HomeMy WebLinkAboutGRD2014-00007 Stormwater - GRD Permit / Conditions - 6/4/2014 �rd Zo iL4- DOoo' -
Je
Mason County RECEIVED
Construction Stormwater Pollution Plan Submittal Checklist L!
JUN 0 4 2014
Project Name: Shelton Upper Mountain View Pressure Zone, Phase 1
.�. W. f=FT)AR Si_
Parcel#'s: 42002-10-00020
County Project No.: PAR 2014-00013
Author of Report: Murray. Smith & Associates, Inc.
Minimum Requirements of the DOE 2005 Stormwater Manual
The Stormwater checklist identifies the minimum requirements of the DOE 2005 Stormwater Manual.
The Checklist is intended to identify the locations within the plan that addresses the minimum
requirements. Mason County will not perform a technical evaluation of the submittal. Rather,the
checklist provides a guide to allow Mason County to review the submittal and determine if the applicant
has addressed the minimum features that make up a Stormwater plan.
It is incumbent upon the applicant and his/her engineer to fulfill all the applicable requirements of the
2005 Stormwater Plan as it relates to the proposed project. Review by Mason County is intended to
determine if the plan has addressed the minimum requirements. Applicant's engineer shall be responsible
for the technical accuracy of the submitted Stormwater plan.
During construction of the project,the stormwater plan engineer of record or his/her authorized
representative shall inspect the site to ensure the stormwater plan is being implemented as designed. Upon
completion of the project, the engineer or his authorized representative shall be required to certify that the
stormwater plan has been implemented as designed.
Failure to meet the minimum requirements could result in delay or rejection of the application until the
deficiencies are corrected.
Section I—Construction SWPPP Narrative
1. Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention Elements
X a. Describe how each of the Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention Element has been
addressed though the Construction SWPPP.
X b. Identify the type and location of BMPs used to satisfy the required element.
X c. Written justification identifying the reason an element is not applicable to the proposal.
12 Required Elements—Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
X 1. Mark Clearing Limits, See page/paragraph CSWPPP Page 10
X 2. Establish Construction Access, See page/paragraph CSWPPP Page 10
X 3. Control Flow Rates, See page/paragraph CSWPPP Page 11
X 4. Install Sediment Controls, See page/paragraph CSWPPP Page 11
x 5. Stabilize Soils, See page/paragraph CSWPPP Page 12
I:\Community DevelopmentTAC\STORMWATER 1 of 5 Updated May 20,2009
t
X 6. Protect Slopes, See page/paragraph CSWPPP Page 12
7. Protect Drain Inlets Seepage/paragraph CSWPPP Pa
� � e 12 g
X 8. Stabilize Channels and Outlets, See page/paragraph CSWPPP Page 13
X 9. Control Pollutants, See page/paragraph CSWPPP Page 13
X 10. Control De- Watering, See page/paragraph CSWPPP Page 14
X I l. Maintain BMPs, See page/paragraph CSWPPP Page 15
X 12. Manage the Project, See page/paragraph CSWPPP Page 15
2. Project Description
X a. Total project area. Acres 162.4 Sq. Ft. 7,074,144
X b. Total proposed impervious area. Acres 0.10 Sq. Ft. 4,000
X c. Total proposed are to be disturbed, included off-site borrow and fill areas.
Acres 2.50 Sq. Ft. 108,900
X d. Total volumes of proposed cut and fill. Cubic Yards 150
3. Existing Site Conditions
X a. Description of the existing topography. See page/paragraph CSWPPP Pages 8-9
X b. Description of the existing vegetation. See page/paragraph CSWPPP Pages 8-9
X c. Description of the existing drainage. See page/paragraph CSWPPP Pages 8-9
4. Adjacent Areas
X I. Description of adjacent areas that may be affected by the site disturbance
X a. Streams, See page/paragraph CSWPPP Pages 8-9
X b. Lakes, See page/paragraph CSWPPP Pages 8-9
X c. Wetlands, See page/paragraph CSWPPP Pages 8-9
NA d. Residential Areas, See page/paragraph None. NA
X e. Roads, See page/paragraph CSWPPP Pages 8-9
NA f. Other, See page/paragraph None
X 11. Description of the downstream drainage path leading from the site to the receiving body of water.
(Minimum distance of 400 yards), See page/paragraph SSP Page 6
5. Critical Areas
X a. Description of critical areas that are on or adjacent to the site.
See page/paragraph CSWPPP Pages 8-9
X b. Description of special requirements for working in or near critical areas.
See page/paragraph CSWPPP Pages 8-9
L•\Community Development\PAC\STORMWATER 2 of 5 Updated May 20,2009
6. Soils
Description of on-site soils.
X a. Soil name(s), See page/paragraph CSWPPP Pages 8-9
X b. Soil mapping unit, See page/paragraph CSWPPP Pages 8-9
X c. Erodibility, See page/paragraph CSWPPP Pages 8-9
x d. Settleability, See page/paragraph CSWPPP Pages 8-9
X e. Permeability, See page/paragraph CSWPPP Pages 8-9
X f. Depth, See page/paragraph CSWPPP Pages 8-9
X g. Texture, See page/paragraph CSWPPP Pages 8-9
X h. Soil Structure, See page/paragraph CSWPPP Pages 8-9
7. Erosion Problem Areas
X Description of potential erosion problems on site. See page/paragraph CSWPPP Page 8
8. Construction Phasing
X a. Construction sequence, See page/paragraph CSWPPP Pages 16. 18 19
X b. Construction phasing (if proposed) , See page/paragraph CSWPPP Pages 16. 18, 19
9. Construction Schedule
N I. Provide a proposed construction schedule, See page/paragraph CSWPPP Pages 16, 18, 19
x II. Wet Season Construction Activities
X a. Proposed wet season construction activities, See page/paragraph CSWPPP Pages 16, 18, 19
NA b. Proposed wet season construction restraints for environmentally sensitive/critical areas. See
page/paragraph None
10. Engineering Calculations
Provide Design Calculations.
NA a. Sediment Ponds/Traps, See page/paragraph None
NA b. Diversions, See page/paragraph None
NA c. Waterways, See page/paragraph None
x d. Runoff/Stormwater Detention Calculations, See page/paragraph CSWPPP Appendix F
11. Operations and Maintenance.
X An operation and maintenance schedule shall be provided for all proposed stormwater facilities and
BMPs, and the party (or parties) responsible for maintenance and operation shall be identified. An
operation and maintenance (O&M) Declaration of Covenant will be required to cover all privately
owned and maintained stormwater facilities. O&M Declaration of Covenant forms are available at
the Mason County Permit Assistance Center, 426 W. Cedar Street, Shelton, WA 98584. The
proponent shall record a copy of the completed Declaration with the Mason County Auditors' office.
A copy of the recorded document must be submitted to the Permit Assistance Center together with
this completed Checklist. See page/paragraph SSP Appendix C
I:\Community DevelopmentTAC\STORMWATER 3 of 5 Updated May 20,2009
Section II—Erosion and Sediment Control Plans
1. General
X a. Vicinity Map, See page/paragraph Cover Sheet
NA b. Clearing and Grading Approval Block, See page/paragraph Not included
_X_c. Erosion and Sediment Control Notes, See page/paragraph Sheet G-3
2. Site Plan
X a. Legal description of subject property Included separately
X b. North Arrow
X c. Indicate boundaries of existing vegetations, e.g. tree lines,pasture areas, etc.
NA d. Identify and label areas of potential erosion problems, See page/paragraph NA
NA e. Identify any on-site or adjacent surface waters, critical areas and associated buffers
NA f. Identify FEMA base flood boundaries and Shoreline Management boundaries (if applicable), See
page/paragraph
X g. Show existing and proposed contours
X h. Indicate drainage basins and direction of flow for individual drainage areas
X i. Label final grade contours and identify developed condition drainage basins
X j. Delineate areas that are to be cleared and graded
X k. Show all'cut and fill slopes indicating top and bottom of slope catch lines
3. Conveyance Systems
X a. Designate locations for swales,interceptor trenches, or ditches
NA b. Show all temporary and permanent drainage pipes, ditches, or cut-off trenches required for erosion
and sediment control
_IA c. Provide minimum slope and cover for all temporary pipes or call out pipe inverts
X d. Show grades, dimensions, and direction of flow in all ditches, swales, culverts, and pipes
NA e. Provide details for bypassing off-site runoff around disturbed areas
NA f. Indicate locations and outlets of any dewatering systems
4. Location of Detention BMPs
X a. Identify location of detention BMPs.
5. Erosion and Sediment Control Facilities
X a. Show the locations of sediment trap(s),pond(s), and pipe structures.
X b. Dimension pond berm widths and inside and outside pond slopes.
NA c. Indicate the trap/pond storage required and the depth, length, and width dimensions.
X d. Provide typical section views through pond and outlet structure.
I:\Community DevelopmentTAC\STORMWATER 4 of 5 Updated May 20,2009
NA e. Provide typical details of gravel cone and standpipe, and/or other filtering devices.
N f. Detail stabilization techniques for outlet/inlet.
NA g. Detail control/restrictor device location and details.
x h. Specify mulch and/or recommended cover of berms and slopes.
_NA i. Provide rock specifications and detail for rock check dams.
_NA j. Specify spacing for rock check dams as required.
NA k.Provide front and side sections of typical rock check dams.
x 1. Indicate the locations and provide details and specifications for silt fabric.
X m. Locate the construction entrance and provide a detail.
6. Detailed Drawings
NA a. Any structural practices used that are not referenced in the Ecology Manual should be explained and
illustrated with detailed drawings.
7. Other Pollutant BMPs
NA a. Indicate on the site plan the location of BMPs to be used for the control of pollutants other than
sediment,e.g. concrete wash water.
8. Monitoring Locations
NA a. Indicate on the site plan the water quality sampling locations to be used for monitoring water quality
on the construction site, if applicable.
I certify that the stormwater plan submitted for this project fulfills the applicable provisions of the 2005
DOE Stormwater Manual.
OR
Engi eer D e
Matt Hickey, P.E. �, x
Murray, Smith &Associate , Inc. L
i Jr 495N
ff
an Date '8 ��'�a��t$�
Jau , P.E.
City of Shelton, Public Works
Place eng.stamp and sign/date above.
1ACommunity DevelopmentTAOSTORMWATER Updated May 20,2009
5 of 5
z
c� � i '� }•til, `• i
..
► ' -
�q
PHASE 11
7J f rx�.
PRELIMINARY
SITE PLAN
_ ' (fir\- - • 4- ' ABANDONMENT OF EXISTING 12" �i1'A•'y
24; �'`" LOW-PRESSURE STEEL MAIN i
1- ►. sr \ ayc iy, -��• BETWEEN WELL NO.3 AND EXISTING,
MOUNTAIN VIEW PRESSURE ZONE k•-
y., �.y -' i• ,{.a "" ` • BOOSTER PUMP STATION :11 „i"wT ---�---- CONTOUR LINES WITH ELEVATIONS
K.
WATERLINES
d J�--- _ w \ i �.✓ ---- PARCEL BOUNDS
ol
Y •' A' � .•.e \\ m v ,7B ',�+- 'f/'/•Iyyl- PIPE ABANDONMENT
r
MASON COUNTY PARCEL N0.
•i -�` a -.y 12'WATER MAIN TO .. \ 1 320073060000
y*. a UPPER MOUNTAIN VIEW `
::ti•- - PRESSURE ZONE
•{Y 3200730600on
�p�,.�,, , ~ 1 ,i •'• , y \ r +�
q�`• BOOSTER PUMP STATION ',! •�• \ �'o N
.ilk3lll
t �' ' ' •,1 MG GROUND LEVEL r ;q?�' \ - eft
STORAGE RESERVOIR,
STORMWATER DETENTION/ _
RESERVOIR OVERFLOW PONDINA y,
r t i r. . _ _\ NOTE:PARCEL BOUNDS ARE
:.:PROPOSED _ ' APPROXIMATE IN NATURE AND
,,ACCESS ROAD v,. \ ARE INTENDED FOR PLANNING
_ EXISTING CITY WELL NO.1 PURPOSES ONLY
TO SUPPLY RESERVOIR y
C. r - , � _ \ � � z ao zo o ao eo
1� W� \ \
. FLOW CONTROL VALVE ,•y,.
• --a.y�,y_� SCALE IN GEE
` •• , l L FIGURE 2
• • ` — .`
1 {- 16 LOW-PRESSURE, ,EXISTING SAND TRAP TO
WATER MAIN TO ;' BE ABANDON EDIREMOVED` \
+ HIGH SCHOOL ,. ,,.' --___ UPPER MOUNTAIN VIEW
PRESSURE ZONE 'k - `,� , PRESSURE ZONE Ev PROVEMENTS
PHASE II SrM PLAN
al 320182560021
�^ !I
ABANDON EXISTING 1� z DRAFT
12"GRAVITY SUPPLY LINT" a �'""ry°`,.".r SHF1E1vBER2014
WAC 197-11-960 Environmental checklist.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
Purpose of checklist:
The State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA),chapter 43.21C RCW,requires all governmental agencies to consider the
environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement(EIS)must be prepared for all
proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide
information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal(and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal,if
it can be done)and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required.
Instructions for applicants:
This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies
use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an
EIS. Answer the questions briefly,with the most precise information known,or give the best description you can.
You must answer each question accurately and carefully,to the best of your knowledge. In most cases,you should be
able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not
know the answer,or if a question does not apply to your proposal,write"do not know"or"does not apply." Complete answers to
the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later.
Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer
these questions if you can. If you have problems,the governmental agencies can assist you.
The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on
different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects.
The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably
related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact.
Use of checklist for nonproject proposals:
Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN
ADDITION,complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS(part D).
For nonproject actions,the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant,"and"property or site"should
be read as"proposal," "proposer,"and"affected geographic area,"respectively.
A. BACKGROUND
1. Name of proposed project,if applicable:
City of Shelton Upper Mountain View Pressure Zone AMENDED
2. Name of applicant: City of Shelton Department of Public Works,Attention:Jerry Hauth
3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person:
City of Shelton Department of Public Works,Attention:Jerry Hauth
525 West Cota Street
Shelton,WA 98584
Phone:360432-5120
4. Date checklist prepared: May 2,2014 Checklist Amended on October 1,2014.
5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Shelton
6. Proposed timing or schedule(including phasing,if applicable):
Construction would occur during the summer/fall of 2014 with project completion expected in 2015.
Phase H Construction unknown at this time but would occur after phase I.
7. Do you have any plans for future additions,expansion,or finther activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes,
explain. None.
8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this
proposal.
• Federal Aviation Administration Determination of No Hazard to Air Navigation(attached)
• Cultural Resources Assessment,Prepared by Cultural Resource Consultants,Inc.April 2014(attached).
• Habitat Management Plan for Mazama Pocket Gopher, Streaked Horned Lark, and Taylor's Checkerspot
Butterfly,Prepared by Environmental Science Associates,April 2014(attached).
• Geotechnical Report,prepared by Robinson Noble,March 3,2014(attached).
• Amended Cultural Resources Assessment, Prepared by Cultural Resource Consultants, Inc. Aueust 28, 2014
attached
9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property
covered by your proposal? If yes,explain.
• Special Use Permit from Mason County for construction of the water tanks near Sanderson Field.
• Conditional Use Permit will be required for placement and construction of the water tank near North 13'h Street
(Phase
10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal,if known.
• Special Use Permit from Mason County for construction of the water tanks.
• Appropriate easements from Mason County for access and maintenance of the facility.
• Right of Way Permit from Mason County to perform work within their right-of-way(Public Works Drive).
• Conditional Use Permit will be required for placement and construction of the water tank near North 13`h Street
(Phase
11. Give brief;complete description of your proposal,including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are
several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those
answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.)
The proposed project is identified in the City of Shelton 2010 Water System Plan and would aid in offsetting current
pressure and storage deficiencies within the existing system and also provide needed fire flow and water pressure to the
Washington State Patrol Academy. The project would occur in two phases as follows:
Phase IA, (See Figure 1 and 2). Phase IA work includes construction of one or two elevated water storage tanks,
approximately 2,000 linear feet of 16-inch diameter water main,and a connection to the Mason County Property to the
north. The City intends to construct at least one elevated tank as part of this project. An additive alternative bid item
will be included to construct the second tank if funding and budget allows. The plan is to construct at least one of the
tanks and have it available(operational)by July 2015 to accommodate the Washington State Patrol Academy(a water
line was run from the City to Washington State Patrol in 2012 but does not have enough pressure adequately to serve the
site. The proposed water tanks will provide needed pressure). To connect the tanks to the existing water distribution
system approximately 2,000 linear feet of new 16-inch diameter water main would be installed from West Dayton Airport
Road North along West Public Works Drive to the tank site. The elevated tanks are proposed to be multi-column
elevated steel reservoir tanks with a capacity of 400,000 gallons each(total of 800,000 gallons). The tanks would each
stand approximately 140'tall above existing grade at the site.
2
Phase 1B(See Figures 1 and 3). Phase 1B improvements include the retrofit of the City's existing Well Number 3 with a
new pump, reconfiguration of well yard piping, construction of a new pressure-reducing valve station (PRV), and
construction of approximately 3,500 linear feet of new 12-inch diameter water main from the well site to a connection to
the existing water system located near the intersection of Shelton Springs Road and Tarragon Avenue. Well number 3
currently pumps to the existing Mountain View Pressure Zone. As part of this project,it will be connected directly to the
Upper Mountain View Pressure Zone. The well pump at Well 3 must be replaced to accommodate new head conditions.
No change in pumping capacity is proposed and no new sources of water are being developed or added as part of this
project.
Phase 2 (see figures 4 and 5)improvements include wellhead treatments at(existing)well number 1,a one million gallon
ground level water storage tank.a new 1500 gallon per minute booster pump station adiacent to the new storage tank,
new water transmission mains to connect to the existing water system,and a pressure reducing valve station to service the
Sprinefield loop neighborhood.
12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed
project,including a street address,if any,and section,township,and range,if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of
area,provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description,site plan,vicinity map,and topographic map,if
reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or
detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist.
The Phase 1A project site is located immediately south of the existing Mason County Public Works Facility located at 100
Public Works Drive just north of Shelton City Limits. The site is located north of Sanderson Field Airport, west of
Highway 101,North of Dayton Airport Road. Assessor's Parcel Number 42002-10-00020.See attached site location map
and site plan.
The Phase 1B project site is located immediately north of the intersection of Shelton Springs Road and Wallace Kneeland
Boulevard in and around the existing City wellhouse complex. The site is located North of Wallace Kneeland Boulevard,
East of Shelton Springs Road, and West of Brockdale Road on the City of Shelton owned "watershed" property.
Assessor's Parcel Number 32007-30-60000.
The Phase 2 proiect site is located on the west side of North 13&Street,south of Shelton Springs Road,north of K Street,
and east of Olympic Middle School on City of Shelton owned"watershed"property,Oust north of existing Wellhouse 1
(located at the intersection of north 13&/NorthcHfVK Street). Assessor's Parcel Number 32018-25-60010.
B. EwiRoNMENTAL ELEMENTS
1. Earth
a. General description of the site(circle one): Flat,rolling,hilly,steep slopes,mountainous,
other...... Both sites are,generally,flat.
b. What is the steepest slope on the site(approximate percent slope)?5%.
c. What general types of soils are found on the site(for example,clay,sand,gravel,peat,
muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils,specify them and note any prime
farmland. The soils at each site are generally gravelly with good drainage and minimal organic toplayer.
d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so,
describe. None noted.
e. Describe the purpose,type,and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed
Indicate source of fill. No fill is proposed Elevated tank foundations will be dug below ground surface in the
range of 8 feet. All proposed water main piping will be conventional depths below grade and covered
3
approporiately with native cover. The access roadway to the tank site will be minimally graded to allow for
drainage.
£ Could erosion occur as a result of clearing,construction,or use? If so,generally describe. Doubtful. The
construction areas are generally flat with gravelly,well draining,soils. That said,best management practices
for control of erosion will he practiced throughout all phases of construction. Denuded areas will be
replanted with appropriate grasses following construction.
g.About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project
construction(for example,asphalt or buildings)? .15 acres(6,534 square feet). This amount includes the water
tower and access road for the tower. Other areas would be reseeded after construction and result in no
increase in impervious coverage.
Phase II improvements have not been designed though impervious surfaces will be the minimum amount
necessary for placement of the project and all stormwater is required to be handled pursuant to the
Department of Ecology Stormwater Mangement Manual for Western Washington.
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion,or other impacts to the earth,if any: Best management practices
will be utilized during all phases of construction(silt fences and straw waddles as necessary)and all denuded
areas will be revegetated following construction.
2. Air
a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal(i.e.,dust,automobile,
odors,industrial wood smoke)during construction and when the project is completed? If
any,generally describe and give approximate quantities if known.
Emissions would result from equipment utilized for construction as well as workers vehicles traveling to and from the
site. Periodic emissions would emanate from maintenance workers accessing the site to maintain the tanks and/or facility
over time.
b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so,
generally describe. None.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air,if any: None proposed.
3. Water
a. Surface:
1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site(including
year-round and seasonal streams,saltwater,lakes,ponds,wetlands)? If yes,describe type
and provide names. If appropriate,state what stream or river it flows into. A portion of Phase 1B work
includes work in an existing maintained access road which crosses upper Shelton Creek. Shelton Creek
is as seasonal creek in this location.
2)Will the project require any work over,in,or adjacent to(within 200 feet)the described
waters? If yes,please describe and attach available plans. Yes. See attached plans. Work would include
installation of a new 12"Watermain to be installed from existing well house 3,due west,to Shelton
Springs Road. The water main would be installed along and existing maintained access road for the
water system. Work would be performed during the"dry"season and no water is expected to be present
on the surface during construction.
3)Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed
from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected.
Indicate the source of fill material. None.
4
4)Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general
description,purpose,and approximate quantities if known. No.
5)Does the proposal he within a 100-year floodplain? If so,note location on the site plan.No.
6)Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so,
describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge.No.
b. Ground:
1) Will ground water be withdrawn,or will water be discharged to ground water? Give
general description,purpose,and approximate quantities if known.No.
2)Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or
other sources,if any(for example: Domestic sewage;industrial,containing the
following chemicals...;agricultural;etc.). Describe the general size of the system,the
number of such systems,the number of houses to be served(if applicable),or the number of animals or humans
the system(s)are expected to serve. None.
c. Water runoff(including stormwater):
1) Describe the source of runoff(including storm water)and method of collection
and disposal,if any(include quantities,if known). Where will this water flow?
Will this water flow into other waters? If so,describe. Nearly all work associated with the proposal would
occur on existing road rights of way or within existing maintained access driveways. The only exception
is the construction work directly associated installation of the water towers(Phase 1A). That work
includes installation of a gravel access road as well as impervious coverage associated with the footings
for each one of the tower legs. This water will be directed to an on-site detention/treatment facility.
Phase II also includes installation of a eravel access road in addition to the ground level water tank.
2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so,generally describe. No. Runoff from these
areas will be clean.
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface,ground,and runoff water impacts,if any: Compliance with the
2005 State of Washington Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington.
4. Plants
a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site:
deciduous tree: alder,maple,aspen,other
evergreen tree: fir,cedar,pine,other
shrubs
X grass
pasture
crop or grain
wet soil plants: cattail,buttercup,bullrush,skunk cabbage,other
water plants: water lily,eelgrass,milfoil,other
other types of vegetation
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Vegetation in the locations of proposed
improvements will be removed. The project will result in approximately 6,534 square feet of permanent
5
vegetation impact. Areas cleared during construction that are not covered with structures or access
ways will be reseeded.
Phase II proposed improvements have not been fully designed. The amount of impervious surfaces for
the facility are unknown at this time.
c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
None Known.
d. Proposed landscaping,use of native plants,or other measures to preserve or enhance
vegetation on the site,if any:
All areas cleared of vegetation or otherwise impacted through construction and not covered with permanent structures
will be reseeded with native grasses.
5. Animals
a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site:
birds: hawk,heron,eagle,songbirds,other:
mammals: deer,bear,elk,beaver,other: Mazama Pocket Gopher
fish: bass,salmon,trout,herring,shellfish,other:
b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
The site associated with Phase 1A is known Mazama Pocket Gopher Habitat. A Habitat Management Plan has been
developed(see attached). Further the entire project area is considered potential habitat for the Streaked Horned Lark
and the Taylor's Checkerspot Butterfly though no occurrences on the sites is known(see attached Management Plan).
The Phase lI proiect site has been surveyed(drive by)for presents of Mazama Pocket Gopher. None have been noted at
this time. Mitigation proposed for the facility include a Mazama Pocket Gopher survey be performed prior to the
initiation of construction activities for the review and approval of the Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife.
c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. The site is located within the Western Flyway used by
migratory birds(a majority of the west coast is).
d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife,if any: A Habitat Management Plan for the Mazama Pocket
Gopher has been developed. A mitigation ratio of 3:1 was utilized and the project proposes that.45
acres of the Phase 1A site would be enhanced through planting of native prairie grasses. The areas
would be mowed a minimum of twice per year to discourage the growth of woody vegetation.
Compliance with requirements of a survey for impacts to Mazama Pocket Gooher on the Phase H site.
6. Energy and natural resources
a. What kinds of energy(electric,natural gas,oil,wood stove,solar)will be used to meet
the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating,
manufacturing,etc. The completed project will use eletricity to power pumps and monitors associated with the
City's water system.
6
b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties?
If so,generally describe. The project(Phase n may impact the potential use of solar energy on the County
Property to the north of the site. The impact would be minimal.
c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal?
List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts,if any: None,specifically. However,all pumps
associated with the proposal are generally high efficiency type.
7. Environmental health
a. Are there any environmental health hazards,including exposure to toxic chemicals,risk
of fire and explosion,spill,or hazardous waste,that could occur as a result of this proposal?
If so,describe. No.
1)Describe special emergency services that might be required. Typically,water systems do not require much in
the way of emergency services. Water Department staff monitor the system and visit sites based on
need.
2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: Compliance with Washington
State Department of Health standards for drinking water production and conveyance.
b. Noise
1)What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project(for example:
traffic,equipment,operation,other)? The Ridge Motorsports park lies due east of the Phase IA site and
Sanderson Field Airport lies due south of the site. Both sites have noise associated with them(the
motorsports park with racing vehicles and the airport with aircraft)but the proposed use would be
unimpacted by it.
2)What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a
short-term or a long-term basis(for example: traffic,construction,operation,other)?Indi-
cate what hours noise would come from the site. Construction equipment would produce some noise during
construction and intermittent gurgling of water may be heard from time to time as the tank operates.
3)Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts,if any: Construction equipment would operate during
normal construction hours.
8. Land and shoreline use
a_ What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The site is owned by Mason County and is
utilized as a County Public Works facility and storage area
b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so,describe. No.
c. Describe any structures on the site. The site includes several structures,equipment,and vehicles associated with
the Mason County Public Works facility.
d. Will any structures be demolished? If so,what? No.
e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? The Phase IA site is zoned"Public"and is within the
Shelton Urban Growth Area.
The Phase II site is zoned"Public"and is within City limits.
7
f What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? The Comprehensive Plan Designation for the
Phase IA site is"Public"and is within the Shelton Urban Growth Area.
The Comprehensive Plan Designation for the Phase H site is"Public"and it is located within Shelton City Limits.
g. If applicable,what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site?NA.
h. Has any part of the site been classified as an"environmentally sensitive"area? If so,specify. The site is known
habitat for the Mazama Pocket Gopher(see attached report)and the site lies within a Critical Aquifer
Recharge Area.
i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project?None.
J. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace?None.
L Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts,if any:N/A
1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land
uses and plans,if any: Compliance with zoning requirements,Mason County Code,and any special conditions of the
Special Use Permit process which will be handled through Mason County Staff.
The Phase H site would be required to obtain a Conditional Use Permit through the City of Shelton hearines
examiner. Compliance with conditionine of the permit is mandatory.
9. Housing
a. Approximately how many units would be provided,if any? Indicate whether high,mid-
dle,or low-income housing.None.
b. Approximately how many units,if any,would be eliminated?Indicate whether high,
middle,or low-income housing.None.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts,if any: Not Applicable.
10. Aesthetics
a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s),not including antennas;what is
the principal exterior building material(s)proposed? The two Phase 1A water tanks would be 140'tall with
open scaffold style legs.
The Phase H water tank is anticipated to be ayyroxdmately 45 feet tall above evade at the site.
b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None we are aware of. The tanks would be
located in an area with large amounts of forest land on adjacent properties.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts,if any: None.
11. Light and glare
a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly
occur? There would be minimal lighting associated with the facility for security purposes(all lighting will be
downcast and shielded)and the top of the tank would be lit pursuant to FAA Advisory Circular 70/7460-1 K
8
Change 2,Obstruction Marking and Lighting,a med-dual system—Chapters 4,8(M-Dual),& 12(per FAA
letter dated 3/312014,attached).
b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No.
c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? The existing Mason County Public
Works facility is north of the project 1A site.
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts,if any: All lighting associated with the proposal
will be downcast and shielded(with the exception of required FAA beacon lighting).
12. Recreation
a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? The Ridge MotorSports
park lies to the east and Sanderson Field(a General Aviation Airport)lies to the south of the Phase I
site.
b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so,describe. No.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation,including recreation op-
portunities to be provided by the project or applicant,if any:None.
13. Historic and cultural preservation
a. Are there any places or objects listed on,or proposed for,national,state,or local preser-
vation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so,generally describe. No historic or cultural resources
were located within the project limits(see attached cultural resources assessment). The assessment concludes
that"Pedestrian survey and subsurface testing did not identify any evidence of archaeological sites within the
(construction areas). Environmental conditions and land use history suggested a low potential for
archaeological sites in the majority of the project areas."
b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic,archaeological,scientific,or
cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None known.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: The report recommends an inadvertent discovery
protocol be implemented during construction.
14. Transportation
a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site,and describe proposed access to the
existing street system. Show on site plans,if any. Phase 1A construction area is accessed via Highway 101
to West Dayton Airport Road to West Public Works Drive near Shelton.
Phase 1B is accessed via Wallace Kneelend Boulevard and Shelton Springs Road in Shelton.
The Phase H site is accessed via North 13&Street and Shelton Surines Road.
b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not,what is the approximate distance to the
nearest transit stop?Unknown. Dial a ride service would be available though.
c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the
project eliminate? The project would not need parking spaces per se. Service vehicles would park in the
access driveway for the sites.
9
d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets,or improvements to existing roads or
streets,not including driveways? If so,generally describe(indicate whether public or
private). A private gravel access drive,maintained by the City of Shelton,would be constructed from Public
Works Drive to the tank site in the Phase IA work area.
e. Will the project use(or occur in the immediate vicinity of)water,rail,or air transporta-
tion? If so,generally describe. The site is located directly north of Sanderson Field Airport.
f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project?If known,indicate when peak
volumes would occur. Vehicle trips would be intermittent and generally 1 to 2 a day at most to each site.
g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts,if any:None proposed.
15. Public services
a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services(for example:fire pro-
tection,police protection,health care,schools,other)? If so,generally describe. No.
b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services,if any.None proposed.
16. Utilities
a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity,natural gas,water,refuse serv-
ice,telephone,sanitary sewer,septic system,other. All utilities are available at the sites.
b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project,the utility providing the service,
and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might
be needed. The project will include running of new water mains within eristing rights of way.
C. SIGNATURE
The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead
agency is relying on them to make its decision.
Signature: ...............................................................................................................................................................................
DateSubmitted: ......................................................................................................................................................................
10
"
1
PHASE I A � !/
PROJECTCT
�: r
-LOCATION102
102
ISLAND LAKE �, }
1 /!
I ' ;
PHASE I B
PROJECT
...... - LOCAT ION
r GOOSE
LAKE
�<< FIGURE 1
UPPER MOUNTAIN VIEW PRESSURE ZONE
IMPROVEMENTS PHASE 1
CITY OF SHELTON
VICINITY MAP
1000 500 0 1000 2000 I11nrCd�Smllh&ASSOCIateS,Ifif. DRAFT
Engineers/Plaaners
His k-A-J a %u 101 reo¢M m_iuo MARCH 2O14
I Inch — 1000 Feet t � m osie ru m-a iM
a i w i ADDITIVE BID ALTERNATE
�wt fHS z PIP �rYA{ 3r E 400,000-GALLON ELEVATED
u 4r�
�l WATER STORAGE TANK
PROPOSED SERVICE
�`•? •�- v . �>t � " PROPOSED 16-INCH CONNECTION TO
' .' MASON COUNTY
�D I AMETEK WATER f
i1 404 MAIN
,20' ACCESS: AND
LIT I L I TY EASMENT
PROPOSED
DETENTIDN P0Wl'
pi
MASON COI.NTY PARCEL NO. 42002-I0-00020
` �"s
{�r rAf�� �arm`��" � z ���� I •r �.
myy;��"'�.��� `` -' ,• �j�'' '"tee
-
t
PROPOSED TIE-IN 70
EXISTING 12-INCH EXISTING SYSTEM
1 DIAMETER WIATER MA111
- - - - _- W DAYTON AIRPORT ROAD
FIGURE 2
UPPER MOUNTAIN VIEW
PRESSURE ZONE
IMPROVEMENTS PHASE I
PHASE IA PROJECT OVERVIEW
100 50 0 too 200WM�jSNilfl&AssoaafCS,Ii1C. DRAFT
Engineels/P(ann�s
SCALE IN FEET ug&w"i&V6 wmimM-W-0 MARCH2O14
_-- -- _ -per,,#.iiifs IEYt rli 2St•Ci-I®
\ � 1r ��� :\ \ •1 • •' A� I���.��I�l ��}y�''r�f� �'�f-y�Y 1� r�}', 't I �t'•
•h "'' • � rf`:r•S ,r, t,?.al#'►Y'� f ;n:''; Y�,; ,+ �jl��y 14t r�_.,:
',�+.tt 'a. , .1(��sftrs�I�•" .•}�S•`�„�- ..,�� i:�.�`11Z,;. ;i, < i iti'
"r s .
�` 'j3 ',t},t ��?". � it �'• \l�+ �`y.f+► !�.'
Y�. ~ 6;. '��� �, -al� -`F �:.�ilyp .i LJ•a•/1�?�•L�?�•}.al •/r S`a t ••••Y
Aq
", �. •.� �� •F �F E 11
4 kl .sc�
� 2
.01
Sk�i�• i" —
« 1
i
°f s"eL0 CITY OF SHELTON
� z
y"SNIN��0� UPPER MOUNTAIN VIEW PRESSURE ZONE
"BuildingA Stronger Conmwnity PHASE 1 A
TOGETHER'
MARCH 2O14 90% SUBMITTAL
INDEX OF DRAW I NGS j``�� �� x, ` Lj
\ I+T
�1 .2ovt-o-000,o T I GENERI�O-I TIRE,VICINITY MAP,INDEX OF DRAWINGS
2 D-2 GEIN Al NOTES o PROJECT L
% 3 G-3 GENERAL NOTES-2
4 0-4 SYMODLS AND LEGEND
B FB ABBRF.VIATIDNS �}J PROJECT � SITE 11
crva " T� LOCATI%k
8 C-I RESERVOIR SITE PLAN Jv
.R 7 C-2 RESERVOIR DETAIL
AND ROOF PLAN _ ( `'
d 6 rr3 RESEflV01R DETAILS-t -
i 9 C-4 RESERVOIR BETA IL4-2 __
9 10 C-S TRANSMISSION MAIN PLAN AM PROFILE STA I.OD TO STA 14+00 rj' "o 41 \ - 1
it C-8 Tn.
1691ON MAIN PLAN AND PROFILE STA 14+00 TO STA 18+00 \ -- -_
12 C-7 TRAN9M 1S91Or YAIN PLAN AND PROFILE STA 18+00 TO STA 22+00 "-- '
I ^ 1
13 C-B TRANSMISSION MAIN PLAN AND PROFILE STA 22+00 TO STA 28+00 -
'� 14 C-0 TRANSMISSION MAIN PLAN AND PROF STA ZB+00 TO STA 28+60
A 18 O-t0 MA90N COUNTY WATER SERVICE PLAN AND PROFILE
18 C-11 CITY OF SHELTON DETAILS-I
0 17 C-13 CITY OF SHELTON DETAILS-2 •�_ ++t�Al� "��T(\
18 C-13 CITY a SHELTON DETAILS-3 / y
19 C-14 CITY OF SHELTON DETAILS-{H _9:1 �20 C-18 SITE DETAILS-1 N D T ARP-T ---
21 C-16 SITE DETAILS-2 _
22 C-17 EROSION CONTROL RAN \ - `, •`. ^ of /2092-1b00910
�I 23 0-I3 EROSION CONTROL DETAILS
g r _`chi—'J �I --APPROXIMATE II
�� 4mm-1+-o0o,u 3I ELECTRICAL E-1 ELECTRICAL LEGEND SHEET I OF 2 T I l=-j.. �, LIMITS
2'4J E-2 ELECTRICAL LEGEND SHEET,LUM 2 OF 2 r @
28 E-3 RESERVOIR ONE-LINE,LW INAIRE AND PANEL SCHEDULE I`f� r-/� I _ - S� _ OF WORK 1
27 E-{ RESERVOIR ELECTRICAL SIT E PLAN ll
■ 28 E-6 RESERVOIR ELEVATION AND PLAN VIEW-ELECTRICAL I --__��-; W DAYTON AIRPORT ROAp 1
29 E-B ELECTRICAL DETAILS SiEET 1 OF 2 - -______- --
30 E-7 ELECTRICAL DETAILS""2 OF 2 •. I '-
JI E-8 CONDUIT AND WIRING SCHEDULES I /
I NSTRU/ENTAT I ON
32 P-I CONTROL SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS SHEET I OF 4 -
33 P-2 CONTROL SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS SHEET 2 OF 4
34 P-3 CONTROL SYMBOLS AND ADBREVATIONS SHEE7 3 OF 4
/ JB P-4 CONTROL SYMDOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS SHEET 4 OF 4
TR 38 P-B CONOL SCHEMATIC SYMBOLS
g 37 P-8 WELL NO.3 PflOCESS AND INSTRUMENTATION DIAGRAM(INFORMATION ONLY-BY OTHE F7
/ 38 P-7 PROCESS AND INSTRUMENTATION DIAGRAM
,s 39 P-B SCADA BLOCK DIAGRAMS LOCATION MAP AQ
d 40 P-0 MOTOR CONTROL-%AN,ELEVATION,SECTION AND DETAILS SCALE 1•-1800' SCALE: I'�300'
STRUCTURAL
S 41 5-1 GENERA STRUCTURAL NOTES
3� 42 S-2 SPECIAL INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS
43 S-3 RESERVOIR FOUNDATION-STRUCTURAL PLAN AND ELEVATION
44 S-4 RESERVOIR FOUNDATION-SECTION AND DETAILS
y Aartay,&IM k Assaciales,Inc.
L
Bmina,lfashnncrs Know Call bebelow,
-•+- g Tacoma,leshinglan Call hniore you Llly,
u-I50.5.201
L —
i
SHEET NOTES
I. ALL DUCTILE IRON WATER PIPING SHALL BE RESTRAINED WITH
MINIMUM 42 NCHES OF COVER.DEFLECTION LIMITED TO
ONE-HALF MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATION
42002-10-00010 2. SWAB AND CHLORINATE ALL NEWLY-INSTALLED WATER PIPING
120 W PUBLIC WORKS DRIVE CONNECT IRIS AND OBSERVE FOR LEAKS.SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR
DETAILS ON WATERLINE TESTING.
GRAVEL SURFACE
INOTE TO REVIEWER THAT 3. OBTAIN GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER'S APPROVAL OF FINAL TANK
IS WILL LIKELY BE UBGRVOER I TO
OION PLACEMENT
ATERIALS.LEVELING COURSE AND
NW SITE 2DBB 4t.FJRB 1506.77 REMOVED FOR POCKET GOPHER
EASEMENT B FURNISH AND INSTALL: FURNISH a INSTALL: HABITAT 4, RESERVOIR PIPE A10 FITTINGS SOUTH Di VALVE TO BE INSTALLED
CORNER I 1-15'FLEX-TEND ASSY,MJxFLG SEE NOTE B 111•TRANSMISSION MAIN AS PART d:APPROVED BID ALTERNATE
PER BHT C-0 2
JN IRSTALI.SC��I1DA SEE NOTE B NE SITE S. LIMITS OF WORK SHALL BE RESTRICTED TO EASEMENTS.
' SHED PER D 4:. EASEMENT B. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL PRESTRESSED STEEL SUPPORTS AND
•J3Q024' "� __,� _ SHT 0-10 SEE��7 CORNER THREE-STRAND BARBED WIRE CLIMB BARRIER PER SHEET C-I5 ON
42002-24-00050 ,' �T"'' j•` O'TP EXISTING FENCE PROTECT EXISTING FENCE
450 W DAY70H t ,jY^� ��4.S�p'•'tih�'.;r��f •'7T""' -'' '�" 7. ELECTRICAL CONDUIT NOT SHOWN.SEE SIEET E-4 FOR MORE
AIRPORT RO 1 •. :'+i• Fri .'.i:y;;:::'., "�.,, ••a, -.-n—
�•;' �,,. �• i•;,7•:...1v..:. ^`tr.r. rw.,..1�'`',•1.?1Tf00''i - INFORMATION.
r:•A•,t( .A.kx^9 :.y .a: ,,a'f.::.a:y. .r',: �';•rr,l :;i' Yt
_i T• a,:.., ,,HIS.' .A,.' Y¢... rt�;J4 µ ^{ •.. 1R'.Frll.tiy �.
& INSTALL 3 4 SINGLE SERVICE INSTALLATION PER DETAIL W-01,
////��,,,{� •.tv. .,Y....A,. i� '•.y�':�5+• ,S,L., �:.`r4Y.Te�W'}`'q?'-4.'.a SHT C-14 AND HOSE BIB PER DETAIL a SIT C-IB
- 6!`:'?�.•�:' F�',y1Qiw F1;;i•'.TF�:!' 111:.f 7f::'�., '• ♦:fii:Y•:�'i:ni!!
_ S•�A'!• :•'�i.d}„•,(t;`^,� ;:ti:••;'-.'�.ikt %`0 "'-a ` r='f':'i"" INSTALL CHAIN LINK PATE q• FURNISH AND INSTALL IB'BUTTERFLY VALVE PER DETAIL I,SHEET
r..,t. ity.: ." PER GET 2,BHT C-15 C-4
L•. "';�`�;tii•, LZQJar 1.+.•,.;.,. �,-t
'X CENTER OF TANK >!::•in4:':.'S'
SEE NOTE 0 "r' +Hn ,#. t LIMITS OF ADDITIVE ALTERNATE
r.!:"' '•� j• •,,,'�• y.�.,,I4 FOI SECOND RESERVOIR.SEE NOTE GRADING QUANTITIES:
P OSED 4 GQ0 GALLON ;15 t.''Rie I 4 THE FOLLOWING 1RA01NO QUANTITIES ARE PROVIDED FOR THE
TI-COLUMN ELEVATED STEEL ' .; ,7I EXCLUSIVE USE OF THE REGULATORY AUTHORITIES HAVING
sw-" RESERVOIR "ISOCTION OVER THIS PROJECT FOR THE PURPOSES OF PERMITTING
WET WELL DIM 6o FEET aSFE NOTE S ONLY.CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL QUANTITIES PRIOR TO PLACING
M OVERFLOW ELEV� O FEET ..•., r` FURNISH AND INSTALL(ALTERNATE): A BIG FOR THE WORK.NO ADD ITIONAL PAYMENT WILL BE MADE TO
•":�' I-IB'FLEX-TEND ASSY,MJ.FLG THE CONTRACTOR FOR DISCREPANCIES ASSOCIATED WITH USE(IF THE
14A;.+, /,;F.. Via. ,•.- FOLLOW
Om"QUANTITIES
•:F f.. ,N-•'4r.p` t• I FILL:3IB30 CU CU.Y0.Y0.
L v< OVERFLOW DITCH PER
?.••`: +Y iy..i�r •
DET 5,SHT C-IS ':•4'.•i`:•;:. ;ti ;:
� ______________ CENTER CO ALTERNATE TANK
D B _ }�T T GRAD INO COORDINATE TABLE
1 ��,••". 5 I` BHT
TALL FENCE PER GET I.
\I 7 F"—•—• � -1 W/ a71110:4&47
E..thg
B 1 712100.34 fa,4=21
54.)1
A\___�___ �'�_ ______� ` 2 51.ee
``
C ���,.____ ..a _ /
2'TYP
u �y � _ _ _ �i 2 2x.1e4
F 4 PROPOSED INFILTRATION BASIN I
SW SITE FOR STORMWATER AND RESERVOIR � J
j' EASEMENT OVERFLOW Tm SE SITE
CORNER d' EASEMENT
CORNER
#� 7 A 42ASON C-00020
MnsoN COUNTY 1� GRADING COORDINATE TABLE
SOALE: I�20' PaYI!/ NlrUkry EmElnq
5 n11m.n7 111en.Je
t 71114lae 1t14M./t
_<
7 nllraol Itl4eam
! t 71 IN!S7 NIN382
gi
R7
gE
d
n
g 90% — SUBMITTAL
n
j MarmS NJM PRBLIMINARTYONLY MR
MurraKSmllh&Assoclales Inc, ro� CI7Y OF SHELTON q 1 V z RESERVOIRJON �" UPPER MOUNTAIN VIEWDRAWN BngmeerAnnus } PRE88URE ZONESrrE PLAN c—l
kM IXWmAfN'lIC HN II.W.q 1m.IuM 1aB pppEE W-M-USN yyh ���«.•.L PHASE 1A
Nor,o srNE 7xm1 TaMrylol Wlre IR SI-tR-IFLI 2— B o1 44
� �� .fi PIpFZ,ND.:IJ-Ie01x01 NNE, AS SND%M MiL WlR(!1
I
r
ROOF EXHAUST
FAN MANHOLE 50'WET WELL DIAMETER TANK VENT EXTERIOR ROOF ACCESS TANK LADDER
w ROOF LADDER ACCESS
B PAINTERS LlpS EOL ELECTRICAL BRACKET FOR WET WELL ROOF ACCESS MANHOLE BALCONY MANHOLE
01 ST AROUND WET WELL OBSTRUCTION LIGHT
INTERIOR PERIMETER. WET WELL ROOF ACCESS MANHOLE BALCONY w ANDRAIL TOWER LADDER
MOUNT I'ABOVE HWL. M
SEE DET 3,SHT C-J ROOF LADDER w/OSHA
7 COMPLIANT SAFETY CLIMB
DEVICE ELECTRICAL BRACKET FOR
HN1.ELEVATION.440' -._-- OBSTRUCTION L10HT A/0
1 POWER RECEPTICLE 1
OVERFLOW WEIR BOX ; INSIDE TANK LADDER V
W/ANTI-VORTEX
ENTRANCE 1 BALCONY W/HANDRAIL
B'DIA OVERFLOW SEE NUIES 1 PAINTERS RAILS.SEE GET 4,
9 TO fINISHEO GRADE \�.1� ENT C-3,AND
= 1 SPECIFICATIONS
4 PAINTERS.LIDS EOL DIST MOUND
WL ELEVATION- 0' .1 1 EXTERIOR OF ACCESS TUBE.SEE GET 3,SHT
.I F C-3.MIXNT AT APPROX LOCATION SHOWN
I 1
1 —PERIMETER STEEL SUPPORT
CWIMN.TYP
F i SEE NOTE B
ROOF ACCESS LADDER W LL/FA
SEE NOTE 3 / PREVENTION DEVICE,TYP.SEE
ZDE7
I.SHT C-3
L4
Py HORIZONTAL ROD BRACING,TYP
Un p EXHAUST FM MANHOLE TAW VENT
OVERFLOW
NQIF.f'
d ROO LAN I.
BOTH IB'DIAMETER INIrkUITLET AND 8'DIAMETER
F i SCALE: T OVERFLOW PIPING SHALL BE Ft LY SUPPORTED FROM
q g i CET41ER STEEL STEEL COMPRESSION STRUT,TYP OVER
AS PER TANK MANUFACTURER'S STANDARD
n SUPPORT COLUMN DESION.
DIAGONAL TENSION ROD 2. ELECTRICAL NO CONTROL CONDUITS NOT SHOWN FOR
BRACING,TYP CLARITY.SEE ELECTRICAL SHEETS FOR DETAILS
A 3. INTERIOR PAINTERS LUDS SHALL BE INSTALLED WITHIN
CENTER COLUMN RISER.
` 4. ALL ACCESS HOLES AND BOLT HOLES TO BE DRILLED PRIG
TO TANK COATING ALL ROUGH EDGES TO BE GROUND
IYc'CONDENSATE DRAIN SMOOTH.
j W/ELBOW AND MESH SST S. TIDE-X�TYP�V�D EWBi1EL INSTALLED ON INLET
SCREENED OUTLET, /CURET
S MOUNTED 70 INTERIOR 8. TIOEF EX TYPE VALVE TO BE INSTALLED CI INLET/WILET
�46.1 WALL PIPING,OR APPROVED EQUAL.
RISER LADDER
7. TANK BOTTOM ACCESS HATCH
INTERIOR DISTRIBUTION
R CONDUITS NOT SHOWN FOR
CLARITY.SEE SHEETS E-S
rJr FOR MORE INFORMATION
66 Fi Zq FIRST RUNG
Jg' ELEVATION-310, i b Z
3
IU % FOIMDATION DETAIL
\r� ACCESS MANHOLE SEE SHT S-4,TYP
SHEETS C-2 AND C-3 SHOW MINIMUM TANK DIMENSIONS,LAYOUT AND DETAILS FOR
18'INLET/OUTLET PIPE APPURTENANCES.SHEETS S-I TO S-4 SHOW MINIMUM REOUIRWENI'S FOR CONCRETE -
SEE DIET I,ENT C-4 FOUNDATION.FINAL TANK STRUCTURAL REQUIREMENTS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH
THE FINAL CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS PROVIDED BY THE TANK DESIGN/CONl—TION
B�SERV01 R TANK ELEVATION CONTRACTOR AND AS APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER.SEE 1ECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
S °N S FOR ADDITIONAL STRUCTURAL FLEW IREMENTS FOR TART. 90% — S U B M I TTAL
p„II p -
i NJM PAELIMINAHTY ONLY Murray Snlllb&ASSOGaIfS[nc, ao sriXN� Ste,
D k I DE9c m nmmwnawRrrtonax ME
I I o CITY OF SHELTON DN UPPER MOUNTAIN VIEWRESERVOIR ELEVATION
Engineers/Plannus �4. PRESSURE ZONE' AND ROOF PLAN C—Z
CHU1INsPHASE7A
a...w,u,...�.wr to scvE THmA TuligkA IIIM N IAiII-IIO +=` 7 of 44 i1 N0. DATE BY REVISION P116RZT ND:IS-IlD6101 ern AS 90WN d1L• YAXM 1014
f
NOTICE OF OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (DNS)
PROCESS COMMENT PERIOD
Application Name: City of Shelton Upper Mountain
View Pressure Zone
Application File No.: SEPA Number 03-14
Primary Contact(Applicant): City of Shelton Department of Engineering
Michael Michael
City Engineer
525 West Cota Street
Shelton,WA 98584
Application/SEPA Checklist Submitted: May 12,2014
Project Location: The Phase IA project site is located immediately south of the existing
Mason County Public Works Facility located at 100 Public Works Drive just north of Shelton
City Limits. The site is located north of Sanderson Field Airport, west of Highway 101,North
of Dayton Airport Road. Assessor's Parcel Number 42002-10-00020. See attached site
location map and site plan.
The Phase 113 project site is located immediately north of the intersection of Shelton Springs
Road and Wallace Kneeland Boulevard in and around the existing City wellhouse complex.
The site is located North of Wallace Kneeland Boulevard, East of Shelton Springs Road, and
West of Brockdale Road on the City of Shelton owned "watershed" property. Assessor's
Parcel Number 32007-30-60000.
Project Description: The proposed project is identified in the City of Shelton 2010 Water
System Plan and would aid in offsetting current pressure and storage deficiencies within the
existing system and also provide needed fire flow and water pressure to the Washington State
Patrol Academy. The project would occur in two phases as follows:
Phase IA work includes construction of one or two elevated water storage tanks,approximately
2,000 linear feet of 16-inch diameter water main, and a connection to the Mason County
Property to the north. The City intends to construct at least one elevated tank as part of this
project. An additive alternative bid item will be included to construct the second tank if
funding and budget allows. The plan is to construct at least one of the tanks and have it
available (operational) by July 2015 to accommodate the Washington State Patrol Academy (a
water line was run from the City to Washington State Patrol in 2012 but does not have enough
pressure adequately to serve the site. The proposed water tanks will provide needed pressure).
To connect the tanks to the existing water distribution system approximately 2,000 linear feet
of new 16-inch diameter water main would be installed from West Dayton Airport Road North
along West Public Works Drive to the tank site. The elevated tanks are proposed to be multi-
column elevated steel reservoir tanks with a capacity of 400,000 gallons each (total of 800,000
gallons). The tanks would each stand approximately 140' tall above existing grade at the site.
Phase 113 improvements include the retrofit of the City's existing Well Number 3 with a new
pump, reconfiguration of well yard piping, construction of a new pressure-reducing valve
station (PRV), and construction of approximately 3,500 linear feet of new 12-inch diameter
water main from the well site to a connection to the existing water system located near the
intersection of Shelton Springs Road and Tarragon Avenue. Well number 3 currently pumps to
the existing Mountain View Pressure Zone. As part of this project, it will be connected directly
to the Upper Mountain View Pressure Zone. The well pump at Well 3 must be replaced to
accommodate new head conditions.
No change in pumping capacity is proposed and no new sources of water are being developed
or added as part of this project.
Required Permits: Required permits include a Special Use Permit through Mason County
for construction of the proposed water towers.
Environmental Review: The City has reviewed the proposed project for probable adverse
environmental impacts and expects to issue a Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance
(MDNS) for this project. The optional MDNS process contained in WAC 197-11-355 is
being used. This may be your only opportunity to comment on the environmental
impacts of the proposed project. Agencies, tribes, and the public are encouraged to review
and comment on the proposed project and its probable environmental impacts.
The City of Shelton has determined that potential impacts that may result from the project are
addressed by the design of the project as well as with the addition of the following mitigation
measures:
1. The construction of the water tanks shall be in accordance with the terms and
conditions of the Federal Aviation Administration Aeronautical Study Number 2014-
ANM-297-OE and include Notice of Actual Construction be filed with the FAA.
2. In the event that ground disturbing or other activities result in inadvertent discovery
of archaeological deposits, work shall be halted in the immediate area and the
g Po ,
contractor will contact the City of Shelton and the State Department of Archaeology
and Historic Preservation for consultation as to how to proceed.
3. All exterior lighting, with the exception of lighting required by the FAA, shall be
fully cutoff style and downcast"dark skies"compatible lighting.
4. The proposal is subject to all conditions applied through any ensuing Mason County
permitting activities.
5. The project will include all recommendations found in the Habitat Management Plan
developed for the project associated with the Mazama Pocket Gopher populations
present on the site.
Environmental Documents Available for Review at the City of Shelton Civic Center at the
address below: SEPA Checklist and project site/construction plan.
Comment Period: Until 5:00 p.m. May 29,2014.
Please mail, hand-deliver, or e-mail specific comments to:
City of Shelton Department of Community and Economic Development
Attention: Jason Dose
525 West Cota Street
Shelton, WA 98584.
Phone: (360)432-5102
E-mail:jasond(c�ci.shelton.wa.us
WAC 197-11-960 Environmental checklist.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
Purpose of check-list.-
The State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA),chapter 43.21C RCW,requires all governmental agencies to consider the
environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement(EIS)must be prepared for all
proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide
information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal(and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal,if
it can be done)and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required
Instructions for applicants:
This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies
use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an
EIS. Answer the questions briefly,with the most precise information known,or give the best description you can.
You must answer each question accurately and carefully,to the best of your knowledge. In most cases,you should be
able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not
know the answer,or if a question does not apply to your proposal,write"do not know"or"does not apply." Complete answers to
the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later.
Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer
these questions if you can. If you have problems,the governmental agencies can assist you.
The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on
different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects.
The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably
related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact
Use P
ect non checklist for f nonproject roJ' proposals:
Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN
ADDITION,complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS(part D).
For nonproject actions,the references in the checklist to the words"project," "applicant," and"property or site" should
be read as"proposal,""proposer,"and"affected geographic area,"respectively.
A. BACKGROUND
1. Name of proposed project,if applicable:
City of Shelton Upper Mountain View Pressure Zone
2. Name of applicant: City of Shelton Department of Public Works,Attention:Jerry Hauth
3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person:
City of Shelton Department of Public Works,Attention:Jerry Hauth
525 West Cota Street
Shelton,WA 98584
Phone:360-432-5120
4. Date checklist prepared: May 2,2014
5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Shelton
6. Proposed timing or schedule(including phasing,if applicable):
Construction would occur during the summer/fall of 2014 with project completion expected in 2015.
7. Do you have any plans for future additions,expansion,or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes,
explain. None.
8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this
proposal.
• Federal Aviation Administration Determination of No Hazard to Air Navigation(attached)
• Cultural Resources Assessment,Prepared by Cultural Resource Consultants,Inc.April 2014(attached).
• Habitat Management Plan for Mazama Pocket Gopher, Streaked Horned Lark, and Taylor's Checkerspot
Butterfly,Prepared by Environmental Science Associates,April 2014(attached).
• Geotechnieal Report,prepared by Robinson Noble,March 3,2014(attached).
9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property
covered by your proposal? If yes,explain.
• Special Use Permit from Mason County for construction of the water tanks.
10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal,if known.
• Special Use Permit from Mason County for construction of the water tanks.
• Appropriate easements from Mason County for access and maintenance of the facility.
• Right of Way Permit from Mason County to perform work within their right-of-way(Public Works Drive).
11. Give brief,complete description of your proposal,including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are
several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those
answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.)
The proposed project is identified in the City of Shelton 2010 Water System Plan and would aid in offsetting current
pressure and storage deficiencies within the existing system and also provide needed fire flow and water pressure to the
Washington State Patrol Academy. The project would occur in two phases as follows:
Phase IA, (See Figure 1 and 2). Phase 1A work includes construction of one or two elevated water storage tanks,
approximately 2,000 linear feet of 16-inch diameter water main,and a connection to the Mason County Property to the
north. The City intends to construct at least one elevated tank as part of this project. An additive alternative bid item
will be included to construct the second tank if funding and budget allows. The plan is to construct at least one of the
tanks and have it available(operational) by July 2015 to accommodate the Washington State Patrol Academy(a water
line was run from the City to Washington State Patrol in 2012 but does not have enough pressure adequately to serve the
site. The proposed water tanks will provide needed pressure). To connect the tanks to the existing water distribution
system approximately 2,000 linear feet of new 16-inch diameter water main would be installed from West Dayton Airport
Road North along West Public Works Drive to the tank site. The elevated tanks are proposed to be multi-column
elevated steel reservoir tanks with a capacity of 400,000 gallons each (total of 800,000 gallons). The tanks would each
stand approximately 140'tall above existing grade at the site.
Phase 1B(See Figures 1 and 3). Phase 1B improvements include the retrofit of the City's existing Well Number 3 with a
new pump, reconfiguration of well yard piping, construction of a new pressure-reducing valve station (PRV), and
construction of approximately 3,500 linear feet of new 12-inch diameter water main from the well site to a connection to
the existing water system located near the intersection of Shelton Springs Road and Tarragon Avenue. Well number 3
currently pumps to the existing Mountain View Pressure Zone. As part of this project,it will be connected directly to the
Upper Mountain View Pressure Zone. The well pump at Well 3 must be replaced to accommodate new head conditions.
2
No change in pumping capacity is proposed and no new sources of water are being developed or added as part of this
project.
12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed
project,including a street address,if any,and section,township,and range,if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of
area,provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description,site plan,vicinity map,and topographic map,if
reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or
detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist.
The Phase 1A project site is located immediately south of the existing Mason County Public Works Facility located at 100
Public Works Drive just north of Shelton City Limits. The site is located north of Sanderson Field Airport, west of
Highway 101,North of Dayton Airport Road. Assessor's Parcel Number 42002-10-00020.See attached site location map
and site plan.
The Phase 1B project site is located immediately north of the intersection of Shelton Springs Road and Wallace Kneeland
Boulevard in and around the existing City welIbouse complex. The site is located North of Wallace Kneeland Boulevard,
East of Shelton Springs Road, and West of Brockdale Road on the City of Shelton owned "watershed" property.
Assessor's Parcel Number 32007-30-60000.
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS
1. Earth
a. General description of the site(circle one): Flat,rolling,hilly,steep slopes,mountainous,
other... ... Both sites are,generally,flat.
b. What is the steepest slope on the site(approximate percent slope)?5%.
c. What general types of soils are found on the site(for example,clay,sand,gravel,peat,
muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils,specify them and note any prime
farmland. The soils at each site are generally gravelly with good drainage and minimal organic toplayer.
d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so,
describe. None noted.
e. Describe the purpose,type,and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed.
Indicate source of fill. No fill is proposed. Elevated tank foundations will be dug below ground surface in the
range of 8 feet. All proposed water main piping will be conventional depths below grade and covered
approporiately with native cover. The access roadway to the tank site will be minimally graded to allow for
drainage.
f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing,construction,or use? If so,generally describe. Doubtful. The
construction areas are generally flat with gravelly,well draining,soils. That said,best management practices
for control of erosion will be practiced throughout all phases of construction. Denuded areas will be
replanted with appropriate grasses following construction.
g.About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project
construction(for example,asphalt or buildings)? .15 acres(6,534 square feet). This amount includes the water
tower and access road for the tower. Other areas would be reseeded after construction and result in no
increase in impervious coverage.
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion,or other impacts to the earth,if any: Best management practices
will be utilized during all phases of construction(silt fences and straw waddles as necessary)and all denuded
areas will be revegetated following construction.
3
2. Air
a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal(i.e.,dust,automobile,
odors,industrial wood smoke)during construction and when the project is completed? If
any,generally describe and give approximate quantities if known.
Emissions would result from equipment utilized for construction as well as workers vehicles traveling to and from the
site. Periodic emissions would emanate from maintenance workers accessing the site to maintain the tanks and/or facility
over time.
b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so,
generally describe. None.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air,if any: None proposed.
3. Water
a. Surface:
1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site(including
year-round and seasonal streams,saltwater,lakes,ponds,wetlands)? If yes,describe type
and provide names. If appropriate,state what stream or river it flows into. A portion of Phase 1B work
includes work in an existing maintained access road which crosses upper Shelton Creek. Shelton Creek
is as seasonal creek in this location.
2)Will the project require any work over,in,or adjacent to(within 200 feet)the described
waters? If yes,please describe and attach available plans. Yes. See attached plans. Work would include
installation of a new 12"Watermain to be installed from existing well house 3,due west,to Shelton
Springs Road. The water main would be installed along and existing maintained access road for the
water system. Work would be performed during the"dry"season and no water is expected to be present
on the surface during construction.
3)Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed
from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected_
Indicate the source of fill material. None.
4)Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general
description,purpose,and approximate quantifies if known. No.
5)Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so,note location on the site plan.No.
6)Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so,
describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge.No.
b. Ground:
1) Will ground water be withdrawn,or will water be discharged to ground water? Give
general description,purpose,and approximate quantities if known.No.
2)Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or
other sources,if any(for example: Domestic sewage;industrial,containing the
following chemicals.. . ;agricultural;etc.). Describe the general size of the system,the
4
number of such systems,the number of houses to be served(if applicable),or the number of animals or humans
the system(s)are expected to serve. None.
c. Water runoff(including stormwater):
1) Describe the source of runoff(including storm water)and method of collection
and disposal,if any(include quantities,if known). Where will this water flow?
Will this water flow into other waters? If so,describe. Nearly all work associated with the proposal would
occur on existing road rights of way or within existing maintained access driveways. The only exception
is the construction work directly associated installation of the water towers(Phase IA). That work
includes installation of a gravel access road as well as impervious coverage associated with the footings
for each one of the tower legs. This water will be directed to an on-site detention/treatment facility.
2)Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so,generally describe. No. Runoff from these areas
will be clean.
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface,ground,and runoff water impacts,if any: Compliance with the
2005 State of Washington Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington.
4. Plants
a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site:
deciduous tree: alder,maple,aspen,other
evergreen tree: fir,cedar,pine,other
shrubs
X grass
pasture
crop or grain
wet soil plants: cattail,buttercup,bullrush,skunk cabbage,other
water plants: water lily,eelgrass,milfoil,other
other types of vegetation
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Vegetation in the locations of proposed
improvements will be removed. The project will result in approximately 6,534 square feet of permanent
vegetation impact. Areas cleared during construction that are not covered with structures or access
ways will be reseeded.
c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
None Known.
d. Proposed landscaping,use of native plants,or other measures to preserve or enhance
vegetation on the site,if any:
All areas cleared of vegetation or otherwise impacted through construction and not covered with permanent structures
will be reseeded with native grasses.
5. Animals
a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site:
birds: hawk,heron,eagle,songbirds,other:
mammals: deer,bear,elk,beaver,other: Mazama Pocket Gopher
fish: bass,salmon,trout,herring,shellfish,other:
5
b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
The site associated with Phase 1A is known Mazama Pocket Gopher Habitat. A Habitat Management Plan has been
developed(see attached). Further the entire project area is considered potential habitat for the Streaked Horned Lark
and the Taylor's Checkerspot Butterfly though no occurrences on the sites is known(see attached Management Plan).
c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. The site is located within the Western Flyway used by
migratory birds(a majority of the west coast is).
d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife,if any: A Habitat Management Plan for the Mazama Pocket
Gopher has been developed. A mitigation ratio of 3:1 was utilized and the project proposes that .45
acres of the Phase 1A site would be enhanced through planting of native prairie grasses. The areas
would be mowed a minimum of twice per year to discourage the growth of woody vegetation.
6. Energy and natural resources
a. What kinds of energy(electric,natural gas,oil,wood stove,solar)will be used to meet
the completed projeces energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating,
manufacturing,etc. The completed project fvill use eletricity to power pumps and monitors associated with the
City's water system.
b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties?
If so,generally describe. The project may impact the potential use of solar energy on the County Property to
the north of the site. The impact would be minimal.
c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal?
List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts,if any: None,specifically. However,all pumps
associated with the proposal are generally high efficiency type.
7. Environmental health
a. Are there any environmental health hazards,including exposure to toxic chemicals,risk
of fire and explosion,spill,or hazardous waste,that could occur as a result of this proposal?
If so.describe. No.
1)Describe special emergency services that night be required. Typically,water systems do not require much in
the way of emergency senices. Water Department staff monitor the system and visit sites based on
need.
2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards,if any: Compliance with Washington
State Department of Health standards for drinking water production and conveyance.
b. Noise
1)What types of noise exist hi the area which may affect your project(for example:
traffic,equipment,operation,other)? The Ridge Motorsports park lies due east of the site and Sanderson
Field Airport lies due south of the site. Both sites have noise associated with them(the motorsports park
with racing vehicles and the airport with aircraft)but the proposed use would be unimpacted by it.
2)What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a
short-term or a long-teen basis(for example: traffic,construction,operation,other)?Indi-
cate what hours noise would come from the site. Construction equipment would produce some noise during
construction and intermittent gurgling of water may be heard from time to time as the tank operates.
6
3)Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts,if any: Construction equipment would operate during
normal construction hours.
8. Land and shoreline use
a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The site is owned by Mason County and is
utilized as a County Public Works facility and storage area.
b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so,describe. No.
c. Describe any structures on the site. The site includes several structures,equipment,and vehicles associated with
the Mason County Public Works facility.
d. Will any structures be demolished? If so,what? No.
e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? The site is zoned"Public"and is within the Shelton Urban
Growth Area.
f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? The Comprehensive Plan Designation for the site
is"Public"and is within the Shelton Urban Growth Area.
g. If applicable,what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site?NA.
h. Has any part of the site been classified as an"environmentally sensitive"area? If so,specify. The site is known
habitat for the Mazama Pocket Gopher(see attached report)and the site lies within a Critical Aquifer
Recharge Area.
i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project?None.
j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace?None.
k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts,if any:NIA
1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land
uses and plans,if any: Compliance with zoning requirements,Mason County Code,and any special conditions of the
Special Use Permit process which will be handled through Mason County Staff.
9. Housing
a. Approximately how many units would be provided,if any? Indicate whether lvgh,mid-
dle,or low-income housing.None.
b. Approximately bow many units,if any,would be eliminated?Indicate whether high,
middle,or low-income housing.None.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts,if any: Not Applicable.
10. Aesthetics
a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s),not including antennas;what is
the principal exterior building material(s)proposed? The two water tanks would be 140'tall with open scaffold
style Iegs.
7
b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed.? None we are aware of. The tank would be
located in an area with large amounts of forest land on adjacent properties.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts,if any. None.
11. Light and glare
a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce'? What time of day would it mainly
occur: There would be minimal lighting associated with the facility security purposes(all li htin gilt be
g g tY tY P� g g
downcast and shielded)and the to of the tank would be lit pursuant to FAA Advisory Circular 70/7460-1 K
P P rY
Change 2,Obstruction Marking and Lighting,a med-dual system—Chapters 4,8(M-Dual),&12(per FAA
letter dated 3/31/2014,attached).
b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No.
c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? The existing Mason County Public
Works facility is north of the project site.
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts,if any: All lighting associated with the proposal
will be downcast and shielded(with the exception of required FAA beacon lighting).
12. Recreation
a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? The Ridge MotorSports
park lies to the east and Sanderson Field(a General Aviation Airport)lies to the south.
b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so,describe. No.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation,including recreation op-
portunities to be provided by the project or applicant,if any:None.
13. Historic and cultural preservation
a. Are there any places or objects listed on,or proposed for,national,state,or local preser-
vation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so,generally describe. No historic or cultural resources
were located within the project limits(see attached cultural resources assessment). The assessment concludes
that"Pedestrian survey and subsurface testing did not identify any evidence of archaeological sites within the
(construction areas). Environmental conditions and land use history suggested a low potential for
archaeological sites in the majority of the project areas."
b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic,archaeological,scientific,or
cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None known.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any. The report recommends an inadvertent discovery
protocol be implemented during construction.
14. Transportation
a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site,and describe proposed access to the
existing street systen-L Show on site plans,if any. Phase lA construction area is accessed via Highway 101
to West Dayton Airport Road to West Public Works Drive near Shelton.
Phase 1B is accessed via Wallace Kneelend Boulevard and Shelton Springs Road in Shelton.
8
b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not,what is the approximate distance to the
nearest transit stop?Unknown. Dial a ride service would be available though.
c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the
project eliminate? The project would not need parking spaces per se. Service vehicles would park in the
access driveway for the site.
d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets,or improvements to existing roads or
streets,not including driveways? If so,generally describe(indicate whether public or
private). A private gravel access drive,maintained by the City of Shelton,would be constructed from Public
Works Drive to the tank site in the Phase IA work area.
e. Will the project use(or occur in the immediate vicinity of)water,rail,or air transporta-
tion? If so,generally describe. The site is located directly north of Sanderson Field Airport.
£ How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project?If known,indicate when peak
volumes would occur. Vehicle trips would be intermittent and generally 1 to 2 a day at most.
g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts,if any:None proposed.
15. Public services
a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services(for example:fire pro-
tection,police protection,health care,schools,other)? If so,generally describe. No.
b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services,if any.None proposed.
16. Utilities
a, Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity,natural gas,water,refuse serv-
ice,telephone,sanitary sewer,septic system,other. All utilities are available at the site.
b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project,the utility providing the service,
and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might
be needed. The project will include running of new water mains within existing rights of way.
C. SIGNATURE
The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead
agency is rel ' them to make
�decisio
Signature: .......... ....................................................................................................
DateSub ....... .....4:5] j. �� .....................................................................................................
...................
9
Mail Processing Center Aeronautical Study No.
Federal Aviation Administration 2014-ANM-297-OE
Southwest Regional Office
Obstruction Evaluation Group
2601 Meacham Boulevard
Fort Worth,TX 76193
Issued Date:03/31/2014
Michael J.Michael,P.E.
City of Shelton
525 West Cota Street
Shelton,WA 98584
**DETERMINATION OF NO HAZARD TO AIR NAVIGATION **
The Federal Aviation Administration has conducted an aeronautical study under the provisions of 49 U.S.C.,
Section 44718 and if applicable Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations,part 77,concerning:
Structure: Water Tank Upper Mountain View Elevated Tank
Location: Shelton,WA
Latitude: 47-15-19.65N NAD 83
Longitude: 123-09-13.47W
Heights: 310 feet site elevation(SE)
175 feet above ground level(AGL)
485 feet above mean sea level(AMSL)
This aeronautical study revealed that the structure would have no substantial adverse effect on the safe
and efficient utilization of the navigable airspace by aircraft or on the operation of air navigation facilities.
Therefore,pursuant to the authority delegated to me,it is hereby determined that the structure would not be a
hazard to air navigation provided the following condition(s) is(are)met:
As a condition to this Determination,the structure is marked/lighted in accordance with FAA Advisory circular
70/7460-1 K Change 2,Obstruction Marking and Lighting, a med-dual system-Chapters 4,8(M-Dual),&12.
It is required that FAA Form 7460-2,Notice of Actual Construction or Alteration,be a-filed any time the
project is abandoned or:
At least 10 days prior to start of construction(7460-2,Part 1)
X Within 5 days after the construction reaches its greatest height(7460-2,Part 2)
See attachment for additional condition(s)or information.
This determination expires on 10/01/2015 unless:
i
(a) the construction is started(not necessarily completed)and FAA Form 7460-2,Notice of Actual
Construction or Alteration,is received by this office.
(b) extended,revised,or terminated by the issuing office.
(c) the construction is subject to the licensing authority of the Federal Communications Commission
(FCC)and an application for a construction permit has been filed,as required by the FCC,within
i
Page 1 of 6
i
• 1
6 months of the date of this determination.In such case,the determination expires on the date
prescribed by the FCC for completion of construction,or the date the FCC denies the application.
NOTE: REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF THE EFFECTIVE PERIOD OF THIS DETERMINATION MUST
BE E-FILED AT LEAST 15 DAYS PRIOR TO THE EXPIRATION DATE.AFTER RE-EVALUATION
OF CURRENT OPERATIONS IN THE AREA OF THE STRUCTURE TO DETERMINE THAT NO
SIGNIFICANT AERONAUTICAL CHANGES HAVE OCCURRED,YOUR DETERMINATION MAY BE
ELIGIBLE FOR ONE EXTENSION OF THE EFFECTIVE PERIOD.
This determination is subject to review if an interested party files a petition that is received by the FAA on or
before April 30,2014. In the event a petition for review is filed,it must contain a full statement of the basis
upon which it is made and be submitted to the Manager,Airspace Regulations&ATC Procedures Group,
Federal Aviation Administration,800 Independence Ave, SW,Room 423,Washington,DC 20591.
This determination becomes final on May 10,2014 unless a petition is timely filed. In which case,this
determination will not become final pending disposition of the petition.Interested parties will be notified of the
grant of any review.For any questions regarding your petition,please contact Airspace Regulations &ATC
Procedures Group via telephone--202-267-8783-or facsimile 202-267-9328.
This determination is based in art on the foregoing description which includes specific coordinates heights,
> gP �P g
frequency(ies)and power. Any changes in coordinates,heights,and frequencies or use of greater power will
void this determination.Any future construction or alteration,including increase to heights,power,or the
addition of other transmitters,requires separate notice to the FAA.
This determination does include temporary construction equipment such as cranes,derricks,etc.,which may be
used during actual construction of the structure. However,this equipment shall not exceed the overall heights as
indicated above.Equipment which has a height greater than the studied structure requires separate notice to the
FAA.
This determination concerns the effect of this structure on the safe and efficient use of navigable airspace
by aircraft and does not relieve the sponsor of compliance responsibilities relating to any law,ordinance,or
regulation of any Federal, State, or local government body.
Any failure or malfunction that lasts more than thirty(30)minutes and affects a top light or flashing obstruction
light,regardless of its position,should be reported immediately to (877)487-6867 so a Notice to Airmen
(NOTAM)can be issued.As soon as the normal operation is restored,notify the same number.
This aeronautical study considered and analyzed the impact on existing and proposed arrival,departure,and
en route procedures for aircraft operating under both visual flight rules and instrument flight rules; the impact
on all existing and planned public-use airports,military airports and aeronautical facilities; and the cumulative
impact resulting from the studied structure when combined with the impact of other existing or proposed
structures. The study disclosed that the described structure would have no substantial adverse effect on air
navigation.
An account of the study findings,aeronautical objections received by the FAA during the study(if any), and the
basis for the FAA's decision in this matter can be found on the following page(s).
Page 2 of 6
f
If we can be of further assistance,please contact Daniel Shoemaker, at(425)227-2791. On any future
correspondence concerning this matter,please refer to Aeronautical Study Number 2014-ANM-297-OE.
Signature Control No: 206714055-212242448 (DNH)
John Page
Manager, Obstruction Evaluation Group
Attachment(s)
Additional Information
Map(s)
Page 3 of 6
Additional information for ASN 2014-ANM-297-OE
ASN 2014-ANM-297-OE
Abbreviations
AGL-above ground level MSL-mean sea level RWY -runway
VFR-visual flight rules IFR-instrument flight rules nm-nautical mile
Part 77 -Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations(CFR)Part 77, Objects Affecting Navigable Airspace
1. LOCATION OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION
This proposal is for a 485-foot MSL(175-foot AGL)elevated water tank,which would be located
approximately 8033 feet(1.32 nm)northwest of the RWY 23 threshold at Sanderson Field(SHN) in Shelton,
WA. The water tank would be located approximately 1340 feet northwest of the comer of West Dayton
Airport Road and West Public Works Drive in Shelton. The SHN airport elevation is 273 feet MSL.
2. OBSTRUCTION STANDARDS EXCEEDED: The structure is identified as an obstruction under the
following Part 77 standard:
Section 77.19(a): The surface of a takeoff and landing area of an airport or any imaginary surface established
under 77.17,77.19,or 77.23. This structure would exceed the horizontal surface at SHN by 62 feet.
3. EFFECT ON AERONAUTICAL OPERATIONS
a. The impact on arrival,departure, and en route procedures for aircraft operating under VFR: This stricture
would exceed the SHN horizontal surface by 62 feet.
b.The impact on arrival, departure, and en route procedures for aircraft operating under IFR: None.
c.The impact on all planned public-use airports and aeronautical facilities: None.
d.The cumulative impact resulting from the proposed construction or alteration of a structure when combined
with the impact of other existing or proposed structures: None.
4. CIRCULATION AND COMMENTS RECEIVED
The proposal was circulated for public comment on 19 February 2014. The public comment period ended on 28
March 2014,and no responses were received as of that date.
5.DETERMINATION-NO HAZARD TO AIR NAVIGATION
It is determined that the proposed construction would not have a substantial adverse effect on the safe and
efficient use of navigable airspace by aircraft.
6.BASIS FOR DECISION
Part 77 establishes standards for determining obstructions to air navigation. A structure that exceeds one or
more of these standards is presumed to be a hazard to air navigation unless the obstruction evaluation study
determines otherwise. Just because a proposed structure exceeds a Part 77 surface does not automatically
make it a hazard. In this case,the elevated water tank would exceed the SHN Part 77 horizontal surface by 62
feet. However,there are no effects on instrument procedures at SHN,nor were any VFR issues raised. The
incorporation of obstruction lighting will mitigate the Part 77 horizontal surface penetration.
I
Page 4 of 6
TOPO Map for ASN 2014-ANM-297-OE
Ra.�r.`�i"''�fJ(r - '"-y�y�•�°' 5'Tf� �C f�s•.��s � .. ',w�nT r�� rJ� ice*-• iw1��� ,� �,,, -,� .
:"r,^:5�'., ti�� # � �� �j1j� �'�,�`.Ri��� �"s' � •i'F9S.f,�-'s,,
�� j S� .:� - �.+r•"Y 'Y.
L �-.t t � L. �R-:+"'1� L•rv. i 4 .S dc.fnt dld� ���Y. �-zf.
,ems z ���,,�}t �� ._ ?�-..\ '. ��� �� ice, � ;"•i ��X,k_ 056--s-S"t?:. z � fat
i/i�' .i•
f e
�,,:''•'� ) 1 ::,� 4 +yam' .!9' C-�'�.•:.Tx-r, .}��� Y� - yc t f(f ,T y;�•+. I
h
Z•. � ;.; y�_- �.. .. Y� F{F•i�3•a,✓ �.... C �d�^ ;;} _ L4ic � ! ii _
1r tic�Y23/ .:.` s. -�y � �.^.'•'-�►� �� T- ;t� Q` �j 1 --.ate•
k1A''J ! t y '7UIfFfly x ..N ; s 3 3
i�'i° r�.fi'" �e ..>:5 '�{{".f� i � • w. w � ;."tF� � r �"
t.�t• s
i! �a1 L.-.,. i r".,- 'f -r• J� '-�-�'" '" .:ram + �2� c c' i� .�.
:� '�` i?'� •� f �� ,T l ��.�F f,. �'mot .,,�t-`��"� 2�c-M1` +E�n? S �� !
-
�j� .. 1�4'Zt ...Jr'i +.�..c•'�
Page 5 of 6
a
Sectional Map for ASN 2014-ANM-297-OE
z. 3v ✓1rt t7 s +
+ , Ott
./y�yi4.u�j
4.JsJ
4 r
r�N ve ♦.+ft' —.,Jew
+.a r• yr is M �i
as
f 3LK s At y
4rFL r .e� `� cy. t' '..�,. 4 4, t` •n""kC
R s r 4
it +s, i }.�''_ G � �� P��`4•^
J` ram'' ..y so- `iY +w..+..�.+•�,�,x t' $
� f � ...r-,. � .F Z� .99''°"t• rro� c� J°i
1si
u s. •� � '� .F Cr t��4 v.; G 17r y'+ n� M�wF'b�i�i t•5'.y� _� ,*�••
�/'-i��°'��4� - .ens r ✓ _ ��.,� � )IlT ;�i+r�s�� �.�.�x -•�a""+"`^t�c""'"�"`` a.o "tis. }f
.` �r�. `.� ���; - �.a!'� � j,: �•:� � may.
- to i Ja�.- .,"+..a..^' 5•. / {`'-„ �" "st'kr�7.7.
y oa
E
wu F •CAM '. Y
Page 6 of 6
i
I
S A
Murray;Smith&Associates,Inc.
EngmeerslPlanners 1145 Broadway Plaza,Suite 1010 ■ Tacoma,WA 98402-3524 ■ PHONE 253.627.1520 ■ FAX 253.627.1 M
Topic: Upper Mountain View Pressure Zone Improvement Project Status Review
Meeting
LOCATION Mason County
DATE: January 23, 2014
TIME: 9:30 AM To 11:00 AM
A. Agenda Review/Introductions
a. Lead contacts and responsibilities
2. Project Overview
3. Project Overview and Project Elements
a. Bid Package 1
i. Elevated reservoir and transmission main
b. Bid Package 2
i. New pump at the City's Well No. 3
ii. Transmission main
iii. Pressure reducing stations
4. Current Status of Work and Schedule
a. Geotech-Drilling at PW site complete
b. Surveying-Underway
c. Tank size/type/cost/constructability preliminary engineering work
d. Review of environmental issues
5. Discussion of Key Issues of County Interest
a. Reservoir siting
b. Airspace area variances
c. Environmental considerations - pot lz°ram f /
d. Conditional use permitting _NA
e. EP "
f. Easements -
g. Watershed —4
Project Status Review Meeting Page 1 of 2 City of Shelton
January 2014 Upper Mountain View Pressure
K:\TAC_Projects\I3A505-UMVPZ Design101 Project Menagement\Meetings\I-23-14 Mediog Agendadocx Zone Improvements
�.
O 6(
6. Next Steps
7. Other Items
P0evaia i5o -goof pLV
At
J�,.(A, C (A)o dt5
v
Project Status Review Meeting Page 2 of 2 City of Shelton
January 2014 Upper Mountain View Pressure
K:\TAC_ProjeM\13\1505-UMVPZ DesignA01 Project ManagementWeekingsA-23-14 Meeting Agmda.docx Zone Improvements
K:\TAC_Projects\13\1505 — UMVPZ Design\CAD\FIGURES\13-1505—WA—FICURE 4.dwg OPTION 2 1/15/2014 4:44 PM JHF 18.19 RMS Tech)
wl
1 _
�7i �L
- - I 1
x
Z
1 I _
a � � Z
o� _p 1
^ d I YYA..1'k'Tx 1'y4i...✓.._ J __I _- 'Z '. Lt-`S .� t
a f
.. '--a '1�'+Fi+P►.alY'M+��'<+:�4.`r J'��lW +1 � 'fi ,:.� }Q� ,.. 4..
Ar
�R
• ' -
b o �on1m �-
�a4m �i�s .� c� CD
3nla o z E ,.
,A*
00 4 it CA
O
w .71
,N • Ad
s �
� r �
CITY OF SHELTON
UPPER MOUNTAIN VIEW PRESSURE ZONE IMPROVEMENTS
ENGINEERING SERVICES
SCOPE OF WORK
Draft
Introduction and Background 10-22-13
This scope of services details and outlines a work program for the final design, bidding and
award services for the Upper Mountain View Pressure Zone Improvements Project. This
scope includes continuing services under the Agreement executed on March 4, 2013 which
was used to complete Phase I Preliminary Design. Phase IA work developed a prioritized
schedule of improvements to satisfy the City's obligation to provide water service to
Washington State Patrol (WSP) facility in the northwestern portion of the City's service area.
This work also addressed system supply, storage, and distribution deficiencies through the
planning year 2029. The Phase II work plan is developed based on the outcome of the
prioritization work and includes a multi schedule approach that economically meets the
City's near-term obligations while allowing the City to meet its long-term water system
improvement needs within existing budget constraints. The project work program is
structured in a multi-phase work plan with the following phases:
Phase I—Preliminary Design—Complete
Phase IA—Schedule Prioritization and Project Definition— Complete
Phase II—Final Design and Bidding and Award
Phase III—Construction Support
A detailed description of the associated work for Phase-II tasks are provided as follows.
Phase H—Final Design and Bidding and Award
Under this work phase, the MSA team will develop the design for facilities defined under the
July 2013 Basis of Design Report(BODR) completed under Phase I, and as further defined
in the Phase IA prioritization work. The BODR has been submitted to Washington State
Department of Health(DOH) for review and approval. Subsequently, the BODR
improvements have been prioritized and phased. The Phase IA work further defined and re-
ordered that work program into the following schedules:
• Schedule A:
o Element 1 —Upper Mountain View Elevated Tank
o Element 2—Well No. 3 Upgrades
o Element 3 —Well No. 4 Connection Piping Improvements
o Element 4—Pressure Reducing Valve Improvements
• Schedule B: Well No. 1 Site—Well Upgrades, Ground Level Reservoir and Pump
Station
• Schedule C: Wells No. 4 Transmission Main and Pressure Zone Improvements
DRAFT Scope of work MURRAY,SMITH&ASSOCIATES,INC. City of Shelton
October 2013 Engineers/Planners Upper Mt.View Pressure Zone Improvements
1
kAtac_bd\clients\shelton,wa\upper my pressure zone 2012\10-13 scope and fee\draft scope of work 10-13—
! � 1
• Schedule D: Slipline Existing Gravity Main
All Schedule A work must be substantially complete and able to provide service to the WSP
facilities by January 1, 2015. The Schedule A work includes the construction of a new
elevated reservoir, which is a critical path item on the schedule. In order to meet the City's
supply obligations the design, bidding and award and construction of this element will
commence immediately and be completed independent of the remaining Schedule A
elements. Under this schedule two bid packages will be prepared as follows:
Schedule A Bid Package 1: Element 1 —Upper Mountain View Elevated Tank
Schedule A Bid Package 2: Element 2, 3 and 4 —Well No. 3 Upgrades, Well No. 4
Connection Piping Improvements Pressure Reducing Valve
Improvements
Schedule A Summary
Schedule A elements are summarized and defined as follows:
• Element 1 includes the construction of a new 750,000 gallon elevated welded steel
reservoir near the Mason County Shops on Dayton Road. The tank will be a
spheroid type structure with an approximate height of 80 feet. The site
improvements will include an access road, yard piping, miscellaneous
appurtenances and new 12-inch diameter transmission main piping.
• Element 2 includes the replacement of the existing Well No. 3 pump with a higher
head unit that will allow the well to supply the new Upper Mountain View
Pressure Zone. Yard piping modifications and upgrades to the Well's existing
electrical and telemetry systems are also included in this element.
• Element 3 includes the construction of approximately 1,200 linear feet of new 12-
inch diameter transmission main connecting Well No. 4 to the Mountain View
Pressure Zone.
• Element 4 includes the construction of two pressure reducing stations in Shelton
Springs Road near the new Well No. 4 transmission main connection.
Schedule A work tasks and subtasks are detailed and described below. Included for the
City's consideration in this scoping schedule are construction phase services identified, as
Task A.6, for both Schedule A bid packages.
Task A.1 —Schedule A Project Management
Under this task, the MSA team will develop a project management plan for all Schedule A
elements for design, bidding and award, and construction phase services. Design team and
subconsultant work will be coordinated and managed by MSA's project manager and
principle-in-charge Chris Uber.
DRAFT Scope of Work MURRAY,SMITH&ASSOCIATES,INC. City of Shelton
October 2013 Engineers/Planners Upper Mt.View Pressure Zone Improvements
2
kAtac_bd\chents\.shelton,wa\upper my pressure zone 2012\10-13 scope and fee\draft scope of work 10-13—
Subtask A.1.1 Project Management and Coordination. Under this work task, the project
manager and design team leaders will coordinate all design development effort. This task
includes all project communication and coordination with the City staff, subconsultants, and
other project stakeholders as necessary to execute the work and maintain schedule. Included
as the first order of work under this subtask is the completion of a detailed project schedule
showing the duration and milestones associated with all work tasks. This schedule will
reflect a substantial completion date for Schedule A elements as January 1, 2015. Items
performed as part of this subtask include:
• Monitor progress against schedule, scope of service, and budget, including earned
value assessments of design documents. Administer monthly invoicing to City.
• Provide regular communications on project status to the City, including progress
meetings as necessary. Anticipate schedule adjustments needed to achieve City
provision of service deadlines and budgetary limitations.
• Subconsultant coordination.
• Project documentation.
Deliverables:
1. Monthly invoicing and progress reports.
SubtaskA.1.2 Project Meetings This subtask includes all project meetings for Schedule A
elements to include:
• Project Startup Meeting: Immediately following contract execution, a startup meeting
will be held to introduce project team leaders to City staff, review scope, budget and
schedule, discuss the preferred method of communication protocols and establish
priorities.
• Site and Facility Investigation Review Meeting. Conduct up to two (2) Site and
Facility investigation meetings to aid in detailed design activities.
• Final Design Milestone Review Meetings: At the 30, 60 and 90 percent design
completion levels, meetings will be held to review contract document package
deliverables (plans, specifications, and cost estimates—PS&E) and incorporate City
comments. Comments will be documented through the course of design with an
electronic review comment log indicating design team responses and changes
implemented.
• Pre Bid and Bid Opening Meetings: Following advertisement of the general
construction contract and schedules of work, the MSA team will attend both a pre-bid
meeting and site walk-through for prospective contractors, as well as attend the public
bid opening.
• Project Status and Design Coordination Calls: A weekly half hour time slot will be
established to conduct brief project status and coordination calls. A standing agenda
will be established that includes project status issues, design coordination issues,
DRAFT Scope of Work MURRAY,SMITH&ASSOCIATES,INC. City of Shelton
October 2013 Engineers/Planners Upper Mt.View Pressure Zone Improvements
3
kAtac_bd\chents\.shelton,wa\upper my pressure zone 2012\10-13 scope and fee\draft scope of work 10-13—
upcoming work schedule, and any project schedule or budget concerns associated
with the development of design packages.
Assumptions made as part of this subtask include:
• Schedule A will include two design and bid packages.
• City staff will be available and prepared to make decisions at the meetings to advance
the project.
• Meetings will be held at Shelton City Hall or via teleconference.
• The project manager, and Ito 2 other design team leaders as appropriate, will attend
all project meetings.
Deliverables:
1. Meeting agenda and minutes.
2. Design milestone review comment log.
Task A.2—Schedule A Preliminary Design
Concurrent to the start of design package development, a series of site and facility
investigations will be performed. Work in this task includes performing design surveys,
defining project environmental permitting needs, and completing geotechnical subsurface
investigations. As appropriate, documents and findings developed under this task will be
provided as appendices within bid packages.
Subtask A.Z] Site Surveys. Work under this subtask includes the completion of property,
topographical and utility location surveys for Schedule A elements. Work will include
preliminary utility and records review and completion of field surveys with adequate
coverage to allow for element designs to be completed. Electronic copies of field data will
be downloaded and used to establish design base mapping for all Schedule A elements.
Assumptions made as part of this Task include:
• Base mapping will reflect review of all available utility documentation and facilities
marked in the field. No subsurface detection technologies are included to locate
unmarked utilities.
Deliverables:
1. Base mapping work products will be incorporated into and delivered as part of Task
A.3 final designs.
Subtask A.2.2 Geotechnical Investigations for Schedule A Elements Work under this task
includes the completion of geotechnical investigations necessary for the design and
construction of the project elements. Included in this subtask is a site reconnaissance which
will be followed by a subsurface exploration program consisting of a test pits and borings.
DRAFT Scope of Work MURRAY,SMITH&ASSOCIATES,INC. City of Shelton
October 2013 Engineers/Planners Upper Mt.View Pressure Zone Improvements
4
kAtac bd\chents\shelton,wa\upper my pressure zone 2012\10-13 scope and fee\draft scope of work 10-13_
For budgeting purposes it is assumed that the test pits will be excavated and backfilled by
City personnel. Subtask elements include the following:
1. Review available geologic maps for the element sites.
2. Explore the subsurface soil and groundwater conditions in the area of the planned
elevated reservoir and adjacent structures.
3. Perform one day of test pit explorations and 2 borings. It is assumed that all
borings will be performed for element A, the elevated reservoir.
4. Evaluate pertinent physical and engineering characteristics of the soils resulting
from the boring and test pit explorations.
5. Prepare a geotechnical report documenting the results of subsurface explorations,
and conclusions and recommendations for geotechnical design elements of the
project. The report will include:
• Description of the geologic materials encountered.
• Description of depth to groundwater, if encountered.
• Discussion of seismicity at the site along with seismic design
parameters including Site Class and site coefficients based on current
International Building Code (IBC) criteria.
• Subsurface investigations necessary for foundation support
recommendations.
Assumptions made as part of this Task include:
• The elevated reservoir is expected to have higher overturning moments and the need
for foundations to resist uplift loads will have to be provided once a preliminary
design is obtained. For budgeting purposes 100 feet of drilling is assumed with two
50 foot borings.
• Subsurface exploration for elements 2, 3 and 4 will include up to 8 test pits.
• City equipment and staff will be used to dig all test pits.
Deliverables:
1. Draft and final geotechnical report, including boring logs.
Subtask A.2.3 Schedule A Site Telemetry/SCADA Integration Study. The identified property
location for the elevated reservoir to serve the new Upper Mountain View pressure zone is
geographically isolated from other existing water utility facility locations currently linked by
radio communications. Communications with this new facility,preferably using the City's
current radio frequency,must be established for system operations and remote monitoring of the
reservoir. Under this subtask, a radio path analysis will be performed by the radio manufacturer,
DRAFT Scope of Work MURRAY,SMITH&ASSOCIATES,INC. City of Shelton
October 2013 Engineers/Planners Upper Mt.View Pressure Zone Improvements
5
k:\tac_bd\chents\shelton,wa\upper my pressure zone 2012\10-13 scope and fee\draft scope of work 10-13_
Freewave. MSA will provide Freewave with the necessary design information and review the
findings of the analysis.
Assumptions made as part of this subtask include:
• The City will provide needed access and information allowing Freewave to complete
its analysis
Deliverables:
1. Draft and final technical memorandum
Subtask A.2.4 Environmental Review/Permitting Needs. Work under this task includes the
preparation of a SEPA environmental checklist for each project element in accordance with
WAC 197-11. An inventory of various permitting needs anticipated for the project elements
will be prepared. Work will include a site visit to review the sites for the presence of
wetlands and streams. Work elements and assumptions are listed by schedule:
Schedule A Element 1: Upper Mountain View Elevated Reservoir. Scoping
assumptions for this schedule are as follows:
• Based on aerial photo review, we do not anticipate impacting any wetlands,
streams, or buffers. Should critical areas be unavoidable, additional scope and
budget would be required.
• Permitting requirements are anticipated to be limited to City of Shelton fill and
grade permit, Mason County Utility permit for location of utilities in public right-
of-way, and Mason County grading permit.
Schedule A Elements 2, 3 and 4: Scoping assumptions for this schedule are as
follows:
• Based upon aerial photo review,we do not anticipate impacting any wetlands,
streams, or buffers. Transmission main and distribution piping is anticipated to be
constructed in existing developed road right of way. Should critical areas or
buffers be unavoidable, additional scope and budget would be required to prepare
appropriate documentation.
• Permitting requirements are anticipated to be limited to City of Shelton fill and
grade permit, Mason County Utility permit for location of utilities in public right
of way, and Mason County grading permit.
It is also anticipated that a Mason County conditional use permit will be required and that the
City will secure and pay for this permit. The MSA project team will provide supporting
technical documentation for identified permits. Any additional permitting requirements will
be identified as part of this task, with appropriate responsibilities being further established
with City staff.
Assumptions
DRAFT Scope of Work MURRAY,SMITH&ASSOCIATES,INC. City of Shelton
October 2013 Engineers/Planners Upper Mt.View Pressure Zone Improvements
6
kAtac_bd\clients\shelton,wa\upper my pressure zone 2012\10-13 scope and fee\draft scope of work 10-13—
f �
• It is assumed that no cultural resource review, evaluation, investigation or
documentation will be conducted or provided as part of any phase of this work
program.
• It is assumed that the City of Shelton will serve as the SEPA lead agency, and will be
responsible for the publication and distribution of the SEPA checklist.
• Public notification will be conducted by the City of Shelton.
• No permit applications will be prepared as part of this scope of work.
Deliverables:
1. Electronic draft SEPA environmental checklist for review and comment by
City/Team.
2. Electronic version of final SEPA checklist for publication and distribution by the
City.
3. List of required project permits for Schedule A elements.
Task A.3—Final Design
Following completion and incorporation of the work performed under Task 2.2, final plans,
specifications and estimates (PS&E) will be completed. Final plans will incorporate survey
base mapping, design and schedule modifications recommended under Task 2.2, and the
requirements of various anticipated permits and City plan reviews. Plans will be presented
for the 30 percent, 60 percent, 90 percent, and final design completion level for City review,
comment and approval. Final plans will incorporate various comments as may be
appropriate. As previously described two separate design, bidding and award and
construction packages will be developed for the Schedule A improvement elements as
follows:
Schedule A Bid Package 1: Element 1 —Upper Mountain View Elevated Tank
Schedule A Bid Package 2: Element 2, 3 and 4—Well No. 3 Upgrades, Well No. 4
Connection Piping Improvements Pressure Reducing Valve
Improvements
MSA will coordinate the various work activities of the project team, monitor the work of
individual design elements and guide activities relative to overall project design
requirements. The various specific work efforts will be managed relative to the agreed
design assumptions and scope and fee structures to ensure proper and continuous integration
between various designelements. Specialty subconsultants will develop the architectural
P tY P
structural, electrical and instrumentation and control documents. The construction contract
documents will be prepared based on the following assumptions:
A. Technical Specifications—Technical specifications, complementing project plans will
be prepared for all schedules of the work. Specifications will be prepared in accordance
with Construction Standards Institute (CSI) formats and will include references to
appropriate industry standards. Special provisions will be developed which address the
DRAFT Scope of Work MURRAY,SMITH&ASSOCIATES,INC. City of Shelton
October 2013 Engineers/Planners Upper Mt.View Pressure Zone Improvements
7
Utac_bd\clients\shelton,wa\upper my pressure zone 2012\10-13 scope and fee\draft scope of work 10-13_
unique features of the project. Measurement and payment provisions will be coordinated
with the construction proposal schedule of prices.
B. Bidding and Construction Contract Documents—Bidding and construction contract
documents will be prepared based on Engineers Joint Construction Documents
Committee (EJCDC) standard formats, including custom schedule of prices for the
project, General Conditions and Supplementary General Conditions which recognize any
unique City contracting interests relative to this work. Draft bidding and construction
contract documents will be provided to the City as part of the 60 percent design
completion submittal for review by the City and the City's legal counsel.
C. Opinions of Probable Construction Cost—Opinions of probable costs will be
prepared and submitted at all design milestone review periods. The estimates will be
subject to levels of accuracy and contingency percentages recommended by the former
Association for the Advancement of Cost Engineering (AACE) for different design
development levels.
Technical specifications and construction bidding and contract documents will be prepared
for bidding under public contracting procedures. Fee estimates assume that one bidding
package will be developed. Draft documents will be reviewed by the City staff prior to final
revisions being made. Final documents will be provided to the Builders Exchange of
Washington for printing and distribution. Subtasks include:
Subtask A.33—30 Percent Design Completion Plans,Specifications and Estimate (PSE).
This subtask includes the preparation of 30 percent design completion plans and
specifications based on the preliminary design work and analysis completed in Task 2.2 and
the City's review and acceptance of recommended design concepts. Preliminary plans
completed to the 30 percent design completion level will be prepared for all schedules.
Construction cost estimates will be developed for proposed improvements based on the 30
percent completed designs and a judgment and analysis of current construction market
conditions. Work will include the preparation of specification table of contents and draft text
for relevant technical specification sections, as well as a limited plan set that includes
symbols and legends, general notes, schematics and plan views.
Subtask A.3.2—60 Percent Design Completion Plans,Specifications and Estimate (PSE).
Under this subtask the preliminary designs completed and reviewed by the City as part of
Subtask 2.3.1 will be further developed to the 60 percent design completion level. Plans and
specifications will be prepared for all key project components and include civil, structural,
geotechnical, mechanical, electrical and SCADA features. As part of this task a 60 percent
design completion level set of full pipeline alignment plans, plans and elevations for all
storage,pumping and treatment facilities, and full draft specifications will be provided to the
City for review and comment. This submittal will also include a draft set of 60 percent
design completion level contract documents and an updated project schedule and
construction cost estimate.
DRAFT Scope of Work MURRAY,SMITH&ASSOCIATES,INC. City of Shelton
October 2013 Engineers/Planners Upper Mt.View Pressure Zone Improvements
8
kAtac_bd\clients\shelton,wa\upper my pressure zone 2012\10-13 scope and fee\draft scope of work 10-13_
Subtask A.3.3—90 Percent Design Completion Plans,Specifications and Estimate (PSE).
Under this subtask the 60 percent designs completed and reviewed by the City will be further
developed to the 90 percent design completion level, including the addition of all draft
details. As part of this subtask a 90 percent design completion level set of plans,
specifications and contract documents will be provided to the City for review and comment.
This submittal will include an updated project schedule and construction cost estimate.
Following the 90 percent complete design review meeting,this design package will be
submitted to DOH for approval to proceed with construction.
Subtask A.3.4—Final Completion Plans,Specifications and Estimate(PSE). Under this
subtask the 90 percent designs completed and reviewed by the City will be finalized for
bidding and three (3) complete final sets of plans, specifications and contract documents will
be provided to City staff, with an additional ten(10) sets for distribution to prospective
bidders.
Assumptions made as part of this subtask include:
• Level of effort and fee estimates for the development of construction contract PS&E
documents are based on a preliminary drawing set sheet list and anticipated technical
specifications.
• Plans will be developed in AutoCAD 2012, but saved and delivered to the City in
another acceptable AutoCAD format.
Deliverables:
1. Three (3) hardcopies and one electronic copy of 30 percent, 60 percent, and 90
percentcompletion
design level draft PS&E document submittals.
2. Three (3)hardcopies and one electronic copy of 100 percent stamped PS&E for City
staff record. Plans are assumed to be delivered at 11"x 17" half-scale, but can be
produced at full scale upon request. Electronic deliverables will be in PDF format, as
well as in original Word, Excel, or AutoCAD file format.
3. Ten(10)hardcopies of 100 percent PS&E for City retention and distribution to
prospective bidders. Plan set copies will be produced at full scale.
Task A.4—Permits and Approvals
�I
Under this task, coordination with regulatory and various environmental and local permitting
agencies for the preparation and submittal of required documents will be performed, based
on the stated assumptions for each schedule in subtask A.2.4. It is understood all permitting
fees will be paid directly by the City, and that construction plans will be used extensively for
permitting applications figures. Review comments will be addressed and incorporated, as
necessary, to obtain approvals.
Subtask A.4.1 Update BODR. Update Basis of Design Report(BODR) following the 90%
design submittal to document the improvement prioritization activities and changes made
I
DRAFT Scope of work MURRAY,SMITH&ASSOCIATES,INC. City of Shelton
October 2013 Engineers/Planners Upper Mt.View Pressure Zone Improvements
I
kAtac_bd\chents\shelton,wa\upper my pressure zone 2012\10-13 scope and fee\draft scope of work 10-13_
during design. Incorporate improvement prioritization activities, updates to the selected
alternative, refine cost estimates, and summarize anticipated project schedule. Update site
considerations and existing system information based on findings in Tasks 2.2—Site and
Facility Investigations and Task 1.4- Permits and Approvals. Provide the final facility
configuration and design criteria, including the 90% design drawings. Submit the updated
Draft BODR to the City in electronic form for review and comment. Incoporate comments
into the Final BODR. Prepare 5 hard copies and 1 electronic copy of the Final BODR for
submission to the City.
Assumptions
• City will submit the updated BODR to the Department of Health(DOH).
• Completed 90 percent design plans and the completion level opinion of probable
construction cost for the project will be completed under Task 1.3.
• The City will review the Draft BODR and comments will be incorporated into the
Final BODR.
• No additional alternatives analysis or hydraulic modeling will be required.
Deliverables:
• A draft and final copy of the BODR for the selected alternative will be submitted in
electronic form for review.
• Following the City's review,prepare 5 hard copies and 1 electronic copy for
submission to the City. The BODR will include 90 percent design completion level
design drawings, estimates of construction cost and anticipated project schedule.
Subtask A.4.2 Soormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). This subtask includes the
preparation of a SWPPP for all project sites in compliance with Washington State
Department of Ecology(DOE), City and Mason County requirements. Work includes
preparation of the plan forms, narrative, illustrations and associated figures using the 90
percent complete design documents. The document will be prepared in compliance with
DOE and County S WPPP guidelines and will be prepared as a separate document.
Construction site stormwater protection/monitoring requirements will be identified and
described as a compliance requirement of the construction contractor.
Deliverables:
1. Draft and final S WPPP.
Subtask A.4.3 Local Agency Permuting. Based on aerial image review and assumptions
stated in subtask A.2.4, no critical areas are anticipated to be impacted and no additional
environmental permitting beyond SEPA checklist preparation is scoped. Work under this
task includes coordinating the applications of the local agency permitting associated with
construction of the Schedule A facilities within public rights-of-way, as well as permits
associated with above grade buildings and structures that are subject to City building
department codes. Work under this task include preparation of a Mason County Utility
DRAFT Scope of work MURRAY,SMITH&ASSOCIATES,INC. City of Shelton
October 2013 Engineers/Planners Upper Mt.View Pressure Zone Improvements
10
kAtac_bd\clients\shelton,wa\upper my pressure zone 2012\10-13 scope and fee\draft scope of work 10-13—
4
permit application. It is anticipated that the remaining local agency permits will be acquired
by the selected contractor using the completed designs as support documentation.
Assumptions made as part of this subtask include:
• All permit applications will be approved and will be non-contested.
• Local construction and building permits will be obtained by the construction
contractor
Deliverables:
1. Mason County Utility Permit application
2. Construction permitting support documentation provided as part of final designs
Task A.5—Bidding and Award
Under this task, assistance will be provided to the City for the two Schedule A bidding
packages. It is anticipated that Element 1,the elevated reservoir will be completed first and
will be advertised first. Schedule A elements 2, 3 and 4 will be combined into the second bid
package. The contract documents will be made available to the Builders Exchange of
Washington for online posting and for advertisement targeted at the area's construction
contractors.
It is understood that the City will lead this task with MSA providing technical support
through the subtasks outline below.
Subtask A.S.1 Advertisement. Prepare advertisements for public bidding and arrange for
publication in the Seattle Daily Journal of Commerce (DJC)and the Builders Exchange of
Washington website. It is assumed that the Builders Exchange of Washington will make the
documents available for distribution to prospective bidders, subcontractors, equipment
suppliers and other vendors upon request. Advertisements and posting costs are assumed to
be paid by the City. It is also assumed that Builders Exchange of Washington will maintain a
list of planholders for distribution upon request.
Deliverables.-
1. Electronic and hardcopy of advertisements and final contract documents to Builders
Exchange of Washington for the two Schedule A bidding packages.
Subtask A.5.2 Bidders Inquiries and Addenda. Work under this subtask includes
documentation of and responding to questions from bidders, subcontractors, equipment
suppliers and other vendors regarding the project and the plans and specifications. Included
in this subtask is reviewing and acting upon any submittals received as allowed by any pre-
bid submittal process. It is assumed that there will be a pre-bid submittal and approval
process for the following items: steel reservoir supplier/constructor and painting contractor
for the new reservoir. Also included in this task is preparing for and issuing addenda as
DRAFT Scope of Work MURRAY,SMITH&ASSOCIATES,INC. City of Shelton
October 2013 Engineers/Planners Upper Mt.View Pressure Zone Improvements
II
k:kac_bd\clients\shelton,wa\upper my pressure zone 2012\10-13 scope and fee\draft scope of work 10-13_
necessary to clarify the contract documents. For budgeting purposes it is assumed that up to
four(4) addenda will be issued.
Deliverables:
1. Bid period correspondence log.
2. Electronic and hardcopy for all issued addenda.
Subtask A.5.3 Bid Tabulation and Award Recommendation. Under this subtask assistance
will be provided to the City for evaluation of the bids and preparation of a written bid
tabulation summary document. Following a review of qualifications and references, letters
of recommendation for award of the construction contracts will be provided. For budgeting
purposes it is assumed that the bid opening and award process will be non-contested.
Assumptions made as part of this subtask include:
• Construction contract selection and award will be non-contested.
Deliverables:
1. Bid tabulation and letter of recommendation for construction contract award.
Task A.6—Construction Support Services
It is understood that the City will lead all construction management activities and that MSA
will provide engineering and technical support throughout project construction activities.
Engineering fee estimates assume a total construction contract period of 12 months with
project substantial completion by January 1, 2015. It is anticipated that the Schedule A
improvements will be constructed as two separate projects. Work in this task is provided as
in office engineering support and field engineering support as follows:
Task A.6.1 —In Office Engineering Support
Under this task, MSA will provide in office engineering support to the City. Subtask
elements, including any obligated construction correspondence materials, are itemized as
follows:
A.6.1.1 Preconstruction Conference—Participate of two engineering team
members in a preconstruction conference, for which agenda and minutes will be
prepared.
A.6.1.2 Clarifications—Provide clarification of the contract documents to the
construction contractor based on the contractor's written requests for clarifications,
verbal requests or as the need otherwise arises. Prepare written responses and
drawings or sketches as necessary for any clarifications of the contract documents.
DRAFT Scope of Work MURRAY,SMITH&ASSOCIATES,INC. City of Shelton
October 2013 Engineers/Planners Upper Mt.View Pressure Zone Improvements
12
kAtac_bd\chents\shelton,wa\upper my pressure zone 2012\10-13 scope and fee\draft scope of work 10-13_
For budgeting purposes it is assumed that up to 30 total written clarifications will be
provided.
A.6.1.3 Process Contract Modifications—Provide services related to contract
modifications. These include preparation of contract modification proposal
descriptions and justification documentation, assistance with construction contractor
negotiations, making recommendations to the City regarding any contract
modifications, and processing the formal contract amendment documents between
the City and the construction contractor. For budgeting purposes it is assumed that
up to 10 total contract modifications will be provided.
II
A.6.1.4 Project Manager/Assistant Project Manager Site Visits—Conduct periodic
li site visits by MSA's project manager or assistant project manager when significant
construction is occurring. The purpose of these visits is to answer questions
regarding the contract documents,review the progress of the work, assist with
resolving project difficulties and review the construction work to confirm that it is
proceeding in accordance with the requirements of the contract documents. For
budgeting purposes it is assumed that up to 10 visits will be provided for during the
active construction period.
A.6.1.S Miscellaneous Project Related Correspondence—Prepare various
miscellaneous correspondence communiqu6s related to the project. Such
correspondence includes but is not limited to letters, faxes, a-mails and memos to
the City, permitting agencies, and the contractor. A budgetary provision of 80 hours
is allocated.
A.6.1.6 Schedule Review—Review the project schedule, the schedule of shop
drawingsubmittals and schedule of values prepared and updated b contractor on a
P P P Y
monthly basis.
A.6.1.7 Shop g Drawin and Submittal Reviews: Under this subtask receive review
and process shop drawings and other technical submittals. Consider and evaluate
any alternatives or substitutions proposed by the contractor. Receive and review
other submittals of the contractor including construction schedules, shop
drawings/submittal schedules, lump sum price breakdowns, and other submittals
required b the contract documents. 1 d file will be developed
q y o ents. A submittal log an and
maintained recording date of receipt of shop drawings and technical submittals and
their current status. Advise on any work requiring shop drawing or technical
submittal. For budgeting purposes it is assumed that up to 80 submittals will be
received and tracked, and that no more than 30 will require resubmittal.
A.6.1.8 Special Inspections and Reporting: It is assumed that the City will
coordinate, conduct and oversee all needed special inspection work and no such
services are provided as part of this work program.
�IDRAFT Scope of Work MURRAY,SMITH&ASSOCIATES,INC. City of Shelton
October 2013 Engineers/Planners Upper Mt.View Pressure Zone Improvements
13
kAtac_bd\clients\shelton,wa\upper my pressure zone 2012\10-13 scope and fee\draft scope of work 10-13_
• I
' I .
A.6.1.9 Operation and Maintenance Manuals: Under this subtask, contractor
submitted operation and maintenance materials will be reviewed and compiled for
final project records and future staff use.
A.6.1.10 Record Drawings: Record drawings of the project will be prepared, based
on the construction records of the construction contractor and the Engineer's on-site
engineering/observation representative. Record drawings will be provided to the
City in AutoCAD electronic file format.
A.6.1.11 DOH Construction Completion Report: Following final acceptance of the
construction contract, a construction completion report will be completed and
submitted for record. Signing the report as the Engineer of Record will be
contingent on adequate field observation and daily report documentation being filed
by City staff and offered to MSA for review.
Task A.6.2—Field Engineering Support
Under this task, MSA will provide limited field engineering support to the City. Subtask
elements, including any obligated construction correspondence materials, are itemized as
follows:
A.6.2.1 Site Meetings and Project Milestone Meetings—Attend meetings with the
contractor, such as progress meetings,job conferences and other project related
meetings, and prepare and circulate copies of meeting summaries. Site meetings
will occur over the course of project construction activities. Included in this subtask
element are the following formal construction phase milestone meetings:
• Bi monthly construction meetings
• Facility Start-up
• Construction Completion
A.6.2.2 Facility Start-Up and Project Close-Out: Under this task, assistance will
be provided in the start-up, testing and City operator training schedule periods for
the new reservoir and pump station facilities. MSA will provide overall engineering
coordination with the general contractor, City operations staff, the City's SCADA
system integrator,the City's project representative and the construction contractor's
technical representatives for specialty equipment, all as required to attain proper
long-term operation of constructed facilities in full accordance with design plans.
With the City's concurrence and successful project completion, conduct various
activities to effectively close-out the project. The City's SCADA system integrator
will be responsible for all start-up activities related to that system.
A.6.2.3 Anniversary/Warranty Inspection: Under this task, assistance will be
provided for an anniversary/warranty inspection at the end of the construction
contractor's warranty period. MSA will notify the City and the construction
DRAFT Scope of Work MURRAY,SMITH&ASSOCIATES,INC. City of Shelton
October 2013 Engineers/Planners Upper Mt.View Pressure Zone Improvements
14
kAtac_bd\clients\shelton,wa\upper my pressure zone 2012\10-13 scope and fee\draft scope of work 10-13—
contractor of pending warranty period completion times and will assist with the
coordination of a suitable date and time. MSA will note any items requiring attention
and/or correction.
Based on previous discussion with the City the scope and scale of construction support
services will be determined and confirmed as design work progress. The budget for Task
A.6 outlined above is approximately $231,000 and may be authorized as design work is
completed.
Project Schedule
A project schedule that includes all tasks and subtasks will be prepared as part Task A.l and
reflect a substantial completion date of January 1, 2015 for the Schedule A improvements.
Project Fee Estimate
A fee estimate summary for project tasks is presented below as Table 1. A detailed
breakdown of resources by staff is attached as Exhibit land includes resource allocations by
staffing class and budget estimates for all the work by individual phase and task. It is
anticipated that the work be completed on a time and expenses basis under the existing
engineering services agreement between MSA and the City. The budget amounts shown will
not be exceeded without written authorization by the City.
Task Description Budget
Task A.1 Project Management $101,296
Task A.2 Preliminary Design 111,098
Task A.3 Final Design 484,147
Task A.4 Permits and Approvals 39,151
Task A.5 Bidding and Award 22,988
Total $758,680
Task B Scope Outline
With the completion of Task A Schedules and elements a final work plan and schedule for
the remain project improvements will be prepared and will include the following:
• Schedule B: Well No. 1 Site—Well Upgrades, Ground Level Reservoir and Pump
Station
• Schedule C: Wells No. 4 Transmission Main and Pressure Zone Improvements
• Schedule D: Slipline Existing Gravity Main
The :scope of work outline for these elements will include the following:
g
Task BA Project Management
B.1.1 —Project'ect Management and Coordination
g
DRAFT Scope of Work MURRAY,SMITH&ASSOCIATES,INC. City of Shelton
October 2013 Engineers/Planners Upper Mt.View Pressure Zone Improvements
i
15
k:\tac—bd\clients\sheltonwa\uppermv pressure zone 2012\10-13 scope and fee\draft scope of work 10-13_
I
B.1.2—Project Meetings
Task B.2 Preliminary Designs
B.2.1 —Site Surveys
B.2.2—Geotechnical and Hydrogeological Investigations
B.2.3 —Site Telemetry and SCADA System Improvements
B.2.4—Environmental Review/Permitting Needs
Task B.3 Final Designs
B.3.1 —30 Percent Design Completion Plans, Specifications and Estimate (PSE).
B.3.2—60 Percent Design Completion Plans, Specifications and Estimate (PSE).
B.3.3—90 Percent Design Completion Plans, Specifications and Estimate (PSE).
B.3.4—Final Percent Design Completion Plans, Specifications and Estimate (PSE).
Task BA Permits and approvals
B.4.1 —Local Agency Permitting
B.4.2—Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Task B.5—Bidding and Award
B.5.1 —Advertisement.
B.5.2—Bidders Inquiries and Addenda.
B.5.3 —Bid Tabulation and Award Recommendation.
Task B.6—In-Office Engineering Support
B.6.1 —Preconstruction Conference
B.6.2—Clarifications
B.6.3—Process Contract Modifications
B.6.4—Project Manager/Assistant Project Manager Site Visits
B.6.5—Miscellaneous Project Related Correspondence
B.6.6—Schedule Review
B.6.7—Shop Drawing and Submittal Reviews
B.6.8—Operation and Maintenance Manuals
B.6.9—Record Drawings and DOH Construction Completion Report
Task B.7—Field Engineering Support
B.7.1 —Site and Project Milestone Meetings
B.7.2—Facility Start-Up and Project Close-Out
B.7.3 —Anniversary/Warranty Inspection
Project Schedule
The schedule for Task B improvements is dependent on a number of variables and will be
determined at a later date.
Project Fee Estimate
DRAFT Scope of Work MURRAY,SMITH&ASSOCIATES,INC. City of Shelton
October 2013 Engineers/Planners Upper Mt.View Pressure Zone Improvements
16
k:\tac bd\clients\shc1ton,wa\upper my pressure zone 2012\10-13 scope and fee\dmft scope of work 10-13—
It is anticipated that the Task B improvements may be undertaken and completed in varying
bid package elements similar to the Task A work. The final engineering budget for this task
will vary depending on final scoping and bid package configurations.
I
I
I
I
DRAFT Scope of Work MURRAY,SMITH&ASSOCIATES,INC. City of Shelton
October 2013 Engineers/Planners Upper Mt.View Pressure Zone Improvements
17
kAtac_bd\clients\shelton,wa\upper my pressure zone 2012\10-13 scope and fee\draft scope of work 10-13_
1
1
e JUL, 2'7 2010
State of Washington MASON CO. PLANNING DEPT.
Department of Fish and Wildlife
48 Devonshire Road, Montesano, Washington 98563-9618(360)249-4628 FAX(360)249-1229
July 26, 2010
Mason County Department of Community Development
Michael MacSems
Post Office Box 279
Shelton, WA 98584
Dear Mr.MacSems:
SUBJECT: Determination of Non Significance(DNS) of State Environmental Protection Act
(SEPA) SEP2010-00053 for the Release from a Development Moratorium (Forest
Practice Application#2409811); Ridge Motor Sports Group/Manke; Section 4,
Township 20 North,Range 04 West,Mason County, WRIA 14 and 22
The Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) appreciates this opportunity to
provide comments regarding the release of this property from a development moratorium.
The subject property has been identified as having Mazama pocket gophers. Mazama pocket
gophers are considered a priority species under the Washington State Department of Fish and
Wildlife Priority Habitat and Species program and are currently listed as State Threatened due to
population declines and elimination of prairie habitat by development and other land uses.
Prior to projects with potential impacts to Mazama pocket gopher such as stumping and
development,WDFW requests that the proponent hire a wildlife consultant to perform a field
survey of the subject property for Mazama pocket gopher mounds. The findings of the mound
survey and a Mazama pocket gopher management plan shall be reported to WDFW at the address
noted above.
You may access WDFW's management recommendations with the following hyperlink.
Management Recommendations for Mazama Pocket Gopher[PDF]- Updated December 2009
o List of Consultants trained by WDFW for Mazama pocket gopher survey protocols[PDF]
i
Michael MacSems
July 26,2010
Page 2
Thank you for the opportunity to provide these comments. If you have any questions,please
contact me at 360-249-1293.
Sincerely,
67
Gloria Rogers
Area Habitat Biologist
Cc: Dave Kloempken, WDFW,Assistant Regional Habitat Program Manager(email)
Jeff Skriletz,WDFW,Area Wildlife Biologist
Teresa Eturaspe, WDFW, SEPA Coordinator(email)
WRIA 14 and 22 File, Olympia(email)
i
O CITY OF SHELTON
� z
�� MOUNTAINZONE
S VIEW PRESSURE�IIN� UPPER
"Budding A Stranger Community TOG PHASE 1 A
ETHER"
MARCH 2O14 9 0% SUBMITTAL
I NDEX OF DRAW I NGS
' I 42002-10—DOOi0 l
GENERAL
I G-I TITLE, VICINITY MAP, INDEX Of DRAWINGS
2 G-2 GENERAL NOTES - I _ � v n'�: PROJECT
t 3 0-3 GENERAL NOTES - 2
4 G-4 SYMBOLS AND LEGEND SITE I+
5 G-5 ABBREVIATIONS j e � I ea ! , PROJECT y ti
w CIVIL 1 i ar
m 6 C-I RESERVOIR SITE PLAN 1 I �;�' L O C A T I ONE
cv 7 C-2 RESERVOIR ELEVATION AND ROOF PLAN
_� 8 C-3 RESERVOIR DETAILS - 1 o ' \� i 1
9 C-4 RESERVOIR DETAILS - 2 - -- ~ f
0 10 C-5 TRANSMISSION MAIN PLAN AND PROFILE STA 10+06 TO STA 14+00 r �j' �� t� 0. 49
' II C-6 TRANSMISSION MAIN PLAN AND PROFILE STA 14+00 TO STA 18+00
a 12 C-7 TRANSMISSION MAIN PLAN AND PROFILE STA 18+00 TO STA 22+00
N 13 C-8 TRANSMISSION MAIN PLAN AND PROF 1 LE STA 22+00 TO STA 26+00
.n 14 C-9 TRANSMISSION MAIN PLAN AND PROFILE STA 26+00 TO STA 28+60
i.i 15 C-10 MASON COUNTY WATER SERVICE PLAN AND PROFILE �,� .L;=•"' �•'•• J ' '""ff+ \ f,/ 11
16 C-11 CITY OF SHELTON DETAILS -
17 C-12 CITY OF SHELTON DETAILS - 2
N 18 C-13 CITY OF SHELTON DETAILS - 3
00 19 C-14 CITY OF SHELTON DETAILS - 4 �'• - 31 �• �`-`_i _
20 C-15 SITE OETA I LS- -W Df0a A RP
2 42002-I o-00020
T R AD -t -
21 C-16 SITE DETAILS- /� �• , I { -
22 C-17 EROSION CONTROL PLAN Y } F"�•� -
23 C-18 EROSION CONTROL DETAILS
\� APPRCX I MATE ti `
Uj ELECTR I CAL /S� I L 42002-24-00010 31.1 LIMITS
c� 24 E-I ELECTRICAL LEGEND SHEET I OF 2
25 E-2 ELECTR I CAL LEGEND SHEET 2 OF 2 0 F WORK
-<? 26 E-3 RESERVOIR ONE-LINE, LUMINAIRE AND PANEL SCHEDULE I I r / I 1
27 E-4 RESERVOIR ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN
_ o W DAYTON AIRPORT ROAD_
3 28 E-5 RESERVOIR ELEVATION AND PLAN VIEW - ELECTRICAL 7
29 E-6 ELECTRICAL DETAILS SHEET 1 OF 2 I -
30 E-7 ELECTRICAL DETAILS SHEET 2 OF 2 --
31 E-8 CONDUIT AND WIRING SCHEDULES
INSTRUMENTATION _
n 32 P-1 CONTROL SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS SHEET I OF 4
w 33 P-2 CONTROL SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIDNS SHEET 2 OF 4 1 LL IIT 0
= 34 P-3 CONTROL SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS SHEET 3 OF 4 �'
j 35 P-4 CONTROL SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS SHEET 4 OF 4 +HJO-
0 36 P-5 CONTROL SCHEMATIC SYMBOLS �o
37 P-6 WELL NO. 3 PROCESS AND INSTRUMENTATION DIAGRAM (INFORMATION ONLY - BY OTHE - 1
38 P-7 PROCESS AND INSTRUMENTATION DIAGRAMCATION MAP '/ LOCATION MAP
rn 39 P-8 SCADA BLOCK DIAGRAMS
0 40 pP�-9 MOTOR CONTROL - PLAN, ELEVATION, SECTION AND DETAILS SCALE; 1"-1500' SCALE: 1'=300'
N STRUCTURAL
> 41 S-1 GENERAL STRUCTURAL NOTES
42 S-2 SPECIAL INSPECTION REOUIREMENTS -
43 S-3 RESERVOIR FOUNDATION - STRUCTURAL PLAN AND ELEVATION -
44 S-4 RESERVOIR FOUNDATION - SECTION AND DETAILS
o in - —
Murray,Smith&Associates,IOC.
Bnginecrs f Planners Know what's below.
w. <I Tacoma, Washington Call before you dig,
13-1505.20
Y
LL
MEET NOTES
I. ALL DUCTILE IRON WATER PIPING SHALL BE RESTRAINED WITH
MINIMUM 42 INCHES OF COVER. DEFLECTION LIMITED TO
ONE-HALF MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATION.
42002-10-00010 2 SWAB AND CHLORINATE ALL NEWLY-INSTALLED WATER PIPING
120 W PUBLIC WORKS DRIVE CONNECTIONS AND OBSERVE FOR LEAKS. SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR
DETAILS ON WATERLINE TESTING,
GRAVEL SURFACE
(NOTE TO REVIEWER THAT 3. OBTAIN GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER'S APPROVAL OF FINAL TANK
I THIS WILL LIKELY BE
SUBGRADE PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF LEVELING COURSE AND RESERVOIR FOUNDATION MATERIALS.
NW S ITE 89 4 qg 508 REMOVED FOR POCKET GOPHER
EASEMENT B FURNISH AND INSTALL: FURNISH a, INSTALL HABITAT
CA ER • 18" TRANSMISSION MAIN 4. RESERVOIR PIPE AND FITTINGS SOUTH OF VALVE TO BE INSTALLED
—I 1—IB FLEX-TEND ASSY, MJxf1G SEE NOTE 8 16' SHT C-9 AS PART OF APPROVED BID ALTERNATE
PER2
NE SITE 5, LIMITS OF WORK SHALL BE RESTRICTED TO EASEMENTS.
3f7- fNST�4LL--SC SEE NOTE 6 EASEMENT
SHED PER DE-T 4, /� 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL PRESTRESSED STEEL SUPPORTS AND
SEE NOTE 7 CORNER PER SHEET C 15 ON
GD-0 SHT C-16 THREE-STRAND BARBED WIRE CLIMB BARRIER
330.024' ° —CL -
-.._Mffr �_20.79'w �-� -- EX 1 ST I N G FENCE PROTECT EXISTING FENCE
42002-24-90050 a ` • o
�
450 W DAYTON 28}Op.:::.:; -�, 7. ELECTRICAL CONDUIT NOT SHOWN. SEE SHEET E-4 FOR M7E
AIRPORT ROAD 27F00 '"' INFORMATION.
^ ' - L... ,, r '�lal INSTALL 3/4" SINGLE SERVICE INSTALLATION PER DETAIL W-01,
ro y �� ��� "''.:d r- SHT C-14 AND HOSE BIB PER DETAIL 3, SHT C-Ifi
NIV
� _ ,•r� - ��::,'':�=�"�`�' '•� �/ INSTALL CHAIN LINK GATE 9, FURNISH AND INSTALL 16' BUTTERFLY VALVE PER DETAIL I, SHEET
PER DIET 2, SHT C-15 C-4
N712041.73. E981504.70 q; - 'r;•..; �r `• y/ _
CENTER OF TANK \K: `• r' = I `\ y/
S:. r > a ;. LIMITS OF ADDITIVE ALTERNATE
SEE NOTE 8 �k..::: GRADING QUANTITIES:
\., FOR SECOND RESERVOIR. SEE NOTE
I ED GALLON 11.. "'°='r� I t;': 1� 4 THE FOLLOW 1 NG GRADING WANT I T I ES ARE PROVIDED FOR THE
TI-COLUMN TED STEEL k ':. 1 EXCLUSIVE USE OF THE REGULATORY AUTHORITIES HAVING
RESERVOIR \ { l -,':I JURISDICTION OVER THIS PROJECT FOR THE PURPOSES OF PERMITTING
SEE NOTE 9 WET WELL D I A- 50 FEEf� j1.S ,M �I
15' 50 ;.r SEE NOTE 9 t•',:'::. ONLY. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL QUANTITIES PRIOR TO PLACING
OVERFLOW ELEV- 440 FEET 1'.''.:r ?,'t
(.i.i:'`jf FURNISH AND INSTALL ALTERNATE: A B I D FOR THE WORK. NO ADDITIONAL PAYMENT WILL BE MADE TO
I-I6• FLEX-TEND ASSY, MJxFLG THE CONTRACTOR FOR DISCREPANCIES ASSOCIATED WITH USE OF THE
;. ; s _• \k` `�. �� �. FOLLOWING QUANTITIES:
CUT: 356 U. .
�Y+ D.
OVERFLOW DITCH PER \�� " `��- FILL: 18 CU. YD.
DL-f 5, SHT C-15 �t: ,` ;'
< �� -- ---- ------- ------_-- _-------------- I 7 038. E981654.68
-------_____ ---- CENTER OF ALTERNATE TANK
C
� I I 1 � I"j 1 INSTALL FENCE PER DIET I, GRADING COORDINATE TABLE
7 �� _ �s ± 1 I SHT C-15 Point # Northing Eosting
\\ - _-
I 712109.34 991454.71
N 6 1/X.
"- ---�------�--�`--'-- --------`� _ ` ( 2 712096.95 981734.68
------ ----- ------------------='�t-- / 2' TYP
3 711946.47 981729.95
:-e--�� --- =w/
4 711959.39 981450,21
3 4 PROPOSED INFILTRATION BASIN
SW SITE
ri EASEMENT FOR STORMWATE R AND RESERVOIR 3
OVERFLOW SE SITE
�
3 CORNER EASEMENT
i
0 CORNER
42DO2-10-OD020
/ PLAN MASON OCUNTY �1 GRADING COORD I NATE TABLE
SCALE: 1'=20' Point # Northing EOsting
r
w 5 711986.83 981891.36
T
6 711960.38 981691.45
Q
7 711970.0! 981466.02
0
B 711995.27 981465.62
a
0
a
U
O:
y
V
N
a
z
0 90% - SUBMITTAL
NO= NJM PRELLMLNARI'ONLY = _ __ _ 01 A<y
SHEEr
ICED 9DWTWFWC0lffrMZT l =_MwaySmd&Associates Inc -- - CITY OF SHELTON
D JON = _ _ —= — ► ;( z1, RESERVOIR
DRAWNJID —EagineCPS/I�auas �f _�$ UPPER MOUNTAIN VIEW SITE PLAN C-- I
1 IF 7HIS BAR DOEST= _ — - - _ r.n� l PRESSURE ZONE
a �w-DIUMM 5 CHu > t __ - _ _ __ _ 1145 Ihmdnp Am,sb 1010 pm z�••0-15w A,�„„W G PHASE 1A
YN0. DATE BY REVISION NET TD SCALE CHECKED E• - - -�mIDA i� Jim 9"12 FUi 253-58740 � PROJECT NO.: 13-150.5.201 SCALE: AS SHOWN DATE: MARCH 2O14 6 of 44 '.
ROOF EXHAUST
FAN MANHOLE 50' WET WELL DIAMETER TANK VENT Lu EXTERIOR ROOF ACCESS TANK LADDER
ROOF (ADDER ACCESS
8 PAINTERS LUGS EOL ELECTRICAL BRACKET FOR WET WELL ROOF ACCESS MANHOLE z BALCONY MANHOLE
DIST AROUND WET WELL OBSTRUCTION LIGHT -
INTERIOR PERIMETER. w TOWER LADDER
MOUNT I' ABOVE HWL,
WET WELL ROOF ACCESS MANHOLE BALCONY w/HANDRAIL
SEE DET 3, SHT C-3 ROOF LADDER w/OSHA =o
COMPLIANT SAFETY CLIMB 0
DEVICE ELECTRICAL BRACKET FOR >
HWL ELEVATION= 440' OBSTRUCTION LIGHT AND
p POWER RECEPTICLE
oPO INSIDE TANK LADDER U
N OVERFLOW WEIR BOX
Ld W/ ANTI-VORTEX 0 BALCONY W/ HANDRAIL
z ENTRANCE
< • SEE NOTE 5 I I
8 DIA OVERFLOW 1 Q PAINTERS RAILS. SEE DET 4,
o TO FINISHED GRADE �ti SHT C-3, AND
zi SPECIFICATIONS 19
4 PAINTERS LUGS EOL DIST AROUND
LWL ELEVATION= 410' 1 EXTERIOR OF ACCESS TUBE. SEE DET 3, SHT
1
d C-3. MOUNT AT APPROX LOCATION SHOWN
1 a
1 9 PERIMETER STEEL SUPPORT
b COLUMN, TYP
0
SEE NOTE 6
J J ROOF ACCESS LADDER W/FALL
> w SEE NOTE 3 i' PREVENTION DEVICE, TYP. SEE
DET I, SHT C-3
m
3 3 i HORIZONTAL ROD BRACING, TYP
EXHAUST FAN MANHOLE TANK VENT
3o
=o JO OVERFLOW NOTES:
z z ROOF PLAN L BOTH 16" DIAMETER INLET/OUTLET AND 8' DIAMETER
o F SCALE: NTS OVERFLOW PIPING SHALL BE FULLY SUPPORTED FROM
0 0 o CENTER STEEL STEEL COMPRESSION STRUT, TYP OVERHEAD AS PER TANK MANUFACTURER'S STANDARD
Z z SUPPORT COLUMN
o 0 DESIGN,
a
DIAGONAL TENSION ROD 2. ELECTRICAL AND CONTROL CONDUITS NOT SHOWN FOR
BRACING, TYP CLARITY. SEE ELECTRICAL SHEETS FOR DETAILS.
0 0
n. a 3. INTERIOR PAINTERS LUGS SHALL BE INSTALLED WITHIN
v o o CENTER COLUMN RISER.
0
4. ALL ACCESS HOLLS AND BOLT HOLES TO BE DRILLED PRIOR
TO TANK COATING. ALL ROUGH EDGES TO BE GROUND
14' CONDENSATE DRAIN SMOOTH.
i W/ELBOW AND MESH SST 5. TIDEFLEX TYPE VALVE TO BE INSTALLED ON INLET/OUTLET
SCREENED OUTLET, PIPING, OR APPROVED EQUAL.
WOULTED TO INTERIOR 6. TIDEFLEX TYPE VALVE TO BE INSTALLED ON INLET/OUTLET
PIPING, OR APPROVED EQUAL.
aRISER LADDER 7. TANK BOTTOM ACCESS HATCH
5
INTERIOR DISTRIBUTION
o `J CONDUITS NOT SHDWN FOR
NA CLARITY. SEE SHEETS E-5
r�
FOR MORE INFORMATION
F-
L i
� f_l
L FIRST RUNG
v� 1-4 -
a a z
c ELEVATION= 310'
h
o � _
r - -
a
i
FOUNDATION DETAIL
c r— ACCESS MANHOLE SEE SHT S-4, TYP
n SHEETS C-2 AND C-3 SHOW MINIMUM TANK DIMENSIONS, LAYOUT AND DETAILS FOR
N I6" INLET/OUTLET PIPE APPURTENANCES. SHEETS S-1 TO S-4 SHOW MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR CONCRETE
> SEE DET I, SHT C-4 FOUNDATION. FINAL TANK STRUCTURAL REQUIREMENTS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH
THE FINAL CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS PROVIDED BY THE TANK DESIGN/CONSTRUCTION
CONTRACTOR AND AS APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. SEE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
RESERVOIR TANK ELEVATION
FOR ADDITIONAL STRUCTURAL REQUIREMENTS FOR TANK. O O/� S U B M I TTA L
o SCALE: NTS
i
q ND� NJM PR9JMINARY0 m
-_ —=MartgStmfh8 #ssOCl e<S InCr Hof Sri��` CITY OF SHELTON SHEET DESIGNED BDIIDT BIE fOPCOM6+DOCIION ----
0 I6 + —_ — I ul a III RESERVOIR ELEVATION
JDN _ -Englneel /pnner$ ' UPPER MOUNTAIN VIEW
DRA1VN __ _ 7SjllNG� PRESSURE ZONEAND ROOF PLAN C-2
IF THE BAR r 5 NOT MEML RE I" CHU kKINkIb90G0�AIC 1145 Bradea Plana,Saito 101C PIBE W-1127-106THEN DRAINNG S CHECKED •/�. . l h�saarrrn Cauw,dq PHASE 7 A
NOT TO Sr&E ?mma,Yukon 90 PAST 2w-E7-lm TOOCTrrER-
Y
NO. DATE BY REVISION i./� PROJECT NO.: 13_15D5.2D1 CAIF AS SHOWN DATE IAARCH 2Oi4 7 of 44