Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEP2013-00046 - SEP Determinations - 6/20/2013 ON_STA MASON COUNTY BPS C �� DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT M o S° = Planning Division Y �? P O Box 279, Shelton, WA 98584 (360)427-9670 1864 DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (WAC 197-11-340) SEP2013-00046 Description of Proposal: Repair of 116-ft. long log bulkhead: remove top tire of three logs and replace with 1- to 3-man granite rock setback 2 feet from face of remaining logs to a height of 4 feet; use of filter fabric and quarry spalls between log bulkhead and rock wall to address potential erosion, possible inset steps at west end of new setback rock wall. Proponent: ROBERT MURNEN Location of Proposal: 7920 E STATE ROUTE 106 UNION Parcel Number: 322343400220 Legal Description: TRS 21 A, 22-23 OF LTO 3 & T.L. Directions to Site: FOLLOW ST RT 106 TO SITE ADDRESS ON THE RIGHT SIDE Lead Agency: Mason County The Lead Agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed Environmental Checklist and other information on file with the Lead Agency. This information is available to the public upon request. Please contact Allan Borden at ext. 365 with any questions. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2). The Lead Agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date shown below, when the determination is final. Comments must be submitted to Dept. of Community Development, P.O. Box 279, Shelton WA 98584 by 7/5/2013. Appeal of this determination must be filed within a 14-day period following this final determination date, per Mason County Code Chapter 15.11 Appeals. 12, 1 �� Authorized Local Government Official Date yf 4,Y .ug STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY PO Box 47775 •Olympia, Washington 98504-7775 •(360)407-6300 711 for Washington Relay Service •Persons with a speech disability can call 877-833-6341 July 3,2013 Mr.Allan Borden — Your address Mason County ` r is in the Department of Community Development ` Planning --- Division tsoiclsborough PO Box 279 - watershed Shelton,WA 98584 -- Dear Mr. Borden: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the determination of nonsignificance for the Murnen Bulkhead Repair project(SEP2013-00046)located at 7920 East SR 106 in Union as proposed by Robert Murnen. The Department of Ecology(Ecology)reviewed the environmental checklist and has the following comment(s): FLOODPLAINS MANAGEMENT: Donovan Gray(360)407-7253 Work in a 100yr floodplain requires a floodplain development permit. A habitat assessment may be required per the National Marine Fisheries Service/Federal Emergency Agency (NMFS/FEMA)biological opinion. Ecology's comments are based upon information provided by the lead agency. As such,they may not constitute an exhaustive list of the various authorizations that must be obtained or legal requirements that must be fulfilled in order to carry out the proposed action. If you have any questions or would like to respond to these comments,please contact the appropriate reviewing staff listed above. Department of Ecology Southwest Regional Office (SM:13-3076) cc: Donovan Gray, SEA Robert Mumen(Proponent) PALArneNJ INS� DOS I Z—�rinnon. Duckabush. 5eabeck.. FOREST >: Q4 ' L ENA HA M MA LAK HM AMA 9 E.,:_ �o-�'�" !fir Hendefsa . . -- scs B EA -�L ENA CREEK fl ;' �✓;, Eldon �`9- -s ap6255 X �t �' --: '`•SBreme TAIRCASE sr ?'NOOCHE LAKE : FALLS LahE' �► CUSHMAN.• shmrxn s S. `w E.iiliwaup 300 L. Cus oa an :`�eWattO BELFAIR _3, 1 M = r y Hood s port BROWN 1 '' �/� �,,�r�..-•' 4 D CREEK : ah uy -' %15 Rllyn IT E -}-E ''�otlatCll `��0.. TC _ ' IU6 TWANOH ` + SKOKOMEB - 1Y Ile ,.......-::.,•.: (NOIA : :<::::: AT TACOhtf• ,., f2 p Y' '-7fACOMA NARROYY-c,-' '" '''''�"'""'''== '••.::::;V. SHINGTON STATE HlsmF. ._ _ FORT 1Vf'SCUAL {� . '� , 1(�1 1 19 _ 3 POINT D£ JdNC L� 1Lahwatzel latlock Lake f covf"'i 102 4 (MA RINE) 9 �aE i G S 6a I $ A � A ate -----��!'► A, R/N_)FJe Lost d s 7 �.%. 23 Lake Ilcc� ..�---, z ��iN©:'.:;�tES. �.•• - SCHAFER Bostoti Harbor: USE& Clcquallum TOLMIE MrA1 Mu(woQ _ 10 Pro P-JI �u.L ?rop"✓� (rrn 'L w 'v/ f= ---- 79 zz. { /� t s ',T6, - �# 1 Sider V/ e � 7g2a L S 2 1a6 VIVId I5 PA IA j, ,@ ToPs;d.�f,hl5 1 J t }L it , f, ` J ro.n k i4✓ <<,etf r]a s e A 02 �l EVAT MURNEN BULKHEAD PROJECT 7920 E. SR 106 UNION, WA ««<PHOTO 1 View from beach looking East:bottom 2 visible log courses are sound;top 3 log courses to be replaced with rock wall 74 Aft r , A tW o- •�.' Q x � +•III � �� �. .. PHOTO 2—ABOVE--View from beach looking West(6 of 7 log rows showing) per.. PHOTO 3 View from beach looking Southeast at bulkhead face(top 5 courses of logs showing) MURNEN BULKHEAD PROJECT 7920 E.SR 106 UNION, WA PHOTO 4 View from beach looking Southwest at bulkhead face Amer PHOTO 5—ABOVE- View of mean high tide mark of 11.5 feet as seen in orange tape r PHOTO 6 View from SR 106 looking from SR 106 looking PHOTO 7 View from top side of bulkhead looking East at Northwest down the grassy path (staging area/rock dump site) grassy path that will be staging area/rock dump site I I c�xEP -60o44 WAC 197-11-960 Environmental checklist. RECEIVED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST JUN 10 2013 Purpose of checklist: 426 W. CEDAR ST The State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA),chapter 43.21C RCW,requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement(EIS)must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal(and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done)and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly,with the most precise information known,or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully,to the best of your knowledge. In most cases,you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer,or if a question does not apply to your proposal,write"do not know"or"does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems,the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION,complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS(part D). For nonproject actions,the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as"proposal," "proposer,"and"affected geographic area,"respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project,if applicable: Murnen Bulkhead Repair Project 2. Name of applicant: Murnen Family Representative: Robert B.Murnen 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 32707 42"d Ave SW Federal Way,WA 98023 Cell:253-670-2984 4. Date checklist prepared: 6-5-2013 5. Agency requesting checklist: Mason County Planning Department 6. Proposed timing or schedule(including phasing,if applicable):..'. s. '- 4-5 days to complete project ideally done Summer 2013 2013 42�) W. CEDAR ST 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No,we are just repairing what is already there. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. JARPA and SEPA were submitted for similar repair (using logs instead of rocks) in 2-18-1993. Determination of non- significance was issued. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes,explain. NO 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. SEPA,JARPA and Mason County Construction permits 11. Give brief,complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) The 116' bulkhead was constructed circa 1933 by our grandfather EJ Murnen,Sr. It is comprised of 7 horizontal rows of logs each approximately 12 inches in diameter. The bottom 4 tiers of logs are quite sound. The very bottom 2 tiers are under the beach sands. This project entails the replacement of the top 3 tiers of logs that we replaced 20 years ago(under a previous 1993 permit)which due to being out of the water have failed due to freshwater from rains,and sunlight. See PHOTOS 1-7 The top 4.5 tiers of logs are all situated above the mean high tide. (See PHOTO 5)Specifically,the top 3 tiers of logs have rotted and are to be replaced with 1-3 man basalt rock set back appropriately. There will be no footprint changes. The job will be done by Randles Landscape & Design of Tahuya, WA. All of the work is to be done from the bulkhead surface; no work shall be done from the water or from the beach. See SKETCH 1-Aerial and Sketch-2-Elevation. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any,and section,township,and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description,site plan,vicinity map,and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. Common Address: 7920 East Hwy 106,Union,WA 98592 Legal Description: 24-22-3,Tract 22A of CGovt.Lot 3#TL General: Property lies% of a mile past Alderbrook Resort going east on SR 106 (toward Belfair). The house is a log house structure with the bulkhead being below the road at the shoreline. Site Plan(Sketch 1-Aerial)Attached Map Attached TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 2 1. Earth a. General description of the site(circle one): Flat,rolling,hilly,steep slopes,mountainous, other. .. . .. Flat site but steep slope from Hwy 106 which ivy covered and bordered by trees and shrubs.See PHOTOS#1-7 attached. b. What is the steepest slope on the site(approximate percent slope)? 75%slope from Hwy 106 down to bulkhead surface in spots. Two paths provide pedestrian access to bulkhead. c. What general types of soils are found on the site(for example,clay,sand,gravel,peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils,specify them and note any prime farmland. Glacial till sands and gravels. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so,describe. Slide areas on Hwy 106 above road to the southwest(Olympic Vista)in recent years in approximately 2007. Noticeable undermining of Hwy 106 at corner+/-300 feet to the southwest of subject. e. Describe the purpose,type,and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Estimated 25-30 CY washed granular drainage material to be used behind new rock wall constructed of 1-3 man basalt rock(estimate 40 T). Approximately 5 yards of washed quarry spall rock will be used in front of the base row of rocks and behind the top remaining log.See Sketch 2-Elevation f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing,construction,or use? If so,generally describe. NO. The job will be done from the existing bulkhead surface. The staging area for the receipt of the rocks will be on a grassy pathway which will be protected with soil from the excavation behind the logs which are to be removed. The existing natural vegetation(ivy,grasses,maple trees)will be protected as will our planted trees(i.e.laurels and conifers)as needed. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction(for example,asphalt or buildings)? NONE h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion,or other impacts to the earth,if any: The mitigation strategy will be to keep our activities on the bulkhead without damaging the natural vegetation on our slopes or the bulkhead that has always served as a buffer strip and BMP for runoff from E SR 106. Specifically: 1) All work is to be done by an experienced excavator and manual labor from the topside of the bulkhead surface(not from the beach or from a barge in the water).The basalt rock(i.e.3-2-1-man rocks,washed granular drainage material and spall rocks)will be delivered onto the bulkhead from E SR 106 by a small(5 CY) dump truck that will dump onto our path(See Photos 6-7)which will have previously been set up as a staging area with appropriate safety measures in place. The dumps will be brief and will not impede traffic.The vegetation will be protected by plywood and tarps as necessary. 2) The damaged logs will be used as a BMP wall to keep native fill soils contained during the excavation phase. A silt fence will be installed on the beach prior to the excavation being started in an attempt to capture any soils or wood debris which may fall during excavation and log removal. 3) The soils removed will be used to reduce the slope of the existing path leading onto the bulkhead from the highway. 3 4) The affected areas will be allowed to naturally seed with native grasses that are drought and salt water tolerant. 5) Any loose excavated soils that are stock piled prior to use on the path will be tarped in the event of rains, until used or removed from the site(if necessary). 6) No activities will take place in the water. 7) The logs being removed from the bulkhead will be taken away from the property. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal(i.e.,dust,automobile, odors,industrial wood smoke)during construction and when the project is completed? If any,generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Only emissions coming from the dump truck and excavator machine's exhaust pipe. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. NONE c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air,if any: NONE REQUIRED 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site(including year-round and seasonal streams,saltwater,lakes,ponds,wetlands)? If yes,describe type and provide names. If appropriate,state what stream or river it flows into. The bulkhead,originally finished in 1933,is located along the shoreline of Hood Canal. There is a stream located 50 feet to the East and another stream located 200 feet to the West. 2) Will the project require any work over,in,or adjacent to(within 200 feet)the described waters? If yes,please describe and attach available plans. Yes,as the bulkhead is on the shoreline. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. NONE placed or removed. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description,purpose,and approximate quantities if known. NO 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so,note location on the site plan. We presume so as it is on the shoreline of Hood Canal. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. NO. The damaged logs will be used as a BMP wall to keep native fill soils contained during the excavation phase.A silt fence will be installed on the beach prior to the excavation being started in an attempt to capture any soils or wood debris which may fall during excavation and log removal. 4 b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn,or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description,purpose,and approximate quantities if known. NO 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources,if any(for example: Domestic sewage;industrial,containing the following chemicals. . . ;agricultural;etc.). Describe the general size of the system,the number of such systems,the number of houses to be served(if applicable),or the number of animals or humans the system(s)are expected to serve. NOT APPLICABLE c. Water runoff(including stormwater): 1) Describe the source of runoff(including storm water)and method of collection and disposal,if any(include quantities,if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so,describe. Water runs off the highway E.SR 106 travels through the bios(ivy,laurels,fir/maple trees,grasses,dirt onto bulkhead and settles on/filters through the washed granular drainage material behind the bulkhead and seeps through into Hood Canal. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so,generally describe. NO,there are no waste products involved. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface,ground,and runoff water impacts,if any: The 5-day project is to be done in the Summer of 2013 during a dry period.We will protect all ivy, shrubs and trees during the project as is reasonable,tarp over all soils removed during the project(if there is a threat of rain)until they are restored to their final destination on the bulkhead. The damaged logs will be used as a BMP wall to keep native fill soils contained during the excavation phase.A silt fence will be installed on the beach prior to the excavation being started in an attempt to capture any soils or wood debris which may fall during excavation and log removal. The end result of this project should result in a better filtration system than what exists at present. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: xx deciduous tree: alder,FEa I aspen,other xx evergreen tree: ©i ,cedar,pine,other "x shrubs grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail,buttercup,bullrush,skunk cabbage,other water plants: water lily,eelgrass,milfoil,other xx other types of vegetation IV b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? None 5 �l c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. The following species are listed under the federal Endangered Species Act for the area: Bull trout Northern spotted owl Marbled murrelet d. Proposed landscaping,use of native plants,or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site,if any: As seen under Section B.I.h.above,we will employ several BMPs to preserve the native plants and vegetation during the project. No damage to the existing vegetation is anticipated. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: awk,heron,eagle,songbirds,other: ulls,kingfisher,are also seen overhead mammals: deer,bear,elk,beaver,other: fish: bass, almon,trout,hen in ,shellfis ,other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. NONE Known c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so,explain. Unknown d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife,if any: NONE as we will not be endangering any wildlife. 6. Energy and natural resources a. What kinds of energy(electric,natural gas,oil,wood stove,solar)will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing,etc? Small dump trucks and a Trac-hoe excavator utilizing diesel fuel will be used in the delivery of the new basalt rock,washed granular drainage material,and quarry spall rock,and excavation of soils/logs and placement of new rock. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so,generally describe. NO c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts,if any: The use of equipment sized for the job instead of oversized equipment will save energy. 7. Environmental health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals,risk of fire and explosion,spill,or hazardous waste,that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so,describe. There are no environmental health hazards. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. 6 First aid kits will be on hand; vehicles for access to hospital will be available and cell phones for the dispatching of an ambulance will be available. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards,if any: Professional grade machinery (small 5 CY dump truck and Trac-hoe excavator) will be operated by licensed, bonded and insured operator. A silt fence will be installed on the beach to capture any loose soils and wood debris that may fall during construction. Tarps will also be used to cover excavated soils in the event of rains. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project(for example: traffic,equipment,operation,other)? NONE 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis(for example: traffic,construction,operation,other)?Indi- cate what hours noise would come from the site. Job hours will be M-F 7:30-5. Occasional small dump truck loads(5 CY capacity X 6-8 loads)will not cause any traffic disruptions. The Trac-hoe excavator is a late model variety and is reasonably quiet. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts,if any: NONE 8. Land and shoreline use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? This 80 year old north facing bulkhead serves as a recreational area for the benefit of the second through fourth generations of our large family for family fellowship. It provides a safe,dry area for our recreation equipment and general seating at higher tides. It is the most used area of the property and provides a wonderful platform for reunions and life-guarding our young swimmers. We rarely see anyone on the beach to the East,and occasionally see neighbors to the West. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so,describe. NO I c. Describe any structures on the site. NONE I d. Will any structures be demolished? If so,what? NO I e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Rural residential 5 f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Rural area g. If applicable,what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Urban 7 I L h. Has any part of the site been classified as an"environmentally sensitive"area? If so,specify. Yes,Hood Canal i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? None j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts,if any: Not Applicable II I 8 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans,if any: Preservation and Maintenance 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided,if any? Indicate whether high,mid- dole,or low-income housing. Not Applicable b. Approximately how many units,if any,would be eliminated?Indicate whether high, middle,or low-income housing. Not Applicable b. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts,if any: Not Applicable 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s),not including antennas;what is the principal exterior building material(s)proposed? The bulkhead is made of logs currently and is approximately 4 feet above the mean high tide; the bulkhead is +/-7 feet below the highway SR 106 elevation b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? NONE c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts,if any: None,as making this repair will help to preserve this 80 year old bulkhead to go along with the well-maintained 80-}ear old log cabin located across the street. 11. Light and glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur?Not Applicable b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views?Not Applicable c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal?Not Applicable d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts,if any:Not Applicable 9 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Clamming,fishing,oystering,boating,skiing,swimming,sunbathing,crabbing C. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so,describe. No the bulkhead promotes strong family values as it is the centerpiece of all our summer gatherings. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation,including recreation op- portunities to be provided by the project or applicant,if any: Not applicable 13. Historic and cultural preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on,or proposed for,national,state,or local preser- vation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so,generally describe. NONE b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic,archaeological,scientific,or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. NONE c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts,if any: None other than maintaining this grand property as best we can to honor past stewards and promote its value for future generations to come. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site,and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans,if any. The small(5CY)dump truck will make approximately 6-8 trips using E SR 106 to unload the new basalt rock for the wall,the washed granular drainage material for behind the wall and the quarry spall to be place in front of the wall. Each dump should take less than 1 minute. (See Map,Sketch 1-Aerial and Photos 6-7) b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not,what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? No,however a Mason County Transit Authority bus goes by the house on weekdays around 7:15 AM towards Belfair,and 9:40 AM towards Union. So,rock dumps taking place between 7:30 and 9:30 will not impact bus service. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Not Applicable d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets,or improvements to existing roads or streets,not including driveways? If so,generally describe(indicate whether public or private). NO 10 it TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY e. Will the project use(or occur in the immediate vicinity of)water,rail,or air transporta- tion? If so,generally describe. Not Applicable f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project?If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Not Applicable g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts,if any: Not Applicable 15. Public services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services(for example:fire pro- tection,police protection,health care,schools,other)? If so,generally describe. There will be no increased need for public services. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services,if any. There will be no impacts on public services. 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: lectrici natural gas,Riii refuse serv- ic tele hon sanitary sewer, a tics ste ,other. ALL OF THE ABOVE ARE AT THE HOUSE ABOVE THE HIGHWAY;NONE ARE ON BULKHEAD. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project,the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. No utilities as circled above will be used in this project. The contractor's crew may use a porta-potty up at the house,and perhaps get water for drinking. C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make' cision. Signature: ................ /. . ......................................................................................................... DateSubmitted: ......................b.'-5...-. ........................................................................................................... 11 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROIECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general,it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions,be aware of the extent the proposal,or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal,would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water;emissions to air;pro- duction,storage,or release of toxic or hazardous substances;or production of noise? The proposal will not likely promote any of the activities above. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: The proposal will help continue to support SR 106 structurally and the vegetation between the highway and the bulkhead will continue to help filter the runoff from the highway. 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants,animals,fish,or marine life? The bulkhead, as repaired will help maintain the plants between it and the highway above, but won't impact the fish or marine life at all. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants,animals,fish,or marine life are: As seen under the Section 1.h Earth,several BMP's will be implemented to minimize any impacts on the environment. 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Not applicable. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: Not applicable. 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated(or eligible or under study)for governmental protection;such as parks, wilderness,wild and scenic rivers,threatened or endangered species habitat,historic or cultural sites,wetlands,floodplains,or prime farmlands? Not applicable. Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: Not applicable. 12 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use,including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? The vintage 1933 bulkhead is part of the ambience that which is the south shore of Hood Canal. Our proposal is for the repair of this prominent structure which is a perfect complement to the 1933 log cabin across the street. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: The proposed use of 1-4 man rock instead of using replacement logs while not increasing the original footprint would seem to be a recipe for responsible management of the shoreline and land. 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Not applicable at all Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s)are: Not applicable at all 7. Identify,if possible,whether the proposal may conflict with local,state,or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. Not known 13