Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
COM2006-00033 Fire Pump House - COM Inspections - 5/4/2006
MASON COUNTY DEPT. OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Inspection Line(360)}27-7262 Mason County Bldg. 3 426 W. Cedar P.O. Box 186 Phone: (360)427 9670,ext. 352 Shelton, WA 98584 COMMERCIAL BUILDING PERMIT COM2006-00033 OWNER: HOOD CANAL SCHOOL DISTRICT 404 RECEIVED: 3/15/2006 CONTRACTOR: LICENSE: EXP: ISSUED: 5/4/2006 SITE ADDRESS: 111 N STATE ROUTE 106 SHELTON EXPIRES: 11/4/2006 PARCEL NUMBER: 421023460000 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: S1/2 OF SW EX PROJECT DESCRIPTION: DIRECTIONS TO SITE: PUMP HOUSE FOR FIRE PUMP INTERSECTION OF SR 101 AND SR 106 General Information Construction &Occupancy Information Type of Use: Insp.Area: No. of Units: Type of Constr.: VB Type of Work: NEW Fire Dist.: 6 No.of Bathrooms: Occ. Group: U Valuation: $ 11,292.54 No. of Stories: 1 Occ. Load: 2 Building Height: 10 Pre-Manufactured Unit Information Square Footage Information Make: Length: Lot Size: Model: Width: Building: 334 Year: Serial No.: Basement: Parking Spaces: Setback Information Front: W 360.00 Ft. Shoreline: Ft. Shoreline& Planning Information Rear: E 600.00 Ft. Slope: Ft. Water Body:NONE Shoreline Desig.: Not Applicable Side 1: N 40.00 Ft. SEPA?:Unknown Comp.Plan Desig.: Rural Side 2: S 10.00 Ft. Fire Protection System Information Auto Fire Alarm System?: Emergency Key Box?: Standpipe?: Auto Fire Sprinkler System?: Access Road?: Fire Extinguishers?: Fixed Fire Suppression System?: Fire Hydrants?: Fire Lanes?: • COM2006-00033 Please refer to the following pages for conditions of this permit. 1 of 5 Plumbing Fixtures Mechanical Fixtures FEES 'Type Qty. Type Qty. Type By Date Amount Receipt Ventilation Fan 1 EH Plan Review r.F1N s/Stn?nnR -gR nn R17nnRnn Fuel Tank 1 Plan Check Fee ni r. arlRI?nnR n1 c1?nnrnn UFC Plan Check Fee ni r. al1R/?nnR ORR n1 S19nnRnn Building State Fee ni r AmAonnR T�d fin R19nnRnn Building Permit Fee ni r. ailA/9nnR 09nci 9F oi9nnRnn Mechanical Fee ni n.. AllQ/7MR Rr,4 sr, R19nnRnn Mechanical Base Fee ni (I. d/1QIgor, 5n R19nnRnn Total $535.82 CASE NOTES FOR COM2006-00033 CONDITIONS FOR COM2006-00033 1) ALL CONSTRUCTION MUST MEET OR EXCEED ALL LOCAL CODES AND THE INTERNATIONAL CODE REQUIREMENTS AND OCCUPANCY IS LIMITED TO THE PERMITTED AND APPROVED CLASSIFICATION. ANY CHANGE OF USE OR OCCUPANCY WOULD RESULT IN PERMIT REVOCATION. CHANGE OF USE MUST BE APPROVED PRIOR TO CHANGE. x 2) Changes to approved building plans that affect compliance to the current Washington State Energy Code (WSEC), ventilation and Indoor Air Quality Code (VIAQ), Building/Plumbing/Mechanical Codes and/or Mason County Regulations shall be approved prior to construction. X _ t� 3) Prior to final approval, all upland areas disturbed or newly created by construction activities shall be seeded, vegetated or given an equivalent type of erosion protection (silt fencing or straw matting). X -<,? >> 4) CONSTRUCTION PROCESS TO BE FIELD CORRECTED AS REQUIRED PER MASON COUNTY BUILDING DEPARTMENT AND THE ADOPTED BUILDING CODE. The construction of the permitted project is subject to inspections by the Mason County Building Department. All construction must be in conformance with the international codes as amended and adopted by Mason County. Any corrections, changes or alterations required by a Mason County Building Inspector shall be made prior to requesting additional inspections. X '-W 1� 5) All building permits shall have a final inspection performed and approved by the Mason County Building Department prior to permit expiration. The failure to request a final inspection or to obtain approval will be documented in the legal property records on file with Mason County as being non-compliant with Mason County ordinances and building regulations. XP 6) The use, handling and storage of hazardous materials or flammable and combustible liquids in excess of 10 gallons is not allowed without the approval of the Mason County Fire Marshal. X R F COM2006-00033 2 of 5 1 7) The approval of this project is subject to the recommendations and specifications outlined in the attached geotechnical report or assessment. t" Structures and/or land modifications (grading, cuts, fills, etc.) required in the geotechnical report/as essment, may require a seperate permit. � The geotechincai report/assessment shall remain attached to the approved building plans. X. R 8) Provisions for surface/subsurface drainage control must be implemented with new construction or development on site and MUST NOT adversely impact adjacent parcels. Under the requirements of Mason County Stormwater Ordinance, either private ditches and drains will meet requirements of the stormwater ordinance or prior approval will be granted to use an existing utility and drainage easement dedicated for that specific purpose. For further information regarding this ordinance and the REQUIREMENT to obtain an ACCESS PERMIT for the installation/construction of a driveway or access connecting from a Mason County Road, Contact the Mason County Public Works Department prior to construction at Ext 450. For any construction which is proposed to be located within 25'of a Mason County road right of way, it is suggested to contact that office to review future planned work which may affect your project. X <R 9) Water q�ty is not to be degraded to the detriment of the aquatic environment as a result of this project. X � 10) All approved plans are required to be on-site for inspection purposes. If inspection is called for and plans are not on site, Approval WILL NOT be granted. In addition, a reinspection fee, based on the current fee schedule, minimum one-hour ill charged and collected by the Mason County Building Department prior to any further inspections being performed or approvals granted. X *' I 11) PURSUANT TO INTERNATIONAL CODE, ALL SITES MUST HAVE APPROVED NUMBERS OR ADDRESSES PROVIDED IN SUCH A POSITION AS TO BE PLAINLY VISIBLE AND LEGIBLE FROM THE STREET OR ROAD FRONTING THE PROPERTY. MASON COUNTY BUILDING DEPARTMENT REQUIRES THAT THIS BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO CALLING FOR ANY SITE INSPECTIONS. A REINSPECTION FEE, BASED ON RATES AS ADOPTED BY THE JURISDICTION AND THE INTERNATIONAL CODE WILL BE ASSESSED IF OWNE�/CONTRACTOR FAILS TO POST ADDRESS ON SITE PRIOR TO REQUESTING INSPECTIONS. X 12) All property lines shall be clearly identified at the time of foundation inspection. X 13) Contractor registration laws are governed under RCW 18.27 and enforced by the WA State Dept of Labor and Industries, Contractor Compliance Division. There are potential risks and monetary liabilities to the homeowner for using an unregistered contractor. Further information can be obtained at 1-800-647- 2. The person signing this condition is either the homeowner, agent for the owner or a registered contractor according to WA state law. X � 14) This structure is approved as semi-heated space as identified in the Washington State Energy Code section 1310.2. Ceiling insulation minimum R-19. Thermostat control shall not exceed 44 degrees Fahrenheit. X S�i�> 15) XpprovveO per dimensions and setbacks on submitted site plan. Setbacks are measured from the furthest projection of the structure. 16) The approved site plan is required to be on-site for inspection purposes. If inspection is called for and the site plan is not on site, Approval WILL NOT be granted. In addition, a reinspection fee, based on the current fee schedule, minimum one-hour will be charged and collected by the Mason Cou Building Department prior to any further inspections being performed or approvals granted. x v 17) Recyclable materials &Solid Waste Storage: Space shall be provided for the storage of recycled materials and solid waste. The storage area shall be de i ned to meet the needs of the occupancy, efficiency of pick-up, and shall be available to occupants and haulers.X � COM2006-00033 3 of 5 18) A structural observation, as defined in Chapter 17 of the International Code, shall be provided by Northwest Testing Co. as specified and approved on the Special Inspection Authorization form. Periodic reports prepared by the structural observer shall be mailed in a timely manner to the Mason County Building Department, PO Box 186, Shelltttoonn,,�(VA 98584 indicating that the site visits have been made and identify any reported deficiencies. 19) Temporary erosion control measures must be implemented to prevent water quality degradation of adjacent waters or wetlands. Silt fencing must be installed and maintained until upland vegetation has become established. ) 20) The mechanical system for which energy consumption, performance, or mode of operation are regulated by the 2001 Washington State Energy Code (WSEC) and Ventilation And Indoor Air Quality Code (VIAQ) shall be tested to ensure that control devices, equipment and systems are calibrated, adjusted and operate in accordance with approved plans and specifications. Drawings and notes shall require commissioning in accordance with WSEC section 1416.4. Lighting controls shall be tested to ensure that control devices, components, equipment and systems are calibrated, adjusted and operate in accordance with the approved plans and specifications. A complete report of test procedures and results shall be prepared and filed with the owner. Drawing notes shall require commissioning in accordance with WSEC 1513.7. X 21) The building and equipment for the fire pump house shall be installed per manufacturer installation specifications and inspected and approved by the Mason County Fire Marshal and Washington State Patrol Fire Protection Bureau prior to the final occupancy inspection of building permit number COM2006-00003, K-8 school remodel and addition. X 22) FIRE MARSHAL REVIEW: THIS PARCEL IS LOCATED WITHIN A SMOKE MANAGEMENT ZONE. PLEASE CONTACT THE FIRE WARDEN, AT 360-427-9670 - EXTN. 459, FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. This permit becomes null and void if work or construction authorized is not commenced within 180 days,or if construction or work is suspended for a period of 180 days at any time after work is commenced. Evidence of continuation of work is a progress inspection within the 180 day period. Final inspection must be approved before building can be occupied.Proof of continuation of work is by means of a progress inspection.The owner or the agent on the owners behalf,represents that the information provided is accurate and grants employees of Mason County access to the above described pr structure fo ie and inspection._ OWNER OR AGENT: DATE: COM2006-00033 4 of 5 CONCRETE MECHANICAL MANUFACTURED HOME _._ e Hat By Footings I Setbacks Date piping Ribbons GasInterior Date By Interior-Date By Dale By Exterior Date By Exterior-Date t3 Set-up Point Load;Isolated Footings IN-SULA110N Date a BG I SLAB:INSULATION y Date By Data By FIRE DEPARTMENT Foundation Walls Floors Date By Date By Data ev DECKS FRAMING Wails Date By Date By Data By PROPANE TANKS PLUMBING vault Date By Date B y Groundwork Attic OTHER Date By Date By Type: _ Dale By D.W.v DRYWALL Type: Date B Int Brad Wall Date By y Date e y -0 _._ .. FINAL INSPECTION 2 Water Line Fire Soperation 8 Datip By Dale B y Gale Pass or Request Inspect. Type of InSp. Fail Date Date Done By Comments � b.IG, 1 �k�s�tc � 1�' qAb 4 Ga"' tor- ;�c.G L r-ai o ,7c ✓�1 �-'w- o _ It) p 07 3 07 Lkj)(; 0 4 ,T an 0 th' Y 'OIL 4 fil d7 y L pry�►t Fl,It Z>,r ►►.� I,.�t t v IL o Z. —r, I,pp`, R om- G ��', 0 1-07 /0 -,3-07 .)( ) 'lit 13 191 ( +- '1 l � 1 , � fI a CONCRETE MECHANICAL MANUFACTURED HOME Footings I Betbmko Delve By Ribbons Date By Gas piping tie By Foundation Wain DOW By Set-up Date By INSULATION [ By 50 r Slab Insulation Floors FINALINSPECTION Date By Date By Date By FRAMING uwis FIRE DEPARTMENT Date By Dane By Date By PLUMBING JttMc _ DITHER Groundwork WA� By Date By WALLBOARD NAILING Date By D.W.V _v Date By Water Line FINAL I NSPECTIdN Date By Date By Date By a Typo of Insp. PasslFail RegUeSt Date Inspact. Date Dono'sy Carnments sue(.-IVd-t ot d-7 Z IZ �'T LK)1t lCow.w.rl�s1 t Sao `o wcA IuYti� vD Wti t 6dar (7 All c,•+1 Cc�w. le�t�c/` cl� o Jn . acL S►��. 8 eJo 1. �.d.`. pr.r clso v l.r h7—cL.rAI'Ll y ytb 4 Epp D �� Z i3 D Z Iq 0-7 LO1L diG i�c�clt- a GIGSs OC....,- s►21Ler O d"1►� ina3 �)o f, s l 4 y e►z r C4-, s y d5c):,,.. c-I J9, LuT.11 �70 s etc►I be�ai' ', -e '3�� I'���c'o,. ��jjpprr�vt.® 300, Sov ✓rlj IS wit ZPC vt o Bsa- a..(( 7 lax' 1-S- 4— l rG roe a lf-Y44c- �iwcs r.,,, s►sec .«o)Vs G k�OIDvL 2 s�.lwc�rr� GS S 3 Z I v? 3 Z 7 z. W o 'CONCRETE MECHANICAL MANUFACTURED HOME 0 C) Fovtings 1$9ibacks Date By Ribbons oDate By fiat Piping Date By Foundation Wails DM By set-up Date By INSULATION Dale By BG 1 slab insulation Floors FINAL I IPECTItI Dats By DWe By pate By FLAMING wall# FIRE DEPARTMENT Date By Date By Date By PLUMBING AW OTHER Groundwork Data By Date By WALLBOARD NAILING D.W.V Date By Date By cy'o Water tine FINAL I NBPEGTIt�N [Sets By i�abt By [late By m s Type of Insp. Pass/Fail Request Date Inspect. Date Done By Comnwnts eul,b,.,1��' a I' t_ I -Q o �J tcs �/\�5► `� �`1 5� N"I �c et r`GC/� T-C� 8 Nidd !;Lw-t 0 � fe ZY y �d i Cv�T tc?Q 2 �' i,,, r— , /ylse) 7dct7 CDLok ,g"f � tv � bra CCU .�✓- rr v i''ew s� S- a DWV ! 17 07 1�n\t, �� -- � arnq AA s1� �,✓� -1PD -�Pc MM ckd„ty awl w nre-Z Yz- j ��,, io O-t 1 l D � P CON�CREfE MECHANICAL MOBILE HOME Footings-Setback date by Ribbons date by Gas Piping date by Foundation Walls date by Set Up date byINSULATION date by BG/SIAB Insulation Floors Final date by date by date by FRAMING Walls FIRE DEPT. dale by date by date by PLUMBING Attic OTHER GrourK work date b date by D.W.V. WALLBOARD NAILING date by date by Water Line RNAL INSPECTION date by date by dale by � ,.4T•) �,ti� r� 1/5�we'S E Vidal �a�ai�ss,- 6,) /6)4, 121101 L r/ (j-fc�w•. f'/`' �L P�l i 55 `n f ID 6b t!(��. ��— tMCL� 12►�` 50i'o 3oD — G•,A - - l rf /0 -2y-nc, /o -26 -OG G•-� north, e- or� - X -Prek i— Ann, /a d� 6 fM C ZZA a�!t4 c. / —3I— -2-Dso L.-"j (2�� 41 14A I CaL 'lAsr--t> CC 11 .30 12 i ;can o 17,11 (.ryes v� p �� o MAI � Vf'st�l 511 y a.,.Aj �a I rC3 fUM w� (CONCRETE MECHANICAL MANUFACTURED HOME 0 - — rn Footings/Setbacks Date By Ribbons b Cis Piping o Interior Date By Interior-Date By Date By o D Exterw Data By Exterior Date B set-up Z Point Load/Isolated Footings INSULATION _ Date By r BG 1 SLAB INSULATION C/) Date By Date By FIRE DEPARTMENT 0 Foundation Walls Floors Date By 0 Date BY Data By DECKS 0 FRAMING Wails Date By p [sate By Data 3 Zi d'1 By LzK PROPANE TANKS PLUMBING Vault Date By Date By OTHER n Groundwork Attic "i Type: 46 Data By Date By Date By D.W.v DRYWALL Type: O Int Brace Wall Date By Date 8 Date By 9 y FINAL INSPECTION IN) OWater Line Firs Sops ration Date B Dale By €fate By I y O Pass or Request Inspect. c Type of Insp. Fail Date Date Dane By Comments u, y" 0VJv S 13 � .a Uic Cv�rt Py z.wiwwN yv py. �Z.t� two✓ y�.'v►. � �, Stda.z� AW s� 5 3e(pr, s/3i o�i t.b� O&Vitt'j �, I��-c.. CYNIC (ay.IMZ.Zo Z+S 4 r-t?u O ti ,D . Fitt (0 0W v y l� b 1✓ k bs 4 5k i s-t u4 t„p ,ram cr Zi ox-/�kft 2. 69 7 r f die C)I at S2. t'a�o�� wo�tc QQ fo M2.ZD �IZTDS � -I,5 i7l�frcc �* 7 J- VL Vro I-L At ` M� rC> Llif` r ?As-.-) k, i o te Aj rn ,r -4 uti a-0 ci)0_11A4.110A ovk cowfAcll r0.JtA�A+4:;4A* ewa~T 4, cooca4- *54A� W9- CW V\0[ &QCJ ,4;Q- 4451200"h iU4 (Vle-s OF A11 .Q oo#, l r)Vw) Request To Revise An Approved Plan Co tvlPermit Number: p 00033 � f Name 4+o D d <and ' Parcel Number Phone Number da ime «53 Project Address D �uL Mailing Address � FLU o �,�/gyp Please provide a complete, detailed descnption of the proposed revisions to the approved plans: Are two sets of the revised plans or addendum indicating the changes included? '* Yes ❑ No Are the approved site plans included? W Yes ❑ No Are the revisions clearly and accurately identified on the plans or addendum? ` Yes ❑ No Does the plan contain an engineer's or architect's lateral or vertical analysis? ❑ Yes `13--No If Yes,Has the engineer or architect approved this revision? ❑ Yes ❑ No Is a stamped and signed approval included with this request? ❑ Yes ❑ No 1Tlote:No structural changes to a"designed"plan will be approved without the written consent of the engineer and/or architect of record.) Does the proposed revision modify the footprint or location of the structure? 6-Yes ❑ No If Yes, Is a revised site plan,.with all new setback dimensions included with this request? 1:1 Yes ❑ No Additional Information: Applicant's signature-LIJ a U h l ad Date: Office use only Received by: Date Sent Assigned To Approved By Dal ii B. Original Valuation: $ CC Additional Valuation: $ P4. lSq.Ft x$ $ Sq.Ft. x L __Tptal New Valuation t :ffd-- 11 s P.W. U Additional Fees: Additional Planning Dept. $ New Setbacks: Front / Additional Plan Review $ Rear / Additional Building Permit $ Sidel. I Side2 / Additional Plumbing $ Additional Conditions/Comments: Additional Mechanical $ Additional E.H.Dept. Other $ Total Amount Due: $ Amount To Be Paid Up-Front$ jai LiWI Revised SRG aR7/2007 N„ N N, APPROVED MASON COUNTY DCD PLA,vMNG 3 SITE PLAN REQ(.;I ::_J TO BE 3 CHANGES SUBJECT TO ON E n .BY -- ----- Date • -�_ 01 EXISTING FIRE BOOSTER ` Q""" BUILDING. 69' - S i nr m N; v� \ c 0 O m Q� EXISTING 40,000 GALLON c 40 WATER TANK. CD ;N \ \ \ O ORIGINAL LOCATION OF ~' PUMPHOUSE 45V-7 1X TO SOUTH WEST EXISTING FENCE TO REMAIN. PROPERTY LINE. CUT AND RECONNECT AT CORNERS OF REVISED PUMPHOUSE LOCATION. HOOD CANAL K-S SCHOOL 1 ASI 14 REVISED PUMPHOUSE LOCATION SCALE=1/1 6=V-al REFERENCE A1.01 AND C6.00 C/�4`T•T REVISED:January 12,2007 J~ O�I 110 STAP ti0 OoFR/Y �J o Q�� w= (1/18/2007) Charell Holcomb- FW: Revised location of pump house for Hood Canal School Page 1 From: "Ray Mow" <ray@ericksonmcgovern.com> To: <CMH@co.mason.wa.us> Date: 1/18/2007 10:54 AM Subject: FW: Revised location of pump house for Hood Canal School Attachments: Hood Canal REV Pump House 1-12-07.pdf CC: <Galcoenggary@com cast.net> Charell, Attached is the revised pump house location drawing that includes a dimension off of the properly. (76'-4").The scale of the document is 1/16"=V-0". Let me know if more is needed. Thank you, Raymond Mow, AIA Associate Erickson McGovern PLLC Ray@EricksonMcGovern.com Phone 253 531 0206 Fax 253 531 9197 Cell 253 208 3235 -----Original Message----- From: Cindy Butterworth Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 12:05 PM To: Stan Zielinski Cc: Ray Mow Subject: FW: Revised location of pump house for Hood Canal School -----Original Message----- From: Charell Holcomb [mailto:CMH@co.mason.wa.us] Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 11:26 AM To: Cindy Butterworth Cc: Tammi Clark; galcoenggary@comcast.net Subject: Revised location of pump house for Hood Canal School Cindy: Thank you for submitting the new revised location for the pump house referenced above. Please submit a site plan that shows the dimensions from the property lines. We are unable to determine what the setbacks are or if the scale suggested is even accurate since there are no measurements to check against. Any further questions, please do not hesitate to let me know. Charell Holcomb Permit Technician II - Lead Phone: (360)427-9670, Extension 616 (1/18/2007) Charell Holcomb - FW: Revised location of pump house for Hood Canal School Page 2 Email: cmh@co.mason.wa.us Mailing address: Mason County Permit Assistance Center P.O. Box 186 Shelton, WA 98584 Inspection Line: (360)427-7262 Inspection email: pib@co.mason.wa.us FORM MUST BE COMPLETED IN INK MASON COUNTY PERMIT NO III_) PLEASE PRESS HARD BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION 426 W. Cedar• P.O. Box 186, Shelton, WA 98584 Shelton (360) 427-9670 • Belfair (360) 275-4467 • Elma (360) 482-5269 � On the web www.co.mason.wa.us APPLIC NT INFORMATION CONTRACTOR INFORMATIO14 Owner U J Company Name )c"Te'em I Mailing Address Mailing Address �� citySHeLT11N State Zip Code City State Zip Code Phonel�h��_77-97f1d Other Ph. Phone Other Ph. Lien/Title Holder t3 C- Contractor Reg.# Exp. E mail address E Mail Address Drivers Lic. DOB A Drivers Lic.# DOB SEPTIC /WATER SYSTEM INFORMATION - Connect to New Septic Existin Septic Connect to Water System Name of Water System --ASS 7_ M n 3�9 Well Sewer System Name of Sewer System PARCEL INFORMATION - 12 Digit Parcel No. Fire District - Legal Description SE?P f-�-T AEAA eh Site Address(Please include street name, street numb and city Directions to site i tJ��{� Z rkJ r') U 1 b Will timber be cut and sold in parcel preparation?Yes/ Is property within 200'of Saltwater _U0 Lake 1�,,j Q River/Creek N Q Pond N D Wetlan Seasonal Runoff N Q Stream_L10 _Slopes or Bluff 15% Is this permit submittal the result of a Stop Work Notice,Correction Notice or other enforcement action?Yes/No TYPE OF JOB- New Add Alt Repair Other _ R RIMARY SIDE CE SEASONAJ ❑ Use of Building / escrbe Work ✓� No. of Bed oom No. of Bathroom-, Square_��age—�f oo EzL S^ 2nd Floor—, 3rd Floor Basement Deck Covered Deck O her Sq. ft. Garage Attached Detached Carport Attached Detached MANUFACTURED HOME INFORMATION - Make N, / 7_ Model Year Length Width Serial No. —�� No. of Bedrooms No. of Bathrooms Type of Heat Purchase Price$ Replacement Unit? Yes/No Installer Name Certification No. OWNER/BUILDER Acknowledges submission of inaccurate information may result in a stop work order or permit revocation. Acknowledgement of such is by signature below. I declare that I am the owner,owners legal representative,or the contractor. I further declare that I am entitled to receive this permit and to do the work as proposed in the application. I declare that I have obtained the permission from all the necessary parties. If permission is required from any easement holder or any other party in interest regarding this application or the work proposed in the application, I have obtained permission from them to apply for this permit and conduct the work proposed. The owner or agent on owners behalf, represents that the information provided is accurate and grants employees of Mason County access to the above described property and structure for review and inspection.This permit/application becomes null &void if work or authorized construction is not comment d within 180 days or if construction work is suspended for a period of 180 days.PROOF OF CONTINUATION OF WORK IS BY MEANS RTI- ESS INSPECTION.INACTI OFTHIS PERMITAPPUCATION OF 180 DAYS WILL INVALIDATE THE APPLICATION. X � Date: ? / Owner/ ners Representativ Contractor (indicate which one) FOR OFFICIAL USE BEYOND THIS POINT Accepted by: Date DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW APPROVED DENIED NOTES Building Department no Planning Department SPsz_ � Pzzfe u Environmental Health Department Fire Marshal FEES Building Permit Fee O Site Ins ection e Plan Review Fee .D/ EH Review Fee Plumbing & Base Fee Planninq Review Fee Mechanical & Base fee Other SU Wood/Gas/ Pellet Stove Fee State Fee — Violation Fee Pre-Paid at Submittal Valuation $ 3�Lf X .33.D TOTAL FEES v h MASON COUNTY DEPARTMENT O COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 426 West Cedar Street ♦ PO Box 186 ♦ Shelton, WA 98584 V (360)427-9670 EXT. 352 FAX (360) 427-7798 HOME PAGE— oa,trjason'uC�.us Special Inspection Authorization O n p C/)_r ,��- C OM)Off-o r03 2,006 —000 32 Project Owner 0-OA- <'Mk ET Building Permit Number 0D6-- O ra n �3 Project Address Engineer/Architect of record r alGg,�c Yo 3 V►� �G'�v�� �-�c�!�`c-e�-s In addition to the inspections required by Internationaly Building Code (IBC) Section 109, the owner or the engineer or architect of record acting as the owner's agent shall employ one or more special inspectors who shall provide special inspections during construction on the types of work listed under IBC Section 1704. This form must be completed by the owner or the engineer or architect of record, prior to permit issuance, indicating who will perform the required special inspections for this particular project. The specified special inspector(s) shall perform the required special inspections during construction of the project, submit all inspection reports to the Building Department and provide a final signed report stating whether the work requiring special inspection was, to the best of the inspector's knowledge, in conformance to the approved plans and specifications and the applicable workmanship provisions of the IBC. The following checked items require special inspection: A1. Concrete. During the taking of test specimens and placing of reinforced concrete. (IBC 1704.4) 'PC 2. Bolts installed in concrete. Prior to and during the placement of concrete around bolts when stress increases permitted by Table 1912.2 and section 1912.5 are utilized. (IBC 1704.4) ❑ 3. Erection of precast concrete members. Periodic inspection per ACI 318: Ch 16. (IBC 1704.4) ❑ 4. Shotcrete. Continuous inspection per ACI 318: 5.9, 5.10 and IBC Chapter 19. (IBC 1704.4) Xk. Reinforcing steel and prestressing steel tendons. Inspection of reinforcing steel including prestressing tendons. (IBC 1704.4) K6. Welding of reinforcing steel. Inspection of the welding of reinforcing steel according to AWS DII A, ACI 318: 3.5.2, and IBC 1903.5.2. (IBC 1704.4) Structural welding. Welding inspection shall be in compliance with AWS D1.1. (IBC 1704.3.1) _Cela. High-strength Bolting. The installation of high-strength bolts shall be periodically inspected in accordance with AISC LRFD Section M2.5. (IBC 1704.3.3) Ll 9. Structural Masonry. Masonry construction shall be inspected and evaluated with the requirements of IBC section 1704.5. )(10. Soils. Inspections for fills 12 inches or greater to be performed in accordance with IBC Section 1704.7. ❑ 11. Pile foundations. Inspector to be present when pile foundations are being installed and during tests. (IBC 1704.8) ❑ 12. Pier foundations. Special inspection of pier foundations for buildings are required in seismic Zone D. (IBC 1704.9) Spray-applied fire resistant materials. Inspections shall be in accordance with sections 1704.11.1 )1113_ through 1704.11.5. ❑ 14. Exterior insulation finish system (EIFS). Special inspection shall be required for all EIFS systems. (IBC 1704.12) Continued on reverse side tr �(_15. Smoke-control system. Smoke control systems shall be tested by a special inspector per IBC Section 1704.14. 11 16. Special cases. Special inspection shall be required for proposed work that is, in the option of the building official, unusual in its nature such as alternative methods and material of construction, unusual design applications, and materials and systems required to be installed in accordance with additional manufacturer's instructions that prescribe requirements not contained in the IBC or referenced standards. Installation of structural epoxies ❑ Installation of"high-load shear panels" Structural Observation (IBC1709) ❑Other: Special Inspector Selection: The special inspection agency and special inspector shall be registered by the Washington Association of Building Officials (WABO) for the particular type of construction or operation requiring special inspection. Such inspector(s) shall be selected by the owner or the owner's agent and approved by the Building Official prior to issuance of the building permit. The owner's agent shall not be acting as, or employed by the special inspection agency or the contractor for this project. Name of Special Inspector or Agency: Type of Inspection: Reir�ti Tee: vN a ;Al►! c� �Tewls �JJ LL�f ��ff ('qe0rec lira,[, res" ALL Sot.t_s w o YNZ-- U& WnVI<- Authorization: I hereby state that I am the legal owner of the project property, or that I am the legal owner's agent who is not employed by a special inspection agency or contractor associated with this project. In addition, I agree to comply with the special inspection requirements established by Chapter 17 of the International Building Code as r(14-by ason County. Cp pta_�A. LAt s Rik- 11_W 2,90 Signature Printed t4ame ❑Owner Agent Date PURPOSE OF SPECIAL INSPECTION Special inspection is the monitoring of materials and workmanship which are critical to the integrity of the building structure to assure that the approved plans and specifications are being followed and that relevant codes are being observed. Special inspections are in addition to those conducted by the county building inspector and by the engineer or architect of record. Special inspectors furnish inspection at all times that their presence is required by the code, the plans and specifications, and the enforcing jurisdiction. Good communication between the special inspector and the designer, contractor, and building department is essential. DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR: Special inspectors are individuals with highly developed, specialized skills who observe those critical building or structural features which they are qualified to inspect. Duties of special inspectors and/or inspection agencies include the following: 1. General Requirements Special inspectors shall review approved plans and specifications for special inspection requirements. Special inspectors shall comply with the special inspection requirements of the enforcing jurisdiction. 2. Signify Presence at Job Site Special inspectors should notify contractor personnel and the enforcing jurisdiction of their presence and responsibilities at the job site. 3. Observe All Work for Which They Are Responsible Special inspectors shall inspect all work and perform or observe all tests requiring inspection and testing for conformance with the building-department-approved (stamped)drawings, specifications and applicable provisions of the code. } 4. Notification of Discrepancies Special inspectors shall bring all nonconforming items to the immediate attention of the contractor. If any such item is not resolved in a timely manner or is about to be incorporated in the work, the engineer or architect of record and the building official should be notified immediately by telephone or in person, and the item noted in the special inspector's written report. The special inspector shall write a separate report to be posted at the job site regarding noted discrepancies which should contain, as a minimum, the following information about each nonconforming item: • Description and exact location, • Reference to applicable detail of approved plans/specifications, • Name and title of each individual notified and method of notification, and • Resolution or corrective action. 5. Reports A. Inspection reports The special inspector should complete written inspection reports for each inspection visit and provide the reports on a timely basis determined by the building official. The special inspector or inspection agency shall furnish these reports directly to the building official, engineer or architect of record, and others as designated. These reports should be organized on a daily format and may be submitted weekly at the option of the building official. In these reports, special inspectors should: • Describe inspections and tests made with applicable locations; • List all nonconforming items; • Indicate how nonconforming items were resolved; • List unresolved items, parties notified, and time and method of notification; and • Itemize changes authorized by the architect/engineer of record and approved by the building department, if not included in the nonconformance items. B. Final reports Special inspectors or inspection agencies shall submit a final, signed report to the building department stating that all items requiring special inspection and testing were fulfilled and reported and, to the best of their knowledge, in conformance with the approved design drawings, specifications, approved change orders and the applicable provisions of the code. Items not in conformance, unresolved items or any discrepancies in inspection coverage (i.e., missed inspections, periodic inspections when continuous was required, etc.) should be specifically itemized in this report. DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE CONTRACTOR: The contractor's duties include responsibility for notifying the special inspector or agency regarding individual inspections required by the Building Department, or required by the International Building Code, Chapter 17. Adequate notice shall be provided so that the special inspector shall have appropriate access to the approved plans at the job site prior to the required inspection. The contractor shall not perform any work that requires special inspection without the special inspector present. Completion of this form, and the performance of special inspections does not relieve the contractor's responsibility to schedule required inspections by the Mason County Building Department prior to concealing any work. DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE ENGINEER OR ARCHITECT OF RECORD: The engineer or architect of record is responsible for identifying which special inspections are necessary, developing a schedule of required special inspections, and assisting the owner in the selection of the special inspector. The engineer or architect or record shall review the special inspection reports to determine that all required special inspections have been performed and that all discrepancies (if any) have been resolved. DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE PROJECT OWNER: The project owner, or the engineer or architect of record acting as the owner's agent, is responsible for the funding of all required special inspection activities in accordance with International Building Code Section 1704. GAL(o Engineering rO January 13, 2006 /�a RC ,, �! 4118 Kyro Road S.E. Debbera Coker r ,+ 0ly"ie,WA 98503 Mason County Dept. of Community Development Phone:(360)491-759) P.O. Box 186 Cell:(360)789-1865 Shelton, WA 98584 fox:P60)456-3802 Re: Hood Canal School District#404 New K-8 Additions and Modernization Project No. 2005-00011. Dear Debbera, Please find enclosed a plan review package for Hood Canal School District's new K-8 school facility. I have included the following documents for the permit and plan review process. • 1- Building permit application. • 1- Plumbing/Mechanical permit application. • Legal description of property parcels owned by school district. • 1- Set of completed Washington State energy code compliance forms. • 1- Set of structural calculations. • in the amount of$13,728.69 for plan review fees. • 4- Sets of A/E project plans. • 4- Sets volumes 1 &2 of project manual specifications (soil and draft storm drainage reports are included in volume 1). The above A/E plans and specifications are approximately 98% complete with the following exceptions and noted comments. • The large on site sewage disposal system is design if being designed and coordinated with Cindy Waite and Warner Engineering will be submitted separately for plan review and approval. • The entire school will have a full fire sprinkler system We have been coordinating fire flow and storage requirements with State Fire Marshal Lance Talley and Craig Haugen. A back-up emergency generator is proposed for existing fire pumps. • The frontage setbacks to Hwy106 are approximately 26 feet. • Bracy&Thomas surveyors will be submitting application for a lot consolidation of three property parcels owned by HCSD. Currently no proposed building cross-existing property lines. • Currently, we are working with DOT for the site access driveways along SR 106. Our contact Engineer is Alana Hess. (360) 357-2725 a r Page 3 We again thank Mason County Staff for continued support of this exciting project for HCSD students, staff and community. Sincerely, Gary A. Larson, P.E. cc: Ron Zier, Hood Canal School District Stan Zielinski, Erickson McGovern GAL/sal (11/30/2006) Phyllis Burnison- nov2921fld.email.doc Page 1 Northwest Testing Company, Inc. CONSTRUCTION TESTING and INSPECTION ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTATION and ASSESSMENT FIELD INSPECTION REPORT CLIENT:Hood Canal School District DATE:November 29,2006 PROJECT:Hood Canal K-8 School REPORT NO:21 CONTRACTOR:Jones&Roberts Construction PROJECT NUMBER: 0602.3 PERMIT NUMBER:COM 2006-00003 INSPECTOR:Mark Robinson Inspector Mark Robinson on site 10:00 am, for inspection of interior and exterior wall sheathing nailing. Overcast,34 degrees. Today's area of inspection includes exterior wall sheathing nailing at the following areas: First Floor Exterior Walls: grid lines A5.5 (13.8-139.5),B9.5 (A5.5-A5.7). First and Second Floor Exterior Walls: grid lines E.2 (Al 6-Al7), diagonal wall between A16- A17, B2 (A10-A14), A4 (139.3-1310),B9.3 (A4-A5.5), second floor wall at line E2 (A16-A17), DI (Cl-C6). Exterior Kitchen Walls:grid lines Al2(1313-1314),B14(Al2-A13.5),A13.5 (1313.8-1314). First Floor Interior Walls: grid lines E1 (A13-A15),B7(A7-A13),B8(A3-A5),A5(138-1310). Second Floor Interior Walls: grid lines 1310 (A3-A5), A5.5 (138-139.3, west side only), A5 (138- B9.3). Second Floor Mezzanine Walls: grid lines E1 (AA13-A15.5),B7(A7-A13),C5(131-135). All areas approved after the corrections are completed at the following locations: *Nailing across top of exterior sheathing at diagonal wall A14-A16 and B2(A10-A14). *Nail top of interior sheathing at B7(A7-A13) *Nail panel edge,2'floor exterior sheathing at grid line B9.3 (A4). Completed and approved areas are marked in the field with a green check mark. 311/30/2006) Phyllis Burnison -nov2921fid.email.doc Page 2271 NORTHWEST TESTING COMPANY,INC. Mark Robinson Mark Robinson Licensed Professional Geologist Registered Site Assessor ACl/1CC Certified Concrete Technician cc: Gary Larson,Ron Zier,Ray Mow,Eric Bailey,Bob Roberts, Steve Brannon,Phyllis Burnison I PO BOX 11581 OLYMPIA,WASHINGTON 98508-1581 PHONE or FAX (360)866-3647 (12/4/2006)Phyllis Burnison -nov2922fld.email.doc Page 1 1 Northwest Testing Company, Inc. CONSTRUCTION TESTING and INSPECTION ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTATION and ASSESSMENT FIELD INSPECTION REPORT CLIENT: Hood Canal School District DATE:November 29,2006 PROJECT:Hood Canal K-8 School REPORT NO:22 CONTRACTOR: Jones&Roberts Construction PROJECT NUMBER: 0602.3 PERMIT NUMBER: COM 2006-00003 INSPECTOR:Dennis Smith I arrived at Al's welding to perform visual welding inspection. Inspection performed as follows: I inspected the two stairs marked MK34A. The welds are placed in accordance with approved j shop drawings section A-A, D-35. The welds are visually acceptable as per AWSD1.1-06. Welding performed by WABO certified welder using Triple 7,E71T-8 electrode, FCAW process. NORTHWEST TESTING COMPANY,INC. Dennis Smith Dennis Smith WABO Certified Welding Inspector cc: Gary Larson,Ron Zier,Ray Mow,Eric Bailey,Bob Roberts, Steve Brannon,Phyllis Bumison PO BOX 11581 OLYMPIA,WASHINGTON 98508-1581 PHONE or FAX (360)866-3647 (10/23/2006) Phyllis Burnison - oct2318fld.email.doc Page 1 Northwest Testing Company, Inc. CONSTRUCTION TESTING and INSPECTION ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTATION and ASSESSMENT FIELD INSPECTION REPORT CLIENT:Hood Canal School District DATE: October 23,2006 PROJECT:Hood Canal K-8 School REPORT NO: 18 CONTRACTOR:Jones&Roberts Construction PROJECT NUMBER: 0602.3 PERMIT NUMBER:COM 2006-00003 INSPECTOR: Mark Robinson Inspector Mark Robinson on site 10:00 am, for inspection of shear wall nailing. Overcast, 51 degrees. Today's areas of inspection include the shearwall and floor diaphragm nailing for the west classroom wing mechanical mezzanine. Inspector reviews plan notes on sheet S3.40, S2.90, detail S7.01,and shear wall and floor diaphragm nailing schedule.Two items are noted: 1) The edge nailing on the wall sheathing is not in place per detail S7.01 on the south mezzanine wall. 2) Strap placement needs to be completed on the header to sheathing connection east of grid line A- 3 (the contractor is aware of this already,strap placement is ongoing). Nailing on floor decking and shear wall approved after some minor corrections. Also approved is grid line B-8 exterior wall louver seismic strap placement per detail C/S5.02. NORTHWEST TESTING COMPANY,INC. Mark Robinson Mark Robinson Licensed Professional Geologist Registered Site Assessor ACl/ICC Certified Concrete Technician cc:Gary Larson,Ron Zier,Ray Mow,Eric Bailey,Bob Roberts, Steve Brannon,Phyllis Burnison PO BOX 11581 OLYMPIA,WASHINGTON 98508-1581 PHONE or FAX (360)866-3647 (11/15/2006) Phyllis Burnison -nov1420fld.email.doc Page 1 Northwest Testing Company, Inc. CONSTRUCTION TESTING and INSPECTION ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTATION and ASSESSMENT FIELD INSPECTION REPORT CLIENT:Hood Canal School District DATE:November 14,2006 PROJECT:Hood Canal K-8 School REPORT NO:20 CONTRACTOR:Jones&Roberts Construction PROJECT NUMBER:0602.3 PERMIT NUMBER:COM 2006-00003 INSPECTOR:Mark Robinson Inspector Mark Robinson on site 8:20 am, for inspection of exterior wall sheathing and floor and roof diaphragm nailing.Overcast,46 degrees. Today's area of inspection includes exterior wall sheathing nailing, floor sheathing, and roof sheathing. West Classroom Exterior Walls: Second story exterior sheathing nailing is checked at grid lines Al (134-137),A2 (137-13 11),1311 (A2-A3),A3 (B 10-B 11),and 1310(A3-A5).All areas approved per referenced notes on sheet S2.60 except wall line 1310 (A2-A3). This area still requires one line of nailing and the installation of 16d nails per detail 8/S6.01. Exterior Walls D1-D5 (Cl-C6): Second story exterior sheathing nailing is checked at grid lines C2 (DI-D3), C1 (D3-D5), D5 (CI-C6), C6 (DI-D5), and first story exterior sheathing at grid line D1 (C2-C6). All areas approved per referenced notes on sheet S2.50 except wall line C2 (D1-D3). This area also still requires the 16d nails per detail 8/S6.01. Second Floor Diaphragm:Nailing and seismic details on sheet S2.50 reviewed. General edge and field nailing is approved at grid lines D1-D5 (C1-C6). Straps in place per 7/S6.01. Contractor has to complete blocking nailing per details 5&6/S6.02 at interior shear walls grid line D3 (C1-C6). This is completed prior to inspector leaving the site.Exterior blocking and nailing in place per l/S6.02. Roof Diaphragm C3-05 (DI-D5): Note: at this time the majority of this roof area has been covered with the vapor barrier so the nailing cannot be observed. Inspector does locate the bumps indicating the seismic straps per details 11/S7.01 and 8/S7.04). End nailing still visible and approved at area D4-D5(C1-C4). (11/15/2006) Phyllis Burnison - nov1420fld.email.doc Page 2 NORTHWEST TESTING COMPANY,INC. Mark Robinson Mark Robinson Licensed Professional Geologist Registered Site Assessor ACl/ICC Certified Concrete Technician cc:Gary Larson,Ron Zier,Ray Mow,Eric Bailey,Bob Roberts, Steve Brannon,Phyllis Burnison PO BOX 11581 OLYMPIA,WASHINGTON 98508-1581 PHONE or FAX (360)866-3647 (10/11/2006) Phyllis Burn ison - oct1016fld.email.doc Page 1 Northwest Testing Company, Inc. CONSTRUCTION TESTING and INSPECTION ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTATION and ASSESSMENT FIELD INSPECTION REPORT CLIENT:Hood Canal School District DATE: October 10,2006 PROJECT:Hood Canal K-8 School REPORT NO: 16 CONTRACTOR:Jones&Roberts Construction PROJECT NUMBER: 0602.3 PERMIT NUMBER:COM 2006-00003 INSPECTOR:Mark Robinson Inspector Mark Robinson arrives on site, 7:45 am, for inspection of concrete placement. Sunny, 57 degrees. Contractor places concrete for the second floor topping slab for the west classroom wing. Slab depth 1.5" uniform grade. Reinforcing with fiber mesh. Concrete placed directly onto plywood decking,no callout for plastic sheeting.Upon arrival, inspector begins review of second floor notes on sheet S2.50 and nailing and strapping details on S6.02 and notes the following: 1) Blocking per 1/S6.02 is not in along grid lines Al/A2. This is installed with the floor sheathing nailed into blocking ahead of concrete placement,but the clips are not available. 2) Blocking not in place line A2.9 (B4-B7). By the time this is noticed,the concrete topping slab has been poured at this location. 3) Blocking is in place along grid line A3 (B8-B11)but the sheathing nailing into blocking has not been done.This is corrected ahead of concrete placement. Concrete is placed by pump at a 5.0" maximum slump. Two sets of compressive strength test specimens are made on the total placement of approximately 40 yards (inspector had a late notification of this placement and could not stay for the entire pour). Cylinders are stored in the field away from the work area for later pickup. NORTHWEST TESTING COMPANY,INC. Mark Robinson Mark Robinson Licensed Professional Geologist Registered Site Assessor ACl/ICC Certified Concrete Technician cc:Gary Larson,Ron Zier,Ray Mow,Eric Bailey,Bob Roberts, Steve Brannon,Phyllis Burnison PO BOX 11581 OLYMPIA,WASHINGTON 98508-1581 PtiONE or FAX (360)866-3647 (11/13/2006) Phyllis Burnison -nov0819fld.email.doc Page 1 Northwest Testing Company, Inc. CONSTRUCTION TESTING and INSPECTION ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTATION and ASSESSMENT FIELD INSPECTION REPORT CLIENT:Hood Canal School District DATE:November 08,2006 PROJECT:Hood Canal K-8 School REPORT NO: 19 CONTRACTOR:Jones&Roberts Construction PROJECT NUMBER: 0602.3 PERMIT NUMBER:COM 2006-00003 INSPECTOR:Mark Robinson Inspector Mark Robinson on site 11:45 am, for inspection of exterior wall sheathing and roof diaphragm nailing. Sunny,48 degrees. Today's areas of inspection include roof diaphragm nailing, interior shear walls nailing in the west classroom wing,and sheathing for the second story exterior walls for the west classroom building Exterior Wall Sheathing: Inspector reviews general structural notes on sheet S1.02 and the structural nailing and shear wall details 2&4/S5.01, and notes and referenced details on sheet S2.60. Typical notes call for exterior grade Y2" sheathing (OSB used)nailed with 10d @ 6" on center for all supported panel edges and 12"on center in the field. Specific shearwall schedule nailing is called out by detail 2/S5.01. Sheathing is checked on the exterior walls at the second floor, grid lines B4 (A2.4-A5) and A5 (134- B7),and first and second floor exterior walls at grid line B7 (A5-A5.5).Upon initial nailing review, inspector notes that the seismic nail "stitching"around the building at the transition of the first and second floor per details 6/S6.01, 8/S6.01, and 2/S5.04 is not in place or only partially in place. Corrections are initiated and completed at the above referenced grid lines. The balance of the exterior wall nailing will be checked Friday after completion of this nailing. Field and edge nailing and seismic strapping are approved in the referenced areas, and approved walls are marked in the field with red checks. Interior Wall Sheathing: Interior corridor and shear wall nailing in the west classroom building is approved at 2'floor grid lines B8 (A2-A3), A2.9 (B4-137), and A3 (B8-B11). Seismic straps in the corridor floor in place. Also approve V floor nailing at corridor wall B8 (A2-A3),A2.9 (B4.5-B7-west side only, east side sheathing not yet in place), and A3 (138-B11, both sides). Some areas are marked for missing nailing in these areas. In addition, HVAC ductwork is already in place and prevents visual inspection in some areas along the lateral walls. `(11/13/2006) Phyllis Burnison - nov0819fld.email.doc Page 2 Roof Diaphragm: Inspector reviews roof framing notes on sheet S3.30,and partial roof framing plans on sheets S3.10 and S3.30. Typical notes call for 5/8" T&G plywood nailed with 10d at 6" on center field for all supported panel edges and 10"on center in the field. Area A7-A16 (112-117): Approved for cover after missing boundary nailing is completed along the east end and two field locations corrected. Area Cl-C3 (Dl-D5)and C5-C7(D1-D5): These areas are approved for the most part. Diaphragm placement at area C1-C3 is approximately 98%completed. One notable exception is that the second floor shear wall at grid line D3 has not been constructed yet. This shear wall ties into the roof diaphragm per detail 6/S7.06.Boundary and edge/field nailing per requirements. Contractor is notified of results of the field inspections. NORTHWEST TESTING COMPANY,INC. Mark Robinson Mark Robinson Licensed Professional Geologist Registered Site Assessor ACl/ICC Certified Concrete Technician cc: Gary Larson,Ron Zier,Ray Mow,Eric Bailey,Bob Roberts, Steve Brannon,Phyllis Bumison PO BOX 11581 OLYMPIA,WASHINGTON 98508-1581 PHONE or FAX (360)866-3647 (12/4/2006) Phyllis Burnison -dec0423fld.email.doc Page 1 Northwest Testing Company, Inc. CONSTRUCTION TESTING and INSPECTION ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTATION and ASSESSMENT FIELD INSPECTION REPORT CLIENT:Hood Canal School District DATE:December 04,2006 PROJECT:Hood Canal K-8 School REPORT NO:23 CONTRACTOR:Jones&Roberts Construction PROJECT NUMBER: 0602.3 PERMIT NUMBER:COM 2006-00003 INSPECTOR:Mark Robinson Inspector Mark Robinson on site 10:45 am, for inspection of roof diaphragm and interior wall sheathing nailing. Light rain,46 degrees. Today's area of inspection includes roof diaphragm nailing at roof areas A-5.5 (B9.3-B11); and Al2—A15 (B12-B14). All roof areas approved after completion of edge nailing at roofline B.3-B9 and stitching the over-framing cricket edge along the lower edge of the cricket transition. Also approved is the first floor interior corridor shear wall at grid line C4(D1-D5). NORTHWEST TESTING COMPANY,INC. Mark Robinson Mark Robinson Licensed Professional Geologist Registered Site Assessor ACl/ICC Certified Concrete Technician cc:Gary Larson,Ron Zier,Ray Mow,Eric Bailey,Bob Roberts, Steve Brannon,Phyllis Bumison PO BOX 11581 OLYMPIA,WASHINGTON 98508-1581 PHONE or FAX (360)866-3647 Northwest Testing Company, Inc. CONSTRUCTION TESTING AND INSPECTION ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTATION AND ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATE OF COMPLUNCE PROJECT NAME: Hood Canal K-8 School PROJECT ADDRESS: 111 N. State Route 106, Shelton, Washington BUILDING PERMIT NO: COM 2006-00003 JOB NO: 0602.3 ARCHITECT: Erickson and McGovern ENGINEER: PCSA Engineers CONTRACTOR: Jones and Roberts TYPE of INSPECTION PERFORMED: Soil compaction testing, reinforcing placement, reinforced concrete, structural welding, diaphragm and shearwall nailing. STATEMENT of CERTIFICATION: Except as noted below in "Outstanding Issues", the soil compaction, placement of reinforcing and reinforced concrete, structural welded connections, and nailing of both shearwall and roof diaphragm for the above referenced project have been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications, per the manufacturers recommendations, and in accordance with the applicable provisions of the 2003 International Building Code. Outstanding Issues.No outstanding issues. NORTHWEST TESTING COMPANY,INC. Wa jhs�i Mark Robinson ��` f0 Licensed Professional Geologist Registered Site Assessor ACl/ICC Certified Concrete Technician 1188 CO c�O�Sod Geo\off Mark R. Robinson P.O.BOX 1 1581 •OLYMPIA,WASHINGTON 98508-1 58 1 • PHONE or FAX 360/866-3647• EMAIL:norwestest@comcast.net (1/3/2007) Phyllis Burnison -dec2726fld.email.doc Northwest Testing Company, Inc. CONSTRUCTION TESTING and INSPECTION ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTATIONand ASSESSMENT FIELD INSPECTION REPORT CLIENT:Hood Canal School District DATE: December 27,2006 PROJECT:Hood Canal K-8 School REPORT NO:26 CONTRACTOR:Jones&Roberts Construction PROJECT NUMBER: 0602.3 PERMIT NUMBER:COM 2006-00003 INSPECTOR:Mark Robinson Inspector Mark Robinson on site 9:35 am, for inspection of roof diaphragm nailing. Partly cloudy, 44 degrees. Roof diaphragm nailing is inspected between grid lines A14-A19 (315-B17). Inspector reviews notes and referenced details on sheet S3.20. All field and boundary nailing in place, straps in place per details. Very minor additional nailing at two locations required and completed. All areas are approved for cover. NORTHWEST TESTING COMPANY,INC. Mark Robinson Mark Robinson Licensed Professional Geologist Registered Site Assessor ACl/ICC Certified Concrete Technician cc: Gary Larson,Ron Zier,Ray Mow,Eric Bailey,Bob Roberts, Steve Brannon,Phyllis Burnison PO BOX 11581 OLYMPIA,WASHINGTON 98508-1581 PHONE or FAX (360)866-3647 /9/2007)Phyllis Burnison -jan0828fld.email.doc Page Northwest Testing Company, Inc. CONSTRUCTION TESTING and INSPECTION ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTATION and ASSESSMENT FIELD INSPECTION REPORT CLIENT:Hood Canal School District DATE:January 08,2007 PROJECT: Hood Canal K-8 School REPORT NO:28 CONTRACTOR: Jones&Roberts Construction PROJECT NUMBER: 0602.3 PERMIT NUMBEBWM 2006-00003 - INSPECTOR:Mark Robinson Inspector Mark Robinson on site 12:40 pm, for inspection of exterior wall nailing and roof diaphragm nailing.Light rain,44 degrees. Walls:Exterior shearwall nailing is inspected on the commons area at grid lines B7(A7-A14),A14 (B7-B11), and B11 (A7-A14). Also checked is nailing on exterior short exposed portion of the mezzanine at C1 (D1-D6).All walls are type A. Straps at upper side of windows in place.Field and edge nailing approved after some minor corrections for missing or wide spacing. Review wall framing notes and roofing notes. Roof: New roof area (over-roofing) over the former Music Room is 95% complete at time of inspection. Field and boundary nailing are approved. Straps in place per details 3/S7.04 and 11/S7.01.Roof area approved for cover after minor convections for missing or spaced nailing. NORTHWEST TESTING COMPANY,INC. Mark Robinson Mark Robinson Licensed Professional Geologist Registered Site Assessor ACUMCC Certified Concrete Technician cc:Gary Larson,Ron Zier,Ray Mow,Eric Bailey,Bob Roberts, Steve Brannon, Phyllis Bumison PO BOX 11581 OLYMPIA,WASHINGTON 98508-1581 PHONE or FAX (360)866-3647 (12/21/2006) Phyllis Burnison - dec1425fld.email.doc Page 1 j Northwest Testing Company, Inc. CONSTRUCTION TESTING and INSPECTION ENVIRONMENTAL CONSUL TATIONand ASSESSMENT FIELD INSPECTION REPORT CLIENT:Hood Canal School District DATE:December 14,2006 PROJECT:Hood Canal K-8 School REPORT NO:25 CONTRACTOR:Jones&Roberts Construction PROJECT NUMBER: 0602.3 PERMIT NUMBER:COM 2006-00003 INSPECTOR:Mark Robinson hispector Mark Robinson on site 11:10 am, for inspection of roof diaphragm and interior wall sheathing nailing.Rain,44 degrees. Today's area of inspection includes floor diaphragm nailing at the second level, grid lines B7-B8 (A5-A6) corridor and the room south of line B8 (A5-A5.5), lines D1-B8 A5-A5.7), and the stairwell middle landing. Inspector notes the straps called out in detail 9/S6.01 are not in place at grid lines B8(A5-A5.5)and C3 (Dl-B9). Contractor is notified and will correct as necessary. Slab placement scheduled for Monday. All other areas approved after completion of miscellaneous additional boundary and field patch nailing as necessary. NORTHWEST TESTING COMPANY,INC. Mark Robinson Mark Robinson Licensed Professional Geologist Registered Site Assessor ACl/1CC Certified Concrete Technician cc:Gary Larson,Ron Zier,Ray Mow,Eric Bailey,Bob Roberts,Steve Brannon,Phyllis Burnison PO BOX 11581 OLYMPIA,WASHINGTON 98508-1581 PHONE or FAX (360)866-3647 (12/13/2006) Phyllis Burnison - dec1224f1d.email.doc Page 1 Northwest Testing company, Inc. CONSTRUCTION TESTING and INSPECTION ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTATION and ASSESSMENT FIELD INSPECTION REPORT CLIENT:Hood Canal School District DATE:December 12,2006 PROJECT:Hood Canal K-8 School REPORT NO:24 CONTRACTOR:Jones&Roberts Construction PROJECT NUMBER: 0602.3 PERMIT NUMBER: COM 2006-00003 INSPECTOR:Mark Robinson Inspector Mark Robinson on site 12:55 pm, for inspection of exterior and interior shear wall sheathing nailing.Overcast,showers,45 degrees. Exterior walls, first and second floor, grid lines 136-117 (A5.5-A7), A7 (114-B6). All areas approved after miscellaneous patch nailing and completion of double line of lower nails per detail 8/S6.01 along grid line B7(A5.5-A6). Second floor interior shear walls, grid lines D2/D3 (Cl-C6). All areas approved after miscellaneous patch nailing. All approved areas are marked in the field with check marks. NORTHWEST TESTING COMPANY,INC. Mark Robinson Mark Robinson Licensed Professional Geologist Registered Site Assessor ACMCC Certified Concrete Technician cc:Gary Larson,Ron Zier,Ray Mow,Eric Bailey,Bob Roberts,Steve Brannon,Phyllis Burnison PO BOX 11581 OLYM PIA,WASHINGTON 98508-1581 PHONE or FAX (360)866-3647 Page 1 of 2 Debbera Coker - Re: Hood Canal K-8 School Project - h From: Debbera Coker O - ��'f.;�• r To: Mow, Ray rfa © .r `' C ! ' Subject: Re: Hood Canal K-8 School Project - ' /� r . As a follow-up to our conversation concerning mold mitigation at the Hood Canal School. Please plan on handling the mitigation issues as a special inspection with all reports sent to the Mason County Building department. In addition the mold report prepared by Nowicki Environmental specified that there may be structural concerns on shear walls covered with OSB. Where structural concerns exist the engineer of record, or their authorized representative should issue a report concerning repairs. Washington State Energy Code, Section 1313 specifies that a vapor retarder is required. Approved vapor retarder can be poly, paint or another approved method. Mr. Gary Nordeen, a representative of the WSU-Energy Program reviewed the mold mitigation/vapor retarder report and offered comments. The Word document attached to this e-mail contains his comments. Please contact me if you would like to discuss further. Please arrange to mail, fax, or e-mail reports to me at the following: Mason County Building Department Attn: Debbera Coker PO Box 186, Shelton, WA FAX (360)427-7798 aQ©Cv _ ODDo3 E-mail: dlc@co.mason.wa.us >>> "Ray Mow" <ray@ericksonmcgovern.com> 12/21/2006 8:33 AM >>> Debbra, Last week there was a discovery of some surface mold growth on the framing at the hood canal project. In discussions with Larry (sorry I did not get his last name) with Mason County, we decided that the best course of action was to get our environmental consultant, Nowicki and Associates to field evaluate the condition and provide all parties with a report that includes the method for corrective actions. That report is attached and the contractor has diligently followed through with those actions. There have been issues raised with the contract and code requirements of having a vapor retarder on the warm side of the insulations. The concern is that the vapor retarder will trap moisture in the exterior wall cavity, creating the potential for further problems. The 2004 Washington State Energy Code, Section 502.1.6, requires that a vapor retarder be installed on the warm side of insulation (see also attached). The product being used is a 6 mil polyethylene film that has a vapor permeation rate of .12 which makes it a class II vapor retarder per ASTM E-96.(Product information attached). Nowicki's report recommends against using a vapor 'barrier' (actually it is a vapor retarder, vapor barriers allow vapor to escape.). Code requires a vapor retarder. We request two responses from Mason County: 1.Please confirm that a vapor retarder is required per the Washington State Energy Code. 2.Please review and provide comment to Nowicki's report. about:blank 12/21/2006 Page 2 of 2 Please contact me if there are questions. Thank you, Raymond Mow, AIA Associate Erickson McGovern PLLC Ray@EricksonMcGovern.com Phone 253 5310206 Fax 253 5319197 Cell 253 208 3235 �r1 7' /`, ✓�a_a i.. V 6 j yx Li � about:blank 12/21/2006 December 21, 2006 Debbera Coker Mason County Building Dept. Debbera: I reviewed the report from Nowicki Environmental concerning mold issues at a school under construction in Mason County. The report was from Robert F. Simmons, Inspector and was dated December 19, 2006. 1 generally agree with the report recommendations and have the following comments: 1. Remove the polyethylene vapor retarder and the insulation to allow the walls to dry out. Also, the report noted the slab is still fairly green and it will continue to add moisture to the space until cured. 2. Make sure the building is weather tight and dry before re-insulating. The comment in the report regarding the Tyvek being used as a vapor retarder is incorrect. You are aware of the moisture physics involved and the proper locations of a vapor retarder and moisture barriers. Moisture movement from weather barriers is commonly misunderstood. It was thought that all building wraps stopped bulk water from entering a wall cavity and also allowed vapor to escape from the inside. This is only true with some building wraps. Tyvek manufactured after 2001, Typar manufactured after 2004, Weathermate Plus, Gorilla Wrap, and Weather Smart are some of the products I am aware of that allow vapor movement to the exterior. 3. When the building is enclosed and heat is introduced do not use propane heaters as they generate more moisture than they will remove. Consider using electric space heat in combination with de-humidifiers. 4. Avoid using 6 mil polyethylene as a vapor retarder. Using a perm rated paint or a "smart vapor retarder' is a better choice. Certainteed makes a product with a variable perm rating depending on humidity levels within a wall cavity. http://www.certainteed.com/CertainTeed/Pro/Contractor/Insulation/Prodindex/Residential/ Mem Brain Prod lndex.htm 5. Verify that the exterior finish is installed so that it will be durable and in a way to minimize moisture damage. If a stucco finish is the finish material look at the attached detail and make sure some sort of drainage plane is incorporated into the cladding. This may accomplished with a simple system using two layers of felt paper or can be something more elaborate. This mold situation is not uncommon but can be easily avoided with some common sense.We have been harping for 20 years about not using wet lumber(like cover your lumber package on a jobsite), dry the building before insulating, and make sure the window flashing will repel rain water. It was good to talk to you again and have a good holiday season. Wasn't that politically correct! Sincerely, Gary Nordeen,WSU Energy Program (12/21/2006) Debbera Coker- Hood Canal K-8 School Project- Page 1 i From: "Ray Mow" <ray@ericksonmcgovern.com> To: "Debbera Coker" <Dlc@co.mason.wa.us> Date: 12/21/2006 8:35 AM Subject: Hood Canal K-8 School Project- Attachments: B000042D.TIF; 2004 WS Energy Section 5.pdf; HC Vapor Retarder.pdf CC: <bobroberts@jonesandroberts.com>, <forrest@jonesandroberts.com>, <steveb... Debbra, Last week there was a discovery of some surface mold growth on the framing at the hood canal project. In discussions with Larry(sorry I did not get his last name)with Mason County, we decided that the best course of action was to get our environmental consultant, Nowicki and Associates to field evaluate the condition and provide all parties with a report that includes the method for corrective actions. That report is attached and the contractor has diligently followed through with those actions. There have been issues raised with the contract and code requirements of having a vapor retarder on the warm side of the insulations. The concern is that the vapor retarder will trap moisture in the exterior wall cavity, creating the potential for further problems. The 2004 Washington State Energy Code, Section 502.1.6, requires that a vapor retarder be installed on the warm side of insulation (see also attached). The product being used is a 6 mil polyethylene film that has a vapor permeation rate of.12 which makes it a class II vapor retarder per ASTM E-96.(Product information attached). Nowicki's report recommends against using a vapor'barrier' (actually it is a vapor retarder, vapor barriers allow vapor to escape.). Code requires a vapor retarder. We request two responses from Mason County: 1. Please confirm that a vapor retarder is required per the Washington State Energy Code. 2. Please review and provide comment to Nowicki's report. Please contact me if there are questions. Thank you, Raymond Mow, AIA Associate Erickson McGovern PLLC Ray@EricksonMcGovern.com Phone 253 531 0206 Fax 253 531 9197 Cell 253 208 3235 0 .. Dec 20 06 10:40a p.1 t V . I !• t.V VV l• JLI ill -I11 VIT, 1111 , i L•I,IIIL.IItM I VVI • II.VJ ITV IlV• I If 1. 34004 9m avenue South Unit 412 Federal Way,WA 98003 Phone 253-927-5233 FAX 253-924-0323 Fm Y« Gary Larson From: Robert Simons Fax- Pages: FINXM Data: 12!19106 Re: Moisture Testing in Structure CC: Steve Brennan 0 Urgent x For Review ❑Plea"Comment O Please Reply Q Please Recycle •Comments: Here is the report. I do not have a good source for the Timbor. Usually you can get it at a pest store but not in quantity. I am on the road for a couple of days but will try and run down a source if you haven't found any. It is available in 5 gallon buckets I got a verbal on the mold count in the flooded classroom but did not get the fax yet. The room is very clean. it is OK io occupy, Bob Simons Nowicki Environmental i t ll U "• ` 2004 Edition b. Frame that is thermal break aluminum(as defined in 502.1.5.2 Standard Procedure for Determination of footnote 9 to Table 10-613),wood,aluminum clad Door U-Factors: All doors,including fire doors,shall wood,vinyl,aluminum clad vinyl,or reinforced vinyl. be assigned default U-factors from Table 10-6C. The only labeling requirement for products using this exception shall be a description of the product and a label EXCEPTIONS: 1. U factors determined certified stating: "This product is deemed to satisfy the Table 6-1 or and labeled in accordance with the National Fenestration 6-2 vertical glazing U-factor.requirement using the exception Rating Council rNFRC)Product Certification Program to Section 502.1.5 in the Washington State Energy Code." i PCP),as authorized en ed independent certification and 2. For overhead glazing,assemblies with all of the inspection agency licensed by the NFRC. following features are deemed to satisfy the overhead glazing 2. The default values for the opaque portions doors U-factor requirement in Table 6-I or 6-2 options except the shall be those listed in Table therm,provided that the be unlimited glazing area options(Options IV and V in Table 6- factor listed fora door with a thermal break shall only be allowed if both the door and the frame have a thermal 1 and Options V and VI in Table 6-2): a. Either,double glazing with a minimum 1/2 inch gap break 3.` width,having a low-emissivity coating with e� with.20 with the maximum One unlabeled area untested exterior swinging door maximum,with 90%minimum argon gas fill, a of 24 square feet may be t or,triple glazed plastic domes,and installed for ornamental,security or architectural l purposes. Products using this exception shall not be b. Frame that is thermal break aluminum(as defined in included in the U-factor calculation requirements; footnote 9 to Table 10-613),wood,aluminum clad w however,glazing area shall be included in glazing area wood,vinyl,aluminum clad vinyl,or reinforced vinyl. calculations. The only labeling requirement for products using this i 1`� exception shall be a description of the product and a label stating: "This product is deemed to satisfy the Table 6-1 or 502.1:6.1 Vapor Retarders:Vapor retarders shall be 6-2 vertical glazing U-factor requirement using the exception installed on the warm side(in winter)of insulation as to Section 502.1.5 in the Washington State Energy Code." specified in the following cases. I 3. For solariums with a floor area which does not exceed EXCEPTION: Vapor retarder installed with not more 1 300 square feet,assemblies which comply with the features than 1/3 of the nominal R-value between it and the listed in Exception 2 are deemed to satisfy the vertical ndi'on spa glazing and overhead glazing U-factor requirements in Table 6-1 or 6-2 options with vertical glazing U-0.40 and greater. 502.1.6.2 Floors:Floors separating conditioned space from The only labeling requirement for products using this unconditioned space shall have a vapor retarder installed. exception shall be a description of the product and a label The vapor retarder shall have a one perm dry cup rating or f stating: "This product is deemed to satisfy the Table 6-1 or less(i.e.four mil 10.004 inch thick]polyethylene or kraft 1 6-2 vertical glazing U-factor requirement using the exception faced material). to Section 502.1.5 in the Washington State Energy Code." 502.1.6.3 Roof/Ceilings:Roof/ceiling assemblies where the \ 502.1.5.1 Standard Procedure for Determination of ventilation space above the insulation is less than an I <= Glazing U-Factors: U-factors for glazing shall be average of 12 inches shall be provided with a vapor i determined,certified and labeled in accordance with retarder. Faced batt insulation where used as a vapor the National Fenestration Rating Council(NFRC) retarder shall be face stapled. Single rafter joist vaulted Product Certification Program(PCP),as authorized by ceiling cavities shall be of sufficient depth to allow a an independent certification and inspection agency minimum one inch vented air space above the insulation. licensed by the NFRC. Compliance shall be based on the Residential Model Size. Product samples used for 502.1.6.4:Vapor retarders shall not be required in rYs U-factor determinations shall be production line units roof/ceiling assemblies where the ventilation space above or representative of units as purchased by the consumer the insulation averages 12 inches or greaconsumer or contractor. Products that are listed in the NFRC 502.1.6.5:Vapor retarders shall not be required where all of Certified Products Directory or certified to the NFRC the insulation is installed between the roof membrane and Standard shall not use default values. the structural roof deck. �r EXCEPTIONS: 1. Glazing products without NFRC 502.1.6.6 Walls:Walls separating conditioned space from ratings may be assigned default U-factors from Table unconditioned space shall have a vapor retarder installed. ffr: 10-6A for vertical glazing and from Table 10-6E for Faced batt insulation shall be face stapled. G• overhead glazing. 2. Units without NFRC ratings produced by a small business may be assigned default U-factors from Table 10- ' 6A for garden windows,from Table 10-613 for other vertical glazing,and from Table 10-6E for overhead glazing. Dec 20 06 10:41 a p.2 9eC. Iv. 2m (CIYI 140WILKI Lily IivlrmCniai U71 "ca NOWICKI 'J;c�,z,bcr 19, 2006 i7 N VIRQNivi EX �?ngox�prrac.u,uo'xn.T r oo►+�:+n't Hood Canal School District I I I N State routes 106 Shelton, WA 98584 Attn: Ron Zier—Superintendent Gary Larson—G31co Engineering Last Friday 1 inspected the new school building urith Steve Brennan of Jones and Roberts and Gary Larson. The purpose of the inspection was to view the mold and wct framing lumber and offer recommendations. The school has a wood frame and has been under construction for several months. One two story wing had the first layer of roofing installed keeping that part of the structure dry. The remaining structure is open to the weather. In the dry section insulation is installed and some drywall is installed although the exterior walls generally have only the insulation and the plastic vapor barrier inst led. Tlie entire extet;or is covar-,d'With tycel . In the roofed section of the building framing is generally 14 to 17% moisture content. This is generally acceptable_ 17%is where mold growth can be supported. Under the current very wet conditions 14-15%in the covered areas is likely as low as is possible without heat- Some surface mold is visible on lumber that was wet when installed. The Oriented Strand Board sheeting is generally free of staining and mld. There is mild condensation behind the insulation with the sheeting behind the insulation at 17°ro. Under the current wet and humid construction conditions the plastic vapor barrier may eventually become a problem. All water and vapor has to leave the wall system through the exterior and the tyvek will only pass vapor. Closing the wall system before it is dry may trap enough moisture to cause mold and possibly rot.Using an inside complete vapor barrier has been falling out of favor due to this trait of trapping moisture. The tyvek exterior vapor bamex may be sufficient to meet the building code. At this point I am recommending not using the plastic on the inside of the building unless it is an absolute code requirement. The framing, OSB and plywood floors in the unprotected areas are close to being saturated in many areas of the open structure. Where the roof and wall sheeting is on the lumber is in the 15-19%range. The bottom of the shear walls covered with OSB is saturated and appears to be supporting mold. The bottom four feet may have to be removed prior to cover. This will have to be re-evaluated when the entire building is dry. The gypsum,wallboard installed behind the shear wall on the second floor is moldy and has likely lost its structural integrity. The concrete floors are still green and in unroofed areas are calleeting water. Wet concrete will inhibit the lumber in the building drying. 34004 9th Avenve Soul Suite 12 Federal Way,Washingtnn 98003 Phone:(253)927-5233 fax:(253)924-C323 Dec 20 06 10:41a p.3 Below are some recommendations • Move as quickly as possible to close the building from the weather. • In the dry areas circulate the air as much as is possible with.fans. Stagnant cool humid air will greatly slow the drying process. • Once the building or sections of the building can be closed introduce heat. There may be a brief period when new mold is noticeable but this will end quickly once the moisture is brought under control. • Remove the plastic vapor barrier already installed to let the walls dry out. Investigate whether it can be left out entirely. The exterior tyvek may be sufficient to meet current code when analyzed as a wall system. • Once all of the wood materials in the building are dry to at least 1 S%re- evaluate the structural integrity of any suspectwood materials. The materials generally at risk are the OS$sheeting and engineering lumber. • Do not cover the wood structure until the average moisture content is I So/oor less- • Treat the mold and stained wood with a wood preservative fungicide such as Timbor or copper naphtha late. The copper naphthalene is solvent based and does carry an odor so I do not recommend it for use around the public or in closed spaces. Timbor is borate and is non-toxic to humans. Timbor leaves a white residue that is hard to see so use green paint tint if possible to show where it has been installed. It can be applied with a pump sprayer or professional equipment. For cleaning use 4 tablespoons of borax soap with very warm water. This will clean any mold and leave a borax residue. This can be used when Timbor is not available or soap is needed • Re-evaluate the mold and structural issues prior to cover. Replace any questionable materials. Sincerely, Robert F' Si rnous Inspector Cc: Steve Brennan 0 b�: vV Dec 20 06 10:41a p.4 UGI.• 17• LVVV / JJI IV Ilux I un1 LII• I I VIIISIU.IUVI V.I • I .Oo ..V• 1J41 IJv>y+.a_ J lbrT1' or INSECTICIDE AND FUNGICIDE A wood preservative for-the protection and treatment of lumbrr against fungal.decay and wood destroying insects For the prevention and Medial control of wood*infesting organisms including:MY- wood Termites,Wood Destroying Beetles,Tmnitcs and Carpontcr Ants *Also fox Wood Foam Composite Stiuctti al Componeerlts 4 ;A V r ACTIVE INGREDIENT- Disodtum Oetaborsm TaueWdraw(Nm2S8013. MO) ....................9896 ' �'�•' ti INERT INGREDIENTS .................. *Cc muias 2%WO-AbsarbW Moistam Keep Out of Reach of Children CAITUON EPA Reg.No.64405-8 EFTA Est.64445-TN-1 PRECAUMONARY STATEMENTS aazartuTbITomaas&DomeslJcAatmsk CAUTION: Harmful if swallawcd oriahaled.CausrsmQduntecr itrilatioa. Avoid e g Avoid breadtirrg dust 'Wash thottwghiy with soap Ilnd water after hi¢ ti clothing Detour cruse, Smtcmeat � '� IL Ir Swxgotied: R' 2 gtan,*of water and induce vomiting by copching Ae" b aek of U with is -� do oat give anyrLiag oy march gad do nor induce rocuiting. 1f immrkd: Remove victiu�:_ n atlIinggive artiSciN.respimon,prefe-rably mouth-to-mouth. G"medical attcarion. It In Eyes ush cyt5 y lI of water.Call a physiciaa if irritation persists.In ctsa of a mediczl emergency involving (his ptod= 424.9 or your lacel poison control center. Eariroaamm"I Hmrds Tito-bor oriim-bov solutions camlesWy spilled or appUed io aaFlaod or growing pbsnu,iaefud ing hoes tad sbrnkx.may kill nr set ocs'Y rtrui piaar arowdr_ Covcrr(-arbv plants and crri:m". cut po5s%1rcont+nunation. Do not apply>3ircc'.IV m Will er. Co not&5chuge cMuew coatamttg this pmd=into latcm atresms.ponds ct MWIC3,ocean orotber W%a9 u01e2 w =cord&=witb tAe rcgsliremena of a Natiorad M'lataar Discharge E4zoimtioa Symm tNTDES)pettrsitand the pemi rtsiog -authority t=beta notified in Writing prior to discharge, M not discharge cMuezir con twining ibis product to atwrr systems without rr.ieusl}'nmitving tl.r,into!5c-age trritmcni p'anz authodry. rnr guider=cortsr-your Stets Water Bortd or RegiunaIf Mice of c=EPA. NOTICE Fred end tmrkistend nc�Truitt label GCfpre usirng. t1.sc«tty according to label ttircrtions, Before buying or cuing this product,rrW WARRANTY LIMITATIONS AND DISCI.ABAERswemcni found&ewh=M this label, If ierms art unac:ezptable.mum unopeD d package in seller foe full reftatd cf pwrhax price Oth,rwisc.i;s by the buyer or any other user coF=ru=acceptance of Oho terns under WARRANTY 1,M1ITA710N5 AND DISC]-UNfEIR DMEMONS FOR USE It is a violarion of Ftdtrsl Jaw to use this product in a manna inC6nsisttnt with its Ubciing- ST'ORAGK AND DISPOSAL Do not conlaminaae walcr.food or iced by storage or disposal. Suwge: Swreiaa dry plux Do not stomwhemcWdrenovanimais May gainacc wPa66icriirposil: Wutesresulung from the use of this produce truy be disposed*ran sre or ran appro..cd wascodisposal faulity.Co r.; c D6pn sl:Triple rime fPr tGui�olentl tfien¢(Ter for rncrciiag or reconditioning,or aunounr and.dispose of in a.s^.rieary 1erd5ll,or incinera- tion-or.if at lowed by state and I ocal authorities,by burning, 1C burccd,stay out of stnokc- Dec 20 06 10:41 a p.5 • Jtl.. ll• C'JVV /. JJfIII AVR1t,nl UftlftJMI1Cf1ral vcirir.ca fro, tJvf iru CFNE8AL YN'IFORMATTON 'Jinn-bar is a ware wtobl4 inorganic lw.att salt wi[h inscctieiQal and fungicidal properties effecti.e against wood-dsstroyms Organisms, including tht to btt posts lined I.-Tow- This rroducc cam be Um4 for prevcntntivt treatment(befoc-,signs of infesialion).for wood in eaiatlns structures and iorteroedw treatment of inlitfted wood in existing srix-Mones. Tim-bor is rccornrncaded for Wood and cellulose material in accordance with the specific ucatrncni rtxtA described herein. Tin-Boriseffectiva for 311interioraadexuaiorwood(andwood-ioman composite s4ucwraltompomenul lug W1llbc prwc,cted from Oxeetsive rain nod not in di) tortsrt with the sail. Types of WO"d incrudC,bcrt Arc NN timired to.slr r}rM of lumber,lays and plywood This product soil!kill wood desuoyiny organisms. Some etching of u mted wood may occur Pram oftmisms before they die. Tinrh-w iho,klf!tsar;tt appliO to wtxsd oc cellulose material that his been puintcd.ventishcd or[cared_ For best result, apply Tirn bocto bale wood. Use soap and watts to dean apptkAtlan equipment, Urycc Organisms Tam-her is an CPfec ire xeatneuc for w00d(arrd t" foDm C pesitc sm ctYffsr comperrnt<.}to kill and prevent info:atiOnS Of decay fungi including wUc rot,brvwa m(flJ.-Rxia)and wet tots. "nn rbor 39 also tffocrive for the pmwduon and eoneof of wood destroying itdyecu such as,but not Brute to,the following organisms: Sul,tunaean Termites(Reticulitcrtnns.Hacroiemm. "False"Poudarpos:Scetltss(BcsVichidaa) Coptoctrmes IFOTmosan)) )?uu Toewh and Futnizure Beetles(anebitcae) brywood Termites(CaI otcm scs,lncisiovmrs) Old)louse Borem Longhorn Beetles(Cerambycidas) Damp%ood Ttsrrititts(Zo0utv,op4) Carpww Ants(CatmponaWs) Pomxdupost Beetles(Lyrudae) Bark and Timber Scales(Soolytidne) Preparation of a Treatment Solution 10%Tun-boT LiQuid Sotudcu: Ib prepare sol u4ec,edd appiwimatcly BO%of the rzquired volume of water ro fist rcixing vessel. White stirring.gradually add 1-0 pound of Tim-bar for each eaIIon of treating ItOltitfoa rtx)uirsd Add rrrruining water to the solution and stir until dre entire ptvducl has di=s lvcd. 15%Tim-bar liquid Solutions Prepare station as above:but gradually add l.5 pounds of Tim-bow for each gallon ofh=t- meet soturiou needed. This solution thoold be used as soon in possible and not snared for an esttendcd]engrh of amc. l 54s Tim-her Foam: Prnpare a 15`fb Liquid solution as described aborts and a1w add a staftcum-foaming abcnr. Generally . 2-2 oonCtz of a teaming agem addod w the 15%tiquid solution will produz a dry foam with die desired encpaasioa ratio of approximately 20 to 1 (20 gallons of fasm per I gallon of liquid soludon). Tne Tim-bor foam sftou of a"dry" mnsisrrncy clot sdhe.es to wtrod stufaces so that run-off is mn:..,��r.t i A•,wet"fawn Z, ..cr ad= building compowatt. ft is also iInco xt ended to refer to rba individual rt 4+�+qf and the surfacmut'sLabel Ear spteiFctatzu ons. Watts and rirue all t after each u Appli Tires-bar as a - gtdsolutioa of a 10%solution to wood surfaces by brash or spray. I'w.bor liquid applications ma >' ones inclutfitry decks,fences,eupre,sheds,barns and other our-bAdir.se. Tun-bor may be ns a tigui sotsulon,a powder or a foam.Apply twv applicadaes of a 10%solution to wood sarfacw by brush or spray. Apply,ono appination of a 15%sciatica lb wood atarfa ies by brush or spray. Application may dco be made by drilling mid there iai odirtg the solution undivir ptessam inrn sarnd woad or into tine i nett galleriec of infested voott. TLD-bar may be,applied as a foam w wood surtwes Or injected into real voids of insect galleries. RezneaW and I1hx-v=vatkw T=tSi eat Tim-bow Solutioas for the C""I of wood Dcwvjiing Otsawwrm sued sa Kill Active Infestatlons of termites,Powderpoet Bowies awn)Wood becay rungs: For restsedial control of wood suaeaag organisms or ror the pmr.-aion of wood agtinst future infesxvdoas.two appticauions Of m 10%liquid tglution are nounally rNoiree_Ono application ofa 15%liquid solution tray be ased. Apply Tam-bor"ucforu by brash or spray se she rate of 5 ganom of tiqu3d solution per I WO square Foot or woad surfaoc area wood surface ate sbould be diagoisghly w a afw appUcwiaa Application nay also be rase by dnMag and aica it,,;ing the,liq.LJ talurian ssnjtr prss.su:t into serener:oval cr until run-off is obsenv_d coming ftvm Cn ylcsiT hoiea of infested wood. 71'm-bor Pov/tW to t 311 and Convoi Wood Detuoyias Organisms_Sueb as Termites mod Carpentrr Ants: Tirn-bor may be applied as is w wood members by drilling and injecting em powder Sate galleries or by dusting generously on wood svrfaas Tim-bor pot+dc c=eJici be in cV=1 or dined IMO Walt lei&!uch as b iw ex:tads.block raids.box,,^:Ls.env ,..ti+sw. sofTets.cv— Apply Tin-Wr powder w Obese areas at Inc rate of OL5 otarcxi l L2^14 gjums)per square 1aaL Tint-]ror foam: 2n urn Il voids,infers r�iooYAary(Darn to coauct wood sattfacas of sods iw the ones ar the unite desired tar;ec area. Appty Yearn where:possible.to dbtstdnr wood surfaces and between wood jo nts_ Apply tier foam so that all sc=uihte wood surfaces etc covered with foam. Tyra-bar foam can also be injecud imto ioxecs galleries aaril rare-off is obsttrv& protect newly•rested wood from ezccasive rain of moistum WARRANTY LIMMIMNS AND aISCLAMER BBC:vxc 6;r'ay.1 co'&4101ra alfctfig]ba use;ad l;"Ttrrm.rnX7v.5icdtr=r arrvs tcytrcFst e=:svmsy impair r vary n4c rcrultrareRbcuo!'theuseofrtisproduct In Any ew—w-aarrplei:pacsraomofdecwYwatsinu nlenitroni3norgrur+ereed Nudrr V�a MAO&tacycisme Aar SaCcr sba0 be&ebb is_.goer ro anry;P t soy Pr durxge suJfCrCd by frown oaf Me ror o/MA paoafarslorapvrpo5rivitrrdfrxedbyo6rfabdar-f;cntrsedCoriVwy[nr75edriedvasofrrrsaucaaorlc'1 arwrrbAGfpcacf ro Drcach of any""vary new a pAr sir sprcihed herein. Bvyrr sea rr^rr d rt myrvll suGers ro r6rar tors ce ar v axe my elJ trek afasoge end Aandliogtsxtcpr when need or/iand�ednv xrarafavacr wrfS this latfrrf. UPC Code-6 16W 11153 Nisus Corporation 100 Nisus Drive • Rockford.IN 37853 800-264--0970 805-577-6119 Emil' NisusOnisuscalp.com Www.nisuscam cem MADE IN THE U.S.A. December 2001 L,� ✓is• `1 lrwr�r �1 �( ...i Yd i. '9 LY-A M E R I C R Inc. 2000 W.Marshall Drive Grand Prairie,Texas 75051 800-527-3322 214-647-4374 Telex 79-2851 To Whom It May Concern: Please accept this letter as certification that Poly-America's polyethylene film meets or exceeds ASTM D-4397, standard specification for construction, industrial and agricultural applications. Our film also meets or exceeds federal specification i LP378D. Additional test methods used include impact resistance ASTM D1709- 67, tensile strength ASTM D882-67, water vapor transmission ASTM E96-66, and thickness ASTM D374-68. Poly-America routinely samples and tests stock construction film for numerous physical and chemical characteristics. Part of this testing includes procedures detailed in ASTM E-154 and called out in ASTM C-156 for resistance to decay. In all quality control testing we have performed, our film has always passed this specification. In accordance with testing procedures called forth by ATSM E-154, I Poly-America certifies that its stock construction film is resistant to decay. Test results of individual rolls of lots may vary, but are within specification. I Should you require any additional information, feel free to call me at 800/527-3322, extension 325. i Sincerely, Poly-America, Inc. Diana Morris. -r Sales Representative DM:mc p w� i P o LY-R M E R I C R Inc. 2000 W.Marshall Drive Grand Prairie,Texas 75051 800-527-3322 214-647- 6t, . Telex 79-2851 1)w"I � f a SPECIFICATIONS THAT POLY-eMERICA STOCK CONSTRUCTION FILM WILL NORMALLY MEET t ' Bureau of Standards: PS17-69 sia =es National Bu erse e p Commercial Standard CS 238-61 i National Flexible Packaging Association: B-11 supersedes Commercial Standard CS 227-59 Government Specifications: L-P-378-D, FTMS 101C* i American Standard Testing Material (ASTM) Specifications: j ASTM D-1248 Standard specification for polyethylene plastic. ASTM D-2103 Standard specification for polyethylene film and sheeting. ASTM D-4397 Polyethylene sheeting for construction, industrial and agricultural application, I ASTM E-154 Materials for use as vapor barriers under concrete slabs C-156 and as ground cov=r in crawl spaces. t *FTMS - Federal Test Method Standar.:.; i. 'O LY-A M E R I C A Inc. 2000 W.Marshall Drive Grand Prairie,Texas 75051 800-527-3322 214-647-4374 Telex 79-2851 TEST DATA ON POLYETHYLENE CONSTRUCTION FILM MATERIAL: The sheeting shall be made from polyethylene or modified polyethylene such as an ethylene copolymer consisting of a major proportion of ethylene in combination with a minor proportion of some other monomer, or a mixture of polyethylene with . a lesser amount of other polymers. It may contain additives or modifiers such as pigments and stabilizers. TOTAL FILM THICKNESS: .001 .002 .004 .006 .008 .010 WEIGHT PER LB./MSF: 4.8 9.6 19.1 28.7 38.2 47.8 (ASTM D374-68) MOISTURE VAPOR TRANSMISSION: The requirement for this shall be 1.40 Grams per 100 square (ASTM E 96-66) inches per 24 hours divided by the thickness in mils. It may also be shown as permeance in perms (grains per squre foot per I hour per inch of Hg water vapor pressure differential) as shown in the attached drawing. FOLDING ENDURANCE: Good on all mil weights. I �T RESISTANCE: The average impact resistance shall be not less than the resistance speci- 1 (ASTM D 1709-67) fied in the table below when tested. f 1 Sheeting Thickness Dart Drop Impact Resistance 1 Mil 40 Grams + I 2 Mil 85 Grams 4 Mil 165 Grams i 6 Mil 260 Grams `� 1 �C/ j• 1 8 Mil Grams ,, lif,• 10 Mil 475 Grams TENSILE STRENGTH: MECHANICAL PROPERTIES DIRECTION (ASTM D 882-67) Lengthwise Crosswise �. Tensil Strength, min, psi 1700 1200 Elongation, min. , percent 225 350 REFLECTANCE: The average 45-deg. 0-deg directional reflectance of white opaque sheeting (ASTM E97-55) intended for use in curing concrete shall be not less than 70% when determined in accordance with reflectance. LUMINOUS TRANSMITTANCE: Black sheeting intended for exclusion of light and for maximum resis- (ASTM D2103-67) tance to weathering shall have an average luminous transmittance not greater than 1 percent when determined in accordance with the specification on luminous transmittance. Cf. AND FINISH: The sheeting may be natural, color tinted, translucent or opaque. APPEARANCE: The sheeting shall have appearance qualities conforming with those produced by good commercial practice. It shall be free as is commercially possible of gels, streaks, pinholes, particles of foreign matter, and undispersed raw material. 1 D-96 Test for Water Vapor Transmission of Materials in Sheet orm. Using the mil thickness on the let and perms on the bottom, you can determine the thickness required to meet a certain perm level. to 9 (� E T I c ' x v j f 4 i }}i . � I !I 0 J5 .12 .IQ Ae Water V'opor Permeonce. Perms lYayss 3. liitrr �a�or Oer*,nxee rip(rswrmn Jor ptYsfA�tsne Mntinp. All of these, tests are further reviewed under Federal Product Standard 17-69 and Voluntary PS-1769. PS 17-69 covers Polyethylene sheeting of 10 mils or less. r (9/26/2006) Phyllis Burnison - sep2514fld.email.doc Page 2 NORTHWEST TESTING COMPANY,INC. Mark Robinson Mark Robinson Licensed Professional Geologist Registered Site Assessor ACl/ICC Certified Concrete Technician cc:Gary Larson,Ron Zier,Ray Mow,Eric Bailey,Bob Roberts, Steve Brannon,Phyllis Burnison PO BOX 11581 OLYMPIA,WASHINGTON 98508-1581 PHONE or FAX (360)866-3647 (10/2/2006) Phyllis Burnison - sep2815fid.email.doc Page 1 Northwest Testing Company, Inc. CONSTRUCTION TESTING and INSPECTION ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTATIONand ASSESSMENT FIELD INSPECTION REPORT CLIENT:Hood Canal School District DATE: PROJECT:Hood Canal K-8 School REPORT NO: 15 CONTRACTOR:Jones&Roberts Construction PROJECT NUMBER: 0602.3 PERMIT NUMBER:COM 2006-00003 INSPECTOR:Dennis Smith I arrived at Al's Welding to perform visual welding inspection for the columns and brackets. Cohnnns marked.26A,26B,27A,28B,28A,28B,29B,30A,30B,three each 33B,53A,and 53B. Brackets marked: 7 each 31A, S each 31 C, 31E, 4 each 32A, 32B, 32C, and 32A All welds are visually acceptable as per AWSD1.1-06.The welds are placed in accordance with the approved shop drawings on sheets D-2 through D-29. Welding performed by WABO certified welders using triple 7 E71 T-8 electrode,FCAW process. NORTHWEST TESTING COMPANY,INC. Dennis Smith Dennis Smith WABO Certified Welding Inspector cc: Gary Larson,Ron Zier,Ray Mow,Eric Bailey,Bob Roberts, Steve Brannon,Phyllis Burnison PO BOX 11581 OLYMPIA,WASHINGTON 98508-1581 PHONE or FAX (360)866-36.17 Sep 19 06 10:04a P.3 *Juur WELDING INSPECTION KraZan & Associates , Inc . REPORT NO.: 44 GF(,trCH1N1CA-- CCX1t51RC-CT'0,-j TES-ING AND lNSPC--C')0j-j CONTRACTOR: )JECT#-. PERMIT NO: . LECT: INSPECTOP: 'ATION: ----------- . JURISDiCTION: LZAN PROJECT MANAGER: WEATHER: TEMP STRUCTURAL STEEL fY FIELD SHOP i WELDING 5i� V.T MATERIAL ID SHOP J.T. M.T. P.T. item(s) insPected: P-6 .4 Location-4 ........... .. ..................... .............. Welder qualffication/certilleation verified Jor. ............ ....... Position: VERITICAL (Hd—R1Z0t4T—AL-;) OVERHEAD X Hier Metal: 4 �/77�4 Process-. SMAW GMAW SAW Other: Weld Type: <-�.FILLET C.P. RP. PLUG Other e! Weld Size <�:516- (:1 iZ .5 5/16" XB" Other. ;7! Codes: AWS AI-SC TITLE 21 TITLE 24 LIBC ASIVIE NOTES DISCREPANCIES % COMPLETE 4 i he best of my knowledge. the aboll��Vlj WAS NOT aerformed in accordance with Ihe approved plans, specifications, and rGIgulatory requirements. erinlendentfRapresenlalive-. Technician: f 2:1 5 Ncsr Dakota 4vrrw,-.Cdcvm C,-936 1.? . ''S91 348-ZZCO ZW N.Sherman.Sta.A��to�orm CA 92880 • (9021 S45-1788 ,1231 Fostcriva..9akersheld.CA 933G8 . 166))633-22C.0 7507 75rh Street NW,9105.Auburn.iiiA 9802 dr (25j)93D.250t) '025 twe Palm Ave.Sic. 2E..V:idesco.C-4 953.51 - (209) 572-2200 ZV14 State POLte 305N.F.,Ste.3C.Pouisba. WA 98370 (360)S9a-2126 545 P;wr.,)(!St..San lose. r-4 95112 . 4081 ?71-?;?r70 114.14 JV F 1 7 71h Warn WA QjW.77 id2cl-AOC.CZ'a Sep 19 06 10:04a p.4 ..d:ob FAX PA001 OWL Now-* V%XaZa ISPATCH LOG SHEET CALLER INFORMATION Your Name: Date: ' 1 Caller's Name: Company- Name L • �.� --- Caller's # ( ) t� Site # Company # Cell# Pager`# i* (Please Crcle One) `C v PROJECT INFORMATION i ' KA Project##: Project Name Pro*ect Address v. 1,' -� - �� S �— j W Directions/Landmarks ts Project City -- — ,�``• �Y SCHEDULE INFORMATION Date Inspection Needed Day Needed M T W Th F 513t Su Se On Site At: A PM AnytimeAM AnytimePM All Day Z r Pour Be ins At: AM PM INSPECTION • • J Reinforced Concrete Inspection ,J Structural Steel Inspection Est. #yards ❑ Bolts: What Size How ( 51ab Wall Footing Column) Many? Air Needed What Type: Unit Weight Needed J LeJunne Reinforced Masonry Inspection ❑ Turn of the Nut, Est. # yards -:3 Load Indicator Washer J In Place Densities :3 $olt Torque Soils Welding Inspection Asphalt Fabrication on 15ite J Shoterete Inspection Other G�` ►J v Fireproofing Inspection :1 Piles J Reinforcing Steel Inspection J Auger Cast J Driven ^ C Offices Serving The western United States 1 i34 VL- r7-1 Place • Woodinville, WasiingLon 98072 • 1.423) 485-5519 • Fax 141-5),485-6817, Phyllis Burnison - may1701fld.email.doc gel] Northwest Testing Company, Inc. CONSTRUCTION TESTING and 1NSPECTION L-NVIRONMENTAL CONSULTATION and ASSESSMENT FIELD INSPECTION REPORT CLIENT:Hood Canal School District DATE: May17,2006 PROJECT:Hood Canal K-8 School REPORT NO: 01 CONTRACTOR:Jones&Roberts Construction PROJECT NUMBER:0602.3 PERMIT NUMBER: INSPECTOR:Mark Robinson Inspector Mark Robinson arrives on site, 10:30 am, for preliminary site review. Partly sunny, 67 degrees. Inspector meets with Jones and Roberts project Superintendent Steve Brannon and reviews Geotechnical Testing Laboratory geotechnical soil report and earthwork recommendations. After review,two random locations are excavated in the inside the future building area. Moderately firm blue silty clay with gravel is exposed in both locations. The soil report recommends a 12" over-excavation of footing areas to include 6" (one-half the depth)on each side of the footing.Exposed subgrade should be consolidated as necessary;with 12" of gravel fill placed and compacted in lifts to 95% compaction. This inspection agency will be contacted to approve final subgrade conditions prior to introduction of structural fill. NORTHWEST TESTING COMPANY,INC. Mark Robinson Mark Robinson Licensed Professional Geologist Registered Site Assessor ACl/ICC Certified Concrete Technician cc: Gary Larson, Ron Zier, Steve Storaash, Jack Pinkard, Bob Roberts, Phyllis Bumison (Mason County) k f PO BOX 11581 OLYMPIA, WASHINGTON 98508-1581 PHONE or FAX (360) 866- 3647 -------------------------------- r + Northwest TestingCompany, Inc. CONSTRUCTION TESTING and INSPECTION ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTATION and A RVESSMENT FIELD INSPECTION REPORT CLIENT: Hood Canal School District DATE: May 30/June 02,2006 PROJECT: Hood Canal K-8 School REPORT NO: 02 CONTRACTOR: Jones& Roberts Construction PROJECT NUMBER: 0602.3 PERMIT NUMBER: COM 2006-00003 INSPECTOR: Mark Robinson May 30: Inspector Mark Robinson arrives on site, 1:45 pm, for inspection of earthwork progress and structural fill placement and compaction. Sunny, 67 degrees. Earthwork contractor has begun the excavation of the trenches. Footing cuts are formed to provide a minimum of 12" of compacted structural fill beneath the footing, with the footing trench widened at a 1/1 ration to fill depth. Should the cut reveal unsuitable material such as wood debris, logs, old fill, this material will have to be excavated prior to placement of structural fill. Excavation is being done with a smooth-bladed excavator bucket. A select 1 '/4" gravel is used for fill, placed in one lift and compacted with the backhoe mounted hoe-pak. The gravel may require some moisture conditioning if dry weather continues. There are no areas ready for compaction testing at this time. A sample of the imported gravel is taken for moisture-density test. June 02: Inspector Mark Robinson arrives on site, 9:45 am, for inspection of earthwork progress and structural fill placement and compaction. Drizzle, 59 degrees. Earthwork contractor is in the process of placement and compaction of structural fill in the footing trenches along the northeast side of the building area adjacent to the existing classroom building along the east end. Gravel fill has been placed in two or more separate lifts and has been compacted with a combination the hoe-pak and the pan compactor. Moisture condition is good. One location fails to comply with 95%compaction requirements. See attached for test locations and results. NORTHWEST TESTING COMPANY,INC. Mark Robinson Licensed Professional Geologist Registered Site Assessor ACUICC Certified Concrete Technician cc: Gary Larson, Ron Zier,Ray Mow,Eric Bailey,Bob Roberts, Phyllis Burnison(Mason County) PO BOX 1l_581 OLYMPIA,WASHINGTON 98508-1581 PHONE or FAX (360)866-3647 NORTHWEST TESTI G COMPANY, INS. REPORT OF IN PLACE SOIL DENSITY TESTS CLIENT: Hood Canal School District PROJECT: Hood Canal K-8 School REPORT NO: 02A DATE: June 02,2006 CONTRACTOR: Jones&Roberts SUB-CONTRACTOR: SECO INSPECTOR: Mark Robinson PERMIT NUMBER:COM 2006-00003 PROJECT NUMBER: 0602.3 Soil Description and Moisture/Density Relationship: Proctor#1: imported 1 ''/4"gravel (GV). 139.4 PCF @ 5.8 %. Method of Test: ASTM D-1557(D) Field Wet Dn, Percent Test No. Test Location Moisture Density Density Compaction All tests taken at top of footing fill 1 grid line 137/A1, footing box 5.6 143.9 136.3 97.8 2 grid line B14/A13.5, footing 6.2 147.3 138.7 99.5 3 grid line B12.8/A13, footing and box 4.5 140.7 134.6 96.6 4 grid line B7/A14, footing box 4.8 140.7 134.3 96.3 5 grid line 132/A14, footing box 5.1 135.4 128.8 92.4 Remarks: Job Specifications: 95% compaction required. Test #5 does not comply with specifications. See Field Report for further information. Inspector: Mark Robinson PO BOX 11581 OLYMPIA,WASHINGTON 98508-158I PHONE/FAX:(360)866 3647 Northwest Testing Company, Inc. CONSTRUCTION TESTING and INSPECTION ENVIRON41F,NTAL CONSUL TATIO.N and ASSESSMENT 1 FIELD INSPECTION REPORT CLIENT: Hood Canal School District DATE: June 08,2006 PROJECT: Hood Canal K-8 School REPORT NO: 03 CONTRACTOR: Jones&Roberts Construction PROJECT NUMBER: 0602.3 PERMIT NUMBER: COM 2006-00003 INSPECTOR: Mark Robinson Inspector Mark Robinson arrives on site, 8:45 am, for inspection of earthwork progress and structural fill placement and compaction and forms and reinforcing. Overcast,61 degrees. Earthwork contractor continues the placement and compaction of structural fill in the footing trenches along the northeast and west sides of the building area Gravel fill has been placed in two or more separate lifts and has been compacted with the hoe-pak. Five in-place density tests are taken at random locations; all tests comply with specifications. See attached for test locations and results. Contractor is in the process of placement of forms and reinforcing along the east side of the project area in building sections S2.20 and S2.10. Inspector reviews structural notes and details 2&3/S4.03, footing box schedule 7/S4.02, holdown schedule 4/S5.50, and typical steel column spread footing schedule and detail 8/S4.02. All completed footing areas are approved for reinforcing and dimensions. All footings will be pre-inspected prior to placement of concrete. Inspector also reviews the concrete mix design with contractor. NORTHWEST TESTING COMPANY,INC. Mark Robinson Licensed Professional Geologist Registered Site Assessor ACl/ICC Certified Concrete Technician cc: Gary Larson, Ron Zier, Ray Mow,Eric Bailey,Bob Roberts, Phyllis Burnison(Mason County) PO SOX 11581 OLYMPIA,WASHINGTON 98508-1581 PHONE or FAX (360)866-3647 NORTHWEST TESTI G COMPANY, 1 C. REPORT OF IN PLACE SOIL DENSITY TESTS CLIENT: Hood Canal School District PROJECT: Hood Canal K-8 School REPORT NO: 03A DATE: June 08, 2006 CONTRACTOR: Jones &Roberts SUB-CONTRACTOR: SECO INSPECTOR: Mark Robinson PERMIT NUMBER:COM 2006-00003 PROJECT NUMBER: 0602.3 Soil Description and Moisture/Density Relationship: Proctor#1: imported 1 1/4"gravel(GW). 139.4 PCF @ 5.8 %. Method of Test: ASTM D-1557 (D) Field Wet Dry Percent Test No. Test Location Moisture Density Densi Compaction All tests taken at top of footing fill 1 grid line B2/A14, footing box(re-test) 3.6 140.2 135.3 97.1 2 sewer trench bylines B1 and B2 5.0 143.7 136.9 98.2 3 grid line A2,5B11 footing 3.7 140.4 135.4 97.1 4 grid line B8/A2.3,footing 4.4 139.9 134.0 96.1 5 grid line A1B7,footing box 4.9 139.6 133.1 95.5 Remarks: Job Spqcifications: 95% compaction required. All tests comply with specifications. See Field Report for further information. Inspector: Mark Robinson PO BOX I1581 OLYMPIA.WASHINGTON 98508-1581 PHONE/FAX:(360)866 3647 Mark Core-jun2706fld.email.doc Page 1 Northwest Testing Company, Inc. CONSTRUCTION TESTING and Il1'SPFCTIO.N ENI 7RONMENTAL COAiSULTATION and ASSESSMENT i t i FIELD INSPECTION REPORT CLIENT:Hood Canal School District DATE:June 27/29,2006 , PROJECT:Hood Canal K-8 School REPORT NO:06 CONTRACTOR: Jones&Roberts Construction PROJECT NUMBER: 0602.3 PERMIT NUMBER:COM 2006-00003 INSPECTOR: Mark Robinson i June 27: Inspector Mark Robinson arrives on site, 8:30 am, for inspection of fill compaction,epoxy i anchor installation and forms and reinforcing. Sunny,66 degrees. Contractor is preparing for Thursday's concrete placement for foundation walls at grid lines B 13 (C7-C7+);C7(D1-D5);B2(A9-A11);B4(A7-A9),A7(134-137);and elevator pit walls. Inspector reviews structural notes on sheets S1.01 and S1.02, and wall details 2&3/S4.03,holdown schedule 4/S5.50,shear wall anchor bolt schedule and typical steel column spread footing schedule and detail 8/S4.02. Also review elevator pit details 5&7 /S4.01.All completed footing areas are approved for reinforcing and dimensions. Contractor also dowels reinforcing bar into concrete footings at grid lines A7(B5)and B7 (A7). Six #4 reinforcing bar total. Dowel hole preparation and bar installation are completed in manner similar to that described in previous field reports with a 6"embedment. Earthwork contractor has completed structural fill for the footing at grid line B4(A1-A5). One field compaction test is made at the footing box at grid line B4 (A3). While the material has dried out, the compaction complies with minimum 95%requirement.Earthwork contractor begins moistening the gravel prior t placement and compaction. See attached for test results. June 29: Inspector Mark Robinson on site 9:10 am, for inspection of forms, reinforcing, and concrete placement. Sunny,72 degrees. Contractor places concrete for the building foundation walls at grid lines B 13 (C7-C7+); C7(D 1- D5); B2 (A9-A11); B4 (A7-A9), A7 (B4-B7); and elevator pit walls. All areas approved after addition of one#2 holdown at grid line C7(D1). Concrete is placed by truck chute at a 4.5"maximum slump and is vibrated for consolidation. One set of compressive strength test specimens is made on the total placement of 10 yards. Cylinders are stored in the field away from the work area for later pickup. Inspector begins pre-inspection of foundation walls scheduled for concrete placement after the holiday. At this time, walls at grid lines B8+BI I (A2-A3) and A2 (138-1311) have been completed. /21&X)16) Mark Core -jun2706a.sol.doc Page 1 NORTHWEST TESTING COMPANY, INC. REPORT OF IN PLACE SOIL DENSITY TESTS CLIENT:Hood Canal School District PROJECT:Hood Canal K-8 School REPORT NO:06A DATE:June 27,2006 CONTRACTOR:Jones&Roberts SUB-CONTRACTOR:SECO INSPECTOR:Mark Robinson PERMIT NUMBER:COM 2006-00003 PROJECT NUMBER:0602.3 Soil Description and Moisture/Density Relationship:Proctor#1:imported 1 '/4"gravel(GW). 139.4 PCF @ 5.8%. Method of Test: ASTM D-1557(D) Feld Wet Dry Percent Test No. Test Location Moisture Density Densi Compaction All tests taken at top of footing fill 1 grid line B4 Al-AS ;taken at footing box B4 A3 1.8 135.0 1321.6 95.1 Remarks: Job Specifications:95%compaction required.All tests comply with specifications.See Field Report for further information. Inspector:Mark Robinson Phyllis Burnison - may3002f1d.email.doc Page 1 Northwest Testing Company, Inc. CONSTRUCTION TESTING and INSPECTION ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTATION and ASSESSMENT FIELD INSPECTION REPORT CLIENT:Hood Canal School District DATE:May 30/June 02,2006 PROJECT:Hood Canal K-8 School REPORT NO:02 CONTRACTOR:Jones&Roberts Construction PROJECT NUMBER:0602.3 PERMIT NUMBER:COM 2006-00003 INSPECTOR:Mark Robinson May 30: Inspector Mark Robinson arrives on site, 1:45 pm, for inspection of earthwork progress and structural fill placement and compaction. Sunny,67 degrees. Earthwork contractor has begun the excavation of the trenches. Footing cuts are formed to provide a minimum of 12" of compacted structural fill beneath the footing, with the footing trench widened at a 1/1 ration to fill depth. Should the cut reveal unsuitable material such as wood debris, logs,old fill,this material will have to be excavated prior to placement of structural fill. Excavation is being done with a smooth-bladed excavator bucket. A select 1 '/a" gravel is used for fill, placed in one lift and compacted with the backhoe mounted hoe-pak. The gravel may require some moisture conditioning if dry weather continues. There are no areas ready for compaction testing at this time. A sample of the imported gravel is taken for moisture-density test. June 02: Inspector Mark Robinson arrives on site, 9:45 am, for inspection of earthwork progress and structural fill placement and compaction.Drizzle,59 degrees. Earthwork contractor is in the process of placement and compaction of structural fill in the footing trenches along the northeast side of the building area adjacent to the existing classroom building along the east end.Gravel fill has been placed in two or more separate lifts and has been compacted with a combination the hoe-pak and the pan compactor. Moisture condition is good. One location fails to comply with 95%compaction requirements. See attached for test locations and results. Phyllis Burnison - may3002f1d.email.doc Page 2 { NORTHWEST TESTING COMPANY,INC. Mark Robinson Mark Robinson Licensed Professional Geologist j Registered Site Assessor ACl/ICC Certified Concrete Technician cc: Gary Larson, Ron Zier, Steve Storaasli, Eric Bailey, Bob Roberts, Phyllis Burnison (Mason County) I PO BOX 11581 OLVMPIA, WASHINGTON 98.508-1581 PHONE or FAX (360) 866- 3647 L Phyllis Burnison - may3002fld.email.doc Page 3 i f i i i I t` I i i i i Phyllis Burnison - may3002a.sol.doc Page 1 NORTHWEST TESTING COMPANY, INC. REPORT OF IN PLACE SOIL DENSITY TESTS CLIENT:Hood Canal School District PROJECT:Hood Canal K-8 School REPORT NO:02A DATE:June 02,2006 CONTRACTOR:Jones&Roberts SUB-CONTRACTOR:SECO INSPECTOR:Mark Robinson PERMIT NUMBER:COM 2006-00003 PROJECT NUMBER:0602.3 Soil Description and Moisture/Density Relationship:Proctor#1:imported 1'A"gravel(GW).139.4 PCF @ 5.8%. Method of Test: ASTM D-1557(D) Field Wet Dry Percent Test No. Test Location Moisture Density Density Compaction All tests taken at top of footing fill 1 grid line B7/Al,footing box 5.6 143.9 136.3 97.8 2 grid line B14/A13.5,footing 6.2 147.3 138.7 99.5 3 grid line B12.8/A13,footing and box 4.5 1140.7 134.E 196.6 4 grid line B7/A14,footing box 4.8 140.7 134.3 96.3 5 grid line B2/A14,footing box 5.1 135.4 128.8 92.4 Remarks: Job Specifications: 95% compaction required. Test #5 does not comply with specifications. See Field Report for further information.Inspector.Mark Robinson fPhyllis Burnison - may3002a.sol.doc Page 2 PO BOX 11581 OLYMPIA. WASHINGTON 98508-1581 PHONEiFAX: (360) 866 3647 (7/15/2006) Phyllis Burnison -jun 1 204a.sol.doc Page 1 NORTHWEST TESTING COMPANY, INC. REPORT OF IN PLACE SOIL DENSITY TESTS CLIENT:Hood Canal School District PROJECT:Hood Canal K-8 School REPORT NO:04A DATE:June 12,2006 CONTRACTOR:Jones&Roberts SUB-CONTRACTOR:SECO i INSPECTOR:Mark Robinson PERMIT NUMBER:COM 2006-00003 PROJECT NUMBER:0602.3 Soil Description and Moisture/Density Relationship:Proctor#1:imported 1 ''/4"gravel(GW). 139.4 PCF @ 5.8%. Method of Test: ASTM D-1557(D) Field Wet Dry Percent Test No. Test Location Moisture Density Densi Compaction All tests taken at top of footing fill 1 footing,grid line B7/Al2 4.0 138.2 132.9 95.3 2 footing box,grid line A7/3.8 3.4 137.3 132.8 95.3 Remarks: Job Specifications:95%compaction required.All tests comply with specifications.See Field Report for further information. Inspector:Mark Robinson (7/15/2006) Phyllis Burnison -jun1204fld.email.doc Page 1 Northwest Testing Company, Inc. CONSTRUCTION TESTING and INSPECTION ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTATION and ASSESSMENT FIELD INSPECTION REPORT CLIENT:Hood Canal School District DATE:June 12/13,2006 PROJECT:Hood Canal K-8 School REPORT NO:04 CONTRACTOR:Jones&Roberts Construction PROJECT NUMBER:0602.3 PERMIT NUMBER:COM 2006-00003 INSPECTOR:Mark Robinson June 12: Inspector Mark Robinson arrives on site, 8:10 am, for inspection of fill placement and compaction,epoxy anchor installation,and forms and reinforcing.Partly sunny,61 degrees. Earthwork contractor continues the placement and compaction of structural fill in the footing trenches along the northeast and west sides of the building area Gravel fill has been placed in two or more separate lifts and has been compacted with a combination the hoe-pak and the pan compactor. Two in-place density tests are taken at random locations; all tests comply with specifications. See attached for test locations and results. Contractor is preparing for tomorrow's concrete placement for footings at grid lines A-12 through A-19 (excepting footing supports for the handicap ramp). Inspector reviews structural notes on sheets S 1.01 and S 1.02, and footing details 2&3/S4.03, footing box schedule 7/S4.02, holdown schedule 4/S5.50, and typical steel column spread footing schedule and detail 8/S4.02. All completed footing areas are approved for reinforcing and dimensions. Contractor also installs reinforcing bar into existing concrete footings at grid line Al3.8/A15. Materials: 5/8"diameter reinforcing bar,36"or greater length Epoxy:Hilo HY 150,expiration date 10/2006. Procedure: Inspector reviews structural detail 5/S4.02. The holes for the reinforcing have been drilled with the diameter of the drilled holes exceeding the reinforcing rod diameter by approximately 1/8" The drilled holes have already been initially blown free of debris and dust. Today the preparation is completed with each drilled location brushed and blown out such that no debris is noted leaving hole when compressed air is introduced.Imbed depth is measured at 4.5". After ensuring proper color(mixing)of epoxy at the end of the dispenser nozzle the holes are filled approximately 2/3 full with epoxy, and the reinforcing bar is inserted into the hole with a slight (7/15/2006) Phyllis Burnison -junl204fld.email.doc Page 2 R clockwise rotation, with a 1/8" counter-clockwise turn upon complete penetration. A bleed of epoxy is witnessed at the completion of installation. June 13: Inspector Mark Robinson on site 6:45 am, for inspection of forms, reinforcing, and concrete placement. Sunny,61 degrees. Contractor places concrete for the building footings and foundation boxes between grid lines B2- B14 (Al2-A16) excepting handicap ramp foundation; also footings at grid lines B2 & B4(A9- A14), B5 & B7 (A9-A13), and diagonal footing at A9-A10 (132-134). Footing tie-in to existing building footing along the northeast side is not done, footing stopped short of existing building. All areas are approved for dimensions, holdown placement, and reinforcing prior to concrete placement. Concrete is placed by pump at a 4.5"maximum slump and is vibrated for consolidation. One set of compressive strength test specimens is made on the total placement of 38 yards. Cylinders are stored in the field away from the work area for later pickup. NORTHWEST TESTING COMPANY,INC. Mark Robinson Mark Robinson Licensed Professional Geologist Registered Site Assessor ACFICC Certified Concrete Technician cc: Gary Larson, Ron Zier, Ray Mow, Eric Bailey, Bob Roberts, Steve Brannon, Phyllis Bumison (Mason County) PO BOX 11581 OLYMPIA,WASHINGTON 98508-1581 PHONE or FAX (360)866-3647 (7/15/2006) Phyllis Burnison -junl301.email.con.doe Page 1 I i Northwest Testing Company, Inc. CONSTRUCTION TESTING and INSPECTION ENVIRONMENTAL CONSUL TATIOrN'and ASSESSMENT REPORT OF CONCRETE TEST SPECIMENS Date Molded: June 13,2006 Job No.0602.3 Client:Hood Canal School District Permit No.COM 2006-00003 Project: Hood Canal K-8 School Address: I I I N. State Route 106,Shelton,Washington,98584 Contractor: Jones and Roberts Construction Sub-Contractor:NA Concrete Supplier: Miles Sand and Gravel Cast By:Mark Robinson Weather: cloudy Temp.Concrete: 73° Temp.Air: 64° Location of Concrete Placement: Footings and footing boxes between grid lines 132-1314(Al2- A16)excepting handicap ramp foundation; also footings at grid lines 132 &134(A9-A14),135 &137 (A9-A13),and diagonal footing at A9-A10(132-134). Sampled first 10-yard load,grid Al2/1313. Strength Requirement: 3000 PSI @ 28 days Slump: 4.5" Cement Type: Portland I Sacks: 5.5 Air Entrainment: 1.3%(non-entrained) Mix: 517#cement, 1860#rock, 1500#fine,31 oz poly. (mix number 025506) Set Specimen Test @ Register Date Date Total Unit No. Size Days Number Rec'd Tested Load Load 01 4 x 8 7 9871 06-14 06-20 47000 3740 " 28 9872 1107-11 67000 5330 " 28 9873 07-11 65000 5180 " hold 9874 discard Remarks: See Field Report for further details on placement.All tests comply with specifications. P.O.BOX 11581 OLYMPIA,WASHINGTON 98508-1581 PHONE or FAX (360)866-3647 f t L(7/20/2006) Phyllis Bumison -jun2202.email.con.doc Page 1 Northwest Testing Company, Inc. CONSTRUCTION TESTLNG and INSPECTION EN'1 7RONMENTAL CONSUL TATIO 'and ASSESSMENT REPORT OF CONCRETE TEST SPECIMENS Date Molded: June 22,2006 Job No.0602.3 Client: Hood Canal School District Permit No.COM 2006-00003 Project: Hood Canal K-8 School Address: 111 N. State Route 106,Shelton,Washington,98584 Contractor: Jones and Roberts Construction Sub-Contractor:NA Concrete Supplier:Miles Sand and Gravel Cast By:Mark Robinson Weather:partly cloudy Temp.Concrete: 70' Temp.Air: 60' Location of Concrete Placement: Foundation walls, grid lines 132-1314 (Al2-A16) excepting handicap ramp foundation; grid lines 132&134(A9-A14), 135 &137 (A9-A13), and diagonal wall at A9-A10(132-134). Sampled at grid Al2-A15 wall and elevator pit foundation, 10-yard total. Strength Requirement: 4000 PSI @ 28 days Slump:4 '/4" Cement Type: Portland I Sacks: 6.0 Air Entrainment: (non-entrained) Mix: 564#cement, 1860#rock, 1460#fine, 34 oz poly. (mix number 026006) Set Specimen Test @ Register Date Date Total Unit No. Size Days Number Rec'd Tested Load Load 02 4 x 8 7 9903 06-23 06-29 56000 4460 " 28 9904 07-20 73500 5850 " 28 9905 07-20 73000 5810 " hold 9906 discard Remarks: See Field Report for further details on placement. All tests comply with specifications. P.O.BOX 11581 OLYMPIA,WASHINGTON 98508-1581 PHONE or FAX (360)866-3647 I /06) Phyllis Burnison -jun2203.email.con.doc Page 1 Northwest Testing Company, Inc. CONSTRUCTION TESTING and IA'SPECTION ENVIRONMENTAL CONSUL TATION and ASSESSAIEA'T REPORT OF CONCRETE TEST SPECIMENS Date Molded: June 22,2006 Job No.0602.3 F Client:Hood Canal School District Permit No.COM 2006-00003 Project: Hood Canal K-8 School Address: 111 N. State Route 106,Shelton,Washington,98584 Contractor:Jones and Roberts Construction Sub-Contractor:NA Concrete Supplier:Miles Sand and Gravel Cast By:Mark Robinson Weather: sunny Temp.Concrete: 71' Temp.Air: 67' Location of Concrete Placement:Footings and footing boxes at grid lines 13 (Al 1-A-12); C6(D1- D5); 4 (A7-A9); A7 (134-7); elevator foundation slab; footings at B8&B11 (A2-A3 minus footing box at A3/B11); A2 (138-1311); free standing footing boxes at grid lines B9 (A1.5); B12.2 (A2.3 & A2.6); and B8.2(A2.5). Sampled at grid C6(133-135)and B7(A2A3),40-yard total. Strength Requirement: 3000 PSI @ 28 days Slump:4.0" Cement Type: Portland I Sacks: 5.5 Air Entrainment: (non-entrained) Mix: 517#cement, 1860#rock, 1500#fine, 31 oz poly. (mix number 025506) Set Specimen Test @ Register Date Date Total Unit No. Size Days Number Rec'd Tested Load Load 03 4 x 8 7 9907 06-23 06-29 51000 4060 " 28 9908 07-20 58000* 4620 " 28 9909 07-20 66500 5290 " 28 9910 07-20 64500 5140 Remarks: See Field Report for further details on placement. *Shear break-bad test cylinder. Backup cylinder is tested as well.All tests comply with specifications. F.O.BOX 11581 OLYMPIA,WASHINGTON 98508-1581 PHONE or FAX (360)866-3647 ` Northwest Testing Company, Inc. CONSTRUCTION TESTING and INSPECTION ENVIRONMENTAL CONSUL TATIONand ASSESSMENT FIELD INSPECTION REPORT CLIENT: Hood Canal School District DATE: June 21/22, 2006 PROJECT: Hood Canal K-8 School REPORT NO: 05 CONTRACTOR: Jones &Roberts Construction PROJECT NUMBER: 0602.3 PERMIT NUMBER: COM 2006-00003 INSPECTOR: Mark Robinson June 21: Inspector Mark Robinson arrives on site, 12:20 pm, for inspection of epoxy anchor installation and forms and reinforcing.Partly sunny, 72 degrees. Contractor is preparing for tomorrow's concrete placement for foundation walls at grid lines A-12 through A-19 (excepting footing supports for the handicap ramp and tie-in to existing building). Also scheduled for placement are footings and footing boxed at grid lines 13 (A11-A-12); C6 (D1- D5); 4 (A7-A9); A7 (B4-7); elevator foundation slab; footings at B8&B11 (A2-A3); A2 (B8-B11); free standing footing boxes at grid lines B9(A1.5);B12.2 (A2.3 &A2.6); and B8.2 (A2.5). Inspector reviews structural notes on sheets S 1.01 and S 1.02, and footing and wall details 2&3/S4.03, footing box schedule 7/S4.02, holdown schedule 4/S5.50, shear wall anchor bolt schedule and typical steel column spread footing schedule and detail 8/S4.02. Also review elevator pit details 5&7 /S4.0l.All completed footing areas are approved for reinforcing and dimensions. Inspector notes that the two additional#5 continuous bar are not placed in the elevator pit per detail. Contractor notified and these are placed. Contractor also dowels reinforcing bar into existing concrete foundation wall at grid line A13.8/A15. Materials: 5/8"diameter reinforcing bar, 36"or greater length Epoxy:Hilti HY 150, expiration date 10/2006. Procedure: Inspector reviews structural detail 5/S4.02. The holes for the reinforcing have been drilled with the diameter of the drilled holes exceeding the reinforcing rod diameter by approximately 1/8" The drilled holes have already been initially blown free of debris and dust. Today the preparation is completed with each drilled location brushed and blown out such that no debris is noted leaving hole when compressed air is introduced. Imbed depth is measured at 4.5". t After ensuring proper color(mixing)of epoxy at the end of the dispenser nozzle the holes are filled approximately 2/3 full with epoxy, and the reinforcing bar is inserted into the hole with a slight clockwise rotation, with a 1/8" counter-clockwise turn upon complete penetration. A bleed of epoxy is witnessed at the completion of installation. June 22: Inspector Mark Robinson on site 6:40 am, for inspection of forms, reinforcing, and concrete placement. Partly cloudy to sunny, 60 degrees. Contractor places concrete for the building foundation walls between grid lines B2-B14 (Al2-A16) excepting handicap ramp foundation and tie-in to existing building; also grid lines B2 & B4 (A9- A14), B5 & B7 (A9-A13), and diagonal wall at A9-A10 (132-134). Also place building footings at grid lines 13 (AI I-A-12); C6 (D1-D5); 4 (A7-A9); A7 (B4-7); elevator foundation slab; footings at B8&B11 (A2-A3); A2 (B8-B11 minus footing box at A3B11); free standing footing boxes at grid lines B9 (A1.5); B12.2 (A2.3 &A2.6); and B8.2 (A2.5). Upon final plan review and field inspection, inspector notes detail 754.02 callout for additional upper reinforcing mat in column footing boxes where HSS column is indicated "W/4x". This condition occurs in one location today at grid line A3B8. Contractor informed and additional \114 reinforcing mat is placed. All other areas are approved for dimensions, holdown placement, and reinforcing prior to concrete placement. Concrete is placed by pump at a 4.5" maximum slump and is vibrated for consolidation. Two sets of compressive strength test specimens are made on the total placement of 50 to represent different classes of concrete yards (30 yards of 4K plus 20 yards of 3K) for the foundation walls and the footings. Cylinders are stored in the field away from the work area for later pickup. NORTHWEST TESTING COMPANY,INC. H"A R44,soo, Mark Robinson Licensed Professional Geologist Registered Site Assessor ACl/ICC Certified Concrete Technician cc: Gary Larson, Ron Zier, Ray Mow, Eric Bailey, Bob Roberts, Steve Brannon, Phyllis Burnison , Terry Vosler PO BOX 11581 OLYMPIA,WASHINGTON 98508-1581 PHONE or FAX (360)866-3647 1 1 I I i I I i - j I t i i (7/15/2006)Phyllis Burnison -jun2105fld.email.doc Page 1 Northwest Testing Company, Inc. CONSTRUCTION TESTING and INSPECTION ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTATION and ASSESSMENT FIELD INSPECTION REPORT CLIENT:Hood Canal School District DATE:June 21/22,2006 PROJECT:Hood Canal K-8 School REPORT NO:05 CONTRACTOR:Jones&Roberts Construction PROJECT NUMBER:0602.3 PERMIT NUMBER:COM 2006-00003 INSPECTOR:Mark Robinson June 21: Inspector Mark Robinson arrives on site, 12:20 pm, for inspection of epoxy anchor installation and forms and reinforcing.Partly sunny,72 degrees. Contractor is preparing for tomor ow's concrete placement for foundation walls at grid lines A-12 through A-19 (excepting footing supports for the handicap ramp and tie-in to existing building). Also scheduled for placement are footings and footing boxed at grid lines 13 (Al 1-A-12); C6(D1- D5);4(A7-A9); A7 (134-7); elevator foundation slab; footings at B8&B11 (A2-A3); A2 (138-B11); free standing footing boxes at grid lines 139(A1.5);B12.2(A2.3 &A2.6);and 138.2(A2.5). Inspector reviews structural notes on sheets S1.01 and S1.02, and footing and wall details 2&3/S4.03, footing box schedule 7/S4.02, holdown schedule 4/S5.50, shear wall anchor bolt schedule and typical steel column spread footing schedule and detail 8/S4.02. Also review elevator pit details 5&7 /S4.0l.All completed footing areas are approved for reinforcing and dimensions. Inspector notes that the two additional#5 continuous bar are not placed in the elevator pit per detail. Contractor notified and these are placed. Contractor also dowels reinforcing bar into existing concrete foundation wall at grid line A13.8/A15. Materials: 5/8"diameter reinforcing bar,36"or greater length Epoxy:Hilo BY 150,expiration date 10/2006. Procedure: Inspector reviews structural detail 5/S4.02. The holes for the reinforcing have been drilled with the diameter of the drilled holes exceeding the reinforcing rod diameter by approximately 1/8" The drilled holes have already been initially blown free of debris and dust. Today the preparation is completed with each drilled location brushed and blown out such that no debris is noted leaving hole when compressed air is introduced.Imbed depth is measured at 4.5". After ensuring proper color(mixing)of epoxy at the end of the dispenser nozzle the holes are filled (7/15/2006) Phyllis Burnison -jun2105f1d.email.doc Page 21 approximately 2/3 full with epoxy, and the reinforcing bar is inserted into the hole with a slight clockwise rotation, with a 1/8" counter-clockwise turn upon complete penetration. A bleed of epoxy is witnessed at the completion of installation. June 22: Inspector Mark Robinson on site 6:40 am, for inspection of forms, reinforcing, and concrete placement.Partly cloudy to sunny,60 degrees. Contractor places concrete for the building foundation walls between grid lines 132-1314(Al2-A16) excepting handicap ramp foundation and tie-in to existing building; also grid lines B2 & B4(A9- A14), B5 & B7 (A9-A13), and diagonal wall at A9-A10 (132-114). Also place building footings at grid lines 13 (Al I-A-12); C6(131-135);4(A7-A9);A7 (134-7); elevator foundation slab;footings at B8&B I I (A2-A3); A2 (138-13 11 minus footing box at A3/13 11); free standing footing boxes at grid lines B9(A1.5);B12.2(A2.3&A2.6);and B8.2(A2.5). Upon final plan review and field inspection, inspector notes detail 7S4.02 callout for additional upper reinforcing mat in column footing boxes where HSS column is indicated "W/4x". This condition occurs in one location today at grid line A3/138. Contractor informed and additional reinforcing mat is placed. All other areas are approved for dimensions, holdown placement, and reinforcing prior to concrete placement. Concrete is placed by pump at a 4.5"maximum slump and is vibrated for consolidation. Two sets of compressive strength test specimens are made on the total placement of 50 to represent different classes of concrete yards (30 yards of 4K plus 20 yards of 3K) for the foundation walls and the footings.Cylinders are stored in the field away from the work area for later pickup. NORTHWEST TESTING COMPANY,INC. Mark Robinson Mark Robinson Licensed Professional Geologist Registered Site Assessor AC1/ICC Certified Concrete Technician cc: Gary Larson,Ron Zier,Ray Mow,Eric Bailey,Bob Roberts, Steve Brannon,Phyllis Bumison , Terry Vosler PO BOX 11581 OLYMPIA,WASHINGTON 98508-1581 PHONE or FAX (360)866-3647 (7/15/2006) Phyllis Burnison -jun2706a sol.doc Page 1 NORTHWEST TESTING COMPANY, INC. REPORT OF IN PLACE SOIL DENSITY TESTS CLIENT:Hood Canal School District PROJECT:Hood Canal K-8 School REPORT NO:06A DATE:June 27,2006 CONTRACTOR:Jones&Roberts SUB-CONTRACTOR:SECO INSPECTOR:Mark Robinson PERMIT NUMBER:COM 2006-00003 PROJECT NUMBER:0602.3 Soil Description and Moisture/Density Relationship:Proctor#1:imported 1 '/4"gravel(GW).139.4 PCF @ 5.8%. Method of Test: ASTM D-1557(D) Field Wet Dry Percent Test No. Test Location Moisture Density Density Compaction All tests taken at top of footing fill I grid line B4 Al-A5);taken at footing box B4 A3 1.8 135.0 1321.6 95.1 Remarks: Job Specifications:95%compaction required.All tests comply with specifications.See Field Report for further information. Inspector:Mark Robinson (7/15/2006) Phyllis Burnison -jun2706fld.email.doc Page 1 i Northwest Testing Company, Inc. COVSTRUCTION TESTING and INSPECTION ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTATIONand ASSF_SShfEN`T FIELD INSPECTION REPORT CLIENT:Hood Canal School District DATE: June 27/29,2006 i PROJECT:Hood Canal K-8 School REPORT NO: 06 CONTRACTOR:Jones&Roberts Construction PROJECT NUMBER: 0602.3 PERMIT NUMBER:COM 2006-00003 INSPECTOR: Mark Robinson June 27: Inspector Mark Robinson arrives on site, 8:30 am,for inspection of fill compaction, epoxy anchor installation and forms and reinforcing. Sunny,66 degrees. Contractor is preparing for Thursday's concrete placement for foundation walls at grid lines B13 (C7-C7+);C7(D1-D5);B2(A9-A11);B4(A7-A9),A7(134-137);and elevator pit walls. Inspector reviews structural notes on sheets S 1.01 and S 1.02, and wall details 2&3/S4.03,holdown schedule 4/S5.50,shear wall anchor bolt schedule and typical steel column spread footing schedule and detail 8/S4.02. Also review elevator pit details 5&7 /S4.0l.All completed footing areas are approved for reinforcing and dimensions. Contractor also dowels reinforcing bar into concrete footings at grid lines A7(135)and B7(A7). Six #4 reinforcing bar total. Dowel hole preparation and bar installation are completed in manner similar to that described in previous field reports with a 6"embedment. (! Earthwork contractor has completed structural fill for the footing at grid line B4(Al-A5).One field compaction test is made at the footing box at grid line B4 (A3). While the material has dried out, the compaction complies with minimum 95%requirement.Earthwork contractor begins moistening the gravel prior t placement and compaction. See attached for test results. June 29: Inspector Mark Robinson on site 9:10 am, for inspection of forms, reinforcing, and concrete placement. Sunny,72 degrees. Contractor places concrete for the building foundation walls at grid lines B13 (C7-C7+); C7(D1- DS); B2 (A9-All); B4 (A7-A9), A7 (134-B7); and elevator pit walls. All areas approved after addition of one#2 holdown at grid line C7(D 1). Concrete is placed by truck chute at a 4.5"maximum slump and is vibrated for consolidation. One set of compressive strength test specimens is made on the total placement of 10 yards. Cylinders are stored in the field away from the work area for later pickup. Inspector begins pre-inspection of foundation walls scheduled for concrete placement after the holiday. At this time,walls at grid lines B8+1311 (A2-A3)and A2 (B8-B11)have been completed. (7/15/2006) Phyllis Burnison -jun2706fid.email.doc Page 2 Inspector notes that the anchor bolts in the wall along grid line B8 have been placed at 48"o.c.This "B"type wall requires anchor bolts at 36"o.c.Contractor notified and corrections will be made.All other areas approved. NORTHWEST TESTING COMPANY,INC. Mark Robinson Mark Robinson Licensed Professional Geologist Registered Site Assessor ACl/ICC Certified Concrete Technician cc: Gary Larson,Ron Zier,Ray Mow,Eric Bailey,Bob Roberts, Steve Brannon,Phyllis Burnison, Terry Vosler PO BOX 11581 OLYM PIA,WASHINGTON 98508-1581 PHONE or FAX (360)866-3647 (7/10/2006) Phyllis Burnison -ju10507a.sol.doc Page 1 y NORTHWEST TESTING COMPANY, INC. i REPORT OF IN PLACE SOIL DENSITY TESTS CLIENT:Hood Canal School District PROJECT:Hood Canal K-8 School REPORT NO:07A DATE:July 05,2006 CONTRACTOR:Jones&Roberts SUB-CONTRACTOR:SECO INSPECTOR:Mark Robinson PERMIT NUMBER:COM 2006-00003 PROJECT NUMBER:0602.3 Soil Description and Moisture/Density Relationship:Proctor#1:imported I '/A"gavel(GW). 139.4 PCF @ 5.8%. Method of Test ASTM D-1557(D) Field Wet Dry Percent Test No. Test Location Moisture Density Densi Compaction All tests taken at top of footing fill I grid line AS 134-1312;taken at footing box A5/B7 6.6 147.7 138.6 99.4 2 grid line AS 134-1312;taken at footing box A5/B12 5.7 145.6 137.8 98.9 Remarks: Job Specifications:95%compaction required. All tests comply with specifications. See Field Report for further information. Inspector:Mark Robinson A0/2006) Phyllis Burnison -ju10507a sol.doc Page 2_� PO BOX 11581 OLYsMPIA,WASHINGTON 98-W&1581 PHONEIFAX:(360)866 3647 (7/15/2006) Phyllis Burnison -ju10507a.sol.doc Page 1 1 _.__ -_..- --.__ --._ _. .----- - —— ----------- --- -- -- _J NORTHWEST TESTING COMPANY, INC. REPORT OF IN PLACE SOIL DENSITY TESTS CLIENT:Hood Canal School District PROJECT:Hood Canal K-8 School REPORT NO:07A DATE:July 05,2006 CONTRACTOR:Jones&Roberts SUB-CONTRACTOR:SECO INSPECTOR:Mark Robinson PERMIT NUMBER:COM 2006-00003 PROJECT NUMBER:0602.3 Soil Description and Moisture/Density Relationship:Proctor#1:imported 1 %"gravel(GW). 139.4 PCF @ 5.8%. Method of Test: ASTM D-1557(D) Field Wet Dry Percent Test No. Test Location Moisture Density Densi Compaction All tests taken at top of footing fill I grid line A5(134-13 12);taken at footing box A5/B7 6.6 147.7 138.6 99.4 2 grid line AS 134-1312;taken at footing box A5/B12 5.7 145.6 137.8 98.9 Remarks: Job Specifications: 95%compaction required.All tests comply with specifications.See Field Report for further information. Inspector:Mark Robinson (7/10/2006) Phyllis Burnison -jul0507fld.email.doc Page 1 Northwest Testing Company, Inc. CONSTRUCTION TESTING and INSPECTION ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTATION and ASSESSMENT FIELD INSPECTION REPORT CLIENT:Hood Canal School District DATE: July 05/07,2006 PROJECT:Hood Canal K-8 School REPORT NO: 07 CONTRACTOR:Jones&Roberts Construction PROJECT NUMBER:0602.3 PERMIT NUMBER:COM 2006-00003 INSPECTOR:Mark Robinson July 05: Inspector Mark Robinson arrives on site, 11:30 am, for inspection of fill compaction, epoxy anchor installation and forms and reinforcing.Overcast,66 degrees. Contractor is preparing for tomorrows concrete placement for footings and footing boxes at grid lines B4 (Al-A5), Al (B4-W), B7 (Al-A5), A2.1 (W-B8), A5 (134-B7), and boxes at grids B5 (A16.2),A18(B4.5),A2.9(W),BI I (A3),and B9.3(A3).Also place foundation walls at grid lines B8&B11 (A2—A3),A2(138-B11). Inspector reviews structural notes on sheets S 1.01 and S 1.02,and wall details 2&3/S4.03,holdown schedule 4/S5.50,shear wall anchor bolt schedule and typical steel column spread footing schedule and detail 8/S4.02. All completed footing and foundation wall areas are approved for reinforcing and dimensions. Contractor also dowels reinforcing bar into existing concrete footings and foundation walls for new footing and wall tie-in B5 (A16.2) and A18 (B4.5). #5 bar is used for footing, #4 bar for walls. Dowel hole preparation and bar installation are completed in manner similar to that described in previous field reports with a 4"embedment. Earthwork contractor has completed placement and compaction of structural fill for the footing at grid line A5 (B4-B12). Inspector notes that the material being placed is well below optimum moisture conditions and the fill in the footing area does not appear well consolidated. The reinforcing steel mat is removed from footing box A5 (1137) and the entire footing line is re- moistened and re-compacted with both the hoepak and the pan vibrator.(forms are not in along the rest of the line yet). Two compaction tests are taken, both comply with compaction requirements. See attached for test results. July 06: Inspector Mark Robinson on site 6:45 am, for inspection of forms, reinforcing, and concrete placement.Overcast,drizzle,58 degrees. Contractor places concrete for the building footings and footing boxes at grid lines B4(Al-A5),Al (B4-B7), 137 (Al-A5), A2.1 (W-B8), A5 (134-137), and boxes at grids B5 (A16.2), A18 (B4.5), A2.9 (W), BI I (A3), and B9.3 (A3). Also place foundation walls at grid lines B8 & BI I (A2 — (7/10/2006) Phyllis Burnison -ju10507fld.email.doc Page 2 A3),A2(B8-1311). r Concrete is placed by pump at a 4.5"maximum slump and is vibrated for consolidation. Two sets of compressive strength test specimens are made on the total placement of 44 to represent different classes of concrete yards (30 yards of 3K plus 14 yards of 4K) for the footings and the foundation walls.Cylinders are stored in the field away from the work area for later pickup. NORTHWEST TESTING COMPANY,INC. Mark Robinson Mark Robinson Licensed Professional Geologist Registered Site Assessor ACl/ICC Certified Concrete Technician cc: Gary Larson,Ron Zier,Ray Mow, Eric Bailey, Bob Roberts, Steve Brannon, Phyllis Burnison , Terry Vosler I PO BOX 11581 OLYMPIA,WASHINGTON 98508-1581 PHONE or FAX (360)866-3647 (7/15/2006) Phyllis Burnison -jul0507fld.email.doc Page 1 Northwest Testing Company, Inc. CONSTRUCTION TESTING and INSPECTION ENUMON31ENTAL CONSULTATION and ASSESSMENT FIELD INSPECTION REPORT CLIENT:Hood Canal School District DATE:July 05/07,2006 PROJECT:Hood Canal K-8 School REPORT NO:07 CONTRACTOR: Jones&Roberts Construction PROJECT NUMBER: 0602.3 PERMIT NUMBER:COM 2006-00003 INSPECTOR:Mark Robinson July 05: Inspector Mark Robinson arrives on site, 11:30 am, for inspection of fill compaction, epoxy anchor installation and forms and reinforcing. Overcast,66 degrees. Contractor is preparing for tomorrows concrete placement for footings and footing boxes at grid lines B4 (Al-A5), Al (134-137), B7 (Al-A5), A2.1 (137-138), A5 (B4-B7), and boxes at grids B5 (A16.2),A18(B4.5),A2.9(135),BI I (A3),and B9.3(A3).Also place foundation walls at grid lines B8&BI I (A2—A3),A2(138-1311). Inspector reviews structural notes on sheets S1.01 and S1.02, and wall details 2&3/S4.03,holdown schedule 4/S5.50,shear wall anchor bolt schedule and typical steel column spread footing schedule and detail 8/S4.02. All completed footing and foundation wall areas are approved for reinforcing and dimensions. Contractor also dowels reinforcing bar into existing concrete footings and foundation walls for new footing and wall tie-in B5 (A16.2) and A18 (B4.5). #5 bar is used for footing, #4 bar for walls. Dowel hole preparation and bar installation are completed in manner similar to that described in previous field reports with a 4"embedment. Earthwork contractor has completed placement and compaction of structural fill for the footing at grid line A5 (134-B12). Inspector notes that the material being placed is well below optimum moisture conditions and the fill in the footing area does not appear well consolidated. The reinforcing steel mat is removed from footing box A5 (B7) and the entire footing line is re- moistened and re-compacted with both the hoepak and the pan vibrator(forms are not in along the rest of the line yet). Two compaction tests are taken, both comply with compaction requirements. See attached for test results. July 06: Inspector Mark Robinson on site 6:45 am, for inspection of forms, reinforcing, and concrete placement.Overcast,drizzle,58 degrees. Contractor places concrete for the building footings and footing boxes at grid lines B4(A1-A5),Al (B4-137), B7 (Al-A5), A2.1 (B7-B8), A5 (B4-137), and boxes at grids B5 (A16.2), A18 (B4.5), A2.9 (B5), B I I (A3), and B9.3 (A3). Also place foundation walls at grid lines B8 & BI I (A2 — (7/15/2006) Phyllis Burnison -ju10507fld.email.doc Page 2 i A3),A2(138-1311). f Concrete is placed by pump at a 4.5"maximum slump and is vibrated for consolidation. Two sets of compressive strength test specimens are made on the total placement of 44 to represent different classes of concrete yards (30 yards of 3K plus 14 yards of 4K) for the footings and the foundation walls.Cylinders are stored in the field away from the work area for later pickup. NORTHWEST TESTING COMPANY,INC. Mark Robinson Mark Robinson Licensed Professional Geologist Registered Site Assessor ACl/ICC Certified Concrete Technician cc: Gary Larson,Ron Zier, Ray Mow, Eric Bailey, Bob Roberts, Steve Brannon, Phyllis Burnison , Terry Vosler PO BOX 11581 OLYMPIA,WASHINGTON 98508-1581 PHONE or FAX (360)866-3647 (7/15/2006) Phyllis Burnison -ju11108a.sol.doc Page 1 NORTHWEST TESTING COMPANY, INC. REPORT OF IN PLACE SOIL DENSITY TESTS CLIENT:Hood Canal School District PROJECT:Hood Canal K-8 School REPORT NO:08A DATE:July 11,2006 CONTRACTOR:Jones&Roberts SUB-CONTRACTOR:SECO INSPECTOR:Mark Robinson PERMIT NUMBER:COM 2006-00003 PROJECT NUMBER:0602.3 Soil Description and Moisture/Density Relationship:Proctor#1:imported 1 '/4"gravel(GW).139.4 PCF @ 5.8%. Method of Test: ASTM D-1557(D) Field Wet Dry Percent Test No. Test Location Moisture Density Density Compaction All tests taken at top of footing fill 1 footing box A5.5/B8 5.3 140.3 133.2 95.6 2 footing box A6/139 4.1 141.4 135.8 97.4 Remarks: Job Specifications:95%compaction required.All tests comply with specifications.See Field Report for further information. Inspector:Mark Robinson (7/15/2006) Phyllis Burnlson -ju11108a sol.doc Page 1 . NORTHWEST TESTING COMPANY, INC. REPORT OF IN PLACE SOIL DENSITY TESTS CLIENT:Hood Canal School District PROJECT:Hood Canal K-8 School REPORT NO:08A DATE:July 11,2006 CONTRACTOR:Jones&Roberts SUB-CONTRACTOR:SECO INSPECTOR:Mark Robinson PERMIT NUMBER:COM 2006-00003 PROJECT NUMBER:0602.3 Soil Description and Moisture/Density Relationship:Proctor#1:imported 1 '/."gravel(GW).139.4 PCF @ 5.8%. Method of Test: ASTM D-1557(D) Field Wet Dry Percent Test No. Test Location Moisture Density Density Compaction All tests taken at top of footing fill 1 footing box A5.5/B8 5.3 140.3 133.2 95.6 2 footing box A6/B9 4.1 141.4 135.8 97.4 Remarks: Job Specifications:95%compaction required.All tests comply with specifications.See Field Report for further information. Inspector:Mark Robinson (7/15/2006)Phyllis Burnison -jull 108fld.email.doc Page 1 Northwest Testing Company, Inc. CONSTRUCTION TESTING and INSPECTION ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTATION and ASSESSMENT FIELD INSPECTION REPORT CLIENT:Hood Canal School District DATE:July 11/14,2006 PROJECT:Hood Canal K-8 School REPORT NO:08 CONTRACTOR:Jones&Roberts Construction PROJECT NUMBER:0602.3 PERMIT NUMBER:COM 2006-00003 INSPECTOR:Mark Robinson July 11: Inspector Mark Robinson arrives on site, 8:00 am, for inspection of fill compaction, forms and reinforcing.Overcast,60 degrees. i Earthwork contractor continues the placement and compaction of structural fill for the footings east of grid line A5. Inspector observes placement and compaction,and the moisture-conditioning of the fill. Water is added as required to both the stockpile and to the material as it is placed into the footings. Compaction is achieved through both the hoepak and vibratory pan. Two in-place field compaction tests are taken,both tests comply with compaction requirements. See attached for test results. Contractor is preparing for concrete placement of foundation walls and footings for Friday (or before). Completed footing areas are inspected and approved. Foundation wall reinforcing is not complete(anchor bolts and holdowns not in yet),but forms are approved for width. July 14: Inspector Mark Robinson on site 6:45 am, for inspection of forms, reinforcing, and concrete placement.Overcast,58 degrees. Contractor places concrete for the building footings and footing boxes at grid lines B8 (A3-A5.6), B9 (A3.2-A4.8), B 10 (A3-A5), A5 (B8-B 12), D 1 (C 1-C6), C 3 (N of D 1 line), B7 (A5-A6), C4/5 (D1-D2),D1 (C5-C6),and stairwell footings at B8-B9.2(A5.5-A7). Also place foundation walls at grid lines B4&B7 (Al-AS), A2.1 (B7-138), Al&AS (B4-B7). Also place foundations adjacent to existing for ramp and column,grid lines A7(B5)and B7(A7). Concrete is placed by pump at a 4.5"maximum slump and is vibrated for consolidation. Two sets of compressive strength test specimens are made on the total placement of 68 to represent different classes of concrete yards (50 yards of 3K plus 18 yards of 4K) for the footings and the foundation walls.Cylinders are stored in the field away from the work area for later pickup. (7/15/2006) Phyllis Burnison -jull 108f[d.email.doc Page 2 \ORTHWEST TESTING COMPANY,INC. Mark Robinson Mark Robinson Licensed Professional Geologist Registered Site Assessor ACMCC Certified Concrete Technician cc: Gary Larson,Ron Zier,Ray Mow,Eric Bailey,Bob Roberts, Steve Brannon,Phyllis Burnison , Terry Vosler PO BOX 11581 OLYMPIA,WASHINGTON 98508-1581 PHONE or FAX (360)866-3647 (7/1 5/200F.,,) Phyllis Burnison jul1108fid.email.doc Page 1 Northwest Testing Company, Inc. CONSTRUCTION TESTING and INSPECTION ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTATION and ASSESSMENT FIELD INSPECTION REPORT CLIENT:Hood Canal School District DATE:July 11/14,2006 PROJECT:Hood Canal K-8 School REPORT NO:08 CONTRACTOR:Jones&Roberts Construction PROJECT NUMBER:0602.3 PERMIT NUMBER:COM 2006-00003 INSPECTOR:Mark Robinson July 11: Inspector Mark Robinson arrives on site, 8:00 am, for inspection of fill compaction, forms and reinforcing.Overcast,60 degrees. Earthwork contractor continues the placement and compaction of structural fill for the footings east of grid line A5. Inspector observes placement and compaction,and the moisture-conditioning of the fill. Water is added as required to both the stockpile and to the material as it is placed into the footings. Compaction is achieved through both the hoepak and vibratory pan. Two in-place field compaction tests are taken,both tests comply with compaction requirements. See attached for test results. Contractor is preparing for concrete placement of foundation walls and footings for Friday (or before). Completed footing areas are inspected and approved. Foundation wall reinforcing is not complete(anchor bolts and holdowns not in yet),but forms are approved for width. July 14: Inspector Mark Robinson on site 6:45 am, for inspection of forms, reinforcing, and concrete placement. Overcast,58 degrees. Contractor places concrete for the building footings and footing boxes at grid lines B8 (A3-A5.6), B9 (A3.2-A4.8), B10 (A3-A5), AS (B8-B12), D1 (Cl-C6), C 3 (N of D1 line), B7 (A5-A6), C4/5 (DI-D2),D1 (C5-C6), and stairwell footings at B8-B9.2 (A5.5-A7). Also place foundation walls at grid lines B4&B7 (Al-AS), A2.1 (137-138), Al&AS (B4-B7). Also place foundations adjacent to existing for ramp and column,grid lines A7(B5)and B7(A7). Concrete is placed by pump at a 4.5"maximum slump and is vibrated for consolidation. Two sets of compressive strength test specimens are made on the total placement of 68 to represent different classes of concrete yards (50 yards of 3K plus 18 yards of 4K) for the footings and the foundation walls.Cylinders are stored in the field away from the work area for later pickup. (7/15/2005) Phyllis Burnison -jull 108fld.email.doc Page 2 NORTHWEST TESTING COMPANY,INC. Mark Robinson Mark Robinson Licensed Professional Geologist Registered Site Assessor ACMCC Certified Concrete Technician cc: Gary Larson,Ron Zier,Ray Mow,Eric Bailey,Bob Roberts, Steve Brannon,Phyllis Burnison , Terry Vosler PO BOY 11581 OLYMPIA,WASHINGTON 98508-1581 PHONE or FAX (360)866-3647 (7/20/2006) Phyllis Burnison -jul1909fid.email.doc Page 1 Northwest Testing Company, Inc. COASTRI"CTION TESTING and I'SPF.CTION EN 17ROA,tIE.A TA1.COAS1%1_TATION and ASSESSMENT FIELD INSPECTION REPORT CLIENT:Hood Canal School District DATE: July 19,2006 PROJECT: Hood Canal K-8 School REPORT NO: 09 CONTRACTOR: Jones&Roberts Construction PROJECT NUMBER: 0602.3 PERMIT NUMBER: COM 2006-00003 INSPECTOR:Mark Robinson July 19: Inspector Mark Robinson arrives on site, 9:10 am, for inspection of fill compaction, forms and reinforcing. Sunny,64 degrees. Contractor places concrete for foundation walls at grid lines B10 (A3-A5), AS (B8-B12), B9(A3.2- A4), B8 (A3-A6), B7 (A5-A6), stairwell walls at area B8-139.5 A5.5-A6), DI (CI-C2), C3&C5 (north of line D1),and the two short walls N&E of point D1 (C5). Forms, reinforcing, anchor bolt and holdown placement are inspected prior to placement of concrete and are approved per notes,schedule,and details. Concrete is placed by pump at a 4.5"maximum slump and is vibrated for consolidation. One set of compressive strength test specimens is made on the total placement of 10 yards. Cylinders are stored in the field away from the work area for later pickup. NORTHWEST TESTING COMPANY,INC. Mark Robinson Mark Robinson Licensed Professional Geologist Registered Site Assessor ACl/ICC Certified Concrete Technician cc: Gary Larson, Ron Zier, Ray Mow, Eric Bailey, Bob Roberts, Steve Brannon, Phyllis Burnison , Terry Vosler PO BOX 11581 OLYM PIA,WASHINGTON 98508-1581 PHONE or FAX (360)866-3647 ,_J (7/30/2006) Phyllis Burnison -jul2510a.sol.doc Page 1 NORTHWEST TESTING COMPANY, INC. REPORT OF IN PLACE SOIL DENSITY TESTS CLIENT:Hood Canal School District PROJECT:Hood Canal K-8 School REPORT NO: l0A DATE:July 25,2006 CONTRACTOR:Jones&Roberts SUB-CONTRACTOR:SECO INSPECTOR:Mark Robinson PERMIT NUMBER:COM 2006-00003 PROJECT NUMBER:0602.3 Soil Description and Moisture/Density Relationship:Proctor#1:imported 1 ''/4"gravel(GW).139.4 PCF @ 5.8%. Method of Test: ASTM D-1557(D) Field Wet Dry Percent Test No. Test Location Moisture Density Density Compaction All tests taken at top of footing fill 1 Footing,grid line C3 .5 3.8 138.8 133.7 95.9 2 Footing box,grid line C3 3 3.7 140.4 135.4 97.1 Remarks: Job Specifications:95%compaction required.All tests comply with specifications.See Field Report for further information. Inspector:Mark Robinson (7/30/2006) Phyllis Burnison -ju1251 Oa.sol.doc Page 2-1 N)BOX 11581 0[,N.NII'IA,��ASMNGTON 98508-1581 P"ONEITAX:(360)866 3647 1 (7/30/2006) Phyllis Burnison -jul2410fld.email.doc Page 1 Northwest Testing Company, Inc. CONSTRUCTION TESTING and INSPECTION ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTATION and ASSESSMENT FIELD INSPECTION REPORT CLIENT:Hood Canal School District DATE:July 24/25/26/27,2006 PROJECT:Hood Canal K-8 School REPORT NO: 10 CONTRACTOR:Jones&Roberts Construction PROJECT NUMBER:0602.3 PERMIT NUMBER:COM 2006-00003 INSPECTOR:Mark Robinson July 24: Inspector Mark Robinson arrives on site, 6:40 am, for inspection of concrete placement. Sunny,62 degrees. Contractor places concrete for the floor slab, grid lines A7-EO (132-B7). Note: contractor had scheduled to place considerably more footage, but the finishing crew had a number of employees not show up to the job this morning, so placement of the remainder of the slab has been postponed until Wednesday. Also placed today are the footing boxes and footing along grid line C.5 (D1.5- 135),and the footings for new wall in the existing mechanical room. Slab is 4" depth with vapor barrier (taped at joints), run up against interior walls for bond break. Exterior walls insulated. Zip-strip used for joint control. Typical wall and slab details per sheet 54.01. Fiber mesh used, doorways and interior column boxes reinforced per typical slab details. Footings and forms are also approved per typical details prior to placement. Mechanical footing dimension is 30", with two #5 continuous bar horizontal, and hooked #4 bar at 12" on center j (alternate tails)vertical. p Concrete is placed by pump at a 5.0"maximum slump and is vibrated for consolidation in footing and thickened areas. Two sets of compressive strength test specimens are made on the total placement of 69 yards,40 yards of slab mix and 29 yards of footing mix. Cylinders are stored in the field away from the work area for later pickup. July 25: Inspector Mark Robinson arrives on site, 9:40 am, for inspection of structural fill placement and sample pickup.Overcast,60 degrees. Earthwork contractor continues excavation and placement of structural fill along grid line C3.Fill is being moisture conditioned and compacted with a combination of the hoe pak and the vibratory pan compactor. Two in-place field compaction tests are taken at random locations, both tests comply with compaction requirements. See attached for test locations and results. July 26: Inspector Mark Robinson arrives on site, 6:40 am, for inspection of concrete placement. Sunny,61 degrees. Contractor places concrete for the floor slab area bounded north by grid lines E2/EO, east by (7/30/2006) Phyllis Burnison-jul2410fld.email.doc Page 2 I A15/E2 B (4.2), south by B13B14, west by A7/A5.8/C3/Al2. In addition, a short section of foundation wall is placed at grid line C5 (131-135). Forms and reinforcing are inspected and approved prior to placement per typical slab and foundation wall notes and per above slab placement notes of 7-24. Concrete is placed by pump at a 5.0" maximum slump. Two sets of compressive strength test specimens are made on the total placement of 105 yards.Cylinders are stored in the field away from the work area for later pickup. July 27: Inspector Mark Robinson arrives on site, 12:10 pm, for inspection of reinforced concrete placement.Sunny,71 degrees. Contractor places concrete for footings and footing boxes at grid lines C1 & C2 (131-134), C2.6 (D1.3-D1.7), C3 (DI-D4), D4 (CI-C3), D3.8 (C3-C4), and footing box at C2.5 (132). Forms, reinforcing, anchor bolt and holdown placement are inspected prior to placement of concrete and are approved per typical notes and details after the addition of two#7 reinforcing bar required in an F8 footing box. Concrete is placed by truck chute at a 4.5"maximum slump and is vibrated for consolidation. One set of compressive strength test specimens is made on the total placement of 22 yards. Cylinders are stored in the field away from the work area for later pickup. NORTHWEST TESTING COMPANY,INC. Mark Robinson Mark Robinson Licensed Professional Geologist Registered Site Assessor ACl/ICC Certified Concrete Technician cc: Gary Larson, Ron Zier,Ray Mow,Eric Bailey,Bob Roberts, Steve Brannon,Phyllis Burnison, Tent'Vosler (7/30/2006) Phyllis Burnison -ju12410fld.email.doc Page 3 I PO BOX 11581 OLYMPIA,WASHINGTON 98508-1581 PHONE or FAX (360)866-3647 (8/4/2006) Phyllis Bumison -jul06 11 05.email.con.doc Page 1 Northwest Testing Company, Inc. CONSTRUCTION TESTING and INSPECTION ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTATION and ASSESSMENT REPORT OF CONCRETE TEST SPECIMENS Date Molde Job No.0602.3 Client: Hood Canal School District Permit No.COM 2006-00003 Project:Hood Canal K-8 School Address: I I I N. State Route 106,Shelton,Washington,98584 I Contractor:Jones and Roberts Construction Sub-Contractor:NA Concrete Supplier:Miles Sand and Gravel Cast By:Mark Robinson I I Weather:overcast,drizzle Temp. Concrete: 73' Temp. I Air: 60' Location of Concrete Placement: Footings and footing boxes at grid lines 134 (AI-A5), Al (134- 137),137 (Al-A5),A2.1 (137-138),A5 (134-137),boxes at footing to existing tie-in at 135 (A16.2)and A18 (134.5),boxes at A2.9 (135), 139.3 (A3), and B I I (A3). Sampled first 10-yard load, grid lines Al (134-137)and 134(Al-A2.4). Strength Requirement: 3000 PSI @ 28 days Slump:4 1/4' Cement Type:Portland I Sacks: 5.5 Air Entrainment:(non-entrained) Mix: 517#cement, 1860#rock, 1500#fine,31 oz poly. (mix number 025506) Set Specimen Test @ Register Date Date Total Unit No. Size Days Number Rec'd Tested Load Load 05 4 x 8 7 9963 07-07 07-13 44000 3500 " 28 9964 08-03 59000 4700 28 9965 08-03 57500 4580 " hold 9966 discard Remarks: See Field Report for further details on placement.All tests comply with specifications. (8/4/2006) Phyllis Burnison -ju10606.email.con.doc Page 1 Northwest Testing Company, Inc. CONSTRUCTION TESTING and INSPECTION ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTATION and ASSESSMENT REPORT OF CONCRETE TEST SPECIMENS Date Molded Job No.0602.3 Client:Hood Canal School District Permit No.COM 2006-00003 Project: Hood Canal K-8 School Address: I I I N. State Route 106,Shelton,Washington,98584 Contractor: Jones and Roberts Construction Sub-Contractor:NA E Concrete Supplier:Miles Sand and Gravel Cast By: Mark Robinson i [ Weather: overcast,drizzle Temp. Concrete: 74' Temp. Air: 61° Location of Concrete Placement:Foundation walls,grid lines 138+1311 (A2-A3),A2 (138-1311). Strength Requirement: 4000 PSI @ 28 days Slump: 4 '/2" Cement Type:Portland I Sacks: 6.0 Air Entrainment: (non-entrained) Mix: 564#cement, 1860#rock, 1460#fine, 34 oz poly. (mix number 026006) Set Specimen Test @ Register Date Date Total Unit No. Size Days Number Rec'd Tested Load Load 06 4 x 8 7 9967 07-07 07-13 51000 4060 " 28 9968 08-03 67500 5370 " 28 9969 08-03 67000 5330 " hold 9970 discard Remarks: See Field Report for further details on placement.All tests comply with specifications. P.O.BOX 11581 OLYAMPIA,WASHINGTON 98508-1581 PHONE or FAX (360)866-3647 (8/14/2006) Phyllis Burnison -jul1408.email.con.doc Page 1 Northwest Testing Company, Inc. CONSTRUCTION TESTING and I:YSPF.CTIO.'V ENVIROV 11 FWAL CONSULTATION and ASSESSMENT REPORT OF CONCRETE TEST SPECIMENS Date Molded Job No.0602.3 Client:Hood Canal School District Permit No.COM 2006-00003 Project: Hood Canal K-8 School Address: I I I N. State Route 106,Shelton,Washington,98584 Contractor:Jones and Roberts Construction Sub-Contractor:NA Concrete Supplier:Miles Sand and Gravel Cast By:Mark Robinson Weather:partly cloudy Temp.Concrete: 74' Temp.Air:57' Location of Concrete Placement: Foundation walls, grid lines B4&137 (Al-A5), A2.1 (137-138), Al&A5 (134-137); foundations adjacent to existing for ramp and column, grid lines A7 (135) and 137 (A7). Strength Requirement: 4000 PSI @ 28 days Slump:4.5" Cement Type:Portland I Sacks: 6.0 Air Entrainment: (non-entrained) Mix: 564#cement, 1860#rock, 1460#fine,34 oz poly. (mix number 026006) Set Specimen Test @ Register Date Date Total Unit No. Size Days Number Rec'd Tested Load Load 08 4 x 8 7 0027 07-17 07-21 56000 4460 " 28 0028 08-11 65000 5180 " 28 0029 08-11 63000 5020 " hold 0030 discard Remarks: See Field Report for further details on placement.All tests comply with specifications. P.O.BOX 11581 OLYMPIA.WASHINGTON 98508-1581 PHONE or FAX (360)866-3647 (8/14/2006) Phyllis Burnison -ju11407.email.con.doc Page 1 Northwest Testing Company, Inc. CONSTRUCTION TESTING and 1,VSPF.CTION ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTATION and ASSESSMENT REPORT OF CONCRETE TEST SPECIMENS Date Molded- Job No.0602.3 Client:Hood Canal School District Permit No.COM 2006-00003 Project: Hood Canal K-8 School Address: 111 N. State Route 106,Shelton,Washington,98584 Contractor:Jones and Roberts Construction Sub-Contractor:NA Concrete Supplier:Miles Sand and Gravel Cast By:Mark Robinson Weather:partly cloudy Temp.Concrete: 730 Temp.Air: 58' Location of Concrete Placement: Footings and footing boxes at grid lines 138 (A3-A5.6), 139 (A3.2-A4.8), 1310 (A3-A5), A5 (138-1312), D1 (CI-C6), C 3 (N of D1 line), 137 (A5-A6), stairwell footings at 138-139.2 (A5.5-A7), C4/5 (131-132), D1 (C5-C6). Sampled first 10-yard load, grid line 137(A5-A6). Strength Requirement: 3000 PSI @ 28 days Slump:4 '/4" Cement Type:Portland I Sacks: 5.5 Air Entrainment:(non-entrained) Mix: 517#cement, 1860#rock, 1500#fine, 31 oz poly. (mix number 025506) Set Specimen Test @ Register Date Date Total Unit No. Size Days Number Rec'd Tested Load Load 07 4 x 8 7 0023 07-17 1 07-21 46000 3660 " 1128 0024 08-11 55000 4380 " 28 0025 08-11 58000 4620 " hold 0026 discard Remarks: See Field Report for further details on placement.All tests comply with specifications. P.O.BOX 11581 OLY\1PIA,WASMNGTON 98508-1581 PHONE or FAX (360)866-3647 Phyllis Burnison j |14O8 ai| Page (8/14/2006) Phyllis Burnison -jull407.email.con.doc Page 1 Northwest Testing Company, Inc. CONSTRUCTION TESTING and INSPECTION ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTATION and ASSESSMENT REPORT OF CONCRETE TEST SPECIMENS Date Molded: Job No.0602.3 Client: Hood Canal School District Permit No.COM 2006-00003 Project:Hood Canal K-8 School Address: 111 N. State Route 106,Shelton,Washington,98584 Contractor: Jones and Roberts Construction Sub-Contractor:NA Concrete Supplier:Miles Sand and Gravel Cast By:Mark Robinson Weather:partly cloudy Temp.Concrete: 730 Temp.Air: 58' Location of Concrete Placement: Footings and footing boxes at grid lines 138 (A3-A5.6), 139 (A3.2-A4.8), 1310 (A3-A5), A5 (138-1312), D1 (CI-C6), C 3 (N of D1 line), 137 (A5-A6), stairwell footings at 138-139.2 (A5.5-A7), C4/5 (131-132), D1 (C5-C6). Sampled first 10-yard load, grid line 137(A5-A6). Strength Requirement: 3000 PSI @ 28 days Slump:4 '/4" Cement Type:Portland I Sacks: 5.5 Air Entrainment: (non-entrained) Mix: 517#cement, 1860#rock, 1500#fine,31 oz poly. (mix number 025506) Set Specimen Test @ Register Date Date Total Unit No. Size Days Number Rec'd Tested Load Load 07 4 x 8 7 0023 07-17 07-21 " 28 0024 08-11 " 28 0025 08-11 " hold 0026 discard Remarks: See Field Report for further details on placement. All tests comply with specifications. P.O.BOX 11581 OLYMPIA,WASHINGTON 98508-1581 PHONE or FAX (360)866-3647 (8/21/2006) Phyllis Burnison -jul2411.email.con.doc Page 1 i I Northwest Testing Company, Inc. j CONSTRUCTION TESTING and INSPECTION ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTATION and ASSESSMENT REPORT OF CONCRETE TEST SPECIMENS Date Molded Job No.0602.3 Client:Hood Canal School District Permit No.COM 2006-00003 Project:Hood Canal K-8 School Address: 111 N. State Route 106,Shelton,Washington,98584 Contractor: Jones and Roberts Construction Sub-Contractor:NA Concrete Supplier:Miles Sand and Gravel Cast By:Mark Robinson Weather: sunny Temp.Concrete: 84' Temp.Air: 82' Location of Concrete Placement: Footings and boxes, grid lines C.5 (131.5-135), and existing mechanical room wall footings. Sampled at line C.5. Strength Requirement: 3000 PSI @ 28 days Slump: 5.0" Cement Type:Portland I Sacks: 5.5 Air Entrainment:(non-entrained) Mix: 517#cement, 1860#rock, 1500#fine, 31 oz poly. (mix number 025506) Set Specimen Test @ Register Date Date Total Unit No. Size Days Number Rec'd Tested Load Load 11 4 x 8 7 0047 07-25 07-31 32500 2590 "' C " 28 0048 08-21 50500 4020 " 38 0049 08-21 49000 3900 " hold OOSO discard Remarks: See Field Report for further details on placement. All tests comply with specifications. P.O.BOX 11581 OLYMI PIA,WASHINGTON 98.508-1581 PHUNE or FAX (360)866-3647 (8/21/2006) Phyllis Burnison -jul2410.email.con.doc Page 1 Northwest Testing Company, Inc. CONSTRUCTION TESTING and INSPECTION EN11RONME.NTAL CONSULTATION and ASSESSMENT REPORT OF CONCRETE TEST SPECIMENS Date Molded Job No.0602.3 4 Client:Hood Canal School District Permit No.COM 2006-00003 Project:Hood Canal K-8 School Address: 111 N. State Route 106,Shelton,Washington,98584 Contractor:Jones and Roberts Construction Sub-Contractor: La Russo Concrete Supplier:Miles Sand and Gravel Cast By:Mark Robinson Weather: sunny Temp. Concrete: 87' Temp.Air: 810 Location of Concrete Placement: Floor slab, grid lines A7-EO (132-137). Sampled along the NE slab area,first 10-yard load. Strength Requirement: 4000 PSI @ 28 days Slump:4 3/a°' Cement Type:Portland I Sacks: 6.0 Air Entrainment:(non-entrained) Mix: 564# cement, 1860# rock, 1460# fine, 34 oz poly, with fibermesh and Rheomix 235. (mix number 026006) Set Specimen Test @ Register Date Date Total Unit No. Size Days Number Rec'd Tested Load Load 10 4 x 8 7 0043 07-25 07-31 39000 3100 " 28 0044 08-21 52000 4140 " 28 0045 08-21 50000 3980 " hold 0046 discard Remarks: See Field Report for further details on placement. Average 28-day test result (4060 psi) complies with specifications. P.O.BOX 11581 OLYMPIA,WASHINGTON 98508-1581 PHONE or FAX (360)866-3647 I (8/21/2006) Phyllis Burnison -jull909.email.con.doc Page 1 ' Northwest Testing Company, Inc. CONSTRUCTION TESTING and INSPECTION ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTATION and ASSESSMENT REPORT OF CONCRETE TEST SPECIMENS Date Molded: Job No.0602.3 Client:Hood Canal School District Permit No.COM 2006-00003 Project: Hood Canal K-8 School Address: 111 N. State Route 106,Shelton,Washington,98584 Contractor: Jones and Roberts Construction Sub-Contractor:NA Concrete Supplier: Miles Sand and Gravel Cast By:Mark Robinson Weather:sunny Temp.Concrete:74' Temp.Air: 76' Location of Concrete Placement: Foundation walls at grid lines 1310(A3-A5), A5 (138-1312),139 (A3.2-A4), 138 (A3-A6), 137 (A5-A6), stairwell walls at area 138-139.5 A5.5-A6), D1 (Cl-C2), C3&C5 (north of line D1),two short walls N&E of point D1 (C5). Sampled at stairwell. Strength Requirement: 4000 PSI @ 28 days Slump:4.5 Cement Type:Portland I Sacks:6.0 Air Entrainment: (non-entrained) Mix: 564#cement, 1860#rock, 1460#fine,34 oz poly.(mix number 026006) Set Specimen Test @ Register Date Date Total Unit No. Size Days Number Wc'd Tested Load Load 09 4 x 8 7 0035 07-20 07-26 48000 3820 " 28 0036 08-16 62500 4980 " 28 0037 08-16 61000 4860 " hold 0038 discard Remarks: See Field Report for further details on placement.All tests comply with specifications. P.O.BOX 11581 OLYMPIA,WASHINGTON 98508-1581 PHONE or FAX (360)866-3647 (8/21/2006) Phyllis Burnison -jul2411.email.con.doc Page 1 Northwest Testing Company, Inc. i CONSTRUCTION TESTING and INSPECTION ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTATION and ASSESSMEAT REPORT OF CONCRETE TEST SPECIMENS Date Molded: Job No.0602.3 Client:Hood Canal School District Permit No.COM 2006-00003 Project:Hood Canal K-8 School Address: 111 N. State Route 106,Shelton,Washington,98584 Contractor:Jones and Roberts Construction Sub-Contractor:NA Concrete Supplier:Miles Sand and Gravel Cast By: Mark Robinson Weather: sunny Temp.Concrete:84' Temp.Air:820 Location of Concrete Placement: Footings and boxes, grid lines C.5 (D1.5-D5), and existing mechanical room wall footings. Sampled at line C.5. Strength Requirement: 3000 PSI @ 28 days Slump: 5.0" Cement Type:Portland I Sacks: 5.5 Air Entrainment:(non-entrained) Mix: 517#cement, 1860#rock, 1500#fine,31 oz poly. (mix number 025506) Set Specimen Test @ Register Date Date Total Unit No. Size Days Number Rec'd Tested Load Load 11 4 x 8 7 0047 0 7-2_5 07-31 32500 2590 " 28 0048 08-21 50500 4020 " 28 0049 08-21 49000 3900 " hold 0050 discard Remarks: See Field Report for further details on placement.All tests comply with specifications. P.O.BOX 11581 OLvMP1.A,WASHINGTON 98508-1581 PHONE or FAX (360)866 3647 (8/21/2006) Phyllis Burnison -jul2410.email.con.doc Page 1 Northwest Testing Company, Inc. CONSTRUCTION TESTING and INSPECTION ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTATION and ASSESSMENT i REPORT OF CONCRETE TEST SPECIMENS Date Molded Job No.0602.3 Client: Hood Canal School District Permit No.COM 2006-00003 Project: Hood Canal K-8 School Address: 111 N.State Route 106,Shelton,Washington,98584 Contractor:Jones and Roberts Construction Sub-Contractor:La Russo Concrete Supplier:Miles Sand and Gravel Cast By: Mark Robinson Weather:sunny Temp.Concrete: 87' Temp.Air: 81° Location of Concrete Placement: Floor slab, grid lines A7-EO (132-137). Sampled along the NE slab area,first 10-yard load. Strength Requirement: 4000 PSI @ 28 days Slump:4 3/a" Cement Type:Portland I Sacks: 6.0 Air Entrainment: (non-entrained) Mix: 564# cement, 1860# rock, 1460# fine, 34 oz poly, with fibermesh and Rheomix 235. (mix number 026006) Set Specimen Test @ Register Date Date Total Unit No. Size DaN,s Number Rec'd Tested Load Load 10 4 x 8 7 0043 07-25 07-31 39000 3100 28 0044 08-21 52000 4140 " 28 0045 08-21 50000 3980 hold 0046 discard Remarks: See Field Report for further details on placement. Average 28-day test result(4060 psi) complies with specifications. P.O.BOX 11581 OLYMIPIA,WASHINGTON 98508-1581 PHONE or FAX (360)866-3617 f (8/23/2006) Phyllis Burnison -jul2612.email.con.doc Page 1 Northwest Testing Company, Inc. COA'STRUCTION TF.STI.NC and INSPECTION EN11RO.NMENTAL CONSULTATION and ASSESSMENT REPORT OF CONCRETE TEST SPECIMENS Date Molded Job No.0602.3 Client: Hood Canal School District Permit No.COM 2006-00003 Project: Hood Canal K-8 School Address: 111 N. State Route 106,Shelton,Washington,98584 Contractor: Jones and Roberts Construction Sub-Contractor:La Russo Concrete Supplier:Miles Sand and Gravel Cast By: Mark Robinson Weather: sunny Temp.Concrete: 80' Temp.Air: 640 Location of Concrete Placement: Floor slab area bounded north by grid lines E2/E0, east by A15/E2 B (4.2), south by 1313/B14, west by A7/A5.8/C3/Al2. Sampled at 134.8 (A15), 20-yard load. Strength Requirement: 4000 PSI @ 28 days Slump: 5.0" Cement Type:Portland I Sacks: 6.0 Air Entrainment: (non-entrained) Mix: 564# cement, 1860# rock, 1460# fine, 34 oz poly, with fibermesh and Rheomix 235. (mix number 026006) Set Specimen Test @ Register Date Date Total Unit No. Size Days Number Rec'd Tested Load Load 12 4 x 8 7 0063 07-27 08-02 35000 2790 " 28 0064 08-23 47500 3780 " 42 0065 09-06 " 42 0066 09-06 Remarks: See Field Report for further details on placement. Compressive strength does not comply with specifications at 28-days. Remaining cylinders set for 42-day test. (8/23/2006) Phyllis Burnison -jul2613.email.con.doc Page 1 Northwest Testing Company, Inc. CONSTRUCTION TESTING and INSPECTION ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTATION and ASSESSMENT REPORT OF CONCRETE TEST SPECIMENS Date Molded:s Job No.0602.3 Client: Hood Canal School District Permit No.COM 2006-00003 Project: Hood Canal K-8 School Address: 111 N. State Route 106,Shelton,Washington,98584 Contractor:Jones and Roberts Construction Sub-Contractor:La Russo Concrete Supplier:Miles Sand and Gravel Cast By:Mark Robinson Weather: sunny Temp.Concrete: 80' Temp.Air: 70' Location of Concrete Placement: Floor slab area bounded north by grid lines E2/E0, east by A15/E2 B (4.2), south by 1313/1314, west by A7/A5.8/C3/Al2. Sampled at grid line 139 (A7),70- yard load. Strength Requirement: 4000 PSI @ 28 days Slump:4 3/4" Cement Type:Portland I Sacks: 6.0 Air Entrainment: (non-entrained) Mix: 564# cement, 1860# rock, 1460# fine, 34 oz poly, with fibermesh and Rheomix 235. (mix number 026006) Set Specimen Test @ Register Date Date Total Unit No. Size Days Number Rec'd Tested Load Load 13 4 x 8 7 0067 07-27 08-02 37500 2980 " 28 0068 08-23 37500 3780 " 42 0069 09-06 " 42 0070 09-06 Remarks: See Field Report for further details on placement. Compressive strength does not comply with specifications at 28-days. Remaining cylinders set for 42-day test. (8/2/2006) Phyllis Burnison -jul2612.email.con.doc- Page 1 Northwest Testing Company, Inc. CONSTRUCTION TESTING and INSPECTION ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTATION and ASSESSMENT REPORT OF CONCRETE TEST SPECIMENS Date Molded. Job No.0602.3 Client: Hood Canal School District Permit No.COM 2006-00003 Project: Hood Canal K-8 School Address: 111 N. State Route 106,Shelton,Washington,98584 Contractor:Jones and Roberts Construction Sub-Contractor:La Russo Concrete Supplier: Miles Sand and Gravel Cast By:Mark Robinson Weather: sunny Temp.Concrete: 80' Temp.Air:64' Location of Concrete Placement: Floor slab area bounded north by grid lines E2/E0, east by A15/E2 B (4.2), south by 1313/1314, west by A7/A5.8/C3/Al2. Sampled at 134.8 (A15), 20-yard load. Strength Requirement: 4000 PSI @ 28 days Slump: 5.0" Cement Type:Portland I Sacks: 6.0 Air Entrainment: (non-entrained) Mix: 564# cement, 1860# rock, 1460# fine, 34 oz poly, with fibermesh and Rheomix 235. (mix number 026006) Set Specimen Test @ Register Date Date Total Unit No. Size Days Number Rec'd Tested Load Load 12 4 x 8 7 0063 07-27 08-02 35000 2790 " 28 0064 08-23 " 28 0065 08-23 " hold 0066 " Remarks: See Field Report for further details on placement. P.O.BOX 11581 OLYMPIA,WASHINGTON 98508-1581 PHONE or FAX (360)866-3647 (8/2/2006) Phyllis Burnison -jul2613.email.con.doc Page 1 Northwest Testing Company, Inc. CONSTRUCTION TESTING and INSPECTION ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTATION and ASSESSMENT REPORT OF CONCRETE TEST SPECIMENS Date Molde Job No.0602.3 Client:Hood Canal School District Permit No.COM 2006-00003 Project: Hood Canal K-8 School Address: 111 N. State Route 106,Shelton,Washington,98584 Contractor: Jones and Roberts Construction Sub-Contractor: La Russo Concrete Supplier: Miles Sand and Gravel Cast By:Mark Robinson Weather: sunny Temp.Concrete: 80° Temp.Air:700 Location of Concrete Placement: Floor slab area bounded north by grid lines E2/E0, east by A15/E2 B (4.2), south by 1313/1314, west by A7/A5.8/C3/Al2. Sampled at grid line 139 (A7), 70- yard load. Strength Requirement: 4000 PSI @ 28 days Slump:4 3/4" Cement Type:Portland I Sacks: 6.0 Air Entrainment: (non-entrained) Mix: 564# cement, 1860# rock, 1460# fine, 34 oz poly, with fibermesh and Rheomix 235. (mix number 026006) Set Specimen Test @ Register Date Date Total Unit No. Size Days Number Rec'd Tested Load Load 13 4 x 8 7 0067 07-27 08-02 37500 2980 " 28 0068 08-23 " 28 0069 08-23 " hold 0070 " Remarks: See Field Report for further details on placement. P.O.BOX 11581 OLYMPIA,WASHINCTON 98508-1581 PHOtiE or FAX (360)866-3647 (9/6/2006) Phyllis Burnison -ju12612.email.con.doc Page 1 Northwest Testing Company, Inc. CONSTRUCTION TESTING and INSPECTION ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTA TION and ASSESSMENT REPORT OF CONCRETE TEST SPECIMENS Date Molded Job No.0602.3 Client:Hood Canal School District Permit No.COM 2006-00003 Project:Hood Canal K-8 School Address: 111 N. State Route 106,Shelton,Washington,98584 Contractor: Jones and Roberts Construction Sub-Contractor:La Russo Concrete Supplier:Miles Sand and Gravel Cast By:Mark Robinson Weather: sunny Temp.Concrete:80' Temp.Air:64° Location of Concrete Placement: Floor slab area bounded north by grid lines E2/E0, east by A15/E2 B (4.2), south by 1313/1314, west by A7/A5.8/C3/Al2. Sampled at B4.8 (A15), 20-yard load. Strength Requirement: 4000 PSI @ 28 days Slump: 5.0" Cement Type:Portland I Sacks: 6.0 Air Entrainment:(non-entrained) Mix: 564# cement, 1860# rock, 1460# fine, 34 oz poly, with fibermesh and Rheomix 235. (mix number 026006) Set Specimen Test @ Register Date Date Total Unit No. Size Days Number Rec'd Tested Load Load 12 4 x 8 7 0063 07-27 08-02 35000 2790 " 28 0064 08-23 47500 3780 " 42 0065 09-06 49500 3940 42 0066 09-06 50000 3980 Remarks: See Field Report for further details on placement. Compressive strength does not comply with specifications at 28-days. 42-day compressive test results do not comply with specifications. (9/6/2006) Phyllis Burnison -jul2613.email.con.doc Page 1 Northwest Testing Company, Inc. CONSTRUCTION TESTING and INSPECTION ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTATION and ASSESSMENT REPORT OF CONCRETE TEST SPECIMENS Date Molded: Job No.0602.3 Client:Hood Canal School District Permit No.COM 2006-00003 Project:Hood Canal K-8 School Address: I I I N.State Route 106,Shelton,Washington,98584 Contractor: Jones and Roberts Construction Sub-Contractor:La Russo Concrete Supplier:Miles Sand and Gravel Cast By:Mark Robinson Weather: sunny Temp.Concrete: 80' Temp.Air:700 Location of Concrete Placement: Floor slab area bounded north by grid lines E2/E0, east by A15/E2 B (4.2), south by 1313/1314, west by A7/A5.8/C3/Al2. Sampled at grid line 139 (A7),70- yard load. Strength Requirement: 4000 PSI @ 28 days Slump:4 3/4" Cement Type:Portland I Sacks: 6.0 Air Entrainment:(non-entrained) Mix: 564# cement, 1860# rock, 1460# fine, 34 oz poly, with fibermesh and Rheomix 235. (mix number 026006) Set Specimen Test @ Register Date Date Total Unit No. Size Days Number Reed Tested Load Load 13 4 x 8 7 0067 07-27 08-02 37500 2980 " 28 0068 08-23 37500 3780 " 42 0069 09-06 50500 4020 42 0070 09-06 51000 4060 Remarks: See Field Report for further details on placement. Compressive strength does not comply with specifications at 28-days.42-day compressive test results comply with specifications. 1 (8/24C2000) Phyllis Burnison -ju12714 i| Page __- , _ _ -~ age- ����� Northwest Testing Company, Inc. CONSTRUCTION TESTING and INSPECTION ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTATION and ASSESSMENT REPORT OF CONCRETE TEST SPECIMENS Date Molde Job No.0602.3 Client: Hood Canal School District Permit No.COM 2006-00003 Project:Hood Canal K-8 School Address: 111 N. State Route 106,Shelton,Washington,98584 Contractor: Jones and Roberts Construction Sub-Contractor:La Russo Concrete Supplier:Miles Sand and Gravel Cast By:Mark Robinson Weather: sunny Temp.Concrete: 74' Temp.Air:58' Location of Concrete Placement: Floor slab area west of grid lines A5.8/A6 and north of line DI minus two recessed slab areas at B 10(A2.5)and A4(B9). Sampled at 20-yard total,133/A3. Strength Requirement: 4000 PSI 28 days Slump:43/4" Cement Type:Portland I Sacks: 6.0 Air Entrainment: (non-entrained) Mix: 564# cement, 1860# rock, 1460# fine, 34 oz poly, with fibermesh and Rheomix 235. (mix number 026006) Set Specimen Test Register Date Date Total Unit No. Size Days Number Rec'd Tested Load Load hold 0082 discard Remarks: See Field Report for further details on placement.All tests comply with specifications. (8/28/2006) Phyllis Burnison -jul3116.email.con.doc Page 1 Northwest Testing Company, Inc. CONSTRUCTION TESTING and INSPECTION ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTATION and ASSESSMENT REPORT OF CONCRETE TEST SPECIMENS Date MoldedIIIIII1106 Job No.0602.3 Client: Hood Canal School District Permit No.COM 2006-00003 Project:Hood Canal K-8 School Address: I I I N. State Route 106,Shelton,Washington,98584 Contractor: Jones and Roberts Construction Sub-Contractor:La Russo Concrete Supplier:Miles Sand and Gravel Cast By:Mark Robinson Weather: sunny Temp.Concrete: 78' Temp.Air: 74' Location of Concrete Placement: Floor slab area west of grid lines A5.8/A6 and north of line D1 minus two recessed slab areas at 1310 (A2.5) and A4 (139). Sampled at 100-yard total, grid line B 10/A3. Strength Requirement: 4000 PSI @ 28 days Slump: 5.0" Cement Type:Portland I Sacks: 6.0 Air Entrainment: (non-entrained) Mix: 564# cement, 1860# rock, 1460# fine, 34 oz poly, with fibermesh and Rheomix 235. (mix number 026006) Set Specimen Test @ Register Date Date Total Unit No. Size Days Number Rec'd Tested Load Load 16 4 x 8 7 0083 08-01 08-07 36500 2910 " 28 0084 08-28 53000 4220 " 28 0085 08-28 52000 4140 " hold 0086 discard Remarks: See Field Report for further details on placement. All tests comply with specifications. P.O.BOX 11581 OLYMPIA,WASHINGTON 98508-1581 PHONE or FAX (360)866-3647 (8/28/2006) Phyllis Burnison -ju13117.email.con.cloc Page 1 Northwest Testing Company, Inc. CONSTRUCTION TESTING and INSPECTION ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTATION and ASSESSMENT REPORT OF CONCRETE TEST SPECIMENS Date Molde Job No.0602.3 Client: Hood Canal School District Permit No.COM 2006-00003 Project: Hood Canal K-8 School Address: 111 N. State Route 106,Shelton,Washington,98584 Contractor:Jones and Roberts Construction Sub-Contractor:NA Concrete Supplier:Miles Sand and Gravel Cast By:Mark Robinson f Weather: sunny Temp.Concrete: 80' Temp.Air: 78' k Location of Concrete Placement: Foundation walls at grid lines C1 & C2 (DI-D4), C2.6(D1.3- D 1.7), and C3(D 1-D4);footing and wall(monolithic placement)at grids D4(C 1-C6)and D3.8(C3- C4),and footing for new walls at existing bus barn. Sampled at 123 yard total,monolithic area. Strength Requirement: 4000 PSI @ 28 days Slump: 4'/4" Cement Type: Portland I Sacks: 6.0 Air Entrainment: (non-entrained) Mix: 564# cement, 1860# rock, 1460# fine, 34 oz poly, with fibermesh and Rheomix 235. (mix number 026006) Set Specimen Test @ Register Date Date Total Unit No. Size Days Number Rec'd Tested Load Load 17 4 x 8 7 0087 08-01 08-07 37000 2940 " 28 0088 08-28 50500 4020 " 28 0089 08-28 51500 4100 " hold 0090 discard Remarks: See Field Report for further details on placement. All tests comply with specifications. P.O.BO\11581 OLVNIPIA,WASHiNGTON 98508-1581 PHONE or FAX (360)866-3647 (9/1/2006) Phyllis Burnison - aug0418 email.con.doc Northwest Testing Company, Inc. CONSTRUCTION TESTING and INSPECTION ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTATION and ASSESSMENT REPORT OF CONCRETE TEST SPECIMENS Date Molded: Job No.0602.3 Client: Hood Canal School District Permit No.COM 2006-00003 Project:Hood Canal K-8 School Address: I I I N. State Route 106,Shelton,Washington,98584 Contractor: Jones and Roberts Construction Sub-Contractor:NA Concrete Supplier:Miles Sand and Gravel Cast By:Mark Robinson Weather: overcast Temp.Concrete: 66' Temp.Air: 59" Location of Concrete Placement: Foundation walls for the existing bus barn new exterior walls along the north east comer, the footing for the existing locker room along southwest corner of existing,and the new foundation wall in the existing mechanical room. Strength Requirement: 4000 PSI @ 28 days Slump:4 3/4" Cement Type:Portland I Sacks: 6.0 Air Entrainment: (non-entrained) Mix: 564#cement, 1860#rock, 1460#fine,34 oz poly. (mix number 026006) Set Specimen Test @ Register Date Date Total Unit No. Size Days Number Rec'd Tested Load Load 18 4 x 8 7 0107 08-07 08-11 48000 3820 " 28 0108 09-01 56000 4460 " 28 0109 09-01 58000 4620 " hold 0110 discard Remarks: See Field Report for further details on placement.All tests comply with specifications. P.O.BOX 11581 OLYMPIA,WASHINGTON 98508-1581 PHONE or FAX (360)866-3647 (8/7/2006) Phyllis Burnison- aug0713fld.email.doc Page 1 Northwest TestingCompany, Inc. CONSTRUCTION TESTING and IVSPF_CTIO.M1' ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTATION and ASSESSMENT FIELD INSPECTION REPORT CLIENT: Hood Canal School District DATE:�� PROJECT:Hood Canal K-8 School REPORT NO: 13 CONTRACTOR:Jones&Roberts Construction PROJECT NUMBER: 0602.3 PERMIT NUMBER: COM 2006-00003 INSPECTOR:Mark Robinson Inspector Mark Robinson arrives on site, 6:45 am, for inspection of concrete placement. Sunny, 57 degrees. Contractor places concrete for the floor slab at grid lines south of line D1 (C2-C7), bathroom slabs at lines A14/134, B10/A2.5, and A4/139. Also place canopy footings at A7-A9 (B1-132) and A16- A17(132-134). Slab depth 4" uniform grade. Typical wall and slab details per sheet S4.01. Fiber mesh used, doorways and interior column boxes reinforced per typical slab details. Thickened wall foundation areas reinforced per detail. Footings and forms are also approved per typical details prior to placement. Control joints are accomplished with zip-strip. Concrete is placed by pump at a 5.0" maximum slump and is vibrated for consolidation in the foundation walls and footing areas. Three sets of compressive strength test specimens are made on the total placement of 106 yards, 96 in the slab and 10 in the footings. Cylinders are stored in the field away from the work area for later pickup. i i NORTHWEST TESTING COMPANY,INC. Mark Robinson Mark Robinson a Licensed Professional Geologist Registered Site Assessor ACMCC Certified Concrete Technician i cc: Gary Larson,Ron Zier,Ray Mow,Eric Bailey,Bob Roberts, Steve Brannon,Phyllis Burnison i i PO BOX 11581 OLVM PIA,WASHINGTON 98508-1581 PH ON E or FAX (360)866-3647 i I (9/5/2006) Phyllis Burnison -aug0721.email.con.doc Page 1 Northwest Testing Company, Inc. CONSTRUCTION TESTING and INSPECTION ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTATION and ASSESSMENT REPORT OF CONCRETE TEST SPECIMENS Date Molded: Job No.0602.3 Client:Hood Canal School District Permit No.COM 2006-00003 Project: Hood Canal K-8 School Address: 111 N. State Route 106,Shelton,Washington,98584 Contractor: Jones and Roberts Construction Sub-Contractor:NA Concrete Supplier:Miles Sand and Gravel Cast By: Mark Robinson Weather: sunny Temp.Concrete: 76' Temp.Air: 72' Location of Concrete Placement: Canopy footings at A7-A9(131-132)and Al6-A17 (132-134). Strength Requirement: 3000 PSI @ 28 days Slump: 4 '/4" Cement Type: Portland I Sacks: 5.5 Air Entrainment: (non-entrained) Mix: 517#cement, 1860#rock, 1500#fine, 31 oz poly. (mix number 025506) Set Specimen Test @ Register Date Date Total Unit No. Size Days Number Rec'd Tested Load Load 21 4 x 8 7 0131 08-08 08-14 34000 2710 " 28 0132 09-04 54000 4300 " 28 0133 09-04 48500 3860 " hold 0134 discard Remarks: See Field Report for further details on placement.All tests comply with specifications. P.O.BOX 11581 OLYMPIA,WASHINGTON'98508-1581 PHONE or FAX (360)866-3647 (9/5/2006) Phyllis Burnison - aug0720.email.con.doc Page ' Northwest Testing Company, Inc. CONSTRUCTION TESTING and INSPECTION ENV/RONME,NTAL CONSULTATION and ASSESSMENT REPORT OF CONCRETE TEST SPECIMENS Date Molded: Job No.0602.3 Client:Hood Canal School District Permit No.COM 2006-00003 Project: Hood Canal K-8 School Address: I I I N. State Route 106,Shelton,Washington,98584 Contractor: Jones and Roberts Construction Sub-Contractor:La Russo Concrete Supplier:Miles Sand and Gravel Cast By: Mark Robinson Weather: sunny Temp.Concrete: 76' Temp.Air: 70' Location of Concrete Placement: Floor slab at grid lines south of line D1 (C2-C7), bathroom slabs at lines A14/134,1310/A2.5,and A4/139. Sampled at 70-yard total,grid 131.4(C5.2). Strength Requirement: 4000 PSI @ 28 days Slump:4 '/2" Cement Type:Portland I Sacks: 6.0 Air Entrainment: (non-entrained) Mix: 564# cement, 1860# rock, 1460# fine, 34 oz poly, with fiber esh and Rheomix 235. (mix number 026006) Set Specimen Test @ Register Date Date Total Unit No. Size Days Number Rec'd Tested Load Load 20 4 x 8 7 0115 08-08 08-14 44000 3500 " 28 0116 09-04 61000 4860 " 28 0117 09-04 58000 4620 " hold 0118 discard Remarks: See Field Report for further details on placement.All tests comply with specifications. P.O.BOX 11581 OLYMPIA,WASHINGTON 98508-1581 PHONE or FAX (360)866-3647 (9/5/2006) Phyllis Burnison - aug0719.email.con.doc Page 1 Northwest Testing Company, Inc. CONSTRLICTIO:N TESTING and IASPF.CTIO:N EN17RO:N69EATAL COA:SI LTATION and ASSESS:NENT REPORT OF CONCRETE TEST SPECIMENS Date Molded: Job No.0602.3 Client: Hood Canal School District Permit No.COM 2006-00003 Project:Hood Canal K-8 School Address: 111 N. State Route 106,Shelton,Washington,98584 Contractor: Jones and Roberts Construction Sub-Contractor:La Russo Concrete Supplier:Miles Sand and Gravel Cast By:Mark Robinson Weather: sunny Temp.Concrete: 70' Temp.Air:600 Location of Concrete Placement: Floor slab at grid lines south of line D1 (C2-C7), bathroom slabs at lines A14B4,B10/A2.5,and A4/139. Sampled at 20-yard total,grid line C.2(D3.2). Strength Requirement: 4000 PSI @ 28 days Slump: 5.0" Cement Type: Portland I Sacks: 6.0 Air Entrainment: (non-entrained) Mix: 564# cement, 1860# rock, 1460# fine, 34 oz poly, with fibermesh and Rheomix 235. (mix number 026006) Set Specimen Test @ Register Date Date Total Unit No. Size Days Number Rec'd Tested Load Load 19 4 x 8 7 0111 08-08 08-14 39000 3100 " 28 0112 09-04 49000 3900 " 28 0113 09-04 50500 4020 " 28 0114 09-04 61500 4100 Remarks: See Field Report for further details on placement. Average 28-day compressive test results comply with specifications. P.O.BOX 11581 OLYMPIA,WASHINGTON 98508-1581 PHONE or FAX (360)866-3647 F(11/7/2006) Phyllis Burnison -oct1022.email.con.doc Page 1 Northwest Testing Company, Inc. CONSTRUCTION TESTING and INSPECTION ENVIRONMENTAL CONSUL TATIONand ASSESSMENT REPORT OF CONCRETE TEST SPECIMENS Date Molded:October 10,2006 Job No.0602.3 Client: Hood Canal School District Permit No.COM 2006-00003 Project:Hood Canal K-8 School Address: 111 N. State Route 106,Shelton,Washington,98584 Contractor: Jones and Roberts Construction Sub-Contractor:La Russo Concrete Supplier:Miles Sand and Gravel Cast By:Mark Robinson Weather: sunny(indoor placement) Temp.Concrete: 60' Temp.Air:40' Location of Concrete Placement: Second floor topping slab for the west classroom wing. Sampled at 10-yard total,grid line A3-A5 (B4-137). Strength Requirement: 4000 PSI @ 28 days Slump: 5.0" Cement Type:Portland I Sacks: 6.0 Air Entrainment: (non-entrained) Mix: 550# cement, 1700# pea gravel, 1580# fine, 33 oz poly 997, with fibermesh (mix number 07400) Set Specimen Test @ Register Date Date Total Unit No. Size Days Number Rec'd Tested Load Load 22 4 x 8 7 0308 10-10 10-17 35000 2790 " 28 0309 11-07 55000 4380 28 0310 11-07 55000 4380 Remarks: See Field Report for further details on placement. All samples comply with specifications. P.O.BOX 11581 OLYMPIA,WASHINGTON 98508-1581 PHONE or FAX (360)866-3647 1/7/2006) Phyllis Burnison -oct1023.email.con.doc Northwest Testing Company, Inc. CONSTRUCTION TESTING and INSPECTION ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTATION and ASSESSMENT REPORT OF CONCRETE TEST SPECIMENS Date Molded: October 10,2006 Job No.0602.3 Client:Hood Canal School District Permit No.COM 2006-00003 Project:Hood Canal K-8 School Address: 111 N. State Route 106,Shelton,Washington,98584 Contractor: Jones and Roberts Construction Sub-Contractor: La Russo Concrete Supplier:Miles Sand and Gravel Cast By:Mark Robinson Weather: sunny(indoor placement) Temp. Concrete: 62' Temp.Air:44' Location of Concrete Placement: Second floor topping slab for the west classroom wing. Sampled at 20-yard total,grid line A1.3-A1.5 (134-137). Strength Requirement: 4000 PSI @ 28 days Slump: 5.0" Cement Type: Portland I Sacks: 6.0 Air Entrainment: (non-entrained) Mix: 550# cement, 1700# pea gravel, 1580# fine, 33 oz poly 997, with fibermesh (mix number 07400) Set Specimen Test @ Register Date Date Total Unit No. Size Days Number Rec'd Tested Load Load 23 4 x 8 7 0324 10-10 10-17 33000 2630 " 28 0325 11-07 52500 4180 " 28 0326 11-07 54000 4300 Remarks: See Field Report for further details on placement. All samples comply with specifications. P.O.BOX 11581 OLYMPIA,WASHINGTON 98508-1581 PHONE or FAX (360)866-3647 F(8/20/2007) Phyllis Burnison -augl732fld.email.doc Page 1 Northwest Testing Company, Inc. CONSTRUCTION TESTING and INSPECTION ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTATION and ASSESSMENT FIELD INSPECTION REPORT CLIENT:Hood Canal School District DATE: August 17, 2007 PROJECT:Hood Canal K-8 School REPORT NO: 32 CONTRACTOR:Jones&Roberts Construction PROJECT NUMBER: 0602.3 PERMIT NUMBER: COM 2006-00003 INSPECTOR: Mark Robinson Inspector Mark Robinson on site, 11:00 am, for inspection of ballast placement and compaction. Partly cloudy,73 degrees. Earthwork contractor SECO has completed the moisture conditioning and compaction of the native subgrade soil for the north parking lot. With only a few exceptions limited in degree, all areas appear well compacted. The few areas that have some soil loosened from drying out and traffic are limited in extent and will be compacted in the course of the placement of ballast and top course. Four in place field compaction tests are taken and a sample of the native subgrade soil is taken for laboratory moisture-density test. Subsequent results indicate that all tests comply with compaction requirements. See attached for test results. Should dry weather persist, it will be important to moisture condition any imported ballast and crushed surface rock as necessary. NORTHWEST TESTING COMPANY,INC. Mark Robinson Mark Robinson Licensed Professional Geologist Registered Site Assessor ACl/ICC Certified Concrete Technician cc:Gary Larson,Ron Zier,Ray Mow,Eric Bailey,Bob Roberts, Steve Brannon,Phyllis Burnison PO BOX 11581 OLYbIPIA,WASHINGTON 98508-1581 PHONE or FAX (360)866-3647 (8/20/2007) Phyllis Burnison -aug1732a.sol.doc Page 1 NORTHWEST TESTING COMPANY, INC. REPORT OF IN PLACE SOIL DENSITY TESTS CLIENT:Hood Canal School District PROJECT:Hood Canal K-8 School REPORT NO:32A INSPECTOR:Mark Robinson PERMIT NUMBER:COM 2006-00003 PROJECT NUMBER:0602.3 DATE:August 17,2007 CONTRACTOR:Jones&Roberts SUB-CONTRACTOR:SECO Soil Description and Moisture/Density Relationship: Proctor#1: imported 1 '/4"gravel(GW), 139.4 PCF @ 5.8 %. Proctor#2: imported screened ballast(GW),143.2 PCF @ 5.6%.Proctor#3:native silty gravel(GM),114.4 PCF @ 15.8%. Method of Test: ASTM D-1557(D) Field Wet Dry Percent Test No. Test Location Moisture Density Density Co action All tests taken at north parking lot/drive,top of subgmde I Drive area,south side 8.2 118.6 109.6 95.8 2 Drive area,east side 13.7 126.9 111.6 97.6 3 1 Parking area,northwest side 12.6 126.7 112.5 198.3 4 Parking area,southeast side 12.3 123.6 110.1 196.2 Remarks: Job Specifications:95%compaction required.All tests comply with specifications.See Field Report for further information. Inspector:Mark Robinson PO BOX 11581 OLYMPIA,WASHINGTON 98508-1581 PHONE/FAX:(360)866 3647 (%2/2007) Phyllis Burnison -jun2929a.sol.doc Page 1 NORTHWEST TESTING COMPANY, INC. REPORT OF IN PLACE SOIL DENSITY TESTS CLIENT:Hood Canal School District PROJECT:Hood Canal K-8 School REPORT NO:29A INSPECTOR:Mark Robinson PERMIT NUMBER:COM 2006-00003 PROJECT NUMBER:0602.3 DATE:June 29,2007 CONTRACTOR:Jones&Roberts SUB-CONTRACTOR:SECO Soil Description and Moisture/Density Relationship: Proctor#1: imported 1 '/4" gravel (GW). 139.4 PCF @ 5.8 %; Proctor#2: imported screened ballast(GW).143.2 PCF @ 5.6%. Method of Test: ASTM D-1557(D) Field Wet Dry Percent Test No. Test Location Moisture Density Density Compaction All tests taken at top of driveway ballast 1 20'west of shop;15'south of NW comer of shop 5.8 146.9 138.8 96.9 2 60'diagonally off the SW comer of the shop 5.8 147.0 138.9 97.0 Remarks: Job Specifications:95%compaction required.All tests comply with specifications.See Field Report for further information. Inspector:Mark Robinson PO BOX 11581 OLYMPIA,WASHINGTON 98508-1581 PHONEIFAX:(360)866 3647 (7/2/2007) Phyllis Burnison -jun2929fld.email.doc Page 1 Northwest Testing Company, Inc. CONSTRUCTION TESTING and INSPECTION ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTATION and ASSESSMENT FIELD INSPECTION REPORT CLIENT:Hood Canal School District DATE:June 29,2007 PROJECT:Hood Canal K-8 School REPORT NO:29 CONTRACTOR:Jones&Roberts Construction PROJECT NUMBER: 0602.3 PERMIT NUMBER:COM 2006-00003 INSPECTOR: Mark Robinson Earthwork contractor SECO is currently grading and compacting roadway ballast gravel for the drive area along the west and south sides of the existing shop building. Contractor had intended to have more area ready for compaction testing but the work has been delayed due to rain and issues regarding grade along the west side of the shed. The imported screened ballast rock is being compacted with the vibratory roller. Heavy rains begin to set in and earthwork contractor cancels further work today. Two compaction tests are taken in the area west of the shop building where compaction is complete and a sample of the ballast gravel is taken for moisture-density testing. Subsequent laboratory test results indicate that both in place tests comply with compaction requirements. See attached for test results. NORTHWEST TESTING COMPANY,INC. Mark Robinson Mark Robinson Licensed Professional Geologist Registered Site Assessor ACl/ICC Certified Concrete Technician cc:Gary Larson,Ron Zier,Ray Mow,Eric Bailey,Bob Roberts, Steve Brannon,Phyllis Burnison PO BOX 11581 OLYMPIA,WASHINGTON 98508-1581 PHONE or FAX (360)866-3647 (7/5/2007) Phyllis Burnison -ju10530a.sol.doc Page 1 NORTHWEST TESTING COMPANY, INC. REPORT OF IN PLACE SOIL DENSITY TESTS CLIENT:Hood Canal School District PROJECT:Hood Canal K-8 School REPORT NO:30A INSPECTOR:Mark Robinson PERMIT NUMBER:COM 2006-00003 PROJECT NUMBER:0602.3 DATE:July 05,2007 CONTRACTOR:Jones&Roberts SUB-CONTRACTOR:SECO Soil Description and Moisture/Density Relationship: Proctor#1: imported 1 ''/4'gravel (GW). 139.4 PCF @ 5.8 %; Proctor#2: imported screened ballast(GW).143.2 PCF @ 5.6%. Method of Test: ASTM D-1557(D) Field Wet Dry Percent Test No. Test Location Moisture Density Density Compaction All tests taken at top of driveway ballast 1 Drive area due south of centerline of gyrn 7.5 147.2 136.9 95.6 2 Drive,2 P east of bus barn 6.1 151.3 142.6 99.6 3 Drive 47'south of middle door of bus barn 6.0 146.8 138.5 96.7 4 1 Entry area,21'south of southwest corner of bus bam 6.1 146.2 137.8 96.2 Remarks: Job Specifications:95%compaction required.All tests comply with specifications.See Field Report for further information. Inspector:Mark Robinson PO BOX 11581 OLYMPIA,WASHINGTON 98508-1581 PHONE/FAX:(360)866 3647 L(7/5/2007) Phyllis Burnison -ju10530fld.email.doc Page 1 Northwest Testing Company, Inc. CONSTRUCTION TESTING and INSPECTION ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTATION and ASSESSMENT FIELD INSPECTION REPORT CLIENT:Hood Canal School District DATE: July 05,2007 PROJECT:Hood Canal K-8 School REPORT NO: 30 CONTRACTOR:Jones&Roberts Construction PROJECT NUMBER: 0602.3 PERMIT NUMBER: COM 2006-00003 INSPECTOR:Mark Robinson Inspector Mark Robinson on site, 1:40 pm,for inspection of roadway ballast compaction. Sunny, 83 degrees. Earthwork contractor SECO has completed the placement, moisture conditioning and compaction of roadway ballast for the bus drive area along the south sides of the maintenance shed/bus barn and extending east to a point by the southeast comer of the gym. While the ballast appears well conditioned and compacted throughout most of the area, inspector does note some surface areas that have dried out and become loosened by construction traffic. In particular,just in front of the south end bus barn entry and the drive extension northward between the new classroom addition and the west side of the gym. Additional fine grading, moisture conditioning, and compaction will be necessary prior to placement of top course. Four in place field compaction tests are taken. All tests comply with compaction requirements. See attached for test results. NORTHWEST TESTING COMPANY,INC. Mark Robinson Mark Robinson Licensed Professional Geologist Registered Site Assessor ACl/ICC Certified Concrete Technician cc:Gary Larson,Ron Zier,Ray Mow,Eric Bailey,Bob Roberts,Steve Brannon,Phyllis Burnison PO BOX 11581 OLYMPIA,WASHINGTON 98508-1581 PHONE or FAX (360)866-3647 L(7/11/2007) Phyllis Burnison -jul1031f1d.email.doc Page 1 Northwest Testing Company, Inc. CONSTRUCTION TESTING and INSPECTION ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTATION and ASSESSMENT FIELD INSPECTION REPORT CLIENT:Hood Canal School District DATE: July 10,2007 PROJECT:Hood Canal K-8 School REPORT NO: 31 CONTRACTOR:Jones&Roberts Construction PROJECT NUMBER: 0602.3 PERMIT NUMBER:COM 2006-00003 INSPECTOR:Mark Robinson Inspector Mark Robinson on site, 12:20 pm, for inspection of ballast placement and compaction. Sunny,hot,87 degrees. Earthwork contractor SECO has completed the placement, moisture conditioning and compaction of roadway ballast for the bus turn around and parking lot east of the gym. All areas appear well moisture conditioned and compacted. Three in place field compaction tests are taken.All tests comply with compaction requirements. See attached for test results. NORTHWEST TESTING COMPANY,INC. Mark Robinson Mark Robinson Licensed Professional Geologist Registered Site Assessor ACl/ICC Certified Concrete Technician cc:Gary Larson,Ron Zier,Ray Mow,Eric Bailey,Bob Roberts,Steve Brannon,Phyllis Burnison PO BOX 11581 OLYMPIA,WASHINGTON 98508-1581 PHONE or FAX (360)866-3647 (7/11/2007) Phyllis Burnison -jul1031 a.sol.doc Page 1 NORTHWEST TESTING COMPANY, INC. REPORT OF IN PLACE SOIL DENSITY TESTS CLIENT:Hood Canal School District PROJECT:Hood Canal K-8 School REPORT NO:31 A INSPECTOR:Mark Robinson PERMIT NUMBER:COM 2006-00003 PROJECT NUMBER:0602.3 DATE:July 10,2007 CONTRACTOR:Jones&Roberts SUB-CONTRACTOR:SECO Soil Description and Moisture/Density Relationship: Proctor#1: imported 1 ''/4"gravel (GW). 139.4 PCF @ 5.8 %; Proctor#2: imported screened ballast(GW). 143.2 PCF @ 5.6%. Method of Test: ASTM D-1557(D) Field Wet Dry Percent Test No. Test Location Moisture Density Density Com action All tests taken at parking lot/bus loop east of gym,top of ballast course 1 NE side at turn-around drive 6.8 149.4 139.9 97.7 2 Center of parking lot 6.8 148.2 138.8 96.9 3 Southwest side of parking lot 6.9 150.4 140.7 198.3 Remarks: Job Specifications:95%compaction required.All tests comply with specifications.See Field Report for further information. Inspector:Mark Robinson PO BOX 11581 OLYMPIA,WASHINGTON 98508-1581 PHONE/FAX:(360)866 3647 CA.Cb Engi neeri ng March 13, 2007 RECEIVED Craig Haugen MAR 1'3 2007 4118 Kyro Faad SE Mason County Fire Marshal Clyff#a,VW 985M P.O. Box 186 426 W. CEDAR ST. RXM-PM491.7591 Shelton, WA 98584 C,bI I:(M 789-1865 Fax:Pffl)456-3802 RE: HCSD Fire Pump&Related Dear Craig, FYI,we have completed framing the fire pump and are soon to start placing fire pump equipment. Additionally,I have discovered the existing concrete silo water storage tank has a capacity of 59,500 gallons of water. We originally thought it was 50,000 gallons and with the 10,000 gallon steel above ground totaling 60,000 gallons. The School District would like to eliminate the steel tank from the system. We would appreciate your approval to do so. I have spoken with Lance Talley and he has no objections. I would appreciate a quick response to our request. Do you know of any Fire District that would want a tank of this size? If you have any questions,please contact me at(360)491-7591 or cell (360) 789-1865. Sincere , ary A. Larson,P.E. cc: Ron Zier; HCSD Rob Hart; HCSD Ray Mow; EMA Fred Blanchard; BCE Lance Talley; DSFM Debbera Coker; MCCD �L�• CGS' GAL/sal `"l