HomeMy WebLinkAboutStormwater, Erosion, and Sediment Control - PLN General - 6/23/2004 RECEIVED
OUN 2 , 2004
STORMWATER 426 W. CEDAR ST.
and
EROSION and SEDIMENT CONTROL
SITE PLAN
for j
1�583
138-1 E Shelton Springs Road
Shelton, Washington 98584
Located in
Tract 10 of the NE 1/4 of the NW V4 of
Section 129 T20N, R4W,W.M.
Prepared for:
Ray Allen
1901 Parkwood Dr.
Olympia,WA 98501
360-943-7722
Prepared by
MARLEY L.YOUNG,CONSULTING ENGINEER
P.O.Bog 1343
Shelton WA 98584
(360) 426-7475
Project No. 99-28
April 18,2000
ro
az-66
a3 sn9m���ano�"I�t�i
SNOLLV'MIIVD madoddfIS
SZ.NLqL1iHJV.L.LV
�I ......................................................................................................................... uolisog. 0 s,laolustu
£I .............................................................................................................................. su0141PuoO FIO
£T-Zi ......................................................................................... Isuusn u0l4gxad0 pug aauBualuceylt 'IX
ZT ............................................................................................................ vmoAoop uorilusioaQ
`(6'/N)IPI21IS Pug IaaclS A.Isu ms 41pos3 uouuxoa`(vlm)woqmpoa 4AwnO PuoH x
ZT .............................................................................. soma I04wO Iw�S pug uolsolauoH
ZI .............................................................................................................. ...... suogslnolgO
ZT ......................................................................................................................... aousuaiupw
ZI .............................................................................. suotisiapisuoO ivauca8lMW iaisesuuoiS
Zi .............................................................................. . ....................... uoAir-rficros ivausuuad
II-OT ....................................................................................... SI#-I#s;uauramiWa umumM
samMW Io.IuoO IWWRS PM uotsoag
OI ......................................................................................................I..................... SWIT Po?I?TO
01-6 .............................................................................................: ............ uogduosaQ slcoS SOS
6 ............................................................................................................... spvduq sgaay ivaoufpd
6 ............................................................................................................ stioiiipuoo onSugsixd
6 ........................................................................................... ..............:........ w0psaQ ioafoad
ZI-6 ............................... .................................... MId IaliuoO wua Pug uolsord Iam osn xl
6 ............................................................................................................................I.............. Sliuuad.m
g ........................................................................................... (N/m alr!=ld f4T=l uoO pus ursgg m .
g ................................................................................................. (V/,o saq)mS P'us gjodo-d W!oWS 'IA
8-L ...................................................................................................................... iusilnsag us
tsaQ
L-9 ............................................................................................ suopdcunssd la saQ Im a utzolS
9-9 ................................................................................................s#to Pus siRWjo uonolnoM
UvId to.>IuoO,4Tnl6 aaismu MS Iuausauad •A
S .............................................................................................................................. SISAIRW al is 0 'AI
S ............................................................................... . ................. Acgcams suogTpuoO staid 'III
S ......................................................................................................................................... lmd Told 'II
.............................................................................................................. sluauiaimbag umuittu
V-Z ........................................................................................................................ nsauian0 Toaf m I
Z-T ..................................................................................................... (BcmfD saogowd IuaucaSsu n IsoH
........................................................................................................... . .......... . asoclmd Pla Pow
aged
S.LNU NO3 90 ariovL
t ,
STORMWATER and EROSION and SEDIMENT
CONTROL SITE PLAN
for
1381 E Shelton Springs Road
Shelton, Washington 98584
Located in
Tract 10 of the NE%of the NW V4 of
Section 12, T20N,R4W,W.M.
Prepared for:
Ray Allen
1901 Parkwood Dr.
Olympia,WA 98501
360-943-7722
NEED AND PURPOSE
The Puget Sound Water Quality Management Plan(PSWQMP)which is administered by the State of
Washington Department of Ecology mandates that all counties and cities within the Puget Sound drainage
basin adopt ordinances to control runoff from new development and redevelopments. The PSWQMP
also directs local governments to adopt stormwater programs which must include minimum requirements
that are consistent with the PSWQMP,and which are substantially equivalent to the DOE's Stormwater
Management Manual for the Puget Sound Basin, (DOE's Technical Manual).
The goal of the Puget Sound Water Quality Management Plan is to:
► Protect and restore beneficial uses of aquatic resources,including shellfish beds,fish habitat,and
other resources;
► Prevent contamination of sediments from urban runoff;
► Meet standards for water and sediment quality by reducing pollutant discharges from stormwater
throughout Puget Sound.
BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES(BMPs)
Best management practices(BMPs)are defined as physical,structural,or management practices that,
when used singly or in combination,prevent or reduce pollution of water. Specific BMPs have been
developed by Ecology to control stormwater runoff(quality and quantity)for protection of receiving
waters.
Marley L.Young Consulting Engineer
Project No.99-28
Ray Allen,1381 E Shelton Springs Rd.
There are three main reasons for applying BMPs before considering advanced treatment.
First,it has been shown through research and experience that BMPs can significantly reduce pollutants in
stormwater.Using BMPs to control localized discharges is cost effective in comparison to treating large
volumes of water.
,Second, our lakes and streams depend on stormwater to provide adequate flow for fish habitat and water
quality. Our groundwater resources also depend on stormwater for recharge. BMP implementation offers
a way to discharge water back into the natural system.
Third,and perhaps most important,stormwater management programs demand the conscientious use of
best management practices to protect water quality.
Specific BMPs that cover stormwater runoff quality and quantity have been included in Ecology's
Technical Manual. Those BMPs can be divided into three basic categories,including Source Control
BMPs,Runoff Treatment BMPs and Streambank Erosion Control BMPs.
Source Control BMPs are designed to prevent pollutants from entering stormwater by eliminating the
source of pollution or by preventing contact of pollutants with rainfall and runoff. Source controls are
usually the most cost-effective because they reduce or eliminate the need for treatment BMPs.
Implementing source control BMPs generally involves relatively simple and straightforward actions.
Examples of source control BMPs include erosion control(e.g., covering disturbed soil), covering
material storage areas,and eliminating illicit discharges.
Runoff Treatment BMPs are designed to remove pollutants contained in stormwater runoff. These types
of BMPs are the second line of defense in protecting stormwater quality. Examples of runoff treatment
BMPs include infiltration basins,biofiltration swales and sediment ponds.
Streambank Erosion Control BMPs are designed to protect stream ecosystems from erosion and
sedimentation. Types of streambank erosion control BMPs include flow attenuation BMPs for reducing
peak flows from a development(e.g.,detention ponds,infiltration trenches), and streamside stabilization
BMPs used to stabilize eroding streambanks.
I, PROJECT OVERVIEW
The proposal is to develop a site plan for light industrial development on an existing parcel of property
containing 3.25 acres(per Mason County Assessor's records),located at 1381 E Shelton Springs Road.
The total property lies south of Shelton Springs Road. Of the 3.25 acres, 1.95 acres are directly involved
in land modification for light industrial development. The acreage not included in this development is the
acreage lying southerly of the existing shop. Because of the upward slope of this ground,this area is not
projected for improvement. The stormwater and erosion control requirements will focus on the 1.95 acres
intended for modification.
There will be one access from Shelton Springs Road. For stormwater runoff design purposes we are
analyzing the access road, future parking,and future building(s)sites as if they were impervious, either
roof or asphalt surfacing. For example,the ground around any future building for design purposes will be
asphalt for parking and material storage.
Marley L.Young Consulting Engineer
2 Project No.99-28
Ray Allen,1381 E Shelton Springs Rd.
Part of the existing house roof and all of the existing shop roof are tightlined to infiltration pond A-A.
In order to satisfy the treatment requirement for motor oils,etc.,that may be dripped onto the shop floor,
we have designed it as follows: the shop floor and the concrete parking pad in front of the shop drain to a
spilt control separator and then gravity flow to a wet well with a submersible pump that pumps the
stormwater to a bioswale draining into infiltration pond A-A. We feel that the combination of spill control
separator and bioswale satisfies treatment required for the use of the shop.
The runoff from the access road north of the infiltration ponds(6,025 square feet)and the future parking
(9,872 sf)is intended to be directed into a bioswale adjacent to pond B-B. It is expected that the bioswale
will provide adequate treatment for the future parking and access road.
The future building(s)site(19,816 sf)is also considered as impervious area,8,000 sf of building and
11,816 sf of paved storage. The stormwater runoff from the building roofs will be piped directly to the
infiltration pond A-A. The paved areas around the building will be contoured and directed to the bioswale
A-A.
The area reserved for septic tanks and drain fields(9,320 sf)is contoured to discharge into the infiltration
pond A-A.
Minimum Requirements
The calculated total of impervious acreage is 1.15 acres. The project is designed to include a 15-foot wide
buffer along the easterly property line adjacent to the proposed road and a 7.5-foot wide buffer along the
westerly property line southerly to the hammerhead turnaround.
The area that will be disturbed in developing this lot represents approximately 60 percent of the total. The
impervious area represents 35 percent of the total. (The impervious area represents the existing house and
shop and the future parking and building(s)site.)
Mason County has adopted the Department of Ecology"Stormwater Management Manual for the Puget
Sound Basin". This project is defined as a redevelopment. The project adds or creates more than 5,000
square feet of impervious area, and disturbs more than one acre of land. Therefore,this project is required
to comply with the Large Parcel Minimum Requirements#1 through#I I found in Section I-2.5 of the
Department of Ecology's Stormwater Management Manual for the Puget Sound Basin(the Technical
Manual). This Stormwater Site Plan consists of a Large Parcel Erosion and Sediment Control Plan and a
Permanent Stormwater Quality Control(PSQC)Plan. This report is intended to be a part of said Plan.
The project shall comply with Redevelopment Minimum Requirements#1 through#11.
Minimum Requirement#1: EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL
See Section IX, Erosion and Sediment Control Plan(Requirements 1-IS),for the Large Parcel
Erosion and Sediment Control Plan for this project
Minimum Requirement#2: PRESERVATION OF NATURAL DRAINAGE SYSTEMS
• Natural drainage patterns shall be maintained,and discharges from the site shall occur at
the natural location,to the maximum extent practicable.
No surface water drainage flows through this project.
Marley L.Young Consulting Engineer
3 Project No.99-28
Ray Allen,1381 E Shelton Springs Rd.
Minimum Requirement#3: SOURCE CONTROL OF POLLUTION
Potential pollution from stored motor oils, brake fluid etc., will be housed in a small building
which will have a concrete floor constructed in conformance with DOE Manual Fig.IV-4.9,
Covered and Bermed Containment A rea,page IV-4-12. Also, see page 2 of 2 of Engineer's Civil
Drawings.
Roof drainage shall be collected and directed to the infiltration ponce Stormwater from
all pavement shall be directed through a bioswale, then into an infiltration pond
Minimum Requirement#4: RUNOFF TREATMENT BMPS
All stormwater runoff is discharged to infiltration trenches. All storm events equal to or less than
100 year storms are designed to stay on site. The DOE Technical Manual, Page IV-1-6, states,
"Stormwater Treatment is not required for Parking Lots with less than 20 stalls, except for a
simple oil spill control separator(BMP RO-05 in Volume EEE, Runoff Control), unless it is a
retail business that experiences a high turnover of vehicles."
Minimum Requirement#5: STREAMBANK EROSION CONTROL
N/A-No stormwater runoff is discharged offsite or directly to a stream.
Minimum Requirement#6: WETLANDS
N/A-This property does not include wetlands.
Minimum Requirement#7: WATER QUALITY SENSITIVE AREAS
Mason County has designated this area as an Aquifer Recharge Area.
Minimum Requirement#8: OFF-SITE ANALYSIS AND MITIGATION
N/A -The calculated discharge for the I00 year storm and less is irjdtrated on site. Further
analysis is not required.
Minimum Requirement#9: BASIN PLANNING
• An adopted and implemented basin plan may be used to develop requirements for water
quality sensitive areas that are tailored to a specific basin.
N/A-No basin plan is in place.
Minimum Requirement#10: OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE
• An operation and maintenance schedule shall be required for all proposed stormwater
facilities and BMPs,and the party(or parties)responsible for maintenance and operation
shall be identified. The private facility maintenance checklist should be tailored to the
facility.
The owner(s)will be responsible for operation and maintenance of the stormwater facilities.
Mason County requires that a Declaration of Covenants Associated with Privately Maintained
Storm Drainage Facilities be executed and filed with Mason County as part of the approval
process. A core is s attached
Minimum Requirement#11: FINANCIAL LIABILITY
• Performance bonding or other appropriate financial instruments shall be required for all
projects to ensure compliance with these standards.
NotApplicable.
II PLOT PLAN
A plot plan(Engineer's Civil Drawing) has been developed for the project, showing the supposed
footprint of the area of the buildings,the footprint of paved parking,the location of the buffer strips and
infiltration ponds, and the layout of the proposed access. The drawings are attached as part of this
Stormwater and Erosion Control Site Plan.
Marley L.Young Consulting Engineer
4 Project No.99-28
Ray Allen,1381 E Shelton Springs Rd.
III PRELIMINARY CONDITIONS SUMMARY
The project is located in Tract 10 of the NE'/4 of the NW'/4 of Section 12,T20N,R4W,W.M. Shelton,
Mason County,Washington;commonly known as 1381 E Shelton Springs Road, Shelton,Washington
98584;Parcel No.42012-21-00100. The property is located within the Urban Growth Boundary of
Mason County. This property contains approximately(3.25 acres). The lot has 223 feet of frontage along
Shelton Springs Road.
There is an existing three bedroom residence and a shop building on the site.
Current access into the property is by an existing driveway from Shelton Springs Road. This access is
intended to be abandoned.
I_V OFF-SITE ANALYSIS (No off-site analysis is required. The calculated 100 year storm event is
being disposed of on site.)
Wetlands or Water of the State
This site is not within 200 feet of any waters of the State. No wetlands have been identified.
Analysis of the 100-year Flood
This site does not contain or abut a Federal Emergency Management Administration(FEMA)identified
stream and is,therefore, outside any 100-year flood plain.
V PERMANENT STORMWATER QUALITY CONTROL PLAN
Analysis and design of proposed stormwater runoff control facilities,including treatment and source
control BMPs.
Calculation of Areas and CN#s
Description CN# Pond A-A(sfl Bioswale A-A(so. Pond B-B(sfl Bioswale B-B(s)
'/2 Existing house 98 900
Shop 98 1198
Concrete slab(24'x26') 98 624 624
Access south of pond 98 5000
Access north of pond 98 8240 6025
Future building sites 98 19816 7926
Future parking 98 98 9872
Square feet 27536 8550 18112 15897
Acres 0.632 0.196 0.416 0.365
SF=1.1 Acres 0.695 0.216 0.457 0.401
Easterly buffer 77 3000 3000
Area west of shop 77 10220
Square feet 10220 3000 3000
Acres 0.235 0.069 0.069
SF=1.1 0.258 0.076 0.076
Marley L.Young Consulting Engineer
5 Project No.99-28
Ray Allen,1381 E Shelton Springs Rd.
Description CN# Pond A-A(sfl Bioswale A-A(sfl nl'o d B-B(sfl Bioswale B-B(sfl
Pond area 68 5200 990 3400 990
Future drain field
&buffer 68 9320
Square feet 14520 990 3400 990
Acres 0.333 0.023 0.078 0.023
SF=1.1 0.367 0.025 0.086 0.025
Pond 1 Composite CN Pond 2 Composite CN
77 0.258 19.872 77 0.076 5,833
68 0.367 a.933 68 0.085 5,838
Composite CN 71.72 0.625 44,806 72.22 0.162 11.672
Bioswale 2 Composite CN
77 0.076 5.833
68 0,025 1.700
Composit CN 74.77 0.101 7.533
SWC Acreages and CN#s to be used to Calculate Peak Discharge of Storm Events
Pond 1 CN 71.72 98 Pond 2 CN 72.22 98
Acreage 0.625 0,700 Area 0.162 0.457
Bio 1 CN 68 98 Bio 2 CN 74.77 98
Acreage 0.025 0.216 Area 0.101 0.401
STORM EVENT DESIGN ASSUMPTIONS
Based on DOE's Stormwater Management Manual:
STORM EVENT
■ Rain Precipitation(in.)
■ Six-month,24-hour Storm Event 2.56"
■ Two-year, 24-hour Storm Event 4.00
■ Ten-year,24 hour Storm Event 5.50
■ Hundred year,24-hour Storm Event 8.50
■ Rainfall choice IA
■ Hydrograph SBUH**
** Santa Barbara Urban Hydro,graph method
DRAINAGE BASIN
■ (Gh)Grove Gravelly Sandy Loam 0-5%
■ Hydrologic Soil Group A
■ Infiltration Rate 6 min/inch or 10 inches/hr
■ Preexisting Conditions(because total discharge is on Site) N/A
■ CN#for Impervious Pavement&Roofs 98
■ CN#for Landscaping,grass cover 50-75% 77
■ CN#for Lawn,good condition, grass cover>75% 68
Marley L.Young Consulting Engineer
6 Project No.99-28
8Z'66'oN 1-!OJd L
=U!Oua RUMU OD Sunk•I sol-W
sd3 OZ'I =,CltoolaA 6-9 ulnuuod£I-9-III'gd`Imut'W 210Q 8ucsn •
90 0 (u)IuaroljaoD ssoug2nog s,Sutulm
$/$ZO'O- ado1S ap msotg umut!"W •
OZ'0 Iaad T y;daQ zalgM aleensotg umuT"W
I:£ :sadols apis
0 goui/uilu- alux uousulgui •
1 _ :xpdaQ u!n •
£ - UPPM.00H
umummu 08 :gl2ua7 a001d •
:e1aa r i�uo!ptulsuoj 91 n+s ig
OL69 99£ty 6b0£ Z17LI 30- 3um1OA Isod •
Itr'O 9Z'0 8I'0 11*0 s3a- MOH Isod •
zff5T--o pi is—ax--UOJL aga -o u t -9 Juana mao;S
•a;is uo pauculaz aq 1pm tAO1A Isod asmoaq paj!nbaa jou motd and
:; aea uiao;S-jA-Oof a a ya i 0; u ! aQ V-V TIV SOig
V199 9tZZ Stlol ZSZ 30- awntOA-PuOd •
WE 09'I 98'0 VV0 )j- sipdaQ-Isod •
00'0 00'0 0000 OOOO 3o- aumIOA-IsOd '
00*0 00'0 00'0 00'0 sp- Mo13-1Sod •
au�IOIO �eaX=u4JL .i�nl q uom-9 jUaAa W.1 1S
52. 1Q y uaad,u 63 11.IuI ON
(I:£)F39JaA 104 1eluozuog £ :sodolS op!S •
9 gouijunu- alug U0,99119W '
'unu b 4- :glda(I ulw •
SI 33- APPM J00H
'UTm 99 $' :q)Sua-I J00W •
. aa; .1u 0663 u aool} y 1 ui g 1e loza J,u p
009Z£ £9I6I I I8ZI Z91L 30- aumloA IsOd •
LI6'I 60I'I 6ZL'0 b6£'0 s3o- mO13lsod •
.i a -00 a a -iay :a wa qluoui-9 jUaAa tUJOI
.alis uo paun:Iai aq 1ptA enoU Isod asneoaq paimbat Iou mo13 aid
V-V ClNod O.Lm saM] asIQ'TIV
Z02LLNoJ HalvMLI ols-S,LTisau N!)Isaa
*jjoutu aoejinsgns puu 3ou3ins Ieloi agl3o
xoleo.pui ue sI(#ND)joQu,mN anima j1oun21 aqI`osfl PuL,I Pus adAs IToS `Iuang uuolS DIP uanFO UL
-ml ssuuds U0113 is 3 I8EI`-Hv Auld
Ray Allen.1381 E Shelton Springs Rd.
DESIGN RESULTS-STORMWATER CONTROL
ALL DISCHARGES INTO POND B-B
Pre Flow not required because Post Flow will be retained on site.
Storm Event 6_ month Two-year Ten-,year 100-vear
► Post Flow -cfs 0.244 0.414 0.599 0.980
> Post Volume -cf 4190 7100 10245 16705
Open Trapezoidal Basin with a floor area of 442 square feet:
Floor Length: -ft 34 min.
► Floor Width: -ft 13
► Min. Depth: -ft 4 min.
► Infiltration Rate -min/inch 6
► Side Slopes: 3 Horizontal to 1 Vertical(3:1)
No Infiltration Trench Discharge
Storm Event 6-m n h Two-year Ten-year 10 Rear
► Post-Flow -cfs 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
► Post-Volume -cf 0000 0000 0.00 0.00
► Post-Depths -ft 0.48 1.11 1.77 2.90
► Pond-Volume -cf 248 677 1293 - 2767
RIOSWALE B B Designed to Discharge the 100-Yr.Storm Event:
Pre Flow not required because Post Flow will be retained on site.
Storm Event 6-month Two-year Ten-year I O Rear
► Post Flow -cfs 0.21 0.36 0.51 0.82
► Post Volume -cf 3485 6098 8712 13939
Bioswale Construction Criteria:
► Floor Length: -ft 65 minimum
► Floor Width: -ft 5
► Min.Depth: -ft 1
► Infiltration Rate -min/inch 0
► Side Slopes: 3:1
Maximum Bioswale Water Depth in Feet 0.25
► Maximum Bioswale Slope -0.02 fIlft
► Manning's Roughness Coefficient(n) 0.06
Using DOE Manual,Pg.III-6-13 Formula 6-9 Velocity= 1.39 fps
VI SPECIAL REPORTS AND STUDIES
N/A-No special reports or studies have been required or prepared for this project
VI> BASIN AND COMMUNITY PLANNING
N/A
Marley L.Young Consulting Engineer
8 Project No.99-28
Ray Allen,1381 E Shelton Springs Rd.
V_ IIa, PERNIITS
A eg ncv Permit/Appr4val
Mason County Environmental Permit
Potential additional permits include:
Mason County Grading Permit(if more than 50 yards of material
are to be excavated, filled,and/or graded)
Mason County Right of Way permit(if there is work in the right of way)
IX EROSION and SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN
Project Description
Proposed Light Industrial area development.
Existing Site Conditions
Single family residence occupying approximately 14,000 square feet. Approximately 75,400 square feet
available for light industrial development. Condition of existing area to be developed is grass-covered
undeveloped ground.
Adjacent Areas Impacts
N/A-Property to the west is existing light industrial. Property to the east is owned by a church and is part
of the church operation. No impact anticipated.
SCS Soils Description
The Soil Conservation Service-Soil survey of Mason County Series 1951,No. 9,Issued September 1960,
shows this property having soils type Grove gravelly sandy loam(Gh),0-5 percent slopes.
The following description of Grove Series Soils was taken from the SCS Soil Survey ofMason County and
Thurston County's SCS report. Soils conditions found on the property may not match exactly the soils
described by SCS.
Grove Series
The Grove series consists of somewhat excessively drained,reddish-brown gravelly soils. It occupies the
large glacial outwash plains. The Grove soils have developed from Vashon glacial drift,modified
considerably by inclusions of local basaltic rock and mixed material from the Olympic Mountain glaciers.
FROM TNURSTON couNrrs SCS UNDATED REPORT. THIS VERY DEEP, SOMEWHAT EXCESSIVELY
DRAINED SOIL IS ON OUTWASH PLAINS. PERMEABILfTY IS RAPID IN THE GROVE SOIL. AVAILABLE WATER
CAPACITY IS LOW. EFFECTIVE ROOTING DEPTH IS 60 INCHES OR MORE. RUNOFF IS SLOW AND THE
HAZARD OF WATER EROSION IS SLIGHT.
Grove gravelly sandy loam, O to S percent slopes(Gh)-
This soil occupies nearly level outwash plains.
In forested areas there is a 1-to 2-inch layer of needles, leaves,twigs,roots, and moss. The lower
part is moderately decomposed and very dark grayish brown.
The surface soil consists of reddish-brown,gravelly sandy loam,6 inches thick. It is very friable,
is single grained,and contains a few small,round shot. The upper part of this layer contains a few firm,
irregular,more reddish aggregates. The next layer extends to depths ranging from 12 to 14 inches. It is
similar to the surface soil, except that it is more gravelly,contains less shot,and the gravel is stained and
coated with dark reddish-brown fine material.
Marley L.Young Consulting Engineer
9 Project No.99-28
Ray Allen,1381 E Shelton Springs Rd.
The subsoil is a light-brown,very gravelly loamy sand. It is loose,is single grained,and contains
no shot. At depths ranging from 24 to 32 inches,the subsoil grades to the substratum of loose gravel,
cobbles, and sand. The dominant colors are gray,grayish brown,yellowish brown,and light brown.
Much of the gravel is highly stained with nearly black and reddish-brown material. In places the upper 24
inches of the substratum is compact or weakly cemented.
This soil is strongly to medium acid and less acid with depth. Surface runoff is very slow because
of the rapid permeability of the soil and the smooth topography.
.Use and suitability-Except for a very small acreage in farms producing mainly for the farm
household,this soil is in forest,a use for which it is best suited. Because of droughtiness and low fertility,
it is not suitable for hay or pasture. hi suitability,this soil is in classes 3 and 4 for Douglas-fir,partly
because of the higher rainfall. Areas in young Douglas-fir are managed for Christmas trees. The soil is in
capability subclass Vls.
Critical Areas
The area is designated by Mason County as a Critical Aquifer Area.
Erosion and Sediment Control Measures
Minimum Requirements
Mason County has adopted the Department of Ecology"Stormwater Management Manual for the Puget
Sound Basin", and this project must comply through implementation of a Large Parcel Erosion and
Sediment Control Plan. All projects that disturb more than one acre must develop a Permanent
Stormwater Quality Control Plan. (Mason County Ordinance 141-97).
The fifteen large parcel minimum requirements specified by DOE are:
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL REQUIREMENTS
#1: Stabilization and Sediment Trapping
• All exposed and unworked soils shall be stabilized by suitable application of BMPs. From
October 1 to April 30,no exposed and unworked soils shall remain unstabilized for more than 2
days. From May 1 to September 30,no exposed and unworked soils shall remain unstabilized for
more than 7 days. Prior to leaving the site,stormwater runoff shall pass through a sediment pond
or sediment trap,or other appropriate BMPs.
During construction the overburden which is approximately 3"in depth will be removed from the
construction zone and stockpiled on site for use as cover at the conclusion of construction.
Because of the gravelly sandy loam characteristics of this soil, migration during storm events is
not expected to become a problem at this site.
#2: Delineate Clearing and Easement Limits
The majority of the 1.95 acres of property has been previously cleared and grubbed The
delineation of clearing limits is identified as the property boundaries of the area under
consideration for development.
#3: Protection of Adjacent Properties
The gravelly underlying soils have very little potential for migration. Protecting adjacent
property from damage from sediment deposition does not appear to be a problem.
Marley L.Young Consulting Engineer
10 Project No.99-28
Ray Allen,1381 E,Shelton Springs Rd.
#4: Timing and Stabilization of Sediment Trapping Measures
Although the gravelly characteristics of the soils do not encourage migration under the proposed
action, during construction the detention/retention pond will act as a natural sediment pond and
trap.
#5: Cut and Fill Slopes
Except for the ponds, all cuts and fills will not exceed two feet in height. Pond slopes will be no
steeper than 3 foot horizontal to I foot vertical(3:1).
#6: Controlling Off-site Erosion
No stormwater discharge will leave this site. Therefore, off site erosion is not anticipated to
become an issue.
#7: Stabilization of Temporary Conveyance Channels and Outlets
To prevent the possibility of erosion at the pond sites, quarry spalls should be placed where
stormwater flows into the infiltration pond Quarry spalls sized D50=0.33. All other raw slopes
will be seeded to grass.
#S: Storm Drain Inlet Protection
There is no public storm drainage system; however, the owner will take steps to protect the three
catch basins which he is installingfor stormwater control and oil-water separation from being
contaminated.
#9: Underground Utility Construction
Not Applicable to this project.
#10: Construction Access Routes
• Construction vehicle access shall be,whenever possible,limited to one route. Access points shall
be stabilized to minimize the tracking of sediment onto public roads.
There is one access to the site which will be surfaced with crushed rock. The gravelly soil found
on this property is not sensitive to migration; therefore, stabilization of the construction access
should not be an issue, and it is not anticipated that the accumulation of mud and debris onto the
County road would become a problem. However, if accumulation does occur, the access to the
property should be rocked with quarry spalls in order to prevent sediment migration off the site.
1 recommend that the access be surfaced with 1 %4"crushed rock
#11: Removal of Temporary BMPs
All temporary erosion and sediment control Best Management Practices (BMPs)will be removed
when final site stabilization is achieved
#12: Dewatering Construction Sites
Dewatering is not necessary. During our soils investigation and percolation test attempts, we
were unable to "stabilize"the soil, which means that the infiltration rate exceeded one minute
per inch of drawdown.
#13: Control of Pollutants Other Than Sediment on Construction Sites
All pollutants other than sediments that occur on-site during construction shall be handled and
disposed of in a manner that does not cause contamination of stormwater.
#14: Maintenance
All temporary and permanent erosion and sediment control Bmps shall be maintained and
repaired as needed to assure continued performance of their intended function.
#15: Financial Liability
Not Applicable to this project
Marley L.Young consulting Engineer
11 Project No.99-28
Ray Allen,1381 E Shelton Springs Rd.
Permanent Stabilization
In addition to the stormwater infiltration ponds and bioswales,at the conclusion of site construction
improvements,within seven days,permanent site stabilization shall be completed by spreading seed and
mulch on all exposed soils to establish a ground cover.
Stormwater Management Considerations
Due to the porosity of the soils on this site,all of the stormwater runoff is being directed to an infiltration
pond. It is anticipated that no stormwater will leave the property. Please see Section V,"Permanent
Stormwater Quality Control Plan"for a complete description of the stormwater management plan.
Maintenance
The responsibility for maintaining the facilities will he with the owners of the property or their
assigns.
Calculations
Calculations are briefly described in Section V above,and included in attached Calculations.
Nonerosion and Sediment Control BMPs
See Page 2 of 2 of the Civil Drawings.
X. Bond Quantities Worksheet Retention/Detention Facility Summary Sheet and Sketch,and
Declaration of Covenant
Bond Quantities Worksheet-N/A
Retention/Detention Facility Summary Sheet-N/A
Declaration of Covenant- Mason County requires that a DECLARATION OF
COVENANTS ASSOCIATED WITH PRIVATELY MAINTAINED STORM
DRAINAGE FACILITIES be executed and filed with Mason County as part of the
approval process. A copy is attached.
XI MAINTENANCE&OPERATIONS MANUAL
MAINTENANCE PLAN
The responsibility for maintaining the facilities will lie with the owners of the property or their assigns
(e.g.,Contractor). The facilities are designed to minimize the need for extensive maintenance.
During construction the major maintenance activity is to inspect that the drainage flows toward the
infiltration pond. If the drainage carries mud or debris,a silt fence and/or straw bales should be placed in
the path of the drainage to reduce the amount of siltation into the pond.
All erosion and sediment control BMPs installed shall be inspected regularly, especially after any large
storm. Maintenance,including removal and proper disposal of sedi,-iie;nt should be done as necessary.
(Generally sediment in the pond which restricts the infiltration must be removed.)
Marley L.Young Consulting Engineer
12 Project No.99-28
Ray Allen,1381 E Shelton Springs Rd.
A spill control separator in a catch basin is installed in the concrete slab in front of the shop. This catch
basin must be inspected and sediment removed from the bottom of the catch basin when it reaches a depth
of 6 inches. Floating debris and oil should be removed annually in September.
A wet well,located approximately 15 feet west of the spill control separator catch basin,is also a part of
the oil-water separation design_ The wet well includes a submersible pump that pumps to bioswale A-A.
The catch basin and pump should be inspected in September of each year and debris removed if necessary.
Repair the pump if it is not functioning properly. The small catch basin at bioswale A A should also be
inspected in September and all foreign objects removed.
At the conclusion of site construction improvements,within seven days perrnanen site stabilization shall
be completed by spreading seed and mulch on all exposed soils to establish a ground cover.
TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL
Erosion control will be mitigated when necessary by the use of Filter Fabric Fencing,Straw and Hay Bale
Barriers, and the Stabilization of the Construction Entrance. Please refer to the Attachments Fig.B2,B3,
114,B8,B9 and B16 for design proposals to satisfy the Large Parcel Requirements for the Erosion and
Sediment Control Plan.
CHANGED CONDITIONS
The conclusions and recommendations in this report are based on my interpretation of site conditions, and
the expectation that my on-site exploratory efforts adequately define the surface and sub-surface
conditions throughout the site. In the event that the scope of the project or location of the improvements
or surface/subsurface conditions differ from those I relied on in this report,I should be advised. At that
time,a review of the changed conditions will be made and alternative or remedial recommendations given
as requested.
This Stormwater Site Plan has been prepared by:
Q
z �
*v
'PSG/STER�� `yy�
Marley L. Young P.E., S. Date `rd'�-Nit
WIRES stsi a
ATTACHMENTS
SUPPORTING CALCULATIONS
Marley L.Young Consulting Engineer
13 Project No.99-28
Ray Allen,1381 Shelton Springs Road,Shelton,WA
MARLEY L. YOUNG CONSULTING ENGINEER
Q P.O. BOX 1 343 SHEI..TON WA 98584 (3eO)42e-7475
Marley L. Young P.E., P.L.S.,
'.'Civil Engineering Civil Engineer& Land Surveyor
Stornmter Site Plans
Sewer Extensions
o NIINIH
PROJECT ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATTON
I hereby certify that this Stormwater Site Plan prepared for Ray Allen has been prepared
by me or under my supervision and meets minimum standards of Mason County and
normal standards of engineering practice. I understand that the jurisdiction does not and
will not assume liability for the sufficiency, suitability,or performance of drainage
facilities designed by me.
Y
was U�
Marley L. Young P.E.,P.L.S. Ln o
N
14144 �� O
IXPiRES 3/5/6 & }
Marley L.Young Consulting Engineer
14 Project No.99-28
Ray Allen,1381 E Shelton Springs Rd
ATTACHMENTS
Marley L.Young Consulting Engineer
Project No.99-28
RETURN ADDRESS GRANTOR(S)(Last,First and Middle Initial)
RAY E. ALLEN ALLEN. RAY E. _
1901 PARKWOOD DR. ALLEN.DOROTHY M.
OLYMPIA, WA 98501
GRANTEE: MASON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF
PUBLIC WORKS
DECLARATION OF COVENANTS ASSOCIATED WITH
PRIVATELY MAINTAINED STORM DRAINAGE FACILITIES
Declaration of Covenant
In consideration of approval of the development known as Ray E. Allen, 1381 E. Shelton Springs Road,
Shelton WA 98584,relating to real property legally described as follows:
Tract 10 of the South 15 acres of the NE %a of the NW%of Section 12, Township 20 North,
Range 4 West, W.M.,in Mason County,Washington.
County Assessor's Property Tax Parcel Number 42012-21-00100
The undersigned, as owner(s), covenant and agree that:
1. If at any time Mason County reasonably determines that maintenance or repair work is required
to be done to the existing, approved storm drainage facilities installed on the property described above and
located outside of any public right-of-way(which will mean repair and or clean out of the existing system only
to the same standards as originally installed and approved), the Director of the Department of Public Works
shall give the current owners seven days notice that the County intends to perform such maintenance or
repairs,or to have them performed by others.
Tf the current owners have not completed or are not diligently pursuing the repair or maintenance of
the system and it becomes necessary for Mason County to perform the work,the current owners will assume
responsibility for the cost of such maintenance or repair and will reimburse the County within thirty days of
receipt of the invoice. Overdue payments will require payment of interest at the current legal rate for liquidated
judgments, and any costs or fees incurred by the County,should any legal action be required to collect such
payments,will be borne by the parties responsible for said reimbursements.
2. If at any time Mason County reasonably determines that the existing and approved storm drainage
system on the property poses a hazard to life and limb,or endangers property, or adversely affects the safety
and operations of a public way, due to failure, damage or non-maintenance of the existing on-site storm
system, and that the situation is so adverse as to preclude written notice to said owners, the Director of the
Department of Public Works may take the measures necessary to eliminate the hazardous situation(which will
mean repair or clean out of the existing system only to the same standards as originally installed and approved)
provided the Director has first made a reasonable effort to locate said owner before acting.
The current owners will assume responsibility for the cost of such maintenance or repair;and will
reimburse the County within thirty days of receipt of the invoice. Overdue payments will require payment of
interest at the current legal rate for liquidated judgments, and any costs or fees incurred by the County, should
any be bome by the parties responsible for said reimbursements.
3. The owner shall keep the Mason County Public Works Department informed at all times as to the
name, address and telephone number of the contact person responsible for the performance of maintenance
or repair work to the storm drainage facilities.
These covenants are intended to protect the value and desirability of the real property described above,
and to benefit all the citizens of Mason County. They shall run with the land and be binding on all parties
having or acquiring from the current owners or their successors,any right,title or interest therein, and to the
benefit of all the citizens of Mason County.
Signature Signature
RAY E. ALLEN DOROTHY M.ALLEN
Owner Owner
1901 Parkwood Dr. 1901 Parkwood Dr.
Address Address
Ol mpia_WA 98501 Olympia, WA 98501
City, State,Zip City, State,Zip
Phone: 360-943-7722 Phone: 360-943-7722
- - -- --- - -,TATF QF-WASH) GT4N,
ss. (INDIVIDUAL ACKNOWLEDGEMENT)
County of MASON
I, Notary Public in and for the State of Washington,residing at
do hereby certify that on this day of 2000,personally appeared before
me RAY E.ALLEN and DOROTHY M.ALLEN,husband and wife,to me known to be the individuals
described in and who executed the within instrument and acknowledged that they signed and sealed the
same as their free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes herein mentioned.
GIVEN UNDER MY-HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL this day of. 2000.
Notary Public in and for the State of Washington,residing at
in said County.
My Commission expires
Ray Allen,1381 E Shelton Springs Rd.
SUPPORTING
T ,.,:-T:
UALC:ULA�-n0 S
Marley L.Young Consulting Engineer
Project No.99-28
BIO SWALE CALCULATIONS POND #1 (A-1q
Owner Ray Allen
Project# 1
Remarks Bio Swale East Half-South of Sales Lot 2
Design for Swale Capacity 3
Date 04/10/00 4
8
Q for the max.year storm event to use the Swale 100 Year 9
Q= 0.41 cfs cubic feet per second
y= 0.2 Max. Bio Swale water depth in feet 2.780794
s= 0.02 Slope of Bio Swale in feet per foot
Z= 3 Swale side slope 3:1
Note: The free board above the storm event is double the 100-year event depth 5
(See Manual-III-6-19: SC-14.) 10
Use DOE Manual, page III-6-13 Formula(6-9)
b=(Qn/(1.486)*(y^1.667)*(s^0.5)]-Zy
Note-Assume Q is directed to both ends and CD is in middle.
Q = 0.41
n = 0.06
(See Manning's Roughness Coefficients(n) IV Highway_ Channel and'
Swales with Maintained Vegetation) 6
A. Depth of flow up to 0.7 feet: 7
1. Bermuda grass—Length 4 to 6 inches=n= .09 to.05; Use=0.06
Qn = 0.0246
(y^1.667) = 0.068362
(s"0.5) = 0.141421
(-Zy) _ -0.6
b = 1.112318
Swale has a maximum lenth of 80 ft. Swale must be widened to
compensate for shorter length than 200'. — See Page I11-6-20, paragraph CO-1
200/ 80 x 1.112318 = 2.780794 feet design width
3 ft. use
Flow Velocity Check
v=Q/A
- - -X=—Cross Sectional Area-=--ty+-Z"{y42}- - - - -------------— -- --- - ----- -- ----- -- -
A= 0.342464
Therefore
v= 1.197208 fps < 1.50 fls =OX
BIO SWALE CALCULATIONS POND #2
Owner Ray Allen
Project# 1
Remarks Bio Swale East Half-South of Sales Lot 2
Design for Swale Capacity 3
Date 04/17/00 4
8
Q for the max.year storm event to use the Swale 100 Year 9
Q= 0.82 cfs cubic feet per second
y= 0.25 Max. Bio Swale water depth in feet 4.95641
s= 0.02 Slope of Bio Swale in feet per foot
Z= 3 Swale side slope 3:1 .
Note: The free board above the storm event is double the 100-year event depth 5
(See Manual-111-6-19: SC-14.) 10
Use DOE Manual, page 111-6-13 Formula(6-9)
b=[Qn/(1.486)*(y^1.667)*(e0.5)]-Zy
Note-Assume Q is directed to both ends and CD is in middle.
Q = 0.82
n = 0.06
(See Manning's Roughness Coefficients(n) IV Highway Channel and
Swales with Maintained Vegetation) 6
A. Depth of flow up to 0.7 feet: 7
1. Bermuda grass—Length 4 to 6 inches= n= .09 to.05; Use= 0.06
On = 0.0492
(y^1.667) = 0.099167
(s"0.5) = 0.141421
(-Zy) _ -0.75
b = 1.610833
Swale has a maximum lenth of 65 ft. Swale must be widened to
compensate for shorter length than 200'. — See Page 111-6-20, paragraph CO-1
200/ 65 x 1.610833 = 4.95641 feet design width
5 ft. use
Flow Velocity Check
v= Q/A
A=Cross Sectional Area= by+Z*(y^2)
A= 0.590208
Therefore
v= 1.38934 fps < 1.50 fts = O.K.
4/17/00 8 :33 :3 am Marley Young Engineer page 1
SHELTON SPRINGS LIGHT INDUSTRIAL
Ray Allen 2 . 95 Acres
Stormwater Control
-------------------------
BASIN SUMMARY
BASIN ID: la A-4 NAME: West Side Only 1/2 year storm
SBUH METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA. . . . . . . : 1.33 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0 .00 cfs
RAINFALL TYPE. . . . : TYPElA PERV IMP
PRECIPITATION. . . . : 2 .56 inches AREA. . : 0. 63 Acres 0.70 Acres
TIME INTERVAL. . . . : 5. 00 min CN. . . . : 71.72 98 . 00
TC. . . . : 10 . 00 min 10. 00 min
ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20
PEAK RATE: 0 .39 cfs VOL: 0 .16 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min
BASIN ID: labio NAME: West Side Only 1/2 year storm
SBUH METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA. . . . . . . : 0.25 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0. 00 cfs
RAINFALL TYPE. . . . : TYPEIA PERV IMP
PRECIPITATION. . . . : 2 .56 inches AREA. . : 0 .03 Acres 0.22 Acres
TIME INTERVAL. . . . : 5 .00 min CN. . . . : 68 .00 98 . 00
TC. . . . : 10 . 00 min 10. 00 min
ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20
PEAK RATE, n .11 rfc 17M. n nA Z�n_f+ mlrury nQn
. T V V lm.L 11
BASIN ID: lb NAME: West Side Only 2 year storm
SBUH METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA. . . . . . . : 1.33 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0. 00 cfs
RAINFALL TYPE. . . . : TYPEIA PERV IMP
PRECIPITATION. . . . : 4.00 inches AREA. . : 0.63 Acres 0 .70 Acres
TIME INTERVAL. . . . : 5 .00 min CN. . . . : 71.72 98 .00
TC. . . . : 10 . 00 min 10 . 00 min
ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20
PEAK RATE: 0.73 cfs VOL: 0.29 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min
BASIN ID: Ibbio NAME: West Side Only 2 year storm
SBUH METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA. . . . . . . : 0 .25 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0. 00 cfs
RAINFALL TYPE. . . . : TYPEIA PERV IMP
PRECIPITATION. . . . : 4.00 inches AREA. . : 0 .03 Acres 0 .22 Acres
TIME INTERVAL. . . . . 5 . 00 min CN. . . . . 68 . 00 98 . 00
TC. . . . . 10.00 min 10.00 min
ABSTRACTION COEFF: -0-20- - ----- - --- -
PEAK RATE: 0.18 cfs VOL: 0 .07 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min
4/17/00 8 :33 :3 am Marley Young Engineer page 2
SHELTON SPRINGS LIGHT INDUSTRIAL
Ray Allen 2 .95 Acres
Stormwater Control
-- ----------------------
BASIN SUMMARY
BASIN ID: lc A-A NAME: West Side Only 10 year storm
SBUH METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA. . . . . . . : 1.33 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0 .00 cfs
RAINFALL TYPE. . . . : TYPEIA PERV IMP
PRECIPITATION. . . . : 5.50 inches AREA. . : 0.63 Acres 0 .70 Acres
TIME INTERVAL_ . . . : 5. 00 min CN. . . . : 71.72 98 . 00
TC. . . . : 10.00 min 10 . 00 min
ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20
PEAK RATE: 1.11 cfs VOL: 0 .44 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min
BASIN ID: lcbio NAME: West Side Only 10 year storm
SBUH METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA. . . . . . . : 0.25 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0 .00 cfs
RAINFALL TYPE. . . . : TYPEIA PERV IMP
PRECIPITATION. . . . : 5.50 inches AREA_ : 0. 03 Acres 0 .22 Acres
TIME INTERVAL. . . . : 5 . 00 min CN. . . . : 68 .00 98 . 00
TC. . . . :, 10. 00 min 10. 00 min
ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0,20
PEAK RATE: 0 .26 cfs VOL: 0 .10 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min
BASIN ID: id NAME: West Side Only 100 year storm
SBUH METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA. . . . . . . : 1.33 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs
RAINFALL TYPE. . . . : TYPEIA PERV IMP
PRECIPITATION. . . . : 8.50 inches AREA. . : 0.63 Acres 0.70 Acres
TIME INTERVAL. . . . : 5 . 00 min CN. . . . : 71.72 98 .00
TC. . . . : 10 . 00 min 10. 00 min
ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20
PEAK RATE: 1.92 cfs VOL: 0.75 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min
BASIN ID: ldbio NAME: West Side Only 100 year storm
SBUH METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA. . . . . . . : 0.25 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs
RAINFALL TYPE_ . _ . : TYPEIA PERV IMP
PRECIPITATION. . . . : 8.50 inches AREA. . : 0 .03 Acres 0 .22 Acres
TIME INTERVAL. . . . : 5.00 min CN. . . . : 68.00 98.00
- ----- - --- - ------ - - TC. . . . : 10.Wmin I0.00 min
ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20
PEAK RATE: 0 .41 cfs VOL: 0.16 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min
4/17/00 8 :33 :3 am Marley Young Engineer page 3
SHELTON SPRINGS LIGHT INDUSTRIAL
Ray Allen 2 .95 Acres
Stormwater Control
BASIN SUMMARY _
BASIN ID: 2a �3 _6 NAME: East Side Only 1/2 year storm
SBUH METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA. . . . . . . : 0. 62 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0. 00 cfs
RAINFALL TYPE. . . . : TYPEIA PERV IMP
PRECIPITATION. . . . : 2.56 inches AREA. . : 0.16 Acres 0.46 Acres
TIME INTERVAL. . . . : 5.00 min CN. . . . : 72 .22 98 . 00
TC. . . . : 10 .00 min 10 .00 min
ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20
PEAK RATE: 0 .24 cfs VOL: 0.10 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min
BASIN ID: 2abio NAME: East Side Only 1/2 year storm
SBUH METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA. . . . . . . : 0.50 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0. 00 cfs
RAINFALL TYPE. . . . : TYPEIA PERV IMP
PRECIPITATION. . . . : 2 .56 inches AREA. . : 0 .10 Acres 0 .40 Acres
TIME INTERVAL. . . . : 5.00 min CN. . . . : 74.77 98 .00
TC. . . .:, 10 . 00 min 10. 00 min
ABSTRACTION C OR-vr- 0 ,2 0
PEAK RATE: 0 .21 cfs VOL: 0.08 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min
BASIN ID: 2b NAME: East Side Only 2 year storm
SBUH METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA. . . . . . . : 0.62 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs
RAINFALL TYPE. . . . : TYPEIA. PERV IMP
PRECIPITATION. . . . : 4. 00 inches AREA. . : 0.16 Acres 0 .46 Acres
TIME INTERVAL. . . . : 5 . 00 min CN. . . . : 72 .20 98 .00
TC. . . . : 10 .00 min 10. 00 min
ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20
PEAK RATE: 0.41 cfs VOL: 0.16 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min
BASIN ID: 2bbio NAME: East Side Only 2 year storm
SBUH METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA. . . . . . . : 0 .50 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0. 00 cfs
RAINFALL TYPE. . . . : TYPEIA PERV IMP
PRECIPITATION. . . . : 4 .00 inches AREA. . : 0 .10 Acres 0 .40 Acres
TIME INTERVAL. . . . . 5.00 min CN. . . . . 74.77 98 .00
-- - - .- -1-a-.00- min 10 .00 min
ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20
PEAK RATE: 0 .36 cfs VOL: 0.14 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min
4/17/00 8 :33 :3 am Marley Young Engineer page 4
SHELTON SPRINGS LIGHT INDUSTRIAL
Ray Allen 2 .95 Acres
Stormwater Control
BASIN SUMMARY
SUMMARY
BASIN ID: 2c 6--e NAME: East Side Only 10 year storm
SBUH METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA. . . . . . . : 0. 62 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0 . 00 cfs
RAINFALL TYPE. . . . : TYPEIA PERV IMP
PRECIPITATION. . . . : 5 .50 inches AREA. . : 0.16 Acres 0 .46 Acres
TIME INTERVAL. . . . : 5 . 00 min CN. . . . : 72.20 98. 00
TC. . . . : 10. 00 min 10 . 00 min
ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20
PEAR RATE:- 0.60 cfs VOL: 0.24 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min
BASIN ID: 2cbio NAME: East Side Only 10 year storm
SBUH METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA. . . . . . . : 0.50 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0. 00 cfs
RAINFALL TYPE. . . . : TYPEIA PERV IMP
PRECIPITATION. . . . : 5 .50 inches AREA. . : 0.10 Acres 0 .40 Acres
TIME INTERVAL. . . . : 5 . 00 min CN. . . . 74.77 98 . 00
TC. . . . :, 10 .00 min 10. 00 min
ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20
PEAK RATE: 0.51 cfs VOL: 0.20 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min
BASIN ID: 2d NAME: East Side Only 100 year storm
SBUH METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA. . . . . . . : 0 .62 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0 . 00 cfs
RAINFALL TYPE. . . . : TYPEIA PERV IMP
PRECIPITATION. . . . : 8.50 inches AREA. . : 0.16 Acres 0 .46 Acres
TIME INTERVAL. . . . : 5 . 00 min CN. . . . : 72 .20 98 . 00
TC. . . . : 10 .00 min 10 . 00 min
ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20
PEAK RATE: 0 .98 cfs VOL: 0 .38 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min
BASIN ID: 2dbio NAME: East Side Only 100 year storm
SBUH METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA. . . . . . . : 0 .50 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0 .00 cfs
RAINFALL TYPE. . .. : TYPEIA PERV IMP
PRECIPITATION. . _ . : 8.50 inches AREA. . : 0.10 Acres 0 .40 Acres
TIME INTERVAL. . . . . 5.00 min CN. . . . : 74.77 98.00
TC. . . . : 10.IfO-min 10GO- min
ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20
PEAR RATE: 0 .82 cfs VOL: 0.32 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min
4/17/00 8 :33 :3 am Marley Young Engineer page 5
SHELTON SPRINGS LIGHT INDUSTRIAL
RayAllen
len 2 . 95 Acres
Stormwater Control
-----------------------
BASIN SUMMARY
BASIN ID: a NAME: Total of Lot No. End 1/2 SE
SBUH METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA. . . . . . . : 1.94 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs
RAINFALL TYPE. . . . : TYPEIA PERV IMP
PRECIPITATION. . . . : 2 .56 inches AREA. . : 0,79 Acres 1 .15 Acres
TIME INTERVAL. . . . : 5. 00 min CN. . . . : 71.80 98 .Q0
TC. . . . : 10.00 min 10 .00 min
ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20
PEAK RATE: 0.63 cfs VOL: 0.26 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min
BASIN ID: b NAME: Total of Lot No. End 2 S Event
SBUH METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA. . . . . . . : 1.94 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0 . 00 cfs
RAINFALL TYPE. . . . : TYPEIA PERV IMP
PRECIPITATION. . . . : 4 .00 inches AREA. . : 0 . 79 Acres 1.15 Acres
TIME INTERVAL. . . . : 5 . 00 min CN. . . . : 71. 80 98 . 00
TC. . . . : 10 .00 min 10. 00 min
ABSTRACTION COPF'F: 0.20
PEAK RATE: 1.14 cfs VOL: 0.46 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min
BASIN ID: c NAME: Total of Lot No. End 10Y Event
SBUH METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA. . . . . . . : 1.94 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0 .00 cfs
RAINFALL TYPE. . . . : TYPEIA PERV IMP
PRECIPITATION. . . . : 5 .50 inches AREA. . : 0. 79 Acres 1.15 Acres
TIME INTERVAL. . . . : 5 . 00 min CN. . . . : 71.80 98 . 00
TC. . . . : 10 .00 min 10 . 00 min
ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20
PEAK RATE: 1.70
cfs VOL: 0. 67 AC-ft TIME: 480 min
BASIN ID: d NAME: Total of Lot No.End 100Y Event
SBUH METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA. . . . . . . : 1.94 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0 . 00 cfs
RAINFALL TYPE. . . . : TYPEIA PERV IMP
PRECIPITATION. . . . : 8 .50 inches AREA. . : 0 .79 Acres 1.15 Acres
TIME INTERVAL. . . . : 5.00 min CN. . . . : 71.80 98.00
TC.-, 10.-00-thin - -10.00 min
ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20
PEAK RATE: 2 . 89 cfs VOL: 1.13 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min
4/17/00 8 :33:3 am Marley Young Engineer page 6
SHELTON SPRINGS LIGHT INDUSTRIAL
Ray Allen 2 .95 Acres
Stormwater Control 14 -Q
STAGE STORAGE TABLE
TRAPEZOIDAL BASIN ID No. 1T A-A
Description: Pond for West Side only
Length: 66 .00 ft. Width: 15 .00 ft.
Side Slope 1: 3 Side Slope 3: 3
Side Slope 2 : 3 Side Slope 4: 3
Infiltration Rate: 6. 00 min/inch
STAGS <----STORAGE----> STAGS <----STORAGE----> STAGE <----STORAGE----> STAGE ----STORAGE---->
(ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Ft- (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Ft- (ft) ---cf--- --AC-Ft- (£t) ---cf--- --Ac-Ft-
100.00 0.0000 0.0000 101.05 1321 0.0303 102.10 3262 0.0749 103.15 5905 0.1356
100.05 50.109 0.0012 101.10 1399 0.0321 102.15 3371 0.0774 103.20 6050 0.1389
100.10 101.44 0.0023 101.15 1478 0.0339 102.20 3482 0.0799 103.25 6196 0.1422
100.15 154.01 0.0035 101.20 1559 0.0358 102.25 3594 0.0825 103.30 6345 0.1457
100.20 207.82 0.0049 101.25 1641 0.0377 102.30 3708 0.0851 103.35 6495 0.1491
100.25 262.88 n,nn6n lnl.'+O 1724 0.0396 1ng,?5 3824 0.0879 l03.40 6647 0,1S26
100.30 319.19 0.0073 101.35 1809 0.0415 102.40 3942 0.0905 103.45 6801 0.1561
100.35 376.78 0.0086 101.40 1895 0.0435 102.45 4061 0.0932 103.50 6956 0.1597
100.40 435.65 0.0100 101.45 1983 0.0455 102.50 4181 0.0960 103.55 7114 0.1633
100.45 495.80 0.0114 101.50 2072 0.0476 102.55 4304 0.0988 103.60 7273 0.1670
100.50 557.25 0.0128 101.55 2163 0.0497 102.60 4428 0.1016 103.65 7434 0.1707
100.55 620.00 O.Q142 101.60 2255 0.0518 102.65 4553 0.1045 103.70 7598 0.1744
100.60 684.07 0.0157 101.65 2349 0.0539 102.70 4681 0.1075 103.75 7763 0.1782
100.65 749.46 0.0172 101.70 2444 0.0561 102.75 4810 0.1104 103.80 7929 0.1820
100.70 816.19 0.0187 101.75 2541 0.0583 102.80 4941 0.1134 103.85 8098 0.1859
100.75 884.25 0.0203 101.80 2639 0.0606 102.85 5073 0.1165 103.90 8269 0.1898
100.80 953.66 0.0219 101.85 2739 0.0629 102.90 5207 0.1195 103.95 8441 0.1938
100.85 1024 0.0235 101.90 2841 0.0652 102.95 5343 0.2227 104.00 8616 0.1978
100.90 1097 0.0252 101.95 2943 0.0676 103.00 5481 0.1258
100.95 1170 0.0269 102.00 3048 0.0700 103.05 5620 0.1290
101.00 1245 0.0286 102.05 3154 0.0724 103.10 5762 0.1323
4/17/00 8 :33 :3 am Marley Young Engineer page 7
SHELTON SPRINGS LIGHT INDUSTRIAL
Ray Allen 2 .95 Acres
Stormwater Control
------------
STAGE STORAGE TABLE
Infiltration Rating Curve for Storage Struct 1T
STAGS <-INFILTRATION-> STAGS <-INFILTRATION-> STAGS <-INFILTRATION-> STAGS <-INFILTRATION->
(ft) ---cfa-- ------- (ft) ---cfs-- ------- (ft) ---cfs--
------- (ft) ---cfs-- -------
100,00 0.2292 101.05 0.3634 102.10 0.5169 103.15 0.6899
100.05 0.2351 101.10 0.3702 102.15 0.5247 103.20 0.6986
100.10 0.2411 101.15 0.3772 102.20 0.5326 103.25 0.7074
100.15 0.2472 101.20 0.3841 102.25 0.5405 103.30 0.7162
100.20 0.2532 101.25 0.3911 102.30 0.5484 103.35 0.7250
100.25 0.2594 101.30 0.3982 102.35 0.5564 103.40 0.7339
100.30 0.2655 101.35 0.4053 102.40 O.S644 103.45 0.7428
100.35 0.2717 101.40 0.4124 102.45 0.5724 103.50 0.7518
100.40 0.2780 101.45 0.4196 102.50 0.5805 103.55 0.7608
100.45 0.2843 101.50 0.4268 102.55 0.5887 103.60 0.7699
100.50 0.2907 101.55 0.4341 102.60 0.5969 103.65 0.7790
100.55 0.2970 101.60 0.4414 102.65 0.6051 ,103.70 0.7882
100.60 0.3035 101.65 0.4487 102.70 0.6134 103.7S n,7974
100.65 0.3100 101.70 0.4561 102.75 0.6217 103.80 0.8066
100.70 0.3165 101.75 0.4636 102.80 0.6301 103.85 0.8159
100.75 0.3230 101.80 0.4711 102.85 0.6385 103.90 0.8253
100.80 0.3297 101.85 0.4786 102.90 0.6469 103.95 0.8346
100.85 0.3363 101.90 0.4862 102.95 0.6554 104.00 0.8441
100.90 0.3430 101.95 0.4938 103.00 0.6640
100.95 0.3498 102.00 0.5015 103.05 0.6726
101.00 0.3565 102.05 0.5092 103.10 0.6812
4/17/00 8 :33 :3 am Marley Young Engineer page 8
SHELTON SPRINGS LIGHT INDUSTRIAL
Ray Allen 2 .95 Acres
Stormwater Control B- g
STAGE STORAGE TABLE
TRAPEZOIDAL BASIN ID No. 2T -g
Description: Pond for East Side only
Length: 34. 00 ft. Width: 13 . 00 ft.
Side Slope 1: 3 Side Slope 3 : 3
Side Slope 2 : 3 Side Slope 4 : 3
Infiltration Rate: 6. 00 min/inch
STAGS <----STORAGE----> STAGE <----STORAGE----> STAGS <----STORAGE----> STAGS <----STORAGE---->
(ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Ft- (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Ft- (ft) ---cf--- --AC-Ft- (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Ft-
100.00 0,0000 0.0000 101.30 839.25 0.0193 102.60 2313 0.0531 103.90 - 4580 0.1051
100.05 22.454 0.0005 101.35 883.20 0.0203 102.65 2385 0.0547 103.95 4685 0.1076
100.10 45.622 0.0010 101.40 928.09 0.0213 102.70 2457 0.0564 104.00 4792 0.1100
100.15 69.513 0.0016 101.45 973.94 0.0224 102.75 2531 0.0581 104.05 4900 0.1125
100.20 94.136 0.0022 101.50 1021 0.0234 102.80 2606 0.0598 104.10 5009 0.1150
100.25 119 50 C 55.2.. .....�27 ,...�. 1069 0.0245 ........,.. 2v33 ...voIo ivY.i;i Sit^v v.ii 75
100.30 145.61 0.0033 101.60 i117 0.0256 102.90 2760 0.0634 104.20 5233 0.1201
100.35 172.49 0.0040 101.65 1167 0,0268 102.95 2839 0.0652 104.25 5347 0.1227
100.40 200.13 0.0046 101.70 1218 0.0280 103.00 2919 0.0670 104.30 5462 0.1254
100.45 228.55 0.0052 101.75 1270 0.0291 103.05 3000 0.0689 104.35 5579 0.1281
100.50 257.75 0.0059 101.80 1322 0.0304 103.10 3083 0.0708 104.40 5697 0.1308
100.55 287.75 0.0066 101.85 1376 0.0316 103.15 3166 0.0727 104.45 5817 0.1335
100,60 318.55 0.0073 101.90 1431 0.0329 103.20 3251 0.0746 104.50 5938 0.1363
100.65 350.17 0.0080 101.95 1487 0.0341 103.25 3338 0.0766 104.55 6061 0.1391
100.70 382.61 0.0088 102.00 1544 0.0354 103.30 3425 0.0786 104.60 6185 0.1420
100.75 415.88 0.0095 102.05 1602 0.0368 103.35 3514 0.0807 104.65 6311 0.1449
100.80 449.98 0.0103 102.10 1661 0.0381 103.40 3604 0.0827 104.70 6438 0.1478
100.05 484.94 0.0111 102.15 1721 0.0395 103.45 3696 0.0848 104.75 6567 0.1508
100.90 520.76 0.0120 102.20 1783 0.0409 103.50 3789 0.0870 104.80 6697 0.1537
100.95 557.44 0.0128 102.25 1845 0.0424 103.55 3883 0.0891 104.85 6829 0.1568
101.00 595.00 0.0137 102.30 1908 0.0438 103.60 3978 0.0913 104.90 6963 0.1598
101.05 633.44 0.0145 102.35 1973 0.0453 103.65 4075 0.0936 104.95 7098 0.1630
101.10 672.78 0.0154 102.40 2039 0.0468 103.70 4174 0.0958 105.00 7235 0.1661
2.01.15 713.02 0.01" 102.45 2106 0.0483 103_7S 4273 0.0981
101.20 754.18 0.0173 102.30 2174 0.0499 103.80 4374 0.1004
101.25 796.25 0.0183 102.55 2243 0.0515 103.85 4476 0.1028
4/17/00 8 :33 :3 am Marley Young Engineer page 9
SHELTON SPRINGS LIGHT INDUSTRIAL
Ray Allen 2 .95 Acres
Stormwater Control
-------------------------
STAGE STORAGE TABLE
infiltration Rating Curve for Storage Struct 2T
STAGS <-INFILTRATION-> STAGES <-INFILTRATION-> STAGE <-INFILTRATION-> STAGS <-INFILTRATION->
(ft) ---cfs-- ------- (ft) ---c£a-- ------- (ft) ---cfs--
------- (ft) ---cfs--
100.00 0.1023 101.30 0.2066 102.60 0.3406 103.90 0.5043
100.05 0.1058 101.35 0.2112 102.65 0.3463 103.95 0.5112
100.10 0.1093 101.40 0.2159 102.70 0.3521 104.00 0.5181
100.15 0.1128 101.45 0.2206 102.75 0.3580 104.05 0.5251
100.20 0.1164 101.50 0.2253 102.80 0.3638 104.10 0.5321
100.25 0.1201 101.55 0.2301 102.85 0.3698 104.15 0.5392
100.30 0.1237 101.60 0.2349 102.90 0.3757 104.20 0.5463
100.35 0.1275 101.65 0.2398 102.95 0.3817 104.25 0.5534
100.40 0.1312 101.70 0.2447 103.00 0.3878 104.30 0.5606
100.45 0.1351 101.75 0.2496 103.05 0.3939 104.35 0.5679
10Q.50 0.1389 101.80 0.2546 103.10 0.4000 104.40 0.5751
100.55 0.1428 101.85 0.2597 103.15 0.4062 104.45 0.5825
i00460 0.1458 101.90 11,2648 103-20 0.4725 104.50 0.58e8
100.65 0.1508 101.95 0.2699 203.25 0.4187 104.55 0.5972
100.70 0.1548 102.00 0.2751 103.30 0.4250 104.60 0.6047
100.75 0.1589 102.05 0.2803 103.35 0.4314 104.65 0.6122
100.80 0.1630 102.10 0.2856 103.40 0.4378 104.70 0.6198
100.85- 0.1671 102.15 0.2909 103.45 0.4443 104.75 0.6273
100.90 0.1714 102.20 0.2962 103.50 0.4508 104.80 0.6350
100.95 0.1756 102.25 0.3016 103.55 0.4573 104.85 0.6427
101.00 0.1799 102.30 0.3070 103.60 0.4639 104.90 0.6504
101.05 0.1842 102.3S 0.3125 103.65 0.4705 104.95 0.6582
101.10 0.1886 102.40 0.3181 103.70 0.4772 105.00 0.6660
101.15 0.1931 102.45 0.3236 103.75 0.4839
101.20 0.1975 102.50 0.3292 103.80 0.4906
101.25 0.2021 102.55 0.3349 103.85 0.4974
4/17/00 8 :33 :3 am Marley Young Engineer page 10
SHELTON SPRINGS LIGHT INDUSTRIAL
Ray Allen 2 .95 Acres
Stormwater Control
---------------------
HISTORY OF HYDROGRAPH ACTIVITY
Date of Session: 4/17/00 8:30:40 am
CLEARHI9
MOVE a to 1
0.6339 cfs 0.2591 ac-ft 8.00 hrs
MOVE b to 2
1.1375 cfa 0.4551 ac-ft 8.00 brs
MOVE c to 3
1.7018 cfa 0.6723 ac-ft 8.00 bra
MOVE d to 4
2.8876 cfs 1.1259 ac-ft 8_00 hrs
LPOOL 1 "1/2" a a T W 9
Description MatchQ PeakQ Sto Din PkStg OutQ hyd Volume
1/3 0.63 0.63 T .. 0.41 9 415.93 ea.
LPOOL 2 "2" b b T W 10
Description MatchQ PeakQ Sto Dis PkStg OutQ hyd Volume
2 1.14 1.14 T W 100.85 0.53 10 1631.97 of
LPOOL 3 "10" c c T W 11
Description MatchQ PeakQ Sto Din PkStg OutQ hyd Volume
10 1.70 1.70 T W 101.57 0.67 11 3448.57 of
LPOOL 4 "100" d d T W 12
Description MatchQ PeakQ Sto Din PkStg OutQ hyd Volume
100 2.89 2.89 T W 103.01 0.98 12 8419.31 of
SPLIT W 1 13 17
0.0000 cfa 0.0000 ac-ft 0.00 bra
0.4124 cfa 0.2591 ac-ft 8.33 brs
S=T W 2 14 18
0.0000 cfs 0.0000 ac-ft 0.00 hrs
0.5259 cfs 0.4551 ac-ft 8.67 hrs
SPLIT W 3 15 19
0.0000 cfa 0.0000 ac-ft 0.00 hrs
0.6686 cfs 0.6723 ac-ft 9.17 hrs
SPLIT W 4 16 20
0.0000 cfs 0.0000 ac-ft 0.00 brs
0.9818 cfs 1.1259 ac-ft 9.25 hra
MOVE 1a to 1
4/17/00 8:33:3 am Marley Young Engineer page 11
SHELTON SPRINGS LIGHT INDUSTRIAL
Ray Allen 2.95 Acres
Stormwater Control
HISTORY OF HYDROGRAPH ACTIVITY
0.3936 cfa 0.1642 ac-ft 8.00 bra
MOVE 1b to 2
0.7285 cfe 0.2941 ac-ft 8.00 hre
MOVE lc to 3
1.1093 cfe 0.4397 ac-ft 8.00 bra
MM 1d to 4
1.9169 cfe 0.7461 ac-ft 8.00 bra
LPOOL 1 "1/2" la la 1T W 9
Description MatchQ PeakQ Sto Dis Pk$tg oatQ hyd Volume
1/2 0.39 0.39 1T W 100.24 0.26 9 251.77 of
WOOL 2 "2" lb lb 1T W 10
Descriptim MatchQ PeakQ Sto Die PkStg outQ hyd Volume
2 0.73 0.73 1T W 100.86 0.34 10 1044.95 of
LPOOL 3 010" lc lc 1T W 11
Description MatcbQ PeakQ Sto Die PkStg OutQ hyd Volume
10 1.11 1.11 1T W 101,60 0.44 11 2246.32 of
LPOOL 4 "100" Id Id 1T W 12
Description MatchQ PeakQ Ste Die PkStg OutQ byd Volume
100 1.92 1.92 IT W 203.01 0.67 12 5513.90 of
SPLIT W 1 13 17
0.0000 cfe 0.0000 aO-£t 0.00 bre
0.2581 cfe 0.1642 ac-ft 8.33 hrs
SPLIT W 2 14 18
0.0000 cfs 0.0000 ac-ft 0.00 bra
0.3382 cfe 0.2941 ac-ft 8.75 brs
SPLIT W 3 I5 19
0.0000 cfe 0.0000 AC-ft 0.00 bra
0.4407 cfa 0.4397 ac-ft 9.17 bra -
SPLIT W 4 16 20
0.0000 cfe 0.0000 ac-ft o.00 hre
0.6660 cfa 0.7461 ac-ft 9.25 bra
,OD/Jv
MOVE 2a to 1
0.2438 cfe 0.0962 ac-ft 8.00 bra
MOVE 2b to 2
0.4142 cfs 0.1630 ac-ft 8.00 hrs
4/17/00 8 :33 :3 am Marley Young Engineer page 12
SHELTON SPRINGS LIGHT INDUSTRIAL
Ray Allen 2.95 Acres
Stormwater Control
HISTORY OF HYDROGRAPH ACTIVITY
MOVE 2c to 3
0.5992 cfs 0.2352 ac-ft 8.00 hrs
MOVE 2d to 4
0.9801 cfs 0.3835 ac-ft 8.00 hrs
LPOOL 1 "1/2" 2a 2a 2T W 9
Descripticn MatchQ PeakQ Sto Dis PkStg OutQ hyd Volume
1/2 0.24 0.24 2T W 100.48 0.14 9 247.80 cf
LPOOL 2 "2" 2b 2b 2T W 10
Description MatchQ PeakQ Sto Die PkStg outQ hyd Volume
2 0.41 0.41 2T W 101.11 0.19 10 677.33 cf
LPOOL 3 "10" 2c 2c 2T W 11
Description MatchQ PeakQ Sto Dis PkStg OutQ hyd Volume
10 0.60 0.60 2T W 101.77 0.25 11 1292.89 cf
LPOOL 4 "100" 2d 2d 2T W 12
Description MatchQ PeakQ Sto Dis PkStg OutQ hyd - Volume
100 0.98 0.98 2T W 102.90 0.38 12 2766.87 cf
SPLIT W 1 13 17
0.0000 cfs 0.0000 ac-ft 0.00 hrs
0.1376 cfs 0.0962 ac-ft 8.42 hrs
SPLIT W 2 14 18
0.0000 cfs 0.0000 ac-ft 0.00 hrs
0.1891 cfs 0.1630 ac-£t 8.67 hrs
SPLIT W 3 15 19
0.0000 cfs 0.0000 ac-ft 0.00 bra
0.2518 cfe 0.2352 ac-ft 0.92 bra
SPLIT M 4 16 20
0.0000 efs 0.9000 ac-ft 0.00 bra
- - - - -- - - ----
.3762 c fs 0.3835 ac-ft 9.17 bra
End program file C:\EGMOUS\PROJ\RAYALEN2.pgm
MARLEY L. YOUNG, CONSULTING ENGINEER
P.O. BOX 1343, SHELTON, WA 98584-0959
(360) 426-7475 FAX (360) 426-5789
Civil Engineering Marley L. Young, P.E., P.L.S.
Stornmater Site Plena Civil Engineer& Land Surveyor
Sewer Extension
ED
June 23, 2004 RECEIVED
Tammy Clark IjUN 2 3 2004
Mason County Planning Dept.
411 N. 5'' Street CEDAR ST-'
Shelton, WA 98584 426 W:
Re: Michael Allen
COM 200400135
Classic Auto RV Storage
Dear Tammy:
Enclosed is a copy of the Erosion and Sediment Control Site Plan(report)dated April 18,2000
and the civil drawing dated April 05,2001, for the above-referenced project.
The original report took into consideration the possibility of impervious surface for building and parking in
what is now Lot 1. I have reviewed this report and am convinced that the original stormwater control
calculations provided sufficient impervious areas to still be valid under Michael Allen's new proposal.
Bioswales and pond size are more than adequate to handle the new proposal.
The civil drawings show the existing building in Lot 2 as well as the areas for future building and future
parking in Lot 1. These future building sites and future parking were considered as impervious surfacing in
the report.
Please contact me if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Marley L. Young, E. L.S.