HomeMy WebLinkAboutDDR2012-00016 Hearing - DDR Letters / Memos - 5/2/2012 1 ' Z3.2 75 , g0113
TO a-: r f THE
1 BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER
FOR MASON COUNTY e _�2 �I
3
4 RE: John and Evelyn Frazier No. DDR2012-00016
5 Special use Permit for an Accessory
Dwelling Unit DECLARATION OF MAILING
6
7
8 I, Rebecca Hersha, declare and state as follows:
9 On May 2"d 2012, 1 deposited in the U.S. Mail, postage properly prepaid, the
10 documents related to the above cited Hearing Examiner Decision and to which this
declaration is attached to:
11
12 John and Evelyn Frazier
PO Box 153
13 Union, WA 98592
14
1 declare under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington the
15
foregoing information is true and correct.
16 Dated this 62ndth of May at Shelton, Washington.
17 i
18
Rebecca Hersha, Planner
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
DECLARATION OF MAILING MASON COUNTY
MASON COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 411 N. 5T"AVE. P.O. BOX 279
SHELTON, WA
360-427-9670 TEL.
360-427-8425 FAX
MASON COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Planning
Mason County Bldg. 1 411 N.5th
P.O. Box 279 Shelton,WA 98584
(360) 427-9670 Belfair (360) 275-4467 Elma (360) 482-5269 Seattle (206) 464-6968
May 2nd,2012
Notice of Decision - Approval
Case Number: DDR2012-00016
Applicant: John and Evelyn Frazier
Notice is hereby given that the Fraziers, applicants for the above referenced Special Use
Permit,have been granted approval for the project pursuant to the Mason County
Development Regulations, specifically for an Accessory Dwelling Unit. The Hearing
Examiner's Decision of Approval was dated April 25 h, 2012.
If you have any questions or require clarification on this issue please contact Rebecca
Hersha, Planner with the Mason County Department of Community Development at
(360)427-9670,x 287.
This is a final decision.No further appeals to the County are available. Appeals may be
made to the appropriate state administrative agency or superior court pursuant to RCW
36.70C. It is the appellant's responsibility to meet all legal requirements of any appeal
process.
Time Limit for Action. Per the Mason County Code Title 15 —Development Code -No
permit authorizing construction shall extend for a term of more than five years. If actual
construction of a development for which a permit has been granted has not begun within
two years after the approval, the Hearing Examiner shall review the permit and upon a
showing of good cause, may extend the initial two year period by permit for one year.
Otherwise, the permit terminates; PROVIDED that no permit shall be extended unless the
applicant has requested such review and extension before the Hearing Examiner PRIOR
to the expiration date. Work must begin by April 25th 2014. Permit expires April 25 h
2017.
RECE ED
MAY 01 012
1
2 MASON CO. PLAN ING DEPT.
3
4
BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR MASON COUNTY
5
Phil Olbrechts, Hearing Examiner
6
7 RE: John and Evelyn Frazier FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS
8 OF LAW AND FINAL DECISION
Special Use Permit
9 #DDR2012-00016
10
11
INTRODUCTION
12
The Applicants seek a special use permit (SUP) for an accessory dwelling unit
13 (ADU). The application is approved with conditions.
14
15 ORAL TESTIMONY
16 Rebecca Hersha, Mason County planner, summarized the staff report. She noted
another septic system or updated septic system would be required for the project. She
17 noted that a neighbor had asked questions about the project but had not made any
18 comments for or against the project. John Frazier, Applicant, explained the reason
for the proposal.
19 EXHIBITS
20 All exhibits identified in"Exhibits" page of the March 27, 2012 are admitted into the
record.
21
FINDINGS OF FACT
22
Procedural:
23
24 l. Applicant. The Applicants are John and Evelyn Frazier.
25 2. Hearing. The Hearing Examiner conducted a hearing on the application
on April 10, 2012, at 1:00 p.m., in the Mason County Board of Commissioners
Meeting Chambers.
SUP/ADU P. 1 Findings, Conclusions and Decision
1
Substantive:
2 3. Site/Proposal Description. The application is for a SUP for a 1000 square
foot ADU and attached garage. The applicants will continue to live on the property in
3 one of the dwellings. The subject site already contains a residence that is 1,600
square feet in area as well as a 720 square foot garage. The subject lot is 1.41 acres in
4 size and is located in Union. The lot accommodates a septic system rated for three
bedrooms. There is a proposed septic system for the proposed ADU. Water is
provided to the site by a public utility district. The ADU will be located within 150
6 feet from the existing residence and garage. As shown in the site plan attached to the
staff report, The ADU will be setback from side and rear property lines by more than
7 20 feet and more than 25 feet from adjoining roads.
8 4. Characteristics of the Area. The surrounding area is rural and residential.
9 5. Adverse Impacts of Proposed Use. There are no adverse impacts
10 discernable from the record. As shown in the aerial photograph attached to the staff
report, the subject and adjoining lots are heavily treed and fairly large. The addition
1 1 of a small ADU should not create any negative aesthetic or compatibility impacts, as
confirmed by the fact that no one spoke in opposition to the project. According to the
12 staff report, which is uncontested, there are no streams, wetlands, lakes, salt water, or
13 hazardous areas in the vicinity. The site is served by public water, phone, electricity,
adequate roads, postal service, emergency services and school bussing. The existing
14 septic system will have to be modified to accommodate the new development or an
additional system installed.
15
16
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
17
Procedural:
18
19 1. Authority of Hearing Examiner. MCC 15.03.050(10) and 17.05.42
provide the Examiner with the authority to review and act upon SUPS.
20
Substantive:
?1
2. Zoning. The area is zoned as Rural Residential 5.
23 3. Review Criteria and Application. MCC 17.03.029 governs ADUs in rural
lands. Under MCC 17.03.029, ADUs in rural lands are subject to a SUP, unless they
24 are located in the shoreline jurisdiction, in which case they are subject to a shoreline
permit. The proposed ADU is not within 200 feet of the shoreline and, therefore, no
25 shoreline permit is required. The review criteria for SUPS are governed by MCC
17.05.044. Those criteria, in addition to miscellaneous criteria for all Hearing
Examiner decisions, are quoted and addressed below.
SUP/ADU p. 2 Findings, Conclusions and Decision
MCC 17.05.044 SPECIAL USE REVIEW CRITERIA:
1
2 (1) That the proposed use will not be detrimental to the public health, safety and
welfare.
3
4. As discussed in the findings of fact, there are no adverse impacts
4 associated with the project. The project also serves to provide affordable housing as
encouraged by the Washington State Growth Management Act (Chapter 36.70A
5 RCW). The criterion is satisfied.
6 (2) That the proposed use is consistent and compatible with the intent of the
7 Comprehensive Plan.
8 5. The ADU is consistent and compatible with the intent of the
Comprehensive Plan. Chapter 9 of the Mason County Comprehensive plan provides
9 that ADUs should be permitted "when minimal impact would occur to surrounding
10 areas. The cumulative impact of like structures on neighboring properties must be
considered. " As noted in the Findings of Fact, the size of the proposed ADU is
11 relatively small, but it will be in an area characterized by relatively large lots
compared to the size of the ADU being proposed. Due to the large lot sizes, no
12 adverse cumulative impacts are anticipated. As further found, the ADU will not
create any adverse impacts and hence will have minimal impacts on surrounding
13 areas. Given these factors,the approval of other ADUs in the area also will not create
14 any cumulative adverse impacts.
15 (3) That the proposed use will not introduce hazardous conditions at the site that
cannot be mitigated through appropriate measures to protect adjacent properties and
16 the community at large.
17 6. No hazardous conditions are expected, nor have any been identified as a
18 result of the proposed ADU. No adjacent properties,nor the community at large, will
be impacted by the introduction of hazardous conditions from the ADU.
19
(4) That the proposed use is served by adequate public facilities which are in place,
20 or planned as a condition of approval or as an identified item in the County's Capital
21 Facilities Plan.
22 7. As discussed in Finding of Fact No. 5,the proposal will be served by a full
complement of public facilities.
23
(5) That the proposed use will not have a significant impact upon existing uses on
24 adjacent lands.
25 8. As noted in Finding of Fact No. 5, no significant impacts are expected to
result from this proposal, including impacts on adjoining properties.
SUP/ADU p. 3 Findings, Conclusions and Decision
(6) If located outside an Urban Growth Area, that the proposed use will not result in
1 the need to extend urban services.
2 9. The addition of an ADU and its use by a single family should not result in
3 a need to extend urban services. As noted in Finding of Fact No. 5, all necessary
public services are already available for the site.
4
MISCELLANEOUS CRITERIA FOR ALL HEARING EXAMINER REVIEW:
5
6 MCC 15.09.055(C): Required Review: The Hearing Examiner shall review
proposed development according to the following criteria:
7
1. The development does not conflict with the Comprehensive Plan and meets
8 the requirements and intent of the Mason County Code, especially Title 6, 8, and 16.
9 2. Development does not impact the public health, safety and welfare and is
in the public interest.
3. Development does not lower the level of service of transportation and/or
neighborhood park facilities below the minimum standards established within the
12 Comprehensive Plan.
10. According to the staff report, the proposed development complies with the
14 Mason County Code, including Title 6 and 8, including setback requirements. The
project is not subject to Title 16 which only governs subdivisions. The staff report
15 does not identify whether the proposal will lower level of service standards, so
compliance with those standards shall be made a condition of approval. The project
16 will also have no adverse impact upon health, safety and welfare.
17 The ADU meets the specific requirements for ADUs in rural lands as laid out in MCC
is 17.03.029 because the owner of the proposed ADU will occupy the primary
residence; the size of the ADU is 1000 square feet and less than 80% of the area of
19 the primary residence; only one ADU will result from the project; adequate parking is
provided for the ADU; the ADU is located within 150 feet of the primary residence;
20 all setback requirements are satisfied; and as conditioned the ADU will be served by
21 County approved water and septic. The proposed project does not impact the public
health, safety and welfare and it is in the public interest as it permits full beneficial
22 use of real property without any corresponding significant adverse impacts.
23 DECISION
24 The proposed ADU is approved subject to the following conditions:
25 1. Prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy the Applicants shall demonstrate
compliance with county septic requirements.
SUP/ADU p. 4 Findings, Conclusions and Decision
2. The project shall not lower level of service standards for parks and roads below
1 adopted standards.
2 Dated this 25th day of April, 2012.
3
4 ti� - -
Ph' Olbrechts
5 Hearing Examiner
6 Mason County
7
8 APPEAL
9 The decision of the Hearing Examiner is final and may be appealed to superior court
10 as outlined by the Washington State Land Use Petition Act, Chapter 36.70C RCW.
11 CHANGE IN VALUATION
12 Notice is given pursuant to RCW 36.70B.130 that property owners who are affected
by this decision may request a change in valuation for property tax purposes
13 notwithstanding any program of revaluation.
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
SUP /ADU p. 5 Findings, Conclusions and Decision
Frazier ADU(DDR2012-00016) 3/27/2012
Mason County
Department of Planning
Building I * 411 N. 5th Street * P.O. Box 279
Shelton,Washington 98584
TO: Mason County Hearings Examiner
FROM: Mason County Department of Community Development
STAFF: Rebecca Hersha-Planner; 360.427.9670 x 287,rebeccah@co.mason.wa.us
RE: Mason County Special Use Permit for an Accessory Dwelling Unit
(DDR2012-00016).
HEARING DATE: April 1 Oth, 2012
STAFF REPORT
I. Introduction. This report evaluates a proposal for the construction of an accessory dwelling
unit(ADU). Staff recommends approval of the Special Use Permit.
II. Applicant. John and Evelyn Frazier.
III. Property Location. 350 Union Heights Dr., Union, WA. The SW '/4 of Section 32, Township
22 N., Range 3 W., W.M. Parcel#32232-75-90113.
IV. Project Description. The proposal is to construct 1,000 square foot accessory dwelling unit
and an attached garage(Exhibit#2) in Rural Residential 5 Zoning. Without approval of this
Special Use Permit,the property would need to be 10 acres in order to be approved for two
dwellings.
V. Evaluations.
A. Characteristics of the area and site. The proposed development is located within a rural,
residential area in Union. The area contains a gradual slope of about 10 percent, offering a
view to the north of Hood Canal. No streams, wetlands, lakes, salt water, or hazard areas
are in the vicinity.
The rectangular lot, approximately 290 by 200 feet (1.41 acres) is at the corner of two
intersecting private streets(Exhibit# 3). The lot currently contains a 1600 square foot main
dwelling, a 720 square foot garage, and a septic system rated for 3 bedrooms, all of which
were approved by Mason County in 2003. The local Public Utility District provides water
to the site. The applicant is proposing to site the ADU with an attached garage in an area
that currently is maintained as lawn(Exhibit# 1).
B. Shoreline Desi ation. Not Applicable.
Page 1 of 5
Frazier ADU(DDR2012-00016) 3/27/2012
C. Comprehensive Plan Designation/Zoning. The Mason County Comprehensive Plan
designation for the site is Rural and the zoning is Rural Residential 5.
VI. SEPA Compliance. Project is SEPA exempt per WAC 197-11-800(1)(b)(i).
VII. Other Permits/Approvals. Building Permit and On Site Sewage Permit and Water Adequacy
Application.
VIII. Public Notice. A Notice of Application and Public Hearing(Exhibit# 5)was mailed to
neighboring properties on March 20t', 2012, and it was published in Mason County Journal for
a week beginning May 22nd, 2012. It was posted on site and in Mason County Building One
on March 26t', 2012. No comments have been received regarding this project.
IX. Analysis.
A. Accessory Dwelling Unit Requirements—Development Regulations 17.03.029:
1. The ADU shall be subject to a special use permit, unless in the shoreline jurisdiction it
is subject to a shoreline permit.
Staff Response: A Special Use Permit, DDR2012-00016, has been applied for (Exhibit
#4). This proposal is not within 200 feet of a shoreline, so it does not require a
Shoreline Substantial Development Permit.
2. The owner of the ADU must reside on the lot in either the principal residence or ADU.
Staff Response: The owner does and will continue to reside on the lot.
3. The ADU shall be located within 150 feet of the principal residence or shall be a
conversion of an existing detached structure (i.e. garage).
Staff Response: The ADU is located within 150 feet of the main dwelling.
4. The ADU shall not exceed 80%of the square footage of the habitable area of the
primary residence or 1,000 square feet,whichever is smaller.
Staff Response: The 1,000 square foot structure proposed as an ADU is only 63%of
the 1600 square foot main dwelling.
5. All setback requirements must be met by the ADU.
Staff Response: Mason County requires that structures be set back at least 20 feet
from side and rear property lines and at least 25 feet from roads or access easements.
The proposal meets all setback requirements.
6. All applicable health district standards for water and sewer must be met by the ADU.
Staff Response: The main dwelling contains three bedrooms, and the existing septic
system is rated for three bedrooms. The applicant is aware that the proposal will
require installing a new septic system or modifying the existing one. Upon submittal of
a Building Permit Application, the Environmental Health Department will assure that
water and septic are adequate to serve the site improvements.
Page 2 of 5
Frazier ADU(DDR2012-00016) 3/27/2012
7. No recreational vehicles shall be allowed as ADUs.
Staff Response: The proposed ADU is a permanent, "stick built"structure.
8. Only one ADU is allowed on any property.
Staff Response: There is no other ADUon this lot.
9. An additional off-street parking space must be provided for the ADU.
Staff Response: There is sufficient driveway,parking, and garage area on this parcel.
B. Special Use Review Criteria—Development Regulations 17.05.040:
1. Will the proposed use be detrimental to the public's health, safety and welfare?
Staff Response: The proposed ADU will not be approved for use until the Building
and Environmental Health Departments have checked that it meets current safety and
health regulations. As proposed, it meets all county setbacks and assures adequate off
street parking.
2. Will the proposed use be consistent and compatible with the intent of the
Comprehensive Plan?
Staff Response: There do not appear to be any conflicts with the County
Comprehensive Plan. Rural Residential 5 zoning does allow for one ADUper lot. The
owner of the parcel will reside on the parcel. The ADU does not exceed 80%of the
habitable area of the proposed primary residence.
3. Will the proposed use introduce hazardous conditions at the site that cannot be
mitigated through appropriate measures to protect adjacent properties and the
community at large?
Staff Response: No hazardous conditions are expected to be introduced.
4. Is the proposed use served by adequate public facilities,which are in place, or planned
as a condition of approval or as an identified item in the County's Capital Facilities
Plan?
Staff Response: The site is already served by all necessary public facilities. The street
address is clearly marked for emergency and mailing purposes. The site has postal,
emergency, and public school bussing services in place.
5. Will the proposed use have a significant impact upon existing uses on adjacent lands?
Staff Response:No significant impacts are expected to result from this proposal.
6. If located outside an Urban Growth Area,will the proposal result in the need to extend
urban services?
Staff Response: The site is served by water, road access,phone, and electric lines,
therefore the proposal will not result in the need to extend urban services.
Page 3 of 5
Frazier ADU(DDR2012-00016) 3/27/2012
C. Type III Permit Review - Code 15.09.050(c)
Type III Review for permit applications require that the Hearing Examiner evaluate the
proposal for consistency with Mason County's Development Code, adopted plans and
regulations. The Hearing Examiner shall review the proposal according to the following
criteria:
1. The development does not conflict with the Comprehensive Plan and meets the
requirements and the intent of the Mason County Code, especially Title 6, 8, and 16.
2. The development does not impact the public health, safety and welfare and is in the
public interest.
3. The development does not lower the level of service of transportation and/or
neighborhood park facilities below the minimum standards established within the
Comprehensive Plan.
Staff Response: The proposed development meets the applicable criteria and does not
conflict with the Comprehensive Plan, specifically the Planning Policies, Land Use,
Housing, and Utility chapters. It also meets the requirements and intent of the Mason
County Code and regulations (see A and B above).
X. Conclusions. The proposed development conforms to the policies and use regulations of the
Mason County Development Regulations with regard to Accessory Dwelling Units. Staff
recommends approval.
XI. Choices of Action.
A. Approve of the SUP request.
B. Approve with conditions the SUP request.
C. Deny the SUP request(reapplication or resubmittal is permitted).
D. Remand for further information as authorized by MCC 15.09.090.
Page 4 of 5
Frazier ADU(DDR2012-00016) 3/27/2012
EXHIBITS
Exhibit# 1. Aerial Photo/Parcel Map of Vicinity
Exhibit#2. Site Plan
Exhibit#3. Short Plat(1993)
Exhibit#4. Special Use Application (3 pages)
Exhibit# 5. Notice of Application and Hearing for Special Use
Page 5 of 5
w k
a=
awQH
i S axL
C=,
Luc S �r99/ _ dohs _ Qb
1 o£Xh-e ---_
z9- u,L.si)(-
Oi
tJ I
_. -- TV X9z �LTI/
-,,... • • V
rr.
���C9r
'+ ./i'I �1 , : ° :T a `� + DEL+• r t
r � ��" � `. f,�� +�, .7'. `'!i- '�' ;. tom•,« �•
��"`�r ` ram! r *� •T,•�� ���~ �•�. � 1 y�•�1 � �' �[��, �
s w-.�1 .�' F a.• � � - ��S 31,E,.�.. r '�,�•� '"�'-� '
��� ��- �� ' '� - - • '#I�';. •,`,fir; -,,. .s
.: ,f; � � '� �-tom ✓ � ,, _,,-
of • ++NOW
Alt
`'�,..�c,, � �,� `+�, •„sue a ,� �
Ile
.RAW 6
Vq
'fey ��' �. • . .� .• :_.� .
.sue. ti 4�►- -�` ��':,4; .•a '� �` �4 .ir� .
v •! ��*• .ems. ,r. ari.'C__ . CAPS
SHORT SURDI V/SON if
d D PR VFD 2z-9?
100 0 100 200
01RE F 0ORUU1V1TY DEVELOPMENT '
0 SCALE: 1 " = 100'
+ SHORT PLAT 610
IV SSER SHOR T PL A T
WERSON IVERSON FOR
N 89 57'20" W 751.84' (N 89'56'28" W 751.79') PH YLL/S A. NA TlOIV
NEARING N 89'57'20" W 33L63'(N 89'56'28" W 331.63') 7HE SW 114 OF 71.1E SW 114 OF
180.11• ~— 180.04' 172.g1' 159.62, SECTION 32,
30.00' i i (180.191) (180.20') 30.07' I 1 30.088 HOUSE z LOT 1 B TOWNSHIP 22 NORTH, c
o I I I SEPPC . . , 0.75 ACRES 't RANGE 3 WEST, W.M. ri
I +� I I �, ► cp
,_ E 320 N PARK O
z I N ° 1 co "' 1 � i WOOD �_ O w UNION, WA. 98592
W I N 1 cV N I
cn N ( � � SHED o = PARCEL NO. 322.32-75-90110
J 3 T N N 04 32232-75-90112
� 3 LOT 3 0� 2 GARAGE �•
Q 1 = I 3 3 �--- I w w I J2232-75-90113
PUMP r�w
_
MP
1 =q• I I I o
M
o ,rN� I f— HOUSE o cKAY
m l N `V I A Z// Ac• in
N N /• 38 4C- I o o I , z I��BLic W ATEP- S y57�/YJ
EL ITCH �1 3 6 1 0 0 1 00 0 l 100 R o S 89157'15" E
�� 60. 0'
Q I z z l Z Z 1 I O 1 '•,� o . w
Z z: 11.35 ACRES tl cv
o =
I I 0 O I I o ad
'`' o NOTE:
I I M LOTS 2 & 3 WILL REMAIN THE
L60'--------- - 60' - •- 30•34' ? --o rn SAME PER SHORT PLAT #1555
------- ---
o - DONE IN 1985.
1 f- 210.05' 202.57' 197.27' 74.32'z
S 89'5715 E 412.62 _�'�L_ N 89'57 15 W 1. ��
(S 89'56'28" E -412.67') - (N 89'56'28" W 271.63') �hh
_ - --------- ----------0 , i<ds Yr
m � off,+
M PRIVATE ROAD EASEMENT FOUND PER e.
coo LEITCH SHORT PLAT 2231 � o i
SHORT PLAT # 2231 MERIDIAN
"° eo e
31 32 BASED ON VOLUME 5 PAGE 59
1 1/2" IRON PIPE PER OF SURVEYS �L LAB y
VOLUME 5 PAGE 59 LEGEND
FlRES:
G 5 OF SURVEYS
° FOUND I 5 P CORNERS PER FOREST LAND SURVEYS
5 PAGE 59 � 5 + ■ _ I
OF SURVEYS ,+ ,:
WARNING.• SET 5/8" REBAR & RICHARD B. NORRIS P.L.S.
MASON COUNTY HAS NO RESPONSIBILITY TO BUILD, INPROVE MAINTAIN OR OTHERXfSE SER14CE THE PLASTIC CAP +9LS " f4 P.O. Box 397 (206) 427-5530
PRIVATE ROAD, 1F ANY, CONTAINED W7HIN OR PROVIDING SERVICES TO THE PROPERTY DESCR/BED 8 u SHELTON, WASHINGTON 98584
1N THIS• SHORT PLAT. SOILLOG HOLES n x JOB # S32(22.3)3S
Special Use Permit: $1,135 Mason County Permit Center Use:
Plu 05 or $670 for ADU's
RECtfft6 DDR LO I - DWI CO
FEB 2 7 2012 Date Rcvd ,_Z1 12-6 1 �.
426 W. CEDAR ST
MASON COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
426 W Cedar Street/P.O. Box 186, Shelton, WA 98584
APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL USE
A Special Use is one that possesses unique characteristics due to size, nature, intensity of use, technological
processes involved, demands upon public services, relationship to surrounding lands, or other factors. The
purpose of this application is to provide for adequate oversight and review of such development proposals, in
order to assure that such uses are developed in harmony with surrounding land uses, and in a manner consistent
with the intent of the Development Regulations for Mason County; Ordinance No. 82-96. Acceptance of this
application by Mason County does not guarantee approval of request.
Type of Special Use Permit:
❑ Communications Tower ® Accessory Dwelling Unit ❑ Oversize Construction
❑ Other:
Applicant Name -3-cAz L F_r,}. -7- 1 e r Telephone# ( 360 ) i 9 - c / 3 3
Mailing Address PD Xec x / 3'3 ll c�,n �8'f9z
Site Address 3 S 0 &,% /"'e i�h Ts- Dr ��r� ��,� `3 FI S" y 2_
Tax Parcel# 3W_ z 3z - 7f'- to / 13
Legal Description r4 Ii- C op sa.t v S/.f4 SIP -7 of S/ �t fs %R 3 S/°.0 2 z
Property Owner Names Sow L Fed: e.^ 4- EY8 L vn a /=-4 z z ier
Project Description.,;1 D /0a0 S 2 rr R D-U—
Please provide a site plan that includes the following:
1) Indicate Scale and North Arrow.
2) Property line dimensions, easements, and right-of-ways.
3) The location of all existing and proposed structures. Include square footage of existing and proposed
structures.
4) Setback distance, in feet from all property lines and structures.
5) Existing and proposed road access to and from the site.
6) Parking spaces. -
7) Location of on-site sewage tanks and drainfields.
� J '
I TLANNINGTACTORMS Page 1 of 3 Updated 6/17/2010
8) Location of drinking water supply.Include location on the proposed site and surrounding parcels.
9) Steep bluffs,wetlands, streams, and bodies of water
10) Location of fire hydrants and emergency vehicle access roads, including grade.
1 I) Surface and storm water run-off routes.
On a separate piece of paper,state your reasons for requesting a Special Use Permit and be sure to address
the following six criteria. Your request will be evaluated based on these criteria.
1) Will the proposed use be detrimental to public health, safety,and welfare?
2) Will the proposed use be consistent and compatible with the intent of the Comprehensive Plan?
3) Will the proposed use introduce hazardous conditions, at the site,that cannot be mitigated through
appropriate measures to protect adjacent properties and the community at large?
4) Is the proposed use served by adequate public facilities,which are in place,planned as a condition of
approval or as an identified item in the County's Capital Facilities Plan?
5) Will the proposed use have a significant impact upon existing uses on adjacent lands?
6) If located outside of an Urban Growth Area,will the proposal result in the need to extend urban services?
#of Pages Attached:
Applicant(s) Signature Date
............................................................................................................._.._..............................................................._......................................................_............................................................................_..........._................
Publication Cost Agreement
Publication cost is the responsibility of the applicant. Final permit processing will not occur until advertising fees
have been paid to the newspaper by the applicant.The Shelton-Mason County Journal will bill the applicant
directly.
I/WE understand that I/WE must sign and date the attached acknowledgment indicating and that I/WE
understand that is MY/OUR responsibility. I/WE must submit the signed page as part of application in order for
it to be considered as complete.
- Z - ��A& L 60&Z ier
Sipature of Property OWne Date Print Name r
J � E✓ /YA, 13 r�"az i a4
Signature of XpAicant Da'te3 Print Name
IAPLANNINGTACTORMS Page 2 of 3 Updated 6/17/2010
/Y)� 4dn Cdccn.Tv_ z - Zy-JZ
Ltz;fs, ena! ha ..P 1 ; ved !n The eXiSTinq Sfn dE
1 O D 3. Th 0- h on P h a,S S Ti,r OL r d C/o a r s _ ba Ti/r-ooar s
an,el is ��r a �kQE! C/ca,�r �l1osT of T/1e T�.� e »oc,J.
We ham. vp 4. 9reea(e u�irh pscr - -rn 4 '� �Q
h *in D a r h o,a a and A Q w.'// b t..r i of be s �
ha,,. : n hoscse .H Ad 12 . s fe, ",'LV A2"zP
tier-Q and 2arQ far US as S:aam as haato tear
we_ Lt vT a �/0 a uj /'I C-f�ArnvL TA :s A S SODA" a s
Dn.S c i b L e. So hgv a-aA a Q T Tl.ro i4. D. u. b�_
b s,CA001 sr .,nrs IAJS fa/i.
TA,&Y K w /I
N
�S, VeL 1 /3 4Li vQ�rs Old c2,v40
L. l Tg TR S 1"a r
f1854
MASON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Mason County Planning Mason County Bldg.I
P.O.Boa 279 411 N 5th Street,Shelton
Shelton,WA 98584 (360)427-9670
HOME PAGE—www.co.mason.wams
NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PUBLIC HEARING
FOR
SPECIAL USE PERMIT
Notice is hereby given that John and Evelyn Frazier have filed an application for a Special Use
Permit for the following development: Construct an Accessory Dwelling Unit on a 1.4 acre
parcel in Rural Residential 5 zoning.
Site Address/Project Location: 350 Union Heights Drive, Union, WA. Parcel # 32232-75-
90113.
A decision on this application will be made within 120 days. The proposed development is
reviewed as a Special Use Permit under Section 17.05.040 of the Mason County Development
Regulations.
A Public Hearing will be held by the Hearings Examiner on the proposed project on Tuesday,
April loth, 2012 at or sometime after 1:00 PM within the Commissioners Chambers Bldg. I,
411 North Fifth Street, Shelton. If special accommodations are needed, contact the
Commissioners Office, (360)427-9670,ext 747.
Any person wishing to express their views or to be notified of the action taken on the application
should express their views or interest by April 3`d or at the public hearing on April loth, 2012.
Please send comments to Planning Dept., ATTN: Rebecca Hersha, PO Box 279, Shelton, WA
98584.
Please contact Rebecca Hersha of the Planning Department at (360) 427-9670, ext. 287 or at the
address listed above with any questions or clarifications on this development and permit.
Rebecca Hersha - Re: Frazier ADU
From: Rebecca Hersha
To: B.E. Donner
Date: 4/9/2012 9:31 AM
Subject: Re: Frazier ADU
Yes, he will install a new septic, I am not sure where exactly. The other questions you have
posed are not typically known or decided at this time. They will be decided upon submittal of a
Building Permit Application. Minimum setback to a road right-of-way is 25 feet and 10 feet to an
access easement.
Maybe you can ask the Fraziers about these details.
Sincerely,
Rebecca Hersha, Planner
Mason County DCD
360-427-9670 ext. 287
>>> On 4/4/2012 at 8:48 AM, in message
<CADi4kBg7cH70kO2QwnYrpSryLQUgv+Pwz+ZzJsVvFefkVivw7g@mail.gmail.com>, "B.E.
Donner" <acndonner@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Rebecca,
Thanks!
A few more questions, and then I will leave you alone! :)
. will there be a driveway?
. is John installing a new septic/where?
. how close will it be to the easement between our property lines?
. how far from the ditch?
. where is it in reference to the right-of-way setback?
On a related issue, who/how would I petition to eliminate the easement?
Many thanks!
Brenda
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 8:27 AM, Rebecca Hersha <RebeccaH(cDco.mason.wa.us> wrote:
One story - handicap accessible. Just one bedroom...
>>> On 4/3/2012 at 5:29 PM, in message
<CADi4kBgCTU7MtYgk5C+Wg gkNDQ9M Y9Ss*FYtaPzvgf3D FPA(a�mail.gmail.com>,
"B.E. Donner" <acndonner(a�gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Rebecca,
I don't get a feel for how tall he wants his garage. It's possible it will loom over my
property, so I may need to think about planting some trees. Is the height mentioned
on the plans?
Thanks!
Brenda
Thank you for the plan.
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Rebecca Hersha <RebeccaHCcDco.mason.wa.us>
wrote:
Hi Brenda,
Frazier's site plan (approximate) and an aerial photo are attached.
Sincerely,
Rebecca Hersha, Planner
Mason County DCD
360-427-9670 ext. 287
PUBLIC NOTICE
MASON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COM-
MUNITY DEVELOPMENT Affidavit of Publication
NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PUBLIC
HEARING FOR SPECIAL USE PERMIT
Notice is hereby given that John and Evelyn STATE OFF MASOGTON I SS.
COUNTY OF MASO
Frazier have filed an application for a Special Use N
Permit for the following development:Construct
an Accessory Dwelling Unit on a 1.4 acre parcel in Margot Brand, being first duly sworn on oath deposes and says that she is the
Rural Residential 5 zoning. Clerk of the SHELTON-MASON COUNTY JOURNAL, a weekly newspaper.
Site Address/Project Location:350 Union That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and has been for more
Heights Drive, Union,WA.Parcel#32232- than six months prior to the date of the publication hereinafter referred to,
7590113. published in the English language continuously as a weekly newspaper in
A decision on this application will be made SHELTON, Mason County, Washington, and it is now and during all of said
within 120 days.The proposed development is time was printed in an office maintained at the aforesaid place of publication of
reviewed as a Special Use Permit under Section said newspaper. That the said SHELTON-MASON COUNTY JOURNAL was
17.05.040 of the Mason County Development on the 9th day of August, 1941, approved as a legal newspaper by the Superior
Regulations. Court of said Mason County.
A Public Hearing will be held by the Hearings
Examiner on the proposed project on Tuesday, That the annexed is a true copy of a Notice of Hearing&Application for
AprillOt\2012 at or sometime after 1:00 PM within
the Commissioners Chambers Bldg. I,411 North
Fifth Street, Shelton.If special accommodations Special Use Permit
are needed, contact the Commissioners Office,
(360)427-9670, ext 747. 4974—Frazier
Any person wishing t0 express their views or to as it was published in regular issues and not in supplement form of said
be notified of the action taken on the application
should express their views or interest by April 3rd newspaper once each week for a period of One
or at the public hearing on April 10th,2012. Please consecutive weeks,commencing on the
send comments to Planning Dept.,ATTN:Rebec- 22nd day of March
ca Hersha, PO Box 279, Shelton,WA 98584. 2012,and ending on the
Please contact Rebecca Hersha of the Plan
ning Department at(360)427-9670, ext.287 or 22nd day of March
at the address listed above with any questions or 2012,both dates inclusive,
clarifications on this development and permit. and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its subscribers during all of
4974 the said period.That the full amount of the fee charged for the
foregoing publication is the sum of S 135.00
Subscribed and sworn to before me this 22nd day of March 2012.
DO/V --..
S oTARy p AIRp Notary blic in and forte State of Was ngton
M rATE OF w VBLIC Residing at Shelton,Washington
�- YCorn'"i ASH/ •
ssio
•
A#ar • My commission expires March 24,2016.
..•--- .?016•
LIST OF ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS' MAILING ADDRESSES
WITHIN 300 FEET OF YOUR PROPERTY BOUNDARIES
Mailing addresses are to be obtained from the Mason County Assessor's 2TLt,Bldg. 1, Second Floor.
;T'dltrt, HageceorA
,73a CAS7- S1oe of as
�� SOX S/ �wivv ec. f sZ ,So A WI4
At Al
IATS
Jp D. QoX 8 l.�i,.iv.d A leoa 2. CC 'A k 14 y
vac&^T a1( To
/voAtti * wes o f' k.s
�Fdn wo
Je4i
010q s �ye
�/074
1.TLANNINGTACTORMS Page 3 of 3 Updated 6/17/2010
Rebecca Hersha - Notice of Hearing
From: Rebecca Hersha
To: jlegals@masoncounty.com
Date: 3/19/2012 2.28 PM
Subject: Notice of Hearing
Attachments: NOH Frazier.pdf
Please publish the attached Notice of Public Hearing for one week, beginning March
22nd, 2012. The second page of the attachment contains the portion of the application
with the signed publication cost agreement.
Please send the bill to the following address:
John Frazier
PO Box 153
Union, WA 98592
Thank you.
Sincerely,
Rebecca Hersha, Planner
Mason County DCD
360-427-9670 ext. 287
AGo Green! Please consider the environment before printing this email or its attachments.
Rebecca Hersha- Re: Frazier ADU
From: Trish Woolett
To: Rebecca Hersha
Date: 3/16/2012 11:49 AM
Subject: Re:Frazier ADU
Attachments: Trish Woolett.vcf
Rebecca,
Canceled due to inactivity.Meaning they never called for any further inspections and the permit became null and
void. If they are going to permit any other permits on this structure,with the Building Department,they will need to
pay for a final inspection(s).Currently$73.00 fee per inspection until final approval.
Tricio Woolett
Permit Specialist II
Mason County Community Dev.
360.427.9670 ext. 281
fax 360.427.7798
tw@co.mason.wa.us
County Web Site: www.co.mason.wn.us
>>>Rebecca Hersha 3/14/2012 10:48 AM>>>
Hi Trish,
I am looking at a Special Use Permit DDR2012-16 recently applied for an ADU. Parcel 32232-75-90113. A shop
was constructed but the permit for it BLD2002-1551 was canceled. If you have time,could you look in the parcel file
and see why the permit was canceled?
Thanks.
-Rebecca