The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutRLC2001-00122 - RLC Inspections - 11/30/2001 �P11b;ON.cA?-, MASON COUNTY Mo y Planning Department o N = P O Box 279, Shelton, WA 98584 Zoo N v o~ (360)427-9670 J t1 1864 Resource Lands & Critical Area Site Evaluation November 30, 2001 VV*NE CA)MNI40C-4� 19Ct 1,2 t^(NO If t4 A4V e W �6(4 r-��NE� WA 9$ t33 Case No.: RLC2001-00122 Parcel No.: 322357590110 Project Description Planning preinspection to determine applicability of critical areas regulations to proposed single family residence. Dear Applicant: As part of this department's review of your permit application, a Resource Lands and Critical Areas (RLC) site inspection was performed on your property. Below you will find comments made regarding the proposed development and its critical values. This information is based on County and State regulations as they exist to date. These regulations may change and may affect the requirements for development of the subject property. Please contact me at (360) 427-9670, ext. 295 if you have questions. Sincerely, Pam Bennett-Cumming Land Use Planner Mason County Planning Department oc)l ICsi�;t ,I�e i 11/30/01 1 of 3 RLC2001-00122 Resource Lands & Critical Area Site Evaluation 11/30/01 Case No.: RLC2001-00122 Comments Site visit was conducted to provide applicant Wayne Cummingham, and applicant's agent Keith Fuller, information on planning regulations applicable to the property in question. The site is located on the upper portion of the high, steeply sloping bluffs which abut the south shore of Hood Canal. Slopes on the site vary from medium to steeply sloping (30% to over 50%) with steep slopes in the area of the proposed development area. Previously, a building pad was cleared at the top of a steep slope, and a "daylight basement" type concrete foundation constructed. Staff recommends that the applicant contact the Mason County Building Department for a site inspection to determine the usability of this earlier foundation, for any future project, before making decisions relative to design configurations. Landslide Hazard Area Chapter 17.01.100 of the Mason County Resource Ordinance guides in the review of areas with steep slopes. Slopes very close to the proposed development area are greater than 40%, which will require a project-specific Geotechnical Report by an engineer licensed in the state of washington, with knowledge and experience of local soils, geology and slope stability. The report should address the provisions set forth in section E5 of the enclosed chapter (see highlighted area), and include coverage of the following site-specific issues. The earlier development of a building pad resulted in some overcast material on the steep slope. Treatment and use of of this area should be included in the geotech report. The report should also address proposed site treatment relative to the steep (almost vertical) bank at the road cut, immediately below the proposed building area, including site and development recommendations. Please also review the chapter's recommendations for development standards, which address how to maintain such areas, including vegetation retention, and minimizing disturbance to the site, except in the immediate development area. Just a suggestion FYI, while staff was performing site review, one of the neighbors commented that it appeared an earlier owner had performed some site work which may extend beyond one of the boundaries. Staff does not know if this is the case or not, but new purchasers often find that taking the time to find the actual surveyed site boundaries, can go a long way to ensuring that your development work is performed within the actual site ownership, 11/30/01 2 of 3 RLC2001-00122 Resource Lands & Critical Area Site Evaluation 11/30/01 Case No. RLC2001-00122 rather than relying on assumptions based on earlier activities. 11/30/01 3 of 3 RLC2001-00122 i MASON COUNTY e i3 . r RESOURCE LANDS %�gV?FAL AREAS CHECKLIST _ASE PRINT t —� tX $70.00 Fee Required C.aLo 1---' (-_0 I Applicant: LlJ%n P. C ck ry%m to 4�r�� Parcel No. 3� 3 Applicant Address: kq`tai, L'Lv\ael^ City: St Lft Zip a g 133 Legal Description: 1a f I U� t o 19 Phone: te) 5 ti g � Owner Name (if different from applicant: -3 -ZZ- �(- A\��s S11-5 MG Purpose of Pre-Inspection: S `�fi� �� n L �7r� r� Q Use of Building: Do any of the following exist on or within 200 feet of the property: saltwater lake river/stream pond wetland seasonal runoff slope _ Directions to Site: P ) lb � � �()f,v�_ W�1��1 ►S Please illustrate in the box below the proposed building site in relation to property lines, significant natural features, slope grade and direction and topography (or include on separate sheet): North Arrow �L LA- W ?M ��OPS TO Sea^, Po'.) ON � 5.,assft-Ir p y2G-DW(o This checklist is designed to assist an applicant for a Building Permit, On-Site Sewage System Site Evaluation and Disposal Permit, Access Permit, Land Modification Permit, Boundary Line Adjustments, Land Segregations, Hazardous Waste Permit, or Shoreline Permit in determining whether their property is affect by regulations under the Mason County Interim Ordinance (77-93). This checklist is an important opportunity for identifying early in the permit process whether there will be any environmental regulations affecting the proposed development. If the information is incomplete, then Mason County U dis laim any errors resulting from deficiencies in the original application. Pre-inspection reports remain valid only n it ev lopment changes occur in the vicinity which affects the lot evaluated in this inspection. Applicant Signature: Date- Return application to: Department of Community Development,Planning Divi iDn (►n 411 N 5th/PO Box 279 Shelton, WA 98584 OCT O (360) 427-9670 ! Please make checks or money orders payable to Mason County Treasurer When completed, this form becomes pert of the permit application. PERMIT ASSISTANCE CENTER Q� 7oo= 11470 16A 2 Please illustrate below the proposed building site in relation to critical area & property.lir LN C ` S 6 , sjd.,� OR `-r Departmental Review (For Office Use Only) kP � � Planning Department Findings: 65,,= SEE MAP 11 F 15 � E Q, Qo HAY` HIGH PASS RD ¢ �r ENTRY i LAKE ; 14 113 P RD \ ♦ 119 4 ,a a xx i x, �pP I x, 22 i &Rl a N PL P D PC, SAP , Q' s{HURD RD r ACE i Y¢HURD R OUT OF PL ---- �- - I THE WAY PL. - 1 _____________________W E. ____i_____ __ -MURK- N-RIDGE- --- 1 -- --- - O-----------i--- -- y --- --------------------- J�Q wy PARK I Q �p oP pP N pC MP 12.5 I' BELFAIR _ , WE N` - I 2TqfUyq _ _ ESTATES ---------, ------------------------ ---- _ 30 N -a _________ --- --------------- I 9y Q1 i xx Ixa - - — - - FS` -------,-- 2 t 25 I , x7-R 1 Q� DR 2 i E L LNN OQ �pP 1 I ~ I PL,p ' < i ' Sy�q I IA p \�E . I FB P 3 TGLKIEN'NW TpLKIEN LN E Pow I I , ------- --- - - - I - CL i �,----------O-- �- --- ' Gf -- ------- ---- ------- (A.K k LAKE TAHlYA)m --------- D = w i t -p ui 1 1 cn ' I 130 __J____________________________3__ tzt___________ , 31 132 1 I p�--�-�-�------------' 35- - ---- $,E - ---- ' --- ----- °rE NCH 1 , W ' SISTERS ' 1 ' POINT , 1 ' t 5 �r H ----------------OOD -________-___ - -----------------------i-------------- - - ______9.6_- ' • 1�'1MERP\M MERPIM i i �� O�T. ; P� ES DA I DR � � �cP 6 1\MBEA j\D 0 31 2 6 HARMONY 1 �INDSTAR RD • HILL LN OLYMPIC T22N M C(AI e s Mr i 3♦ 1 35 2 1 1- T21 N 4 M7. WASHINGTCN CT hsF(4W_e 1 a+ o x VIEW PL IMBQR TIDES DR 4 A � 3 9 CTI I ,E 9 am��wvr.ai9i«=�• Cam � -��1ct la�de��