Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEP2020-00016 - SEP Determinations - 6/17/2020 �TATY F f ihwi STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY PO Box 47775 •Olympia, Washington 98504-7775 •(360)407-6300 711 for Washington Relay Service -Persons with a speech disability can call 877-833-6341 June 17, 2020 Scott Ruedy, AICP, Planner III Mason County Department of Community Services Planning Division PO Box 279 Shelton, WA 98584 Dear Scott Ruedy: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the determination of nonsignificance for the Dew Replacement Bulkhead Project (SEP2020-00016)as proposed by David and Susan Dew. The Department of Ecology(Ecology) reviewed the environmental checklist and has the following comment(s): SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT: Derek Rockett(360) 407-6287 The applicant proposes to remove a structure(s)that may contain treated wood. Please refer to Ecology's publication Focus on Treated Wood Exclusion, available at. Focus on Treated Wood,for suggested best management practices and disposal requirements for treated wood. All removed debris and dredged material resulting from this project must be disposed of at an approved site. Contact the local jurisdictional health department for proper management of these materials. Ecology's comments are based upon information provided by the lead agency. As such,they may not constitute an exhaustive list of the various authorizations that must be obtained or legal requirements that must be fulfilled in order to carry out the proposed action. If you have any questions or would like to respond to these comments,please contact the appropriate reviewing staff listed above. Department of Ecology Southwest Regional Office (GMP:202002913) cc: Derek Rockett, SWM Michelle Bahnick-Leon Environmental, LLC LEON� Environmental,LI.LC 8047 Burke Ave N. • Seattle,WA 98103 • 206.948.5366 March 24, 2020 Planning Services, Mason County Community Services 615 W Alder St Shelton,WA 98584 Re: Dew Replacement Bulkhead Project Dear Permit Reviewer, Please find the attached DARPA, plans and required documents for the Dew Replacement Bulkhead Project.We are applying for a shoreline exemption under Washington Administrative Code(WAC)173-27-040(2)b. Replacing the failing creosote-treated wood and concrete bulkhead by installing an angular rock bulkhead is a common method of repair for this type of structure and will restore the structure to a state comparable to its original condition.This repair will not cause substantial adverse effects to the shoreline resources or environment. Additionally, please accept this analysis supporting our opinion that a geotechnical assessment or geotechnical report is not required for the Dew Replacement Bulkhead Project. Although the project is shown in the Mason County WA GIS as being located within 300 feet north of a polygon mapped as a slope,the GIS does not reflect actual conditions at the project site or immediate vicinity. All proposed work is geographically separated from actual sloped areas by E Highway 106 and another residential parcel (322353100240). The work proposed — replacing a small (less than 4 feet in height) bulkhead located approximately 90 ft— 120 ft north of the nearest edge of E Highway 106,which is itself separated from actual sloped areas by another residential parcel—will not affect conditions on the area mapped as slope on the Mason County GIS. We assume that a geotechnical assessment,which would impose a significant financial cost on the project without providing any relevant value, is not necessary. Project Description: The purpose of this project is to repair an existing deteriorated creosote-treated wood and concrete bulkhead to protect the residence located in the upland. The bulkhead is failing, as evidenced by undermining and small failed sections of the bulkhead, which will allow material to erode from behind if not repaired.The replacement rock bulkhead will be within or landward of the existing bulkhead footprint. Application Submittal Requirements: Please find the attached required application material: 1. Mason County Building Permit 2. Site Plans and Construction Drawings 3. Current photos of the subject property 4. State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Checklist 5. Joint Aquatic Resources Permit Application (DARPA) Please contact me at 206.948.8067 if you have any questions.Thank you for your time and assistance. Sincerely, '�w I Michelle Bahnick, Biologist Leon Environmental, LLC www.leon-environmental.com MASON COUNTY Planning Division of Community Development Planning DEPARTMENT 615 W. Alder St. Bldg. 8, Shelton, WA 98584 360-427-9670 ext 352 DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (WAC 197-11-340) SEP2020-00016 Description of Proposal: REPLACEMENT OF EXISTING CONCRETE AND WOOD BULKHEAD WITH P P ROCK BULKHEAD Proponent: DEW DAVID W& SUSAN E Location of Proposal: 8941 E STATE ROUTE 106 Parcel Number: 322353100230, 322353100220 Lead Agency: Mason County The Lead Agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement(EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed Environmental Checklist and other information on file with the Lead Agency. This information is available to the public upon request. Please contact Scott Ruedy at 360-427-9670 x287 with any questions. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11- 340(2). The Lead Agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date shown below, when the determination is final. Comments must be submitted to the Dept. of Community Development, 615 W Alder St, Shelton, WA 98584 by 06/17/2020. Appeal of this determination must be filed with a 14-day period following this final determination date, per Mason County Code Chapter 15.11 Appeals. Authorized Local Gove ment Official Date Printed by:Scott Ruedy on:06/03/2020 09:10 AM Page 1 of 1 RECEIVED PLANNING MAY 0 7 2020 615 W. Alder Stru' EPA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Purpose of checklist: Governmental agencies use this checklist to help determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant. This information is also helpful to determine if available avoidance, minimization or compensatory mitigation measures will address the probable significant impacts or if an environmental impact statement will be prepared to further analyze the proposal. Instructions for applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Please answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. You may need to consult with an agency specialist or private consultant for some questions. You may use "not applicable" or "does not apply" only when you can explain why it does not apply and not when the answer is unknown. You may also attach or incorporate by reference additional studies reports. Complete and accurate answers to these questions often avoid delays with the SEPA process as well as later in the decision- making process. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Instructions for Lead Agencies: Please adjust the format of this template as needed. Additional information may be necessary to evaluate the existing environment, all interrelated aspects of the proposal and an analysis of adverse impacts. The checklist is considered the first but not necessarily the only source of information needed to make an adequate threshold determination. Once a threshold determination is made, the lead agency is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of the checklist and other supporting documents. Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: For nonproject proposals (such as ordinances, regulations, plans and programs), complete the applicable parts of sections A and B plus the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). Please completely answer all questions that apply and note that the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proponent," and "affected geographic area," respectively.The lead agency may exclude (for non-projects) questions in Part B- Environmental Elements—that do not contribute meaningfully to the analysis of the proposal. SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 1 of 12 A. Background rHELP1 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Dew Replacement Bulkhead Project 2. Name of applicant: David Dew 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contactperson: Applicant: Contact Person (Agent): David Dew Michelle Bahnick 50 E Blackberry Ct 8047 Burke Ave. N Union, WA 98592 Seattle, WA 98103 360.898.2993 206.948.8067 4. Date checklist prepared: March 24, 2020 5. Agency requesting checklist: Mason County. 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): The project will begin as soon as permits are received and tides allow work within approved work windows. The project construction is expected to take 2 weeks. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. JARPA, Plans. R f A 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. HPA. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. SEPA Determination, Shoreline Exemption, Mason County Building Permit, HPA. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) The purpose of this project is to protect the existing upland home and related infrastructure by replacing the existing, deteriorating concrete and creosote-treated wood bulkhead with an angular rock bulkhead. The project will utilize Mason County Community Services Department's prescriptive design and installation standard for shoreline bulkhead. This project will also provide habitat benefits by replacing the existing, deteriorating creosote-treated wood bulkhead (a source of PAHs). 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 2 of 12 are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. Small eastern portion of project 8940 E State Route 106, Union,WA 98592 Township 22N, Range 3W, Section 36, SW'/< 47.350981 ° N lat. /-123.030683 ° W long. Center of project 8941 E State Route 106, Union, WA 98592 Township 22N, Range 3W, Section 35, SW'/. 47.3509580 N lat. /-123.0308670 W long. Small western portion of project 8931 E State Route 106, Union,WA 98592 Township 22N, Range 3W, Section 35, SW'/. 47.351414° N lat. /-123.031256*W long. B. Environmental Elements fHELPI 1. Earth hf elpl a. General description of the site: (circle one : Flat, r Iling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? The vertical bulkhead has the steepest slope on the site.The steepest landform slope is on the beach at approximately 20% slope. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any agricultural land of long-term commercial significance and whether the proposal results in removing any of these soils. The soils are predominately Everett very gravelly sandy loam (very gravelly sandy loam and extremely cobbly coarse sand)with 0 to 15 percent slopes. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. There is evidence of minor wave-driven erosion on a neighboring property and in the small section of failed bulkhead. e. Describe the purpose, type, total area, and approximate quantities and total affected area of any filling, excavation, and grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. The purpose of the excavation is to remove the existing creosote-treated bulkhead and the minor amount of additional material in order to place large angular bulkhead rock to replace the existing structure. Approximately 33 CY of concrete and creosote treated wood bulkhead and steps as well as 75 CY of soil behind the bulkhead will be excavated. The replacement bulkhead will be approximately 90 linear feet and will require approximately 87 CY of granite and 26 CY of quarry spalls from an upland source. SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 3 of 12 f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. No. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? There will be no change in percent impervious cover at the site after project construction. Approximately 26% of the site is currently covered with impervious surfaces. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Erosion control BMPs, such as straw wattles, silt curtains, and straw bales, will be used as necessary or required. 2. Air !]el a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal during constructions operation, and maintenance when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Short-term air emissions from an excavator will occur during construction. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Low sulfur fuel will be used and no idling of equipment will be allowed. 3. Water hf elpl a. Surface Water: hel 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Yes, saltwater(Hood Canal, Puget Sound). 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet)the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Yes. The project requires work in and adjacent to Puget Sound while the project area is not inundated by tidal water. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 4 of 12 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. Yes. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. b. Ground Water: hf elpl 1) Will groundwater be withdrawn from a well for drinking water or other purposes? If so, give a general description of the well, proposed uses and approximate quantities withdrawn from the well. Will water be discharged to groundwater? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals. . . ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None. c. Water runoff(including stormwater): 1) Describe the source of runoff(including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Runoff is unlikely to occur from this project, although runoff could occur as storm water. BMPs will be used as necessary or required. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No. 3) Does the proposal alter or otherwise affect drainage patterns in the vicinity of the site? If so, describe. No. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water, and drainage pattern impacts, if any: The project will use geotechnical fabric, mulch, straw, or grass seed, as needed, post- construction. 4. Plants 1bpjp1 a. Check the types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other X shrubs X grass SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 5 of 12 pasture crop or grain Orchards, vineyards or other permanent crops. wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage; other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? A strip of lawn and two shrubs adjacent to the existing bulkhead and inset concrete steps will be removed in order to place the replacement bulkhead within and landward of the existing bulkhead footprint. c. List threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site. No threatened or endangered species are known to be on the project site. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: None. e. List all noxious weeds and invasive species known to be on or near the site. No known noxious weeds or invasive species. 5. Animals hf elpl a. List any birds and other animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site. Examples include: birds: hawk, heron, eagl on bir ther: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, o IL fish: bass salmo trout errin hellfis other Surf smelt b. List any threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site. No threatened or endangered species are known to be on the project site. The following species can be found in Puget Sound. No effect on these species by the proposed work is expected. Bocaccio Rockfish (Sebastes paucispinis) — Endangered Bull Trout (Salvelinus confluentus) - Threatened Chinook Salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) (Puget Sound) - Threatened Marbled Murrelet (Brachyramphus marmoratus) -Threatened Steelhead (O. mykiss) (Puget Sound DIPS) -Threatened Southern Resident killer whale (Orcinus orca) (Southern Resident DPS) - Endangered Yelloweye Rockfish (S. ruberrimus) —Threatened c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Pacific flyway and migratory route for salmon. SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 6 of 12 d. Proposed measures to reserve or enhance wildlife if any: P P Y Removal of creosote-treated wood. e. List any invasive animal species known to be on or near the site. None known. 6. Energy and Natural Resources hf elpl a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar)will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. None. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. N/A. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: None. 7. Environmental Health hf elpl a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No known environmental health hazards. 1) Describe any known or possible contamination at the site from present or past uses. No known contamination or possible contamination. 2) Describe existing hazardous chemicals/conditions that might affect project development and design. This includes underground hazardous liquid and gas transmission pipelines located within the project area and in the vicinity. No known contamination. 3) Describe any toxic or hazardous chemicals that might be stored, used, or produced during the project's development or construction, or at any time during the operating life of the project. None. 4) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None. 5) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None. SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 7 of 12 b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Residential noise and boat traffic. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indi- cate what hours noise would come from the site. Short-term: construction equipment noise. Long-term: none. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None. 8. Land and Shoreline Use h[ elpl a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties?Will the proposal affect current land uses on nearby or adjacent properties? If so, describe. Residential. The proposed project will have no effect on the current land uses. b. Has the project site been used as working farmlands or working forest lands? If so, describe. How much agricultural or forest land of long-term commercial significance will be converted to other uses as a result of the proposal, if any? If resource lands have not been designated, how many acres in farmland or forest land tax status will be converted to nonfarm or nonforest use? No. 1) Will the proposal affect or be affected by surrounding working farm or forest land normal business operations, such as oversize equipment access, the application of pesticides, tilling, and harvesting? If so, how: No. c. Describe any structures on the site. Upland structures include a single-family residence, an attached wood deck, a carport, a driveway, a septic system (tank and seepage pit), and connection to community well. Structures on or adjacent to the marine shoreline include a deteriorating concrete and creosote-treated wood bulkhead with a concrete footing on the beach and inset concrete steps, a CMU bulkhead, and a treated-wood float. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? Yes. The existing concrete and creosote-treated wood bulkhead, inset concrete steps, and CMU bulkhead will be demolished. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? RR5 (Rural Residential 5 Acres). f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? RR/5 (Rural Residential-5 [1 DU/5 Acres]). (,�,f- A/ SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 8 of 12 g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Residential. h. Has any part of the site been classified as a critical area by the city or county? If so, specify. Yes. The site is within a marine area buffer. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? No change. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? No change. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: N/A. L. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: None. The project will not affect existing and projected land uses and plans. m. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts to agricultural and forest lands of long-term commercial significance, if any: N/A. 9. Housing hf g a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None. b. Approximately how many units, if any,would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None. 10. Aesthetics hI elpl a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? Approximately 4 ft. tall; no taller than the existing structure. Angular bulkhead rock. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: None. SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 9 of 12 11. Light and Glare hf elpl a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? None. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: None. 12. Recreation hf e a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Recreational boating. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None. 13. Historic and cultural preservation hf elpl a. Are there any buildings, structures, or sites, located on or near the site that are over 45 years old listed in or eligible for listing in national, state, or local preservation registers ? If so, specifically describe. None known. b. Are there any landmarks, features, or other evidence of Indian or historic use or occupation? This may include human burials or old cemeteries. Are there any material evidence, artifacts, or areas of cultural importance on or near the site? Please list any professional studies conducted at the site to identify such resources. Unknown. It is unknown if a cultural resources survey has been done at the site. The online mapping tool from WISAARD identified a Cultural Resource Damage Assessment conducted over 0.1 miles to the west of the Dew property in 2017 ("Cultural Resource Damage Assessment of Mason County Tax Parcel No. 32235-32-00020"). c. Describe the methods used to assess the potential impacts to cultural and historic resources on or near the project site. Examples include consultation with tribes and the department of archeology and historic preservation, archaeological surveys, historic maps, GIS data, etc. The Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation WISAARD online database was used to assess the presence of potential cultural and historic resources on or near the project site. SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 10 of 12 d. Proposed measures to avoid, minimize, or compensate for loss, changes to, and disturbance to resources. Please include plans for the above and any permits that may be required. The project is unlikely to affect cultural or historic resources. The area to be disturbed is limited to the footprint of the existing bulkhead and a minor area landward, which was disturbed as part of the original bulkhead construction. The project will follow state recommendations for Inadvertent Discovery of Human Skeletal Remains on Non-Federal and Non-Tribal Land in the State of Washington (RCWs 68.50.645, 27.44.055, and 68.60.055). 14. Transportation [!]el a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site or affected geographic area and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. State Route 106. b. Is the site or affected geographic area currently served by public transit? If so, generally describe. If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes. Mason County Transit Route 2 stops for flag stops along Hwy 106. However, the closest established stop on Route 2 is approximately 4 miles away at WA-106 and E McReavy Rd. c. How many additional parking spaces would the completed project or non-project proposal have? How many would the project or proposal eliminate? None. d. Will the proposal require any new or improvements to existing roads, streets, pedestrian, bicycle or state transportation facilities, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No. e. Will the project or proposal use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of)water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project or proposal? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur and what percentage of the volume would be trucks (such as commercial and nonpassenger vehicles). What data or transportation models were used to make these estimates? None. g. Will the proposal interfere with, affect or be affected by the movement of agricultural and forest products on roads or streets in the area? If so, generally describe. No. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: None. SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 11 of 12 15. Public Services jtgjo a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, public transit, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None. There will be no impacts on public services. 16. Utilities hf e a.Oer lities currently Ha te: natural gas water efuse service telephone, sanitary sewer septic system, d. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. None. C. Signature ItELE1 The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: `W Name of signee Michelle Bahnick Position and Agency/Organization Biologist, Leon Environmental, LLC Date Submitted: May 7, 2020 SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 12 of 12