HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEP2021-00080 GRD2021-00013 - SEP Application - 9/10/2021 F& 4,d Izz, oUo 13
SEPA Environmental Checklist Mason county Permit center Use
Z.DZ t _ G�oBC�
❑ Single Family DNS: $600.00 SEP
❑ Other DNS: 0 to 9.99 acres: S730 Parcel#:�?oS�a�3 oZ•�3-�I't�l
I O 20 acres: $ 0 Date Rcr�di E C E I V E D
Overer 20 acres: $1100
❑ DS/EIS: $5000 + $90 per hour
SEP 10 2021
615 W. Alder Street
Purpose of checklist:
Governmental agencies use this checklist to help determine whether the environmental impacts of your
proposal are significant. This information is also helpful to determine if available avoidance, minimization
or compensatory mitigation measures will address the probable significant impacts or if an environmental
impact statement will be prepared to further analyze the proposal.
Instructions for applicants: hf elpl
This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Please
answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. You may need to consult
with an agency specialist or private consultant for some questions. You may use "not applicable" or
"does not apply" only when you can explain why it does not apply and not when the answer is unknown.
You may also attach or incorporate by reference additional studies reports. Complete and accurate
answers to these questions often avoid delays with the SEPA process as well as later in the decision-
making process.
The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of
time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal
or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your
answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant
adverse impact.
Instructions for Lead Agencies:
Please adjust the format of this template as needed. Additional information may be necessary to
evaluate the existing environment, all interrelated aspects of the proposal and an analysis of adverse
impacts. The checklist is considered the first but not necessarily the only source of information needed to
make an adequate threshold determination. Once a threshold determination is made, the lead agency is
responsible for the completeness and accuracy of the checklist and other supporting documents.
A. BACKGROUND hel
1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: of e
2. Name of applicant: of e
South Shore Enterprises, LLC
3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: of ei
Owner- Rick Buechel - PO Box 249, Union, WA 98592
SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960)(MC version-non project portion omitted): 2016 Page 1 of 11
4. Date checklist prepared: of el
June 4th, 2021
5. Agency requesting checklist: Lnet
Mason County
6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): n( u
Work Completed
7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with
this proposal? If yes, explain. lLgM
Possible future Warehouse
8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared,
directly related to this proposal. LLgiW
9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals
directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. nI eM
Yes, bridge replacement
10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. nL gjp]
11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of
the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe
certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead
agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) hf e
Grading of approximately 3000 squdre4eet of soil
e--9
12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location
of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if
known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the
site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably
available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to
duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. of eM
Parcel#(s):32232-43-90013
Address:750 E Dalby Rd, Union, WA 98592
Legal Description:LOT 3 OF SP #3059 AF#1948722
Twp/Range/Section and/or GPS location: Section 32 of T22N, R3W
SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960)(MC version-non project portion omitted): 2016 Page 2 of 11
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS hI elpl
1. Earth
a. General description of the site of elpl
(circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes mountainous, other:
b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? of el
50%
c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)?
If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any agricultural land of
long-term commercial significance and whether the proposal results in removing any of these
soils. Lg_
Sandy Loam
d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so,
describe. nI elpl
None
e. Describe the purpose, type, total area, and approximate quantities and total affected area of any
filling, excavation, and grading proposed. Indicate source of fill.1net
Grading for Storage area. Cut & Fill approximately 3000 sqft of soil
f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. n[ elpl
g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project
construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? of eu
N/A
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: nl e
Silt fencing and Jute Netting
2. Air
a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal during construction, operation,
and maintenance when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give
approximate quantities if known. of elpl
N/A
b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so,
generally describe. of eU
N/A
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: n( elpl
N/A
SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960)(MC version-non project portion omitted): 2016 Page 3 of 11
3. Water
a. Surface Water: LLei
1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-
round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and
provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. of eU
Big Bend Creek
2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet)the described
waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. of elgl
No
3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from
surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected.
Indicate the source of fill material. of elpl
4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description,
purpose, and approximate quantities if known. of gio
5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. hf elpl
N/A
6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so,
describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. LLet
No
b. Ground Water:
1) Will groundwater be withdrawn from a well for drinking water or other purposes? If so, give a
general description of the well, proposed uses and approximate quantities withdrawn from
the well. Will water be discharged to groundwater? Give general description, purpose, and
approximate quantities if known. of elpl
No
2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other
sources, if any(for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following
chemicals. . . ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of
such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or
humans the system(s) are expected to serve. of el
N/A
c. Water runoff(including stormwater):
1) Describe the source of runoff(including storm water)and method of collection and disposal,
if any(include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other
waters? If so, describe. of elpl
N/A
SEPA Environmental checklist(wAC 197-11-960)(MC version-non project portion omitted): 2016 Page 4 of 11
2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. of eM
No
3) Does the proposal alter or otherwise affect drainage patterns in the vicinity of the site? If so,
describe.
No
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water, and drainage pattern
impacts, if any:
N/A
4. Plants hf elpl
a. Check the types of vegetation found on the site: hI el
x deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other
x evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other
x shrubs
x grass
pasture
crop or grain
orchards, vineyards or other permanent crops
wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other
water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other
other types of vegetation
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? hf eE
Alder and Salal
c. List threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site. hf elal
None, Alder trees& Salal primary vegetation
d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance
vegetation on the site, if any: hf elpl
None
e. List all noxious weeds and invasive species known to be on or near the site.
None
5. Animals
a. List any birds and other animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to
be on or near the site. Examples include: hI eM
birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other:
mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other:
fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other:
SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960)(MC version-non project portion omitted): 2016 Page 5 of 11
b. List any threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site. of eM
c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. of eU
No
d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: hf elal
None
e. List any invasive animal species known to be on or near the site.
None
6. Energy and natural resources
a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar)will be used to meet the
completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing,
etc. nI elpl N/A
b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties?
If so, generally describe. of elol
N/A
c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal?
List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: of gjo
N/A
7. Environmental health
a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk
of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal?
If so, describe. of el
1) Describe any known or possible contamination at the site from present or past uses.
None
2) Describe existing hazardous chemicals/conditions that might affect project development and
design. This includes underground hazardous liquid and gas transmission pipelines located
within the project area and in the vicinity.
None
3) Describe any toxic or hazardous chemicals that might be stored, used, or produced during
the project's development or construction, or at any time during the operating life of the
project.
None
4) Describe special emergency services that might be required.
None
SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960)(MC version-non project portion omitted): 2016 Page 6 of 11
5) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any:
b. Noise
1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example:
traffic, equipment, operation, other)? of elpl
None
2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a
short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indi-
cate what hours noise would come from the site. of elpl
None
3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: nr eU
None
8. Land and shoreline use
a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties?Will the proposal affect current land
uses on nearby or adjacent properties? If so, describe. of piL
Storage Area
b. Has the project site been used as working farmlands or working forest lands? If so, describe.
No
How much agricultural or forest land of long-term commercial significance will be converted to
other uses as a result of the proposal, if any?
None
If resource lands have not been designated, how many acres in farmland or forest land tax
status will be converted to nonfarm or nonforest use? hf el
N/A
1) Will the proposal affect or be affected by surrounding working farm or forest land normal
business operations, such as oversize equipment access, the application of pesticides,
tilling, and harvesting? If so, how:
No
c. Describe any structures on the site. LLem
Storage Buildings
d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? hf M
No
e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? of elpl
Rural Residential 5
f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? of !l
Rural Area
SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960)(MC version-non project portion omitted): 2016 Page 7 of 11
g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? h( e
N/A
h. Has any part of the site been classified as a critical area by the city or county? If so, specify.
h[ elpl No
i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? of eM
N/A
j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? LLeiw
N/A
k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: of el
N/A
L. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land
uses and plans, if any: of elpl
N/A
m. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with nearby agricultural and forest
lands of long-term commercial significance, if any:
N/A
9. Housing
a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-
income housing. hf el
N/A
b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high,
middle, or low-income housing. of el
N/A
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: of el
N/A
10. Aesthetics
a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is
the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? of elw
N/A
b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? n[ eU
None
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: of eM
N/A
11. Light and glare
a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly
occur? of e-M None
b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views?iLpiW
No
SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960)(MC version-non project portion omitted): 2016 Page 8 of 11
c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? of elal
N/A
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: [help]
N/A
12. Recreation
a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity?iLtu
N/A
b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. hf eU
N/A
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation
opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: JLeU
N/A
13. Historic and cultural preservation
a. Are there any buildings, structures, or sites, located on or near the site that are over 45 years old
listed in or eligible for listing in national, state, or local preservation registers located on or near
the site? If so, specifically describe. hf eU
No
b. Are there any landmarks,features, or other evidence of Indian or historic use or occupation?
This may include human burials or old cemeteries. Are there any material evidence, artifacts, or
areas of cultural importance on or near the site? Please list any professional studies conducted
at the site to identify such resources. hf IL
No
c. Describe the methods used to assess the potential impacts to cultural and historic resources on
or near the project site. Examples include consultation with tribes and the department of
archeology and historic preservation, archaeological surveys, historic maps, GIS data, etc. hf el
N/A
d. Proposed measures to avoid, minimize, or compensate for loss, changes to, and disturbance to
resources. Please include plans for the above and any permits that may be required.
N/A
14. Transportation
a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site or affected geographic area and describe
proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Jhei
E Dalby Rd
SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960)(MC version-non project portion omitted): 2016 Page 9 of 11
b. Is the site or affected geographic area currently served by public transit? If so, generally
describe. If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? of elpl
N/A
c. How many additional parking spaces would the completed project or non-project proposal have?
How many would the project or proposal eliminate? of elal
N/A
d. Will the proposal require any new or improvements to existing roads, streets, pedestrian, bicycle
or state transportation facilities, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate
whether public or private). hf em
N/A
e. Will the project or proposal use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of)water, rail, or air
transportation? If so, generally describe. ILgipi
N/A
f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project or proposal? If
known, indicate when peak volumes would occur and what percentage of the volume would be
trucks (such as commercial and nonpassenger vehicles). What data or transportation models
were used to make these estimates? of eM
N/A
g. Will the proposal interfere with, affect or be affected by the movement of agricultural and forest
products on roads or streets in the area? If so, generally describe.
N/A
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: LLLeU
N/A
15. Public services
a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection,
police protection, public transit, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. of eU
No
b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. nei
N/A
16. Utilities
a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: of elpl
electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone,
sanitary sewer, septic system, other
SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960)(MC version-non project portion omitted): 2016 Page 10 of 11
b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the
general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might
be needed. nei
None
C. SIGNATURE of elpl
The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead
agency is relying on them to make its decision.
Signature: /14-
Date Signed: ( 1 l' I a 1 ,
Print Name of Signee: '21Lk ' �"` L hd
If applicable, Position and Agency/Organization: S4h Siwc E, craft Sc S
Date Submitted: to 11-, ` 2-1
SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960)(MC version-non project portion omitted): 2016 Page 11 of 11
Pacific Testing Inspection Inc.
2417 Harrison Avenue, Centralia,WA 98531
Phone(360) 736-3922 Fax(360)807-6022
ASTM C-136 Sieve Report ASTM D4318
U.S.Standard Sieve Opening in U.S.Standard Sieve Hydrometer
100%
20 6 4 3 1 1/ h 94 10 1 203040 60 10 200
°
80% 20%
r 70% -- 30%
m
L
?� 60% 40% d
50% 50% >
C
40% 60%
a
0 30% 70% z
20% 80%
10% _ 90%
0
0% 100%
1000 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001
Grain Size in Millimeters
Gravel Cobble Sands Silt Class
Coars I Fine I Coarse IMediurn Fine
Ddie: 2.22'201 U D,,=0.08 USCS Classification "a Gravel Sand
Sample#: 19-068 DJ0=0.65 GP-GM,Poorly graded Gravel with Silt 46.7% 43.7%
Source: Building pad subgrade Do=6.59 Specifications Color:
Project#: 190015 Cc=0.80 No Specs 7.5YR 4/6 Strong Brown
Project: Union Bldg.4 Cl,=81.24 Sample Meets Specs %Silt&Clay
Client: Hood Canal Communications Liquid Limit--0.0% n/a 9.6%
Tested By: TB/MH Plastic Limit-- 0.0% Fineness Modulus
Date Tested: 2/25 12019 Plasticity Index=0.0% 4.67
Dane Actual interpolatedes Actual interpolated
saetlon Cumulative Cumulative Section Cumulative Cumulative
- ,
ST-ieve Siii ---ze Percent Percent Specs Specs Sieve Size Percent Percent ;; -Specs Spec.
US Metric Passing PassingMax Min US Metric Passin Passin Max Min
o o /o
4.00" 100.00 100% #8 2.360 43% 43%
3.00" 75.00 100% #l0 2.000 41% 410.
2.50" 63.00 100% 100% #16 1.180 35% 35°0
2.00" 50.00 96% 96% #20 0.850 324u
1.75" 45.00 94% #30 0.600 29% 294.,.
1.50" 37.50 90% 90% #40 0.425 22% 22"i,
1.25" 31.50 87% 87% #50 0.300 1
1.001, 25.00 I 83% 83% 460 0.250
7/8" 22.40 82% #80 0.180 16%
3/4" 19:00 81% 81% #100 0.150 15% 15%
5/8" 16.00 78% 78% #140 0.106 12%
1/2" 12.50 72% 72% j #170 0.090 11%
3/8" 9.50 67% 67% #200 0.075 9.6% 9.6%
1/4" 6.30 59% 59% #270 0.053
04 4.75 53% 53%
Copyright ISpears Engineering&Technical Services PS.19Q,2005
Comments:
Reviewed by: Tim Bamev
All results apply only to actual location,and materials tested.As a mutual protmiton to clients.the public and ourselves.all reports arc wbtnnted as the confidential property of clients.
and authorization for publication of statements,conclusions or extracts tremor regarding our reports is reserved pending our written approval.
Rev.616115
Revision 6
Pacific Testing Inspection Inc.
2417 Harrison Avenue,Centralia,WA 98531
Phone(360) 736-3922 Fax(360)807-6022
Project: Union Bldg.4 Date: 2/22/2019 Date Tested 125 20191
Sample#: 19.068 Sampled By:Client Color: 7.5YR 4/6 Strong Brown
Sample ID: No Specs Tested By: TB/MH Sieve Size Specifications
Source: Building pad subgrade Project#: 190015 US min Max Min
ASTM D-2487.Unified Soils Classification System 6.00" 150.0
(iP-GN1.Poorly graded Gravel with Silt and Sand 4.00" 100.0
Sample Prepared: Moist: X Manual: 3.00" 75.0
Dry: Mechanical:X 2.50" 63.0 100.0%
Test Standard: AASHTO.T 99: AASHTO T 180: Method 2.00" 50.0 95.9%
ASTM D 698: ASTM D 1557;X C 1.75" 45.0
Dn Dry 1.50" 37.5 89.9%
Assumed Sp.Gr. Point Percent Density Density Maximum Optimum 1.25" 31.5 86.8 Quo
2.75 Number Moisture lbs/ft' Kgs/m' Dn,Density %Moisture 1.00" 25.0 83.3%
1 11.6% 108.1 1,732 111.4 Ibs/ft' 10.0% 7/8" 22.4
2 8.3% 109.4 1,752 1,784 Kgs/m' 3/4" 19.0 81.1.%
3 10.3% 113.2 1.814 5/8" 16.0 77.6%
4 13.9% 103.3 1,655 1/2" 12.5 72.2%
3/8" 9.5 66.9%
1/4" 6.3 59.3%
Moisture Densitv Relationship #4 4.750 53.3%
120.0 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- #8 2.360 43.3%
118.0 ----•--------------------------------------------------------------------------- 910 2.000 413%
116.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- #16 1.180 35.5%
n4.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- #20 0.850
112.0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---- #30 0.600 29.4
---------------- --------------- -------------------------------------------- 940 0.425 22.2%
u1s.o ----------- ---------------------*--- ---------------------------------------- #50 0.300
1116.0 -------- --------- --------------- ---- ------------------------------------ #60 0:250
Ct04.0 ----- -------------------------------------- --------------------------------- 080 0.180
1)2.0 -- ------------------------------------------- -------------------------------
#100 0..150 14.8%
111°'0 #140 0.106
5"� 6"-;. 7"6 N"n 9"�„ 10"�b ll% 12"r: I3 f4". FSy" I6:. I�"�� I%"�o 19"�" Ztl";.
Percent Moisture
#170 0.090
l Data Points Z 4200 0.075 9.6%
• crn\u ls l oi r�i l arse fn
'Pecs: Meets Specs? n/a
No Specs
ASTM D4718,Correction for Oversize Particles %Retained 3/4" 18.9%
Retained Corrected Density Optimum %Retained Corrected Density Optimum 010 Gravel:46.7% D1101: 0.091
3/4"Sieve Ihs/ft' Kgs/m' Moisture 3/4"Sieve lbs/R3 Kgs/m' Moisture %Sand: 43.7% Dljot: 0.655
5% 113.4 1..816 9.5% 20% 119.8. 1.919 8.1% %Silt&Clay: 9.6% D1bol: 6:593
10010 115.4 1.849 9.0% 25% 122;1 1,956 7.6"S, Cc; 0.80 LL: 0:0%
15% 117.6 1.883 8.5% 30% 124.5 1,994 7.1 n," CIF; 81.24 PL;0.0%
PM;4.67 PI: 0.0%
Copvnghl Spears I ngi-ring C Icchnical Senwes PS.1996-200
Comments:
Reviewed by: Tim Barney
All resuhs apply only.to actual locatwns and matenaL.tested.As a muuial protmiton io clients.the public and oarsely-.en reports are subiruued as.the contidenital property of clients.
and auth"woon Ibr pubhcanon of statements:conclusions or estracL from or regardingmr reports iv resmed pending our wrnicn approval.
Rev 61Wt5
Revocn6