HomeMy WebLinkAboutBLD2009-00212 Retaining Wall - BLD Application - 3/26/2009 FORM MUST BE COMPLETED IN INK MASON COUNTY PERMIT NO.
PLEASE PRESS HARD BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION
426 W. Cedar- P.O. Box 186, Shelton, WA 98584 d
Shelton (360) 427-9670 - Belfair (360) 275-4467 - Elma (360) 482-5269
On the web www.co.mason.wa.us
APPLICANT INEgRMATION CONTRACTOR INFORM,TION
Owner l Company Name
Mailing Address V' _F Mailing Address
City State Zip Code City State Zip Code
Phone Other Ph. Phone Other Ph.
Lien/Title Holder Contractor Reg. � Exp.
E mail address E Mail Address
Drivers Lic. # DOB Drivers Lic. # DOB
SEPTIC /WATER SYSTEM INFORMATION - Connect to New Septic Existing Septic
Connect to Water System Name of Water System
Well Sewer System Name of Sewer System
PARCEL INFORMATION - 12 Digit Parcel No. — Fire District
Legal Description
Site Address (Please include street name, street number and city)
Directions to site
Will timber be cut and sold in parcel preparation?Yes/No
Is property within 200' of Saltwater Lake River/Creek Pond
Wetland Seasonal Runoff Stream Slopes or Bluffs
Is this permit submittal the result of a Stop Work Notice,Correction Notice or other enforcement action?Yes/No
TYPE OF JOB - N,eW , Add Alt Repair ther PRI RY.RESIDENCE SEASONAL ❑
Use of Building —may�—fir Describe Work
No. of Bedrooms No. of Bathrooms Square Footage- 1 st Flo r 2nd Floor
3rd Floor Basement Deck Covered Deck Other Sq. ft.
Garage Attached Detached Carport Attached Detached
MANUFACTURED HOME INFORMATION - Make Model Year
Length Width Serial No. No. of Bedrooms No. of Bathrooms
Type of Heat Purchase Price $ Replacement Unit? Yes/ No
Installer Name Certification No.
OWNER/BUILDER Acknowledges submission of inaccurate information may result in a stop work order or permit revocation.
Acknowledgement of such is by signature below. I declare that I am the owner,owners legal representative,or the contractor. I further declare
that I am entitled to receive this permit and to do the work as proposed in the application. I declare that I have obtained the permission from all
the necessary parties. If permission is required from any easement holder or any other party in interest regarding this application or the work
proposed in the application, I have obtained permission from them to apply for this permit and conduct the work proposed. The owner or
agent on owners behalf, represents that the information provided is accurate and grants employees of Mason County access to the above
described property and structure for review and inspection. This permit/application becomes null & void if work or authorized construction is
not commenced within 180 days or if construction work is suspended for a period of 180 days. PROOF OF CONTINUATION OF WORK IS BY
MEANS OFA PROGRESS INSPECTION.INACTIVITY OF THIS PERMIT APPLICATION OF 180 DAYS WILL INVALIDATE THEAPPLICATION.
X �'_.-'` Date: �`� 2,L U
Owner/Owners Representative/Contractor (indicate which one)
FOR OFFICIAL Ugli8tgYOND THIS POINT Accepted byTlZjf5L4 Date
DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW APPROVED DENIED NOTES
Building Department I
Planning Department
Environmental Health Department
Fire Marshal
FEES
Building Permit Fee Site Ins ection
Plan Review Fee EH Review Fee
Plumbing & Base Fee Planning Review Fee
Mechanical & Base fee Other
Wood /Gas/ Pellet Stove Fee State Fee
Violation Fee Pre-Paid at Submittal
Valuation $ TOTAL FEES
a r
MASON COUNTY PERMIT NO
PLUMBING/MECHANICAL PERMIT APPLICATION
426 W.Cedar• P.O. Box 186, Shelton,WA 98584
Shelton (360) 427-9670•Belfair(360) 275-4467• Elma (360) 482-5269
On the web www.co.mason.wa.us
APPLICANT INFORMATION CONTRACTOR INFORMATION
Owner t (- Z--1 C.'✓ Company Name
Mailing Address Mailing Address
City State Zip Code City State Zip Code
Phone Other Ph. Phone Other Ph.
Lien/Title Holder Contractor Reg. # Exp.
E mail address E Mail Address
Drivers Lic.# DOB Drivers,Lic.# DOB
SEPTIC INFORMATION - Connect to New Septic Exist' 'g Sept' Connect to Sewer System
Name of Sewer System
PARCEL INFORMATION - 12 Digit Parcel No. _ Fire District
Legal Description
Site Address (Please include street name, street number and city)
Directions to site
Is property within 200'of Saltwater Lake River/Creek Pond
Wetland Seasonal Runoff-Stream-Slopes or Bluffs > 15%
TYPE OF JOB - New Add Alt Repair Other Use of Building
Location of Fixtures/Units - 1 st Floor 2nd Floor Basement Garage Closet
PLUMBING FIXTURES (Show Number of each) MECHANICAL UNITS
Type of Fixture No. of Fixtures Fees Fuel Type:Electric LPCz_ Natural Gas_ Heat Pump_
Toilets Type of Unit No. of Units Fees
Bathroom Sink Furnace
Bath Tubs Heatpumps
Showers Spot Vent Fan
Water Heater _ Propane Tank
Clothes Washer Gas Outlets
Kithen Sinks Wood/Gas/Pellet Stove
Dishwasher Kitchen Exhaust Hood
Hosebibs Dryer Vent
Other Other
Base Fee Base Fee
TOTAL PLUMBING TOTAL MECHANICAL
OWNER/BUILDER Acknowledges submission of inaccurate information may result in a stop work order or permit revocation.Acknowledgement of
such is by signature below.I declare that I am the owner,owners legal representative,or the contractor.I further declare that I am entitled to receive this
permit and to do the work as proposed in the application.I declare that I have obtained the permission from all the necessary parties.If permission is
required from any easement holder or any other parry in interest regarding this application or the work proposed in the application,I have obtained
permission from them to apply for this permit and conduct the work proposed. The owner or agent on owners behalf,represents that the information
provided is accurate and grants employees of Mason County access to the above described property and structure for review and inspection.
PROOF OF CONTINUATION OF WORK IS BY MEANS OF A PROGRESS INSPECTION.
X Date:
Owner/Owners Representative/Contractor (indicate which one)
FOR OFFICIAL USE BEYOND THIS POINT
Accepted by: Planning Pd Ck# Date Bld Pd Receipt No.
DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW APPROVED DENIED NOTES
Building Department
i
Occ Group-Type Constr.
Planning Department
Environmental Health Department
FEES
Plumbing & Base Fee Site Ins ection
Mechanical & Base fee UFC Plan Review Fee
Wood/Gas/Pellet Stove Fee Other
Violation Fee TOTAL FEES
X. CIO
1
x
f
8 -
1
3 x x cl , 4
28 , 9 `
Ifl(;tc> F—
pL P•N
APPROVED
_ M ON OUNT�' DCD PLANNI
SITE P RED T ONAN REQUI f �\
?� QQ''�� ITE
CHA GE5 SUBJECT TO-APPROV S�AL
Q
MARLEY L. YOUNG, CONSULTING ENGINEER
P.O. BOX 1343, SHELTON, WA 98584-0959
Ci vi I Engineering (360)426-7475-(360)490-0939- Fax (360)426-5789
Stornwdter Site Plana mlyoung3542@comcast.net
sewer Extensions Marley L. Young, P.E., P.L.S.
a Civil Engineer& Land Surveyor
o IIII IIII �
11-Dec-06
Mason County Planning Department
Subject: Flood Elevation Calculations for Art Tozier Flood Protection Plan
Dear Planner:
Art Tozier is the owner of property in the Skokomish Valley, located in the southeast quadrant
of the intersection of the West Bougault Road and the Skokomish Valley Road. Mr.Tozier is
attempting to protect his home from flood damage by importing fill. The County has stated
that they can issue Mr. Tozier a Land Modification Permit if he is able to satisfy the counties
criteria. The criteria is paraphrased as such, 'The fill must have no impact on the nearest
insurable structure or his property line,whichever comes first." No impact has been defined as
0.0499 feet rise in water elev. for a i 00-year 24-hour storm event.
The County's Skokomish River Comprehensive Flood Hazard Management Plan, KCM, Inc.,
Feb. 1997, and the Walker&Asso. Digital terrain maps have been used as a reference.
Cross section 32 shown on figure 6-2b, Volume 1, of the Flood Hazard Plan. At the 100-year
flood event the calculated flood elevation is 33.43'. The 100-year flow rate is 34,910 cfs.
Cross section 32 is approximately 4,693 feet long and has an end area of 19,646 sq. ft..
Assuming that the 100-year flood event produced a flood cross section at cross section 32
with a constant, uniform flow and a flood elev. of 33.43 feet, Mr.Tozier's proposed plan could
reduce the cross sectional area of 19,646 sq.ft. by 234.18 sq.ft., and be in compliance.
Length of cross section= 4693
X the allowable rise 0.0499
Total cross section area in sq. ft. 234,1807
1 of 3
2 of 3
If Mr. Tozier is allowed to complete his flood protection plan, his home will be 6' above the
100-year flood elevation. The proposed fill which is included as part of this Permit Application
will have a cross sectional area of less than 200 sq. ft.
During a 100-year storm event, it is expected that the storm water will cross the Skokomish
Valley Road south of the intersection with the West Bourgault Road and head directly for the
Tozier improvement. The flood waters will split and flow around the improvement and join on
the east side of his fill.
As the water splits, it in effect'turns a comer. The calculated increase in water elevation
caused by the water turning the corner is next to be analyzed.
For a more accurate and reasonable review, the flood way has been reduced to a cross section
being 160'wide, that puts the Tozier fill in the middle of the section. Vertical sides and
a top elev. of 33.43 ft.
The Tozier fill has been placed on ground having an old elevation of 29.0 ft.
100-year, 24-hour storm event elev. 33.43
Assumed depth of flood water to be 4.43 ft
V= 1.486/n *r^.667 *s^.5
n = 0.15 very weedy
width 160
d= 4.43
a= area 708.8 sf
p= wet perimeter 168.86
r= a/p 4.19756
s= 0.006 SA = 0.07746
1.486/n = 9.906667
(1.486/n)*(s^.5) 0.767367
rA 667= 2.603388
V= 1.997755
Q = Vla 1416.008
v = Q/A
d 1 = y 4.43
NF = v/ (gy)^.5
w= width 160
Ay= v^213/gr
g = 32.2
B 160
Radius 50
Q = 1416.008 cfs
A= 708.8
3fo3
v = Q/A 1.997755 fps
NF = v/(gy)A.5 0.167268 less than 1 = subcritical flow= ok
Ay= ((VA2)*B)/gr 0.396623 As the water turns to go around the Tozier fill,
the water against the fill will rise by 0.40 ft.
The following tabulation is to determine the distance from the fill to where the flood water would
return to the original elevation of 33.43. If the calculated distance is shorter than the distance
to the County Road right of way, then the fill can be approved because there would be no negligible
impacts to abutting properties. Shortest distance to West Bourgault Rd. is 160 ft.
y A=(160y) p, R(A/p), v VA2/2g, s distance
ft ftA2 ft ft ft ft x
4.83 772.8 169.66 4.554992 �.132 0.070581 0.0057
-136.204
4.43 708.8 168.86 4.19756 1.9977 0.061969 0.0087
136.2 is shorter than 160 = ok
Based on the above review the Tozier Flood Protection Plan will have no affect on Roads
or neighboring property.
Submitted by r�`�oF wA
Marley L. Youn E., P. S , O�
Consulting Engineer Na �, 14144 R� ��
PR❑P❑SED FL❑❑D PR❑TECTI❑N PLAN
CR❑SS SECTI❑N AREA EQUALS 170 SF.
33,43 33,43
29,0 29,0
N❑RTH
THE EXISTING FILL CR❑SS SECTI❑N AREA ❑F
IMP❑RTED MATERIAL BEL❑W THE 100 YR FL❑❑D
ELE V, EQUALS 326,35 SF,
SCALE 1" = 20'
f
VOLUME OF NEW FILL
TOP TIER
A= PIwR^2
25' 35' Rtop = ((25+19)/2) _
22'
A = 1520.5 SF
VOLUME = A*D
D = DEPTH = 3.54'
V= 5382.7 cf
1/2V = TWO CORNERS
= 2691,35 cf
40' LOWER TIER
A= PI)KR^2
Rlower = ((29+23)/2) = 26'
A = 2123.7 SF
VOLUME = AwD
D = DEPTH = 3.54'
35' V= 7517.9 cf
1/2V = TWO CORNERS =
25' 3759.0 cf
TWO ROUNDED CORNER VOLUME:
2691.35 + 3759.0 = 6450.35
STRAIGHT LENGTH 90'-25'-25'=
40
STRAIGHT VOLUME 40)K170=
6800 cf
SUM OF VOLUME 6800cf +
TOP TIER 6450,35cf = 13,250.35cf
25'
19' S4 VOLUME IN CUBIC YARDS =
3,54' 490.75 CY
N :
0 200' 400' 600` 800'1,000' H i
r■s��■1:.� 5 £SCALE:V a-1,000' '
itl 65 0 ■
m
sl O 9E 040
I
40 �' E ■ 33.0
/� �'••:yr 'ems.....
-
o
ao 0 O
SKOKOMISH d ,
■ ` Q e
■ `�y `' Ir . ■
M
ao dN
39 °
0 +L e O W, RGAULT '25
30
16
0
/ 26 y
■
L 38 a n
37.90 37 ti -
3
36 35 s
30
34.91
33 _
33.784 Geo Adams
33. i S11hion
H ch—ry 0 i
Water surface elevations for
Sections 22-32 are for the
main channel. Elevations for 34 3i 30
the North Overflow,Weaver
Creek and Purdy Creek are 33.35 29 28 6 '
not shown on this figure. 27
Mason County
KCM SKOKOMISH RIVER COMPREHENSIVE I
1917FirstAvenue HAZARD MANAGEMENT PLAN
C....al., U/achin�nn QR1M
i MARLEY L. YOUNG, CONSULTING ENGINEER
Q P.O. BOX 1343, SHELTON, WA 98584-0959
360.426.7475-360.490.0939-Fax 360.426.5789
.
'Civil Engineering mlyoung3542@comcast.net
site Plans Marle L. Youn , P.E., P.L.S.
SewExnsions y 9
o Civil Engineer& Land Surveyor
II )
Mr. Art Tozier
110 Mill Street
Shelton, WA 98584
Re: 401 West Bourgault Road
Rock Retaining Wall Investigation
Dear Mr. Tozier:
This letter summarizes the findings of the site inspection conducted on March 17, 2009 to
investigate the retaining wall system constructed around the Tozier residence located at
401 West Bourgault Road. This investigation was conducted to determine the rock
sliding resistance,overturning resistance and bearing capacity of the retaining wall
system.
Information was gathered at thirteen locations along the rock retaining wall. The three
attached documents provide a review analysis to each of the thirteen locations.
Based on the investigation and the resulting engineered analysis the rock wall
configuration is stable and well within safety factors accepted by the engineering
profession.
We appreciate this opportunity to be of service to you. If you have any questions,or if
we can be of any further assistance please let us know.
Thank you,
Marley L. Y ,P.E P .S. 11.1 Q
Attachments. 14144 �'
17-Mar-09
ART TOZIER
401 West Bourgault Rd.
Shelton WA 98584
RE: EXISTING COHERENT STONE GRAVITY WALL
RETAINING WALL ANALYSIS-401 WEST BOURGAULT RD.
CIVIL ENGINEERS ANALYSIS OF A GRAVITY ROCK WALL
TWO TO FOUR MAN ROCK - UP TO 4.5 FEET HIGH -
TOP ROCK APPROX. 12 INCHES DEEP
BOTTOM ROCK APPROX. 20 INCHES DEEP
This portion of the rock wall is along the west well and is 4.5'Tall --
The proposed rock retaining wall is being reviewed for sliding resistance,
overturning resistance, and bearing capacity.
The slope of the existing soil is estimated to stand at 4.5' vertical to 1' horizontal.
t ft = Wall depth at top 1
d ft = Wall depth at base 1.66
H ft = Wall height 4.5
Batter inches 8
Batter ft = Soil Face degrees 8.4
Batter Front face tangent 0.147667
sp gr 3 Man Rock Void Ratio
62.2 186.6 0.7
Yw = Wall Density pcf = 130.62
Ys = Soil Density pcf = 124
Ys/wet = Wet Soil Density pcf 124
0 = Angle of Internal Friction 32
Cos = 0.848048
Sin 0.529919
Ow= Factored friction Angle 40% 12.8
Qs = 3000
i = Slope above wall 0
Surcharge None
B = Wall angle at back side 81.6
Tan(90-B) 0.147667
---------------------------------------------------------------------
SLIDING RESISTANCE Page 2 of 3
KA=Active pressure coefficient
csc(B) *Sin (B- 2
KA =
Sin (B+ �w)�A.5 +((Sin (0+ Ow) Sin (0-i)1 J.5 LO
Sin (B + i) 1
0.769796
0.998525 + 0.614368
KA = 0.227793
FA = Active force on wall = .5 (Ys) *(KA) * H A 2 = 285.9941
W =Total weight of Wall =( Yw*H*t)+(((Yw*H*(d-t))/2) = 781.76
Wt= Weight of rock rectangle t width 587.79
Wb= Weight of rock triangle section b-t/2 193.9707
Fv = Vertical force on wall from retained soils
_ _ 1 6
FA (Sm(�w) G3 3G 5
Fh = Horizontal forces on wall from retained soil
= FA(Cosin(ow) _ ) 278.887
Fr= Force resisting sliding = (W+ Fv)Tano= 528.091
Safety factor against sliding: SFS= Fr/Fh 1.893566 > 1.5 OK
Note: safety factor is greater than 1.5- Design is OK
---------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
OVERTURNING RESISTANCE
Mo = Overturning Moment= Fh(.33)H 418.2886
Mr= Moment resisting overturning =
Wt* Moment arm. Wt*(d-t)+(t/2)+((h/2)*)Tan90-B)) 877.1303
Wb*Moment arm. Wb*(d-t)/2)+((H/3*Tan90-B)) 106.975
Fv*Moment arm. Fv* ((b+(H/3)*Tan90-B) 119.2148
Mr= 1103.32
Safety factor against overturning: SFO= Mr/Mo= 2.6377 >2.0 OK
Note: safety factor is greater than 2 -Design OK
---------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
BEARING CAPACITY
Qw= Pressure exerted on soil below base block= (W+Fv)/d = 509.1098
Qs= 3000
Safety factor against bearing failure FSB =Qs/Qw = 5.892639 >2.0 OK
Note: safety factor is greater than 2- Design OK
---------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
ti
Page 3 of 3
ANALYSIS:
Our Analysis is based on a review of the internal and external stability of the wall and
DOES NOT INCLUDE either global or seismic analysis
CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBILITY:
The contractor is expected to have used due care in properly setting and installing the rocks.
Also the contractor is expected to have properly installed the drainage
according to acceptable standards_
CHANGED CONDITIONS:
The conclusions and recommendations in these engineering calculations are based on
my interpretation of information found in the field. In the event that the scope of
the project, surface/subsurface or contractual conditions differ from those relied on in these
calculations, the civil engineer and the soils engineer should be advised immediately.
A review of the changed conditions will be conducted and alternative or remedial
recommendations given at that time.
ENGINEERS CERTIFICATE:
This 4.5 foot high rock wall configuration is stable and well within safety factors.
I hereby certify that the engineering shown in this
document was performed by me or under my direction.
Marley L. Young, P.E., P.L.S.,
Consulting Civil Engineer
P.O. Box 1343
Shelton, WA 98584
360 426-7475
�l<% r ��}
14134
Project No. 2009-13
n
tat
'�j
5�1CP
-�Ocyl
N
, q
Ic
s \
a
1�