HomeMy WebLinkAboutSPI2010-00065 - SPI Inspections - 12/7/2010 °N-STATE MASON COUNTY
o P� A o N DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
o N z Planning Division
7 N y 4 P O Box 279, Shelton, WA 98584
�0 (360)427-9670
1864
Site Inspection
December 07, 2010
TO BE KEPT IN THE
PARCEL FILE
PN
Case No.: SP12010-00065
Parcel No.: 122163100030
Project Description: Site inspection requested to determine setbacks for new
construction
Dear Applicant:
Pursuant to your application, a site pre-inspection (SPI) was performed on your property. Below
you will find comments made regarding the proposed development and its critical values.
In some cases, setbacks for development from shorelines, steep slopes, streams, and wetlands
must be included in your specific proposal; these setbacks are included as part of the comments
listed below.
This information is based on County and State regulations as they exist to date. These
regulations may change and may affect the requirements for development of the subject property.
Please contact me at (360) 427-9670, ext. 365 if you have questions.
Sincerely,
Allan Borden
Land Use Planner
Mason County Planning Department
12/7/2010 Page 1 of 4 SP12010-00065
Site Inspection
12/7/2010 Case No.: SP12010-00065
Comments:
Pre-inspection for Lee and Pat Lynch on Sept. 14, 2010:
The pre-inspection was made to evaluate the property for a
proposed new residence to replace a park model with covered
deck on the 1 acre parcel located on State Route 302 with a west
shoreline frontage along Case Inlet. The parcel has some shrub
and tree cover on the 200 ft. length and 100 ft. width of the
property and with no bank protection along the saltwater
shoreline. A proposed residence would need to be located at the
proper setbacks based upon this inspection. These findings state
regulations in effect at inspection time, unless noted otherwise
[NOTE: the Shoreline Setbacks stated below].
Development Regulations standards:
_Y_ The site is in Rural Residential 5 zone. Standard building
setbacks are 25-foot front yard setback, and 20-foot side property
line and rear yard setbacks. These setbacks are measured from
structures above grade such as roof overhangs, stairs, balconies,
decks, heat pumps, storage buildings, and fuel tanks.
_Y_ An exception is made for lots less than 100 feet in width,
where side yard setbacks are equal to 10 percent of the lot width,
but no less than 5 feet; this property has a 10 ft. side yard
setback, depending on proposed building footprint.
_Y_ An administrative variance may be requested to reduce
these setback distances from property lines, to as low as 5 feet
(side yard), if the size, shape, or features of the property constrain
development from the proper setbacks. This process requires
application and review at the time of the building permit submittal.
Shoreline Setback standards:
_Y_ Shoreline setbacks: The shoreline designation for Case Inlet
is Urban Environment per the Mason County Shoreline Master
Program and development setbacks would be determined by the
Mason County Resource Ordinance. On March 2, 2010, the
Washington Legislature passed a law that has determined that
the county Resource Ordinance development standards do apply
to proposals within 200 feet of the OHWM (shoreline
management area). The shoreline setback is typically determined
by averaging the distances of each of the rooflines of adjacent
neighboring residences from roof projection closest to the
shoreline to the ordinary high water mark (OHWM) of the
saltwater shoreline. Any portion of the new structure, including
12/7/2010 Page 2 of 4 SP12010-00065
Site Inspection
12/7/2010 Case No.: SP12010-00065
decks, balconies, and rooflines, must be behind this common line.
Shoreward of this line for 15 feet toward the shoreline is an area
that may be used for lawns, patios or landscaping (development
at grade level). From that point toward the shoreline is considered
to be a required vegetated buffer that must remain and is
regulated by the Mason County Resource Ordinance Fish and
Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas Chapter. Within this chapter
are those activities listed that can be done both with and without a
Mason Environmental Permit, proposed tree limbing and limited
cutting of trees in the buffer for view improvement are reviewed by
the area permit planner prior to starting these type of activities.
In addition, a new structure will need to be located no closer that
35 feet from shore OHWM (a Resource Ordinance provision),
comprised of the 20 (+) feet vegetation buffer near the OHWM
and 15 feet of building setback close to the structure.
Staff measured the average setbacks from shore OHWM from the
roofline of existing residence on the lot to the north, on the subject
property, and on the residence to the south. In your case, the
shore setback of a proposed structure must meet the distance of
the following setbacks:
Setback at the north property: 36 feet from shoreline OHWM to
the closest roof at the center of the residence.
Setback at the south property: 25 feet from shoreline OHWM to
the closest roof at the southwest of the residence.
Setback at the subject property: 35 feet from covered deck roof to
the shoreline OHWM
[The average of the north and south setbacks is 30.5 feet, so the
35 feet shoreline setback distance from the OHWM will apply to
the new home replacement.]
Two precautions for site development on this property should be
noted:
1) that the siting of new buildings and structures shall be located
so that further shoreline protection measures are not needed in
the future; retaining structures to protect upland sloped areas near
proposed buildings may be needed; and
2) a setback determination may change if the adjacent property
owners submit applications and are granted permits for new or
remodeled residences established at proper shoreline setbacks.
Please consider that if a residence is built on the property, an
erosion protection rockery or wooden bulkhead along all or part of
the shoreline will need a building permit, environmental checklist,
12/7/2010 Page 3 of 4 SP12010-00065
Site Inspection
12/7/2010 Case No.: SP12010-00065
and shoreline exemption, as well as a Mason Environmental
Permit, and habitat management plan for the new bulkhead. If no
residence is present, this review for bank protection would include
a shoreline substantial development permit public hearing review.
Other Resource Ordinance Standards.-
_N_ Wetland critical area: Planning staff confirmed that the
parcel does not contain certain wetlands, which are regulated
under Mason County's Wetlands chapter 17.01.070 of the Mason
County Resource Ordinance. The observed vegetation is
associated with the saltwater shoreline; so the applicant will not
need a wetlands special report during development review.
_N_ Stream setbacks: No seasonal or perennial drainage flows
through the subject property. The proposed development is
greater than 200 feet from the any stream management area
covered by the standards of this critical area.
_N_ Slope or Landslide hazards: Slopes that are less than 15
percent are observed within 300 feet of a proposed project on the
property. For the present proposal, no geologic study will be
needed to review the proposal.
You would need to confirm with the Environmental Health
Department what their septic system standards are to make sure
about the adequacy of supplying a septic disposal for the
proposed development.
General process: Future development must include a site plan,
showing setbacks from property lines, shoreline, driveway, road,
and existing and proposed improvements; this site plan will be
needed for building permit application submittal and review.
Specific County Codes standards for future development may be
found at the County website address http://www.co.mason.wa.us.
If you have any questions please feel free to call. Thank you.
12/7/2010 Page 4 of 4 SP12010-00065
NX( toI�Nm 7_5 P( 9*. OX 6
MASON COUNTY
PLANNING DEPT. PRE-INSPECTION APPLICATION a �Iz PLEASE PRINT 1 $125`5.00 Fee Required
1. Owner: � t Pb_+ t t.1 yi L- it Applicant:TQvh�ulY1_ �s-'EbYY� V)p Yri_.S
Site Address:^2A 1 6 V0 A Applicant Address:` O. Box 4vt-1
Owner Address:2`,q(oq N SR3 SN i C--77 City: 1�p u S60 St t,�pr Zip�'l3 3'1 b
City: ' r'` Zip _ �6 PhoneAr_o ) (,,�1 =ZOO o day
P day
P evening Planner: (I A n 13orj
Ema1 Ss: SNIP QebAn Comp.Plan I Type of Use_
Water Body 2. Parcel No. I2 ,1 G - 31 - 0003 b
Parcel No. - -
Legal Description:
a►
3. Purpose of Pre-Inspection: Y►V\
4. Use of building: S�
5. Do any of the following exist on or adjacent to property?: slope( ) saltwater"'A lake( ) river )
pond ) wetland ) seasonal runoff ) other( ) stream seasonal creek )
Directions to Site:
2 • Z
If the information is incomplete, then Mason County must disclaim any errors resulting from deficiencies in the original
application. Pre-inspection reports remain valid only until development changes occur in the vicinity which affect the lot
evaluated in this inspection,or the laws regulating development of the site change after the time of inspection.
Applicant Sign eturej: ;�P Date:_f,_�-2S'-1 d
If you would like to be on site during inspection,please check here: )
Return application to: Department of Community Development,Planning Division
P.O.Box 186
Shelton, WA 98584
(360)427-9670
Please include a$255 .00 check or money order payable to Mason County Treasurer
When completed,this form becomes part of the parcel file.
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY:Accepted by: Date:
MORE ON BACK SIDE
Revised: 12/30/08
Please illustrate below the proposed building site in relation to critical areas(slopes, streams, lakes, wetlands, etc.)
existing improvements, as well as property lines. APPLICATIONS SUBMITTED WITHOUT ADEQUATE
ILUSTRATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED AND WILL BE RETURNED TO THE APPLICANT. '
ICI :
BS_14 L)
Departmental Review
(For Office Use Only)
Planning Department Findings:
� A '�/v C t - � vV
Please illustrate below the proposed building site in relation to critical areas (slopes, streams, lakes, wetlands, etc.)
existing improvements, as well as property lines. APPLICATIONS SUBMITTED WITHOUT ADEQUATE
ILUSTRATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED AND WILL BE RETURNED TO THE APPLICANT.
fi v `i
35 14 b I t
C
Departmental Review
(For Office Use Only)
Planning Department Findings:
W
r� eta
Y-a' 3'-0' {'-6' 3'-0- Ia'-4 2"-6' ^'
O
Length of deok
to b. dj..t,4
lm 't'ng.all
L D ck I p Deck
14'a•.10.0" of; Covered Deck m•-D••.r-a•
�� ls•-a•.w•-a• �
T.
3'i6'ah ^le 3'.5'¢h 3'c5'aM1 a.'.1'6"xo temp W
I {'6".6've lem {'6'46'.0 lem ce Vaunt 8
_EmRSDd9g __ M1 M �e
M1eetr k rapped 3'a'
sll t W
II Y>• •/P�
Dining Room Master Suite 28
du•-a•.12•-6"
I Is V)
____ ra••Pkl
- FlUM EDlin aw 3 " Great Room
29 PLom I 18'-2".16'-8'•C—t 2'8"Pkt - 2'4"
II3 V.Wf•/Sua,a T— �I Ig 7F
I I i� RiS
I oohs ._____1W________
Kitchen g Oigll W 6 i1d^ U a
12•-6".13•-2'+-`t II s linen aoa.l
- d ———xa,w,beano=____— �"—`= 6•R�roid � ('�
I I
Ilse Foyer Ilex '° O
•' F •F ? m
o n I. z.{.. Rwdre.d ¢s Bedroom#2
]'0 Pkl" " A $
]•t-R.l: Rd6 3'a'Enl Y i 2'8 12'-a'.11'-0"aD.P.t z
sere
e•-a'.r-a•
z•n•>m se¢ 22•00" aao7 O w
St,,TDVOrdd.TED an si i.rrp Aace,f �t
--------------; € � a
CO
1/2"cws
n,k cuing a R7
O
VI 1 Car Garage a a
27•-a'.17-IW r,
Wroga MiM.d dab.to be 16" o FJ•'•I q
bJoP h—f.M.d floor
p Ir ar
� r p ooj
3'-0• 20'-W 4'-1' 28•-r O
56.-0.
Main floor Plan Scale: 1/8" = 1r-O" € ��
Square Footage: Living 1517 Garage 513.5 g
Ea
.F+rim' L1}� h . • !� �• ��, .7,�'-.t��9'k tse
41
oll
r:
14
iX
OV
y
T` ,, '
T22 RI �, f
16 �;
jr
.z•
=3 111.1 �tlt•sQ - ,� ,
y N.
r�4 �,