Utilities Chapter 7.16.090 applies to this type of development. Because Hood P PP YP P Canal is a Shoreline of Statewide Significance, portions of Environment Designations chapter 7.24.010 of the Mason County Shoreline Master Program guide in the review of this chapter. Utilities Chapter 7.24.010 provisions only calls out upland projects in its references, however the policies and use regulations address the need to minimize both environmental and view impact by locating projects with those issues in mind and restoring disturbed areas. It is clear the spirit of the chapter is that these issues be considered wherever the project is located. Environment Designations Chapter, Section 7.24.010 Shorelines of Statewide Significance includes the following provisions that are applicable in review of this project: 1. Recognize and protect the statewide interest over local interest; 2. Preserve the natural character of the shoreline; 3. Result in long term over short term benefit; 4. Protect the resources and ecology of the shoreline; 2 Sewer Outfall Analysis: To ensure as little disturbance as possible to the marine substrate and the environment in which the pipe will be located, assembly of the 40ft sewer pipe sections will happen out of the water. Butt fusion welds are used to ensure secure connections of the pipe sections. Concrete anchors are attached every 30ft to weight and ensure stability of the finished installation. Air flotation bags hold up the entire assembly until submergence. As the pipe is assembled the unit will be fed off the site's dock with the assistance of a small powerboat, and maneuvered into position. The pipe will be slowly and systematically submerged by deflating the flotation beginning at the landward end, which will then be connected to the existing outfall. Divers will complete this connection work by hand. As the air is let out of the bags in series, the balance of the new pipe will slowly sink to its final location on the bed of the canal. The process will ensure as little disturbance as possible to the natural environment including the marine substrate. The applicant indicates "the project is being proposed to convey treated wastewater into deeper water, thereby opening up some existing shellfish beds for commercial harvest." Currently the area within 400 meters of the existing outfall terminus is a Department of Health shellfish closure zone. It is anticipated that future recertification of some of these beds may be possible, based on Department of Health review and provisions. The new Department of Health closure zone is proposed at 300 yards from the new outfall (at minus 155ft water depth). The applicant will be working with the Department to ensure the new outfall is located to be more than 300 yards from the minus 70ft depth contour, which is the outer limit of geoduck harvest. Based on review of the materials submitted, the proposal appears consistent with the intent of the Utilities Chapter, and meets the applicable provisions of Shorelines of Statewide Significance Section 7.24.010. IX. Conclusions. A Substantial Development Permit is required based on the value of the proposal which exceeds $5,000. Following the above analysis, this proposal as designed appears consistent with the Shoreline Management Act and applicable Mason County Shoreline Master Program policies and use regulations. Staff recommends approval of the proposal subject to the following conditions: Conditions for SHR2002-00013 l. Prior to construction, applicant shall obtain all necessary federal, state and local permits for this project. 2. Debris or deleterious material resulting from construction shall be removed from the beach area and project site and shall not be allowed to enter waters of the state. 3. Water quality is not to be degraded to the detriment of the aquatic environment as a result of this project. 4. Applicant shall work directly with Washington State Department of Health to ensure that the specific siting of the extended outfall terminus meets their location requirements 3 relative to the new 300 yard closure zone proposed by them. At minimum this may mean moving the terminus slightly east as necessary to ensure a minimum distance of 300 yards from the 70ft depth contour. X. Choices of Action. 1. Conditionally approve the SDP request. 2. Deny the SDP request. 3. Postpone decision pending further information. 4 V1 cjm-F l� 33 T 2.Z 12 3v�! -34 77 35 _36 �3 +- -- 2 i 4 3 2- 8 9 10 (� 9Qo �i 1Haodsport:�.::: :: 7�' 15 14 18 17 16 15 2 14 13 m - 1 22 23 - 19 20 21 22 I 30 .29 28 27 =: 110ri::=..:: :::::::::::: . .. . . . . 36 31 -32 34 1 6 �.:.•�:':::--:::.:_:.::�• MANZANITA DR. 3 2 B I'�SO, i � - I � Lek, S OKOMIS INDIAN 7 9 10 11 12 9 � v� 1 O N / SO RES>CRVA ASP 0 i 1 Shumocher—Cheek s Q D. ` �r Q� 18 G� 17 16 15 14 13 17 f6 DOFF Rp. goy � S�N�PK QJ 1 .?3 P 19 20 21 I - t 23 24 19 2 22 .24 20 Lake Umerick k 26 25 30 28 8 27 OCKDALE 30 ra � ' 9� ,soh Cnberry Leke 3. 34 31 �r _36 3 �� T!�p"t,,t, I UIie 41`iorS /0 S��e,' ?=S iS:y/,4(a� l� 4/ eml ♦7` iS 4/J�/off, /� /�>i�S Jr �9/�/�i�/�.� -�/I� . Optb .o ' $-(ATE HIGHWAY 10 JC o ���` a11tes1 YJ� O CONFERENCE m CENTER x ESQ zw ALDERBROOK I COTTAGES LJ sw;�.�.,.y PSI Zo Chris G,,I e H; 7r�slee I to Pro eriy I:,e ~\ P"pC01 I;Ae v FLOATING WALKWAY AND --� VESSEL MOORAGE DOCK &nerete 0-Overt &jt9' kT3 4t be,-A 4-or CaTch b45i-13 ;K Ix.A%n 167` 4 fel-0. loct7;�1 of ex;St;, outs I I EASTING LOW TIDE LINE HOOD CANALI I FLOATING WALKWAY p� VESSEL MOORAGE DOCK \ 1150 I S.0. %y of Sic. 33 !J 74x 1-cc/ a 31.233 So 000/Y 5,YC 4dll?s5.' E. 7090 N.y/, y, I Cli�in� alas/,. FILE. 20700102 Joe: 21-2070-01 - N Figure 1: Site Plan 0 100 200 Alderbrook Inn Marina SCALE IN FEET i �-� BEFa(2,WA . o i EXPS O \ OUTFAL_ \ I-OcA-n O N VlflopE <-60'T. I = i APPO)cfftA-t-L-- ou-T-PAu 50� tD " PuoPos m L E-pBk6orc rNN o►�ws�2 -��.Q \ MAIN I-oD6G 'BLDrP, Y �s-nAlC, WASTMOA-R--R. t r . -TRffk-r-lOJT OLA�/y- We t ❑ r 1 1 •• -TO UulOKl !' }bomPo�2T " 1?—MILE5 nn N'vld i o,ti �:a s 147 `7l.:-I0 ro�zrbd� yoJ / 5-41 off dJ�d r � Q z.S.'�oQ ^�ofsMddX.'a 11S•.L� �iF drQ,, cS�l3 r1 iu.s °J► � `d ems- —...... - -- --- ,o� pas -� - � N J t> ,4doH „� �-zoo� 77-0C3:lcyQ' r MY-7d rorcN-;UX-w -r7Vi-Lno - _ .1?J Oj 'A;;,SCrj 10 -10 --Ibnscrt,� 4jNv.S%1,;;r aL (wo1�1X_� ►'�brd.L�o ad0�1 „� do nrot1�3 rvro� TJo d Z-��b 3as nl ---- - — -- --- - _ —- ----— 'r o -?did z -Wwt -X :--4� oy -r ,7--irv6ce���N/ / 9t$C1� -yLP4/ 'i'4tta2l.�1t1., a 1{s'21s3�C �o,s�� 1elr�tt R-41 --N/Or W 9 gdld W 04 r �82�cv�-+� arr� c�-ct�►_-►0�7 , �?lod „Z iu�M zP���rQ �\ 1 c?v--4 3O-Prvv-T:1 aN-'4 Aoy J I V I -- v Alderbrook Inn ;z Treated Wastewater Outfall Extension WW Contract Documents 'Z Z` Mason County, Section 33, T 22 N, R 3 W, W.M. ,Z NPDES Permit No. WA-003775-3 O BELFAIR, WA IW W= S MILES k ss; mq EXISTING OUTFALL S fi LOCATION 6" HOPE Drawing Index CID G-1 Title Sheet,Vicinity Map C-1 Existing Outfall,Plan&Profile �"'----- ---~� — APPROXIMATE OUTFALL ROUTE BURIED 1 C-2 Outfall Extension,Plan&Profile it C-3 Details DOCK ALDERBROOK INN MAIN LODGE BUILDING D�oO EXISTING WASTEWATER Notes n TREATMENT PLANT 1. Extend existing 6"diameter outfall pipe from existing end NOTE' ❑ 0 0 OUTFALL FROM BULKHEAD of diffuser 1,500 lineal feet to a new diffuser at approximately — — 5 1,150 LF OF EXISTING OUTFALL. STATE iY -142 below Mean Lower Low Water,complete with anchors HIGHWAY 106 1,500 LF OUTFACE EXTENSION �o and diffusers,as shown hereon. THIS CONTRACT. 0� � 2. Pipe shall have flange connection welded to each end. d' i 3. All plates,backing rings,bolts,fasteners,expansion bolts, o nuts,washers,etc.,shall be type 316 stainless steel. I 4. Backing rings shall be used on both sides of flanges. o L c 0 to Owner 0o000 10 d South Forty Utilities �� C Alderbrook Inn Y East 7090 Highway 106 TO UNION p 2.5 MILES, G Union,Washington 98592 HOOOSPORT 6 O 12 MILES O m a� Alderbrook Inn Outfall Repair Vicinity Map G p,RD S \/ Z q-ad L Z Z i Z F y>>I� }} W 1 A .� w wuj j I r. CONCRETE SEA WALL 2 �1 GUIDEPILING (TYP) CZPIxiS I Z Z a= � �j EXISTING FLOATING DOCK ` gI I iW WZ vII �I W W{~ APPROX. iJl V 2 lU I ! m I 1 DIFFUSER _ _ i SEE DETAIL k TIDELANDS ON � '— — 14'-� 0 1.150 LF EXISTING DUVALL 6- HOPE PIPE. SDR 32 PLAN - EXISTING 6" HDPE OUTFALL 0 4U 80' '60' SCALE. N EXISTING SEA WALL S EXTREME HIGH 11DE - +15' a +10 _. ... ... -------—--- ----- ___._..—.__. ci / \ EXISTING BURIED OUTFALL MSL - +6.7' Z 0' --- - - - ------- --- --. -.---.._.---__ _MEAN LOWER LOW WATER . 0.0' EXISTING MUD BOTTOM i./, EXTREME LOW TIDE -4.5' 10. / EXISTING OUTFALL LAID ON BOTTOM -20' -- ------------...__------ .... ..---------..-.. __. _- - ---._.._ _...._-_.. _ _ _ CO EXISTING OUTFALL PIPE BURIED IN THIS AREA — - W -30' --'--- - --- -- m EXISTING SAND BOTTOM CC 40' _ ef 0 W CONNECT 6' HOPE SOR 32 PIPE a PROFILE - EXISTING 6" HDPF 01 ITFAI I OUTFALL EXTENSION TO EXISTING SEE A/C-2 FOR CONNECTION OF DIFFUSER: FLANGE FROM N1R i V 4 6" HOPE WTFALL EXTENSION TO EXISTING DIFFUSER MATH 2- a` °f mZ i EXISTING & CLOSURE OF DIFFUSER PORT, BOLTED TO END = b ' Z g PORT FLANGE & 2" DIAMETER HOLE AT E 3 3 3 O'CLOCK 14'-0" FROM END IIo W w 6' OUTFALL �'AL W W < LXPIRLS I Z ~a Z 1500 LF _OUTFALL EXTENSION 6" HOPE SDR 32 PIPE i o+ ANCHOR BLOCKS ON PIPE, 25 OC I W 62 TOTAL, SET ON BOTTOM HOPE PIPE SHALL BE JOINED WITH HEAT FUSION W.2 SYSTEM, THERMAL BUTT. FUSION IN ACCORDANCE MATH ASTM D2657, & MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. PLAN - OUTFALL EXTENSION - 1,500 LF 6" SDR 32 PIPE 0 40 BO' 160' SCALE: LT?--r-r-T-1------1 APPROX. 0 50' 50' -60 EXISTING OUTFALL -70 600 LF 6' HOPE SDR 32 PIPE MATH ANCHOR BLOCKS_25-OC FIRST BLOCK 5' FROM CONNECTION --- . ._ .,. . .. --_----- _ -------__-----. _._--- -80' ATTACH OUTFALL EXTENSION - ---- - ..__. ---- -._. _. -- -90' TO EXISTING 6" HOPE DIFFUSER 750 LF 6" HOPE SDR 32 PIPE 150 LF 6" HOPE -1�, SEE A/C-3 -70' MLLW WATH ANCHOR BLOCKS 25' OC _ SDR 32 PIPE _.._.. -----.. . _ 24 ANCHOR 30 ANCHOR BLOCKS - WITH ANCHOR BLOCKS -100 BLOCKS, SEE 25' OC + 1 AT 3' FROM DETAIL B C-3 END, B ANCHOR BLOCKS O w c - - ------150 uuw_.- --- - - -uo' �! i DIFFUSER AT c.+S •\ ELEV -142' C LLYY MLLW Y C 0 m PROFILE- OUTFALL EXTENSION �V Z m Z W ss V 9{ t'1 Z PLUG EXISTING 2* DIA DIFFUSER 4Y PORT WITH 1/4' NEOPRENE W .� CASKET k 4 WIDE 316 ST. STL BAND z i Zaa EXISTING OUTFALL NEW 6" HOPE, SDR 32 1 f11 O o DIFFUSER OUTFALL PIPE ON BOTTOM �L Iw 'r S = Z ` ANCHOR BOLT BOLT FLANGED HOPE TO EXISTING, WITH 316 ST.STL BANDS. BOLTS. m END FLANGE WITH ST.STL. BOLTS r DETAIL- EXISTING DIFFUSER C-2 NTS (New Diffuser Similar) o STRAP, 316 STAINLESS �Z^ STEEL PLATE X p 1'-02'+/_, PRE-SHAPED LA S W �— 5/8" DIA 316 ST.STL - OD - 6" HOPE SDR 32 EXPANSION BOLTS 5' PIPE. 6.63'+/- LONG, 1' FROM BOTTOM OF HOLE. 2 Pl.CS PER BLOCK o E- H 3-+ �—.. 1�__.... _ o C J r10LES FOR -- EXPANSION J y BLOCK BOLTS, 2 PLCS y PER BLOCK L- — V-6" C C Plan _ Section 300 Ib. Concrete Block t no c �-R IV v DETAIL-ANCHOR BLOCKS �aa� ` a ; C-2 NTS d a 0N-ST.4TFo� MASON COUNTY a Ao N DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT o N Planning Division i� N Y ti P O Box 279, Shelton, WA 98684 1864 (360)427-9670 SHR2002-00013 NOTICE OF SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PERMIT Notice is hereby given that ALDERBROOK INN, who is the owner of the described property, has filed an application for a Shoreline Management Permit for the development of: Substantial Develooment Extend existing 6in HDPE plastic sewer outfall pipe an additional 1500 linear feet into Hood Canal. Existing outfall ends 1150 ft waterward of the bulkhead in front of Alderbrook Inn, and discharges into approx 60ft of water. The pipe will lie on the canal bed. The new terminus will be in approximately 155ft depth of water. Purpose of extension is to convey treated wastewater into deeper water, thereby opening up the existing shellfish beds for possibility of commercial harvest. Site Address: 7101 ESTATE ROUTE 106 UNION Parcel Number: 322335000014 Location of Project: Highway 106 to 7101 State Route 106, site is waterward of Alderbrook Inn. Within: SW(quarter section) of Section: 33 Township: 22N N Ranae: 3W W,W.M. in , Mason County Washington. Said development is proposed within Hood Canal and/or its associated wetlands. Any person desiring to express their view or to be notified of the action taken on the application should notify: MASON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT P O BOX 279 SHELTON, WA 98584 in writing of their interest within 30 days of the final date of publication given pursuant to WAC 173-14-020. The final date of publication, posting, or mailing of notice is 6/6/2002. Written comments must be received by 7/6/2002. A public hearing will be hell on this permit request. Contact this office at(360)427-9670, ext. 295 for date and time of hearing. A Determination of Nonsignificance was issued on 6/6/2002 under WAC 197-11-340. Written comments regarding this determination must be received by 6/20/2002. SHR2002-00013 ��'oN.STA?, MASON COUNTY MS DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT c A v '= Planning Division N T �? P O Box 279,Shelton,WA 98684 Zoo Y �,o~ (360)427-9670 1864 MITIGATED DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (WAC 197-11-350) SEP2002-00041 Description of Proposal: Extend existing 6in HDPE plastic sewer outfall pipe an additional 1500 linear feet into Hood Canal. Existing outfall ends 1150 ft waterward of the bulkhead in front of Alderbrook Inn, and discharges into approx 60ft of water. The pipe will lie on the canal bed. The new terminus will be in approximately 155ft depth of water. Purpose of extension is to convey treated wastewater into deeper water, thereby opening up the existing shellfish beds for possibility of commercial harvest. Proponent: ALDERBROOK INN Site Address (If Assigned): 7101 E STATE ROUTE 106 UNION Directions to site: Highway 106 to 7101 State Route 106, site is waterward of Alderbrook Inn. Parcel Number: 322335000014 Legal Description: SUNNY BEACH TR 8-11 EX AND TAX 895 SEE SP #1664 Lead Agency: Mason County The Lead Agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverser impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed Environmental Checklist and other information on f le with the Lead Agency. This information is available to the public upon request. MITIGATED MEASURES ARE ATTACHED. Please contact Pam Bennett-Cumming at ext. 295 with any questions. This DNS is issued under 197-11-340(2), the Lead Agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted to Pam Bennett-Cumming, C/O Mason County DCD, Planning Division, PO Box 279, Shelton WA 98584 by 6/28/2002. Authorized Local Government Official Dat coin`, - V. V W kelo 6 �GKO"YW 9Z-RT-F L4 A_N - BASELINE SUBTIDAL SURVEY and GEODUCK DENSITY ANALYSIS Preparad for. Aldcrbrook Ina E=7090 Highway 106 Unioa,Washington 98592 P-pared by-- CEO,I=. P.O.Hox 282 Olympia,WA 98507-0282 00000- �rrn3i�Ns 3a Id >'DO a Ic QZ "? bz pi ST.itiZlr.,►"1�� V- Z1 Z £I 1 hl � ��ottsvdoa� ,00sl �.. �I��._----- �,����rwXovdad � sl LI 'N�7 �r►olrvv� +��.d.�a ,OL �av� s waves+ $ ,OOL-z ��SY1��1Q IV�1St`1�1�'� U�SO�O?Jd Alderbrook Saniwir Outbn Geodnck Survey introductlon During March 23-27 1998 Casey Bakker,Jim Alexander,_John Lentz, and Lynn Goodwin surveyed the area around the Alderbrook Inn sanitary ouW in south Hood Canal. The survey was done primarily to assess geoduck stocks with directions supplied by Bob Sizemore of the Washington Departrnew of Fish and v{gdUfe (`oC M. Methods used are published in "Stock Assessment of Geoduck Clams (Paaape abn=) in Washington by Alex Bradbury, Bob Sizemore, Don Rothaus snd Leslie MacGregor of WDFW. Infomation on geoduck numbers, substrate, important flora and fauna including the eel grass bed was recorded. All positions on the wafer were fixed wiih a difnerential global positioning receiver, (GPS). Water depths were measured with a calibrated depth sounder and diver computers. A line 600 ft. seaward of the mean high line(600 ft. line)was determined with a laser range finder. Twenty seven 900 sq.ft. geoduck transects were taken and axe shown in the attached drawings and table. The avenge geoduck count of all Z7 wanscm was 13.67. The shallowest geoduck observed was in 10 ft_ of water. When the two uwnse:= (1 and 8) chat were taken shoreward of the -10 h. contour are excluded, the average count is 14.76 geoducks. This number divided by 900 sq. h. equals 0.164 geoduck per sq. ft. This number divided by the March show facror(0.74) equals 0.022 geoducks per sq. ft_ This number is used in all of the following population estimates. Population 23stim=tes Tne zone between a line 600 fr. seaward from the mean high tide and the -70 ft and within 400 meters of the outfall diffuser contains 1,110,360 sq. ft This number multiplied by 0.022 geoducks per sq_ft. equals 24,428 geoducks. The zone between the -18 and the-70 ft. contours and within 400 meters of the cudfail diffuser conozins 1,563,500 sq. ft. This number multiplied by 0.022 .-odducks par sq. ft. equah, 34.a26 geadudcs. The Zone between the seaward edge of the eel grass bed and the -70 ft. contour and within 400 meters of the outfail diffuser contains 1,787.545 sq. fr- This number multiplied by 0,022 geoducks per sq. ft. equals 39,326 geoduda. The zone between the -18 fL contour or the 600 ft. line (whichever is furthest from the shore) and the -70 h. contour s.nd within 400 meters of the outfa.11 diffuser contaim 1,058,560 sq. ft_ This number multiplied by 0.022 geoducks per sq. ft. equals 23,E $eoducks. Other Important flora and rm= An cc] grass bed was found along the entire shoreward side of the geoduck bed. Divers swam along the seaward edge of the eel grass and their position determined with the GPS. The seaward edge is shown in drawing 1. The most seaward rooted eeigms pterion was found in 14 ft. of water(itifI. V). Dungeness crab were found throughout the suivcy location. Crab pots attached to buoys were seen in the stud area as well as several pots which had lost their buoys (ghost pots). Horse clams (=nIj were observed at several of the a=ects locations. r Lynn 754 Mounrain view Road Quilcene 'WA 98376 Table oac Gcoduck Transcrt won Watcr Depth Geoduck Count Tr sssect Number 1 Ft AIUW (900 . fL) Cammears 1. 6 0 soh mud sand; er, i grass Dungeness crab, moon snails 2. 33 7 firm sand; plumed anemone, human debris, Dungeness aftd graceful mb, iost crab poTs 3. I 46113 firm sand mud; plumed anemone, Dungeness and F-Taceful crab 4 18-30 24 f m sand; Dungeness crab � 5. 3C-41 9 s=c 6_ 41-51 3 mud sand; - buarrwing 1nemone 7. 51-65 2 mud sand, pea gravcl; Dungenm crab, bun-c W3ng Yt =one 8. 7-20 0 mud sand; eel psass, Dungeness crab, horse clams, sunflower stars 9. 10.19 3 firm sand; eel gnu, IJungen�s c=b, chactoptend nl r;2o:o n,�,irc � 10. 19-24 20 f pca &,ravel; horse ch.-^s, Dus�g�ess crab 11_ 23-27 13 I'mucl sand, pca gravel; hors- dall^s 12. 27-36 47 mud, sand, pca g'evel, hose clams, hzrdshei r..1am< 13. 36-44 36 u-a sand; Dungeness crb Water Depth Gcodwk Count Transea Nu=ber Ft. M_UV eq.ft. Comments 14. 44-50 40 sand;sea pens, burrg an I 15. 50-61 28 sauce 16. 6-26 0 mud, grVd; ceI gam. Lamirm, Dungeness crab, plumed anemone, home duns 17. 26-56 4 sand, gravel, cobble, plumed sncmcrre � is. 7-37 17 mud, sa-4 pc2 gmytj; =1 gr2w i chaC`.opoterid qol•chacte robes 19. 3 7-46 i sand, gr-zvcl; sunflower stirs, hinted anemone 20. 46-L2 2 sand, gravel; bustaving a:zuiont 21. 6-18 0 rand;human debris,shells, borse chins 22. 18-21 17 fiirm s horse' clams,Dungeness crab, plumed anemcnz, 5urifiowe7 scars 23. 27-33 42 film scud; Dungmess crib 24. 33-41 17 pmF•Z=nd; plumed 25. 41-48 4 sand Dungeness crab, host Qab 26. 1 48-53 12 sane.,'• ph,mcd _ 1 2 ticmone, bunvwin ang 27. 53 61 17 sand, caul; bg ilanemcne i Appendix 2. Washington Department of Health Report on the Alderbrook Inn wastewater treatment plant and the proposed outfall extension art GTAr,,0 • O f J Y 0 Ue9 d y STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH OFFICE OF FOOD SAFETY&SHELLFISH PROGRAMS 7171 Cleanwater Ln.,Bldg.4 • PO Box 47824 • Olympia, Washington 98504-7824 (360)236-3330 • TDD Relay Services 1-800-833-6388 December 10, 2001 CRISTA Ministries Alderbrook Wastewater Treatment Plant Attention: Nathan Stout 1583 Dickinson Street Shelton,WA 98584 Dear Mr. Stout: Thank you for your assistance during the evaluation of the Alderbrook wastewater treatment plant(WWTP)on August 27 h. This report summarizes the information collected during our visit,and describes the shellfish closure zone for the proposed outfall extension of the Alderbrook WWTP. I. SYNOPSIS A 1600-foot extension of the Alderbrook Inn WWTP outfall has been proposed in order to reduce or eliminate the impact to nearby harvestable.geoducks. A review of the Alderbrook Inn WWTP by the Department of Health(DOH)indicates that operations at the plant are generally satisfactory and that several significant improvements in treatment reliability have been completed since 1990. A dilution assessment of the proposed outfall extension indicates that the shellfish water quality standard would be achieved within 300 yards of the outfall terminus in Hood Canal. Installation of the outfall would result in a 300-yard closure zone to shellfish harvest,which eliminates any impact of the closure.zone on commercially harvestable geoducks. " A period of time to allow the natural degradation of possible human pathogens around the existing outfall is required after the new outfall becomes operational. DOH has recently conducted a separate closure zone assessment for shellfish harvesting at the Alderbrook Inn Marina. II. INTRODUCTION The Food Safety and Shellfish Program of the Department of Health(DOH)is required to establish a closure zone around any wastewater outfall near harvestable shellfish. WWTP closure zones are classified as Prohibited areas, and no shellfish can be harvested from within their boundaries. The existing closure zone for the Alderbrook WWTP is the area in Hood Canal within 400 meters from its present terminus,which takes into account potential boat waste discharges from boats moored at the Alderbrook Irm Marina. The existing WWTP outfall is located approximately 1100 feet from shore(550 feet beyond the end of the marina dock)in about 40 feet of water as measured on a low tide. The outfall pipe enters the beach area at the eastern side of the swimming pool building. Since the outfall pipe curves gently to the west in the subtidal zone,the terminus of the existing outfall is located in approximately the same direction as the main walkway for the Alderbrook Inn Marina. According to measurements recently taken for CRISTA Ministries,the proposed 1600-foot outfall extension for the Alderbrook WWTP will place the terminus of the new outfall approximately 1000 feet beyond(north of) the 70-foot depth line,at a depth of approximately 140 feet(see enclosed map). This extension distance was tentatively selected so that a 300-yard closure zone around the new outfall terminus would not impact any portion of Geoduck Tract 23600(the"Union Tract'). The minimum size of closure zone established by DOH for WWTP outfalls is 300 yards in radius. Information collected during the visit to the Alderbrook WWTP on August 27t'was used by DOH to establish the appropriate shellfish closure zone for the proposed Alderbrook Inn WWTP outfall. M. FLOWS AT THE ALDERBROOK INN WWTP The Alderbrook Inn WWTP (360-898-4612)is a small facility that at present receives only domestic sewage from guests and staff at the Alderbrook Inn. The Alderbrook Inn is a 78-room resort,with two 3-bedroom suites and 18 cottages, employing 50-75 people(depending upon the season).It is possible that the collection system will be extended in the future to service nearby residents,but no heavy industrial or commercial facilities are located in the immediate area of the Inn. A major plant upgrade occurred in 1990, which included new headworks,secondary clarifier, flashmixer, lab, outfall/diffuser and a flow-paced chlorinator. Monthly average flows at the WWTP from June 1998 to June 2001 have ranged from 4,500 gallons per day(gpd)in December of 2000 to 20,200 gpd(in September 1998). The design monthly average flow for this WWTP is 30,000 gpd. A review of the daily effluent flows recorded the week previous to this visit showed very little apparent infiltration or inflow contribution to the collection system from the intense rainfall. More wastewater is generated on weekends and Mondays at the Inn due to increased guest occupancy. In general, flows at the WWTP have decreased since purchase and operation of the Alderbrook Inn by CRISTA Ministries in late 1998,perhaps due to a downturn in guest usage of the facility. The new potential owner/operator of the Inn may implement management changes that may in turn increase guest usage and flows to the WWTP. Recorded flows at the WWTP appear to have decreased significantly since the recalibration of the flow meter in August of 2000. 2 The collection system contains a single pump station, located near the laundry room. The pump station contains three 7.5-HP grinder pumps in a wet well/dry well arrangement. Each pump is rated at 30 gallons per minute(gpm). Several years ago a 27-kW generator was installed to operate the lift station in case of power outages. This generator has an automatic transfer switch and is automatically exercised every Monday for approximately one hour. No overflows are known to have occurred from the lift station. The last sewage overflow from the manhole below the cottages in the collection system occurred in 1990,due to pump failures in the pump station. A mercury float switch in the pump station triggers an alarm behind the front desk in the lobby in case of a high wastewater level in the pump station. The collection system contains an above-ground 1200-gallon grease trap by the kitchen. This grease trap is a modified fiberglass septic tank,with an intemal baffle that was installed in 1983. A serpentine PVC-pipe arrangement in the bottom of the tank passed cold water from the stream through the piping to help cool down the kitchen wastewater in the grease trap. The stream connection was removed several years ago. Earlier this.year some grease was observed in the stream downstream of the grease trap. Maintenance staff observed that some grease had entered the remaining PVC pipe in the trap and had evidently been released to the stream. The pipe connection to the stream downstream of the grease trap was capped earlier this summer. The grease trap is pumped about every three weeks in the summer and about every 6-8 weeks in the winter. IV. ALDERBROOK INN WWTP OPERATIONS Mr.Bill VanBuskirk has been the Alderbrook Inn WWTP main operator since July 1996. Mr. VanBuskirk is also an operator at the Shelton Corrections facility and has a Group II operator license. The Alderbrook Inn WWTP's lab is certified in his name by the Department of Ecology to conduct a variety of tests. Fecal coliform and BOD tests for Alderbrook are conducted at the Shelton WWTP. He has agreed to continue attending the Alderbrook Inn WWTP in case the Inn is sold to another owner. The plant is attended every day by the main operator or by Steve Trim (O.I.T.). You have also helped out on occasion at the WWTP. Typically Mr.VanBuskirk attends the plant early in the mornings on Tuesdays-Saturdays on his way to the Shelton WWTP, and sometimes on Mondays. The treatment components at the Alderbrook Inn WWTP are illustrated on the attached diagram. Sewage is pumped to the headworks and flows by gravity through the plant to the outfall line. A bar screen at the headworks can remove large solids,but the grinder pumps in the pump station macerate the solids before the headworks. Sewage then flows into the aeration basins. During higher flow summertime conditions,all six aeration basins are utilized. During the wintertime a plug in the headworks is manually changed and only three basins are used. From the aeration basins the wastewater flows through the secondary clarifier to the distribution box, and then flows to the settling basin near the disinfection system. A LTV disinfection system was installed at the plant in June 1999 and has been in operation since that time. The effluent then flows through a Parshall flume and the effluent flow monitor records the instantaneous flows. 3 No excessive foam in the aeration basins,or unsatisfactory odors in the plant were noted during the DOH/Ecology announced visit in August. There was however,an excessive amount of biosolids and grease observed in the inlet weir to the secondary clarifier. Some floc was observed going into the effluent weir of the clarifier. It was suggested during the visit that the aeration in the distribution box be moved a little farther away from the box's outlet,that the air be reduced or a fine air diffuser be installed in the distribution box,and/or large tee connection could be installed over the box's outlet pipe. These changes could possibly reduce the production and discharge of buoyant solids to the clarifier. After the visit we found out that the operator had already attempted some of these suggestions, and that he would prefer sending these solids to the clarifier rather than trying to keep them in the distribution box. The flash mixer basin was converted to a settling basin when the UV disinfection system was installed. Small bubbles were observed rising to the surface in the settling basin. The bubbles are gas production from denitrifying solids in the bottom of the settling basin. The gas bubbles tend to bring settled solids to the surface where they can then enter the disinfection chamber. Some solids were observed in the outlet pipe from the settling basin to the UV chamber. It was suggested that the truck that collects the settled solids from the aerobic digester also remove the solids from the bottom of the settling basin as a routine procedure to reduce this occurrence. The operator will pursue that removal process. The UV system may need to be shut down during the period of time that the settling basin is drained due to lack of cooling flow through the disinfection system. The Ultra Dynamics UV disinfection system appeared to be in satisfactory operation during our visit. However,two LED lights were not working on the display panel. A transmittance monitor displays the percentage UV transmittance on the panel. After a quick cleaning of the probe during our visit the percent transmittance rose from over 90%to 100%. The UV bulbs were changed a few days prior to this visit. The crystal tubes are cleaned on approximately a weekly basis by brushing with a calcium lime remover. In case of a loss of power to the WWTP (there is no emergency generator at the plant)or loss of the UV disinfection system there are several backup methods available for disinfection. The chlorine gas flow-paced disinfection system is still connected to the settling basin,but would not operate in case of power failure. It.is also possible to operate the manually adjusted chlorination system in case of a power outage. A 150-pound chlorine cylinder with gas was hooked up for this contingency during the visit. Also the operator can use calcium hypochlorite tablets to provide for some degree of disinfection. This latter approach was used during a power outage at the plant a few days prior to this visit. No chlorine contact basin is available at the plant,as it has been converted to the UV disinfection chamber. Some chlorine contact time would be provided in the outfall pipe. Instrument Repair Service can calibrate and clean the gas chlorination system, but this has not been done in several years. Effluent flows are continuously monitored with an Ultra Sonic flowmeter. Instrument Repair Service calibrates this flowmeter on an annual basis. The effluent flowing into the outfall pipe at the Parshall flume appeared satisfactory during this visit. 4 The outfall pipe for the Alderbrook Inn WWTP was initially extended in 1985. The outfall pipe is a 6-inch HDPE pipe which is exposed on the beach during low tide conditions to the east of the marina dock. The terminus of the existing outfall is approximately 1100 feet from shore, in about 40 feet of water at a low tide level. Recent inspections of the entire length of the outfall by Mike Smith(of Mike's Diving Center)reveal no apparent leaks in the outfall pipe or signs of pollution. Mr. Smith conducts this outfall inspection every year. V. POTENTIAL UPSET CONDITIONS IN THE ALDERBROOK WWTP Closure zones for NWTPs are based on potential upset conditions that could result in the discharge of elevated pathogen levels. A grab sample for fecal coliform analysis of the final effluent is collected once each week and tested at the Shelton WNTP. A review of the Alderbrook Inn WWTP DMRs from June 1998 to June 2001 shows three causes for instances of disinfection system problems or elevated fecal coliform levels. A power outage in August 2000 had serious effects on treatment plant operations. Discharges of highly chlorinated swimming pool water to the WWTP in April and May of 2000 killed many of the microorganisms needed in the treatment plant process. In December 1998 the plant experienced difficulties with the chlorination process. In addition, a high level of solids in the final effluent in October 1999 was traced to a change in the type of dishwater soap used by the kitchen crew. The highest recorded fecal coliform levels during these periods were 10,000 FC/100 ml and TNTC(too numerous to count). These brief instances of upsets at the Alderbrook WWTP illustrate the impact that relatively small wastewater discharges to the collection system can have on a small VAV P operation. However,this plant typically discharges a high quality disinfected effluent. The highest single fecal coliform result for the final effluent recorded at the plant since August 2000 is 50 FC/100 ml. Six samples of treated-but-not-disinfected effluent were collected for fecal coliform analysis by DOH during this August visit. The instantaneous flow rate at the time of sample collection was 18 gpm(0.026 mgd). These samples provide an indication of the levels of fecal coliforms that could be released from the Alderbrook WWTP to Hood Canal during rare upset conditions at the plant. These results range from 4600 FC/100 ml to 13,000 FC/100 ml. VI. CLOSURE ZONE PARAMETERS The following parameters and conditions are assumed by DOH in the dilution analysis used to determine the size of the closure zone for the proposed Alderbrook Inn WNTP outfall extension. These parameters are used in the COR 4 X computer model to estimate the distance needed to achieve the shellfish water quality standard of 14 FC/100 ml. • An upset condition at the WWTP in the summertime. This assumption is based on the fact that the largest loading rates and hydraulic flows to the plant occur during the high- occupancy season. • A discharge flow of 30,000 gpd,based on the existing design monthly maximum flow rate and the potential for future residential hookups. 5 • A fecal coliform level of 13,000 FC/100 ml,based on the highest sample result taken by DOH for the treated-but-not-disinfected effluent in August 2001. This discharge level could occur during potential interruptions in the disinfection system. • A single-port outfall. A two-inch and a three-inch diameter port will both be modeled by CORMIX, as no diffuser design has yet been proposed for the outfall extension. • An outfall depth of 140 feet, approximately 1000 feet north of the—70 foot contour line. • An ebb tide current speed of 0.10 m/s and a flood tide current speed of 0.13 m/s. These speeds are 50%of the average maximum ebb tide and flood tide current speeds at the NOAA"Great Bend"station, located approximately two miles east of the Alderbrook Inn. • A strong stratification in the upper 10 meters (33 feet)of the water column. This stratification was observed and monitored during the September 1991 Alderbrook Effluent Mixing Study at the existing outfall. I also reviewed the data collected by the Ecology Ambient Monitoring Program at their south Hood Canal Station HCB004. The density profiles at HCB004 in the months of May through September(inclusive) from 1995 through 1997 also indicate a strong stratification layer at this approximate depth. Therefore a stratification layer at 33 feet will be assumed to be a boundary condition in the CORMIX model. • A weak stratification of the water column between the proposed outfall depth of 140 feet and 33 feet. A review of the stratification data at HCB004 in the months of May through September shows an average sigma(density) value difference of 0.69 between 10 meters (33 feet) and 30 meters(98 feet). Little or no density difference is expected between a depth of 98 feet and 140 feet. Therefore DOH will assume a linear density difference of 0.69 sigma units from a depth of 140 feet to 33 feet in the CORMIX model. VIL CORMIX MODEL RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS The results of the various CORMIX model runs indicate that the shellfish water quality standard is met within 300 yards of the proposed Alderbrook Inn WWTP outfall extension. Slightly improved dilution is provided by the increased flood tide current speed. The port discharge velocity from a single three-inch port is low in comparison to the two-inch port. The consultant for the Alderbrook Inn should therefore consider a smaller port size, or the use of a removable restrictor orifice plate on the port. The minimum 300-yard(radius)closure zone around the end of the proposed 1600-foot extension of the Alderbrook Inn WWTP outfall provides sufficient dilution to achieve 14 FC/100 ml nt the PdgP of the closure zone during upset conditions in the Alderbrook Inn WWTP. In addition, the CORMIX model predicts that the slight linear stratification in the deeper waters of Hood Canal at the proposed outfall site prevents the effluent plume from rising to a depth of 70 feet. The effluent plume will therefore remain below the level of the deepest geoducks that can be commercially harvested at the present time. Assuming that there are no geoducks between the proposed outfall site and land to the southwest of this site, the dilution model predicts no impact on nearby commercially harvestable geoducks from the proposed outfall project. The consultant for CRISTA Ministries should consider moving the outfall location slightly to the east of the site shown on the attached map if geoducks are present in this locale. 6 The previous closure zone for the Alderbrook Inn WWTP outfall and the Alderbrook Inn marina was a 400-meter closure zone around the end of the existing WWTP outfall. DOH has recently conducted a separate marina closure zone assessment for the Alderbrook Inn marina. The new closure zones for the marina and the WWTP will replace the 400-meter closure zone some time after the outfall is extended and effluent flows through the new outfall. No shellfish should be harvested from the area of the existing outfall for one to two years after the extended outfall begins operation. DOH and the Skokomish Tribe will determine the exact period of cleansing time required for this process. This period of time will allow for the degradation of any human pathogens that may have been released to the immediate environment through the existing outfall. Thank you for your consideration and review of this closure zone evaluation. I can be contacted at 360-236-3321 or at frank.meriwetherPdoh.wa.gov if you have any questions. Sincerely, Frank Meriwether Environmental Engineer Enclosures rc: Dave Dougherty,Ecology John Golden,Gateaway Estate Mark Mauren,DNR Senator Tim Sheldon Bob Sizemore, WDFW Eric Sparkman,Skokomish Tribe Bill White, DOH 7 • MASON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT. Planning Divtslon P O Box 279,Shelton,WA 98584 (360)427-9M Affidavit of Publication VOTiCE OF SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PERMIT SHR20 -"13 Notice is hereby given that ALDER- 'WASHINGTON, ROOK INN, who is the owner of the de- 'Y OF MASON �� --ribed property,has filed an application for a horeline Management Permit for the develop- tent of: Substantial Development Julie G. Orme Extend existing 6in HDPE plastic sewer being first duly swom utfall pipe an additional 1500 linear feet into _es and says that she is the clerk food Canal. Existing d in ends 1150 lde ft oo TON-MASON COUNTY JOURNAL,a weekly newspaper.That said news- in,and discharges into approx 60ft of water. al newspaper and it is now and has been for more than six months prior to the he pipe will lie on the canal bed.The new ter- iblication hereinafter referred to,published in the English language continu- iinus will be in approximately 155ft depth of -ekly newspaper in SHELTON. Mason County, Washington, and it is now +ater.Purpose of extension is to convey treat- I of said time was printed in an office maintained at the aforesaid place of •d wastewater into deeper water, thereby f said newspaper.That the said SHELTON-MASON COUNTY JOURNAL opening up the existing shellfish beds for pos- h day of August, 1941,approved as a legal newspaper by the Superior Court ibility of commercial harvest i County. Site Address:7101 ESTATE ROUTE 106 1NION xed is a true copy of a Notice of Shoreline Mgmt Parcel Number:322335000014 Location of Project:Highway 106 to 7101 mi t - Alderbrook Inn ;fate Route 106, site is waterward of Alder xook Inn. Within:SW(quarter section)of Section:33 ownship:22N N Range:3W W,W.M. ished in regular issues(and not in supplement form)of said in,Mason County Washington. Said development is proposed within Hood ce each week for a period of two ;anal and/or its associated wetlands.Any per- eeks,commencing on the on desiring to express their view or to be noti- ed of the action taken on the application should lay of May 20 02 and ending on the otify: MASON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT lay of June 20 02 both dates inclusive, P O BOX 279 newspaper was regularly distributed to its subscribers during all of the said SHELTON,WA 98584 he full amount of the fee charged for the in writing of their interest within 30 days of ,ie final date of publication given pursuant to dication is the sum of$ 10 5 . 12 VAC 173-14-020.The final date of publication, bs ing,or mailing of notice is 6/6/2002. Written comments must be received by A public hearing will be held on this permit 6 t h equest.Contact this office at(360)427-9670, id swom to before me this day of �xt.295 for date and time of hearing. A Determination of Nonsignificance was June 20 02 ssued on 6/6/2002 under WAC 197-11-340. n Witten comments regarding this determina- ,on must be received by 620/2002. Notary blic in and for the State of Washington 5l306/62t Residing at Shelton,Washington ook'fJ r 1 1.. (�;���� My commission expires 20 A W AS\k l 'SOO°P •Mi NOS ue H'Rev r a 001 fi a� z0U . la' s►°�ePar'raPs\w. y`J of aJQ°N 0 g1e 14a s\ e u\ syrnpe �qo�d `, se�¢6e 5 p t e S\e 1°•patsy�ej? u se`pdg0 Oda»1 4 S !` •q Bo!\q�Is*to �p\n ,eweA o0 aUl►° a�'au� W1e 2101\ °�ynollZse yo1!PyasaydalJ Sy W. yaUe sy1 8p%N°yd as 914 Yale\a% ale�ti yaP�qkAPa e�y eP 1,1y%.W�eyi V uy uosyad sayd a°`�nuo yl6u\\1a�P�l`a uo le �� o\eu\6. SsayP� at nel e\`M1e\o M1aaa Pad dyad ay�o U0 6u`Na1�1 y to�&D a eseydaa 1e�6u\\1o�Se)aU` 9\geo e s atal oslad P!^ o .Gtda o 0 ``M a> e1!ld e�4 P\a°� u1e6e (�g0�\00ON o(,u w\Ru--ate oiloann Affidavit of Publication u�W. �yaul ,��w alels o Sey - a0 Q9�Pney°y�a Pa1u\°ddead o e 6u euosyad ydalj\euo� ldW d,�o 'Uve%3 ydatij�a��e1ua� OSNNO� Nl N\ 'WASHINGTON, eN tjo eGoaa,N ydW NOSdW 1�C OF MASON SS. Mo\ Pa -Pas ,O�3 t,r,nOa Julie G. Orme being first duly swom on oath deposes and says that she is the clerk of THE SHELTON-MASON COUNTY JOURNAL,a weekly newspaper.That said news- paper is a legal newspaper and it is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of the publication hereinafter referred to,published in the English language continu- ously as a weekly newspaper in SHELTON, Mason County,Washington,and it is now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained at the aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper.That the said SHELTON-MASON COUNTY JOURNAL was on the 9th day of August,1941,approved as a legal newspaper by the Superior Court of said Mason County. That the annexed is a true copy of a Notice of Shoreline Mgmt Permit - Alderbrook Inn as it was published in regular issues(and not in supplement form)of said newspaper once each week for a period of two consecutive weeks,commencing on the 3 0 th day of May ,20 02 and ending on the 6 th day of June 20 0 2 both dates inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its subscribers during all of the said period.That the full amount of the fee charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of$ 10 5 12 r-)� OA416wQ Opllclllls�,,e N D �i..,Subscribed and sworn to before me this 6 t h day of p o g10 Np� 02 June ,20 ••� �pTAAY �Q�-a� I�L�a.� = Notary Fi6blic in and for the State of Washington PO t.\4 g? Residing at Shelton,Washington r My commission expires 200,5 Of 11 WAS111811110 A AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss. COUNTY OF MASON ) e4 -(])m do reby certify that I posted 4'-2opies of the attached k q�Aj�p1)QQkML ' . in `3 public places as follows: one at fit, v1 n one at one at �UtSi —�O STA MASON COUNTY oP Ao N DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT } S NuPlanning Division o Y 0 P O Box 279, Shelton, WA 98684 00 ��~ (360)427-9670 1864 Case No.: SHR2002-00013 SHORELINE PERMIT STATUS: ISSUED Received: 5/28/2002 Issued: 7 f 2-3/ bZ. Expires: i ZZI(D-7 Type of Permit: Substantial DeveloDment Applicant: ALDERBROOK INN 7101 E HIGHWAY 106 UNION, WA 98592 Location of Project: Highway 106 to 7101 State Route 106, site is waterward of Alderbrook Inn. Within Hood Canal and/or its associated wetlands. The projectwill be within shorelines of statewide significance. Shoreline Designation: Urban Parcel Number: 322335000014 Address: 7101 E STATE ROUTE 106 UNION Legal Description: SUNNY BEACH TR 8-11 EX AND TAX 895 SEE SP #1664 Project Description: Extend existing 6in HDPE plastic sewer outfall pipe an additional 1500 linear feet into Hood Canal. Existing outfall ends 1150 ft waterward of the bulkhead in front of Alderbrook Inn, and discharges into approx 60ft of water. The pipe will lie on the canal bed. The new terminus will be in approximately 155ft depth of water. Purpose of extension is to convey treated wastewater into deeper water, thereby opening up the existing shellfish beds for possibility of commercial harvest. This permit has been granted by Mason County persuant to the Shoreline Management Actof 1971 and nothing in this permit shall excuse the applicant from compliance with any other federal, state or local statutes, ordinances or regulations applicable to this project but not inconsistent with the Shoreline Management Act. (Chapter90.58 RCW). This permit may be rescinded pursuant to RCW 90.58.140(7)in the event the permittee fails to comply with the terms and conditions hereof. CONSTRUCTION PURSUANT TO THIS PERMIT WILL NOT BEGIN OR IS NOT AUTHORIZED UNTIL THIRTY(30)DAYS FROM THE DATE OF FILING THE FINAL ORDER OF THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT WITH THE REGIONAL OFFICE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL,OR UNTIL ALL REVIEW PROCEEDINGS INITIATED WITHIN THIRTY(30) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF SUCH FILING HAVE TERMINATED. JNo permit authorizing construction shall extend for a term of more than five (5) years. If actual construction of a development for which a permit has been granted has not begun within two years after the approval of the permit by the Board of County Commissioners, the Board shall, at the expiration of the two-year period, review the permit, and upon a showing of good cause, extend the permit for one year. Otherwise, the permit terminates; provided that no permit shall be extended unless the applicant has requested such review and extension prior to the last regular meeting of the Board coming before the permit exipration date. Approved: Denied: 1-1 Auth ized Lo al Government Official Date THIS SECTION FOR DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY USE ONLY IN REGARD TO A CONDITIONAL USE OR VARIANCE PERMIT. Approved: ❑ Date received by Department of Ecology.- Denied: ❑ This permit is approved by the Department of Ecology pursuant to Chapter 90.58 RCW. Development shall be undertaken pursuant to the attached terms and conditions. Date Authorized Dept. of Ecology Official SHR2002-00013 2 of 2 .> 7/24/2002 Conditions Associated With 4:28:34PM .T I D E M A R K Case#: SUM002-00013 COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC Hermit Condition Status lldattd item# Code Title : ,Status ['ltan € ed By Tag Date By - fi 1) I "CUSTOM CONDITION" NOT MET 7/24/2002 PBC CONDITIONS FOR SHR2002-00013 1. Prior to construction,applicant shall obtain all necessary federal,state and local permits for this project. 2. Debris or deleterious material resulting fro construction shall be removed from the beach area and project site and shall not be allowed to enter waters of the state. 3. Water quality is not to be degraded to the detriment of the aquatic enfironment as a result of this project. 4. Applicant shall work directly with the Washington State Department of Health to ensure that the specific siting of the extended outfall terminus meets their location requirements relative to the new 300 yard closure zone proposed by them. At minimum this may mean moving the terminus slightly to the east as necessary to ensure a minimum distance of 300 yards from the 70ft depth contour. Page I of 1 CaseConditions..rpt - 3RP33- T PAP Shoreline Management Act Q © � Permit Data Sheet and Transmittal Letter From: mason County To:_ Wash _ nAnt - of pc"Qg� P.O. Box ATTN: Shoreline Permit Reviewer wer Shelton, WA 98589 Southwest Regional Office ox , ymPTa, PIA 98504 Date of Transmittal: b� D- I Vate of Receipt (Dept of Ecology) ape of Permlt: (Indicate all that apply) Substantial Development 4 Conditional Use Variance Revision Other Local Government Decision' Approval)L Conditional Approval Denial Applicant Information: Applicant's Representative'_(If primary contact) PA C Name: F3 _ 1�fJ f �i Name: 1\1k14W Address: 0)1�hNI kw q K Eq oa, Address:_ Phone(s):_ 49\[--003 Phone(s): 4d"10 _00 3 Is the applicant the property owner: Yes No 'Location of Property, (Section, Township and Range to the nearest 1/4, 1/4 Section or latitude and longitude, and a street address where available) I n rn _70 k f 0 On►oh w � 33 1aa 2�\\/ 1 Water Body Name: 4f_,�d Cfjk,_� Shoreline of Statewide Siqnificance Yes No Environment Designation: 1�}-� �,�_ ,tWU ,, P o Description of Project (Summary of the intended use or project purpose) I Sb0 I I ,t fir- Jo v040 \te4j�l I n i" Pao/ f SS A A-- W-Q". Notice of Application Date: Final Decision Date: By.. Yl (R.Q Phone #: 3(0O 4al