The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSEP2018-00109 DEMO Bulkhead - SEP Determinations - 12/19/2018 MASON COUNTY Department of Community Services Planning Division 615 W Alder St, Shelton, WA 98584 l (360)427-9670 MITIGATED DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (WAC 197-11-350) SEP2018-00109 Description of Proposal: DEMO OF FAILING BULKHEAD Proponent: PORT OF GRAPEVIEW Site Address (If Assigned): Directions to Site: HWY 3 N, TAKE E GRAPEVIEW LOOP RD TO GRISWOLD AVE, ADJACENT TO 5054 E GRAPEVIEW LP RD Parcel Number: 121055163003 Legal Description: DETROIT #2 BLK: 63 TR 3 & TLS. Lead Agency: Mason County The Lead Agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed Environmental Checklist and other information on file with the Lead Agency. This information is available to the public upon request. MITIGATED MEASURES ARE ATTACHED. Please contact Ron Buckholt at ext. 287 with any questions. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-350. The Lead Agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date shown below, when the determination is final. Comments must be submitted to Community Services Department, 615 W Alder St, Shelton WA 98584 by 1/2/2019. Appeal of this determination must be filed within a 14-day period following this final determination date, per Mason County Code Chapter 15.11 Appeals. Authorized Local Government Official bate �p b �pq SEP2018-00109 Page 1 of 2 MASON COUNTY Department of Community Services Planning Division 615 W Alder St, Shelton, WA 98584 (360)427-9670 MITIGATED DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (WAC 197-11-350) SEP2018-00109 CONDITIONS OF THIS DETERMINATION 1) Proponent is responsible for obtaining all necessary state and federal permits prior to the commencement of any work. 2) Prior to the commencement of any work, the proponent shall obtain proof of ownership for the subject property or obtain written permission from the owner to conduct the subject scope of work. 3) Phase II - soft shoreline stabilization is not approved at this time and will be subject to further review and permitting at a later date. SEP2018-00109 Page 2 of 2 f ae P Z),) lb 67 SEPA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST A10V 3 VA64) 61 W 8 ?�1 S 8 Purpose of checklist: •Auer Stromt Governmental agencies use this checklist to help determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant. This information is also helpful to determine if available avoidance, minimization or compensatory mitigation measures will address the probable significant impacts or if an environmental impact statement will be prepared to further analyze the proposal. Instructions for applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Please answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. You may need to consult with an agency specialist or private consultant for some questions. You may use "not"not applicable" or"does not apply"only when you can explain why it does not apply and not when "does not apply"only when you can explain why it does not apply and not when the answer is unknown. You may also attach or incorporate by reference additional studies reports. Complete and accurate answers to these questions often avoid delays with the SEPA process as well as later in the decision-making process. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Instructions for Lead Agencies: Please adjust the format of this template as needed. Additional information may be necessary to evaluate the existing environment, all interrelated aspects of the proposal and an analysis of adverse impacts. The checklist is considered the first but not necessarily the only source of information needed to make an adequate threshold determination. Once a threshold determination is made, the lead agency is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of the checklist and other supporting documents. Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: Lhel For nonproject proposals (such as ordinances, regulations, plans and programs), complete the applicable parts of sections A and B plus the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS art D . Please completely answer all questions that apply and note that the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site"should be read as "proposal," "proponent," and "affected geographic area," respectively.The lead agency may exclude (for non-projects) questions in Part B- Environmental Elements—that do not contribute meaningfully to the analysis of the proposal. SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960) November 2018 Page 1 of 16 A. Background IbLel 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Jhel Soldier Pile Bulkhead Removal/Mitigation for Port of Grapeview Floating Community Dock 2. Name of applicant: hf elgl Glenn Carlson,Commissioner, Port of Grapeview 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: hf elpl Applicant: Port of Grapeview PO Box 3 Grapeview, WA 98546 (360)275-5020 Prepared by: Ann Boeholt Soundview Consultants LLC 2907 Harborview Drive, Suite D Gig Harbor, WA 98335 (253)514-8952 4. Date checklist prepared: 1hel November 28,2018 5. Agency requesting checklist: 1hel Mason County 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): hf elpl Start Date: December 15,2018. End Date: February 15,2019. Portions of the work associated with the overarching Port of Grapeview dock project shall occur landward of the OHW and are not subject to time of year restrictions. Intertidal work includes removal of the creosote piles comprising the dysfunctional bulkhead, removal of angular stone from the beach, and placement of beach nourishment material. This work shall all occur during low tides. The contractor will be required to submit a Construction/Tides Plan outlining possible work dates and times that allow construction of all portions of the project during the applicable tide. It is possible that some work may need to be conducted during the evening hours,as that is when low tides occur during the proposed construction window. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. Lhel SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960) November 2018 Page 2 of 16 The proposed creosote timber bulkhead removal is mitigation for a floating community dock previously approved by Mason County(see permits listed under Question 8 below). Additional "Phase II" mitigation elements, consisting of shoreline restoration and soft shoreline stabilization at the location of the creosote timber bulkhead removal, will be proposed in a separate application at a later date. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. hf elpl Shoreline,Critical Areas,FEMA and ESA Assessment Report and Habitat Management Plan has been prepared by Soundview Consultants LLC,dated June 2017. Compensatory Mitigation Plan for Impacts to Non-Wetland Aquatic Resources, prepared by Soundview Consultants LLC,Revised November 28,2018 Eelgrass and Macroalgae Survey prepared by Soundview Consultants LLC,dated June 2017. JARPA Application prepared by Soundview Consultants LLC, dated February 2018, for the Port of Grapeview Community Floating Dock. The Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife has issued a Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA# 2016-6-467+01)for reconstruction of the existing boat ramp,an independent but related project. That HPA includes provisions related to the protection of fish life and fish habitat. GeoTechnical Report prepared by GeoResources,dated September 28,2018,for the creosote bulkhead removal. Document Id: Portof Grapeview.GrapeviewLoop.RG. Mason County has issued an Environmental Permit (MEP 2017-00017), Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance (SEP2017-00054), and Shoreline Variance permit(SHR2017-00004) for the Port of Grapeview Community Floating Dock. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. LheI An application(NWS-2018-161) is currently under review by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for construction of a community floating dock to serve the recently reconstructed boat ramp at the Port of Grapeview property. This planned community floating dock is located on property (Mason County Tax Parcel Number 12105-51-00900) less than 100 feet south of the site with the creosote timber bulkhead to be removed(Mason County Tax Parcel Number 12105-51-63003). The proposed project includes modification of an existing stormwater outfall located on Mason County Tax Parcel 12105- 51-63004 immediately north of the planned community floating dock. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. hel United States Army Corps of Engineers(USACE)Section 10 Permit • Washington State Department of Ecology Section 401 Water Quality Certification Washington State Deparment of Ecology Coastal Zone Management(CZM)Consistency Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Hydraulic Project Approval WA) SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960) November 2018 Page 3 of 16 • Mason County Environmental Approval 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) hel The proposed project is the removal of a creosote timber pile bulkhead, beach restoration, and stormwater improvements,as compensatory mitigation for aquatic habitat impacts likely to result from new intertidal coverage from planned floating community dock previously approved by Mason County. This floating community dock is currently under federal review. The bulkhead is located less than 100 feet north of the proposed floating dock location. Bulkhead removal,beach restoration,and stormwater improvements,will occur during the current fish construction window,which closes Feruary 15,2019 and is the subject of this application. Phase 2 of the dock mitigation will involve shoreline stabilization, and will be applied for under separate cover following this application. The failing creosote timber pile bulkhead will be removed entirely from Mason County Tax Parcel Number 12105-51-63003. The proposed mitigation will also remove angular stone from a 1,275 square foot patch of intertidal beach on Mason County Tax Parcel Number 12105-51-63004 immediately north of the planned floating dock and restore this beach area with a top dressing of appropriate natural sand and gravel material. Finally, a diffuser tee will be installed on the existing stormwater outfall located immediately north of the proposed floating dock,situated within an existing concrete bulkhead. The diffuser will slow the outfall velocity and spread the flow, reducing the potential for scour at the outfall location. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. hf gj The project is located in Section 5, Township 21 North, Range 1 West; WM,NE Quarter, at the west end of Griswold Avenue in the City of Grapeview in Mason County, Washington. A legal description and vicinity map are attached to this checklist. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS JbLel 1. Earth [hel a. General description of the site: hel (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other Gently sloped toward the shoreline SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960) November 2018 Page 4 of 16 Upland areas of the mitigation site consists of lawn and sparse ornamental trees and shrubs. The intertidal beach consists of mud, sand,and small rocks. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? h 15% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any agricultural land of long-term commercial significance and whether the proposal results in removing any of these soils. Itp1pl Per the Natural Resources Conservation Service(NRCS)soil map,the soil found on this site is classified as Alderwood gravelly sandy loam. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. hf elgl The shoreline behind the existing creosote timber bulkhead demonstrates active shoreline erosion hazards, consisting of active toe erosion, sloughing,and shoreline regression(GeoResources,2018). e. Describe the purpose, type, total area, and approximate quantities and total affected area of any filling, excavation, and grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. JtPjPJ The bulkhead to be removed contains 34,partially decomposed, 15-inch-diameter creosote timber piles visible above the beach grade. Given the gaps between the remaining visible piles, it is assumed that about 10 creosote timber piles remain buried along the line of the soldier pile bulkhead. The proposed project requires removal of the 34 visible piles and approximately 10 assumed buried piles. Following removal of the piles,approximately 12 cubic yards of beach gravel will placed over the existing bulkhead footprint to fill holes created by the pile removal and to restore substrate conditions in the project area. The proposed project includes removing 1,275 square feet of angular stone from the beach. Approximately 12 cubic yards of clean beach gravel (appropriately sized for fish spawning) will be placed over the footprint of the removed angular stone. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. hel Active shoreline erosion is observed behind the existing degraded bulkhead (GeoResources, 2018). While highly degraded,the existing bulkhead may be providing some shoreline protection from the wave action and removal of the bulkhead may result in some additional shoreline erosion. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)?[hel The proposed project does not include any changes to impervious surfaces on the site. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: hf elpl SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960) November 2018 Page 5 of 16 Following the bulkhead removal, the Applicant will closely monitor the shoreline for any substantial increases in shoreline erosion. The Applicant is currently completing designs for soft shoreline stabilization to replace the degraded bulkhead(Phase II of mitigation). The Applicant intends to submit applications for this work within the next few weeks and to install this soft shoreline stabilization during the next fish window starting as early as July 2019. Potential disturbance of marine sediments associated with vibratory removal of the existing creosote piles will be reduced by timing the work during low tides. 2. Air h( elpl a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal during construction, operation, and maintenance when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known.1hel During construction,heavy equipment will give off normal emissions during operation and some dust may occur. These emissions will be short-term and only when construction equipment is in use. All construction equipment will be inspected daily for fluid leaks and no equipment will leave the staging area until any leaks are repaired. Fueling and maintenance of equipment will occur in upland staging areas only. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. [help] None are known. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: h Construction equipment will be maintained properly and kept in good repair to limit emissions during the project. 3. Water hf elpl a. Surface Water: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year- round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. hf elpl The project is located on the shoreline of Case Inlet in Puget Sound. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. h The proposed project includes work in Case Inlet. The work consists of removing a creosote timber bulkhead and angular stone, restoring the bulkhead and angular stone footprints with clean beach gravel(appropriately sized for fish spawning),and modifying an existing stormwater outfall. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. 1hel SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960) November 2018 Page 6 of 16 The proposed project requires removing approximately 44, 15-inch-diameter piles incorporated into the bulkhead structure and removing approximately 1,275 square feet of angular stone from the beach. Approximately 12 cubic yards of clean beach gravel (appropriately sized for fish spawning) will be used to fill in holes created by pile removal and to restore a natural beach grade on the bulkhead removal area. Approximately 12 cubic yard of clean beach gravel (appropriately sized for fish spawning) will be used to restore a natural beach substrate over the 1,275 square feet currently covered by angular stone. 4)Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. hf elpl No. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. heI Yes,the FEMA floodplain map is attached. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. Lhel No. The proposed bulkhead removal will occur during low tide and the removed creosote material will be transported to upland areas for safe disposal in accordance with state guidelines. b. Ground Water: 1)Will groundwater be withdrawn from a well for drinking water or other purposes? If so, give a general description of the well, proposed uses and approximate quantities withdrawn from the well. Will water be discharged to groundwater? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. 1hel No. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals. . . ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. hf elpl Not applicable. c. Water runoff(including stormwater): 1) Describe the source of runoff(including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. LLeM No changes to upland land surfaces,and therefore runoff,are proposed. The proposed project includes modifying an existing stormwater outfall pipe immediately north of the floating community dock location. This outfall pipe releases water to Case Inlet and is assumed to SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960) November 2018 Page 7 of 16 convey stormwater from adjacent impervious surfaces. The outfall modification includes installing a diffuser tee to spread out the flows, reducing flow velocity, and the potential for scour or erosion on the beach. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. [LeI The proposed project will not alter runoff conditions. The bulkhead creosote material to be removed will be safely disposed of in accordance with state guidelines. The footprint of the removed bulkhead will be covered with clean beach gravel. 3) Does the proposal to alter or otherwise affect drainage patterns in the vicinity of the site? If so, describe. hel The proposed project will not affect drainage patterns. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water, and drainage pattern impacts, if any: hf elpl The proposed bulkhead removal will occur during low tide to minimize the water quality impact of disturbing creosote materials. 4. Plants hf elpl a. Check the types of vegetation found on the site: LLpjpJ deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs X grass pasture crop or grain Orchards, vineyards or other permanent crops. wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other X water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other _other types of vegetation The area upland of the existing creosote bulkhead is vegetated with lawn grass. Some sea lettuce (Ulva sp) was found attached within the lower intertidal beach zone. At the location of the existing stormwater outfall, an area measuring at most 30 square feet is vegetated with small clumps of pickleweed(Salicornia virginica)and seaside plantain(Plantago maritima). b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? h The only vegetation disturbance will occur from the heavy equipment required for the bulkhead removal driving over the upland lawn area. c. List threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site. hf elpl No ESA listed plant species are present on the subject property. SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960) November 2018 Page 8 of 16 d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: hf elpl No shoreline plantings are proposed at this time. Phase 11 of mitigation will likely include shoreline plantings. e. List all noxious weeds and invasive species known to be on or near the site. hf elpl None. 5. Animals LheI a. List any birds and other animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site. [help] Mammals: harbor seal, river otter, Birds: mallard duck,Canada geese, Northwestern crow, gulls Fish: salmon,trout, herring Invertebrates: barnacles(Balanus glandula), mud snail (Batillaria attramentaria), moon snail (Neverita lewisii),red rock crab(Cancer productus),bay ghost shrimp(Neotrypoa sp),bent-nosed clam(Macoma nasuta), sea star(Pisaster sp.), Pacific oyster(Crassostrea gigas). b. List any threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site. LheI Humpback Whale(Megaptera novaeangliae) Southern Resident Killer Whale(Orcinus orca) Puget Sound Steelhead Trout(Oncorhynchus mykiss) Puget Sound Chinook Salmon(Oncorhyncus tshawytscha) Bull Trout(Salvelinus confluentus) Bocaccio Rockfish(Sebastes paucispinis) Yelloweye Rockfish(Sebastes ruberrimus) Marbled Murrelet(Brachyramphus marmoratus) c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. LheI Site is part of the Pacific Flyway for migratory birds. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: hf e The proposed bulkhead removal will occur during low tide to minimize wildlife exposure to creosote released during the removal process. The creosote timber bulkhead removal and replacement of angular stone with spawning substrate are expected to have long-term positive impacts on wildlife. e. List any invasive animal species known to be on or near the site. JtLeM None. 6. Energy and Natural Resources 1heI SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960) November 2018 Page 9 of 16 a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. hel Not applicable. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. hel The project will not affect the use of solar energy on adjacent properties. . c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: JLgjPJ Not applicable. 7. Environmental Health h a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. LLeM Following state guidelines for safe disposal of creosote materials will minimize any environmental health hazards associated with improper disposal of creosote materials. 1) Describe any known or possible contamination at the site from present or past uses. hf elpl None known. 2) Describe existing hazardous chemicals/conditions that might affect project development and design. This includes underground hazardous liquid and gas transmission pipelines located within the project area and in the vicinity. [hel The Washington State Department of Ecology(WSDOE)database shows a confirmed or suspected contaminated site (ID# 6309) on the nearby Fair Harbor Marina parcel, due to the presence of petroleum products in soil and groundwater (from a leaking underground storage tank). However, this area will not be disturbed during the proposed project. Also, The WSDOE noted the site as "reported cleaned up"in February 2008. 3) Describe any toxic or hazardous chemicals that might be stored, used, or produced during the project's development or construction, or at any time during the operating life of the project. Lhel None. 4) Describe special emergency services that might be required. hf elpl No special emergency services are required. 5) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: 1hel SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960) November 2018 Page 10 of 16 Best management practices will be employed during bulkhead removal to prevent the unintentional release of creosote material and petroleum products.BMPs will consist of coir logs,silt curtains,and conducting all intertidal work during low tide. A Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure Plan (SPCCP) will be developed by the contractor and the contractor will be responsible for containment and removal of any toxicants released. A spill kit will be immediately available onsite for use in the event of any inadvertent release. b. Noise hf elpl 1)What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project(for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? hf elpl Project is located at Grapeview Loop Road and Griswold Avenue in a residential area with associated noise from street traffic and boat traffic. This noise will not affect the project. 2)What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. [help] Construction noise is likely to include a vibratory pile driver,excavator,dump truck,and construction crew, All work will normally occur during normal daylight hours; however, there may be some activity during evening hours for work that needs to occur during low tides. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: 1hel Vibratory pile driver is quieter than an impact driver,so use of this equipment is a minimization measure. 8. Land and Shoreline Use Jhel a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties?Will the proposal affect current land uses on nearby or adjacent properties? If so, describe. Lhel The property with the bulkhead to be removed(Mason County Tax Parcel# 12105-51-63003)is largely undeveloped and used for residential purposes. The property with the existing stormwater outfall to be modified and a portion of the angular stone to be removed(Mason County Tax Parcel 12105-51-63004) is used for single-famiy residential purposes. A portion of the angular stone will be removed from the Port of Grapeview property (Mason County Tax Parcel# 12105-51-00900),which is used for community boat access to Case Inlet. Nearby properties include additional residential parcels and the site of the planned Port of Grapeview floating community dock. b. Has the project site been used as working farmlands or working forest lands? If so, describe. How much agricultural or forest land of long-term commercial significance will be converted to other uses as a result of the proposal, if any? If resource lands have not been designated, how many acres in farmland or forest land tax status will be converted to nonfarm or nonforest use? hf elpl SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960) November 2018 Page 11 of 16 7 No. 1)Will the proposal affect or be affected by surrounding working farm or forest land normal business operations, such as oversize equipment access, the application of pesticides, tilling, and harvesting? If so, how: h( elpl No. b. Describe any structures on the site. h The site of the proposed bulkhead removal (Mason County Tax Parcel 412105-51-63003) is largely undeveloped, with the exception of a dysfunctional creosote timber pile bulkhead present along the shoreline. There are 34 partially decomposed, creosote timber piles visible above the beach grade. Given the gaps between the remaining visible piles, it is assumed that about 10 creosote timber piles remain buried along the line of the soldier pile bulkhead. There are no structures waterward of the bulkhead,within Case inlet. The site of the proposed stormwater outfall modification and a portion of the angular stone removal footprint(Mason County Tax Parcel #12105-51-6300) is developed with a single family residence, a lawn, and a concrete bulkhead, all in a well maintained condition. There are no structures waterward of the bulkhead. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what?Lhel The existing creosote timber bulkhead will be removed. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? hf elpl The subject property is zoned RR5 f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? hel Undeveloped. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? hf elpl Residential and Urban Commercial. h. Has any part of the site been classified as a critical area by the city or county? If so, specify. heI Yes. Saltwater Shorelines are considered Critical Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas within Mason County. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? hel None. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? hel None. SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960) November 2018 Page 12 of 16 k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: Lhel Not applicable. I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: [help] The proposed project is a shoreline mitigation action. m. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts to agricultural and forest lands of long-term commercial significance, if any: hf elpl Not applicable. 9. Housing Lhel a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. hf elpl No housing units will be built.Not applicable. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. hf elpl No housing units will be eliminated.Not applicable. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: JLeM Not applicable. 10. AestheticsLLg!pJ a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? hf elpl No structures are proposed. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? hf elgl The existing degraded creosote bulkhead is visible from adjacent properties and the water. This bulkhead will be removed. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: hf elpl None;the proposed project is likely to improve the shoreline aesthetics by removing a degraded structure. 11. Light and Glare 1hel SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960) November 2018 Page 13 of 16 a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? hel None. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views?1hel Not likely. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? hf elpl None. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: hel None. 12. Recreation hf jpj a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity?ILgIP1 Public boat ramp is immediately nearby. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. hf pj No,the proposed project will not impact recreational uses. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: h None. 13. Historic and cultural preservation Lhel a. Are there any buildings, structures, or sites, located on or near the site that are over 45 years old listed in or eligible for listing in national, state, or local preservation registers ? If so, specifically describe. hel No. b. Are there any landmarks, features, or other evidence of Indian or historic use or occupation? This may include human burials or old cemeteries. Are there any material evidence, artifacts, or areas of cultural importance on or near the site? Please list any professional studies conducted at the site to identify such resources. hel No. c. Describe the methods used to assess the potential impacts to cultural and historic resources on or near the project site. Examples include consultation with tribes and the department of archeology and historic preservation, archaeological surveys, historic maps, GIS data, etc. hf elpl SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960) November 2018 Page 14 of 16 e None. d. Proposed measures to avoid, minimize, or compensate for loss, changes to, and disturbance to resources. Please include plans for the above and any permits that may be required. Lhel There will be an Unanticipated Discovery Clause in construction contract documents. 14. Transportation h a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site or affected geographic area and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. hf elpl The two sites are located off E.Grapeview Loop Road. b. Is the site or affected geographic area currently served by public transit? If so, generally describe. If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? h A Mason Transport Authority bus route runs on Grapeview Loop Road. The closest transit stop is approximately 3/4 of a mile south of the project site at the Grapeview Fire Station. c. How many additional parking spaces would the completed project or non-project proposal have? How many would the project or proposal eliminate?LLeM The proposed project does not include parking spaces or affect existing parking availability. d. Will the proposal require any new or improvements to existing roads, streets, pedestrian, bicycle or state transportation facilities, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). hf elpl None. e. Will the project or proposal use(or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. h No. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project or proposal? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur and what percentage of the volume would be trucks (such as commercial and nonpassenger vehicles). What data or transportation models were used to make these estimates? hf elpl Not Applicable. g. Will the proposal interfere with, affect or be affected by the movement of agricultural and forest products on roads or streets in the area? If so, generally describe. hel No. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: hf elpl SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960) November 2018 Page 15 of 16 None. 15. Public Services hf elpl a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, public transit, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. JLpjo The project will not increase the need for public services. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. hf elpl None are proposed. 16. Utilities 1heI a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: hf elpl electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other None b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. heI Not Applicable. C. Signature 1LeM The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: Name of signee Ann Boeholt Position and Agency/Organization Senior Environmental Planner/ Soundview Consultants, LLC, Date Submitted: November 28, 2018 SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960) November 2018 Page 16 of 16 LOCATION: THE SE Y4 OF SECTION 5,TOWNSHIP 21 N,RANGE 1 W,W.M. SHORELINE MASON COUNTY PARCEL NUMBER: 12105-51-00900 NOV 3 0 2011$ RESTORATION SITE LAT 47°20' 17"N LONG-1220 49'S7.25"W 615 W.Alder Street (MITIGATION SITE) VICINITY MAP ADJACENT OWNERSHIP d M.±..I.f„ Falr Harbor Rea 1, —,, SITE R OQ VICINITY °° O Q4 �= SHORELINE \ ®�RESTORATION OO (MITIGATION SITE) , ® Reach I&I—d PROJECT PROJECT SITE SITE a a' ® W J i 0 W W ' U SOURCE:ESRI,OSM,USGS SOURCE:MASON COUNTY GIS ADJACENT OWNERS: PROJECT:PORT OF GRAPEVIEW COMMUNITY DOCK AND REMOVAL OF BULKHEAD 1.BIANCHI,ROBERT&MARGARET PURPOSE: SHORT TERM AND LIMITED REFERENCE#: NWS-2018-161 2.CARTER,MARK&DIANE DURATION MOORING OF BOATS BEFORE AND IN: REACH(TREASURE)ISLAND 3.PORT OF GRAPEVIEW AFTER LAUNCHING BOATS AT THE BOAT RAMP NEAR:REACH(TREASURE)ISLAND 4.NELSON,VERNON&SUSAN 5.NELSON,VERNON&SUSAN SITE ADDRESS: COUNTY:MASON 6.MCNEISH,JOHN ALBERT&MELISSA GRAPEVIEW LOOP RD&GRISWOLD AVE APPLICANT: PORT OF GRAPEVIEW MARTIN GRAPEVIEW,WASHINGTON 98546 SHEET: I of 8 DATE: H/26/2018 EXISTING BULKHEAD ERODING MHHW PACIFIC OYSTER BED SEGMENT OF 14.16 (Crassostrea gigas) PRELIMINARY SHORELINE L A -1055 SF INFORMATION ONLY ' ( / / REMAINING ROW /�- // / MLLW 0.0' \ / OF PILE FROM NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION \I FAILED BULKHEAD \ r EXISTING SOUNDVIEW CONSULTANTS,LLC.ASSUMES BULKHEAD NO LIABILITY OR RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANGULAR ROCK CONSTRUCTION,IMPROVEMENTS, OR I -11275 SF \ \ I 2 ESTIMATES BASED ON THIS PLAN SET ❑ r„DRAE„„ 1 i / G EXISTING STORM OUTFALL OHW 16.64'�� GMSMLD AVE I PROPERTY BOUNDARY TOO EITENAND MARINE AlK4 EXISTING CONCRETE / BOAT RAMP / TO REMAIN / N ' MHHW / / L ROPERTY B L NDARIES SHO 14.16' i / / MLLW 0.0' APfROXIM E DNLY. / EXISTING LOOKING WEST AT PROJECT SITE(2006) 1 / / MARINA / FAIR HARBOR MARINA (DOES NOT SHOW RECENTLY CONSTRUCTED CONC. RAMP) I / / TIDAL DATUM (MLLW) EXISTING CONDITIONS :PORT OF GRAPEVIEW MEAN HIGHER HIGH WATER =+ 14.16t COMMUNITY DOCK MEAN HIGHER WATER =+ 13.22f AND REMOVAL OF BULKHEAD MEAN LOW WATER =+ 3.23t REFERENCE# MEAN LOWER LOW WATER = 0.0± 0 30 60 120 APPLICANT:PORT OF GRAPEVIEW LOCATION: GRAPEVIEW LOOP RD& NOTE:TIDAL ELEVATIONS DRAWN GRISWOLD AVE,GRAPEVIEW,WA,98546 APPROXIMATELY. GRAPHIC SCALE i•=eo SHEET: 2 of 8 DATE: 11/26/2018 MITIGATION SITES REMOVE EXISTING ROW MHHW PACIFIC OYSTER BED OF PILE AND INSTALL 14.16' / (1055 strew gigas) PRELIMINARY MIN.12 CU YD BEACH I q I / I ~1055 SF INFORMATION ONLY GRAVEL TO REPLACE - - - �� ' VOLUME OF PILES MLLW 0.0' ' (SEE SHEET 5) / NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION I PLATFORM \ I /i jig I FLOATING DOCK SOUNDVIEW CONSULTANTS,LLC.ASSUMES ELEVATION NO LIABILITY OR RESPONSIBILITY FOR 19'-6" CONSTRUCTION,IMPROVEMENTS, OR I " — PILINGS(7 2 ESTIMATES BASED ON THIS PLAN SET ADA ,-A �GANGWAY oSIDEWALKW. 1 /-- — — — — \ F 1 / ' O / v. cwawoLo I J OHW 16.64' ! PROPERTY BOUNDARY INSTALL DIFFUSER TEE AT EXISTING STORMWATER OUTFALL- SEE DETAIL SHEET 10 1M w REMOVE ANGULAR ROCK AND INSTALL BEACH GRAVEL THIS AREA(SEE SHEET 4) _ \ / / N \\\\` \�/ / /MHHW / / / / / L ROPERTY B NDARIES S 14.16' APpR0XIM E NLY. OWN MLLW 0.0' / FAIR HARBOR MARINA TIDAL DATUM (MLLW) PROPOSED PROJECT PROJECT:PORT OF GRAPEVIEW MEAN HIGHER HIGH WATER =+ 14.16t COMMUNITY DOCK MEAN HIGHER WATER =+ 13.22t AND REMOVAL OF BULKHEAD MEAN LOW WATER =+ 3.23t REFERENCE# MEAN LOWER LOW WATER = 0.0t 0 30 60 120 APPLICANT:PORT OF GRAPEVIEW LOCATION: GRAPEVIEW LOOP RD& NOTE:TIDAL ELEVATIONS DRAWN GRISWOLD AVE,GRAPEVIEW,WA,98546 APPROXIMATELY. GRAPHIC SCALE 1'=eo' SHEET: 3 of 8 DATE: 11/26/2018 CONC WALL I , 4 A REMOVE ANGULAR ROCK AND ADD BEACH GRAVEL -1,275 SF � � N INSTALL DIFFUSER TEE ATSTORMWATEROUTFALL- \ PREVIOUS PROJECT SEE DETAIL SHEET 10 g T RAMP MHHW 1 1 14.16' \ PRELI MINAR \ ` FORMATION ONLY /) \\\ NOT FOR CONS�CTION /UND-EWCONS ULTAN S,LLC.ASSUMES / v CONSTRUCTIONR MPROVEMENTS OR ESTIMATES BASED ON THIS PLAN SET / TIDAL DATUM (MLLW) MITIGATION MEASURES- 1 PROJECT:PORT OF GRAPEVIEW MEAN HIGHER HIGH WATER =+ 14.16t COMMUNITY DOCK MEAN HIGHER WATER =+ 13.22t AND REMOVAL OF BULKHEAD MEAN LOW WATER =+ 3.23t REFERENCE# MEAN LOWER LOW WATER = 0.0t 0 $ 16 32 APPLICANT: PORT OF GRAPEVIEW LOCATION: GRAPEVIEW LOOP RD& NOTE:TIDAL ELEVATIONS DRAWN GRISWOLD ANTE,GF-0EVIEW,WA,98546 APPROXIMATELY. GRAPHIC SCALE Pale' SHEET: 4 of 8 DATE: 11/26/2018 EXISTING / EXISTING / CONCRETE CONCRETE BULKHEAD BULKHEAD APPROX.EXTENT REMOVE APPROX.44 EXISTING OF ERODING SLOPE/ PILE AND REMAINING CROSS- SHORELINE SCOUR APPROX.ALIGNMENT OF /V MEMBERS,AND DISPOSE OF DYSFUNCTIONAL ly OFF-SITE AS DIRECTED BY TIMBER PILE BULKHEAD (y PROJECT BIOLOGIST EXISTING TIMBER PILETO BE VED- /�f\l�l� APPROX 34O ABOVE SUBSTRATE, i L GRAVEL THIS AREAS O CH APPROX.10 BELOW SUBSTRATE I \, REPLACE VOLUME OF \� /y REMOVED PILES I � 6 H APPROX.OW ' APPROX.OHW e /APPROX.MHHW /I 14.16'ELEV. APPROX.MHHW 14.16'ELEV. PACIFIC OYSTER BED EXISTING EXISTING CONCRETE / / CONCRETE BULKHEAD I BULKHEAD EXISTING SHORELINE CONDITIONS PROPOSED SHORELINE MITIGATION TIDAL DATUM (MLLW) MITIGATION MEASURES-2 PROJECT:PORT OF GRAPEVIEW MEAN HIGHER HIGH WATER =+ 14.16f PILE REMOVAL AND BEACH GRAVEL COMMUNITY DOCK MEAN HIGHER WATER =+ 13.22t INSTALLATION AREA AND REMOVAL OF BULKHEAD MEAN LOW WATER =+ 3.23t REFERENCE# MEAN LOWER LOW WATER = 0.0t 0 $ 16 32 APPLICANT: PORT OF GRAPEVIEW LOCATION: GR0EVIEW LOOP RD& NOTE:TIDAL ELEVATIONS DRAWN GRISWOLD AVE,GRAPEVIEW,WA,98546 APPROXIMATELY. GRAPHIC SCALE i•=ie SHEET: 5 of 8 DATE: 11/26/2018 TO FACE OF CONCRETE WALL A TOP OF PILING 23'TYP, 9 PLUS PILING CAP 3'1 162' TOP OF DECK 19.50' GANGWAY 10"DIA STEEL PILE,TYP _ —_MHHW —Itlhnl' � t --- --------- — — i-- — ---- 14.16' f-1Tf—III—III � I I 1 11 I F =1I I—III=111=1 I I I=1a ICI I1=1I1=1 11 I1=1 -1 I1=1 FLOATING DOCK @ I I—III—III—I I I I—III—III—III—III=III=III=III=III—III .1 IJ -(I -- __- MHHW&MLLW ='ME=MEIII= II-III=111=-1Tf=1Tf=1ff=11( I(=III=III=III=III—III=III=III=_ _ MLLW )♦ 1=1 1=I 1=1 I I 11=1 11=I 1=1 1=1 11=1 11=I 11=1 1=1 I I-1 I I�11=1 11=1 I I-1 I I-1-1 11=1 1=1 1=1 11=1 I I�11== ----------- -I I I—I I I—I I I=1 I=1 I I—I I—I I I—I I I I I=1 I f=III=I I I�I I=1 I I=I I IJ I I=III=III—III=III=III I I 11=1 I I—I E-:III=1 I I-I 11=I I-I I _ 0.001- —�— _ _ — — — _ _ 1T=-1_TI=1TI 11=1 =1 I I-iTf—III—III-1Tf III—III-1 I I�I—III iTf ill-1 I f-1Tf-1Tl �.—III I—11 I—III-1 I I—I 1-1 I I-111=11 I_I1I— =11 I�I I—III—I I=1 I� I—III—I I� =1 I I=1 I I=1 I�I I—III—I I—u I—I 11-1 1—I n—I n—III-1 I I I I—I� I I I—III—I� I—I n III 11 1=1 =1 1 11=1 11=1 11=1 I I 11=1 11=1 1=1 I I—I 11=1 11=1 I(=1 11=1 11=1 I I�I I—I 11=1j I I—I 11=1TI=1 I I 11=I I—I 11=1 I I;J 1-11(�—ITI-(11=11 I�11—I I I=I I:1 I—I 11=1 11=,I J N I 1=1 11= 1 1-111=1 1=1 11 DRAINAGE PIPE BEYOND- ILJI �J IIJI II JI U INSTALL DIFFUSER PIPE BEACH GRADE SEE DETAIL ON SHEET 10 PRELIMINARY INFORMATION ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SOUNDVIEW CONSULTANTS,LLC.ASSUMES PRE-EXISTING CONDITIONS - NO LIABILITY OR RESPONSIBILITY FOR PROJECT SITE LOOKING SOUTHEAST AT CONCRETE RAMP CONSTRUCTION,IMPROVEMENTS, OR ESTIMATES BASED ON THIS PLAN SET TIDAL DATUM (MLLW) CROSS-SECTION PROJECT:PORT OF GRAPEVIEW MEAN HIGHER HIGH WATER =+ 14.16t AT PROPOSED FLOATING DOCK COMMUNITY DOCK MEAN HIGHER WATER =+ 13.22t AND REMOVAL OF BULKHEAD MEAN LOW WATER =+ 3.231 REFERENCE# MEAN LOWER LOW WATER = 0.0t 0 1�.5 25 50 APPLICANT: PORT OF GRAPEVIEW LOCATION: GRAPEVIEW LOOP RD& NOTE:TIDAL ELEVATIONS DRAWN GRISWOLD AVE,GRAPEVIEW,WA,98546 APPROXIMATELY. GRAPHIC SCALE 1'=25' SHEET: 6 of 8 DATE: 11/26/2018 (2)2x8 PT TIMBER HANDRAIL 2x2 CHAINLINK FABRIC 4x6 PT TIMBER POST 4"CONCRETE WALK, ��•• ��i� GANGWAY HEAVY BROOM FINISH 18'-0" EXISTING TING STORM DRAIN `i 'Y �� MHHW MHHW ia.1s' REINFORCING- PER ' DEL REINFORCING PER STRUCTURAL o� STRUCTURAL PLATFORM SECTION A PLATFORM BULKHEAD SCALE. 3/8"=1'-0" SCALE. 3/8"=I'-0" TIDAL DATUM (MLLVV) PLATFORM AND BULKHEAD DETAILS PROJECT: PORT OF GRAPEVIEW MEAN HIGHER HIGH WATER =+ 14.16t COMMUNITY DOCK MEAN HIGHER WATER =+ 13.22t AND REMOVAL OF BULKHEAD MEAN LOW WATER =+ 3.23t REFERENCE# MEAN LOWER LOW WATER = 0.0t APPLICANT: PORT OF GRAPEVIEW LOCATION: GRAPEVIEW LOOP RD& NOTE:TIDAL ELEVATIONS DRAWN GRISWOLD AVE,GRAPEVIEW,WA,98546 APPROXIMATELY. SHEET: 7 of 8 DATE: 11/26/2018 INSTALL DIFFUSER TEE AT END OF EXISTING STORMWATER OUTFALL IMMEDIATELY NORTH OF BOAT RAMP p m Fused or flanged connection 3 specified in profile& plan. - 6 HDPE moulded or fabricated tee same diameter and dimension as pipe. -• -:_ �; r Le �9ti� `e<ev o X p�aR _ y EXISTING STORMWATER OUTFALL Drill holes in front half of tee only. 0 Hole diameter(inches) =Tee diameter divided by 6. (Example: 6 inch tee= V holes 0 0 18 inch tee = 3 inch holes) No holes opposite pipe. Hole spacing = 1.5 x hole diameter. DIFFUSER TEE DETAIL PROJECT: PORT OF GRAPEVIEW COMMUNITY DOCK AND REMOVAL OF BULKHEAD REFERENCE# Note: APPLICANT: PORT OF GRAPEVIEW 1. Source: Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) Highway Runoff LOCATION: GR-\PEVIEW LOOP RD& Manual, Figure 5-71. GRISWOLD AVE,GRAPEVIEW,W.X,98546 SHEET: 8 of 8 DATE: 11/26/2018 MASON COUNTY DCD SEPA Contact List Sent SEPA 01 -00I01 to(check all that apply) on � 1 Skokomish Tribal Nation,Nat.Res.Dept. WA Department of Commerce- ATTN: Randy Lumper reviewteam@commerce.wa.go , N 541 Tribal Center Rd.,Skokomish Nation,98584 rlumper@skokomish.org 0 U.S.Army Corps of Engineers SEPA Reviewer-Jason Sweeney Skokomish Tribal Historic Preservation Officer PO Box C-3755,Seattle,98124 ATTN: Kris Miller Jason.t.sweeney@usace.army.mil 80 N Tribal Center Rd,Skokomish Nation,98584 shlanay1@skokomish.org WA Dept.of Fish and Wildlife Quinault Indian Nation SEPAdesk@dfw.wa.gov ATTN: Mark Mobbs PO Box 189,Tahola,98587 WA Dept.of Fish and Wildlife mmobbs@quinault.org ATTN: Chris Waldbillig Squaxin Tribal Nation,Natural Res.Dept. 450 Port Orchard Blvd,Suite 290 2952 SE Old Olympic HWY,Shelton 98584 Port Orchard,WA 98366 jdickison@squaxin.us Chris.waldbillig@dfw.wa.gov emarbet@squaxin.us szaniewski@squaxin.us WA Dept.of Fish and Wildlife sneil@squaxin.us ATTN: Darrin Masters The Confederated Tribe of the Chehalis 450 Port Orchard Blvd, Suite 290 ATTN: SEPA Reviewer-Glen Connelly Port Orchard,WA 98366 420 Howanut Rd., Oakville,98568 Darrin.Masters@dfw.wa.gov gconnelly@chehalistribe.org WA DNR,South Puget Sound Region WA Dept.of Fish and Wildlife 950 Farman Avenue N, Enumclaw,98022-9282 ATTN: Margie Bigelow southpuget.region@dnr.wa.gov (Habitat Biologist-S Puget Sound Watershed) WA DNR,Aquatic Resources 2391 W Deegan Rd.,Shelton,98574 PO BOX 47027, Olympia, 98504-7027 margaret.bigelow@dfw.wa.gov and@dnr.wa.gov 'JAI WA DNR,SEPA Center © WA Dept.of Transportation ATTN: External Coordinator ATTN: Dale Severson PO BOX 47015,Olympia,98504-7015 P.O. Box 47440, Olympia 98504-7440 sepacenter@dnr.wa.gov OR-SEPA-REVIEW@wsdot.wa.gov Olympic Region Clean Air Agency ATTN: Lauren Whybrew City of Shelton 2940-B Limited Ln. NW, Olympia.98502 ATTN:Jason Dose lauren.whybrew@orcaa.org 525 West Cota St.,Shelton 98584 Mason County Transit jasond@ci.shelton.wa.us ATTN: Danette Brannin 790 E Johns Prairie Rd,Shelton,98584 Port of Shelton dbrannin@masontransit.org ATTN: Brandon Palmer Mason County PUD#1 21 West Sanderson Way,Shelton 98584 ATTN: Steve Taylor BrandonP@portofsheIton.com N 21971 Hwy 101,Shelton,98584 sntaylor@mason-pud1.org 0 Dep't of Archaeology&Historic Preservation Mason County PUD#3 P.O. Box 48343,Olympia,98504-8343 ATTN: Kristin French SEPA@dahp.wa.gov kristin.french@masonpud3.org WA Department of Ecology Tacoma Public Utilities-Real Property Services Environmental Review Section ATTN: Dave Letterman PO BOX 47703, Olympia, 98504-7703 3628 S 35th St,Tacoma, 98409-3192 separegister@ecy.wa.gov dletterm@cityoftacoma.org WA Department of Health Mason Cty P.W.ATTN: ATTN: Kelly Cooper kelly.cooper@doh.wa.gov Mason Cty E.H.ATTN: 1 Other: ann owl,JI l uLanSult-1 0 Mason Cty Bldg ATTN: Agent: Applicant: 0 School District: MC DCD last updated on 10/15/2018 a STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY PO Box 47775 •Olympia, Washington 98504-7775 •(360)407-6300 711 for Washington Relay Service •Persons with a speech disability can call 877-833-6341 January 2, 2019 Ron Buckholt, Planner Mason County Department of Community Services Planning Division PO Box 279 Shelton, WA 98584 Dear Ron Buckholt: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the mitigated determination of nonsignificance for the Soldier Pile Bulkhead Removal and Mitigation for Port of Grapeview Floating Community Dock Project(SEP2018-00109) located at 5054 E Grapeview Loop Road in Grapeview as proposed by Glenn Carlson,Port of Grapeview. The Department of Ecology(Ecology)reviewed the environmental checklist and has the following comment(s): SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT: Derek Rockett(360)407-6287 The applicant proposes to remove a structure(s)that may contain treated wood. Please refer to Ecology's publication "Focus on Treated Wood Exclusion,"available at: https://fortress.wa.gov/ecy/publications/publications/0304038.pdf, for suggested best management practices and disposal requirements for treated wood. All removed debris resulting from this project must be disposed of at an approved site. Contact the local jurisdictional health department for proper management of these materials. WATER QUALITY: Chris Montague-Breakwell(360)407-6364 Erosion control measures must be in place prior to any clearing, grading, or construction. These control measures must be effective to prevent stormwater runoff from carrying soil and other pollutants into surface water or stormdrains that lead to waters of the state. Sand, silt, clay particles, and soil will damage aquatic habitat and are considered to be pollutants. Any discharge of sediment-laden runoff or other pollutants to waters of the state is in violation of Chapter 90.48 RCW, Water Pollution Control, and WAC 173-201A, Water Quality Standards for Surface Waters of the State of Washington, and is subject to enforcement action. The following construction activities require coverage under the Construction Stormwater General Permit: Ron Buckholt, Planner January 2, 2019 Page 2 1. Clearing, grading and/or excavation that results in the disturbance of one or more acres and discharges stormwater to surface waters of the State; and 2. Clearing, grading and/or excavation on sites smaller than one acre that are part of a larger common plan of development or sale, if the common plan of development or sale will ultimately disturb one acre or more and discharge stormwater to surface waters of the State. a) This includes forest practices(including,but not limited to, class IV conversions) that are part of a construction activity that will result in the disturbance of one or more acres, and discharge to surface waters of the State; and 3. Any size construction activity discharging stormwater to waters of the State that Ecology: a) Determines to be a significant contributor of pollutants to waters of the State of Washington. b) Reasonably expects to cause a violation of any water quality standard. If there are known soil/ground water contaminants present on-site, additional information (including,but not limited to:temporary erosion and sediment control plans; stormwater pollution prevention plan; list of known contaminants with concentrations and depths found; a site map depicting the sample location(s); and additional studies/reports regarding contaminant(s))will be required to be submitted. You may apply online or obtain an application from Ecology's website at: http://www.ecy.wa.goy/programs/wq/stormwater/construction/-Application. Construction site operators must apply for a permit at least 60 days prior to discharging stormwater from construction activities and must submit it on or before the date of the first public notice. Ecology's comments are based upon information provided by the lead agency. As such,they may not constitute an exhaustive list of the various authorizations that must be obtained or legal requirements that must be fulfilled in order to carry out the proposed action. If you have any questions or would like to respond to these comments,please contact the appropriate reviewing staff listed above. Department of Ecology Southwest Regional Office (CC:201807053) cc: Derek Rockett, SWM Chris Montague-Breakwell, WQ Glenn Carlson, Port of Grapeview(Proponent) Ann Boeholt, Soundview Consultants,LLC (Contact) Page 1 of 3 Ronald Buckholt -RE: RE: From: "Mraz, Richard A. (ECY)" <rmra461@ECY.WA.GOV> To: Ronald Buckholt<rbuckholt@co.mason.wa.us> Date: 11/26/2018 2:25 PM Subject: RE: RE: Hi Ron, Removal or deconstruction-only activities do not require a shoreline permit or exemption. They're not development. They may require the County demo permit (and SEPA, since it's work in the water). -Rick From: Ronald Buckholt [rbuckholt@co.mason.wa.us] Sent: Monday, November 26, 2018 2:18 PM To: Mraz, Richard A. (ECY)<rmra461@ECY.WA.GOV> Subject: RE: Rick, Hope you are doing well. The Port of Grapeview is inquiring about doing a bulkhead removal on a residential lot, a couple of parcels down from the actual Port as part of some mitigation stipulated by the Corp for their pier/dock project which was approved by our Hearing Examiner less than a year ago. They would then follow up with a second phase in a year or two for doing some soft-shore stabilization. They are interested in permitting the first phase - bulkhead removal only at the moment. I am assuming that they would need SEPA,JARPA (shoreline exemption and HPA) and a County demolition permit. Is there anything that I am missing?, as the updated SMP seems to lack specific procedural guidance for a"bulkhead removal only" project. I am suggesting that they permit the subject bulkhead removal separately, versus doing an amendment to the previously approved SEPA& Shoreline Substantial Development permit for the pier-dock, which was vested under the old SMP;tied to a specific parcel owned by the Port; and that the modification would require another public hearing to expand the scope of work to another parcel not owned by the proponent. A separate permit process can be done administratively and greatly assist the proponents turn-around time. Your thoughts? Thank you in advance. Ron Buckholt Senior Planner Mason County Community Services Department 615 W. Alder St., Bldg 8 Shelton, WA 98584 360.427.9670 x287 rbuckholt@co.mason.wa.us >>> "Mraz, Richard A. (ECY)" <rmra461@ECY.WA.GOV> 11/21/2018 2:38 PM >>> file:///C:/Users/rbuckholt/AppData/Local/Temp/XPgrpwise/5BFCO247Masonmai1100176... 12/14/2018 Page 2 of 3_, Hi all, This "change" seems to qualify for a shoreline permit revision(see WAC 173-27-100: http://apps.leg.wa.gov/WAC/default.aspx?cite=173-27&full=true#173-27-100). It may also qualify for issuance of a SEPA addendum: httj2://apps-leg.wa.gov/WAC/default.aspx?cite=197- I I&full=true#197-11-625 Eck oAft.,PWS Shorelands Technical and Regulatory Lead Shorelands and Environmental Assistance Program Southwest Regional Office (360)407-6221 (360)810-0024 - cell rmra46l gecy.wa.gov From:Ann Boeholt [mailto:ann@soundviewconsultants.com] Sent:Wednesday, November 21, 2018 10:53 AM To: rbuckholt@co.mason.wa.us Cc: Roger Hansen <roger@h hand*.com>; Mraz, Richard A. (ECY)<r_mra461@ECY.WA.G0V> Subject: Port of Grapeview Ron, Thank you for calling me back yesterday and for your message. So, per your message, you are recommending that we submit a JARPA and SEPA checklist for the Port of Grapeview shoreline restoration at the Bianchi site as a stand-alone project--apart from the already permitted dock for which the shoreline restoration will serve as compensatory mitigation that is required by the USACE and WDFW. I understand that your reason for suggesting this approach is that since the dock project was permitted last year,there have been amendments to the Mason County Code and Shoreline Master Program and you recommend that we not open that back up or try to mix apples and oranges. We can do that. My concern, however, is that at least Phase 1 of the shoreline restoration will need to be completed at the same time as piling installation for the floating dock. The Port of Grapeview has a narrow work window to complete this work(from the time they have all permits in hand—perhaps as early as December 15—to only the middle of February). Is it not possible and potentially quicker to simply amend the prior DNS and Shoreline Variance permit to include at least phase 1 of the shoreline restoration since this was mitigation required for the county-approved project during federal review of that very same project? The Port has asked that as mitigation for the dock, we restore a 63 LF of marine shoreline adjacent to the Port of Grapeview site. The shoreline restoration would consist of pulling out creosoted pilings and cross beams that comprise a dysfunctional and dilapidated soldier pile bulkhead along the "Bianchi" parcel. Pulling of these piles/bulkhead and applying spawning gravels to fill the holes left by the piles and to restore the beach will comprise Phase 1. Phase 2 would be soft shoreline stabilization/restoration which will consist of re-sloping the beach, re-planting the beach, and installing and anchoring logs with rootwads at or above the MHHW. We have decided to separate this into phases for the following reasons: file:///C:/Users/rbuckholt/AppData/Local/Temp/XPgrpwise/5 BFCO247Masonmail 100176... 12/14/2018 Page 1 of 3 Ronald Buckholt - RE: RE: From: "Mraz, Richard A. (ECY)" <rmra461@ECY.WA.GOV> To: Ronald Buckholt<rbuckholt@co.mason.wa.us> Date: 11/26/2018 2:25 PM Subject: RE: RE: Hi Ron, Removal or deconstruction-only activities do not require a shoreline permit or exemption. They're not development. They may require the County demo permit (and SEPA, since it's work in the water). -Rick From: Ronald Buckholt [rbuckholt@co.mason.wa.us] Sent: Monday, November 26, 2018 2:18 PM To: Mraz, Richard A. (ECY) <rmra461@ECY.WA.GOV> Subject: RE: Rick, Hope you are doing well. The Port of Grapeview is inquiring about doing a bulkhead removal on a residential lot, a couple of parcels down from the actual Port as part of some mitigation stipulated by the Corp for their pier/dock project which was approved by our Hearing Examiner less than a year ago. They would then follow up with a second phase in a year or two for doing some soft-shore stabilization. They are interested in permitting the first phase - bulkhead removal only at the moment. I am assuming that they would need SEPA,JARPA(shoreline exemption and HPA) and a County demolition permit. Is there anything that I am missing?, as the updated SMP seems to lack specific procedural guidance for a "bulkhead removal only" project. I am suggesting that they permit the subject bulkhead removal separately, versus doing an amendment to the previously approved SEPA &Shoreline Substantial Development permit for the pier-dock,which was vested under the old SMP;tied to a specific parcel owned by the Port; and that the modification would require another public hearing to expand the scope of work to another parcel not owned by the proponent. A separate permit process can be done administratively and greatly assist the proponents turn-around time. Your thoughts? Thank you in advance. Ron Buckholt Senior Planner Mason County Community Services Department 615 W. Alder St., Bldg 8 Shelton, WA 98584 360.427.9670 x287 rbuckholt@co.mason.wa.us >>> "Mraz, Richard A. (ECY)" <rmra461@ECY.WA.GOV> 11/21/2018 2:38 PM >>> file:///C:/Users/rbuckholt/AppData/Local/Temp/XPgrpwise/5 BFCO247Masonmai 1100176... 12/17/2018 Page 2 of 1 Hi all, This"change" seems to qualify for a shoreline permit revision(see WAC 173-27-100: http://apps.leg.wa.gov/WAC/default.aspx?cite=173-27&full=true#173-27-100). It may also qualify for issuance of a SEPA addendum: http://apps.leg.wa.gov/WAC/default.ast)x?cite=197- 11&full=true#197-11-625 dW oNtaz,PWS Shorelands Technical and Regulatonj Lead Shorelands and Environmental Assistance Program Southwest Regional Office (360)407-6221 (360,81�- cell rmra461 Aecy.wa.gov From:Ann Boeholt [mailto:ann@soundviewconsultants.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2018 10:53 AM To: rbuckholt@co.mason.wa.us Cc: Roger Hansen <roger@hhand4.com>; Mraz, Richard A. (ECY)<rmra461@ECY.WA.GOV> Subject: Port of Grapeview Ron, Thank you for calling me back yesterday and for your message. So, per your message,you are recommending that we submit a JARPA and SEPA checklist for the Port of Grapeview shoreline restoration at the Bianchi site as a stand-alone project--apart from the already permitted dock for which the shoreline restoration will serve as compensatory mitigation that is required by the USACE and WDFW. I understand that your reason for suggesting this approach is that since the dock project was permitted last year,there have been amendments to the Mason County Code and Shoreline Master Program and you recommend that we not open that back up or try to mix apples and oranges. We can do that. My concern, however, is that at least Phase 1 of the shoreline restoration will need to be completed at the same time as piling installation for the floating dock. The Port of Grapeview has a narrow work window to complete this work(from the time they have all permits in hand—perhaps as early as December 15—to only the middle of February). Is it not possible and potentially quicker to simply amend the prior DNS and Shoreline Variance permit to include at least phase 1 of the shoreline restoration since this was mitigation required for the county-approved project during federal review of that very same project? The Port has asked that as mitigation for the dock, we restore a 63 LF of marine shoreline adjacent to the Port of Grapeview site. The shoreline restoration would consist of pulling out creosoted pilings and cross beams that comprise a dysfunctional and dilapidated soldier pile bulkhead along the"Bianchi" parcel. Pulling of these piles/bulkhead and applying spawning gravels to fill the holes left by the piles and to restore the beach will comprise Phase 1. Phase 2 would be soft shoreline stabilization/restoration which will consist of re-sloping the beach, re-planting the beach, and installing and anchoring logs with rootwads at or above the MHHW. We have decided to separate this into phases for the following reasons: file:///C:/Users/rbuckholt/AppData/Local/Temp/XPgrpwise/5 BFCO247Masonmai 1100176... 12/17/2018 s Page 3 of 3 f ' 1. The so-called Phase 2 elements may be outside of USACE jurisdiction. 2. Bianchi parcel acquisition or an agreement on a restrictive covenant/easement will likely not be complete before the dock construction and the State and Federal resource agencies generally require that mitigation occur concurrently with the impacts. We at least want the removal of the soldier piles (Phase 1) to occur at the same time as the dock installation. 3. We are still working out design details for the Phase 2 elements and yet urgently need to get all local, state, and federal permits and approvals in hand in order to install/construct the floating dock and Phase 1 of the mitigation this winter. In conclusion, my request is twofold: Can you please consider another means of environmental permitting for bulkhead removal? Can the existing DNS simply be amended? If not, what documents do you need and how quickly can you process bulkhead removal (Phase 1)? Thank you Ron. Sincerely, Ann Boeholt, PWS Sr. Environmental Planner. Soundview Consultants LLC Environmental,Natural Resource,and Land Use Consulting Office: 253.514.8952 x 020 Fax: 253.514.8954 Email: annna,soundviewconsultants.com Main Office and MailinLy Address: 2907 Harborview Drive,Suite D Gig Harbor,WA 98335 file:///C:/Users/rbuckholt/AppData/Local/Temp/XPgrpwise/5 BFCO247Masonmail 100176... 12/17/2018 lqjh.� �v Al Sk w "-fo 'WA WNW We �MW -14 PA, ED *67 mr, A4 MASON COUNTY Department of Community Services Planning Division 615 W Alder St, Shelton, WA 98584 Iot$ (360)427-9670 MITIGATED DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (WAC 197-11-350) SEP2018-00109 Description of Proposal: DEMO OF FAILING BULKHEAD Proponent: PORT OF GRAPEVIEW Site Address (If Assigned): Directions to Site: HWY 3 N, TAKE E GRAPEVIEW LOOP RD TO GRISWOLD AVE, ADJACENT TO 5054 E GRAPEVIEW LP RD Parcel Number: 121055163003 Legal Description: DETROIT #2 BLK: 63 TR 3 & TLS. Lead Agency: Mason County The Lead Agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed Environmental Checklist and other information on file with the Lead Agency. This information is available to the public upon request. MITIGATED MEASURES ARE ATTACHED. Please contact Ron Buckholt at ext. 287 with any questions. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-350. The Lead Agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date shown below, when the determination is final. Comments must be submitted to Community Services Department, 615 W Alder St, Shelton WA 98584 by 1/2/2019. Appeal of this determination must be filed within a 14-day period following this final determination date, per Mason County Code Chapter 15.11 Appeals. Authorized Local Government Official Date SEP2018-00109 Page 1 of 2 MASON COUNTY Department of Community Services Planning Division 615 W Alder St, Shelton, WA 98584 ot$N (360)427-9670 MITIGATED DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (WAC 197-11-350) SEP2018-00109 CONDITIONS OF THIS DETERMINATION 1) Proponent is responsible for obtaining all necessary state and federal permits prior to the commencement of any work. 2) Prior to the commencement of any work, the proponent shall obtain proof of ownership for the subject property or obtain written permission from the owner to conduct the subject scope of work. 3) Phase II - soft shoreline stabilization is not approved at this time and will be subject to further review and permitting at a later date. SEP2018-00109 Page 2 of 2 ----------------, *r AGENCY USEONLY r r c US Army Corps ; Date received: ,., WASHINGTON STATE ofEnglneerse r ; Sealllo Oinlricl ; r Joint Aquatic Resources Permit Agency reference#: Application (JARPA) Form',2 ,et ; USE BLACK OR BLUE INK TO ENTER ANSWERS IN THE WHITE SPACES BELOW. Tax Parcel#(s): ' --------------------------------------: Part I--Project Identification 1. Project Name(A name for your project that you create.Examples:Smith's Dock or Seabrook Lane Development) [balm Soft Shoreline Stabilization/Mitigation for Port of Grapeview Floating Community Dock Part 2—Applicant The person and/or organization responsible for the project. het 2a. Name(Last,First,Middle) Carlson, Glenn(Commissioner) 2b. Organization(if applicable) Port of Grapeview 2c. Mailing Address (Street or PO Box) PO Box 3 2d. City, State, Zip Grapeview,WA 98546 2e. Phone(1) 2f. Phone(2) 2g. Fax 2h. E-mail (360) 275-5020 (206)200-5452 Portofgrapeview2@gmail.com lAdditional forms may be required for the following permits: • If your project may qualify for Department of the Army authorization through a Regional General Permit(RGP),contact the U.S.Army Corps of Engineers for application information(206)764-3495. . if your project might affect species listed under the Endangered Species Act,you will need to fill out a Specific Project Information Form(SPIF)or prepare a Biological Evaluation. Forms can be found at n Rwww nws.usace army mIVKssions/CiviiWorks/Reoulatorv/PermilGuidebooklEndanaeredSaecies . Not all cities and counties accept the JARPA for their local Shoreline permits.if you need a Shoreline permit,contact the appropriate city or county government to make sure they accept the JARPA. 2To access an online JARPA form with[help]screens,go to 't //www eoermittirta wa aov/site/alias resouroacenter/arva taros mrrfd9MAarua forrn aspx For other help,contact the Governor's Office for Regulatory Innovation and Assistance at(800)917.0043 or he]000ria.wa.Uoy. Page 1 of 14 ORIA-16-011 Part 3-Authorized Agent or Contact Person authorized to represent the applicant about the project. (Note:Authorized agent(s) must sign 11 b of this application.) t[LqM 3a. Name(Last,First,Middle) Boeholt,Ann 3b. Organization (If applicable) Soundview Consultants, LLC 3c. Mailing Address(Street or PO Box) 2907 Harborview Dr., Suite D 3d. City, State, Zip Gig Harbor,Washington, 98335 3e. Phone(1) 3f. Phone(2) 3g. Fax 3h. E-mail (253) 514-8952 (253) 514-8954 ann@soundviewconsultants.com Part 4-Property Owner(s) Contact information for people or organizations owning the property(ies)where the project will occur. Consider both upland and aquatic ownership because the upland owners may not own the adjacent aquatic land. el ❑ Same as applicant. (Skip to Part 5.) ❑ Repair or maintenance activities on existing rights-of-way or easements. (Skip to Part 5.) ❑ There are multiple upland property owners. Complete the section below and fill out JARPA Attachment A for each additional property owner. ❑ Your project is on Department of Natural Resources(DNR)-managed aquatic lands. If you don't know, contact the DNR at(360)902-1100 to determine aquatic land ownership. If yes, complete JARPA Attachment E to apply for the Aquatic Use Authorization. 4a. Name(Last,First,Middle) Bianchi, Robert L and Margaret(Parcel#121055163003) 4b. Organization (if applicable) 4c. Mailing Address(Street or PO Box) 6765 38th Avenue SW 4d. City, State, Zip Seattle,Washington, 98126-3031 4e. Phone( ) 4f. Phone(2) 4g. Fax 4h. E-mail ORIA-16-011 Page 2 of 14 Part 5—Project Location(s) Identifying information about the property or properties where the project will occur. n(, ell ❑ There are multiple project locations(e.g. linear projects). Complete the section below and use JARPA Attachment B for each additional project location. 5a. Indicate the type of ownership of the property. (Check all that apply.) L hel ® Private ❑ Federal ❑ Publicly owned (state,county,city,special districts like schools,ports,etc.) ❑ Tribal ❑ Department of Natural Resources(DNR)—managed aquatic lands (Complete JARPA Attachment E) 5b. Street Address(Cannot be a PO Box,If there Is no address,provide other location information in 5p.) [hel2l The parcel north of 5054 E Grapeview Loop Road, along the shoreline of Case Inlet. Be. City, State, Zip(If the project is not in a city or town,provide the name of the nearest city or town.) [ LI Grapeview,WA 98546 5d. County h[ eM Mason Be. Provide the section,township, and range for the project location. het I '/4 Section Section Township Range NE 5 21N 1W;WM 5f. Provide the latitude and longitude of the project location. [ham] Example:47.03922 N let.1-122.89142 W long.(Use decimal degrees-NAD 83) 47.33806/-122.82275 69. List the tax parcel number(s)for the project location. [bel2l • The local county assessor's office can provide this Information. 12105-51-63003 5h. Contact Information for all adjoining property owners. (If you need more space,use JARPA Attachment C.) [Ue p] Name Mailing Address Tax Parcel#(if known) John Albert& Melissa Martin 15701 Goodrich Dr NW McNeish ....................._...............-..............................-.......-....................................................... 12105-51-65002; Gi.g.Harbor,WA 98329 Mark and Diane Carter 16951 15151 Ave SE ............._................................._..........-....................................................................... 12105-51-63004 Renton,WA 98058 Margaret and Robert Bianchi 6765 3.8". . 'Av. . . e SW 12105-51-63005 .....-......................-.................................._................................................_.......... Seattle,WA 98126-3031 ORIA-16-011 Page 3 of 14 511. List all wetlands on or adjacent to the project location. [ eF M None 5j. List all waterbodies(other than wetlands) on or adjacent to the project location.[am] Case Inlet 51k. Is any part of the project area within a 100-year floodplain7 he( el © Yes ❑ No ❑ Don't know 51. Briefly describe the vegetation and habitat conditions on the property. hel The upland portion of the subject mitigation site consists of[awn and sparse ornamental shrubs and trees. The beach consists of mud, sand, and small rocks. A Pacific oyster(Crassostrea gigas) bed is present between elevations +4 ft and +6 ft at the intersections of parcels 12105-51-63003 and 12105-51-63004. Washington Department of Ecology background data suggests the potential presence of patchy eelgrass fringes, patchy salt marsh fringes, and low marsh fringes on the shoreline of the subject property; however, an aquatic vegetation assessment during a low tide on May 27, 2017 concluded that no macroalgae or eelgrass was present within the project area. 5m. Describe how the property is currently used. [helpi Parcel#12105-51-63003 is currently undeveloped; a dysfunctional creosote timber pile bulkhead is present along the edge of the shoreline, below OHW.This bulkhead will be removed as Phase 1 of the mitigation for the Port of Grapeview' community dock. 5n. Describe how the adjacent properties are currently used. h[ eIg The adjoining properties to the north and south are developed with single-family residences. The Port of Grapeview public boat launch is 2 parcels south, along Case Inlet.A new floating dock is planned within the Port of Grapeview property, adjacent to the recently reconstructed boat launch. The dock has received Mason County Environmental Approvals and a Shoreline Variance permit and is planned to be constructed in January 2018. The properties further to the south are occupied by single family homes and buildings and structures associated with the Fair Harbor Marina,which provides boat moorage for recreational boaters,fuel for motorized boats and grocery/gift shopping. East Grapeview Loop Road is present to the west of the property, and to the east of the subject property is Case Inlet. 5o. Describe the structures(above and below ground) on the property, including their purpose(s) and current condition. (ho.pt Parcel#12105-51-63003 is largely undeveloped,with the exception of a dysfunctional creosote timber pile bulkhead present along the shoreline. There are 34 partially decomposed, creosote timber piles visible above the beach grade. Given the gaps between the remaining visible piles, it is assumed that about 10 creosote timber piles remain buried along the line of the soldier pile bulkhead.There are no structures waterward of the bulkhead,within case inlet. 5p. Provide driving directions from the closest highway to the project location, and attach a map. h[ eiM Starting from Allyn,WA drive South 0.8 miles on State Route 3.After crossing Sherwood Creek Bridge turn left onto Grapeview Loop Road and travel 3.0 miles. Turn left onto Griswold Avenue. The Port of Grapeview boat launch is next to Fair Harbor Marina.The subject mitigation parcel is along the shoreline,two parcels north of the boat launch. ORIA-16-011 Page 4 of 14 Part 6—Project Description 6a. Briefly summarize the overall project.You can provide more detail in 6b. Lhalpi This project consists of mitigation to compensate for the anticipated impacts associated with the construction and use of the floating dock to the south of the subject property; mitigation has been divided into Phase I and Phase II. Phase I will include removal of the dysfunctional creosote timber bulkhead, beach nourishment, beach restoration, and stormwater improvements and was the subject of a previous application. Phase II will involve shoreline stabilization and is the subject of this application. 61b. Describe the purpose of the project and why you want or need to perform it. nel The proposed Phase II Mitigation elements include gentle re-grading of the existing shoreline to lay back the eroding bank—the final shoreline will have a final grade not to exceed 2:1. The bank will then be stabilized with biodegradable jute matting and planted with native salt tolerant shrubs and herbaceous plants. Beach logs with rootwads will be placed along the toe of the slope and anchored with buried boulders. Additional boulders will be embedded into the beach adjacent to the beach logs for additional shoreline habitat and to provide additional shoreline protection. Salt tolerant upper salt marsh vegetation will be planted among the logs and boulders at the toe of the slope. A 3-foot wide gravel pathway will be provided to the beach. These measures will improve intertidal habitat for forage fish and juvenile salmonids in order to offset potential impacts to aquatic habitat from the construction of the new floating community dock on the Port of Grapeview property. 6c. Indicate the project category. (Check all that apply) t gel ❑ Commercial ❑ Residential ❑ Institutional ❑ Transportation ❑ Recreational ❑ Maintenance ® Environmental Enhancement 6d. Indicate the major elements of your project. (Check all that apply) (help) ❑ Aquaculture ❑ Culvert ❑ Float ❑ Retaining Wall ® Bank Stabilization ❑ Dam/Weir ❑ Floating Home (upland) ❑ Boat House ❑ Dike/Levee/Jetty ❑ Geotechnical Survey [I Road ❑ Scientific ❑ Boat Launch ❑ Ditch El Land Clearing Measurement Device ❑ Boat Lift ❑ Dock/Pier ❑ Marina/Moorage ❑ Stairs ❑ Bridge ❑ Dredging ❑ Mining ❑ Stormwater facility ❑ Bulkhead ❑ Fence ❑ Outfall Structure ❑ Swimming Pool ❑ Buoy ❑ Ferry Terminal ❑ Piling/Dolphin ❑ Utility Line ❑ Channel Modification ❑ Fishway ❑ Raft ❑ Other: ORIA-16-011 Page 6 of 14 6e. Describe how you plan to construct each project element checked in 6d. Include specific construction methods and equipment to be used. he • Identify where each element will occur in relation to the nearest waterbody. • Indicate which activities are within the 100-year floodplain. All work will be completed from the shoreline, using an excavator. The waterward 15 feet of shoreline will be pulled back to a slope not to exceed 2:1. Jute matting will be applied to stabilize the bank. A gravel pathway will be constructed,then buried boulders, logs, and embedded boulders will be installed along the toe slope at the vicinity of OHW. The logs will be anchored with chain that is threaded through holes drilled through the buried boulders. The logs will be further held in place with additional embedded boulders. Finally, shoreline plantings will be installed among the logs at the toe of the slope and along the slope. Plantings will be irrigated for the first year or longer to ensure survival. All activities will take place within a 100-year floodplain. 6f.What are the anticipated start and end dates for project construction?(Month/Year) ftlpj • If the project will be constructed in phases or stages,use JARPA Attachment D to list the start and end dates of each phase or stage. Start Date: July 16, 2019 End Date: Feb. 14, 2019 ❑ See JARPA Attachment D 6g. Fair market value of the project, including materials, labor, machine rentals, etc. g!UIj $20,000 6h.Will any portion of the project receive federal funding? ht eel • If yes,list each agency providing funds. ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Don't know Part 7 Wetiands: Impacts and Mitigation ❑ Check here if there are wetlands or wetland buffers on or adjacent to the project area. (If there are none, skip to Part 8.) net 7a.Describe how the project has been designed to avoid and minimize adverse impacts to wetlands. (LeM ® Not applicable 7b.Will the project impact wetlands? h[ eM ❑ Yes Z No ❑ Don't know 7c.Will the project impact wetland buffers? WaIA ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Don't know 7d. Has a wetland delineation report been prepared? (gel • If Yes,submit the report,including data sheets,with the JARPA package. ❑ Yes ® No 7e. Have the wetlands been rated using the Western Washington or Eastern Washington Wetland Rating System? I bel 1 • If Yes,submit the wetland rating forms and figures with the JARPA package. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Don't know Not Applicable ORIA-16.011 Page 6 of 14 7f. Have you prepared a mitigation plan to compensate for any adverse impacts to wetlands? lt1ol • If Yes,submit the plan with the JARPA package and answer 7g. • If No,or Not applicable,explain below why a mitigation plan should not be required. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Don't know Not Applicable 7g. Summarize what the mitigation plan is meant to accomplish, and describe how a watershed approach was used to design the plan. ftlpi Not Applicable 7h. Use the table below to list the type and rating of each wetland impacted,the extent and duration of the impact, and the type and amount of mitigation proposed. Or if you are submitting a mitigation plan with a similar table, you can state(below)where we can find this information in the plan. h( etpj Activity(fill, Wetland Wetland Impact Duration Proposed Wetland drain, excavate, Name' type and area(sq. of impact3 mitigation mitigation area flood, etc.) rating ft. or type4 (sq.ft, or category' Acres) acres) I If no official name for the wetland exists,create a unique name(such as'Welland 1"). The name should be consistent with other project documents, such as a wetland delineation report. 2Ecology wetland category based on current Western Washington or Eastern Washington Wetland Rating System.Provide the wetland rating forms wish the DARPA package. 3Indicate the days,months or years the wetland will be measurably Impacted by the activity.Enter"permanent'if applicable. 4 Creation C,Re-establishmenURehabllitation R.Enhancement E,Preservation(P),Mitigation Bank/ln-lieu fee B Page number(s)for similar information in the mitigation plan,-if available: 7i. For all filling activities identified in 7h, describe the source�nd nature of the fill material, the amount in cubic yards that will be used, and how and-where-it-will-bd placed into the wetland. he► Not Applicable 71. For all excavating activities identified in 7h, describe the excavation method,type and amount of material in cubic yards you will remove, and where the material will be disposed. (last Not Applicable Part 8-Waterbodies (other than wetlands): Impacts and Mitigation In Part 8, "waterbodies"refers to non-wetland waterbodies. (See Part 7 for information related to wetlands.) Mglpj © Check here if there are waterbodies on or adjacent to the project area. (if there are none, skip to Part 9.) 8a. Describe how the project is designed to avoid and minimize adverse impacts to the aquatic environment. hLe�i ❑ Not applicable The subject proposal is intended as compensatory mitigation for potential aquatic habitat impacts from an already approved project. As such, the subject proposal will have a net environmental benefit. This project is the second phase of a project that will be removing a dysfunctional creosote timber bulkhead and replacing it with soft shoreline stabilization elements, similar to the pre-disturbance condition of the shoreline. This is minimizing potential adverse impacts that would otherwise occur if the timber bulkhead were proposed to be replaced in-kind or with some other type of structural shoreline stabilization i.e. a rock bulkhead), 8b.Will your project impact a waterbody or the area around a waterbody? let ® Yes ❑ No It will have a positive impact 8c. Have you prepared a mitigation plan to compensate for the project's adverse impacts to non-wetland waterbodies?ingtpj Page 7 of 14 ORIA-16-011 If Yes,submit the plan with the JARPA package and answer 8d, • If No,or Not applicable,explain below why a mitigation plan should not be required. © Yes ❑ No ❑ Not applicable Avoidance and minimization measures are proposed, as detailed in Section 8a, above. Avoidance, minimization, and compensatory mitigation measures are further discussed within the Shoreline, Critical Areas, and ESA Assessment Report(Soundview Consultants, September 2018). The mitigation measures are discussed In greater detail within the Compensatory Mitigation Plan for Impacts to Non-Wetland Aquatic Resources(Soundview Consultants, November 2018). 8d. Summarize what the mitigation plan is meant to accomplish. Describe how a watershed approach was used to design the plan. • If you already completed 7g you do not need to restate your answer here. [heAl Compensatory mitigation will be divided into two sections, Phase I and Phase 11, and will include removal of a dysfunctional creosote timber pile bulkhead, shoreline planting, installation (and anchoring) of large woody debris, and removal of angular rock currently upon the beach at this location.This application addresses Phase 11. Phase I was the subject of a prior application. Together these measures will improve the quality of shoreline habitat at the Port of Grapeview property. The mitigation measures are occurring immediately adjacent to the impact project(the Port of Grapeview floating dock), providing the greatest opportunity to immediately compensate for aquatic habitat impacts from that project. 8e. Summarize impact(s)to each waterbody in the table below. het Activity(clear, Waterbody Impact Duration Amount of material(cubic Area(sq.ft. dredge,fill, pile name' location of yards)to be placed in or or linear ft.) drive, etc.) relative impact, removed from waterbody of waterbody to directly MLLW2 affected Log Placement Case Inlet Approx.. 2 days place 4-5 large logs with rootwads 63 linear feet. +15 ft. Boulders Case Inlet approx.. 2 days Up to 15 boulders(1/3 of these 63 linear feet +15 ft. buried to depth of 3 ft), 'If no official name for the waterbody exists,create a unique name(such as'Stream 1")The name should be consistent with other documents provided. 2 Indicate whether the Impact will occur In or adjacent to the waterbody. If adjacent,provide the distance between the impact and the waterbody and indicate whether the Impact will occur within the 100-year flood plain. Indicate the days,months or years the waterbody will be measurably Impacted by the work. Enter"permanent'if applicable. U For all activities identified in 8e, describe the source and nature of the fill material, amount(in cubic yards) you will use, and how and where it will be placed into the waterbody. hmi 1 • Bury up to 5 boulders to anchor logs with rootwads. Boulders will be buried to a depth of 3 feet. A hole drilled through the center of each boulder will accommodate a chain which will tie around and anchor each log. Additional(up to 10) boulders will be embedded into the shoreline to assist with holding logs in place and to provide additional habitat structure.An excavator, operated from the shoreline,will be used to dig holes and to place boulders and logs. Place logs on the beach and anchor with chain to buried boulders. 8g. For all excavating or dredging activities identified in 8e, describe the method for excavating or dredging, type and amount of material you will remove, and where the material will be disposed. [help] ORIA-16-011 Page 8 of 14 Part 9—Additional Information Any additional information you can provide helps the reviewer(s) understand your project. Complete as much of this section as you can. It is ok if you cannot answer a question. 9a. If you have already worked with any government agencies on this project, list them below. M Agency Name Contact Name Phone Most Recent Date of Contact DNR Donald Olmsted (360) 902-1071 11/30/2018 WDFW Margie Bigelow/Chris (360) 874-7258 12/07/2018 Waldbillig Ecology(Fed Lori Kingsbury (360)407-6926 11/29/2018 Permitting) Ecology(Federal Loree Randall (360)407-6068 11/29/2018 Consistency Coordinator Ecology(Shoreline Rick Mraz (360)407-6221 11/29/2018 Permitting) Mason County Ron Buckholt (360)427-9670 x287 12/10/2018 9b.Are any of the wetlands or waterbodies identified in Part 7 or Part 8 of this JARPA on the Washington Department of Ecology's 303(d) List? et • If Yes,list the parameter(s)below. • If you don't know,use Washington Department of Ecology's Water Quality Assessment tools at: http•//w Ay ecy.wa.aoviproaramsMra1303d/. ❑ Yes 0 No The Washington State Department of Ecology's (WSDOE) on-line Water Quality Atlas identifies this portion of Case Inlet as having a water quality assessment of Category 2, due to potentially elevated levels of bacteria. Category 2 waters are not 303-d listed but these are areas where there is some evidence of a water quality problem, but not enough to require production of a water quality improvement project(including total maximum daily load[TMDL]). 9c.What U.S. Geological Survey Hydrological Unit Code(HUC) is the project in? h( elgi • Go to http•//cfoub epa aov/surfAocatehnd@X.cfm to help identify the HUC. Puget Sound Watershed- 17110019 9d.What Water Resource Inventory Area Number(WRIA#)is the project in? h[_pe1 .I • Go to htto://www ecv wa aov/waterlwdalindex.html to find the WRIA A 14 Kennedy--Goldsborough 9e.Will the in-water construction work comply with the State of Washington water quality standards for turbidity? [ham Go to tttto:/Avww ecv wa aov/oroarems/wa/swaskriterla.htm)for the standards. N Yes ❑ No ❑ Not applicable 9f. If the project is within the jurisdiction of the Shoreline Management Act,what is the local shoreline environment designation? [hel • If you don't know,contact the local planning department. ORIA-16-011 Page 9 of 14 • For more Information,go to:htto://www.ecv.wa.aoy/aroorams/sea/sma/laws rules/173-26/211 desianations.html. ❑ Urban ❑ Natural ❑ Aquatic ❑ Conservancy N Other: Residential 9g.What is the Washington Department of Natural Resources Water Type? chew • Go to htto:liwww.dnr.wa.gov/forest-r)ractices-water-tvr)lna for the Forest Practices Water Typing System. N Shoreline N Fish ❑ Non-Fish Perennial ❑ Non-Fish Seasonal 9h.Will this project be designed to meet the Washington Department of Ecology's most current stormwater manual? het • If No,provide the name of the manual your project is designed to meet. ❑ Yes N No Name of manual: Mason County Countywide Stormwater Management Plan 911. Does the project site have known contaminated sediment? (h�j • If Yes,please describe below. ❑ Yes N No Creosote piles are present,which are partly buried and may have leached contaminants into adjacent sediments. These are being removed as Phase I of the mitigation. 9j. If you know what the property was used for in the past, describe below. [helal Uses are unknown at the subject properties prior to their current use. The timber pile bulkhead has been in place since at least early 1990(according to Google Earth; it is also visible in a 1992-1997 shoreline oblique photographs from the Department of Ecology's Shoreline Photo Viewer). 9k. Has a cultural resource(archaeological) survey been performed on the project area? h[ e�I.I • If Yes,attach it to your JARPA package. ❑ Yes ® No 91. Name each species listed under the federal Endangered Species Act that occurs in the vicinity of the project area or might be affected by the proposed work. LhqlA Humpback Whale(Megaptera novaeangliae) Southern Resident Killer Whale(Orcinus orca) Puget Sound Steelhead Trout(Oncorhynchus mykiss) Puget Sound Chinook Salmon (Oncorhyncus tshawytscha) Bull Trout(Salvelinus confluentus) Bocaccio Rockfish (Sebastes pauclspinis) Yelloweye Rockfish(Sebastes ruberrimus) Marbled Murrelet(Brachyramphus marmoratus) 9m. Name each species or habitat on the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife's Priority Habitats and Species List that might be affected by the proposed work. MOM Estuarine and Marine wetlands Part 10—SEPA Compliance and Permits Use the resources and checklist below to identify the permits you are applying for. • Online Project Questionnaire at http://apl)s.oria.wa.gov/opas/. ORIA-16-011 Page 10 of 14 Governor's Office for Regulatory Innovation and Assistance at(800) 917-0043 or help(a-oria.wa.gov. • For a list of addresses to send your JARPA to, click on agency addresses for completed JARPA. 10a. Compliance with the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA). (Check all that apply.) het • For more information about SEPA,go to www.ecy,wa.aovlprooramstsea/sepa/e-review.htmi. ❑ A copy of the SEPA determination or letter of exemption is included with this application. ® A SEPA determination is pending with Mason County (lead agency).The expected decision date is January. 2019 ❑ 1 am applying for a Fish Habitat Enhancement Exemption. (Check the box below in lob.)[help] ❑ This project is exempt(choose type of exemption below). ❑ Categorical Exemption. Under what section of the SEPA administrative code(WAC) is it exempt? ❑ Other: ❑ SEPA is pre-empted by federal law. 10b. Indicate the permits you are applying for. (Check all that apply.) try LOCAL GOVERNMENT Local Government Shoreline permits: © Substantial Development ❑ Conditional Use ❑ Variance ❑ Shoreline Exemption Type(explain): Other City/County permits: ❑ Floodplain Development Permit ® Critical Areas Ordinance STATE GOVERNMENT Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife: ® Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) ❑ Fish Habitat Enhancement Exemption—Attach Exemption Form Check the appropriate boxes ❑ $150 check enclosed. Check# Attach check made payable to Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, ❑ My project is exempt from the application fee. (Check appropriate exemption): ❑ HPA processing is conducted by applicant funded WDFW staff. Agreement# ❑ Mineral prospecting and mining ❑ Project occurs on farm and agricultural land. (Attach a copy of current land use classification recorded with the county auditor,or other proof of current land use) ❑ Project is modification of an existing HPA originally applied for, prior to July 10, 2012. HPA# Washington Department of Natural Resources: ❑ Aquatic Use Authorization Complete JARPA Attachment E and submit a check for$25 payable to the Washington Department of Natural Resources. Do not send cash. Page 11 of 14 ORIA-16-011 Washington Department of Ecology: ❑ Section 401 Water Quality Certification FEDERAL GOVERNMENT United States Department of the Army permits (U.S.Army Corps of Engineers): Cl Section 404 (discharges into waters of the U.S.) ® Section 10 (work in navigable waters) United States Coast Guard permits: ❑ Private Aids to Navigation (for non-bridge projects) Page 12 of 14 ORIA-16-011 Part 11—Authorizing Signatures Signatures are required before submitting the JARPA package.The JARPA package includes the JARPA form, project plans, photos, etc, hel 11 a. Applicant Signature(required) hel I certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief,the information provided In this application is true, complete, and accurate. I also certify that I have the authority to carry out the proposed activities, and I agree to start work only after I have received all necessary permits. I hereby auth agent named in Part 3 of this application to act on my behalf in matters related to this application. (initial) By initialing here, I state that I have the authority to grant access to the property. I also give my consent to the permitting agencies ent property where the project is located to inspect the project site or any work related to the project. (initial) Glenn Carlson, Commissioner MUNN 11 b. Authorized Agent Signature[b@ip] I certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief, the information provided in this application is true, complete, and accurate. I also certify that I have the authority to carry out the proposed activities and I agree to start work only after all necessary permits have been issued. Ann Boeholt "J�r' December 11, 2018 Authorized Agent Printed Name Authorized Agent Signature Date IIc. Property Owner Signature(if not applicant) hel Not required if project Is on existing rights-of-way or easements(provide copy of easement with JARPA). I consent to the permitting agencies entering the property where the project is located to inspect the project site or any work.These inspections shall occur at reasonable times and, if practical,with prior notice to the landowner. 18 u.S.c§1001 provides that:Whoever,in any manner within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States knowingly falsifies,conceals,or covers up by any trick,scheme,or device a material fact or makes any false,fictitious,or fraudulent statements or representations or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing same to contain any false,fictitious,or fraudulent statement or entry,shall be fined not more than$10,000 or imprisoned not more than 5 years or both. Page 13 of 14 ORIA-16-011 If you require this document In another format,contact the Governor's Office for Regulatory Innovation and Assistance(ORIA)at(800) 917-0043. People with hearing loss can call 711 for Washington Relay Service.People with a speech disability can call(877)833- 6341. ORIA ublication number: ORIA-16-011 rev.09/2016 Page 14 of 14 ORIA-16-011