Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
FPA2015-00005 MEP2016-00003 HMP multi parcel PUD - FPA Permit / Conditions - 12/6/1993
Inspection Line(360)427-7262 MASON COUNTY DEPT. OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Phone: (360)427-9670, ext. 352 Mason County 615 W Alder St to Shelton, WA 98584 FPA PERMIT FPA2015-00005 OWNER: PUD#1 RECEIVED: 10/22/2015 CONTRACTOR: LICENSE: EXP: ISSUED: 5/4/2016 SITE ADDRESS: 21971 N US HIGHWAY 101 SHELTON EXPIRES: 5/4/2018 PARCEL NUMBER: 422233460020 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: TR 3A&TR 2 OF SE SW PROJECT DESCRIPTION: DIRECTIONS TO SITE: FPA CONVERSION ON APPROX 4 ACRES AND WILL BE USED FOR A Private road just west of intersection of N Potlatch Rd and SR 101, behind PUD 1 PORTION OF THE OVERALL MASTER PLAN FOR THE MASON PUD#1 facility. OPERATION AND ADMINISTRATION FACILITY. PERMIT INFORMATION FEES Type By Date Amount Receipt NUMBER: CLASS: FPA Plan Check Fee with SEF JBN 10/23/201 $255.00 S2201500000000001023 FPA 15-05 IV Total $255.00 MORITORIUM: BOARD FEET: N 0.110 TOTAL AREA: CUT AREA: 4.00 4.00 CONVERSION TO: SHORELINE DESIG. IND NA WATER BODY: WATER TYPE: SHORELINE OF SIG.: SEPA: Y TYPE: ZONING: Clear Cut RR20 FPA2015-00005 Please refer to the following pages for conditions of this permit. Page 1 of 3 CASE NOTES FOR FPA2015-00005 CONDITIONS FOR FPA2015-00005 1) Habitat Management Plan As mitigation for impacts to Piliated Woodpecker habitat, the Habitat Management Plan prepared by Randy Reeve of Reeve Sherwood Consulting is approved as written. Mitigation shall be performed within one year of the issuance of a Class IV General FPA or within the first phase of development, which ever comes first. Prior to permit approval, a Title Notification of Habitat Management Plan and a Site Plan meeting all Auditor's formatting requirements shall be recorded with the Mason County Auditor. Cost of the recording shall be at the applicant's expense. 2) Cultural Resources Mason County has received comments from DAHP and the Skokomish Tribe that there is reason to believe that this site as a high potential for archeological resources. Prior to any ground disturbing activities (post-logging). A professional cultural resources survey archeological survey shall be completed with copies provided to the Mason County Planning Department, the Washington State Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation and the Skokomish Tribe. 3) Stormwater& Erosion Control Escape of silty water or mud from this property shall be considered a violation of County and State storm water management regulations, and could subject the applicant(s) to civil fines or penalties. Conditions and specifications of the SWPPP prepared for this project by Byron Woltersdorf of Brown and Kysar shall be consistent with section 2.5.2 of the 2005 WSDOE Stormwater Manual, shall be fully implemented and observed. 4) Slash Abatement This Forest Practice Application indicates that forest debris resulting from the proposed logging operation may create an extreme fire hazard under RCW 76.04.600 and WAC 332-24-650. An extreme fire hazard could be created if one or more of the conditions found in WAC 332-24-650 is located within 100 feet of the running surface of a public road; or is within 500 of an existing structure and/or designated public use area, which is not owned by the owner of the fire hazard area. The land owner is fully liable in the event of fire, if he or she fails to appropriately abate the hazard. Extreme fire hazards shall be abated by removing the forest debris, or by other means approved by the Washington State Department of Natural Resources (DNR). FPA2015-00005 Please refer to the following pages for conditions of this permit. Page 2 of 3 This permit becomes null and void if work or construction authorized is not commenced within 180 days, or if construction or work is suspended for a period of 180 days at any time after work is commenced. Evidence of continuation of work is a progress inspection within the 180 day period. Final inspection must be approved before building can be occupied. Proof of continuation of work is by means of a rogress inspection. The owner or the agent on the owners behalf, represents that the information provided is accurate and grants employees of Mason ount a ove scribed property and structure for review andinspection. OWNER OR AGENT: DATE: FPA2015-00005 Please refer to the following pages for conditions of this permit. Page 3 of 3 w LJ MASON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FPA poi -_�/yyOJ j 1 Mason County Bldg. III, 426 West Cedar Street / PO Box 279, Shelton, WA 98584 tn'st www.co.masonma.us (360)427-9670 Belfair(360)275-4467 Elma (360)482-5269 - -- RF�'aIVED FOREST PRACTICES APPLICATION/NOTIFICATION OCT 2 2 2015 Type IV General 426 W. CEDAR ST. This application should be accompanied with an Environmental Checklist(SEPA)as well as an activity map/site plan which addresses items listed below. TYPE OR PRINT IN INK: 1. Landowner,Timber Owner and Operator information. Legal Name of LANDOWNER Legal Name of TIMBER OWNER Legal Name of OPERATOR Mason PUD#1 Same Same Mailing Address: Mailing Address: Mailing Address: N 21971 Hwy. 101 City, State,Zip City,State,Zip City,State,Zip Shelton, WA 98584 Phone(360 877-5249 Phone( ) Phone( ) Email: stevent@mason-pudl.org Email: Email: 2. Contact person information. Contact Person Phone(360 877-5249 Steven Taylor, General Manager t t seven mason- udl.or Email: @ P g 3. If you are harvesting timber,enter the Forest Tax Reporting Account Number of the Timber Owner: #800-888-888 For tax reporting information or to receive a tax number,call the Department of Revenue at(800)548-8829. 4. Legal description where the forest practices will occur. Parcel Number Sub Division Y.1A Section Township Range E/W 4222-33-400000 All 3.3ac SE1/4,SW1/4 23 22N 4 W 4222-33-400030 portion " Z2 z 3- 20 (hb; 5. Answer each question as it applies to your proposed forest practice. a. [q]No. [] Yes. Is the activity within an urban growth area? b. [n]No. [] Yes. Is the activity within a public park? c. [e]No. [] Yes. Is the activity within 500 feet of a public park? Park name: d. [q]No. [] Yes. Is the activity located on lands platted after January 1, 1960? e. [■]No. [] Yes. Is the activity within 200 feet of saltwater lake river/creek/stream pond wetland seasonal runoff slopes which exceed 15%? f. What is the expected duration of FPA? 21 days Proposed start date: November 2015 Proposed end date: December 2015 Page 1 of 4 6. Are you cutting or removing timber? []No. Yes. Complete the table below and identify all timber harvest and salvage activity boundaries on the activity map. Acres Volume to be Steepest Slope in Unit# Harvest Type Yarding Method net Harvested mb Harvest Unit all units Even a e Feller, Rub Tire Skd —4.0 0.110 MBF —7% 7. Are you constructing or abandoning roads? [�]No. [] Yes. Complete the table below. Show locations and identify all road activities on the activity map. Total Length Steepest Side Slope Abandonment Date Type of ActivityNone feet % (Mo/Yr Road Construction NA Does Not Apply Temporary Road Construction Atypical Con. entrance 100' 5% At completion Road Abandonment NA Work in or over typed water may require a Hydraulic Project Approval(HPA)from the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW). If you have questions concerning the HPA,visit the WDFW website at www.wdfw.wa.aov/habitat.htm. 8. Are you installing or replacing water-crossings? H No. [] Yes. Complete the table below. Show locations and identify all proposed water-crossings on the activity map. Crossing Crossing Dimensions Crossing Crossing Dimensions Identifier Type (width x length) Identifier Type width x length) 9. Mark the following activities that will be done in or over typed water. Activity in or over: Type I Stream Type H Stream Type III Stream Type IV Stream Type V Stream Removing culverts of bridges Equipment crossing Ground skidding Suspending cables Cable yarding Falling and bucking Other 10. Is any activity in a wetland or wetland buffer? [--]No. [] Yes. Complete the table below. Show locations and identify all wetlands and buffers on the activity map. Wetland Wetland Type Activity Type in Activity Type in Total Wetland Total Area Total Area Identifier (1,H,III,IV, Wetland Buffer Area(acres) Drained(acres) Filled(acres) other 11. Describe how the following are identified on the ground. • Harvest boundaries/unit corners: Flagging • Right-of-way limits and centerlines for road work,culverts and bridges: Paved gravel and maintained marked with flagging • Critical areas and critical area buffer boundaries: NONE Page 2 of 4 12. Have you reviewed this forest practices activity area to determine whether it may involve historic sites and/or Native American cultural resources? []No. [I Yes- 13. We affirm that the information contained herein is true,and understand that this proposed forest practice is subject to the Forest Practices Act and Rules and Mason County Forest Practices Conversion Ordinance as well as all other federal,state or local regulations. Compliance with the Forest Practices Act and Rules and the Mason County Forest Practices Conversion Ordinance does not ensure compliance with the Endangered Species Act or other federal state or local laws. Sign f LANDOWNER Signature of TIMBER OWNER Signature of OPERATOR (if differen an landowner) (If differe t t 1 vQerj'' I!I Print name: f� zT� ke5�rl sG+c r� 1 Print name: L Print name: Date: lb—I q—J 5— �c �(c— Date: Lo—J`Y—i 5 � Date: Additional information: (Optional) Per Mason County Ordinance 11.05,Section 11.05.120,a site map shall accompany this application which includes the following information. I Harvest boundaries and tree retention areas. II The approximate location of any structures. III The location of all existing and proposed streets,right-of-ways,easements,skid roads,haul roads,and landings within the proposal. IV The location of future land development including stormwater management facilities and vegetation to be retained for site landscaping,open space,wildlife habitat,screening,and/or buffers. V Site topography at contour intervals of 40 feet. VI Critical areas and critical area buffers regulated pursuant to the Critical Areas Ordinance. VII Drainage ways and culverts. VIII Site area targeted for further harvest including proposed timing. IX North arrow and scale shall be shown on all site plans.The scale shall be no smaller than one inch to 200 feet. Staff asks that,at a minimum,the corners of the harvest unit(s)be flagged for clear identification. Page 3 of 4 WWI NOTE: Copies of all FPA Applications will be forwarded to Mason County Public Works for stormwater and erosion control review.Projects which disturb more than one acre(regardless of total lot size)will require an engineered stormwater plan consistent with the Mason County Stormwater Ordinance(Chapter 14.48.)and the 1992 WSDOE Stormwater Manual(2005 in Belfair&Allyn UGA's).Applicants will be charged for Public Works staff time to review these plans and applications. Property owners should also be aware that the Washington State Department of Ecology(WSDOE)might ask for a NPDES(National Pollution Discharge Elimination System)Permit. The threshold for such a permit is equivalent to Mason County's threshold.WSDOE will notify applicants through SEPA review if a NPDES is required.An NPDES is not a perquisite for FPA approval. It is the responsibility of the applicant to obtain this permit when required. FPA FEE: $255.00 with SEPA SEPA FEE: 0-9.99 Acres$630 $375.00 without SEPA 10 to 20 Acres$755 Over 20 Acres$945 EIS(DS)$2,525+70/hr Departmental Review (For Office Use Only) Site visit: Date approved: y /Z / ) G n (IN - 0 X- Mason County Community eveloptnen ITLANNINGPACTPA.DOC 12/15/2008 Page 4 of 4 FINDINGS OF FACT FPA Case#2015-00005 APPLICANT: PUD # 1 APPLICATION DATE: October 22, 2015 Mason County has reviewed the above referenced application for Class IV General Forest Practices and finds it in conformance with all applicable County land use regulations in effect at the time of application. FINDINGS The proposed FPA is compliant with the following conditions: The proponent has paid the prescribed fees. The proponent has filed a complete, signed application. A map has been received that complies with the requirements of 11.05.120: (I) Harvest boundaries and tree retention areas. (II) The approximate location of any structures. (III) The location of all existing and proposed streets, right-of-ways, easements, skid roads, haul roads, and landings within the proposal. (IV) The location of future land development including stormwater management facilities and vegetation to be retained for site landscaping, open space,wildlife habitat, screening, and/or buffers. (V) Site topography at contour intervals of 40 feet. (VI) Critical areas and critical area buffers regulated pursuant to the Critical Areas Ordinance. (VII) Drainage ways and culverts. (VIII) Site area targeted for further harvest including proposed timing. (IX) North arrow and scale shall be shown on all site plans. The scale shall be no smaller than one inch to 200 feet. That this FPA is in conformance with the following Mason County ordinances: 11.05 That the proposed FPA involves 4 acres encompassing three parcels. That the notifications required by 11.05.060 have been made if applicable. N/A Mason County Resource Ordinance 1 _X_That at the issuance of this permit will not result in a violation of the Mason County Resource Lands and Critical Areas Ordinance. The site was inspected by Michael MacSems of the Mason County Planning Department who determined that any critical area buffer and/or steep slope issues have been resolved. Habitat Management Plan in place for Piliated Woodpecker habitat mitigated through MEP 2016-00003. Geo-Technical Report/Assessment Review A Geo-Technical _X_ Assessment_Report(check one) was written by Jason Ordway of Columbia West Engineering and a submittal checklist was approved by Michael MacSems of Mason County DCD on 2/2/16. Washington State Department of Transportation _X_A DOT Access Permit is not required for this proposal. _A DOT Access Permit is required for this proposal. Date Approved by DOT: Note: WSDOT did not respond to SEPA determinations. Mason County Road Access Permit Road Access Permits were issued by Mason County Public Works on Access is to SR 101. Shoreline Master Program That, if applicable, all activity under this application are in conformance with the Mason County Shoreline Master Program and has a shore line designation of N/A. State Environmental Policy Act This application for FPA#2015-00005: _X_Has been reviewed for SEPA compliance under case 4: SEP 2015-00084. _Is SEPA exempt. _DNS X MDNS Stormwater Management 2 e A Stormwater and Erosion Control plan written to the specifications of the 2005 WSDOE Stormwater Manual by Byron Woltersdorf of Brown and Kysar, as well as a submittal checklist was reviewed Michael MacSems of DCD and he approved a submittal checklist on 2/3/16. Permission from Underlying Property Owners: Signed by Greg Kester I Director of Finance&Customer Service and District Auditor CONCLUSION In conclusion,this application for Class IV General Forest Practices is consistent with the above criteria and that the public uses and Mason County has fulfilled its statutory obligations. RECOMMENDATIONS I, being the Manager of the Mason County Planning Department,hereby attest to and certify that appropriate provisions have been made for this Class IV General Forest Practices Application and hereby recommend approval. In addition these facts evidenced by the contents of the file for this Forest Practice Application. Signed, � a Barb A ns, Planning Director Dat Michael MacSems, FPA Reviewer Date 3 P.ON ooa'4T MASON COUNTY Shelton (360) 427-9670 A DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Belfair (360) 275-4467 Planning Mason County Bldg. 1 411 N.5th Elma (360) 482-5269 P.O.Box 279 Shelton,WA 98584 1854 Steve Taylor Mason County PUD 1 N 21971 Hwy 101 Shelton, WA 98584 May 26, 2011 RE: 42223-34-00000 Dear Mr. Taylor, This morning I inspected your site for tress and snags showing evidence of being used for forage by Pileated Woodpeckers. Using red&white striped surveyor's tape I marked eight snags east of the driveway and seven snags west of the driveway. These snags may or may not be in the logging unit (it was hard to be sure). The snags marked are only a fraction of the total number of snags on your site showing evidence woodpecker forage as I only marked those showing the large oblong holes associated with the Pileateds. I can not guarantee that I found every Pileated Woodpecker snag,but I'm sure that I found most of them. Your options are to 1: leave these snags alone during the logging phase or 2: to hire a qualified biologist to create a Habitat Management Plan for mitigation to impacts. Please feel free to contact me if you have further questions. I can not do any more work on this case until I know how you want to proceed and whether or not you are going to enlarge your logging unit to include land east of the current driveway. I can be reached at ext. 571 or by email at mms@co.mason.wa.us if you have any questions. Thank you. Sincerely, J . Michael MacSems FPA Reviewer °p°�Tp MASON COUNTY (360)427-9670 Shelton ext. 352 COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT (360)275-4467 Belfair ext. 352 Mason County Bldg. 82 615 W.Alder Street (360)482-5269 Elma ext. 352 Shelton, WA 98584 www.co.mason.wa.us 18.54 To: Whom It May Concern From: Michael MacSems, Mason County Planning Dept Date: February 18, 2016 Re: Mason Environmental Permit w/Habitat Management Plan for Mason County PUD#1 (MEP 2016-00003) Comment Period: Per sections 17.01.110.G and J and 17.01.120.H of the Mason County Resource Ordinance, a copy of the Mason County PUD#1 Mason Environmental Permit(MEP) is being made available to all stipulated parties. Mason County officials have until March 10th,to respond and outside agencies need to respond by March 17th. In the event that no comments are received from a particular department or agency, within the comment window,the Planning Department will assume that there are not any concerns. Written comments should be sent to the address listed above. Project Background: This MEP is part of a larger project to expand the current PUD #1 facility at N 21971 SR 101 near Potlatch, Washington. The stand of trees just behind(west) of the existing PUD facility needs to be removed in order for the expansion to occur. In that stand of trees, several trees showing signs of being used by Piliated Woodpeckers for forage have been observed. Piliated Woodpeckers are listed in the Mason County Critical Areas Ordinance as a Species of Importance. As such, disruption of their habitat is to be avoided when possible and mitigated for when avoidance is not possible. PUD #1 has contracted with Reeve Sherwood Consulting to create a mitigation plan. Attached is a copy of a Habitat Management Plan written by Randy Reeves for a .58-acre mitigation plan to be located on the site. If you have any questions,please call me at ext 571 or e-mail at mms@co.mason.wa.us. Thank you. Contact List: Mason County Department of Community Development Director,Mason County Public Works Director, Mason County Department of Environmental Health Director Mason County Fire Marshal Mason County Building Official Olympic Region Clean Air Agency Skokomish Tribe Wash Dept of Fish&Wildlife Wash Dept of Ecology r ® MASON ENVIRONMENTAL PERMIT($630 or$380 w/other permit) Mason County Permit Center Use: ❑ CONDITIONAL USE($1520) MEP 2l) I e - 660D a HABITAT MANAGEMENT PLAN REVIEW($445) Date Rcvd 1' MASON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Mason County Resource Ordinance(Chapter 17.01 MCC) ENVIRONMENTAL PERMIT APPLICATION The purpose of the Resource Ordinance is to protect Mason County's natural resource lands and critical areas and is under the authority of Chapters 36.32,36.70A,39.34,58.17, 76.09, 84.33, 84.34 and 90.58 RCW. PLEASE PRINT 1.PROPERTY OWNER Name: Steven Taylor(Mason County PUD41) Mailing Address:N 21971 HWY 101,Shelton, WA 98584 Work Phone: (360)877-5249 Email Address: Home/Cell Phone: Fax#: If an agent is acting for the property owner during the permit process, complete 42. 2.AUTHORIZED AGENT Name:Byron Woltersdorf, PE(Brown&Kysar) Mailing Address:PO Box 1720, Battle Ground, WA 98604 Work Phone: (360)607-0643 Email Address:byronw@bki.cc Home/Cell Phone: Fax# 3.PROJECT SITE Site Address: 22021 N HWY 101,Shelton, 97A 98584 Parcel#: 42223- 34 -00000,00030,00020 Legal Description: SEl/4,SGT'I/4,S23,T22N,R4W Directions to Site:Site is located on the intersection of N. HWY. 101 and Potlatch Cushman RD. and is west of N HWY 101 and south of Potlatch Cushman RD. - _ -o S 01a 3 Ile— Attach a site plan showing the following: Lot Dimensions,Flood Zones,Existing Structures,Fences, Water Lines,Driveways,Drainage Plans,Shorelines,Septic System,Topography,Proposed Improvements,Easements,North Arrow,and Scale. Also draw a separate topography diagram. 4. State which section requires permit: ❑ Long Term Commercial Forest,Chapter 17.10.060 ❑ Frequently Flooded Areas,Chapter 17.01.090 ❑ Mineral Resource Lands,Chapter 17.01.066 ❑ Landslide Hazard Area,Chapter 17.01.100 ❑ Aquifer Recharge Area,Chapter 17.01.080 ❑ Seismic Hazard Areas,Chapter 17.01.102 ❑ Erosion Hazard Area,Chapter 17.01.104 0 Fish&Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas,Chapter ❑ In-Holding Lands,Chapter 17.01.062 17.01.110 ❑ Wetlands,Chapter 17.01.070 5. Identify current use of the property with existing improvements: The property is currently not in use. 6. Identify and describe the proposed project,including the type of materials to be used,construction methods, principle dimensions,and other pertinent information(attach additional sheets,if needed): Proposed for the site are land clearing activities. Total area of clearing will be approximately 4 acres.Best management practices are to be implemented during site disturbance to contain and infiltrate any runoff resulting from proposed activity. 7. Describe why the action requiring this permit cannot be avoided. Area needs clearing for future development.Impacted wildlife habitat conservation areas are to be appropriately mitigated under an approved AMP. 8. Will there be an alteration of a wetland and/or wetland vegetation area(circle one)? Yes No 9. Identify any surface water on or adjacent to property(circle one): rt$e Saltwater Lake Stream Pond Wetland Drainage Ditch 10. Identify existing septic/sewer connection(circle one): If septic is located on project site,include records. Yone Connected to Septic Connected to Community Septic 11. Identify existing water supply(circle one):. one Public Water Supply Well 11. Type of Job(circle one): New Add Alteration Repair Demolition Other: TvpeIVFPA Byron Woltersdorf 0210412016 Print Name Signa a Date Case Activity Listing 3/16/2016 4:09:09PM Case #: PAR2016-00011 IF, Description: PART OF THE SITE CURRENTLY CONTAINS THE ACTIVE FACILITIES OF MASON CO PU ,kssigned Done Activity„ Description Date 1 Date 2 Date 3 Hold Disp To 11v Updated Updated By PARB20 Building Plan Review 2/24/2016 None 2/24/2016 JBN PARB40 Environ.Health Review 2/24/2016 None 2/24/2016 JBN PARB50 Public Works Review 2/24/2016 None 2/24/2016 JBN PARB60 Fire Marshal Review 2/24/2016 None 2/24/2016 JBN PARA10 Application Received 2/24/2016 None DONE JBN 2/24/2016 JBN INVOICING PUD#1 FOR PAR CONF FEES$460 PARBIO Planning Review 2/24/2016 3/16/2016 None DONE GBM GBM 3/16/2016 GBM Grace Miller attended the meeting on behalf of the Planning Department.We discussed the following Planning Dept reqirements: -Zoning-The portions of the property along Hwy 101 are Zoned as Rural Commercial 2.The remainder of the property is Zoned Rural Residential 20.The development is considered as a"Public Utility" under the defined use. Staff requested that a Site Plan be sumitted that indicates where the parcel lines are in relation to the structures,with the Zoning layers,so that we can discuss this requirement further in a future meeting with Planner Michael MacSems and our Director,Barbabra Adkins.It may be necessary to re-zone some of the property and do Boundary Line Adjustments so that the structures are not crossing property lines. Staff will also need to determine if a Development Regulation Variance must be approved by the Hearing Examiner through the Public Hearing process because of the size of the structures. -Parking and Stormwater-Staff gave you the Parking Standards and a Stormwater Submittal Checklist.The Engineered Stormwater Plan will need to meet the 2005 Ecology Stormwater Manual.The Site plan will need to show all of the proposed parking stalls,ingess,egress,etc..per this ordinance. - A SEPA Checklist will need to be prepared and submitted for the development proposal.The checklist is required because of the size of the development and the grading.The previous information that has been prepared regarding enviormmental impacts such as the pileated woodpecker mitigation and the Cultural Resource Survey will be included in the SEPA for the site. -Geotehnical Report-An Addendum to the submitted Geotechnical Analysis that was prepared should be submitted with the applications.The Addendum should address the proposed grading and structures. C � -v iat ujdwjjj� Page 1 of I CaseActivity-rpt REEVE -Or SH ERWOOD CONSULTING. LLC Habitat Management Plan — Final Report Parcel: 42223-34-00000 Mason County, Washington This report discusses the actions taken to meet the mitigation requirements outlined in the Habitat Management Plan(HMP) for the construction of a new operations facility for Mason County Public Utility District#1. In accordance with the HMP, a 140' x 180' (—0.58 acres)portion of property in the northwest corner of the project area was protected. Eight snags from the portion of the property that was cleared were replanted within this protected area. This was possible because the PUD has the equipment capable of auguring out a hole and then placing a tree into it. Trees with rootwads and logs that were also removed from the surrounding area were also placed within the protected area as nursing logs to help maintain insect populations and foraging habitat for the woodpeckers. The western approximately 30 feet of this area previously contained no trees. Thirty(30)Douglas fir trees were planted on 15-foot centers within this area and the SE portion of the project area. The wide spacing of these trees will allow the trees to grow lots of limbs and create a good buffer to the cleared lands to the west. The old access road has been abandoned and log piles were placed on and along this road. The preservation and enhancement of this—.58 acre area located in the northwestern portion of the PUD#1 property will provide foraging habitat and also has the potential to provide nesting habitat as the trees continue to mature and die. The placement of additional dead trees on the ground will provide additional foraging opportunities and make for insect colonization of current and future dying trees. The placement of this protected area adjacent to other forested habitats is another reason why it is believed that this project is and will continue to be a good location for Pileated Woodpecker activities. All requirements of the HMP mitigation plan were completed and extra I "was left onsite to further enhance foraging and insect recruitment. If there are any questions pertaining this final monitoring report please contact Randy Reeve at 541-231-9475. p. :Iced pc't ,� .�$ I � fir, /w � �`� 1 �. '`J[. /" �•'T i . �,N e , ' �"°"�' �� �"' � �•� � Harstine Isl"a Tour Guide h�-"`Lnagery Date:5�5l2013 lat 47.326480' Ion-123.083918' elev 422 ft eye aft SZ23 mi Q Approximate Proje tT Habitat .g_ Site • REEVE © As-Built • Figure . 1 • . ONLY 1 - A7 M� xea vw Mks +� 4 0 Tour Guide tv0ap Imagery Date.5,5 2013 lat 47.375162 ibn.a.3.15 565° elev 0 It ew aft 142Habitat Management Plan • • • 1 NOT ONLY1 Gravel r - Wft ALAbandoned Road: Ilk 05 01 ��' 'S rf�.;� +r� � • -�!f.�� as ,, . IL r r t ` s, , x+,� ► ,;;�. Y -=: C;c oglc Par.. °Tou Guw •199F. . - I! .? 7,,323,°.Ion 12 S;--` �_. -. m Soil Map—Mason County,Wasn 9 v1 487300 4875M 4877M 487900 48BI00 488" 488800 4BB700 4889W 439100 4893G, j Approximate Project ` Location u. ,,, + t 1J a 4T=TN 487300 487500 487700 487900 488100 488300 48SEW 488700 488900 489100 489300 31. 3 Map Sale:1:9,970 f prixed on A krxkmpe(li"x 8.5l sheet m R, Melers N 0 100 200 400 600 A0 450 900 1800 2700 Map pmJ.chm:Vkb M—tar Com .—d—WS:VG5B4 Edp Ga:UrM zone 10N NK594 Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 1/6/2016 conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 3 Soil Map—Mason County,Washington MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION Area of Interest(AOI) g Spoil Area The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:31,700. o Area of Interest(AOI) Q Stony Spot Warning:Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. Soils Soil Map unit Polygons W Very Stony Spot Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause Wet Spot misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line w Soil Map Unit Lines placement.The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting Soil Map Unit Points p other soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale. � Special Line Features Special Point Features Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map Blowout Water Features measurements. r... Streams and Canals Borrow Pa Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Transportation Web Soil Survey URL: http:l/websoilsurvey.nrGs.usda.gov Clay Spot +14 Rails Coordinate System: Web Mercator(EPSG:3857) 0 closed Depression ry Interstate Highways Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator Gravel Pit N US Routes projection,which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area.A projection that preserves area,such as the Gravelly Spot Major Roads Albers equal-area conic projection,should be used if more accurate 0 Landfill Local Roads calculations of distance or area are required. h Lava Flow Background This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s)listed below. 46 Marsh or swamp . Aerial Photography Soil Survey Area: Mason County,Washington * Mine or Quarry Survey Area Data: Version 11,Sep 15,2015 O Miscellaneous Water Soil map units are labeled(as space allows)for map scales 1:50,000 O Perennial Water or larger. y Rock Outcrop Date(s)aerial images were photographed: Data not available. + Saline Spot The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background Sandy Spot imagery displayed on these maps.As a result,some minor shifting 4W Severely Eroded Spot of map unit boundaries may be evident. Q Sinkhole Slide or Slip t Sadic Spot Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 1/6/2016 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 3 Soil Map—Mason County,Washington Map Unit Legend Mason County,Washington(WA645) Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI Gk Grove gravelly sandy loam,5 to 170.1 33.9% 15 percent slopes Hd Hoodsport gravelly sandy loam, 14.3 2.9% 5 to 15 percent slopes He Hoodsport gravelly sandy loam, 11.8 2.4% 15 to 30 percent slopes Hf Hoodsport gravelly sandy loam, 119.5 23.8% 30 to 45 percent slopes Ma Made land 3.8 0.8% Subtotals for Soil Survey Area 319.4 63.7% Totals for Area of Interest 501.3 100.0% USpy Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 1/6/2016 �i Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3 Mason County PUD#1 Habitat Management Plan: Pictures 6 4 Yf i; 4 a � s K z =s Photo 1:Shows protected NE portion of the habitat management area { Planted Snags ars. a Photo 2:NW corner of management are with log pile and planted habitat tree in the foreground T {{ t 4 t K Y 4. •.tit' 'R' f �a Photo 3: Looking west from interior portion of management area at LWD Snags Photo 4:Looking SW from interior portion of management area LWD and snags r+ i'J i•�i� �arY *C .c ® 3 F `��. !; a ._ - f .i t�•_ •� S ' �•.. Photo 7: LWD placed in abandoned gravel roadway ^ :..:f*`a.++a`�..ts- .. Photo 8: Looking N on western edge at tree plantings and LWD Photo 9:LWD placement on western edge Snag j'. Photo 10: Planted snag in center of protected area 4 3 Snag Photo 11:Another planted snag Snag i Photo 12: Planted snag Photo 13:Eastern side of protected area LWD and snag Snag � s Photo 14: LWD and snag placement in NW corner f - ' 2055240 MASON CO WA 04/21/2016 12 58 PM NOTCE MASON C011NTY P101 *92185 Rec Fee $74 00 Pages 2 Name and Return Address: 1111111111111III6ll 1i1i1il I1111I 1111�111111111111!HIM 1111111111111111111111 IN Mason County PUD#1 N 21971 HWY 101 5helton. WA 98584 TITLE NOTIFICATION OF HABITAT MANAGEMENT PLAN Legal Description: Portions of SE1/4, SW1/4 of Section 23, T22N, R4W Parcel Number. NW Comer of 42223-34-00000 & NE Comer of 42223-34-00100 Permit(s)#: MEP 2016-00003 q k1jJ HMP Approved By: yo-s Planner Name Signature NOTICE: The property was the subject of a development proposal within a critical area or its buffer. This property is subject to conditions, mitigation, and/or conservation measures as contained within the Habitat Management PlanMletland Mitigation Plan submitted to the Mason County Department of Community Development and subject to the conditions for the permit(s) noted above. Restrictions on the use or alteration of the property may exist due to these conditions, which are to remain in perpetuity. A copy of the Habitat Management Plan/Wetland Mitigation Plan has been placed in the County parcel record file located at the Permit Assistance Center, Building III, 426 W. Cedar Street, Shelton,WA, 98584. Grantor(s): Mason PUD#1 Last(print) First MI Taylor, Steven ; General Manager Last(print First MI Signature(s): Grantee: PUBLIC State of WASHINGTON ) I,the undersigned Notary Public, in and for the )ss. jurisdiction aforesaid,do hereby certify that County of ) Steven Taylor General Manager whose name(s) is(are)signed to the foregoing (SEAL): instrument,appeared before me and personally a wledged the same. GIVEN under my hand and seal this ao day of t-t My commission expires: O f(� c art N SCALE )"=B0' PARCEL fcp 42223-34--00100 14.96 AC 4Z 11117-1111 m a K00 HABITAT MITIGATION AREA 0.58AC W h 5'p MASON COUNTY PUD#? o ol O Q3� a S Z d PARCEL SF G�t2 B` z m c7S= ° 42223-34-60020 QE m 1.98 AC PARCEL 42223-34-00000 S� 1 /!���► 3.3 AC 1 / PARCEL 42223-34-00030 / 0.98 AC / o.. REj 00 Z Z O REEVE SH ERWOOD CONSULTING. LLC Habitat Management Plan - Parcel: 42223-34-00000 F f Mason County, Washington 1.0 Introduction The details of a Habitat Management Plan for the proposed construction of a new operations facility for Mason County Public Utility District#1 within a property supporting pileated woodpecker(Diycopus pileatus)habitat are discussed in this report(see Figure 1 & 2). Pileated woodpecker is regulated as a species of importance in the Mason County Resource Ordinance due to their state listing status of Candidate. The proposed mitigation focuses on the management of important habitat features and protection&enhancement of a forested area within the property. 2.0 Project Description Use of the property by Mason County PUD#1 will be for the construction of a new operations facility which will consist of administrative buildings,maintenance buildings and a utility"lay-down"storage yard. Standing dead trees(snags)with observed signs of Pileated woodpecker use are within the identified project area(see Photos 14). Some of the standing dead trees are used by the woodpeckers for foraging and therefore important to the use of the site by the regulated species. No indicators of nesting or roosting of pileated woodpeckers have been observed. Removal of all trees from the majority of the property will be mitigated by protection of a 140' x 180' (—0.58 acres) in the northwest corner of the property(see Figure 2). A number of snags from the portion of the property that is to be cleared, will be replanted within this protected area. This action is possible because the PUD has the equipment capable of auguring out a hole and then placing a tree into it and or through the use of an excavator equipped with grapple buckets capable of digging a hole and then grabbing a tree and positioning it into a hole. A number of snags unable to be replanted(due to deteriorated condition)will also be placed within the protected area as nursing logs and to help maintain insect populations(see Figure 3). The western approximately 30 feet of this area does not have any trees currently. The project will also plant 30 Douglas fir tree rooted starts on 15- foot centers. The wide spacing of these trees will allow the trees to grow lots of limbs and create a good buffer to the cleared lands to the west. The old access road that is currently being used in this area will be abandoned and several of the proposed log piles will be placed on and along this road. REEVE SHERWOOD CONSULTING,LLC 1 4790 NW ANTHONY . REEVE �► S H E RWOO D CONSULTING. LLC 3.0 Project Area Description The property consists of a predominantly> 80%coniferous forest with the dominant tree species being Douglas fir(Pseudotsuga menziesii)interspersed with western hemlock (Tsuga heterophylla),a mix of deciduous trees comprised of dogwood(Cornus florida) and madrone(Arbutus menziesii)with an understory consisting of salal(Gautheria shallon),Oregon grape (Mahonia nervosus),evergreen huckleberry(Vacciniium ovatum), trailing evergreen blackberry(Rubus laciniatus),rhododendron(Rhododendron macrophyllum)and various mosses and ferns. This stand of timber has a fairly high percentage of dead and dying trees present. A total of 10 trees were observed to show pileated woodpecker foraging activity but this may have been an overestimate because other birds were also utilizing the area(see Photos 1-4). Photo 4 shows a non-typical pileated woodpecker hole. The landscape topography consists of a gentle slope,consisting of a gravelly sandy loam soil(see Soil Maps),from the western edge sloping down toward Highway 101. At Highway 101,the slope becomes steeper. The slope also becomes steeper as it approaches Sheldon Road to the north. 4.0 Species Information Pileated woodpecker is listed as a candidate species by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife(WDFW), and is a Species of Importance in Mason County. The pileated woodpecker lives in coniferous and deciduous forests,preferring large,dead trees for nesting. The pileated woodpecker digs characteristically rectangular holes in trees to find ants. Pilieated woodpeckers seldom use clearcuts,but will forage in clearcuts or shelterwood cuts if substantial foraging habitat is retained. The presence of standing dead trees with foraging excavations are indicative of woodpecker use within any given property. The WDFW recommendations for coniferous forests(stands with>70%conifer stems)of about 60 years of age or older include maintain>70%canopy closure and an average of>5 nest snags/10 ha(2 snags/10ac)that are>76 cm dbh(30 in)and 12 snags/ac as foraging trees. Due to the observed indicators of use of the site by pileated woodpecker for foraging, removal of standing dead trees will be mitigated by protection of the existing snags and the creation of additional foraging habitat within the protected portion of the property. Eight snags from the portion of the property that is to be cleared,will be replanted within this protected area to supplement existing snags. A minimum of ten logs will be placed on the . ground within the protected area to act as nurse logs and to help maintain insect populations. REEVE �► SH ERWOOD CONSULTING. LLC 5.0 Mitigation 5.1 Preservation of—.58 acres of existing habitat The northwestern corner of the property will be preserved and enhanced for pileated woodpecker habitat. This location was chosen because it is adjacent to similar conifer forest habitat to the north across Sheldon Road. All the trees currently in this 140' x 180' area will be left to mature. This will maintain the 70%canopy closure that WDFW states is a preferred condition. The existing dead trees will also be left unless they are leaning out into the proposed PUD facilities area or are in danger of falling out onto Sheldon Road. The only reason any of these would be removed is if they presented a danger to the staff using the facilities or the public traveling on the adjacent road. This area will also be enhanced by moving 8 dead 30' trees which will be removed from the cleared area and planted into this protection area. The placing of these dead trees along with the existing dead trees will provide good foraging opportunities for the Pileated woodpecker and other birds. This will be accomplished by the tree being cut down in the clearing area and then moved over to the protection area. Holes will be drilled into the ground with the same equipment that the PUD uses to plant poles along the roadways or with an excavator. The dead trees will then be placed into the holes and the ground compacted around them. An additional 10 dead trees will be hauled to the site from the cleared area and set on the ground and in piles to provide additional insect habitat and thus providing more food for the woodpeckers to harvest(see Figure 3). The western edge(-30')of this protection area will be planted with 30 Douglas fir tree starts that will be planted on 15 foot centers so they can grow up and become very bushy and provide hiding cover. The protection area will be clearly marked as no cutting and the trees to be moved from the cleared area will also be flagged before clearing starts. Location for placement of these trees and log piles will also be flagged in the protection area. 6.0 Monitoring Monitoring of the project will consist of being present during the logging operation to ensure that all live and dead trees within the protected area are not cut and to give assistance in the placement of the dead trees. The mitigation map shows the approximate location of the proposed dead trees and nurse log pile locations. Site specific modifications may occur during the construction due to ground conditions and habitat impact minimization techniques. An as-built drawing will be provided to Mason County Planning department within 30 days of conclusion of timber harvest and mitigation construction and will represent the conclusion of the monitoring. REEVE ... CONSULTING, ANTHONY .. 97321 REEVE �► S H E RWOO D CONSULTING. LLC 7.0 Conclusion The proposed preservation and enhancement of the—.58 acre area located in the northwestern portion of the PUD#1 property will not only provide foraging habitat but will also have the potential to provide nesting habitat as the trees continue to mature and die. The placement of additional dead trees on the ground will provide additional foraging opportunities and make for insect colonization of current and future dying trees. The placement of this protected area adjacent to other forested habitats is another reason why it is believed that this project will be a success. References Lewis,J. and J.M.Azerrad 2003, WDFW PHS Management Recommendations,Volume IV Birds, Pileated Woodpecker(Dryocopus pileatus) USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service,Web Soil Survey(1/6/2016) Pojar,J. and A.MacKinnon,2004. Plants of the Pacific Northwest Coast(2nd Edition). Lone Pine Publishing,Vancouver, B.C. Figs Figure 1. Site Vicinity Map Figure 2. Site Map Figure 3. Mitigation Map Figure 4. Soil Survey Map Photos 1-4 WPM— REEVE SHERWOOD CONSULTING, LLC 4790 NW ANTHONY PLACE, ALBANY, OR 97321 1 541.231.947 5 �l Jt Xx 1 Hoodsport ;�. ,• IL .r ahuya 4' •' ''�' � •ram � '� !-�: �� : ��. - . "� � /, �,. � kokomish wow go Z . r. * w •� J 'S �A kk �. 1 �` •� -��' �'11 ` „ :� ''.L ' � . #, Rat .i�� ..) ,r, �•`_� r. � � , '� ,�`j=� } � �� `` f•Harstine Isla nVton•:4} _ iV. 4 . Goo-je-earth Tour Guide .Imagery Date:5/5/2013- lat 47.326480° !on-123.083918°'elev 422 R eye aft 17.23 mi 0 • • 1 1 ., -w J,r :air. �1v� y �. �•• '; .ee,::try#• Area y r a :• • y •~-Yr 11R_.".. Aa �Y f r.. '7�17r�JA'T`'//A7�• 'L. '�• y,. /' s 1.,J�: 't - -vim�'�. �A` J � °�`-�",�,R�. y�1.� •• ""t '�+ .. �•!J ��r�� I. '�.tfn,_7-. 4lbr .4[y��.r -�V�, '.�� �:of �ht1 `"� .:q �_�yam....,' .. � }' •�sf ;.�J' .4d ` J.�iw „�. I •'C F le M Tour Guide imagery Dat-S/5/2013 -lat 4737516_10n ft .1 565° lev 0'R eye• It 14 R • • • • '� t� '' �►�. 4� `►�r ti 'i, Lid z. ♦� sa�Ti Planted Snag .r " • . i s K Sheldon Road �i ♦, _• : ' ^r�+K =Placed Nursury r �'` t.y �` �,^ .c. ♦ % -�-• Ce i iry Log tom'iA.`r �+y j•� o� +• r,,'4:• � ❑ =Protected Area 16-7 °� •GQ J' ♦♦ •• 1 . ♦ 1 ti-' • =Tree planting ♦ • �c Area r �ti , • V: : y,• a•y X. .�-ty, �....� .��171f`^yi�� a /� `T'.ti: ;1� �:•1*ti' .... •'ram.v�yF .�'�y. ,.S °. - 4-t �J4. �:. wZ•i - H ..,;yam; ':a �„�?= � "' _ � •~ -"�.� �' REEVE Habitat Management Plan Mitigation Map SHERWOOD Project Detail VCONSULTING.LLC N Figure 3 01/17/2016 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ - - - - - - - - - - z.R, �•., ....................Gravel Road:' M '" ,r� 'To be abandoned ."� . ,' r r , •. . �-� .�`.. •uric:- �' ' -i ` „- � '- ' � " ' ' ',`:. "., t4'•'' ,; Far ,.'�-`'a' a .. ';"•' f`� °r '� `ry' � r Legend— r 1 1t " ,f m ,A! t •_ " "�'�r = Planted Snag �� �� •� �! ",�•,♦� .� ����-.•+ t♦ �`:.� ���} � t ���'��^ � .S^ Sal@ld011 Road. ,,1 . , �,„ ,, ,� �, i ` r�" �r" �f •1 = Placed Nursury .. Y , Log ,� � � i " �� ♦ ♦ Vs+ •rx �•� Ar Protected Area r •. IL r . t �`'�>' , . . • =Tree planting 'r A rea `�- „ - "�� �y fir. ; ♦ ,,..1 ; . -- ,� "�"` �`�+t+ .may h`'. V� '. ♦ ♦ �._ ,y T"�p�x wt4 s — � •h[ � few �" T^n. 7f+S•1' �""•i tq i - wK �.�°_" ,�+r. ..} 'MsE� _ 'b ���.r,,r + c ads .�• �� � ' � t� .tom• „fit ..n• !M��"�� � {". �,.. .m yy 1 u REEVE Habitat Management Plan Mitigation Map SHERWOOD Project Detail CONSULTING,LLC y Figure 3 01/17/2016 3 Soil Map—Mason County,Washington 3 50 `a :7 487300 487500 487700 487900 488100 488300 488500 488700 4BB900 489100 489300 4r 2Z 53'N 47'?Y 53'N A r . yam, �iy • i .i°+Wf. Approximate Project Location 3{ F • f T'to r � ,r +.tr(E pkp Y .7 N � I N I N.j 47°22'T N 47°27 TN 487300 487500 487700 487900 488100 488300 4885M 488700 488900 489100 489300 3 3 to 6 a Map Sole:1:9,970 if printed on A landscape(11"x 8.5")sheet. N m N Me6e1s n0 100 200 400 600 /V 0 450 900 1800 2700 Map proleCbon:Web Mercator Corner coordinates:WGS84 Edge tics:UTM Zane 10N WGS84 usim Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 1/6/2016 '� Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 3 Soil Map—Mason County,Washington MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION Area of Interest(AOp Spoil Area The soil surveys that comprise your AC I were mapped at 1:31,700. Area of Interest(AOI) Stony Spot Warning:Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. Soils Very Stony Spot Soil Map Unit Polygons Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause Wet Spot misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line Soil Map Unit Lines placement.The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting 13 Soil Map Unit Points Other soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale. Special Line Features Special Point Features Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map Blowout Water Features measurements. Streams and Canals Borrow Pit Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Transportation Web Soil Survey LIRL: http://websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov Clay Spot +--" Rails Coordinate System: Web Mercator(EPSG:3857) Closed Depression 11 Interstate Highways Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator Gravel Pit US Routes projection,which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area.A projection that preserves area,such as the Gravelly Spot Major Roads Albers equal-area conic projection,should be used if more accurate Landfill Local Roads calculations of distance or area are required. ak Lava Flow Background This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of 9 the version date(s)listed below. Marsh or swamp Aerial Photography Soil Survey Area: Mason County,Washington o: Mine or Quarry Survey Area Data: Version 11,Sep 15,2015 0 Miscellaneous Water Soil map units are labeled(as space allows)for map scales 1:50,000 y Perennial Water or larger. `o Rock Outcrop Date(s)aerial images were photographed: Data not available. + Saline Spot The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background Sandy Spot imagery displayed on these maps.As a result,some minor shifting Severely Eroded Spot of map unit boundaries may be evident. Sinkhole Slide or Slip �( Sodic Spot I till,\ Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 1/6/2016 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 3 Soil Map—Mason County,Washington Map Unit Legend Mason County,Washington(WA645) Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI Gk Grove gravelly sandy loam,5 to 170.1 33.9% 15 percent slopes Hd Hoodsport gravelly sandy loam, 14.3 2.9% 5 to 15 percent slopes He Hoodsport gravelly sandy loam, 11.8 2.4% 15 to 30 percent slopes Hf Hoodsport gravelly sandy loam, 119.5 23.8% 30 to 45 percent slopes Me Made land 3.8 0.8% Subtotals for Soil Survey Area 319.4 63.7% Totals for Area of Interest 501.3 100.0% USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 1/6/2016 lilliliiI Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3 3 Soil Map—Mason County,Washington 3 re m N 487MO 48M 487700 48M QUM 488300 48a900 48B70D 48M 4891M 489300 ^ 47 2z 53•N 47^2851'N Q LS 8 a q >' Approximate Project Location �yr 1R�i .7 C y.5 4A 22'T N 4r 27T N gg/30p g87500 48TA0 48T3W 488100 4883DO 488:A0 488700 488900 489100 469300 3 3 b m a map Scale:1:9,970 if prutled an A landsape(11'x 8.5")stream. Meters N 0 100 200 400 600 Feet Ao aso 900 teoo 2700 Map projection:Web Mercator Comermordiratas:W6584 Edge tits:UrM Zone 1ON WGS84 USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 1/6/2016 �� Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 3 1 1 Soil Map—Mason County,Washington 1 MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION Area of Interest(AOI) Spoil Area The soil surveys that comprise your ACII were mapped at 1:31,700. Area of Interest(AOI) Stony Spot Warning:Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. Soils Very Stony Spot Q Soil Map Unit Polygons t t' Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause ;• Wet Spot misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line �y Soil Map Unit Lines placement.The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting Soil Map Unit Points Other soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale. � 0 Special Line Features Special Point Features Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map Blowout Water Features measurements. Streams and Canals ® Borrow Pit Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Transportation Web Soil Survey URL: hftp:/twebsoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov Clay Spot t44 Rails Coordinate System: Web Mercator(EPSG:3857) Closed Depression ry Interstate Highways Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator Gravel Pit N us Routes projection,which preserves direction and shape but distorts Gravelly Spot distance and area.A projection that preserves area,such as the Major Roads Albers equal-area conic projection,should be used if more accurate O Landfill Local Roads calculations of distance or area are required. h Lava Flow Background This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version dates)listed below. ,�, Marsh or swamp . Aerial Photography Soil Survey Area: Mason County,Washington +� Mina or quarry Survey Area Data: Version 11,Sep 15,2015 O Miscellaneous Water Soil map units are labeled(as space allows)for map scales 1:50,000 O Perennial Water or larger. Rock Outcrop Date(s)aerial images were photographed: Data not available. + Saline Spot The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background Sandy spot imagery displayed on these maps.As a result,some minor shifting g Severely Eroded Spot of map unit boundaries may be evident. 0 Sinkhole Slide or Slip g Sodic Spot USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 1/6/2016 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 3 Soil Map—Mason County,Washington Map Unit Legend Mason County,Washington(WA645) Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI Gk Grove gravelly sandy loam,5 to 170.1 33.9% -r 15 percent slopes Hd Hoodsport gravelly sandy loam, 14.3 2.9% 5 to 15 percent slopes He Hoodsport gravelly sandy loam, 11.8 2.4% 15 to 30 percent slopes Hf Hoodsport gravelly sandy loam, 119.5 23.8% 30 to 45 percent slopes —I Ma Made land 3.8 0.8% Subtotals for Soil Survey Area 319.4 63.7% Totals for Area of Interest 501.3 100.0% r r r r r r r r e r r r r r r r M J USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 1/6/2016 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3 J Reference Photos Photo I Typical Pileated Woodpecker foraging holes w � � • ' - Photo / Pilcated Woodpecker foraging holes Reference Photos r,' a c 3 Sk e� Photo 1 Typical Pileated Woodpecker foraging holes 14 •i * g y arm s �i"°54�' rt� Photo 2 Typical Pileated Woodpecker foraging holes i t .r Photo 1 • Woodpecker foraging holes IS axI 4 ti, .. • Photo Potentially not1Woodpeckerhole two r` r, i �� "� �� 7 f � ;•� � 4 s t - s/_ Photo 3 TypicalPileated Woodpecker foraging holes -15 DO Photo 4 Potentially not a Pileated Woodpecker hole ' . -a .