HomeMy WebLinkAboutVAR Letters / Memos - 9/4/2002 ltl� rtQClk /fQ✓-4 rG��[1P�
-�
�'� �jlj Sloe
• °�` ,.,�,,5�✓ca(� RECEIVED
5Ev 0 5 2002
MASON COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 426 W. CEDAR ST.
411 No Fifth Street//P.O. Box 279, Shelton WA. 98584
Request for
Reduction in the Required Front Yard Setback
Applicant: /T�!-���y� S ���`�l`/may �L.�'�S/- JlvG
Mailing Address:
City: L�) State: la A_ zip:
Telephone No .
Parcel Number(s): ( u one / z-
In your request to reduce a front yard setback standard, please state which of the
following circumstances apply in your situation and illustrate these in your site plan:
1) existing lots of record as of March 5, 2002,
2) one of the following:
a) steep slopes, wetlands, or streams present
b) soils that restrict building or septic development
c) lot width at the front yard line of no more than 50 feet
d) lot size of no rnore than one-quarter acre
e) existing improvements of buildings, septic systems, and well areas
Explain how these circumstances preclude a proposed development from meeting the
25 foot front yard setback standard.
It is the purpose of this request to reduce the required front set back form 25' to 15' for lots B,C
and D of SHORT PLAT 4460. The front of lots B,C and D are shortened up by a 20' easement.
In this easement power and water lines will be run along with a private road to provide access to
lots B,C and D. Taking away 20 ft. from the front of these lots leaves only a 15' to 16' set back
from the homes I am planing to build. ( Please see plot plan and plot map provided.)
d Z—
IS,ignature date
MASON COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Planning
Mason County Bldg. 1 411 N.5th
P.O.Box 279 Shelton,WA 98584
(360) 427-9670 Belfair (360) 275-4467 Elma (360) 482-5269 Seattle (206) 464-6968
September 17, 2002
Memo to file: Regarding front yard variance application.
Administrative variance granted to reduce required front yard setback on private access
easement from 25 ft. to 15 ft. minimum. Due to lot configuation and dimensions of
proposed home, it would be difficult to meet the requirements of this ordinance, without
making structural changes to the proposes residence. Application appears to meet
general requirements of Development Regulations section 1.05.035. SAL 9/17/02