HomeMy WebLinkAboutCommissioners Proceeding - PLN General - 6/7/1982 18
BOARD OF MASON COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PROCEEDINGS E''"'` �� �'��
JUNE 7TH, 1982 - PAGE 4
a permit shall be required for re-roofing over 2 or more existing roof
coverings. Motion carried. The motion is pending clearance from the
prosecuting attorney on the County 's liability. All motions are to be
in effect two weeks from today pending receipt of resolution drawn up
for adoption with prosecutor' s signature.
SHORELINE ADVISORY BOARD
Dave 110.1illin, Chairman of Shoreline Advisory Board, appeared before
the Board today . Mr. McMillin commented that they are hearing the
Assoc. Sand & Gravel project at the present time. Mr. McMillin was
requesting direction from the Board today as to what all they should
consider in their hearing process at the Shoreline Advisory Board. The
Board felt that he should not deny any testimony but that they should
consider only the first 200 feet, line of demarcation for the shoreline.
Chairman Hunter stated that this should be talked over with the
Prosecutor.
I14SURANCE
Darlene Pennock, Prudential Insurance Co. , appeared before the Board
today requesting their approval for the Auditor to make payroll deductions
for IRA and life insurance with The Prudential insurance Company of
America. Ms . Pennock stated that she has two employees at present
signed up for each program and has several others which she needs to
contact after September and offices which she has not contacted yet .
`Ss. Pennock presented a letter which the Auditor has informed her that i
they can accommodate payroll deductions. Jackie Dagle, Bookkeeping
Deputy, informed the Board that this would be the last slot available
for payroll deductions. Ms. Dagle commented that they are doubled up
in several areas and even have some slots with three different deductions,
in it . Cmmr. McGee was concerned over the legality of providing this
service for a private company and wanted to check with prosecutor on this
ratter. Cmmr. Johnston stated that they should find out which insurances
employees request and that way fill the needs of the employees. Cmmr.
Hunter stated that he wanted to see the outcome of the insurance meeting
which he just attended. There would be more information regarding the
insurance meeting in' September.
SHOPdELINE VARIANCE - JOHN W. COKER
Martha Turner, Planning Department , informed the Board that by their
request the Shorelines Advisory Board had reviewed the revised proposal
for Dr. Coker's residence. Ms. Turner stated that the Advisory Board
,/ after reviewing the new drawings felt Dr. Coker had done his best to
comply with requirements. They felt that any further reduction would
impose an unnecessary hardship. Cmmr. Johnston/AlcGee moved and seconded
to approve the variance as presented by recommendation of the Shoreline
Advisory Board. Cmmr. McGee motion was noted that they are upholding
the laws of the State of Washington. Motion carried.
SHORELINE VARIANCE - LEAMING
At the hour of 10: 15 a.m. the Board considered the shoreline variance
permit for William G. Leaming. Ms. Turner, Planning Department , presented
the staff report . Ms. Turner commented that Mr. Learning's variance
was an after-the-fact request for a boathouse forward of the line of
ordinary high water. She noted that a "Stop Work" order was posted at
the site by the Mason County Building Official on March 19, 1980 as the
Army Corps of Engineers in 1979 had discovered the violation and contacted
Mason County regarding this. Ms. Turner commented that a letter was
sent to Mr. Leaming on the necessity of complying with the Shoreline
Management Act requirements . The letter requested that a reply be given
by June 20, 1982 and none was received. March 17, 1982, Mr. Leaming
submitted his application for a shoreline variance along with the
environmental checklist . Mr. Leaming was present today and stated that
he did not know of his information source but was under the impression
that he was exempted from a permit . Mr. Leaming stated that he had sent
letters to his neighbors and only one neighbor had concerns and that was
in the white paint of the building which made it stick out . Mr. Leaming
commented that he could paint it green or a color which would blend in
with the environment . He noted that the structure was 12 ' X 241 . The
reason for the heighth is that it is used as a sun roof he explained.
,is . Turner commented that there are no other boat houses on the tidelands
in that area. Cmmr. questioned if he would not also need a permit to