The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSPI2009-00025 - SPI Inspections - 5/7/2009 °%,.STgT� MASON COUNTY e P5 n o N DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT > s N Planning Division o Y ti N n P O Box 279, Shelton, WA 98684 o° (360)427-9670 1864 Site Inspection May 07, 2009 DON9 19 TH AVE KPN TO BE KEPT IN THE BELFAIR WA 98528 PARCEL FILE Case No.: SP12009-00025 N 1-z-7,v �-Lf OQoct o Parcel No.: 122212400090 Project Description: Site review to replace or expand cabin structure. Dear Applicant: Pursuant to your application, a site pre-inspection (SPI) was performed on your property. Below you will find comments made regarding the proposed development and its critical values. In some cases, setbacks for development from shorelines, steep slopes, streams, and wetlands must be included in your specific proposal; these setbacks are included as part of the comments listed below. This information is based on County and State regulations as they exist to date. These regulations may change and may affect the requirements for development of the subject prope Please contact me at (360) 427-9670, ext. 365 if you have questions. Sincerely, AAllanBorden jG(� CA Land Use Planner Mason County Planning Department 5/7/2009 Page 1 of 4 SP12009-00025 Site Inspection 5/7/2009 Case No.: SP12009-00025 Comments: Pre-inspection for Donald DeHope on Apr. 10, 2009: The pre-inspection was made to evaluate the proposed addition to or replacement of single family cabin on a 0.15 acre parcel located along the east side of North Bay Case Inlet. The parcel has some evergreen or deciduous trees throughout and a lawn next to the shoreline. The shoreline has a short concrete bulkhead with inset steps. The cabin has a deck just above grade on the water side; two small sleeping area buildings are located near the state highway. The proposed replacement and/or additional areas would be located at the proper setbacks based upon this inspection. These findings state regulations in effect at inspection time, unless noted otherwise. Development Regulations standards: The site is in Rural Residential 5 zone. Standard building setbacks are 25-foot front yard setback, and 20-foot side property line and rear yard setbacks. These setbacks are measured from structures above grade such as roof overhangs, stairs, balconies, decks, heat pumps, storage buildings, and fuel tanks. _Y_ An exception is made for lots less than 100 feet in width, where side yard setbacks are equal to 10 percent of the lot width, but no less than 5 feet; this property has 7.5 ft. side yard setback. An administrative variance may be requested to reduce these setback distances from property lines, to as low as 5 feet (side yard), if the size, shape, or features of the property constrain development from the proper setbacks. This process requires application and review at the time of the building permit submittal. Resource Ordinance Standards: Wetland critical area: Planning staff confirmed that the parcel does not contain certain wetlands, which are regulated under Mason County's Wetlands chapter 17.01.070 of the Mason County Resource Ordinance. The applicant will not need a wetlands special report during development review. Stream setbacks: No seasonal or perennial drainage flows through the subject property. The proposed development is greater than 200 feet from the any stream management area covered by the standards of this critical area. _N_ Slope or Landslide hazards: Slopes less than 10 percent 5/7/2009 Page 2 of 4 SP12009-00025 Site Inspection 5/7/2009 Case No.: SP12009-00025 adjacent to or within 300 feet of a proposed project were observed. No geologic special report (geologic assessment or geotechnical report) is needed during development review. _Y_ Shoreline setbacks: The shoreline designation for North Bay Case Inlet is Urban Environment per the Mason County Shoreline Master Program and development setbacks would be determined by the Mason County Resource Ordinance. The shoreline setback is determined by averaging the setback distance from the roofline of the adjacent residence on each side of the subject parcel to the ordinary high water mark (OHWM) of the Case Inlet shoreline. Any portion of the new structure, including decks, balconies, and rooflines, must be behind this common line. Shoreward of this line for 15 feet toward the shoreline is an area that may be used for lawns, patios or landscaping (development at grade level). From that point toward the shoreline is considered to be a required vegetated buffer that must remain and is regulated by the Mason County Resource Ordinance Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas Chapter. Within this chapter are those activities listed that can be done both with and without a Mason Environmental Permit; proposed tree limbing and limited cutting of trees in the buffer for view improvement are reviewed by the area permit planner prior to starting these type of activities. Staff measured the common line setback from the ordinary high water mark (OHWM) of the North Bay Case Inlet shoreline to a shoreward roof eave of a proposed residence. The shore setback of the roofline of the residence to the south (parcel -00100) is 35 feet from the inlet OHWM. The roofline of the residence to the north (parcel -00080) is 21 feet from the inlet OHWM. The proportional setback for a structure on the subject parcel would be 28 feet from the OHWM; but the Resource Ordinance requires 35 feet from the OHWM as the minimum shoreline setback for new development [composed of 20 feet vegetation buffer along the inlet and a 15-foot building setback on the upland side of the vegetation buffer]. As stated above, all development above grade must be behind this distance as shown on enclosed drawing. The existing cabin is 28 feet from the inlet OHWM (or face of bulkhead). The existing 20-foot wide by 17-foot deep deck on the waterward side ends at 12 feet from the bulkhead. The applicant has proposed replacing the existing cabin in its footprint in front of the 35-foot commonline and expanding the footprint upland of the common line. The possible replacement area of the existing cabin in front of the commonline is 29 feet wide and 7 feet deep (total of 203 sq. ft.). The area of the proposed residence upland of the commonline and the garage may be expanded but still need to 5/7/2009 Page 3 of 4 SP12009-00025 Site Inst)ection 5/7/2009 Case No.: SP12009-00025 meet the proper shoreline, side yard, and front yard setbacks, including proposed roof overhangs, stairs, balconies, decks, heat pumps, storage buildings, and fuel tanks. You would need to confirm with the county Utilities / Waste Mgmt. and Environmental Health Departments what their sewer system standards are to make sure about the adequacy of supplying septage disposal for the proposed development. General process: Future development must include a site plan, showing all setbacks from property lines, shoreline, road, and existing and proposed utilities improvements; this site plan will be needed for building permit application submittal and review. Specific County Codes standards for future development may be found at the County website address http://www.co.mason.wa.us. If you have any questions please feel free to call. Thank you. 5/7/2009 Page 4 of 4 SP12009-00025 SV( ID�D`'7 - MASON COUNTY PLANNING DEPT. PRE-INSPECTION APPLICATIO 3�3nJ� PLEASE PRINT 255.00 F Required 1. Owner: �� Applicant: P b �� Site Address: - 2 .' 3 it_ Applic nt Addre s: 7/ Owner Address: n/ City: St Zip City: 4tu�bpt _St Zip Phone: ?'d 3409 day Phone:(7-5-3) 7,oJk ' 2 d day Phone: 2( V3 ) leveni Planner: AY1—PY)r4eAt Email Address: SMPU�Q n Comp. Plan Type of Use �/ Water Body 2. Parcel No. t I—ZZ - 2Y _ !� 02,0 Parcel No. - - I 1 y Legal Description:7Z� f��" G 8�" ' ��r' /�-— �I I � 3. Purpose of Pre-Inspection : 4. Use of building: /f elp' C u 2-b 3 S A- i /fDkS 5. Do any of the following exist on or adjacent to property?: slope saltwater( ) lake( river pond wetland seasonal runoff( other stream seasonal creek Directions to Site: If the information is incomplete, then Mason County must disclaim any errors resulting from deficiencies in the original application. Pre-inspection reports remain valid only until development changes occur in the vicinity which affect the lot evaluated in this inspection, r the laws regulating development of the site change after the time of inspection. Applicant Signature: Date: U If you would like to be on site during inspection,please check here: OL Return application to: Department of Community Development, Planning Division P.O. Box 186 Shelton, WA 98584 ;0(3604 7-9670 Please inclu e a$255. k or money order payable to Mason County Treasurer When comp comes part of the parcel file. FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: Accepted by: Date: MORE ON BACK SIDE 1:1PLANNING\PAC\PRE-INSPECTION Revised: 12/26/08 Please illustrate below the proposed building site in relation to critical areas (slopes, streams, lakes, wetlands, etc.) existing improvements, as well as property lines. APPLICATIONS SUBMITTED WITHOUT ADEQUATE ILUSTRATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED AND WILL BE RETURNED TO THE APPLICANT. rJ l�J 261 5v W� pep v" Departmental Review (For Office Use Only) L� Sr6v Planning Department Findings. V'WMAX 122212490170 �pa ----. ..__._.__ �90050 t; 122212400070 <<`212400080 " 7 122212 1'C'jo { 11�,'5001 10 s T22NR1W � 122210060000 4 d drAil& r-, Ila 122212400110 '. ti > - n ;. y xh 122212400120 j �. -b 122212490151 �i 122212493162 44 N 1 inch = 100 feet W E 1 inch = 0 miles S w �N.STATF MASON COUNTY o Py A o�, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT >. o N i Planning Division z� N y Y P O Box 279, Shelton, WA 98584 ? (360)427-9670 1864 Site Inspection April 30, 2009 DONALD DEHOPE TO BE KEPT IN THE 13719 198TH AVE KPN PARCEL FILE BELFAIR WA 98528 Case No.: SP12009-00025 PAJ vZZr ( c)oo t o V Parcel No.: 122212400090 Project Description: Site review to replace or expand cabin structure. Dear Applicant: Pursuant to your application, a site pre-inspection (SPI)was performed on your property. Below you will find comments made regarding the proposed development and its critical values. In some cases, setbacks for development from shorelines, steep slopes, streams, and wetlands must be included in your specific proposal; these setbacks are included as part of the comments listed below. This information is based on County and State regulations as they exist to date. These regulations may change and may affect the requirements for development of the subject property. Please contact me at (360)427-9670, ext. 365 if you have questions. Sincerely, AAAII2nrden Land Use Planner Mason County Planning Department 4/30/2009 Page 1 of 4 SP12009-00025 Site Inspection 4/30/2009 Case No.: SP12009-00025 Comments: Pre-inspection for Donald DeHope on Apr. 10, 2009: The pre-inspection was made to evaluate the proposed addition to or replacement of single family cabin on a 0.15 acre parcel located along the east side of North Bay Case Inlet. The parcel has some evergreen or deciduous trees throughout and a lawn next to the shoreline. The shoreline has a short concrete bulkhead with inset steps. The cabin has a deck just above grade on the water side; two small sleeping area buildings are located near the state highway. The proposed replacement and/or additional areas would be located at the proper setbacks based upon this inspection. These findings state regulations in effect at inspection time, unless noted otherwise. Development Regulations standards: _Y_ The site is in Rural Residential 5 zone. Standard building setbacks are 25-foot front yard setback, and 20-foot side property line and rear yard setbacks. These setbacks are measured from structures above grade such as roof overhangs, stairs, balconies, decks, heat pumps, storage buildings, and fuel tanks. _Y_ An exception is made for lots less than 100 feet in width, where side yard setbacks are equal to 10 percent of the lot width, but no less than 5 feet; this property has 7.5 ft. side yard setback. _Y_ An administrative variance may be requested to reduce these setback distances from property lines, to as low as 5 feet (side yard), if the size, shape, or features of the property constrain development from the proper setbacks. This process requires application and review at the time of the building permit submittal. Resource Ordinance Standards: _N_ Wetland critical area: Planning staff confirmed that the parcel does not contain certain wetlands, which are regulated under Mason County's Wetlands chapter 17.01.070 of the Mason County Resource Ordinance. The applicant will not need a wetlands special report during development review. _N_ Stream setbacks: No seasonal or perennial drainage flows through the subject property. The proposed development is greater than 200 feet from the any stream management area covered by the standards of this critical area. _N_ Slope or Landslide hazards: Slopes less than 10 percent 4/30/2009 Page 2 of 4 SP12009-00025 Site Inspection 4/30/2009 Case No.: SP12009-00025 adjacent to or within 300 feet of a proposed project were observed. No geologic special report (geologic assessment or geotechnical report) is needed during development review. _Y_ Shoreline setbacks: The shoreline designation for North Bay Case Inlet is Urban Environment per the Mason County Shoreline Master Program and development setbacks would be determined by the Mason County Resource Ordinance. The shoreline setback is determined by averaging the setback distance from the roofline of the adjacent residence on each side of the subject parcel to the ordinary high water mark (OHWM) of the Case Inlet shoreline. Any portion of the new structure, including decks, balconies, and rooflines, must be behind this common line. Shoreward of this line for 15 feet toward the shoreline is an area that may be used for lawns, patios or landscaping (development at grade level). From that point toward the shoreline is considered to be a required vegetated buffer that must remain and is regulated by the Mason County Resource Ordinance Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas Chapter. Within this chapter are those activities listed that can be done both with and without a Mason Environmental Permit; proposed tree limbing and limited cutting of trees in the buffer for view improvement are reviewed by the area permit planner prior to starting these type of activities. Staff measured the common line setback from the ordinary high water mark (OHWM) of the North Bay Case Inlet shoreline to a shoreward roof eave of a proposed residence. The shore setback of the roofline of the residence to the south (parcel -00100) is 35 feet from the inlet OHWM. The roofline of the residence to the north (parcel -00080) is 21 feet from the inlet OHWM. The proportional setback for a structure on the subject parcel would be 28 feet from the OHWM; but the Resource Ordinance requires 35 feet from the OHWM as the minimum shoreline setback for new development [composed of 20 feet vegetation buffer along the inlet and a 15-foot building setback on the upland side of the vegetation buffer]. As stated above, all development above grade must be behind this distance as shown on enclosed drawing. The existing cabin is 28 feet from the inlet OHWM (or face of bulkhead). The existing 20-foot wide by 17-foot deep deck on the waterward side ends at 12 feet from the bulkhead. The applicant has proposed replacing the existing cabin in its footprint in front of the 35-foot commonline and expanding the footprint upland of the common line. The possible replacement area of the existing cabin is 29 feet wide and 7 feet deep. The expanded area of residence and garage still need to meet the proper shoreline, side yard, and front yard setbacks, including proposed roof overhangs, stairs, 4/30/2009 Page 3 of 4 SP12009-00025 Site Inspection 4/30/2009 Case No.: SP12009-00025 balconies, decks, heat pumps, storage buildings, and fuel tanks. You would need to confirm with the county Utilities / Waste Mgmt. and Environmental Health Departments what their sewer system standards are to make sure about the adequacy of supplying septage disposal for the proposed development. General process: Future development must include a site plan, showing all setbacks from property lines, shoreline, road, and existing and proposed utilities improvements; this site plan will be needed for building permit application submittal and review. Specific County Codes standards for future development may be found at the County website address http-//www.co.mason.wa.us. If you have any questions please feel free to call. Thank you. 4/30/2009 Page 4 of 4 SP12009-00025 1411b tIA-M soloo ( _ oo 0 MASON COUNTY PLANNING DEPT. PRE-INSPECTION APPLICATION-") 3/�qo9 PLEASE PRINT S255.00 F Re" 1. Owner: <I Applicant: U d �� Site Address: 3� iL- Applic nt Addre s: Z 3 7/ OwnerAddress: VC N City: 02 St Zip City: '7 Jt St Zip 'cAr Phone: '2,e 0 / day Phone:(?-3) `?�� ' 2 �/ day Phone:( V3 ) eveni Planner: �,Q11��,Q� Email Address: SMPU�jQ r) Comp. Plan Type of Use 7 Water Body__)Qe� 2. Parcel No. Parcel No. - - Legal Description:'9� 1�f / 61&'' 'PtX / 3 '4 - �1 - 7 I 3. Purpose of Pre-Inspection Q ,/. A_fl)ge" AAY-� Al- kJnx L it/ A 4. Use of building: //1/G2 E� L 5. Do any of the following exist on or adjacent to property?: slopeV� saltwater lake river pond wetland seasonal runoff( other stream seasonal creek Directions to Site: L Gtx. 3,U) T t' TO/L y If the information is incomplete, then Mason County must disclaim any errors resulting from deficiencies in the original application. Pre-inspection reports remain valid only until development changes occur in the vicinity which affect the lot evaluated in this inspection, r the laws regulating development of the site change after the time of inspection. Applicant Signature: �_64 Date: J U Ifyou would like to be on site during inspection,please check here: 0- Return application to: Department of Community Development, Planning Division P.O. Box 186 Shelton, WA 98584 (360 )47-9670 Please incluLa$255.00 c k or money order payable to Mason County Treasurer When comps-f iin becomes part of the parcel file. FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: Accepted by: Date: MORE ON BACK SIDE I:\PLANNING\PAC\PRE-INSPECTION Revised: 12/26/08 Please illustrate below the proposed building site in relation to critical areas (slopes, streams, lakes, wetlands, etc.) existing improvements, as well as property lines. APPLICATIONS SUBMITTED WITHOUT ADEQUATE ILUSTRATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED AND WILL BE RETURNED TO THE APPLICANT. ter" lit/ S� WS _ 04 f�� 6 (1) a 141 Departmental Review J/ (For Office Use Only) #-7 L' L,I { L Planning Department Findings: - i� 2 *q-qk,4VU'Y'--'6J !Q ��it.tl �.�' �tivLri�►-c f�t�-�s�i l� eAj Please illustrate below the proposed building site in relation o critical areas (slopes, streams, lakes, wetlands, etc.) existing improvements, as well as property lines. APPLICATIONS SUBMITTED WITHOUT ADEQUATE ILUSTRATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED AND WILL BE RETURNED TO THE APPLICANT. 4-1 SQL W5 / S /)0$0 *Use, bud � Departmental Review (For Office Use Only) �7bt St 6v (Planning Department Findings: VWvt/X hkV-14 6o cj t� 17 122212490 12221 = O d C r ' a. r r� E e o � � A 22212400080 P T22 N R1 W 2212400100Aid , e 122212400110 .; k h Z. - t il _ � 122212490162 � � N 1 inch = 100 feet W E 1 inch = 0 miles S