Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBLD2000-00983 GeoTech Assessment - BLD Engineering / Geo-tech Reports - 8/21/2000 MASON COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR/COUNTY ROAD ENGINEER Shelton,Washington 98584 DATE: Aug. 21 St, 2000 INTER-DEPARTMENTAL COMMUNICATIONS TO: Shandra O'Haleck, DCD -Planner FROM: Alan A. Tahja, P/W- Co. Hydr. Engr. DCD WO# 00-0078 SUBJ: Geo-Tech Assessment Review NAME: Harmon Hill a South Shore BLD2000-00983 Shandra, The geotechnical assessment prepared for the proposed Harmony Hill caretaker residence at 7362 li E. SR 106 Union has been received and reviewed by Public Works. The report conforms to standards of sound engineering principles and practices and conforms to the requirement of DCD for geotechnical assessment reporting. The design of the proposed structure's retaining walls is based on smaller bearing values than recommended in the assessment, so their design is conservative, and well within the recommendations made in the report for bearing values. i I contacted MC2 regarding the dead weight of the roofing material. The plans indicate that a synthetic slate roof will be used. I've discussed this with MC2 `s engineer who conducted the analysis to make sure this had been considered in their design. I was informed that the proposed synthetic roof shale is relatively light, constructed of a plastic or polymer with a weight similar to that of 3 tab shingles. The roof dead weight was figured on a double roof material weight, so I feel this issue has been adequately considered. Please feel free to contact me at County extension 461 if you have any questions regarding these comments, or if you feel any features need further discussion or attention. Si cerely, UA Al n A. Tahj File: H:\WP\GEO\ASESMNTS\Harmony Hill.doc li -- - J WORK ORDER - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. py Date: g- - a�� { ii �nsa n f�t I I — � y (p Work Order PERMIT#,. —pp Lp 3c�W - c�pgS 3 Number. 7s Requested by: C)'/4;1,--cX Authorized by: Date: goon Type of Work: �' cZSSc� . r v I CHARGE TO: NAME AGENCY/COMPANY - BILLING ADDRESS PHONE Pub. Works Person In Charge: h (C) Project Time Line: (from -to da tes) rho TO Project Start date: Estmated Finish Date: Applmd-nale hours: ESTIMATED TOTAL='S: COST ESTIMATE (D) Pak Employe rs Subtotal Frimn% TOTAL$ g r0 �2 r oo 5 � >� i BRIE EQUIPMENT USED: TOTAL n MATERIAL US ED: '.. ...w.....�..-. .. f�� �..�c�a�ie.ocfoaG "eiuC.� .....:.::�. ........ .. .... .:�.+x �.�G,y,.�. .:C.•-..,�.. `�.'eG.;:�•.CQ .. '�:"�'"Q?`�."f"a,"..1Y;SkJ+JSSµ : �Lxw�c.Iwo..JfurxylbiK?x:.i�4eGf..3�.'iiaa�:w�n.a..�w..ro�:�/7 W`{ c''.�:J�,:w':J.C:;�V„,1��. �v�.',`�- ♦-,�.`:•.y^.7.,. -:�...:..�.:;..-...._:y.. (F) Actual Cost $ BARS: PROJ»: DATE EfrPloyw Name U24 flours §AdtQiM Erie TOTAL$ EQUIPMENT USED: Date 911-4 Rate TOTAL MATERIAL USED: (G) BILLED DATE TOTAL ALL INV f PAID GATE TOTAL CKN