The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSPI2003-00162 - SPI Inspections - 8/21/2003 SoN_STA MASON COUNTY �P MD DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ° ss N Planning Division z� N y ti P O Box 279,Shelton,WA 98584 (360)427-9670 1 64 Site Inspection August 21, 2003 EARNEST LOCKETT P O BOX 88329 STEILACOOM WA 98388-2605 Case No.: SPI2003-00162 Parcel No.: 323047590050 Project Description: DETERMINE STRUCTURE/SOIL VULNERABILITIES Dear Applicant: Pursuant to your application, a site pre-inspection (SPI)was performed on your property. Below you will find comments made regarding the proposed development and its critical values. In some cases, setbacks for development from shorelines, steep slopes, streams, and wetlands must be included in your specific proposal; these setbacks are included as part of the comments listed below. This information is based on County and State regulations as they exist to date. These regulations may change and may affect the requirements for development of the subject property. Please contact me at(360) 427-9670,ext. 286 if you have questions. Sincerely, Scott Lonqanecker Land Use Planner Mason County Planning Department 8/21/2003 1 of 3 SP12003-00162 Site Inspection 8/21/2003 Case No.: SP12003-00162 Comments: Pre-inspection for Earnest and Lizza Lockett: regarding Hamma Ridge lots 20 and 33. Rural Residential 5 zoning designation. Standard building setbacks for this zoning are 20 foot side and rear setbacks with a 25 foot front yard setback. These setbacks are measured from portions of structures over 30 inches above grade such as roof overhangs, etc. Other setbacks can apply when critical areas are present such as streams, wetlands, steep slopes etc. On lots smaller than one acre, sideyard setbacks are equal to 10% of the lot width. The site is not within shoreline (SMA/SMP)jurisdiction. Landslide hazard areas: Generally the topography and features of lots 20 and 33 are very similar and would require the same type of review through a Geological Assessment. Lot 33 is situated higher relative to lot 20 and may be less prone to drainage and erosion issues, however a Geological Assessment by a licensed engineer, geologist or geotechnical engineer will address these issues in more detail. No significant signs of erosion or slope instability were identified on either lot. There is a cut slope along the western side of lot 20 where the access road to lower lots is located and no significant signs of erosion are evident. No springs or seeps were observed, although this may be due to prolonged dry weather. Due to the steep slopes on or adjacent to the site (within 300 feet) and over 15%, development of the property would require that a Geological Assessment be provided prior to permit issuance in accordance with the enclosed Landslide Hazard Ordinance, section EA. A least 2-3 copies of the report should be provided when applying for a building permit. The Landslide Hazard Covenant enclosed may need to be completed and recorded with the Mason County Auditor prior to building permit issuance if it is determined that the development will occur within a landslide hazard area or buffer. A copy of the recorded document would then need to be provided to the Planning Dept. Under ordinance 17.01.100 a minimum 50-foot natural vegetated buffer is required from landslide hazard areas (back from the top or toe of slope). An application can be made to reduce this distance based upon the recommendations contained within a geotechnical report or geological assessment. If this is requested the applicant needs to supply the County with the names and addresses of all adjacent land owners within 300 feet so that public notice can be done. A minimum 10 day comment period will take place after public notice has been issued. If the site plan clearly indicates a 50-foot vegetated buffer will be maintained then public notice is not required. 8/21/2003 2 of 3 SP12003-00162 Site Inspection 8/21/2003 Case No.: SP12003-00162 No other critical areas, including streams and / or wetlands were identified on site. 8/21/2003 3 of 3 SP12003-00162 MASON COUNTY PLANNING DEPT. PRE-INSPECTION APPLICATION PLEASE PRINT $200'00 Fee Requhed 1. Owner: Herbert J. Shapiro Trust Applicant: Earnest & Lizza Lockett Site Address: -1 Applicant Address: OwnerAddre i City:Steilacoom St WA Zip 8388 City: Port an st OR Zp; 9 7 2 0 9 Phone:_(Z�) - 6 8 day Phone:_(. ) day Phone:_(_) - BB evening 2. Parcel No. 3 2 3 0 _-4 S Parcel No. Legal Description: TR 5-A of SurvE Planner: GBM RAM DW AL YRD _ 1 3_/237 TR A of ,SP #1 912 J� /Q ,TRS 1-2 of SP 288 SMP �nP.PlahI(� Type of Use/a Water Body V4 _ _ 3. Purpose of Pre-Inspection: To determine the to of structure most suited to be. built on e and.___ATso to determine soil vulnerabilities. 4. Use of Buildin . etirement Residence 9R- 5. Do any of the following exist on or adjacent to property?: :s lope saltwater lake river pond wetland seasonal runo other stream seasonal creek Directions to Site: HWY 101 just past Aycok Beach, turn left up the hill _ to Hamma Ri ge If the information is incomplete, then Mason County must disclaim any errors resulting from deficiencies in the original application. Pre-inspection reports remain valid only until development changes occur in the vicinity which affect the lot evaluated in this inspection, or the laws regulating development of the site change after the time of inspection. Applicant Signature:�-�� Date: 8/5/0 3 If you would like to be on site during inspection, please check here: R RECEIVED Return application to: Department of Community Development, Planning�.�siDoEn P.O. Box 279 AUG 12 2003 AUG 1 1 2003 Shelton,WA 98584 (360)427-9670 426 W. CEDAR ST: MCCD - PLANNING Please include a$200.00 check or money ord r payable to Mason County Treasurer When completed, this form becomes part of e.parcel file. FOR OFFICE USE ONLY:Accepted by: Date: Please illustrate below the proposed building site In relati to w er&property lines: MORE ON BACKSIDE Please illustrate below the proposed building site in relation to water and property lines: ') *S'�, ) 42-a- Departmental Review (For Office Use Only) Planning Department Findings: _________________ ------- -———————————————————————————————————— ————— ------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------ ----- ------------------------------------------------ S-101�v . OVIRRALL HAMNtk RIDGE EXMIT 33 33 3+t Ir► �Lti.►Yr �� (,n11! *0(J/"J��/�� "59002lc/� 2 4 3 � �y�oers �• '7550103 7.00a.. ° /•. / '15Ro�ot �5gotoo A n5gpp13 /Q+ S nsv0070 / '/590014 / -- iu.lt � to Orb 2(o 1VV` � My \ A 7sao10 4 17a07os 54010 32 Sd ov `\ \\ y ��i /1�I/ ` �� ,'�%V r "I.a lam- ' 34 - 1,2 11 -- - -- - -, 31 1 , �-- � I.L .. �, \ �' �� '\ y 3 'P ^ �59ooq I � JSo.00 ISoe• ,�T,�o �•mo 3�y,� t It sS1 �� Coln..- Gass S o fl h �s