Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Wetland Delineation - HMP Habitat Managment Plan - 9/30/2003
32—c-4no(so WETLAND DELINEATION REPORT AND IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR THE 10 ACRE CANNARD HONYSUCKLE LANE PROPERTIES SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE MASON COUNTY, WA Prepared For: Karen Cannard P.O. Box 1608 i Shelton, WA 98584 Tel. (360) 791-1074 Prepared By: Felix H. Mahr, Principal Biologist& Curtis Wambach, Fish and Wetland Biologist LAND-TEK WETLAND SERVICES 11202 Littlerock Road SW Olympia, Washington 98512 (360) 956-7274 September, 2003 Felix H. Mahr COE Certified Wetland Delineator f , TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION Page Purposeand Location............................................................................................................... 1 METHODS Wetland Reference Information...............................................................................................4 FieldMethods and Mapping....................................................................................................4 INVESTIGATION FINDINGS GeneralSite Description..........................................................................................................5 Wetland Determination and Rating..........................................................................................5 Vegetation.................................................................................................................................7 Soils...........................................................................................................................................8 Area Topography,Hydrology and Drainage Patterns........................................................... 10 FunctionalAssessment........................................................................................................... 10 REGULATIONS,PROJECT IMPACTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Applicable Regulations and Buffer Setbacks........................................................................ 12 ImpactAnalysis...................................................................................................................... 12 Recommendation.................................................................................................................... 12 Summary................................................................................................................................. 13 Disclaimer............................................................................................................................... 14 REFERENCES...................................................................................................................... 14 LIST OF FIGURES Fig. 1. Vicinity and Topography Map...................................................................................2 Fig. 2. Aerial Photo................................................................................................................3 Fig.3. Wetland Delineation Map...........................................................................................6 Fig.4. Soil Survey Map..........................................................................................................9 LIST OF TABLES Tab. 1. Wetland Characteristics..............................................................................................7 Tab.2. Functional Assessment Ratings for Wetland A....................................................... 11 APPENDICES A. Plant Indicator Status Definitions B. Plant Species Encountered During Field Investigations C. Field Data Forms D. Washington State Wetland Rating Form for Western Washington E. Functional Analysis Data Forms LAND-TEK WETLAND SERVICES INTRODUCTION 2 Purpose and Location This study is the wetland delineation and impact report for a proposed single-family residence on a 10-acre property,consisting of two existing parcels that are approximately equal in size. The properties are located at 671 and 691 Honeysuckle Lane in Mason County,Washington, approximately 5 miles northwest of the City of Shelton. The subject properties(Tax Parcel No.'s 4213121000-30&-60)were formerly used for Christmas tree production. The parcel is situated in the NW 1/4 of the SW '/4 of Sec. 32, Tn. 21N,RAE, Willamette Meridian. A vicinity and topography map is shown in Figure 1,and an aerial photo photograph of the property is shown in Figure 2. This report has been prepared by Land-Tek at the request of the property owner,Karen Cannard. The property owner has commissioned this study of wetlands on the property to facilitate project planning and permitting for a proposed single-family residence with septic drainfield and access driveway. The proposed residence would be located on the eastern portion of the southern lot. An existing domestic water well is located on the east portion of the north lot. The proposed access driveway would enter the site at the existing 30 foot road easement off of Honeysuckle Lane. The objectives of this wetland study are to determine the presence, extent, characteristics and jurisdictional status of wetlands on and adjacent to the property,and to prepare a preliminary assessment of potential wetland impacts that would occur in developing the eastern portion of the southern lot for a single-family dwelling. The findings are intended for use by the applicants and by Mason County to ensure compliance with Mason County Resource Ordinance(MCRO, Chapter 17.01)and to assist in permitting of the proposed dwelling. 1 LAND-TEK WETLAND SERVICES i li Cannard Property Vldnnty and Topography, Mason County,WA p vt-5 1=✓ / gy .s "/ ��i;,,°> I �Q'- _� ,�- at"�.+ �>ar 45QT�i ��'�., a*''�+ �� _�4 --� - � - •►-.o<��l{ --� -, ✓�eniLhke ' j 0 -130 -----__--- � -� '3Z 'ri� 3 n!C I o S_nlI^��,_7 ++<%'✓ U �BB��� ���� ��� lw \ �2 ��. 1� ( dG�•u _' 1 6EµC I T■ n�=F'y`t �j�-�i��l GG�'. ° .� 3G4T—L'C ;� n•,g n t a I +p I.TS ED 1-136 JO nir lt9 L k 9/ ,D WfSf on- O,�=�^c_>9 < l a e 3, , a 1304� °4 ''.---� � i- Air cr /�d I. I' r•� -- --- _ �I��� ,•tee yl 79 y Y A n 3 q n �+ Wash Sate Pe roI II. G $ + a u •` Acad{>R,y - a r 2r 'Ijf VE7 0. I 6 I l C c L I i�..�"-.�� �G Y-1,(1�`�v 4�:ir-tS� � �. I •C, � .il' �'/'`�) o F4 Val it ---- - l—I —----niOe-R"'go- - 1 _ 11 es.7.J W�SHIP TON Pit„•_;' `.( ��\ pflE /ONSICENT H ' SAN ERSON I'wens' �v ;o v ♦ ) I + �11 F ELD a ) I ��/ 'r ^•War k��\0 1", \ , - I �• Dirsel � A Eoo°rrrrod i f _ •'' _ / v I \ �\ I 4 `• ;rf p rgroe ids.:a� TN � N /Mlie 0�1000 GEET 0 ;AO IQA A7ETEtIS - VMap created with TOPOI®@2002 National Oeogmphic(www.ratiora lVogmphic.condtopo) . . _ Well -M, •- • . . S, . • .•- IV Je � � t gL r - R 'A j r r� IL ' w IF, 8: of + _ i METHODS Wetland Reference Information References were reviewed to provide initial site information regarding occurrence of wetlands. streams and hydrology. The sources include: Soil Survey of Mason County Area, Washington by U.S.D.A. Soil Conservation Service(SCS)in cooperation with Washington Agricultural Experiment Station. 1960 National Wetlands Inventory Map by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for the Skokomish Valley Quadrangle. Downloaded from Topozone.com on 4 September 2003. Topographic Map by the U.S. Geological Service for the Skokomish Valley Quadrangle. Downloaded from Topozone.com on 4 September 2003. Field Methods and Mapping The vegetation, soils,and hydrology of suspect areas of the site were examined according to the methodology described in the Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual(WDOE 1997). The wetland and stream delineation was performed on 30 August 2003. • Orange flagging imprinted with the words"WETLAND BOUNDARY"indicates the outer edge of the wetland. • Pink flagging labeled"TP-#"indicates wetland test plots. Delineated wetland edges were marked at natural angle points and approximately 30 to 50-foot intervals with wetland boundary flagging. The wetland flagging was sequentially labeled as"A-1","A-211,etc., where"A"refers to Wetland A,the single site wetland that was identified. Some flags were labeled with a lowercase"a'or"b"after the wetland flag numeration(i.e.,A-la,A-lb,etc.)to provide additional flagging to fine-tune the wetland boundary location. Wetland field data sheets were completed at six locations considered representative of the plant communities and topographic/hydrologic regimes encountered,or judged to be critical to the wetland -d-e-Iineation(p npe dix=, i—eT-Da-ta-gam): S-oi'1 e-Fa-aractenstics- ydrroTogfe indicators;and dominant - tree,shrub,and herb species were noted at each of the data plots. Test plots(data plots)were marked with fluorescent pink flagging and sequentially marked as"TP1","TP2",etc. At each field test plot,soil pits were band dug to approximately 18 inches and examined for hydric soil indicators in the upper 10 inches,including the occurrence of organic soils,histic epipedons,sulfitic material,aquic or peraquic moisture regimes,reducing soil conditions,gleyed soils and mottled and/or low chroma soils. Hydrology of the site was primarily evaluated by observations of surface water,soil saturation,groundwater depth,sediment deposits,drainage patterns,oxidized rhizospheres and water- stained leaves. Vegetation was determined to be hydrophytic(adapted to anaerobic conditions)when more than 50%of the dominant plant species had an indicator status of facultative(FAC),facultative wetland(FACW),or obligate wetland(OBL)(see Appendix A for definitions). Dominance was determined separately in herb,shrub and tree strata using the Intermediate-Cover Class Method described in the Federal Manual for Identifying and Delineating Jurisdictional Wetlands(FICWD 1989). 4 LAND-TEK WETLAND SERVICES ' e The wetland boundary flags locations were located using a compass and tape,and were mapped using AutoCADTM. The locations of the data plots are approximate. INVESTIGATION FINDINGS General Site Description The approximately 10-acre site is situated 5 miles northwest of the City of Shelton,7 miles northwest of Oakland Bay,and approximately 9 miles southwest of Hood Canal. The property is part of an abandoned Douglas fir Christmas tree farm. The site is mainly forested by young Douglas fir(Pseudotsuga menziesii)with some shore pine(Pinus contorta). On site and in the vicinity of the site, shore pine appears to be an early secondary succession species that quickly dominates disturbed areas,forms exceedingly dense growth,and then dies back at approximately 30 feet in height. Douglas fir appears to be the dominant upland tree on site and near the project site,forming a complete canopy in most locations. Sala] (Gaultheria shallon) is the dominant understory,species in upland areas on the property. The topography on site is relatively flat with a shallow swale extending diagonally from northwest to southeast across the central portion of the property. This swale periodically becomes inundated with water during winter months when the water table rises closer to the surface. This seasonal drainage is sometimes referred to as Winter Creek,because of its characteristically intermittent occurrence. Scrub- shrub and herbaceous growth dominates the swale,with Oregon oak(Quercus ganyana)and serviceberry (Amelanchier alnifolia)growing along its periphery. Two cleared driveways cross the site and traverse the on-site drainage swale. An unimproved driveway is associated with the existing 30-foot road easement located on the southern property boundary.A partially improved(lightly graveled)driveway traverses the northern lot from the northeast corner to the west portion of the north lot. Traces of a third unimproved driveway formerly used to access and maintain the Christmas tree plantings crosses the center of the property from east to west approximately 30 feet south of the property line dividing the two subject parcels. An existing shed is situated on the eastern portion of the north lot. Wetland Determination and Rating A single site wetland,designated Wetland A,was identified in the shallow swale located diagonally from northeast to southwest across the property. The Swale contains hydrophytic vegetation,hydric soils,and positive indicators of wetland hydrology that are generally lacking in the nearby upland (see field data sheets,Appendix Q. The wetland delineation map is shown in Figure 3. The wetland extends off-site to the northeast and to the south within the 60 to 70-foot wide swale. Wetland A has an on-site area of approximately 35,000 sq.ft. (0.80 acre)within the subject property and has an estimated total area of approximately 40 acres off-site,based on the NWI and Mason County Soil Survey maps. 5 LAND-TEK WETLAND SERVICES i CANNARD HONEYSUCKLE LANE PROPERTIES WETLAND DELINEATION wetland delineation performed by Curtis i Wombach and Felix Mohr of 0 60 120 UNINCORPORATED MASON COUNTY TAX PARCELS 4213232000-30 & -60 (10.0 ACRES) Land—Tek Wetland Services In 691 (NORTH PARCEL) & 671 (SOUTH PARCEL) HONEYSUCKLE LANE, SHELTON, WA September, of using the methodology of the PORTIONS OF THE NWI/4 OF THE SWI/4, SEC.32, TN.21N, R4W, W.M. Washington State Wetland Identification and Delineation (J Manual (WDOE 1997). I PROPERTY OUTLINE BASED ON MASONICOUNTY ASSESSOR'S MAP. Delineated wetland boundaries were located from EXISTING&PROPOSED BUILDINGS PER PROPERTY OWNER. marked property corners THIS IS NOT A SURVEY. ALL FEATURES APPROXIMATE. using a compass and tape. OFF—SITE WETLAND (HIGHLY APPROXIMATE) AiC�3 �;l,1tYA A10 Driveway location highly AIOC �' l'' `ao approx. outside buffer A101 EX. PARCEL \ '\ •1V 09ae 421323200030 / IAil t' A7F1 / / Ex. Shed A'12 A.jA Y { I Al2r"Y Y o95iai j n13 c A130 AP, Existing Well rF,�y © ■ — — — — All,,. A.5 WETLAND A p A'tp 100 fd I Class 2 v+�ae �, .................Ra...... •1' + Pro. Driveway Approx. OnLSite Area: yr��,tt°` , & Parking 35,000+ s.f. (0.150 acres) s�tia• A16 i .. o , Hone Lane Honeysuckle EX. PARCEL 040 , , Pro. Drainfield y e� (0 1 , and Reserve 421323200960 � Se tip ..... .... Tank 30' Easement -- r WETLAND DATA PLOT qtr; 4; Al SW CORNER OF LOCATION (TYP.) NW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 SEC 32 t t � Revisions Date B LAND-TEK WETLAND SERVICES CANNARD PROPERTIES Sheet OLYMPIA, WA (360) 956-7274 WETLAND DELINEATION 1 of 1 09/20/03 Wetland A is a Category H wetland based on Mason County Resource Ordinance(MCRO)Section f 17.01.070(E)(1). Category 11 wetlands in Mason County typically require an 85-foot wetland vegetation area(buffer),based on MCRO Section 17.01.070(E)(2). A building setback of 15 feet is required from the edge of the wetland vegetation area(Section 17.01.070(E)(7)). Wetland A rates as a Category 11 wetland because of a 22 point score on the Washington State Wetland Rating Form for Western Washington (Appendix D) and because it contains State priority-status `oak woodland' habitat along the wetland edge. Characteristics of the single delineated site wetland are summarized in Table 1. Table 1. Wetland Characteristics. Wetland On-Site Area Est. Total WDOE Rating Plant Community Regulated Area Category Classes' Water Feature? A 0.8±acre 40 acres II Scrub-shrub Yes (minimum) Emergent Wetland and non-wetland areas are well differentiated on this property. Other areas examined generally lacked all three parameters of jurisdictional wetland(hydrology indicators,hydric soils and hydrophytic vegetation). Details of site vegetation, soils,and hydrology follow. Vegetation A list of plants encountered on the property,their scientific names,and their assigned wetland indicator status is given in Appendix B. Details of vegetation recorded at individual data plot locations can be found in Appendix C. No plant species listed in Endangered, Threatened and Sensitive Vascular Plants of Washington (Washington Department of Natural Resources, 1999)were identified either on or near the site in the course of these studies. Wetland Vegetation Dominant scrub-shrub wetland vegetation consists of Douglas spirea(Spiraea douglasii;FACW),Pacific ninebark(Physocarpus capitatus;FACW-),clustered rose(Rosa pisocarpa; FAC),and Nootka rose(Rosa nutkana; FAC). Emergent vegetation consists of velvet grass(Holcus lanatus;FAC),red fescue(Festuca rubra; FAC), and Pacific Bedstraw(Galium cymosum;FACW). The most abundant wetland species in Wetland A is Pacific ninebark. During the wetland reconnaissance,the 6 to 7-foot tall bushes of Pacific ninebark appeared water-stressed with shriveled,shrunken, or browned leaves. Short(2 to 4 feet high) stands of Douglas spirea and clustered rose are interspersed within the ninebark. Buffer Vegetation Dominant buffer vegetation consists of serviceberry(Amelanchier alnifolia;FACU),low Oregon grape (Mahonia nervosa;FACU),wood's rose(Rosa woodsii;FACU),snowberry(Symphoricarpos albus; FACU);beaked hazelnut(Corylus cornuta;FACU),Oregon white oak(Quercus garryana;no assigned 7 LAND-TEK WETLAND SERVICES indicator status,likely FACU),tall fescue(Festuca arundhwcea; FAC-),ocean spray(Holodiscus discolor,not listed,likely U'PL),Douglas fir(FACU),velvet grass(FAC),red fescue(FAC),and shore pine(FAC). Buffer vegetation occurs in a narrow 10 to 25-foot wide strip located along both edges of the wetland. This vegetation community gives way to a Douglas fir(FACU)forest and salal(FACU) understory further than 25 feet from the wetland. Upland Vegetation Dominant upland vegetation consists of kinnikinnick(Arctostaphylos uva-ursi;FACU-), Scot's broom (Cytisus scoparius;NL,likely UPL),Douglas fir(FACU),Salal(FACU),Oregon grape(FACU),shore pine(FAC),and ocean spray. This vegetation community occurs approximately 25 feet or more from the wetland and dominates the majority of the subject property. Souls Upland Soils The Mason County Soil Survey has mapped the majority of the subject property and the surrounding area as non-hydric Grove gravelly sandy loam,0-5 percent slopes(Figure 4). Grove gravelly sandy loam is described as somewhat excessively drained,reddish brown(5YR 5/3, 5/4,4/3,or 4/4)gravelly soils. This soil type occupies large glacial outwash plains. Typically,the surface layer of Grove gravelly sandy loam is reddish-brown, gravelly sandy loam, 6 inches thick. Below this layer,soils contain round and irregular reddish aggregates(cobbles). From 12 to 14 inches, soils are more gravelly and are covered with dark reddish-brown(5YR 3/2. 3/3,3/4,2.5/2) fine material. The subsoil is light-brown (7.5YR 6/3-6/4),very gravelly loamy sand. From 24 to 32 inches,the soils grade to a substratum of loose gravel,cobbles, and sand. The dominant colors are gray (IOYR 5/1-6/1),grayish brown(IOYR 5/2),yellowish brown (1 OYR 5/4, 5/6, 5/8),and light brown (7.5YR 6/3-6/4). At 24 inches,soils can be weakly cemented. Based on the Mason County soil survey, drought resistant plant species dominate this soil type. These plant species include Douglas fir,kinninnick,salal, snowberry, and Oregon grape. Common land use is Douglas fir Christmas tree farms,which is consistent with former land use on the project site. Upland test pits were dug in buffer soils that spear to be transitional between Gove soils(non-hydric) and McKenna soils(hY dric),althoughi s these so i not meet the definition ot fiyaFic based on the Washington State Wetland Identification, and Delineation Manual(WDOE 1997). Generally,upland soils on the site conformed to the characteristics of Grove soils,based on the description in the Mason County Soils Survey. These soils are dark brown to very dark brown(IOYR 3/3-2/2)from 0 to 8 inches when moistened. Between 8 and 18 inches,soil color appeared to be dark yellowish brown to dark brown(10YR 3/3 to 4/4)when moistened. No redoxymorphic deletions or inclusions were observed in upland soil test pits. 8 LAND-TEK WETLAND SERVICES Wetland Soils The hydric soil associated with the on-site wetland is mapped as McKenna gravelly loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes. This soil series consists of poorly drained,very dark, gravelly soils in depressions and along natural drainage ways. McKenna gravelly loam is dark gray(I OYR 511 to 6/1; almost black when moist, 1 OYR 2/1)gravelly loam that is high in organic matter. From 10 to 15 inches,the soil is firm, dark grayish-brown(I OYR 4/2)very gravelly loam or gravelly clay loam moderately high in organic matter. The substratum, beginning at 24 to 30 inches, consists of slightly to moderately compact, olive- brown (2.5Y 4/3 to 4/4) and pale-brown (1 OYR 6/3)coarse gravel and sand that is fairly mottled and stained. The soil is wet for most of the year,but dries rapidly in the summer. Based on the Mason County soil survey,natural vegetation consists of deciduous trees and shrubs. Land use is most commonly grazing and pasture. Wetland test pits may have also been in a transition area between soil types;however,these soils meet the definition of hydric based on the Washington State Wetland Identification, and Delineation Manual (WDOE 1997). Horizonation was difficult to establish in the wetland soil test pits because of the dry, crumbly, and dusty composition of the soils during the late summer delineation. Generally,on-site wetland soils conformed to the characteristics of McKenna gravelly loam,based on the description in the Mason County Soils Survey. From 0 to 16 inches below the surface,wetland soil color appeared very dark gray to black when moistened(I OYR 3/1-2/1). Below 16 inches, soil color appeared as olive-brown (2.5Y 4/3 to 4/4)when moistened. Area Topography,Hydrology and Drainage Patterns General topography of the site vicinity is shown in Figure 2. The property is located approximately 360 to 400 feet above sea level(UTM Zone 10 NAD83 Datum). Topography is relatively flat,other than the shallow drainage swale that extends diagonally through the northwestern to southeastern portion of the property. The Swale empties descends slightly across flat terrain, ending in a gravel pit near the Washington State Corrections Center approximately 1'/z miles southeast of the subject property. The National Wetland Inventory map for the project vicinity shows a large wetland approximately 1 mile west and a small wetland approximately'/4 mile southeast along the same drainage corridor. Excessively drained,gravelly Grove soils allow the quick interflow of water to the shallow depression of the on-site drainage swale. The poorly drained soils within the swale cause inundation and subsequent wetland conditions to form. During the wetter months,the groundwater table may rise,contributing to the __-- i—'nunda eft condit ions-m the swale�Iydrolog�cal in ica o finun da onfi were observed�uring fhc— --- wetland delineation. Hydrological indicators included faint drainage patterns,some water stained leaves, and dried pond scum that clung to the vegetation several inches from the ground. Functional Assessment Wetlands perform significant functions that are valued by human society. Wetland rating categories (WDOE 1993) are used to establish different degrees of protection to wetlands depending on the likely overall value of their functions. A quick assessment of the potential for the single site wetland to perform specific types of functions is as follows. Wetlands, in general, provide many valuable ecological and social functions, including 1) stormwater storage, 2) groundwater recharge,3)erosion control, 4)water quality improvement, 5)natural biological support, 6) overall habitat functions, 7)specific habitat functions, and 8)cultural and 10 LAND-TEK WETLAND SERVICES socioeconomic value. These functions were semi-quantitatively assessed using the wetland and buffer functional analysis methodology modified from Cooke Scientific Services, Inc. (Cooke,2000). The scores from the analysis of each parameter are summarized in Table 2. Functional analysis data forms are for the wetland are shown in Appendix E. Table 2. Wetland and Buffer Functions and Semi-Quantitative Performance Assessment' (Appendix E Wetland A Function Values Stormwater Functions Stormwater Capacity High (81%)* Groundwater Support Moderately High (79%) Erosion Control/ High Shoreline Protection (83%) Water Quality Improvement Moderately High (70%) Biological Functions Natural Biological Support Moderately High (70%) Overall Habitat Functions Moderate (68%) Specific Habitat Functions Low (46%) u tura,S-o—cial,and conomic Functions Cultural/ Moderately Low Socio-economic (50%) 1. Methodology modified from Cooke,2000 Very High 90%to 100% Moderately low 50%to 59% High 80%to 89% Low 40%to 49% Moderately high 70%to 79% Very Low 30%to 39% Moderate 60%to 69% Negligible <30% I 1 LAND-TEK WETLAND SERVICES The stormwater functions(i.e.,stormwater capacity and groundwater support)of the wetland are rated as high to moderately high primarily because of the large size of the wetland complex,mainly off site,and the location of the wetland in the upper one-third of the drainage basin. Erosion control and shoreline protection and water quality improvement is rated as high and relatively high,respectively,because of the vegetative cover in the wetland and its buffer and the relatively undeveloped shoreline. Biological functions are rated as low to moderately high because the wetland provides high quality habitat for a relatively low number of species. The extreme conditions in the wetland,including periodic inundation during the wetter months and excessively dry conditions during the summer months,limit the number of species that can utilize this harsh environment as habitat. Although the on-site wetland has distinctive and aesthetic qualities, such as an oak woodland component to its buffer,its cultural and socio-economic value is rated as moderately low because of its relatively inaccessible location for the public on private property. REGULATIONS,PROJECT IMPACTS AND RECOMMENDATION Applicable Regulations and Standard Buffers Mason County regulates new activities in and near wetlands under Chapter 17.01 of the MCRO. The code strictly limits new activities in wetlands and their mandated buffers,and stipulates standard wetland vegetation areas(buffers)of 85 feet wide preserved for Category H wetlands. A building setback of 15 feet is required from the edge of the wetland vegetation area(buffer). The code allows for buffer averaging and other alterations to wetlands and their buffers provided that wetland preservation and mitigation occur to off site wetland impacts. The U.S.Army Corps of Engineers regulates the discharge of fill in non-isolated wetlands that drain to navigable waters. The Washington Department of Ecology regulates some wetland impacts by controlling discharges that may affect waxer quality. Impact Analysis No areal impacts to Wetland A or its 85-foot wide wetland vegetation area(buffer)would occur as a result of this proposed single-family development,as designed. The residence,its septic drainfield,access road, and parking would all be outside of the 85-foot wide wetland vegetation area(buffer). The residence is located outside of the 15-foot building setback from the edge of the wetland vegetation area(buffer). No utility crossing or alteration to the wetland or the wetland vegetation area is proposed. All impacts to Wetland A and its wetland vegetation area(buffer)would be avoided as the project is designed. A long narrow wetland was identified on the approximately 10-acre property located at the western end of Honeysuckle Lane in Mason County,Washington. The wetland was determined to be a Category II wetland and have a total on-site area of approximately 35,000 sq.fL,which makes it a jurisdictional wetland under the MCRO. Category H wetlands under Mason County jurisdiction typically require an 85-foot wetland vegetation area(buffer)and 15 foot building setback from the edge of the wetland vegetation area(buffer). The off-site portion of the wetland is possibly larger than 40 acres. The wetland is assessed as having a relatively high potential for providing stormwater wetland functions due to its relatively large size and location in the upper one-third of the drainage basin. Biological functions are rated high for biological support and lower for habitat functions because the wetland contains high quality wildlife habitat for relatively few wildlife species. No wetland or wetland vegetation area(buffer)impacts are expected as a result of this project, as designed. All development and development activities would occur outside of the 85-foot wetland vegetation area(buffer) 12 LAND-TEK WETLAND SERVICES Disclaimer This analysis of site wetlands, impacts of the proposed development,and recommendations to regulatory personnel are based on the professional judgement of Land-Tek Wetland Services,observations made at the time of the site visits,and prevailing regional standards. Final judgement as to the extent and jurisdictional status of regulated water features,specification of required buffers,and mitigation of impacts to critical areas, is the prerogative of regulatory agencies. 13 LAND-TEK WETLAND SERVICES REFERENCES Adamus,Paul R. 1983. A Method for Wetland Functional Assessment: Vol.11, FHWA Assessment Method.Report No.FHWA-IP-82-24,U.S.Dept.of Transportation,Federal Highway Administration,Washington,D.C. Cowardin,L.M.,V.Carter,F.C.Golet,and E.T.LaRoe. 1979. Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States. Office of Biological Services,U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service,FWS/OBS-79/31, Washington,D.C. Federal Interagency Committee for Wetland Delineation(FICWD). 1989. Federal Manual for Identij�ing and Delineating Jurisdictional Wetlands. U.S.Army Corps of Engineers,U.S.Environmental Protection Agency,U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service,and U.S.Department of Agriculture. Washington,D.C. Hitchcock,C.L. and A.Cronquist. 1973. Flora of the Pacific Northwest. University of Washington Press,Seattle. Mason County.2003. Mason County Resource Ordinance—Wetlands Chapter. 17.01.070 of Mason County Code, Revised June 20,2003. Shelton,WA Reed,P.B.Jr. 1988. National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands: 1988 Northwest(Region 9). U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service,Inland Freshwater Ecology Section,St.Biological Report 88(26.9),St.Petersburg, Fla. ReppeM Richard T.,Wayne Sigleo,Eugene Stakhiv,Larry Messman,and Caldwell Myers, 1979. Wetland Values- Concepts and Methods for Wetlands Evaluation. Fort Belvoir,Virginia:U.S.Army Corps of Engineers Water Resources Institute. Natural Resources Conservation Service(MRCS). 1995. Hydric Soils of Washington List(rev. 12/15/1995). U.S. Department of Agriculture. U.S.Army Corps of Engineers. 1987. Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual. Technical Report Y-87-1, National Technical Information Service,Springfield,VA. Washington State Department of Ecology(WDOE). 1997. Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual. Ecology Publication#96-94. Olympia,WA. Washington Department of Natural Resources(DNR). 1999. Endangered Threatened and Sensitive Vascular Plants of Washington. Olympia,WA. U.S.D.A. Soil Conservation Service(SCS). 1960. Soil Survey of Mason County Area, Washington. U.S.D.A. Soil Conservation Service(SCS)in cooperation with Washington Agricultural Experiment Station. 14 LAND-TEK WETLAND SERVICES APPENDIX A Definitions of Plant Indicator Status (Reed, 1988) Indicator Category Indicator Definition Symbol OBLIGATE WETLAND OBL Plants that occur almost always (estimated PLANTS probability >99%) in wetlands under natural conditions, but which may also occur rarely (estimated robabili <1%)in uplands FACULTATIVE WETLAND FACW Plants that occur usually (estimated probability PLANTS >67% to 99%) in wetlands, but also occur (estimated robabili 1%to 33%)in uplands. FACULTATIVE PLANTS FAC Plants with a similar likelihood (estimated probability 33% to 67%) of occurring in both wetlands and uplands FACULTATIVE UPLAND FACU Plants that occur sometimes(estimated probability PLANTS 1% to <33%) in wetlands, but occur more often (estimated bability>671/o to 99%)in uplands. OBLIGATE UPLAND UPL Plants that occur rarely (estimated probability PLANTS >99%)in wetlands under natural conditions. Positive and negative signs following the Indicator Symbol are regionally designated modifiers of the indicator status. A positive sign(+) indicates an increased frequency, and a negative sign(-) a decreased frequency, of occurrence in wetlands. (Environmental Laboratory 1987, Reed 1988) APPENDIX B Plant Species Encountered During Field Investigations WETLAND INDICATOR STATUS OF PLANTS ENCOUNTERED CANNARD 10 ACRE HONEYSUCKLE LANE PROPERTY, MASON COUNTY, WA NI = not an indicator NL = not listed Scientific Name Common Name Indicator Status ** Stratum: HERBS Agrostis tenuis BENTGRASS, COLONIAL FAC Cirsium arvense THISTLE, CANADIAN FACU+ Dactylis glomerata ORCHARD GRASS FACU Epilobium angustifolium FIREWEED FACU- Festuca arundinacea FESCUE, TALL FAC- Galium cymosum BEDSTRAW, PACIFIC FACU Holcus lanatus VELVET GRASS, COMMON FAC Phalaris arundinacea REED CANARYGRASS FACW Polystichum munitum FERN, SWORD FACU Pteridium aquilinum FERN, BRACKEN FACU Rubus ursinus TRAILING BLACKBERRY FACU Rumex crispus DOCK, CURLY FAC+ Urtica dioica NETTLE, STINGING FAC+ ** Stratum: SHRUBS Acer circinatum MAPLE, VINE FAC- Amelanchier alnifolia SERVICEBERRY FACU Arctostaphylos uva-ursi KINNIKINNICK FACU- Corylus cornuta HAZEL-NUT, BEAKED FACU Crataegus douglasii HAWTHORN, BLACK FAC Cytisus scoparius SCOT'S BROOM NL Gaultheria shallon SALAL FACU Holodiscus discolor OCEAN SPRAY NL(FACU) Ilex aquifolium HOLLY, EVERGREEN NL Mahonia (Berberis) aquifolium OREGON GRAPE, TALL NL Mahonia (Berberis) nervosa OREGON GRAPE, DWARF NL Oemleria cerasiformis INDIAN PLUM (OSO-BERRY) FACU Physocarpus capitatus PACIFIC NINEBARK FACW- Rosa nutkana NOOTKA ROSE FAC Rosa pisocarpa ROSE, CLUSTERED FAC Rosa woodsii WOOD'S ROSE FACU- Rubus discolor_ . BLACKBERRY, HIMALAYAN_ __ FACU Rubus iaciniatus BLACKBERRY, EVERGREEN FACU+ Rubus spectabilis SALMONBERRY FAC+ Sambucus racemosa ELDERBERRY, RED FACU Spirea douglasii DOUGLAS SPIREA FACW Symphoricarpos albus SNOWBERRY FAC ** Stratum: TREES Acer macrophyllum MAPLE, BIGLEAF FACU Alnus rubra ALDER, RED FAC Fraxinus latifolia ASH, OREGON FACW Prunus virginiana CHOKECHERRY FACU Pseudotsuga menziesii FIR, DOUGLAS FACU Salix sitchensis WILLOW, SITKA FACW Salix spp. WILLOWS FAC-FACW Thuja plicata CEDAR, WESTERN RED FAC Quercus garryana OREGON OAK FACU Pinus contorta SHORE PINE FAC APPENDIX C Field Data Forms I ' WETLAND DETERMINATION FIELD DATA FORM I 1987 COE Manual ! WETLAND DETERMINATION FIELD DATA FORM 1987 COE Manual 'r ,i Land-Tek Welland Services Land-Tek Wetland Services i Project/Sit e p�d Sec. Z I,Plot ID "1 1 Project/Site C&.4 1 4I'll Sec. 3z Plot ID �t Applicant/Owner_C 4-1'(, Twn.:2 I. Date -3 Applicant/Owner Cam ,. y.W'd Twn. 2/u Date. Investigator(s) (',3,(` u(4 4 Range.I County Vl'i Investigators) ^A � c C . oon 'C it Are Normal Circumstances present? No State. L /Y1 s Are Normal Circumstances present? ® No State.tJA I Significantly&Recently Disturbed(Atypical Situation)?Yes ( Significantly&Recently Disturbed(Atypical Situation)?Yes N-0 (F Potential Problem Ares(see Final Remarks)7 Yes Potential Problem Area(see Final Remarks)? Yes " VEGETATION Indicator Cover I Indicator Cover VEGETATION Indicator Cover Indicator Cover .; Plant Species Slaw Classl Stratum Plant Species tatus lass' Stra ;• Plant Species S atu Class' tra m Plant Species Status Class' t t Z'L 7.5 7.�I� SoC�t(�cS 2. J _ a I EEiG✓ S' ;: 2. _ a. 3. 9. I ( 3. SIiYhOLaY%Lc(e�S Q/bV5 9. l_ d. ,r. 10. t I 4. y 10. 5. _�_ _r 1 I. _ 5. oSgr _J 11. i 6. ul?JS tl%W"gl L ,j _- 12. .I 6. AAC -_ _ 12. _ 'Cover Classes(and Midpointsl: T—<I%(none); 1 e 1-5%(3.0); 2-6-15" (10.5); 3—16-25(20.5)%; t ;ovor Classes •d i - T—<l%(none); I=1-5%(3.0); 2—6-15%(10.5); 3-16-25(20.5ft 4-26-50%(38); 5=51-75%(63); 6=76-95%(85.5%); 7=96-100%(98. ). • =Dominant Species .; I ( d—26-50%(38); 5=51-75%(63); 6=76-95%(85.5%); 7=96-100%(98.0). " Dominant Species ( Perc ent dominants wetter than FAC--6 % Hydrophytic vegetation present? Yes Q i \ Percent dominants wetter than FAC-9_% Hydrophytic vegetation present? (�es No REMARKS: , REMARKS: } HYDROLOGY ' ' 1 HYDROLOGY it Recorded Data fsee remarks) Primary Indicators Secondary Indicators Recorded Data(see remarks) Primary Indicators Secondary Indicators I _Water Gauge Data _Drainage Pattern in WL Oxidi2ed Root Channels Upper 12" I _Water Gauge Data _,&Drainage Pattern in WL _Oxidized Root Channels Upper 12" j _Aerial Photgraphs —Saturated in Upper 12" —Water Stained Leaves ZC Aerial Photgmphs _Saturated ih Upper 12" Water Stained Leaves I _.Other _Water Marks Local oil Survey Data _Other ater Marks Local Soil Survey llata Drift Lines FAC-ijleutral Test _W tt Lines _FAC-Neutral Test t Sediment Deposits _Other 4see remarks Sediment Deposits Other(see remarks Depth in Inches: Surface 1120 Free Water in Pit I Saturated Soil Depth in Inches: Surface H,0__- Free Water in Pit Saturated Soil Welland Hydrology Present 7 1'es No Welland Hydrology Present? Yeso REMARKS: I j REMARKS: SOILS �GKO 7rliyr'^ c r PL,11' ,?lP✓Frfill�4�rr[. s;s�xrl% SOIL$ Soil Survey Map Series&Phase _Drainage Clasp Soil Survey Map Series&Phase &Ae tl-f-7 Drainage Class_ Taxonomy____.__ Field observations consistent with mapped type? Yes No ( Taxonomy Field observations consistent with mapped type?(!�p No ! My�ya,trr Colors T xt re Mottle abundatice/size/coutrast ' �t�he�.yfjor� Horzon AAoUt fill. Matrix Color Texture Mottle abundance/size/coutrast e I r Hydric Soil Indicators,- )jydric Soil Indicators: Histosol _Reducing Conditions _Sandylw/Organic Matter Streaks I _•Histosol _ Reducing Condtiona _Sandy w/Organic Metter Streaks _Histic Epipedon _Gleycd or Low Chrome _Locall Listed Hydric Soil _Histic Epipedon Gleyed or Low Chroma Locally Listed Hydric Soil Sulfidic Odor _Concretions Nationally Listed Hydric Soil _Sulfidic Odor _-_Concretions �G Nationally Listed Hydric Soil ..• Aqu1c Moisture Regime _Sandy wlHigh O.M.Surface Horizon _Aquic Moisture Regime _Sandy w/Hfglt O.M.Surface Hpr-Izon r; Hydric Soils Present? Yes® Hydric Soils Present? ( es No �! REMARKS: ' REMARKS: rl�s v {`ppi WETLAND DETERMINATION 5 C•wr Fry>,l �c HeG, •ft�IC' 'g. 9 S�J�S ii �' WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic vegetation present? Yes I Hydrophytic vegetation present? 'e No (.1 Wetland hydrology present' Yes ;I Wetland hydrology present? No Hydric soils present? Yes Is this data plot within a wetland? Yes N I Hydric soils present' No Is this data plot within a Welland?(YR. No RATIONALE/REMARKS: ! RATIONALE/REMARKS: , i WETLAND DETERMINATION FIELD DATA FORM i 1987 COE Manual WETLAND DETERMINATION FIELD DATA FORM 1987 COE Manual Land-Tek Welland Services Land-Tek Welland Services Project/Site Ja Sec. "" i ---�y Project/Site / _,i. Plot ID J c_ct(/1.✓��r Sec. Z Plot ID yI: ApplicanUOwner ef a f / Twn. 2 V � Date �C� Applicant/Owner ,a f Twn. 2/N Date121AO t? jy Investigator(s) W r ki- Range ttF, bounty Mar 5 eti,,1 Investigators) a v iId,,.r Li Range. County ,/yj g ,V1 !II Are Normal Circumstances present? e State. Jj�_ Are Normal Circumstances present? Ve N State.jnl A !l! Significantly&Recently Disturbed(Atypical Situation)7 Yes I Significantly&Recently Disturbed(Atypical Situation)7 es Potential Problem Area(see Final Remarks)? Yes ( Potential Problem Area(see Final Remarks)? Yes VEGETATION Indicator Cover i Indicator Cover VEGETATION Indicator Cover Indicator Cover Plant Species Status Class' Stratum Plant Spycies! I talus ems' Stratun Plant Species Status Class' Stratum Plant Specie s Status Class' Stratunt 1. t� f� 1.�"gt7 tOf rqI cS pJkVS 7.•�r5}L,tn S. ��ft c.• ak 9. r- `' 3 )(obafSC•S ��;�.1�f 9. S � 4. W F 10. el q�-f i i J— 4• FA(-L)_ — 10. q�pt�y(� f vVG1 -vrs ! S.riLerL, � �, II. L_(� — 5 �✓1t,r.(azNC+<ely—J/Z) oIe"rY lI. -'T 6. IfF/+G�_ 12. 6. 'Cover Classes(and Midpoints): T-<I%(none); 1-1-5%(3.0); 2=6-I5%(10.5); 3=16-25(20.5)%; 'Cover Classes(and Midpoints): T-<I%(none); 1=1-5%(3.0); 2=6-15%(10.5); 3-16-25(20.5)%; 4-26-50%(39); 5=51-75%(63); 6-76-95%(85.5%), 7-96-100%(98.0). * =Dominant Species 4-26-50%(38); 5-51-75%(63); 6-76-95%(85.5%); 7-96-100%(98.0). * m Dominant Spies p-'es;<-oca/'dire. �'AG (1 ct'•ve-rc„S ya�ry�-cam fi'HGv a Percent dominants wafter than FAC-�Q % Hydrophytic vegetation l,resem? es No Percent dominants wetter than FAC--JV210 Hydrophytic vegetation present? Yes No I REMARKS: REMARKS: HYDROLOGY HYDROLOGY tl i;I r Recorded Data(see remarks) Primary Indicators Secondazy Indicators Recorded Data(see remarks) Primary ludicators Secondary Indicators _Water Gauge Data Drainage Pattern in WL _Oxidized Root Chemrels Upper 12" _Water Gauge Data _Drainage Pattern in WL _Oxidized Root Channels Upper 12" } _Aerial Phoigraphs _Saturated in Upper 12" _Water S4a]ned Leaves _Aerial Photgraphs Saturated in Upper 12" _Water Stained Leaves t' _Other _Water Marks Local Sqi]Survey Data _Other _Water Marks _Local Soil Survey Data _Drift lines —FAC-Ndddutral Test t _Drift Lines _FAC-Neutral Test —Sediment Deposits 6 Other(she remarks _Sediment Deposits _Other(see remarks �+ Depth in Inches: Surface H2O Free Water in Pit Saturated Soil Depth in Incites: Surface H20_ Free Water in Pit Saturated Soil Wetland Hydrology Present 7 e No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes REMARKS' REMARKS: 4 /�o��sit�✓ � ovl 17l�,-r�S SOILS LL SOILS 99 Soil Survey Map Series&Phase ,t 4-Y Drainage Class Soil Survey Map Series&Phase Drainage Class 1 Taxonomy --.--Field observations consistent witJ mapped type? a No Taxonomy. _ Field observations consistent with mapped type? Yes No Horizon ]fie t(in.) Matrix Cul are t a ands ce/i e co r ast Mottle color 1 rizoi ]?g t i . Matrix Color Texture Mottle abundance/size/contrast Mottle color to Z �/ +v1C 5�—Y .(y� �'� (7 B ice— 0)Y K f''vt C a s(T_I r s. I a ✓�l g s� t � tI Hydric Sotl Indicators: 11\ Hydric Soil Indicators: _Histosol ` Reducing Conditions _Sandy /Organic Matter Streaks i _Histosol r __--.___Reducing Conditions _Sandy w/Organic Matter Streaks I _Histic Epipedon Gleycd or Low Chronta �Locally Listed Hydric Soil _Histic Epipedon _Gleyed or Low Chroma _Locally Listed Hydric Soil j Sulfidic Odor _Concretions _Nationally Listed Hydric Soil _Sulfidic Odor _Concretions _.Nationally Listed Hydric Soil _Aquic Moisture Regime —Sandy edHlgh O.ht.Surface Horizon I ii _Aquic Moisture Regime _Sandy w/High O.M.Surface Horizon ( Hydric Soils Present? No Hydric Soils Present? Yes No r rV' 1 4L REMARKS: REMARKS: p yL1a�s;�,r,���s. ti r cr� D1?t2�f 1?z2F� i? WETLAND DETER INAT1 NN l j WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophylic vegetation present? ) No °I Hydrophytic vegetation present? Yes ? Welland hydrology present? 1,91Q No Welland hydrology present'? Yes ► Hydric soils present? ee No Is tlds data plot within a Netladd? No Hydric soils present? Yes Is Ibis data plot within a wetland? Yes /No RATIONALE/REMARKS: I RATIONALE/REMARKS: I i WETLAND DETERMINATION FIELD DATA FORM I 1987 COE Manual WETLAND DETERMINATION FIELD DATA FORM 1987 COE Manual Land-Tek Wetland Services Land-Tek Wetland Services ? II V I Project/Site it e ,� Sec. Plot ID Prcject/Site �t' ✓1 r"�/ Sec. _ Plot ID- I ApplicanUOwner Twn. Z/ � Date ApplicanUOwner �s �^I '/' V Twn. 2.�/�__ I Date U r' Investigators) i G✓ (l Rang County Investigators) /. •( ',5 f,/u H 6 r Range. CountyA.4' r Are Normal Circumstances present? (Gi No State._ t Are Normal Circumstances present? No State.IA I Significantly&Recently Disturbed(Atypical Situation)7 Yes t Significantly&Recently Disturbed(Atypical Situation)7 Yes � Potential Problem Area(see Final Remarks)? Yes KO-1 i Yes �"Y' ___.._____.-..__._ Potential Problem Area(see Final Remarks)? _.__..__._-____—_..._..-_._._.____ --_—__�-__�_.__-__._ It "1"'-""--'--'-"—" VEGETATION indicator Cover Indicator Cover VEGETATION Indicator Cover Indicator Cover PI fie Status Class'Class, train Plant Species Status Class, Stratum •I1 S cies -Am,Class, Stratum 1 ecies Sta/tus ' ass, lm t 1 $ 7 ;l 2. 8. 2. .� 8. I ,. 3.1' 9. _ 4. 5. o - }� 1t. 6./4.a✓ie � 2 12. a 6 A --?- j6�— 12. ,Cover Classes(and Midpoints): T n<I%(none); I=1-5%(3.0); 2=6-15%(10.5); 3=16-25(20.5)0/0; ,Cover Classes land MidoointA T-<I%(none); 1-1-5%(3.0); 2=6-15%( 0.5); 3=16-25(20.5)°/u; % 4-26-50%(38); 5-51-75%(63); 6-76-95%(85.5%);7-96-100%(98.0). • =Dominant Species 4=26-50%(38); 5=51-75%(63); 6-76-95%(85.5%); 7-96-100%(98.0). • =Dominant Species t Percent dominants wetter than FAC-� % Hydrophytic vegetation present? Ye No Percent dominants wetter than FAC-2D—°/o Hydrophytic vegetation p I sent? (9 No , REMARKS: REMARKS: 1 HYDROLOGY HYDROLOGY i Recorded Data(see remarks) Primary Indicators Secondary Indicators Recorded Data(see remarks) Primary Indicator SecondW Indicators I Water Gauge Data. XDrainage Pattern in WL _Oxidized Root Channels Upper 12" Water Gauge Data _Drainage Pattern in W L _Oxidized Root Channels Upper l2" Aerial Photgraphs _Saturated in Upper 12" �_Water Stained Leaves _Aerial Photgrpphs _Saturated in Upper 12" _Water Stained Leaves f _Other _ Water Marks Local Soil Survey Data _Other _Water Marks Local So Survey Data r _Drift Lines _FAC-Neutral Test _Drift Lines —�FAC-Nei trot Test I _Sediment Deposits _Other(see remarks t _Sediment Deposits _Other(see remarks Depth in Inches: Surface H2O Free Water in Pit�_ Saturated Soil Depth in Inches: Surface H2O_ Free Water in Pit Saturated Soil Wetland Hydrology Present 7 _es No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes 'No REMARKS: n REM RK l a S�t•1/!�� /�✓fit ,tz di C-71, Y/r� SOILS I l SOILS ? Soil Survey Map Series&Phase Drainage Class Soil Survey Map Series&Phase Drainage Class Taxonomy Field observations consistent with mapped type? Yes No Taxonomy Field observations consistent with,napped type? Yes No I y `. Horizoi in. Matrix Color Texture Mottle abu dat c/size/contrast Mottle color Horizon Pg th in. Matrix Color Texture Mottle abundance/size/colt rant Mottle color 16p— � ti y�/� f lq" t 2 rm i�ll .1' e.1W'A' Hydric Soil Indicators: Hydric Soil Indicators: _Histosol _ Reducing Condtions _Sandy w/Organic Matter Streaks _Histosol Reducing Condtions _Sandy s/Organic Matter Streaks _Histic Epipedon Gleyed or Low Chroma J Locally Listed Hydric Soil _Histic Epipedon _Gleyed or Low Chroma _Locally isted Hydric Soil Sulfidic Odor _ Concretions Nationally Listed Hydric Soil 1 Sulfidic Odor _Concretions _Nations ly Listed Hydric Soil _Aquic Moisture Regime _Sandy w/High O.M.Surface Horizon Aquic Moisture Regime _Sandy Av/Iltgh O.M.Surface Horizon I Hydric Soils Present? es No I Hydric Soils Present? Yes No L, �' REMARKS: REMARKS: WETLAND DETERMINATION WETLAND DETERMINATION i `' Hydrophytic vegetation present. Y No c Hydrophytic vegetation present? a No Welland hydrology present' No Welland hydrology present? Yes ! Hydric soils present? a No Is this data plot within a wetland? Yes No' Hydric soils present? Yes (fy-, is this data plot within a wetland? Yes RATIONALE/REMARKS: RATIONALE/REMARKS: + APPENDIX D Washington State Wetland Rating Form for Western Washington Wetlands Rating Field Data Form Background Information: Name of Rater: j„�^ { (� �� t. ,Affiliation: r =-td 1 j Date: 7!j ' ri Name of wetland(if known): c1. V 1/7 y.: i Government Jurisdiction of wetland: Location: 1/4 Section: of 1/4 S: Section: Township- Range: Sources of Information: (Check all sources that apply) Site visit: V USGS Topo Map: NWI map: ` Aerial Photo: X Soils survey: Y Other: Describe: When The Field Data form is complete enter Category here: Q.1. High Quality Natural Wetland Circle Answers Answer this question if you have adequate information or experience to do so.If not find someone with the expertise to answer the questions.Then,if the answer to questions Ia, I and lc are all NO,contact the Natural Heritage program of DNR. Ia. Human caused disturbances. Is there significant evidence of human-caused changes to topography or hydrology of the wetland as indicated by any of the following conditions? Consider only changes that may have taken place in the last 5 decades. The impacts of changes done earlier have probably been stabilized and the wetland ecosystem will be close to reaching some new equilibrium that may represent a high quality wetland. ---—— - - -- --- - - - - - --- Yes:-go -- 1 a.l Upstream watershed> 12%impervious. Yes: go to Q.2 1 a2. Wetland is ditched and water flow is not obstructed. Yes:go to Q.2 1 a3. Wetland has been graded,filled,logged. Yes:go to Q.2 1 a4. Water in wetland is controlled by dikes,weirs, etc. Yes:go to Q.2 la5. Wetland is grazed. Yes:go to Q.2 1 a6. Other indicators of disturbance(list below) No:go to lb. 25 lb Are there populations of non-native plants which are currently present,cover YES:go to Q.2 more than 10%of the wetland,and appear to be invading native populations? No:go to 1 c. Briefly describe any non-native plant populations and Information source(s): 1 c.Is there evidence of human-caused disturbances which have visibly degraded water quality.Evidence of the degradation of water quality include: direct(untreated)runoff from roads or parking lots; presence,or historic YES: go to Q.2 evidence, of waste dumps;oily sheens;the smell of organic chemicals;or NO:Possible Cat.I livestock use.Briefly describe: Contact DNR Q.2. Irreplaceable Ecological Functions: Does the wetland: (NO to all:go to Q.3) have at least 1/4 acre of organic soils deeper than 16 inches YES go to 2a and the wetland is relatively undisturbed;OR [If the answer is NO because the wetland is disturbed briefly describe: Indicators of disturbance may include: -Wetland has'been graded, filled, logged; -Organic soils on the surface are dried-out for more than half of the year; -Wetland receives direct stormwater runoff from urban or agricultural areas.]; OR have a forested class greater than 1 acre; YES: Go to 2b OR have characteristics of an estuarine system, Yes:Go to 2c OR have eel grass floating or non-floating kelp beds? Yes:Go to 2d 2a.Bogs and Fens Are any of the three following conditions met for the area of organic soil? 2a.1.Are Sphagnum.mosses a common ground cover(>30%)and the cover of invasive species(see Table 3)is less than 100/o? Is the area of sphagnum mosses and deep organic soils> 1/2 acre?__ __ _YES:Category I_ Is the area of sphagnum mosses and deep organic soils %<-1/2 acre? YES: Category II NO: Go to 2a.3 2a.2.Is there an area of organic soil which has an emergent class with at least one species from Table 2,and cover of invasive species is< 10%(see Table 3)? Is the area of herbaceous plants and deep organic soils> 1/2 acre? YES:Category I Is the area of herbaceous plants and deep organic soils 1/4-1/2acre? YES:Category H NO: Go to 2a.3 26 2a.3.Is the vegetation a mixture of only herbaceous plants and Sphagnum mosses with no scrub/shrub or forested classes? Is the area of herbaceous plants, Sphagnum, and deep organic soils> 1/2 acre? YES: Category I Is the area of herbaceous plants, Sphagnum,and deep organic soils%4-1/2 acre? YES: Category II NO: Go to Q.3. Q.2b.Mature forested wetland. 2b.1.Does 50%of the cover of upper forest canopy consist of evergreen YES: Category I trees older than 80 years or deciduous trees older than 50 years? NO: Go to 2b.2 Note.The size of trees is often not a measure of age,and size cannot be used as a surrogate for age(see.guidance). 2b.2.Does 50%of the cover of forest canopy consist of evergreen trees older YES: Go to 2b.3 than 50 years,AND is the structural diversity of the forest high as NO: Go to Q.3 characterized by an additional layer of trees 20'-49'tall,shrubs 6-20', tall,and a herbaceous groundcover? 2h.3.Does<25%of the areal cover in the herbaceous/groundcover or YES: Category I the shrub layer consist of invasive/exotic plant species from the list on p. 19? NO:Go to Q.3 Q.2c.Estuarine wetlands. 2c.1. Is the wetland listed as National Wildlife Refuge,National Park, YES: Category I National Estuary Reserve,Natural Area Preserve, State Park,or NO: Go to 2c.2 Educational,Environmental or Scientific Reserves designated under WAC 332-30-151? 2c.2.Is the wetland>5 acres; ......................................................... YES:Category I Note.If an area contains patches of salt tolerant vegetation that are 1)less than 600 feet apart and that are separated by mudflats that go dry on a Mean Low Tide,or 2)separated by tidal channels that are less than 100 feet wide; all the vegetated areas are to be considered together in calculating the wetland area. or is the wetland 1-5 acres; ......................................................... YES: Go to 2c.3 or is the wetland< 1 acre? .......................................................... YES: Go to 2c.4 27 2c.3.Does the wetland meet at least 3 of the following 4 criteria: ....... YES:Category I NO Category II -minimum existing evidence of human related disturbance such as diking,ditching,filling,cultivation,grazing or the presence of non- native plant species(see guidance for definition); -surface water connection with tidal saltwater or tidal freshwater; -at least 75%of the wetland has a 100 buffer of ungrazed pasture, open water, shrub or forest; -has at least 3 of the following features: low marsh;high marsh;tidal channels;lagoon(s);woody debris; or contiguous freshwater wetland. 2c.4.Does the wetland meet all of the four criteria under 2c3?(above)? YES: Category II NO: Category III Q.2d.Eel Grass and Kelp Beds. 2d.1.Are eelgrass beds present? .................................................. YES:Category I NO: go to 2d.2 2d.2.Are their floating or non-floating kelp bed(s)present with greater than YES:Category I 50%macro algal cover in the month of August or September?............... NO: Category II 0.3. Category IV wetlands. 3a.Is the wetland:less than 1 acre and, hydrologically isolated and, comprised of one vegetated class that is dominated(>80%areal cover) YES: Category rV by one species from Table 3 (page 19)or Table 4(page 20) NO:go to 3b 3b.Is the wetland:less than two acres and,hydrologically isolated, with one vegetated class,and>90%of areal cover in any combination of YES: Category IV species from Table 3(page 19) NO: go to 3c 3c.Is the wetland excavated from upland and a pond smaller than 1 acre YES: Category IV without a surface water connection to streams,lakes,rivers,or other NO:go to Q.4 wetland,and has<0.1 acre of vegetation. 28 0.4. Significant habitat value. Answer all questions and enter data requested. Circle scores that qualify 4a. Total wetland area Estimate area,select from choices in the near-right column,and score in the acres op ints far column: >200 6 40-200 5 Enter acreage of wetland here: acres,and source: S�r 1 s� °" 1040 4� 5-100 1-5 2 0.1-1 1 <0.10 4b.Wetland classes: Circle the wetland classes below that qualify: Open Water:if the area of open water is> 1/4 acre Aquatic Beds:if the area of aquatic beds> 1/4 acre, :E er eg nt:if the e-area of emergent class is> 1/4 acre, #of classes Points — ----— __ I............ 0 Scrub-Shrub: if the area o sf`cnib-sliraYclass s> 1/4 ace,, �^2�:........... 3 _....._ _ �._._.._.._._. __ 3............ 6 Forested:if area of forested class is> 1/4 acre, 4............ 8 5............10 Add the number of wetland classes,above,that qualify,and then Score according to the columns at right. e.g.If there are 4 classes(aquatic beds,open water,emergent& Scrub-shrub),you would circle 8 points in the far right column 4c.Plant species diversity. For each wetland class(at right)that qualifies in Class #species in class Points 4b above, count the number of different plant species Aquatic 1 0 you can find that cover more than 5%of the ground. 2 1 You do not have to name them. 3 2 >3 3 Score in column at far right: e.g.If a wetland has an aquatic bed class with 3 species,an Emergent 1 0 emergent class with 4 species and a scrub-shrub 233 1 class with 2 species you would circle 2,2, and 1 in the 4-5 2 far column >5 3 Note.Any plant species with a cover of>5% qualifies for points within a class, even those Scrub-Scrub - 1- - - -- -- 0 that are not of that class. 2 1 3-4 2 >4 3 Forested 0 3-4 2 .>4 3 f 29 4d. Structural diversity. If the wetland has a forested class,add 1 point if each of the following Classes is present within the forested class and is larger than 1/4 acre: -trees>50'tall............................ YES- 1 -trees 20'-49'tall........................ YES- 1 -shrubs....................................... YES—l -herbaceous ground cover................ YES—] Also add 1 point if there is any"open water" or"aquatic bed" class Immediately next to the forested area(i.e.there is no scrub/shrub or emergent vegetation between them). YES—l 4e.Decide from the diagrams below whether interspersion between liigh—5 wetland classes is high,moderate,low or none?If you think the Moderate—(3' amount of interspersion falls in between the diagrams score accordingly Low 4D (i.e. a moderately high amount of interspersion would score a 4, None—0 while a moderately low amount would score a 2) r AMC &� ry`fYA y y - � 'K�1.; 4f Habitat features. Answer questions below, circle features that apply,and score to right: Is there evidence that the open or standing water was caused by beavers YES=2 Is a heron rookery located within 300'?- --- - YES= 1----- -- — — Are raptor nests located within 300'? YES= 1 Are there at least 3 standing dead trees(snags)per acre greater than 10" in diameter at"breast height" (DBH)? YES= ] Are there at least 3 downed logs per acre with a diameter >6" for at least 10'in length? ES 1 J Are there areas(vegetated or unvegetated)within the wetland that are ponded for at least 4 months out of the year,and the wetland has not qualified as having an open water class in Question 4b. ? YES= 30 4g.Connection to streams.(Score one answer only.) 4g.1.Does the wetland provide habitat for fish at any time of the year AND YES=6 does it have a perennial surface water connection to a fish-bearing stream. 4g.2 Does the wetland provide fish habitat seasonally AND does it have YES=4 a seasonal surface water connection to a fish-bearing stream. 4g.3 Does the wetland function to export organic matter through a surface YES=4 7 water connection at all tunes of the year to a perennial stream. 4g.4 Does the wetland function to export organic matter through a surface AYES=2 water connection to a stream on a seasonal basis? 4h.Buffers. Score the existing buffers on a scale of 1-5 based on the following four descriptions. If the condition of the buffers do not exactly match the description, score either a point higher or lower depending on whether the buffers are less or more degraded. Forest, scrub,native grassland or open water buffers are present for more than 100'around 95%of the circumference. Score=5 Forest, scrub,native grassland,or open water buffers wider than 100' for more than 1/2 of the wetland circumference,or a forest,scrub, grasslands,or open water buffers for more than 50'around 95 %of the circumference. Score=3 Forest, scrub,native grassland,or open water buffers wider than 100' S for more than 1/4 of the wetland circumference,or a forest, scrub,native grassland,or open water buffers wider than 50'for more than 1/2 of the wetland circumference. Score=2 No roads,buildings or paved areas within 100'of the wetland for more than 95%of the wetland circumference. Score=2 No roads,buildings or paved areas within 25'of the wetland for more than 95%of the circumference,or No roads buildings or paved areas within 50'of the wetland for more than 1/2 of the wetland circumference. Score= 1 Paved areas, industrial areas or residential construction(with less than 50' between houses)are less than 25 feet from the wetland for more than 95 % of the circumference of the wetland. Score=0 31 J 4i.Connection to other habitat areas: Select the description,which best matches the site being evaluated. -Is the wetland connected to,or part of,a riparian corridor at least 100'wide connecting two or more wetlands;or,is there an upland connection present>100' wide with good forest or shrub cover(>25%cover)connecting it with a Significant Habitat Area? YES=5 -Is the wetland connected to any other Habitat Area with either 1)a forested/shrub corridor< 100'wide,or 2)a corridor that is> 100'wide,but has a low vegetative cover less than 6 feet in height? Yes=3 -Is the wetland connected to,or a part of,a riparian corridor between 50- 100'wide with scrub/shrub or forest cover connection to other wetlands? Yes=3 -Is the wetland connected to any other Habitat Area with narrow corridor(<100) of low vegetation(<6' in height)? Yes= 1 -Is the wetland and its buffer(if the buffer is less than 50'wide)completely isolated by development(urban,residential with a density greater than 2/acre,or industrial)? Yes=0 Now add the scores circled (for Q.Sa—0.51 above) to get a total. Is the Total greater than or equal to 22 points? DES_=CtegorI` NO=Category M 32 APPENDIX E Functional Analysis Data Forms Table 1 Wetland size in Landscape Context Attribute Group 1 Group 2 I Group 3 Group 4 1 point 1 2 points 3 points 4 points Score • Wetland size <1 acre Wetland size Wetland size Wetland size 4 1 to 5 acres 5 to 10 acres >10 acres • Wetland loss in Basin >60% <60 to 40% <40 to 20% <20% 3 • Size relative to other >50%average 50 to 100% >100 to 200% >200% 3 wetlands in basin(See size average size average size average size NWI Map) • Size of vegetated buffer 0 to 25 feet 25 to 50 feet >50 to 100 >100 4 • Buffer disturbance >60% <60 to 20% <20 to 10% <10% 2 Relative Score If pre score is#1,the overall score is a I Total If pre score is>1 but<2,the overall score is a 2 If pre score is 2 to 3 the overall score is a 3 16 If pre score is>3 to 5,the overall score is a 4 Divide by 5 for pre score Table 2 Score 4 3.2 Table 2 Over flow Contained in Wetland Attribute Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 Group 4 1 point 2 points 3 points 4 points Score • Configuration Flat&Plate- Shallow-bowl- Deep-bowl-shaped Mosaic of 2 shaped shaped configurations • Drainage basin <2 acres 2 to 5 acres 5 to 10 acres >10 acres 4 size • Outlet Constrained Semi-constrained Bermed Surface water 4 enters and slowly infiltrates • Input Groundwater only Groundwater and Surface water and Surface flow only 3 some surface water some groundwater • Impervious No significant <20% 20 to 40% >40% 2 surfaces impervious Relative Score If pre score is#1,the overall score is a I Total If pre score is>1 but<2,the overall score is a 2 If pre score is 2 to 3 the overall score is a 3 15 If pre score is>3 to 5,the overall score is a 4 Divide by 5 for pre score Table 2 Score 3 3 STORMWATER FUNCTIONS Function Group I Group 2 Group 3 Group 4 1 point 1 2 points 3 points 4 Igoints Value Stormwater Capacity Table 1 score 4 Wetland type Riverine or Lake edge Mid-slopped& Shallow Headwaters, wetland isolated wetland depressions bogs 3 Forested component No forested component <10% 10—30% >30% Areal cover 2 Location in watershed Lake or mouth of Lower 1/3 of Middle 1/3 of Upper 1/3 of 4 drainage/waterway drainage/waterway drain oe basin drainage basin drain a basin Highest Score 16 Unit Score 13 (Score 13 /16)100= 81% Groundwater support Table 1 score 4 Wetland size <1 acre Wetland size Wetland size Wetland size 4 1 to 5 acres 5 to 10 acres >10 acres Wetland type Riverine or Lake edge Mid-slopped& Shallow Headwaters, 3 wetland isolated wetland depressions bogs Location in watershed Lake or mouth of Lower 1/3 of Middle 1/3 of Upper 1/3 of 4 drainage/waterway —drainage basin drainage basin drainage basin Flooded/saturated to surface Ephemeral Intermittent Semi- Permanently 2 permanently Percent areal cover of OBL <10% 10 to 30% 30 to 50% >600/. 1 species Percent areal cover of FACW <10% 10 to 30% 30 to 50% >60% 4 species Hie est Score 28 Unit Score 22 (Score 22 /28)100= 79% Erosion coutrol/Shoreline protection Vegetative cover at edge of Sparse grasses/herbs or Dense grass and Shrubs Shrubs and 4 wetland or OHW none herbs trees Wetland extends from OHW of <10 feet 10 to 30 feet 30 to 60 feet Greater than 60 2 open water or centerline of feet drainage Developed shoreline >60% 40 to 60% 40 to 20% <20% 4 Hi est Score 12 Unit Score 10 (Score—l0--/12)l00= 83% - Function Group I Group 2 Group 3 Group 4 I point 2 points 3 points 4 points Value Water quali improvement Score from Table 2 3 Water flow through site Rapid Moderate Slow Mostly 2 infiltrates Vegetative cover <20% 20 to 50% 50 to 80% >80% 3 Developed shoreline >60% 40 to 60% 40 to 20% <20% 4 Substrate Gravel,sand,sandy Silty loam, Mineral Matrix Heavy organics, 2 loam Mineral matrix with strong muck and peat 20%organic organic com onent Hiehest Score 20 Unit Score 14 (Score 14 120)100= 70% BIOLOGICAL FUNCTIONS Functions Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 Group 4 1 I � 1 point 2 points 3 points 4 oints Value 'natural Biological Support Score from Table 1 1 4 Connectivity to vegetated buffers Almost none Low Moderate High 4 Layers of vegetation One Two Three More than 2.5 Aericulture three Flooded/saturated to surface Ephemeral Intermittent Semi- Permanently permanently Or mosaic Number of Cowardin Classes: One class Two classes Three classes More than 2 PAB POW PEM PSS PFO EST three classes Plant richness <4 species 4 to 9 9 to 13 species >13 species 3 species Invasive weeds 60 to 100% 30 to 60% 10 to 20% <I0% 4 Organic accumulation None visible Low Moderate High 2 Organic export Very little Low Moderate High 2 Habitat features(Downed logs,brush Very little Few Some Many 3 piles,bird houses,cavity nests,bird nests,eagle roosting trees Buffer disturbance >60% 40 to 60% 40 to 20% <20% 2 Isolation from upland Habitats Completely isolated Partially Mostly No isolation 3 isolated connected Highest Score 48 Unit Score 33.5 (Score 33.5 /48}100= 70% Overall Habitat Functions Score from Table I 1 3 Layers of vegetation One Two Three More than 2.5 three Habitat diversity Low Moderate Hieh Very High 2 Refugta(Brush piles,down logs, Low Moderate High Very High 2 cavity nests,etc. Landscape linkages Within 4 miles Within one Within one-half Significant 4 mile mile feature found Some Significant habitat features such Some significant on-site as eagle nests,heron colony,wetlands, feature Or Or significant streams,or etc. moderately feature in the significant vicinity feature nearby_ Highest Score 20 Unit Score 13.5 (Score 13.5 /20)100= 68% Specific Habitat Functions Invertebrate habitat Low or none Moderately Moderately High 1 low_ .. high Amphibian habitat Low or none Moderately Moderately High 2 low high Fish habitat Low or none Moderately Moderately High I low high Mammal habitat Low or none Moderately Moderately High 2 low high Bird habitat Low or none Moderately Moderately High 3 low high Species observed at site Low or none Moderately Moderately High 3 low high Habitat on-site for Federally-listed 1 None known in Some Moderate Essential or I species known to occur in vicinity I immediate vicinity critical habitat Highest Score 28 1 Unit Score 13 (Score 13 /28)IOG= 46% Functions Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 Group 4 1 point 2 points 3 points 4 points Value Cultural/Socio-economic Educational opportunities Low Moderately low Moderately High 1 high Aesthetic value Low Moderately low Moderately High 3 high Commercial value(Fisheries, Low Moderately low Moderately High 3 agriculture,renewable resources) hi h Historical or archeological Value Low Moderately low Moderately High 3 high Passive or active recreational Low Moderately low Moderately High 1 opportunities high Access to regulated sensitive area Low Moderately low Moderately High 1 (wetland or stream) high Publicly Privately Privately owned, Publicly owned with owned but some access owned,but unrestricted little access public access Hi hest Score 24 Unit Score 12 (Score 12 /24)100= 50% ++,,. ,i a•.S , t r I+�I I! ' r t ¢.:�OF•1 1 t.a y fl 4 i/e Sall° I I - � �A Id S ,71•: } I?,.. f 4 1 ri St' •J 7 w ram' V'{t}I� tl,k�J'Wr u � �'f triJ ti}f,.tr.?.il)xn• "` b•r».K'.:.,,N-:,�:'�k W'il.�.`W=.rf W+:-,;. kt .5?�.F1Yi4M1> yt�fi{'I�'}�r1�it,1!`'�'1�� �R+IS"`d`,?4'' ,: `.': �.£`Iy�u � 4 } "JfI h I $ ! i .^ f�1rC�,.p1 R t.t r.un•Pl,ed b—,—OW pi-11,d,uVl Ilnr,n b and "",7,:: .,. Range, township and section corners shown on this map are indeflnlle. IV: ' T. 20 N. T. 21 N. (Joins sheet 12) . {{ ate;'. '� tt:,,r•1 rj i T''� , t l'>tl� +�`'� ` '('� 'r/T'!..>ti rv. ; i .'�� ... ), ..... ........... 1�` • ,��r _,�,�t t ' 1 1,4�. ���s !' �+ ,l �' ,I '.1 /g�.,J' ( {v11 111 ' ��i� ' ; 'yi 'PP / 7(� �f tl` fm ' � �1 �� ((�'u}1♦ ':,I%� 11,�'i 1� 4�, � y \d r j.�1,\1,1 et p i I��' �I �� � rr' g \ �•+ ��ryH.t(~ � lx .� t �' Y�•( �n/ �','L .:,11�t i •,� 'r '' :r��r 1 �i� y �,} ri' xr: � ,Sc 1 1 ,t�.�. .•7 I.4. 7�,�1 , - l 4� �Ir Y/ 1� � .r' 1 1 � +rl �''t�c'. ��rr '•'.r :�:iZty' �t�t,.. r .,� `���. P. '11� ���'Y, � € ' x,. i� "I' � �`^,f :� 4�' v is I� ,;�1i�'�t ,`. It_ \`''t''r, :tl ::r �Sr �t�� "'t�' �.'I} �.� , + u�`" ,'I' d..: i, 'f � a 1' tt,'a 1,; :��I•�4,' 4.+';,trt;`�"�! ir' I�r +n' i j; + a r' ,t'1���. Su ;1. 1 �4.. '� ,.�Y.. 11f•�' \ y� tt .} l� 1'1y "ltiNi'.Ly, i (k\'id ,t I I �1 .E ;3a,'r•. 1.. �Y: t� 1 .Ir: t ti`' li + �4�' 'lih\,i '^! ',ti: .r .'I 1N i v�, � ''i Yid�t't'. t� 'l'r<`la��I�I,1C is r r',i5y+tyy t. ,'Yd • �q. QI � :� tv 'i . ,1 +��yj �,h; '�; a.�"Iw :ii r ,i,1. L(�� !]i �{4iL; ':1+}'�? e„ ,.!{ t i1C,? j. • 1 i-. �'."e-/ 4'' .1 '+44�'• ,�. Sry {. G, •�Y; I ''•�T I'� ry.AA\�..� �, +M.�'tI t'.:. •I K: - ��. t.. '� �'l1���t. �f} ' 1 .i q .F'{ � .a. it 11rr ��' 1 `Qlrk }.. r � h .� ,.tt �� C ,,.,, 9 r�1,� Ivs d .�C..,�1�Jt I, f.; , tk.-•lu,,l a.,+ I�r�r. •".6�''14r. t�r' xp� :?r !�t}' \' + �.�.,, �` 'S', r,f,:.;(,.h. �:, ,.:� NF , li L.�,i,,,:a y., 's, r# 1�`.y�:,(1 tFY,� 4...ry. '/ \ r• !r'� �1,21+' �'4�,a:'! r, .�,y::'.� t;TS r1 r yl.• ,f 1 :1:•�i r' n rt, 4 �: i.lr; .9,��' h n r.'C' :L.. y�, _' ,. .}' 't�, 1 'vli ,;M ,� d �'�5�, �- yy ��,��1 9'�� � .k'a � 1 :. , ,it �a�:��'' `yt.• j :7, '{, �,.� I ,��y(� ,\,''�.1..: M ':a.::@ •el�, ��. t+i' 1• f aia(. +'7 � , ,ti i{� ,� ''-,p' ,',,i ,J, i� - , �• ,.>t' i1.��.,. \, �' ',4 I :Cx�"'�>ti it�J;•l.J r.ti.'#� (� a2 .i. ,„'8 .(� ?! �, ,1 rr{ {'`"a. v�a."f�rW •!.. '.:i�:i, �'f,i1'1 f+ '' S. i'. '� ,�y. � t ��•' `'�M4 Yr�+t ry lw'T p\'. �}!,1 m +,F. '!� d, v: +ri \ f. , '1 N,6 .P `{.F �l �kk'. •�>I :!'11 t,, `i tlh 1 '3�� ,1'P '!4rlk,r -3i �., I :i!/ -. + �" + \.. �•i', •Ilt.:%H�t..r .i,, ,'., \i, 4+�y1-.r ityi#� iSM4 `' /`` �y{ i !.?.r t'"1 �1 qy1• :t�, �, y+I { ,j.'� y � �1 .,�'• ,'\� 1( 1 � r r.".'151 ,'� +\; { >E� � ', ;1 I, '•:.7�� i I ,+ P; 3 � t�. �'{� :\.` �C t 'r, ,y. n� li: Ii^ •4 Y�1� � ��}1� •'!{ 6i 4 �Y� 4 �, 4't _ '.Y�.. ,,y ' :'l�. 1�1\Y��f�t.'•��������71 + yl -•\y�.•} ORN,;-1 #i° ••yi t ti•v. '�—• -'a' '��- Fil :'T����+r-t#q,'a.! '�r �p+�' A,�,,� .�,` � t -�:ir �, j F�. e,.� �i11 s.'. �tr:��:;l �' +. 11. �+• Flf I..y.'g .sr S .�:, ;.i':! t, --�.+ l 1....U7'�: � a. .l-{ ? .` ..A fir.. uPy'w,l \ w'r F7i c ;c )" ,1 T q \ ;, Z .�`Y tt 7 ry• t ,'[r r .`}, --`—\\ P •° I jq), ,a \\ f: .j` i„ i`1 TC' T >' (r. I:;i'. t ' f SUS}•`� 17^. i;�. �, L7> '+ } ..,',,: �l an \ .� C �'. e N ♦ t +ti' fy. ? •CL 1* q..,' ,!'•:y ytlr`�u �vl. 9: .--I rf. � I6�:!1. fl)7nn-' Y19fSi11�' y�1'r1'ItI, I `ti y,x' \ �}.� '�di<'•-f+� {#w ltT�' X: I r'"� Ir 1i �.I- I '\ ; l ,� P !. ri F '�r n 4� 1 �h;4i Ly[ at,� t i SS �I� i O \\ . I S t ;� ik I,a r4 7xw ". ' a ! _ / ;i '' �'' I • 1 \,� 1 'wT . �. ,��: l.. III'. � � .? dlr�r;£7s u iL. ;\\.\. y D.. —I—� •` A it r; .1`'. L� .� r rjy W : It 1\ Ul ,I Ilt yy u �• \ t d r ,�� xl i I t ti a p r 4• . ,� lit 1� 'I+Ir al ',: 7'Ct;\ ..\ �I: 1 ,, � �� � _-� ICrC � n i ur it it r(ni IFT + \ �+ \S. ' r \. l r' It l /• _ice u N �;'X'' II k � u t� I III 0) V t { y /r f 11 q, ,s _Mc y.Il ,+,4�, :/ y F_ G) it CI; ,��'\ � - :I. r t - i \ ., � --_ = ��Y)• �,�}" `\ y+ ��C,, � j�. n It i 4i1' `\ 1 1 (,), . II �� i `\�t \ , f 'i , \\' (7 '/•' \n�\ 1 to '/. ,r, III \IV- o II` I IE it, Ln It � ., K 11 s o 11 % ^y� �' \ \O�lit X Ir?'. �__ r' P •.l .. \�_ �r' � � `.� tt � 1 \\�+�' �+o it i •'Q/ � it `I �J \\ e` f6) \ E"•, \ttP41 N- "1- 111 \- 11 ? O•'_____ N it11; 11It I Gy 11 1: 1 ,\\ �,�i r-. S II / `,p r ��� 0a k� If 1\\'. II ` V1 S I \in it If•� r it '�\ i:: :t It /r ; \\\\ 1f 11 , ..� liJi It p ) .. u � Ilk �•� tea- �• \, \ r X _ 1 4/ _ �'I l !D \W y 1, ✓ \ �1,\ -� II �� �, !/!' t .�III\�t tiG\ ". O UO y t� .\' I 1 ' ,• 1 � �. Iv II =`11 � _ \\��I�I,1ill \I +�� I_� t,ja 111 \� ul It ,0II \iII 111 4., s- II N / u tl a 11 t 11 / \I Y' �� I II ll it it 1' sx It 't•� � Iif I _ V. II + It .,.�;f"� ,•J II�''w on '.II +t\\IE:"U it Ll 7 1 , II " i' r /4 X' r► (Joins sheet 1 d) �Z w ;lrPs