Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSHR2019-00011 Substantial Development - SHR Permit / Conditions - 9/9/2019 RECEIvEKECEIVED MASON COUNTY �'( COMMUNITY SERVICES SEP 0 9 2019 t Building,Planning,Environmental Health,Community Health 615 W. Alder Street 615 W.Alder St.—Bldg.8,Shelton,Wa 98584 j� G Phone:(360)427-9670 ext.352 ♦ Fax:(360)427-7798 PERMIT NO.: S r' � 1 -! ow I v W SHORELINE PERMIT APPLICATION LU SHORELINE PERMITS CONDITIONAL USE* SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT X VARIANCE* EXEMPTION The Washington State Shoreline Management Act (RCW 90.58) requires that substantial developments within designated shorelines of the state comply with its administrative procedures (WAC 173-14) and the provisions of the Mason County Shoreline Management Master Program. The purpose of this Act and local program is to protect the state's shoreline resources. The program requires that substantial development (any development of which the total cost or fair market value exceeds $7,047.00 or materially interferes with the normal public use of the water or shorelines of the State be reviewed with the goals, polices, and performance standards established in the Master Program. Answer all questions completely. Attach any additional information that may further describe the proposed development. Incomplete applications will be returned. *Shoreline Variances and Conditional uses require public hearings and have additional pages that shall be attached to this application. APPLICANT: Glen Carlson, Port of Grapeview ADDRESS: PO Box 3 (street) Grapeview, WA 98546 (city) (state) (zip) TELEPHONE: N/A (425) 610-6552 (home) (business) AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE: Ann Boeholt ADDRESS: 2907 Harborview Drive, Suite D (street) Gig Harbor, WA 98335 (city) (state) (zip) TELEPHONE: (253) 514-8952 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: General location (include property address, water body and associated wetlands—identify the name of the shoreline): The project is located along the shoreline of Case Inlet, Puget Sound, immediately north of 5054 E Grapeview Loop Road. Rev. March 1, 2018 Include all parcel numbers: Projects located in open water areas, away from land shall provide latitude/longitude. 12105-51-63003 OWNERSHIP: Contract Applicant X Owner Lessee Purchaser X* (Identify) Other Owner: (street) (city) (state) (zip) DEVELOPMENT DESCRIPTON: Development proposal (identify and describe the proposed project, including the type of materials to be used, construction methods, principle dimensions, and other pertinent information): The proposed actions are Phase 2 of mitigation for the potential impacts a soci tad with the construction of a floating dock located south of the subject property. Phase 2 includes sloping back the eroding bto a grade not to exceed 2:1 from the OHW and approximately 8 feet landward, installation of a gravel path to the beach, burying boulders which will serve as anchors for large beach logs, placing logs with rootwads, embedding widely spaced boulders to further hold the logs and the beach material, place biodegradable jute matting upon the re-graded slope, and planting the shoreline (upper zone and slope) with native shore-friendly vegetation. This will occur along the entire stretch of this shoreline property(approximately 63 linear feet. Existing Use (identify current use of property with exist improvements): The existing property is undeveloped,with a dysfunctional creosote timber bulkhead present along the shoreline,below OHW. Reason for requesting development: The proposed project will provide compensatory mitigation for the Port of Grapeview floating dock project. This proposed mitigation will restore the shoreline with natural vegetation, beach logs, and substrate, enhancing habitat for native fish and wildlife. The applicant shall provide, at a minimum, the following information: a. SITE PLAN -drawn to scale and including: i. The boundary of the parcel(s) of land upon which the development is proposed; ii. The ordinary high water mark (OHWM). This may be an approximate location provided, that for any development where a determination of consistency with the applicable regulations requires a precise location of the OHWM the mark shall be located precisely and the biological and hydrological basis for the location as indicated on the plans shall be included in the development plan. Where the OHWM is neither adjacent to or within the boundary of the project, the plan shall indicate the distance and direction to the nearest OHWM of a shoreline; iii. Where appropriate, the proposed land contours using five-foot intervals in water area and ten-foot intervals on areas landward of OHWM, if development involves grading, cutting, filling, or other alteration of land contours; iv. The dimensions and location of existing structures which will be maintained, V. The dimensions and locations of proposed structures; parking and landscaping; vi. The location of proposed utilities, such as sewer, septic tanks and drain fields, water, gas and electricity; vii. The location, source, composition, and volume of fill material; viii. The location, composition and volume of any extracted materials, and proposed disposal area; b. CROSS SECTION, drawn to scale including: i. The existing ground elevations; ii. The proposed ground elevations; iii. The location and height of existing structures; iv. The location and height of proposed structures, V. The OHWM. c. VICINITY MAP, including: i. The location of subject parcel using natural points of reference (roads, state highways, prominent landmarks, etc.). ii. If the development involves the removal of any soils by dredging or otherwise, identify the proposed disposal site on the map. If disposal site is beyond the confines of the vicinity map, provide another vicinity map showing the precise location of the disposal site and its distance to nearest city or town. iii. On the map, or separately, give a brief narrative description of the vicinity of the proposed project including identification of the adjacent uses, structures and improvements, intensity of development and physical characteristics. d. ADJACENT LANDOWNERS. Provide names and mailing addresses of all real property owners within 300 feet of property line boundaries where development is proposed. ACKOWLEDGEMENT: I hereby declare, to the best of my knowledge and belief, the forgoing information and all attached information is true and correct. December 6,2018 (Applicant or Authorized Representative) (date) .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Publication Cost Agreement Publication cost is the responsibility of the applicant. Final permit processing will not occur until advertising fees have been paid to the newspaper by the applicant.The Shelton-Mason County Journal will bill the applicant directly. I/WE understand that I/WE must sign and date the attached acknowledgment indicating and that I/WE understand that is MY/OUR responsibility. I/WE must submit the signed page as part of application in order for it to be considered as complete. /4 Signature of Property Owner Date Print Name OR ignature of Applicant Date Print Name C,n-AfEVt 6 V /�u�SE IL & �c AI 2ex3o ARC@ TEC S,PLLC PICNIC SHELTER 4- ip. 2. GRAPF-VIFW _ _ _ LAW, o = RCO DEVELOPMENT - GRANT NO. 3 ( // 5q F HHJ Architects,PLLC 6015t.Helens Ave:;Tacoma,WA 98402 4 r 4' 0� LANDSCAPE AREA ' f(/ 1 4 } I 1 S UJ n LD u PORT OF GRAPEVIEW RCO DEVELOPMENT GRANT NO. 3 I''=� '•p`' fed 0/� G E o R E S 0 u R C E S _ ea:ili science 5 genic-chniC.ai' engineering 5007 Pacific Hwy E , Suite 16 ( Fife, WA 98424 1 253.896.1011 j www.georesources,rocks September 28, 2018 Port of Grapeview c/o Soundview Consultants 2907 Harborview Drive, Suite D Gig Harbor,Washington 98335 Attn: Ms.Ann Boeholt, PWS (253)514-8953 ext 020 ann@soundviewconsultants.com Engineering Geology Report Proposed Shoreline Restoration xxx-Grapeview Loop Road Mason County,Washington PN: 121055163003 Doc ID: PortofGrapeview.GrapeviewLoop.RG INTRODUCTION This geotechnical engineering report summarizes our site observations,ourgeotechnical data review and engineering analyses, and provides geotechnical recommendations for the proposed shoreline restoration to be located at xxx-Grapeview Loop Road near the Port of Grapeview in Mason County,Washington, as shown on the Site Location Map, Figure 1. Our understanding of the project is based on our correspondence with Ann Boeholt of Soundview Consultants, our September 20, 2018 site visit, and our experience in the site area. We understand that the Port of Grapeview is planning to install a new floating dock to provide short term moorage to users of the existing public boat ramp located at Grapeview Loop Road and that the Army Corps of Engineers is requiring mitigation for potential aquatic impacts. We further understand that the Port of Grapeview proposes to purchase an adjacent parcel that has a creosote timber pile bulkhead that is dysfunctional, and proposes to remove the old timber pile and wood lagging bulkhead and replace it with large woody debris soft armoring. SCOPE The purpose of our services was to evaluate the surface and subsurface conditions at the site as a basis for assessing potential impacts to and from the wave and tidal erosion on the shoreline portion of the parcel. Specifically,our scope of services for the project included the following: 1. Conducting a geologic reconnaissance of the site area; 2. Observing subsurface conditions at the site by logging the soils exposed along the beach; 3. Describing surface and subsurface conditions, including soil type; 4. Providing conclusions and recommendations regarding the type of bulkhead and alternative materials; Po rtofGra pevi ew.G ra peviewLoopRd.RG September 28,2018 Page 1 2 5. Preparing this written Geotechnical Engineering Report summarizing our site observations and conclusions, and our geotechnical recommendations and design criteria, along with the supporting data. The above scope of work was summarized in our Proposal for Geotechnical Engineering Services dated September 18, 2018. We received your written authorization to proceed on September 19, 2018. SITE CONDITIONS Surface Conditions The subject mitigation site is located at xxx Grapeview Loop Road, two lots north of the Port of Grapeview boat ramp and marina in Mason County,Washington. According to the Mason County WA GIS website,the parcel is roughly flag-pole in shape. The"flag'portion is approximately 60 feet wide (north to south) by about 218 to 236 feet deep(east to west). The"pole"section of the parcel measures about 20 feet wide by about 74 to 82 feet deep.The entire site area encompasses approximately 0.31 acres. The site is currently undeveloped except for the failing creosote timber bulkhead. The site is bounded by the residence located at 5054 E Grapeview Loop Road to the south, by Grapeview Loop Drive to the west,the residence at 5100 E Grapeview Loop Road to the north,and by the Puget Sound to the east. From Grapeview Loop Road, the site slopes down from the northwest to the southeast at about 10 percent or less. The shoreline portion of the site is generally vertical and about 4 feet tall. Total topographic relief across the site is on the order of 15 feet. The current site configuration is shown on the Site Vicinity Map, Figure 2. Vegetation in the upland portion of the site consists of grasses and scattered deciduous trees in the west portion of the site. No seeps were observed on the slopes at the time of our site visit. As stated, the old timber pile/wood lagging bulkhead that extended along the shoreline portion of the site is failing and tidal scour is occurring behind the old bulkhead. Scour has extended back as far as 9 to 10 feet from the face of the old bulkhead. No other evidence of upland erosion, landslide activity or deep-seated slope instability was observed at the site at the time of our site visit. The adjacent parcels to the north and south are protected by concrete cast-in-place bulkheads. Site Soils The USDA Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) Web Soil Survey maps the soils in the area of the site as Alderwood gravelly sandy loam(Alb)soils. The Alderwood soils are derived from glacial drift or glacial outwash over dense glaciomarine deposits and form on slopes of 8 to 15 percent. These soils have a"moderate to severe"erosion hazard when exposed,and are included in hydrologic soils group B. A copy of the SCS map for the site vicinity is attached as Figure 3. Site Geology The Geologic Map of the Vaughn 7.5-minute Quadrangle, Pierce and Mason Counties, Washington (Logan et Al., 2007) indicates the site is underlain by Vashon glacial till (Qgt) deposits. The glacial till soils were deposited during the most recent Vashon Stade of the Fraser Glaciation some 12,000 to 15,000 years ago. The glacial till consists of a heterogeneous mixture of gravel,sand,silt and clay that was deposited at the base of the continental ice mass, and was subsequently over-ridden. As such, GEORESOURCES Po rtofGra pevi ew.G ra pevi ewLoo p Rd.RG September 28,2018 page 1 3 the glacial till is considered to be over consolidated and generally exhibits high strength and low compressibility characteristics where undisturbed. The near surface soils at the site have been disturbed by natural weathering processes that have occurred since their deposition. An excerpt of the above referenced map is included as Figure 4. The Washington State Department of Ecology (DOE) Coastal Atlas maps the site as being "stable". We also reviewed a series of oblique aerial photos from 1992 to 2016 which show minor erosion along the shoreline from 2000 to 2016. The Coastal Zone Atlas also shows the drift cell current as undefined in the site area. A copy of the Coastal Zone Atlas is attached as Figure 5,while copies of the aerial photographs are attached as Figures 6a through 6d. Subsurface Conditions We were able to observe subsurface conditions at the site by logging the bare soils along the shoreline. We observed about 6 inches of sod and topsoil mantling about 18 to 24 inches of light orange- brown silty sand with gravel that appeared to be medium dense and moist. These soils appeared to be consistent with weathered glacial till soils. Underlying the surficial soils, we observed grey/tan with orange mottling silty sand with gravel that appeared dense and moist. These soils appear to be consistent with glacial till deposits.The glacial till extended down to the beach sand and gravel. ENGINEERING CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Based on our site evaluation, it is our opinion that an active shoreline erosion hazard does exist at the site. The combination of shoreline tidal and wave action is resulting in active toe erosion, sloughing and shoreline regression. We recommend that new soft armoring be installed to prevent additional erosion at the site. The new soft armor bulkhead will be constructed at the toe of the active shoreline area, landward of old timber pile bulkhead, Mean High Water (MHW) and Ordinary High Water(OHW)and tie into the adjacent concrete cast-in-place bulkheads. Bulkhead Materials We understand that the selected material for replacement bulkhead is large woody debris with scattered large rocks used to hold the ends of the woody debris in place. There are a variety of alternative materials that may be considered for the construction of shoreline bulkheads. Virtually all shoreline protection construction methods and materials require beach access and/or beach disturbance. In general, the shoreline protective materials can be divided into three basic types, including the following: cast-in-place construction materials(concrete), placed materials(rock, blocks and timber), and "soft armor" materials(anchored large woody debris). Based on our experience, although poured in-place concrete bulkheads provide excellent protection of the shoreline from erosion, they are not a preferred alternative by regulatory staff because of water quality issues during construction and redirection or reflection of shoreline energy often resulting in scour on the adjacent properties. Large rock, block or treated timber materials are common bulkhead materials in the Puget Sound area. Treated timber materials provide adequate protection of the toe, but are not considered permanent, as illustrated by the number of timber bulkheads that are replaced on a regular basis owing to damage,rot or decay.The treated timber materials are also considered to have water quality issues by some agency staff,depending on the treatment(creosote). Because the permitted structure GEORESOURC?S 3 PortofGra pevi ew.G ra peviewLoopRd.RG September 28,2018 page 14 would not be at risk of failure within 3 years, the state agencies would not support the use of hard armoring. We understand that you propose to use soft armoring to mitigate the toe erosion along the shoreline. Although technically not a bulkhead, anchored large wood placed at or near the toe of the shoreline bank and beach area can provide limited erosion protection for the toe of the shoreline. The large wood does have a limited life expectancy and requires maintenance and possibly occasional replacement, but should adequately mitigate toe erosion at the site. It is our opinion that the use of soft armoring will reduce the rate of shoreline regression and will provide opportunity for biologic activity and variation of the energy dissipation patterns along the shoreline. The shoreline across the front of the site faces east towards Reach Island and has a fetch of less than 1,000 feet to the east,and 1,250 to 1,400 feet to the southeast and northeast respectively. The fetch to the southeast is interrupted by the exiting Port of Grapeview Marina. The predominant winter storm direction results in severe, damaging winds from the south and southwest, which the site is not subject too.Also,the Washington State Department of Ecology Coastal Atlas indicates that the site does not have "any appreciable drift". Given the short fetch, east facing direction of the shoreline, and little to no drift current along the shoreline, the use of soft armoring does appear feasible from a geotechnical standpoint. The anchored large woody debris should abut the adjacent cast-in-place concrete bulkheads so as to not result in scour eddies or sediment traps. The logs should be installed along the new "active" shoreline behind the failing bulkhead. The irregular shape of the logs, and the voids associated with the soft armoring,will absorb most of the wave energy(tidal and boat traffic)thereby reducing the potential for erosion to the site and adjacent properties. The large wood should be anchored by using cable or chains attached to buried deadman anchors(ecology blocks)or to helical or manta ray type anchors. We do recommend using occasional placement of individual rocks near the end of each log in order to hold the logs in place. A typical detail for a soft armor bulkhead is attached as Figures 7a and 7b. It is our opinion that large woody debris and placement rock, if properly installed, should mitigate against the active erosion. While the soft armoring will be an effective method of addressing the active and ongoing erosion,this system will not fully eliminate or stop tidal and wave energy from impacting the site. LIMITATIONS We have prepared this report for use by Port of Grapeview, Soundview Consultants, and other members of the design and construction team, for use in the design of a portion of this project. The data used in preparing this report and this report should be provided to prospective contractors for their bidding or estimating purposes only. Our report, conclusions and interpretations are based on data from others and limited site reconnaissance, and should not be construed as a warranty of the subsurface conditions. Variations in subsurface conditions across the site are possible and may also occur with time. A contingency for unanticipated conditions should be included in the budget and schedule. Sufficient monitoring,testing and consultation should be provided by our firm during construction to confirm that the conditions encountered are consistent with those indicated by the explorations, to provide recommendations for design changes should the conditions revealed during the work differ from those GEORESOURCES Po rtofG rapeview.G ra peviewLoop Rd.RG September 28,2018 page 15 anticipated, and to evaluate whether earthwork and foundation installation activities comply with contract plans and specifications. The scope of our services does not include services related to environmental remediation and construction safety precautions. Our recommendations are not intended to direct the contractor's methods, techniques, sequences or procedures, except as specifically described in our report for consideration in design. Within the limitations of scope, schedule and budget, our services have been executed in accordance with generally accepted practices in this area at the time this report was prepared. No other conditions, express or implied,should be understood. We have appreciated the opportunity to be of service to you on this project. If you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to call at your earliest convenience. Respectfully submitted, GeoResources,LLC Jordan Kovash,GIT Staff Geologist in Training X meenr G i O ' od_G� KEITH SCOTT SCHqml- Seth T. Mattos, LG Keith S.Schembs, LEG Associates Principal JLK:STM:KSS/jlk,kss Doc ID:PortofGrapeview.GrapeviewLoopRd.RG Attachments: Figure 1:Site Location Map Figure 2:Site Vicinity&Cross-Section Figure 3:NRCS Soils Map Figure 4:Geology Map Figure S:Coastal Zone Atlas Figures 6a-6d:Oblique Aerial Photos Figure 7a-7b:Soft Shoreline Stabilization Details GEORESOURCES i 1 WA �. Ile €& 1 1 ,1 W 1}j 11}( 1 I fI I l r 1 Approximate Site Location Map created from Mason County Public GIS(https://gis.co.mason.wa.us/mason/) Not to Scale Site Location Map --■■+�-""" —�••/�_� Proposed Soft Armor and Shoreline Mitigation GEORESOURCES xxx Grapeview Loop Road Mason County, Washington . -if 1:, r1'�f=1+r.K, SOD"►Kif;Hq I,Swle 16 1 We,*A 11414 ISU96AP 1�*.*it orI IOU,ees rocs Doc ID:PortofGrapeview.GrapeviewLoopRd.F September 2018 Figure 1 i IF Of —,: , � ce.. _7 r *'A r w s p �y�r` . e H z F . 4 i` 4 Approximate Site Location Map created from Mason County Public GIS (https://gis.co.mason.wa.us/mason/) NX T r 5 Not to Scale �/� Site Vicinity Map / /M Proposed Soft Armor and Shoreline Mitigation xxx Grapeview Loop Road GEORESOURCES Mason County,Washington Uk � i1tE 13r= 907 ratiic Hwy t,soft 16 1 fife,*0?!::+ asr O r.w eeresco+t►.raats Doc ID:PortofGrapeview.GrapeviewLoopRd.F September 2018 Figure 2 � 711 Vr ' x y-+mot� A + d yA x a� y v y - 10, , ' , Approximate ite Location Map created from Web Soil Survey(http://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/WebSoilSurvey.aspx) Soil Soil Name Parent Material Slopes Erosion Hydrologic Type Hazard Soils Group Ab Alderwood gravelly Glacial drift and/or glacial outwash over dense g to 15 Moderate B sandy loam glaciomarine deposits to Severe Bellingham silty None to Be clay loam Alluvium. Lacustrine deposits and loess 0 to 3 slight C/D itti~' t Not to Scale �IIr — NRCS Soils Map Proposed Soft Armor and Shoreline Mitigation GEORESOURCES xxx Grapeview Loop Road {{EE Mason County, Washington Earth %clerk & 8e=01t�%11(m cal f t"gillei'i 1(' $074tift"1..Suitt 16 1 Fite,*A S14J1 iS1196JOIt I wow Doc ID:PortofGrapeview.GrapeviewLoopRd.F September 2018 Figure 3 fff � wp « oil or « t 4w 10 x a �t xi n �e< Approximate Site Location An excerpt from Geologic Map of the Vaughn 7.5-minute Quadrangle, Pierce and Mason Counties, Washington by Robert L., Logan,and Timothy J.Walsh December 2007. Qgt Vashon till t Not to Scale USGS Geologic Map Proposed Soft Armor and Shoreline Mitigation GEORESOURCES xxx Grapeview Loop Road Mason County, Washington W1 Pit isI H%q{.Sc.tr 16 1;,rr "''11414 M 69C 13., 0.A Sew*,vu,It,II;f, Doc ID:PortofGrapeview.GrapeviewLoopRd.F September 2018 F Figure 4 § r x 41 d Ow m, t 1 Approximate Site Location Map created from Washington State Coastal Atlas(https://fortress.wa.gov/ecy/coastalatlas/tools/Map.aspx) Slope stability A Drift cells Q Stable `- Divergence zone Intermediate .1 Left to right OW Modified %-e No appreciable drift OW Unstable _: Right to left 40 Unstable(old slide) r Undefined Unstable(recent slide) Not to Scale Coastal Zone Atlas Proposed Soft Armor and Shoreline Mitigation GEORESOURCES xxx Grapeview Loop Road eattit science & geutechrimal englneetlng, Mason County, Washington Ml PS ilc""t,%4116(«,*6 ISM+2531 ,1111 1 wr.leooswoe ."is Doc ID:PortofGrapeview.GrapeviewLoopRd.F September 2018 Figure 5 + a a. r � 1 3. F . J " Hilt Approximate Site Location Photo obtained from Washington State Coastal Atlas(https://fortress.wa.gov/ecy/coastalatlas/tools/Map.aspx) 4 Not to Scale Oblique Aerial Shoreline Photograph - 2016 Proposed Soft Armor and Shoreline Mitigation GEORESOURCES xxx Grapeview Loop Road Mason County, Washington SOG;tasiS;Mw-�t,5a4R tb;F�+e.KA}jl1J Y43 69c."�'!�w.w�to�tiaurta.ro;t. Doc ID:PortofGrapeview.GrapeviewLoopRd.F September 2018 Figure 6a b3 ♦ .a q s d 1 Approximate Site Location Photo obtained from Washington State Coastal Atlas(https://fortress.wa.gov/ecy/coastalatias/tools/Map.aspx) t Not to Scale Oblique Aerial Shoreline Photograph - 2006 __..g Proposed Soft Armor and Shoreline Mitigation GEORESOURCES xxx Grapeview Loop Road Mason County,Washington SQ47 tatiic N�[.,#W4t li I ii#e,MA!?i.� 43},i1�.10R6;'iY+W�lMesuances,ritM Doc ID:PortofGrapeview.GrapeviewLoopRd.F I September 2018 Figure 6b � ,. 5 &"�� 8�px�qP�•:.t.�iC+, k"�: w R.rt{5f 'ku�*�, 'Al - w I i x « s � k*00611 x $ >AN s " 9 i i a v r 20 mi l I, "g G r Approximate Site Location Photo obtained from Washington State Coastal Atlas(https://fortress.wa.gov/ecy/coastalatlas/tools/Map.aspx) Not to Scale Oblique Aerial Shoreline Photograph - 2000 ....rl� llll Proposed Soft Armor and Shoreline Mitigation GEORESOURCES xxx Grapeview Loop Road earns "f i_•„re & geolechnit_!i efigi"eo Mason County, Washington "#I racist Nay J.,Swtt 16 1 Foe,**IWA iSJ 1*11411 i 1tMw;arose+r.�ce,r,:ta Doc ID:PortofGrapeview.GrapeviewLoopRd.F September 2018 Figure 6c b, Approximate Site Location Photo obtained from Washington State Coastal Atlas(https://fortress.wa.gov/ecy/coastalatlas/tools/Map.aspx) Not to Scale ■�"''�" Oblique Aerial Shoreline Photograph - 1992 -""� ► Proposed Soft Armor and Shoreline Mitigation 6EORESOURCES xxx Grapeview Loop Road Mason County, Washington . . ..z 15y i41.4�15�wax;earaufu+tea.raslr Doc ID:PortofGrapeview.GrapeviewLoopRd.F September 2018 Figure 6d EXISTING PROPOSED EXISTING EXISTINGCONCRETE CONCRETE BULKHEAD BULKHEAD JUTE MAT OHW 16.64' 7 BURY ECOLOGY BLOCKS 1.5 TO 2 FEET i FOR SCOUR PROTECTION, ECOLOGY I BLOCK SPACING AND MHHW ANCHORING 14.16' SUFFICIENT IN NUMBER TO PROVIDE EFFECTIVE mI r� ! ANCHORING OF LOGS, ■I CONTRACTOR TO �i ADJUST AS REQUIRED �i EMBEDDED ROCK, MIN. 1 FT, 36" TO EXISTING TIMBER 42" DIAMETER BULKHEAD TO BE REMOVED 3 TO 4 LARGE 20 FT ± LENGTH LOGS, 12" I EXISTING MIN DIAMETER, WITH SHORELINE ROOT BALL (SCOUR ' BEHIND FAILING BULKHEAD) EXISTING EXISTING CONCRETE CONCRETE BULKHEAD BULKHEAD PLAN Not to Scale Soft Shore Stabilization Typical Detail GeoResources, LLC Proposed Shoreline Restoration 5007 Pacific Highway East, Suite 16 xxx - Grapeview Loop Road Fife, Washington 98424 Mason County, Washington Ph: (253) 896-1011 Fax: (253) 896-2633 ____.._____ PN: 121055163003 --i — _ Doc ID: PoG.GraveviewLoop.F September 2018 1 Figure 7a i EXTEND JUTE TO FOUR FEET ABOVE OHW TOPSOIL AND PLANTS TO BE LARGE INSTALLED HERE WOODY —> DEBRIS OCCASIONAL (LOGS) —lll-- EMBEDDED ROCK 36 to 42" DIM f— OHW - „_ = JUTE MAT BURIED ECOLOGY BLOCK WIRE ROPE � SUFFICIENT TO CARRY LOAD OF LOGS ELEVATION /SECTION Not to Scale Soft Shore Stabilization Typical Detail GeoResources, LLC Proposed Shoreline Restoration 5007 Pacific Highway East, Suite 16 xxx - Grapeview Loop Road Fife, Washington 98424 Mason County, Washington Ph: (253) 896-1011 Fax: (253) 896-2633 PN: 1 21 0551 63003 Doc ID: PoG.GrapeviewLoop.F September 2018 Figure 7b c •fs E, „ V Photo - Sept 20, 2018 Looking north along failing bulkhead from south property line. 4� 1 Not to Scale ISO I Site Photographs -Nwlll...ri/� Il� Proposed Soft Armor and Shoreline Mitigation GEORESOURCES xxx Grapeview Loop Road Mason County,Washington SAG7 P�sil;NMI t.iukt tb�Ci"e,NA}4!N 253 bib.}+71!�MwY�rwtxm++tr3,ra:�1 Doc ID.PortofG'rapeview.GrapeviewLoopRd.F September 2018 Figure 8a U, ^ tt s� c � y ,�"'".i�, _�,�}/►�si '� ,ir Ltd t� #a f � �_, } . i. gym*_ F"� -i! pr _2; r m ' } Photo - Sept 20, 2018 Looking west past failing bulkhead Site Photographs Proposed Soft Armor and Shoreline Mitigation GEORESOURCES xxx Grapeview Loop Road c-'artit %f it m e Inn Mason County,Washington SUI►atilt M"i,S"t tf i pfe,xA 4Nlt 2S?. .i0tt l ww.�eae�ua.furafts Doc ID:PortofGrapeview.GrapeviewLoopRd.F September 2018 Figure 8b ua. .N a y J s ,�" •'',.�` .yam� ,.�� `� f fit . J T 4* ). v0v R r' a tr r ed .. ®d i''i K'x"} �' > N�'... s_ y�e > ,v.'�t 6 ,�--•• �.4 tea�' "wAa to r 1r _.,a , y r='Y �� qq�� ��+' a °� � t .yivllY' Photo - Sept 20, 2018 Looking south along failing bulkhead from north property line. Site Photographs Proposed Soft Armor and Shoreline Mitigation GEORESOURCES xxx Grapeview Loop Road card} "cteruEc & gc-k�,� t�k .3� � ",�;,� " Mason County, Washington S�OYIKiiClW�1„trHEti)fik,11G11t2� 15i��6•d^ n"a�etl�s+_.:e>=;.s> Doc ID:PortofGrapeview.GrapeviewLoopRd.F September 2018 Figure 8c wr } AGENCY USE ONLY a s iy , US Corps ; Date received: WASHINGTON STATE ,v of Engineers Ineera• s Seattle Disvict Joint Aquatic Resources Permit Agency reference#: Application (JARPA) Fdf-m''2 [help] USE BLACK OR BLUE INK TO ENTER ANSWERS IN THE WHITE SPACES BELOW. Tax Parcel#(s): `-------------------------------------------------------------------- Part 1—Project Identification 1. Project Name (A name for your project that you create. Examples: Smith's Dock or Seabrook Lane Development) hel Shoreline Restoration and Public Access Part 2—Applicant The person and/or organization responsible for the project. [km 2a. Name (Last, First, Middle) Carlson, Glenn (Commissioner) 2b. Organization (If applicable) Port of Grapeview 2c. Mailing Address (Street or Po Box) PO Box 3 2d. City, State, Zip Grapeview, WA 98546 2e. Phone (1) 2f. Phone (2) 2g. Fax 2h. E-mail (360) 275-5020 (206) 200-5452 Portofgrapeview2@gmail.com lAdditional forms may be required for the following permits: • If your project may qualify for Department of the Army authorization through a Regional General Permit(RGP),contact the U.S.Army Corps of Engineers for application information(206)764-3495. • If your project might affect species listed under the Endangered Species Act,you will need to fill out a Specific Project Information Form(SPIF)or prepare a Biological Evaluation.Forms can be found at http:/twww nws usace armv mil/Missions/CivilWorks/RecLulatory/PermitGuidebook/EndangeredSpecies.aspx. • Not all cities and counties accept the JARPA for their local Shoreline permits. If you need a Shoreline permit,contact the appropriate city or county government to make sure they accept the JARPA. 2To access an online JARPA form with[help]screens,go to hftp://www.epermitting.wa.gov/site/alias resourcecenter/jarpa larpa form/9984/jarpa form.aspx. For other help,contact the Governor's Office for Regulatory Innovation and Assistance at(800)917-0043 or help(a)-oria.wa.g-Ov. ORIA-16-011 Page 1 of 13 ., S 4 Part 3—Authorized Agent or Contact Person authorized to represent the applicant about the project. (Note: Authorized agent(s) must sign 11 b of this application.) hel 3a. Name (Last, First, Middle) Boeholt, Ann 3b. Organization (If applicable) Soundview Consultants, LLC 3c. Mailing Address (street or PO Box) 2907 Harborview Dr., Suite D 3d. City, State, Zip Gig Harbor, Washington, 98335 3e. Phone (1) 3f. Phone (2) 3g. Fax 3h. E-mail (253) 514-8952 (253) 514-8954 ann@soundviewconsultants.com Part 4—Property Owner(s) Contact information for people or organizations owning the property(ies) where the project will occur. Consider both upland and aauatic ownership because the upland owners may not own the adjacent aquatic land. [help] X Same as applicant. (Skip to Part 5.) ❑ Repair or maintenance activities on existing rights-of-way or easements. (Skip to Part 5.) ❑ There are multiple upland property owners. Complete the section below and fill out JARPA Attachment A for each additional property owner. ❑ Your project is on Department of Natural Resources (DNR)-managed aquatic lands. If you don't know, contact the DNR at (360) 902-1100 to determine aquatic land ownership. If yes, complete JARPA Attachment E to apply for the Aquatic Use Authorization. 4a. Name (Last, First, Middle) 4b. Organization (If applicable) 4c. Mailing Address (Street or PO Box) 4d. City, State, Zip 4e. Phone (1) 4f. Phone (2) 4g. Fax 4h. E-mail ORIA-16-011 Page 2 of 13 Part 5—Project Location(s) Identifying information about the property or properties where the project will occur. [held ❑ There are multiple project locations (e.g. linear projects). Complete the section below and use JARPA Attachment B for each additional project location. 5a. Indicate the type of ownership of the property. (Check all that apply.) neI Private ❑ Federal X Publicly owned (state, county, city, special districts like schools, ports,etc.) ❑ Tribal ❑ Department of Natural Resources (DNR) — managed aquatic lands (Complete JARPA Attachment E) 5b. Street Address (Cannot be a PO Box. If there is no address, provide other location information in 5p.) hel 5070 E Grapeview Loop Road 5c. City, State, Zip (If the project is not in a city or town, provide the name of the nearest city or town.) hf elgl Allyn, WA 98524 5d. County hel Mason 5e. Provide the section, township, and range for the project location. neI '/4 Section Section Township Range NE 5 21N 1W; WM 5f. Provide the latitude and longitude of the project location. k • Example:47.03922 N lat./-122.89142 W long. (Use decimal degrees- NAD 83) 47.33806/-122.82275 5g. List the tax parcel number(s) for the project location. neI • The local county assessor's office can provide this information. 12105-51-63003 and 12105-51-63005 5h. Contact information for all adjoining property owners. (If you need more space, use JARPA Attachment C.) h[ elp] Name Mailing Address Tax Parcel #(if known) John Albert & Melissa Martin 15701 Goodrich Dr NW ... _......_. 12105-51-65002; Gig Harbor, WA 98329 Mark and Diane Carter 16951 151stAve SE .................. ........................................__..................__....-------...._.._.._..._....._..__................__..... 12105-51-63004 Renton, WA 98058 MOMO Event and Marina LLC 37526 51 st Ave S 12105-51-64001 and 1205- ............................. ..............................._...__............._.-._..........._......._..............._..-..............._... 51-65001 Auburn, WA 98001 Philip M Wolff PO Box 2566 12105-51-62007 ................................................ ............................ ..........__................._......................—-.. ......._.__......._.....__.... Belfalr, WA 98528 ORIA-16-011 Page 3 of 13 .r • Si. List all wetlands on or adjacent to the project location. n[ elpl None 5j. List all waterbodies (other than wetlands) on or adjacent to the project location. of elpl Case Inlet 5k. Is any part of the project area within a 100-year floodplain? hey ❑ Yes ❑x No ❑ Don't know 51. Briefly describe the vegetation and habitat conditions on the property. n�ei The upland portion of the subject property consists of lawn and sparse ornamental shrubs and trees, and a one story single family home, with normal accessories. The beach consists of mud, sand, and small rocks. A Pacific oyster (Crassostrea gigas) bed is present between elevations +4 ft and +6 ft at the intersections of parcels 12105-51-63003 and 12105-51-63004. Washington Department of Ecology background data suggests the potential presence of patchy eelgrass fringes, patchy salt marsh fringes, and low marsh fringes on the shoreline of the subject property; however, an aquatic vegetation assessment during a low tide on May 27, 2017 concluded that no macroalgae or eelgrass was present within the project area. 5m. Describe how the property is currently used. nei The subject property contains a one-story single family home, constructed in 1920 (described in Historic Property Report). This home is served by an on-site septic system. A dysfunctional creosote timber pile bulkhead is present along the shoreline which is already permitted to be removed. 5n. Describe how the adjacent properties are currently used. nei The adjoining properties to the north and west (across Grapeview Loop Road) are developed with single-family residences. The Port of Grapeview public boat launch and floating dock are on the Port's property immediately south of the subject property. The properties further to the south are occupied by single family homes and buildings and structures associated with the private Fair Harbor Marina. East Grapeview Loop Road is present to the immediate west of the property, and to the east of the subject property is Case Inlet. 5o. Describe the structures (above and below ground) on the property, including their purpose(s) and current condition. nei Parcel #12105-51-63003 is largely undeveloped, with the exception of a dysfunctional creosote timber pile bulkhead present along the shoreline. There are 34 partially decomposed, creosote timber piles visible above the beach grade. Given the gaps between the remaining visible piles, it is assumed that about 10 creosote timber piles remain buried along the line of the soldier pile bulkhead. There are no structures waterward of the bulkhead, within case inlet. Parcel #12105-51-63005 contains a one-story single family home, constructed in 1920 (described in Historic Property Report). This home is served by an on-site septic system. The home is in fair condition. 5p. Provide driving directions from the closest highway to the project location, and attach a map. nei Starting from Allyn, WA drive South 0.8 miles on State Route 3. After crossing Sherwood Creek Bridge turn left onto Grapeview Loop Road and travel 3.0 miles. Turn left onto Griswold Avenue. The Port of Grapeview boat launch is next to Fair Harbor Marina. The subject mitigation parcel is immediately north of the boat launch. ORIA-16-011 Page 4 of 13 Part 6—Project Description 6a. Briefly summarize the overall project. You can provide more detail in 6b. heM The proposed project is to construct essential upland facilities that support the Port of Grapeview's recently completed boat launch and floating dock as well as to complete shoreline restoration which will serve as part of the required compensatory mitigation for the new floating dock. 6b. Describe the purpose of the project and why you want or need to perform it. heI Currently the Port's facilities are crowded into a narrow area leading to the launch, which leaves little room for users to manipulate their boats and trailers prior to launching. Parking is currently located across the main Grapeview Loop Road and therefore not easily accessible for people with disabilities. The Port plans to create a turn-around area, trailer parking, and pathways for safer and easier access to the launch. Also there currently are no upland amenities other than the private marina located next to the launch that allows boaters a place to spend quality time before and after launching. It is envisioned that the picnic area will be used primarily by boaters. The shoreline restoration is Phase II of the compensatory mitigation necessary to compensate for the anticipated impacts associated with the construction and use of the new floating dock. Phase I of this mitigation included removal of the dysfunctional creosote timber bulkhead, beach nourishment, beach restoration, and stormwater improvements. Those actions were the subject of a previous application, have been permitted and will be completed this November (2019). 6c. Indicate the project category. (Check all that apply) h ❑ Commercial ❑ Residential ❑ Institutional ❑ Transportation x❑ Recreational ❑ Maintenance ❑x Environmental Enhancement 6d. Indicate the major elements of your project. (Check all that apply) [help] ❑ Aquaculture ❑ Culvert ❑ Float ❑ Retaining Wall ❑x Bank Stabilization ❑ Dam /Weir ❑ Floating Home (upland) ❑ Boat House ❑ Dike / Levee /Jetty ❑ Geotechnical Survey ❑ Road ❑ Boat Launch ❑ Ditch ❑ Land Clearing ❑ Scientific Measurement Device ❑ Boat Lift ❑ Dock/ Pier ❑ Marina / Moorage ❑ Stairs ❑ Bridge ❑ Dredging ❑ Mining ❑ Stormwater facility ❑ Bulkhead ❑ Fence ❑ Outfall Structure ❑ Swimming Pool ❑ Buoy ❑ Ferry Terminal ❑ Piling/Dolphin ❑ Utility Line ❑ Channel Modification ❑ Fishway ❑ Raft ❑x Other: Public restroom/shower, picnic shelter, playground, pump station, turn-around, and parking ORIA-16-011 Page 5 of 13 6e. Describe how you plan to construct each project element checked in 6d. Include specific construction methods and equipment to be used. [help]_ • Identify where each element will occur in relation to the nearest waterbody. • Indicate which activities are within the 100-year floodplain. All work will be completed from the shoreline, using an excavator. The waterward 14 feet of shoreline will be pulled back to a slope not to exceed 2:1. Jute matting will be applied to stabilize the bank. A gravel pathway will be constructed, then buried boulders, logs, and embedded boulders will be installed along the toe slope at the vicinity of OHW. The logs will be anchored with chain that is threaded through holes drilled through the buried boulders. The logs will be further held in place with additional embedded boulders. Finally, shoreline plantings will be installed among the logs at the toe of the slope and along the slope. Plantings will be irrigated for the first year or longer to ensure survival. The proposed public access features will be constructed landward of the shoreline using appropriate construction equipment. The restroom/shower facility and picnic shelter will have a concrete foundation poured by a concrete pump truck and will be stick frame construction. 6f. What are the anticipated start and end dates for project construction? (MonthNear) [help] • If the project will be constructed in phases or stages, use JARPA Attachment D to list the start and end dates of each phase or stage. Start Date: April 30, 2020 End Date: Dec. 31, 2020 ❑ See JARPA Attachment D 6g. Fair market value of the project, including materials, labor, machine rentals, etc. hel $600,000.00 6h. Will any portion of the project receive federal funding? [km • If yes, list each agency providing funds. ❑ Yes X❑ No ❑ Don't know Part 7—Wetlands: Impacts and Mitigation ❑ Check here if there are wetlands or wetland buffers on or adjacent to the project area. (If there are none, skip to Part 8.)[help] 7a. Describe how the project has been designed to avoid and minimize adverse impacts to wetlands. Lem ❑X Not applicable 7b. Will the project impact wetlands? EkM ❑ Yes ❑X No ❑ Don't know 7c. Will the project impact wetland buffers? hel ❑ Yes ❑X No ❑ Don't know 7d. Has a wetland delineation report been prepared? [km • If Yes, submit the report, including data sheets, with the JARPA package. ❑ Yes ❑X No 7e. Have the wetlands been rated using the Western Washington or Eastern Washington Wetland Rating System? h� elp • If Yes, submit the wetland rating forms and figures with the JARPA package. ORIA-16-011 Page 6 of 13 .I v ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Don't know Not Applicable 7f. Have you prepared a mitigation plan to compensate for any adverse impacts to wetlands? hel • If Yes, submit the plan with the JARPA package and answer 7g. • If No, or Not applicable, explain below why a mitigation plan should not be required. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Don't know Not Applicable 7g. Summarize what the mitigation plan is meant to accomplish, and describe how a watershed approach was used to design the plan. hel Not Applicable 7h. Use the table below to list the type and rating of each wetland impacted, the extent and duration of the impact, and the type and amount of mitigation proposed. Or if you are submitting a mitigation plan with a similar table, you can state (below) where we can find this information in the plan. hel Activity (fill, Wetland Wetland Impact Duration Proposed Wetland drain, excavate, Name' type and area (sq. of impact' mitigation mitigation area flood, etc.) rating ft. or type' (sq. ft. or categoryz Acres) acres) 'If no official name for the wetland exists,create a unique name(such as"Wetland 1").The name should be consistent with other project documents, such as a wetland delineation report. 2 Ecology wetland category based on current Western Washington or Eastern Washington Wetland Rating System. Provide the wetland rating forms with the JARPA package. 3Indicate the days,months or years the wetland will be measurably impacted by the activity. Enter"permanent"if applicable. °Creation(C), Re-establishment/Rehabilitation(R), Enhancement(E), Preservation(P), Mitigation Bank/In-lieu fee(B) Page number(s) for similar information in the mitigation plan, if available: 7i. For all filling activities identified in 7h, describe the source and nature of the fill material, the amount in cubic yards that will be used, and how and where it will be placed into the wetland. [heV Not Applicable 7j. For all excavating activities identified in 7h, describe the excavation method, type and amount of material in cubic yards you will remove, and where the material will be disposed. hf elpl Not Applicable Part 8—Waterbodies (other than wetlands): Impacts and Mitigation In Part 8, "waterbodies" refers to non-wetland waterbodies. (See Part 7 for information related to wetlands.) hel ❑x Check here if there are waterbodies on or adjacent to the project area. (If there are none, skip to Part 9.) 8a. Describe how the project is designed to avoid and minimize adverse impacts to the aquatic environment. hel ❑ Not applicable The subject proposal is intended, in part, as compensatory mitigation for potential aquatic habitat impacts from an already approved project. As such, the subject proposal will have a net environmental benefit. This project is the second phase of a project that will be removing a dysfunctional creosote timber bulkhead and replacing it with soft shoreline stabilization elements, similar to the pre-disturbance condition of the shoreline. This is minimizing potential adverse impacts that would otherwise occur if the timber bulkhead were proposed to be replaced in-kind or with some other type of structural shoreline stabilization (i.e. a rock bulkhead). The proposed development of public access features will utilize Best Management Practices (BMP's) to avoid any potential impact to waterbodies. All construction will take place landward of the shoreline. 8b. Will your project impact a waterbody or the area around a waterbody? heI ❑x Yes ❑ No It will have a positive impact ORIA-16-011 Page 7 of 13 R 8c. Have you prepared a mitigation plan to compensate for the project's adverse impacts to non-wetland waterbodies? h( eM • If Yes, submit the plan with the JARPA package and answer 8d. • If No, or Not applicable, explain below why a mitigation plan should not be required. 0 Yes ❑ No ❑ Not applicable Avoidance and minimization measures are proposed, as detailed in Section 8a, above. Avoidance, minimization, and compensatory mitigation measures are further discussed within the Shoreline, Critical Areas, and ESA Assessment Report with Conceptual Mitigation Plan (Soundview Consultants, December 2018). The mitigation measures are discussed in greater detail within the Compensatory Mitigation Plan for Impacts to Non-Wetland Aquatic Resources (Soundview Consultants, November 2018). 8d. Summarize what the mitigation plan is meant to accomplish. Describe how a watershed approach was used to design the plan. • If you already completed 7g you do not need to restate your answer here. Ehel Compensatory mitigation will be divided into two sections, Phase I and Phase II, and will include removal of a dysfunctional creosote timber pile bulkhead, shoreline planting, installation (and anchoring) of large woody debris, and removal of angular rock currently upon the beach at this location. This application addresses Phase II. Phase I was the subject of a prior application. Together these measures will improve the quality of shoreline habitat at the Port of Grapeview property. The mitigation measures are occurring immediately adjacent to the impact project (the Port of Grapeview floating dock), providing the greatest opportunity to immediately compensate for aquatic habitat impacts from that project. 8e. Summarize impact(s) to each waterbody in the table below. [help] Activity (clear, Waterbody Impact Duration Amount of material Area (sq. ft. dredge, fill, pile name' location of (cubic yards) to be or linear ft.) drive, etc.) relative impact3 placed in or removed of waterbody to from waterbody directly MLLW2 affected LogAppPlacement Case Inlet +15 ft. .. 2 days place 4-5 large logs with rootwads 63 linear feet. ' +15 ft. approx.. Up to 15 boulders (1/3 of Boulders Case Inlet +15 ft. 2 days these buried to depth of 3 ft). 63 linear feet Clear and Grade Case Inlet Landward Permanent 200 cubic yards cut and fill 63 linear feet of of OHW shoreline If no official name for the waterbody exists,create a unique name(such as"Stream 1")The name should be consistent with other documents provided. z Indicate whether the impact will occur in or adjacent to the waterbody. If adjacent, provide the distance between the impact and the waterbody and indicate whether the impact will occur within the 100-year flood plain. 3 Indicate the days, months or years the waterbody will be measurably impacted by the work. Enter"permanent"if applicable. 8f. For all activities identified in 8e, describe the source and nature of the fill material, amount (in cubic yards) you will use, and how and where it will be placed into the waterbody. hel • Bury up to 5 boulders to anchor logs with rootwads. Boulders will be buried to a depth of 3 feet. A hole drilled through the center of each boulder will accommodate a chain which will tie around and anchor each log. Additional (up to 10) boulders will be embedded into the shoreline to assist with holding logs in place and to provide additional habitat structure. An excavator, operated from the landward side of the shoreline, will be used to dig holes and to place boulders and logs. • Place logs on the beach and anchor with chain to buried boulders. • The project will require the clearing and grading of 0.57 acres of shorelands for the car turn around, restroom facility, and picnic shelter area, and shoreline restoration. 8g. For all excavating or dredging activities identified in 8e, describe the method for excavating or dredging, type and amount of material you will remove, and where the material will be disposed. hf elpl ORIA-16-011 Page 8 of 13 .► r Excavation will be accomplished with an excavator,-operating from the upland portion of the property. Part 9—Additional Information Any additional information you can provide helps the reviewer(s) understand your project. Complete as much of this section as you can. It is ok if you cannot answer a question. 9a. If you have already worked with any government agencies on this project, list them below. h[ ell Agency Name Contact Name Phone Most Recent Date of Contact DNR Donald Olmsted (360) 902-1071 04/10/2019 WDFW Allison Cook (360) 480-3510 08/30/2019 Ecology (Fed Lori Kingsbury (360) 407-6926 11/29/2018 Permitting) Ecology (Federal Loree Randall (360) 407-6068 11/29/2018 Consistency Coordinator Ecology (Shoreline +elrPdlmr (360) 407-6221 11/29/2018 Permitting) Mason County f�orr Backh>?tt (360) 427-9670 x287 12/10/2018 9b. Are any of the wetlands or waterbodies identified in Part 7 or Part 8 of this JARPA on the Washington Department of Ecology's 303(d) List? LbLeV • If Yes, list the parameter(s)below. • If you don't know, use Washington Department of Ecology's Water Quality Assessment tools at: hftp://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/Wq/303d/. [] Yes ® No The Washington State Department of Ecology's (WSDOE) on-line Water Quality Atlas identifies this portion of Case Inlet as having a water quality assessment of Category 2, due to potentially elevated levels of bacteria. Category 2 waters are not 303-d listed but these are areas where there is some evidence of a water quality problem, but not enough to require production of a water quality improvement project (including total maximum daily load [TMDL]). 9c. What U.S. Geological Survey Hydrological Unit Code (HUC) is the project in? nel • Go to http://cfpub.epa.gov/surf/locateAndex.cfm to help identify the HUC. Puget Sound Watershed - 17110019 9d. What Water Resource Inventory Area Number (WRIA#) is the project in? he[ el • Go to http//www.ecy.wa.govtwater/wria/index.html to find the WRIA#. 14 Kennedy—Goldsborough 9e. Will the in-water construction work comply with the State of Washington water quality standards for turbidity? hel • Go to hftp:/twww.egy-wa.gov/programs/wq/swqs/criteria.html for the standards. M Yes ❑ No ❑ Not applicable ORIA-16-011 Page 9 of 13 w 9f. If the project is within the jurisdiction of the Shoreline Management Act, what is the local shoreline environment designation? heI • If you don't know, contact the local planning department. • For more information, go to:hftl)://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/sea/sma/laws rules/173-26/211 designations htmi. ❑ Urban ❑ Natural ❑ Aquatic ❑ Conservancy Z Other: Residential 9g. What is the Washington Department of Natural Resources Water Type? Lbeld • Go to http://www.dnr.wa.gov/forest-practices-water-typing for the Forest Practices Water Typing System. ❑x Shoreline ❑x Fish ❑ Non-Fish Perennial ❑ Non-Fish Seasonal 9h. Will this project be designed to meet the Washington Department of Ecology's most current stormwater manual? heI • If No, provide the name of the manual your project is designed to meet. ❑ Yes ❑x No Name of manual: Mason County Countywide Stormwater Management Plan 9i. Does the project site have known contaminated sediment? hf eM • If Yes, please describe below. ❑ Yes ❑x No Creosote piles are present, which are partly buried and may have leached contaminants into adjacent sediments. These are being removed as Phase I of the mitigation. 9j. If you know what the property was used for in the past, describe below. [heV Single family residential. The timber pile bulkhead has been in place since at least early 1990 (according to Google Earth; it is also visible in a 1992-1997 shoreline oblique photographs from the Department of Ecology's Shoreline Photo Viewer). 9k. Has a cultural resource (archaeological) survey been performed on the project area? EbeM • If Yes, attach it to your JARPA package. ❑ No ❑x Yes It will be completed the week of October 7, 2019. 91. Name each species listed under the federal Endangered Species Act that occurs in the vicinity of the project area or might be affected by the proposed work. heI Humpback Whale (Megaptera novaeangliae) Southern Resident Killer Whale (Orcinus orca) Puget Sound Steelhead Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) Puget Sound Chinook Salmon (Oncorhyncus tshawytscha) Bull Trout (Salvelinus confluentus) Bocaccio Rockfish (Sebastes paucispinis) Yelloweye Rockfish (Sebastes ruberrimus) Marbled Murrelet (Brachyramphus marmoratus) 9m. Name each species or habitat on the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife's Priority Habitats and Species List that might be affected by the proposed work. heI Estuarine and Marine wetlands ORIA-16-011 Page 10 of 13 S � � Part 10—SEPA Compliance and Permits Use the resources and checklist below to identify the permits you are applying for. • Online Project Questionnaire at http://apps.oria.wa.gov/opas/. • Governor's Office for Regulatory Innovation and Assistance at (800) 917-0043 orhelp(cDoria.wa.gov. • For a list of addresses to send your JARPA to, click on agency addresses for completed JARPA. 10a. Compliance with the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). (Check all that apply.) h[ gld • For more information about SEPA,go to www.ecy.wa.ciov/programs/sea/sepa/e-review.htmi. ❑ A copy of the SEPA determination or letter of exemption is included with this application. M A SEPA determination is pending with Mason County (lead agency). The expected decision date is ❑ 1 am applying for a Fish Habitat Enhancement Exemption. (Check the box below in yob.) hel ❑ This project is exempt (choose type of exemption below). ❑ Categorical Exemption. Under what section of the SEPA administrative code (WAC) is it exempt? ❑ Other: ❑ SEPA is pre-empted by federal law. 10b. Indicate the permits you are applying for. (Check all that apply.) hel LOCAL GOVERNMENT Local Government Shoreline permits: © Substantial Development ❑ Conditional Use ❑ Variance ❑ Shoreline Exemption Type(explain): Other City/County permits: ❑ Floodplain Development Permit ® Critical Areas Ordinance STATE GOVERNMENT Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife: © Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) ❑ Fish Habitat Enhancement Exemption —Attach Exemption Form Check the appropriate boxes ❑ $150 check enclosed. Check# Attach check made payable to Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. ❑ My project is exempt from the application fee. (Check appropriate exemption): ❑ HPA processing is conducted by applicant funded WDFWstaff. Agreement# ❑ Mineral prospecting and mining ❑ Project occurs on farm and agricultural land. (Attach a copy of current land use classification recorded with the county auditor,or other proof of current land use) ❑ Project is modification of an existing HPA originally applied for, prior to July 10,2012. HPA# ORIA-16-011 Page 11 of 13 Washington Department of Natural Resources: ❑ Aquatic Use Authorization Complete JARPA Attachment E and submit a check for$25 payable to the Washington Department of Natural Resources. Do not send cash. Washington Department of Ecology: ❑ Section 401 Water Quality Certification FEDERAL GOVERNMENT United States Department of the Army permits (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers): ❑ Section 404 (discharges into waters of the U.S.) © Section 10 (work in navigable waters) United States Coast Guard permits: ❑ Private Aids to Navigation (for non-bridge projects) ORIA-16-011 Page 12 of 13 A Part 11—Authorizing Signatures Signatures are required before submitting the JARPA package. The JARPA package includes the JARPA form, project plans, photos, etc. hel 11a. Applicant Signature (required) hf eM Aog* 6y� I certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief, the information provided in this application is true, complete, and accurate. I also certify that I have the authority to carry out the proposed activities, and I agree to start work only after I have received all necessary permits. I hereby au�OY ' he agent named in Part 3 of this application to act on my behalf in matters related to this application. (initial) By initialing htate that I have the authority to grant access to the property. I also give my consent to the permitting agencies enterin he property where the project is located to inspect the project site or any work related to the project. (initial)Glenn Carlson, Commissioner � C,6A LSS/OAJE /P— A) 7 401 Applicant Printed Name Applicant Signature Date 11 b. Authorized Agent Signature hel I certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief, the information provided in this application is true, complete, and accurate. I also certify that I have the authority to carry out the proposed activities and I agree to start work only after all necessary permits have been issued. Ann Boeholt October 5, 2019 Authorized Agent Printed Name Authorized Agent Signature Date 11 c. Property Owner Signature (if not applicant) hf em Not required if project is on existing rights-of-way or easements (provide copy of easement with JARPA). I consent to the permitting agencies entering the property where the project is located to inspect the project site or any work. These inspections shall occur at reasonable times and, if practical, with prior notice to the landowner. L CA) Property Owner Printed Name r perry Owner Signature Date 18 U.S.0§1001 provides that:Whoever, in any manner within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States knowingly falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact or makes any false,fictitious, or fraudulent statements or representations or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing same to contain any false,fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry, shall be fined not more than$10,000 or imprisoned not more than 5 years or both. ORIA-16-011 I Page 13 of 13 A. Background hf el 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: hf elpl Port of Grapeview Shoreline Restoration and Public Access 2. Name of applicant: hf p. Glenn Carlson, Commissioner,Port of Grapeview 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: hf elpl Applicant: Port of Grapeview PO Box 3 Grapeview, WA 98546 (360)275-5020 Prepared by: Ann Boeholt Soundview Consultants LLC 2907 Harborview Drive, Suite D Gig Harbor, WA 98335 (253)514-8952 4. Date checklist prepared: hel October 5, 2019 5. Agency requesting checklist: hf elpl Mason County 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): hI elpl Start Date: April 30, 2020. End Date: December 31,2020. The shoreline restoration components will occur during the window of time required by WDFW for the protection of aquatic habitat: July 15 to February 15 of any consecutive years. The contractor will be required to submit a Construction/Tides Plan outlining possible work dates and times that allow construction of all portions of the project during the applicable tide. Upland construction may occur at any time within the year. . 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. 1Lg!pJ No. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. hf elpl SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960) December 2018 Page 2 of 16 Shoreline,Critical Areas,and ESA Assessment Report with Conceptual Mitigation Plan, prepared by Soundview Consultants LLC,dated(revised)December,2018. Compensatory Mitigation Plan for Impacts to Non-Wetland Aquatic Resources, prepared by Soundview Consultants LLC,Revised November 28,2018. Eelgrass and Macroalgae Survey prepared by Soundview Consultants LLC,dated June 2017. Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA# 2019-6-40+02) for Port of Grapeview Gangway, Floating Dock, and Tideland Restoration. That HPA includes provisions related to the protection of fish life and fish habitat. Cultural Resources Assessment for the Port of Grapeview Public Access Project, Technical Memorandum 190913-1,prepared by Cultural Resources Consultants, October 2019. Historic Property Report, Property ID 719832: 5070 E. Grapeview Loop Rd, Allyn, WA, 98524. Prepared by Cultural Resources Consultants, September 30,2019. GeoTechnical Report prepared by GeoResources,dated September 28,2018,for the creosote bulkhead removal. Document Id: PortofGrapeview.GrapeviewLoop.RG. Shoreline Stabilization Submittal Checklist,completed by GeoResources, December 17,2018. Coastal Zone Management Act Consistency Analysis: Port of Grapeview Community Dock and Shoreline Restoration,Prepared by Soundview Consultants LLC,December 17,2018. Mason County has issued an Environmental Permit(MEP 2017-00017), Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance (SEP2017-00054), and Shoreline Variance permit(SHR2017-00004) for the Port of Grapeview Community Floating Dock. Biological Opinion, Letter of Concurrence, and Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act Essential Fish Habitat Response for the Port of Grapeview Community Dock Project (COE No.NWS-2018-161). NMFS No. WCR-2019-10363. December 4, 2018. USACE Letter of Permission(REF#NWS-2018-161): Port of Grapeview Floating Community Dock, January 9, 2019. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. h( elgl No. The proposed shoreline restoration and public access improvements have received all necessary approvals from WDFW and USACE. No other government approvals are pending. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. hel • Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Hydraulic Project Approval(HPA)(received) • Mason County Shoreline Substantial Development Permit SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197.11-960) December 2018 Page 3 of 16 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) hf elpl The proposed project is to construct essential upland facilities that support the Port of Grapeview's recently completed boat launch and floating dock as well as to complete shoreline restoration which will serve as part of the required compensatory mitigation for the new floating dock. The upland facilities will include parking, restrooms, showers, picnic shelter, playground, pathways and pump out station on land directly adjacent to the launch. Currently the Port's facilities are crowded into a narrow area leading to the launch, which leaves little room for users to manipulate their boats and trailers prior to launching. Parking is currently located across the main Grapeview Loop Road and therefore not easily accessible for people with disabilities. The Port plans to create a turnaround area, trailer parking, and pathways for safer and easier access to the launch. Also there currently are no upland amenities other than the private marina located next to the launch that allows boaters a place to spend quality time before and after launching. It is envisioned that the picnic area will be used primarily by boaters. The shoreline restoration is Phase II of the compensatory mitigation necessary to compensate for the anticipated impacts associated with the construction and use of the new floating dock. Phase I of this mitigation included removal of the dysfunctional creosote timber bulkhead, beach nourishment, beach restoration, and stormwater improvements. Those actions were the subject of a previous application, have been permitted and will be completed this November. The proposed Phase II Mitigation elements include gentle re-grading of the existing shoreline to lay back the eroding bank—the final shoreline will have a final grade not to exceed 2:1. The bank will then be stabilized with biodegradable jute matting and planted with native salt tolerant shrubs and herbaceous plants. Beach logs with root wads will be placed along the toe of the slope and anchored with buried boulders. Additional boulders will be embedded into the beach adjacent to the beach logs for additional shoreline habitat and to provide additional shoreline protection. Salt tolerant upper salt marsh vegetation will be planted among the logs and boulders at the toe of the slope. A 3-foot wide gravel pathway will be provided to the beach. These measures will improve intertidal habitat for forage fish and juvenile salmonids. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. Jt@jpJ 5070 E Grapeview Loop Road,Allyn;along the shoreline of Case Inlet(Section 5,Township 21 North, Range 1 West; WM, NE Quarter), at the west end of Griswold Avenue in the City of Grapeview in Mason County, Washington. SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960) December 2018 Page 4 of 16 B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS hf elpl 1. Earth hel a. General description of the site: hf elpl (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other Gently sloped toward the shoreline Upland areas of the mitigation site consist of lawn and sparse ornamental trees and shrubs. The intertidal beach consists of mud, sand,and small rocks. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? hf g-M 15% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any agricultural land of long-term commercial significance and whether the proposal results in removing any of these soils. Jt@jpJ Per the Natural Resources Conservation Service(MRCS)soil map,the soil found on this site is classified as Alderwood gravelly sandy loam. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. hf elpl The shoreline behind the existing creosote timber bulkhead demonstrates active shoreline erosion hazards, consisting of active toe erosion, sloughing,and shoreline regression(GeoResources,2018). e. Describe the purpose, type, total area, and approximate quantities and total affected area of any filling, excavation, and grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. hf elpl The 63-foot stretch of shoreline,to a width of up to 14 feet, will be gently graded and sloped back to a slope not to exceed 2:1. The construction of the public access elements will involve cut and fill. Approximately 200 cubic yards of soil will be removed from the site. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. ltpipl Active shoreline erosion is observed behind the existing degraded bulkhead (GeoResources, 2018). While highly degraded, the existing bulkhead may be providing some shoreline protection from wave action. Removal of the bulkhead may result in additional shoreline erosion. The purpose of the soft shoreline stabilization measures is to arrest any future erosion while returning the shoreline to a more natural condition. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? h SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960) December 2018 Page 5 of 16 24 percent(6,000 square feet of 24,829 square feet). h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: 1hel Following the bulkhead removal (Phase I of the mitigation project), the Applicant will closely monitor the shoreline for any substantial increases in shoreline erosion. Sediment and erosion control measures, including coir logs or sediment curtains, will be utilized during project construction to prevent any release of sediment. 2. Air [bgjpj a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal during construction, operation, and maintenance when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. 1hel During construction,heavy equipment will give off normal emissions during operation and some dust may occur. These emissions will be short-term and only when construction equipment is in use. All construction equipment will be inspected daily for fluid leaks and no equipment will leave the staging area until any leaks are repaired. Fueling and maintenance of equipment will occur in upland staging areas only. It is likely that emissions would increase due to the permanent implementation of a car turn around and parking lot. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. [help] No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: hf gm Construction equipment will be maintained properly and kept in good repair to limit emissions during the project. 3. Water It@jpJ a. Surface Water: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year- round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. hf elpl The project is located on the shoreline of Case Inlet,Puget Sound. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. hf &j The proposed project includes work at the OHW of Case Inlet; landward of MHHW. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. JtgjpJ SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960) December 2018 Page 6 of 16 None 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Jtg!PJ No. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. Itpipi No. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. hf pM No. b. Ground Water: 1) Will groundwater be withdrawn from a well for drinking water or other purposes? If so, give a general description of the well, proposed uses and approximate quantities withdrawn from the well. Will water be discharged to groundwater? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. hf elpl Potable water will be provided for drinking water and showering. The water is provided by public water from we-1 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals. . . ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. h( elpl The restroom facilities and pump out station will be pumped across Grapeview Loop Road and discharge to an existing septic drainfield at that location. c. Water runoff(including stormwater): 1) Describe the source of runoff(including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. h( elpl The proposed project will not alter runoff conditions. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. hf e No. 3) Does the proposal alter or otherwise affect drainage patterns in the vicinity of the site? If so, describe. hf elpl SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960) December 2018 Page 7 of 16 M The proposed project will not affect drainage patterns. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water, and drainage pattern impacts, if any: ltgjo TESC best management practices will be employed during construction, as described above. 4. Plants hf elpl a. Check the types of vegetation found on the site: hf g X deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other X evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other X shrubs X grass pasture crop or grain orchards, vineyards or other permanent crops. wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other _water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other X other types of vegetation The area upland of the on the subject property is vegetated with lawn grass. Some sea lettuce(Ulva sp) was found attached within the lower intertidal beach zone. An area of pickleweed (Salicornia virginica)is present landward of the creosote bulkhead to be removed. Pickleweed will be replanted as an element of the shoreline restoration. b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered?Jt@jPJ The lawn will be removed and replanted in areas that will not become new hard surfaces(picnic shelter,play area,trailer parking,turn around, pathways, restrooms). As noted,pickleweed that is removed from the shoreline will be replanted. Native shrubs will be replanted within a 14-foot wide strip along the shoreline. c. List threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site. hel No ESA listed plant species are present on the subject property. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: hI gjo Native,salt tolerant shrubs and herbaceous plants will be installed along the shoreline slope and within the upper shore zone. These are shown on the project plans. e. List all noxious weeds and invasive species known to be on or near the site. 1hel None. SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960) December 2018 Page 8 of 16 A 5. Animals hel a. List any birds and other animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site. [help] Mammals: harbor seal, river otter, Birds: mallard duck, Canada geese, Northwestern crow, gulls Fish: salmon, trout, herring Invertebrates: barnacles(Balanus glandula), mud snail (Batillaria attramentaria), moon snail (Neverita lewisii), red rock crab(Cancer productus), bay ghost shrimp(Neotrypoa sp), bent-nosed clam (Macoma nasuta), sea star(Pisaster sp.), Pacific oyster(Crassostrea gigas). b. List any threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site. hf elpl Humpback Whale(Megaptera novaeangliae) Southern Resident Killer Whale(Orcinus orca) Puget Sound Steelhead Trout(Oncorhynchus mykiss) Puget Sound Chinook Salmon (Oncorhyncus tshawytscha) Bull Trout(Salvelinus confluentus) Bocaccio Rockfish(Sebastes paucispinis) Yelloweye Rockfish(Sebastes ruberrimus) Marbled Murrelet(Brachyramphus marmoratus) c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. hf e Site is part of the Pacific Flyway for migratory birds. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: 1hel The project includes the addition of logs with root wads and boulders in the upper shore zone. This will improve the viability of the upper shore zone habitat for forage fish and migrating juvenile salmonids. e. List any invasive animal species known to be on or near the site. hf pm None. 6. Energy and Natural Resources 1hel a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. 1hel Electric power(public utility)will be used for hot water, septic pump, lights,and heat. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. Itpipj The project will not affect the use of solar energy on adjacent properties. . SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960) December 2018 Page 9 of 16 c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: hf elpl Flow restrictors and automatic electric hand dryers. 7. Environmental Health [hel a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. [hel Mis-use of the pump out station may lead to spills of toxic and hazardous waste or explosion. 1) Describe any known or possible contamination at the site from present or past uses. hf g.!Q None known. 2) Describe existing hazardous chemicals/conditions that might affect project development and design. This includes underground hazardous liquid and gas transmission pipelines located within the project area and in the vicinity. heI The Washington State Department of Ecology(WSDOE)database shows a confirmed or suspected contaminated site (ID# 6309) on the nearby Fair Harbor Marina parcel, due to the presence of petroleum products in soil and groundwater(from a leaking underground storage tank). However, this area will not be disturbed during the proposed project. Also, The WSDOE noted the site as "reported cleaned up"in February 2008. 3) Describe any toxic or hazardous chemicals that might be stored, used, or produced during the project's development or construction, or at any time during the operating life of the project. hf elpl None. 4) Describe special emergency services that might be required. lt@!Pj Only typical emergency services. The turnaround/trailer parking area will provide a closer parking area for emergency vehicles servicing marine rescues and emergency responses. 5) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: hf e Pump station will be clearly signed with directions for proper use and emergency procedures, including an emergency contact for the Port of Grapeview. b. Noise lbpjpj 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)?Jt@jpJ Project is located at Grapeview Loop Road and Griswold Avenue in a residential area with associated noise from street traffic and boat traffic. This noise will not affect the project. SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960) December 2018 Page 10 of 16 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. [help] Construction noise is likely to include that from an excavator,dump truck,and construction crew. All work will normally occur during normal daylight hours. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: hf elpl Work will occur during typical work hours. 8. Land and Shoreline Use JtpjpJ a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties?Will the proposal affect current land uses on nearby or adjacent properties? If so, describe. hf elpl The subject property is developed with a single family residence that will be demolished. Nearby and adjacent properties include additional residential parcels,the private Fair Haven Marina, and the Port of Grapeview boat launch and community-accessible floating dock. b. Has the project site been used as working farmlands or working forest lands? If so, describe. How much agricultural or forest land of long-term commercial significance will be converted to other uses as a result of the proposal, if any? If resource lands have not been designated, how many acres in farmland or forest land tax status will be converted to nonfarm or nonforest use? hf eM No. 1) Will the proposal affect or be affected by surrounding working farm or forest land normal business operations, such as oversize equipment access, the application of pesticides, tilling, and harvesting? If so, how: Jt@!pJ No. c. Describe any structures on the site. [help] The subject property contains a one-story single family home, constructed in 1920 (described in Historic Property Report). This home is served by an on-site septic system. A dysfunctional creosote timber pile bulkhead is present along the shoreline which is being removed as Phase I of the mitigation. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? hj elpl The existing home and septic system will be demolished. The existing creosote timber bulkhead will be removed, as phase I of the mitigation-which has already been approved by Mason County. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site?1hel The subject property is zoned RR5 f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? hf elpl SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960) December 2018 Page 11 of 16 Residential g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site?JtPjPJ Residential h. Has any part of the site been classified as a critical area by the city or county? If so, specify. hel Yes. Saltwater Shorelines are considered Critical Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas within Mason County. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? hf elpl None. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? hf elpl Two. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: hf pm None. I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: [help] None. m. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts to agricultural and forest lands of long-term commercial significance, if any: hf pM Not applicable. 9. Housing hf elpl a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. 1hel No housing units will be built.Not applicable. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. JtpjpJ No housing units will be eliminated.Not applicable. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: hf elpl Not applicable. SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960) December 2018 Page 12 of 16 10. Aesthetics hel a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed?1hel The restroom and shower building will beXfeet tall,.plus a gabled roof. The picnic shelter will be cacCj1"S b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? hf elpl The existing degraded creosote bulkhead is visible from adjacent properties and the water. This bulkhead will be removed. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: hf pm None;the proposed project is likely to improve the shoreline aesthetics by removing a degraded structure. 11. Light and Glare Jt@jpJ a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? h� el None. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? hf elpl Not likely. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? hf elpl None. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: 1hel None. 12. Recreation 1hel a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity?Jt@!PJ Public boat ramp and floating dock are immediately nearby. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. hf gm No,the proposed project will not displace recreational uses; it will enhance them. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: hel None. SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960) December 2018 Page 13 of 16 13. Historic and cultural preservation hf elpl a. Are there any buildings, structures, or sites, located on or near the site that are over 45 years old listed in or eligible for listing in national, state, or local preservation registers ? If so, specifically describe. JLgjpJ Yes. The single family home was constructed in 1920. It has been reviewed and determined to not meet criteria for the National Register of Historic Places. b. Are there any landmarks, features, or other evidence of Indian or historic use or occupation? This may include human burials or old cemeteries. Are there any material evidence, artifacts, or areas of cultural importance on or near the site? Please list any professional studies conducted at the site to identify such resources. hel No. c. Describe the methods used to assess the potential impacts to cultural and historic resources on or near the project site. Examples include consultation with tribes and the department of archeology and historic preservation, archaeological surveys, historic maps, GIS data, etc. hel (1)review of available project information and correspondence,(2)examination of local environmental, cultural,and historical documentary and cartographic datasets(3)field investigations,and(4)contacted cultural resources staff at the Squaxin Tribe to inquire about project-related information and concerns on a technical staff-to-technical staff basis. Fieldwork consisted of pedestrian surface survey and subsurface testing via hand excavated shovel test probes. Surface survey was conducted by walking transects across the property at no less than 5 meters apart and targeted mineral soil exposures. Shovel probes were placed approximately 20 meters apart. Probes measured 40 cm in diameter and were manually excavated,with a target depth of 50-70 centimeters with the intent of reaching culturally sterile glacial sediments.All sediments were screened through '/4-inch hardware mesh. Probe locations were recorded using an I-Pad using the Theodolite 7 software and processed using ArcMap 10.5.1. d. Proposed measures to avoid, minimize, or compensate for loss, changes to, and disturbance to resources. Please include plans for the above and any permits that may be required. 1hel There will be an Unanticipated Discovery Clause in construction contract documents. 14. Transportation hI @ a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site or affected geographic area and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. hf elpl The subject site is located off E.Grapeview Loop Road. b. Is the site or affected geographic area currently served by public transit? If so, generally describe. If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop?[hel A Mason Transport Authority bus route runs on Grapeview Loop Road.The closest transit stop is approximately'/4 of a mile south of the project site at the Grapeview Fire Station. SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960) December 2018 Page 14 of 16 r c. How many additional parking spaces would the completed project or non-project proposal have? How many would the project or proposal eliminate? hf elpl The proposed project will provide 8 new parking spaces and is only eliminating the private parking space currently serving the single family home. d. Will the proposal require any new or improvements to existing roads, streets, pedestrian, bicycle or state transportation facilities, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). hf elpl None. e. Will the project or proposal use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. hj elpl No. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project or proposal? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur and what percentage of the volume would be trucks (such as commercial and nonpassenger vehicles). What data or transportation models were used to make these estimates?1hel Not Applicable. g. Will the proposal interfere with, affect or be affected by the movement of agricultural and forest products on roads or streets in the area? If so, generally describe. h� elpl No. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: h None. 15. Public Services hel a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, public transit, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. hf elpl The project will not likely increase the need for public services,however with the additions of public access features there could be necessary trash pickup and the potential need for police and other emergency services in the area. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. Jtg1pJ None are proposed. 16. Utilities ltpipl - a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: hf elpl electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960) December 2018 Page 15 of 16 other b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the siteor in the immediate vicinity which might be needed j, C. Signature It@jpj �f5eGiiqi2Ce. The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: Name of signee Ann Boeholt Position and Agency/Organization Senior Environmental Planner/ Soundview Consultants, LLC, Date Submitted: October 5, 2019 SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960) December 2018 Page 16 of 16 1 I I r t1 ^s l I II t ARCHITECTS,,— - mh 4A QRA PEYLEW RGO DEVELOPMENT GRAM NO.3 M' NW�1dJts¢s.H1L R "' �t `(� � -. s •.�/ ® 1 f , � / � ...-._. ___ I sp 6O1X 11Hnube;Tsmw.U'Aswz `lI /I l ^ . � - .Zt _ 11 _ T� l I.a4,caihw¢n-vew^�( �rwt��Q :o�.+r � '` •\ �z .eI"IST, 2.iA x 3v WaoG C► (Su}fit.V>TE QO �y.�_' ! LANDSCAPE - i a Ii1Yf� AREA „%NBw6P BASIN, . 1 _—�./ r .rey / — _1 �_ t•1._. .-{—•) 1.171. I EAST ELEVATION �/,�� e _ oaf PICNIC SHELTER - PORT OP GRAPEVIEW RCO DEVELOPMENT GRANT NO. 3 1 -sd o J �wo Urn- �o.wwp+fi�M1.kwao, R I.— Z tTaw. !o-l-I'j GupuHt!t W.�tv.�p•x f�3I kNv.sey�/¢Colo _ - 1 SOUTH ELEVATION 1/0 � �ffsw l Pam- 51pINv W/Ix 9 PICNIC SHELTER I flhvJeM u IV°0Abt$P"o SGri► kjw Air(-VLrg3 S(LN¢Ir1f/$ awl MtibN i I v ¢.00(�Ntr-fLts. 5 rQ I l� I I e0 lD I CF'PSN" `'bl..• Womr-tS I ma e, XGVHI�j I / a, f 4Sxvu]�t�-_ 04 _� t^ 1p1c Deets-oec�r�I,,{B-wrtj fEtlitJl'1FeF1 eNly FLOOR PLAN V4 NORTH/SOUTH ELEVATIONS v44 EAST/WEST ELEVATIONS- 1,4" - RESTROOMS AND SHOWER/)RESS BUILDING (RESTROOMS AND SHOWER/DRESS BUILDING) k f ; Y .. • �r, t r a � •-4�,� f. ,ram. •^v�. �. •- �.• -� fir"_` ..l. Y� � ♦6 � �y � L�, i .} AO 41 01 i 4 0 / VYI lit, It + - . . Approximate gite Location Map created from Web Soil Survey(http://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/WebSoilSurvey.aspx) Soil Soil Name Parent Material Slopes Erosion Hydrologic Type Hazard Soils Group Ab Alderwood gravelly Glacial drift and/or glacial outwash over dense g to 15 Moderate B sandy loam glaciomarine deposits to Severe Bellingham silty None to Be clay loam Alluvium. Lacustrine deposits and loess 0 to 3 slight C/D Not to Scale NRCS Soils Map Proposed Soft Armor and Shoreline Mitigation xxx Grapeview Loop Road GEORESOURCES Mason County, Washington PN: 121055163003 techni I engineering 5007 Pacific Hwy E.,Suite 16 1 Fife,WA 98424 12S3.896.1011 I www.georesources.rocks r Doc ID:PortofGrapeview.GrapeviewLoopRd.F September 2018 Figure 3 I� I/ Qg't tv At / It IL it PeVi Approximate Site Location An excerpt from Geologic Map of the Vaughn 7.5-minute Quadrangle, Pierce and Mason Counties, Washington by Robert L., Logan, and Timothy J.Walsh December 2007. Qgt Vashon till „+t Not to Scale USGS Geologic Map Proposed Soft Armor and Shoreline Mitigation xxx Grapeview Loop Road GEORESOURCES Mason County, Washington PN: 121055163003 earth science & geotechnical engineering 5007 P30c Hwy E.,Suite 16 1 Fife,WA 99424 1253.896.1011 1 www.georesources.rocks Doc ID:PortofGrapeview.GrapeviewLoopRd.F September 2018 T Figure 4 Mob V/I Approximate Site Location Map created from Washington State Coastal Atlas(https://fortress.wa.gov/ecy/coastalatlas/tools/Map.aspx) Slope stability © Drift cells p R' Stable %_4" Divergence zone Q��Intermediate --.w Left to right Modified No appreciable drift Unstable �,.,+► Right to left Unstable (old slide) Undefined IV Unstable (recent slide) Not to Scale Coastal Zone Atlas Proposed Soft Armor and Shoreline Mitigation GEORESOURCES xxx Grapeview Loop Road Mason County, Washington h Science & geotechnical engineering PN: 1 21 0551 63003 5007 PaGfic Hwy E.,Suite 16 1 Fite,WA 99424 1 253.896.1011 I www.(eoresources.rocks Doc ID:PortofGrapeview.GrapeviewLoopRd.F September 2018 Figure S r ri s 4 =.ter Approximate Site Location Photo obtained from Washington State Coastal Atlas(https://fortress.wa.gov/ecy/coastalatlas/tools/Map.aspx) J Not to Scale Oblique Aerial Shoreline Photograph - 2016 Proposed Soft Armor and Shoreline Mitigation GEORESOURCES xxx Grapeview Loop Road Mason County, Washington eai 01 suence ��'uie�'nnical engineerinb PN: 1 21 0551 63003 5007 Pacific Hwy E.,Suite 16 i Fife,WA 96424 i 253.896.1011 i www.beoresources.rocks Doc ID:PortofGrapeview.GrapeviewLoopRd.F September 2018 T Figure 6a s JIM �1 tee w t � � 4 r � Approximate Site Location Photo obtained from Washington State Coastal Atlas(https://fortress.wa.gov/ecy/coastalatlas/tools/Map.aspx) j Not to Scale Oblique Aerial Shoreline Photograph - 2006 Proposed Soft Armor and Shoreline Mitigation GEORESOURCES xxx Grapeview Loop Road Mason County, Washington earth science & geotechnical engineering PN: 121055163003 5007 Pacific Hwy E.,Suite 16 I Fife,WA 96424 1253.996.1011 i www.gecresources.rocks Doc ID:PortofGrapeview.GrapeviewLoopRd.F September 2018 T Figure 6b + • VL lot L 1 kV 10000"OF01.0 Fr ' r ' �e Approximate Site Location Photo obtained from Washington State Coastal Atlas(https://fortress.wa.gov/ecy/coastalatlas/tools/Map.aspx) t j Not to Scale Oblique Aerial Shoreline Photograph - 2000 Proposed Soft Armor and Shoreline Mitigation GEORESOURCES xxx Grapeview Loop Road Mason County, Washington earth science & geotechnical engineering PN: 121055163003 5007 Pacific Hwy E.,Suite 16 1 Fife.Wit 96124 1 2S3.896.1011 I www.georesources.rocks Doc ID:PortofGrapeview.GrapeviewLoopRd.F September 2018 Figure 6c � r r ..e Approximate Site Location Photo obtained from Washington State Coastal Atlas(https://fortress.wa.gov/ecy/coastalatlas/tools/Map.aspx) ,w+f J Not to Scale Oblique Aerial Shoreline Photograph - 1992 Proposed Soft Armor and Shoreline Mitigation GEORESOURCES xxx Grapeview Loop Road Mason County, Washington earth science & geutedimcai engineering PN: 121055163003 5007 Pacific Hwy E.,Suite 16 i Fife.WA 98424 1253.896.1011 i www.8eoresources.rocks Doc ID:PortofGrapeview.GrapeviewLoopRd.F September 2018 Figure 6d EXISTING CONCRETE CONCRETE CONCRETE „ BULKHEAD BULKHEAD APPROX.EXTENT OF REGRADED SHORELINE APPROX.EXTENT TO BLEND INTO EXISTING — OF ERODING SLOPE! UPLAND TERRACE(SEE / BURY BOULDER WITH SHORELINE SCOUR ' APPROX.ALIGNMENT OF CROSS-SECTION SHEET 8) CHAIN MIN.3 FEET TO ry/ b ANCHOR LOGS(TYP.) DYSFUNCTIONAL TIMBER PILE BULKHEAD PROVIDE 7-T WIDTH ANCHOR 3 TO 4 EXISTING TIMBER PILE GRAVEL PATH TO BEACH LOGS(12'MIN.DIA.) U►.) 9 I TO BE REMOVED- H WITH ROOiWAOS TO 1 BURIED BOULDERS APPROX 34 ABOVE SUBSTRATE, O APPROX.10 BELOW SUBSTRATE PLANT SHORELINE EMBED BOULDERS 38'TO 42'DIA. 0 WITH NATIVE SPECIES o TO DEPTH OF 1 FOOT OR HEIGHT, / (SEE CROSS-SECTION (1 OR 2 PER LOG) ON SHEET 8 E PLANT LIST ON SHEET 9) APPROX.OHW O / O APPROX.OHW APPROX.MHHW O APPROX.MHHW REGRADE ERODED SLOPE ' 14.19 ELEV. 1 14.16'ELEV. TO MAX.2'1 SLOPE do j GRADE SLOPE(AFTER / o ' 2r g41C�I v EMOVAL OF BULKHEAD AND I O ��°F I / PILES)TO MATCH EXISTING 0 4o h , BEACH GRADE TO OHW / PACIFIC r BURY BOULDER WITH CHAIN OYSTER BED j, I TO ANCHOR LOG(TYP.)SEE / b CROSS-SECTION ON SHEET 8 EXISTING / EXISTING CONCRETE / CONCRETE BULKHEAD / BULKHEAD EXISTING SHORELINE CONDITIONS )PROPOSED SHORELINE STABELIZATION AND MITIGATION NOTES: Soft Shore Stabilization Site Plan Site Plan provided by Soundview Consultants,LLC ♦ �� Proposed Shoreline Stabilization Not to Scale NORTH I G E O R E S O U R C E S xxx-Grapeview Loop Road Mason County,Washington earth science&geotechnical engineering PN:121055163003 $002 40fic Hq I.Sclte 16 1 ZIZe.VIA 01424 1 255.SWIM1 I amr Vaasa0rcn.racks Doc ID:PortofGrapwiew.GrapeviewLoopRd.SP December 2018 Figure 7a APPROX.14' — 20 EXISTING 19• ERODED SLOPE APPROX.LOCATION AND UPLAND OF PREVIOUS PILE NATIVE 18' BULKHEAD AND SHORELINE UPLAND PLANTS J / 1T I I LOGS WITH 1 �+ JUTE MAT SLOPE is t ROOTWADS / ROUNDING I I OCCASION / R GRADE AL EMBEDDED BOULDER e 1 SLOPE RE-GRADE SLOPE TRANSITION 15• I I 36'TO 42'DIM. 1.,--�— 6: (MAX"2:1 SLOPE) I 10 OR 2 PER LWD) r =� BURIED BOULDER 14.16' WITH DRILLED HOLE fi---- - GALV_STEEL CHAIN FOR ANCHORING (OR SUBSTITUTE APPROVED 1 CHAIN(TOP OF X MIN. 13' I BY PROJECT BIOLOGIST) i BOULDER 3'BELOW SUFFICIENT TO SECURE BEACH GRADE) I I LOAD OF LOG ft PIU11MINARY _ _ 1 EXISTING t INFORIJATION ONLY - - ---- -- — I SLOPE NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION — T � CROSS-SECTION-MITIGATION AREA 2 SHORELINE STABELIZATION Elevation/Section provided by Soundview Consultants, LLC (X Not to Scale Soft Shore Stabilization Detail Proposed Soft Armor and Shoreline Mitigation --� xxx Grapeview Loop Road GEORESOURCES Mason County, Washington PN: 121055163003 earth science & geotechnical engineering 5007 Pacific Hwy E.,Suite 16 1 Fife,WA 98424 1253.896.1011 1 www.georesources.rocks Doc ID:PortofGrapeview.GrapeviewLoopRd.F December 2018 Figure 7b j �yy e � r J d• I p 1� 4 1 d •12, Photo - Sept 20, 2018 Looking north along failing bulkhead from south property line. 1� AV r: Not to Scale Site Photographs Proposed Soft Armor and Shoreline Mitigation xxx Grapeview Loop Road GEORESOURCES Mason County, Washington earth science & geotechnical engineering PN: 121055163003 5007 Pacific Hwy E.,Suite 16 1 Fife,WA 96124 1253.896.1011 1 www.jecresources.rocks Doc ID:PortofGrapeview.GrapeviewLoopRd.F September 2018 Figure 8a �I v, " � ♦ is f� } .�� i��, 4�(, 1. _.,... Photo - Sept 20, 2018 Looking west past failing bulkhead Site Photographs _ Proposed Soft Armor and Shoreline Mitigation RCES xxx Grapeview Loop Road GEORESOUMason County, Washington earth science & geotechnical engineering PN: 121055163003 5007 Pacific Hwy F.,Suite 16 1 Fife,WA 98e24 12S3.896.1011 I www.georesources.rocks Doc ID:PortofGrapeview.GrapeviewLoopRd.F September 2018 Figure 8b e t. '�IIIu f. r %•it '~ V Photo - Sept 20, 2018 Looking south along failing bulkhead from north property line. Site Photographs Proposed Soft Armor and Shoreline Mitigation GEORESOURCES xxx Grapeview Loop Road Mason County, Washington earth science & geotechnical engineering PN: 121055163003 5007 Pacific Hwy E.,Suite 16 1 Fife,WA 98424 1253.896.1011 1 www.6eoresources.rocks Doc ID:PortofGrapeview.GrapeviewLoopRd.F September 2018 Figure 8c LOCATION: THE SE Y4 OF SECTION 5,TOWNSHIP 21 N,RANGE 1 W,W.M. SHORELINE MASON COUNTY PARCEL NUMBER- 12105-51-00900 RESTORATION SITE LAT 470 20' 17"N LONG-1220 49'57.25"W (MITIGATION SITE) VICINITY MAP ADJACENT OWNERSHIP F,,.,Harbor •reh Iala ,. `y �O SITE .x VICINITY i= SHORELINE 4 RESTORATION O (MITIGATION SITE) R—h Inland 7777777 PROJECT PROJECT SITE SITE ® W ►I W N SOURCE:ESRI,OSM,USGs SOURCE:MASON COUNTY GIS ADJACENT OWNERS: PROJECT:PORT OF GRAPEVIEW COMMUNITY DOCK AND SHORELINE RESTORATION 1.BIANCHI,ROBERT&MARGARET PURPOSE: PUBLIC ACCESS AND SHORT TERM AND REFERENCE#: NWS-2018-161 2.CARTER,MARK&DIANE LIMITED DURATION MOORING OF BOATS BEFORE IN:REACH(TREASURE)ISLAND 3.PORT OF GRAPEVIEW AND AFTER LAUNCHING BOATS AT THE BOAT RAMP NEAR:REACH(TREASURE)ISLAND 14.NELSON,VERNON&SUSAN 5.NELSON,VERNON&SUSAN SITE ADDRESS: COUNTY:MASON 6.MCNEISH,JOHN ALBERT&MELISSA GRAPEVIEW LOOP RD&GRISWOLD AVE APPLICANT:PORT OF GRAPEVIEW MARTIN GRAPEVIEW,WASHINGTON 98546 SHEET: 1 of 11 DATE: 12/07/2018 EXISTING / BULKHEAD ERODING I � � j PACIFIC OYSTER BED SEGMENT OF i 14.16 �'� (Crassostrea gigas) — — SHORELINE / , I i / —1055 SF PRELIMINARY ' REMAINING ROW i ' / I-; / // � MLLW 0.0' INFORMATION ONLY OF PILE FROM , FAILED BULKHEAD NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION I Eall T. XISTING BULKHEAD SOUNDVIEW CONSULTANTS,LLC.ASSUMES ANGULAR ROCK NO LIABILITY OR RESPONSIBILITY FOR —1,275 SF CONSTRUCTION,IMPROVEMENTS, OR ..A [V ESTIMATES BASED ON THIS PLAN SET ( \ \ \ / / / I U / o EXISTING01 0 STORM " / °w " P OUTFALL I `"—T OH 1 — — GWSWOLD AYE e n O cz /- - PROPERTY BOUNDARY a / T. RIIE EXISTING CONCRETE / BOAT RAMP TO REMAIN N / MHHW / / / / L ROFERTY B �NDARIES SHOWN 14.16' MLLW 0.0' P ROXIM ENLY. / EXISTING LOOKING WEST AT PROJECT SITE (2006) ) / / MARINA / FAIR HARBOR MARINA (DOES NOT SHOW RECENTLY CONSTRUCTED CONC. RAMP) ) / PROJECT:PORT OF GRAPEVIEW EXISTING CONDITIONS TIDAL DATUM (MLLW)MEAN HIGHER HIGH WATER =+ 14.16t COMMUNITY DOCK MEAN HIGHER WATER =+ 13.22t AND SHORELINE RESTORATION MEAN LOW WATER =+ 3.23t REFERENCE# MEAN LOWER LOW WATER = 0.0t 0 30 60 120 APPLICANT:PORT OF GRAPEVIEW LOCATION: GRAPEVIEW LOOP RD& NOTE:TIDAL ELEVATIONS DRAWN GRISWOLD AVE,GRAPEVIEW,WA,98546 APPROXIMATELY. GRAPHIC SCALE 1"=e0' SHEET: 2 of I 1 DATE: 12/07/2018 MITIGATION SITES MITIGATION AREA 2-PHASE 1: / WHW- PACIFIC OYSTER BED REMOVE EXISTING ROW OF PILE AND r14.16' (Crassostrea gigas) INSTALL MIN. 12 CU YD BEACH GRAVEL TO — 1 �� / / -1055 SF REPLACE VOLUME OF PILES(SEE SHEET 5) MITIGATION AREA 2-PHASE 2: / / i �' / MLLW 0.0' ) ' GRADE ERODED SLOPE AND INSTALL SHORELINE STABILIZATION ELEMENTS: ,' ANCHORED LOGS WITH ROOTWADS, PLATFORM / � � � x� I � FLOATING DOCK BOULDERS AND NATIVE PLANTS(SEE ELEVATION SHEET 6 AND SHEET 8 FOR DETAILS) 19'-6" PILINGS(7) I / I ADA \GANGWAY \ / / SIDEWALK \ o / .�,M°�"° OHW 1664' =�:1 / GMWO ni . wE I PROPERTY BOUNDARY INSTALL DIFFUSER TEE AT o / EXISTING STORMWATER OUTFALL- SEE DETAIL SHEET 11 / MITIGATION AREA 1- / REMOVE ANGULAR ROCK AND INSTALL BEACH GRAVEL PRELIMINARY v i // / / % / // (SEE SHEET 4) \ INFORMATION ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION - \\\ \` / / / / / N MHHW / / / / L ROPERTY B NDARIES SHOW SOUNDVIEW CONSULTANTS,LLC.ASSUMES - — \\\ /14.16' r R APeROXIMA E NLY. NO LIABILITY OR RESPONSIBILITY FOR -�\\\\��\ / / / / MLLW 0.0' / CONSTRUCTION,IMPROVEMENTS, OR ESTIMATES BASED ON THIS PLAN SET - — _ \\ �//�/� ) / / / / / / FAIR HARBOR MARINA TIDAL DATUM (MLLW) PROPOSED PROJECT PROJECT:PORT OF GRAPEVIEW MEAN HIGHER HIGH WATER =+ 14.16t COMMUNITY DOCK MEAN HIGHER WATER =+ 13.22t AND SHORELINE RESTORATION MEAN LOW WATER =+ 3.23t REFERENCE# MEAN LOWER LOW WATER = 0.0± 0 30 60 120 APPLICANT: PORT OF GRAPEVIEW LOCATION: GRAPEVIEW LOOP RD& NOTE:TIDAL ELEVATIONS DRAWN GRISWOLD AVE,GRAPEVIEW,WA,98546 APPROXIMATELY. GRAPHIC SCALE 1'-so SHEET: 3 of I 1 DATE: 12/07/2018 EXISTI G CONC \ WALL � \ X / / REMOVE ANGULAR ROCK AND ADD BEACH GRAVEL -1,275 SF r \ / 1 / GANGWAY FLOATING DOCK toco r INSTALL DIFFUSER TEE \ PREVIOUS PROJECT AT STORMWATER OUTFALL- SEE DETAIL SHEET 11 g T RAMP MHHW \ 1 O 14.16' I PRELIMINA \ \ NFORMATION ONLY l / NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION /UND''IEW CONSULTAN S,LLC.ASSUMES NO LIABILITY OR RESP NSIBIL[TY FOR / \� CONSTRUCTION,IMPROVEMENTS,OR ESTIMATES BASED ON THIS PLAN SET TIDAL DATUM (MLLW) MITIGATION MEASURES-AREA I PROJECT: PORT OF GRAPEVIEW MEAN HIGHER HIGH WATER =+ 14.16t COMMUNITY DOCK MEAN HIGHER WATER =+ 13.22t AND SHORELINE RESTORATION MEAN LOW WATER =+ 3.23t REFERENCE# MEAN LOWER LOW WATER = 0.0t 0 8 16 32 APPLICANT: PORT OF GRAPEVIEW LOCATION: GRAPEVIEW LOOP RD& NOTE:TIDAL ELEVATIONS DRAWN GRISWOLD A\TE,GR NPENTIEW,WA,98546 APPROXIMATELY. GRAPHIC SCALE i--ie' I SHEET: 4 of 1 I DATE: 12/07/2018 EXISTING EXISTING CONCRETE CONCRETE ' BULKHEADy ' / BULKHEAD u AP RP OX EXTENT O / REMOVE APPROX.44 EXISTING OF ERODING SLOPE/ r / PILE AND REMAINING CROSS- SHORELINE SCOUR APPROX.ALIGNMENT OF MEMBERS,AND DISPOSE OF DYSFUNCTIONAL OFF-SITE AS DIRECTED BY TIMBER PILE BULKHEAD I I 1 PROJECT BIOLOGIST J / \ EXISTING TIMBER PILE \ TO BE REMOVED- INSTALL-12 CU YD BEACH APPROX.34 ABOVE SUBSTRATE, 1 / GRAVEL THIS AREA TO APPROX.10 BELOW SUBSTRATE VOLUMEREPLACE OF REMOVED PILES IAPPROX.OHW � / APPROX.OHW / APPROX.MHHW 14.16'ELEV. APPROX.MHHW 14.16'ELEV. IPACIFIC I OYSTER BED EXISTING EXISTING / CONCRETE / / CONCRETE BULKHEAD / BULKHEAD / EXISTING SHORELINE CONDITIONS PHASE I -PROPOSED SHORELINE MITIGATION TIDAL DATUM (MLLV) MITIGATION MEASURES-AREA 2 PROJECT:PORT OF GRAPEVIEW MEAN HIGHER HIGH WATER =+ 14.16t PHASE 1 -PILE REMOVAL AND COMMUNITY DOCK MEAN HIGHER WATER =+ 13.22t BEACH GRAVEL INSTALLATION AND SHORELINE RESTORATION MEAN LOW WATER =+ 3.23t REFERENCE# MEAN LOWER LOW WATER = 0.0t 0 8 16 32 APPLICANT: PORT OF GRAPEVIEW LOCATION: GRAPEVIEW LOOP RD& NOTE:TIDAL ELEVATIONS DRAWN GRISWOLD AVE,GRAPEVIEW,WA,98546 APPROXIMATELY. GRAPHIC SCALE i•-le' SHEET: 5 of I I DATE: 12/0Z22 j EXISTING CONCRETE ` BULKHEAD ' APPROX.EXTENT OF / m REGRADED SHORELINE TO BLEND INTO EXISTING BURY BOULDER WITH UPLAND TERRACE(SEE / CROSS-SECTION SHEET 8) CHAIN MIN.3 FEET TO N/ ro ANCHOR LOGS(TYP.)' PROVIDE 2'-3'WIDTH ANCHOR 3 TO 4+/-20' GRAVEL PATH TO BEACH LOGS MIN. S WITH ROOTWAD T Fv TO 8 BURIED BOULDERS PLANT SHORELINE EMBED BOULDERS 36"TO 42"DIA. WITH NATIVE SPECIES TO DEPTH OF 1 FOOT OR i HEIGHT, (SEE CROSS-SECTION / (1 OR 2 PER LOG) ON SHEET 8&PLANT LIST ON SHEET 9) APPROX.OHW / APPROX.MHHW r I REGRADE ERODED SLOPE 14.16'ELEV. ' TO MAX.2:1 SLOPE 1 / GRADE SLOPE(AFTER 2:1 v REMOVAL OF BULKHEAD AND SL PE % PILES)TO MATCH EXISTING 1j BEACH GRADE TO OHW / I BURY BOULDER WITH CHAIN TO ANCHOR LOG(TYP.)SEE / b CROSS-SECTION ON SHEET 8 7EXISTINGCONCRETE BULKHEAD / / PROPOSED SHORELINE STABILIZATION AND MITIGATION TIDAL DATUM (MLLV� MITIGATION MEASURES-AREA 2 PROJECT:PORT OF GRAPEVIEW PHASE 2-GRADE ERODED SLOPE AND COMMUNITY DOCK MEAN HIGHER HIGH WATER =+ 14.16t INSTALL SHORELINE STABILIZATION AND SHORELINE RESTORATION MEAN HIGHER WATER =+ 13.22t MEAN LOW WATER =+ 3.23t ELEMENTS REFERENCE# MEAN LOWER LOW WATER = 0.0± 0 $ 16 32 APPLICANT: PORT OF GRAPEVIEW LOCATION: GR�A PEVIEW LOOP RD& NOTE:TIDAL ELEVATIONS DRAWN GRISWOLD AVE,GR.NPEN'IEW,WA,98546 APPROXIMATELY. GRAPHIC SCALE i'-ie' SHEET: 6 of 11 DATE: 12/07/2018 TO FACE OF CONCRETE WALL A TOP OF PILING 23'TYP, 10 PLUS PILING CAP 3' 162' TOP OF DECK 19.50' GANGWAY 10"DIA STEEL PILE,TYP MHHW t - ------------------- =III-11�=11IEE =1 lElil_- II�II�II=iil=1 — — FLOATING DOCK @ I F=1 I I—III=1 I I I I—III—III I I "II I III III III III III=1 I I=1 I I=1 I- MHHW&M L L W 1Tf=(i1=III=I 1T(�11 Tf� MLLW�� I-1 I I-1 I(=1 I I 0.00 1=1 11=1 1=1 11=1 11=1 1=1 1=1 1=1 11-1J 11=1 I III 11=1 11=1 I TI 1��=1 11=1 11= - -- 1I I—I I I—I I I=1 I—III I I—III—I I I�I I—III=1 I=1 I I—I I—I I—I I I� 1 =1 11=1 11=1TI=1 11=1 I( I I—I—I 11=1 1=1 - ' T1�1Tf-1Tf =1 1Tf�I f-1TI-1T_I=1 -1T_I=1 1ii�Tl-1 1=_1Tf i-1Tf-1 I f-1T��1=1 iTi I =1 i -1TI=1 i-111=1111= 1=1TI—I=_— — 111=1 I I—III—I I=1 I I—I(f=1 I I—I I I�I I—III—III—��((=1 I I—I I�I I—III—III—III—I 11—I 11=1 I I--I M M 11-11=1 11=111=1 1=111_I 11-111�11-11 f=1 11-111—I 1 I I 111=1 —I I I -i I I H I 1=1 I I 11=1 11=��11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 I f=1 11=1 I I 11=1 11=1TI�11=�=1 I f=TiT�11=1 11=1 11=1 11= 1 11=1 I-I 11=11=1 I ICI 1=1 11=I I�11=1 I I-I 11=1 1-1 11 11= 1=1 DRAINAGE PIPE BEYOND- � U LJ INSTALL DIFFUSER PIPE BEACH GRADE SEE DETAIL ON SHEET 11 PRELIMINARY INFORMATION ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SOUNDVIEW CONSULTANTS,LLC.ASSUMES PRE-EXISTING CONDITIONS - NO LIABILITY OR RESPONSIBILITY FOR PROJECT SITE LOOKING SOUTHEAST AT CONCRETE RAMP CONSTRUCTION,IMPROVEMENTS, OR ESTIMATES BASED ON THIS PLAN SET TIDAL DATUM (MLLW) CROSS-SECTION PROJECT:PORT OF GRAPEVIEW MEAN HIGHER HIGH WATER =+ 14.16t AT PROPOSED FLOATING DOCK COMMUNITY DOCK MEAN HIGHER WATER =+ 13.22t AND SHORELINE RESTORATION MEAN LOW WATER =+ 3.23t REFERENCE# MEAN LOWER LOW WATER = 0.0t 0 1 9.5 25 50 APPLICANT:PORT OF GRAPEVIEW LOCATION: GRAPEVIEW LOOP RD& NOTE:TIDAL ELEVATIONS DRAWN GRISWOLD AVE,GRAPEVIEW,WA,98546 APPROXIMATELY. GRAPHIC SCALE 1•=26• SHEET: 7 of I I DATE: 12/07/2018 APPROX. 14' 20' EXISTING 19' ERODED SLOPE APPROX. LOCATION AND UPLAND OF PREVIOUS PILE NATIVE 18' BULKHEAD AND SHORELINE _ UPLAND PLANTS , LOGS WITH JUTE MAT SLOPE 16' I ROOTWADS ROUNDING OCCASIONAL AT GRADE ♦ RE-GRADE SLOPE TRANSITION EMBEDDED BOULDER �� 6.1 SLOPE (MAX.2:1 SLOPE) 15' I I 36"TO 42"DIM. � (1 OR 2 PER LWD) 14.16' BURIED BOULDER WITH DRILLED HOLE GALV.STEEL CHAIN FOR ANCHORING (OR SUBSTITUTE APPROVED CHAIN(TOP OF 3' MIN. BY PROJECT BIOLOGIST) !' BOULDER S BELOW 13 SUFFICIENT TO SECURE ; ; BEACH GRADE) LOAD OF LOG ; i' PRELIMINARY EXISTING ; INFO TION ONLY I SLOPE NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SOUNDVIEW CONSULTANTS,LLC.ASSUMES NO LIABILITY OR RESPONSIBILTTY FOR CONSTRUCTION,IMPROVEMENTS, OR ESTIMATES BASED ON TIIIS PLAN SET V� PROJECT: PORT OF GRAPEVIEW TIDAL DATUM (MLL CROSS-SECTION- MITIGATION AREA 2 COMMUNITY DOCK MEAN HIGHER HIGH WATER =+ 14.16t SHORELINE STABILIZATION AND SHORELINE RESTORATION MEAN HIGHER WATER =+ 13.22t MEAN LOW WATER =+ 3.23t REFERENCE# MEAN LOWER LOW WATER = 0.0t 0 1 2 4 APPLICANT: PORT OF GRAPEVIEW LOCATION: GRAPEVIEW LOOP RD& NOTE:TIDAL ELEVATIONS DRAWN GRISWOLD ANTE,GRAPEVIEW,WA,98546 APPROXIMATELY. GRAPHIC SCALE 11r.l,-0' SHEET: 8 of I I DATE: 12/07/2018 1/3 Shrubs, 2/3 Groundcover/ Tidal Area Plants, at 100%coverage Plant Name Scientific Common Quantity Spacing Size Condition Planting Area -1,100 sf *krubs Acer cm imuwn b'inc maple 4 4 It 2-4ft Bare root Dry/Moist Corylus cornuta californica Beaked hazlenut 4 4 It 2-4ft Bare root Moist Holodiscus discolor Oceanspray 6 4 It 2-4ft Bare root Dry Rrbes sanguineum Red-Flowering currant 6 4 ft 2-4ft Bare root Dry/Moist Rasa nutkana Nootka rose 4 4 It 2-4ft Bare root Dry Salix hookeriana I looker's willow 2 4 ft 2-4ft Stakes Moist/Wet "Total 26 Groundcover/Tidal Area Plants Carex lyngbyei Lyngbye's sedge 28 2 ft 6-12 in Plug/Bare root Molst/Wet Desc 'ota Tufted hairgrass 20 2 ft 6-12 is Plug/Bare root Moist/Wet mas Nos Dune grass 24 2 ft 6-12 In Plug/Bare root Dry/Moist Carex obmtpta Slough sedge 28 2 ft 6-121a Plug/Bare root Moist/Wet Fragatia chiloensis Beach strawberry 36 2 ft 6-12 In Bare root Dry/Moist Plamago mantum; Seaside plantain 20 2 ft 6-12 in Plug/Bare root Moist/Wet Potentilla anserina varpacifrca Silverweed 28 2 ft 6-12 in Plug/Bare root Moist/Wet Salicornia L. Pickleweed 28 2 ft 6-12 in Plug/Bare root Moist/Wet Total 212 Seed Mixes - Shoreline Buffer Seed Mix 30 Ibs/acre %by wt. rostis exarata Spike ben ass 10 Descba is ce itosa —Tuftcdhairgiass 10 Duchy Darrhaffoda danthomoider Annual haigMs 10 Det sia elongata Slender hairgrass 10 mur laatus Bl—uevildryc 25 Hordeum brat antberNm Meadow bark 25 nNr Ilus Streamside lupine 10 Total 100 1-Scientific names and species identification taken from/ora of the Pacific Northwest(Hitchcock and Cronorsst,1973). 2-Over-sized plants are suitable for replacement pending project biolo 'es approval. 3-All plans and schedules are conceptual for regulatory review and impact analysi, final plans may be needed for construction,and may be subject to regulatory approval. NATIVE PLANT SCHEDULE PROJECT: PORT OF GRAPEVIEW COMMUNITY DOCK AND SHORELINE RESTORATION REFERENCE# APPLICANT:PORT OF GRAPEVIEW LOCATION: GRAPEVIEW LOOP RD& GRISWOLD AVE,GRAPEVIEW,Wit,98546 SHEET: 9 of I I DATE: 12/07/2018 (2)2x8 PT TIMBER HANDRAIL 2x2 CHAINLINK FABRIC 4x6 PT TIMBER POST 4"CONCRETE WALK, j•• GANGWAY HEAVY BROOM FINISH EXISTING STORM DRAIN oll MHHWOU HW .. 14.16' REINFORCING- PER <.: PER REINFORCING PER STRUCTURAL o� STRUCTURAL PLATFORM SECTION A PLATFORM BULKHEAD SCALE. 3/8"=P-0" SCALE. 3/8"=P-0" TIDAL DATUM TIDAL pATUM(MLL� PLATFORM AND BULKHEAD DETAILS PROJECT:PORT OF GRAPEVIEW MEAN HIGHER HIGH WATER =+ 14.16t COMMUNITY DOCK MEAN HIGHER WATER =+ 13.22t AND SHORELINE RESTORATION MEAN LOW WATER =+ 3.23t REFERENCE# MEAN LOWER LOW WATER = 0.0t APPLICANT: PORT OF GRAPEVIEW LOCATION: GRAPEVIEW LOOP RD& NOTE:TIDAL ELEVATIONS DRAWN GRISWOLD AVE,GRAPEVIEW,WA,98546 APPROXIMATELY. SHEET: 10 of 11 11 DATE: 12/07/2018 INSTALL DIFFUSER TEE AT END OF EXISTING STORMWATER OUTFALL IMMEDIATELY NORTH OF BOAT RAMP -p m Fused or flanged connection o specified in profile&plan. 3 Cr HDPE moulded or fabricated tee same �. diameter and dimension as pipe. o Le�9t �.,mekev 4 20X EXISTING STORMWATER OUTFALL Drill holes in front half of tee only. 0 Hole diameter(inches)=Tee diameter divided by 6. (Example: 6 inch tee= 1" holes 0 18 inch tee= 3 inch holes) No holes opposite pipe. Hole spacing = 1.5 x hole diameter. DIFFUSER TEE DETAIL PROJECT: PORT OF GRAPEVIEW COMMUNITY DOCK AND SHORELINE RESTORATION REFERENCE# Note: APPLICANT: PORT OF GRAPEVIEW 1. Source: Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) Highway Runoff LOCATION: GRAAPEVIEW LOOP RD& Manual, Figure 5-71. GRISWOLD AVE,GR.-kPEVIEW,WA,98546 SHEET: 11 of 11 DATE: 12/07/2018 dahpHistoric Property Report Resource Name: Property ID: 719832 DfM O(AQCtI ECLOGv. MSTORIC PRESERVATION Location _ gr ✓ .7 tz Oe c 0 U 7 J Address: 5070 E Grapeview Loop Rd,Allyn,WA,98524, USA Geographic Areas: Mason Certified Local Government, Mason County,T21RO1W05,VAUGHN quadrangle Information Number of stories: 1.00 Construction Dates: Construction Type Year Circa Built Date 1920 r Historic Use: Category Subcategory Domestic Domestic-Single Family House Domestic Domestic-Single Family House Historic Context: Category Architect/Engineer: Category Name or Company Thematics: Local Registers and Districts Name Date Listed Notes Project History Monday, September 30, 2019 Page 1 of 9 dahp Historic Property Report Resource Name: Property ID: 719832 Iliti;;SIC('4:i[G':•ii,�\ Project Number,Organization, Resource Inventory SHPO Determination SHPO Determined By, Project Name Determined Date 2019-09-06910,RCO,Grapeview 9/10/2019 Boat Launch-Development RCO 18-2420 Monday, September 30, 2019 Page 2 of 9 d �'} Historic Property Report p Resource Name: Property ID: 719832 Woof mC'WcIOGY MISTOEIC PRESERVATION Photos _ I ' f f / Ah. ti F _ _ Property location on aerial imagery Partial Southeast Elevation Clipped Gable Roof Entry rt Foundation Large Fixed Window Monday, September 30, 2019 Page 3 of 9 dchp Historic Property Report Resource Name: Property ID: 719832 DPT of ARCIUECIOG-- H15TCRIC PRESERVATION A w ii 1 I ,•v k ' � t.. South Elevation Southeast Elevation c -- 1 Northeast Elevation Southwest Elevation 1, i.• _ L� hp iew 5 Tbn&�q shown how my a would Mc b=Io 6Ma—l Rvn,Pup+S-4 to Ikmwl to =_ Hood',Cre1—tfooly the ux,w,wc,e"a "Detroit of the West" Property location on 1954 USGS topographic map Monday, September 30, 2019 Page 4 of 9 d(--"`hP Historic Property Report Resource Name: Property ID: 719832 Dirt of niCwdC:O_--.. InSTOR,C PRESEk'. riC f Property location on 1969 air photo Property location on 1951 air photo Monday, September 30, 2019 Page 5 of 9 d "q� Historic Property Report Resource Name: Property ID: 719832 HISTORIC PR{SERVJ4TLI.C• ♦ Inventory Details - 9/10/2019 Common name: Date recorded: 9/10/2019 Field Recorder: James McNett Field Site number: SHPO Determination Detail Information Characteristics: Category Item Foundation Concrete-Block Form Type Single Dwelling Roof Type Gable-Clipped/Jerkin head Roof Material Asphalt/Composition-Shingle Cladding Wood-Fiberboard Structural System Wood-Platform Frame Plan L-Shape Surveyor Opinion Property appears to meet criteria for the National Register of Historic Places: No Property is located in a potential historic district(National and/or local): No Property potentially contributes to a historic district(National and/or local): No Monday, September 30, 2019 Page 6 of 9 dchp Historic Property Report Resource Name: Property ID: 719832 Significance narrative: Logging and milling have been the main industries in Mason County since the 1850s (Thomas and Perry 1996),and aquaculture has been prominent in the local economy since the late nineteenth century. Mills were built along the Oakland Bay shoreline in Shelton and at Arcadia at the mouth of Little Skookum and Totten inlets,and a logging railroad system was constructed to transport timber from the forest to the mills (Andrews 2009;Thomas and Perry 1996). Grapeview is located on Case inlet,approximately 15 miles northeast of Shelton.The first settler in the area was a veteran of the Confederate Army who settled on Stretch Island. He planted grapevines from cuttings he obtained during his long travel to the area and for 11 years he remained the only settler for miles. In 1889,a group of bankers from Portland,Ladd and Tilton,decided to buy the land,now known as Grapeview,and called it Detroit.They envisioned a city(Sagerson and Robinson 1992)sited at the end of a new canal that would connect the Hood Canal to lower Puget Sound. Rumors of future rail connections,canals,and manufacturing fueled a small speculation boom that fizzled when the panic of 1893 cancelled any plans for the canal.The only remaining vestige of the original plan is the"Detroit Townsite"sign on the Grapeview Loop Road. The early community was serviced by the mosquito fleet and by 1893 the community organized school district No. 23(Sagerson and Robinson 1992),which became the first political entity in the community.With the dream of Detroit long gone,the community changed the name to Grapeview which was approved by the Post Office in April 1922. The subject property, 5070 East Grapeview Loop Road,is located an area now known as Grapeview,a census-designated place(CDP)in Mason County,Washington.Grapeview was part of the former Allyn-Grapeview CDP that was broken up into Allyn and Grapeview in 2010. Historical topographic maps and aerial photographs show the project location on East Grapeview Loop Road(USGS Aerials 1951, 1969).The 1954 topographic map also shows the structure in the project location(USGS 1954). The property is next to the Port of Grapeview which was created on November 14th, 1923 to"care for commodities shipped into or out of the district by water."The Commission sold bonds and eventually constructed a pier that connected to the shore by a trestle. By 1968,two ramps had been constructed and in late 1988,the Port purchased 1.74 acres at Grapeview Center.The port has recently upgraded its boat ramp and according to a 2016 plan the subject property will become an area for boat turnaround and restrooms. National Register Consideration The house on 5070 East Grapeview Loop Road has maintained integrity of location, setting,and association. However,substantial repairs and additions have diminished the integrity of the original structure after the period of significance(1920-1968). Materials, windows,and doors have been changed or added and the physical setting of the house was altered by adjustments to the alignment of East Grapeview Loop Road.The design and method of construction appears typical of the era and lacks any distinctive architectural features. Research did not identify any association with individuals or events of local,state,or national significance. Results of research and field observations indicate the property does not have potential to yield significant historical information. Aside from its age,it does not meet criteria for listing on historic registers. Monday, September 30, 2019 Page 7 of 9 dchp Historic Property Report Resource Name: Property ID: 719832 Physical description: The house is a simple one story rectangle 25 feet wide by 30 feet long located on a west to east sloped site.There is historic photo evidence of a former garage that has been removed and replaced with a prefabricated storage unit.The assessor's report says the two bedroom one bath house was built in 1920 and is 785 square feet in area.The house has an additional section 6 feet wide by 11 feet long that is attached to the northeast corner. The exterior of the house is covered by manufactured wavy siding panels that are 12 inches high by 24 inches long and have a 10 inch exposure.The material has been painted.The house is typical platform framing with floor joists that rest on the 8 by 8 by 16 inch grouted concrete block foundation.The foundation extends to the 6 by it foot extension on the northeast and seems to have been built at the same time as the larger volume.There is a crawl space below the floor. The house is wood frame construction with fixed and operable widows.The large fixed windows are 4 feet wide by 4.5 feet high and are divided into three equal horizontal liter. The operable windows are typically wood double hung that are 32 inches wide by 4.5 feet high.Each of the operable sections has two equal horizontal lites.Some windows on the street elevation have decorative non-operable shutters attached on both sides.The current doors have been replaced. The east side of the house has a 288 square feet wood deck that is 20 feet long by 5 to 12 feet wide and is accessed from the south by a 4 feet wide wood stair made of 2 by 10 inch boards.The stair has 8 risers of 6.5 inches and 7 treads 10.5 inches deep. The deck is supported on three 4 by 4 inch columns with 12 inch square concrete footings.The deck structure is 2 by 8 inch joists at 24 inches on center that support 2 by 4 inch decking.The 3 feet high handrail is supported by 4 by 4 inch bolted posts that support a 2 by 4 inch flat top rail. The roof is a simple clipped gable with a 5:12 slope and has half hips at both ends.The roof is covered with asphalt shingles.A concrete brick chimney, 20 by 30 inches,is located in the center west portion of the house.The roof has a one foot overhang supported by 2 by 6 inch at 24 inches on center rafter extensions with a 2 by 8 inch fascia applied to the edge rafters.The house has metal gutters and downspouts attached to the fascias on the on the east and west elevations. Monday, September 30, 2019 Page 8 of 9 dohp Historic Property Report Resource Name: Property ID: 719832 nisrc:,�resew'++nc� Bibliography: Andrews,M. 2009 County-Wide Historic Context Statement and Reconnaissance-Level Survey of U.S. Highway 101 Corridor in Mason County,WA.Andrews History Group,Seattle. Prepared for Mason County,Shelton,Washington,and Washington DAHP,Olympia. Chambers,J. 2013 Mason County Historic Maritime Transportation Survey: Phase 1.Aqua Terra Cultural Resource Consultants.Submitted to Mason County Historic Preservation Commission. Google Inc. 2019 Google Earth Pro. Electronic Resource,accessed September 20,2019. Nationwide Environmental Title Research(NETR) 2019 HistoricAerials.com. Nationwide Environmental Title Research, LLC,in partnership with USDA and USGS. Electronic Resource,http://historicaerials.com/,accessed September 20,2019. Ott,J. 2011 Port of Grapeview commissioners hold their first meeting on November 14, 1923. Electronic document, https://www.historylink.org/File/9732,accessed September 20, 2019. Port of Grapeview 2019 Port History.Electronic Resource, https://www.portofgrapeview.com/about-us, accessed September 18,2019. Sagerson, M.,and D. Robinson 1992 Grapeview the Detroit of the West,A Narrative History of the early Years, 1872 to 1923, Mason County Historical Society,Shelton,Washington. Thomas, B. B.,and F. Perry 1996 Shelton:The First 100 Years, plus Ten. Mason County Historical Society,Shelton, Washington. Monday, September 30, 2019 Page 9 of 9