Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutJARPA Fish Habitat Enhancement - SHR Application - 2/20/2007 �= South Puget SoundFF-?, 25 Salmon Enhancement Group -._,D p , G O V 6700 Martin Way East • Suite N 2 • Olympia, Washington 98516 360-412-0808 FAX 360-412-0809 spsseg@spsseg.org www.spssseg.org ANC ` Mason County Planning Department P.O. Box 279 Shelton, WA 98584 February 20, 2007 To Whom It May Concern: Please accept the enclosed JARPA and Fish Habitat Enhancement application for comment on the South Puget Sound Salmon Enhancement Group's Pirate's Cove Restoration Project. As a Fish Habitat Enhancement Project per the requirements of RCW 77.55.290, this project is exempt from all county permits and fees, as well as the requirements of SEPA. In addition to the copy enclosed, I have mailed copies to the Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife (3 copies), the Washington State Department of Ecology, and the US Army Corps of Engineers. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Thank you. Sincerely, Eli Asher Habitat Restoration Project Manager enclosures TO BE KEPT IN THE PARCEL FILE Application for Streamlined Process for FISH HABITAT ENHANCEMENT PROJECTS Addition to the Joint Aquatic Permit Application Form (JARPA) Under recent laws,you may qualify for a streamlined permit process with no fees,if your project is designed to enhance fish habitat. If your project meets the requirements below,you are entitled to the streamlined Hydraulic Project Approval(HPA) process,exemption from the State Environmental Policy Act,and exemption from all local government permits and fees. To apply for the exemption process,the applicant must provide on the same day,the JARPA form and this cover addition to: the Department of Fish and Wildlife(WDFW)and all applicable Local Government planning and permitting departments. Local governments have 15-days to provide comments to WDFW,who will use these comments to aid them in making decisions(see below for details). APPLICANTS - To QUALIFY for the fish habitat enhancement exemption you must check at least one each from A and B: A)Projects must accomplish one or more of the following fish habitat restoration tasks(check which one applies): X Removal of human-made fish passage barriers;or ❑ Restoration of an eroded or unstable stream bank using bioengineering techniques;or ❑ Placement of woody debris or other in-stream structures that benefit naturally reproducing fish stocks. AND B)Projects must also be approved in one or more of the following ways(check which apply,and provide details as requested): X By WDFW,through the Salmon Enhancement,or Volunteer Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Enhancement Programs;Provide project name,and who at WDFW approved the project Pirate's Cove Restoration,Margie Schirato; ❑ By the sponsor of a watershed restoration plan as provided in chapter 89.08RCW;Provide title of plan and date,and approving or sponsoring agency ; ❑ By the Department of Fish and Wildlife as a department-sponsored fish enhancement or restoration project; ❑ Through the review and approval process for the Jobs for the Environment program; ❑ Through the review and approval process for Conservation District sponsored projects,where the project complies with design standards established by the conservation commission through interagency agreement with the United States Fish and Wildlife Service and the Natural Resource Conservation Service;Provide approval date and name of Conservation District approving project ;or X Through a formal grant program established by the legislature or the Department of Fish and Wildlife for fish habitat enhancement or restoration(currently the Dept. of Transportation is handling grant applications—contact Peter Downey at (360)705-7492 for information)Provide grant application date _Salmon Recovery Funding Board 2006 ,and circle status-Approved,Denied,or Pending. To APPL Y for the Exemption—if you have checked a box from both A and B above,complete the following: 1) Submit this cover letter and a complete JARPA form as an application for the fish habitat enhancement exemption to the Local Government planning department,and WDFW. These applications must be submitted on the same day starting a 15-day comment period. If significant concerns are raised during the 15-day comment period regarding adverse impacts that cannot be addressed through HPA conditions, WDFW can determine that the project does not qualify for the exemption process. If this determination is made,the applicant may re-apply to WDFW,the applicable Local Government, and any other applicable permitting agency for approval under the full permitting process. Provide 1)name and number of habitat biologist at WDFW you applied to_Margie Schirato_360-427-2179 , and 2) what local government you applied to Mason County. 2) Apply for all other Federal and State permits needed as defined in the JARPA form. (Fill in waters of the state will require a 404 permit from the Corps of Engineers,and possibly a 401 Water Quality Certification from Ecology). 3) The only work covered by the exemption process must be for fish habitat enhancement. If only a piece of your project is for habitat enhancement,the remainder of the project must be covered by the full permitting process. 4) If WDFW determines that your project meets the criteria for the exemption,your project is exempt from SEPA and from local government permits and fees. You will have an answer from WDFW within 45 days of the receipt of this cover letter and complete JARPA form. LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: PLEASE NOTE—you only have 15 days to review the projects and provide comments to WDFW or your comments will be considered waived Per the new law, you are responsible for the following: JARPA\2879form.doc,4/27/98,page I of 2 l. You must accept the JARPA application form and this revised cover addition for project review; 2. If the Local Government chooses to comment on the project,comments(support or objection)must be provided to the WDFW local habitat biologist responsible for the project area within 15-days of receipt of the JARPA form; 3. If determined by WDFW that the project meets the habitat enhancement exemption criteria,SEPA and all local government permits are considered exempt and consistent with the revisions to the WACs,and local government fees are waived. 4. The law determines that"fish habitat enhancement projects that conform to the provisions of the act are determined to be consistent with local shoreline master programs". DEPAR TMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE: 1. Upon receipt of a complete JARPA and request for the fish habitat exemption process,review the proposed project plan for compliance with the requirements listed in section 1 and 2 of 2SHB 2879(also listed on page 1,applicant section#A and B). a) If JARPA is incomplete or if it is determined that a project does NOT meet the exemption criteria,contact the applicant and local government planning department and inform them the project does not qualify for the exemption. Return JARPA to the applicant. The applicant may reapply to WDFW,the applicable Local Government and other permitting agencies for approval under the full permitting process. b) If JARPA is complete and the project meets the criteria,start the HPA 45-day exemption process(defined below); 1. WDFW must allow 15 days for interested parties,and local governments to provide comments on the project—no approval action can be taken within the first 15 days of receipt of the DARPA; 2. If comments are received,WDFW will decide whether the concerns raised can be mitigated through conditions of the HPA—if yes, continue to A. If no,WDFW will notify the applicant and applicable Local Government. The applicant may reapply to WDFW,the applicable Local Government and other permitting agencies for approval under the full permitting process; 3. WDFW must approve or deny the HPA,or make a determination that the proposed work does not qualify for the exemption process within 45 days. JARPA\22879form.doc,4/27/98,page 2 of 2 AGENCY USE ONLY Agency Reference#: Date Received: Circulated by: (local govt.or agency) Project Tracking Number: JOINT AQUATIC RESOURCES PERMIT APPLICATION FORM (JARPA) (for use in Washington State) ^� Please type only in white fields and use blank ink. 1p»+ To fill in electronically, use F11 to move through the fom1. To use the help feature you must have an internet connection. R Application for a Fish Habitat Enhancement Project per requirements of RCW 77.55.290. You must submit a copy of this completed JARPA application form and the(Fish Habitat Enhancement JARPA Addition) to your local Government Planning Department and Washington Department of Fish &Wildlife Area Habitat Biologist on the same day. NOTE: LOCAL GOVERNMENTS—You must submit any comments on these projects to WDFW within 15 working days. Based on the instructions provided, I am sending copies of this application to the following: (check all that apply) Ox Local Government for shoreline:❑Substantial Development ❑Conditional Use ❑Variance oExemption []Revision ❑Floodplain Management []Critical Areas Ordinance © Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife for HPA(Submit 3 copies to WDFW Region) © Washington Department of Ecology for 401 Water Quality Certification(to Regional Office-Federal Permit Unit) ❑ Washington Department of Natural Resources for Aquatic Resources Use Authorization Notification © Corps of Engineers for: ❑x Section 404 ❑ Section 10 permit ❑ Coast Guard for: ❑ General Bridge Act Permit ❑ Private Aids to Navigation (for non-bridge projects) ❑ For Department of Transportation projects only: This project will be designed to meet conditions of the most current Ecology/Department of Transportation Water Quality Implementing Agreement PROJECT TITLE:Pirate's Cove Shoreline Restoration PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Restore the form and function of an historic shoreline spit and semi-impounded lagoon on the west shore of Pirate's Cove in Case Inlet, Puget Sound. Restoration actions include removing fill from an access causeway built from the shoreline to the northern section of the historic spit;filling a breached section of the spit caused by a failed tide gate;and re- contouring the spit and beach sediments to be naturally self-sustaining. SECTION A-Use for all permits covered by this application. Be sure to ALSO complete Section C(Signature Block)for all permit applications. 1.APPLICANT South Puget Sound Salmon Enhancement Group MAILING ADDRESS 6700 Martin Way E. Suite 112, Olympia,WA 98516 WORK PHONE E-MAIL ADDRESS HOME PHONE FAX# 360 412-0808 elia s sse .or 360 412-0809 If an agent is acting for the applicant during the permit process, complete#2. Be sure agent signs Section C(Signature Block)for all permit applications SM 2.AUTHORIZED AGENT MAILING ADDRESS WORK PHONE E-MAIL ADDRESS HOME PHONE FAX# CO 3. Relationship of applicant to property: ❑ OWNER ❑ PURCHASER LESSEE x] PrOlect sponsor m 4. Name, address and phone number of property owner(s) if other than applicant: Pirate's Cove Country Club, PO Box 62, Gra eview,WA 98546-0062 5. Location (street address, including city, county and zip code,where proposed activity exists or will occur) Access between 470 and 490 E. Lombard Rd. South, Grapeview,WA 98546 Local government with jurisdiction (city or county) Mason County Waterbody you are working in Pirate's Cove, Puget Sound M Tributary of IMI WRIA# 03 Is this waterbody on the 303(d) List" ❑ YES E NO N/A 14 If YES,what parameter(s)? Shoreline designation Urban residential, rural "*For 303d List, Zoning designation Rural residential http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/wg/303d/index.html Y+Section Section Township Range Government Lot N/A SW 8 21N 1W I m DNR stream type if known One-Stop-JARPA Beta"Pest ver.1.5.20060620.1700 1 47'1s'18"N Tax Parcel Number 121085004001 Latitude and Longitude: 122'50'28"W 6. Describe (a)the current use of the property, (b)structures existing on the property, and (c) existing environmental conditions. Have you completed any portion of the proposed activity on this property? ❑ YES Q NO For any portion of the proposed activity already completed on this property, indicate month and year of completion. a) The project site is currently used by the Pirate's Cove community as a recreational beach. Residents use the spit for temporary storage of small boats, beach walks, clam digging, and wildlife viewing. b) No permanent structures exist on the spit. A causeway (likely created from native beach material) leads from a gated access road to the northern portion of the spit. Some riprap from the former tidal weir still remains in the eroded mid-section of the spit, but serves no beneficial purpose at this point. c) The spit is an historic barrier spit partially impounding a saltwater lagoon. Feeder bluffs and beaches up-drift supply sediment to the spit, but the construction of the causeway and later failure of the tidal weir constructed to maintain low-tide elevation of the lagoon has interrupted sediment supply to the spit, creating a large gap in the spit. The lagoon likely provides excellent non-natal rearing habitat for Chinook and other salmon, and feeding areas for cutthroat trout and other marine fishes. Project completion will increase the amount of this habitat by restoring the full length of the barrier spit, and remove the causeway that currently is a fish passage barrier. The substrate surrounding the spit supports a variety of shellfish, including Manila clams, native littleneck clams, cockles, horse clams, mussels, Olympia oysters, and Pacific oysters. Sand dollars and geoducks are abundant seaward of the project area, but populations are not expected to be directly impacted by the project. Rock and shore crabs are common. Terrestrial wildlife populations are typical of South Puget Sound, including shorebirds, raptors, raccoons, coyotes, etc. The spit is sparsely vegetated above ordinary high water with pickleweed, silver burweed, gumweed, and beach grasses. The shorelines opposite the spit are developed as residential lots; the slopes in the area appear relatively stable and are forested with bigleaf maple, Douglas fir, western hemlock, and western redcedar. The understory is dominated by evergreen huckleberry, salmonberry, sword fern, and salal. Is the property agricultural land? ❑ YES E] NO M Are you a USDA program participant? ❑ YES 0 NO IM 7a. Describe the proposed work that needs aquatic permits: Complete plans and specifications should be provided for all work waterward of the ordinary high water mark or line, including types of equipment to be used. If applying for a shoreline permit, describe all work within and beyond 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark. If you have provided attached materials to describe your project, you still must summarize the proposed work here. Attach a separate sheet if additional space is needed. Proposed work that requires aquatic permits includes the removal of the causeway to restore the historic channel that allows seawater to fill and drain the lagoon and provide fish passage to and from Case Inlet, fill and reshaping of the gap in the spit caused by the failed tidal weir, placement of concrete block mattress material for foot traffic to mitigate the community's shoreline access lost by removing the causeway, shaping the cut and fill areas to match natural conditions, and replanting disturbed and filled areas with native salt-tolerant plants. Onsite construction will involve heavy machinery: causeway removal will be conducted with tracked excavators; material movement from cut areas to fill areas will be conducted with front-end loaders, excavators, or Morooka- style tracked vehicles; material grading will be conducted with bulldozers, excavators, or front-end loaders. Concrete block slope stabilization mats will be placed with a crane or excavator. Construction activities will be timed to maximize working hours during low tides within the allowable fish window; no significant construction phasing is planned. Replanting of disturbed and fill areas will be conducted during fall to ensure high plant survival, and SPSSEG will coordinate local volunteer watering crews to maintain plantings to ensure 80% survival and eventual natural propagation. Access to the site is provided by a gated upland access road. Equipment will be staged on this road (well above ordinary high water) and in a cleared area on the shoulder of Lombard Road when not in use. PREPARATION OF DRAWINGS: See sample drawings and guidance for completing the drawings ONE SET OF ORIGINAL OR GOOD QUALITY REPRODUCIBLE DRAWINGS MUST BE ATTACHED. NOTE Applicants are encouraged to submit photographs of the project site,but these DO NOT substitute for drawings. THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS AND COAST GUARD REQUIRE DRAWINGS ON 8-112 X 11 INCH SHEETS. LARGER DRAWINGS MAYBE REQUIRED BY OTHER AGENCIES. 7b. Describe the purpose of the proposed work and why you want or need to perform it at the site. Please explain any specific needs that have influenced the design. One-Stop-DARPA Beta Test ver.1.5.20060620.1700 2 Restoring pocket estuaries, barrier beaches, and tidal lagoons is a high priority for overall Puget Sound nearshore habitat restoration. Removing the causeway will restore fish passage through the north end of the lagoon that was blocked by the road. Restoring the spit to its historic function will enlarge the lagoon, part of which has been cut off by the causeway, and part of which has filled with fine sediment because of reduced tidal flushing through the north end of the lagoon. Four other options were considered for repairing the damage to the spit: 1) cutting a narrow channel through the causeway and importing fill for repairing the washed out midsection of the spit; 2) constructing a tidal culvert under the causeway and importing fill to repair the washed out midsection; 3) no action, which would probably restore the spit over the course of several decades (assuming continued sediment input to the south), but would be unacceptable to community members and would delay salmon recovery; and 4) removing the causeway and filling the midsection of the spit, and then building a bridge from the shoreline access road to the spit. These options were dismissed because of high cost (options 1, 2, and 4), low certainty of success (options 2 and 3), low or slow restoration value (options 1, 2, and 3), and community interest in maintaining a stable barrier beach to protect shoreline properties from winter storms (option 3). One option that was not considered was rebuilding the tidal weir that precipitated this problem in the first place. In the late 1970s, a similar problem arose, and while the community was advised by a consulting engineer that the tidal weir was unsustainable, the weir was rebuilt and the causeway was maintained. This option will not serve the community in the long term, and further degrades nearshore habitat. m 7c. Describe the potential impacts to characteristic uses of the water body. These uses may include fish and aquatic life,water quality, water supply, recreation and aesthetics. Identify proposed actions to avoid, minimize, and mitigate detrimental impacts and provide proper protection of fish and aquatic life. Identify which guidance documents you have used. Attach a separate sheet if additional space is needed. This project will restore historic fish usage to the Pirate's Cove lagoon and allow natural processes to sustain the spit and lagoon throat and mouth. Community residents have reported lagoon use by adult salmon staging for spawning and sea-run cutthroat or juvenile salmon foraging. Based on nearshore surveys and studies throughout the South Puget Sound region, it is reasonable to assume that the lagoon provides high quality habitat for Chinook and other salmon species that rely on nearshore environments outside their natal streams for juvenile rearing. The following documents, among others, helped guide this project's identification and prioritization: Beamer, E., A. McBride, R. Henderson and K. Wolf. 2003. The importance of non-natal pocket estuaries in Skagit Bay to wild Chinook salmon: an emerging priority for restoration. Skagit System Cooperative Research Department. Ellings, C.S. and S. Hodgson. 2007. Nisqually Estuary Baseline Fish Ecology Study: 2003-2006. Nisqually National Wildlife Refuge and Nisqually Indian Tribe, Olympia, Washington. Fresh, K., C. Simenstad, J. Brennan, M. Dethier, G. Gelfenbaum, F. Goetz, M. Logsdon, D. Meyers, T. Mumford, J. Newton, H. Shipman, C. Tanner. 2004. Guidance for protection and restoration of the nearshore ecosystems of Puget Sound. Puget Sound Nearshore Partnership Report No. 2004-2. Published by Washington Sea Grant Program, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington. Available at http://pugetsoundnearshore.org. Fresh, K. 2006. Juvenile Pacific Salmon in Puget Sound. Puget Sound Nearshore Partnership Report No. 2006-06. Published by Seattle District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Seattle, Washington. Goetz, F., C. Tanner, C.S. Simenstad, K. Fresh, T. Mumford and M. Logsdon, 2004. Guidling restoration principles. Puget Sound Nearshore Partnership Report No. 2004-03. Published by Washington Sea Grant Program, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington. Available at http://pugetsoundnearshore.org. Gelfenbaum, G., T. Mumford, J. Brennan, H. Case, M. Dethier, K. Fresh, F. Goetz, M. van Heeswijk, T.M., Leschine, M. Logson, D. Myers, J. Newton, H. Shipman, C.A. Simenstad, C. Tanner, and D. Woodson, 2006. Coastal Habitat in Puget Sound: A research plan in support of hte Puget Sound Nearshore Partnership One-Stop-JARPA Beta Test er.1.5.20060620.1700 3 Report no. 2006-1. Published by the U.S. Geological Survey, Seattle, Washington. Available at http://pugetsoundnearshore.org. Johannessen, J. and A. MacLennan. 2007. Beaches and Bluffs of Puget Sound. Puget Sound Nearshore Partnership Report No. 2007-04. Published by Seattle District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Seattle, Washington. Penttila, D. 2007. Marine Forage Fishes in Puget Sound. Puget Sound Nearshore Partnership Report No. 2007- 03. Published by Seattle District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Seattle, Washington. Redman, S., D. Myers, D. Averill, K. Fresh, B. Graeber. 2005. Regional Nearshore and Marine Aspects of Salmon Recovery in Puget Sound. Published by Shared Strategy for Puget Sound, Seattle, Washington. The lagoon and outer beach provide good to excellent habitat for several clam species, as well as Olympia and some Pacific oysters. Brady Blake, WDFW shellfish biologist, visited the site and predicted that overall, habitat quantity would be increased for Manila, native littleneck, and horse clams, and Olympia oysters. Species distribution will be changed, however, since productive clam beds in the breached spit will be covered by fill during restoration work. This will likely be mitigated by a contract harvest of clams, with market sized clams being sold and undersized clams relocated to other suitable habitat within the community's property to jump-start populations in substrate uncovered by the road removal. The Pirate's Cove community has used the lagoon for decades for swimming, boating, wildlife viewing, and shellfish harvest. Restoring the spit to its original configuration will increase the area of the lagoon during mid- to high tides, and should not interfere with small craft navigation other than creating a longer path from outside waters to the lagoon. Community members currently launch small car-top boats, canoes, and kayaks from the spit accessed by the causeway, and this access would be lost if not mitigated as part of the construction plan. The project engineer has proposed a gently sloped (7 to 1) access path lined with concrete block-mats that allow water percolation without significant sediment transfer interference. This would stabilize a strip of beach to allow foot traffic to the throat of the lagoon at low tide and provide a stabile pathway from which to launce hand-carried small craft at higher tides. L7 7d. For in water construction work, will your project be in compliance with the State of Washington water quality standards for turbidity WAC 173.201A-110? K] YES ❑ NO (See USEFUL DEFINITIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS) 8. Will the project be constructed in stages? ❑ YES xx NO Proposed starting date: September 1, 2008 Estimated duration of activity: Forty-five days, ending October 14, 2008 9. Check if any temporary or permanent structures will be placed: x0 Waterward of the ordinary high water mark or line for fresh or tidal waters AND/OR x0 Waterward of the mean higher high water for tidal waters? 10. Will fill material (rock, fill, bulkhead, or other material) be placed: ❑ Waterward of the ordinary high water mark or line for fresh waters? If YES, VOLUME (cubic yards) /AREA (acres) x0 Waterward of the mean higher high water for tidal waters? If YES, VOLUME (cubic yards) 5,000 /AREA (acres) 03 11. Will material be placed in wetlands? ❑ YES Q NO If YES: A. Impacted area in acres: B. Has a delineation been completed? If YES, please submit with application. ❑ YES ❑ NO C. Has a wetland report been prepared? If YES, please submit with application ❑ YES ❑ NO M3 D. Type and composition of fill material (e.g., sand, etc.) E. Material source: m F. List all soil series (type of soil) located at the project site, and indicate if they are on the county's list of hydric soils. Soils information can be obtained from the natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). One-Stop-JARPA Beta Test N er.1.5.20060620.1700 4 E7 G.WILL PROPOSED ACTIVITY CAUSE FLOODING OR DRAINING OF WETLANDS? ❑ YES ❑ NO If YES, IMPACTED AREA IS ACRES OF DRAINED WETLANDS. NOTE:If your project will impact greater than%of an acre of wetland,submit a mitigation plan to the Corps and Ecology for approval along with the JARPA form. NOTE:A 401 water quality certification will be required from Ecology in addition to an approved mitigation plan if your project impacts wetlands that are: a)greater than Y:acre in size, or b)tidal wetlands or wetlands adjacent to tidal water. Please submit the JARPA form and mitigation plan to Ecology for an individual 401 certification if a)or b)applies. CM 12. Stormwater Compliance for Nationwide Permits Only: This project is(or will be)designed to meet ecology's most current stormwater manual, or an Ecology approved local stormwater manual. x❑ YES ❑ NO If YES—Which manual will your project be designed to meet Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington--2005 EM If NO—For clean water act Section 401 and 404 permits only—Please submit to Ecology for approval, along with this JARPA application, documentation that demonstrates the stormwater runoff from your project or activity will comply with the water quality standards,WAC 173.201 A m 13. Will excavation or dredging be required in water or wetlands? ❑ YES ❑x NO If YES: A. Volume: (cubic yards) /area (acre) B. Composition of material to be removed: C. Disposal site for excavated material: D. Method of dredging: 14. Has the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA) been completed ❑ YES �x NO SEPA Lead Agency: WDFW SEPA Decision: DNS, MDNS, EIS,Adoption, Exemption Exemption Decision Date(end of comment period) SUBMIT A COPY OF YOUR SEPA DECISION LETTER TO WDFW AS REQUIRED FOR A COMPLETE APPLICATION 15. List other Applications, approvals or certifications from other federal,state or local agencies for any structures,construction discharges or other activities described in the application (i.e. preliminary plat approval, health district approval, building permit, SEPA review, federal energy regulatory commission license(FERC), Forest practices application,etc.). Also, indicate whether work has been completed and indicate all existing work on drawings. NOTE:For use with Corps Nationwide Permits, identify whether your project has or will need an NPDES permit for discharging wastewater and/or stormwater. TYPE OF APPROVAL ISSUING AGENCY IDENTIFICATION DATE OF APPLICATION DATE APPROVED COMPLETED? NO. m 16. Has any agency denied approval for the activity you're applying for or for any activity directly related to the activity described herein? ❑ YES FTJ NO If YES, explain: SECTION B - Use for Shoreline and Corps of Engineers permits only: m 17a. Total cost of project. This means the fair market value of the project, including materials, labor, machine rentals, etc. Approximately$120,000, including construction,engineering,and administrative costs. 17b. If a project or any portion of a project receives funding from a federal agency,that agency is responsible for ESA consultation. Please indicate if you will receive federal funds and what federal agency is providing those funds. See instructions for information on ESA.* FEDERAL FUNDING ❑ YES © NO If YES, please list the federal agency. M 18. Local government with jurisdiction: Mason County One-Stop-JARPA Beta Test ver.1.5.20060620.1700 5 L=- 19.' For Corps, Coast Guard and DNR permits, provide names, addresses and telephone numbers of adjoining property owners, lessees, etc. Please note: Shoreline Management Compliance may require additional notice—consult your local govemment. NAME ADDRESS PHONE NUMBER Susan and Banks Ritchie 490 E. Lombard Rd. South,Grapeview.WA 98546 (360)275-6154 Glen Baskett and Delores Cooper 470 E. Lombard Rd. South,Grapeview,WA 98546 Unlisted Mailing: P.O. Box 689 Graham,WA 98338-0689 SECTION C- This section MUST be completed for any permit covered by this application IM 20. Application is hereby made for a permit or permits to authorize the activities described herein. I certify that I am familiar with the information contained in this application, and that to the best of my knowledge and belief, such information is true, complete, and accurate. I further certify that I possess the authority to undertake the proposed activities. I hereby grant to the agencies to which this application is made, the right to enter the above-described location to inspect the proposed, in-progress or completed work. I agree to start work ONLY after all necessary permits have been received. DATE SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT DATE SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED AGENT I HEREBY DESIGNATE TO ACT AS MY AGENT IN MATTERS RELATED TO THIS APPLICATION FOR PERMIT(S). I UNDERSTAND THAT IF A FEDERAL PERMIT IS ISSUED, I MUST SIGN THE PERMIT. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT DATE SIGNATURE OF LANDOWNER (EXCEPT PUBLIC ENTITY LANDOWNERS, E.G. DNR) THIS APPLICATION MUST BE SIGNED BY THE APPLICANT AND THE AGENT, IF AN AUTHORIZED AGENT IS DESIGNATED. 18 U.S.0 §1001 provides that: Whoever, in any manner within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States knowingly falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact or makes any false,fictitious, or fraudulent statements or representations or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing same to contain any false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry, shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than 5 years or both. COMPLETED BY LOCAL OFFICIAL A. Nature of the existing shoreline. (Describe type of shoreline, such as marine, stream, lake, lagoon, marsh, bog, swamp, flood plain, floodway, delta; type of beach, such as accretion, erosion, high bank, low bank,or dike; material such as sand, gravel, mud, clay, rock, riprap; and extent and type of bulkheading, if any) B. In the event that any of the proposed buildings or structures will exceed a height of thirty-five feet above the average grade level, indicate the approximate location of and number of residential units, existing and potential,that will have an obstructed view: C. If the application involves a conditional use or variance, set forth in full that portion of the master program which provides that the proposed use may be a conditional use, or, in the case of a variance, from which the variance is being sought: These Agencies are Equal Opportunity and Affirmative Action employers. For special accommodation needs, please contact the appropriate agency in the instructions One-Stop-JARPA Beta Test ver.1.5.20060620.1700 6 SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 21 N, RANGE 1 W PIRATES COVE SHORELINE RESTORATION II I I j l l l, \;\ 01�1Aer Irk\ �ii 'i I�i ice%_-_-';=_ '" '_-_�-__-- •/ ii4%`--C== =;'c- 'c='---5' S-==SScccc-cc=c�-'''-_ � ---- SIR T_ -'-'""- ----- I VICINITY MAP -.r--;�, "_',' III I I I I -'--��'• :-= _ - �`''�'r'? I ---- L - - _ - - ', • __�--� �-_�-- ''�'.-11-__-.._�___I•-_--'-r—_-_-_�__._.-______F_._._�_..�_-..._rY`-• !--`--'\--` .`O - - ''-1 t`,,...-`._._f'--_.--']lI. . z -il--.--.-._--.----1__-� - -- I 1I � 9H D COVER E' SHEET AN ----F -__----------------- _ .J' E VEGETATION PLAN 4.DETAILS ............. - - ---- I� _ ---� 1-_ L I 1 I 1 _� _ -_= = - - --- ---- ---- ---- - -- -------- _____ - --_--- ja---- ----- = - --------------- --=r- ---- -I -------- _ I------;>�-- - -- I ' I '� I —" KRnMAt DApRN� r.-•___•••• ��>•YY M[a.•4�--roar I i 11 I rr"�-• -I I I 1 L:•' � I I - - T' NO DATE BY PP REVISIONS Approved By °^'ro' Civil-Municipal Geotechnical Engineering and Planning Shoreline Restoration Jerome W. Morrissette & Associates Inc., P.S. Pirates Cove Cover sheet 1700C,rPl.Rd S.W.OB-2,Olympia,Wa.98502-1110 Ph360.352.9456 Fx360.352.9m 06154-3.dw9 SHT 1 OF 4 SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 21 N, RANGE 1 W I , ,r _-------- --_ _ - - llil' - ---- ------ — - ' ---_---- -- _-_'--- - _-_--_--_- - ------------ -- -------- iil ' - - ----�- - _-_-_-_-_-_-_--' 1, - ---- —- - l l l 1// __p-__________�^__-___- _ -- '' __- DwAIr/BaOt` ` "- - _ - I _ --� -� ---- _-"- _- -_-_ _____--_-_____--___-�-_ _-__-_'-_-__- ------ ---- -- - -_----_ ^ \ _ �'y" .I111 - -__A', ---\\- •�^^_____ ill WITS _^^ �� r /lll/ - --- ---- - ---- ------ - __` //! _ - ____ II\\NII/' '-n-- -- \\_`--�•�- -________-s_______- --r_si.,c wv-°,a-' / 'I[-'_n.-y--""- --_ _ _ ____-- ____ __ l -- - - - - - -- ------ ___-_ __ - ---_-— i cx oww�m�.,°p1°'`mr"` 1�i�\\\\iZ�\'I I l a.=_- __'_ -_ _ ._-_- �'.��':,;."co>�� \) J•(`\'\\\\\ \/'.\ cur lwxrs� II\I\ii "III I �Y wEw irs Ix sRi Ixl.u«rs J , liF' cur rw/Ts r WTWIIS _ A V °p r{/F_ ------------------ ---- ---- --- --------------- `.•'••--••- I ICE i I I I I I I 1 \ \ ,.�-'� ;..-- ---=-�--- \ --�--------m_-. I I I I I I I I I -----1------- �- I �, _ \ 1------------- - rcan�MAI oAruw' e,•� l•-w rzcr /aamr w w,�eiiw oos /or •,wr s i�o����,a owc 0 t5 30 fp0 MEw OF SIT - Q, EMSNM O'SP'1 DI35 1p.N 1L00 N.00 N.M ----- __ L L« Y « lee d Lao «.oe 1L00 pp °.rmr°T w� I10dt `6 gvv a« aeB L« Lep / _` S.« L00 0.00 arm V°rs L00 -- 0.00 a00 ..N A.w/OrJ aao aoe LOD u« « e.00 V SPIT REPAIR DETAIL ACCESS REMOVAL DETAIL SEC SECTION A-A SECTION B-B NO DATE BY PP REVISIONS , Approved By gpKKpp, "pn Lhoreline Restoration civil.Municipal-GeDtechnical Engineering and Planning °E ° Jerome W. Morrissette &Associates Inc., P.S. Pirates Cove Grading Plan 1700Cooper Pr.Road S.W.♦B-2,Olympia,Wa.98502-1110 Ph360.352.9456 Fx360.352.9990T g SHT 2 OF 4 SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 21 N, RANGE 1 W r _- -1- -----------\ ---------------- -*-- --- 1/l l/' -- - -- _ -I---- ------------- - -- ------- -- ' 2---' --- -.. -------- "-' -----3 o - -- _ - 3 I 7'MIIX 1 1/)- WASNFD ORNN ROC%\ / l/l l l /l ''- _____-6 _ 0 rr1Y,__ 8-' __\ \�_ .`\ ___3____-____-- ---_ - . \, . _-' {1 "___-_-_g__-_ ______ 10 4111U11 '-' -"`. \\ ``�`•� --- I / i l l __ -"_ _ -''-- _----'"11----- 1n\\\ I roro sr nANTFNcs a , - 140DSFLANIINGS pI MIS SOE __ - \`�� `�\_`---_ ___ __ e 7 6 ---------�` =======i--- I`J 1 I I 9 I I I I —j I I c I I 10 I n 12 3 I 14 1 S 1 I I Ir7 I I I I I I 16 7 VFAETATION REPLANTING AREA SCue 1...—T M40YE NDV-NAP4T SPECIES,IE.RUBUS pSCOLM I—AYAN BIALNRCRRY). pNAf)pAND MBRpNSOYECNCN515(ALA5tA1 BRWCRU4E%O%pDEN lAt15(IA5IERN O 15 JO 60 NSDOi RRVCALNo TUMiG6 LDCAIED W MC NEM—Y SIDE W 1NC'.4&YF ROST p X PARKING LOT PRESCRIE EtlSpIG NARK:KGE IAPON AS..AS PoSSIBIE. NN 1NE NORMNCST END Df A LIXNGRETE 9XE AU( MARK DESIWARD LA4PFFTE AREAS AND WS—T CAMPr1RE5 TO MESE AREAS MARK IS WSELE pSC RRA55 fALE E CV. JR. NA N)f18 A.—RORNEEDA(40Ff,SYIAARROW(f ...ML SiOp(—1)AID IS INC.C.C. CAB(f CONCRE*E MA15 ..44V`o Rff 4y:A��1A 1 112'WASIICD DRAM RM - nvlpzs� vAl/ NO I DATE I BY 1APPF4 REVISIONS I Approved By k-- 1110` f `*-Civil-Municipal.Geotechnical Engineering and Planning L°'" °" ' Shoreline Restoration Jerome W. Morrissette & Associates Inc., P.S. Pirates Cove Revegetation Plan 1700 Cooper Pt.Road S.W.08-2.Olympia,W..98502-1110 Ph 360.332.9456 F.360.352.9990 06154-3.dw9 $HT 3 OF 4 —�� ACCESS RDAD (SEE YCWN E-C) CAM CLNC.YAT y rt•M .tt s•-aRIseD Roca 9 ---------------- -- R -------------------- ' r \ __ r WNCARE.AT -7__ .I ,'�'��..•�!; ',�1 CARERS T WTN SIOfS 11'OEPM WXTAWN RfPLAAIINQ +,•I'..: •II LRUSAED RORf (SEE 5r1EET l) rr \(:: .� l SECTION D-D \ �. I.• . N.iS � alA x LNX rtua �\ y - �• BOiN VCfs I ----- _ _ EXIEAo wTIREss �_I Pf�SIRUry DDLLAFO I(SCC SEQ pI E_ELKSS RR1D CfOrFNME \\ = -____/ _C-- ELEN 9PlXAfYO• (SEE DE T.) 6E.A.­AP \ aD1B'CABLE CMCRETE MAT _ T _-- I____ 1 / EXTRE YATINES$ <bN­ >�T f.1BI.E WTIR[SS D - \\ 'M----._ll --\ ----_4 QOIEXMf ANI !! - ` �CCM /'I ATF RPNAP CC-U CA-CRLCAEIE I.—UGOCY WT— \\ C ( - I - CCfss RJAp_ I • E�ND PFOIECFPI YAKS TODEIKR 32'CC /' i . i J'-CRUSN[D C'ORf � ii _ \ \ \ \ - /\ \ 1t'OEPiN BINr arc \ \ -I I nNY Drr r-aysLm Rax aoa TEIr-1��/ � I I IX� wCARv SPAus GRAVEL ACCESS BLOWUP Y LABE LRER[E _! N: TEN FEPLAN°ND A.rS A B c.car AAa uTMTcl°Es AA.— M. SAE[T SECTION C-C STEEL CAP --\�(sa aoN�.v)=- • -•� •�•�\�'' A9' I r srfEL AwE eauRo '\• �,; -x{«x' o ';-' T•°t11/�-STEEL TAB f,ESINP aAxao T COYPACTW csro r f ' aalN LM!rtAcf I nE7 OE0 SOiN 4DE5 TO{•AOE BQLARD 6 D F I BOiN 90E5 BCR1 Bs AUDAEO ' J 7 I AM IX+ttL[D[DF P.A. 1 I L \ 12.101•SEEEI.TAB S•OfPDI CRAK VASE I \ % MELDED BOM SICES C_c'ro BJx A.ORY DENSITY I [yy� I I i �. TO 0•SiEEI NSEFI r J I E•52CI PW[NSEFr WAGE AND FFOOE F0.L SUBCFADE I I I I .•• •' (mP v-ro vox u.x.DFY oENvnl r � I I_ ly J cowEnau ttwcefrE SECTION E-E °A e> PEDESTRIAN BOLLARD A s® DETAILA..°� 0 10 )0 40 NO DATE BY P RE%A9ONS Approved By Civil•Municipal•Ge lechnical Engineering and Planning 9ON0°` °' Shoreline Restoration Jerome W. Morrissette & Associates Inc., P.S. Pirates cove Details 1700 Cooper P1.Rwd S.W.eB-2,OIynVia,Wa.98502.1110 Ph 360.352.9456 Fx 360.352.9990 06154-3.dwq 5H T 4 OF 4 Pirate's Cove Restoration Project Funded by the Salmon Recovery Funding Board and Washington State Department of Ecology Sponsored by the South Puget Sound Salmon Enhancement Group x tf Tidal spit breach to be restored Aerial oblique of Pirate's Cove lagoon, breached spit, and causeway proposed for removal (Washington State Department of Ecology photo).