Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutHMP - HMP Habitat Managment Plan - 3/30/2003 Habitat Management Plan ALDERBROOK RESORT REMODEL HABITAT MANAGEMENT PLAN Prepared by ENGINEERING SERVICES ASSOCIATE S,Inc. 210 Cherokee Beach Road Belfair,WA 98528 360-275-7384 THE HOOD CANAL SALMON ENHANCEMENT GROUP PO Box 2169 Belfair,WA 98528 ENVIRONMENTAL MARICULTURE SERVICES 121 Resolute Lane Port Ludlow, WA 98365 By Doug Thompson Senior Fish Biologist I certify this document to be in compliance with Mason County Ordinance No.17-02 Doug Thompson Senior Fish Biologist Environmental Mariculture Services January 7, 2003 - 1 - TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Description of Proposed Alderbrook Inn Remodel Project............................ roject............................3 2. Effects of Proposed Alderbrook Resort Remodel on Fish and Wildlife Species and Their Habitats---------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------13 3. Riparian Habitat Restoration Plans --------------- --------------------------------------------------19 4. Summary-------------------------------------------- ----- .................. ----- --------- -..................24 - 2 - 'L INTRODUCTION This report, together with attached maps and photographs, serves as the Habitat Management Plan (HMP)required by Mason County for the proposed Alderbrook Resort Remodel Project. The resort remodel project involves alterations and modification to the main resort complex including rooms, conference center, and administrative offices, and a major realignment of SR 106 to lesson the potential for pedestrian/vehicle conflicts that presently exist on the resort campus. The resort remodel will impact the lower riverine section of Alderbrook Creek. The realignment of SR106 will impact a low value wetland on the hillside south of the SR106 realignment, the second growth forest habitat in the area of the right of way and Alderbrook Creek and Dalby Creek where the realignment cross the creeks. In addition the SR106 realignment will have minor construction work within the existing roadbed of SR106 at Big Bed Creek The HMP plan identifies how a significant riparian habitat restoration project on Alderbrook Creek, will mitigate for impacts associated with the proposed Alderbrook Remodel Project and SR106 realignment. This HMP provides: (1) a description of the proposed project; (2) an analysis of effects of the project on existing fish and wildlife species and their habitat; and (3) a riparian habitat restoration plan. The plan considers effects of impervious surfaces, erosion control, and retention of natural vegetation on the functions and values of the FWHCA. The riparian habitat restoration project was designed in consultation with Hood Canal Salmon Enhancement Group (HCSEG). 1. Description of Proposed Alderbrook Inn Remodel Project Alderbrook Resort is a 101-room resort located on SR 106, 1.5 miles east of Union, in Mason County, Washington(see Appendix A for legal description). The location of Alderbrook Resort and relationship to surrounding topographic/water features is shown in Fig. IA and 1B respectively. The fundamental goal of the project is to enhance and reposition Alderbrook as a leading Pacific Northwest year round resort and conference center.. While the building square footage will increase slightly, the room count will actually decrease. Adjacent properties to the west and east are residential. To the south, across SR 106, approximately 80 acres of hillside are undeveloped and owned by the same ownership that holds Alderbrook,North Forty Lodging, LLC. Following is a brief overview of the proposed resort remodel project including existing Alderbrook site topographic features(Exhibit G-1) and drainage(Exhibit D-1). The main campus is located on the north side of SR 106 and fronts Hood Canal with a marina. Most hotel facilities are located in this area. West of and adjacent to the main campus is a grouping of 21 cottages, of which 13 are owned by North Forty Lodging, LLC and the remaining eight are individually owned by other parties. Opposite the main campus and the cottages, on the south side of SR 106, are approximately 6.3 acres housing surface parking lots, a commercial building, Alderbrook's sewage treatment plant and undeveloped lands. Located about 307 feet - 3 - west of the aforementioned property, also on the south side of the highway, is a 0.77-acre lot,which houses an old barn structure. The existing resort in development is spread over 7-acres (Exhibit D-1). Impervious space in the existing resort development is 1.5 acres in roofs and 2.3 acres of pavement for a total area of 3.8 acres. In the proposed resort development, total impervious space is 5.9 acres with 1.4 acres in roofs and 4.5 acres in pavement. - 4 - FIGURE 1-A ALDERBROOK RESORT RENOVATION PROJECT VICINITY MAP Ve is N :,f \' s 5 Rol bay' Sf rd Ile I ! land \ ` F ti t 1 SIC W Id a e t0� ) 'Ila'he ,tp,` o�'ak'rt Vs a' e�llC, 1 i Oily L. � /� %�� ancliester V •+Vf ,INS sty a raE ashon ! 0 �A unnysio' jfeights I ~r VAN } $ d f t 2 ' Vi W Pa arhurst ! bkm a� 94 W ��..✓� t,a :t 13 to f 23 a 3' ragaria '� SI1!yahurst Burier VAshon Walla 1 j Ili p NOP Lis e(i 11 PROJECT LOCATION 1 �► n `< <� l un rdy M g►i ° r 7 I r r 'v irF �� a�C / IWPICktOn fen o �� j j ?MAry Island hleg/ Redond r+ ff lew Aak `,' �as' ale, e e r c 13 h �� ''�uston p� y , r ' ay hofr J r 9LV-, L ay e ! Q ie z: htt { sC� , r 'J \o it ski or j' n (`itlaytDrr°Peak f. r it Est yma F y ' A Idt n 4n Ilacop' o ���` er n land' ilchel. 1�` os o y fi_i 1 D ,all South Ba 1 u nt Sp n Y j � WILOr rE REFUG �OT IE�Vf t _( I'milly t. W ovela FIGURE 1-B ALDERBROOK RESORT RENOVATION PROJECT SURROUNDING AREA TOPOGRAPHY ! IV r.r �-_�� 1 � � ' _-:_..__ :cam',,,••\ l Foot Bpi e wIf r��•- , :1 ---- - - ,- � -- ! J // / • Lay DALBY CREEK J I � 1 f r / l •` • • �� / wr ALDERBROOK CREEK �— � �• r1, 6LA+YIa rrA r_ �'Mi IV t7 1 C t T / • / `\\\�'�,lr ;��/• ♦ ��\.• /, I 0 1 I -.� Y - e• T-J` 4 • 1 MEN W OUR hill w Lit I namilliffil)I OWN wg imoliffithEr-all,I 141. - WE SF X V 44 '-,, L'.:1. I OAPC *AW* -Aw EAST BEACH OUTTALL z 4 • / ( ` ! RPM WAN litz TAT ON a — � - • .c - �`-� � ••� _ � ter+!/� �/� , � � - �� �•tiC- • ?tea ,� -� �� ,•.' �� i .ail ;• �I ' ` _ - ..T�7 _ `T` �,rn'x+a•, ;1� .F / y�.�k•aJ A t �. Rim -19 z P.M.P.4 to �f Description of Resort Property The Main Hotel Building, sometimes referred to as The Plaza Building, is a three-story (primarily), wood-frame structure built in 1979. It is located along the west side of the main campus parcel. The building houses 47 guest rooms, conference/ ballroom facilities, restaurant, lounge and kitchen facilities, main lobby, administrative offices and some back-of-house support functions. There is a small, additional area below the first floor on the canal side of the building, housing the hotel laundry and some support space. The square footage of this building is approximately 43,831 SF. The Main Hotel Building will be renovated extensively, inside and outside. The"Lanai"Buildings are two, three-story, wood-framed, connected structures,both built in 1965. Each building houses 18 guest rooms, six rooms on each of three floors, comprising 36 total rooms. The Lanai buildings are east of the lobby of the Plaza Building and separated from SR 106, by 40 feet of parking lot.. The combined areas of these buildings are approximately 15,966 SF. The two lanai buildings will be demolished. The Pool House is located at the northeast corner of the property, and is a one-story, aluminum, glass and plastic building housing the swimming pool,Jacuzzi and restrooms/ changing areas. The structure was built at the same time as the Plaza Building, in 1979. The square footage of this building is approximately 4,500 SF. The Pool House will maintain its functions and receive some architectural modifications and improvements such as new restrooms, new roof, some exterior improvements to the east side where the building has been damaged, some HVAC improvements and a new trellis which will front the exposed portions of the structure on the west and south facades. The Eastwood Building is a one-story, wood-frame structure built in 1965. It houses a large, column-free meeting room and support facilities. It is located to the south of the Pool House. The square footage of this building is approximately 3,350 SF. The Eastwood Building will be renovated extensively, inside and outside, and will house a new spa. Between the Pool House and the Spa(Eastwood Building), a new fitness room will be added. The Conference Center is located to the south of the Eastwood Room and east of the lanai buildings. The building is a two-story, wood-framed structure,believed to have been built in 1965. A series of meeting and support spaces, restroom facilities and the Alderbrook maintenance shop are located in this structure. Due to grades in this area, each room in the building is at its own level and the resulting floor plates stair-step. The square footage of this building is approximately 4,318 SF. The Conference Center will be demolished. The covered walkways are a network of wood-framed canopies,which connect many of the buildings, providing shelter in inclement weather. Separately, there is an assortment of stairs and elevated walkways were added in front (on the west side)of the Conference Center. The covered walkways in the courtyard and the Conference Center stairs and - 9 - walkways combined are approximately 6,503 SF. The covered walkways and the Conference Center stairs will be demolished. The marina consists of a"T"configuration dock, wood-frame, floating and anchored with wood pilings. A walkway extends approximately 500 feet from the shoreline to a 600-foot long moorage pier running perpendicular to the walkway. There is a small marina shack at the juncture of the walkway and the pier. The square footage of the marina is approximately 9,584 SF. The marina will remain as is with no modification outside of routine maintenance. Cottages West of the Plaza Building, there are 21 cottages, which are organized in a horseshoe plan configuration around a central green space. Eight are privately owned and 13 are property of Alderbrook. The total square footage of Alderbrook's 13 cottages is approximately 10,088 SF. The total square footage of all 21 cottages is approximately 17,431 SF. The exteriors and interiors of these units will be partially renovated P Y (including those owned privately by others). One cottage,number 103, which is owned by North Forty Lodging will be partially demolished to make room for emergency vehicle access/turning radii. Two privately owned cottages (located on the waterfront) will be modified to add a second story. South of SR 106 The Brookside Building is a one-story,wood-framed building,built in 1965. The square footage of this building is approximately 3,600 SF. The Brookside Building will be renovated inside to accommodate the primary hotel administration components and staff facilities. Alderbrook's Sewage Treatment Plant serves the hotel campus and cottages exclusively. It is located south of the Brookside Building. The Sewage Treatment Plant will be maintained and no modifications are anticipated. Maintenance Facility Alderbrook will be tradingits off-site maintenance and storage barn and the lot it is on g for maintenance and storage building lot located south of the new SR106 realignment and west of the realigned Beach Drive The maintenance building Alderbrook will construct is a one-story, wood-frame structure of approximately 2,400 SF. SR 106 Realignment A major component of the Alderbrook resort re model is the proposed realignment of SR J P P P 1� 106 (Exhibit P-1). Under existing conditions, the majority of resort parking lies to the south of SR 106. To access the main campus guests must cross SR106 creating - 10 - vehicle/pedestrian conflicts. The proposed realignment will eliminate current vehicle/pedestrian conflicts for Alderbrook Lodge guests. The realignment of SR 106 will incorporate current design standards to improve intersection skew angles, horizontal and vertical sight distances, and overall safety in the project area. A traffic study(The Shea Group, 2003) shows that realignment of SR 106 will accommodate traffic volumes projected to the year 2022. Drainage and Run-off Control Measures The existing resort in development is spread over 7-acres(Exhibit D-1). Impervious space in the existing resort development is 1.5 acres in roofs and 2.3 acres of pavement for a total area of 3.8 acres. In the proposed resort development, total impervious space will increase to 5.9 acres with 1.4 acres in roofs and 4.5 acres in pavement. An extensive drainage system has been designed to control and treat stormwater run-off from impervious surfaces within the resort complex and the proposed SR 106 realignment (Exhibit D-2). These modern storm water drainage and collection systems will control the quantity of storm water runoff and greatly improve the quality of storm water runoff entering Hood Canal. Surface pollutants and road oils will be largely removed as water filters through settling ponds, infiltration galleries and bioswales. Prior to these improvements stormwater run-off flowed un-treated into Hood Canal. - 11 - i - r ti - -l�f. S� ELK• .�' - �• "R,r _ 7< _ , ,�•'�i � i �''S� z . ?,nd�,X _:4's' - "'ta" .jt' �••`•_ •- -yr: s, �; .- - -d ,�:: � �' ,f�� �, ..to - tea,.}-y�.�� - �°h . . .: �« •� -�� - S �3a .•r,_ a � .�r41 _ - ` - �•R - Ir W� ,L e • i • m. S + ^y s wsF a � _ t• 1 rx'-' 3 � 6 yx WE vp ftl6- d '� k f' •. l t r Y ,{, }fit' �" .V ,'S`r rid `441 474 5 ;a G . > •? s V P - �, r Top View Side View NOTES: -wale divider for wrdh>10 R I. 65'X 10'STORM WATER INFILTRATION GALLERY SUMMARY ON/OFF SITE IMPACT 1. GRAVEL PARKING LOT WITH 12"OF ASTM 33 SAND UNDER GRAVEL AREA FOR PROPOSED ACTION oro, er Tree Bnoae water quarry desgn dL�th(Y},4' 3. 12'WIDE BY 9S'LONG ALSP BOTTOMLESS CULVERT 1. ROOFS = 1.4 ACRES Nor E.,e Over Trench (2,for r�ntty mowed areas) �. Y.1' f 4.RECONSTRUCTED STREAM CHANNEL WITH POOLS 8 LWD 1. PARKING/ACCESS = 2.06 AC. -rove or OLD STR EAM REAM TO BE USED AS COHO REARING SITE oer..g La_�:;'=;s`+• ______ ___ ___ 3. LANDSCAPED = 4.7 ACRES 0. 0o -whoa cure:nu 6. 12'WIDE BY 45'LONG BOTTOMLESS CULVERT 4. OFF SITE RD'S PAVM'T= 1.43 AC 4-1- % _ 7. 100'X 4'DIA.STORM WATER SETTLING AND DETENTION S.SR 106 SLOPES = 4.61 ACRES `"' O 2'compost ulloo into 8.SALMON GROTTO-SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR DETAILS 6. STREAMS/RIP— 0.9 ACRES _ s n bofo111 w yN�,,(b)_l 6'r1ffih•e sa 9. 192'BIOSWALE AND INFILTRATION TRENCH-SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN c,ne.5rr.p N'"ye % a dare N-- 10. 120'OF 4'DIA. DETENTION PIPE TO LIMIT FLOW TO OUTFALL o,.em�n $17(). CA F+ram TOTAL IMPACT AREA = 16.1 AC. Gatl 're max.-10�dividet wkitn 11.BUILDING ROOF DRAINS-SEPARATE DISCHARGE TO OUTFALL rtrtt. ZR 12. 140'X 6'WIDE INFILTRATION TRENCH-DISCHARGE TO DETENTION -` opoonal Sam Fifter 13. WEST PARKING LOT STORM WATER COLLECTION SYSTEM 14.EAST SR 106 DRAINAGE COLLECTION SYSTEM 15. COLLECT HILLSIDE DRAINAGE IN SOUTH ROADSIDE DITCH TYPICAL BIO SWALE SECTION HILLSIDE DRAINAGE TO BE SEPARATE FROM ROADWAY RUNOFF WATER IN DITCH WILL DRAIN TO NATURAL STREAMS TO THE EAST. 16.DRIANAGE INTERCEPTOR DITCH AND 4'DEEP BY 12"DIA. INFILTRATOR/FILTRATION TRENCH SECTION DRAIN CURTAIN MEEADOW BROOK CREEK.LONG THE TOP PROPOSED ROADWAY CUT. LI ------_ _ 10 1 / i > O i 20 90 O +10 EXHIBIT D-2 0 _ZZ_-- �'- ALDERBROOK RESORT REMODEL ------ � SEPA DOCUMENTATION *°-- 4+ ° '° + ' 6+ � '° +°° ' 9+ ° '� / PROPOSED STORM WATER COLLECTION, TREATEMENT, AND DISPOSAL SYSTEM .X 17. REMOVE THE EXISTING 24"CONCRETE CULVERT(FISH PASSAGE BARRIER) WITH A PREFABRICATED 20'LONG BY 14' WIDE BRIDGE. N RESTORE STREAM CHANNEL FOR APPROXIMATELY 60 FEET. �. 1& INSTALL A 110'OF 12' WIDE BY 4.1'DEEP BOTTOMLESS ARCH CULVERT(ALUMINUM STRUCTURAL PLATE)AND REBUILD THE STREAM 5.5 1 2' 4 11 11 4 FOR 50'EACH SIDE OF PROPOSED CULVERT. 19. SR 106 STORM WATER TREATMENT TRENCH. SLOPE SR 106 TO THE NORTH AT 2%FROM DALBY RD.INTERSECTION TO THE START OF 4' SUPERELEVATION CURVE. CONSTRUCT A 3' WIDE BY 1'DEEP SAND TRENCH WITH PERFORATED PIPE IN THE BOTTOM.INSTALL 1'HZGH ROCK WEIRS EVERY 30 FEET IN THE 2'DEEP DITCH. USE 10' WIDE GRASS SWAIL TO FILTER RUNOFF , G`L� 20. 1' WZDE DITCH WITH WITH ROCK WEIRS.k AA O o 110 -- --11-51 Q 14 �• i s olq� � x D - 15 -10 CZ, �. �- __�=J__�� EXHIBIT D-3 m ---- - — m- *oQ� — ? _ ,Uy+oo , 3+ o 104+00 ,U + ALDERBROOK RESORT REMODEL SEPA DOCUMENTATION PROPOSED STORM WATER COLLECTION, f o o _ TREATMENT, AND DISPOSAL SYSTEM r WESTERN PORTION OF ROADWAY _ ., BILL GA TES The proposed site storm water management system (Exhibit D-2) is described as follows for the eastern, central, and western portion of the site and SR 106: 1. Storm water from the parking lot directly in front of the resort will flow northerly through scuppers across landscaping into a 192-foot long combination bio-swale and infiltration trench(Exhibit D-2, #9) for treatment before flowing into a 120 feet of 4' diameter, underground detention pipe (Exhibit D-2 #12)before discharging into an existing 12"diameter storm water outfall located along the eastern boundary of the property. The roof drainage and foundation drainage (Exhibit D-2, #11)will be isolated and discharged separately to the existing 12"storm water outfall on the East boundary of the site. 2. Storm water from the eastern portion of the site and the middle portion of the realigned SR 106 will be directed to collected in catch basins and conveyed through piping(Exhibit D-2, #13)to a 100 feet of 4' diameter underground detention pipe (Exhibit D-2, #7). After detention the storm water will be conveyed to the bottom of the hill and allowed to seep into the ground through a storm water infiltration gallery (Exhibit D-2, #1). The lawn behind the bulkhead next to the beach will be rebuilt with gravel to allow the storm water to seep through the gravel out through the bulkhead. 3. Drainage flowing north from the watershed above the proposed roadway cut will flow into a 4' deep x 12"diameter curtain drain that runs along the top of the proposed roadway cut(Exhibit D-2, #16) A 12" diameter curtain drain will be installed below the surface of the drainage ditch to intercept groundwater interflow. The surface and ground water runoff will be discharged at the east end of the proposed roadway into a small stream known locally as Brookhaven Creek. The storm water runoff from the proposed roadway cut slopes will flow down slope where it will be intercepted mid- slope at two locations by small 4-foot wide benches. This runoff along with the water runoff that reaches the toe of the cut slope (Exhibit D-2,#15)will also be directed to the east and discharged into Brookhaven Creek. The storm water runoff from the proposed roadway cut slope will not be contaminated and will not require treatment or detention 4. The eastern portion of the SR 106 realignment road drainage systems will flow into catch basins and be conveyed in piping into a 140 long bioswale and infiltration trench(Exhibit D-2, #12) and then to the existing 12" stormwater outfall on the East boundary of the site. 5. The storm water runoff from Beach Drive and the proposed parking lot and building maintenance area(Exhibit D-2, #2)will be directed into the proposed SR 106 roadway drainage system where it will eventually cross SR 106 in an existing culvert. Runoff from the maintenance building paved areas will be run through an oil water separator(plate separator)before discharge to the roadway ditch. The maintenance - 15 - area parking lot will be constructed with a gravel surface over 12"of ASTM sand so as to provide treatment through filtration before flowing to the roadway ditch. 6. Substantial improvements are planned to Alderbrook Creek(Exhibit D-2, #4, #5, #6, and#8) as previously discussed in the environmental checklist. No site or roadway runoff drainage piping will be discharged into Alderbrook Creek. Overland flow from the stream riparian areas will drain into the stream. The small drainage that flows from the south down the hill just to the east of the wastewater treatment plant will be piped under the proposed SR 106 roadway into Alderbrook Creek through a 24" CMP pipe 7. The westerly 900 feet of the proposed SR 106 realignment roadway will drain to the Big Bend Creek watershed—0.61 acres of pavement. There will be a small increase in the runoff from SR 106 that flows to the Big Bend Creek watershed. Approximately 550 feet of the existing SR 106 drains to the Big Bend Creek watershed—0.34 acres of pavement compared to 0.61 for the SR106 realignment. The increase in roadway runoff will be 0.27 acres. The water quality impact of the increased roadway runoff will be mitigated by installing a 3' wide by 3' deep storm water infiltration ditch(See Exhibit D-3 #19). The stormwater will enter the ditch and percolate down through sand or pea gravel to a 8"underdrain pipe. The underdrain pipe will discharge into the near Big Bend Creek west of the proposed Dalby Road intersection with SR 106. The proposed storm water drainage collection and treatment system will greatly control and improve the quality of storm water runoff entering Hood Canal. Surface pollutants and road oils will be largely removed as water filters through the bio-swales, infiltration trenches and settling ponds. Restoration of Alderbrook Creek and improvements to Dalby Creek will significantly improve salmon production in both stream systems. - 16 - 2. Effects of Proposed Alderbrook Resort Remodel on Fish and Wildlife Species and Their Habitats Riparian Habitat Alderbrook Creek Alderbrook Creek is a spring fed stream system. The average annual flow is approximately 100 gallons per minute below the culvert at Beach Drive, through the resort property, and into Hood Canal. Between Beach Drive and SR 106 downstream, there is approximately 200 feet of stream habitat (Exhibit G-1). Beach Drive parallels the stream channel to the east and a gravel parking lot lies to the west. These features limit riparian habitat within this section to a narrow band of 30 to 50 feet on each side of the streambed. The entire channel below the Beach Drive culvert is confined to about a twenty-foot wide by ten-foot deep trench that lacks sinuosity. This is the result of the improperly designed culvert at Beach Drive,which is now perched three feet above the stream channel and acts as a scouring, high water velocity barrier preventing fish migration(Exhibit W-1). The riparian habitat is dominated by an over-story of mature Douglas fir(Pseudotsuga menziesh), Hemlock (Tsuga heterophylla), and Western Red Cedar(Thuja plicata)with an under-story of Willow(Salix spp.), Big Leaf Maple(Acer macrophyllum), Vine Maple (Acer circinatum), and Red Alder(Alnus rubra) as well as younger Cedars. The stream is well shaded with over 85%canopy cover. This canopy cover helps to maintain the low water temperature of this spring fed system making for ideal salmon habitat. The in- stream large woody debris (LWD) abundance in this section, however, is minimal resulting in lesser structural habitat and a lower pool/riffle ratio than what would naturally occur. - 17 - HOOD CANAL ��� ALDERBROOK RESORT a SR j ,'Eii r a 0.38 ACRES OF LOW : � VALUE HILLSIDE SEEP WETLANDS 001-M - � I `' ! 3i;�r f ' / I 3�- 'cFa,`,{:!, I '{,^ eI; "7• s•�V �: _• :_ t `..- 1 ffi ,� .,- a ! may`' 'af":`I": _ `��. . _ .;. - :;: .,: ^„fir^•,. ! � -{+ } � :5, {+ '•"1 I a K . 4 yy a t r :Y , �Y h - a i I / �i r f + = + �a F / ; y — THIS CUL VERT A T BEACH DRIVE BLOCKS ONE HALF MILE OF EXCELLENT COHO AND y STEEL HEAD SPAWNING 4} 4 HABITA T IN THE ALDERBROOK CREEK WA TERSHED, a , { . J{ f S EXISTING ALDERBROOKSEPA DOCUMENTATION T• .r� � �' f - REAMS AND WETLANDS : Benthic macroinvertebrates identified in the stream are stoneflies (Plecoptera), caddisflies (Tricoptera), and mayflies (Ephemeroptera). These orders of aquatic insects are pollution intolerant and indicate high water quality. The aquatic insects identified in this system indicate the water quality of this system to be well within the tolerance range of priority species such as coho salmon(Oncorhynchus kisutch), chum salmon (Oncorhynchus keta), and steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss). However, the pool/riffle ratio, channel confinement and fish passage barriers are interacting in complex ways that significantly limit salmon productivity. The lack of LWD within the active stream channel of the lower reach is preventing pool habitat that is essential for juvenile coho and other salmonid survival. The increased velocity north of the Beach Drive culvert has limited spawning habitat throughout the accessible reach by entrenching the stream channel and flushing out most of the spawning gravel, leaving mostly cobble sized substrate. The SR 106 crossing represents a partial barrier while the Beach Drive barrier is preventing access to over 3000-feet of optimal upstream habitat (Exhibit W-1). There were no anadromous fish species of concern identified in this area. One juvenile cutthroat trout(Oncorhynchus clarki)was identified in a pool directly downstream from the Beach Drive crossing. North of SR 106, in the resort complex,there is very little riparian complexity compared to the upper watershed(Exhibit W-1). During rehabilitation of Alderbrook Creek, cutthroat in the existing channel could be affected because of an intermittent period of no water in the channel. This water will be pumped around the channel during construction. To avoid fish mortality,the cutthroat will be removed from the project section using seine nets, and placed in other parts of the stream that will not be affected by construction. The stream section under construction will be isolated upstream and downstream using block nets so that fish will not be able to swim near the construction area from other sections of the stream. Within the construction zone,there will be mortality to benthic organisms, such as aquatic insects, from lack of water during the construction phase. The impact of this on the stream ecosystem will be minimal considering the contribution of benthic fauna from the upstream habitat once stream flow is restored. In its present state,Alderbrook Creek is a poor fish-bearing stream. The habitat is already severely degraded and no significant negative impact is expected to Alderbrook Creek as a result of Alderbrook Resort remodel and SR 106 realignment project. Ambient temperature and naturally occurring aquatic insects indicate that conditions are optimal for Pacific salmon. Restoration of Alderbrook Creek will significantly enhance natural conditions for Pacific salmon species, and more than adequately compensate for changes to the existing riparian habitat Dalby Creek Dalby Creek is a spring fed stream system located approximately 15 miles west of Belfair and crossing underneath SR106 approximately 400 feet west of Alderbrook Resort before emptying into Hood Canal. The riparian zone above SR 106 is dominated by an over- - 19 - story of mature Douglas Fir(Pseudotsuga menziesii), Hemlock (Tsuga heterophylla),Big Leaf Maple(Acer macrophyllum), and Western Red Cedar(Thuja plicata)with an under- story of Willow(Salix spp.), Vine Maple (Acer circinatum), and Red Alder(Alnus rubra). Like Alderbrook Creek, this section is well shaded with over 85% canopy cover. Despite a moderate level of channel confinement,the habitat in this section still seems representative of natural conditions. There is a lower pool to riffle ratio than what would occur naturally,however, due to a lack of LWD. North of existing SR 106, the riparian zone is primarily residential with very little native successional vegetation. There were no fish identified in Dalby Creek south of the culvert at SR106. The habitat, however, is similar to Alderbrook Creek where cutthroat trout(Oncorhynchus clarki) were found, so it is likely that this species also occurs in Dalby Creek. Aquatic insects identified in the stream are stoneflies (Plecoptera), caddisflies (Tricoptera), and mayflies (Ephemeroptera). These orders of aquatic insects are known to be pollution intolerant and indicate high water quality well within the tolerance range of priority species such as coho salmon(Oncorhynchus kisutch), chum salmon(Oncorhynchus keta), and steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss). At Dalby Creek there are two stream crossings (Exhibits T-3 and D-3). The proposed crossing for the SR 106 realignment will occur roughly 200 feet south of the current SR 106 crossing. There will be roughly 60-feet of riparian habitat on both stream banks removed and converted to roadway and semi-impervious surface. Impacts to aquatic habitat will be minimized by the installation of a 12-foot bottomless arch aluminum culvert with the addition of spawning gravel. (Fig 3). The current crossing of SR 106 is over an under sized culvert that represents a partial barrier to fish passage. This culvert will be removed and replaced with a 12-foot wide 24-foot long prefabricated bridge. The removal of this culvert will open up over 3000 feet of productive upstream fish habitat. LWD will be placed throughout the stream to improve in-stream structural habitat and increase the pool to riffle ratio. The overall impact from construction will be temporary and minimal to this stream system. The replacement of the culvert with a bridge at the existing SR106 crossing along with the placement of the LWD throughout the stream to improve in-stream structural habitat and increase the pool to riffle ratio and additional spawning gravel in the SR106 right of way will have a positive impact on pacific salmon species. Big Bend Creek Big Bend Creek is a Type 3 stream at the west end of the SR106 alignment. There are existing runs of fall chum and coho salmon. Under present conditions, roadway oils and surface pollutants flow untreated into Big Bend Creek and Hood Canal. The west 130 feet of the new roadway overlay on SR 106 is within the 150-foot stream buffer of Big Bend Creek. Approximately 550 feet of the existing SR 106 drains to the Big Bend Creek watershed—0.34 acres of pavement. The westerly 900 feet of the proposed SR 106 realignment roadway will drain to the Big Bend Creek watershed—0.61 acres of pavement. The increase in roadway runoff will be 0.27 acres. The water quality impact of the increased roadway runoff will be mitigated by installing a 3' wide by 3' deep storm - 20 - water infiltration ditch (See Exhibit D-3). The storm water will enter the ditch and percolate down through sand or pea gravel to a 8"underdrain pipe. The underdrain pipe will discharge into Big Bend Creek west of the proposed Dalby Road intersection with SR 106. This new infiltration trench along the west end of the realigned SR 106 will prevent road oils and other surface pollutants from entering Big Bend Creek. Terrestrial Habitat The eastern third of the road alignment represents an established early successional ecosystem characterized by past low-level development. The primary plant species occurring are Willow (Salix spp.) and Red Alder(Alnus rubra). There were no wildlife species of concern identified in this area The middle third of the zone consists of mature conifer forest impacted by low levels of business development. The plant species identified in this area were Douglas Fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii), Hemlock (Tsuga heterophylla), Big Leaf Maple (Acer macrophyllum), and Western Red Cedar(Thuja plicata) with an under-story of Willow (Salix spp.), Vine Maple (Acer circinatum), and Red Alder(Alnus rubra). This area maintains potential habitat for Pileated Woodpecker(Drycopus pileatus), Bald Eagle (Haliaetus leucocephalus), and Great Blue Heron (Ardea herodias),which are all wildlife species of concern. Evidence of Pileated Woodpecker was observed during the site inspection. There was no direct evidence of Bald Eagle or Great Blue Heron regularly using this tract of land, although these species are known to frequent this habitat type in the Hood Canal area. The western third of the upland habitat zone maintains plant and wildlife characteristics comparable to the middle third with lesser impacts from development. There are no documented eagle nests within a one-mile radius of the Alderbrook property according to the WDFW database of nesting sites (Boad and Hannafious 2002). The new road will require clearing of approximately 7.4 acres of second growth forest (Exhibit P-1). Approximately 4.3 acres of the proposed site will be terraced and re- vegetated with native vegetation (Exhibit T-3)to merge naturally with upslope second growth forest. The remaining 3.1 acres will be in impervious road surface and roadside slope. The clearing of the road will result in the loose of approximately 80 large diameter trees in the western third of the realignment zone. North Forty Lodging will be submitting for a conversion of timber to road, which does not require reforestation. Wetlands A wetland inventory was conducted along the proposed construction path for the SR 106 Realignment(Shanewise, 2002). The proposed road realignment has dramatically different topography between the east and west ends (Exhibit G-1). The east end cuts across a steep slope typical of shoreline bluffs common to Hood Canal. At the point where Alderbrook Creek is crossed, the topography flattens to a gentle slope to the - 21 - project's western terminus. The wetlands and stream described within this report all occur within the eastern, steep-sloped part of the proposed new roadway. Two, small wetland systems (Exhibits G-1, P-1 and W-1), approximately 0.38 acre, occur along the realignment route. These are minor class III, hillside seeps. Surface water is restricted to flows artificially consolidated by human caused alterations to the ground surface. Soil saturation is caused by daylighting groundwater, and appears to occur at many locations along the uphill wetland boundary. Both wetlands have downslope terminuses where hydrology seeps subsurface again and soil saturation ceases. Minor outlet channels that drain from the downslope points on both wetlands also fade from defined channels to vegetated swales that technically lack either stream or wetland conditions. An old dirt roadway was cut across the slope where the two wetlands occur, and this roadway now intercepts most wetland hydrology. Where this roadway occurs, downslope conditions are entirely upland. It seems likely that the past road builders cut their path just below where the wetland seep naturally disappeared,but the hydrology then drained into the flat roadway and created new wetland conditions below where the natural wetlands had previously occurred. The two slope wetlands technically terminate both wetland and stream conditions prior to their connection with the existing ditch along SR106. Water from this ditch drains through culverts and beneath adjacent developed ground before finally reaching Puget Sound roadside ditch where water flows through culverts to the shoreline of Puget Sound over 200 feet away. Although storm event generated surface flows drain from the wetlands to the roadside ditch during winter, this weak connection to Puget Sound should qualify these sloped wetlands as not associated with tidal waters. A small, Type 5 stream also occurs along the steep slope near the two minor - 22 - i ��, � -_sir � � - ♦ -,, qp �•' 3' ''' \�\�►���1�� � � � /"%ice /�� / _, '�� /j �'/- ����_ • �lA ���� � lei rig • �, v� /-'1/ ��,�� E�j.�I��� / .:',Y�. . ram. :\ �� .. � � • ------------� :i'�"� �J!'- ..ice 7� -- -- ---- �� , � -.�\ PROPOSEDEXHIBIT T3 MO ALDERBROOK RESORT REMODEL SEPA DOCUMENTATION OVERVIEW OF THE . �IIT A • A • • • SITE IMRPOVMENTS wetland systems. This system drains to an intake grate at the slope toe where solid pavement begins. From here, the surface flow is culverted west into the Alderbrook Creek channel. Both the wetlands and stream described here are low value systems with minimal function performance. Water quality benefits from the densely vegetated sloped wetlands are the primary function of these systems. The seasonal stream flows should contribute organic matter to Alderbrook Creek, but the low volumes involved limit the total value of this action. Habitat structures of all three systems are simple, and past disturbances have occurred. Avoidance of these systems by the proposed project is unwarranted (Shanewise, 2002), and the proposed restoration of Alderbrook Creek and improvements to Dalby Creek will qualify as adequate mitigation for impacts to these wetlands from the SR 106 realignment. 3. Riparian Habitat Restoration Plans Alderbrook Creek The Alderbrook Resort remodel will affect the lower riverine section of Alderbrook Creek as well as terrestrial habitat associated with the SR 106 Realignment Project. Alderbrook Creek Restoration(Fig. 2 and Exhibit D-2)will be completed as part of the new construction under guidance of the HCSEG. The goals of the restoration project are to restore the natural characteristics of the lower sections of the stream systems and provide a people/wildlife interface associated with salmon. The change in in-stream habitat within the development boundary will in� g p y increase by 0.5 acres from the existing area of 0.27 acres to 0.77 acres after the stream restoration projec t � t is completed (Fig. 2). The stream flood plain will increase from an existing area of 4,500 s . ft. to 10 119 s . ft. An existing section q q g of Alderbrook Creek will be modified into a community watershed habitat viewing area with five pools for juvenile salmon rearing. There will be two stream crossings incorporated in the new road construction. Each iP stream crossing will be designed over 12-foot bottomless aluminum arch culverts (Fig. 3). The upstream culvert will open over 3000 feet of optimal upstream habitat t P p p p o salmon migration and juvenile rearing. It will also restore natural fluvial processes to the downstream habitat such as large wood debris LWD movement and nutrient cycling. g Y ( ) The overall impact of the lost riparian habitat to the stream ecosystem is expected to be minimal considering the goals of the restoration project. New Stream Channel A new channel will be created to maintain a spawning zone for returning salmon. Moving the existing stream channel to the new location will impact roughly 200-feet of in-stream habitat (Exhibit D-2, #4). The new channel with seven pools and six log weirs will be constructed to mimic more natural conditions such as sinuosity and structural in- stream habitat. This will be conducive to more beneficial habitat relating to salmon productivity and overall abundance of aquatic organisms. - 24 - The new channel will consist of a meandering stream flowing roughly 70 GPM through a matrix of native landscape (Exhibit D-2, #5). To accomplish this, Beach Drive the existing road along the east bank of Alderbrook Creek will be removed and relcated to the west side of the reconstructed Alderbrook Creek, with asphalt parking between Beach Drive road and the Brookside Building being removed. . The new riparian area will be planted with native shrubs and trees in accordance with an approved landscape plan. The planted trees will provide an immediate source of shade, nutrients, and bank stability to the new channel. The in-stream structure of the new channel will be enhanced through the addition of LWD. This will provide a natural pool forming mechanism as well as cover for aquatic organisms. Research has found that pools formed from constructed log structures result in a 3-fold increase in summer juvenile coho numbers. At Big Beef Creek, Quinn and Peterson(1996) indicated a positive correlation between LWD volume and coho over- winter survival. Figure 8-1A and 8-113 from Fish Habitat Rehabilitation Procedures show the documentation of the positive correlations between LWD addition and coho smolt abundance within streams (Slaney and Zaldokas 1997). Left Figure 8-1A. Increases in number of outmigrant coho salmon smolts after experimental addition of LWD to debris poor streams in the Alsea River basin (A) and Nestucca River basin in western Oregon. Treatment occurred in summer 1990. (Murphy 1995). Right Figure 8-113. Coho smolt yield increases three years before and three years after large woody debris enhancement in Porter Creek, a tributary of the Chehalis River, coastal Washington (Cederholm et al. in prep). Spawning success of returning adult salmon is directly related to the quality, size, and abundance of spawning gravel(Groot and Margolis, 1994). To maximize the potential spawning success of returning coho and chum salmon, the benthic environment created for the new stream will consist of mostly one to three-inch substrate. Because the average depth of chum and coho spawning redds range between 15 and 30cm into the gravel, the new streambed will contain at least a 30 cm depth of the optimal spawning substrate previously described(Groot and Margolis, 1994). It must be considered that the benthic environment existing in the previous channel upheld complex nutrient cycles and other functions associated with the concept of river continuum that will not immediately occur in the new channel. It can be assumed that these functions will eventually transpire; however, this process can be supplemented and expedited by mimicking natural nutrient input processes. Adding salmon carcasses to streams stems has been documented to increase juvenile salmon abundance and elevate Y levels of benthic - 25 - r cc 40 ��, ' ' ?I�� ' ` •.gyp:, . if,� `�```" .. �\ ■■Ra r I _ ��' �11r11� •! , .1►. ji0 • I , STA: 0+72.02 ELEV: 49.23 100'X12'-O"X4'-1" DEEP BOTTOMLESS ALUMINUM w PLATE ARCH CULVERT STA: 1+71.83 ELEV: 42.99 o w 6jjjj - .2�%_ SIX LOG WEIRS WITH 1' DROP EACH -, n m 1.74% 0+00 0+40 0+80 1+20 1+60 2+00 2+40 2+80 3+20 3+60 3 93 18" SPAWNING GRAVEL - 12" MINUS COBBLES IN CULVERT 6" MINUS COBBLES BEHIND LOG WEIRS ALDERBROOK CREEK CROSSING OF SR 106 AND NEW STREAM SECTION SCALE: 1"=50' STA: 0+37.05 ELEV: 46.82 100'X 12'-0"X 4'=1" HIGH BOTTOLESS ALUMINUM PLATE ARCH CULVERT STA: 1+47 ELEV: 41.18 -5.217. DATUM ELEV 25.00 0+00 0+40 0+80 1+20 1+60 18 SPAWNING GRAVEL - 16" MINUS COBBLES DALBY CREEK CROSSING OF SR 106 SCALE: 1"=50' SR 106 ROADWAY SURFACE 1'-6" FEET OF COVER (MIN.) FIGURE 3 - 1 SPAWNING GRAVEL PROFILE OF PROPOSED 12' OR 16" MINUS COBBLE MIX STREAM IMPROVEMENTS AND TYPICAL CULVERT E4 SECTION 12 ' - 0 " ALSP ARCH 12'-0" X 4'-1" TYPICAL BOTTOMLESS ARCH CULVERT SECTION macroinvertebrates throughout the northwest and British Columbia(Cederholm et al. 2000), (Bilby et al., 1998). Since there are currently no adult salmon returning to this system, salmon carcasses will be added to the new stream section during the natural time of returning salmon. The amount of carcasses added to the stream will be determined using protocols established by Nickelson et al. (1996) in which water surface area is measured and used to determine the biomass of salmon nutrients necessary to support the identified section of aquatic ecosystem. Conversion from Entrenched Channel to Off-Channel Rearing Pond Riffles and pools provide different functions to stream habitat. Riffles tend to oxygenate water, lower the temperature, and cause the water to lose carbon dioxide. Pools provide nutrient storage, areas of energy conservation for fish, and relief to aquatic organisms from terrestrial predation. Converting the entrenched channel to an off channel-rearing pond will change roughly 200-feet of riffle habitat to 200-feet of pool habitat. Most of the water(70 GPM)will be diverted elsewhere to create the new pool/riffle habitat described previously, while roughly 30 GPM will flow into the new off channel rearing pond. Off channel ponds are documented to provide productive fish habitat for certain species and life stages of salmonids especially chum and coho, and to a lesser degree steelhead. They provide cover and protection from peak flows making them extremely stable over- wintering habitat. Narver(1978, Carnation Creek)reported that over-winter survival of juvenile coho in a side channel pond averaged 74%over four winters while comparable survival in the main channel was only 23%. Figure 3-2 as published in Fish Habitat Rehabilitation Procedures (Slaney and Zaldokas, 1997) shows the relationship between surface area of off channel ponds and salmon abundance as documented by various scientists. Figure 3-2. The relationship between surface area of off-channel ponds and estimated number of salmonid fish present. Equation of the line is log,a fish number=0.51 logo pond area (ha)+ 3.47, n=19, r 2= 0.64, P< 0.001. (Data are from Bustard and Narver 1975; Lister et al. 1980; Peterson 1982a; Swales et al. 1986; Beniston et al. 1987; Beniston et al 1988; Swales et al. 1988; Cederholm et al. 1988; Swales and Levings 1989; Cederholm and Scarlett 1991; M. Foy, Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Vancouver, B.C., unpublished data. Figure after Keeley and Slaney 1996 published in Slaney and Zoldokas 1997) Dalby Creek At Dalby Creek, there are two stream crossings (Exhibit T-3 and D-3). The proposed crossing for the SR 106 realignment will occur roughly 200 feet above the current SR 106 crossing. There will be roughly 60-feet of riparian habitat on both stream banks removed and converted to roadway and semi-impervious surface. Impacts to aquatic habitat will be minimized by the installation of a 12-foot bottomless arch aluminum culvert (Fig 3)with new spawning gravel. The size of this culvert will allow for - 28 - maintenance of natural fluvial processes in downstream habitat such as LWD movement and nutrient cycling. The current crossing of SR 106 is over an under sized culvert that represents a partial barrier to fish passage. This culvert will be removed and replaced with a 12-foot wide 24-foot long prefabricated bridge. This will open up over 3000 feet of productive upstream fish habitat. LWD will be placed throughout the stream to improve the in- stream structural habitat and increase pool to riffle ratio. The overall impact from construction to this stream system will be minimal given the scope of the streambed restoration. The overall impact of the lost riparian habitat to the stream ecosystem is expected to be minimal. Placement of LWD and an increase in pool to riffle ratio will greatly improve habitat for Pacific salmon species. 4.0 SUMMARY The Alderbrook Resort remodel with its new drainage system will control and improve the quality stormwater run-off entering Hood Canal. Road oils and associated surface pollutants will be removed through the action of bioswales and retention ponds planned for new drainage system. Restoration of Alderbrook Creek and supplementation with Pacific salmon species will restore fish runs to presently degraded fish habitat. The salmon viewing pools with interpretive signs as part of the restoration project will add greatly to the publics understanding and knowledge of natural resources issues and the importance of habitat preservation. Removal of fish passages barriers on both Alderbrook Creek and Dalby Creek will open over 3000 feet of productive fish habitat in each watershed that is currently inaccessible to pacific salmon species. The overall action of the resort remodel, SR 106 realignment resulting in improved storm water runoff facilities and restoration of salmon streams will benefit salmon production within Hood Canal. The guests and the public will be provided with an educational experience demonstrating the linkage between improved storm water run off facilities, restoration of in-stream habitat of salmon streams, and increases in salmon production within Hood Canal. - 29 - Literature Bilby, R.E, B.R. Fransen, P.A. Bisson, and J.W. Walker. 1998. Response of juvenile coho salmon(Onchorynchus kisutch) and steelhead (Onchorynchus mykiss) to the addition of salmon carcasses to two streams in Southwestern Washington. , U.S.A. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 55:1909-1918. Boad, L. and D. Hannafious. 2002. A plan for restoration of Alderbrook Creek and Dalby Creek as part of the Alderbrook Inn remodel project. Hood Canal Salmon Enhancement Group, Belfair, WA. The Shea Group. 2003 Transportation Impact Analysis Alderbrook Resort Cederholm, C.J., D.H. Johnson,R.E. Bilby, L.G. Dominguez,A.M. Garrett, W.H. Greaber, E.L. Greda, M.D. Kunze, B.G. Marcot, J.F. Palmisano,R,W,Plotnikoff, W.J. Pearcy, C.A. Simenstad, and P.C. Trotter. 2000. Pacific Salmon and Wildlife Ecological Context and Implications for Management. Special edition technical report, Prepared for D.H. Johnson and T.A. O'neal (Managing Directors), Wildlife- Habitat Relationships in Oregon and Washington. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Olympia, Washington. Groot, C., and L. Margolis. 1994. Pacific Salmon Life Histories. Government of Canada Department of Fisheries and Oceans. 312-396. Narver, 1978 . Carnation Creek study. Nickelson, T.E. 1998. A Habitat based assessment of coho salmon production potential and spawner escapement needs for Oregon coastal streams. Portland, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Information Report 98-4. Quinn, T.P. and N.P. Petersen. 1994. The effects of forest practices on fish populations. Timber Fish and Wildlife Report F4-94-001 to Washington Department of Natural Resources. 157p. han wise S. 2002. Wetlands v -1 Relocation. Prepared S e S ds Inventory for the Alderbrook SR 06 rY P for Engineering Services Associates 210 NE Cherokee Beach Belfair Wa 98528. The Coot Company Wetland and Wildlife Consulting Services 416 s. Washington, Olympia WA 98501 360-352-9897 Slaney, P.A., and D. Zaldokas. 1997. Fish Habitat Rehabilitation Procedures Watershed Restoration Technical Circular No.9. Ministry of Environment, Lands and Parks Watershed Restoration Program. 3-6, 3-10 - 30- 'L H p O Q Nps NOTE,•SEE EXHIBITB 2 FOR 3 Q p EPS� PARCEL DESCRIPTIONS PREP TOTAL PARCEL AREA =17,43ACRESCA AQUA MI �ANqS LEASE_3 0ACRES ME LOW Wg7ER A L I I i 4,43AC 5,30AC - ---- L I I I S Tq T L E � _ nt- - - I 7RoU1' E 1 I I I I Q I 06 I I I LAC 1,4A 2.i�AC I I I I I I I EXHIBIT B-1 OI I ALDERBROOKPROPERTY 2,00 AC 6 I I BOUNDARY I I SCALE,•1"=100' O PARCEL 1 THOSE POR7701VS OF TRACTS 9, 10 AND 11 LYING NORTH OF STATE ROUTE NO. 106, ALL IN SUNNY BEACH, AS PER PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 2 OF PLATS, PAGE 34, RECORDS OF MASON COUNTY, WASHING70N. EXCEPT THAT PORTION LYING WITHIN THE PLAT OF ALDERBROOK COUNTRY CLUB, AS PER PLAT THEREOF RECORDED UNDER VOLUME 5 OF PLATS RECORDS OF MASON COUNTY, WASHINGTON. TOGETHER WITH ALL 77DELANDS OF THE SECOND CLASS FORMERLY OWNED BY THE STATE OF WASHINGTON AS DEFINED BY CHAPTER 255 OF SESSION LAWS OF 1927, S17UA IF IN FRONT OF, ADJACENT TO, OR ABUTTING UPON THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY. O PARCEL 2 PARCEL NO. 1 OF SHORT PLAT NO. 1664, RECORDED UNDER AUDITORS FILE NO.. 465718, RECORDS OF MASON COUNTY, WASHINGTON, BEING A POR7701V OF LOTS 7 AND 8, SUNNY BEACH, RECORDED IN VOLUME 2 OF PLATS PAGE 34. O PARCEL 3 PARCEL NO. 2 OF SHORT PLAT NO. 1664, RECORDED UNDER AUDITORS FILE NO.. 465718, RECORDS OF MASON COUNTY, WASHINGTON, BEING A PORTION OF LOTS 8 AND 9, SUNNY BEACH, RECORDED IN VOLUME 2 OF PLATS PAGE 34. ® PARCEL 4 TRACTS 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, 15, 19, 20 AND 22, ALD£RBROOK COUNTRY CLUB, AS PER PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 5 OF PLATS, PAGE 18, RECORDS OF MASON COUNTY WASHINGTON. O5 PARCEL 5 THE SOUTHERLY 50 FEET OF THE WESTERLY 90.17 FEET AND 7HAT PART OF THE EASTERLY 60 FEET OF TRACT 4 LYING SOUTHERLY OF STATE ROUTE NO. 106, ALL IN SUNNY BEACH, AS PER PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 2 OF PLATS PAGE 34, RECORDS OF MASON COUNTY, WASHINGTON. TOGE7HER WITH AN EASEMENT FOR ROADS, AS DESCRIBED UNDER AUDITORS FILE NO. 195672 © PARCEL 6 PARCEL 4 OF SHORT PLAT NO. 1664, RECORDED UNDER AUDITORS FILE N0. 465718. RECORDS OF MASON COUNTY, WASHINGTON, BEING A POR770N OF L07S 7, 8 AND 9, SUNNY BEACH, RECORDED IN VOLUME 2 OF PLATS, PAGE 34. O PARCEL 7 THOSE POR77ONS OF TRACTS 10 AND 11, LYING SOUTH OF STATE ROUTE NO.. 106, ALL IN SUNNY BEACH, AS PER PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 2 OF PLATS, PAGE 34, RECORDS OF MASON COUNTY, WASHINGTON. O SEWER TREA WENT PLANT PARCEL 3 OF SHORT PLAT N0. 1664, RECORDED UNDER AUDI R7R S FILE NO. 465718, RECORDS OF MASON COUNTY, WASHINGTON, BEING A POR77ON OF LOTS 7, 8 AND 9 OF SUNNY BEACH, RECORDED IN VOLUME 2 OF PLATS PAGE 34. EXf/IBITB 1 ALDERBROOKPROPERTY PARCEL DESCRIPTIONS