HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEP2020-00020 Dock - SEP Determinations - 7/1/2020 MASON COUNTY
Planning Division of Community Development
Planning DEPARTMENT
615 W. Alder St. Bldg. 8, Shelton, WA 98584
`11 360-427-9670 ext 352
DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE
(WAC 197-11-340)
SEP2020-00020
Description of Proposal: FLOATING DOCK WITH WALKWAY
Proponent: RICHARD KRIEGBAUM
Location of Proposal: 420 E LAKESHORE DR
Parcel Number: 122205200009
Lead Agency: Mason County
The Lead Agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact
on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement(EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c).
This decision was made after review of a completed Environmental Checklist and other information on file with
the Lead Agency. This information is available to the public upon request.
Please contact Scott Ruedy at 360-427-9670 x352 with any questions. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-
340(2). The Lead Agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date shown below, when the
determination is final. Comments must be submitted to the Dept. of Community Development, 615 W Alder St,
Shelton, WA 98584 by 07/15/2020. Appeal of this determination must be filed with a 14-day period following
this final determination date, per Mason County Code Chapter 15.11 Appeals.
f114 1:�-� 7 I Zo Z c�
Authorized Local Government Official Date
Printed by:Scott Ruedy on:07/01/2020 09:15 AM Page I of 1
Lp 2o U 3°I MAY 18 2020
0-Lo 615 W. Alder Street
SEPA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
Purpose of checklist:
Governmental agencies use this checklist to help determine whether the environmental impacts of your
proposal are significant. This information is also helpful to determine if available avoidance, minimization
or compensatory mitigation measures will address the probable significant impacts or if an environmental
impact statement will be prepared to further analyze the proposal.
Instructions for applicants:
This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Please
answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. You may need to consult
with an agency specialist or private consultant for some questions. You may use "not applicable" or
"does not apply" only when you can explain why it does not apply and not when the answer is unknown.
You may also attach or incorporate by reference additional studies reports. Complete and accurate
answers to these questions often avoid delays with the SEPA process as well as later in the decision-
making process.
The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of
time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal
or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your
answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant
adverse impact.
Instructions for Lead Agencies:
Please adjust the format of this template as needed. Additional information may be necessary to
evaluate the existing environment, all interrelated aspects of the proposal and an analysis of adverse
impacts. The checklist is considered the first but not necessarily the only source of information needed to
make an adequate threshold determination. Once a threshold determination is made, the lead agency is
responsible for the completeness and accuracy of the checklist and other supporting documents.
Use of checklist for nonproject proposals:
For nonproject proposals (such as ordinances, regulations, plans and programs), complete the applicable
parts of sections A and B plus the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). Please
completely answer all questions that apply and note that the words "project," "applicant," and "property or
site" should be read as "proposal," "proponent," and "affected geographic area," respectively. The lead
agency may exclude (for non-projects) questions in Part B - Environmental Elements—that do not
contribute meaningfully to the analysis of the proposal.
A. Background 1HELPI
1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Kriegbaum Float Project
2. Name of applicant: Richard Kriegbaum (landowner); Lakeshore Construction
(contractor)
SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197.11-960) July 2016 Page 1 of 11
3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person:
Richard Kriegbaum, 660 E Lakeshore Drive, Allyn, WA 98524; 360-275-6019;
mekrieg@msn.com
4. Date checklist prepared: 7 April 2020
5. Agency requesting checklist: Mason County Dept. of Community Services (required with
Building Permit Application for Dock)
6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): May-Aug 2020
7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or
connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No
8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be
prepared, directly related to this proposal. WA State Joint Aquatic Resources Permit
Application; Habitat Management Plan; WA Dept. of Fish &Wildlife Hydraulic Project
Approval Application
9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other
proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. Yes.
Building permit(BLD2019-01440) for house on this property was issued by Mason
County 2/20/2020
10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known.
Mason County Building Permit; WA State Joint Aquatic Resources Permit; WA Dept. of
Fish & Wildlife Hydraulic Project Approval
11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size
of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to
describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this
page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project
description.)
Build (offsight) then install a floating dock (8' x 12') with walkway (14' x 6') at property
shoreline with Lake Anderson to allow residential recreational access (boating, fishing,
swimming) to the lake
12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise
location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and
range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or
boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic
map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you
are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications
related to this checklist.
Address: 420 E Lakeshore Drive, Allyn, WA 98524
Parcel: 122205200009; Legal Description: Lakeland Village 3 TR 9
Section: 19; Township: 22N; Range: 1W
Lattitude: 47.37776; Longitude: -122.84553
See Attachments for Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Topographic Map
SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960) Ja'y 20"6 Page 2 of 11
B. Environmental Elements HELP
1. Earth
a. General description of the site:
(circle one): Flat , rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other
b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)?
—5' / 116' 4 4%
c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat,
muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any
agricultural land of long-term commercial significance and whether the proposal results in
removing any of these soils. Land is small stone and soil mix covering clay; lake bottom
is silt covered
d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so,
describe. No
e. Describe the purpose, type, total area, and approximate quantities and total affected area of
any filling, excavation, and grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. No filling, excavation
and/or grating planned for dock installation
f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe.
No
g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project
construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Floating dock and walkway will cover
168 sgft (8 x 12 + 12 x 6) of lake surface and 12 sgft (2 x 6) of land at shoreline. Site
land surface is 13,939 sqft (0.32 acre). Site covered by walkway is less than 0.1%.
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: None
2. Air h� elpl
a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal during construction,
operation, and maintenance when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and
give approximate quantities if known. None expected
b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so,
generally describe. No
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: None
3. Water hel
SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 3 of 11
a. Surface Water: hf e
1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including
year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe
type and provide names. If appropriate. state what stream or river it flows into.
Yes, dock assembly will be installed on Lake Anderson which flows into Sherwood
Creek
2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described
waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Yes. Floating dock will be
held in place using two piles driven into the lake floor and the walkway will be
secured to the shoreline using two aluminum angles driven into native soil. See
Attachments for Kriegbaum Float Project drawing package.
3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed
from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected.
Indicate the source of fill material. Zero
4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general
description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No
5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan.
Yes, dock will be installed on Lake Anderson; refer to Attachments for Site Plan
that shows FEMA FIRM location.
6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so,
describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No
b. Ground Water:
1) Will groundwater be withdrawn from a well for drinking water or other purposes? If so,
give a general description of the well, proposed uses and approximate quantities
withdrawn from the well. Will water be discharged to groundwater? Give general
description.. purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No
2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or
other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the
following chemicals. . . ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the
number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the
number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None
c. Water runoff (including stormwater):
1) Describe the source of runoff(including storm water) and method of collection
and disposal, if any (include quantities. if known). Where will this water flow?
Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Rain on dock will runoff into
Anderson Lake
SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197.11-960) J—y 2C16 Page 4 of 1 1
2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No
waste materials
3) Does the proposal alter or otherwise affect drainage patterns in the vicinity of the site? If
so. describe. No
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water, and drainage
pattern impacts, if any: None
4. Plants h[ e
a. Check the types of vegetation found on the site:
_X_deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other
_X_evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other
shrubs
_X_grass
pasture
crop or grain
Orchards, vineyards or other permanent crops.
_X—wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other
_X—water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other
other types of vegetation
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Cattails (-10 feet wide by
--30 feet) have been removed to provide access from shore to open water; removal
per WA Dept. of Fish &Wildlife "Aqutic Plants and Fish — Rules for Aquatic Plant
Removal and Control"
c. List threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site. None —see list of
observed species in Kriegbaum Habitat Management Plan (in Attachments)
d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance
vegetation on the site, if any: Will plant 400 sgft of native plants near shoreline per
Kriegbaum Habitat Management Plan (see Attachments)
e. List all noxious weeds and invasive species known to be on or near the site. Himalayan
Blackberry, Reed Canarygrass, Yellow Archangel, Yellow Flag Iris, Curly Dock
5. Animals thel
a. List any birds and other animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known
to be on or near the site. Eagle, Osprey, Heron, Owl, Raven or Crow, Stellar's Jay,
SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960) Jcly 2016 Page 5 of 11
small Songbirds, Hummingbirds, Geese, Ducks (Mallard, Wood, Bufflehead), Deer,
Otter, Beaver, Raccon, various Squirrels, Chipmunk, Rabbit, small Snakes, Bass,
Trout, Salamander; occational Bear and Cougar sightings
Examples include:
birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other:
mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other:
fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other
b. List any threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site. Per U.S Fish &
Wildlife Services IPaC — Fisher (proposed threatened), no critical habitat defined;
Marbled Murrelet, Streaked Horned Lark, Yellow-billed Cuckoo, Bull Trout (all
threatened), this location is outside critical habitat for all
c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. IPaC lists Bald Eagle, Great Blue Heron,
Olive-sided Flycatcher, Red-throated Loon, Rurous Hummingbird and Western Screech-
owl as migratory for this area. Geese and Ducks appear during select seasons, may
imply being migratory.
d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: Dock will use 60% "fish
friendly" open array deckng. Habitat plan includes 400 square feet of native
shoreline restoration plantings. (See Attachments.)
e. List any invasive animal species known to be on or near the site. Nutria have been reported
in the area
6. Energy and Natural Resources hf eM
a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet
the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating,
manufacturing, etc. None
b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties?
If so, generally describe. No
c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal?
List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: None
7. Environmental Health hI elpl
a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk
of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal?
If so, describe. No
1) Describe any known or possible contamination at the site from present or past uses.
None
SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 6 of 11
2) Describe existing hazardous chemicals/conditions that might affect project development
and design. This includes underground hazardous liquid and gas transmission pipelines
located within the project area and in the vicinity. None
3) Describe any toxic or hazardous chemicals that might be stored, used, or produced
during the project's development or construction, or at any time during the operating
life of the project. None
4) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None
5) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None
b. Noise
1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example:
traffic, equipment, operation, other)? None
2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a
short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indi-
cate what hours noise would come from the site. Installation of dock requires maual
driving of two piles into lake bottom and two aluminum angles into soil near
shoreline; noise associated with driving these items will occur for a short duration.
3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Installation will occur
during typical workday daylight hours over a period of less than one workday.
8. Land and Shoreline Use _u1
a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Will the proposal affect current
land uses on nearby or adjacent properties? If so, describe. Site is undeveloped land;
permit(BLD2019-01440) for single family house construction was issued 2/20/2020 by
Mason County; house construction is imminent. Neighboring sites (north & south)
each have a single family house. East side bounded by road; west bounded by lake.
Proposed dock will not impact land uses on nearby sites.
b. Has the project site been used as working farmlands or working forest lands? If so, describe.
How much agricultural or forest land of long-term commercial significance will be converted to
other uses as a result of the proposal, if any? If resource lands have not been designated,
how many acres in farmland or forest land tax status will be converted to nonfarm or
nonforest use? No
1) Will the proposal affect or be affected by surrounding working farm or forest land normal
business operations, such as oversize equipment access, the application of pesticides,
tilling, and harvesting? If so, how: No
SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 7 of 11
c. Describe any structures on the site. No structures presently on site. Construction of
single family home is imminent.
d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No
e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? R-1 P (Singel-Family Residential,
Platted)
f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Site is parcel
122205200009; Lakeland Village 3 TR 9; current designation is Undeveloped - Land
UGA
g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site?
Residential
h. Has any part of the site been classified as a critical area by the city or county? If so, specify.
No
i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Zero
j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? Zero
k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None
L. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land
uses and plans, if any: Working through the Mason County and Lakeland Village
Community Club permit processes to ensure compatibility
m. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts to agricultural and forest lands of long-term
commercial significance, if any: None
9. Housing
a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, mid-
dle, or low-income housing. Zero
b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high,
middle, or low-income housing. Zero
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None
10. Aesthetics hf gjp
a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is
the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? Dock surface will be —18 inches
above lake surface; dock is constructed of wood, Trex & deck grating
b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None
SEPA Envlronmental checkllst(WAC 197.11-960) July 2016 Page 8 of 11
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: None
11. Light and Glare ;�hel
a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly
occur? None
b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No
c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: None
12. Recreation hf elpl
a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity?
This project is on a lot in Lakeland Village. Lakeland Village provides multiple
recreation opportunities including golf, play ground, basketball court, tennis
court, use of Lake Anderson (swimming, fishing, boating); plus the lack of traffic
promotes walking along the roadways.
b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation
opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Dock is for private
residential use; will not reduce nor enhance public recreation opportunities.
13. Historic and cultural preservationr�= I:
a. Are there any buildings, structures, or sites, located on or near the site that are over 45 years
old listed in or eligible for listing in national, state, or local preservation registers ? If so,
specifically describe. No
b. Are there any landmarks, features, or other evidence of Indian or historic use or occupation?
This may include human burials or old cemeteries. Are there any material evidence, artifacts,
or areas of cultural importance on or near the site? Please list any professional studies
conducted at the site to identify such resources. No
c. Describe the methods used to assess the potential impacts to cultural and historic resources
on or near the project site. Examples include consultation with tribes and the department of
archeology and historic preservation, archaeological surveys, historic maps, GIS data, etc.
None
SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197.11-960) July 2016 Page 9 of 11
d. Proposed measures to avoid, minimize, or compensate for loss, changes to, and disturbance
to resources. Please include plans for the above and any permits that may be required.
None
14. Transportation
a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site or affected geographic area and
describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any.
E Lakeshore Drive is along the east border of site; the road access permit
(RAP2019-00102)was issued 2/12/2020
b. Is the site or affected geographic area currently served by public transit? If so, generally
describe. If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Site is not
serviced by public transit; nearest bus stop is in Allyn along State Road 3 roughly 1.3
miles (by road) from site.
c. How many additional parking spaces would the completed project or non-project proposal
have? How many would the project or proposal eliminate? None and none
d. Will the proposal require any new or improvements to existing roads, streets, pedestrian,
bicycle or state transportation facilities, not including driveways? If so, generally describe
(indicate whether public or private). No
e. Will the project or proposal use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air
transportation? If so, generally describe. No
f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project or proposal?
If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur and what percentage of the volume would
be trucks (such as commercial and nonpassenger vehicles). What data or transportation
models were used to make these estimates? Zero
g. Will the proposal interfere with, affect or be affected by the movement of agricultural and
forest products on roads or streets in the area? If so, generally describe. No
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: None
SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 10 of 11
15. Public Services hel
a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection,
police protection, public transit, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No
b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None
16. Utilities hp.
a. Circle utilities currently available at the site:
electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system,
other Electricity,water, refuse service, telephone, sewer are available
b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service,
and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might
be needed. None
C. Signature rHELP1
The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the
lead agency is r" on them to make its decision.
Signature:
Name of signee Richard K4- baum
Position and Agency/Organization Land Owner
Date Submitted: IS y ZeZA
SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 11 of 11
SEPA Environmental Checklist — Attachments
for
Proposed Project: Kriegbaum Float Project
Applicant: Richard Kriegbaum
List of Attachments:
SitePlan ........................................................................................... 1 page
VicinityMap ..................................................................................... 1 page
TopographicMap ............................................................................ 1 page
Kriegbaum Float Project Drawing Package ................................. 4 pages
Kriegbaum Habitat Management Plan ......................................... 23 pages
N Site Plan
[Ain Anclorma ■ Name: Richard Kriegbaum
(� Project: Kriegbaum Float Project
Flow I ` Location: 420 E Lakeshore Dr,Allyn,WA
{f 1 How. Parcel: 122205200009
FEMA
4� FIRM
v
1 f
Cattaf ,
Pmeaused
DOCk N 6 X 14
X 78
00
3Spro
r� 1
ofte
+ cettaNa I e+�o 91
I4401 24 I
39
�Aw
60
On*u"High
Water Una
. r
Hone
Scale: 1 inch=30 feet
All Dimensions Shown in Feet /
Mason County WA G IS Web Map
N Vicinity Map
Name: Richard Kriegbaurn
Project: Kriegbaurn Float Project
Location: 420 E Lakeshore Dr,Allyn,WA
Parcel: 122205200009
r , /
All�n
(U
Dock Site Location
Latitude: 47.37776
Longitude: -122.94553
Section: 19
Township: 22N
Range: 1W
Parcel: 122205200009
1/17/2020, 1 A3:41 PM 1:12,248
0 0.1 0,2 0.4 mi
County Boundary
0 0.15 0.3 0.6 km
Tax Parcels (Zoom in to 1-30,000)
Sources Est HERE Gatrmn 11(map increment P Corp.GESCO,USGS.
FAD. NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase IGN, Kadaste(NL, Ordnance Survey, Esn
Japan METI,Esn China(Hong Kong) (c)OpenStreetMap contributors and
the GtS User Gornrnunfty
Mason County WA GIS Web Map Application
Esi i HERE Garmin FAO.NOAA USGS.EPA.NPS I
Mason County WA GIS Web Map
Topographic Map
Name: Richard Kriegbaurn
Project: Kriegbaurn Float Project
Location: 420 E Lakeshore Dr,Allyn,WA
Parcel: 122205200009
4u
M
2/7/2020, 9:39:59 PM 1:1,531
0 0.01 0.03 OM Mi
Tax Parcels (Zoom in to 1.-30,000) 1 ! 1 1 1 1 1 1
0 0.02 0.04 0.08 km
Contours 5 ft
Sources-Esri,HERE,Gafrnin,Intermap,increment P Corp.,GEBCO,USGS.
FAO,NIPS, NRCAN, GeoBase,IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri
Japan METI,Esri China(Hong Kong),(c)OpenStreetMap contributors,and
the GIS User Community
Mason County WA GIS Web Map Application
Esri Canada,Esri,HERE,Garrrin,USGS,NGA,EPA,USDA,NPS I
t PIN PIL PILE
ALUMINUM
EMSTING PARCEL
NEIGHBORING 12121P520000T EXISTING BANK.TYP LADDER 3'�
aX
FLOAT
Alf
PARCEL
1221OW0021 WREANDERSON tPN PILE L'YASLEY
NGW[[CWO
PARCEL ^-Di81GlT
PROPOSED FLOAT, 1 22 20 510 0 0 0E 2-0 GALVANIZED SOH 40 TREX TRANSCEND
CONTRACTOR TO OREINT PN FILE.TYP DECKING OR PRESSURE
FLOAT YWHNG PROPERTY 14.-0. TREATED 2.E HEM-FIR
LINE PROXCTION INTO LAKE 02 DECKING
PARCEL v-cr
1221050DOD20
PARCEL PROPOSED FLOAT
U
PROPOSED 127185200000 W
YALKMAY 0
MOORING CLEAT, t- a
PROPOSED WALKWAY CONTRACTOR TO 0 f-•
EXISTING PROVIDE BLOCKING ui
PARCEL YMERE RE01).TVP -2 0
122105000019 FLOAT PARCEL 0
122205200040L I m LL
a
PARCEL TRE%TRANSCEXD OECNNG Epq�OPEN ARFA ---4'-0"—� m
OR PRESS DE K EATED 24 DECKING rr�n1
1Y2195000018 HEMFR/2 DECK
AND TYP V
OPEN DECKING _W
NOTE CONTRACT TO INSTALL A BUMPER AND/OR RUB RAIL PER
SITE PLAN VIEW OVNIERS REWEST PLACEMENT,T'WE AND SIZE SHALL BE PER
OWAER
SCALE:1/37'=1'-U'
70PPB DECK PLAN VIEW _
MATH PILE NOOP. STANDARD
TYP ANGLE IRON
CONNECTOR PER
DETAL 3/S3.0.
TYP
bMI$"DEEP
ROTATION TUBTYP
`�`•`
DECKING PER STANDARD HINGE
1 4XE PT HEMFR Q 1a 18'DEEP ro P1/9R CONNECTOR PER
OR B7R FLOTATION PLAN
rF PERIMETER
STRINGER.TYR
Li i
•:`:..."::.�`. 2EPTHEMFP.12 3'-0",MIN
STRINGER§IE'
24 PT HEM-FR l2 OC.TYP STRINGER CCC
OR STIR 12'OC PER PLAN PER p
MAX
ROTATION TUB PLAN
TYPPR PLAN,
e.
TANDARD RON LL9 PER PION WITH A 7.6'0 S
NNECTOR PER 1;�t�c1,�1•i J',: 1.:. z' .•1t HOLE FOR A 3A-A307 BOLT. -EXISTNG _
OE 2I53 " • - DRIVE AMMIMJM OF 3 FT GROLNDLINE $
INTO NATIVE SOIL.OR UNTIL ELEVATION VIEW SHEET CONTENTS
RIDGING SEA REFUSAL.
L3000ANGLE BRIDGING FROM
TYP ORST1EMFIR92 SCALE:1/2"=1r-0"
CONNECTION FROM DOG( 2IDGINGASE STRINWTR .TYR PERIMETER PLAN
DRIVEN INTO PLATE SEE EDGE HINGE. BRIDGING STINGER,TYP AND
SHORE DETAIL 1/M0 TYP
ELEVATION
REFERENCE: LOCATION:420 E LAKESHORE OR, PROJECT:CONSTRUCTION OF NEW DRAWING NUMBER
FRAMING PLAN APPLICANT:RICHARD KRIEGBALIM ALLYN,WA99524 WALKWAY AND FLOAT
S(J{�;1/Z"=1'Q' ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: PARCEL f:122205200009 NEAR:LAKE ANDERSON I�
1.LYNNE ARAM,127105200008 ONOLTUDE7122.9451M STTAUTME:Y MASCN
WASHINGTON S2•O
2.ARLINE DEAN,122205200010
PAGE 3 OF 4 DATE:01.31.2020
KRIEGBAUM FLOAT PROJECT EwP�
4K
GENERAL NOTES 100% SUBMITTAL SET
1. ALL CONSTRUCTKR4 SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH APPLICABLE JANUARY 31,2020
LAWS,REGULATIONS AND CODES.CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY
STATE AND LOCAL AUTHORITIES PRIOR TO BEGINNING ANY WORK. e>cw
2. ALL LINEWORK IN THIS DRAWING SET IS PARALLEL OR SCOPE OF WORK SHEET INDEX
PERPENDICULAR TO THE LINES FROM WHICH THEY ARE MEASURED SHEET SHEET NAME
TO UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE,CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW&WIDE x 14'LONG WALKWAY !
DIMENSIONS PRIOR TO PRODUCT AND MATERIAL PROCUREMENT AND INSTALLATIONiCONSTRUCTION. AND CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW T WIDE x 12'LONG FLOAT G1.0 TITLE PAGE AND VACINITY MAPS
ON LAKE ANDERSON IN MASON COUNTY. S1.0 GENERAL NOTES U
3. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THESE DRAWINGS,ALL ITEMS, ILL!MATERIAL,ETC AND INSTALLATION OF THE SAME ARE A PART OF THE S2.0 PLAN AND ELEVATION
CONTRACT DEFINED BY THESE DRAWINGS. PROJECT INFORMATION S3•0 SECTIONS AND DETAILS 0
4. CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY F- d
FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS AND COMPLY WITH SAFETY REGULATIONS U Q
AND RESTRICTIONS AS APPLICABLE FOR WORKERS AND PEDESTRIAN PARCEL NUMBER:122205200009 LLj
PROTECTICN DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION.SHOULD PARCEL SIZE IN ACRES:0.32 ') O
THERE BE ANY DAMAGE TO MATERIAL FOR THIS PROJECT DURING LEGAL DESCRIPTION:LAKELAND VILLAGE 3 TR 9 g. 11
CONSTRUCTION,THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPLACE IN KIND THE RANGE 1 W,TOWNSHIP 22N,SECTION 19 d
DAMAGED MATERIAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER.
LAND USE20NING:UNDEVELOPED-IPND/R•1 P- �
5. ONE SET OF THE APPROVED PLANS BEARING THE STAMPS OF MASON RESIDENTIAL PLATTED Q
COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE m
MAINTAINED ON THE PROJECT SITE THROUGHOUT ALL PHASES OF GOVERNING BUILDING CODES:
CONSTRUCTION AND MUST BE MADE AVAILABLE TO THE BUILDING W
INSPECTORS FOR REFERENCE DURING CONSTRUCTION. 2015 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE AS AMENDED BY IY
MASON COUNTY AND WASHINGTON STATE Y
I
�5
a�
v>n
as
SHEET CONTENTS
VACINITY MAPS PROJECT SITE
TITLE
PAGE
REFERENCE: LOCATICN:420 E LAKESHORE DR, PROJECT:CONSTRUCTION OF NEW RAWMGNUMBER
APPLICANT:RICHARD KRIEGBAUM ALLYN,WA 98524 WALKWAY AND FLOAT
ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: PARCEL#:122205200009 NEAR:LAKE ANDERSON ^ ,O
1.LYNNE ADAM,122205200008 LATITUDE:47.377808 COUNTY:MASON IV_
2.ARLINE DEAN,122205200010 LONGITUDE: STATE:WASHINGTON
PAGE 1 OF4 DATE:01.31.2020 j
GENERAL NOTES: MATERIALS: DESIGN LOADS:
1)CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONS 1)STEEL,UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED: 1)DEAD LOADS:WEIGHT OF ALL STRUCTURE MATERIAL Y
SHOWN IN THESE DRAWINGS AS+F OR'REF"AND _ANGLES AND PLATES: ASTM A36 -TIMBER: 35 PCF
SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD _PIN PILES: ASTM A53 GRADE B -STEEL: 490 PCF
IMMEDIATELY IF ANY OF THE OBSERVED -MISCELLANEOUS STEEL: ASTM A36 -DECKING: 5 PCF L'4sl.ar
CONDITIONS DIFFER FROM THOSE SHOWN IN -BOLTS: ASTM A307 GRADE A t.1�1�641M0
THESE DRAWINGS. 2)LIVE LOAD: 40 PSF Dealclr
ALL STEEL COMPONENTS SHALL BE HOT DIPPED
2)THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL GALVANIZED AFTER FABRICATION. 3)SNOW LOAD: 20 PSF(BASED ON Pg=25 PSF)
DIMENSIONS OF EXISTING STRUCTURES AND ALL STEEL OR FIBERGLASS REINFORCED PLASTIC(FRP) 4)WIND LOAD: 17 PSF(BASED ON VuR=110 MPH)
OTHER FEATURES THAT MAY IMPACT THE DESIGN GRATING FOR THE FLOATS SHALL HAVE AT LEAST 60%
OR CONSTRUCTION DETAILS AS SHOWN IN THESE FUNCTIONAL OPEN SPACE OR 40%OR GREATER 5)ALLOWABLE LOAD COMBINATIONS F
DRAWINGS.PLEASE BRING ANY CONFLICTS TO THE MULTI-DIRECTIONAL OPEN SPACE.INSTALL GRATING PER W
ATTENTION OF THE ENGINEER OF RECORD PRIOR MANUFACTURERS RECOMMENDATIONS AND PROCEDURES. A-DEAD
B-DEAD+LIVE
TO BEGINNING AFFECTED WORK. 2)DECKING: C-DEAD+SNOW 0
D-DEAD+0.75(LIVE)+0.75(SNOW) ir
a
3)THERE ARE NO SPECIAL INSPECTIONS FOR THIS ALL DECKING FOR THE FLOATS SHALL BE A COMPOSITE E-DEAD+0.6(WIND) 1—
PROJECT THAT NEED TO CONFORM TO THE DECKING SUCH AS TREX TRANCEND 1 X 5.5 DECKING F-DEAD+0.75(LIVE)+0.75(SNOW)+0.75(0.6'WWND) W Q
MATERIAL OR APPROVED EQUAL.INSTALL DECKING
INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE,CHAPTER 17. O
HOWEVER,THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE MATERIAL PER THE MANUFACTURERS RECOMMENDATIONS 6)BUOYANCY CALCULATION INFORMATION: J
AND PROCEDURES.ALTERNATIVELY DECKING MAY BE 2X6 a' a
RESPONSIBLE FOR DRIVING PIN PILES TO THE PT HEM FIR#2. BELOW IS A SUMMARY OF THE STRUCTURES a
MINIMUM EMBEDMENT LENGTH LISTED PER PLAN, INTENDED USE AND LOADS CONSIDERED WHILE
3)TIMBER: PERFORMING THE BUOYANCY CALCULATIONS. Q
THE FLOAT STRUCTURE WAS DESIGNED m
ALL SAWN LUMBER SHALL CONFORM TO THE"GRADING AND UTILIZING MINIMUM LOADS OUTLINEDABOVE
CODES AND STANDARDS: DRESSING RULES"OF THE WEST COAST LUMBER SUCH THAT THE STRUCTURE ITSELF CAN W
INSPECTION BUREAU(WCLIB),LATEST EDITION.LUMBER PERFORM TO PREVIOUSLY LISTED LOADS.
SHALL BE KILN DRIED AND BE THE SPECIES AND GRADE
1)ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO THE NOTED BELOW.DESIGN STRESSES ARE BASED ON THE 2015 PROPOSED FLOAT:8'X IZ PERSONAL USE FLOAT
INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE(IBC)2015 NOS AND SUPPLEMENTAL DESIGN MATERIAL.
EDITION,INCLUDING ANY AMENDMENTS ADOPTED INTENDED USE:PRIVATE OWNER USE
BY MASON COUNTY. STRINGERS:HEM-FIR N2 OR BETTER
LOADS USED IN BUOYANCY DESIGN:
2) ASCE 7-10 MINIMUM DESIGN LOADS FOR BUILDINGS ALLOWABLE SHEAR STRESS:150 PSI
ALL MATERIAL DEAD LOAD o
AND OTHER STRUCTURES. ALLOWABLE BENDING STRESS:850 PSI SNOW LOAD=20 PSF
OCCUPANCY LIVE LOAD=20 PSF
3)MISCELLANEOUS STEEL FABRICATION AND ALLOWABLE CRUSHING PERPENDICULAR TO
ERECTIONS SHALL CONFORM TO THE AISC GRAIN STRESS:405 PSI
MANUAL OF STEEL CONSTRUCTION,LRFD,14TH ALL TIMBER SHALL BE PRESERVATIVE TREATED IN
EDITION,2011 UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. ACCORDANCE WITH THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF THE AWPA
STANDARDS TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF USE CATEGORY 5
4)TIMBER CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO THE (UC5).ALL TREATMENT SHALL BE DONE BY A MANUFACTURER
NATIONAL DESIGN SPECIFICATION FOR WOOD THAT PRODUCES PRESERVATIVE TREATED TIMBER.ALL
CONSTRUCTION(IDS),2015 AND THE CUTTING AND BORING AFTER PRESERVATIVE TREATMENT
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL AND CODES. SHALL BE FIELD TREATED PER THE MANUFACTURERS
RECOMMENDATIONS AND PROCEDURES.TREATMENT SHALL BE
ACZA UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.
5)ALL MISCELLANEOUS MATERIAL SUCH AS BUT NOT 6
LIMITED TO ANY UHMW,RUB RAIL,DECKING,AND ALL LAG SCREWS SHALL BE 100 AND SHALL CONFIRM TO m
GRATING SHALL CONFORM TO THE ANSI/ASME STANDARD B18.2.1.LAG SCREWS SHALL BE
MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS AND EMBEDDED A MINIMUM OF 8D(8'DIAMETER)AND MATCH THE R
DIAMETER INDICATED ON PLAN UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.
GUIDELINES FOR MATERIAL HANDLING, THE LEAD HOLE FOR THE THREADED PORTION SHALL HAVE A
INSTALLATION,AND INTENDED USE. DIAMETER EQUAL TO 60%-70%OF THE SHANK DIAMETER AND
A LENGTH EQUAL TO AT LEAST THE LENGTH OF THE THREADED
PORTION. ALL LAG SCREWS SHALL HAVE A STANDARD
WASHER. SHEET CONTENTS
GENERAL
NOTES
REFERENCE: LOCATION:420 E LAKESHORE DR, PROJECT:CONSTRUCTION OF NEW DRAWING NUMBER
APPLICANT.RICHARD KRIEGBAUM ALLYN,VWA 98524 WALKWAYAND FLOAT
ADJACENT PROPERTYOVANERS: PARCEL 11:1222052ODD08 NEAR:LAKE ANDERSON ^� -O
1.LYNNE ADAM,122205200008 LATITU DE:47.377808 COUNTY:MASON J
2.ARLNE GFAN,12220520D010 LONGITUDE:-122.845932 STATE:WASHINGTON
PAGE 2 OF 4 DATE:01.31.2020
cwpy4
itY4'0 A307 BOLT �PL1Ax4111'-0" 5' 3"
L3x3 PER PLAN It
7' 1� s��wtif
AiIEY
IMRRRING
t I BENT PL 3/18'
b
BENT PL 311W I W
0
w
a
9/18"O HOLE FOR 9/1C 0 HOLE FOR V
1tT0 BOLT.TYP 1/Y O BOLT.TYP W Q
PERIMETER
TIMEER J
STRINGER PER LL
PLN1 STANDARD ANGLE IRON CONN. 2 a j
DETAIL 1 SCALE:T=1'-a' s3.o m
SCALE:T=1'-0' S3.0 0
Lu
EXISTING Y
GROUND PL V4x4Nr-(r CONTRATOR TO SET
ELEVATION PLATE SUCH THAT TOP SURFACE
OF WALKWAY IS FLUSH WITH
EXISTING GROUND ELEVATION
III—III—III-1 I I—I s�
11—I 1 11 I-1 I I
c34-0 BOLT
c
CENTER
III — — PROPOSED
HOLE
0 SLOTTED CENTER LEG
3" —T7T—I I— VIALKWAY PER
HOLE FOR 1/Y 0 ANGLE LEG III— —
BOLT,TYP — PLAN
O BENT PL 111"
1/MIU25THRU
Fc (-—// 1 4 fj• L3x3 PER PLAN BOLT,TW
L 1-ryp
NOTE:ALL PARTSAND SHAPES LISTED ON THIS SHEET ARE MINIMUM DIMENSIONS IF 5
STIFFENER PL 114.VIEUO TO CONTRACTOR HAS OTHER MEANS AND METHODS OF CONNECTING THE WALKWAY TO
BENT PL iM USING Y18 THE STEEL ANGLE,THOSE ARE ACCEPTABLE AS LONG AS THEY ARE GREATER Q
FEET DIMENSIONS THAT WHAT IS SHOWN HERE. SHEETCONTENTS
DETAIL 4 SECTIONS
SCALE:1-1/7'=1'-0' S3.0 AND
CORNER ANGLE IRON CONN. 3 DETAILS
SCALE:6'=r-V S3.0
REFERENCE: LOCATION:420 E LAKESHORE DR, PROJECT:CONSTRUCTION OF NEW DRAMIGNUMBER
APPLICANT:RICHARD KRIEGBAUM ALLYN,WA 99524 WALKWAYAND FLOAT
ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: PARCEL*I222052DOODS NEAR:LAKE ANDERSON
1.LYNNE ADAM,1222D52DD008 LATITUDE:47.377908 COUNTY:MASON S3.0
2.ARLWEGEAN,122205200010 LONGITU DE:-122.845932 STATE:WASHINGTCN
PAGE 4 OF 4 DATE:01.31.2020
KRIEGBAUM
HABITAT MANAGEMENT PLAN
MARCH 2O20
ACERAf is
Ad►:uxrd Concrpts in Entironmeata/RegulatoryAssistxncr
KRIEGBAUM
HABITAT MANAGEMENT PLAN
PREPARED FOR:
RICHARD KRIEGBAUM
660 EAST LAKESHORE DRIVE
ALLYN,WA 98524
PREPARED BY:
ACERA"`
PO Box 272
EAST OLYMPIA,98540
(360)292-9639
4
l YEi�
t 7
MIKE LAYES
PROFESSIONAL WETLAND SCIENTIST
MARCH 2O20
A CElC!-_
Advanced C=rpxsin Entiwnmcatr/RcgWuoryAssistancr
Table of Contents
1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................... 1
1.1 Scope of Services........................................................................................................................................1
1.2 Site Description...........................................................................................................................................1
1.3 Project Description.....................................................................................................................................3
2 Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas...................................................................................... 3
2.1 WA State Fish and Wildlife Database Review.............................................................................................3
2.2 US Fish and Wildlife Database Review.......................................................................................................3
2.3 Site Visit......................................................................................................................................................4
2.4 Mason County Shoreline Inventory and Characterization Report.............................................................4
2.5 Project Impacts on FWHCA.........................................................................................................................4
3 Restoration plan...................................................................................................................................5
3.1 Planting Specifications................................................................................................................................5
3.2 Mulch..........................................................................................................................................................7
3.3 Maintenance...............................................................................................................................................7
3.4 Installation Inspection and Monitoring......................................................................................................7
4 CONCLUSION........................................................................................................................................ 7
5 QUALIFICATIONS OF AUTHOR.............................................................................................................. 8
TABLES
Table 1. Plant Species Observations..........................................................................................................................2
Table 2. SHORELINE RESTORATION PLANTS.....................................................................................................................6
277.001 Kriegbaum ACERA
Habitat Management Plan March 2020
i
APPENDIX A FIGURES
FIGURE 1 PROJECT LOCATION
FIGURE 2 PARCEL MAP
FIGURE 3 AERIAL PHOTO
FIGURE 4 PROPOSED PROJECT
FIGURE 5 WDFW PHS REPORT
FIGURE 6 IPAC SPECIES LIST
FIGURE 7 MASON COUNTY SHORELINE INVENTORY AND CHARACTERIZATION REPORT
FIGURE 8 MASON COUNTY SHORELINE INVENTORY AND CHARACTERIZATION REPORT
FIGURE 9 PLANTING AREAS
FIGURE 10 PLANTING DETAILS
277.001 Kriegbaum ACERA
Habitat Management Plan March 2020
ii
1 INTRODUCTION
This Habitat Management Plan (HMP) is for new construction of a residential float (Kriegbaum Float Project) on
Lake Anderson, at Mason County Parcel 122205200009, located at 420 East Lakeshore Drive, Allyn, WA (Site)
(Figures 1 and 2). The project is located within Section 19,Township 22N, Range 01W,Willamette Meridian. The
center of the Site is at Latitude 47.3777796N and Longitude-122.845629W. Figures are provided in Appendix A.
Mike Layes, a Qualified Wildlife Biologist and Professional Wetland Scientist conducted research and investigated
the Site on February 20, 2020. The Site and adjacent areas within 1,000 feet were investigated for the presence
of listed Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas (FWHCA)regulated under MCC 8.52.170-Fish and wildlife
habitat conservation areas. Potential impacts to FWHCA were assessed and a mitigation plan was developed.
1.1 SCOPE OF SERVICES
The scope of work for this study was limited to the following tasks:
• A review of documents and maps readily available, including the Washington State Department of Fish
and Wildlife's Priority Habitat and Species (PHS)data base and the United States Department of Fish and
Wildlife's online Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC).
• A property assessment to observe existing site conditions and identify listed Fish and Wildlife Habitat
Conservation Areas(FWHCA)regulated under MCC8.52.170-Fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas,
and to identify potential mitigation opportunities and management recommendations.
• Review of federal,state,and local regulations and management recommendations pertainingto the listed
Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas identified during the site visit and document review activities.
This includes applicable information from Management Recommendations for Washington's Priority
Habitats and Species.
• A Habitat Management Plan detailing the proposed project, an analysis of perceived project impacts to
identified Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas, and if necessary, mitigation and management
actions intended to offset any such impacts to Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas.
1.2 SITE DESCRIPTION
The Site is located at 420 East Lakeshore Drive, Allyn, WA 98524. Access to the property is on the west side of
East Lakeshore Drive at the intersection of East Channel Drive. The Site gently slopes down west from East
Lakeshore Drive, approximately 210' to the shoreline of Lake Anderson. Adjacent properties to the north and
south are developed with single family residents,each of which has a developed/landscaped lake front and private
residential dock. The Site is undeveloped, and covered with native coniferous forest dominated by Douglas Fir
over an understory of Evergreen Huckleberry (Figure 3). The shoreline has been previously cleared of trees and
shrubs and is dominated by Reed Canarygrass.
277.001 Kriegbaum ACERA
Habitat Management Plan March 2020
1
Observations of plant species found during field work activities were noted. Table 1 provides a summary of plant
species observations. These observations are not intended to provide a complete inventory, but a basic list of
common flora species found at the Site.
Table 1. Plant Species Observations
Common Name Scientific Name Wetland Indicator Status
Trees
Douglas Fir Pseudotsuga menziesii FACU
Pacific Madrone Arbutus menziesii NL(UPL)
Red Alder Alnus rubra FAC
Western Red Cedar Thuja plicata FAC
Shrubs
Beaked Hazelnut Corylus cornuta FACU
Douglas spiraea Spiraea douglasii FACW
English Hawthorn Crataegus monogyna FAC
Evergreen Huckleberry Vaccinium ovatum FACU
Himalayan Blackberry Rub us armeniocus FAC
Indian Plum Oemleria cerosiformis FACU
Low Oregon Grape Mahonia nervosa FACU
Oceanspray Holodiscus discolor FACU
Salal Gaultheria shallon FACU
Salmonberry Rub us spectabilis FAC
Trailing Blackberry Rubus ursinus FACU
Herbs,grasses,sedges,rushes,and ferns
Broad-leaf Cattail Typha latifolio OBL
Colonial Bentgrass Agrostis capillaris FAC
Common Dandelion Taraxacum officinale FACU
Creeping buttercup Ranunculus repens FACW
Curly Dock Rumex crispus FAC
Field Horsetail Equisetum arvense FAC
Kentucky Bluegrass Poa Pratensis FAC
Lady fern Athyrium cyclosorum FAC
Orange Honeysuckle Lonicera ciliosa NL
Periwinkle Vinca minor NL
Purple Foxglove Digitalis purpurea FACU
Red Clover Trifolium pratense FACU
Reed Canarygrass Phalaris arundinoceo FACW
Slough Sedge Carex obnupta OBL
Soft Rush Juncus effusus FACW
Sword Fern Polystichum munitum FACU
Twin Flower Linnaea borealis FACU
Yellow archangel Lomiostrum galeobdolon NL
Yellow Flag Iris Iris pseudacorus OBL
This listing represents the major plant species identified by ACERA in February 2020
There may be other species present on the Site that are not listed.
277.001 Kriegbaum ACERA
Habitat Management Plan March 2020
2
1.3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The Project is to Install an 8'x 12'floating dock and 6'x 14' walkway(180 square feet total)on the shore of Lake
Anderson (Figure 3) to allow residential recreational access (boating, fishing, swimming). Construction of float
and walkway will occur offsite at contractor facility; parts will be delivered to local boat launch (-0.2 mile south
of property); floated to property and installed. Manual Installation will require driving two 2" pin piles into lake
bottom for the foat,two angle pin piles into land at shore to secure walkway; float and walkway are coupled by
two hinges. Entire installation is within the 100-year floodplain. Detailed engineered plans for the float will be
submitted separately.
2 FISH AND WILDLIFE HABITAT CONSERVATION AREAS
The preparation of this report included review of several existing sources of documentation, review of agency
databases and maps. A field reconnaissance was conducted to review habitat conditions and verify written
documentation. The review of existing information includes, but was not limited to,the following documents and
information sources:
2.1 WA STATE FISH AND WILDLIFE DATABASE REVIEW
The Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife's (WDFW) Priority Habitats and Species (PHS) database was
queried on March 9, 2020 to determine if Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas (FWHCA)regulated under
MCC 8.52.170 within the project vicinity (Figure 5). According to the PHS database review, Coho Salmon
(Oncorhynchus kisutch),Steelhead Trout(Oncorhynchus mykiss),and Cutthroat Trout(Oncorhynchus clarki)occur
within Lake Anderson. Cutthroat Trout are not regulated under MCC8.52.170.
2.2 US FISH AND WILDLIFE DATABASE REVIEW
The United States Fish and Wildlife (USFWS) online Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC)was queried
on March 9 to determine if fish and wildlife species and habitats regulated under MCC8.52.170 Fish and Wildlife
Habitat Conservation Areas(FWHCA)were within the project vicinity. The IPaC website shows that 5 species listed
under the Endangered Species Act (ESA)are"known to occur or may be affected by activities on or near"the Site
(Figure 6). However, the IPaC data shows that these species may occur anywhere within Mason County.
Therefore, this information is not precise enough to determine if these species actually occur within the project
vicinity. These 5 species are: Fisher (Pekania pennanti); Marbled Murrelet (Brachyramphus marmoratus);
Streaked Horned Lark(Eremophila alpestris strigata);Yellow-billed Cuckoo(Coccyzus americanus); and Bull Trout
(Salvelinus confluentus). The USFWS has designated Critical Habitat for these 5 species. No such USFWS Critical
Habitat for these species is documented as occurring on or within the project vicinity. Based on habitat availability
and documented sightings of these species, it is highly unlikely that any of these species occur within the project
vicinity.
277.001 Kriegbaum ACERA
Habitat Management Plan March 2020
3
2.3 SITE VISIT
A site visit was conducted on February 20,2020. The Site and accessible areas within the vicinity were investigated
for fish and wildlife species and habitats regulated under Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas (FWHCA)
regulated under MCC 8.52.170. Lake Anderson is the only FWHCA identified during the site visit. No other
FWHCA were observed.
2.4 MASON COUNTY SHORELINE INVENTORY AND CHARACTERIZATION REPORT
The Mason County Shoreline Inventory and Characterization Report was reviewed for Lake Anderson (Figures 6
and 7). According to this report Lake Anderson is 45.3 Acres, and is within WRIA 14 Kennedy—Goldsborough. The
entire shoreline designation for Lake Anderson is Urban Residential.
2.5 PROJECT IMPACTS ON FWHCA
The Project will take place within the waters of Lake Anderson. Construction of the float and walkway will take
pace entirely offsite. The float and walkway will be secured to the shoreline as discussed in the project description
at time of installation. Installation of the float and dock is expected to take less than one day.
The Project will not affect any of the identified terrestrial FWHCA species or their habitats: (Fisher (Pekania
pennanti); Marbled Murrelet(Brachyramphus marmoratus);Streaked Horned Lark(Eremophila alpestris strigata);
Yellow-billed Cuckoo (Coccyzus americanus).
Bull Trout (Salvelinus confluentus)is not documented as occurring in Lake Anderson, or its inlet/outlet (Anderson
Creek)on in Sherwood Creek. Shallow lakeshore waters are not its habitat. Its presence within the project area
is therefore highly unlikely to ever occur. There are no perceived impacts on this species from this project.
Coho Salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) and Steelhead Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) are documented as
present within the waters of Lake Anderson and its inlet/outlet (Anderson Creek) and within Sherwood
Creek. Both of these species prefer streams and rivers as habitat, as opposed to shallow lakeshores.
However,these species are likely to occasionally migrate through the project area, between the inlet and
outlet streams of Lake Anderson. The project will not directly inhibit their migration route. The project
will not affect water quality,quantity, or temperature. Minimal,temporary increased turbidity will occur
during placement of the float and walkway. Perceived projects impacts will be alteration of lake shoreline
habitat by placement of 180 square feet of overwater structure. Impacts to these two fish species will be
minimal. The project is exempt from FWHCA buffer requirements according to MCC 8.52.170(E)(4)(e).
277.001 Kriegbaum ACERA
Habitat Management Plan March 2020
4
Mitigation for project impacts include:
• The walkway and float are the minimal size necessary to allow recreational access to Lake Anderson;
• Construction of the walkway and float will take place completely offsite;
• The design of the walkway and float will use 60% "fish friendly'open area decking;
• 400 square feet of native shoreline restoration plantings.
3 RESTORATION PLAN
This Restoration Plan (Plan)is intended to mitigate project impacts discussed above with installation of 400 square
feet of native plantings. Two - 200' square feet planting areas were marked and flagged during to site visit,
landward of the Ordinary High Water Mark of Lake Anderson. The approximate location of the planting areas
(Area 1 and Area 2)are shown on Figure 9.
Both Planting Area 1 and 2 are currently dominated by weedy invasive species including: Reed Canarygrass;
Himalayan Blackberry; Curly Dock; and Yellow Arch Angel. Control and removal of these species will take place
prior to installation of native plantings. Site conditions permitting, the optimum time for planting most native
woody plant material appears to be the later part of winter and early spring (February-March). Planting
instructions are provided in Figure 10.
Instillation of native plants will enhance the existing shoreline functions in this area. Habitat and water quality
improvements will include:
• Increased plant species diversity, which will increase nesting, forage, cover, and pray opportunities for
local native wildlife;
• Filtration of sediments by ground cover plants and shrubs;
• Erosion control from rooted ground cover plants and shrubs;
• Dense plantings will provide screening of the shoreline from human disturbance.
3.1 PLANTING SPECIFICATIONS
All plant materials will be native to the northwest, and preferably the Puget Sound Region. Plant materials will be
propagated from native stock;no cultivars or horticultural varieties will be allowed. All plants shall be high quality
restoration grade vigorous stock. Depending on project needs and timing, it may be necessary to acquire plant
material through several local native plant nurseries, and some species may be unavailable. See Table 2 for a
complete list of plant species and quantities. ACERA recommends the following licensed regional nurseries for
procurement of native plants.
• Black Lake Organic Nursery, Olympia, WA (360)786-0537
• Bog foot Environmental,Olympia,WA (360)866-7068
• (SEED) Inside Passage, Port Townsend,WA (360)385-6114
• Sound Native Plants, Olympia,WA (360)352-4122
277.001 Kriegbaum ACERA
Habitat Management Plan March 2020
5
• Watershed Garden Works, Longview,WA (360)423-6456
• Woodbrook Nursery, Gig Harbor,WA (253) 265-6271
Plant species have been selected that are adapted to grow within the planting areas based on moisture tolerances,
habitat adaption, and the desired plant community. The landscape contractor/applicant shall make a good faith
effort to secure all species specified in this Plan. Native plant species substitutions may be authorized by the
project biologist. Plantings will be generally installed at the quantities and densities specified below. Plants with
the "FAC" designation should be generally planted closer to the shoreline,within each planting area.
Tattle 2.SHORELINE RESTORATION PLANTS
SCIENTIFIC COMMON INDICATOR SIZE CONDITION SPACING QUANTITY QUANTITY
NAME NAME STATUS AREA 1 AREA 2
Shrubs 15 15
Acercircinatum Vine Maple Container or
FAC 1-gallon 3-4'O/C 3 3
Bare Root
Rosa pisocarpa Pea-fruit Container or
FAC 1-gallon Container
O/C 3 3
Rose Bare Root
Rubus Salmonberry FAC 1-gallon Container or 3-4'O/C 3 3
spectabilis Bare Root
Oemleria Indian Plum Container or
FACU 1-gallon 3-4'O/C 2 2
cerasiformis Bare Root
Symphoricarpos Snowberry Container or
FACU 1-gallon 3-4'O/C 2 2
alb us Bare Root
Sambucus Red FACU 1-gallon container or 3-4'O/C 2 2
racemosa Elderberry bare root
Ground Cover
Polystichum Sword Fern 4"pot to container or
FACU 3-4'O/C 15 15
munitum 1 gallon bare root
277.001 Kriegbaum ACERA
Habitat Management Plan March 2020
6
3.2 MULCH
Two to three inches of mulch will be placed at least 1 foot in diameter around each restoration plant in order to
detour the growth of the Reed Canarygrass, and to help maintain moisture conditions within the Planting Areas.
After installation of the restoration plants and the spreading of mulch, care will be taken to hold the mulch back
from the stems and trunks of restoration plants.
3.3 MAINTENANCE
Maintenance shall consist of supplemental irrigation as necessary and replacement of dead or dying plants with
appropriate vegetation specified in the planting plan. Irrigation of native plantings is recommended twice monthly
during May 15th — October 15th of the first two years post installation. Reed Canarygrass should be cut back
around each restoration plant, as necessary until they are established.
3.4 INSTALLATION INSPECTION AND MONITORING
Compliance monitoring will consist of evaluating the mitigation plantings immediately after installation to confirm
the plan was followed and plants were installed appropriately, and to verify that all design features agreed to in
this plan have been correctly and fully implemented. Due to the small scale of this restoration project, before
and after photos of each planting area should provide adequate proof that the restoration plants were installed
appropriately.
If required by the County, a walk-through survey will be conducted by the project biologist or qualified County
Staff to serve as the"as-built survey". Any changes made in the field will be consistent with the overall objective
of the plan. Following completion of the Installation Inspection and Monitoring, a summary technical
memorandum will be prepared verifying that all design features have been correctly implemented. Any changes
to the planting plan will also be discussed in the technical memorandum. Due to the small scale of this restoration
project, no longterm monitoring is proposed.
4 CONCLUSION
This HMP provides an analysis of impacts to FWHCA for new construction of a residential float (Kriegbaum Float
Project)on Lake Anderson. Two regulated FWHCA species(Coho Salmon and Steelhead Trout)were identified as
have a probable presence in the project area. Mitigation measures including minimizing the size of the project,
offsite construction, and "fish friendly" design was utilized to offset impacts to these species. Additional
mitigation measures included shoreline restoration using native plants. These mitigation measures adequately
compensate for any perceived impacts to regulated FWHCA.
The findings and conclusions documented in this report have been prepared for specific application to this project.
They have been developed in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill normally exercised by members
277.001 Kriegbaum ACERA
Habitat Management Plan March 2020
7
of the environmental science profession currently practicing under similar conditions in the area. Our work was
also performed in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in our proposal. The conclusions and
recommendations presented in this report are professional opinions based on an interpretation of information
currently available to us and are made within the operation scope, budget, and schedule of this project. No
warranty, expressed or implied, is made. In addition, changes in government codes, regulations, or laws may
occur. Because of such changes,our observations and conclusions applicable to this Site may need to be revised
wholly or in part.
5 QUALIFICATIONS OF AUTHOR
Mike Layes is a Wildlife Biologist with over 23 years professional experience. He is also a Professional Wetland
Scientist (#2157) certified through the Society of Wetland Scientists. Mr. Layes has extensive training and
experience in wetland science, aquatic habitat restoration and mitigation project design, wetland delineation,
stream assessments, fishery survey techniques, ordinary high water mark (OHWM) determinations, near-shore
marine habitat assessments, eelgrass bed delineation, aquatic ecology, and threatened and endangered species
survey and monitoring techniques,and environmental permitting.
Mr.Layes earned a Bachelor of Science Degree in Wildlife Biology/Forest Ecology from The Evergreen State College
in 1995. He has previously worked as a wildlife biologist for several Federal and State agencies and Universities
throughout his career on a wide range of projects dealing with threatened and endangered species and their
habitats. Mr. Layes' experience in both wetland and wildlife science gives him the ability to prepare combined
wetland and fish and wildlife habitat assessments as needed for any given project.
Mr. Layes is an experienced SCUBA diver with over 300 logged dives. He conducts underwater field work for
fisheries surveys, shoreline, outfall, marina and shellfish farm development and restoration projects. He also has
extensive experience with the surveying and removal of invasive aquatic plants in lakes and rivers.
e �
PA � res
Mike Layes, PWS
277.001 Kriegbaum ACERA
Habitat Management Plan March 2020
8
APPENDIX A
FIGURES
t
Lakeland Vi!laye
NORTH Goil Course/Pro Shop
a
Allyn Water
pie Bistro at
.. 7 Lakeland VMtW
Big Bubba s Burgers
37
fl'
- .United States ALLYFf
Haven In Allyn Postal Service
AllyniteA�RV
Mobile Pari
Sail On in
St.Hugh of Lincoln
Episcopal Church
Site
C,I,apevie*?irk a Ri-it:
Google
ACERA
Figure 1. Location ___---___---
tn:,MY•r�e,vx,ryxs is rormnmearalXeXrolanu}•.tceiie:uxr
1 22205200oo9 x q 05200 ,;
122205200004
arch fes,i%for 12220 -
2191,
122196906093
122206200005
O
122195000022 ���
12220640001
_. 2220520001
1222052M#7
122195000021
Q'
_ 122205206006
221 889988 122205400040
Y
S
122195000020 Site
122205200008
122195000056 122206406041
12 219 50 00 019
122205200010
1 22 200 06 00 10 CGN
122195000016
122205400042
122205400666
122195000017 1 2054001 6 122205400043 _ 122206400090
u:
C
1222054000" �
122195000015 .. 1222054000"
ACERArrr
Figure 2. Parcel Map — ----
I.1�.rif r�!C�xrpC.in 1 m irtanmrntrslRq�uhtnvy.lwie4xr
Y III„ r
N� r
Figure 3. Aerial
r
r
Photo
I EX_RING PARCEL
r/ NEIGHBC RMG 1�_2�5�CCCC�
F_CA-
PARCE_
/ PARCEL
PR-•_C3ED c_C.1_- T222C52C000 3
t r►i`4AC`CR.TO C RF VT
F-3AT'/,-.I A 3 PPOPER-Y
LIKE=R 3JE ST--K %TO RAKE
PARCE_
22,5-CCt 3Z3
PARCE_
__:C'.2CC 339
'..3=OSED
Pr ALKWAV
FARCE_ EXMTIM3
azCJ_C3i3 FIE 3haORIKv
PARCE-
-= SSCCt]15
SITE PLAN 'VIEW
(PIN PILE
=A— T,p LPL=sc 1
T _
-C Y
I �)♦
may,
"J SAL:r!rLF�:Ch+w: >I 'REX TlAA_"EVr
P Y PILE,IF DECKIK3 OR PRE33URs
•4_0' -REATEC:=E KY-F
22�ECKMG
�F:=OSED--LCAT
` MCD:VE C_EAT
- yy/ �� DOSE!.'dam KWAY C DK-PAC-_.TO
tom. ` �`y -.�✓Sl - PRO'DE 8_ CA.V3
T-tEX'QAL3CEK:3ECKP43 S3%3PEY AREA i.+• 4-0-
CR-gE32_4ETR=-A-E=-271 >E^-
KING 1 -fF,
-EY{q t2 DEC-1%3 AK:
CPEh:E�K Vu
Figure 4. Proposed Float*
*For HMP Reference Only. Not for construction purposes. ACFRA„1
Engineered plans to be submitted separately. Adv;w( df rr,rnE„I/Jnnnx•n,:IlRegubton,I.icr.In
WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE
PRIORITY HABITATS AND SPECIES REPORT
SOURCE DATASET PHSPlusPublic Ouery tD P20G309190306
REPORT DATE. 03+09,12020 7.03
Common Name SIM Name Priority Afaa Accuracy Federal Status Sensmve Data Source Entity
Se,enuk Name Source Dataset Occuurrence Type State Sta%s Resolution Geornetr.Type
Source Record More Information(URL) PHS Listing Status
Notes Source Dale Mgntt Recornmendal")s
Coho Occurrerrcc MigraLor rya NIA N
Onwrhyrtefeut IesaarA SWIFD OccurrenceVMratrnr "A AS MAPPED Lines
53302 hgq;:wrma wa garrw!m:4.ersty s a:sm hen
PHS LISTED
Coho Occurrence NA Candidate N WDFW Fish Program
Oncorhynchus kisutch SASI Occurrence N;A AS MAPPED Lines
3193 htlpllwdtw.wagov!wlmdtversty:soc;soc htm
PHS Listed
Resdenl Coastal Cutthroat OccunencetMgration NA NIA N
Oncorhynchus aark, SWIFD Occunence4nigration WA AS MAPPED Luis
53218 hgp.11wdtw wa.govtwhmidversty/soclsoc him
PHS LISTED
Resdenl Coastal CWdlroat Oecueenc A"rabon NA H;A N
Oncorhynchus darks SWIFD Occurrencefmgrabon WA AS MAPPED Lines
53299 http./!wdtw wa.gov41r?vdivers1y/soc/soc.htm
PHS LISTED
SteeRwad Occunv NA Thmatened N
Oncortrynchus mykas SASI Occurerce NSA AS MAPPF'
6218 htip.etw1w wagovewknMrrera ytsousoe.hlm
PHS Listed
Winter Steelhead OccurrenceVgration NA NIA N
Oncorhynchus myklss SWIFD Occunenm-,myratiw WA AS MAPPED Lutes
53363 Km;;wft wa gov"wtm.:dt slv`s soe Iilrtl
PHS LISTED
PHS Report Clip Area
Allyh
Site
s
ACERA"`
Figure 5. WDFW PHS Report ,,�,rrnr;�;,,rt,,err.inlmr.:vtrre•ntalRey!ulanin ,.. r,, ,
f;fL
9E6t K'B MVP Information for Planning and
Consultation ( IPAC
Mammals
risher Proposed Threatened
=ekan'a o2n^a-f
Birds
Marbled Murrelet cH Threatened
Streaked Horned Lark cm Threatened
Yellow-billed Cuckoo Threatened
--5 ale'Callus
Fishes
Bull Trout c- Threatened
Critical habitats
Potential effects to critical habitat(s) in this location must be analyzed along with the endangered speciess
themselves.
Figure 6. IPAC Species List AC£RA'f`
rldxfx'etilf Svnrly rn 1�rvnnnrrut.d hr;(rrLu,rr L.r.t.im i
LAKE ANDERSON
SHORELINE PERIMETER WATERBODY AREA REACH AREA
`.1 45.? AC t`.2 AC
s I w
•
4
w
PHYSICAL AND ECOLOGICAL FEATURES
HYDROLOGY (MAPS d. 10 AND 25) HAZARD AREAS (MAP 121
=)oocp 31- - acres: of t"e reach, exceuc ng c=a = s °: .z-:s 1.e
cp wate-, ;s mapped as FER1A ' annual c^am-e
`ooep a r
LAND COVER (MAP 151 PRIORITY HABITATS AND SPECIES ;MAP H)
e% deve_Ded, 22_: cps- waver, 3*. Death; 4� , elcaval :un—:at t':.t coho sag` cn evn:e•
forest "'o lloccip'a-.ripa-3, :�. =^ci,:E GAS. s:ee+.ea. :roJt
`c:-� Plc weO-.�s -woed
=!p3r3" wgi-txion «=e forest._ie'. 321. %on- e^
,.c c Ovate,re,; gqa for u•.wn a sa mon:cs and cro,ty
'vest �=e c:�errtat.-3 1�"Et3:'C" 45°'•Waver
iAppen9ix E 014PTC. 2CI• i "
WATER QUALITY(MAP 131
'dot inctudeo on Euv_-ay s st c' mpaa-zc vwat-s. m.•crtan:source of.c z wate-f_-{An:.e-sc— Creek.
ACFRA"'-
Figure 7. Mason County Shoreline a,�-��,�r,,�,;n,�,,�,�,�•�,.�R-,.--- ,.>>uv.ln�
Inventory and Characterization Report
BUILT ENVIRONMENTAND LAND USE
EXISTING LAND USES AND OWNERSHIP (MAP SHORELINE MODIFICATIONS (MAP 16)
181
La-.- -se- Reside^aal t87%;:V3can; Parks. A darn is ocated i^ ;he south ves:ern *onto- cf:he
Cpe^ Space, and Recreatc^ Areas i12 :: a^c reach. According*o 2009 aerial magery. :here are
Tr3nsport3:ic^ (8 Q.vnersh p- IC--"'-' Private. numero.s n.roidua d_#cks:piers 3ssccia:ed wit
single-fans iy^omes
ZONING AND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PUBLIC ACCESS (MAP 14)
DESIGNATIONS (MAPS 21 AND 22)
Zoning distncs- County Rural Resicen:ial 5 Acres There are no mapped public access fac I tes tc
(8%: A Jr Urban S-oerh Area iUGA;: Residential Lake Anderson.
'aged t22%i. and Reside^tial Recrere *icnal (2%).
Corrprehe^si1Je Pla^ Designatic-s- IC,�`.••o Rural
=x sting S_D- 10C% U tan Residential.
IMPERVIOUS SURFACES (MAP 16) AREAS OF SPECIAL INTEREST
13'.= of:he reach contains mapped im.eti ous Accord ng tic P-e Ecology far;r:ies•sites dat3case
surfaces :Appendix 6: NOAA "CAD.2208;. A_-a t^ere a-_nc list_c `acili:ies o,o.-tarr;na;ed sires
pho:cs from _029 she v ^ .merous sin-;le-fam dy
reside^ces and several roads along the lake shore
CULTURAL AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES
The-e are no listed cultural resources cr state or gederally 1 sted ^is:orc prope-ties. ieso..roe ma:•p:ng
suggests the-e is a loci:o mcde•3te*robabT*y offnd ng unk^o+f^ arfacts w;tin this-each
OPPORTUNITY AREAS
Restore trees to npanan zones where vege;a:ron is larking.
,educe numcer cf new docks over;rrre c�y cc^sides^g join: ,se clacks.
dentifj pc:en:ial opperun:t es fa•public access.
KEY MANAGEMENT ISSUES
• Proliferanon of si^gk°am ycocks a^d overwa:er structures
• Use of best managerrent practices:o votect dwate•quality, rr rnrfrize use of fe-:Hzers and pesticide
%sithi^^ shoreline jurisdrr:ion.
• Co d►va;er nefugra`or juve"ile salmon ds and priority ccho rean^g habra:.
ACFRA
Figure 8. Mason County Shoreline Ids.incetIC, pr%in I rmi n,m-nmIR.-ohrort.
Inventory and Characterization Report 0
R
•
a t 0401look
i
jw
N
V..�
Y
Olt,>
Ak�
AC�RA
Figure 9. Planting Areas 0 tdr:rnirJ("nncrrninFnrm r/rnrnrnr. Rrgu(.urrn ..ia l .rncr
(approximate location)
SLOPE PLANTING DETAIL
SCALE
NOTES:
oLOCATER LATH (IF SPECIFIED)
0EXCAVATE APPROX. 2' DIA. WELL FOR
PLANTING
OFEATHER EXCESS ��1
SOIL CREATE DOWN SLOPE WATER BASIN BERM Y
OSLOPE RELIEF (2:1 SHOWN, 1.5:1 MAX.)
�C
03" DEPTH OF MEDIUM HEM FIR BARK IF SPECIFIED
MULCH OVER S,UCER SLOPING INTO E�ANK �r
HOLD MULCH 3 FROM STEM J
III
oSOD STRIPPED AWAY FROM MULCH/WELL ROOT/SOIL BALL SCARIFIED AND WORKED
INTO
E PLANTING MEDIUM VAT �� LL E i ( I
00FRR00T MASS IANO' 0 DWMETR. SPRPEmAD —
ROOTS TO FULL WIDTH OF CANOPY.
WATER IMMEDIATELY AFTER INSTALLATION
TREE & SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL
NOT TO SCALE
LOCATOR LATH (IF SPECIFIED)
APPROXIMATELY 3" DEEP LAYER OF MULCH(IF SPECIFIED)
APPROXIMATELY I;- DIAMETER AROUND BASE OF PLANT
HOLD BACK 2 —3 FROM STEM
FEATHER EXCESS
SOIL CREATE CONTINUOUS
NOTES: WATER BASIN BERM
o PLANT SHRUBS IN GROUPS
OF 3 TO 5 OF SAME SPECIES
AT SPACING SPECIFIED IN PLAN
o REMOVE CONTAINER do WORK ROOTS
FREE OF SOIL; SPREAD ROOTS INTO
EXCAVATION
o BACKFILL TO BE SETTLED USING
WATER ONLY
0 EXCAVATE TREE PIT AT A MIN. OF 4 TIMES
DIA. OF ROOTBALL AT BALL CENTER, TAPERING PIT
GRADE TO FINISH GRADE
o WATER�IpMpMEDIATELY AFTER INS�TA�LLLATII�OtN
o OF R007 MASS IAND' CANOPYT DIAMETER. SPREAD
ROOTS TO FULL WIDTH OF CANOPY.
WATER IMMEDIATELY AFTER INSTALLATION
ACFRA"!`
Figure 10. Planting Details