HomeMy WebLinkAboutWildlife Assessment, Fair Harbor Tracts - HMP Habitat Managment Plan - 6/12/2008 JUN 12 M
OELFAIR 04 E
Wildlife Habitat Assessment and Habitat Management Plan
For
Fair Harbor Tracts
Located in Section 5, Township 21N, Range 01W of Mason
County, Washington
Prepared For
Jurges Enterprises, Inc
2020 Enetai Beach
Bremerton, WA 98310
May 2008
J & J Bio-Logical
2712 Riverlea Dr SE
Olympia, WA 98501
(360) 481-5638
Table of Contents
1.0 Introduction 1
2.0 Description of the Project Location and Activities
2.1 Location 1
2.2 Proposed Activity 4
3.0 Fish and Wildlife Habitat Analysis
3.1 Methodology 6
3.2 Soils 6
3.3 Hydrology 6
3.4 Vegetation
3.5 Priority Wildlife Habitats
3.5.1 Wetlands 7
3.5.2 Instream 10
3.5.3 Snags 10
3.6 Priority Wildlife
3.6.1 Federally Listed Species 12
3.6.2 State Listed Species 14
3.6.3 Other Wildlife Values 14
4.0 Discussion and Recommendations
4.1 Purpose 15
4.2 Project Activities 15
4.3 Impacts to Wildlife and Wildlife Habitat 15
References 17
List of Figures
Figure 1 General Project Location 2
Figure 2 Aerial of Project Area 3
Figure 3 Mason County Parcel Map Prior to BLA # 07-82 5
Figure 4 USDA Soil Map of Area 8
Figure 5 Stream Entry to Site 9
Figure 6 Upland Habitat 9
Figure 7 FPA Stream Map 11
List of Tables
Table 1 Current Parcel information (From the Mason County Assessor) 4
Table 2 Wildlife Uses of Project Area and Vicinity 13
List of Appendices
Appendix A Curriculum Vitae of Author
Appendix B Boundary Line Adjustment (BLA-07-82) Exhibit Map
Appendix C Preliminary MEP Exhibit Map & Stormwater Facilities
Appendix D WDFW PHS Report
Appendix E Bald Eagle Management Plan
1 .0 Introduction
J & J Bio-Logical has been retained to conduct a wildlife habitat assessment study and
Habitat Management Plan (HMP) for a proposed residential housing development located
in Mason County near Grapeview, WA (Fig. 1). The project property is located upland and
west of Case Inlet in Puget Sound in an area of low residential development.
A complete description of the project area location and proposed development is
contained in Section 2.0 of this report. The property supports fish and wildlife species
and habitat areas defined under Chapter 17.01.110 of the Mason County Code. This
ordinance, developed to protect Mason county critical areas and natural resource lands,
provides under subsection J that a HMP may be required to evaluate adverse impacts
and recommend measures to reduce or mitigate these impacts (Mason County.2008).
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) requires that any action authorized by,
funded by or carried out by Federal agencies be reviewed for impacts on species listed
as endangered or threatened and their critical habitat. Critical habitat and threatened
wildlife species occur in nearby Puget Sound. A federal permit is not required for project
activities therefore a " formal " biological evaluation (BE) is not required.
Wildlife and their habitats are also protected by the Washington State Department of
Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) under RCW 77 and WAC 220. WDFW has developed a list of
priority habitat and species (PHS) that are considered to be priorities for conservation
and management in Washington State.
This wildlife habitat assessment and HMP for the project was prepared by James J.
DeShazo, a fisheries biologist with extensive fish and wildlife management experience in
Washington State (Appendix A). The author has prepared numerous Fish and Wildlife
Assessments and Habitat Management Plans for projects in Washington including
Biological Evaluations/Assessments required under Section 7 of the Endangered
Species Act (ESA).
1 .0 Description of the Project Location and Activities
2.1 Location
The proposed project is located in Section 05, of Township 21 N, Range 01 W of Mason
County, Washington. The site is located northwest of Grapeview, WA, a small
community with a population of approximately 2,000 people. The project site is located
west of the Fair Harbor Marina on Case inlet, approximately 1000 feet upland of the
marine shoreline (Fig 2) The property lies at Lat: 47.33, Long: 122.84 at an elevation of
approximately 75 feet.
To access the property from Shelton, drive north on WA-3 approximately 11 miles, turn
right on E Grapeview Loop Rd and continue northerly approximately 5 miles to the Fair
Harbor Marina parking area on the west side of E Grapeview Loop RD. A gravel road
leads west from the parking area to the subject property.
1
Figure 1 General Project Location
300 m
2d00 ft
!e
r
E DeVoit Dr
P
Project Area i
3 y
Grapeview
Stretch
point
Steer
Park
Map Data C Z008 NAVTEQ or Te.le.Atuas
2
Figure 2 Aerial of Pro'ect Area
•, e
to
IL
.. �v•� �1;by�w y
T �
�' • ", l
�**, '� ter:. Y..: • � �{��`'°V�3rg "=� �` 'T spy'
AO
IM
tit-
.tea �'; A �,")� ! i•�•w � -') 7 1
2.2. Proposed Activity
The subject property is irregular in shape totaling approximately 19 acres (280,800 SF) and
has been recently divided into 23 parcels as shown in Appendix B. The property is owned by
Jurges Enterprises, Inc, 2020 Enetai Beach Dr, Bremerton, WA 98310. Current information
regarding this property is provided in Tablet. Parcel sizes are shown in Appendix B. BLA #
07-82( Mason County Auditor File # 1913847 and 1913848) reconfigured the original
blocks in the plat of Detroit# 2 into 23 parcels.
Table 1 Tax Parcel information (From the Mason County Assessor)
Parcel Legal Description
Number
121055144001 PCL 1 OF BLA#07-82 P
121055144003 PCL 2 OF BLA#07-82
121055144005 PCL 3 OF BLA#07-82
121055144006 PCL 7 of .BLA# 07-82
121055144010 PCL 17 of .BLA # 07-82
121055145006 PCL 4 of .BLA# 07-82
121055145010 PCL 5 of .BLA# 07-82
121055145011 PCL 6 of .BLA # 07-82
121055154002 PCL18 of .BLA# 07-82
121055154005 PCL 19 of .BLA # 07-82
121055154009 PCL 20 of .BLA # 07-82
121055155002 PCL 23 of .BLA # 07-82
121055155006 PCL 21 of .BLA# 07-82
121055156002 PCL 8 of .BLA # 07-82
121055156003 PCL 9 of .BLA# 07-82
121055156005 PCL 10 of .BLA # 07-82
121055156007 PCL 11 of .BLA # 07-82
121055156009 PCL 12 of .BLA # 07-82
121055158002 PCL 13 of .BLA # 07-82
121055158003 PCL 14 of .BLA# 07•-80
1 21 0551 58004 PCL 15 of .BLA# 07 -$2
121055158006 PCL 16 of .BLA # 07 -82
121055159002 PCL 22 of .BLA # 07-82
4
Figure 3 Mason County Parcel Map
Mason Count Ma
♦r
' ..� E OANDALE ST`
-
F. W f k gat[
s � ,
"
a , •` 1
0 0
01
E TREASURE ISLAND RD • 7
can
w ; —' rf r
1� s /CA SEINLET
Subject Property -
is J L� _
�........... /
II' I AN
1■ !
I
1
r�
O1SCLAIWR AND LIMITATION OF LL4BILITY:
The data used to make this map have been tested for accuracy,and every effort has been
made to ensure that these data are timely,accurate and reliable.However,Mason County LEGEND
makes no guarantee or warranty to its accuracy as to labeling,dimensions,or placement or
location of any map features contained herein The boundaries depicted by these data are ROb75 + FgDaral L ands
approximate,and are not necessarily accurate to surveying or engineering standards,and are
intended for informational purposes only.Mason County does not assume any legal liability ro9nrays City of Shelton
or responsibility arising from the use of this map in a manner not intended by Mason County. RrvM5.8 5[r6em5 County Bourr0 ar5+(()IdR)
In no event shall Mason County be liable for direct,indirect,incidental.consequential,
special,or tort damages of any kind,including,but not limited to,loss of anticipated profits patG!HS LOmrltssssoner Gstncts
or benefits arising from use of or reliance on the information contained herein
Sections S Lakes
®2006-Mason County
415 N-Sixth Street Townships S Puget Sound 8 Maio,Lat r.
Shelton,WA 98584
5
Jurges Enterprises, Inc proposes to develop twenty (20) residential sites on the property.
It is anticipated that future homes constructed at the site will be 3 bedroom and between
1800 and 2000 SF in size. Lot 21, totaling 3000 SF, will serve as a water system for the
development. Two wells have already been installed at this location. Two lots, 22 & 23,
totaling 181700 SF will serve as drain fields for the development (Appendix C).
To accommodate development of this property, buffer averaging for wetland areas is
proposed. A total of 16,810 SF of wetland buffers will be lost as a result of project
activities. To mitigate for this loss, a total of 21,177 SF of wetland buffer will added for a
net gain of 4,367 SF. AJ Bredberg & Associates of Gig Harbor has prepared and
submitted wetland reports detailing wetlands and buffers and where appropriate buffer
averaging.
3.0 Fish and Wildlife Habitat Analysis
3.1 Methodology
Mason County land use regulations were reviewed for specific requirements relating to the
project proposal, and a wildlife habitat assessment and HMP are required. A review of the
current WDFW Management Recommendations for Washington's Priority Habitats and
Species and other applicable literature was conducted. A WDFW PHS report for species
and/or habitat found in the project vicinity was requested and is included in this document
(Appendix D). A site-specific survey of the property was conducted on April 25, 2008.
WDFW fish biologist Dan Collins, WDFW wildlife biologist Greg Schirato and Squaxin Tribal
biologist John Konovsky were consulted for knowledge regarding fish and wildlife use of the
project area.
3.2 Soils
The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) web soil survey indicates that soils in
the immediate project vicinity are predominantly Sinclair shotty loam with some Alderwood
gravelly sandy loam and Bellingham silty clay loam (Fig. 4)
3.3 Hydrology
A small-unnamed tributary, identified as 0092 in the WDF stream catalog, enters the
property through a small culvert at the southern boundary and drains northerly to Case
Inlet in Puget Sound. (Fig. 5). An intermittent drainage from the west merges with the
tributary in the southwest area of the site. The tributary is believed to be a perennial
stream by local citizens.
6
3.4 Vegetation
The property was partially cleared of vegetation 10 plus years ago and native vegetation
is largely confined to the stream corridor, wetland riparian areas and the northwest
portion of the plat (Fig. 6). Vegetation in the cleared areas is primarily invasive Scotch
broom (Cytisus scoparius) and grasses. Upland vegetation in the northwestern area of
the property is dominated by Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) with a few western red
cedar (Thuja plicata). Understory vegetation includes red alder (Alnus rubra),
salmonberry (Rubus spectabilis), low Oregon grape (Mahonia repens), sword fern
(Polystichum munitum) and Himalayan Blackberry (Rubus discolor). Riparian vegetation
is primarily Red Alder, Western Red Cedar and some pine that reportedly were
introduced several years ago.
3.5 Priority Wildlife Habitats
WDFW indicates there are 18 habitat types currently on the WDFW PHS list. Priority
habitats are defined as " Those habitat types or elements with unique or significant value
to a diverse assemblage of species. A priority habitat may consist of a unique vegetation
type or dominant plant species, a described successional stage, or a specific structural
element." (WDFW. April, 2008). Three priority wildlife habitats were observed during the
field survey of the site. These are described below.
3.5.1 Wetlands
Wetlands noted during the survey were associated with the small drainage. Separate
wetland evaluations have been prepared for the site by B & A, Inc. of Gig Harbor,
Washington.
No additional wetland information was collected during the April 24, 2008 survey. A large
wetland associated with a beaver pond is offsite to the north
7
Figure 4 USDA Soil Map of Area
7.
� r
`, • +►hu » * r i lit
n
• Unit Legend ^
Mason County, Washington (WA645)
Map Unit Map Unit Name Acres Percent of
Symbol in AOI AOI
Ab Alderwood �.1 16.19i6
gravelly sandy
loam, 5 to 15
percent slopes
Be Bellingham silty 2.9 15.2%
clay loam, 0 to
3 percent
slopes
so Sinclair shotty 13.2 68.6%
loam, 5 to 15
percent slopes
Totals for Area of Interest (AOI) 19.2 100.0%
8
Fi ure 5 Stream Entry to Site
Y `
w� 'f4�` ►
Figure 6 Upland Habitat
ell
k ,�•w,t A
9
3.5.2 Instream
As indicated earlier a small-unnamed stream, identified by WDF as # 0092, enters the
property through a culvert at the southern boundary and drains northerly. A stream is
generally defined as those areas where surface waters produce a clearly defined
channel or bed. This stream has a clearly defined channel with a limited floodplain.
The survey conducted on April 24th included walking this stream from its entrance into
Case Inlet upstream to its entrance into the subject property. Immediately upstream from
Case Inlet, the stream passes through a new fish friendly culvert under the East
Grapeview Loop Road. Approximately 200 feet above the culvert, a large active beaver
dam blocks upstream passage to anadromous fish. This blockage was verified in an
earlier survey by the Squaxin Tribe (Konovsky. 2008). The pond created by the dam
extends upstream almost to the project areas northern boundary. Instream habitat
conditions for the stream are poor and it is unlikely to support significant fish populations
except in the beaver pond area. The WDFW fish biologist for this area indicates the
beaver pond has been stocked historically with cutthroat trout (Salmo clarkl) but stocking
has been suspended because of access problems (Collins.2008). The Washington Dept.
of Natural Resources (WDNR) Forest Practices mapping system Indicates there are fish in
the lower portion of the stream but none in the project area (Fig 7). The PHS report does
not indicate the presence of priority fish species in the drainage at this site. In my
professional opinion, the stream within the subject property has poor fish habitat and
should be classified as either Np or Ns as defined under WAC 222-16-030 (WDNR. 2008).
Buffer requirements for these stream types' are100 feet for Np and 75 feet for Ns as
measured landward from the OHWM (Mason County. 2008).
Potential use of the stream by listed species will be discussed under Section 3.6.
3.5.3 Snags and Logs
WDFW considers snags and logs as priority habitat under certain conditions. In this instance,
the following WDFW definition appears to apply. "Priority snag and log habitat includes
individual snags and/or logs, or groups of snags and/or logs of exceptional value to wildlife
due to their scarcity or location in a particular landscape."(WDFW. 2008).
Although snags and logs are limited at the site, a large Douglas fir tree in the northwestern
portion of the site supported an eagle nest site in the past. This issue will be discussed
further under Section 3.6.2 State Listed Species.
10
Figure 7 FPA Stream Map
Mapping
4VASHINGTpN STATE DEPARTMENT OF ��
Natural Resources WWII
1 EestPracticesAvearm.,
i
+704620 22
r
F
f'I
17
04600 a 704e z
Project Vicinit
17C35`;r +70 82
T
u -
11
3.6 Priority Wildlife
During the site survey, special care was given to identify those species in the
Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) Priority Habitat and Species
(PHS) database and Mason County under section 17.01.110. WDFW species of concern
or priority species include those species listed as State Endangered, State Threatened,
State Sensitive, or State Candidate, as well as species listed or proposed for listing by
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service or the National Marine Fisheries Service. Priority
species include "State Endangered, Threatened, Sensitive, and Candidate species;
animal aggregations considered vulnerable; and those species of recreational,
commercial, or tribal importance that are vulnerable. These constitute about 16% of
Washington's approximately 1000 vertebrate species and a fraction of the state's
invertebrate fauna" (WDFW.2008).
Wildlife use of the property was noted during the April 24,2008 survey. Habitats adjacent
to the subject properties were also surveyed by car and on foot to provide additional
information on wildlife species likely to use the area on an intermittent basis. Sight,
sound and/or sign were used to identify wildlife species present. As this survey is based
on a single site visit, it is not intended to be a comprehensive list of wildlife species that
may occur on the subject property. Other species may occur at the site during other
seasons or times of the day.
Only one species of concern from the WDFW SOC list was identified as using the
subject property or adjacent areas (WDFW October 23, 2007). This species, the bald
eagle, has established nesting territories at or near the project area. The primary
concern for bald eagle habitat is breeding areas, communal roosts, areas of regular
large concentrations, and regularly used perch trees in breeding areas. Nesting areas
are especially critical habitat and most nests are located on private lands.
Table 2 provides a listing of wildlife species identified by sight, sound and/or signs during
the survey and from the Priority Habitat and Species report previously cited.
3.6.1 Federally Listed Species
Wildlife species listed by the Federal Government as endangered, threatened or
candidate may occur in the project vicinity. Following is a brief discussion of these
species most likely to occur near the project area.
• Puget Sound Chinook (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) & Their Critical Habitat
Listed as a threatened species on March 24,1999, this species may occur in Case Inlet.
As indicated earlier, the beaver dam near the stream mouth blocks access to the project
site by anadromous fish .A review of the WDFW Salmonscape data base indicates there
is no record of Chinook salmon use in this tributary(WDFW Salmonscape.2008).
• Bull Trout( Salvelinus confluentus) & Their Critical Habitat
This native charr occurs in Mason County waters and was listed as threatened in
Washington State in 1998.The Bull Trout may be either resident or migratory. The
blockage at the beaver dam precludes use of the project area by the migratory
(amphidromous) form. The stream at the site does not provide the type of critical habitat
normally used by the resident form of bull trout. Collins (2008) indicates there are no bull
trout found in this vicinity. A review of the WDFW Salmonscape database indicates there
is no record of bull trout use in this tributary (WDFW Salmonscape.2008).
12
• Puget Sound Steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss)
This Steelhead distinct population segment (DPS)was listed as threatened in 2007.
Again, the stream blockage downstream of the site precludes use by this species. A
review of the WDFW Salmonscape database indicates there is no record of Steelhead
use in this tributary (WDFW Salmonscape.2008).
• Marbled Murrelet (Brachyamphus marmoratus)
Listed as threatened by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), this
species may utilize the marine area off the project site for foraging. The WDFW
Habitats and Species map has no marbled murrelet points and it is very unlikely the
species would use the vicinity for nesting as suitable habitat (old growth forest) does not
exist at this location.
Table 2 Wildlife Use of Project Area and Vicinity
Common Name Scientific Name ID METHOD
Avian
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucoce halus PHS report
Woodpecker Picoides spp. Sign
Mallard Duck Anas platyrhynchos Sight
American Crow Corvus brach rh nchos Sound
Great Blue Heron Ardea herodias Sight
Song Sparrow Melos iza melodia Sight
Black-capped chickadee Poecile atrica illus Sight
White Crowned Sparrow Zonotrichian leucophrys Sight
Mammals
Blacktail Deer Odocoileus hemionus Sign
Coyote Canis latrans Sign
Beaver Castor canadensis Sign
Fish
None observed None observed
Reptiles
Garter snake Thamno his sirtalis Sight
Amphibians
Pacific Tree Frog H la reailla Sound
13
3.6.2 State Listed Species
• Western Pond Turtle (Clemmys maramorata)
Listed as endangered by WDFW, this species may occur in Mason County. The WDFW
Habitats and Species map has no western pond turtle points and the most likely habitat
for this species is in the beaver pond downstream from the project area, No Amphibians
were seen during the brief survey of the pond.
Marbled Murrelet (Brachyamphus marmoratus)
Listed as threatened by WDFW, the Habitats and Species map has no marbled
murrelet points and it is very unlikely the species would use the vicinity for
nesting as suitable habitat (old growth forest) does not exist at this location.
• Bald Eagle (Haliaetus leucocephalus)
Formerly listed as a threatened species under the Endangered and Threatened Species
Act, bald eagles were removed from that list (delisted) in July of 2007. The bald eagle is
still listed as a threatened species by WDFW under state regulations.
This is the most likely threatened or endangered species to occur in the project area.
The PHS report for the area indicates a number of eagle nest sites occur in the project
vicinity including one at the project site. The nest was located in the tallest Douglas fir at
the northeastern edge of the property on Parcel #4712237023 (lot 19) .The tree has not
been used for nesting by eagles since the mid-1990, s (Schirato. 2008). A bald eagle
management plan is being developed to protect the site for future nesting.
3.6.3 Other Wildlife Values
The site provides habitat for a normal complex of western Washington non-listed species
including blacktail deer. The primary value of the cleared area is for foraging. The
vegetated stream and fringe areas provide cover and movement corridors for both large
and small mammals.
14
4.0 Discussion and Recommendations
4.1 Purpose
The purpose of this project is to prepare the approximately 19-acre site for development
of 20 residential homes.
4.2 Project Activities
Project activities will include those normally used for residential housing developments..
clearing, grading, installation of waterlines from the previously installed wells,
construction of stormwater facilities, road construction and installation of utilities (power,
television and telephone).
4.3 Impacts to Wildlife and Wildlife Habitat
Conversion of land from its natural state to a developed state typically eliminates or
significantly changes many important habitat features found in a natural area. In this
instance, prior clearing and initial development of the property has already resulted in
reduction of wildlife habitat values at the property.
The purpose of the Mason County Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation ordinance
(17.01.110) is to allow land development while maintaining viable populations of fish and
wildlife species by avoiding or mitigating adverse impacts. Following is a summary of
potential adverse impacts to wildlife and wildlife habitat and recommended measures to
avoid or mitigate these impacts.
Habitat Fragmentation
Impacts from this process have already occurred at the site because of the previous
clearing. Although some wildlife species, such as blacktail deer, become habituated to
human presence, others will avoid open areas. The stream buffer will reduce impacts at
the site by providing a wildlife movement corridor from adjacent Simpson lands to the
ecologically important beaver pond area. Recommended measures to reduce or mitigate
project impacts include:
• Leave existing trees and other native vegetation within the stream buffer
undisturbed.
• Store construction materials in a designated construction zone in to limit impacts
to the buffer.
• Avoid foot traffic in the buffer area
• Limit removal of native vegetation in upland areas to that necessary for home
building, access roads and installation of utilities
• Consider planting native vegetation at strategic locations to enhance cover for
wildlife movement
15
Water Quality
Protection of water quality and quantity at this site is important not only to wildlife on-site but
also to those downstream including the marine area. A large beaver pond, located
immediately downstream of the project, provides important habitat for many wildlife species.
Recommended measures to reduce or mitigate project impacts to water quality include:
• Perform any excavation and grading work in areas sloping toward
wetlands or the stream corridor(lots 8 thru 16 and 18 thru 20) during dry
weather, generally from July through September.
• Preserve natural vegetation wherever possible, especially near wetlands and
natural drainage areas, to provide erosion control, stormwater detention,
biofiltration and wildlife use.
• Sign and restrict access to stream and wetland buffer areas to maintain their water
quality functions
• Install silt fencing or fiber rolls around the work area to prevent erosion and
siltation of the unnamed tributary.
• Minimize amount of erodible soils at any given time to the maximum extent
feasible.
• Coinciding with, or immediately subsequent to the completion of the
construction work, restoration and stabilization of bare ground should
occur. Restoration and stabilization phases include the application of a
native seed mix and landscape stabilization of any cut and filled areas.
Native species of plants should be used in transition zones between the
construction area and undisturbed native vegetation.
• Check all equipment daily for leaks. Refueling and lubrication of equipment
should occur offsite. Don't store any fuel, lubricants, chemicals, or
hazardous substances overnight within the project area.
• Pesticides, herbicides and fertilizers should not be applied in wetlands or
riparian buffer areas. Do not apply chemicals in upland areas when there is
a possibility of rain.
• Limit the total impervious area (TIA) at the site to no more than 20% of the
total area if feasible.
• Construct storm water retention ponds of adequate capability to treat
anticipated runoff volumes and rate.
• Comply with all permits and requirements of government authorities or agencies.
Critical Wildlife Habitat
• Identify any habitat features on-site that may need special protection- a tree formerly
used, as an eagle nest site is located in the northwestern area of the property.
• Develop a Bald Eagle Management plan ( BMP) with WDFW to address future use of
the tree by eagles (see Appendix E). This plan has tentatively been agreed to by the
landowner and WDFW and is being formalized.
• Retention of this tree and a treed buffer area as part of the BMP plan will not pose
safety and potential fire concerns issues.
16
5.0 References
Collins, Dan. April. 2008. Personal communication regarding fish resources in subject
tributary. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. Olympia, WA
Konovsky, John. 2008. Environmental Program Manager. Squaxin Tribe. Personal
communication regarding stream survey findings
Schirato, Greg. April.2008. Area Wildlife Biologist. Personal communication regarding
eagle nest site. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. Olympia, WA
Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. April. 2008. Priority Habitat and Species
List. http://www.wdfw.wa.gov/hab/phslist.htm
Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. April. 2008. WDFW Salmonscape
Interactive computer mapping system,
Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. Species of Concern in Washington State
Current through October 23, 2007. http://wdfw.wa.gov/wlm/diversty/soc/soc.htm
Washington Department of Natural Resources. April.2008. WAC 222-16-030 Water
typing system. http://www.dnr.wa.gov/forestpractices/watertyping/
Washington Department of Natural Resources. April. 2008. Forest Practices Application
Review System (FPARS) website.
http://www3.wadnr.gov/dnrapp5/website/fpars/viewer.htm
17
Appendix A Curriculum Vitae of Author
J & J BIO-LOGICAL
2712 Riverlea Dr Se James J DeShazo
Olympia, WA 98501 Fish and Wildlife Biologist
360-459-9697 . Fax 360-455-5075 E-mail jimd55@aol.com
EDUCATION:
Bachelor of Science in Fisheries Biology, University of Washington, Seattle,
Washington. June 1965
Undergraduate course work at Wenatchee Valley College,
Wenatchee, Washington. 1958-1961
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE:
More than 30 years of experience in management of wildlife resource programs
in the Pacific Northwest. From 1965 to 1976 1 functioned as a regional fisheries
biologist for the Washington State Department of Game (WDG). Duties included
management of all fresh water fish populations in King, Snohomish, Pierce,
Skagit and Island Counties including protection and enhancement of habitat, life
history investigations, harvest management and supervision of enhancement
operations.
From 1976 to 1988 1 worked in the WDG (Wildlife) office in Olympia, WA
performing a variety of progressively more responsible duties culminating with
my appointment as chief of the Fisheries Management Division in 1986.
Positions held during this period included anadromous fish program manager,
game fish harvest program manager, and assistant chief of operations. As
anadromous fish program manager, I represented WDFW at the Columbia River
Compact and was an active participant in development of the Columbia River
management plan. During the planning process, I developed upper Columbia
and Snake River escapement goals for wild steelhead in consultation with
Oregon, Idaho and the Columbia River tribes. While assistant chief of
operations, I was responsible for an annual operating budget of six million dollars
and prepared numerous grant applications for Federal Government funding. As
Chief of the Fisheries Management Division my responsibilities included
developing, monitoring and evaluating comprehensive research and
management programs for all game fish populations in Washington State. I also
encouraged and approved research projects focused on gathering basic
biological information on trout in Washington.
From 1988 until my retirement in 1993 1 functioned as Regional Manager for
WDFW Administrative Region 6. As Regional Manger, I was responsible for
implementation of all Department programs and objectives within a seven county
area of the Olympic Peninsula. I was directly responsible for the supervision of
operations for the Wildlife, Fisheries, Habitat, Lands and Enforcement programs
as well as the Aberdeen Regional Office Operation. A major function of this
position was to mitigate land use impacts on wildlife species, especially those
classified as sensitive, threatened or endangered.
From 1998 to present, I have acted as a fish and wildlife and wetland consultant
on development projects adjacent to fresh water and marine areas and in upland
areas. These consultations include conducting wildlife and wildlife habitat
surveys, preparation of habitat assessment reports, biological evaluations,
wetland delineations and habitat management plans. I have prepared a number
of formal biological assessments/ biological evaluations required by the COE
under the Endangered Species Act. Evaluations approved include the Lakehaven
sewer line replacement project, Terrace View apartment complex, Lake Chelan
Park dock installation, numerous private dock, pier and shoreline armoring
installations and other marine and freshwater projects. Habitat Management
plans have been prepared for terrestrial species including Bald Eagles, Piliated
Woodpeckers, Blue Herons, Osprey, Red-Tailed Hawk and Western Pocket
Gophers.
Wetland analysis and delineations have been prepared in association with B&A,
Inc of Gig Harbor utilizing specific criteria provided in the Washington State
Wetland Rating System for Western Washington.
PROFESSIONAL ORGANIZATIONS:
Retired member of the American Fisheries Society
Retired member of the Pacific Northwest Fisheries Biologists
Past President of the Association of Retired Fish and Wildlife Employees
Past member of the Board Of Directors for the Association of Retired Fish and
Wildlife Employees
TECHNICAL SKILLS:
• Expertise in life history and habitat requirements for Pacific Northwest
salmonids
• Knowledge of enhancement and mitigation techniques for all Washington
State fish species
• Knowledge of life history and habitat requirements for terrestrial wildlife
species
• Experience in wetland identification and delineation
• Mediation skills in wildlife-landowner conflicts
• Expertise in fish and wildlife survey methodologies
• Technical report writing, grant applications, computer operations
19
BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT EXHIBIT MAP
IN A PORTION OF THE NE 1/4 Of THE NW 1/4 OF SECI•ION 5, /
TOWNSHIP 21N,RANGE 1#W.M.,MASON COUNTY,WASHINGTON p D
RESULTANT PARCELS
MAN
�-
1lIrAIM0/1 ;, ,j'jS-�
� 'L7
/ F"rF
SAW
y rNt MNQt- 'm ✓`
ulalltiooi YARLIAxawaL - SITE
.., w.rer 11D,INY/I AAIRUI
i
wr, 0
41€►� g g r
NLVA EounDMY laa easu.a+
C smm
CL
•. eMEN/NT -•""j U.'.».._�•-...__.�[. 4•.7'75•w 11DY7 { 10•IIOM7e VfRm INO.M,C Vntm Rm" x�
-"•�- AA1101uNAR I OGATIOM o1 YY AYKE
IDnsnNcaav> M L:Ax /.'...i�`tt:.`. a" 1 •7 r -
MA.v +1 I VICINITY MAP r
...........+......_.._MM'31:2 yam, lil leaei a I p� i wyr To semiCD
j.
Y
R I,IaN1�IpR tllrllwe111191a11Nea Itia,l4l+r +
aMV Lro. I Il,leer IT,Ia41
/ . wNt r,.lAw wey.../�T I
{..f._..,bAAwiN,411e,r11 ..._...•_.—./1 _.___.._._.._,....._,. x�„r—�•W IYAD mM(!Wf MpIG M'AOIC�1711{IIY I�.VII' i r
i I wrl
IT __.� ___ I' SKEET 1 OF 2
I TM NA10R,
I 1111a1a1N �• 'mow. r
I — r r r '( I" .�nTv�7a A�nue UIRECTf R APPR7VAI� CD
_ I�
IRATE O?I'
Ila ea rAT1 }g` TNID711 F` __...- -.. _...�.._-
I/,ylyr a nlWlilal �`\ r r � ' I I11a/1yMlpl i! �`
g ,mac.,_
oruc-rr�ll III,ax�r/oevnoaiMw r
.Alcor
AUMOWS,CEIMFICATE v
00
-
- RUM FMRACOWTWO._MCAVn—,TQ�0 . A*
AT,"on=A m INIDIR(AIDROA /SE IIU 4M.. .N.
_ m
ti 7 I I
a ----
Q 1711YNIa, �
r r .QIS99�N
..—...__.--•--.._._.,:atins•w ela.a
er.er• As51R,r .'�I Ij__ 34 i �/ ,AANrr 1-�-+_----•_'_.__.
]■� I IAxrMll*; ARA6a 4w WAD vmi" e 1 e 11„w^Nlou wamrAlalRRx w rr1Mn w SURVEYQR15_CERTIflf'TE44
"Iw w,a�r �.• r.
�+'~..�-•.-_...._-_,.. /� )/ I,n1or1A%E.aATTE+,ucuRnm AS A:AAo wRVETaR e7r THs !y STAR OF wASHIN6rOH,cLRn1Y THAT THIS PEAT 3IMM ON TN/N I � ��v��I1A,r�l�pNiy� i h r,/C,¢ / Acnw as ne wo oasweco lcRaut aonlxlcfco rr Fw ael
-^+• s.7aal__ M ••/•� uMOm W"RMON,THAT ME DWAWM,ODUW 4 AM
. ANOM ARt 9100M THEREIN ODMIMY,AND THAT MMM K"
WTI i A +I�y ? _ HAVE MEN SET AND LOT CORNER%STAKED ON THE GROUND"TM
1 1llr{IIImi 11Ak�rAAgy r C ` r S/a•IRON EMS WITH PLASTIC CAM LS.ri"It
/ h J
SEPTIC D WNFIELD NOTE: PROPS TY OWNER, THOINSS RATTEY,Rom r3/OAily
r • ^�`)r^ •', TRACY A(LOT]Uj AND 71VCT E(LOT 1])►K.LLM OMIKIMTSD AUROaS INTMUx10[S,INC.
Im $ )
1f;,1 AARA5 A7R ILA71AlIVACY DR,►,IIRIaAT7ulr allwAa plOMi 70T9I'A�(IN eeua W S E.S o u n d
� I arsTEMe roR rx71 Lm.TI1e u7cAnoN ASSIQIED IDR EMTI Ern 8RS1aRTON,WA Oulu
/•, / / If IA=D U►ON EaSTINO SOIL SMNES ANC bbsla STANVA",
-is aD p A urRm i ''y` 7` t THE ACTUAL UXATION Or EA0/lIAMWA E mp IANMTTON Engineering,MTE 1
M MY M AOXXTED IN ACp0ft-00 E WM ni!MOIYDUKb Inc 4
/C r SET"W IN E 0ECLAMTlo11 OF CCN ENAW%FOR NUII 11,lelOR ".
TH ���rrSe�r�rEE�
— ma__
r. TRACTS. aI 2I7 Sw.W*%Dee Aw .6olr'A w.I43"
- 1 PAarle 136q/1b177O Fuf%q IM0179
xew AI Emt Gaol
MENT NO � rr, w1rlwingMeaYq Mwnvww.wNn¢wMgta,
w s, duwN DATE oRAmNc
ALL IFN tMO Wl"OEMCTEO ON THIS MAP WV AL INL1Ugl ..., .°' wx 17/7/O7 am-MAO"
Ek%WWt "WA RAMM, WA YMM PMtk RIICI IRIE,
Y/mNw CAAb T'G,U"X TRANVORT LNES.CkgWM AM CHECKED FIELD SOCK JnE NLM4R MM wATBL ,
FAIRHARBOR TRACTS 3�1'f
lA PORTION OF SECTION 5,TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH,RANGE 1 EAST,W.M.10 i _ ---I L— MASONCOUNTY,WASHINGT _,_y .� ., .� EP EXHIBIT '�/ I
YZI
rr
CU
LL If
Tr
CID
Zr
cc
i--——— —--I a — _�!�,�--fir— mar —
w
�// FAIR M�RTMCTS um•moo We9t�J'OUnCI
C /! :•i t�l l% � / /�+�7"� :g` �i Engineering, Inc
L
0.
U
x
c
a
a
Q
Appendix D WDFW PHS Report
WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE - HABITATS �D SPECIES REPORT
IN 'THE VICINITY OF T21RDIW SECT=ON 5
Report Date: April 23, 2008
Information About Priority Habitats and Species Polygons
-----------_-----_--------_-----------------------------
Priority Habitats and Species (PHS) polygons are labeled with a unigge n•.mber and • symbol, roughly in the
center of the polygon on the map• This PHS Poly number refers to a list of form numbers and species and habitat
codes contained in the PHS Polygot Cross Reference Report (listed below). The form numpers refer to the attached
PHS Polygon Report. This report details each species or habitat depicted as a polygon on the map. For a
C
omplete description of the codes used in this report please refer to the Fish and Wi-, li`e Map Products document.
This document may be viewed on our web site at http://www.wdfw.via.gov/nab/release.htn.
Priority Habitats and Species Polygon - Summary :imbitat and Species List:
This report and the accompanying naps may contain some species or habitats that are not considered priority by
the agency. YES under the `PHS- column in the table below indicates that the species is considered a priority
and is on the Priority Habitats and Species List and/or the Species of Concern List. NO under the -PHS- column
indicates the species/habitat is not considered an agency priority.
State
PHS Status PHS Code Common Name Species Use Species Use Description.
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
YES ESrJR ES-URINE ZONE
YES LAGOON LAGOONS
Priority Habitats and Species Polygon Cross Reference Report:
Form number 900000 indicates presence of PHS is unknown or the area was not mapped. Form numbers 909998, 909997,
or 909996 indicate compilation errors.
PHS Poly# Form# PHS Code`Species Use
_________________________________________________________________________________
2 900000
3 904762 LAGOON•-
4 904711 ESTUR•-
5 904711 ESTURw-
6 904762 LAGOON•-
7 904711 ESTUR'-
E 900000
9 904711 ESTUR•
Information About Wildlife Heritage Point Report
________________--______________________________
Wildlife Heritage points on the map can be referenced to this report by noting the quadpt number where the
point occurs on the map, and then looking up the information listed below. This report is sorted by the quadpt
number and provides details on each species depicted on the map. For a complete description of the codes used
in this report, please refer to the Fish and wildlife Map Products document. `-hie document may be viewed on
our web site at http://www.wdfw.wa.gov/hab/release.htm.
Wildlife Heritage Point - Summary Species List:
This report and the accompanying maps may contain some species or habitats that are not considered priority by
the agency. YES under the •FF.S• column in the table below indicates that the species is considered a priority
and is on the Priority Habitats and Species List and/or the Species of Concern List. NO under the -PHS- column
indicates the species/habitat is not considered an agency priority.
State Species
PHS Status Code Common Name Species Use Species Use Description
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YES. SM ARHE GREAT BLUE HERON B BREEDING OCCURRENCE
YES ST HALE BALD EAGLE B BREEDING OCCURRENCE
YES SC PRSU PURPLE MARTIN B BREEDING OCCURRENCE
Wildlife Heritage Point Report:
Quadpt#: 4712237010 Species Code: HALE Species Use: B Common Name: BALD EAGLE
Date: 19920708 Clash: SA Accuracy: C So' tific Name: HALIAEETUS LEUCOCEPHALUS
State Statue: ST Federal Status: FCo Priority: YES WDFW Region: 6 Verified: V
Township - Range - Section: T21N RO1N SIS NEOPNE Occurrence#: 466 Sequence#: 1
General Description: BALD EAGLE, LOCATED ON N SIDE OF PICKERING PASSAGE NEAR SHORELINE.
NEST TREE 67 INCH DBP. DOUGLAS FIR. NEST 15 FT DOWN FROM THE TOP ON THE SE SIDE
OF THE BOLE.
Quadpt#: 4712237010 Species Code: KALE Species Use: B Common Name: BALD EAGLE -
Date: 20010417 Class: SA Accuracy: C Scientific Name: HALIAEETUS LEUCOCEPHALUS
State Status: ST Federal Status: FCo Priority: YES WDFW Region: 6 Verified: V
Township - Range - Section: T21N R01W S18 SEOFNE Occurrence#: 466 Sequence!: 3
General Description: BALD EAGLE NEST. REBUILT IN SAME TREE AS PREVIOUSY h=, NEST 01.
Quadpt#: 47/2237023 Species Code: HALE Species Use: B Commoc Name: BALD EAGLE
Date: 19970404 Class: SA Accuracy: C Scientific Name: HALIAEETUS LEUCOCEPHALUS
State Status: ST Federal Status: FCo Priority: YES WDFW Region: 6 Verified: V
Township - Range - Section: T21N RO1W S05 SEOFNW Occurrence#: 1164 Sequence#: 1
General Description.: BALD EAGLE NEST IN TALLEST DOUG-FIR IN SMALL REMNANT TIMBER STAND PSURROUND3D BY
GEARED AREAS AND YOJNG MANAGED WREST. NEST IS 25 FT FROM SNAG TOP AT WHORL OF
LIVE BRANCHES ON NW SIDE OF BOLE.
Quadpt4: 4712237027 Species Code: HALE Species Use: B Comon Naas: BALD SAG:.E
Date: 19980409 Class: SA Accuracy: C Scientific Name: HALIAIZ--US LE•JCOCEPHALUS
State Status: ST Federal Status: FCo Priority: YES WDFd Region: 6 Verified: V
Township - Range - Section: T21N R01W S05 NEOFNE Occurrence#: 1164 Sequence#: 2
General Description: BALD EAGLE NEST.
Quadpt#: 4712237033 Species Code: HALE Species Use: B Common Name: BALD EAGLE
Date: 20050409 Class: SA Accuracy: C Scientific Name: KA:.iAEETUS LEUCOCEPHALUS
State Status: ST Federal Status: ?CO Priority: YES h%?W Region: 6 Verified: V
Township - Range - Section: T22N ROIW S29 SBOFSE Occurrence#: 1233 Sequence#: 1
General Description: BALD EAGLE NEST IN DOUGLAS FIR. REST CONSTRUCTION BEGAN LAST 2 WEEKS OF NOV.
1998.
Quadpt#: 4712237041 Species Code: PRSU Species Use: 3 Common Name: PURPLE MARTIN
Date: 19980000 Class: AA Accuracy: C Scientific Name: PROCKE SUBIS
State Status: SC Federal Status: Priority: YES WDFW Region: 6 Verified: V
Township - Range - Section: T21N ROIW S05 NWOFSE Occurrence#: 91 Sequence#: -
General Description: PURPLE MARTIN BOXES INSTALLED 1998.
Quadptt: 4722237042 Species Code: ARHE Species Use: B Camor-Name: GREAT BLUE HERON
Date: 20D20000 Class: SA Accuracy: C Scientific Name: AREEA HERODIAS
State Status: SH Federal Status: Priority: YES NDPW Region: 6 Verified: V
Township - Range - Section: T21N ROIW SOB SEOFNW Occurrence#: 417 Sequence#: 1
General Description: GREAT BLUE HERON COLONY. ACCESSED FROM LOGGING ROAD BEHIND 1940'S RENTAL
HOUSE SW OF THE COLONY. NESTS ON BOTH.. SIDES OF OVERGROWN LOGGING ROAD.
ACTIVE 2002, NESTS IN ALDER.
Quadpt#: 4712237047 Species Code: PALE Species Use: B common Name: BALD EAGLE
Date: 20050412 Class: SA Accuracy: C Scientific Name: F-V--ARETUS LEUCOCEPHALUS
State Status: ST Federal Status: PCO Priority: YES WDFW Region: 6 Verified: V
Township - Range - Section: T22N RO'-W S29 SWIOFSH Occurrence#: 1233 Sequence#: 2
General Description: BALD EAGLE NEST IN LARGE MATURE DOUGLAS FIR 50 FEET WEST OF NEST TREE #1.
Quadpt#: 4712237048 Species Code: HALE Species Use: B Common Name: BALD EAGLE
Date: 20050409 Class: SA Accuracy: C SCientific Name: HALIAEETUS LEUCOCEPHALUS
State Status: ST Federal Status: FCo Priority: YES WDFW Region: 6 Verified: V.
Township - Range - Section: T21H ROIW SIB NW02NE Occurrence#: 466 Sequence#: 4
General Description: BALD EAGLE NEST IN LARGE D-FIR NW OF NESTS 1-3.
Codes Used In Wildlife Heritage Point Report
Quadpt# : A sequentiai rnanber for a point based on a US Geological Survey 7.5-minute quadracgle.
Species Code Alphanumeric code which identifies the species. List of codes are available in the docamentation.
Species Use Criteria that identifies how the area is used by the indicated species. List of codes are available
in the docu entation.
Common Name : Common name of the species.
Date Date of the observation by year, month, and day (yyyy-idd).
Class Code that separates animals into general groups.
AA = Artifical animal (e.g., nest platforms not used yet).
MA = Exotic animal.
GA = Game animal.
NA = No animal found after target specific survey completed.
SA = Special animal (e.g., state listed and monitor species).
ST = Split territory.
ZA= Zapped animal. Site no longer supports original Occurrence.
Accuracy : Mapping accuracy of the site as determined by the individual doing the mapp-_ng.
C = Accurate to within 1/4 mile radius and confirmed by a reliable source.
G= Location known only to a general locality.
N = Accurate to Within one mile radius.
U = Accurate to within 1/4 mile radius and unconfirmed by a reliable source.
Scientific Name : Scientific nasA of the species.
State Status : State listing status of species.
SE = State endangered. SC = State candidate.
ST = State threatened. SM = State monitor.
SS = State sensitive.
Federal Status : Federal _istirg status of species.
FE _ ?ederal endangered. PC = Federal candidate.
FT = Federal threatened. FCo = Federal concern..
Priority : Species and habitats that are considered to be priorities for conservation and management by Washington
Priority Habitats and Species Polygon Report
Fom'.1: 904712 PHS Code: ESTUR Species Use: Coon Name: ESTURINE ZONE
Season: Definition: 0 Accuracy: 3 Scientific Name:
State Status: Federal Status: Priority: YES Site Name:
Genera_ Description: ESTUARINE ZONE-COASTAL ZONE ATLAS OF UASHINGTON-STRONGLY INFLUENCED BY T_HE MA.R1N
E ENVIRONMENT AND CAN 3E DIST-NITJISHED 3Y A BRANCHING CHANNEL PATTERN IN A BROAD
FLAT VALLEY. CZA CODE 511.
Source: COASTAL ZONE ATLAS OF WASHINGTON. STATE OF NASHINGTOV DEFT OF ECOLOGY.
Source Date: 78 Source Code: CZA
Synopsis:
Source: MOLENAAR, DAVE WDPW AREA HABITAT MARINE BIOLOGIST
Source Date: 051500 Source Code: PROF
Synopsis: SITE VISIT TO Y,INTNER COVE/BAY.
Source: SCRIRATO, MARGIN WDFW AREA HABITAT BIOLOGIST
Source Date: 051500 Source Code: PRO?
Synopsis: SITE VISITS TO PIRATES COVE AND MCCLANE COVE.
Form#: 904762 pHs Code: LAGOON species Use: Common Name: LAGOONS
Season: Definition: 0 Accuracy: ' Scientific Name:
State Status: Federal Status: Priority: YES Site Name:
General Description: OPEN LAGOON. COASTAL ZONE ATLAS CODE 562-PARTIALLY ENCLOSED LAGOON ARE COMMON, B
SING FORMED WP.EN FRESHWATER INFLOW HAS MAINTAINED A STREAM CHAILIH-M THROUGH BARS
FORMED BY ALONGSHORE DEPOSITION,
Source: COASTAL ZONE ATLAS OF WASHINGTON. STATZ OF WASHINGTON DEPT OF ECOLOGY.
Source Date: Source Code: CZA
Synopsis:
Codes Used in Priority Habitat and Species Polygon Report
_--------------------------------------------------------
Form# : Unique number that links the information in the reports to features on the map.
PHS Code : This contains a code that identifies the fish and Wildlife species found in the area or the habitat
that occurs there. List of codes are available in the documentation.
Species Use : Criteria that _dentifies how the area is used by the indicated species. List of codes are available
in the documentation. This field is not used if a habitat is described.
Common Name : Conmon name of the species or habitat.
Season : Season of species use. use is indicated by the presence of a non-blank character in one or more por-
tions or sub-strings of the field position.
Position 1: W = Winter use. Position 2: S = spring use.
Position 3: U = Sumner use. position 4: F = Fall use.
Position 5: S = Severe winter use.
Definition : Identifies the definitions or criteria used to classify the area as a priority. List of codes are
available in the documentation.
Accuracy : Mapping accuracy of the line delineation as determined by the mapper.
1 =Accurate Within a 1/4 mile. 3 = Location known to within one mile.
2 = Accurate within a 1/2 mile. 4 = Location known to general locality only.
Scientific Name : Scientific name of the species.
State Status : State listing status of species.
SE = State endangered. SC =State candidate.
ST = State threatened. SM = State monitor.
SS = State sensitive.
Federal Status : Federal listing status of species.
FE = Federal endangered. FC Federal candidate-
PT = Federal threatened. FCo = Federal concern.
Priority : Species and habitats that are considered to be priorities for conservation and management by Washington
Department of ?iah and Wildlife (WDFW). For a copy of the mast current Priority Habitats and Species List contact
WDFW pHs Section at (360)902-2543, or it is available on our web site at http://WwW.wdfw.wa.gov/hab/phspage.htm.
YES = Indicates that the species is considered a WDFW priority and is on the Priority Habitat and Species List
and/or Species of Concern List.
NO - Indicates that the species is not a WDPW priority.
Site Name : Name assigned to the area based generally on a local. place nane.
Oapartdeptrsofi$iWnandDWikdi�fao34:&Bidbt tEaraaea9pinofuabagmbee Car£sras8d4-4Lndtyhyalbitatsiopdr8peaies L'st contact
WDFF! PNS Secton at (360)902-2543, or it _s available on our web site at '�ttp://www.wdfw.wa.gov/habiphspage.hta.
S88reelzdtdatea`tba=ambedeDeeibesiaheoaatieeaedeapda66bpaiouftyhandn:axsattba eviaribydiftbitbb 4M". pecaeawhieb
and/nap$pediag:efoEbaoBrtipt&stources nay be cited.
NO = Indicates =hat the species is not a WDFW priority_
Source Date Date of source of information.
WDFW Region Tnis contains the WDFW administrative region number 1 through 6.
Source Code Code identifying the source of in`_o_-sation.
verified : Verification code for an observation.
VynoV*1ifieGrbrfana4liabia da9CeabiW0WAUXtwapWSOaroehef aaencrabioiogist.
U = Not verified by a reliable source, or identification of species is uncertain.
1 = Confirved grizzly bear or wolf observation.
2 = Pro'able grizzly bear or wolf observation.
Township - Range - Section : The legal_ description of the species occurrence.
Occurrence# : An ascensior. catalog number that combined w--tn sequence number identifies a unique record within a
species.
Sequence# : Occurrences with multiple locations of a species.
General Description Description of location of a species.
I
M S.'
-®e732237023
t•
o
t
$ Rom(
Y
Washington Departwt Of Fish and Wildlife YAP IEGENO
AND S P L I Priority liabitatslSpecies: OIhe2 Hahiutospeci-
IN THE VICINITY Of i71HIW SECTION 5 plll t`§OCR o'"�e"ai1e�
n.►Seal.- I:It" ��C•dai
.o.,d,W,S,ste¢-Slat.Pln.Sell Inl 54e6(RAM) fz� Ra,NEI H h p pollb
>r.duti..S.t,-ap,il 23.208
Up W,igced h,UPI!hl—ti..Teela.legy S....ce,rl5
aq rllAil�I2 0 Prixj'H"d
!li,1.,p av3l,le In 1.0,31E:Se:1f11211"'•i ler ge.e.rlSpolled
*bW N:rdd F h (odhwAli�WWgmed Gda
A,.Lpw 4P•Irn.l;i,h,tl anu.{Wq aw 4n fe.fl 1.< ( T ) w G,d.
r..f<. n°O9H1�
lu«lil, w`nr .i4«.In �•r,~i`:k i:.i�l:: la s ow Sk la
dled adled 5010 *.d
rri N fuul<4fwu..,r i«w«r •:ni..ii uy«u 4 # qle 94.FS) TnNQ
.t,f0uh1,« •+,r3 I.rr.le.l ie'i 'l rrwif.l„1,IN.,14,e i.. 5o� od 63co.b.
r. «4<« .� ...«•+.,.4 s (dsdd 011ie,S ebols:
SkM e)
«.....«.. P ra A."—.�P mn Fl—.d Slrr,..d
Sill,�.............:„•,«•i.s :i.�:«. �. e. ..<. t1AAN SA n olfi
1 w I°e2y to I
ed—,Wh*h aruy Sii u.
I.rx ail
. ..i .:•iKir`:±:x .w�.i.�...M...........«.wn 1. a�iam
.L^ 4i1�.'ai:'�4°"i'i.a �S•i'�5:: O.T..
J..P m m—i.i:..
aI`�'.:F::.':::^.«.. ... w,`si...•s.,.'..e..i.,r....r-.,.. O LLS t
f::.:i�•.«:.Ki:il�l.e.i«a c..:w:«:s...w
"HINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FIST AND WILDL_F3
PRIORITY FISH REPORT FROM THE WASHINGTON LAKES AND RIVERS I,FORMATION SYSTEM (WLR=S) DATABASE
FOR TOWNSHIP T21R01W, SECTION 5
Report Date: April 23, 2006
Information About The Fisn Presence Report
__________________________________________
The fist information in this report only includes information that Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife
(WDFW) maintains in a central computer database. This information only documents the location of important
fish resources to the best of our knowledge. It is not a complete inventory of the fish species in the state.
Fish are identified as priority by WDPW if they meet one of three criterion as listed ir. the Priority Habitats
and Species List. The list is available by contacting WDFW Priority Habitats and Species section at (360)902-
2543, or it is available on our web site at `ittp=//�.wdfw.wa.gov/hab/phspage_htm. To insure appropriate use
of =his information users are encouraged to consult with WDF-W bio=.gists.
Streams with presence of priority anadromous and resident fish species from the WLRIS database are highlighted
on the accompanying map. Due to the complexity of displaying linear features individual species that utilize
each river reach are not distinguishable. If more species specific information is needed, users should request
individual species maps, digital data, or contact the WLRIS database manager.
State status -n_`ormation is not available in the ALMS database for these species. Please see WDFW Species of
Concern List for current statue. For a copy of this list, contact WDF19 Endangered species Section at (360)902-
2515, or it is available on our web site at http://w .wdfw.wa.gov/wlm/diverstY!soc/soc.htm.
Priority Anadromous Fish Presence:
Code Common Kame Stream Name Stream LLID Record Date i
_____________________________________________ --------________--_-------__-_____----________-_--____- }
CHMF Fall Chum Sherwood Creek 1228311473769 07-07-12
CHMS Susmer Chum Sherwood Creek 1228311473769 07-07-12
COHO Coho Salmon - Sherwood Creek 1228311473769 07-07-12
STWI winter Steelhead Sherwood Creek 1228311473769 07-01-12
CHMF Fall Chum stream names) not in database 1228319473528 07-07-12
CHKF Fall Chum Stream name(a) not in database 1228501473581 07-07-12
CHMF Fall Chum Stream name(s) not in database 1228653473202 07-07-12
CHMF Fall Chun Stream name(s) not in database 1228664473187 07-07-12
COBO Coho Salmon Strean name(s) not in database 1228319473528 07-07-12
CORO Coho Salmon Stream name(s) not in database 1228502473581 07-07-12
COHO Coho Salmon Stream name(8) not in database 1228653473202 07-07-12
COHO Coho Saloon Strean name(s) not in database 1228664473187 07-07-12
Priority Resident Fish Presence:
Code Common Name Stream Name Stream LLID Record Date
________________________ _-_-_______--_------__-_______---_--_-_-_________-____-_--_-__---------_____
RST Rainbow Trout Sherwood Creek 1228311473769 07-07-12
Codes used In The Fish Presence Report
--------------------------------------
Code : WDFW alphanumeric code that identifies the fish species.
Common Name Coasnon name of the fish species.
Stream Name Stream name based on the US Geological- Survey, Geographic Names Information System database.
Stream LLID unique stream identifier (ID) generated from the node latitude and longitude located at a stream's
mouth. This ID is to be construed only as an ID, and not necessarily as a reference to a stream's location.
Record Date Date record was added or modified in the database.
I
1
1,
i
f.
a
Washington DepBrtne¢t o1 Fish Edsal TYildlife YAr tecENo
BALD EAGLE Bald Eagle Idotnation: Othe,Symbols:
BUFFER MANAGEMENT ZONE MAP S/a / ) losftt`
IN THE VICINITY Of TIIEOIW SECTION 5 c C,dlhxdA Sdm Lin
(�adr.tsar/Oranau/Sep:xe)
BI!Scale-I:z{,ODa
Q..Cast.sy't--Sla le P....5a.1\I...56z6(6AD27) c--Sxa:km is,,u!Is INtld.d la NC,t..deleni.e itf4•-
Pr.da.ti.a Dale-ADrH BI.E1DD .e .1!N.:atle:i .eNN f• (( !r IrcNY-
Bap Deaiacad by IBF1 IV.—Lib.T.ch,.I.a7 S...ices 613 1Ii1 lnteslltl I•1 NI«n MNl.glw arl.rl.[.I.T HA
/m(m:as DMe .119erglnrlW ubl.I'Yae Lr l�rli6eyinsl.Wl.l�i111,1.1
bald nqp1.aJnl1�l.1 btlllell 1.4.I'll Nrlr all Ndletln
® ;,i(ml ad$trthk IredN.i1T rIYN n11.n,. let tow. YOFR.tb 111.11:
Yed De(e •dt...,.„.I.w�l.lrllTl.u{wldeaBla lLsl��ruDel.I.w
nEaR W:1
p.,4(od f N1 1 i�ii#N.1�«.sl.i'�®iir��« ....I.«MN 4.i•,.«.ale v:1�L��Aa Amd hIN I
r.•.oe1.i «.r.a:�u.i..��l..rl•�:1e'�l:i r• � 1
..III.«... #
.. i
......... ....
•c.n,•« e:..........
.«w.Na
.Hite.«�'r:� .•..n�.:�::x,�I."' ::f:� .u..l. AREA IOCdT10\
« i.l..«.Il•I11.... ................
•ln ...:. 0 0.5 1
Ia Mla LYCfS !r,,
Ia.�N•Nl.d.tl.'iw..i ii`flii'wi i�I:1�IM•.Itl,.e r.«
1.5-.�.i�ins ! ,mil,:iw�I.G w I � .a•«r.r«. L7f$
Appendix E Bald Eagle Site Management Plan
01--N 1 Uh tc.;ULUIaY, 1-'tF25l.MYIVtL bb.�
er �
A
s � g
to
STATE OF WASHINGTON
DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY
P.O. Rox 47;r75 • Olympla, Wa6hington 98504-7775 (360) 467-6300
October 13, 1999
As. Pam 13onnett-Curn III ills
Courthouse Building 1
411 N. 511i
P.O. Box 578
Shelton, WA 98584
Subject: Grapeview Wetland and Stream Rostoration,
Dear Me. Bennett-Cumming:
The purpose of this letter is to provide a summary of my September 16, 1999 field review of the
above referenced property with you and the property owner,Mr. Glen Jurges. This letter will
also serve as my response to the July 29, 1999 wetland/stream restoration report and conceptual
mitigation plan(hereafter referred to as "the B&A report")and July 29, 1999 cover letter
prepared by Bredburg and Associates,Inc. The B&A report was prepared in response to the
concerns raised by any colleague,Perry Lund, in his April 16, 1999 letter to you.
Mr. .lurges requested a site visit in order to receive feedback from the County and Ecology on the
proposed location and concept for wetland mitigation. Since I recently took over this project
from Perry Lund, a secondary objective of mine was to become oriented to the site. We walked
along MO wetland and stream restoration areas and wetland A impact area within tho southern
tracts and walked the areas of proposed wolland mitigation and of a proposed access road in the
northern tracts.
Observatlons in Southern Tracts
Area A.
Figure 4 of the B&A report shows area A as having an 85-fool buffer, In Perry's letter to the
County, he observod that this buffer had only been replanted to a width of approximately 45 foot.
No additional plants had been placed by the time of our September 16, 1999 site visit, While this
is an 8540 t buffer, it is not being treated as such. The entire buffer area needs to be planted to
restore this area from the previous disturbance,
Additionally,as Perry forewarned,much of the plantings that were placed within this buffer area
did not survive the summer. In surveying this area, 1 noted that approximately 40M.of the planted
firs had died. A layer of mulch or topsoil and irrigation would likely have been helpful in
l)r0VeII1in8 tills mortality, On the positive sido, sonno red alder saplings (I did not count them)
have voluntecrcd in this area.
Complete performance standards for restoration of this buffer area have yet to be agreed upon, let
along proposed, However,Perr/r,letter suggested 90% survival of all planted species after the
10/1,31 Uth'I uh tI,ULLAz1Y P t tK5UNNt:L iuei
Ms. Bennett Cumming
October 13, 1999
Page 2
first growing season. And,this suggestion was incorporated Into the B&A report(page 9). I
would add the additional condition that If planted species did not survive but were replaced,in
.equal or greater numbers,by naturally colonized, native woody species,that would be acceptable.
Given this, I recommend that the area be surveyed for survival of plantings and naturally-
colonized native saplings. if additional plantings are needed to reach the 90% survival standard,
those should be put in place this fall, along with the plantings still required in tite outer
approximately 40 feet of this buffer,
Area B
This area had been planted with dogwood and fir. Curiously, most of the fir did not survive,
whereas most of the dogwood slid survive. I did not observe naturally colonized plants within
this area. Again,this area was devoid of topsoil or mulch,which, had it been present,may have
improved survival of the fir.
As with Area A, this area needs to be replanted. Plantings should be Installed this fall, in order to
allow the wintdr months for roots to establish.
Stream Corridor
,The stream flows through a wetland corridor approximately 30 feet wide. This area had standing
water during this September site visit aaid was vegetated with cattail, soft-rush, and sedges. This
area meets the criteria for a.Category III wetland, in addition to a Type 5 stream.
While on site,I suggested that the buffer may aced to be increased to 50 feet(as required by the
County for a Category III wetland), In speaking with Perry fund and upon receiving input fi-om
A.J. Bredburg, via Mr.Jurges, it seems that this wetiand area may have developed, or at least
expanded, in response to the stream restoration work that was done here. However, you have
informed me that tine Corps of Engineers did identify this area as a "disturbed riparian wetland".
I do not]lave the benefit of having seen the site prior to the disturbance, and historical aerial
photographs do not provide the detail that would be needed to discern riparian wetland areas from
non-wetland areas. I call only respond to historical accounts others have provided me and to my
observations of current conditions,
1f, in fact,the wetland area expanded in response to the stream butler restoration, it would be
unfair to requite that the restored area now be afforded greater buffers. However, if this wetland
area expanded in response to the unauthorized stream clearing activities,that should be
considcrcd a consequence for which the landowner would now be responsible. Generally,
Ecology recommends that wetlands unintentionally created from other land uses should be
regulated as wetlands. This guidance may apply in this situation,
Given the uncertainty over this issue,I would recommend that the County accept the 25-ft. buffer
for restoration purposes. However for futum fund use actions,tills area should be recognized as
the type 5 stream and category III wetiand that it is, and buffered accordingly. That is, all land
uses should respect�the 50-ft.wetland buffer for category)if wetlands.
Ova
While onsite,Mr.Jurges Inquired Into the possibility of removing dead trees and dead and
downed logs from within the wetland buffers. As I.stated at the time, this Is strongly discouraged.
Dead and downed trees and other woody vegetation are an essential component of a wetland and
lid/1 Si Jy 1�;�y UtN I Ut- tI.ULUUY r 1'tNbLir-4NLL
Ms.Bennett-Cumming
October 13, 1999
Page 3
wetland buffer system, They provide nesting, forage, and refuge for all kinds of wetland
organisins, from bacterla and invertebrates,to insectivorous and cavity nesting birds and
manimals. Decaying woody material also sorvos as an essential source of organic matter to the%
wetland ecosystem. Downed woody vegetation within the buffer also increases the uppurtunity to
limit'intrusion by people and pets into the wetland, as well as the opportunity for the wetland
buffer to detain and filter surface water flows prior to discharge into the wetland,
'A revised.wetland and buffer mitigation report is needed which identifies that the objective of the
buffer replanting effort is to revgetate the wetland and stream buffer areas, to the width required
by the Mason County Resource Ordinance, with native woody vegetation, with the goal being to
facilitate the redevelopment of a native forest community within this area. The report also needs
to include performance standards that can be measured to ensure achievement of this goal and
objective.
while a planting plan for the wetland buffer restoration areas was provided in.the B&A report
(figures 5 aiid 6), additional eloments which should be identified in the buffer restoration plan
include a(planting schedule, and vegetation maintenance treasures. The application of mulch
should be included as a measure to ensure success of(tic planting plan, Planting should occur
within the next few months: this is the best time of the year to plant woody vegetation, as it
provides the plantings with several months of wet oonditions, in which to establish root systems.
Observations in Northern Tracts
The concept of creating or restoring wetlands in the SE corner of Block 23 in the northern tracts rryr�
appoars reasonable, The area Mr.Jurges identified is in a recently logged area adjacent to 11? Gf0 .
existing wetlatds. It was evident that soil had, in fact, bee+) pushed into wetlands in this area.
Given that,this is an excollcnt location to create or restore wetlands. Hydric soils arc likely to ho
found immediately under fill material; wetland hydrology is present; the chance of success is
high.
However,beforo this site may be used for mitigation it must be verified this wetland fill was
either authorized or exempt from wetland regulation, if this was an illegal wetland fill, the
current landowner may be responsible for this violation, which means that the restoration of this
area would not be available as mitigation.
Also,on-site wetland mitigation is preferred to off--site mitigation in cic'cumslauces wlaGru there is
an opportunity to provide meaningful, viable on-site mitigation, "On-siteJs yggl}p1X g� �
The goal, however, should be to identify compensatory wetland mitigation that is as close as
possible to the wetland disturbance. In all cases, compensatory mitigation should be provided at
least within ilro same drainagb basin, Opportunities to provide mitigation for wetland impacts in
ttte southern tracts should be sought in the southern tracts before looking in the area of the
northern tracts.
Other Remaining Issues
Perry's April 16 letter discussed the need for performance standards: criteria for determining the
successor failure of the restoration and mitigation efforts, The B&A report identifies some
performance standards(page 9): to achieve 90%survival of plantings by the end of the first
growing season and 80%coverage by native trees and shrubs after five years. These are
10i13i95 12.30 DEPT OF ECOLOGY, PERSONNEL 005
N
Me.Bennett Cumming
'October 13, 1999
Page 4
:aC-Ceptable standards, but more Is needed, The performance standards need to be expatrded in
ordac to address fire goals and objectives of the wetland mitigation plan,as those are fleshed out,
For Instance, if a goal of the wetland mitigation is to replace all habitat for wetland dependant
species and an objective is to retain and provide nesting and forage habitat for cavity nesting and
insectivores birds, an appropriate perfutmence standard would be to have 5 retained or artificially
placed snags, or similar habitat,per acre and documented use by thusu species targeted.
The report needs to include goals and obiectives of wetland and stream restoration/tnitigation and
performance standards by which achievement of those goals and objectives can be measured. We
would refer Mr, Jurges and his consultant to the Ecology publication(Publication #94-29),
Guidellnes for Developing Freshwater Wetlands Mitigation plans and Proposals. The best
examples ofwctland mitigation plans are those which have followed these guidelines,
Copies of the National Wetland inventory(NWI)map section should be included with the
Mitigation report, I'lie NWI map will better reflect landscape surroundings and position of the
subject site than drawings that have been submitted to date. This information is valuable in
identifying appropriate mitigation sites.
The B&A Ikeport needs to be appended. I recognize that the goal of this plan was to present only
A conceptual scheme for wetland mitigation, in order to receive Ecology feedback. Now that this
feedback has been provided, it is now necessary for this report.to bo completed.
I an,happy to provide this twhnieal assistance to the County and must apologize for the time it
has taken io get this to you. Being down one wetland stafi'person, 1 am finding more work to be
piling up than usual at this time. Please call me, at(360)407-6221, if you have any questions
with this letter. Of course, 1 am available 1.0 review the final restoration and mitigation plan for
this site,
Sincerely
Ann-Boeholt
Wetland Speeinlist
Shorclaxrds and Environmental
Assistance Program
cc; Lori Morris, U,S. Atnty Corps.of Engineers
i�
I
i
�/mot/yam
r!. sTArq
Is 2
STATE OF WASHINGTON /� /0
DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY `i�: l�'oQ /mac//y�
P.O. Box 47775 • Olympia, Washington 98504-7775 (360) 407-6300
April 16, 1999
Pam Bennett-Cumming
Courthouse Building 1
411 N. 5th
P.O.Box 578
Shelton,WA 98584
Subject: Grapeview Wetland/Stream Restoration
Dear Ms.Bennett-Cumming:
As promised,here is a summary of my findings from our field visit to the Richard Scott property located near
Grapeview. We visited the site on Monday, 12 April 1999 with the Corps of Engineers as well as with Mr. Scott
and his associates. You asked me to evaluate the restoration work that has been implemented on the site in response
to previous unpermitted work,and the wetland analysis that was conducted by the consultant for Mr. Scott, B&A
Inc.,for the remainder of the site.
The species composition of the plantings for the restoration work appear appropriate for the region and planting
densities are adequate to ensure coverage as the individual plants mature. However,the absolute lack of
groundcover and topsoil on the site raise serious concerns about the short-term survival of these plants. The surface
temperature will be raised significantly in the hot sun of summer. Without intensive and constant irrigation,I would
expect many of these planted trees and shrubs to die.
The Wetland Report(BA#3016,November 10, 1998)indicated that annual monitoring reports would be sent to the
County. However,criteria for determining the success or failure of the restoration effort were not provided,nor
were contingency measures to implement in the case of project failure. These requirements are essential in order for
the County to be able to determine the immediate and long-term success of this project. A five-year monitoring plan
is generallZ required with plant survival(e.g.,90%survival of all planted individuals after the first growing season)
as the success criterion for the-first year and area coverage as the ultimate measure of success(e.g., 80%coverage
from native trees and shrubs after five years). ?
Please let me know if you would like my help in developing appropriate monitoring and contingency requirements -
for this project. As was noted in thefield,the Corps of Engineer's requirements to correct the violation extended {�.1,r �
only to the implementation of the restoration plan(which was determined to be successful). The review and follow- 4,;
up to the monitoring reports provided by Mr.Scott or his consultant will be the responsibility of on County..--
The Wetland Report does state that"monitoring plans on a yearly basis will be provided to Mason County."Also,
"performance7m—aintenance assurance devices will be provided per the requirements of Mason County." 6(
(B&A#3016,page 6). Again,no specific criteria were offered. Rather, I would view this as a request by Mr. Scott
for the County to set the goals and requirements for him to meet. There are perform ance�oals that are used �W
frequently for wetland and buffer restoration project monitoring; I can provide you with this information if you need
As pointed out in the B&A Wetland Report,the standard buffer for a Calory II wetland in Mason County is 85
feet. The standard buffer for a Type 5 stream is 25 feet. "Wetland D" is where the buffer restoration was
implemented. Wetland D was given a rating of Category II using the Washington State Wetlands Rating System
(pub.#93-74). The site map in the Report(Figure 4) indicates an 85-foot buffer,as does the planting plan(Figure
5). However, our site investigation showed that a buffer of approximately 45 feet was planted. The text of the
Report(page 6,par. 2) indicates that only a 4-0-foot buffer was expected. If the intent of the restoration effort was to
bring this project into compliance with County requirements(i.e.,an 85-foot buffer),then it is my opinion that this
was not accomplished.
TU
tt; �,U L�x Z.•i7f
Ms. Bennett-Cumming C �4'7
April 16, 1999 r�i 1 1' ��" �5 CLz
Page 2
` e
Four wetlands were identified on the site and rated using the Rating System,Wetland A,B,C,and D. They were v 4'
rated as follows: Wetlands A,Category III, 1'3 points; Wetl d B,Category II1, 14 points; Wetland C,Category III,
—14 points; Wetland D,Category 11,30 points. The primary�ason for the low scores for wetlands A,B,and C was V
that they were shown to be small,isolated wetlands with little or no species and habitat diversity. My site review
showed me that wetlands B and C were, in fact, an extensidn of wetland D. They should share the Category II rating
and the 85-foot buffers. Even though it does not change the rating of Category II, I also found evidence of greater
plapt species richness and habitat diversity than was indicated in the B&A Report;this would result in a higher point
score.
The stated purpose of the on-site work is to restore the altered buffers and mitigate the crossing of wetland areas
(B&A#3016,page 5). Mr. Scott stated that some fill had already been placed in wetland A because he was told it
was too small for the County to regulate. This may be correct, it may also be correct that the fill in wetland A would---
qualify for a Nationwide Permit from the Corps of Engineers and the Department of Ecology. However,all wetland /1 I�V-Q{Z;
impacts must be identified prior to project approval so we can address them with a comprehensive review. So,while
the impact to wetland A might be small, it should be added to the"pot'when considering the total pro'eJ et im,
and subsequent mitigation requirements.
Another issue I would like to clarify is the discussion on page 5 regarding the creation of additional wetland along
wetland D adjacent to Ninth Street. The Wetland Report states that"for all practical purposes,5,000 square feet of �l
wetlands will be created"and that an additional 12,000 square feet is available. What the report fails to mention, Pe j
however, is that this area is already part of the buffer that is being restored. If it is in fact wetland,the location of rf
the buffer should move accordingly. If additional wetlands were created here for the purpose of mitigation,the ,t,C�y✓
present location of Ninth Street would prohibit the placement of buffers. It is not likely that we would approve a Y�
mitigation plan under those conditions.
I'hope this information is helpful to you. Please let me know if I can be of any more assistance.
Si cerely,
Perry J. Luncr
Wetlalids/Shorelands Specialist
Shorelands and Environmental
Assistance Program
cc: Mr.Richard Scott
,
a
x
t
_
aft`
.-
�-
s
a �
'* _ RAPEVIEWILOOP R
4
}
t
N
to (U(0) 4g
,
f E GRAPEVIEW PIOIN7% ��
S
`�l�ll
dat.R 0111IL11 r\CY15CU COMIC rIO11.UVU _ rGI�C 1
I
.M?'
Al
w
WASHINGfON DEPARTMENT OF FISH ANT)WILDLIFE
BALD EAGLE SITE MANAGEMENT PLAN
RCW 77.12.655,WAC 232-12-29?. MOW
EAGLE TERRITORY. Fair Harbor Occurrence# 1164 Nest#
rlplslicant Property(T,R.,S} Pendina Activity j
JUROES ENTERPRISES INC T2 I NR I WS5 Detroit Blocks Home sites,roads,water
2020 ENETAI MACH DR as modified by ALA p 07-92 system,storm rater
BREMERTON,WA 9831.0 Recordings 1913847&19138.48 facilities,septic systems t
and utilities
1
FACTORS CONSIDERED
1) Landowners goals were considered through a review of the permit application andlor site
visits conducted on 5/01/08.
2) Bald eagle habitat use was considered by analysis of territory integrity through time,current
surrounding habitat conditions,current status of the population and scientific literature
concerning bald eagle habitat protection.
CONDITIONS
1)The eagle nest tree(72"dbh Douglas fir)and all other standing trees in the old.Block 44 of
Detroit#2 shall not be cut or destroyed. This restriction applies only to that portion of the new
Lots .1,2,3,7 and 17 created by BLA#07-82 located in the old Block 44 of Detroit#2.
DURATION OF PROTECTION
'17ie following may not apply to eagle habitat dial is protected by conservation easement,
covenant,or dedication. 'The Plan applies to the landowner who signs the Plan. If the ownership
changes,the new owner may sign the Plan or rtuest a new one to reflect a cbatrge in land use.
Since eaglessetu n to#hc same4raditi(mal use areas each year,tha.atnditions oftbis Plan shall
apply indefinitely,unless a breeding territory o•communal roost has been unoccupied for 5
consecutive years. At 5 years,the WDFW wf:ll review the plan and determine whether continued I
protection is needed.Please contact WDFW if the eagles change the location of their nest. Do
not assume that the conditions of this Plan.no longer apply.
I
1
f
I
Ha9p 2-
REVIEW AND AMENDMENT
This Plan will be subject to the following review and amendment proettivres. The Plan may be
reviewed periodically by the WDFW and.the landowner to determine whether: 1)the Plan
requires amendment in response to changing eagle and landowner circumstances;or,2)the terms
of the Plan comply with applicable laws and regulations;or,3)the parties to the Plan are
complying with its terms.
APPEAL PROCEDURE
In addition to the provisions of WAC 232-12-292(7.1)-(7.3),the landownermay request a
formal appeal of WDFW actions according to the Administrative:Procedures Act,Chapter 34.05
RCW,mid the Model Rules of Procedure,Cbapter 10.08 WAC. Such a request shall be filed
with the Department within 30 days of receipt of the contested WDFW decision. The appeal
request shall be addressed to the director and clearly state the relief sought and the grounds for
the appeal,
COMPLIANCE
Failure to comply with this Plan constitutes a misdemeanor as set forth in RCW 77,15.130.
However,compliance with this plan.does not ensure compliance with the Endangered Species
Act or other federal,state or local laws. This Plan applies only to the proposed land uses listed
above. Any other proposals may be subject to a different set of conditions. It is the Imidowner's
responsibility to notify the Department of any new proposed land use activities.
SIGNATURES
Izindowner Signature: ......... Date:
Landowner Name(Print): 147 --W—e
Address, d;zc> 6=&&-Z*
Plan written by: Greg Schimto Date:05/01/08
Regional Wildlife Manager, Date:
2
...............
Page 1 of
Glen Jurges
From: "John Konovsky" <jonovsky@squaxin.nsn.us>
To: "Glen Jurges"<gfjurges@prodigy.net>
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 8:35 AM
Subject: Water Right Application
Glen, I have completed a review of the available information about your
development proposal,water right application and the stream/habitat
characteristics in the vicinity of your property. Anion usage of ft
fream is unlikely because of the head cut below the beaver dam and the R
14tk of spawning gravel in the streams On their annual migrations,
salmon may use the pocket estuary created when the culvert was replaced.
Until the hydrogeo study is complete and the impact of water withdrawals
for your proposal quantified, I cannot really give any definitive
opinions about how Squaxin will react.
'W&most I can say is that the lack of current salmon use makes the r
impact of your proposal less of a concern. But please don't mistake
that statement as Squaxin will have no concern. I think what it means
is that there are no serious roadblocks to your proposal, but Squaxin
may suggest mitigation measures commensurate with the proposed impacts
to water levels. Hope that helps your decision-making process. John K.
John Konovsky
Environmental Program Manager
Squaxin Island Tribe
2952 SE Old Olympic Hwy
Shelton, WA 98584
TEL(360)432-3804
CEL (360)951-7379
EMAIL jkonovs (a squaxm.nsn.us
1/29/2007
WETLAND DELINEATION REPORT
Grapeview Loop Road Improvements
Grapeview, Washington
Prepared for
Skillings and Connolly, Inc.
5016 Lacey Boulevard SE
Lacey, Washington 98503
and
Mason County Department of Public Works
411 North Fifth Street
Shelton, Washington 98584
Prepared by
Herrera Environmental Consultants, Inc.
2200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 601
Seattle, Washington 98121
Telephone: 206/441-9080
November 2, 2001
� I o Legend ad
g End
3O Wetland number projec
18
Open water
— Creek channel
17
16
Puget
Sound
15
rU ror, ws
�j
c� o
b 4
p +
Oakdale Street
a)
14 �
a
reasure Is/ ad U
13
a 11 12
10
G�
I-A
8
7
� 4
Stretch Is/ nd
boa 4 I 5 6 0 Stretch
0
3 Island
2 II °'
y o
� 1
0
Start
project -
E HERRM
Not to scale
-� ENVIRONMENT/
- CONSULTANT
Figure 3. Approximate locations of wetlands within the Grapeview Loop Road improvement
project corridor.
Wetland Delineation Report—Grapeview Loop Road Improvements
Methods and Materials
Review of Existing Information
A literature review was performed to identify potential wetland areas near the project site prior to
on-site observations. Information collected specifically for this wetland delineation report
includes the following:
■ Topographic map of the project vicinity (USGS 1994)
Descriptions of the upper Case Inlet watersheds, stream numbering and
names, and locations of tributary channels (Williams et al. 1975)
■ National Wetland Inventory(NWI)map of wetland areas within the
project area(USFWS 1973)
■ Soil Conservation Service soil survey maps and soils descriptions for the
project area(USDA 1960)
■ Aerial photographs of the project area obtained from the University of
Washington map collections (University of Washington 2000)
■ The Mason County development regulations (Mason County 2000)
■ Construction base maps of project area showing stationing, drainage
features, and the locations of infrastructure (Skillings and Connolly 2000).
Wetland Delineation
This delineation was performed in accordance with the Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation
Manual(Environmental Laboratory 1987). The manual's three-parameter approach used to
identify and delineate wetlands relies on the presence of field indicators for hydrophytic
vegetation, hydric soils, and hydrology. Methodologies stated in the routine method
(Environmental Laboratory 1987)were followed to perform the wetland delineation.
To evaluate field conditions and identify potential wetlands, scientists walked along both !
shoulders of Grapeview Loop Road for the length of the project. In each area that appeared to
have wetland characteristics, data on dominant plant species, soil conditions in test pits, and
evidence of hydrologic conditions were recorded on routine wetland data forms. Adjacent
upland areas were also examined. Based on these data, a wetland/non-wetland determination
was made for each area examined.
November 2, 2001 7 Herrera Environmental Consultants
Wetland Delineation Report—Grapeview Loop Road Improvements
Potential wetland areas within the project area were identified as distinct vegetation units to
which the three parameters listed above were applied. A vegetation unit is an area determined to
have similar physical or plant characteristics. Features such as species uniformity, species
dominance, distinct topographic breaks, and obvious similarities in soil or hydrologic indicators
are factors that define a vegetation unit. Following the confirmation of all three wetland _
parameters, wetland boundaries were delineated by placing orange fluorescent flagging along the
perimeter. The wetland boundaries have been surveyed by Skillings and Connolly, Inc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation
Hydrophytic vegetation has the ability to grow, effectively compete, reproduce, and/or persist in
anaerobic soil conditions that have resulted from periodic or long-term saturation. Numerous field
indicators of hydrophytic vegetation may be used, but the most common indicator is when more
than 50 percent of the dominant species in each vegetation unit have a wetland indicator status of
obligate wetland, facultative wetland, or facultative (Table 1) (Environmental Laboratory 1987).
Dominant species are those that contribute more than other species to the character of a plant
community. To determine dominance, plant species are divided into three strata: trees, shrubs, and
herbaceous species. Dominance is measured by one of three factors (height, areal cover, or basal
area) for each stratum. For this study, dominance was recorded as a percentage of areal cover for
each species within its stratum. Plant identification was based on taxonomy listed in Flora of the
Pacific Northwest(Hitchcock and Cronquist 1987) and Cooke (1997). The indicator status of each
plant species is based on the region 9 plant list(Corps 1994).
Table 1. Plant indicator status
Indicator
Indicator Status Symbol Definition
Obligate wetland plants OBL Plants that occur almost always(estimated probability>99%)in
wetlands under natural conditions,but which may also occur
rarely(estimated probability<I%)in non-wetlands.
Facultative wetland plants FACW Plants that usually occur(estimated probability>67%)in wetlands
under natural conditions,but also occur (estimated probability 1%
to 33%) in non-wetlands.
Facultative plants FAC Plants with a similar likelihood(estimated probability 33%to
67%)of occurring in both wetlands and non-wetlands.
Facultative upland plants FACU Plants that sometimes occur(estimated probability 1%to 33 %)in
wetlands, but occur more often(estimated probability>67%to
99%) in non-wetlands.
Obligate upland plants UPL Plants that rarely occur(estimated probability<1%)in wetlands
under natural conditions.
Source: Environmental Laboratory(1987). e
Hydric Soils
Hydric soils are defined as soils that are wet, saturated, or ponded long enough during the
growing season to develop anaerobic conditions in the upper strata(USDA 1988). Hydric soils
vp/ /00.0/6J1-INX1 ontlnnAdelinraJnn.duc
Herrera Environmental Consultants 8 November 2, 2001
Wetland Delineation Report—Grape view Loop Road Improvements
data were obtained by digging test pits at least 16 inches dee
p and four inches wide and
comparing the soil color(hue, value, and chroma) to chips in the Munsell Color Book
(Kollmorgen 1988). Soils with low value and chroma typify hydric conditions. Additional
pertinent field indicators were recorded, such as mottling, gleying, concretions,odor presence,
high organic content, and streaking of subsurface horizons.
Hydrology
Wetland hydrology was assessed based on the presence or evidence of water for a significant
period (of at least seven days and usually more than two weeks) during the growing season of an
average rainfall year. Hydrology indicators include flowing water, standing water, and saturated
soils. Other characteristics may include drainage patterns, water marks, driftlines, sediment
deposition, stream gage data and flood predictions, and historic records.
Wetland Function Assessment
Methods used to complete a functional assessment of wetlands typically involve the
identification and evaluation of physical attributes that provide predictive rather than direct
measurement of specific ecological functions of concern(Reimold 1994). The assessment
method used in this study is based on the Wetland and Buffer Functions Semi-Quantitative
Assessment Methodology, Final Draft User's Manual(Cooke 2000). This method is adapted
from a system developed by Reppert et al. (1979) but modified for northwest wetland
ecosystems. The revised rating form is presented in tabular format and provides an efficient
screening technique for a variety of wetland functions and values. Wetland characteristics are
categorized into three groups: low,medium, and high quality classes. The evaluation questions
can be answered primarily in the field but require a review of literature from such sources as
USGS topographic maps,National Wetlands Inventory maps, stream surveys, soil surveys, and
aerial photographs. This method does not assign absolute values to a particular function; rather,
it generally identifies functional strengths and weaknesses to help guide management decisions
and aid in mitigation choices. Wetland functions are divided into the following categories: flood
and stormwater control, base flow and ground water support, erosion and shoreline protection,
water quality improvement, natural biological support, general habitat functions, specific habitat
functions, and cultural and socioeconomic values.
Wetland Rating
Wetlands were classified using the USFWS system (Cowardin et al. 1979). Wetlands were als
o
rated using the Washington Department of Ecology (Ecology) wetlands rating field data form.
This rating method is a four-tiered wetland categorization system based on wetland acreage,
species diversity, and number of wetland classes (Ecology 1993). The four categories of
wetlands identified by Ecology are hierarchical with category 1 wetlands exhibiting outstanding
features and category 4 wetlands with minimal attributes.
wPl/OU-0!6)1-000 urlleuul.klineulim..d.c
t November 2, 2001 9 Herrera Environmental Consultants
1
Wetland Delineation Report—Grapeview Loop Road Improvements
Soils
The soil survey map of Mason County identifies five soil types in the vicinity of the project site:
Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, Bellingham silty clay loam, Kitsap silt loam, Mukilteo peat,
and Sinclair shotty loam (USDA,1960). The Bellingham and Mukilteo soil series are classified
as hydric soils (USDA 1988). Descriptions of these five soil types and their locations relative to
the project site are provided below.
Alderwood gravelly sandy loam soils on slopes ranging from 5 to 15 percent are the most
common soil type in the project area, and occur from approximately Stretch Island Road to the',
north end of the project site. These well drained soils formed under conifers in glacial moraine
deposits. The soil profile consists of yellowish brown (1OYR 5/3) gravelly sandy loam.
Bellingham silty clay loam on slopes ranging from 0 to 3 percent occurs in two areas along the
project corridor that correspond to creek valleys. This soil is mapped in the south end of the
project corridor near unnamed creek 1, and in the middle of the site near unnamed creek 2. This
finely textured soil formed in linear depressions from glacial lake deposits and it is poorly
drained. The soil profile consists of very dark gray (10YR 3/1) silty clay loam with mottles.
Kitsap silt loam on slopes ranging from 5 to 15 percent is mapped at the south end of the project
corridor near Lombard Road. These soils formed from glacial lake sediments and are
moderately well drained. The soil profile consists of brownish gray silt loam.
Mukilteo peat on slopes ranging from 0 to 2 percent is mapped near the north end of the project
corridor. These very poorly.drained soils formed in depressions where organic matter from
hardhack and sedges accumulate but the acidic conditions prevent decomposition. The soil
profile contains dark black(7.5YR 2.5/1) partly decomposed plant fibers and mottled organic
material.
Sinclair shotty loath on slopes ranging from 5 to 30 percent is found near the south end of the
project area near Lombard Road and on the west side of the project corridor. This moderately
well drained soil formed in gently rolling hills of glacial deposits.
Analysis of Wetland Conditions
Wetland delineations of the Grapeview Loop Road improvement project corridor were
conducted on June 23, July 6, July 7, and July 14, 2000. Based on a review of existing literature
sources and investigations in the project corridor, a total of 18 wetland areas were identified on
both public and privately owned lands. Representative photographs of both wetland and upland
plant communities within the project corridor are presented in Appendix A. Field data sheets are
provided in Appendix B.
Figure 3 illustrates the general location of these 18 wetlands and three unnamed streams located
within the project corridor. The numbering of the 18 wetlands starts at the south end of the
project near Lombard Road and proceeds to the north end of the project near Nelson Road.
Figures 4A through 4J illustrate the boundaries of wetlands 1 through 18 and the areas that will
potentially be impacted by the project. The boundaries of these wetlands were delineated within
1
Herrera Environmental Consultants 12 November 2, 2001
Wetland Delineation Report—Grapeview Loop Road Improvements
100 feet of the road right-of-way, and the approximate boundaries are shown when a wetland
extends off site. The project corridor was divided into 100-foot long stations that extend 17,300
feet from the intersection of Lombard Road and Grapeview Loop Road to the intersection of
Stretch Island Road with Grapeview Loop Road (Stations 10+00 to 61+00), and from the
intersection of Stretch Island Road with Grapeview Loop Road to the northern project end
(Stations 101+00 to 223+00), The southern 3,000 feet of the project corridor are not shown on
Figures 4A through 4J because no wetlands were delineated within that segment.
The entire Grapeview Loop Road project corridor was examined for plant communities that are
indicative of wetland conditions. The affected wetlands contain several plant community types
including palustrine forested, palustrine scrub/shrub, palustrine emergent, palustrine aquatic bed,
riverine lower perennial streambed, and estuarine intertidal streambed. In addition to the
wetland plant communities, three distinct upland plant communities are present within the
project corridor, including second-growth forest, disturbed areas dominated by invasive shrubs,
and agricultural/pasture fields. Adjacent land uses include forested uplands, rural residential
housing, and commercial development.
Table 2 lists the plant species observed in both wetland and upland plant communities within the
project corridor, identified according to stratum and listed by common and scientific names
along with their wetland indicator status.
Wetlands were categorized using the USFWS system and Washington Department of Ecology
(Ecology) wetland rating systems (the Ecology wetland rating forms are provided in Appendix
Q. Wetland functions were also rated for each wetland using the semi-quantitative assessment
method by Cooke (2000). The source of hydrology in each wetland was also evaluated based on
its hydrogeomoiphic classification (Brinson 1993).
Table 3 summarizes the characteristics of the 18 wetlands delineated within the Grapeview Loop
Road project corridor. This table describes the location of each wetland according to stationing, its
size (in square feet and acres), the wetland classification according to the USFWS and Ecology
systems, and the source of hydrology. A description of each of these 18 wetlands is provided
below.
Wetland 1
This palustrine emergent wetland is located in an agricultural field used for livestock grazing
(Figure 413). The dominant herbaceous species include soft rush, toad rush, reed canarygrass,
common velvetgrass, and small-fruited bulrush. There is one assemblage of shrubs in this
wetland that include Pacific willow and red alder saplings. One soil pit (SP-1) was examined to
the 16-inch depth and the soil profile exhibited hydric characteristics (10 YR 3/1 sandy clay with
mottles [7.5 YR 5/8]). The soil survey map (USDA 1960) identifies this area as containing
Bellingham silty clay loam, which resembles the observed soil profile. This wetland receives its
hydrology from ground water seeps and the fine-grained soil perches this water at the surface.
Hydrologic indicators include saturation in the upper 12 inches and drainage patterns. Based on
the Ecology classification system, wetland 1 is rated category III (Ecology 1993). According to
the Cowardin system (Cowardin et al. 1979), it is classified as a palustrine emergent persistent
wetland that is temporarily flooded.
.p 10(1016P.te0 vetlnnJ 101—l-11-
November 2, 2001 33 Herrera Environmental Consultants
Wetland Delineation Report—Grapeview Loop Road Improvements
Table 3. Summary of wetland characteristics for the Grapeview Loop Road
improvements.
Side
Wetland of Area Area USFWS Ecology
# Road Stationing (ftl) (acres) Classification' Category Source of Hydrology
I East 39+50 to 40+50 4,628.9 0.11 PEM III Ground water seep
2 East 44+75 to 47+75 - - PEM III Ground water seep
3 West 44+0 to 45+50 6,108.2 0.14 PEM III Ground water seep
4 North 49+0 to 56+50 — — 15.0 PFO and PEM II Ground water seep,soil
perches water,and
surface water runoff
5 East 53+75 to 54+25 6,138.4 0.14 PEM III Surface water runoff
6 East 54+50 to 55+60 — —0.35 PFO I1 Soil perches water
7 West 108+20 to 111+60 — —15.0 PFO II Soil perches water
8 East 110+10 to 115+20 — --3.0 PFO II Soil perches water
9 West 111+90 to 112+90 4,695.6 0.11 PSS III Soil perches water
10 East 131+25 to 133+90 11,060.3 0.25 PEM III Soil perches water
I 1 West 142+75 to 146+00 — --2.0 PFO II Soil perches water
12 East 145+50 to 149+50 — --2.0 PFO II Soil perches water
3 13 West 148+00 to 150+00 — — 15 PFO II Soil perches water
14 West 159+50 to 160+25 6,961.5 0.16 PEM III Soil perches water
15 East 179+50 to 180+50 4,256.0 0.10 PFO III Soil perches water
16 West 198+90 to 201+80 - - PFO II Soil perches water
17 West 202+50 to 203+10 1,951.4 0.04 PEM IV Soil perches water
18 West 206+80 to 220+00 — —4.5 PSS,PEM,and 11 Soil perches water
PAD
a U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service classification of wetlands: palustrine forested(PFO),palustrine scrub/shrub(PSS),palustrine
emergent(PEM),and palustrine aquatic bed(PAB).
Wetland 2
This palustrine emergent wetland is located in an agricultural field near wetland 1 and has
similar characteristics (Figure 413). The dominant herbaceous species include Baltic rush, soft
rush, and field horsetail. There are several clumps of shrubs that include red alder saplings. One
soil pit (SP-2) was examined to the 16-inch depth and the soil profile exhibited hydric
characteristics (2.5Y 3/1 gravelly silt). The soil survey map (USDA 1960) identifies this area as
containing Bellingham silty clay loam, which does not resemble the observed soil profile. This
i wetland receives its hydrology from ground water seeps and the fine-grained soil perches this
water at the surface. Hydrologic indicators include saturation in the upper 12 inches and
drainage patterns. Based on the Ecology classification system, wetland 2 is rated category III
(Ecology 1993). According to the Cowardin system (Cowardin et al. 1979), it is classified as a
palustrine emergent persistent wetland that is temporarily flooded.
i
vrl /rltl-0161/-INXI�rrinnd klinrollrur.rkrc
Herrera Environmental Consultants 36 November 2, 2001
Wetland Delineation Report—Grape view Loop Road Improvements
6/1 clay with mottles [7.5YR 5/8]). The soil survey map (USDA 1960) identifies this area as
containing Alderwood gravelly sandy loam soils,which does not resemble the observed soil
profile. Another soil pit(SP-14) contained upland soil to the 16-inch depth. This wetland
receives its hydrology from surface water runoff in the immediate area and the fine-grained soil
perches this water at the surface. Based on the Ecology classification sytem,weland 10 is e Cowardin stem (Cowardin et al t 1979), it is rated
category III (Ecology 1993). According to th system
classified as a palustrine emergent persistent wetland that is temporarily saturated.
Wetland 11
This palustrine forested wetland is assumed to have been historically connected to wetlands 12
and 13,but it has been disturbed by placement of fill material and logging operations (Figure
4E). According to a local landowner,the hydrology in wetlands 12 and 13 has possibly been
altered by logging activities occurring upstream of this depressional area(Noyd 2000 personal
communication). Clearing of vegetation during clear-cut logging operations may have increased
the amount of runoff reaching these wetlands. This wetland contains three strata of vegetation in
the tree, shrub, and herbaceous layers. The tree layer includes red alder and quaking aspen. The
shrub layer contains red-osier dogwood, Sitka willow, salmonberry, hardhack,Nootka rose, and
3 Himalayan blackberry. The herbaceous species include slough sedge and water parsley. One
soil pit(SP-15) was examined to the 16-inch depth and the soil profile exhibited hydric
characteristics (lOYR 5/1 clay with mottles [7.5YR 4/6]). The soil survey map (USDA 1960)
loam,which r
identifies this area as containing Bellingham silty clay resembles the observed soil
profile. This wetland receives its hydrology from a high ground water table, surface water
runoff, and fine-grained soils that perch this water. Hydrologic indicators include saturation in
the upper 12 inches, sediment deposits, and drainage patterns. Based on the Ecology
classification system,wetland 11 is rated category II (Ecology 1993). According to the
, it is classified as a palustrine forested broad-leaved
Cowardin system (Cowardin et al. 1979)
deciduous wetland that is temporarily saturated.
Wetland 12
This palustrine forested wetland has been fragmented by private driveways and hG tree, sh Loop
rub,and
Road (Figures 4E and 4F). This wetland contains three strata of vegetation
in herbaceous layers. The tree layer includes red alder, Pacific willow, and western red cedar. The
shrub layer contains salmonberry, red-osier dogwood, Pacific ninebark, serviceberry, hardhack,
black twinberry,Nootka rose, and Himalayan blackberry. The dominant herbaceous species
! include soft rush, water parsley, and bedstraw. One soil pit(SP-16) was examined to the 16-inch
depth and the soil profile exhibited hydric characteristics (5Y 5/1 clay with mottles [7.5YR 5/8])•
The soil survey map (USDA 1960) identifies this area as containing Bellingham silty clay loam,
! which resembles the observed soil profile. This wetland receives its hydrology from a high
ground water table, surface water runoff, and fine-grained soils that perch this water. Hydrologic
' indicators include drift lines, and drainage patterns. Based on the Ecology classification system,
wetland 12 is rated category II (Ecology 1993). According to the Cowardin system (Cowardin et
wpl p1n.016)l-(NiO.relmJ klinrni..�
Herrera Environmental Consultants
40 November 2, 2001
Wetland Delineation Report—Grapeview Loop Road Improvements
al. 1979), it is classified as a palustrine forested broad-leaved deciduous wetland that is
temporarily saturated.
Wetland 13
This palustrine forested wetland has been disturbed by placement of fill material and logging
operations (Figure 4F). This wetland contains three strata of vegetation in the tree, shrub, and
herbaceous layers. The tree layer includes red alder and western red cedar. The shrub layer
contains salmonberry, hardhack,Nootka rose, and Himalayan blackberry. The herbaceous
species include slough sedge,skunk cabbage, and lady fern. One soil pit(SP-17) was examined
to the 16-inch depth and the soil profile exhibited hydric characteristics (5Y 6/1 clay with
mottles [7.5YR 4/6]). The soil survey map (USDA 1960) identifies this area as containing
Bellingham silty clay loam, which resembles the observed soil profile. This wetland receives its
hydrology from a high ground water table, surface water runoff, and fine-grained soils that perch
this water. Hydrologic indicators include saturation in the upper 12 inches, sediment deposits,
and drainage patterns. Based on the Ecology classification system, wetland 13 is rated category
II (Ecology 1993). According to the Cowardin system (Cowardin et al. 1979), it is classified as a
palustrine forested broad-leaved deciduous wetland that is temporarily saturated.
Wetland 14
This isolated emergent wetland is located in a vacant field near the intersection of Grapeview
Loop Road and Oakdale Street (Figure 4F). This wetland has been disturbed by logging
operations and excavation of drainage ditches. The dominant herbaceous species include soft
rush, daggerleaf rush, common velvetgrass, and small-fruited bulrush. There is one assemblage
of shrubs that include Sitka willow and red alder saplings. One soil pit (SP-18) was examined to
the 16-inch depth and the soil profile exhibited hydric characteristics (2.5Y 511 silt loam with
mottles [7.5 YR 6/8]). The soil survey map (USDA 1960) identifies this area as containing
Alderwood gravelly sandy loam,which does not resemble the observed soil profile. This
wetland receives its hydrology from surface water runoff in the immediate area and the fine-
grained soil perches this water at the surface. Hydrologic indicators include drift lines and
drainage patterns. Based on the Ecology classification system, wetland 14 is rated category III
(Ecology 1993). According to the Cowardin system (Cowardin et al. 1979), it is classified as a
palustrine emergent persistent wetland that is temporarily flooded.
Wetland 15
This isolated wetland, located near the intersection of Cronquist Road and Grapeview Loop
Road, has been disturbed by logging operations (Figure 4H). This forested wetland has three
strata of trees, shrubs, and emergent vegetation. The tree layer includes red alder, western red
cedar, and Oregon ash. The shrubs consist of Sitka willow, salmonberry, black hawthorn, Nootka
rose, evergreen blackberry, and red alder saplings. The dominant herbaceous species include
slough sedge. One soil pit(SP-19) was examined to the 16-inch depth and the soil profile
upl/IN4016J 1dNNl vrllnrc/Nrlincalnndr.r
November 2, 2001 41 Herrera Environmental Consultants
Page 1 of 1
Rebecca Hersha - Re: Fair Harbor Tracts
From: Rebecca Hersha
To: Jurges, Glen
Date: 7/22/2008 4:16
Subject: Re: Fair Harbor Tracts
Hi Glen. Good point about the MEP timing. I will issue the MEP ASAP.
Oh and Grace just signs the SEPA's - she has nothing to do with the review...
On 7/22/2008 at 12:38 PM, in message <D6A738136CA24FE5AEB8C585099E2ADA@glennhome>,
"Glen Jurges" <gfjurges@prodigy.net>wrote:
Grace,
I received the notice that the County is retaining the SEPA Threshold MDNS for SEP2008-00088 issued by
the Mason County Planning Department. Appeals must be filed within 14 days and, from the comments I
reviewed, it appears that there may be an appeal. The notice also states that the SEPA conditions will be
attached to the MEP at the time the MEP is issued.
It is my understanding that the County would usually try to time any appeal hearing so that any SEPA appeal
would be heard with any appeal of the MEP. Is this your approach to this kind of matter? If so,
would appreciate knowing when the MEP is likely be issued so that both (potential)appeals can be
addressed at the same time.
Thank you for your help.
Glen Jurges 360 377-0274
file://C:\Documents%20and%20S ettings\rebecch\Local%20Settings\Temp\XPgrpwi se\48860... 7/22/08
Show the following on the site plan
Lot Dimensions Flood Zones
Existing Structures Fences
Water Lines Driveways
Drainage Plans Shorelines
Septic System Topography Indicate Directional by (N,S,E,W,etc.)
Proposed Improvements Easements In relation to plot plan
Name if Flanking Street
APPLICANT TO DRAW SITE PLAN BELOW:
See attached plans.
APPLICANT TO DRAW TOPOGRAPHY BELOW:
See attached plans.
Tax Parcel Information
Parcel Number Legal Description
121055144001 PCL 1 of BLA#07-82
121055144003 PCL 2 of BLA#07-82
121055144005 PCL 3 of BLA#07-82
121055144006 PCL 7 of BLA#07-82
121055144010 PCL 17 of BLA#07-82
121055145006 PCL 4 of BLA#07-82
121055145010 PCL 5 of BLA#07-82
121055145011 PCL 6 of BLA#07-82
121055154002 PCL 18 of BLA#07-82
121055154005 PCL 19 of BLA#07-82
121055154009 PCL 20 of BLA#07-82
121055155002 PCL 23 of BLA#07-82
121055155006 PCL 21 of BLA#07-82
121055156002 PCL 8 of BLA#07-82
121055156003 PCL 9 of BLA#07-82
121055156005 PCL 10 of BLA#07-82
121055156007 PCL 11 of BLA#07-82
121055156009 PCL 12 of BLA#07-82
121055158002 PCL 13 of BLA#07-82
121055158003 PCL 14 of BLA#07-82
121055158004 PCL 15 of BLA#07-82
121055158006 PCL 16 of BLA#07-82
121055159002 PCL 22 of BLA#07-82
FAIR HARBOR TRACTS
A PORTION OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, W.M.
- MASON COUNTY, WASHINGTON ; �', OF
MEP EXHIBIT MAP
Ty
2 ) Jr `�_ -_ , - _ L ` \ .' !: { i 4� - ^v.T„,Y,�+,,..-•+-,"n+-,� T, �ATWATER RI
�l '•` i EAS I I fi EW ROAD} .'CKERT
1 r I I� 11 STRETCH
f VICINITY MAP
I l� '
n
, � tl M�^n�' NOT i0 S^JJ.E
v Z ) 1 LEGEND
�r 988 EXISTINGIJAJOR CONTOUR
LOT3
r}f,,{�{ !7 j // 111 11 -"� $ }'7•• - ft(- _ y aT� �(}` +„ ! ! 134wsi --.----'F7B------ EXISTING MINOR CONTOUR
LOT 17 LOT4 1 f .z�Ti ,T7 ( I PROPERTY LINE
f 'f J I t ♦ I 1 c.-
1 4 .-fir
��` ADJACENT PARCEL
,B•CLEAR SPACE r T1G Th71,or9.1�!lT9t PO i I}I I f�s�3 !----
1 t : f d �-——— c Ex,srwc CULVERT
— /( 1
ADS N-12 OR Aug.
,� W.� fa EDGE OF_- _ _ _ _. �. _ WETLANDS
I
EV ACCESS TURNAROUND EDGE OF WE?IANDSf,+j/ �� ' _ Iixft ..I :} $n, WERANDS BUFFER
�ww.�.. F •I f "l' fRx r. d _ __._ STREAM BUFFER
EDGE OF WERANDS �I! i f J ,/ 'r •I 1 T"AVIMwe C PROPOSED DRAINFIELD
Lot it 1 CENTER OF STREAM
8 I¢�J� 4 t APPROXIMATE TREE LINE �.
WETLANDS LOSS
I I t ✓�r " { s - `Ti f f WEMNDS GAIN
1 DENOTES MAXIMUM _ s-" f
BUFFER ENCROACHMEM ' / rf i "- --. '`- , ) �* ys ;� J �.- *•H•+ SECTION 1/4 CORNER
0 gy�ORMr�WATER PONDS ,f� '• r _ /J Ft R.ny _
D DESIGNATION--�+'� _ J 'r ) '0' `� f /{ r I J - `'�'- e �` I ( �r i"aaN's�• 'n. "+,� PROVIDED BY
Ds'ce avr$Drc+tc�exa�x_, MASON COUNCOUNTYPUB C WORKS n :� ._
BUFFER AVERAGE TABLE
7.7
A -- 3533 SF
fkftEA + +
B 7782 S
'/ t �� ' � .�,C�� �_ t •'-7 f f � � ( F
12 SF
! j fl
2�
! _ D 3952 SF
)ii�I ' LQT43 _ 01
2959 Sr --
1 ��5lm� {/-} � ANT CIPATED HIGH POINT L �� - - ��RWN r *lTf f( ll,�, j IN NEW ROAD GRAVEL ( J �-'l ) _N- F 2774 SF
j') r I 1 1 1 ly G 3433 SF --
jJ I
AREAS SHOWN REPRESENT THE
# MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE IT IN THE
AREA
a , >f = 1 I/ } a A.- ! 11622 SF
J f F _,� ALLOTTED TO EACH LOT IN TFff STORM
! t ±(r LOT,15 i'f {pE@p(gp 85`WERJPID BUFFER { _.. g,' } DRAINAGE ANALYSIS AND DO NOT
i j f I REFLECT THE ACTUAL BUILDING AREAS i � I 1 B785 SF
x E1 � T RHAR�UNt3• - /• -.. �t r I ,
427 SF
i i �'�• I _ �T •JJ�!// ,,.'''�- It jr `- PRIMA@'AND RESERVE
r } I ("ftP) ( ! TOTAL 18697 SF 27292 SF
cr A1' 1. � DRNNFlELD AREA � c�A�-�c SCALE
ao 60 NET GAIN -- 6595 SF
NOTE, I � 7
f \ 1 + ALL IMPROVED ROADS DEPICTED ON THIS MAP SHALL INCLUDE
� r (W F•�
'� +, I II EASEMENTS FOR INGRESS,EGRESS,UTILITIES NOD STORM WART I 1 I kh=60 fret
STANDARD i1v 1 + ff r r ,. ' f I TIRE FAIR HARBOR TRACTS -
MEP EMB[T Wr EXISTING , BOFF J
/D, f '/ a W e S t S O l n C
y aw SEM ON � Engineering, Inc E
m ----
SECTION t8 y 11V WETI.MID BUFFER '$0 2ro50 , CUB- J(JRGEs ENTERPRISES INC. 217 S.W.YAilkirs Ddve Pod Orchard Wa 98366
,32Q +j— + T ti-- - - c By CTB Flo Phane(360)876-3770 Fax(360)876-0439
T - - - L TONA 2D20 ENETAI BEACH ROAD
E-mail:wseQwsen sEc 5 TvM 21N R 1ginsdrQ mm ht�7twrx wsenginee ng com
BREMERroN,wAaB310
i SCALE k6C DESCRIPTION DATE S✓ DATESEALEO n O (360)9A-�74 �g N0. %4T OF- 1 SHTS
FAIRHARBOR TRACTS Ap ,t
A PORTION OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST, W.M.
---------- - — — — _� �, _ MASON COUNTY,WASHINGTON
SITE PLAN
I ?r-_�— �•-- '"�� I f1 I i I{, 12TD55-1-440D1 MET\`_ r�
LOT 1 I �Tu . n
46772$F _ I �� i JJ� � � �I!k
.�. ,'•=, $ i AIWATER RD J 'REACH .-�..
121D55-1-H003� \ ) '� r _
L '+ ' ./"i .F { p I lStAND
1+ LOT2 21055-1-55008
46,M93,E 5w I , 1 ► ti
i I 98fr55'Y HELL -
)J/ U
55-1 �0-$F
j • ! J fI 12 i 055-1_44005 J, ••• {
! JJ lfj LOT 3
49.710 SF r 1
,.14AC
ire xs'
,2,D55_,_44DOB ,,\EIt09'1/
` 1`I 1
L12 A __ — _ _ .. I ' YIC9+IfM SuLE MAP
� 49.61290 SF 1 1 t` + ' -�_ NOT iD
rs � � 1
U.M AD 26 AD
_ _ b LOT 8
LOT b
2,600.OD$f' .,1 12,599.7,$ 1 42.5gg�4 I I ———— EXISTING 610.WR CONTOURS
12101 of
$ ► j ETDSTING MINOR CONTOURS
17 X^ �{
LOT L j fs
49,Do2ay�,. , n PROPOSED uAroR coNrouRs
j(j)J ly1(,�, 3 y ,, 1 11 f} i I � PROPOSED MINOR CONTOURS
"�N 'V j t// +f I 1 I RAW) \`14 \�4. �°f"�� �I�� — _ I ... .. _ EDGE OF ROAD
35,7�07T g 1 rr EDGE OF »f iTANDS ��f1 — 1 GRAVEL ROAD SURFACE
0.e4Nc. /jl ,f� 71�_� ��. t 1 - i -------------
I /` ! /�}�,//ff � LME DENOTING CATCHMENT OF GRADING
.. J ! l/ .�
j -'-F'x ` •' N _ s Sls ECGE OF WE7Lq ypg 1/j j - - _ _ _. -. - -- PROPOSED GRAIN FIELD
,j,f r t '��VE �
ljl _{_sue. "� _ --�� PROPERTY LINE
1 j 127055-t-56003 —_��, 1- -- —
I tt , LO7 9 � '�, � `�1'r � * �
i) 1 36,525 SF J I ~� --------
J, I 0 64 AC r { + ' ADJACENT PARCEL
1 I 1 I ,r`.,� I• { J� J f - r � lim AC 1 f — _1 j — — — _ — — — EDGE OF WETLANDS
_ f/J / {J J
/ — 1 WETLANDS BUFFER
5600 r f - � �1�sjf ff fj �^�• 1 /
LOT 10 5 ,� ` :glyiT•, r ——— ---- -- --
// i " "\ PROPOSED EASEMENT
I
fF f
I •I 0 3093 ACF r. ._ _ _
%/ ..,D9.25 SF r L. , J I , r ` ! /1 STREAM BUFFER
SECTION 1/4 CORNER
Lar Is
.�;>11,0�.00 SIF ,
LOT ! •-_J = CULVERT
�4
/ 11 fI JJ j f�- f�j r f
0 101 AC d { � ? `� "''\ O.aB� x FILTER FABRIC FRJCE
P I
OIL
1\ I •'�' •` r � FENCE
GATE
+ g I MM f
�JJfF +�7J; 12i�1T�009 F 'I J'\ ` .� .-w
I d! 53,a29 SF 1. `•/ [/! .!/rff ._ �' Jj 't ,` - f •13PAPl•'ID SCALE �y'y� CLEARING UWI
123 AD
,J' f f / _ 1� ,Y'ID55--5ao0s W,
IL
58001
/ t 1�.LOT
4d81�1if' G /' N r y ..e?�.- 5 96 u Ef
5212
._
)
l l l r _a 35 f 1
--� ,� y NQ j SHEET INDEX
2,DLOT 158D04 - / 7 /f !1 J ~ +f j �
LOT 15 Jam' i _ 1 � C`Y` � � �'�� ALL RA7140YED ROADS DEPICTED ON THIS MAP SHALL WCLIAE SHEET 1 -SITE PLAN
/ 1 j 15.258.31 SF �' D _ I 3r 1 EASEMENTS FOR INGRESS EGRESS,uIT ITIES AND STORM YARBL'
ttf"" k SHEET 2-GRADING AND TLAN 3C PLAN
SHEET 3-DRAINAGE�/ fl i 1,
I1! ( s Ac,N / ,�• �K { r L F 8NE-CALL NOTE: I' HEFT 4-DRAINAGE PNOTES AND DETAILS
SEkr ID"FIELD NOTE: i 1 I SHEET 5-DRAINAGE NOTES AND DETAILS
�— , i-aoo-aza-ssss , 7
__ // f�• ly,:" PRIMARY AND RESERVE
{1 11 A DRAlNF1ELD AREA(TYP) THE LOCATION OF THE 20 SEPRC ORAINFIFIDS SHOWN IN TRACTS! I I SHEET B-ROAD PLAN AND PROFILES
BURIED UTILITIES ARE SHOWN AS 1 INDICATED ON RECORD SHEET 7-ROW PLAN AND PROFILES t`t\ _ fj f(,f �LLLg��� J/ � � •A•AND'B'FOR EACH LOT CAN BE CHANGED DR MODff1E0 TO FURNISHED By AND VERIFIED WHERE POSSIBLE BY
SHEET B-ROW PLAN AND PROFILES
MEET ANY FUTURE REQUIREMENTS OF MASON COUNTY OR THE FEATURES LOCATED IN THE FIELD. WESTSOUND ENGINEERI IG, SHEET 9 -ROAD RAN AND PROFILES
DEVELOPER,HEDL OR ASSIGNS FURTHER DETALS WILL 8E
82a2(L36 NBI
INC.,ASSUMES NO LLRY FOR THE ACCURACY OF THOSE SHEET 10-TEED NOTES AND DETAILS
po f .. jt I W : I PROVIDED IN THE FAIR HARBOR HOME DOERS ASSOCIATION RECORDS,OR FOR THE FINAL LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES
rr /�f COVEII
1 IN AREAS CRITICAL TO DESIGN.
LOT 16
42 99 AC / ,r ^- t I TITLE FAIR HARBOR TRACTS
g r / t f oe aHEaer _ROUES _
SEA A .' f r #4' ! I �G �,�. SITE PLAN ��rr _-� WestSound
m'Nv elk" _E_ng_ineering
SECflON3 1 (/.` C a1 CLIENT 217S.W.WiWnsDfie Pon omtw(1,Wa.98986
;Z JURGES ENTERPRISES iNC. Pha e(35D)9769nD Fax t38o1BT61Y4
_ oHAL ZO ENTAI BEACH ROADg ID.Wm
E-mail:Ei Wse(dxsen�neering.CXNn ldfphWCrW.
SEC 5 iwN-"—R lw BREME0.TON,WA 983,0
��
• (360)377-0274
SCALE
REY. DESCRIPTION DATE BY DATESEEALED -If 08 JOBNo. 805.4 SHT 1 OF 10 SHTS
FAIR HARBOR TRACTS
A PORTION OF SECTION 5,TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST, W.M.
MASON COUNTY1 WASHII4GTON i f fJ � o I i II -2=
�/.�, T y PLAN
l C..ti`r,,.'�� I OMNI C ROAD P09U TO BE ALTERED TO
NG AND E SC 1 L A rN -� �� `^- --� -�,.` \r- pkOVIDE ADDITIONAL DUFFER NEAR WETLAND. iR MIN SLOPE 2%
1 �Ifl� LOT 1 I o - �
�h � �=•=^ -_ _:-: ....:,,,. �Y RSIING 9UBCRADE OR COMPACTED FILL
PAVEMENT SECTION
D T N TD COLlEC3'llEVELOPFD IQ
RIAJOF FROM�FqyF LATE"AND AMALENT� `
J DIRECT UK, T CF1L _ I 3OLF SECTION F 7 HGii I CROSS SLOPE ROAD CROSS SECTION
-R
t I 1 '1y I,QT'11 � 1 t , I WALL ADJACENT TO RgAO NTS STA O+OO T9 2i50
iEW AND 6+24 TO 17+23
/
JJ 1 f r'J F DETENTION POND
FOREAST tt' I
FAR T 845fN f
WET POND VOLUME IS PART OF F
f Il Jj�t C61 ONE OF DETENTION POND
J // Jrr Q�af 1
I ! 1 i � I' J'j �•+f '''" t - / I 1%MIN SLOPE 2% 2X 190 MW SLOPE
j'�+�ll � t �E , •\ LIFT Y'a1 j _ _ _ 'f fY �JY y
JJJ ♦• i POND ACCESS R 1 rD is'�,^..'�` '���.�
�3 I h }l Q y 1 3oV' t` i i // , I P�G�OGRADE OR COMPACTED FILL
!/ 7/'
/BPS 111 `� _ ff -r , + !' i 791F FA
RIC FILTER FENCE I I r f
FF I J/+ j.OTR \ / I f CROWN SLO FQA CROSS SECTION
7J Jf J/J i'T TOR 9iTRPRAP �N / /t I f I � , LC7f 5 LOT 4 I f // I N15� STA 2+50 TO 6+60
•(" F ! �/OOTFF-ALL TOOpWETPONO i(t LOT 17 � > Jf ` t1�
TOP=524.00 1'•'�:�///@/ r,✓ t t� F 1 cry i i i 1
TOE=52.00 TOP=52J.90 2- 111 WETLAND BUFFER `
J /
TOF5522aA mE s2aJTD . _�_ ( I
1OEa518OO
flt {1 TCE= ( OF WETLANDS
518.W 7 f/ 1 EDGE OF GRADING/ EDGE `DITCH`
1 - M FILTER FABRIC FENCE I , .f } '_
! ++ I I(J J / 7( !f y / CULVERT DITCH CR0551Nc AVEME
EDGE OF WETLANDS t I ( ,7* srf DE7A6. �" '•�
��/ ` \ UI y 1 E%ISDNG SU13GRAM OR COMPACTED FILL
j j�^ 10D' dam. i �.�,'I�LbT 1.� PAVEMENT SECTION
'i I IX fr i�i *'SEPTIC ��� � j ! �`TTOEE�51A 9 1 f 'I I D6 1 11F m CELL 1 '�� f icy' `� / �y I b ' t 7 I + TO ROAD.
FOLLOWS S SLOPE OF ROAD,PARALLEL
! ! �491.D0 TO ROAD.ROAD SLOPES AT MIN OF 2%
T � 1
roEas Dm� + r T OF FLAT ROAD ON SLOPE
I t � -.., CROSS SECl10N _
1 LJI�DENOTES MAXIMUM 493 �1 '"�_-, J " "+
251LF RETAINING WALLOT 1O I ,rH' �• f /
1 it BUFFER ENCROACHMENT j ! \ 1 NTS STA 6+60 0 8+24
JJ I o ) I 0Fp STORMWATP PONDS j{ f a� I y .( I 1 I J� AND 17+23 TO 19+98
11 W ' 27' -
TT,-512 -1=+
ii 3. �L
�{1 11 y�l•`g N d,!E 2 I �'1 � r� � 1 1 T 1.25'DEEP COLLECTION DITCH
7 W .1 SIDE SLOPES
JOP ELEV=49i.DD + I ! K f 1 }' f I } i (,�
OUTLET WfTRASH t / Ott,L7.EV�d85 O /T f '.♦ `r
(SEE DETAIL) 1 I; F �-. !J// - 1 f �YHALE BARRIER ` (IJ INLET H RACK
IE= ATM RIPRAP:�„� -']'f f �`�, }J '� o f { ? i _ 'COVE!MIN
r ND=' I LbT 111��33QQ a 1\ 'G 4' t ' 'T� { f jf ,r i 484.00 S-1.03 12 0 CMP
62LF fiETA1NINGr C - 1 EI =4@0.97 , - / 7 ` !� { 't
CROSSING Ill
QE_508.
, t
' a 1.25'DEEP COLLECTION DITCH
486.E �Wf2;1 51DE SLOPES
OUTLET WITRASH RACK
\COT 1� rl INLET W,I'fllmw p(ISDNG 2►' _Jy-M/�� �., 1'J - - - - _..EW CATCHMENT iJNE COINCIDENT ^_ 5=1,07. 112 0 CA�'MIN IE=461.50
rL_
I _ 1, t� � J CULVD?T Al t;1-]j J� Y H1R0.49 GFJVEL�GH POINT IN N WIOP RTY 1tlE IN THS AREA
• ( l Jr 1 REMAIN 4621@ f 7 ETA 6+60 j I I F j w C60�#2
t I i
FENIX
CULVERT AND[NIGH CROSSINGS IeTAIL
l �/�1 T ' 1 �4 A,t�►0�96'WERMID BURSt �� � �'r �t
f 1 I E ONE-CALL NOTE
J/ f /`` 1 CUT AND RLL= J
1�� PRIMARY AND RESERVER
( i ! 1 I 1"8�- 24' rJ
* F } I ORAINFlELD AREA(TYP) } B1ar ou(�T m I t GRAPHIC SCALE BURIED UTILITIES ARE SHOWN AS INDICATED ON RECORD MAPS
•;i NET Ci1Ti 2048 Cu YD _ !p 3D 6o FURNISHED BY OTHERS AND VERIFIED WHERE POSSIBLE BY
'T i l _ t TCHML'NT LWE (-> I ! I f I FEATURES LOCATED I THE FIELD. E ACCOUNDURACY
ENGINEERING,
SE
{ J J ,,,j ` , i I rat I INC.,ASSJMES NO LIABILITY FOR THE ACCURACY OF THOSE
wprpU { / JJ l g/j f Irf ' iiiJ// ! F I I j , dwlal) RECORDS OR 50 W AREAS'CR[TFOR CAL TOE FKk DESIGN.LOCATION OF COSTING unLrtlEs
LQT"Ill
j' TITLE FAIR HARBOR TRACTSl`
,,,t� Desu�sDer �G t�� GRADING AND MSG PLM - pe s�+ 0 u
nd
9 Df�UNAGEPATII f J T rr �t - - -- Engint ei1 Ing, Inc
WEST�) ��� i� / f f t w sEPfEC SETBACK aum er GAUNM � �f�xa�.- s; ,r
C 110'WETLAND BUFFER -- o CLIENT 217 S.W.WilKms Drive Port omhord,We.98388
` _t_ `. - c e By , '05 JURGES ENTERPRISES • Phone(360)876-3770 Fox(960)870.0439
1520'+1'- •.J ['�p�RFD t 7oxet, 202DENETAI BEACH ROM E-mail:wse@wsenglneering.Dom �._, h6p1twaw.wsengineenng.com
.k l r�'r •" � ,�� "'ti.�- 7 SEC 5 1YO +21 b 1T1/ BREMERTON WA s6310
(360)377-0274 JOB No. $05.4 SNT 2OF- — -- ---SHTS
NYiE
I- - �� y •` _"~"- [ SCA1E REY. OESCRiPTIDN 114T® tN �A 10
i
FAIR HARBOR TRACTS r SEE DETAIL
RAL7(
46LF 12•f ADS N-12 S=1.DX �- -� THIS DSHEET
A PORTION OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST,W.M. TOP :=4n '�
RIPRAP PROTECTED OUTFACE _EMESfSHEET
MASON COUNTY, WASHINGTON ; E E'�T'�G t I ti 4 _ ELF.- Q4.00
-- - DRAINAGE PLAN - �,�i 1 - _ RD�RAP W,6•
J I j E7051iMt;RQAp� _ OIRRY 5PALL5
"J4 LOT 1 - t �
4 5=1.0%
f - --_--
+t w/aBr�DaNTRDE srRucrutE — ,� USE TYPE 2
�2 OD s , 65LF 18'0 ADS M-12 S=25% I I -�_ 18.0 ADS N-12 CATCHBaSIN
I - o 1.0%MIN
WARASH RACK S=0.0% CB/Z 54•r T!PE li / y• I -- I.E. 479.55'
l W/CONE TRASH RACK a t
/ ! j I Ii DETAIL C8#2 EMERGENCY OVERFLOW
,�LOT9 3 ADS N- IE=479.55
W/MASH
RkCK
IF
\\ E TOUT-483.00 C
r
/ $ 22LF 12-0 ADS N-12 RICK �s.Tm
�T} J �"-' •�Y�" - ..:rz'�' IyRASIN 250 i N jiE.Er'NOTE 1)
fff / �� 1 1 t \ J j IF OUT=482A0 - - - HOOK CLAP(4) PLCS. JPVIEW
, / !
�I 1 � EVENLY 5PACFD. PROVIDE MNNt.ACCESS BY WELDING
)f tl o' J 1 a I (a)CROSS�S TO(4)VExncu
11' j �, - �r" ,,, , T // / I # EARS AS SHOWN. HINGE UPPER ENDS
V J JJ J r IT / xf -_ _ - r`�••-'-{ q J///j/ / 1` 17r;: Ii I I / iT Y SPACEDLOCKING MWTTH E(2RMSM wNPADLOCK EON
�pT6 LOTS J + i (SEE NOTE 1) LOWER END, LOCATE LADDERSTEPS
Ro�le
((( Larit ` ` ` -r I DIRECTLY BELOW.
f' t[ LOT 4Y+'"� 6 �125 Y D3 4•THICK x 4•MOE
P�RTMu O D BARS w BorasUPPER STEEL BARD
Y24 EQ.SPA.SEE NOTE 1) 3/4'THICK x 4'WIDE
was"
3 4 THICC xWIOE
GROOVE
TO FIT W
E OF C.B.RISEME
SMOOTH VERT.BAR
HOOK CLAMP ANCHOR
1 J } ff!! I $` �^ �,_{... '4V� STD.STEPS TO C.B.RISER
.� 4; i -1C TIT-11rl-'1- - -----Ji��l t f\ _ ,rLOT �t - -- -- - ' C.B.RISER
I L0�9 ' i 1 1 _ jl� `� 1 I 1 J-� SECTION Hoac CLAMP
_,A5LF 12-0 ADS N-12 {r t '\ NO
A JTRgS f t / /,( J , 238F 12-4 ADS N-12 W RASH RACK -J 9 1.DIMENSIONS ARE FOR INSTALLATIIN ON 54'Mk.C8 FOR OFFERENT OW C8.'S,ADJUST
�. M H RACK 5=1.3X , , j J ! _ /T+�, DIMENSIONS TO LOWER
MAINTAIN 45'ANGLE ON vERRCAL•BARS AND 7'O.C. MOIL SPACING OF
W-492.00 i ' HOCK ONED OVERFLOW / fff/111 � ^J ��� I 7r E M=48a.00 I i
nsLF 15 Y I 1E -491.80 0 -(FJ(IENCING THE OFF SIDE OF ` - E OUT=481.50 t 1 BARS AROUND LDW4A STEEL BAND,
0 5-1.06 / ' I I 1 f f THE OXtAVEI.FILTER WINDOW. - -- 111 f! { - �, 1 I f
J I ! ++ I ( , / f j I ++t (� 3.MEFAL PARTS:CORROSION RESISTANT.
OT10 f i I r SEEPE- DETAIL
I f / tY2 a I
I _t 1 SEE DEPIL j� fjy_�� 9 521E 1.25�—DITCH-
J ,3661E 1.5'V D 1/f{ / ,�� 1 7 O S=1A% 1 �r I 3. THIS DEBRIS BARRIER 15 ALSO RECOMMEND FOR USE ON THE INLET TO ROADWAY
- ' rt �, e lry Jl NfS j } � J -�I --__._ J/ , /,i , /{ CROSS-CULVERTSSTREA WITH HIGH POTENTIAL FOR DEBRIS COLLECTION.(EXCEPT ON CUSS 2
, ifs(; ,/ / /{
It / ? 15LF T2'e ADS N-12 w/T-ASH RACK S-OJOX �r / _LOT-1� ' 1
/ /�f C � � / CONE TRASH RACK DETAIL !
j / tt CB/3 54•0 TYPE q �.
;'W/OUTLET CONTROL 59WCIUPE f�+ A 4FT MIN BERM
NTS WHEN SLOPING DOWNHI Jj _ RR 4 00i'04
J 5 REQUIRED
IE=486.00 t 1 J ///_ .+ ►..'r {
t i \ 81LF 12.0 ADS N-12 l
( uPSLOPE SNF
'T ,4f
t!f =� �•1 F~�'�- v { Wt R"RACK S-1.0% jjj I t \\ f / i ,P•
I-QT MIN SLOPE
= 1%
JJ/ - 4`Y r• T f E OGU.TT=..4,8.5520 ! If I �' H /i f Ar i J ! C(; MAX SLOPE 2-1 ` i DOWNSLOPE SIDE
,29LF AD5 N-12IF IN-495,05
ff ' IF ouT=.494.75 f i WIN g4- — {/+ ` �r INTERCEPTOR DffCH CROSS SECTfOTO ANTICIPATED
F r I HIGH IN NEW ROAD GRAVEL - NT5
;
1 -N
J I f a EA 1/akrx5•srRlPs UNIFORMLY
It
30OLF 1.25'V-DITCH { J \ I t 1 LD ENDS TO FRAME3/4-0
/ .1! I SPACED AND WELDED TO FRAME-
JJ 3'SPACING
M,
3/4.0 FRAME
FLOW
PRIMARY AND RESERVE J T ONE-CALL NOTE, I 1 s'Gkr -V.BOLTS
BARS
SEA
#�-800-424-5555 i i BEY ? E
j`tJJJ J
A ; i DRAWFIELD AREA(T1P) t � £ ALL RTS STEEL PA TO BE OH.YANQED AND BURIED UTILITIES ARE SHOWN AS INDICATES ON RECORD MAPS i I OR BETTER).
FURNISHED BY OTHERS AND VERIFIED WHERE POSSIBLE OY ASPHALT COATED(TRFATIIENT
FEATURE LDOITED IN THE FIELD. WESTSOINAJ ENGINEERING.
i M.ASSUMES NO LIABILJTY FOR THE ACCURACY OF THOSE TRASH RACK DETAIL
1 J RDODRMS;OR FOR THE FINAL LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES I (n fa:C1l NHS
A ,i t t, r '• ( �� i I J` / J ! j '$fff J� + 1 IN,AREAS CRITICAL TO DESIGN. ( J I ins-fi0 feet
Ire. Awa T. B� TITLE FAIR HARBOR TRACTS (0119-
DRAXAGE `^, �+}DRAIINSE ply 1 } • J f i f ` : �' ' 1�' PLAN s r e a7 a d n
me �, ; ,: ORAWN GUAAdEngineering, Inc
- -
132a r /`. — —= ~�__ CTB 2Spp0 �L`"T JURGES ENTERPRISES INC. 217 s.w wRws Dnve Pat C.cHard,wa 965se
-" 2020 ENFTAj MACH ROAD Pho.e 3BD a76-3T70 Fws 360 87"439
x ' I '-._' - •��� '~•�'^--.� SEC 5 TN ...,R I ELP18E8 E-mail:wse@wsenpeenng •Aw.com htIpww.ws-gneer61g.—
_ BREdERTON,VIA98310
J >;GALE REV j DESCRIPTION DATE By I�sBu® 1 o 0I"'-0274 JOB No. 805.4 BHT 3 OF 10 SM
FAIR HARBOR TRACTS CONTROL STRUCTURE NOTES
DETENTION POND CONSTRUCTION ACCOORR
CTION NOTE A PORTION OF SECTION 5,TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST,W,M. MASON COUNTY C AS SHOWN OR NOTED,UNITS S BE CONSTRUCTED IN
ACDANCE WITH THE REQUIRf:MENTS FOR FOR BE
BASIN TYPE 2, 54`
L THE DETENTION POND EMBANKMENT SHALL BE OMSTRIJ=FROM MASON COUNTY WASHINGTON STORM WATER wMMLW DIAMETER,
CLEAR UNIFORM MATERAL EXCAVATED FROM THE WE THE MANAGEMENT FACILJTY
EMBANKMENT SHALL BE COMPACTED W LIFTS TO 9=MAXIMUM DENSITY 1 - "/l,
2. FOR DETPiS SHOWING GRADE RING,{ADDER,SEEPS,HANDHOLDS,AND
AS SPECIFIED IN SECTION 2-033(14)C,METHOD C OF THE wsDm / J {{ TOP SLABS,
WSDOT SEE STANDARD
LAN'MISCELLANEOUS CATCH BASIN DETAILS'. I.
STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS PLACED IN 6 TO B INCH UFTS WITH HAND DRAINAGE NOTES AND DETAILS { / ;
HELD EQUIPMENT AND 10 TO 12 INCH UFTS WITH HEAVY EQUIPMENT, {/{ /{ {
WITH THE FOLLOWING SOIL CHARACTERISTICS PER THE UNITED STATES / {f f 3. PIPE SUPPORTS AND RESTRICTOR/SEPARATOR SHALL BE OF THE SAME
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE'S TEXTURAL TRIANGLE A MINIMUM OF 30% DO NOT {f f 1 f MATERIAL,AND BE ANCHORED AT 3 MAX SPACING BY 5/8-DIA STAINLESS
CLAY,A MAXIMUM OF BOX SAND A MAXIMUM OF 60%SILT,WITH
NOMINAL GRAVEL AND COBBLE CONTENT(NOTE:IN GENERAL,EXCAVATED ! STEEL EXPANSION BOLTS OR EMBEDDED 2 IN WALL
GLACIAL TILL WILL BE WELL-SOLED FOR BERM EMBANKMENT MATERA). ENTER
ROUND SOLID COVER MARKED'BRAN' 4. THE RESTRICTOR/SEPARATOR SHALL BE FABRICATED FROM.060'ALUMINUM,
2. POND BERM EMBANKMENTS SHAH BE CONSTRUCTED BY EXCAVATING A WITH LOCKING BOLTS UNLESS 12�' OR.064"ALUMINIZED AA STEEL,03 .M I GAM 197, STEEL PIPES 91
'KEY'EQUAL TO 50%OF THE BERM EMBANKMENT CROSS-SECTIONAL OTHERWISE APPROVED BY ENGINEER. ACCORDANCE WITH SHALL N 38,E MEN M 197,AND M 274. 1
_ GAL.YM82ED STEEL SHALL HAVE TREATMENT 1. i
HEIGHT AND WIDTH MEASURED THRMM THE CENTER OF THE BERM
(EXCEPT ON TILL SOILS WHERE THE IKEY'MINIMUM DEPTH CAN BE - S. OUTLET SHALL BE CONNECTED TO CULVERT OR SEWER PIPE WITH A
REDUCED TO T-FOOT OF EXCAVATION INM THE TILL). FRAME&LADDER/STEPS TRASH RACK - N
STANDARD COUPLING BAND FOR CORRUGATED METAL RIPE,OR GROUTED
3, IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING COMPLETION OF THE EMBANKMENT,IT SHALL BE f f " 4S MAX( INTO THE BELL OF CONCRETE PIPE
STABILIZED BY SEEDING AND MULCHING WITH STRAW. - I%� _ _= _ 6. THE VERTICAL RISER STEM OF THE RESTRICTOR/SFPARATOR SHALL BE THE
G MIN. > - _ - SAME DIAMETER AS THE HORIZONTAL OUTLET PIPE,WITH AN S'MINIMUM
4. THE DETENTION POND SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH A 6 FOOT HIGH =484 � ._ I MAX.DESIGN E=483.43 ACCESS ABOVE _ DOMIETER
L2'0 ELBOW WATER SU
NON-CUNBASLE FENCE AND A MINIMUM OF ONE LOCKING ACCESS ROAD
W/11'0 ORIFICE •(' - 7. FRAME AND LADDER OR STEPS ARE TO BE OFFSET SO THAT.-
GATE SHALL BE PROVIDED THAT IS III'WIDE CONSISTING OF TWO E=483 R` CONCRETE END PROTECTION SWINGING SECTIONS B'WIDTH, ANY PROPOSED PEDESTRIAN-ONLY 18'0 ADS W _:' +a .P
ACCESS CATES SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 4'WIDTH. THE FOLLOWING .t2, �,� TO BE FLUSH WJ POND SLOPE - A CLEANOIIT GATE IS VISIBLE FROM TOP.
MINIMUM SPECIFICATIONS ARE REQUIRED; 8'PVC ' +----E E=48000 FUR MORE INFORMATION CALL(360) 427-9670 B Cu MB-DOWN SPACE LS CLEAR OF RISER AND GTE. -
E--480�0 �' I C. FRAME IS CLEAR OF CURB(1F ANY EXISTS).
FENCE FABRIC: HEUCALLY WOVEN, 11 GAUGE HOT DIPPED ATTACH TALPIECE TO „ - �.5'DEAD STORAGE
GALVANIZED STEEL WIRE FABRIC,6 FEET WIDE OUTLET PIPE WITH FERNCO - POND FLOOR B. MULTI-ORIFICE ELBOWS MAY BE LOCATE AS SHOWN OR ALL ON ONE SOE
WITH BONDED VINYL COATING SHALL BE GREEN COUPLING OR EQUAL E=478. - OF RISER TO ASSURE LADDER CLEARANCE SIZE OF ELBOWS AND
IN OPEN AREAS AND BLA()C IN WOODED AREAS. - v Cl!"1d/OIIT 5}EAN SPECIFICATIONS PLACEMENT TO BE DETERMINED BY THE ENGINEER. .
TOP AND BOTTOM OF FABRIC SHALL BE 12'MIN
TWISTED AND BARBED. GROUT CRU TAILPIECE - 51ANDARD C�YYAII®SLEET.LADDER/STEPS - SIZE: 30'x24' 9. RESTRICTOR PLATE WITH ORIFICE AS SPECIFIED W THE CONTRACT PLANS.
TO CS WALL _ SPECIFIED OPENING TO 8E CUT ROUND AND SMOOTH
FENCE POSTS: GTE POSTS,2 7/8'D1A.SCH 40 HOT DIPPED - MAT(RJAL- �SCREEN
LETTERING
G REFLECTIVE SHEETING
GALVANIZED STL PIPE CORNER&END POSTS, PIPE SUPPoRE 3x0A90 �C�N''^,` 10. CLEANOUT/SHEAR GATE:ALUMINUM ALLOY PER ASTN 8-28-ZG-32A OR
2 3/8•DW.SCH.20 HOT DIPPED GALVANIZE GAUGE STEFT STRAPS iNSTALlA710N: SECURE TO CHAN UNK FENCE IF AVST BLED, ASTM
SIL PIPE ALL POSTS SHALL BE SET IN BOLTED OR IMBEDDED 2'IN ,.,,, 30'114TO IESGROUD ON 8'x4'14°POST BIJPoE CAST IRON TUBING
A I CLASS 3AB AS REQUIRED. LIFT HANDLE NEOPRENE
30'INTO THE GROUND SOLD OR TUBMG WITH ADJUSTABLE HOOK AS REQUIRED. NEOPRENE
CONCRETE A MINIMUM OF 3 FEET. CROSS WALL AT MAX.Y SPA.(TYP) Sa= RUBBER GASKET REQUIRED BETWEEN RISER MOUNTING FLANGE AND GTE
BARS SHALL CONNECT AD ACENT FENCE POSTS, FLANGE
STORM WATER MATING SURFACES OF LID AND BODY TO BE MACHINED FOR
WITH DIAGONAL BRACES AT CORNERS AND RESTRICTOR PLATE '
S. ALL POSTS,CROSS BARS AND GATES WITH Z 7/8.0 ORIFICE NTS PROPER FIT. FLANGE MOUNTING BOLTS SEAL BE 3/8'WA STAO•A65
END CI341 TYPE II W�OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE STEEL
SHALL BE PAINTED OR COATED THE SAME
COLOR AS THE VOM CLAD FENCE. � /SHEAR GATES TO THE DESIGN SHOWN ON SHEET 2
11.. ALTERNATE CLEANOUT
OF WSMXT STANDARD PLAN 8-3 ARE ACCEPTABLE,PROVIDED THEY MEET
TENSION WIRE: TENSION WIRE SI BE 7 GAUGE HOT DIPPED /"
THE MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS ABOVE AND HAVE A SIX SOLI, 10 3 d
GALVANIZED STEEL WIRE AND BE PROVIDED AT
BOLT CIRCLE FOR BOLTING TO THE FLANGE COMNECTION.
THE TOP AND BOTTOM Of THE FENCE FABRIC.
12. GTE SIW1 NOT OPEN BEYOND THE CLEAR OPENING AS SHOWN ON`MAX
5. ALL PONDS SHALL HAVE SIGNS PLACED SO THAT AT LEAST ONE IS LIMOHLOILl CATCH BASIN FRAME AND VANED NOTES OPENING OF GATE'ON SHEET 2,OF WSDOT STANDARD PLAN B-3,BY
CLEARLY VISIBLE AND LEGIBLE FROM ALL ADJACENT STREETS,SIDEWALKS GRATE OR MANHOLE RING AND } ND SEEPS ARE REOUtREO WHEN HEIGHT IS 4'OR LESS, UNITED HINGE MOVEMENT,STOP TAB,OR SOME OTHER DEVICE
OR PATHS SIGNS SHALL MEET THE DESIGN AND INSTALLATION COVER
REOUIREMENTS ILLUSTRATED N THE STORMWATFR SIGN DETAIL SHOWN ONTHIS SHEET 2 THE BDROM OF THE PRECAST CATCH BASIN MAY BE SLOPE TO FACILITATE
CLEANING.
RECTANGULAR ADJUSTMENT
SECTION OR CIRCULAR 3.FRAME AND GRATE MAY BE INSTATED WITH FLANGE DOWN OR CASs INTO
ADJUSTMENT SECTION ADJUSTMENT SECTION,
4.KNOCKOUTS SHALL HAVE A WALL THICKNESS OF 2'MINIMUM TO 25'
11AT SLAB TOP MAXM kA. PROVIDE A 1.5'MINIMUM GP BETWEEN THE KNOCKOUT WALL AND
THE OUTSIDE OF THE PIPE AFTER THE PIPE IS RNSTALL.EO,FILL THE GP
•�V �.a y WITH JOINT MORTAR IN ACCORDANCE WITH STD.SPEC.9-04A
135" 7.2 OR 89' '
j CATCH BASIN DIMENSIONS
1OREN ) CATCH --- --- MAXIMUM MWIMUM DISTANCE BASE REINFORCING STEEL
BASIN WALL FARE KNOCKOUT BETWEEN W JFF W EACH DIRECTION
11NICIW65 THICKNESS - TOP OF BERM DIVIDING
DIAMETER SIZE KNTCKOIRS INT ank SEPARATE POND INTO TWO CELLS-•,
STEPS OR IADDEB� 46" C r 3N' !' IL15 am 11 w
84" 40 9" 4r
ACCESS ABOVE _ ,w $ A$
le U 24 015 TOP OF
AROUND SOLID COVER MARKED"DRAIN' PLAN VIEW i^1 DEAD STORAGE -
WITH LOCKING BOLTS UNLESS i.� - .:..�• 13' 13' 039 R� BOTTOM POND
"A OTHERWISE APPROVED BY ENGINEER. _ P�A1Dg CROSS SECTION PERPENDICULAR TO
g FRAME&LADDER/STEPS =d915p TRASH RACK Nmm Flu ;' to 2b maN � :1 POND AXIS ALONG CENTER OF BERM
i'T L4 - (', j PPE LIAffRflIL WTIH MAT9NU61 INSIDE DIAMETER 6 MINIMUM
4% .:,....:'-. :�s. -; •: I D COPIpiETE � CPSSPS L�� PROFILE I+AX
----�-I
rr wL� � WAIL I'YC WALL PVC QUARRY SPALLS LAYER
I F... MAX.DESIGN E=489.73 '• .` 4' W 30` •'; ' 27' 30''
_ 12'0 PVC �� Wa. U E I '��• 1-1/2'TO 4'WASHED ROCK CORE
W/9'0 ORIFICE TI 161g SEPARATE BASE Q4TEGRAL 845E
12'ADS N-12 �.. CONCRETE ENO PROTECTION OAST IN PLACE PRECAST WITH RISER IB'THICKHIESS- 1� hc-ti
. TO BE FLUSH W/POND SLOPE 60' 36' 4$' �' d2' CELL 2 POND
P� ..' L� 21MY5 pF11 'D'RMG 72' 43' S4' 4Y 3� 48' BOTTOM -7
E=•48EQ0_ E=AV'� GRAVEL flACKFlLL FOR A(
ATTACH TAILPIECE TO .5'DEAD STORAGE PIPE ZONE BEDDING , W' 46'
'j ,: E.481SB0 _ `NOTE'KEY'NOT REQUIRE
OUTLET PIPE WITH FERNM E - POND FLOOR - _ (D CORRUGATED POL1E11HYLERE STCRII SEWER PIPE M.SPED•9-05.20
COUPLING OR EQUAL " "- ® STD.SPEC.8-05.IS(1)) CROSS SECTION PARALLEL TO POND FOREBAY(CELL. t)POND BOTTOM
T2'wN CLEANOUT SHEAR GATE Si VA%BASE 69�9T0.SPEC.9-D5.1E(2� AXIS ALONG CENTER OF BERM
GROUT CRU TALPECE STANDARD GALVANIZED STEEL LADDER/SM S
TO CB WALL CATCH BASIN TYPE 2 GRAVEL FILTER WINDOW
NIS MS
PIPE SUPPORT:3:0A90
GAUGE STEEL STRAPS -
BOLTED OR IMBEDDED f IN TRH
WALL.AT MAX.3'SPA(TYP) SECTU T. $qt FAIR HARBOR TRACTS W e s t S o u n d
DESGaEDSY AW8 '� dh DILVNAGE NOTES AND ORALS
RESTRICTOR PLATE -._ _
FI Engineering, I n c
WITH 2.25"0 ORI
aeAwxlw GAIfA,lM I _ -
C8i13 TYPE II w/OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE ` z105A CLIENT JURGES ENTERPRISES INC'. 217 S.W.Wifidns Drive Part Orchard We.98366
CHEMI)OF CTB - s .. Phone(360)876-3770 Fax(3601 876 D439
202D ENETM BEACH ROAD E-mailwse en ineeri mm
NTS I0�' @ws g ng. Mtp:llwwtv.Wsan4neeringc0m ..
SEC 5 TWN 21N R 1W BREME-RTON,WA 96310 ----
u SCALE F AS NOTED (360)37r-027A
REV, ossmw7m DATE In' DATEt31734t® & N g JOB No._8�__4 SHl 4 Or 10 SHTS
FAIR HARBOR TRACTS
A PORTION OF SECTION 5,TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST,W.M.
MASON COUNTY,WASHINGTON
DRAINAGE NOTES AND DETAILS
8 MONTH EXCEEDENCE WIER 19.}�,. 5 TOP or BERM 5 DQCH
r:
491.0 11 1or 491.0 1 '1 i8S9 3�
489.73— — — 490A�
8t'TOP OF BERM
Q4$1.i.!— _-- _ 1t1P OF BERM_ --
WUPOND
VOLUME , :',.. 4829
SEDIMENT STORAGE 487.0 '
a79.5
POND LINER - VOLUME
SEDIMENT STORAGE 476.5 POND LINER
WEST POND CROSS SECTION D-D _ EAST POND CROSS SECTION A-A
HORIZONTAL$GALE 1'=20' I 'D ,. HORZONTAL SCALE: I'=29'
VERTICAL SCALE 1'=5' / �` VERTICAL SCAT£1•=5•
77 8"TOP OF BE101 6'TOP OF BERM 5'DITM
231 1t(14D
iv
1 �f
6'TOP OF ISM
IV -
E I —
E —
491.0i
489.73 2:1 No
1 T _ 479.5
POND LINER
POND LINER
WEST POND CROSS SECTION E-E —N'- T ri ;. , T
. ----_-.- �- _ POND CROSS SECTION
HDRZONTAL SCALE 1 1•=20' 1 -
M t HORIZONTAL SCALE:1•=2O'
VERTICAL SCALE t•=5' � II
1 P I "}' V � VERTICAL SCALE 1'=5'
1 d tt ,a
f
=ax' r",
f f 1 f I F 8 . ,: g-{ e''TDP OF WN e'TIP W arms am
DITCH
d TDP OF BHY 15 ACCt35 9f V7{ J j 4p3.43 _
9 '14N0
489.73 2:1 MAX r i '+"r. ar ' --
j.
,•" � C `' i � -' � � POND LW6i
ENT STORAGE 4765
POND LINER
m
WEST POND CROSS SECTION FF 7j __ 1 �a'�s ;. I EAST POND CROSS SECTION C—C
HORIZONTAL SCALE:i-26' t ' a �y`'�" -.
VERTICAL SCALE: 1'=6� / / r "�t '#�. .`s`�. ,y :+- HORIZONTAL SCALE: *-.,V
= j / � •'� '�!- _A � •� VERi1CAL SCALE: t'=5
if
I
A �V� � i• I I
WEW 0YV.11'1
11
SCALE:,'-30, E 1w
p POND LINER NOTES—S DESI�aY AWB T� F AIR NH RBC7RNTo RAC S S
AGE NOTES W est S o lJ n d
1. IMPERVIOUS SOILS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 30R CLAY,
A MAXIMUM OF 60%SAND,A MAXIMUM OF 60%SIU W n By GA.JIAJM Engineering I n c
CONFORMANCE WITH THE USDA TDGUIRAL MANGLE. � ?
2. WHERE EXISTING SOIL MEETS THE CRWCTERISTICS OF 2to� CLIENT 217 S.W.Wilkins Nve Port Orchard W&98366
IMPERVIOUS SOIL,E7(CAVAIION IS NOT REQUIRED. rev CTB �, �{ JURGES ENTERPRISES INC. Phone(360)876-3770 Fax(360)676-0439
9 WA 2020 ENETAI BEACH ROAD E-mail:wse&sengineering.com ht#/Avww.ws ine6n ram
SEC 5 TWN 21N p 1W 9
MERM —1 BREMERTON,WA98310
MAIMQP
SCALE ---AS T+IOTED REY. DESCRIPrIIXN GATE By �,• 00)377-0274 JOB No. 805.4 s{( Jc 10 stirs
FAIR HARB(DR TRACTS
A PORTION OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST, W.M.
MASON COUNTY, WASHINGTON
STA 1+00 TO 6+00.78
tV?:.•n:it �. �:rri: „yy�� —.�—r --------.,,..
1 >•:- '''t>r :r, — — — — — .>Ll� —
�r�...... -�,'. _ t---• i �... Yy;-.tea' ..
Dr C
,r 4c s.?• ..t .•{'
Sir •'1v'. ].A,•^ .i"'Sf �: c,
•A�
- 4` •"`5'D'� 1
l � •1'., i .'may '�,- t '''i• `>1 • >. .A,
—�T— � ?Y% Fl:�.':�4; �•'�12C�':�• t. .M i _ - •,'k:'i �Y\ :�L ...• _ bf�i.-.1Y �1C•�'. Z �h..l ..t.. .tt\.. ti(<> '�� �' J
--------------
`
-------------
STA 1+00 TO 6+00.78
SCALE 1•-20'
505 --.- -- PN SFA'6+04.07
C � PVf gkY,494119�
KAM
A0-7.80%
--•— L Q75.00
-- -------------- --- tea'
CROSSING WERAND
NO C%NG OR
RUING IN THIS 1
o ARFJ4 ONLY MINOR f
495±� ' 1 SHAPING IS ALLOWED` PVT SL4.3+8a11 '_...—
PVt pEV>463.33 W
bi II{
AD:11.21% -
1 M750
PJi STA:1+50.00 � .D -
PM ELEV:502.30 ;o
490 K:21.75
AD:-4.60%
LVC:1 .00
1
485 1 1 —
t
1 1 SM-5+35.02
41� afV-468m- --'
K:10.89
$ AD5.51 X
LVC:60.00
DATUM ELEV 475
475.000 ^
u]� �C• R� c^, N� � '�, h� c'4 M s� � � MN to M� m� pQ
N m
1+00 1+50 2+00 2+50 3+00 3+50 4+00 4+50 5+00 5+50 6+00
STA 1+00 TO 6+=78
HORIZONTAL SCALE:1*=20•
VERTICAL SCALE: 1
e
orsieNEn ar �_ AWB TITLE FAIR ARBORTRACTS
STA 1+CO TO 5+00.78
.
WegtSOUnd
DUM sr GUAM Engineering, Inc_
GRAPHIC SCALE PZOs0 CLIENT — 217 S.w WiNns Ddve Port O dmrt,W&suss
so o®n _ CTs � .t� Jl1RGES ENTERPRISES INC.
40
0 10 ', peat } 2D20 ENEtAI BEACH ROAD Phon I:(M)876-3 i099d cOfn h /lvnnv FFax( meene mm
_ ¢ 21N 1� ® BREMERTON,WA 9B310 w@ g iV � 0 0.
i;.h�-20 ttd (3B0)377-0274
d iE REK ATE DAIE9FALED �'( JOBND. 805,4 SHT 6 OF 10 SHTS
FAIR HARBOR TRACTS
A PORTION OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST,W.M.
MASON COUNTY, WASHINGTON
STA 6+00.78 TO 11+00
1_ — ---------
. 'a"r.:i::y •dr{. :..j•$ :v,n.;.`'y: ^?f, •?.:^.�`: ye r<+_'t'r:yv�:.1:� :• _ •_- ,uK�"'�",+.n',s� : ,� f•'�J, Iy '.•` I -
^,a:+,.. ti;[ �•i`1 .�+? ""trw.+r. ".�,^c i r n,`c :,1 ...:.'i•`Y �• }1 1
v 1r=r'• �•;:;:sx;,. `•;` _ •V-?`e``•y.3�-� k>...����� _ti'i.i.� t: ��+��
.a. �. �'�y:.1.�r: q-CW6:+ f1 ♦a'i>�r M1:✓,.s +1`:..�5 4 ,t .
'r-4�
':� �. a-•..',. :G^ -..- :,- ',;..ice: ?}. LAb*r,
7' •'' .[.'tea: �s•^.. s.�:s. :5c `_<•: �'��.. — — .ram.
r...•:': ,s:rr..:;,1 ,ti s^.?•r. ._ +:C•.�_«? x'<�'•c,:+-:�'+:'=��•� 's %• 'p.•y`.��,;PSs.�,ra*•..Fr�'��+t�,`r''�irs:.^.. — — — — —
++........7.�., �..-a+1 w, .».. ..',- ..'•�.K.:.rA ... . :' 1. -.f_�;-'+ N .��.`l�+L,. ..a v..:..ti.S.x.r.e 4x��:�'l i.Y..Sk.
_:� .,.tiP° •�,. ':ar+x .`A.�".`.�.;iK• �.+' A.ti c:"a`'+�+ �,�• '+_t•�J'b`o,r r;rt- r .}:� �,. .s_. .ti ':c.z..,' - 'i`. 4 s-cc :'s.
..,--" �+... l .eS zL�r;, i s;e. y�i-,� '�+�_ ''' � a$� .•t'' a -- �. Y� ., t.
` ,°3(•;+.�1; •���.' ? .S+ tt�?' 1 '+`r`ri Y,v ia:,s u' ?.ri , a J i >`
i •+.,,,,�� »�'�., a{V .i'.S'�'i¢..�11'+ ,i.4 �•A.:•3, J_'[ �'_•a:�i...:, ;i i __ l+•••;.
j
GRGGAN AVENUE SEVENTH STREET
STA 6+00.78 TO 11+00
SCALE: 1'=20' -
I
SIX
WAZ PN u 7+35b0
f1 Pvl S-lx8,7
PYI EV 494.00 F-A ELEV:19200
K:27.89 K:42.68
tWvc:so0 - AlkL41% I
LVC:60A0
495
-z45X-
__� —1 ---
+90 —40
}
f
--
4
$ l
a � '
475 475
�I$
6+00 6+50 7+00 7+50 844D 8+50 8+50 9+00 9+50 10+00 10+50 11+00
STA 6+0078 TO 11+00
HORIZOWAL SCALE! 1'=20'
VERI X SCALE:i'-5•
-- aA TITLE FAIR HARBOR TRACTS �� -_ /�/ G+}c
o�m+mer AW13 tiV w LOB STA 6+00.78 TO 11+00 N Y Yes`Sound
BY _ Engineering, Inc
GRAPHIC SCALE asumBy C13 �, zjpBO aIE�Lr JURGES ENTERPRISES INC. 217S.W.Wdld"a� Pod Orchard,Wa.SM
so la �s7 �,o+ Phane(360)876.3770 Faz(360)87"30
LWrtL 2020 ENETAI BEACH ROAD E4Wt VAe@wwvk*wk1j mm
SEC 5 TyR 21N R 11'V , BREMERTON,WA 98310 hWAYNW WS60910TkV 0DM
fM (360)377-0'274
ork.sU r a SCALE as REV. OESCRIP(K)N DATE BY �,E (:r c J08 Na 8'OrJ.4 SHr 7 of 10 SHTS
FAIR HARBOR TRACTS
A PORTION OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST,W.M.
MASON COUNTY, WASHINGTON
STA 11+00 TO 15+50
�y~'►'��.r�1.'�' ?:y�'�•�1.�r5i••t''1:tyls': i''.\ \`) „_"`— �r'I"r l �//;x I +�`'s
%%
�"�--.---__ 't• ,r `?' b+�; {{ �r,:"yr."..e d:-.--'`^--- yr..c,-J.1� 1���' frf ��rr I =`ri;, ts�p
_ _. H..x K. !.!i \�b K•. .1 �:;5 �.1. ._.. to ��-- ...—_ '�-_+ ^~ r�' 1
a,r.•,:
�JRy�4 is r
�.
' _ '•'{:n.. ,-:,t t:.3 '�_ ,-1-.•`t'_:. �-j:e•:• ..�� ,.+.' 7-•. .'�.. ,��:`��;ti7� � �:,+' •.4`" ,5,=c:...� ra6 '"'�' Jf,` r:,:.:i�:.:.
�y - •r i�-'rt.fig '•t?�'1' �'r,;:;.yi' :,f,a r.t^•{:e,.,Y..� •a�p.l• `4i.,i!: •`� r-�;.�� ;:�v .r x;.r;,�,s,r-• ��.� ..r....-t'�..
�_T..'�t:• ..t�.t�G „. .�,e.f�aY ..1,_ -.}_ `i4'-;>.'t. •'G.�.::,',-,.. '_i: - :?a. nSr-.-.4: oa..:1: ^4'4.k`�K`.• .--v: - *D:k.
'�, - ..£. :y'�<.. -':4 �'�r- .��•• f. .t� ';� �R.'•.^�y�h-Y:.r:,.i L'-•:A.- a�r� `'� �>_5:��4. - •:..7�'`' '-''° ,t'^' -:.-�a^�'.,_
\� -� -.i:' C �:,':'�•i+-i;`<..n �= 1: .b r�,+' � y:S�.e;�..• caf=1'. _tir C•ti::=1�"'•�.:
STA TO 15+50
SEVENTH STFEEl scvE ,=zo SEVENTH STREET
505
I
309 t
40 I
4m _
8 40
5 —-
I t
g Q9 475 .
n e a
11190 11+50 12+00 12+511 13+00 m Q
13+50 13+50 14+00 14+50 15+00 0M
STA n-WO TO 15+50
HGWONTu SCALE: 11-20'
vER11GL SCALE 1'=5' -
� � AWB G R eel TITLE FAIR HARBOR TRACTS W e S t 5 O 1.1 n C�
o� STAII+ODTO,5+50 DRAWN,RV canAAt En ineering, Inc
GHAPHK0 SCALE a¢r� CTS 2r CLIENT 217 S.W.W1NWDdre � Patoftanl,Wa 98m
20
! JURGES ENTERPRISES INC. Phone(360)aes VM F®c(360)87S0439
0 10 202D ENET1d REACH ROAD
sEc 6 TWN 2�N_ 1 W Qut E 1r1s k rBe�selgineedng cnm htip lWwx.wsEg panes ng mm
�uER oN WA egt,o
a .m It SCALE AS NOTED ,gy oEsasw laH WE ar DATE BMW s 13�m1-02ts J08 No. SW 8 QF 10 SHTS
1
a'
•
FAIR HARBOR TRACTS
A PORTION OF SECTION 5,TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST,W.M.
MASON COUNTY,WASHINGTON
-----
Ile / ` r. *::i};v S�+jfl.''-'�`:4•a:- ~Y-'�.•:o+rr+.�t'-Ly: _ i�i".. ;>• ;!,_ .l. si-' .ice �[ �� _��..-t-••r- _ I 1
,1A �t-_ :c \4.. �:i.�s�'. _ +�tr�!% sa����.`.a_ 4'`+:'; -•'\SiJi•'•;.a,,�;���'•',.,+'-,"'c''.`i,�•..ti �4-:._ :k. •-.:•`F�`+r.;z•. I G
.•e•y .�r- `*:.-;�'.:1 •+.a,7'�s :ti�<`-,i'� �.
q :.14•.t a'\•M .wb'. ��[`!S(�.Mi�.. ..':!a'l:- 4 :.�'-..�.��_. .A ,Z:-t.. .� Wei�\. x7��.�k. ..{.V��, pp-�Ye•a (
f _ �+ .-..e!1��.:r-..y�a+�'". �1•. '•.� ��.�Jid"^':`�t:e�'7?"•r J�,n':.i�t. :�=^'' :",-,'.�.',-.M,,. ..e `:1. ..... �...y`i.:;'. „.J�'•..'F:`17^?7";'�' ..,�.� —
• :%q?'.+a'^ _",:�-��'Y�'-4; a ��.�.w•. �.._r"-�" .L..�.' •C. .'S:`.��..�"�•.' .\"el v-•S:?s_.. 'r_,.�` �'•a� ^'- r, I !
7 .,�•. ti. :x.:[ y.. `.5;�'L iw lo.:+:' .S:T.!. -u..n to ..n. .f,'�C.,�::Y;�.;�:: ,. ^... :t,rFa' •'
2 `.},•a;<< ::i-^.. �Ja:�•-. 'x.,.•�•,�.��� yh':��a7:.=`a'� yam..:
t e' .::r:.-- �•.` -- .., .�.. id,„'z, -.aT',...�.,rr>.ir„y �ti,.�,r:._�.�-, �'ixc'i'"'i`'�5.�It'.iS\.�.r���.V`�:Yt1`�• I --
------------------------------
n
� ,3 vie t-•;�, i � { ' � � � Ft I 1
• �� fJ p
ATWATER AVENUE
A TO19+97B6
SCALE:r-2'
sas — SIX
xa I soa
FM
i
STA17+37 495
K21.30
L1�:75.Op
4W 4H0
I
n.
---------------
475� _ ----
475
go~,11� ' o 2- go g
15+50 16+00 76+50 77+00 17+50 18+00 184m 19+00 19+50 19+97.87
STA 15+50 TO 19+026
HORIZONTAL 5CAl 1 0'
vmnm SML 1':s'
TITLEFAIR HARBOR TRACTS �e g t SO l.1 n CI
oast NEoav AM Q~ �d� STA 15+50 TO 19+97.86 _•
omw„ffy snuA.lm — Engineering, Inc
CRAPIAC SCALE — - _- jpgO CLIENT JURGES ENTERPRISES INC. 217 S.w.WAklns Orive Port Orchard,Wat 98388
a o Phone(369)876-3770 Fax(360)876•0439
SEC 5 ro 2�tt"_R 1w 2020E'ETa BEACH ROAD E-mail:wse@xsengineerntg.com
(N BIREMERTON,WA9B340 --- r htlpJMvm.wsengineedng.COp1 i
tid h.t � AS NOTED REV. OFSCRIP" �DATE B DATESEALE0 G�AI�D I360)377-0Z74 JOB No. SL^ .J4 SHT Q OF"—0-SKS
SILT FENCE NOTES: FAIR HARBOR TRACTS
1. FILTER FABLENGTH
SHALL BE PERCTO AV IN A EFJOINCONTINUOUS ROLL JOINTS
CUT TO q PORTION OF SECTION 5,TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST, W.M.
THE LENGTH OF THE BARRIER TO AVOID USE OF JOINTS.WHEN JOINTS ARE
NECESSARY,FILTER CLOTH SHALL BE SPUCED TOGETHER ONLY AT A �[ OU A'
SUPPORT POST,WITH A MINIMUM 6-INCH OVERLAP,AND SECURELY FILTER FABRIC MATERIAL IN \/MASON CNTY' WASHIN�GTON
FASTENED AT BOTH ENDS TO POSTS, CONTINUOUS ROLLS USE i
WREE MESH SUPPORT
2• POSTS SHALL BE SPACED A MAXIMUM OF 6 FEET APART AND DRIVEN TO ATTACH FABRIC TO WIRE F�FILTER FABRC �y7 MINIMUM EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION
SECURELY INTO THE GROUND(MINIMUM OF 30 INCHES). TESL N QTES AN
�1 D D ETAI LS CONTROL REQMEMENTS
3. A TRENCH SHALL BE EXCAVATED-APPROXIMATELY 8 INCHES WEE AND 12 - 12.STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION. ALL STORM DRAIN INLETS MADE OPERABLE
INCHES DEEP ALONG THE LANE OF POSTS AND UP SLOPE FROM THE TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION MINIMUM EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE PROTECTED SO THAT STORM WATER RUNOFF
BARRIER.THIS TRENCH SHAU BE BACKFWFD WITH WASHED GRAVEL. p ��B0tT0N,OF CONTROL MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS CONTROL REQUIREMENTS SHALL NOT ENTER THE CONVEYANCE SYSTEM WTHOUT FIRST BEING FILTERED OR
T OTHERWISE TREATED TO REMOVE SEDIMENT. AFTER PROPER WRITTEN APPLICATION,
GROUND S RFAil MATERIAL IN ek12' 1• EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL FACILITIES SHALL BE INSPECTED y STABI 17 TION AND SEDIMENT TRAPPING, ALL EXPOSED AND UNWORKED SOILS
4. WHEN STANDARD STRENGTH FRIER FABRIC IS USED,A WIRE MESH SUPPORT 4v THE REQUIREMENT FOR INLET PROTECTION MAY BE WANED BY THE DIRECTOR ON
FENCE SHALL BE FASTENED SECURELY TO THE UP SLOPE SIDE OF THE AFTER EACH RAINFALL EVENT AND DAILY DURING PROLONGED RAINFALL A SITE SPECIFIC BASIS WHEN THE CONVEYANCE SYSTEM DOWNSTREAM OF THE
o INCLUDING SOIL STOCKPILES,SHALL BE STABILIZED BY SUITABLE APPLICATION OF
POSTS USING HEAVE-DUTY WIRE STAPLES AT LEAST I INCH LONG,TIE WIRES I BMPS WHICH PROTECT SOIL FROM THE EROSIVE FORCES OF RANDROP IMPACT INLET DISCHARGES TO AN APPROPRIATE SEDIMENT CONTAINMENT BMP AND THE
OR HOG RINGS.THE WIRE SHALL EXTEND INTO THE TRENCH A MINIMUM OF Tn .. 2 NECESSARY REPAIRS OR REPLACEMENT C;f FACILITIES SHALL BE AND FLOWING WATER APPLICABLE PRACTICES INCLUDE,BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO CONVEYANCE SYSTEM CAN BE ADEQUATELY CLEANED FOLLOWING SITE STABILVA1110N.
4 INCHES AND SHALT.NOT EXTEND MORE THAN 24 INCHES ABOVE THE - ACCOMPUSHED PROMPTLY. VEGETATIVE ESTABLISHMENT,MULCHING,PLASTIC COVERING,AND THE EARLY
ORIGINAL GROUND SURFACE. `ao APPLICATION OF GRAVEL BASE ON AREAS TO BE PAVED. FROM OCTOBER 1 TO 13,UNDERGROUND DIARY CONSTRUCTION. THE CONSTRUCTION OF UNDERGROUND
3. SEDIMENT DEPOSITS SHALL BE REMOVED AFTER EACH STORM EVENT OR UTTLTIY ONES SHALL BE UNTIED,WHERE FEASIBLE,TO NO MORE THAN 5DO FEET
5. THE STANDARD STRENGTH FILTER FABRIC SHAL BE STAPLED OR WIRED TO __ 6,MAUL WHEN THE LEVEL OF DEPOSITION REACHES APPROXTMATE•LY ONE-RNF THE ARIL MAY NO SOILS SHALL REMAIN N SOILS SHALIZEDL
FOR MORE 1T4W 2 DAYS, GF OPEN TRENCH AT ANY ONE ONE TIME. WHERE CONSISTENT WITH SAFETY AND
THE FENCE,AND 20 N04E OF THE FABRIC SHALL BE EXTENDED INTO THE - MAXIMUM POTENTIAL DEPTH. FROM MAY t TO SEPTEMBEA 30,NO SONS SHALL REMAIN UNSTABILIZED FOR MORE THAN 7 DAYS. SPACE CONSIDERATIONS,EXCAVATED MATERIAL SHALL BE PLACED ON THE UPHILL
TRENCH.THE FABRIC SHALL NOT EXTEND MORE THAN 24 INCHES ABOVE SIDE Of THE TRENCH. DEWA713RING DEVICE SHALL DISCHARGE TO AN
THE ORIGKAL GROUND SURFACE FILTER FABRIC SHALL NOT BE STAPLED TO --- 4. SEDIMENT DEPOSITS RENAMING IN PLACE AFTER THE ESC FACILITIES ARE 2. AT ALL TIMES OF THE YEAR,THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE SUFFICIENT MATERIALS, APPROPRIATE SEDIMENT TRAP OR POND,PRECEDED BY ADEQUATE ENERGY
EXISTING TREES 27xY WOOD POSTS.STANDARD OR NO LONGER REQUIRED SHALL 13E DRESSED TO CONFORM TO THE EXISTING EQUIPMENT AND LABOR ON-SITE TO STABILIZE AND PREVENT EROSION FROM ALL DISSIPATION,PRIOR TO RUNOFF LEAVING THE SITE
BETTER OR EQUIVALENT GRADE,PREPARE)AND SELDEA
IF FIBER FABRIC IS INSTALLED DENUDED AREAS WITHIN 12-HOURS AS SIR AND WEATHER CONDITIONS DICTATE. . C
fi. WHEN EXTRA-SFRENGRH FILTER FABRIC AND CLOSER POST SPACING IS AGAINST NATIVE VEGETATION t'RAYEL 14.CONSTRUCTED ACCESS ROUTE, WHEREVER CONSTRUCTION VEHICLE ACCESS I•
USED,THE WIRE MESH SUPPORT FENCE MAY DE ER POST
A SUCH A 5. TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL FACILITIES SHALL BE ROUTES INTERSECT PAVED ROADS,PROVISIONS MUST BE MADE TO MINIMIZE THE
BAWILL MAY BE OMITTED 3. FROM OCTOBER 1ST TO APRIL 3MK THE PROJECT ENGINEER SHALL VSIT THE
CASE,THE FILTER FABRIC IS STAPLED OR WIRED DIRECTLY TO THE POSTS MAINTAINED TRANSPORT OF SEDIMENT MUD ONTO PAVED ROAD BY USE OF APPROPRIATE
WIRE MESH SUPPORT FENCE BE DEVELOPMENT SITE MINIMUM OF ONCE A WEIX FOR THE PURPOSE OF INSPECTING (MUD)
WITH ALL OTHER PROVISIONS OF ABOVE NOTE APPLYING. LOCATED ON THE DOWNHILL SIDE dF THE GLEN JURGES THE EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL FACILITIES,RENEWING THE PROGRESS BMP'S SUCH AS A STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE IF SEDIMENT 15 .�
FILTER FABRIC) OF CONSTRUCTION,AND VERIFYING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE EROSION CONTROL TRANSPORTED ONTO A ROAD SURFACE,THE ROADS SHALL BE CLEANED
7. FILTER FABRIC FENCES SHALL NOT BE REMOVED BEFORE THE UPSLOPE 2020 ENETN BEAC)I R0,^D,BREIMERTON,WA 98310 MEASURES BEING UNDERTAKEN. THE PROJECT ENGINEER SHALL IMMEDIATELY THOROUGHLY,AS A MINIMUM,AT THE END OF EACH DAY. SEDIMENT SHALL BE
AREA HAS BEEN PERMANENTLY STABILIZED. FILTER FABRIC INFORM MASON COUNTY OF ANY PROBLEL49 OR POTENTIAL PROBLEMS OBSERVED REMOVED FROM ROADS BY SHOVELING OR SWEEPING AND BE TRANSPORTED TO A
MATERIAL tmW W-0274 DURING SAID SITE VISITS.AS WELL AS OF ANY RECOMMENDED CHANGES IN THE CONTROLLED SEDIMENT DISPOSAL AREA. STREET WASHING SHALL BE ALLOWED
8, FILTER FABRIC FENCES SHAD.BE INSPECTED IMMEDIATELY AFTER EACH EiEACENCY PHONE N10. EROSION CONTROL MEASURES TO BE UNDERTAKEN, WHEN REQUESTED BY MASON ONLY AFTER SEDIMENT IS REMOVED IN THIS MANNER.
RAINFALL AND AT LEAST DAILY DURING PROLONGED RAINFALL ANY REQUIRED i� COUNTY,THE PROJECT ENGINEER SHALL PROVIDE THE COUNTY WITH WRITTEN
REPAIRS SHALL BE MADE IMMEDIATELY. THE OWNER'S REFIRESENTWK SHALLBE RECORDS OF SAID WEEKLY SITE VISITS,INCLUDING DATES OF VISITS AND NOTED 15. REMOVAL OF TEMPORARY IMPS. ALL TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT
SITE OBSERVATIONS. CONTROL BAPS SHALL BE REMOVED WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER FINAL SITE
9. SILT FENCES WILL BE INSTALLED PARALLEL TO ANY SLOPE CONTOURS. -- aE,,Jl1(iCfS STAB IUZATION IS ACHIEVED OR AFTER THE TEMPORARY BMPS ARE NO LONGER
PROVIDE WASHED GRAVEL.BACKFILL ''+ 4. IN THE EVENT THAT GROUND ON A PROJECT SITE IS LEFT BARE AFTER SEPTEMBER NEEDED, TRAPPED SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED OR STABILIZED ON-SITE
10. CONTRIBUTING LENGTH TO FENCE WILL NOT BE GREATER THAN iD0 FEET. -_'-'�`' DISTURBED SOIL AREAS RESULTING FROM REMOVAL O'TEMPORARY 9MPS SHALL
330 - ID N TRENCH AND ON 2Q20 META BEACH TOAD,BR(DMEERTQN,WA 9B31Q UNTIL MASON COUNTY MAY ISSUE A PROP WORK ORDER FOR TFff ENTIRE PROJECT BE PERMANENTLY STABILIZED. THE REMOVAL OF TEMPORARY EROSION AND
11. DO NOT INSTALL BELOW AN OUTLET PPE OR WEIR BOTH SIRES OF FILTER FENCE UNTIL SATISFACTORY CONTROLS ARE PROVIDED.(3FiO)377-0274 FABRIC ON THE SURFACE 9r SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS MAY NOT BE REQUIRED FOR THOSE PROJECTS,SUCH AS
1►M. SINGLE FAMILY PLATS,THAT WILL BE FOLLOWED BY ADDITIONAL CONSTRUCTION
EMERGENCY PHONE NO: 5. N THE EVEHLT THAT GROUND ON A PROJECT SITE IS LEFT BARE AFTER EEPTELIBER
12. INSTALL DOWN SLOPE OF EXPOSED AREAS. 301H,AND MASON COUNTY B UNSUCCESSFUL W CONTACTING THE OWNER DR UNDER A DIFFERENT PERMIT. N THESE CIRCUMSTANCE,THE NEED FOR
BURY BOTTOM OF FILTER T 'GENERAL NOTES' HIS(HER DESIGNATED EMERGENCY CONTACT PERSON,MASON COUNTY MAY ENTER REMOVING OR REFNNING THE MEASURES WILL BE EVALUATED ON A SITE-SPECIIC
13. OC NOT DINE OVER OR FILL OVER SILT FENCES, MATERIAL N 6'x12'TRENCH 2'x2%5'WOOD POSTS. TH PROJECT SITE AND INSTALL TEMPORARY GROUND COVER MEASURES AND BILL BASIS.
STANDARD OR BETTER OR 1. ALL WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIAL SHALL CONFORM TO THE MOST CURRENT THE OWNER FOR ALL EXPENSE INCURRED BY MASON COUNTY. THESE COSTS
EQUIVALENT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROAD,BRIDGE AND MUNICIPAL CONSTRUCTION WILL BE IN ADDITION TO ANY MONETARY PENALTIES LEVU AGAINST THE OWNER 16.DEWATERING CONSTRUCTION STIES. DEWATERING DEVICES SHALL DISCHARGE INTO
PREPARED W W'SDCT AND A.PWA AS ADOPTED BY MASON COUNTY. AN APPROPRIATE SEDIMENT TRAP OR POND,DESIGNED TO ACCEPT SUCH A
GENERAL EROSION AND FILTER FABRIC FENCE DETAIL 6, Q€LNNEARON OF CLEARING AND EASEMENT LIMITS. CLEARING LIMITS,SETBACKS, DISCHARGE,PRECEDED BY ADEQUATE ENERGY DISSIPATION.PRIOR TO RUNOFF
SEDIMENTA•TIIQN CONTROL.NOTES - Z ANY REVISIONS TO THE ACCEPTED CONSTRUCTION PLANS SHALL BE REVIEWED AND BUFFERS,AND SENSUTVE OR CRITICAL AREAS SUCH AS STEEP SLOPES,WETLANDS LEAVING THE SITE,
APPROVED BY THE PROJECT ENGINEER AND MASON COUNTY PRIOR TO AND RIPARIAN CORRIDORS SHALL BE CLEARLY MARKED N THE FIELD AND
1• THE FOLLOWING EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL NOTES APPLY TO ALL IMPLEMENTATION IN THE FIELD. INSPECTED BY MASON COUNTY PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF LARD CLEARING 17.CONTROL OF POLLUTANTS OTHER THAN SEDIMENT ON CONSTRUCTION SITES ALL
CONSTRUCTION SITE ACTIVITIES AT ALL TIMES,UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED ON INSPECTION SCHEDULE ACTIVITIES POLLUTANTS OTHER THAN SEDIMENT THAT OCCUR ON-SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION
THESE PLANS. 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHIM.NOTIFY MASON COUNTY TO ARRANGE FOR INSPECTION OF 3. Tit CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN A SET OF THE ACCEPTED CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE HANDLED AND LEGALLY DISPOSED OF IN A MANNER THAT DOES NOT
THE VARIOUS PHASES OF WORK CHECKED BELOW. INSPECTIONS SHALL BE DRAWINGS ON-SITE AT ALL TIMES WHILE CONSTRUCTION IS IN PROGRESS. 7, PROTECTION OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES. ADJACENT PROPERTIES SHALL BE CAUSE CONTAMINATION OF STORM OR SURFACE WATERS. POLLUTANTS OF
2. APPROVAL OF THIS EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLAN DOES NOT COMPLETED PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH THE NEXT PHASE OF WORK PROTECTED FROM SEDIMENT DEPOSITION BY APPROPRIATE USE OF VEGETATIVE CONCERN INCLUDE,BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO,FUELS,LUBIRMCANTS,SOLVENTS,
CONSTITUTE AN APPROVAL OF TILE PERMANENT ROAD OR DRAINAGE DESIGN. 4. IT SHALL,BE THE RESPONSBUTY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY BUFFER STRIPS,SEDIMENT BARRIERS OR FILTERS,DIKE OR MULCHING,OR BY A CONCRETE BYPRODUCTS AND CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS.
A CLEATING LISTS. PERMITS FROM MASON COUNTY PRIOR TO COMMENCING ANY WORK WTTHN MASON COMBINATION OF THESE MEASURE AND OTHER APPROPRIATE IMPS.
3. THE OWNER AND HIS/HER CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE AT All TIMES COUNTY RIGHT-OF-WAY, 18. MAINE NANCE ALL TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL
FOR PREVENTING SILT-WEN RUNOFF FROM DISCHARGING FROM THE PROJECT B.IMPLEMENTATION OF THE VARIOUS PHASES OF THE EROSION AND & TIMING AND STABILIZATION OF SEDIMENT TRAPPING MEASURES, SEDIMENT PONDS IMPS SHALL BE MAINTAINED AND REPAIRED AS NEEDED TO ASSURE CONTINUED
SHE FAILURE BY THE OWNER AND/OR CONTRACTOR CAN RESULT 3N A FINE SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLAN. 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING ADEQUATE TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE OF THEIR INTENDED FUNCTION. ALL MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR
/ AND TRAPS,SEDIMENT
DIKES,SEDIMENT BARRIERS AND OTHER IMPS INTENDED THE DESIGNATED TEMPORARY CONTACT PERSON NOTED ON THIS PLAN MUST BE �C.PLACEMENT OF DRAINAGE STRUCTURES PRIOR TO BACK FRLNN(r, CONTROL AT ALL TINES DURING CONSTRUCTION ALONGSIDE OR WITHIN ALL PUBLIC TO TRAP SDMENT ON-SITE SHAI1.BE CONSTRUCTED AS A FIRST STEP IN SHALL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUAL THE APPLCAJNf SHALL
AVAILABLE FOR CONTACT BY TELEPHONE ON A 24 HOUR BASIS THROUGHOUT INCLUDING POND EMBANKMENTS, ROADWAYS- TRAFFIC FLOW ON EXISTING PUBLIC ROADWAYS SHALL BE MAINTAINED GRADING THESE IMPS SHALL BE FUNCTIONAL BEFORE LAND DISTURBING BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ASSURING THAT ANY SUCH FACILITIES DAMAGED DURING
CONSTRUCTION AND UNTIL THE PROJECT HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND APPROVED L 0.PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF THE DETENTION OUTLET CONTROL AT ALL TIMES,UNLESS PERMISSION IS OBTAINED FROM MASON COUNTY FOR ROAD ACTIVITIES TAKE PLACE. EARTHEN STRUCTURES SUCH AS DAMS,DIKES AND FLOODS,STORMS OR UM ADVERSE WEARIER CONDITIONS ARE IMMEDIATELY
BY MASON COUNTY STRUCTURE(ORIFICE SIZE VERIFIED). CLOSURE AND/OR DETOURS. DIVERSION SHALL BE STABIUZED ACCORDING TO THE TIMING INDICATED IN ITEM(1) RETURNED TO NORMAL OPERATING CONDITION.
E I IIPE1711M OF PREPARED SUB-GRADE ABOVE
4. THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ME ESC PLANS AND THE CONSTRUCTION, F.INSPECTION OF GRAVEL BASE PLACEMENT. 6. THE LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES ON THIS PLAN IS APPROXIMATE ONLY. THE 19. FINANCIAL LIABILITY A PERFORMANCE COVENANT OR PERFORMANCE SURETY,SHALL
MANTENANCE,REPLACEMENT AND UPGRADING OF THESE EC FACILITIES S THE G.INSPECTION OF FINE GRADING PRIOR TO PAVING. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE*UNDERGROUND LOCATE CENTER AT PH: 9, SLOPE STABILIZATION, CUT AND FILL SLOPES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN A BE REQUIRED FOR ALL PROJECTS TO TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH THE
RESPONSISADY OF THE OWNER AND/OR CONTRACTOR FROM THE BEGINNING OF - H.INSPECTION PAVING OPERATIONS, 1-8W-424-5555,AND NON-SUBSCRIBING INDIVIDUAL UTILITY COMPANIES 48 MANNER THAT WILL MINIMIZE EROSION. ROUGHENED SOIL SURFACES ARE APPROVED EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN.
CONSTRUCTION UNTIL ALL CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED AND APPROVED BY 2. CION SHALL BE RHSPONSIFI.E FOR ALL WORK PERFORMED AND SHALL HOURS IN ADVANCE OF THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. PREFERRED TO SMOOTH SURFACES. INTERCEPTORS SHOULD BE CONSTRUCTED AT
MASON COUNTY AND THE SITE IS STABILIZED. ENSURE THAT CONSTRUCTION IS ACCEPTABLE TO CITY OF PORT ORCHARD. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE FOR PROTECTION OF EXISTING UTIUTIES FROM THE TOP OF LONG,STEEP SLOPES WHICH HAVE SIGNIFICANT AREAS ABOVE THAT
DAMAGE CAUSED BY THE CONTRACTOR'S OPERATIONS. CONTRIBUTE RUNOFF. CONCENTRATED RUNOFF SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO
5. PRIOR TO BEGINNING ANY WORK ON THE PROJECT SITE,A PRECON5TRUCTiON 3. IF INSPECTION IS NOT CALLED FOR PRIOR TO COMPLETION OF ANY TETM OF WORK FLOW DOWN THE FACE OF A CUT OR FILL SLOPE UNLESS CONTAINED WITHIN AN CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE
CONFERENCE MUST BE HELD,AND SHALL BE ATTENDED BY THE GENERAL SO DESIGNATED,SPECIAL DESTRUCTIVE AND/OR NONDESTRUCTIVE TESTING 7. ROCKERIES OR OTHER RETAKING FACILITIES EXCEEDING 4 Fr..N HEIGHT REQUIRE ADEQUATE CHANNEL OR PIPE SLOPE DRAN. WHEREVER A SLOPE FACE CROSSES
CONTRACTOR,THE PROJECT ENGINEER,REPRESENTATIVES FROM AFFECTED PROCEDURES MAY DE REQUIRED TO ENSURE THE ACCEPTABILITY OF THE WORK A SEPARATE PERMIT FROM MASON COUNTY. A WATER SEEPAGE PLANE,ADEQUATE DRAINAGE OR THE PROTECTION SHOULD BE 1, APPLY FOR AND PICK UP ANY REQUIRED ROAD APPROACH OR RIGHT OF WAY
(1DLBIES,AND A REPRESENTATIVE OF MASON COUNTY. F SUCH PROCEDURE ARE REQUIRED,THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE PROVIDED. IN ADDITION,SLOPES SHOULD BE STABILIZED IN ACCORDANCE WITH PERMITS FROM MASON COUNTY.
FOR ALL COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE TESTING AND/OR RESTORATION OF THE B A FORESTRY PRACTCES'PERMIT MAY BE REQUIRED PRIOR TO CLEARING OF THE FFA(1)ABOVE
6. THE EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL FACILITIES 940M ON THIS PLAN WORK. SITE. CONTACT MASON COUNTY FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. 2. CONSTRUCT STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRAtIMS),
ARE TO BE CONSIDERED ADEQUATE BASIC REQUIREMENTS FOR THE ANDCIPATEO 10. CONTROLLING OFF-SITE EROSION. PROPERTIES AND WATERWAYS DOWNSTREAM
SITE CONDITIONS. DURING CONSTRUCTION,DEVIATIONS FROM THIS PLAN MAY BE FROM DEVELOPMENT STIES SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM EROSION DUE TO 3. CONSTRICT FILTER FENCE BARRIERS,
NECESSARY IN ORDER TO MANTAN WATER QUALITY. MINOR DEPARTURES FROM gRADING NOTES INCREASES IN THE VOLUME,VELOCITY,AND PEAK FLOW RATE OF STORM WATER q, CONSTRUCT SEDIMENTATION BASINS(IF PROPOSED)
THIS PLAN ARE PERMITTED SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF MASON COUNTY RUNOFF FROM THE DEVELOPMENT SITE BY THE IMPLEMENTATION OF APPROPRIATE
INSPECTOR. HOWEVER EXCEPT FOR EMERGENCY STTUATIONS,ALL OTHER 1, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IN THE EVENT OR DISCOVERY OF AS REWIRED 100'MIN. IMPS TO M1NMZE ADVERSE DOWNSTREAM IMPACTS.
DEVIATIONS FROM THIS PLAN MUST BE DESIGNED BY THE PROJECT ENGINEER POOR SONS,GROUNDWATER OR DISCREPANCIES IN THE EXISTING CONDITIONS AS EXCEPT MAY BE REDUCED TO 5, CONSTRUCT RUNOFF INTERCEPTION AND DIVERSION DITCHES.
AND APPROVED BY MASON COUNTY PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. NOTED ON THE PLANS. 50'MN FOR 91ES WITH MESS 11. STABILIZATION OF TEMPORARY CONVEYANCE CHANNELS AND OUTLETS ALL
THAN 1 ACRE OF EXPOSED TEMPORARY ON-SITE CONVEYANCE CHANNELS SHALL BE DEIGNED,CONSTRUCTED 6. CLEAR AND GRADE THE MINIMUM SITE AREA REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE
$ 7. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE INSPECTED BY 2 MAXIMUM SLOPE STEEPNESS SHALL DE 2H:IV FOR CUT AND FILL SLOPES SOIL AND STABIUZED TO PREVENT EROSION FROM THE EXPECTED FLOW VELOCITY FROM VARIOUS PHASES O'WORK
f THE OWNER AND/OR CONTRACTOR ON A FREQUENT BASIS AND IMMEDIATELY A 2-YEAR FREQUENCY,24-NODE DURATION STORM FOR THE POST CONOIRON.
A AFTER EACH RAINFALL,AND MAINTAINED AS NECESSARY TO INSURE THEIR 3. UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED,ALL EMBANKMENTS IN THE PLAN SET SHALL BE 1 - A 2-YEAR
FREQUENCY,
TO PREVENT D EROSION OF OUTLETS,T H ADJACENT0flIOSTREAM 7. PROVIDE TEMPORARY HYDROSEEDING OR OTHER SOURCE CONTROL STABILIZATION
CONITNIfED FUNCTIONING. ALL SEDIMENT MUST BE REMOVED FROM SILT FENCES, CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 2-D3.3(14)B O'THE WSDOT ``' BANKS,SLOPES AND DOWNSTREAM REACHES SHALL BE PROVIDED AT THE OUTLETS MEASURE ON All DISTURBED SOILS.
STRAW BALES.SEDIMENT PONDS,ETC.PRIOR TO THE SEDIMENT REACHING 1/2 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. EMBANKMENT COMPACTION SHALL CONFORM TO - OF ALL CONVEYANCE SYSTEMS.
ITS MAXIMUM POTENTIAL DEPTH. SECTION 2-03.3(f4)C,METHOD B OF SAID STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. S. MAINTAIN ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL FACP.TRE To PROVIDE THE
r..- REQUIRED PROTECTION OF DOWNSTREAM WATER QUALITY,
8. AT NO TIME SHALL CONCRETE,CONCRETE BY-PRODUCTS,VEHICLE FLUIDS,PANT, 4. EMBANKMENTS DESIGNED TO IMPOUND WATER SHILL BE C MPACTEO TO 95%
CHECNCALS,OR OTHER POLLUTING MATTER BE PERMITTED TO DISCHARGE TO THE MAXIMUM DENSITY PER SECTION 2-03.3(14)C,METHOD C OF WSOOT STANDARD lop" 9. PROVIDE PERMANENT SITE STABILIZATION,
w TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DRAINAGE SYSTEM,OR TO DISCHARGE FROM THE SPECIFICATIONS. ��-
B PROJECT SITE 2(Y MIN. 10. EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL FACILITIES SHALL NOT BE REMOVED UNTIL
5. ALL AREAS RECEIVING FILL MATERIAL SHALL BE PREPARED BY REMOVING PROVIDE ACROSS FULL WIDTH CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETE AND ACCEPTED BY MASON COUNTY,
9, PERMANENT DETENTION/RUENTON PONDS,PIPES,TANKS OR VAULTS MAY ONLY VEGETATION, NONCOMPLYING FILL,TOPSOIL AND OTHER UNSUITABLE MATERWL,BY OF INGRESS/EGRESS AREA
BE USED FOR SEDIMENT CONTAINMENT WHEN SPECIFlCNLY INDICATED ON THESE SCARIFYING THE SURFACE TO PROVIDE A BOND WITH THE NEW FILL,AND WHERE STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
PLANS SLOPES ARE STEEPER THAN 3 HORIZONTAL TO 1 VERTICAL AND THE HEIGHT 15
GREATER THAN 5 FT.,BY BENCHING INTO SOUND COMPETENT MATERIAL AS NTS
DETERMINED BY A SOILS ENGINEER.
DRAINAGE NOTES
$ 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE THAT THE DRAINAGE 15 INSTALLED AND FEYAWB -----_- ti , o rmE FAIR HARBOR TRACTS 9 s A/�StC+� r.,lOPERATIONAL PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF PAVING WORK. g T-SC NOTES AND DE 'AILS l' V V S c...l Engineering, Inc
2. All STEEL PIPE AND PARTS SHALL BE GALVANIZED. All NT 11 RGEp STEEL -PIPES SHALL BE GALVANIZED AND HAVE ASPHALT TREATMENT)!t OR BETTER. JM T3, DRAINAGE STUBOUTS ON INDIVDUAL LOTS SHALL BE LOCATED WITH A FIVE FOOT r01 1o50 CLIENT JURGES ENTERPRISES INC. 217 SA WIMns Drive Pal Ordard,We.9836E
HIGH 2'X4'STAKE MARKED'STORM'. THE STUBOUT SHALL BE EXTENDED ABOVE 4•*sroHAl SA�Nf Phone(360)878-3770 FeX(360)876009
SURFACE LEVEL AND BE SECURED TO THE STAKE. SEC 5 THIN 21N iW E-Malt WBe(O1W9e09h1e8N1Q.CORI
2OR ENE T BEACH ROAD
a BREMFRTON,WA98310 ��� ��lbm
z SCALE As NOlEO R I4 OESCRPTON 0►11r TAMP PWI 3774I274
oATEWALm , JOB No. 805.4 SW- ) OF 1�_SHTS
WETLAND RATING FORM—WESTERN WASHINGTON
Name of wetland(if known): TIC r 12
> Location: SEC: _j!�'TWNSHPP?( RNGE:I (attach map with outline of wetland to rating form)
Person(s) Rating Wetland: A16 Affiliation: �/ �'�� Date of site visit:
bused on I ..; {' f;` provided it
11 = Score .11)-:Ij 02 O --
l'(; ,c:)rc fol• ;'unc:ions —��--
Catc�,l�t•, I;•.:�c+.i t�)•� SPLt:I:�L L:1.1.�;:�C'?ERIS s It_'� r)l' �ti's�4l:�nci C��1�'
I 1I Dues iiot Apply
1'lt],il C3tt' t)t'ti' (choose the '=higliesr" care,yore from above:)
Check the appropriate type and class of wetland being rated.
WetIan , .e^an Gias
Estuarine De ressional
Natural Heritage Wetland Riverine
Bog Lake-fringe
Mature Forest Slope
Old Growth Forest Flats
Coastal Lagoon Freshwater Tidal --
Interdunal --
None of the above
Wetland Rating Form—western Washington 1 August 2004
6 0Ae-
IN AN
Does the wetland being rated meet any of the criteria below?
If you answer YES to any of the questions below you will need to protect the wetland
according to the regulations regarding the special characteristics found in the wetland.
CC e afn ecia otectin .an
�
rTe , O
otlnclu a in theRaun
., �
SP 1. Has the wetland been documented as a habitat for any Federally listed
Threatened or Endangered plant or animal species (TIE species)?
For the purposes of this rating system, "documented" means the wetland is on the
appropriate state or federal database.
SP2.Has the wetland been documented as habitat for any State listed Threatened or
Endangered plant or animal species?
For the purposes of this rating system, "documented" means the wetland is on the
appropriate state database.
SP3. Does the wetland contain individuals of Priority species listed by the WDFW
for the state?
SP4. Does the wetland have a local significance in addition to its functions? For /
example, the wetland has been identified in the Shoreline Master Program, ✓
the Critical Areas Ordinance, or in a local management plan as having
special significance.
To complete the next part of the data sheet you will need to determine the
Hydro eo�morphic Class of the wetland beingrated.
ated•
The hydrogeomorphic classification groups wetlands into those that function in similar ways. This
simplifies the questions needed to answer how well the wetland functions. The Hydrogeomorphic
Class of a wetland can be determined using the key below. See p. 24 for more detailed instructions
on classifying wetlands.
Wetland Rating Form—western Washington 2 August 2004
JEW
R .
a
Classification of Vegetated Wetlands for Western Washington
Wetland Name: �tl Date: _ 36
1.Are the water levels in the wetland usually controlled by tides (i.e. except during floods)?
NO—go to 2 YES—the wetland class is Tidal Fringe
If yes, is the salinity of the water during periods of annual low flow below 0.5 ppt(parts per
thousand)? YES—Freshwater Tidal Fringe NO—Saltwater Tidal Fringe(Estuarine)
-If your wetland can be classified as a Freshwater Tidal Fringe use the forms for Riverine
wetlands. If it is Saltwater Tidal Fringe it is rated as an Estuarine wetland. Wetlands that
were called estuarine in the first and second editions of the rating system are called Salt
Water Tidal Fringe in the Hydrogeomorphic Classification. Estuarine wetlands were
categorized separately in the earlier editions, and this separation is being kept in this
revision. To maintain consistency between editions, the term"Estuarine"wetland is kept.
Please note,however, that the characteristics that define Category I and H estuarine
wetlands have changed(see p. ).
2. Is the topography within the wetland flat and precipitation is only source (>90%) of water to it.
NO—go to 3 YES—The wetland class is Flats
If your wetland can be classified as a"Flats"wetland,use the form for Depressional
wetlands.
3. Does the wetland meet both of the following criteria?
The vegetated part of the wetland is on the shores of a body of open water(without any
vegetation on the surface) where at least 20 acres (8 ha) are permanently inundated
(ponded or flooded);
At least 30%of the open water area is deeper than 6.6 ft(2 m)?
NO—go to 4 YES—The wetland class is Lake-fringe(Lacustrine Fringe)
4.Does the wetland meet all of the following criteria?
The wetland is on a slope(slope can be very gradual),
The water.flows through the wetland in one direction(unidirectional) and usually
comes from seeps. It may flow subsurface, as sheetflow, or in a Swale without distinct
banks.
The water leaves the wetland without being impounded?
NOTE: Surface water does not pond in these type of wetlands except occasionally in
very small and shallow depressions or behind hummocks(depressions are usually
<3ft diameter and less than 1 foot deep).
NO -go to 5 YES—The wetland class is Slope
5.Is the wetland in a valley, or stream channel,where it gets inundated by overbank flooding from
that stream or river? The flooding should occur at least once every two years,on the average,to —
answer"yes." The wetland can contain depressions that are filled with water when Me'nver' s h�n
not flooding. �*
NO-go to 6 The wetland class is Riverine
Wetland Rating Fonn—westem Washington 3 August 2004
ft
6. Is the wetland in a topographic depression in which water ponds, or is saturated to the surface, at
sometime of the year. This means that any outlet, if present, is higher than-the'interior of the y
wetland.
NO—go to 7 YES The wetland class is Depressional
7. Is the wetland locate n a very flat area with no obvious depression and no stream or river
running through it and providing water. The wetland seems to be maintained by high
groundwater in the area. The wetland may be ditched,but has no obvious natural outlet.
NO—go to 8 YES—The wetland class is Depressional
8. Your wetland seems to be difficult to classify. For example, seeps at the base of a slope may
grade into a riverine floodplain, or a small stream within a depressional wetland has a zone of
flooding along its sides. Sometimes we find characteristics of several different hydrogeomorphic
classes within one wetland boundary. Use the following table to identify the appropriate class to
use for the rating system if you have several HGM classes present within your wetland. NOTE:
Use this table only if the class that is recommended in the second column represents 10% or more
of the total area of the wetland being rated. If the area of the second class is less than 10%classify
the wetland using the fast class.
IGM L�larses t n a Delin9&8d*eH nd*Bounda. as `ii Rahn
Slope+Riverine Riverine
Slope+Depressional Depressional
Slope+Lake-fringe Lake-fringe
�--� Depressional+Riverine along stream within boundary Depressional
Depressional+Lake-fringe - Depressional
Salt Water Tidal Fringe and any other class of freshwater Treat as ESTUARINE under
wetland wetlands with special
characteristics
If you are unable still to determine which of the above criteria apply to your wetland, or you have
more than 2 HGM classes within a wetland boundary, classify the wetland as Depressional for
the rating.
7
Wetland Rating Form—western Washington 4 August 2004
t
.dIQ'1A16pfI�C,.
ATER QUALITYF[]NCTIONS Indicators that wetland fiinchonktd ttn roer}
water quality _ jtt :, .:
N,-
D D 1. Does the wetland have the potential to improve water quality? (seep. 38)
D 1.1 Characteristics of surface water flows out of the wetland:
D Wetland is a depression with no surface water outlet points =3
- Wetland has an intermittently flowing, or highly constricted, outlet points =2
Wetland has an unconstricted surface outlet points= 1 C
Wetland is flat and has no obvious outlet and/or outlet is a ditch points = 1
D 1.2 The soil 2 inches below the surface is clay, organic, or smells anoxic
D (hydrogen sulfide or rotten eggs).
YES points=4
NO points=0
D 1.3 Characteristics of persistent vegetation(emergent, shrub, and/or forest class):
D Wetland has persistent, ungrazed, vegetation>=95% of area points= 5
Wetland has persistent, ungrazed, vegetation>= 1/2 of area points =3
Wetland has persistent, ungrazed vegetation>= 1/10 of area points= 1
Wetland has persistent, ungrazed vegetation<1/10 of area points =0
D 1.4 Characteristics of seasonal ponding or inundation.
D This is the area of the wetland that is ponded for at least 2 months, but dries out
sometime during the year. Do not count the area that is permanently ponded.
Estimate area as the average condition S out of 10 yrs.-
Area seasonally ponded is> %total area of wetland points=4
Area seasonally ponded is> '/< total area of wetland points=2
Area seasonally ponded is< '/4 total area of wetland points=0 q
NOTE: See text or indicators o seasonal and permanent inundation.. Ok
D Total for D 1 Add the points in the boxes above
D D 2.Does the wetland have the opportunity to improve water quality? (seep. 44)
Answer YES if you know or believe there are pollutants in groundwater or surface
water coming into the wetland that would otherwise reduce water quality in
streams, lakes or groundwater downgradient from the wetland?Note which of the
following conditions provide the sources of pollutants.
— Grazing in the wetland or within 150 ft
— Untreated stormwater discharges to wetland
— Tilled fields or orchards within 150 ft of wetland
— A stream or culvert discharges into wetland that drains developed areas,
residential areas,farmed fields,roads,or clear-cut logging
— Residential,urban areas, golf courses are within 150 ft of wetland multiplier
— Wetland is fed by groundwater high in phosphorus or nitrogen
— Other
YES multiplier is 2 NO multiplier is 1
D TOTAL-Water Quality Functions Multiply the score from DI by D2 >/
Add score to table on . 11161
Wetland Rating Form—western Washington 5 August 2004
r
♦
WEGarwetland ctions to reodin .and sTeam de on `' r
D 3.Does the wetland have the potential to reduce flooding and erosion? ,. :
see . 46 '
D D 3.1 Characteristics of surface water flows out of the wetland
Wetland has no surface water outlet points =4
Wetland has an intermittently flowing, or highly constricted, outlet points=2
Wetland is flat and has no obvious outlet and/or outlet is a small ditch points = 1
Wetland has an unconstricted surface outlet points =0
D D 3.2 Depth of storage during wet periods
Estimate the height of ponding above the bottom of the outlet
Marks of ponding are 3 ft or more above the surface points = 7
The wetland is a"headwater"wetland" points = 5
Marks of ponding between 2 ft to < 3 ft from surface points = 5
Marks are at least 0.5 ft to<2 ft from surface points =3
Wetland is flat but has small depressions on the surface that trap water points= 1
Marks of ponding less than 0.5 ft points= 0
D D 3.3 Contribution of wetland to storage in the watershed
Estimate the ratio of the area of upstream basin contributing surface water to the
wetland to the area of the wetland itself.
The area of the basin is less than 10 times the area of wetland points=5
The area of the basin is 10 to 100 times the area of the wetland points=3
The area of the basin is more than 100 times the area of the wetland points=0 00-
V
Wetland is in the FLATS class (basin=the wetland,b definition points= 5
D Total for D 3 Add the points in the boxes above
D D 4.Does the wetland have the opportunity to reduce flooding and erosion?
(seep. 49)
Answer YES if the wetland is in a location in the watershed where the flood
storage,or reduction in water velocity, it provides helps protect downstream
property and aquatic resources from flooding or excessive and/or erosive flows.
Answer NO if the water coming into the wetland is controlled by a structure such
as flood gate,tide gate,flap valve,reservoir etc.OR you estimate that more than
90%of the water in the wetland is from groundwater.
Note which of the following indicators of opportunity apply.
— Wetland is in a headwater of a river or stream that has flooding problems
— Wetland drains to a river or stream that has flooding problems multiplier
Wetland has no outlet and impounds surface runoff water that might
it
otherwise flow into a river or stream that has flooding problems
7—'Other
YES multiplier is 2 NO multiplier is 1
D TOTAL hydrologic Functions Multiply the score from D 3 by D 4
Add score to table on p. I
Wetland Rating Form—western Washington 6 August 2004 ay .
r .A
MT$4
.410; 1'�q
> # ATEXQUAI.ITYjFUNCTIONS Indicators that wetland function :to improve ice,
t�water:qualiy.. � y
R R 1.Does the wetland have the potential to improve water quality? (seep. 52)
R R 1.1 Area of surface depressions within the riverine wetland that can trap
sediments during a flooding event:
Depressions cover>3/4 area of wetland points = 8
Depressions cover> 1/2 area of wetland points =4
Depressions present but cover< 1/2 area of wetland points =2
No depressions present points =0
R R 1.2 Characteristics of the vegetation in the wetland:
Forest or shrub >2/3 the area of the wetland points = 8
Forest or shrub > 1/3 area of the wetland points = 6
Ungrazed, emergent plants >2/3 area of wetland points =6
Ungrazed emergent plants> 1/3 area of wetland points =3
Forest, shrub, and ungrazed emergent< 1/3 area of wetland points=0
R Add the points in the boxes above
R R 2. Does the wetland have the opportunity to improve water quality? (seep. 53)
Answer YES if you know or believe there are pollutants in groundwater or surface
water coming into the wetland that would otherwise reduce water quality in
streams, lakes or groundwater downgradient from the wetland?Note which of the
following conditions provide the sources of pollutants.
— Grazing in the wetland or within 150ft
— Untreated stormwater discharges to wetland
— Tilled fields or orchards within 150 feet of wetland
— A stream or culvert discharges into wetland that drains developed areas,
residential areas, farmed fields,roads, or clear-cut logging
— Residential,urban areas,golf courses are within 150 ft of wetland
— The river or stream linked to the wetland has a contributing basin where
human activities have raised levels of sediment,toxic compounds or
nutrients in the river water above standards for water quality multiplier
— Other
YES multiplier is 2 NO multiplier is 1
R TOTAL-Water Quality Functions Multiply the score from R 1 by R 2
Add score to table on p. 1
Comments
Wetland Rating Form—western Washington 7 August 2004
Kam.
I3YDRbWGIC`FUNCTIONS Indicators tTiat wetland fiirictians to redtic
m flood -andfstream n.7erosio R. . :.
3.Does the wetland have the potential to reduce flooding and erosion?
see p. 54
R R 3.1 Characteristics of the overbank storage the wetland provides:
Estimate the average width of the wetland perpendicular to the direction of the
- flow and the width of the stream or river channel(distance between banks).
Calculate the ratio: (width of wetland)/(width of stream).
If the ratio is more than 20 points=9
If the ratio is between 10—20 points=6
If the ratio is 5- <10 points =4
If the ratio is 1-<5 points=2
If the ratio is < 1 points= 1
R R 3.2 Characteristics of vegetation that slow down water velocities during floods:
Treat large woody debris as 'forest or shrub". Choose the points appropriate
for the best description.
Forest or shrub for>1/3 area OR Emergent plants>2/3 area points=7
Forest or shrub for> 1/10 area OR Emergent plants> 1/3 area points=4
Vegetation does not meet above criteria points =0
R Add the points in the boxes above
R R 4.Does the wetland have the opportunity to reduce flooding and erosion?
(seep. 57)
Answer YES if the wetland is in a location in the watershed where the flood
storage, or reduction in water velocity, it provides helps protect downstream
property and aquatic resources from flooding or excessive and/or erosive flows.
Note which of the following conditions apply.
— There,are human structures and activities downstream(roads,buildings,
bridges, farms)that can be damaged by flooding.
— There are natural resources downstream(e.g. salmon redds)that can be multiplier
damaged by flooding
— Other
"(Answer NO if the major source of water to the wetland is.controlled by a reservoir
or the wetland is tidal fringe along the sides of a dike)
YES multiplier is 2 NO multiplier is 1
R TOTAL -Hydrologic Functions Multiply the score from R 3 by R 4
Add score to table on p. I
Comments
Wetland Rating Form—western Washington 8 August 2004
WATERYQVALITY FUNC nONS = Indicators that wetland functions to unpro'e
. �. k
_ water.quality... ...
L L 1. Does the wetland have the potential to improve water quality? (seep. 59)
L L 1.1 Average width of vegetation along the lakeshore
Vegetation is more than 33ft(10m) wide points = 6
- Vegetation is more than 16 (5m) wide and<33ft points = 3
Vegetation is more than 6ft(2m) wide and<16 ft points= 1
Vegetation is less than 6ft-wide points = 0
L L 1.2 Characteristics of the vegetation in the wetland: choose the appropriate
description that results in the highest points, land do not include any open water in
your estimate of coverage.In this case the herbaceous plants can be either the
dominant form (called emergent class) or as an understory in a shrub or forest
community.
Herbaceous plants cover>90% of the vegetated area points = 6
Herbaceous plants cover>2/3 of the vegetated area points =4
Herbaceous plants cover>1/3 of the vegetated area points = 3
Other vegetation that is not aquatic bed in>2/3 vegetated area points = 3
Other vegetation that is not aquatic bed in> 1/3 vegetated area points = 1
Aquatic bed cover> 2/3 of the vegetated area points=0
L Add the points in the boxes above
L L 2. Does the wetland have the opportunity to improve water quality? (seep. 61)
Answer YES if you know or believe there are pollutants in the lake water, or
surface water flowing through the wetland to the lake is polluted. Note which of
the following conditions provide the sources of pollutants.
— Wetland is along the shores of a lake or reservoir that does not meet water
quality standards
— Grazing in the wetland or within 150ft
— Polluted water discharges to wetland along upland edge
— Tilled fields or orchards within 150 feet of wetland
— Residential or urban areas are within 150 ft of wetland multiplier
— Parks with grassy areas that are maintained,ballfields, golf courses (all
within 150 ft. of lake shore)
— Power boats with gasoline or diesel engines use the lake
— Other
YES multiplier is 2 NO multiplier is 1 —
L TOTAL-Water Quality Functions Multiply the score from Ll by L2
Add score to table on p. 1
Comments
Wetland Rating Form—westem Washington 9 August 2004
- iL •''3 .. V
r
HYDROIrOGIC'FCJNCTIONS 'Indicators that wetlandrfiinc ons 0'xe tiCe,, �
shoreluie:e77.7
rosion
L L 3.Does the wetland have the potential to reduce shoreline erosion? (seep. 62)
L L 3 Average width and characteristics of vegetation along the lakeshore (do not
include aquatic bed): (choose the highest scoring description that matches
conditions in the wetland)
>'/<of fringe vegetation is shrubs or trees at least 33 ft(10m) wide points= 6
>'/<of fringe vegetation is shrubs or trees at least 6 ft. (2 m) wide points=4
> '/<of fringe vegetation is shrubs or trees at least 33 ft(10m) wide points =4
Fringe vegetation is at least 6 ft(2m) wide points =2
Fringe vegetation is less than 6 ft 2m wide points =0
L Record the points from the box above
L L 4. Does the wetland have the opportunity to reduce erosion? (seep. 63)
Are there features along the shore that will be impacted if the shoreline erodes?
Note which of the following conditions apply.
— There are human structures and activities along the upland edge of the
wetland(buildings, fields) that can be damaged by erosion.
— There are undisturbed natural resources along the upland edge of the
wetland(e.g. mature forests other wetlands) than can be damaged by
shoreline erosion multiplier
— Other
YES multiplier is 2 NO multiplier is 1
L TOTAL -Hydrologic Functions Multiply the score from L 3 by L 4
Add score to table on p. I
Comments
Wetland Rating Form—western Washington 10 August 2004
y T f � Zr p
a
Q S� ndicators WAV— and func ons,,t r,
prove wale `quRL
S S 1.Does the wetland have the potential to improve water quality? (seep. 64) -_ }
S S 1.1 Characteristics of average slope of wetland:
Slope is 1% or less (a 1%slope has a 1 foot vertical drop in elevation for every
- 100 ft horizontal distance) ....... .............................. points = 3
Slope is 1% -2% points =2
Slope is 2% - 5% points = 1
Slope is greater than 5% points =0
S S 1.2 The soil 2 inches below the surface is clay, organic, or smells anoxic
(hydrogen sulfide or rotten eggs).
YES = 3 points NO=0 points
S S 1.3 Characteristics of the vegetation in the wetland that trap sediments and
pollutants:
Choose the points appropriate for the description that best fits the vegetation in
the wetland. Dense vegetation means you have trouble seeing the soil surface.
Dense,ungrazed,herbaceous vegetation> 90%of the wetland area points=6
Dense,ungrazed,herbaceous vegetation> 1/2 of area points=3
Dense,woody, vegetation> '/z of area points =2
Dense,ungrazed,herbaceous vegetation> 1/4 of area points= 1
Does not meet any of the criteria above for vegetation points=0
S Total for S 1 Add the points in the boxes above
S S 2.Does the wetland have the opportunity to improve water quality? (seep. 67)
Answer YES if you know or believe there are pollutants in groundwater or surface
water coming into the wetland that would otherwise reduce water quality in
streams, lakes or groundwater downgradient from the wetland?Note which of the
following conditions provide the sources of pollutants.
— Grazing in the wetland or within 150ft
— Untreated stormwater discharges to wetland
— Tilled fields,logging,or orchards within 150 feet of wetland
— Residential,urban areas, or golf courses are within 150 ft upslope of
multiplier
wetland
— Other
YES multiplier is 2 NO multiplier is 1
S TOTAL-Water.Quality Functions Multiply the score from S 1 by S2
Add score to table on p. I
Comments
Wetland Rating Form—westem Washington 11 August 2004
►r -� Mims
a"
�K
GICiL)1�° � ca ors that wetlandfunction'xto
oo 'and st e erosion.,.. ,. k..x _ ..__g..
S 3. Does the wetland have the potential to reduce flooding and stream erosion? r
(seep. 68 .. w
S S 3.1 Characteristics of vegetation that reduce the velocity of surface flows during
storms. Choose the points appropriate for the description that best fit
conditions in the wetland.
Dense,uncut, rigid vegetation covers >90%of the area of the wetland.
(stems of plants should be thick enough(usually> 1/8in), or dense enough, to
remain erect during surface flows) points= 6
Dense,uncut, rigid vegetation> 1/2 area of wetland points =3
Dense,uncut, rigid vegetation> 1/4 area points = 1
More than 1/4 of area is grazed,mowed, tilled or vegetation is
not rigid points = 0
S S 3.2 Characteristics of slope wetland that holds back small amounts of flood
flows:
The slope wetland has small surface depressions that can retain water over at
least 10%of its area. YES points =2
NO points =0
S Add the points in the boxes above
S S 4. Does the wetland have the opportunity to reduce flooding and erosion?
(see p. 70)
Is the wetland in a landscape position where the reduction in water velocity it
provides helps protect downstream property and aquatic resources from flooding
or excessive and/or erosive flows? Note which of the following conditions apply.
— Wetland has surface runoff that drains to a river or stream that has flooding
problems
— Other t multiplier
(Answer NO if the major source of water is controlled by a reservoir(e.g. wetland is
a seep that is on the downstream side of a dam)
YES multiplier is 2 NO multiplier is 1
S TOTAL -Hydrologic Functions Multiply the score from S 3 by S 4
Add score to table on p. 1
Comments
Wetland Rating Form—western Washington 12 August 2004
'�-'� ,'.
3rtsk :. f _�r'� ter'• ,•'y�` ,
,7�FTABITA'I"FUNCTIONS 'Indicators that wetland functions to provide unportant habitat
ar
H 1.Does the wetland have the potential to provide habitat for many species?
H 1.1 Vegetation structure (seep. 72)
Check the types of vegetation classes present (as defined by Cowardin) if the class
covers more than 10%of the area of the wetland or '/ acre.
Aquatic bed
Emergent plants
Scrub/shrub (areas where shrubs have>30% cover)
Forested (areas where trees have>30% cover)
7-Forested areas have 3 out of 5 strata(canopy, sub-canopy, shrubs, herbaceous,
moss/ground-cover)
Add the number of vegetation types that qualify. If you have:
4 types or more points=4
3 types points=2
2 types points = 1
1 e oints =0
H 1.2. Hydroperiods (seep. 73)
Check the types of water regimes (hydroperiods)present within the wetland. The
water regime has to cover more than 10%of the wetland or '/. acre to count. (see text
for descriptions of hydroperiods)
Permanently flooded or inundated 4 or more types present points =3
I _Seasonally flooded or inundated 3 types present points=2
Occasionally flooded or inundated 2 types present point= 1
Saturated only
,/P-ermanently flowing stream or river in, or adjacent to, the wetland
✓ Seasonally flowing stream in, or adjacent to, the wetland
Lake fringe wetland =2 points I
Freshwater tidal wetland=2 points •
H 1.3. Richness of Plant Species(seep. 75)
Count the number of plant species in the wetland that cover at least 10 ftz. (different
patches of the same species can be combined to meet the size threshold)
You do not have to name the species.
Do not include Eurasian Milfoil, reed canarygrass,purple loosestrife, Canadian
Thistle
If you counted: > 19 species points=2
List species below if you want to: 5 - 19 species points= 1 —
<5 species points=0
Wetland Rating Form—western Washington 13 August 2004
0�
OWNS
y. t.. .K
i
c
H 1.4.Interspersion of habitats(seep. 76) I ,
Decide from the diagrams below whether interspersion between types of vegetation
(described in H 1.1), or vegetation types and unvegetated areas (can include open
water or mudflats) is high,medium, low, or none.
: Aso
t A'
r
K
None=0 points Low= 1 point Moderate =2 points
s:
[riparian braided channels]
High =3 points
NOTE: If you have four or more vegetation types or three vegetation types 0
and open water the rating is always "high".
H 1.5. Special Habitat Features Habitat Features: (seep. 77)
Check the habitat features that are present in the wetland. The number of checks is
the number of points you put into the next column.
Large, downed, woody debris within the wetland(>4in. diameter and 6 ft long).
Standing snags (diameter at the bottom>4 inches)in the wetland
Undercut banks are present for at least 6.6 ft(2m) and/or overhanging vegetation
extends at least 3.3 ft(lm) over a stream for at least 33 ft(10m)
Stable steep banks of fine material that might be used by beaver or muskrat for
denning (>30degree slope)OR signs of recent beaver activity are present
At least'/4 acre of thin-stemmed persistent vegetation or woody branches are present
in areas that are permanently or seasonally inundated.(structures for egg-laying by
v amphibians) L�
Invasive plants cover less than 25%of the wetland area in each stratum of plants
H 1.TOTAL Score- potential for providing habitat
Add the scores in the column above
Comments
Wetland Rating Form—western Washington 14 August 2004
t`
A7�'`' `, ^: .ti .'fir •�n i%. _� , _.. . .
H 2.Does the wetland have the opportunity to provide habitat for many specie§? rwYn
H 2.1 Buffers (seep. 80)
Choose the description that best represents condition of buffer of wetland. The highest
scoring criterion that applies to the wetland is to be used in the rating. See text for
definition of"undisturbed."
— 100 m(330ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water
>95% of circumference. No developed areas within undisturbed part of buffer.
(relatively undisturbed also means no-grazing) Points = 5
— 100 m(330 ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water
> 50% circumference. Points =4
— 50 in(170ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water
>95% circumference. Points =4
— 100 in (330ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water
/>25% circumference, . Points =3
— 50 m(170ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water
for> 50% circumference. Points =3
If buffer does not meet any of the criteria above
— No paved areas (except paved trails) or buildings within 25 m (80ft) of wetland>
95% circumference. Light to moderate grazing, or lawns are OK. Points =2
— No paved areas or buildings within 50m of wetland for>50% circumference.
Light to moderate grazing,or lawns are OK. Points =2
— Heavy grazing in buffer. Points = 1
— Vegetated buffers are<2m wide (6.6ft) for more than 95% of the circumference
(e.g. tilled fields,paving,basalt bedrock extend to edge of wetland Points=0.
— Buffer does not meet any of the criteria above. Points= 1 3
H 2.2 Corridors and Connections (seep. 81)
H 2.2.1 Is the wetland part of a relatively undisturbed and unbroken vegetated
corridor (either riparian or upland) that is at least 150 ft wide,has at least 30% cover
of shrubs, forest or native undisturbed prairie,that connects to estuaries, other
wetlands or undisturbed uplands that are at least 250 acres in size? (dams in riparian
corridors,heavily used gravel roads,paved roads, are considered breaks in the
corridor).
YES =4 points (go to H 2.3) NO=go to H 2.2.2
H 2.2.2 Is the wetland part of a relatively undisturbed and unbroken vegetated
corridor(either riparian or upland)that is at least 50ft wide,has at least 30% cover of
shrubs or forest, and connects to estuaries,other wetlands or undisturbed uplands
that are at least 25 acres in size? OR a Lake-fringe wetland, if it does not have an
undisturbed corridor as in the question above?
YES=2 points (go to H 2.3) - NO=H 2.2.3
H 2.2.3 Is the wetland:
within 5 mi(81an) of a brackish or salt water estuary OR
within 3 mi of a large field or pasture(>40 acres)OR
within 1 mi of a lake greater than 20 acres?
YES=1 point NO =0 points
Wetland Rating Form—western Washington 15 August 2004
t'-
H 2.3 ear or adjacent to other priority habitats listed by WDFW(see p. 82)
ch of the following priority habitats are within 330ft(100m) of the wetland?
( e text for a more detailed description of these priority habitats)
Riparian: The area adjacent to aquatic systems with flowing water that contains
elements of both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems which mutually influence each other.
Aspen Stands: Pure or mixed stands of aspen greater than 0.8 ha(2 acres).
Cliffs: Greater than 7.6 m(25 ft) high and occurring below 5000 ft.
Old-growth forests: (Old-growth west of Cascade crest) Stands of at least 2 tree
species, forming a multi-layered canopy with occasional small openings; with at
least 20 trees/ha(8 trees/acre)> 81 cm (32 in)dbh or> 200 years of age.
Mature forests: Stands with average diameters exceeding 53 cm(21 in) dbh; crown
cover may be less that 100%;crown cover may be less that 100%; decay,
decadence, numbers of snags, and quantity of large downed material is generally
less than that found in old-growth; 80 -200 years old west of the Cascade crest.
Prairies: Relatively undisturbed areas (as indicated by dominance of native plants)
where grasses and/or forbs form the natural climax plant community.
Talus: Homogenous areas of rock rubble ranging in average size 0.15 - 2.0 m (0.5 -
6.5 ft), composed of basalt, andesite, and/or sedimentary rock, including riprap
slides and mine tailings. May be associated with cliffs.
Caves: A naturally occurring cavity,recess,void, or system of interconnected
passages
Oregon white Oak: Woodlands Stands of pure oak or oak/conifer associations
where canopy coverage of the oak component of the stand is 25%.
Urban Natural Open Space: A priority species resides within or is adjacent to the
open space and uses it for breeding and/or regular feeding; and/or the open space
functions as a corridor connecting other priority habitats, especially those that
would otherwise be isolated;and/or the open space is an isolated remnant of natural
habitat larger than 4 ha(10 acres) and is surrounded by urban development.
Estuary/Estuary-like:Deepwater tidal habitats and adjacent tidal wetlands,usually
semi-enclosed by land but with open,partly obstructed or sporadic access to the
open ocean, and in which ocean water is at least occasionally diluted by freshwater
runoff from the land.The salinity may be periodically increased above that of the
open ocean by evaporation.Along some low-energy coastlines there is appreciable
dilution of sea water.Estuarine habitat extends upstream and landward to where
ocean-derived salts measure less than 0.5ppt during the period of average annual
low flow.Includes both estuaries and lagoons.
Marine/Estuarine Shorelines: Shorelines include the intertidal and subtidal zones
of beaches,and may also include the backshore and adjacent components of the
terrestrial landscape;(e.g: cliffs;snags,mature trees,dunes,meadows)that are
important to shoreline associated fish and wildlife and that contribute to shoreline
function(e.g., sand/rock/log recruitment,nutrient contribution,erosion control).
If wetland has 3 or more priority habitats=4 points
If wetland has 2 priority habitats=3 points
If wetland has 1 priority habitat= 1 point No habitats=0 points
Wetland Rating Form—western Washington 16 August 2004
MOW
7,77
H 2.4 Wetland Landscape (choose the one description of the landscape around the
wetland that best fits) (seep. 84) ,�xF� a �•
There are at least 3 other wetlands within %mile,and the connections between them r .
are relatively undisturbed (light grazing between wetlands OK, as is lake shore with
some boating, but connections should NOT be bisected by paved roads, fill, fields,
or other development. points = 5
The wetland is Lake-fringe on a lake with little disturbance and there are 3 other lake-
fringe wetlands within '/z mile points = 5
There are at least 3 other wetlands within %2 mile, BUT the connections between them
are disturbed points = 3
The wetland is Lake-fringe on a lake with disturbance and there are 3 other lake-
fringe wetland within '/2 mile points = 3
There is at least 1 wetland within '/2 mile. points =2
There are no wetlands within %mile. points =0
H 2. TOTAL Score - opportunity for providing habitat '
Add the scores in the column above
Total Score for Habitat Functions —add the points for H 1, H 2 and record the result on
P.
C n i
r Au Wetland Rating Form—western Washington 17 c', ;�•, gust 2004
a :'d
CATEGORIZATION BASED ON SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS
Please determine if the wetland meets the attributes described below and circle the
appropriate answers and Category.
Wetland Type Category
Check off any,criteria that apply,to the;wetland. Circle the appropriate Category
when'the-a 'r'o riate criteria are met. '
SC 1.0 Estuarine wetlands (seep. 86)
Does the wetland meet the following criteria for Estuarine wetlands?
— The dominant water regime is tidal,
— Vegetated, and
— With a salinity greater than 0.5 ppt.
YES = Go to SC 1.1 NO
SC 1.1 Is the wetland within a National Wildlife Refuge,National Park,
National Estuary Reserve,Natural Area Preserve, State Park or Educational, Cat. I
Environmental, or Scientific Reserve designated under WAC 332-30-151?
YES =Category I NO go to SC 1.2
SC 1.2 Is the wetland at least 1 acre in size and meets at least two of the
following three conditions? YES =Category I NO =Category II Cat. I
—The wetland is relatively undisturbed(has no diking, ditching, filling, Cat. II
cultivation, grazing, and has less than 10%cover of non-native plant
species. If the non-native Spartina spp. are the only species that cover
more than 10% of the wetland, then the wetland should be given a dual Dual
rating(I/II). The area of Spartina would be rated a Category II while the rating
relatively undisturbed upper marsh with native species would be a IRI
Category I. Do not,however,exclude the area of Spartina in
determining the size threshold of 1 acre.
—At least 3/4.of the landward edge of the wetland has a 100 ft buffer of
shrub, forest, or un-grazed or un-mowed grassland.
—The wetland has at least 2 of the following features: tidal channels,
depressions with open water,or contiguous freshwater wetlands.
Wetland Rating Form—western Washington 18 August 2004
�1 t
•�. y-� � - „,.,--... SC 2.0 Natural Heritage Wetlands (seep. 87)
Natural Heritage wetlands have been identified by the Washington Natural Heritage Cat.I • �
Program/DNR as either high quality undisturbed wetlands or wetlands that support
state Threatened,Endangered, or Sensitive plant species.
SC 2.1 Is the wetland being rated in a Section/Township/Range that contains a
Natural Heritage wetland? (this question is used to screen out most sites
before you need to contact WNHPIDNR)
S/I'/R information from Appendix D_ or accessed from WNHP/DNR web site
YES —contact WNHP/DNR(see p. 79) and go to SC 3.2 NO
SC 2.2 Has DNR identified the wetland as a high quality undisturbed wetland or as
or as a site with state threatened or endangered plant species?
YES =Category I NO
SC 3.0 Bogs (seep. 87)
Does the wetland(or part of the wetland) meet both the criteria for soils and
vegetation in bogs? Use the key below to identify if the wetland is a bog. If you
answer yes you will still need to rate the wetland based on its functions.
1. Does the wetland have organic soil horizons (i.e. layers of organic soil),
either peats or mucks,that compose 16 inches or more of the first 32 inches
of the soil profile? (See Appendix B for a field key to identify organic
soils)?Yes - go to Q. 3 No -go to Q. 2
2. Does the wetland have organic soils, either pests or mucks that are less than
16 inches deep over bedrock, or an impermeable hardpan such as clay or
volcanic ash,or that are floating on a lake or pond?
Yes -go to Q. 3 No-Is not a bog for purpose of rating
3. Does the wetland have more than 70%cover of mosses at ground level,
AND other plants,if present, consist of the"bog"species listed in Table 3
as a significant component of the vegetation(more than 30%of the total
shrub and herbaceous cover consists of species in Table 3)?
Yes—Is a bog for purpose of rating No- go to Q. 4
NOTE: If you are uncertain about the extent of mosses in the understory
you may substitute that criterion by measuring the pH of the water that
seeps into a hole dug at least 16"deep. If the pH is less than 5.0 and the
"bog"plant species in Table 3 are present,the wetland is a bog.
3. Is the wetland forested(>30%cover)with sitka spruce,subalpine fir,
western red cedar,western hemlock, lodgepole pine,quaking aspen,
Englemann's spruce,Ior western white pine,WITH any of the species (or
combination of species)on the bog species plant list in Table 3 as a
significant component of the ground cover(> 30%coverage of the total
shrub/herbaceous cover)?
4. YES = Category I No Is not a bog for purpose of rating Cat.I
Wetland Rating Form—western Washington 19 August 2004
ax .v.rx_x.,.N..».r...v,+t"i:+tWNA!' r�:.e+,n�urtix.+.:pMerk;�t�MkhC�+trvSiK•ntr'Kc+r.,Nd'°.•.,FR, ace.-..:»: _> w:.:
i
SC 4.0 Forested Wetlands (seep. 90) '
Does the wetland have at least 1 acre of forest that meet one of these criteria for the
Department of Fish and Wildlife's forests as priority habitats? If you answer yes you
will still need to rate the wetland based on its functions.
— Old-growth forests: (west of Cascade crest) Stands of at least two tree species,
forming a multi-layered canopy with occasional small openings; with at least 8
trees/acre(20 trees/hectare) that are at least 200 years of age OR have a
diameter at breast height(dbh) of 32 inches (81 cm) or more.
NOTE: The criterion for dbh is based on measurements for upland forests.
Two-hundred year old trees in wetlands will often have a smaller dbh
because their growth rates are often slower. The DFW criterion is and"OR"
so old-growth forests do not necessarily have to have trees of this diameter.
— Mature forests: (west of the Cascade Crest) Stands where the largest trees are
80—200 years old OR have average diameters (dbh) exceeding 21 inches
(53cm); crown cover may be less that 100%; decay, decadence, numbers of
snags, and quantity of large downed material is generally less than that found
in old-growth.
Cat. I
YES = Category I NO
SC 5.0 Wetlands in Coastal Lagoons (seep. 91)
Does the wetland meet all of the following criteria of a wetland in a coastal lagoon?
— The wetland lies in a depression adjacent to marine waters that is wholly
or partially separated from marine waters by sandbanks, gravel banks,
shingle, or, less frequently,rocks
— The lagoon in which the wetland is located contains surface water that is
saline or brackish(>0.5 ppt)during most of the year in at least a portion
of the lagoon(needs to be measured near the bottom)
YES =Go to SC 5.1 NO not a wetland in a coastal lagoon
SC 5.1 Does the wetland meets all of the following three conditions?
—The wetland is relatively undisturbed(has no diking, ditching, filling,
cultivation,grazing),and has less than 20%cover of invasive plant.
species (see list of invasive species on p. 74).
— At least'/4 of the landward edge of the wetland has a 100 ft buffer of
shrub,forest,or un-grazed or un-mowed grassland. Cat.I
— The wetland is larger than 1/10 acre(4350 square feet)
YES=Category I NO=Category II Cat.11—
Wetland Rating Form—westem Washington 20 August 2004
SC 6.0 Interdunal Wetlands (seep. 93)
Is the wetland west of the 1889 line(also called the Western Boundary of Upland
Ownership or WBUO)?
YES -go to SC 6.1 NO_not an interdunal wetland for rating
If you answer yes you will still need to rate the wetland based on its
functions.
In practical terms that means the following geographic areas:
• Long Beach Peninsula- lands west of SR 103
• Grayland-Westport-lands west of SR 105
• Ocean Shores-Copalis- lands west of SR 115 and SR 109
SC 6.1 Is the wetland one acre or larger, or is it in a mosaic of wetlands that is
once acre or larger?
YES =Category II NO—go to SC 6.2 Cat. II
SC 6.2 Is the wetland between 0.1 and 1 acre, or is it in a mosaic of wetlands that
is between 0.1 and 1 acre?
YES =Category III Cat. III
FCC
atego o,.wetland ba�`se,on SpeciaLCharacterishcs
hoose the h ghest"ratznif wettanclfallsnto several categories, sand record on
,%I� od answered NO.for all. es enter-",Not A' licable' on p.1
Wetland Rating Form—western Washington 21 August 2004
ANTHONY JAY BREDBERG
3303 43"d St. NW
Gig Harbor, Washington 98335
Telephone: 253-858-7055 Fax: 253-858-2534
ajb@wa.net
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
Soil Scientist, Wetlands Biologist, Botanist, Agronomist, BBA, INC.
15 years, specializing in wetland mitigation, enhancement, restoration and studies, soil
survey, slope stability assessment, site evaluation, permitting, and expert witness
testimony.
Senior Soil Scientist, NH SOIL CONSULTANTS, Inc.
Founded and directed soil survey, mapping, and wetland division. .
Consultant, BREDBERG SOILS
Agronomic consulting in conservation, sediment and erosion control, soils, and
production.
Administrator, EL RANCHO CENIT, Campeche, Mexico
Administered 2,000 acre ranch producing and exporting commodity crops
Megerani, Ltd. LAGOS, NIGERIA
Acted as US agent for exporting commodities, industrial, and agricultural supplies.
College Instructor, BLACK HAWK COLLEGE
Focused on plant identification, soil management, and conservation.
EDUCATION
MS North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC.
Studied soil science and plant science. 1979.
BS Western Illinois University, Macomb, IL.
Studied plant science and botany. 1977.
ADDITIONAL GRADUATE STUDIES
Soil Science University of Illinois
Forestry University of New Hampshire
Wetlands University of Massachusetts
CERTIFICATIONS AND REGISTRATIONS
Certified Professional Soil Scientist AJ Bredberg is the only consultant
Certified Professional Soil Classifier in the State with these
Professional Wetland Scientist Professional Credentials
Registered Professional Soil Scientist
Resume 3-5111200 7
Qualifications of AJ Bredberg
AJ Bredberg has superior educational qualifications.He started college at age 16,receiving a B.S.studying plants
and soils with a minor in botany. Mr.Bredberg completed his master's degree by age 21,and was teaching college
classes at the age of 22.
His M.S.thesis monitored hydrology in the upper 36 inches of the soil using tensiometers,gravimetric,pressure
plate,and other methods. Mr.Bredberg's PhD.research at the University of Illinois involved porosity and bulk
density with state of the art mercury porosimeter analyzers. His PhD research at the University of Hew Hampshire
involved forest soil characterization,sampling,and chemical analysis.
Additionally,Mr.Bredberg possesses first-class experience. Since childhood,he was involved in farming and farm
management. He has done irrigation,monitoring water levels and moisture contents. At the age of 20,he negotiated
agricultural export shipments from Europe to Nigeria. By 23,he managed a 2,000-acre ranch in Mexico with 300
employees exporting vegetables to the U.S. While a full-time graduate student at the University of New Hampshire,
his part-time consulting generated more income than the Department Head's salary.
We know of one else in western Washington with the following certifications and registrations,all of which Mr.
Bredberg possesses:
■ Certified Professional Soil Scientist#02630
■ Certified Professional Soil Classifier#02630
■ Professional Wetland Scientist#0866
■ USDA Technical Service Provider(TSP)#03-2710
A TSP prepares farm plans that are approved by the NRCS and accepted by all agencies the same as NRCS prepared
documents. The TSP program is an alternative to using the NRCS or Conservation District to prepare a farm plan.
Mr.Bredberg has seen more soils,test pits,and completed more studies of the entire Puget Sound area than anyone.
He has experience throughout the U.S.in soil properties,identification and management. He has worked
internationally,experiencing soils of subtropical and tropical climates.He can trace the movement of a molecule of
water once it falls from the sky and hits the soils surface all the way back to the point that it evapostranspires back
into the atmosphere,quantitatively and qualitatively.
Mr.Bredberg has worked on over 2,000 projects since 1990 from Oregon to Canada and Pullman to the Pacific.
Clients including:
■ Wal-Mart
■ Costco
■ Safeway
■ ARCO
■ Home Depot
■ Chehalis Airport
■ City of Bellevue
■ US Army Corps of Engineers
■ Timberland
■ Fred Meyer
■ Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of New York(TIAA)
■ Zurn
■ OPUS
■ Panataonni
■ Richard and William Marriott
• Numerous public and private school districts
■ Dozens of churches
■ Worked with every major land use attorney in the Seattle area(either working for or against)
■ Has worked in nearly every county and city in the Puget Sound Area
Mr.Bredberg has also had experience working with government officials. Along with his partner,Mr.Bredberg led
a statewide tour for the Washington State House subcommittee on Agriculture and Environment explaining wetland
issues that led to passage of a new law,House Bill 2339,setting up wetland banking. He was instrumental in passing
an amendment to Senate Bill 5065,which exempted soil scientists from the Geologist Practice Act.
Resume3-5/1/2007
Mr.Bredberg's technical expertise is unique and well documented. His company has reversed wetland decisions
already approved by the Army Corps involving hundreds of acres of land. Major wetland companies have been
shown to be in error after his firm has done a technically accurate review. Federal,county,and local jurisdictions
have accepted and approved the corrected delineations done by Bredberg.
Mr.Bredberg is currently preparing patents for submittal,some of which deal with irrigation and uniform water
dispersal. Mr.Bredberg is a noted speaker,and was a presenter at an international wetland symposium in Kuala
Lumpur Malaysia.Mr.Bredberg was an invited speaker at an international symposium in November dealing with
wetlands,titled"Case studies exemplifying the importance of including a soil scientist in a wetland functional
assessment team".
Resume 3-5111200 7
WETLAND RATING FORM-WESTERN WASHINGTON
Name of wetland (if known): Ti4a4e-5 11,),e1,1dA4
Location: SEC: �TWNSHP)( RNGEV'j(attach map with outline of wetland to rating form)
Person(s) Rating Wetland: A16 Affiliation: A TA1c- Date of site visit:
SU"1N.1-1-L:kRY0F RATENG
Cakfe,,;-ory based on FU:N C"I'l("INS provided by :N i!:nid
IN I
1111C11011S
IV '1'0-; for functions
N
Czae-14ory bused on SPECIAIL 'A CS of wet?:-,Tit:
I'l Does not Apply—
Fill'.11 CatC!101-�7 (choose the -highest" cjre`,ory from above)
Check the appropriate type and class of wetland being rated.
i ,
i-Wili"n-d-Z M AMMWtran&-C-fla*s�' ft,4
Estuarine De sessional 141
Natural Heritage Wetland Riverine
Bog Lake-fringe
Mature Forest Slope
Old Growth Forest i Flats
Coastal Lagoon Freshwater Tidal
Interdunal
None of the above
to
Co 4- at
ems, '7 C"
Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 1 August 2004
Does the wetland being rated meet any of the criteria below?
If you answer YES to any of the questions below you will need to protect the wetland
according to the regulations regarding the special characteristics found in the wetland.
Check List for Wetlands That Need Special Protection, and YES NO
That Are Not Included in the Rating
SP 1.Has the wetland been documented as a habitat for any Federally listed
Threatened or Endangered plant or animal species (TIE species)?
For the purposes of this rating system, "documented" means the wetland is on the `
appropriate state or federal database. v
SP2.Has the wetland been documented as habitat for any State listed Threatened or
Endangered plant or animal species?
For the purposes of this rating system, "documented" means the wetland is on the
appropriate state database.
SPI Does the wetland contain individuals of Priority species listed by the WDFW
for the state?
SP4. Does the wetland have a local significance in addition to its functions? For /
example, the wetland has been identified in the Shoreline Master Program, ✓
the Critical Areas Ordinance, or in a local management plan as having
special significance.
To complete the next part of the data sheet you will need to determine the
Hydroggeomorphic Class of the wetland being rated.
The hydrogeomorphic classification groups wetlands into those that function in similar ways. This
simplifies the questions needed to answer how well the wetland functions. The Hydrogeomorphic
Class of a wetland can be determined using the key below. See p. 24 for more detailed instructions
on classifying wetlands.
Wetland Rating Form—westem Washington 2 August 2004
r
Classification of Vegetated Wetlands for Western Washington
Wetland Name: -Stl Date: Y- 36 0
1.Are the water levels in the wetland usually controlled by tides (i.e. except during floods)?
NO—go to 2 YES—the wetland class is Tidal Fringe
If yes, is the salinity of the water during periods of annual low flow below 0.5 ppt(parts per
thousand)? YES—Freshwater Tidal Fringe NO—Saltwater Tidal Fringe(Estuarine)
If your wetland can be classified as a Freshwater Tidal Fringe use the forms for Riverine
wetlands. If it is Saltwater Tidal Fringe it is rated as an Estuarine wetland. Wetlands that
were called estuarine in the first and second editions of the rating system are called Salt
Water Tidal Fringe in the Hydrogeomorphic Classification. Estuarine wetlands were
categorized separately in the earlier editions, and this separation is being kept in this
revision. To maintain consistency between editions,the term"Estuarine"wetland is kept.
Please note,however,that the characteristics that define Category I and II estuarine
wetlands have changed(see p. ).
2.Is the topography within the wetland flat and precipitation is only source (>90%) of water to it.
NO—go to 3 YES—The wetland class is Flats
If your wetland can be classified as a"Flats"wetland,use the form for Depressional
wetlands.
3. Does the wetland meet both of the following criteria?
The vegetated part of the wetland is on the shores of a body of open water(without any
vegetation on the surface)where at least 20 acres (8 ha) are permanently inundated
(ponded or flooded);
At least 30%of the open water area is deeper than 6.6 ft(2 m)?
NO—go to 4 YES—The wetland class is Lake-fringe (Lacustrine Fringe)
4.Does the wetland meet all of the following criteria?
The wetland is on a slope(slope can be very gradual),
The water flows through the wetland in one direction(unidirectional) and usually
comes from seeps. It may flow subsurface, as sheetflow, or in a swale without distinct
banks.
The water leaves the wetland without being impounded?
NOTE: Surface water does not pond in these type of wetlands except occasionally in
very small and shallow depressions or behind hummocks(depressions are usually
<3ft diameter and less than 1 foot deep).
NO -go to 5 YES—The wetland class is Slope
5.Is the wetland in a valley,or stream channel,where it gets inundated by overbank flooding from
that stream or river? The flooding should occur at least once every two years, on the average,to
answer"yes." The wetland can contain depressions that are filled with water when the river is
not flooding.
NO -go to 6 It
The wetland class is Riverine
Wetland Rating Form—western Washington 3 August 2004
6. Is the wetland in a topographic depression in which water ponds, or is saturated to the surface,at
some time of the year. This means that any outlet, ifpresent, is higher than the'interior of the
wetland.
NO—go to 7 YES The wetland class is Depressional
7. Is the wetland locate n a very flat area with no obvious depression and no stream or river
running through it and providing water. The wetland seems to be maintained by high
groundwater in the area. The wetland may be ditched,but has no obvious natural outlet.
NO—go to 8 YES—The wetland class is Depressional
8. Your wetland seems to be difficult to classify. For example, seeps at the base of a slope may
grade into a riverine floodplain, or a small stream within a depressional wetland has a zone of
flooding along its sides. Sometimes we find characteristics of several different hydrogeomorphic
classes within one wetland boundary. Use the following table to identify the appropriate class to
use for the rating system if you have several HGM classes present within your wetland. NOTE:
Use this table only if the class that is recommended in the second column represents 10%or more
of the total area of the wetland being rated. If the area of the second class is less than 10%classify
the wetland using the first class.
HMC7�ssesthtn aiDelineated Wetland Botirida 'lw gein2, atin
Slope+Riverine Riverine
Slope+Depressional Depressional
Slope+Lake-fringe Lake-fringe
�--� Depressional+Riverine along stream within boundary Depressional
Depressional+Lake-fringe Depressional
Salt Water Tidal Fringe and any other class of freshwater Treat as ESTUARINE under
wetland wetlands with special
characteristics
If you are unable still to determine which of the above criteria apply to your wetland,or you have
more than 2 HGM classes within a wetland boundary, classify the wetland as Depressional for
the rating.
Wetland Rating Form—western Washington 4 August 2004
WATER QUALITY FUNCTIONS - Indicators that wetland functions to improve
water quality
D D 1. Does the wetland have the potential to improve water quality? (seep. 38)
D 1.1 Characteristics of surface water flows out of the wetland:
D Wetland is a depression with no surface water outlet points =3
Wetland has an intermittently flowing, or highly constricted, outlet points =2
Wetland has an unconstricted surface outlet points= 1 C
Wetland is flat and has no obvious outlet and/or outlet is a ditch points = 1
D 1.2 The soil 2 inches below the surface is clay,organic, or smells anoxic
D (hydrogen sulfide or rotten eggs).
YES points=4
NO points=0
D 1.3 Characteristics of persistent vegetation(emergent, shrub, and/or forest class):
D Wetland has persistent, ungrazed, vegetation>=95% of area points= 5
Wetland has persistent,ungrazed, vegetation>= 1/2 of area points=3
Wetland has persistent,ungrazed vegetation>= 1/10 of area points= 1
Wetland has persistent,ungrazed vegetation<1/10 of area points=0
D 1.4 Characteristics of seasonal ponding or inundation.
D This is the area of the wetland that is ponded for at least 2 months, but dries out
sometime during the year. Do not count the area that is permanently ponded.
Estimate area as the average condition 5 out of 10 yrs._
Area seasonally ponded is> '/z total area of wetland points=4
Area seasonally ponded is> `/4 total area of wetland points=2
Area seasonally ponded is< `/4 total area of wetland points=0 q
NOTE: See text or indicators o seasonal and permanent inundation.. O�
D Total for D 1 Add the points in the boxes above
D D 2. Does the wetland have the opportunity to improve water quality? (seep. 44)
Answer YES if you know or believe there are pollutants in groundwater or surface
water coming into the wetland that would otherwise reduce water quality in
streams, lakes or groundwater downgradient from the wetland?Note which of the
following conditions provide the sources of pollutants.
— Grazing in the wetland or within 150 ft
— Untreated stormwater discharges to wetland
— Tilled fields or orchards within 150 ft of wetland
— A stream or culvert discharges into wetland that drains developed areas,
residential areas, farmed fields,roads,or clear-cut logging
— Residential,urban areas, golf courses are within 150 ft of wetland multiplier
— Wetland is fed by groundwater high in phosphorus or nitrogen
— Other
YES multiplier is 2 NO multiplier is 1
D TOTAL-Water Quality Functions Multiply the score from D1 by D2 >/
Add score to table on . 1 GCD
Wetland Rating Form—westem Washington 5 August 2004
# 4r
ti •x;
x
HYDROLOGIC FUNCTIONS Indicators that wetland functions to reduce t
floodm
�
and stream de "`adation z a= P
.: �.
D 3.Does the wetland have the potential to reduce flooding and erosion?
see . 46
D D 3.1 Characteristics of surface water flows out of the wetland
Wetland has no surface water outlet points=4
Wetland has an intermittently flowing, or highly constricted, outlet points=2
Wetland is flat and has no obvious outlet and/or outlet is a small ditch points= 1
Wetland has an unconstricted surface outlet points=0
D D 3.2 Depth of storage during wet periods
Estimate the height of ponding above the bottom of the outlet
Marks of ponding are 3 ft or more above the surface points =7
The wetland is a"headwater"wetland" points = 5
Marks of ponding between 2 ft to <3 ft from surface points = 5
Marks are at least 0.5 ft to<2 ft from surface points=3
Wetland is flat but has small depressions on the surface that trap water points = 1
Marks of ponding less than 0.5 ft points=0
D D 3.3 Contribution of wetland to storage in the watershed
Estimate the ratio of the area of upstream basin contributing surface water to the
wetland to the area of the wetland itself.
The area of the basin is less than 10 times the area of wetland points=5
The area of the basin is 10 to 100 times the area of the wetland points= 3
The area of the basin is more than 100 times the area of the wetland points =0
Wetland is in the FLATS class basin=the wetland,by definitionpoints= 5
D Total for D 3 Add the points in the boxes above
D D 4.Does the wetland have the opportunity to reduce flooding and erosion?
(seep. 49)
Answer YES if the wetland is in a location in the watershed where the flood
storage, or reduction in water velocity, it provides helps protect downstream
property and aquatic resources from flooding or excessive and/or erosive flows.
Answer NO if the water coming into the wetland is controlled by a structure such
as flood gate,tide gate,flap valve,reservoir etc. OR you estimate that more than
90%of the water in the wetland is from groundwater.
Note which of the following indicators of opportunity apply.
— Wetland is in a headwater of a river or stream that has flooding problems
— Wetland drains to a river or stream that has flooding problems multiplier
— Wetland has no outlet and impounds surface runoff water that might
otherwise flow into a river or stream that has flooding problems eZ
— Other
YES multiplier is 2 NO multiplier is 1
D TOTAL -Hydrologic Functions Multiply the score from D 3 by D 4
Add score to table on p. 1
Wetland Rating Form—western Washington 6 August 2004
R;� >� n aresh, ate c�a etl`an ,
WATER;QUALITY FUNCTIONS -' Indicators that wetland functions to improve f
water quality
R R 1. Does the wetland have the potential to improve water quality? (seep. 52)
R R 1.1 Area of surface depressions within the riverine wetland that can trap
sediments during a flooding event:
- Depressions cover>3/4 area of wetland points = 8
Depressions cover> 1/2 area of wetland points =4
Depressions present but cover< 1/2 area of wetland points=2
No depressions present points =0
R R 1.2 Characteristics of the vegetation in the wetland:
Forest or shrub>2/3 the area of the wetland points= 8
Forest or shrub> 1/3 area of the wetland points= 6
Ungrazed, emergent plants>2/3 area of wetland points=6
Ungrazed emergent plants> 1/3 area of wetland points=3
Forest, shrub, and un razed emergent< 1/3 area of wetland points=0
R Add the points in the boxes above
R R 2. Does the wetland have the opportunity to improve water quality? (seep. 53)
Answer YES if you know or believe there are pollutants in groundwater or surface
water coming into the wetland that would otherwise reduce water quality in
streams, lakes or groundwater downgradient from the wetland?Note which of the
following conditions provide the sources of pollutants.
— Grazing in the wetland or within 150ft
— Untreated stormwater discharges to wetland
— Tilled fields or orchards within 150 feet of wetland
— A stream or culvert discharges into wetland that drains developed areas,
residential areas,farmed fields,roads, or clear-cut logging
— Residential,urban areas,golf courses are within 150 ft of wetland
— The river or stream linked to the wetland has a contributing basin where
human activities have raised levels of sediment,toxic compounds or
nutrients in the river water above standards for water quality multiplier
— Other
YES multiplier is 2 NO multiplier is 1
R TOTAL-Water Quality Functions Multiply the score from R 1 by R 2
Add score to table on . 1
Comments
Wetland Rating Form—western Washington 7 August 2004
.t
HYDROL,OOIC`FUNCTIONS - Indicators that wctlan cttotts ti re e.
flooding and stream erosion
R 3.Does the wetland have the potential to reduce flooding and erosion?
see p. 54
R R 3.1 Characteristics of the overbank storage the wetland provides:
Estimate the average width of the wetland perpendicular to the direction of the
flow and the width of the stream or river channel(distance between banks).
Calculate the ratio: (width of wetland)/(width of stream).
If the ratio is more than 20 points=9
If the ratio is between 10—20 points=6
If the ratio is 5- <10 points=4
If the ratio is 1-<5 points =2
If the ratio is< 1 points = 1
R R 3.2 Characteristics of vegetation that slow down water velocities during floods:
Treat large woody debris as 'forest or shrub". Choose the points appropriate
for the best description.
Forest or shrub for>1/3 area OR Emergent plants>2/3 area points= 7
Forest or shrub for> 1/10 area OR Emergent plants> 1/3 area points=4
Vegetation does not meet above criteria points =0
R Add the points in the boxes above
R R 4.Does the wetland have the opportunity to reduce flooding and erosion?
(seep. 57)
Answer YES if the wetland is in a location in the watershed where the flood
storage, or reduction in water velocity, it provides helps protect downstream
property and aquatic resources from flooding or excessive and/or erosive flows.
Note which of the following conditions apply.
— There are human structures and activities downstream(roads,buildings,
bridges, farms) that can be damaged by flooding.
— There are natural resources downstream(e.g. salmon redds)that can be multiplier
damaged by flooding
— Other
-(Answer NO if the major source of water to the wetland is controlled by a reservoir
or the wetland is tidal fringe along the sides of a dike)
YES multiplier is 2 NO multiplier is 1
R TOTAL -Hydrologic Functions Multiply the score from R 3 by R 4
Add score to table on p. 1
Comments
Wetland Rating Form—western Washington 8 August 2004
l' d-.'. l l •' � ? is J'
ors avvet ancrtunco
water quality
L L 1. Does the wetland have the potential to improve water quality? (seep. 59)
L L 1.1 Average width of vegetation along the lakeshore
Vegetation is more than 33ft(10m) wide points =6
Vegetation is more than 16 (5m)wide and<33ft points =3
Vegetation is more than 6ft(2m) wide and<16 ft points= 1
Vegetation is less than 6 ft wide points=0
L L 1.2 Characteristics of the vegetation in the wetland: choose the appropriate
description that results in the highest points, land do not include any open water in
your estimate of coverage.In this case the herbaceous plants can be either the
dominant form (called emergent class) or as an understory in a shrub or forest
community.
Herbaceous plants cover>90% of the vegetated area points =6
Herbaceous plants cover>2/3 of the vegetated area points =4
Herbaceous plants cover>1/3 of the vegetated area points= 3
Other vegetation that is not aquatic bed in>2/3 vegetated area points =3
Other vegetation that is not aquatic bed in> 1/3 vegetated area points= 1
Aquatic bed cover>2/3 of the vegetated area points=0
L Add the points in the boxes above
L L 2.Does the wetland have the opportunity to improve water quality? (seep. 61)
Answer YES if you know or believe there are pollutants in the lake water, or
surface water flowing through the wetland to the lake is polluted. Note which of
the following conditions provide the sources of pollutants.
— Wetland is along the shores of a lake or reservoir that does not meet water
quality standards
— Grazing in the wetland or within 150ft
— Polluted water discharges to wetland along upland edge
— Tilled fields or orchards within 150 feet of wetland
multiplier
— Residential or urban areas are within 150 ft of wetland
— Parks with grassy areas that are maintained,ballfields, golf courses (all
within 150 ft. of lake shore)
— Power boats with gasoline or diesel engines use the lake
— Other
YES multiplier is 2 NO multiplier is 1
L TOTAL-Water Quality Functions Multiply the score from L 1 by L2
Add score to table on , 1
Comments
Wetland Rating Form—western Washington 9 August 2004
hYrMOGEN
HYDROLOGIC FUNCTIONS - Indicators that wetland functions to reduce``
shoreline erosion
L L 3.Does the wetland have the potential to reduce shoreline erosion? (seep. 62)
L L 3 Average width and characteristics of vegetation along the lakeshore(do not
include aquatic bed): (choose the highest scoring description that matches
conditions in the wetland)
>3/4 of fringe vegetation is shrubs or trees at least 33 ft(10m) wide points= 6
>3/4 of fringe vegetation is shrubs or trees at least 6 ft. (2 m) wide points =4
> '/4 of fringe vegetation is shrubs or trees at least 33 ft(1 Om)wide points=4
Fringe vegetation is at least 6 ft(2m) wide points=2
Fringe vegetation is less than 6 ft 2m wide points =0
L Record the points from the box above
L L 4.Does the wetland have the opportunity to reduce erosion? (seep. 63)
Are there features along the shore that will be impacted if the shoreline erodes?
Note which of the following conditions apply.
— There are human structures and activities along the upland edge of the
wetland(buildings, fields)that can be damaged by erosion.
— There are undisturbed natural resources along the upland edge of the
wetland(e.g. mature forests other wetlands)than can be damaged by
shoreline erosion multiplier
— Other
YES multiplier is 2 NO multiplier is 1
L TOTAL -Hydrologic Functions Multiply the score from L 3 by L 4
Add score to table on p. 1
Comments
Wetland Rating Form—western Washington 10 August 2004
y%
7) _000-". -V
improve water quality
S S 1.Does the wetland have the potential to improve water quality? (seep. 64)
S S 1.1 Characteristics of average slope of wetland:
Slope is 1%or less (a 1%slope has a 1 foot vertical drop in elevation for every
100 ft horizontal distance) ....... .............................. points=3
Slope is 1% -2% points=2
Slope is 2% - 5% points= 1
Slope is greater than 5% points =0
S S 1.2 The soil 2 inches below the surface is clay, organic, or smells anoxic
(hydrogen sulfide or rotten eggs).
YES = 3 points NO=0 points
S S 1.3 Characteristics of the vegetation in the wetland that trap sediments and
pollutants:
Choose the points appropriate for the description that best fits the vegetation in
the wetland. Dense vegetation means you have trouble seeing the soil surface.
Dense,ungrazed,herbaceous vegetation> 90%of the wetland area points=6
Dense,ungrazed,herbaceous vegetation> 1/2 of area points=3
Dense,woody,vegetation> '/2 of area points=2
Dense,ungrazed,herbaceous vegetation> 1/4 of area points= 1
Does not meet any of the criteria above for vegetation points=0
S Total for S 1 Add the points in the boxes above
S S 2.Does the wetland have the oyuortunity to improve water quality? (seep. 67)
Answer YES if you know or believe there are pollutants in groundwater or surface
water coming into the wetland that would otherwise reduce water quality in
streams, lakes or groundwater downgradient from the wetland?Note which of the
following conditions provide the sources of pollutants.
— Grazing in the wetland or within 150ft
— Untreated stormwater discharges to wetland
— Tilled fields,logging, or orchards within 150 feet of wetland
— Residential,urban areas, or golf courses are within 150 ft upslope of
multiplier
wetland
— Other
YES multiplier is 2 NO multiplier is 1
S TOTAL-Water Quality Functions Multiply the score from S 1 by S2
Add score to table on p. 1
Comments
Wetland Rating Form—western Washington 11 August 2004
r %.r
HYDROLOGIC FUNCTIONS :Indicators that wetlaric'fiiiictions to""'reduce
-f[66difij and streameiosion
S 3.Does the wetland have the potential to reduce flooding and stream erosion?
see . 68
S S 3.1 Characteristics of vegetation that reduce the velocity of surface flows during
storms. Choose the points appropriate for the description that best fit
conditions in the wetland.
Dense,uncut, rigid vegetation covers >90%of the area of the wetland.
(stems of plants should be thick enough(usually> 1/8in), or dense enough,to
remain erect during surface flows) points= 6
Dense, uncut, rigid vegetation> 1/2 area of wetland points= 3
Dense, uncut, rigid vegetation> 1/4 area points= 1
More than 1/4 of area is grazed, mowed, tilled or vegetation is
not rigid points=0
S S 3.2 Characteristics of slope wetland that holds back small amounts of flood
flows:
The slope wetland has small surface depressions that can retain water over at
least 10% of its area. YES points=2
NO points=0
S Add the points in the boxes above
S S 4.Does the wetland have the opportunity to reduce flooding and erosion?
(see p. 70)
Is the wetland in a landscape position where the reduction in water velocity it
provides helps protect downstream property and aquatic resources from flooding
or excessive and/or erosive flows? Note which of the following conditions apply.
— Wetland has surface runoff that drains to a river or stream that has flooding
problems
multiplier
— Other,
(Answer NO if the major source of water is controlled by a reservoir(e.g. wetland is
a seep that is on the downstream side of a dam)
YES multiplier is 2 NO multiplier is 1
S TOTAL -Hydrologic Functions Multiply the score from S 3 by S 4
Add score to table on p. 1
Comments
Wetland Rating Form—western Washington 12 August 2004
y
01� IP
r.y
;M
� 4
HABITAT.FUNCTIONS-Indicators that wetland functions to provide important habitat
H 1.Does the wetland have the potential to provide habitat for many species?
H 1.1 Vegetation structure(seep. 72)
Check the types of vegetation classes present(as defined by Cowardin) if the class
covers more than 10%of the area of the wetland or Y4 acre.
Aquatic bed
Emergent plants
Scrub/shrub(areas where shrubs have>30%cover)
Forested(areas where trees have>30%cover)
Forested areas have 3 out of 5 strata(canopy, sub-canopy, shrubs, herbaceous,
moss/ground-cover)
Add the number of vegetation types that qualify. If you have:
4 types or more points=4
3 types points =2
2 types points= 1
1 e oints=0
H 1.2. Hydroperiods (seep. 73)
Check the types of water regimes (hydroperiods)present within the wetland. The
water regime has to cover more than 10%of the wetland or % acre to count. (see text
for descriptions of hydroperiods)
Permanently flooded or inundated 4 or more types present points=3
t —Seasonally flooded or inundated 3 types present points =2
Occasionally flooded or inundated 2 types present point= 1
Saturated only
—7e�ermanently flowing stream or river in, or adjacent to,the wetland
./ Seasonally flowing stream in, or adjacent to,the wetland
Lake fringe wetland =2 points I
Freshwater tidal wetland=2 points
H 1.3. Richness of Plant Species(seep. 75)
Count the number of plant species in the wetland that cover at least 10 ftz. (different
patches of the same species can be combined to meet the size threshold)
You do not have to name the species.
Do not include Eurasian Milfoil, reed canarygrass,purple loosestrife, Canadian
Thistle
If you counted: > 19 species points=2
List species below if you want to: 5 - 19 species points= 1
< 5 species points=0
Wetland Rating Form—westem Washington 13 August 2004
4
H 1.4. Interspersion of habitats (seep. 76) i
Decide from the diagrams below whether interspersion between types of vegetation
(described in H 1.1), or vegetation types and unvegetated areas (can include open
water or mudflats) is high, medium, low, or none.
0
None=0 points Low= 1 point Moderate = 2 points
[riparian braided channels]
High =3 points
NOTE: If you have four or more vegetation types or three vegetation types 0
and open water the rating is always "high".
H 1.5. Special Habitat Features: (seep. 77)
Check the habitat features that are present in the wetland. The number of checks is
the number of points you put into the next column.
Large, downed,woody debris within the wetland(>4in. diameter and 6 ft long).
Standing snags (diameter at the bottom>4 inches)in the wetland
Undercut banks are present for at least 6.6 ft(2m)and/or overhanging vegetation
extends at least 3.3 ft(1 m)over a stream for at least 33 ft(1 Om)
Stable steep banks of fine material that might be used by beaver or muskrat for
denning (>30degree slope)OR signs of recent beaver activity are present
✓At least'/4 acre of thin-stemmed persistent vegetation or woody branches are present
in areas that are permanently or seasonally inundated.(structures for egg-laying by
v amphibians) L�
Invasive plants cover less than 25%of the wetland area in each stratum of plants
H 1.TOTAL Score- potential for providing habitat
Add the scores in the column above
Comments
Wetland Rating Form—westem Washington 14 August 2004
MP
�S
H 2.Does the wetland have the opportunity to provide habitat for many specieg?
H 2.1 Buffers (seep. 80)
Choose the description that best represents condition of buffer of wetland. The highest
scoring criterion that applies to the wetland is to be used in the rating. See text for
definition of"undisturbed. "
— 100 m(330ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas,rocky areas, or open water
>95%of circumference. No developed areas within undisturbed part of buffer.
(relatively undisturbed also means no-grazing) Points=5
— 100 m (330 ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas,rocky areas, or open water
> 50% circumference. Points=4
— 50 in (170ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas,rocky areas, or open water
>95% circumference. Points =4
— 100 in (330ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas,rocky areas, or open water
/>25%circumference, . Points =3
— 50 m(170ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water
for> 50%circumference. Points =3
If buffer does not meet any of the criteria above
— No paved areas (except paved trails) or buildings within 25 in (80ft) of wetland>
95%circumference. Light to moderate grazing, or lawns are OK. Points=2
— No paved areas or buildings within 50m of wetland for>50%circumference.
Light to moderate grazing,or lawns are OK. Points = 2
— Heavy grazing in buffer. Points= 1
— Vegetated buffers are<2m wide (6.6ft) for more than 95% of the circumference
(e.g. tilled fields,paving,basalt bedrock extend to edge of wetland Points =0.
— Buffer does not meet any of the criteria above. Points= 1 3
H 2.2 Corridors and Connections (seep. 81)
H 2.2.1 Is the wetland part of a relatively undisturbed and unbroken vegetated
corridor (either riparian or upland)that is at least 150 ft wide,has at least 30%cover
of shrubs, forest or native undisturbed prairie,that connects to estuaries,other
wetlands or undisturbed uplands that are at least 250 acres in size? (dams in riparian
corridors,heavily used gravel roads,paved roads, are considered breaks in the
corridor).
YES =4 points (go to H 2.3) NO=go to H 2.2.2
H 2.2.2 Is the wetland part of a relatively undisturbed and unbroken vegetated
corridor(either riparian or upland)that is at least 50ft wide,has at least 30%cover of
shrubs or forest,and connects to estuaries,other wetlands or undisturbed uplands
that are at least 25 acres in size? OR a Lake-fringe wetland, if it does not have an
undisturbed corridor as in the question above?
YES=2 points (go to H 2.3) NO=H 2.2.3
H 2.2.3 Is the wetland:
within 5 mi(81am) of a brackish or salt water estuary OR
within 3 mi of a large field or pasture(>40 acres)OR
within 1 mi of a lake greater than 20 acres?
YES= 1 point NO =0 points
Wetland Rating Form—western Washington 15 August 2004
H 2.3 Wear or adjacent to other priority habitats listed by WDFW(see p. 82)
ch of the following priority habitats are within 33Oft(100m) of the wetland?
( e text for a more detailed description of these priority habitats)
Riparian: The area adjacent to aquatic systems with flowing water that contains
elements of both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems which mutually influence each other.
-.,—Aspen Stands: Pure or mixed stands of aspen greater than 0.8 ha(2 acres).
Cliffs: Greater than 7.6 m(25 ft)high and occurring below 5000 ft.
Old-growth forests: (Old-growth west of Cascade crest) Stands of at least 2 tree
species, forming a multi-layered canopy with occasional small openings; with at
least 20 trees/ha(8 trees/acre)> 81 cm (32 in)dbh or>200 years of age.
Mature forests: Stands with average diameters exceeding 53 cm(21 in) dbh; crown
cover may be less that 100%; crown cover may be less that 100%; decay,
decadence, numbers of snags,and quantity of large downed material is generally
less than that found in old-growth; 80 -200 years old west of the Cascade crest.
Prairies: Relatively undisturbed areas (as indicated by dominance of native plants)
where grasses and/or forbs form the natural climax plant community.
Talus: Homogenous areas of rock rubble ranging in average size 0.15 -2.0 in (0.5 -
6.5 ft), composed of basalt, andesite, and/or sedimentary rock, including riprap
slides and mine tailings. May be associated with cliffs.
Caves: A naturally occurring cavity,recess,void, or system of interconnected
passages
Oregon white Oak: Woodlands Stands of pure oak or oak/conifer associations
where canopy coverage of the oak component of the stand is 25%.
Urban Natural Open Space: A priority species resides within or is adjacent to the
open space and uses it for breeding and/or regular feeding; and/or the open space
functions as a corridor connecting other priority habitats, especially those that
would otherwise be isolated; and/or the open space is an isolated remnant of natural
habitat larger than 4 ha(10 acres) and is surrounded by urban development.
Estuary/Estuary-like: Deepwater tidal habitats and adjacent tidal wetlands,usually
semi-enclosed by land but with open,partly obstructed or sporadic access to the
open ocean,and in which ocean water is at least occasionally diluted by freshwater
runoff from the land.The salinity may be periodically increased above that of the
open ocean by evaporation.Along some low-energy coastlines there is appreciable
dilution of sea water. Estuarine habitat extends upstream and landward to where
ocean-derived salts measure less than 0.5ppt. during the period of average annual
low flow. Includes both estuaries and lagoons.
Marine/Estuarine Shorelines: Shorelines include the intertidal and subtidal zones
of beaches, and may also include the backshore and adjacent components of the
terrestrial landscape (e.g.,cliffs,snags,mature trees, dunes,meadows)that are
important to shoreline associated fish and wildlife and that contribute to shoreline
function(e.g., sand/rock/log recruitment,nutrient contribution,erosion control).
If wetland has 3 or more priority habitats=4 points
If wetland has 2 priority habitats=3 points
If wetland has 1 priority habitat= 1 point No habitats=0 points
Wetland Rating Form—western Washington 16 August 2004
H 2.4 Wetland Landscape (choose the one description of the landscape around the
wetland that best fits) (see p. 84) !
There are at least 3 other wetlands within ''/2 mile, and the connections between them
are relatively undisturbed(light grazing between wetlands OK, as is lake shore with
some boating, but connections should NOT be bisected by paved roads, fill, fields,
or other development. points =5
The wetland is Lake-fringe on a lake with little disturbance and there are 3 other lake-
fringe wetlands within %2 mile points = 5
There are at least 3 other wetlands within '/2 mile, BUT the connections between them
are disturbed points= 3
The wetland is Lake-fringe on a lake with disturbance and there are 3 other lake-
fringe wetland within '/2 mile points =3
There is at least 1 wetland within ''/2 mile. points=2
There are no wetlands within '/2 mile. points=0
H 2. TOTAL Score - opportunity for providing habitat '
Add the scores in the column above
Total Score for Habitat Functions —add the points for H 1,H 2 and record the result on
Wetland Rating Form—western Washington 17 August 2004
77
CATEGORIZATION BASED ON SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS
Please determine if the wetland meets the attributes described below and circle the
appropriate answers and Category.
Wetland Type Category
Check off any criteria that apply to the wetland. Circle the appropriate Category
when the appropriate criteria are met.
SC 1.0 Estuarine wetlands(seep. 86)
Does the wetland meet the following criteria for Estuarine wetlands?
— The dominant water regime is tidal,
— Vegetated, and
— With a salinity greater than 0.5 ppt.
YES = Go to SC 1.1 NO
SC 1.1 Is the wetland within a National Wildlife Refuge,National Park,
National Estuary Reserve,Natural Area Preserve, State Park or Educational, Cat. I
Environmental, or Scientific Reserve designated under WAC 332-30-151?
YES = Category I NO go to SC 1.2
SC 1.2 Is the wetland at least 1 acre in size and meets at least two of the
following three conditions? YES =Category I NO =Category II Cat. I
—The wetland is relatively undisturbed(has no diking, ditching, filling, Cat. II
cultivation, grazing,and has less than 10%cover of non-native plant
species. If the non-native Spartina spp. are the only species that cover
more than 10%of the wetland, then the wetland should be given a dual Dual
rating(I/II). The area of Spartina would be rated a Category II while the rating
relatively undisturbed upper marsh with native species would be a UII
Category I. Do not,however,exclude the area of Spartina in
determining the size threshold of 1 acre.
—At least'/4 of the landward edge of the wetland has a 100 ft buffer of
shrub, forest,or un-grazed or un-mowed grassland.
—The wetland has at least 2 of the following features: tidal channels,
depressions with open water,or contiguous freshwater wetlands.
Wetland Rating Form—western Washington 18 August 2004
ft :., IV r.
SC 2.0 Natural Heritage Wetlands (seep. 87)
Natural Heritage wetlands have been identified by the Washington Natural Heritage Cat.I
Program/DNR as either high quality undisturbed wetlands or wetlands that support
state Threatened, Endangered, or Sensitive plant species.
SC 2.1 Is the wetland being rated in a Section/Township/Range that contains a
Natural Heritage wetland? (this question is used to screen out most sites
before you need to contact WNHP/DNR)
S/T/R information from Appendix D_ or accessed from WNHP/DNR web site
YES —contact WNHP/DNR(see p. 79) and go to SC 3.2 NO_
SC 2.2 Has DNR identified the wetland as a high quality undisturbed wetland or as
or as a site with state threatened or endangered plant species?
YES = Category I NO
SC 3.0 Bogs (seep. 87)
Does the wetland (or part of the wetland) meet both the criteria for soils and
vegetation in bogs? Use the key below to identify if the wetland is a bog. If you
answer yes you will still need to rate the wetland based on its functions.
1. Does the wetland have organic soil horizons (i.e. layers of organic soil),
either peats or mucks,that compose 16 inches or more of the first 32 inches
of the soil profile? (See Appendix B for a field key to identify organic
soils)?Yes -go to Q. 3 No -go to Q. 2
2. Does the wetland have organic soils, either peats or mucks that are less than
16 inches deep over bedrock,or an impermeable hardpan such as clay or
volcanic ash, or that are floating on a lake or pond?
Yes-go to Q. 3 No -Is not a bog for purpose of rating
3. Does the wetland have more than 70%cover of mosses at ground level,
AND other plants, if present,consist of the"bog"species listed in Table 3
as a significant component of the vegetation(more than 30%of the total
shrub and herbaceous cover consists of species in Table 3)?
Yes—Is a bog for purpose of rating No- go to Q. 4
NOTE: If you are uncertain about the extent of mosses in the understory
you may substitute that criterion by measuring the pH of the water that
seeps into a hole dug at least 16"deep. If the pH is less than 5.0 and the
"bog"plant species in Table 3 are present,the wetland is a bog.
3. Is the wetland forested(>30%cover)with sitka spruce, subalpine fir,
western red cedar,western hemlock, lodgepole pine,quaking aspen,
Englemann's spruce,or western white pine,WITH any of the species (or
combination of species)on the bog species plant list in Table 3 as a
significant component of the ground cover(> 30%coverage of the total
shrub/herbaceous cover)?
4. YES = Category I No Is not a bog for purpose of rating Cat.I
Wetland Rating Form—western Washington 19 August 2004
33
r
tv
SC 4.0 Forested Wetlands (seep. 90)
Does the wetland have at least 1 acre of forest that meet one of these criteria for the
Department of Fish and Wildlife's forests as priority habitats? If you answer yes you
will still need to rate the wetland based on its functions.
— Old-growth forests: (west of Cascade crest) Stands of at least two tree species,
forming a multi-layered canopy with occasional small openings; with at least 8
trees/acre (20 trees/hectare)that are at least 200 years of age OR have a
diameter at breast height(dbh)of 32 inches (81 cm) or more.
NOTE: The criterion for dbh is based on measurements for upland forests.
Two-hundred year old trees in wetlands will often have a smaller dbh
because their growth rates are often slower. The DFW criterion is and"OR"
so old-growth forests do not necessarily have to have trees of this diameter.
— Mature forests: (west of the Cascade Crest) Stands where the largest trees are
80—200 years old OR have average diameters (dbh) exceeding 21 inches
(53cm); crown cover may be less that 100%; decay, decadence, numbers of
snags, and quantity of large downed material is generally less than that found
in old-growth.
Cat. I
YES = Category I NO
SC 5.0 Wetlands in Coastal Lagoons (seep. 91)
Does the wetland meet all of the following criteria of a wetland in a coastal lagoon?
— The wetland lies in a depression adjacent to marine waters that is wholly
or partially separated from marine waters by sandbanks, gravel banks,
shingle, or, less frequently,rocks
— The lagoon in which the wetland is located contains surface water that is
saline or brackish(>0.5 ppt)during most of the year in at least a portion
of the lagoon(needs to be measured near the bottom)
YES=Go to SC 5.1 NO not a wetland in a coastal lagoon
SC 5.1 Does the wetland meets all of the following three conditions?
—The wetland is relatively undisturbed(has no diking,ditching, filling,
cultivation, grazing), and has less than 20%cover of invasive plant.
species (see list of invasive species on p. 74).
— At least%of the landward edge of the wetland has a 100 ft buffer of
shrub, forest,or un-grazed or un-mowed grassland. Cat.I
— The wetland is larger than 1/10 acre(4350 square feet)
YES =Category I NO=Category II Cat. II
Wetland Rating Form—western Washington 20 August 2004
SC 6.0 Interdunal Wetlands (seep. 93)
Is the wetland west of the 1889 line(also called the Western Boundary of Upland
Ownership or WBUO)?
YES -go to SC 6.1 NO_not an interdunal wetland for rating
If you answer yes you will still need to rate the wetland based on its
functions.
In practical terms that means the following geographic areas:
• . Long Beach Peninsula- lands west of SR 103
• Grayland-Westport- lands west of SR 105
• Ocean Shores-Copalis- lands west of SR 115 and SR 109
SC 6.1 Is the wetland one acre or larger, or is it in a mosaic of wetlands that is
once acre or larger?
YES=Category II NO—go to SC 6.2 Cat. II
SC 6.2 Is the wetland between 0.1 and 1 acre, or is it in a mosaic of wetlands that
is between 0.1 and 1 acre?
YES =Category III Cat. III
Category of wetland based on Special Characteristics
Choose the "highest"rating if wetland falls into several categories, and record on
P. 1.
If you answered NO for all types enter"Not Applicable"on p.l
Wetland Rating Form—western Washington 21 August 2004
.1acx smltn - rtevisea � le Hian.aoc Pa e 1
WASHINGfON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WIMLIF13
1 BALD EAGLE SITE MANAGEMENT PLAN
RCW 77.12.655,WAC 232-12-292. 7/2002
EAGLE TERRITORY: Fair Harbor Occunrence# 1164 Nest#
1'eant Property(I R.,S) Pendi=Activity
JURGES ENTERPRISES INC 'T21 NRI WS5 Detroit Blocks Home sites,roads,water
2020 ENETA1 BEACH DR as modified by BLA#07-82 system,stormNvater
BREMERTON,WA 98310 Recording#s 1913847&1913848 facilities,septic systems 1
and utilities i
FACTORS CONSIDERED
1) Landowners goals were considered through a review of the permit application andfor site
visits conducted on 5/01/08.
2) Bald eagle habitat use was considered by analysis of territory integrity through tine,current
surrounding habitat conditions,current status of the population and scientific literature
concerning bald eagle habitat protection.
I CONDITIONS
1 1)17he eagle nest tree(72"dbh Douglas fir)and all other standing trees in the old.Block 44 of
Detroit#2 shall not be cut or destroyed. This restriction applies only to that portion of the new
lots 1,?3,7 and 17 created by BLA#07-82 located in the old Block 44 of Detroit#2.
DURATION OF PROTECTION
The following may not apply to eagle habitat that is protected by conservation casement,
covenant,or dedication. The Plan applies to the landowner who signs the Plan. If the ownership
changes,the new owner may sign the Plan or request a new one to reflect a ebange in land use.
Since eagles return to the sane.1radilional use areas each year,the conditions of this Plan shall
apply indefinitely,unless a breeding territory or communal roost has been unoccupied for 5
consecutive years. At 5 years,the WDFW will review the plan and determine whether continued i
protection is needed.Please contact WDFW if the eagles change the location of their nest. Do
not assume that the conditions of this Plan no longer apply. I
i
I '
` 1
,lack Smith Revised Eagle Plan.doc Page 2`{
e
REVIEW AND AMFNDMFN'I'
This Plan will be subject to the following review and amendment procedures. The Plan may be
reviewed periodically by the WDFW and the landowner to determine whether: 1)the Plan
requires amendment in response to changing eagle and landowner circumstances;or,2)the terms
of the Plan comply with applicable laws and regulations;or,3)the parties to the Plan are
complying,Mth its terms.
APPEAL PROCEDURE
In addition to the provisions of WAC 232-12-292(7.1)-(7.3),the landowner.may request a
formal appeal of WDFW actions according to the Administrative.Procedures Act,Chapter 34.05
RCW,and the Model Rules of Procedure,Chapter 10.08 WAC. Such a request shall be filed
with the Department within 30 clays of receipt of the contested WDFW decision. The appeal
request shall be addressed tote director and clearly state the relief sought and the grounds for
the appeal.
COMPLIANCE
Failure to comply with this Plan constitutes a misdemeanor as set forth in R('W 77,15.130.
However,compliance with this plan does not ens-ue compliance with the.Endangered Species
Act or other federal,state or local laws. This Plan applies only to the proposed land uses listed
above. Any other proposals may be subject to a different set of conditions. It is the landowners
responsibility to notify lbe Department of any new proposed land use activities.
SIGNATURES
Landowner Signature: — , Date: — 08
Landowner Name(Print): 4 iti47b 1;V e re;S Zee-
Address: t?e'rz-cw &;VC'74"' �,+ ri►e��
l Plan written by: Greg Schirato Date:05/01/08
i
Regional Wildlife Manager: �' � � � Date:
1
_ f
i
i
I
l
2
l
I.
i
—��_�
i
At
r
i"
i
i i
i
i -
I
Wdshingtoa Dep+Ptoeot of�it�Fiel-irildlite p IN=
BALD EAGLE hid 491,1.1....In.: Omt frbd
I1FFFn MANAGEMENT ZONE MAP - *
IN THE VICINITY OF T21101W SICTION 5 % r,r Rlb. sit Sam Lk.
5,p Sol,- I.MOOD
S(dtm.- Si.lt Plue Sevt±Pent 5626�cdDPil G Imm$aC km ibl,ut It Iun/td tt\el ry.�ele.tin it.41t[+tl.W.
>-vdvrliw bete-ADril P..EDO! ® vgwn PI.. tl.�l it+<efe/fn�!M..tr.nle[I. Itt®Iv..4 GIS Nb-
Dtii P[ed I.'o—L—T,vb,0.t!S,r.it.. fi+1 u..t..iw I
Up b7 TDFt M..,w�..blglw he.r.w.l.f fill
DIIC .d ldl.ldl. t..d.I.I.J.we.n. .�u.lol
hld u'In..1 re nrblt t/.0 Iu tar MI.1
bald ullt uu ,.......t 1 M V I...A." Y., Mrran.
O!R
M4 MI. .Al..n.„eMYDI.a..lilf.tl►tINgI.IHt�tr.+erwd.►r
s t9D r+e C.,r..,d
'• :.'c: ....w'�::+r�.'%•..n.1+. ® kd Bik I
MIMI
;N
W I
inM:i�l:: �'w:ei::t• �� F(LDLUt' MU LOCATIOk
I
,..w...nt:n ':n:.i:.......+............... tin
D OS 1
.a M..Irtlf
�.Rnw..w'�M.III Orr.iw�r,ln ..i+nwi.n
Appendix E Bald Eagle Site Management Plan