The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutBLD93-0681 LOADING STATION - BLD Permit / Conditions - 7/1/1993 Q O � x n � O O ol olc z _ :3 (D � n o � O Q N � n � CD r 0 Q W '_ S.1 CONCRETE MECHANICAL MOBILE HOME Footings-Setback date by Ribbons date by Gas Piping date b Foundation Walls date by Set Up date by INSULATION date by BG/SLAB Insulation Floors Final date FRAMING by date by date by Walls FIRE DEPT. date by date by date by PLUMBING OTHER Groundwork Attic date by date by D.W.V. WALLBOARD NAILING date by date by Water Line FINAL INSPECTION date by date by date by �N�IN� R�oiz �arame�v iy. txc t�o Bob yba mn er n q xzip (W �615 Us 9,59 9810 dd ��,, 8' x n3 v oo 1 x o C � z n 0 : � C z � 0 � CC) . o � 10Q 0 � CONCRETE MECHANICAL MOBILE HOME Footings-Setback date by Ribbons date by Gas Piping date by Foundation Walls date by Set Up date by INSULATION date by BG/SLAB Insulation Floors Final date FRAMING by date by date by Walls FIRE DEPT. date by date by date by PLUMBING OTHER Groundwork Attic date by date by D.W.V. WALLBOARD NAILING date by date by Water Line FINAL INSPECTION date by date by date by Permit No. MASON COUNTY BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION 426 W. Cedar/P.O. Box 186, Shelton, WA 98584 427-9670/1-800-562-5628 PLEASE PRINT v\ #1 Owner zyaso,ti c oq°ini L Phone# Site Address w SB 1 - LGs 44 , l Fire District# City v .4 St Zip Directions to Job Site S/exs <v ', t D *A C> ro t to 1 ---- 1 ` t ,&s--T 7 V O 0 ILSE— �)L)TD Pr Owner Mailing Address I,>a City / ,, St Zip 4F5 Lien/Title Holder Address City St Zip #2 Contractor Name Contractor Reg# Address Expiration Date City St Zip Phone# #3 If septic is located on project site, include records. Connect to Septic? , Public Water Supply Well Connect to Sewer System? Name of System (If residential, proof of potable water is required) #4 Parcel No.`i��'a -�—- (,00, 0 t Legal Description s ` ' 4 '�J 2 t #5 Building Square Footage: e, fisting/proposed) 1st FI / 2nd FI / 3rd FI / Loft / Basement / Deck / #bedrooms / #bathrooms / Garage / Carport / (Circle:Attached or Detached?) Other -7e-4Lns4er FED �'ou sq. ft. �T62-5' / #6 Use of building i - -x La�.d ' Describe work ° I e �.. #7 Type of Job: New Add Alt Repair Other #8 MOBILE/MANUFACTURED HOME INFORMATION Model Year Make Model Length Width Serial No. # Bedrooms # Bathrooms Type of Heat Purchase Price$ #9 Indicate by circling the applicable source if any water is on or adjacent to subject property: River Pond Creek Stream Wetland Lake Marsh Saltwater Seasonal Runoff Other Show following on the site plan Lot Dimensions Flood Zones Existing Structures Fences �. Structure Setbacks Driveways Water Lines Shorelines Drainage Plan Topography Septic Systems Wells Proposed Improvements Easements Name of Flanking Street Indicate Directional by (N, S, E, W) Name of Fronting Street in relation to plot plan APPLICANT TO DRAW SITE PLAN BELOW APPLICANT TO DRAW TOPOGRAPHY Plumbing Fixtures ($3 eacW Fee Mechanical Fixtures ($6 each) No._Toilets CIRCLE FUEL TYPE: Gas, Electric, _Bath Basins Heatpump, Other _Bath Tubs No.. liaita Fees _Showers Furn BTU _Hot Water Htr _ Heatpumps _Laundry Washer _ Vent Systems _Sinks _ Spot Vent Fans _Floor Drains No. Boilers/Compressors _Laundry Basins HP _Dishwasher No.. Air Handling Units Disposal cfm# _Urinals No: Fire Protection Systems _Other _ Auto. Fire Alarm Sys 50.00 Fixed Fire Supp. Sys 50.00 Permit Basic Fee 15.00 _ Auto Fire Sprink Sys 25.00 TOTAL PLUMBING $ . Other Gas Outlets Wood, Gas, Pellet Stove NOTICE: THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZED IS NOT COM- MENCED WITHIN 180 DAYS OR IF CONSTRUCTION OR Permit Basic Fee 15.00 WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 180 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COM- TOTAL MECHANICAL $ MENCED. PROOF OF CONTINUATION OF WORK IS BY MEANS OF A PROGRESS INSPECTION. OWNERS AFFIDAVIT CONTRACTORS AFFIDAVIT I CERTIFY THAT I AM EXEMPT FROM THE REQUIRE- I CERTIFY THAT I AM A CURRENTLY REGISTERED MENTS OF THE CONTRACTORS REGISTRATION LAW CONTRACTOR IN THE STATE OF WASHINGTON AND I RCW 18.27, AND AM AWARE OF THE MASON COUNTY AM AWARE OF THE ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS REGU- ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR WHICH THIS PER- LATING THE WORK FOR WHICH THE PERMIT IS ISSUED MIT IS ISSUED AND THAT ALL WORK DONE WILL BE IN AND ALL WORK DONE WILL BE IN CONFORMANCE CONFORMANCE THEREWITH.NO CHANGES SHALL BE THEREWITH. NO CHANGES SHALL BE MADE WITHOUT MADE WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING APPROVAL FROM FIRST OBTAINING APPROVAL FROM THE BUILDING THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. DEPARTMENT. i 1 X OWNER X BY DATE DATE FC?R OFFICIAL 11SE ONLY;Acre ted b : . P Y Date: , DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Approved Cond. Hold Approval Planning: — 2- --------------- <.\/ Environmental Health: M Building Plan Review ,y 61F (5p�ipnyn'r�v Q f�}l�erua�ea b�f ey)alofie.lI~y(�-1,o be # bQ OLQUAQ*-6 Next.. - Occupancy Group Type of Cons Fire Marshal: QY 5 L�9 Other: Special Conditions: FEES Building Permit Plan Check Plumbing Fee Mechanical Fee Wood/Gas/Pellet Stove Radon Monitor Violation Fee Site Inspection Building State Fee Other Other Building Valuation: U TOTAL FEE July 19,1993 Page#1 of 1 GEOTECHNICAL TESTING LABORATORY MASON COUNTY P.O. Box 1850 Shelton, WA. 98584 Attn: Tom Moore Re: In-Place Density Test Report performed on 7/19/93 Project: Mason Co. Transfer Sta. Gentlemen: Inspector: 4 Tranum As requested Geotechnical Testing Labortory performed on-site density testing in accordance with current applicable standards. The results obtained were as follows: Test Location Percent Dry Material Percent # Moisture Density Type Compaction 1 A Line Plinth 7.1 128.7 A 95 2 6.8 129.4 96 3 4 5 Required Compaction: 95% Material Type: Gravel Base A: 135.2Cd7.5°% If you have any questions concerning the test results, the procedures used,or if we can be of any further assistance please call on us at(206) 754-4612. Respectfully Submitted, GEOTECHNICAL TESTING LABORATORY Harold Parks Geologist&Manager 10011 Blomberg Street SW,Olympia, WA 98512 Phone#: (206)754-4612 Fax#: (206)754-4848 ENGINEER SITE VISIT/PRE-POUR REPORT Project Name: Mason County Waste Export Transfer Station PMX #21-1682-16 Report Prepared By: Kevin J. Dour, P. E. Project Engineer Contractor: Pease Construction Date: July 27 , 1993 Contractor Personnel On-Site: Dan Bloczynski - Superintendent Ken Bapp - Carpenter George Nelson - Carpenter James Longshore - Carpenter Elvin Walker - Carpenter Jeff Showse - Carpenter Appr. Rich Webster - Laborer Carbek Steel - 3 Ironworkers Other Personnel Present: None Equipment Observed On-Site: 6000# Rough Terrain Fork Lift Gas Generator Miscellaneous Hand Tools Materials observed On-Site: Concrete Forms Rebar for Walls including column ties and wall dowels, and crane plinth Misc. framing lumber, Trench drains, wall forming material. Inspection: During the visit the following items were checked or observed: 1. The as-builts for the project were inspected. They appeared to be legible and complete. The changes for Change Order No. 1 were shown along with all other minor changes in the project to date. 2. The walls along grid 1 and 3 were inspected. The bars were measured for distance on-center, the depth of concrete from face of wall to edge of bar, and the bar type. These check with what is required according to the plans and specifications. They were in the process of installing one expansion joint along this grid. They were cutting every other horizontal bar according to what is required. The forms for these wall were still being installed at the time of the inspection. 3 . The wall along grid B was inspected. Most of the bars and forms were in place. The bars measured the correct distance, 12 inches on-center and were the correct type. There are five expansion joints required along this wall. They were installed and the horizontal bars wore cut, every other one, according to what is required. The depth of concrete from the face of wall to the edge of bar measured to what is required in the plans. 4 . The distance from the face of the crane plinth to the face of the wall along grid B was measured. This measured at 15 feet 9 inches. This is adequate since the required distance from the plans is 15 feet. 5. The concrete pour for the footing for the wall along grid A was inspected. The additional 18 inches for the two column footings for the building were formed according to what was requested in the last inspection. These footings were located between grids 1 and 2 and grids 2 and 3 . 6. The footings between grids B and D along grids 1 and 3 were in progress. The steel for the footings was not placed yet. This will be included in the pour scheduled this week. I asked Dan if he could have Tom or Paul look at the steel before the pour to verify if it was placed according to what is required in the plans. I also asked if he could have Tom or Paul photograph the steel for record. Some additional questions Dan had during the site visit: 1. Is any grout required underneath the plates for the crane plinth or underneath the plates for the building column footings? He did not notice it on any of the details. [GROUTING IS REQUIRED] 2 . Dan had a question on the detail on the Anchor Bolt Setting Plan. This is a drawing we had not yet received as a submittal. The question was on a callout for "shear angle as required" . This shear angle is used to stabilize the anchor bolts and is embedded in the concrete. Dan was wondering what size is required so he can order the angle iron. He gave me a copy of a facsimile he received of the drawing. [PARAMETRIX IS WORKING ON THIS QUESTION] 3 . The specifications require that anchor bolts and embedded products need to be made out of a material that is "compatible with an embedded concrete environment. " Normally what Dan uses is a steel bolt which is what he ordered. He was wondering if the specs meant that a galvanized bolt is required instead. [GALVANIZED STEEL BOLTS PER BUILDING MANUFACTURER' S SIZE REQUIREMENTS ARE REQUIRED. THE BOLTS NEED TO BE GALVANIZED DUE THE FACT THEY ARE PARTIALLY EXPOSED] 4 . Dan brought up a concern regarding inspections from the Mason County Building Department. He has called for an inspection more than once and they have not come out. He is aware of the conversation between Randy and the County Building Inspector which indicated that Randy' s inspection would be fine for the inspection requirement. He just wanted to let me know that he is going through the required channels by asking for an inspection. He wanted to be sure there were not going to be any surprises down the road. Additional Notes: 1. This inspection was for the pour which will occur on Thursday, July 29th or Friday, July 30th. This will include the wall along grid B, the walls along grid 1 and 3 about 13 feet back from grid B, and the footings between grids C and D along grids 1 and 3 . 2 . According to Dan, the next pour should include the wall along grid A, the Crane Plinth, and the walls remaining along grids 1 and 3 . This pour should occur on the following Thursday, August 5th. 3 . Pay Estimate for the concrete retaining walls claiming 55% percent of the work being complete seems to be accurate based upon the work observed at the job site. The overall total of 24% of contract amount seems reasonable. We recommend acceptance of the pay estimate. cc: Tom Moore Loren Pease —; 1——— , 1 �11.Mai, r . ................. -- -_ T��s I r%3 I.X'I ...... . : 7 _ m I'--7i 41 { ..4_•—'—�--' �---.—..,—tom--.�.^ _ ._-T_y ...... _..�' �� --;_;.-1—,....,:1...,:,.-- '� 1 � ¢. i 7 3OO ' 3EDOd XI d13WHaUd-aTjwnS lx oaj 2.7 6 06 , 61 -inf . 4 r .ten ?777 . —'•;�-«'fir-}- --,_r_ ____. .w. ±.-- . t i o- - - n I , i I' E00 ' 3Jdd X i 813WUddd-8311ir s l-in,3 i c-,0 : F SF , t -1i Ei --.. --- I 1 h�l tk F yr' •�y IL r 1 ............. -------- 1 , f i b00 ' 36dd X I 813WUdUd-63 wns Wod3 60 :6 ' 66 , 6 I inf :k SOV3 ' 390d �Uloi . --- --- --- It { • ; t .n i FTA ` - -At.-A. � ------ _..�.- .._ _....--..__._._...... ... . :_..._ ? __._..- �.�, .... ........• -.......... ........._..__.. , i r r !T N I.JUHNHfl W0N3 vo :6 66 , 61 -lflC June 3, 1993 Gary Yando Director of Community Development RECE1V 426 W. Cedar P.O. Box 578 J U N 0 8 1993 Shelton, WA. 98584 MASON CO. PLANN1;,!`� �. Dear Gary, Thank you for the opportunity to provide comment on the proposed Mason County Waste Export Loading Station Determination of Non x significance. The City of Shelton does not have any comment at this time, and is in agreement that an Environmental Impact Statement is not a R required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). Please feel free to contact me here at the City if you have any questions. T � \ Sincerely, Joe Williams City Planner .Y I