The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutHMP Mitigation Plan, Bond Release - HMP Habitat Managment Plan - 7/26/2010 (2) CO MASON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Planning Shelton(360)427-9670 Mason County Bldg.I Belfair(360)275-4467 411 N 5th Street Elma(360)482-5269 PO Box 279 HOME PAGE—www.co.mason.wa.us 1854 Shelton,WA 98584 July 26, 2010 Olympia Federal Savings P.O. Box 337 Belfair, WA 98528 RE: Griffey's Stream Buffer Restoration Bond Release To whom it may concern, I am writing in regard to account number 0330032755, which is a joint interest bond held by you for Ryan Griffey and Mason County. I am requesting that the full bond amount of$500 be released to Mr. Griffey and that Mason County be cleared of all interest in this account. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Sincerely, Rebecca Hersha Planner Mason County Planning Department (360)427-9670 x287 cc: Ryan Griffey • PO Box 262 • Allyn, WA 98524-0262 wT- -T - '�EPr29-2005 THU 04: 13 PM OLYMPIA FEDERAL FAX NO, 3602756003 P. 02 Sfp 20 05 07: 35a Diana Griffea 3602753165 P• I MASON COUNTY BOND FORM Type of Permit: �;Yi�2.rv.i r �.•rc�-� Type of Improvement: N o r j t-6 Project location: C<` Legal Description of Property: r! Ro,rge With reference to the above-identified matter,this will certify that this institution has a savings account(or loan)for the above-referenced owner/developer/contractor for-the project so identified. In consideration of the permitted improvement,and in lieu of a performance bond,this institution hereby agrees that it will freeze the following sums of money for the indicated improvement pending written authorization for release of said funds by in.the amount of$ �Cb•GG Dollars. The total sum indicated will be withheld by this institution from any disbursements of any kind until written authorization has been received by this institution from Mason County to release the sum of money indicated by the written authorization from the County. The design,location;materials and other specifications for the indicated improvement are those required by Mason County as appears in the above-referenced docurnent/pemai't, and shall be in cotpphance with the Mason County Resource Ordinance, Chapter 8.52 Mason County Code as ameuded. Thee funds shall/ b •be held by the institution for a period of three years. rn the event that _ G1 y� � C.(� (responsible parry's flame)does not comply with the aforementioned rNuiremen ,Mason County may demand, and the institution shall make,payment to Mason County of said funds so that the necessary repairs can be perf��)=tned immediately to Masora County standards. The institution shall not be liable to &V`4ee A (responsible patty's name) for any disbursement of said funds to Mason CounVA The conditions in this agreement may only be amended or revoked by express written con 'tion o Mason County. Signatureg Responsible P44-f' Date r � Confidential Page 1 Form Revised:03/25/03 SEP-29-2005 THU 04: 13 PM OLYMT FEDERAL FAX NO, 3602756003 P. 03 odP ca, u;D uv: ,7oa uiana ciriffev 3602753165 p. 2 i .J Accepted: a CA Name of Rkik/Phoua Number Approved: ntle: -A �- Bank Address Date b 3�si��2-� �s' • Account Number STATE OF WASNINGTON, County of m It�D n (Individual Acknowiedgem=t) I, �i11 LVi e, AV1V\ ` ,Notary Public in and for the State of Washington,residing at do hereby certify that on this day of �' ,20 < ,personally appeared before me L — to me Imown to be the individual described herein and who executed as instrument and acknowledged that signed and sealed the same as ' free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes hcrain mentioned. GIVEN UNDER MY#AND AND OFFICIAL SEAL this 2-0 day of -1� 20 Public in an for the State of _ -'."a ►,R Fa gton, residing at s r u1 said �Z'%ter C My Commission expires v Confidontiai Page 2 Form Revised,03M/03 Page 1 of 3 Rebecca Hersha - RE: buffer mitigation From: Rebecca Hersha To: Ryan Griffey Date: 7/26/2010 10:21 AM �� 7 I-)�/ non Subject: RE: buffer mitigation TO BE KEPT IN THE FAnCEL FILE— Hello Ryan, I visited your property on 7-19-10 and found your restoration to be adequate and am sending a letter to Olympia Federal Savings to release your bond. Sincerely, Rebecca Hersha, Planner 2 Mason County DCD 360-427-9670 ext. 287 >>> On 7/8/2010 at 6:41 PM, in message <BAY148-w55528792309C7A178AE3FBD4B50@phx.gbl>, Ryan Griffey <rgriffey65@msn.com> wrote: Rebecca, The paths were not drawn into the plan because the property was overgrown by blackberries and nettles. Some of the blackberries were 15' tall in the trees. It was impossible to navigate. When I planted the cedar trees I hand chopped them out and over the course of three years they were finally manageable. I haven't planted anything other than cedar trees and ferns at this point because the small plants get overtaken by invasive species such as buttercups/blackberries. I've tried to keep those at bay by weedeating on a regular basis. I've let the salmon berries/nettles/thimbleberries/alders and maple trees grow without much interruption. The other issue is that the property was extensively damaged by flooding, I believe in the winters of 2006 and 2007. Lucas Creek runs through the property and Coulter Creek runs along the border as well as a seperate channel that was created by a beaver dam upstream of the property. When it floods the whole lower portion the the property is covered in two feet of water and silt. I think I planted about 40 cedar trees overall and I think all but three of them have survived. If you want me to put more plants in I will do so at my first opportunity. Thanks, Ryan Griffey Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2010 08:27:10 -0700 From: Rebecca H @co.mason.wa.us To: rgriffey65@msn.com Subject: RE: buffer mitigation file://C:\Documents and Settings\RebeccaH\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4C4D6IA9... 7/26/2010 Page 2 of 3 Oh ok, that's fine. I wonder why Lee Boad didn't draw them in. Well, I will just be looking to make sure the plants are all there, per the HMP, and healthy. Sincerely, Rebecca Hersha, Planner 2 Mason County DCD 360-427-9670 ext. 287 >>> On 7/7/2010 at 7:36 PM, in message <BAY148-w6107618EF35B6B4BE304E9D4B40@phx.gbl>, Ryan Griffey <rgriffey65@msn.com> wrote: The paths were put in before I ever took possesion of the property. In addition, I never received written notice from the county that they had to come out. Ryan Griffey Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2010 11:14:58 -0700 From: Rebecca H@co.mason.wa.us To: rgriffey65@msn.com Subject: buffer mitigation Hell Mr. Griffey, Please refer to the email below that I sent to you in January 2009. 1 will be performing a site visit within the next month to see that you have removed the gravel walkways within the buffer and completed the mitigation as detailed in your approved Habitat Management Plan (for VAR2005-00002 and BLD2005- 01233). This is a courtesy warning that if the above has not been completed, Mason County will open an enforcement case on the parcel and may issue fines and schedule a public hearing. Thank you. Sincerely, Rebecca Hersha, Planner Mason County DCD (360) 427-9670 extension 287 **************************************************************** 1/5/09 Hello Mr. Griffey, Your request for a bond release was forwarded to me recently. Thank you for your efforts to restore the critical areas and buffers for your Variance (VAR2005-00002). However, I see that you have not submitted the three annual monitoring reports required in the County's Staff Report and the Hearing Examiner's Decision. These reports shall be prepared by a qualified biologist detailing the condition of the restoration area. Also, on January 2, 2009 I visited the site. I found the following inadequacies: file://C:\Documents and Settings\RebeccaH\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4C4D61 A9... 7/26/2010 Page 3 of 3 1. You created graveled walkways in or within the buffers of the wetland and streams. These gravel walkways were not in your approved Habitat Management Plan. 2. I found several cedar trees planted, but very few shrubs, ferns, and groundcover. Trees shall be 10 feet apart, shrubs shall be 4 feet apart, and ferns shall be 3 feet apart. This planting density was not observed on January 2, 2009.. Please closely review the mitigation section of your approved Habitat Management Plan. When you feel that the mitigation is complete, please hire a qualified biologist (like Lee Boad) to submit annual monitoring reports to Mason County Planning, for three consecutive years. Thank you. file://CADocuments and Settings\RebeccaH\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4C4D61A9... 7/26/2010 Ryan Griffey Replanting Plan Page 2 of 2 1. Planting will be as per the recommendations in the Habitat Management Plan: Trees- 10' on center Shrubs-4' on center Ferns- 3' on center Trees: western red cedar Shrubs: salmonberry Ferns: sword fern Groundcover: kinnikinnik Coastal strawberry 2. Zone A, located along both sides of Lucas Creek will consist of western red cedar and sword fern with one row of salmonberry down each side of the stream. It will include the thinning and eventual removal of invasive/non-native species, mostly of which is Himalayan Blackberry. Removal of Blackberry bushes will occur as replanted materials take over. 3. Zone B, located in the current designated Wetland Zone and part of the currently cleared area will be planted with western red cedar, kinnikinnik and sword fern. In order to restore this area a significant amount of grass and comfry will be removed by hand. 4. Zone C, is inhabited by a very large old growth spruce as well as a big leaf maple tree. This area transmits very little light and therefore will be left natural. I do not believe that anything will grow well in this area. 5. A majority of the cedars will be 3ft. and larger to help prevent the Blacktail Deer from eating them. r surrounding land use. The size of the proposed structure appears to be consistent with the surrounding single-family residences as noted in the response to question one. The proposed location for the new structure will be in an area that contemplates the least impact on critical areas. S. The public interest will suffer no substantial detrimental effect. The proposal is consistent and compatible with the surround land uses. The structure will be built to current Mason County codes. 6. The granting of the variance is necessary for the placement of any structure on this lot due to the required buffer/setbacks from streams and wetlands. IX. Conclusions. Upon the above discussion the proposal is consistent with the variance criteria detailed in Section 17.01.150. Staff recommends approval of the proposal subject to the conditions listed below. 1. Developers and individuals shall be required to control erosion during construction. Removal of vegetation shall be avoided and any areas disturbed should be restored to prevent erosion and other environmental impacts. 2. The existing natural vegetative buffer shall remain undisturbed by any construction and/or development activities on the parcel. 3. The provisions and recommendations of the Habitat Management Plan shall be enacted. 4. All upland areas disturbed or newly created by construction activities shall be seeded,vegetated or given an equivalent type of erosion protection(silt fencing or straw matting). 5. A detailed planting plan, with species composition, density, and distribution shall be provided to and approved by planning staff prior to final approval of the building permit. 6. A monitoring plan shall be enacted whereby a qualified biologist shall submit a report detailing the condition of the restoration area. This report shall be due on the anniversary date of the issuance of the building permit and shall be submitted annually for three years. 7. A survival rate of 90%of plantings is required each year during the three-year monitoring period. If survival falls below 90%, the applicant shall replant to restore the required survival percentage and shall extend the monitoring report the necessary period to address the replantings. 8. A restoration bond shall be established with Mason County in the amount necessary to perform the restoration prior to final approval of building permit. 9. No degradation of water quality shall occur as a result of this project. 10. A title notification of habitat management plan shall be recorded with the deed prior to final approval of the building permit(Attachment 10). X. Choices of Action. 1. Approval of the Variance request. 2. Denial of the Variance request. Lee Boad Habitat Management Planning and Wetland Services PO Box 2854 •Belfair, WA 98528 . 360-620-0618 • leeboad anhctc.com REC'E �f ? f'"V :' Griffey Residential Construction Project _ Habitat Management Plan Parcel12209-24-00041 Prepared for: Ryan Griffey PO Box 181 Allyn,WA 98524 Prepared by: Lee Boad Lee Boad Habitat Management Planning and Wetland Services PO Box 2854 Belfair,WA 98528 leeboad@hctc.com Table of Contents Griffey Residential Construction Project Habitat Management Plan 1.0 Introduction.......... 2 ........ .................................................... 2.0 Project Description... ...... ........................ ......... ....................2 3.0 Property Description............... ........ 2 ......................... ............. 4.0 Applicable Setbacks.............. 4 .... .................................... ... .... 5.0 Species Information............ ......... ............ ............................4 6.0 Potential Development Impacts......... ... ...... ..................... .........5 7.0 Mitigation Measures......... ...................... 6 .. ......... ...... ... ...... ... 7.1 Preservation of Critically Important Plants 7.2 Seasonal Consideration of Construction Activities 7.3 Recommended Best Management Practices 7.4 Riparian Corridor Restoration 7.5 Minimizing Wetland Impacts 8.0 Monitoring... .................. .......................... g .................... ..... 9.0 Conclusion... ................ g ..... ........................... ............. ... ..... Recommended Citation: Lee Boad Habitat Management Planning and Wetland Services. January 2005. "Griffey Residential Construction Project,Habitat Management Plan and Wetland Report". Belfair, WA. Prepared for Ryan Griffey. 1 1.0 Introduction At the Request of Ryan Griffey, a Habitat Management Plan and Wetland Report has been prepared for the proposed residential construction at 461 Coulter Creek Road. This parcel is mapped in Section 9 of Township 22 North, Range 1 West. The property is recorded by the Mason County Tax Assessor's Office as Parcel #12209-24-00041. All observations reported in this report relate to this parcel unless otherwise stated. 2.0 Project Description This report addresses the proposed construction of a single-family residence within the protected buffer of a Type 3 Stream and a Category U Wetland Vegetation Area. The proposed construction site utilizes an area of the property that has been maintained as a cleared and graveled area for several decades. By using this location,disturbance to the stream buffer and wetland vegetation area within the ownership is minimized to the maximum extent. The recommended building footprint within the buffer totals 1,800 square feet. The proposed building size and site location has been recommended to result in no net loss of function or value to the stream buffer or wetland vegetation area. 3.0 Property Description The property consists of 1.12 acres located on Coulter Creek Road in Allyn, Washington. Coulter Creek and an associated side channel flow through the northern section of the property. Lucas Creek,a Type 3 Tributary to Coulter Creek runs through the western section. The riparian area surrounding Coulter Creek consists of a partially fragmented conifer/deciduous forest and scattered palustrine emergent/scrubshrub wetlands. The northern portion of Lucas Creek is also associated with the above-mentioned wetland. Within the property,the southern section of Lucas Creek consists of mature deciduous trees with an under-story heavily impacted by invasive exotic species that have significantly hindered riparian succession. The cleared and managed upland area makes up .29 acres of the total ownership (approximately 12,350 square feet). Nearly all of this area lies within the stream buffer and wetland vegetation area. 2 4 tZ A ..g � Figure 1. Proposed building location Figure 2. Lucas Creek(100' from building site) 3 Figure 3.Wetland location in relation to proposed building site 4.0 Applicable Setbacks This site is within the jurisdiction of Mason County. Ordinance 17.01.110 identifies Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas adopted by Mason County. The a licable setbacks encompassing this property are as follows: Habitat Type Buffer Building Setback from Buffer Type 3 Stream 150' 15' Type 1 Stream 150' 15' Category II Wetland 85' 15' _ 5.0 Species Information Puget Sound Chinook(Oncorhynchus trhawvtsha) Threatened Listed as threatened since March 24,1999 adult Puget Sound Chinook spawn in several rivers and streams flowing into Puget Sound. In the vicinity of the proposed project area, summer/fall Chinook spawn in Coulter Creek and Sherwood Creek. These stocks are assumed to be of hatchery origin,as these particular systems do not uphold habitat characteristics typical of"Chinook Systems". There are no nearby streams that would support core populations of Puget Sound Chinook, Designated Critical Habitat For Puget Sound Chinook Critical habitat includes all marine, estuarine,and river reaches accessible to Chinook Salmon in Puget Sound. Therefore, critical habitat is present within the vicinity of the project area, The entire project footprint is above the Ordinary High Water Mark. There will be no shoreline construction or modification associated with this project. The 4 restoration program associated with this project is designed to have a net benefit on the riparian habitat. Bull Trout(Salvelinus malma)-Threatened Bull Trout typically inhabit very cold headwater streams. Suitable habitat for Bull Trout is not present within the vicinity of the project area. Therefore,the proposed project is not likely to have any adverse impacts on Bull Trout. Bald Eagle(Haliaeetus leucocephalus)-Endangered Stands of second growth,deciduous, and deciduous/coniferous mix forests are in proximity to the project site. Wintering Bald Eagles have been observed in the vicinity of the project area. Foraging habitat encompasses a large vicinity of the surrounding area and is supported by the abundance of anadromous fish returning to Coulter Creek. Foraging and nesting habitat will not be negatively impacted by the proposed project, as no vegetation removal will occur. The restoration program associated with the project will likely have a net benefit. Marbled Murrelet(Brachyramphus marmoratus)-Threatened No old growth forests surround the site or are in vicinity of the project area. There are no documented nesting sites around Coulter Creek. Recovery or Management Plans Compliance Management Recommendations for Bald Eagles are included in W.D.F.W.'s Management Recommendations for Priority Species. This project is in compliance with the recommendations in this document. 6.0 Potential Development Impacts Vegetation Disturbance The proposed construction zone is within an existing cleared and managed graveled area. No vegetation disturbance or removal will be necessary to achieve project objectives. Designated Critical Habitat for Salmonids None of the actions described in the proposed project will destroy or adversely modify designated critical habitat. All actions described in this plan will not jeopardize the continued existence of any listed species. Noise Pollution A slight increase in noise from construction activities is anticipated during daylight construction hours. This will not adversely impact listed fish species occurring in the vicinity of the project area. It will not likely impact Bald Eagles. The project is not located within the proximity to any observed nesting sites. No roosts have been observed or documented within the radii of concern. 5 Temporary Increase in Sediment and Turbidity During Construction The proposed work has the potential to temporarily increase turbidity and suspended sediment within the project area. Best Management Practices have been recommended to reduce the potential for temporary increases in suspended sediment and turbidity. 7.0 Mitigation Measures 7.1 Preservation of Critically Important Plants Native vegetation within designated restoration and preservation zones will be protected. Due to the distance between the proposed construction zone and identified restoration zone, this should not be a problem. 7.2 Seasonal Consideration of Construction Activities Wintering bald eagle may be present between October 31 and March 31. It is recommended that any high noise level construction be minimized during these dates. 7.3 Recommended Best Management Practices Recommended Best Management Practices for this project are as follows: • Perform work during dry weather, • Install silt fencing around the work area to prevent erosion and siltation of waters. • Minimize amount of erodible soils at any given time to the maximum extent feasible. • Check all equipment daily for leaks. Refueling and lubrication of equipment should occur off site. Don't store any fuel, lubricants, chemicals, or hazardous substances outside overnight within the project area. • Do not apply any chemicals when there is a possibility of rain. • No construction equipment should be allowed in the wetland on site. • Comply with all permits and requirements of the government authority or agency. 7.4 Vegetation Restoration Riparian Currently the existing riparian zone is disconnected by a section of lawn that extends into the bankfull channel. It is recommended that this area be restored to a level that provides a riparian continuum throughout the property. The most time and cost effective means to accomplish this would be through planting native vegetation within the area adjacent to the creek. Wetland Vegetation Area An area of approximately 2,000 square feet located north of the house adjacent to the wetland should be planted to enhance the function of the wetland vegetation area and prevent future impacts resulting from residential land use. 6 .,.... .. .. "m.:,;�•-„_.�,6sw3waaea - "a �^iazn k*k ; "g-�,.a�aa3�� iw� :YesS-w1N�°.�d ^,�ac i' Figure 4. A portion of the recommended restoration zones Native Plantings It is recommended that supplemental native plantings be installed within the identified zones. These plantings should be installed to achieve the following densities: Trees- 10' on center Shrubs-4' on center Ferns-3' on center These densities would provide a moderately dense, structurally diverse plant community within the restoration area. Any natural volunteer native vegetation can be counted towards the target densities of restoration plants. After planting is finished, mulching any disturbed dirt areas around the plants with straw will help protect the new plantings and prevent erosion. Native plant species that may be used within the restoration zone include: Trees: western red cedar(Thuja plicata) Shrubs: salmonberry(rubes spectabilis) Ferns: sword fern(Polystichum munitum) Groundcover: kinnikinnik(Arcostaphy1mv uva-ursi) Coastal strawberry(Fragaria chdoensis) 7 These species have been recommended due to their high success rates associated with similar projects. All planting should occur during winter dormancy. The optimum time for planting is during February and March. Exotic Species Removal Much of the identified restoration zone is dominated by exotic species such as Japanese Knotweed and Himalayan Blackberry. Such species are stubborn competitors for light and nutrients and hinder riparian plant succession. These species should be removed from the entire area between the house and stream. Reed cannarygrass(Phalarys arundinacea)will need to be trimmed back from the 2-3 foot radius surrounding supplemented plants for the first three years. Herbicides should not be used to achieve this due to the proximity to the stream. 'Three cuttings during the growing season will be sufficient to offset the rhizomes of targeted species. 7.4 Minimizing Wetland Impacts The proposed building is to be located within the required 85-foot Wetland Vegetation Area. The building site currently maintains minimal to no significance to the wetland due to its cleared nature and relatively flat topography. The following measures are recommended to minimize impacts to habitat features of the wetland. • Direct light away from the wetland. • Route additional runoff resulting from construction away from the wetland. • Limit the use of pesticides within 150-feet of the wetland. • Adhere to recommended Best Management Practices 8.0 Monitorinp, Monitoring of the site will begin the first fall following tree plantings and maintained on a seasonal basis. The information gathered will provide the following: 1)condition of reintroduced plant species;2)the use of the site by wildlife species;3)any disturbance caused by the development and its effect on protected zones and associated aquatic habitat;4)any occurrence of exotic species within the restoration zones;5)any corrective measures that may be deemed necessary to provide desired conditions. This monitoring will be in effect for the duration of three years. The information gathered will be provided in an annual report and submitted to the Director of Mason County Department of Community Development. 9.0 Conclusion This project involves constructing a residence with a footprint of 1,800 square feet. The entire project lies within the protected buffer of a Type 3 Stream and partially within a Wetland Vegetation Area. Based on current conditions the proposed building site upholds minimal ecological significance pertaining to the health and habitat quality of the 8 stream or riparian corridor. Over 4,000 square feet of stream buffer and 2.000 square feet of Wetland Vegetation Area will be restored through vegetation enhancement. Preservation Measures,Restoration Measures,and Best Management Practices have all been identified to avoid,minimize,and mitigate for proposed construction. I trust this information is sufficient for your needs at this time. Thank you for choosing me as your environmental consultant. If you have any questions feel free to call. Lee Boad Habitat Management Planning and Wetland Services PO Box 2854 Belfair,WA 98528 360-620-0618 lceboad@hctc.com Attached:Plot Map 9 Lee 130ad Halo Ma wemerrt Flaming and Wetland Services 2�4,3�' -__-- ------- __. .--------_._—_--255,79' — —-- - - - - -- ' Client;Ryan Gaffey Property, #12209 24 00041 ---- -- 461 �Coulter Creek Road Coulter Creek Ddfair,WA 98528 Side Channel \ 4— Lucaz Creek \ \150' Duffer Cateopq II Wedand 169' Dwldvq 5etbackl 165' DuMN 5et6ack - \ 150' Duffer Categona II Wedand \ --- I—t" Catrgay II Wed`'and l I ` � vcqctaw Upland Area Cl eared ` Forested Lvald 100' Du11dwq Seib / Recam ,-Jed I 85 Duffer / --- 100'----�!cratkn Coulter Creek Road — — — Lee DoM Hab�at Management Plarw N aid Wetland 5cmce5 ---—___-- 21-4.3T --- — —- — 23'5.19 ------- — Cllet t,PJ4M Gaffey property. 412209 24 00041 1 461 �CaAer Creek goad CcAer Creek Pelfair,WA 98y28 5ide Chanel Lucas C4ek Category II Weiland �- 1� � � \ Categay II Weiland scale; I.=60' � 'FO't?esta-anon \ �i \ Za,e \ 323,�9' \\ \\ Weiland Vegetation Area \ Keyta-atbn Zw Category II Wetland 1 - - - 41- Vegetated' /W.,d Area Cleared � llplad -�}y —{ farested Upland I T Kecanmended I h0'Dudd�q Il 1 after Creek►Zaad AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss. COUNTY OF MASON ) I, 0 4k 'e" M. H Iv do hereby certify that I posted .3 copies of the attached IybTl� oi- Aye(,«A-Q-1� in 3 public places as follows: one at 706i1� ( cpe�-rZ.K one at \,-( C(�c'PF� Lt,�� ,I F' one at �bST O��tc � (� C(� In witness whereof,the party has signed this Affidavit of Posting Notice this 1-day of 20 aS By: Address: STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss. COUNTY OF MASON ) Subscribed and sworn to me this / day of 200-5 BONNIE L CAP i NOT,lRY PUBLIC tary Public fbf4fie Stat6 of Washington ST-ATt. . -—ON I 0 My Commission Expires June 6,2006 I Residing at 1 Commission Expires ---Notice of application for Variance from the Mason County Resource Ordinance and Notice of Public Hearing Notice is hereby given that Robert M.Griffey,who is the applicant for the following proposal,has filed an application for a Variance. The request for a variance from the Mason County Resource Ordinance No.77-93 is to place a newly constructed home of 1,800 square feet within the buffer of a tributary of Coulter Creek,a Type III stream,and the Vegetation Area and Building Setback of a Category II wetland. Property location is 461 East Coulter Creek Road,Belfair. Section 9 of Township 22 North,Range 1 West. Parcel# 12209-24-00041. Date of complete application:February 8,2005. The proposed development is reviewed as a Variance under the Mason County Resource Ordinance No.77-93,specifically Sections 17.01.110 and 17.01.070,Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas and Wetlands,respectively,which detail stream buffer and vegetation area requirements. Section 17.01.150,Variances from Standards,establishes Variance procedures and criteria.The proposal requires a Habitat Management Plan and Hearing Examiner approval. A PUBLIC HEARING will be held by the Mason County Hearing Examiner on the proposed project on Tuesday,April 12,2005 at 1:00 p.m.in the County Commissioners Chambers,Bldg.1,411 N.5`h Street,Shelton,WA. Please contact Charles Mead McCoy III of the Mason County Department of Community Development at(360)427-9670,ext.294,with any questions or comments on this development and variance. H:\Word\Griffey RO Variance Public Notice.doc.ram