The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSHX2016-00009 SEP2016-00013 JARPA - SHX Permit / Conditions - 3/16/2016 srq I MASON COUNTY rFo SO �P C DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT o n 0,0 N Planning Division � o T Z 1615 W Alder St, Shelton, WA 98584 N Y y I (360)427-9670 OJ �O 1864 Exemption from Shoreline Management Act Case No.: SHX2016-00009 Substantial Development Permit Requirement The Proposal By: GALLIMORE FAMILY TRUST PO BOX 1707 MERCER ISLAND, WA 98040 To undertake the following development: Lot 23 and 24 - REPLACE DOCK, ADD A BULKHEAD FOOTING, and add a buoy. Also remove a ramp/boat launch. The original structure appears to have not been permitted by the County, so treating entire bulkhead and the dock as new. Also, the dock is being replaced in a new shape and footprint. Most of the new dock has already been constructed. Within LAKE CUSHMAN and/or its associated wetlands is exempt from the requirement of substantial development because the development is categorized under WAC 173-27-040(2) as being category A-does not exceed dollar threshold Please contact Rebecca Hersha at ext 287 if you have a !oy que ions. Issued: 3/16/2016 Expires: 3/16/2018 Authorized Local Government Official cc: APPLICANT WDFW USACOE W OE TRIBAL COUNCIL i _----_----__> � ►___ + AG C E MDate received: MAR Q 12016 US Army Corps WASHINGTON STATE saga°ors° 515 W. Alder Strut Joint Aquatic Resources Permi Agency reference#: Application (DARPA) Forml,2 Tax Parcel#(s): USE BLACK OR BLUE INK TO ENTER ANSWERS IN THE WHITE SPACES BELOW. O 7— SO UUy Z _ --------------------------------------' Part 1—Project Identification 1. Project Name (A name for your project that you create. Examples:Smith's Dock or Seabrook Lane Development) [h.g!p] GALLIMORE FAMILY TRUST— LOTS 23 & 24 Part 2—Applicant The person and/or organization responsible for the project. e-] 2a. Name (Last, First,Middle) % DAVID LG GALLIMORE / PAMELA GALLIMORE-WONG TRUSTEES 2b. Organization (if applicable) GALLIMORE FAMILY TRUST 2c. Mailing Address (Street or PO Box) PO BOX 1707 2d. City, State, Zip MERCER ISLAND WA 98040 2e. Phone(1) 2f. Phone(2) 2g. Fax 2h. E-mail 'Additional forms may be required for the following permits: • If your project may qualify for Department of the Army authorization through a Regional General Permit(RGP),contact the U.S.Army Corps of Engineers for application information(206)764-3495. • If your project might affect species listed under the Endangered Species Act,you will need to fill out a Specific Project Information Form(SPIF)or prepare a Biological Evaluation. Forms can be found at htta://www.nws.usace.army.mil/Missions/CiviWorks/Re-gulatory/PermitGuid ook/EndangeredSpecies asp • Not all cities and counties accept the JARPA for their local Shoreline permit . If you need a Shoreline permit,contact the appropriate city or county government to make sure they accept the JARPA. 2To access an online JARPA form with[help]screens,go to hftp://www.epermitting.wa.gov/site/alias resourcecenter/iar a iar a form/9984/izroa form.as x. For other help,contact the Governor's Office for Regulatory Innovation and Assistaince at(800)917-0043 or helpaoria.wa.gov. JARPA Revision 2015.1 Page 1 of 14 Part 3—Authorized Agent or Contact Person authorized to represent the applicant about the project. (Note: Authorized agent(s) must sign 11 b of this application.) 3a. Name (Last, First,Middle) Ken or Barbara Sides 3b. Organization (if applicable) Kimber Construction, Inc. 3c. Mailing Address (Street or Po Box) P.O. Box 1450 3d. City, State, Zip McKenna, WA 98558 3e. Phone(1) 3f. Phone(2) 3g. Fax 3h. E-mail ( 360 ) 458-4240 { ) ( 360 )458-0533 kimberconst@aol.com Part 4—Property Owner(s) I Contact information for people or organizations owning the property(ies) where the project will occur. Consider both upland and aquatic ownership because the upland owners may not own the adjacent aquatic land. ,-X'� Same as applicant. (Skip to Part 5.) ❑ Repair or maintenance activities on existing rights-of-way or easements. (Skip to Part 5.) ❑ There are multiple upland property owners. Complete the section below and fill out DARPA Attachment A for each additional property owner. ❑ Your project is on Department of Natural Resources (DN )-managed aquatic lands. If you don't know, contact the DNR at (360) 902-1100 to determine aquatic land ownership. If yes, complete DARPA Attachment E to apply for the Aquatic Use Authorization. 4a. Name(Last, First, Middle) 4b. Organization (if applicable) 4c. Mailing Address (street or PO Box) 4d. City, State, Zip 4e. Phone(1) 4f. Phone(2) 4g. Fax 4h. E-mail JARPA Revision 2015.1 Page 2 of 14 Part 5--Project Location(s) Identifying information about the property or properties whert the project will occur. hel ❑ There are multiple project locations (e.g. linear projects). Complete the section below and use<<A,Ri'A 3 for each additional project location. 5a. Indicate the type of ownership of the property. (Check a(that apply.) help] private ❑ Federal Publicly owned (state,county, city,special districts like schools,P Drts,etc.) ❑ Tribal ❑ Department of Natural Resources (DNR) —managed aq atic lands (Complete IAI?DA A+`1-3^1�^,4,^f r) 5b. Street Address (Cannot be a PO Box. If there is no address,pr ide other location information in 5p.) [ j 301/311 N Potlatch Drive N., 5c. City, State, Zip(If the project is not in a city or town, provide the i tame of the nearest city or town.) [ el Hoodsport, WA 98548 5d. County hel Mason 5e. Provide the section, township, and range for the project iocation. n[ efal Y4 Section Section Township Range 7 23N 4W 5f. Provide the latitude and longitude of the project location [1_pi • Example:47.03922 N lat./-122.89142 W long. (Use decimal d(grees-NAD 83) 47.493513 / -123.250602 5g. List the tax parcel number(s)for the project location. [ • The local county assessor's office can provide this information. 42307-50-00023 and 00024 5h. Contact information for all adjoining property owners. (If rou need more space,use C.) (helpJ Name Mailing ATaldress Tax Parcel#(if known) Gallimore Family Trust P.O. Box 1707 ...................__.......__.............................._.............................._........_........_...._.._.... ..._.........._........_....._.._............................ ............_..... Mercer Island, WA 9804Q 42307-50-00025 Danny L and Kim M Boggs 321 N. Potlatch Drive N i 42307-50-00022 _.._... ......_......_...._..........._... ---- Hoodsport, WA 98548 ......................._._........_....._.................._.........................................................._.............__........................................._....._............_.......................... ........ JARPA Revision 2015.1 Page 3 of 14 P 5L List all wetlands on or adjacent to the project location. h' t 5j. List all waterbodies (other than wetlands) on or adjacen to the project location. het Lake Cushman —Skokomish River 5k. Is any part of the project area within a 100-year floodpl in? LrLQipl Z Yes ❑ No X Don't know 51. Briefly describe the vegetation and habitat conditions on the property. het Deciduous trees: Alder, maple, aspen Evergreen trees: Cedar, fir, pine Shrubs Grasses Ferns 5m. Describe how the property is currently used. het Residential Recreation —Vacation Homes 5n. Describe how the adjacent properties are currently used. hei Residential Recreation —Vacation Homes 5o. Describe the structures (above and below ground) on t lie property, including their purpose(s) and current condition. [aea Lot 24: Failing, oversized pier dock and floating dock, boat ramp, st ed Lot 23: Existing concrete bulkhead 5p. Provide driving directions from the closest highway to the project location, and attach a map [ qj W on WA 119/N for approximately 9.5 miles until T; at T turn left and drive for approximately 1.6 miles; turn left into Mt. Rose Village and onto Mt Church Drive for .3 miles; Take 1It right onto North Potlatch Dr N 301/311 North Potlatch Dr. N Hoodport, WA 98548 will be on the left SEE ATTACHED MAP JARPA Revision 2015.1 Page 4 of 14 i Part 6—Project Description 6a. Briefly summarize the overall project. You can provide r iore detail in 6b. [nlpa Lot 24: Replacement of old pier dock, floating dock and rar'np that have been removed with: 6' x 20' pier dock, 4' x 24' floating dock, Tx 17' floating dock, buoy Lot 23: Install a new concrete footing to support existing bulkhead that has been undermined. Footing will be approx. 3' deep, 2' wide and 60' long, buoy 6b. Describe the purpose of the project and why you want or need to perform it. [,!�jp] Lot 24: Docks were failing and unsafe, needing replacement. Replacing pursuant to current Shoreline guidelines and size requirements. Lot 23: Existing bulkhead has been undermined over several decades and is in need of reinforcement with a concrete footing so it will not fail 6c. Indicate the project category. (check all that apply) [het ❑ Commercial X Residential ❑ Institutional ❑ Transportation ❑ Recreational ❑ Maintenance ❑ Environmental Enhancement 6d. Indicate the major elements of your project. (check all th apply) [help] ❑ Aquaculture ❑ Culvert ❑ Float ❑ Retaining Wall ❑ Bank Stabilization ❑ Dam /Weir ❑ Floating Home (upland) ❑ Boat House ❑ Dike/ Levee /Jetty ❑ Geotechnical Survey ❑ Road ❑ Boat Launch ❑ Ditch ❑ Land Clearing ❑ Scientific Measurement Device ❑ Boat Lift X Dock/ Pier ❑ Marina/ Moorage ❑ Stairs ❑ Bridge ❑ Dredging ❑ Mining (�Bulkhead ❑ Fence Outfall Structure El Stormwater facility ❑ Swimming Pool ❑ Buoy ❑ Ferry Terminal Piling/Dolphin ❑ Utility Line ❑ Channel Modification ❑ Fishway Raft ❑ Other: JARPA Revision 2015.1 Page 5 of 14 6e. Describe how you plan to construct each project eleme"t checked in 6d. Include specific construction methods and equipment to be used. L I # t • Identify where each element will occur in relation to the nearest j aterbody. • Indicate which activities are within the 100-year floodplain. PLEASE SEE ATTACHED SCOPE OF WORK 6f. What are the anticipated start and end dates for project construction? (MonthNear) [ • If the project will be constructed in phases or stages, use,ARP P Aliaohrnunt a to list the start and end dates of each phase or stage. ----T AS SOON AS PERMITTED Start date: FALL 2015 End date: `VZ T-&R 2016 ❑ See DARPA Attachment D 6g. Fair market value of the project, including materials, labor, machine rentals, etc. [ Lot 24: 120 sf pier @ $30.00 sf= $3,600.00; 147 sf floating docks @ $43.49 sf = $6,393.03 Lot 23: 60 If of concrete footing @ $92.92 If= $5,575.00 6h. Will any portion of the project receive federal funding? ei ] • If yes, list each agency providing funds. ❑ Yes X No ❑ Don't know Part 7—Wetlands: Impacts and Mitigation ❑ Check here if there are wetlands or wetland buffers on or adjacent to the project area. (If there are none, skip to Part 8.) [ 7a. Describe how the project has been designed to avoid and minimize adverse impacts to wetlands. [ a X Not applicable 7b. Will the project impact wetlands? [ JARPA Revision 2015.1 Page 6 of 14 ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Don't know 7c.Will the project impact wetland buffers? C`?.P_pt ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Don't know 7d. Has a wetland delineation report been prepared? [ntL] • If Yes,submit the report, including data sheets,with the JARPA package. ❑ Yes ❑ No 7e. Have the wetlands been rated using the Western Wash ngton or Eastern Washington Wetland Rating System? Lgpjp] • If Yes,submit the wetland rating forms and figures with the JAR A package. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Don't know 7f. Have you prepared a mitigation plan to compensate for any adverse impacts to wetlands? hel • If Yes,submit the plan with the JARPA package and answer 7g. • If No,or Not applicable,explain below why a mitigation plan should not be required. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Not applicable 7g. Summarize what the mitigation plan is meant to accom lish, and describe how a watershed approach was used to design the plan. LL,Ir-�7 7h. Use the table below to list the type and rating of each tland impacted, the extent and duration of the impact, and the type and amount of mitigation proposed. Or if you are submitting a mitigation plan with a similar table, you can state (below) where we can find this information in the plan. Activity (fill, Wetland Wetland Impact Duration Proposed Wetland drain, excavate, Name' type and area (sq. of impact3 mitigation mitigation area flood, etc.) rating ft. or type (sq. ft. or category2 Acres) acres) If no official name for the wetland exists,create a unique name(such as'Weiland 1"). The name should be consistent with other project documents,such as a wetland delineation report. 2 Ecology wetland category based on current Western Washington or Eastern Washington Wetland Rating System.Provide the wetland rating forms with the JARPA package. 3Indicate the days,months or years the wetland will be measurably impacted by the activity.Enter"permanent"if applicable. 4 Creation(C),Re-establishment/Rehabilitation(R),Enhancement(E), Preservation(P),Mitigation Bank/In-lieu fee(B) JARPA Revision 2015.1 Page 7 of 14 Page number(s) for similar information in the mitigation plan, if available: 7i. For all filling activities identified in 7h, describe the source and nature of the fill material, the amount in cubic yards that will be used, and how and where it will be placed into the wetland. [ 7j. For all excavating activities identified in 7h, describe the excavation method, type and amount of material in cubic yards you will remove, and where the material will be disposed. [ Part 8—Waterbodies (other than wetlands): Impacts and Mitigation In Part 8, "waterbodies" refers to non-wetland waterbodies. (See Part 7 for information related to wetlands.) [ X Check here if there are waterbodies on or adjacent to the project area. (If there are none, skip to Part 9.) 8a. Describe how the project is designed to avoid and minimize adverse impacts to the aquatic environment. [ l ❑ Not applicable The project will result in minimal negative impact to Lake Cushman which will be mitigated through the use of BMP's, compliance to provisions of the HPA and removal of manmade debris from the beach. All post/piling excavation/will a completed by hand. 3/„�,(0 nA; A lam' rat j 8b. Will your project impact a waterbody or the area around a waterbody? [ ;� [�Yes X No JARPA Revision 2015.1 Page 8 of 14 8c. Have you prepared a mitigation plan to compensate for the project's adverse impacts to non-wetland waterbodies? L�It4,, + If Yes,submit the plan with the JARPA package and answer 8d + If No,or Not applicable,explain below why a mitigation plan s uld not be required. �' es ❑ No X Not applicable ;toe- ' i'9/O 7 r L Gy ��e7d'` 8d. Summarize what the mitigation plan is meant to accomplish. Describe how a watershed approach was used to design the plan. • If you already completed 7g you do not need to restate your ansvVer here. [1491p.] The project will result in minimal negative impact to Lake Cushman which will be mitigated through the use of BMP's, compliance of provisions of the HPA and removal of manmade debris from the beach. I 8e. Summarize impact(s) to each waterbody in the table z#iPi Activity (clear, Waterbody Impact Duration Amount of material Area (sq. ft. or dredge, fill, pile name' location of impact3 (cubic yards) to be linear ft.) of drive, etc.) placed in or waterbody removed from directly affected 9 waterbody re a?7 s/ If no official name for the waterbody exists,create a unique name(such as"Stre 1")The name should be consistent with other documents provided. 2 Indicate whether the impact will occur in or adjacent to the waterbody. If adjacent provide the distance between the impact and the waterbody and indicate whether the impact will occur within the 100-year flood plain. 3Indicate the days,months or years the waterbody will be measurably impacted bX the work. Enter"permanent"if applicable. BE For all activities identified in 8e, describe the source and nature of the fill material, amount(in cubic yards) you will use, and how and where it will be placed into th waterbody. [neIp] JARPA Revision 2015.1 Page 9 of 14 8g. For all excavating or dredging activities identified in 8e,{describe the method for excavating or dredging, type and amount of material you will remove, and whe the material will be disposed. [, Il �470?� 6-7 art apo"- 14r 6 uo7 Part 9—Additional Information Any additional information you can provide helps the reviewqr(s) understand your project. Complete as much of this section as you can. It is ok if you cannot answer a question. 9a. If you have already worked with any government agencies on this project, list them below. [h-PjA Agency Name Contact Name Phone Most Recent Date of Contact r✓,�cr Ile ✓'5 A4 —1% 7 Mason County r 360-427-967-x 3raG- -3 i r✓ Tacoma Power Bret Forrester/Dori Bishop 25$-502-8824 9b. Are any of the wetlands or waterbodies identified in Part 7 or Part 8 of this JARPA on the Washington Department of Ecology's 303(d) List? [ wed • If Yes,list the parameter(s)below. • If you don't know, use Washington Department of Ecology's Waier Quality Assessment tools at: http I w .ecyy a.gc�ylrg€js/wgI3C34 ❑ Yes X No 9c.What U.S. Geological Survey Hydrological Unit Code (HUC) is the project in? [heI • Go to http:!/cfp b4 epa.gov_/surf/locate/index_cfm to help identify toe HUC. 1710017 9d. What Water Resource Inventory Area Number(WRIA# is the project in? Lei pj • Go to http://www.ecy.wa.gov/services/gis/maps/wria/Wria,htm to and the WRIA#. #16 JARPA Revision 2015.1 Page 10 of 14 9e. Will the in-water construction work comply with the Stat of Washington water quality standards for turbidity? LbeU • Gotohttp://www.ecy.wa.gov/program.q/• ' f k-6- Rat,„1 for 6 standards. X Yes ❑ No ❑ Not applicable 91f. If the project is within the jurisdiction of the Shoreline Management Act, what is the local shoreline environment designation? [hl • If you don't know, contact the local planning department. • For more information, go to: hfto://www.ecv.wa.gov/programs/ 'a/sma/laws rules/173-26/211 desi9 nations.htmi. 4*Rural _ rban ❑ Natural ❑Aquatic I❑ Conservancy X Other Recreational/Residential 9g. What is the Washington Department of Natural Resour s Water Type? Gn"7 • Go to hftp://www.dnr.wa.gov/BusinessPermits/Topies/ForestPraitic., sA lications/Pa es/f watert in .as x for the Forest Practices Water Typing System. Shoreline X Fish ❑ Non-Fish Perennial ❑ Non-Fish Seasonal 9h. Will this project be designed to meet the Washington Department of Ecology's most current stormwater manual? • If No, provide the name of the manual your project is designed to meet. X Yes ❑ No Name of manual: 9L Does the project site have known contaminated sediment? Ln-!p] • If Yes, please describe below. ❑Yes X No 9j. If you know what the property was used for in the past, dDscribe below. [`��,Ip] Waterfront recreational property/residential SFR 9k. Has a cultural resource (archaeological) survey been pellformed on the project area? LE I • If Yes,attach it to your JARPA package. Yes A We--X • 2 D1 CP6m `TeL& JARPA Revision 2015.1 Page 11 of 14 P 91. Name each species listed under the federal Endangere Species Act that occurs in the vicinity of the project area or might be affected by the proposed work. C-eip Puget Sound Chinook Salmon Puget Sound Steelhead The Bull Trout The Marbled Murrelet Northern S,potted Owlp S�r�� k• e y,r/lnv b:l/{•/ �re�o 9m. Name each species or habitat on the Washington Dep*rtment of Fish and Wildlife's Priority Habitats and Species List that might be affected by the proposed work. [,cs Chi,.t oo/C /eo le a �o ems/ Part 10—SEPA Compliance and Permits Use the resources and checklist below to identify the permits you are applying for. • Online Project Questionnaire at -.r • Governor's Office for Regulatory Innovation and Assistance at (800) 917-0043 or help[a-oria.wa.gov. • For a list of addresses to send your DARPA to, click n agency addresses for completed JARPA. 10a. Compliance with the State Environmental Policy Act (S EPA). (Check all that apply.) [,ei • For more information about SEPA,go to Nww.ecc r.wa.gov/Drog4 %�jtsei.a e re is w �.±n 1. ❑ A copy of the SEPA determination or letter of exemption is included with this application. X A SEPA determination is pending with Mason County (lead agency). The expected decision date is unknown. [:] I am applying for a Fish Habitat Enhancement Exemption. (Check the box below in 10b.)[__e!_a] ❑ This project is exempt (choose type of exemption below). ❑ Categorical Exemption. Under what section of the SEPA administrative code (WAC) is it exempt? ❑ Other: ❑ SEPA is pre-empted by federal law. JARPA Revision 2015.1 Page 12 of 14 10b. Indicate the permits you are applying for. (Check all that ppty.) [Dep] LOCAL GOVE NIVIENT Local Government Shoreline permits: ❑ Substantial Development ❑ Conditional Use ❑ Variance X Shoreline Exemption Type (explain): Replacement of existing failing docks/repair of bulkhead Other City/County permits: ❑ Floodplain Development Permit Critical Areas Ordinance STATE COVE MENT Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife: X Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) ❑ Fish Habitat Enhancement Exemption—Attach Exemption Form You must submit a check for$150 to Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, unless your project qualifies for an exemption or alternative payment method below. Do not send cash. Check the appropriate boxes: �s ��` a 3�t£sue ❑$150 check enclosed. Check# made online Attach check made payable to Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. ❑My project is exempt from the application fee. (Check appropriate exemption) ❑ HPA processing is conducted by applicant-funded WDFW staff. Agreement# ❑ Mineral prospecting and mining. ❑ Project occurs on farm and agricultural land. (Attach a copy of current land use classification recorded with the county auditor,or other proof of current land use.) ❑ Project is a modification of an existing HPA origihally applied for, prior to July 10, 2012. HPA# Washington Department of Natural Resources: ❑ Aquatic Use Authorization Complete JARPA Attachment E and submit a check for$25 pa rable to the Washington Department of Natural Resources. Do not send cash. Washington Department of Ecology: ❑ Section 401 Water Quality Certification FEDERAL GOVERNMENT United States Department of the Army permits (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers): ❑ Section 404 (discharges into waters of the U.S.) ❑ Section 10 (work in navigable waters) United States Coast Guard permits: ❑ Private Aids to Navigation (for non-bridge projects) JARPA Revision 2015.1 Page 13 of 14 Part 11—Authorizing Signatures Signatures are required before submitting the JARPA package. The JARPA package includes the JARPA form, project plans, photos, etc. hei 11a.Applicant Signature (required) w I certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief, the information provided in this application is true, complete, and accurate. I also certify that I have the authority to carry out the proposed activities, and I agree to start work only after I have received all necessary permits. I hereby authorize the agent named in Part 3 of this application to act on my behalf in matters related to this application. (initial) ,E- A"C{f4g) IIPU774P of Z6C7I0110 By initialing here, I state that I have the authority to grant access to the property. I also give my consent to the permitting agencies entering the property where the project is located to inspect the project site or any work related to the project. (initial Barbara Sides/Kimber Construction Inc. l t✓lu`-7 10/20/2015 Authorized Agent for Homeowner Applicant Printed Name Applicant Signature Date 11 b. Authorized Agent Signature [- ,,j I certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief, the information provided in this application is true, complete, and accurate. I also certify that I have the authority to carry out the proposed activities and I agree to start work only after all necessary permits have bee ed. 4 Barbara Sides/Kimber Construction Inc. 10/20/2015 Authorized Agent Printed Name Aut - e Agent ignature Date 11c. Property Owner Signature (if not applicant) [ P] Not required if project is on existing rights-of-way or easements. I consent to the permitting agencies entering the property where the project is located to inspect the project site or any work. These inspections shall occur at reasonable times and, if practical, with prior notice to the landowner. Barbara Sides/Kimber Construction Inc. 10/20/2015 Property Owner Printed Name Property Owner Signature Date 18 U.S.0§1001 provides that:Whoever, in any manner within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States knowingly falsifies,conceals,or covers up by any trick,scheme,or device a material fact or makes any false,fictitious,or fraudulent statements or representations or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing same to contain any false,fictitious,or fraudulent statement or entry, shall be fined not more than$10,000 or imprisoned not more than 5 years or both. If you require this document in another format,contact the Governor's Office for Regulatory Innovation and Assistance(ORIA)at(800) 917-0043. People with hearing loss can call 711 for Washington Relay Service. People with a speech disability can call(877)833-6341. ORIA publication number: ENV-019-09 rev.09/2015 JARPA Revision 2015.1 Page 14 of 14 A c fttmioa P*Mhtinq mrA u_ .e. .; HLAgAPPSf My Dashboard Application Inspection eService My Account Hello,Barbara Help 21 Logout CONFIRMATION RECEIPT: 1.You have successfully submitted your HPA application to WDFW.You v ill also receive notice of receipt of your application via email. 2.If you indicated in your application that you would mail additional docum trits to WDFW,please do so promptly.Your application will not be processed until WDFW receives them.Be sure to include a cop of your confirmation receipt with your documents. 3.A decision on your permit will be issued after your application is deemec complete and accurate,payment is confirmed,and review is complete.A confirmation email will be sent to your account with e i electronic copy of the permit. Application ID:3980(Please remember the Application ID for any future re rences.) Submitted By: Appli t Info: Barbara Sides Devi Gallimore Kimber Construction Inc GAL ORE FAMILY TRUST PO Box 1450 P.O. OX 1707 McKenna WA 98558-1450 Merc Island,WA 98040 360-458-4240 360-4 8-4240— kimberconst@aol.com kimbeconst@aol.com rA Proj t:GALLIMORE-LOTS 24&23 Form Detail • Standard HPA Application Form Attachment Detail Letter of Consent from Applicant to Authorized Agent(Required)--Online ......................................................................................................................................I.......................... ........................................................................................................................ • GALLIMORE-Executed Agent_Auth-Lots 23 and 24.pdf SEPA Determination Letter(Required)--Other .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Will be supplemented upon issuance Supporting Documents(Optional)--Online .................................................................................................................................................................. ........................................................................................................................ GALLIMORE BE 2015-LOTS 23 AND 24.pdf • GALLIMORE-LOT 23-SCOPE OF WORK.doc.pdf GALLIMORE PLANS LOT 23...D2-1-23 Bulkhead Foundation Repair-FI AL.pdf • GALLIMORE-LOT 23 BUOY PLANS.pdf GALLIMORE-REVISED ENGINEERED PLANS 1-27-2015.pdf • Gallimore-Lot 24-SOW-Final.doc.pdf GALLIMORE-SEPA CHECKLIST LOTS 23 AND 24.pdf Payment Detail Processing Convenience Payment Check Paid Dal ii Paid Agency Tax Master Note Fee Fee Method No. Amount Name Payer Index# Name Credit Card $150.00 0 27/2016 .................................................................................................................................................................................. .......................................................................................................................................................... Go to Submitted List Copyright v1994-Z0i6 enfoTech&Cons ing Inc.All i+gnu reserved. Terms of Use i Privacy tement (Last modified Time:2016-0 05 02:26 PM) T 3014 .... 4 •� Potlatch Dry N t r p" s + z � F rr k .� PI �'': 111110Ci mish 511 xk � , Matlock 4- OLympic Dayton A", 426 cedar st' , 1d1 P P i ^` KIMBER CONSTRUCTION, INC. P.O. Box 1450 McKenna,WA 98658-1450 860-468-4240 -Office 860-458-0533- Fax LOT 23 - SOW Gallimore Family Trust Pamela Gallimore-Wong & David Gallimore, Trustees JOB: BULKHEAD FOOTING AND BUOY ANCHOR @ Division#2, Lot#23, 311 N Potlatch Drive N, Hoodsport, WA 98548 Item Descri tion LABOR AND MATERIALS TO PERFORM THE FOLLOWING: #1 Bulkhead Footing: Footing for 1. Excavate(dig out)along toe of existing sixty(60)foot bulkhead; Existing 2. Install forms for concrete footing; Bulkhead 3. Footing will be approximately three(3)feet deep,two(2)feet wide and sixty(60)feet long; 4. Footing will have rebar on 9"centers vertically; 5. Rebar will be bent 90 degrees and be pinned into existing wall; and 6. Rebar will also be set horizontally along footing; 7. Footing concrete will be poured via pump truck; 8. Concrete will be finished with brushed finish. 9. Bulkhead footing price may change if additional work is called for on plans from engineer, Buoy Buoy Anchor: Anchor 10. Hand dig 2'x 2'x 2'hole; 11. Pour concrete block; 12. Install vertical rebar; 13. Install horizontal rebar through galvanized mount with eye hook for buoy chain; 14. Install buoy chain(does not include buoy); 15. Buoy anchor will be centered on lot 23 and out into lake approximately 90'which is approximate) the 720'contour elevation; Debris: 66. Construction debris removal and disposal; &G —Boca LDT Z � r . KIMSER CCINSTRUCTION, INC. P . Box 1460 McKenn WA 98558-1460 S 40- Office S 533- Fax 5 LOT 24 SOW Gallimore Family Trust { Pamela Gallimore-Wong & David Gallimore, Trustees! JOB: DOCK REPLACEMENT—FIXED& FLOATING @ Division#2, Lot#24, 301 N Potlatch Drive N, Hoodsport, WA 98548 Item Description LABOR AND MATERIALS TO PERFORM THE FOLLOWING: 1. Demo and dig out existing structures and concrete as directed by Tacoma Power including that portion of ramp as discussed; 2. Construct a fixed dock that will be 6' wide by 20' long; a floating dock that will be 4' wide x #1 24' and a floating dock at will be 3' x 17'; Fixed Dock Dock 3. Demo/jackhammer out all existing concrete poured previously for existing docks, removal Replacement and disposal; 4. Hand dig 2' x 2' x 4' holes for stationary dock; 5. Install forms, fill forms with concrete and install 6"x 6" post connectors; 1. Construct a 6' x 20' fixed dock; 2. Posts will be 6"x 6"treated outdoor lumber; 3. Beams will be 6"x 6" treated outdoor lumber: 4. Joists will be 2" x 8"treated outdoor lumber, a 5. Posts and beams will be bolted together; 6. Joists will have all necessary joist brackets and hurricane ties; T Deck posts will be wrapped with 2" x 6" treated material to block logs from getting underneath dock; 8. Use of blocking will be done between joists to strengthen dock and will be wrapped with 2" x 12"treated material; 9. Decking will be picture framed and decked with Timbertech composite decking. Main portion will be cedar color Timbertech and picture frame will be Tropical Walnut Timbertech— picture framing will be one board wide (6"); e 10. Decking will be screwed down with like color composite screws; 11. Deck will be wrapped with Timbertech Tropical Walnut composite fascia; 12. Install a homeowner's 2' x 14' gangway and homeowner's ladder for access from stationary I dock to floating dock; Floating Docks: 13. Hand dig two 2' x 2'x 6'deep holes for floating dock pilings; 14. install galvanized steel pilings 8" in diameter; a 15. Pilings will be set into holes, filled with rebar then poured with concrete; i 16. Pilings will be installed inside perimeter of dock with marine piling/roller holders; 17. Pilings will be sleeved with white plastic PVC sewer pipe; 1& Pilings will be topped with black piling caps; 19. Bolts will be installed in concrete pads; 20. Galvanized steel pipe will be used to construct floating dock landing; 21. Beams and joists will be 4" x 10' treated materials and will be bolted together with galvanized %4" plate brackets; 22. 2"x 8" blocking will be used to strengthen dock, along with seismic strapping; 23. 24"' x 48" x 12" poly float drums will be installed under dock and secured with lag screws to provide floatation; & C - S5,W Lo + a C3allimore—LOT 24 SOW Page 2 24. Dock will be picture framed (one boarl wide — 6") and decked with Timbertech composite decking same as fixed dock; 25. Decking will be screwed down with like Qolor composite screws; 26. Outside perimeter of dock will be wrapped with Timbertech Tropical Walnut composite fascia; 27. Floating dock will have four(4) black comer bumpers; 28. Floating dock will be wrapped with heavy duty black dock edging; 29. Six (6) 8" safety cleats will be installed on floating docks as directed by homeowner; 30. Wrap floating docks with Timbertech composite fascia (vs. treated wood fascia); Miscellaneous Bows: 31. Hand dig 2' x 2' x 2' holes. Pour concrete blocks, install rebar and add rebar eye hook fo buoy chain; 32. Install buoys and chain; Rollers: 33. Install rollers on shore for removal of canoe, Lund, etc. 34. Construction debris removal and disposal; Licensed --Bonded--Insured KIMSEC1977CS The above prices reflect a 3%cash/check discount.This discount is not valid A4 credit card purchases.Add 3%to the total cost for credit card purchases. loscov 12 MASON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Planning Division 615 W Alder St, Shelton, WA 98584 (360)427-9670 MITIGATED DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (WAC 197-11-350) SEP2016-00013 CONDITIONS OF THIS DETERMINATION 1) Archaeological or historical resources, such as ruins, sites, buildings, artifacts, fossils, or other objects of antiquity that may have significance from an historical or scientific standpoint, which may be encountered by the developer/contractor, shall not be further disturbed. If the developer/contractor encounters any such artifacts, he/she shall immediately stop work and notify Mason County and the Washington State Department of Archaeolo y and Historic Preservation. Failure to do so may result in civil penalties. X 11 '{ All activities related to this proposal shall adhere to the recommendations made in the Biological Evaluation prepared by BioResources/Kim Schaumburg, dated March 11, 2016. At least 5 of the 20 plants required for enhancement shall be tree species. X Residential development in shoreline areas should be designed to preserve natural drainage courses. X h 1,0 Debris or deleterious material resulting from construction shall be removed from the beach area and project site and shall not be allowed to enter waters of the State. X — I V Water quality is not to be degraded to the detriment of the aquatic environment as a result of this project. X Residential developers and individuals shall be required to control erosion during construction. Removal of vegetation should be minimized and any areas disturbed should be restored to prevent erosion and other environmental impacts. X =jbA- Ju All concrete shall be poured in the dry and allowed to cure a minimum of 7 days before contact with water.. X IV SEP2016-00013 Page 2 of 2 I SEPA Environmental Checklist Mason County Permit Center Use: SEP 26)16 - W I _3 Single Family DNS: $385 Date Rcvd �/ ❑ Other DNS: 0 to 9.99 acres: $630 R I YED 10 to 20 acres: $755 Over 20 acres: $945 MAR 0 12016 ❑ DS/EIS: $2,525 +70 Per hr 61 5 W. Alder S Purpose of checklist: Governmental agencies use this checklist to help determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant. This information is also helpful to determine if available avoidance, minimization or compensatory mitigation measures will address the probable significant impacts or if an environmental impact statement will be prepared to further analyze the proposal. Instructions for applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe so a basic information about your proposal. Please answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. You may need to consult with an agency specialist or private consultant for some questions. You may use not applicable" or"does not apply" only when you caa explain why it does not apply and not when the answer is unknown. You may also attach or incorporate by reference additional studies reports. Complete and accurate answers to these questions often avoid delays with the SEPA process as well as later in the decisionmaking process. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Instructions for Lead Agencies: Please adjust the format of this template as needed. dditional information may be necessary to evaluate the existing environment, all interrelated asplcts of the proposal and an analysis of adverse impacts. The checklist is considered the first but not necessarily the only source of information needed to make an adequate threshold determination. Once a threshold determination is made, the lead agency is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of the checklist and other supporting documents. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: GALLIMORE REPLACEMENT DOCKS AND BULKHEAD FOOTING SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960)(MC version-non project portion omitted): 2014 1 of 13 2. Name of applicant: GALLIMORE FAMILY TRUST 3. Address and phone number of applicant and conlact person: % DAVID LG GALLIMORE / PAMELA GALLIMORIE-WONG TRUSTEES PO BOX 1707 MERCER ISLAND WA 98040 4. Date checklist prepared: 10/20/2015 5. Agency requesting checklist: Mason County 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable) . Work to be completed without phasing. Work to be completed during f Q'f� 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. __ Biological Evaluation and MEP 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No 10. List any government approvals or permits that wil be needed for your proposal, if known. Mason County Shoreline Exemption Permit, Building Permit; Hydraulic Project Approval from WDFW and Shoreline Use Permit from Tacoma Power. 11. Give brief, complete description of your propo al, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to in lude additional specific information on project description.) LOT 24: 1. Demo and dig out existing structures and concrete as directed by Tacoma Power including that portion of ramp as discussed; 2. Construct a fixed dock that will be 6'wide by 20' long; a floating dock that will be 4' wide x 24' and a floating dock at will be Tx 17'; Fixed Dock 3. Demo/jackhammer out all existing concrete poured previously for existing docks, removal and disposal; SEPA Environmental checklist(NAC 197.11-960)(MC version-non project portion omitted): 2014 2 of 13 4. Hand dig 2' x 2' x 4' holes for stationary dock; 5. Install forms,fill forms with concrete and install 6" x 6" post connectors; 1. Construct a 6'x 20'fixed dock; 2. Posts will be 6" x 6"treated outdoor lumber; 3. Beams will be 6" x 6"treated outdoor lumber; 4. Joists will be 2"x 8"treated outdoor lumber; 5. Posts and beams will be bolted together; 6. Joists will have all necessary joist brackets and hurricane ties; 7. Deck posts will be wrapped with 2" x 6" treated material to block logs from getting underneath dock; 8. Use of blocking will be done between joists to strengthen dock and will be wrapped with 2"x 12" treated material; 9. Decking will be picture framed and decked with Timbertech composite decking. Main portion will be cedar color Timbertech and picture frame will be Tropical Walnut Timbertech-picture framing will be one board wide (6"); 10. Decking will be screwed down with like color composite screws; 11. Deck will be wrapped with Timbertech Tropical Walnut composite fascia; 12. Install a homeowner's 2'x 14'gangway and homeowner's ladder for access from stationary dock to floating dock; Floating Docks: 13. Hand dig two 2' x 2'x 6' deep holes for floating dock pilings; 14. Install galvanized steel pilings 8"in diameter; 15. Pilings will be set into holes,filled with rebar then poured with concrete; 16. Pilings will be installed inside perimeter of dock with marine piling/roller holders; 17. Pilings will be sleeved with white plastic PVC sewer pipe; 18. Pilings will be topped with black piling caps; 19. Bolts will be installed in concrete pads; 20. Galvanized steel pipe will be used to construct floating dock landing; 21. Beams and joists will be 4"x 10'treated materials and will be bolted together with galvanized '/." plate brackets; 22. 2"x 8" blocking will be used to strengthen dock, along with seismic strapping; 23. 24"' x 48" x 12" poly float drums will be installed under dock and secured with lag screws to provide floatation; 24. Dock will be picture framed(one board wide-6" and decked with Timbertech composite decking same as fixed dock; 25. Decking will be screwed down with like color co posite screws; 26. Outside perimeter of dock will be wrapped with Timbertech Tropical Walnut composite fascia; 27. Floating dock will have four(4) black corner bumpers; 28. Floating dock will be wrapped with heavy duty black dock edging; 29. Six (6) 8" safety cleats will be installed on floating docks as directed by homeowner; 30. Wrap floating docks with Timbertech composite fascia (vs.treated wood fascia); Bouy: 31. Hand dig 2' x 2' x 2' hole. Pour concrete block, install rebar and add rebar eye hook for buoy chain; 32. Install buoys and chain; Rollers: 33. Install rollers on shore at top of existing bulkhead for removal of canoe, Lund, etc. LOT 23: i Bulkhead Footing: 1. Excavate(dig out)along toe of existing sixty(60)foot bulkhead; 2. Install forms for concrete footing; 3. Footing will be approximately three(3)feet deep,two(2)feet wide and sixty(60)feet long; 4. Footing will have rebar on 9"centers vertically; 5. Rebar will be bent 90 degrees and be pinned into existing wall; 6. Rebar will also be set horizontally along footing; 7. Footing concrete will be poured via pump truck; 8. Concrete will be finished with brushed finish. k SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960)(MC version-non project portion omitted): 2014 3 of 13 Buoy Anchor: 9. Hand dig 2'x 2'x 2'hole; 10. Pour concrete block; 11. Install vertical rebar; 12. Install horizontal rebar through galvanized mount with eye hook for buoy chain; 13. Install buoy chain; 14. Buoy anchor will be centered on lot 23 and out into lake approximately 90'which is approximately the 720' contour elevation; 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The project site is located on the Westside of Lake Cushman. The legal description is LAKE CUSHMAN #2, TR 23 AND TR 24 Section 07, Township 23N, Range 04W B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS �e� 1. Earth a. General description of the site h=!n, (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other: b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 40% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any agricultural land of long-term commercial significance and whether the proposal results in removing any of these soils. Sand, gravel and clay d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No e. Describe the purpose, type, total area, and approximate quantities and total affected area of any filling, excavation, and grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. No filling or grading shall be done f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. WDOE'S BMP's will be followed during construction to protect water quality at the site. SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960)(MC version-non project portion omitted): 2014 4 of 13 g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or building$)? The project will add no new impervious surfaces I h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: WDOE'S Best Management Practices shall be followed during construction and the WDFW's HPA provision shall be strictly adhered to. 2. Air I a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal during construction, operation, and maintenance when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Il,e � Emissions from any equipment use shall be minor b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emis ions or other impacts to air, if any: Work will be completed as quickly as possible 3. Water a. Surface Water: 1he�ra' 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including yearround and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, st ate what stream or river it flows into. Lake Cushman 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Yes 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. No fill will be added or removed from the site 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. Unknown, but the proposed project site is on the waterfront SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960)(MC version-non project portionomitted): 2014 5 of 13 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No b. Ground Water: 1) Will groundwater be withdrawn from a well for drinking water or other purposes? If so, give a general description of the well, proposed uses and approximate quantities withdrawn from the well. Will water be discharged to groundwater? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals. . . ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None will be discharged c. Water runoff(including stormwater): 1) Describe the source of runoff(including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. ,ei. None 1 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. n{ eM No 3) Does the proposal alter or otherwise affect drainage patterns in the vicinity of the site? If so, describe. No d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surfa e, ground, and runoff water, and drainage pattern impacts, if any: None 4. Plants a. Check the types of vegetation found on the sit X deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other X evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other X_shrubs _X_grass SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960)(MC version-non project portiol omitted): 2014 6 of 13 pasture crop or grain orchards, vineyards or other permanent crops wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Minimal native vegetation will be disturbed c. List threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site. Unknown d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: None I e. List all noxious weeds and invasive species known to be on or near the site. None 5. Animals 1 a. List any birds and other animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site. Examples include: h f birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site. The mabled murrelet(6rachyramphus marmoratus marmoratus), the bull trout(Salvelinus confluentus), Puget Sound Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha), the Puget Sound Steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) and the Northern Spotted Owl (Strix Occidentalis). c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, exp ain. No d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance w ldlife, if any: �ne 5,-e ie e. List any invasive animal species known to be on or near the site. None 6. Energy and natural resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. None SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960)(MC version-non project portion omitted): 2014 7 of 13 b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: None 7. Environmental health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. None Known 1) Describe any known or possible contamination at the site from present or past uses. 2) Describe existing hazardous chemicals/conditions that might affect project development and design. This includes underground hazardous liquid and gas transmission pipelines located within the project area and in the vicinity. 3) Describe any toxic or hazardous chemicals that might be stored, used, or produced during the project's development or construction, or at any time during the operating life of the project. 4) Describe special emergency services that ight be required. An ambulance in the event of a construction accident I 5) Proposed measures to reduce or control a vironmental health hazards, if any: None b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? None 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indi- cate what hours noise would come from the site. Construction noise will occur for a short time (up to 20 days) during daylight hours. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Work will be completed as quickly as possible SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960)(MC version-non project portior omitted): 2014 8 of 13 8. Land and shoreline use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties?Will the proposal affect current land uses on nearby or adjacent properties? If so, describe. Residential/recreational b. Has the project site been used as working farmlands or working forest lands? If so, describe. No How much agricultural or forest land of long-term commercial significance will be converted to other uses as a result of the proposal, if any? If resource lands have not been designated, how many acres in farmland or forest land tax status will be converted to nonfarm or nonforest use? 1 Will the proposal affect or be affected b Irroundingworkin farm or forest land normal p p Y 9 business operations, such as oversize equipment access, the application of pesticides, tilling, and harvesting? If so, how: c. Describe any structures on the site. Single-family residence, rock and concrete bulkhead, remains of existing failed docks, ramp. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? Yes, remains of the failed existing structures will be removed from the beach. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Undevelo residential " too, 5 f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Uwn / u g. If applicable, what ""the cur nt shoreline master program designation of the site? Unknown A � h. Has any part of the site been classified as a critical area by the city or county? If so, specify. Lake Cushman has been designated a shoreline of statewide significance i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? None j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: N/A SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960)(MC version-non project portion omitted): 2014 9 of 13 L. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: ; Bulkheads, PRF's, Buoys and shoreline access stairs are normal to waterfront single-family residences in the area m. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with nearby agricultural and forest lands of long-term commercial significance, if any: N/A 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None I b. Approximately how many units, if any, would bie eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: N/A 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? ; The proposed pier and floats on Lot 24 will not be as tall as the existing bulkhead. The footing for the existing bulkhead on Lot 23 will be installed at the bottom of said bulkhead. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: The new pier and floats shall be much more attractive than the failed structures and the new footing for the existing bulkhead will keep the wall from failing. 11. Light and glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? None b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: None 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960)(MC version-non project portion omitted): 2014 10 of 13 Boating, fishing, swimming b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Property will be used in the same manner as with existing structures 13. Historic and cultural preservation a. Are there any buildings, structures, or sites, located on or near the site that are over 45 years old listed in or eligible for listing in national, state, or local preservation registers located on or near the site? If so, specifically describe. No b. Are there any landmarks, features, or other evidence of Indian or historic use or occupation? This may include human burials or old cemeteries. Are there any material evidence, artifacts, or areas of cultural importance on or near the site? Please list any professional studies conducted at the site to identify such resources. None c. Describe the methods used to assess the potential impacts to cultural and historic resources on or near the project site. Examples include consultation with tribes and the department of archeology and historic preservation, archaeological surveys, historic maps, GIS data, etc. None d. Proposed measures to avoid, minimize, or con ipensate for loss, changes to, and disturbance to resources. Please include plans for the above and any permits that may be required. None 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site or affected geographic area and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. N/A b. Is the site or affected geographic area currently served by public transit? If so, generally describe. If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? No c. How many additional parking spaces would the completed project or non-project proposal have? How many would the project or proposal eliminate? None SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960)(MC version-non project portion omitted): 2014 11 of 13 d. Will the proposal require any new or improvements to existing roads, streets, pedestrian, bicycle or state transportation facilities, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No e. Will the project or proposal use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project or proposal? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur and what percentage of the volume would be trucks (such as commercial and nonpassenger vehicles). What data or transportation models were used to make these estimates? None g. Will the proposal interfere with, affect or be affected by the movement of agricultural and forest products on roads or streets in the area? If so, generally describe. No h. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: NIA 15. Public services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, public transit, he Ith care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. I No b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: L electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, tele hone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960)(MC version-non project portion omitted): 2014 12 of 13 b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. None C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is+r" on them to make ' ecision. Signature: Date Signed: 10/20/2015 Print Name of Signee: Barbara Sides, Kimber Construction, Inc. 1 If applicable, Position and Agency/Organization: Agent for Homeowners- Le s se P S Date Submitted: 70)"v[ pofLelir SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960)(MC version-non project portion omitted): 2014 13 of 13 st u - COD777 r rr- 07. zr Tr IN fil fin.+ � � 1 '►,��.....�, �+''1', rJ�_—�raj t d�� 5A� ($ r� 1 4 t if��• �5y� w � t? sv ! ',•� 1£ r� t _ fr PPP r a « 6 d # (#I .n u I PLANNING", x rg i td. E � i^ � � �� ;, � � •. tea? _ r, r b �.q 4 4 ' � AA it w r a f f;4 ,jI F p f A # f 0 J ®"ZZ {� 1 a p e ton eZ tQ r r , I ' VMASON COt NTY k DEPARTMENTg�FCO TY DEVELOPMENT p� ��K RECEIVED p�� ox=9,She1ton,)1A 98584(360) 427-9670—E .352 MAR 0 1 2016 SHORELINE PERMIT WPLICATION 615 W. Alder Street PERMIT NO. �'�" z f'O �9 SHORELINE SU 3STANTIAL DEVEL PMENT SHORELINE V CE* DATE RECEIVED _1 .20) SHORELINE C DITIONAL US SHORELINE E MPTION X The Washington State Shorelin Management Act (RCW 0.58) re Tres that substantial developments within designated shorelines of the state c ply with its administrati a proce es(WAC 173-14)and the provisions of the Mason County Shoreline Manageme Master Program. The urpo of this Act and local program is to protect the state's shoreline resources. The pro requires that subst ial evelopment(any development of which the total cost or fair market value exceeds $5,7 .00 or materially t eres with the normal public use of the water or shorelines of the State be reviewed with a goals, polices, d performance standards established in the Master Program. Answer all questions completely. Attach an addif nal information that my further describe the proposed development. Incomplete applications will be re ed Shoreline Variances and Conditional uses have a di 'oval ages that shall be attached to this application. APPLICANT: GALLIMORE FAMILY T UST ADDRESS: P.O.BOX 1707 M — MERCER ISLAND,WA 98040 TELEPHONE: (h e) � (business) AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATI KIMBER CONST CTION,INC,,/BARB SIDES ADDRESS: P.O.BOX 1450 MCKENNA,WA 98 558 TELEPHONE: 360-458-4240/FAX 0458-0533 /aD PROPERTY DESCRGeneral location(incrty address,water body and as occated wetlands—identify the e of the shoreline): 301 and 311 N.Potle No,Hoodsport,WA 98548 Legal description clude section,township,and range to the i Barest quarter,quarter section or latitude anajongitude to the nearest min te. Projects located in open water areas awa r from land shall provide a longitude location)— iclude all parcel numb s: LAKE CUS #2,LOTS 23 AND 24/Parcels#42307 0-00023 and 00024 Section 07, ownship 23N,Range 04W shoreline 2011 app.doc OWNERSHIP: Contract Applicant_X Owner Lessee Purc aser (Identify) Other Owner: SAME AS APPLICANT (street) (city) (state) (Zip) DEVELOPMENT DESCRIPTON Development (identify and describe the proposed project, in luding the type of materials to be used, construction methods,principle dimensions,and other pertinent informatio ): PLEASE SEE ATTACHED SCOPE OF WORK Use(identify current use of property with exist improvements RecreationaUVacation Home Reason for requesting development: Previously existing recreational pier and floats on Lot 24 were failing and in need of replacing under current Shoreline size requirement. Existing bulkhead on Lot 23 has been undermined and is in need of a footing to prevent it from failing. ACKOWLEDGEMENT declare,to the best of my knowledge and belief,the rgoing information and all attached information is true and c ecrf. W t� 10/20/2015 Barbara Sides,Kimber Construction,Inc.Authorized Agent shoreline 2011 app.doc i Biological Evaluation Gallimore PRF Replacement, Bulkhead Repair, & Buoy Projects Lake Cushman, Hoodsport WA For: Gallimore Family Trust Pamela Gallimore-Wong & David Gallimore, Trustees 9260 SE 461h St Mercer Island,WA 98040-4408 Prepared by: BioResources,LLC Kim Schaumburg Fisheries biologist,University of Washington, 1981 10112 Bay View Rd. KPN Vaughn,WA, 98394 (253) 884-5776 or 225-2973 Email: kimberly035rcenturytel.net May 11,2015 Revised March 11,2016 Table of Contents 1.0 Proposed Action.............................................................................. 3 1.1 Background................................................................................... 3 1.2 Project Need and Objectives................................................................ 3-4 2.0 Project Description........................................................................... 4-5 2.1 Project Activities.............................................................................. 5-7 2.2 Monitoring and Maintenance.................................................................7 2.3 Timing.......................................................................................... 7 2.4 Conservation Measures...................................................................... 7-8 2.5 Best Management Practices.................................................................. 8-10 3.0 Action Area.................................................................................... 10-11 4.0 ESA Species and Habitat Information..................................................... 11-12 4.1 ESA Listed Species.......................................................................... 12-15 5.1 Environmental Baseline Conditions....................................................... 15 5.2 Action Area................................................................................. 15-16 5.3 Proposed Project Area..................................................................... 16 6.0 Effects of the Action.......................................................................... 17 6.1 Direct Effects.................................................................................. 17-20 6.2 Primary Constituent Elements............................................................ 20-21 6.3 Direct Effects to ESA Listed Species...................................................... 22 6.4 Indirect Effects................................................................................. 23-24 6.5 Primary Constituent Elements............................................................ 24-25 6.6 Indirect Effects to ESA Listed Species................................................... 25 6.7 Interrelated/Interdependent Effects......................................................... 25 6.8 Primary Constituent Elements............................................................ . 26 6.9 Cumulative Effects............................................................................ 26-27 7.0 Conclusion...................................................................................... 27 7.1 Take Analysis.................................................................................. 27 7.2 Determination of Effect....................................................................... 27-28 8.0 References....................................................................................... 29-31 Attachments 1. Project location................................................................................... 32 2. Site plan Lot 23................................................. ................................ 33 3. Cross section Lot 23.............................................................................. 34 4. Site Plan Lot 24.................................................................................. 35 5. Site Plan Lot 24.................................................................................. 36 6. Cross section Lot 23.............................................................................. 37 7. Pier,ramp,and float details......................... .......................................... 38 8. Pier,ramp,and float details......................... ........................................... 39 9. Site Photograph.................................................................................. 40 10. Site Photograph.................................................................................. 41 11. Site Photograph.................................................................................. 42 12. Site Photograph.................................................................................. 43 13. Essential Fish Habitat............................................................................ 44-45 Gallimore Biological Evaluation 2 r 1.0 Proposed Action This Biological Evaluation has been submitted n behalf of the Gallimore Family Trust, Pamela Gallimore-Wong and David Gallimore, TUstees, at the request of the Seattle District United States Army Corps of Engineers to comply with Endangered Species Act (ESA)regulations regarding shoreline developn ent. The proposed action will occur on two of the applicant's three adjoining Lake Cus man lots. On Lot 23,the footing of the existing concrete bulkhead will be replaced and a buoy installed. On Lot 24,the applicants are proposing to replace an existing f ier and float with a pier,ramp, and two float structures.An existing failed wood boat ra np will be removed from the site. Additionally, a short section of rock and mortar ulkhead will be installed to fill the gap in the existing bulkhead created by the removal f the boat ramp. Mitigation for the proposed projects will consist of the removal o he wood boat ramp and the pier and float, which will result in a reduction of 662.9 s of overwater coverage at the site. Mitigation also includes a native planting plan, s it is unlikely that the existing pier, float, and boat ramp were permitted 1.1Background The proposed project site is located in Mason C unty at 301 North Potlatch Drive N, Hoodsport Washington (Attachment 1), Divisio 12, Lots 23 and 24.The Mason County tax parcel numbers are 42307-50-00023 &24. 1 he property is located in Section 07, Township 23N, and Range 04W of the western neridian.The latitude is 47.49325 North, and the longitude is -123.25047 West. The proj ct site is located on Lake Cushman in the Skokomish/Dosewallips Water Resource Inven ry Area(WRIA 16)on a shoreline designated Urban Residential by the Shoreline T laster Program of Mason County. Lake Cushman is regulated under the Mason County 35horeline Master Program and the Mason County Resource Ordinance as a Fish and Wild 'fe Habitat Conservation Area. The Shoreline Management Act of 1971 designated ake Cushman as a Shoreline of Statewide Significance. The project site is located in a rural neighborho d on two shoreline lots with approx. 124 (one hundred&twenty-four) feet of frontage. e Gallimore Family Trust owns Lots 23, 24, and 25, and there is a single-family residen (SFR) on the latter.Existing shoreline appurtenances on Lots 23 and 24 include a con ete bulkhead(57' in length and 7' 10" in height), a rock and mortar bulkhead(64' in len h and 7' 6" in height, except beneath the boat ramp where it is approx. 3.5' in height), a 1 Vood boat ramp (20' x 30'), a storage shed(approx. 7' x 8'), a wood planked deck(5 sf), a wood pier(8' x 20'), and a float (10' x 20'). 1.2 Project Need and Objectives Gallimore Biological Evaluation 3 The projects are needed for several reasons. The existing pier and float structure is cumbersome and in poor condition;the applicants wish to replace it with a pier, ramp, and two floats that will have a smaller, more efficient footprint. The existing wood boat ramp has failed and is dangerous. The removal of the boat ramp will leave a gap in the existing rock and mortar bulkhead that will need to be repaired. Erosion from wave action has undercut the toe of the existing concrete bulkhead, which will require reinforcement to prevent imminent failure.There is no existing buoy at the site, but a buoy will enable the applicants to use their boat when the lake's waters are lowered. The project objective is to upgrade/downsize and repair existing shoreline appurtenances, while avoiding or minimizing impacts to ESA-listed species. 2.0 Project Description On Lot 23,the toe of the existing concrete bulkhead will be repaired by pouring a replacement concrete footing. As per the engineered design by P.E. Alan Tahja (Attachments 2 & 3),the new footing will be approx. fifty-seven feet(57') in length, three feet(3') in depth, and two feet(2') in width. The buoy will be installed approx. ninety feet(90')waterward of the bulkhead, at a lake elevation of approx. 720 feet. On Lot 24, a pier, ramp, and two floats will be installed to replace an existing pier, float, and boat ramp. A short section of rock and mortar bulkhead will fill the gap in the existing bulkhead created by the removal of the boat ramp.As per the engineered design by P.E.Alan Tahja(Attachments 4-8),the proposed pier,ramp, and float structure will total approx.two hundred and ninety-seven square feet (297.1 sf) and consist of a six by twenty foot(6' x 20') stationary pier, an approx.three-and-a-half by fourteen-and-a-half foot(3.6' x 14.5') float, an approx. four-and-a-half by twenty-one foot(4.6' x 21')float, and a two by ten foot(2' x 10') aluminum ramp. The square footage of the replacement pier, ramp, and float structure totals precisely 297.1 sf,which is 662.9 sf feet less than the existing waterward development that will be removed. The replacement pier and floats will extend approximately 30' waterward of the existing rock and mortar bulkhead's face. The pier will utilize six(6)pressure treated lumber pier posts (6' x 6");the floats will utilize a total of five(5), eight inch(8") galvanized steel pilings. The posts and piles will be augured in by hand and filled with fiber reinforced Portland cement concrete. Because the pilings will not be driven,the holes will be filled with concrete to assure stability. The pier and float frames and decking will be constructed of pressure treated lumber and a composite material.All pressure treated wood will have undergone one or more BMP's to minimize leaching of contaminants into the water(see BMPs). To protect against erosion, fasteners or other hardware will be made of galvanized and/or stainless steel. The floatation will be constructed of encapsulated polyethylene drums. The floats will be equipped with a mechanism that prevents them from resting on the lake's bottom during low water periods. Gallimore Biological Evaluation 4 As per the engineered design by P.E. Alan Tahj (Attachments 2-6),the bulkhead replacement section will be constructed of rock ind mortar, same as the existing bulkhead. The new section of bulkhead will be I wenty feet(20') in length, four feet(4') in height, and one foot(V) in width. It will occi py a footprint of 20 sf and be constructed on top of the existing bulkhead in a gap current occupied by the boat ramp. The bulkhead will be backfilled with gravel and fini hed with paving stones to match the adjacent walking paths. All materials, equipment, debris, and workers 11 be transported to and from the site in cars or trucks.A jackhammer, circular saw, and various hand tools will be used for the proposed project. All existing manmade debris d construction debris will be removed from shoreline at the site, following constructioi i. 2.1 Project Activities Removal of the Existing Boat Ramp, Pio r, & Float Wood members of the existing boat ramp, pier, iind float will be disassembled, using a circular saw and hand tools. Concrete footings A ill be dug out by hand and broken apart with a jackhammer. Disassembled/demolished i iaterial will be removed from the shoreline via manual labor. Geo-textile fabric All be spread over the dry lakebed during disassembly/demolition to contain any construc ion debris. Construction of the Rock and Mortar B ilkhead Section Following disassembly/demolition, a twenty-foi it section of rock and mortar bulkhead will be installed on top of the existing bulkhead in the gap that was previously occupied by the boat ramp. Mortar will be mixed in a po able mixer on site and applied to the rock as the rock is set.After the mortar dries,the bul ead will be backfilled with gravel. Paving stones will be set in place atop the gravc I following construction of the pier, ramp, and floats. Excavation of the Concrete Bulkhead'sNew Footing, Holes for the Pier and the Float Landing and the Buoy At chor Excavation for the concrete bulkhead's replacement footing,the pier and float landing pilings/posts,and the buoy anchor will be done by r Lanual labor,using hand tools,following disassembly/demolition,due to the difficulty of a cessing the site with heavy machinery. The new footing will be approx. 57' x 3' x 2',aq previously noted. The piling/post holes will be approx. six feet in depth and three by three feet n width(6'x 3'x 3'),while the buoy anchor hole will be two by two by two feet(2'x 2' x 2'). Gallimore Biological Evaluation 5 Construction of the Concrete Bulkhead's Footing, the PRFs, and the Buoy Forms for the concrete bulkhead's new footing will be constructed on site, using untreated lumber.Rebar will be bent to 90 degrees and pinned to the existing footing and set horizontally along the footing, which will then be filled with fiber reinforced Portland cement concrete. After the concrete has sufficiently cured,the forms will be removed, and some of the excavated material will be spread along the new toe to fill in any depressions left by the removal of the forms. Before concrete is poured for the PRFs,pier posts and pilings will be positioned in the appropriate holes.The pier and float will be constructed of pressure treated lumber, composite decking, and galvanized steel or aluminum hardware.All Styrofoam float material will be encapsulated. A fabricated steel cradle for the float will be attached to the 8"pilings. An aluminum ramp or ladder will be installed between the pier and the most waterward float (4.6' x 21'). Before concrete is poured for the buoy anchor,the hole will be reinforced with rebar and an eye hook threaded through a piece of the rebar. After the concrete has sufficiently cured, a galvanized buoy chain and a buoy will be attached to the eye hook. Concrete for the bulkhead footing,the PRFs, and the buoy will be poured at the same time. Geo-textile fabric will be spread over the dry lakebed during construction to contain any manmade construction debris. All existing manmade debris and project debris will be removed from the shoreline at the site following construction. Mitigation Planting Native vegetation will be planted in a ten by twenty-foot(10' x 20') area immediately landward of the shoreline,where vegetation is currently lacking. The exact location of the plantings and the 10' by 20' area will be at the applicants' discretion. Due to the potential for the roots of trees and large shrubs to damage the bulkhead, especially during summer drought conditions, it is recommended that any trees or large shrubs be installed at least ten feet(10') landward of the bulkhead.At least 20 plants and five different species will be installed. Planting will occur in the fall (after the cessation of drought conditions) or in the early spring. Vegetation will be in one or two gallon pots, bare root, or harvested from the site. Recommended native species include: shore pine (Pinus contorta contorta),vine maple (Acer circinatum),Pacific dogwood(Corpus nuttallii), Western yew (Taxus brevifolia), Gallimore Biological Evaluation 6 t ! mountain hemlock(Tsuga mertensiana), evergr en huckleberry(Vaccinium ovatum), red huckleberry(Vaccinium parvifolium),mock ora ige (Philadelphis lewisii), Rhododendron (Rhododendron macrophyllum), Western azalea (Rhododendron occidentale), Pacific ninebark(Physocarpus capitatus), Indian plum Oemleria cerasiformis), common snowberry(Symphoricarpos albus), snowbrush Ceanothus velutinus var. hookeri), salal (Gaultheria shallon), Oregon-grape(Mahonia c,luffiblium, nervosa or repens), Thimbleberry(Rubus parviorus var.parviflor ), sword fern (Polystichum munitum), deer fern (Blechnum spicant), kinnikinnick(Ar ostaphylos uva-ursi), bleeding heart (Dicentra formosa), creeping dogwood(Cornus 4 anadensis), and wild strawberry (Frageria virginiana). Additional plant species that are native to Westt rn Washington may be added to the above list at the applicant's discretion. 2.2 Monitoring and Maintenance The property owners will monitor and water an native vegetation plantings as needed during dry months, until the vegetation has bec e established. Dead plants will be replaced throughout the monitoring period. Invz sive,non-native vegetation will be removed or cut back as necessary. 2.3 Timing Work on the proposed projects will be completc J over an approx.thirty(30) day period during daylight working hours normal to a rural neighborhood. Work will only take place when the water level of Lake Cushman is low, hich is generally between October and April. 2.4 Conservation Measures 1. An existing boat ramp, pier, and floz t occupying a total of 960 sf will be permanently removed from the site hich will result in a reduction of 662.9 sf of overwater coverage at the site. 2. No construction to occur when Lake ushman's waters are raised. 3. Project construction will occur betw en October I"to February 281h for the protection of marbled murrel is and northern spotted owls. 4. Construction to take place as per the PPA provisions from the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. Gallimore Biological Evaluation 7 5. Previously discussed BMPs to be strictly adhered to. 6. Native vegetation will be planted in a ten by twenty-foot(10' x 20') area immediately landward of the shoreline,where vegetation is currently lacking. (see Mitigation Planting) 2.5 Best Management Practices In order to maintain the present water quality of Lake Cushman during project construction,Best Management Practices (BMPs)will be implemented. BMPs are defined as physical, structural, and/or managerial practices that prevent or reduce the pollution of water(WDOE). The following source control BMPs,which are detailed in the WDOE's Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington, Volume H Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention (2012), shall be implemented for long- term protection of water quality at the site: BMP C154: Concrete Washout Area Purpose:Prevent or reduce the discharge of pollutants to stormwater from concrete waste by conducting washout off-site, or performing on-site washout in a designated area to prevent pollutants from entering surface waters or ground water. Conditions of Use:Concrete washout area best management practices are implemented on construction projects where: *Concrete is used as a construction material. •It is not possible to dispose of all concrete wastewater and washout off-site(ready mix plant, etc.). •Concrete trucks, pumpers, or other concrete coated equipment are washed on-site. •Note: If less than 10 concrete trucks or pumpers need to be washed out on-site,the wash water may be disposed of in a formed area awaiting concrete or an upland disposal site where it will not contaminate surface or ground water. The upland disposal site shall be at least 50 feet from sensitive areas such as storm drains, open ditches, or water bodies, including wetlands. •A temporary washout facility shall be constructed on-site or the concrete truck will be washed out off-site. •When temporary concrete washout facilities are no longer required for the work,the hardened concrete, slurries and liquids shall be removed and properly disposed of. •Materials used to construct temporary concrete washout facilities shall be removed from the site of the work and disposed of or recycled. Gallimore Biological Evaluation 8 BMP C151: Concrete Handling Purpose: Concrete work can generate process ater and slurry that contain fine particles and high pH, both of which can violate water qi ality standards in the receiving water. Concrete spillage or concrete discharge to surf e waters of the State is prohibited. Use this BMP to minimize and eliminate concrete, ncrete process water, and concrete slurry from entering waters of the state. Conditions of Use:Any time concrete is used, i tilize these management practices. •Wash out concrete truck chutes, pumps, an I internals into formed areas only. Assure that washout of concrete trucks is perfor ned offsite or in designated concrete washout areas. DO not wash out concre trucks onto the ground, or into storm drains, open ditches, streets, or streams. *Return unused concrete remaining in the tr ick and pump to the originating batch plant for recycling. Do not dump excess concrete on site, except in designated concrete washout areas. *Wash off hand tools including, but not lim ed to, screeds, shovels, rakes, floats, and trowels into formed areas only. •Wash equipment difficult to move in areas that do not directly drain to natural or constructed stormwater conveyances. •Do not allow washdown from areas, such concrete aggregate driveways,to drain directly to natural or constructed stormv ater conveyances(or Puget Sound). *Contain washwater and leftover product in a lined container when no formed areas are available. Dispose of contained con ete in a manner that does not violate ground water or surface water quality st dards. *Always use forms or solid barriers for con ete pours, such a pilings, within 15-feet of surface waters. BMW C101: Preserving Natural Vegetation Wherever practical, native vegetation shall be p-eserved to reduce erosion. Natural vegetation should be preserved on steep slopes, near perennial and intermittent watercourses or swales, and on building sites in wooded areas. BMP C233: Silt Fence Silt fence may be used downslope of all disturb d areas. Silt fence shall prevent soil carried by runoff water from going beneath,thr, ugh, or over the top of the silt fence but shall allow the water to pass through the fence. The following additional BMPs will be used insure that water quality is not degraded during and after construction: Gallimore Biological Evaluation 9 I • Equipment shall be cleaned and checked for leaks, offsite and daily,before commencing work. • Pressure treated wood used in the project shall undergo one or more of the following BMPs to minimize leaching of contaminants: a)Aqua-Ammonia Steaming Cycle(AASC). b)Post Treatment Kiln Drying. c)Minimum Plant Holding Time. d) In-Retort Ammonia Removal Plus Plan Holding Time. e) ACZA Solution Bath/Rinse Procedure. • Pressure treated wood BMP treatment methods shall be verified by providing a signed and dated certification from a third party. In addition,the following Spill Prevention Control measures will also be followed: •The applicant will supply the site with a portable bathroom or allow workers access to the onsite bathroom so that solid or liquid waste will not become a source of stormwater pollution. •The applicant will be responsible for alerting the appropriate authorities in the event of a hazardous spill. *The applicant will have a spill kit and be able to perform basic control, containment, and/or confinement operations within the capabilities of the resources and personnel protective equipment available. In other words, small spills, such as paint or oil, shall be promptly and fully collected and disposed of at a suitable disposal site. In the event of a significant spill, a fish kill, and/or if fish are observed in distress the,Washington State Department of Ecology(800.258.5990) and the Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife's Area Habitat Biologist, Joshua Benton (360.602.0364), shall be notified immediately. 3.0 Action Area The action area is located on the shoreline of Lake Cushman at the proposed project site. Besides the proposed project location, the action area includes the surrounding area within a designated distance from the site in order to account for construction impacts that may affect species listed under the Endangered Species Act by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the National Marine Fisheries Service as either endangered or threatened. The limits of the action area are based upon the geographic extent(in both aquatic and terrestrial environments) of the physical, chemical, and biological effects resulting from the proposed action, including direct and indirect effects, as well as effects of interrelated and interdependent activities(WSDOT 2010). Turbidity and noise are expected to be the most detrimental project effects. Since work will occur when Lake Cushman is lowered, project turbidity is expected to be no greater than turbidity that is common to the area during heavy rains,when various ephemeral and perennial streams and the north fork of the Skokomish River discharge sediment laden water into Lake Cushman. It is probable that the project's distance from the lake's lowered shoreline will be great enough that disturbed sediments will disperse gradually(via precipitation) over Gallimore Biological Evaluation 10 the exposed lakebed without ever reaching wate until the lake is raised.Therefore, terrestrial noise is expected to be the most far-rc iching effect from the proposed installation of a new/replacement bulkhead at tl e site. The action area for terrestrial noise effects is ba ed upon an ambient sound level of 40 dBA for an area with a population of less than 1 0 people per mile (WSDOT 2010). In addition, the Olympic National Forest programr katic biological assessment uses an estimated ambient level of 40 dBA for undisturl ed forested areas(USDI 2003). Noise levels for the sawing of lumber with a circular s w during project disassembly/construction and the demolition of oncrete footings with a jackhammer will produce the proposed project's maximum noise evels. The noise level of a chain saw was used to asce ain the noise level of a circular saw.The noise level at 50 feet from a chain saw is 84 dB (WSDOT 2014). The noise level of a chain saw at three feet is 110 dBA,while a circt lar saw is 100 dBA.Assuming that a chain saw is between approx. five and ten perce it noisier than a circular saw,the noise level of a circular saw at fifty feet was assigned 79 dBA.The noise level at 50 feet from a jackhammer is 89 dBA(WSDOT 2014), so not from the demolition of the concrete footings will produce the project's maximum n 'se levels. To determine the distance that the proposed pro ct's maximum point source construction noise will travel before it attenuates to the ambi nt sound level;the following Practical Spreading Loss Model equation was used: D=Do * 10((Construction Noise—Ambient ound Level in dBA)/a) Where D=the distance from the noise &Do=the reference m asurement distance of 50'. Maximum construction noise from the propose project will travel approx. 14,090' over hard site conditions(Lake Cushman) and 4560' over soft site conditions (forested areas) before it(the noise)attenuates to the ambient sc and level. Therefore,the extent of the action area is 2.67 mi. over the lake's surface at d 0.86 mi. inland from the proposed project site and adjacent shorelines(Attachmen 1). In addition,the action area includes Big Creek, fish-bearing stream that is located approx. 2.30 miles to the southeast of the site. 1,umerous unnamed fish-bearing streams are located in the action area, including three th t are approx. 0.15, 0.45, 0.84 mi. to the southeast of the site.Numerous ephemeral strea ms are located throughout the action area. 4.0 ESA Species and Habitat Info mation In the proposed project area,there are six speci4 s listed under the Endangered Species Act by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (US S) as either threatened, endangered, or candidate species. The bull trout(Salvelinus coi ifluentus),marbled murrelet (Brachyramphus marmoratus), northern spotte owl (Stridex occidentalis), and streaked Gallimore Biological Evaluation 11 i horned lark(Eremophila alpestris strigata)are listed as threatened and critical habitat has been designated for these species. The proposed project action area is in the bull trouts', marbled murrelets', and spotted owls' critical habitat. The yellow-billed cuckoo (Coccyzus americanus) and the fisher(Mantes pennanti)are listed as proposed threatened and candidate species, respectively. In the proposed project area,there is one species listed under the Endangered Species Act by the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) as either threatened, endangered, or candidate species. The Puget Sound Chinook salmon(Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) is listed as threatened and critical habitat has been designated. Lake Cushman is a historical watershed of the Chinook that has been anthropogenically blocked;however, it has been designated critical habitat. The Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) GIS maps reveal the documented presence of two other species of salmonids on the State's PHS list within the action area: Kokanee(Oncorhynchus nerka) and the Puget Sound/Coastal cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarki clarki). The presence of these two species has been documented in Lake Cushman. WDFW data reveals that Lake Cushman was stocked with 23,896 cutthroat trout in 2005 and 205,800 Kokanee (landlocked sockeye salmon) in 2004.A WDFW biologist reported that other species that inhabit the lake include rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) and non-native largemouth bass(Micropterus salmoides). 4.1 ESA Listed Species BULL TROUT Bull trout are members of the char subgroup of the salmon family and are native to the Pacific Northwest and western Canada. Water temperature above 15 degrees Celsius is believed to limit bull trout distribution, as eggs and juveniles require extremely cold water for survival. Bull trout are also vulnerable to degraded stream habitat, poor water quality, dams and other stream blocking structures, and predation by non-native fish. Critical habitat includes the upper North Fork of the Skokomish River(70 FR 56304). Critical Habitat in the North Fork of the Skokomish River includes spawning and rearing habitat. Lake Cushman provides rearing, foraging, and migration habitat, so it is expected that bull trout may be found in the action area of the proposed project site. MARBLED MURRELET A small, diving seabird in the family Alcidae,the marbled murrelet forages for small fish and invertebrates almost exclusively in nearshore marine waters,while nesting inland in old-growth or mature conifer forests.Threats include loss of habitat, predation, gill-net fishing operations, oil spills,marine pollution, and disease. The USFWS assembled a team of scientists in October 2011 to investigate causes for the continued decline in murrelet populations.The outcome of these discussions listed many factors, chiefly loss Gallimore Biological Evaluation 12 of potential nesting habitat as the main reason fr hindrance of population recovery goals (WDFW 2012). Potential nest trees are coniferous trees within mi (88.5 km) of marine waters that support at least one 4-inch(10.2-cm) diameter atform located at least 33 feet(10 meters) above the ground, with horizontal and rtical cover(USFWS 2012). If a tree or forested area does not support these habitat feat 'res, it is"extremely unlikely"to support a murrelet nest(USFWS 2012).Nest success nfluenced by forest structure,the spatial mix of habitat and non-habitat, human disturb a e, prey availability, and marine foraging conditions.Human disturbance can lead to high r predation levels by Steller's and gray jays, crows,ravens,and other species that seek uman-related foods and refuse at high- use recreational areas(Peery et al. 2004, Marzlt ff and Neatherlin 2006). Critical habitat for the marbled murrelet,which was designated in May of 1996 and revised in October of 2011, is located within th proposed project's action area to the northwest of the project site; therefore, it must t e assumed that marbled murrelets may be found nesting in the action area. State Route 11 I I is located between the project site, Lake Cushman, and the marbled murrelets' critical h,bitat, so it is expected that any marbled murrelets nesting in the action area,will do so the far side (north side) of the highway. Additionally,the proposed project will not resu in the loss of any trees or other vegetation, and water quality at the site will be inimally impacted. For the protection of marbled murrelets,project construction will oc r between October I"to February 28th, when marbled murrelets are not nesting. NORTHERN SPOTTED OWL The Northern Spotted Owl is one of the largest wls in North America, and the average adult female is approximately 18 inches tall wit a 48-inch wingspan.Northern spotted owls are strictly nocturnal, and require old-grov th forests with multi-layered canopies of trees, including large trees with broken tops, de ormed limbs, and large holes and cavities to nest in. The Northern spotted owl is very terf torial and intolerant of habitat disturbance, and a pair requires a large amount f forest for hunting and nesting.Habitat loss has occurred as a result of forest conversio ,timber harvest, fire, windthrow, insect outbreak and disease(WDFW 2012). The USFWS designated revised critical habitat or the northern spotted owl under the Endangered Species Act. In total, approximatel 9,577,969 acres (ac) (3,876,064hectares (ha)) in I 1 units and 60 subunits in California, Oregon, and Washington fall within the boundaries of the 2 critical habitat designation. rhe action area includes designated critical habitat for the Northern spotted owl;th efore, it must be assumed that Northern spotted owls may be found nesting in the actior area. For the protection of spotted owls, project construction will occur between Octobe 1st to February 28th,when Northern spotted owls are not nesting. Additionally,the I roposed project will not result in the loss of any trees or other vegetation. Gallimore Biological Evaluation 13 STREAKED HORNED LARK Horned larks are birds that utilize wide open spaces with no trees and few or no shrubs. The streaked horned lark nests on the ground in sparsely vegetated sites dominated by grasses and shrubs. Historically this type of habitat was found in prairies in western Oregon and Washington, in dune habitats along the coast of Washington, on the sandy beaches and spits along the Columbia and Willamette Rivers, and in grasslands, estuaries, and sandy beaches in British Columbia(WDFW 2012). Today the streaked horned lark nests in a broad range of habitats, including native prairies, coastal dunes, fallow and active agricultural fields,wetland mudflats, sparsely-vegetated edges of grass fields, recently planted Christmas tree farms with extensive bare ground, moderately-to heavily- grazed pastures, gravel roads or gravel shoulders of lightly-traveled roads, airports, and dredge deposition sites in the lower Columbia River(WDFW 2012). It is expected that the action area contains unsuitable habitat for the streaked horned lark. YELLOW-BILLED CUCKOO The yellow-billed cuckoo(Coccyzus americanus) is a neotropical migrant bird that winters in South America and breeds in western North America.The yellow-billed cuckoo is insectivorous and lives in riparian woodlands(USFWS 2014). Reports of individual cuckoos have been very rare in recent decades, with only three known reports since 2000,these being near Lind(Adams Co.) in 2001, near Eureka(Walla Walla Co.) in June 2007, and from Little Pend Oreille National Wildlife Refuge (Stevens Co.) in June 2012. Habitat loss and pesticide use are thought to be two of the main causes for the precipitous decline of western yellow-billed cuckoos.Agriculture, grazing, reservoir construction, flood control, urbanization, and other factors across the West have caused the large-scale loss and degradation of lowland riparian forest,which is the cuckoo's primary habitat. It is expected that the action area contains unsuitable habitat for the yellow-billed cuckoo. FISHER The fisher is a stocky, dark brown member of the weasel family that is approximately the size of a house cat. Historically, fishers occurred throughout much of the mid to low elevation forested areas of Washington, but they were extirpated from the state by the mid 1900s (WDFW 2012). The two main causes of the fisher's decline were over- trapping and loss and fragmentation of forested habitats from logging,road construction, urban development,recreation, and wildfires. A reintroduced population in Olympic National Park is quite small(initially 90 fishers). Tracking maps revealed at least one fisher migrating northeast of Lake Cushman in 2010 (WDFW 2011). Several have been killed by vehicle strikes. Gallimore Biological Evaluation 14 Vehicle transportation of workers(i.e.the appli ant)to the site of the proposed project has the potential to impact fishers in the action rea; although,the odds of the applicant's vehicle hitting a fisher are no greater than that any other vehicle hitting one. CHINOOK SALMON Chinook salmon in Lake Cushman are a land-1 ked population that originated from anadromous fish, although loss of genetic varial ion makes it difficult to determine whether they are descended from historical Ho d Canal populations or introduced hatchery fish(NOAA 2006). Lake Cushman Cf inook are genetically different, smaller in size(and presumably less fecund)than their an romous counterparts(Myers et al. 1998). On Jan. 12,2009,Tacoma Power,the Skok ish Tribal Nation and state and federal agencies signed a settlement agreement that res lved a$5.8 billion damages claim and long-standing disputes over the terms of a long erm license for Cushman Hydroelectric Project. Tacoma Power has proposed to introdu e sockeye and spring Chinook and enhance the existing winter steelhead and coho opulations in the North Fork in cooperation with the WDFW and the Skokomi Tribe (Tacoma Public Utilities 2014). In addition, Tacoma Power will annually release to 100,000 rainbow trout for sport harvest(TPU 2014). Lake Cushman has been designated Critical ha 'tat, and the site provides rearing, foraging, and migration habitat, so it is expected that adult and/or juvenile Chinook salmon may be found in the action area. 5.0 Environmental Baseline Con 'tions 5.1 Action Area The environmental baseline represents the exist ng set of conditions,to which the effects of the proposed action are then added. The envi onmental baseline is defined as"the past and present impacts of all Federal, state, and pri vate actions and other human activities in the action area,the anticipated impacts of all pr posed Federal projects in the action area that have already undergone formal or informal section 7 consultation, and the impact of state or private actions which are contemporan us with the consultation process"(50 CFR 402.02).The proposed project site is in IA 16 (Water Resource Inventory Area), on Lake Cushman in Mason County. The majoi ty of the fresh and marine waterbodies in WRIA 16 suffer from water quality issues;how ver Lake Cushman is not listed on the state's 2008 Water Quality 303(d)-5 list of imp ired waterbodies for any parameters. The proposed project site is located in a rural n 'ghborhood on a lot with approximately 64 feet of frontage on Lake Cushman, in an area classified as an Urban Residential shoreline environment by the Shoreline Master rogram of Mason County. Neighboring parcels support single-family residences (or rec eational cabins), bulkheads,piers, and Gallimore Biological Evaluation 15 floats. Forested land in the vicinity of Lake Cushman has been logged heavily. Erosion impacts from surface flows have been particularly damaging in the logged areas above the lake's west shore. Before the completion of two dams in 1926 and 1930, Lake Cushman was a natural oligotrophic lake with a mean depth of 200 feet. Now Lake Cushman is 4,010-acre water body in the Olympic National Forest, having been altered in size to accommodate the hydroelectric dams. Because of the dams, water levels in Lake Cushman can fluctuate up to 21 meters(69 feet),with peak levels occurring during summer and minimum levels during winter. The magnitude of these fluctuations results in periodic inundation of 12 hectares(30 acres)of land surrounding the inlet to the reservoir, resulting in high water temperatures in the shallow waters of the inlet during the summer months (Brenkman 1998). Currently,the reservoir inundates 17.2 kilometers(10.7 miles)of river, including areas of the original Lake Cushman (Brenkman 1998). 5.2 Proposed Project Area Field investigations were conducted in March of 2012 and July of 2014.The project area was surveyed visually on foot. The lake's water level was lowered at the time of the former (field investigation)and at approx. 738 feet,the current ordinary high water mark, at the time of the latter. The proposed project site is located on a small, partially developed waterfront lot on the east side of Lake Cushman.There are existing bulkheads, a boat ramp, deck, shed, pier, and float(Attachments 9-12). The property is heavily vegetated with native vegetation. The substrate in lake's littoral zone,which is the near shore area where light penetrates to the bottom, consists primarily of sand, gravel, cobble, and clay. The slope along the littoral zone is relatively gentle for Lake Cushman.No macrophytes or fish were observed.A small amount of algae was observed. The following native species were observed at the site: Douglas-fir(Pseudotsuga menziesii),western hemlock(Tsuga heterophylla), Western red cedar(Thuja plicata), Red alder(alnus rubra), evergreen huckleberry(Vaccinium ovatum), red huckleberry (Vaccinium parvifolium), salal (Gaultheria shallon), Oregon-grape(Berberis nervosa), and sword fern(Polystichum munitum). Gallimore Biological Evaluation 16 r 6.0 Effects of the Action 6.1Direct Effects Direct effects to the shoreline include: 1) Loss f benthic habitat from the installation of the concrete bulkhead's new footing, six pier p ts, five steel pilings, and the buoy anchor. 2) Creation of shade from the replace nt pier,ramp, and floats. 3) Contamination to Lake Cushman from the leac ng of wood preservatives. 1)The footprint of the bulkhead footing, post/p ings and the buoy anchor will be located waterward of the lake's high water mark of 738feet;nevertheless,the bulkhead footing, posts/pilings and buoy anchor are expected to have an insignificant impact on benthic habitat. The bulkhead's new footing will only o cupy approx. 114 sf of benthic habitat, while each pier post and piling(with a concrete ase)will occupy approx. seven sf(so all the pier posts and pilings will occupy 77 sf).H ever, as per the engineered plans,the area of the steel piles(approx. 0.34 sf for each ght inch steel pile and 0.25 sf for each pier post, totaling 3.2 sf) will constitute the onl lost surface area, as the concrete bases for each piling will be covered by the lake's(b om) substrate. The buoy anchor's 4.0 sf footprint is also expected to be covered by the 1 ke's substrate. In addition, due to the seasonal fluctuations of t ke lake's water level, it is probable that benthic species do not thrive in the nearshore a as of the lake that lack permanent water. No empirical evidence was found to document i f both terrestrial and aquatic species utilize the upper shoreline habitat, or if it has b n too altered to support normal concentrations of either species. 2)Another direct effect is the creation of shade rom the replacement pier, ramp, and floats. The existing pier and overhanging shore ne deck produce a reduction in light to the underlying aquatic environment by creating i light/dark boundary that may give piscivorous species an advantage over their pre The use of over-water structures in western Washington waters by bass, a common non-native predator of juvenile salmonids, has been documented by several aut ors. Largemouth bass in Lake Washington prefer areas of heavy log and brust cover over other habitat types; however, they are commonly found under docks in early pring and are thought to be present until late summer(Stein 1970). Substrate type typica ly determines the acceptability of an area for bass spawning, but adjacent cover and struc ural complexity are also necessary for protection while the fish are concentrated in sh low water(Stein 1970; Cooper and Crowder 1979;Helfinan 1981b; Pflug and Paul y 1984). The substrate type in the vicinity of the bulkhead and landing is gravel, bble, and rock. Largemouth bass prefer moderate to dense vegetation and silt or sand s strate, and nests are constructed at depths from 0.6 to 1.5 meters, in vegetated are with soft sediment or gravel substrate on moderate to steep slopes (Pflug 1981). The prof-Ict site possesses unsuitable habitat for bass, so it is doubtful that the proposed pier, rar ip, and float will increase the concentration of bass at the site or the occurren e of juvenile salmonid predation by bass. The project site supports no existing macroph vegetation and has no potential to Gallimore Biological Evaluation 17 support macrophyte vegetation, due to the Jake's(anthropogenic) seasonal water fluctuations. In addition, White(1975) determined that phytoplankton primary production is not significantly reduced by narrow residential piers, due to the presence of more optimal light conditions than found in surface waters,where light intensities are higher than those in which algae thrive. Data suggests that other fish species, including salmonids, are also attracted to the shade produced by over-water structures, so it is possible that adult salmonids could prey on juveniles at the site. However, researchers have indicated that structural complexity can moderate predator-prey interactions by providing more refuges for prey species as well as reducing the foraging efficiency of the predator(Cooper and Crowder 1979). This moderation may apply to naturally occurring structural habitat complexity, as well as habitat complexity due to the presence of docks, piers, boathouses and associated pilings (WDFW, WDOE, WSDOT 2001). Shade can also affect migrating salmonids. It is not known whether over-water structures disrupt the migration of salmonids in lakes.Numerous studies suggest that docks, piers, and floats attract fish, and that the attraction of fish is linked to shade produced by the object not tactile stimulus. While the effects of shade on migrating juvenile salmonids in lakes is unknown, it is also unclear in marine waters, and there is no empirical evidence of mortality.The significance of predation to migrating populations has never been empirically assessed(Simenstad et al. 1999).No studies have examined mortality due to predation much less that mortality is attributable to overwater structures (Nightingale& Simenstad 2001). In conclusion, shade created by the proposed pier, ramp, and float is expected to have discountable and insignificant direct effects on ESA listed salmonids that may be in the action area. In addition,the proposed project will result in a reduction of approx. 662.9 sf of overwater structure coverage at the site. 3)The leaching of wood preservatives is a common contaminant-related issue with the construction of shoreline SFR appurtenances.ACZA pressure treated wood,which is more prevalent on the west coast because it effectively treats Douglas fir, contains copper,zinc, chromium, and arsenic. The main active ingredient of concern for effects to fish is copper.Environmentally realistic concentrations of free copper are noted to impact the resistance of fishes to disease, cause hyperactivity, impair respiration, disrupt osmoregulation or impair olfactory performance (NOAA 2009). The majority of projects proposing to use treated wood are smaller than the 100 piling size which predicts potentially problematic water column concentrations of copper at current velocities of 1 cm/sec or less(NOAA 2009).Also,ACZA leaching rates were very low in fresh water within ten days of installation(Brooks 1995,NMFS 1998, Hutton& Samis 2000). A boardwalk study(FPL 2000)was conducted in Oregon on a 1,800 foot long boardwalk, constructed in a wetland area from three different copper treated products,to evaluate the Gallimore Biological Evaluation 18 product's environmental effects. The environmc nt was slow moving freshwater,with fine grained sediments and heavy rainfall (NOAA 2009).A localized pattern of distribution indicated that the majority of leached copper wE s bound to suspended materials that settled into the sediments(NOAA 2009). Moni ring of leaching found that the greatest amount leached during initial rainfall(NOAA 2 09). Four invertebrate sampling events were conducted at the AZCA site over a one ye period to detect potential adverse effects. Results did not show a significant redu ion in habitat quality, and no taxa were extirpated from the study area, despite elevated oncentrations of copper near the boardwalk(NOAA 2009). It is unlikely that leaching from treated wood w 11 have a noticeable impact on aquatic life in Lake Cushman at the proposed project si , given the following: a)The pressure treated wood that will be used in the proposed oject will only be directly exposed to the waters of Lake Cushman for approx. six month each year. Rain that falls on all treated wood utilized in the proposed project will drain irectly into Lake Cushman, causing an unknown level of water and sediment contamin tion;however, because the lake's water level will be low during construction, it is prob le (assuming normal winter/spring frequent precipitation)that the greatest concenti ition of leached contaminants will be bound to sediments in the substrate before the 1 e's waters are raised. b) The project is significantly smaller than the 100 piling size wh ch predicts potentially problematic water column concentrations of copper at current velo ities of 1 cm/sec or less. c)All pressure treated wood used in the proposed project shall e sufficiently cured to minimize leaching of contaminants into the water. Temporary Direct Effects Temporary direct effects caused by the propose project include: 1) Turbidity and sedimentation in Lake Cushman. 2)Noise. 3) ater pollution from incidental release of fuel, oil, or other contaminants. 1)Disturbed substrate from the installatioloff f the replacement concrete bulkhead's toe,the replacement PRFs' posts/pilinand the buoy anchor may result in increased turbidity and sedimentation. previously discussed, BMPs will be strictly adhered to during constructionorder to maintain the present water quality of Lake Cushman and prevent and pollution. In addition,the proposed project will take place when t water level in the lake is much lower than the OHWM(738'), so it is probabl( that rainfall will slowly disperse any disturbed substrate before it comes into lirect contact with the lake's waters. Therefore, it is expected that turbidity a d sedimentation will be minimal. 2) The main source of construction noise Y ill be from the sawing of lumber for the bulkhead footing form,the pier, ramp, a id floats, and the demolition of the existing pier and float footings.Noise All be intermittent and is expected to be a maximum of 89 dBA at 50 feet. Since tt ere is critical habitat and nesting habitat Gallimore Biological Evaluation 19 for both Northern spotted owls and marbled murrelets in the action area,proposed project noise is expected to exceed disturbance, disruption, and/or physical injury distance thresholds for northern spotted owl during their nesting season (March 1 to September 30) and marbled murrelet during their nesting season (April 1 to September 22). Proposed timing restrictions will limit construction from October ist to February 28t". These dates roughly coincide with the seasonal lowering of Lake Cushman. 3)Potential water pollution from accidental release of fuel, oil, concrete, or other contaminants is another possible temporary direct effect. As previously discussed, Spill Prevention Control measures and BMPs shall be implemented throughout the proposed project. 6.2 Primary Constituent Elements PRIMARY CONSTITUENT ELEMENTS In order to properly analyze the effects on designated critical habitat, a logical framework must be utilized. In determining what areas are critical habitat, agency regulations require the NMFS to focus on the principal biological or physical constituent elements that are essential to the conservation of the species. The regulations identify Primary Constituent elements (PCEs) as including, but not limited to: "roost sites, nesting grounds, spawning sites, feeding sites, seasonal wetland or dryland, water quality or quantity, host species or plant pollinator, geological formation, vegetation type,tide, and specific soil types(69 FR 71888)." In 2003 NMFS biologists developed a list of PCEs specific to salmon, based on a decision matrix(NMFS, 1996)that describes general parameters and characteristics of most of the essential features under consideration when critical habitat is designated. There are six specific types of sites essential to support one or more life stages of an ESU (sites for spawning,rearing,migration, and foraging).Each site names physical or biological features(PCEs)essential to the conservation of salmonids. In 2010, USFWS biologists developed a list of PCEs specific to bull trout,based on a decision matrix (NMFS, 1996)that describes general parameters and characteristics of most of the essential features under consideration when critical habitat is designated. Lakes and reservoirs figure prominently in meeting the life-cycle requirements of adfluvial bull trout. Lake Cushman is designated critical habitat for the bull trout and the Chinook salmon;therefore,the direct effects on the designated critical habitat of bull trout and Chinook salmon have been analyzed using the appropriate PCEs for the nearshore lacustrine environment. BULL TROUT PCEs: Water temperatures that support bull trout use. Bull trout have been documented in streams with temperatures from 32 to 72 degrees F but are found more frequently in Gallimore Biological Evaluation 20 temperatures ranging from 36 to 59 degrees F the project will have no direct effect on water temperatures that support bull trout use. Migratory corridors with minimal physical, biological, or water quality impediments between spawning, rearing, overwintering, an foraging habitats, including intermittent or seasonal barriers induced by h h water temperatures or low flows— the project will have no direct effect on migrato y corridors that support bull trout use. Passage will not be altered during construction s no construction will occur unless the waters of Lake Cushman are low. The reductior in overwater structure coverage at the site is expected to benefit unobstructed passage ror bull trout, as overwater structures create a light/dark boundary that may give pisci Korous species an advantage over their prey. An abundant food base including terrestrial o anisms of riparian origin, and aquatic macroinvertebrates—the project is expected to iave a minimal direct effect on an abundant food base for bull trout. Construction vill take place when the lake's waters are lowered and overwater coverage will be reduced by approx. 662.9 square feet. Permanent water of sufficient quantity and qu lity such that normal reproduction, growth, and survival are not inhibited--the pro ect is expected to have a minimal direct effect on water quality. Project construction is u ilikely to cause temporary turbidity or sedimentation, and the treated lumber that will I e utilized in the proposed project is not expected to adversely affect the water quality ol Lake Cushman in the action area, if proposed BMPs are adhered to. CHINOOK SALMON PCEs: Unobstructed passage—passage will not be alt red during construction as no construction will occur unless the waters of La Cushman are low.The reduction in overwater structure coverage at the site is expec ed to benefit unobstructed passage for Chinook. Water Quality—project construction is unlikel3 to cause temporary turbidity or sedimentation. The treated lumber that will be t Lilized in the proposed project is not expected to adversely affect the water quality ol Lake Cushman in the action area, if proposed BMPs are adhered to. Water Quantity—the project will have no effec on water quantity. Forage—reduction in overwater coverage may aecrease foraging opportunities for adult salmonids. Natural Cover—the project will have no direct ffect on natural cover. Gallimore Biological Evaluation 21 6.3 Direct Effects to ESA Listed Species The direct effect from the proposed project to other ESA listed species that are likely to be found in the action area have been analyzed as follows: NORTHERN SPOTTED OWL The action area includes designated critical habitat for the Northern spotted owl; therefore, it must be assumed that Northern spotted owls may be found nesting in the action area. For the protection of spotted owls, project construction will occur between October 1st to February 281h,when Northern spotted owls are not nesting. Note: The rural neighborhood where the site is located extends approx. 1.4 mi. south of the proposed project site, 0.1 mi.northeast to State Route 119, and 0.18 northwest. Beyond the northwest boundary of the neighborhood, SR 119 is located less than 0.08 mi. from the shoreline of Lake Cushman for approx.three miles, heading toward the Staircase recreation area. With the extensive acreage of undeveloped forest land nearby, it seems unlikely that Northern spotted owls will be nesting, roosting, or foraging in the vicinity of anthropogenic development. MARBLED MURRELET The primary threats to marbled murrelet from anthropogenic activities include loss of nesting habitat, gill-net fishing operations, oil spills, and marine pollution. Previously noted BMPs and Spill Prevention Control Measures will be adhered to during project construction to protect the water quality of Lake Cushman. In addition, no trees or other vegetation will be removed as a result of the proposed project. The action area includes designated critical habitat for the marbled murrelet;therefore, it must be assumed that marbled murrelets may be found nesting in the action area. For the protection of marbled murrelets,project construction will occur between October Ist to February 28th,when marbled murrelets are not nesting. Note: The rural neighborhood where the site is located extends approx. 1.4 mi. south of the proposed project site, 0.1 mi. northeast to State Route 119, and 0.18 northwest. Beyond the northwest boundary of the neighborhood, SR 119 is located less than 0.08 mi. from the shoreline of Lake Cushman for approx.three miles,heading toward the Staircase recreation area. It seems unlikely that any marbled murrelets would nest in a rural neighborhood with the extensive acreage of undeveloped forest land nearby. Gallimore Biological Evaluation 22 6.4 Indirect Effects Indirect effects are those effects that are caused by or will result from the proposed action and are later in time,but are still reasonably ce ain to occur(50 CFR 402.02). Possible indirect effects from the proposed project inclu e: 1)The loss of shoreline aquatic vegetation. 2)Potential increased motorized b t presence in the area. 3)The new section of the existing rock and mortar bulkhea and the concrete bulkhead's new toe exacerbates passive erosion to the shoreline. 4) ulkhead improvements at the site causes a reduction in the accumulation of large drift to s on the beach. 1) The pier, ramp, floats, and pilings will cause reduction in light to the underlying aquatic environment, which can have significa impacts on the health and productivity of both native and non-native macrophytes and lgae. Macrophytes and algae are the foundation for most freshwater food webs and t ieir presence or absence affects many higher trophic levels(NMFS 2004). It is expec d that the impact of the lake's fluctuating water level on littoral productivity will oversha ow the impacts of shading from the PRF at the proposed project site.As previously disc sed, White (1975)determined that phytoplankton primary production is not signifi antly reduced by narrow residential piers, due to the presence of more optimal light onditions than found in surface waters where light intensities are higher than those in i rhich algae thrive. 2)The pier, ramp, and floats may result in an i reased motorized boat presence in the area. Fuel spills from powerboats can contamin to water quality and potentially affect listed salmonids directly or indirectly through t eir prey source(NMFS 2005). Powerboats also create amplified wave action t at can erode the shoreline, and prop scouring can erode benthic habitat, although bei thic habitat in the littoral zone is already significantly marginalized by the lake's fluctua ng water levels. Powerboats also provide some oxygenation of surface waters, although tJo extent is probably negligible at best. Overall,the indirect effects of powerboat usagen Lake Cushman is likely insignificant due to the lake's large size,the small number oboats that access the remote lake, and the short boating season (primarily May thru Septeber). 3) When waves reflect off shoreline armoring si ructures,particularly concrete or other types of flat-faced bulkheads,they can cause sc wring and hardening of the substrate and steepening of the beach. The sediment in front f a bulkhead will gradually become coarser as wave action and littoral drift remove the finer sediment and there is no sediment available for replenishment because it is impounded behind the bulkhead (Macdonald et al. 1994). Hard-armored bulkhez ds cut off sediment that was once available to feed the beach,thus adversely affec ing natural beach-forming processes. The shoreline at the site is already unnaturally s eep due to the lake's manmade origin. Accordingly, the steepness has caused significa it scouring and erosion, as there is no shallow foreshore to diminish the energy from 'icoming wind waves. Any beach feeding sediments are carried away to deeper water. Gallimore Biological Evaluation 23 The shoreline at the site is already fully bulkheaded. The concrete bulkhead's new (replacement)toe is not expected to result in worse scouring at the site than the original toe. The proposed twenty-foot rock and mortar section will fill a gap that is currently occupied by the failed boat ramp. The proposed rock and mortar bulkhead section is not expected to alleviate or increase scouring and steepening of the beach. The proposed pier, ramp, and floats will be located just waterward of the bulkhead and will help to diminish the energy from incoming waves. 4) Shoreline armoring can also limit the accumulation of large drift logs on the beach, as large woody debris is less likely to accumulate on beaches that have steepened due to the presence of a bulkhead(Macdonald et al. 1994). Large woody debris(LWD)provide detrital input, food sources, and potential refuge for migrating juvenile salmon. Due to the large number of power boats that utilize the lake in the vicinity of the proposed project site, it is not safe to recommend anchoring LWD to the beach.Nor is it allowed by Tacoma Power. In addition,there are numerous existing stumps on the lakebed. 6.5 Primary Constituent Elements PRIMARY CONSTITUENT ELEMENTS The indirect effects on the designated critical habitat of bull trout and Puget Sound Chinook have been analyzed using the appropriate PCEs for the nearshore fluvial environment. BULL TROUT PCEs: Water temperatures that support bull trout use. Bull trout have been documented in streams with temperatures from 32 to 72 degrees F but are found more frequently in temperatures ranging from 36 to 59 degrees F--the project will have no indirect effect on water temperatures that support bull trout use. Migratory corridors with minimal physical, biological, or water quality impediments between spawning, rearing, overwintering, and foraging habitats, including intermittent or seasonal barriers induced by high water temperatures or low flows— increased motorized boat usage may prompt bull trout to avoid the project area. An abundant food base including terrestrial organisms of riparian origin, aquatic macroinvertebrates, and forage fish--the project will have no indirect effect on the bull trout's food base. Permanent water of sufficient quantity and quality such that normal reproduction, growth, and survival are not inhibited--the project will have no indirect effect on the Gallimore Biological Evaluation 24 water quantity and a negligible effect on qualit3, providing proposed BMPs are adhered to. CHINOOK SALMON PCEs: Unobstructed passage—increased motorized b at usage may prompt Chinook salmon to avoid the project area. Water Quality—the project will have no indire4 t effect on the water quantity and a negligible effect on quality,providing proposed BMPs are adhered to. Water Quantity—the project will have no indir ct effect on water quantity. Forage—the project will have no indirect effec on foraging opportunities for Chinook. Natural Cover the project will have no indire 't effect on natural cover. 6.6 Indirect Effects to ESA Listed Species The indirect effects from the proposed project A other ESA listed species that are likely to be found in the action area have been analyze as follows: NORTHERN SPOTTED OWL &MARBLED VIURRELET While it is highly unlikely that either species w ld nest in trees that are located in a rural neighborhood, the proposed project may result 'i increased recreational usage at the site, which could prompt both species to nest elsewh re. 6.7Interrelated/Interdependent fects Interrelated and interdependent effects are descr bed as the effects of the action under consultation analyzed together with the effects c f other activities that are interrelated to, or interdependent with,that action. An interrel ed activity is an activity that is part of the proposed action and depends on the propose action for its justification. An interdependent activity is an activity that has no ndependent utility apart from the action under consultation(FWS &NMFS 1998). It is ssible that the applicant's will purchase a motorized boat that they would not otherwise urchase without a new pier, ramp, and floats, but it is also possible that the applicant's lready own a motorized boat or will not buy one. Gallimore Biological Evaluation 25 6.8 Primary Constituent Elements BULL TROUT PCEs: Water temperatures that support bull trout use. Bull trout have been documented in streams with temperatures from 32 to 72 degrees F but are found more frequently in temperatures ranging from 36 to 59 degrees F--the project will have no interrelated or interdependent effects on water temperatures that support bull trout use. Migratory corridors with minimal physical, biological, or water quality impediments between spawning,rearing, overwintering, and foraging habitats, including intermittent or seasonal barriers induced by high water temperatures or low flows—the project will have no interrelated or interdependent effects on migratory corridors that support bull trout use. An abundant food base including terrestrial organisms of riparian origin, aquatic macroinvertebrates, and forage fish--the project will have no interrelated or interdependent effects on the bull trout's food base. Permanent water of sufficient quantity and quality such that normal reproduction, growth, and survival are not inhibited--the project will have no interrelated or interdependent effects on water supply or quality. CHINOOK SALMON PCEs: Unobstructed passage—the project will have no interrelated or interdependent effects on unobstructed passage. Water Quality—the project will have no interrelated or interdependent effects on unobstructed passage. Water Quantity the project will have no interrelated or interdependent effects on water quantity. Forage the project will have no interrelated or interdependent effects on water quantity. Natural Cover—the project will have no interrelated or interdependent effects on natural cover. 6.9 Cumulative Effects Cumulative effects are defined as"those effects of future state or private activities,not involving Federal activities,that are reasonably certain to occur within the action area of the action subject to consultation"(50 CFR 402.02). Cumulative impacts are difficult to Gallimore Biological Evaluation 26 access. Continued growth and urbanization is li ely to detrimentally impact fish and wildlife resources. Global warming could raise e water level of Puget Sound, leaving many waterfront properties underwater. Global arming could also result in warmer water temperatures,to the detriment of species ch as bull trout.Additionally, over- fishing may deplete stocks of salmon, even as r toration of habitat in the watershed furthers their likelihood of survival. 7.0 Conclusion 7.1 Take Analysis Section 9 of the ESA prohibits take of endange d or threatened species, "take"being defined in Section 3 as to harass,harm, pursue, iunt, shoot,wound,trap, capture, or collect listed species, or attempt to engage in an such conduct. "Harm"is further defined as a significant habitat modification or degradat on that actually kills or injures listed species by"significantly impairing behavioral tterns such as breeding, spawning, rearing, migrating, feeding, and sheltering" (50 FR 222.102). "Harass" is further defined as an intentional or negligent act which reates the likelihood of injury to wildlife by annoying it to such an extent as to significan ly disrupt normal behavior patterns which include, but are not limited to, breeding, eding, or sheltering(50 CFR 17.3). In regards to the proposed project and the existing evelopment activities, it is extremely unlikely that any"take"will occur. Previously 1 sted conservation measures will further insure the likelihood that no"take"will occur. 7.2 Determination of Effect A determination of May affect, not likely to adv rsely affect is the appropriate conclusion when effects on the species or their critical habi at are expected to be beneficial, discountable, or insignificant. After reviewing t e appropriate data and survey information, I have concluded that the proposed project will have an insignificant impact on the previously discussed Endangered or Thr tened species if the previously discussed conservation measures are implemented. In my nost honest and professional opinion, while the proposed project may impact individu il Endangered or Threatened species in the project area, it is not likely to adversely affe t or jeopardize the continued existence of those species or their designated Critical Ha tat. The determination of effect for each of the listed species is: 1. Bull trout and their designated Critical I abitat May affect, not likely to adversely affect. 2. Chinook salmon--May affect, not likely, adversely affect. 3. Marbled murrelet—May affect, not like y to adversely affect. 4. Northern spotted owl—May affect, not Rely to adversely affect. 5. Streaked horned lark---No effect. 6. Yellow-billed cuckoo—No effect. Gallimore Biological Evaluation 27 8.0 References Literature Federal Register/Vol. 70, No. 170/September 2, 2005/Rules and Regulations Federal Register/Vol. 70,No.185 /September 26, 2005/Rules and Regulations Federal Register/Vol. 71,No. 176/Tuesday, September 12, 2006/Proposed Rules Federal Register/Vol. 75,No. 200/October 18, 2010/Rules and Regulations Federal Register/77 FR 14062/March 8, 2012/Proposed Rules Federal Register/Vol. 77,No. 106/June 1, 2012/Proposed Rules Federal Register/Vol. 76, No. 193/October 5, 2011/Rules and Regulations Google Earth. 2013. Aerial Imagery. Internet report. https://www.google.com/earth/ Johannessen,J., A.MacLennan,A. Blue, J. Waggoner, S. Williams, W. Gerstel,R. Barnard, R. Carman, and H. Shipman, 2014.Marine Shoreline Design Guidelines. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Olympia, Washington. Kelty,R.A. and S.Bliven. 2003.Environmental and Aesthetic Impacts of Small Docks and Piers, Workshop Report:Developing a Science-Based Decision Support Tool for Small Dock Management,Phase 1: Status of the Science.NOAA Coastal Ocean Program Decision Analysis Series No.22.National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science, Silver Spring,MD.69 pp. Leigh, Michael. 1996. Grow your own native landscape: a guide to identifying, propagating, and landscaping with Western Washington native plants. Washington State University Cooperative Extension/Thurston County, Olympia, WA. Mason County, Washington. 2015.Assessor-Treasurer Electronic Property Information Profile. Internet report. http://property.co.mason.wa.us/Taxsifter/Search/results.aspx?q=423 07-50-00025 National Geographic. 2002.Field Guide to the Birds of North America. National Geographic Society, Washington, D.C. pg. 226, 244, 250, & 320. National Marine Fisheries Service. 2014. Distribution of Threatened and Endangered Species. Internet report. http://www.nwr.noaa.gov Gallimore Biological Evaluation 28 Nightingale, B. and C. Simenstad. 2001. Overw tter Structures: Marine Issues. Washington Departments of Fish and Wildlife, 1cology, and Transportation. Olympia, Washington. 177 p. NOAA. 2014. Endangered and Threatened Marl e Species. Internet report. http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/species/esa/ Poston, T. 2001. Treated Wood Issues Associat d with Overwater Structures in Marine and Freshwater Environments. Pacific Northwe Laboratory, Richland, Washington. Skokomish Indian Tribe&Washington Depart ent of Fish and Wildlife. 2010. Recovery Plan for Skokomish River Chinook S lmon. Internet Report. http://hccc.wa.gov/Downloads/Downloads Get ile.as x?id=397519&fd=0 Tacoma Public Utilities. 2014. Cushman Hydro roject. Internet report. https://www.mZpu.org/tacomapower/about-tac ma-power/dams-power-sources/hydro- power/cushman-hydro-project/ U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1997. Recovery Ian for the Threatened Marbled Murrelet in Washington, Oregon, and Californi Published by USFWS, Portland, OR. httl2:Hecos.fws.gov/docs/recovery plans/1997/9 70924.pdf U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2004. Draft Rec very Plan for the Coastal-Puget Sound Distinct Population Segment of Bull Tro 't(Salvelinus confluentus). Volume II(of 11): Olympic Peninsula Management Unit. Portland, Oregon. 277+xvi pp U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2011. Species P ofile, Marbled Murrelet. Internet report. http://www.fws.gov/arcata/es/birds/mm/m mur elet.html U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service. 2012. Guidance for Identifying Marbled Murrelet Nest Trees in Washington State. Internet report. http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/NR/rdonl3ies/2D97E 3D8-D448-43A7-8249- E2319095C8C2/0/MAMUhabitatFWS.pdf U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2012. Marbled urrelet Nesting Season and Analytical Framework for Section 7 Consultation in Wash gton. Internet report. htt ://www.wsdot.wa. ov/NR/rdonl res/F3847 4F-BFIC-476C-8E9D- A45A715B624C/0/CoverLtrNestingSeas on. pd U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service. 2013. Conducti g Masking Analysis for Marbled Murrelets and Pile Driving Projects. Internet rel ort. http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/NR/rdonl3ies/3506D AA-4B13-4E1B-855D- 36E047E07090/0/MAMU MaskAnalysis.pdf Gallimore Biological Evaluation 29 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2015. Official Species List#OIEWFW00-2015-SLI- 0599. Internet report. http://www.fws.gov/wafwo/ U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2014. Species fact sheet,Fischer,Martes Pennanti. Internet report. http://www.fws.gov/wafwo/species/Fact%20sheets/Fisher%20Species%2OProfile%20Fin al.ndf U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service. 2014. Species fact sheet, Streaked Horned Lark, Eremophila alpestris strigata. Internet report. http://www.fws.gov/wafwo/species/Fact%20sheets/streakedhomedlarkfinal.pdf Washington State Department of Ecology. 2008. 2008 Water Quality 303(d)-5 List: Skokomish/Dosewallips Water Resource Inventory Area(WRIA) 1. Internet report. http://www.ecy.wa.gov/services/gis/maps/wria/303d/wl6-303d.pdf Washington State Department of Natural Resources.2014.FPARS ARCIMS mapping application. Internet report: http://fortress.wa.gov/dnr/appl/fpars/viewer.htm Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2008.Priority Habitat and Species List. Olympia, Washington. 177 pp. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2010. Olympic Fisher Reintroduction Project: 2010 Progress Report. Internet report. http://wdfw.wa.gov/publications/01393/wdfwOI393.pdf Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2012. Annual Report: Marbled Murrelet. Internet report. http://wdfw.wa.gov/conservation/endangered/species/marbled murrelet.pdf Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2012. Annual Report: Northern Spotted Owl. Internet report. http://wdfw.wa.gov/conservation/endan eg red/species/northern spotted owl.pdf Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2012.Annual Report: Streaked Horned Lark. Internet report. http://wdfw.wa.gov/conservation/endan eg red/species/streaked horned lark.pdf Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2012.Annual Report: Yellow-billed Cuckoo. Internet report. http://wdfw.wa.gov/conservation/endangered/species/ elm billed_cuckoo.pdf Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2015. SalmonScape. Internet report. http://apl2s.wdfw.wa.gov/salmonscqpe/ Gallimore Biological Evaluation 30 Washington State Department of Natural ResInual—Version es. 2014. FPARS mapping website. htt ://fortress.wa. ov/dnr/a 1/f ars/viewer.h Washington State Department of Transportati2014. BA Preparation for Transportation Projects—Advanced Training 4-02-2014. http://www.wsdot.wa.lzov/NR/rdonlyres/AIF85 52-90E0-45713-9A8C- B5103EO97FAElOBA manualpart2.pdf Gallimore Biological Evaluation 31 Attachment 1 The vicinity map and the extent of the action area from a few designated points. aFlapj.&Lakes Alount Lincoln Copper Mountain M A S O N Olympic National Park Mount UUashingWn MourA Eiiinor Olympic National Forest - -- W A 5 H I N G T O N GALLIMORE SITE N^ 301 N POTLATCH DRIVE 0.865 mi 2.67 mid Lake CMm,an .:biliwaup 2.67 mi g00d CC,af a ICax T,t 2718 MI roW.Pn-O W lOr Rs-1*.Ail f MR6P[�. Gallimore Biological Evaluation 32 Attachment 2 Site plan with proposed development for Lot 23 (buoy not shown). "CALI 17 740, 739,0 7)8,7 738.4 734,7 734.-) 740.0 57,_ 712.1 740 > 7Y 7400 N I hmndutionAr 4,SFX IMXvcp GMWC te 7312 Ij VA Lake Cushman JXD 64 IST L Lak,,('Ushman Division 2,Lot 23 251 N Potlatch Drive N Floodsport, WA Gallimore Biological Evaluation 33 Attachment 3 Cross section with proposed development for Lot 23 (buoy not shown). ,A AI.F.t a.....1 4" Ctlo.Walt Profik 740 ' " 740 - 738 Wall lum¢"m , w Itl ffACxu w Fri— N; �, ` GeXYNt�Rf. L� y 2gtxf P,a Fiber RranflttcN C'zxxnroc `a'" %..� 730 pit —{j CAR F ah 1,4 e1 Ronkmsan': Ha i rr '.� __ _._. .... , 730 4 xisiin ... tarulacoi - 'b WA I � CROSS SECTION TION VIEWS THROUGH REPAIRED O WALL SI"C 1IONS —_____----- .. ------_ _------ _._...._....._ -------_........... ...................... Gallimore Biological Evaluation 34 Attachment 4 Site plan with existing development for Lot 24. r ^ 7 � A '"w It°rlatcbl -`^,.w '""."-"-�.._...-�.•'� .y'`� p('f':Aa+f2vtd Cemrnt j � `tea.. ., �t„,, �n�•� �. �----_---x-� n�,u,a,�n �_.. / 1449. P(:l• Gal imr e .,.- 150 24 IV Gwfinw 4 c allm W 26 aA .5��4, f Y `. "'--"^ ( Y� ( � .✓fir `- .. 1 7 LAKE d 'Ft,. .. �1 C�yrr Sg1L�,O� .. I nis7tag 2t)xi0 P9`i � u�JHM� IA-dR my� � tky r C 7. ' �..." 013N+` Urc Chili W nary High A M}'17 t$! i. tmc thnwght the Vr+ ana L.irxh+g'7 3_t a13 �....."anct ad7cccnt f.4-1-lx Irxatal E+� Ybaat i tc7�2(Y� �wri*w v ait miali;yx'mkM tw,, &F"- 'Ofy o ba IYemxxvtd_ �. take C'u.+shnlan Ofty A INN'7.(.at 24 ua7Ln anrrsmmltng tht f-*1 120.... EMSUNG SnT-PLAN ' lliRY(lw4k;. Out AtQ.ilt.PiGH S AP!'hICAATti ARo"EF;fRaTwt 4 :a R44., TARJAONOWWRING W Sk At) 1"°Sa tWAT tNT IAA AIIINI LAt tWllmux l tD}xpYnM:'Y b'j, »-1F'laNfKr<M W ",I.W; PO 0,,R 335 � *E DATUM I t,I f 1t IM AN is i R i LACATKM ADORl.S.S: i u ruk e t i'ur,S? HOMTW WA"54 ADJAWIT QV4RS `i hat hn t>< 1 h a:«!i arat g x,xwn mc+yrtvux >ta-4,p 'AANTs�t+1 3 (360)$TF 9,i12 AAta inxac� r t l a Y iealt k k t Ik }ain t miu t l 0 A[Ian 7 n!y t, i MAtt.AKi ASUTNSPS4. Ai t t!u.1 i n !x"d RevN- lYmc 1 A R,4H. ,gnm,ne CC7LMTY Nu—S TV,.u M—C4, m!M 4230747r�%LN A t!7b a A tvXt DATE x=i-)d 3.i(It Gallimore Biological Evaluation 35 Attachment 5 Site plan with proposed development for Lot 24. WUA �. 77 �e F k sung .y0/ {{t 740 f 4Yeod ftsmp �.Jd cri kxprap Fkrkrinp v-177a0 ^� Pxxkkexm Rfxkrn e ''frr �1. ,,,I fdul(heJ '-� #temaix Remn al 114eueun� (cux-xeaa a �.. k ftlxF.erk a rfx gap In @.ktSting adla<ent rcrckrrvek Ftaekhtl xlt6 g el wr J hmkh with 6 k lY Pitt {uy ulg sto—Mal.htog adl ..ent i(yfas' ., ptrn y w ..'Wr tramp CJ (Rl:peed Nxxrfisr At—, staf—)P." Wo 1200 FW1#2 _. I Wts'}k 17,404 157A 4_Bx.:1,P1-1+2 piles 'k k—p 2k10 TT3.t Sq—Feet W?.i let (iaf 11m4+te:-• take Cush:nnvr i7Tk."t}iN...2,LIT N PROPOSED tMPROVEMrtk"F'S ViJ0.P(°F. x I kill.V 11t R Ajq'MANT MOPOSM ytcr, A k T4— TAIMA f'14Csi2(i'F.RM fw V Al I 1--211 n It[MI INS 1AlIA ISFN�S C k'(.M I10Pan—'T'ip ,.»w.v— a a!f 1-0 PO A4aZ7i DATUM 1 K 0 SI1IMN Ile 1k 1W ILIXATM AM*L';% N1.f 1" W11 i A_" F/O0f13 All Al)dACP.NT(7WNIR8 '5 I wN h I t1 and Eaasw.irr R . d xn are q+{Kux�mac 3}i rt xwd} F t f Ik d" IAA VR IS R( im. xpe (76t1)7(77?74312 F I I d c'blt F E T .q MAri.khA"AM)Afi54 AT Mremca.PM Na 4210r GFWm tM &k eat it!! D AM at,• S NA 1 Fi42 fkW RmvC..,._.._!l 7R7'IS __..._. ._.. .............)SYA7h % 11 YHWrF.YT S 2 Cana>aad theta. s'17lSf AI Gallimore Biological Evaluation 36 Attachment 6 Cross section with proposed development for L t 24. a.tc aa�imp C7 6X20 Stanu )Pier: 1`C'antik.eeex!Ramp ccretrr>. s Ca+U'K N(tCC{3 A plait + Martu %arcs!I wiJer Y CE( laetn#1 x F. 7 NMI NLk � 1 ii&It tl{ 20 1.in.Fi.3'thick Riptap nxka) $CY. -ai,yt R fill area 3.. ...._Zit Fy 20 1A I`+CY 735 Ramp u,he Rnnuvarf. SwFace 14kv�Ikm &^SAL& -729 ISrac" I kclaxe s S akc Cushman Oiv,1 ON2,Lnt 2d f PROPOSED STATIONARY PIER YURMIEfE' bt it xltF fi1a,Pot x A APPuCANT ...lRC1H,13E3k.N,A Repirac TAIUA PL\Af M'PE.PJW tut Sd Alf V-.F DATt7MN I C`!SHMAN` Lk iN.w 71+= ltX`.6411RE c 1'11)f atmcrxtrip xr,r,xa racxrs�o-vW +I-A PO BM 233 AD11RfSS Pa R I (Aa ,L WA 98S49 ,Arl awm.,.mm me ms AD7ACISN'F f7WiVEiS; ?S!htN Ib Fkwn, t+v+CrNfs (360)877.9312 rv� (tyt J SCiali mmrM t 1Yn+ iMxdrpcM Nt Ya iF INS (rxsMca. 4. t Y 1 a M gall 1 r,ntc 7ru-a MAR.IPN3 A[1tHS@S9 Al Ik t tccvr.ll.. k t :d it f ,than_r;Rm tMi4 K.er'' 1M-,A M de is arrc. COMM'I- ST i4 0 ........ w.oa ro.n+N. ix3orsaxz rr:+ Farm„ a do u 1 rrx"ram xsau 3k i 39a�s t1Atr amu s1 txx .I ,.�_. Gallimore Biological Evaluation 37 Attachment 7 Pier, ramp, and float details (Lot 24). short e,a )d x 14.1 Ficai+ _. 1 Pok "�'�' i 8'x 3'x 4 k mrepwlmcd P SnraFxam Pcmnxm CellsWx3t7 Pier IEpT IFA�j s F'kwf R.Pier ihming suri'mes,Inrx sho%ni ---------------•- TtM float&stmionary pier N111 bx rutxsJ�r w8d n t•a-rixneerrren Cmnpasllc Ika&in 6,x2a Pier _.___........._ Jk.4;W&k 43 Shxl Pyle wfth white PVC skc r.Pik apeamp ahtru ii vW&Piling pnSng roikr*oh— f ixlU tl<mt rim t rebctx A Inuvnai timt—, ail^x>n-O— � � xhait incluAe pxkmxrred natal t axat ronn.i s Art i nt- d.t.berg shall be pxc, treat f GalSmnr¢; I uAe t txahmtut tkv,I f�kR 2,1-if 24 PROPOSED P7..pA7 NIn _..,._..__ ._.... PttRP4SH Ntq l'JU AD.Pa 6 A APPAtc'.ANr MOPO4A17 get,,, A RqA'. TAIDA ENO NFER.tNO hw at Ali 1 5 i i')A i CNN W I At t A,,Cmli itYa# 1 1"1)('anxarahip x t e rai al[ n'i Wl PO Bits 239 DAlW f 1:(t UIVA`a I it A 7911 LOCATION A))DIt88,4 o f ru)m 5 1 s A 2 HwdVOK WA 9850 AD7ACEa.°MWNE" 1st NK nxtace 5h IIAst arvt ta,Mky; Alt Q.nKs wv apCa.n�rato t. it t.21 can I t T tk.,tyu WA"5d$ (60)R1793IX a ASAA.INl7 AiMMFSS:. IN i�,s a!u w h i n 7 F i 7 14rrx A g'N t i i!xrwr AT Al—r Piet ku 42307 504*N al 4111,N COINry +.mom STATF wA _.._....... _ ......___... ,11 tt %A a iMiaduhY....,... tM7F ba i/ $43F£`i S.rie 2 Ar k A, /.9 Gallimore Biological Evaluation 38 Attachment 8 Additional pier, ramp, and float details (Lot 24) 1$"x 4'x G kraap}ulaad Float B P1rr Woauing,Surf es;ww ahuWn) StvraCuam Punt xaI CaiiA T'hr IlU4t R flWumary piu will hr • l".6hcd with a'-Tirnb"V"h t,.anPrxile IWking46 �I c AtWh PI 401--i ➢ to Iapx aC landing pipes with gaiv. _.__�. 3,m _ c and WSSIYt4 C1n ai+(NSnllnatG '.X.., 1'centrry 511' J; � } 740 File Top, 4.S g"die S bzduh ao 1 SWf pow 4 04•4 Clod With white PVC akeue.Pik n ter' otx.ings 0.11 i.hwe piling 1 pitillg xolkr kauum _---..W 4x 10 float rim IittlLKn do Pkmy 43lNIaI}al tiailing 3.ay 4 internal archers.All,,u,— 2.6,imtskted 00 un 24" ,P ao 64 p kn Wide aallin Yttx'w' 4C79T6TkT' }k1 .hail mciude galvanized marl M $` ,y'"--- pG� meal ccwuKctorx.All lumber 44?sr.Stu#+re wide 534"T7 Ia�L �aXL:L 8 X Aimbrra.ehall N prr.wuc CWking. 728 NoahlJrvaiiSrn T)pir:al 1h44 ITn4K1}!«rty PT 40 I a}dth - AllLxarirms rf ewl d tm With '3. l�ft.314`nuls n tonher5 t)a9imcm; b•' PruW Wx 3"minimum v'tmcrckieknrs. Lk Cu»hman IN. I Nlk 2,Lori 24 PROPOSM) AT#2 .._.__ ,.... ....,...... ._.....,M.—pipe Ixwmns and lnauxt.. tarxtx e: ntT Kltl nll,PYlu� arnaew34x: PROPOS,p.R,&2 RA— TAIUA 640MERM Inc tit Alt l"�s t1 C IA I INS I At 1 ATh ws Lake Cwdloxxa LTD Ps"t—hip war 4 x.}ve'ae.wl I waft PO A,,23; DA7i1M.lkt.t'111MAu(�A.t,TIf WCATIfMI AI:NMlXg6. Dec r,c1m b dd 1t R $4$ ) < } ltldmk. xx�r wsn At17AC'T:Ni UWlI8Y.4 X'II N w ymychet Ck d b�ma!l anainl. (3df7)g7T 4St2 Igryxoxr v Ii I W 1IM f I1.V 14r telWi A4""t Cht teal( J"- 17,1%26 C.D.— t I T vkLcL* «`y. ...d?- AT I k i u Mr !h 1 ilCs N F'ni PWai .. !4A pen.W R d+r i Ihmaa tXri.lYTY Ala+. R'f alrava Ca.PM No:4ZVT1 5040A4 u„iar♦I Vu S pF DAjl. a 14 g} •Gee!( 13 N van 44.1 „j,,.__.._.........,,._,..... _._. � "�"�' 1 In TII!7S Gallimore Biological Evaluation 39 Attachment 9 The existing concrete bulkhead on Lot 23 (left center in the photo)with the boat ramp and the rock and mortar bulkhead on Lot 24 in the foreground. n zl Y. Gallimore Biological Evaluation 40 Attachment 10 The existing boat ramp that will be removed fro the site and the existing rock and mortar bulkhead on Lot 24. v y s Gallimore Biological Evaluation 41 Attachment 11 Another view of the existing boat ramp that will be removed from the site. 1, Gallimore Biological Evaluation 42 Attachment 12 The existing pier and float that will be disassem led and removed from the site. e , s � h Gallimore Biological Evaluation 43 Attachment 13 Essential Fish Habit Assessment Essential Fish Habitat Assessment A. Background The Magnuson Fishery Conservation and Management Act was signed into law on April 13, 1976. Under provisions of the Act, eight Regional Fishery Management Councils were established to prepare FMP's in conformance with national standards published in 50 CFR Part 600.305-340. The Magnuson Act was renamed the Magnuson-Stevens Act in a 1996 appropriations bill. On October 11, 1996,the Sustainable Fisheries Act,which amended the Magnuson-Stevens Act,was signed into law. Provisions included a mandate that the Councils amend each IMP to include a description of Essential Fish Habitat, including adverse impacts on EFH and conservation measures to protect EFH. Essential Fish Habitat is defined as those waters and substrate necessary to fish for spawning, breeding, feeding, or growth to maturity. The Pacific Fisheries Management Council has designated EFH for federally-managed species on the Pacific West Coast, including 82 species of groundfish, 5 coastal pelagic species, and 3 species of salmon. The following species may occur in Lake Cushman during some period of their life history: Chinook salmon(Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) and Coho salmon(Oncorhynchus kisutch). B. Essential Fish Habitat The designated EFH for Pacific salmon species is identified using U.S. Geological Survey(USGS)hydrologic units as well as habitat association tables and life history descriptions of each life stage(PFMC 1999). The EFH for the Pacific coast salmon fishery is defined as those waters and substrate necessary for salmon production needed to support a long-term sustainable salmon fishery and salmon contributions to a healthy ecosystem (WSDOT 2014).To achieve that level of production, EFH must include all those streams, lakes,ponds,wetlands, and other currently viable water bodies and most of the habitat historically accessible to salmon in Washington, Oregon, Idaho, and California(WSDOT 2014). This does not include habitats above the impassible barriers identified by the Pacific Fishery Management Council Fishery Management Plan(PFMC 1999). Gallimore Biological Evaluation 44 C. Proposed Action The proposed project is the repair of an existing concrete bulkhead's footing, the installation of a buoy,the construction of a repl cement pier,ramp, and float,the removal of an existing boat ramp, and the repair of a twe ity-foot rock and mortar bulkhead section on Lake Cushman. D. Effects of the Proposed Action The effects of the proposed project on designatt d EFH are expected to be comparable to the effects described in the attached BE. E. Conservation Measures The conservation measures and BMPs discusse in the attached BE will be implemented to minimize any adverse effects to Essential Fi Habitat. F. Conclusion The proposed project is likely to have no signif ant impact on designated EFH for Pacific salmon. G. References NOAA, 2006. Final environmental assessment and finding of no significant impact for Magnuson-Stevens Act Provisions; Essential Fish Habitat. Internet report. Website: http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/habitat/eth/finalenv onmentalassessmentandfindingofno.htm PFMC (Pacific Fishery Management Council), 999. Fisheries Management Plans for groundfish, coastal pelagic fish, and Pacific sal on. Internet reports. Website: www.pcouncil.org/ Washington State Department of Transportatio . 2014. BA Preparation for Transportation Projects—Advanced Training Tv anual, Chapter 16—Version 4-02-2014. Internet report. http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/NR/r onl res/A1F85352-90EO-457B-9A8C- B5103EO97FAEIOBA manualpart2.pdf Gallimore Biological Evaluation 45 3628 South 35"Street Tacoma,Washington 98409-3192 t ,. AC MA POWER T TACOMA PUBLIC UTILITIES ACOMA PUBLIC UTILITIES March 10, 2016 Ms. Barbara Adkins Director Mason County Community Services Department 615 West Alder Street, Bldg. 8 Shelton, Washington 98584 i SUBJECT: Gallimore Land Use Application on Tacoma Power Property Dear Ms. Adkins: The City of Tacoma, Department of Public Utilities, Light Division (Tacoma Power)was recently notified of an application to Mason County by Kimber Construction, Inc. to permit existing shoreline structures located on Tacoma Power's property at Lake Cushman. The Gallimore Family Trust currently sub-leases the adjacent property(Mason County Parcel Nos. 42307-50- 00023 and 42307-50-00024)which are also owned by Tacoma Power and leased to the Lake Cushman Development Company. Tacoma Power has received and reviewed an application from Kimber Construction on behalf of the Gallimore Family Trust seeking to permit existing and new shoreline structures associated with these lots. Tacoma Power has no objection to the proposed action and authorizes Mason County to permit the existing and proposed new structures on Tacoma Power's property as conveyed to Tacoma Power in their application to us and subsequent communication regarding these structures. Tacoma Power will issue a permit for the structures after they are permitted by Mason County. Please contact me at 253-502-8782 or bforrestCcDci.!pcoma.wa.us if you have any questions or need something more regarding this matter. Sincerely, G„- Bret Forrester Wildlife & Lands Manager cc: Barbara Sides, Kimber Construction, Inc. David Gallimore Pamela Gallimore-Wong I 4 KIMBER CONSTRUCTION, INC. P.O. Box 1450 McKenna, WA 98568-1450 860-458-4240-Office 560-458-0585 - Fax 4 LOT 24- SOW Gallimore Family Trust Pamela Gallimore-Wong & David Gallimore, Trustees JOB: DOCK REPLACEMENT—FIXED&FLOATING @ Division#2, Lot#24, 301 N Potlatch Drive N, Hoodsport, WA 98548 Item Description LABOR AND MATERIALS TO PERFORM THE FOLLOWING: 1. Demo and dig out existing structures and concrete as directed by Tacoma Power including that portion of ramp as discussed; 2. Construct a fixed dock that will be 6' wide, by 20' long; a floating dock that will be 4' wide #1 24' and a floating dock at will be 3' x IT; Fixed Dock Dock 3. Demo/jackhammer out all existing concrete poured previously for existing docks, removal Replacement and disposal; 4. Hand dig 2' x 2' x 4' holes for stationary dock; 5. Install forms, fill forms with concrete and install 6"x 6" post connectors; 1. Construct a 6' x 20' fixed dock; 2. Posts will be 6"x 6"treated outdoor lumber; 3. Beams will be 6"x 6" treated outdoor lumber; 4. Joists will be 2"x 8"treated outdoor lumber; 5. Posts and beams will be bolted together; 6. Joists will have all necessary joist brackets,and hurricane ties; 7. Deck posts will be wrapped with 2" x 6" treated material to block logs from getting underneath dock; 8. Use of blocking will be done between joists to strengthen dock and will be wrapped with 2" 12"treated material; 9. Decking will be picture framed and decked with Timbertech composite decking. Main portion will be cedar color Timbertech and picture frame will be Tropical Walnut Timbertech—picture framing will be one board wide (6"); 10. Decking will be screwed down with like col r composite screws; 11. Deck will be wrapped with Timbertech Tropical Walnut composite fascia; 12. Install a homeowner's 2' x 14' gangway aid homeowner's ladder for access from stationary dock to floating dock; Floating Docks: 13. Hand dig two 2'x 2' x 6' deep holes for floating dock pilings; 14. Install galvanized steel pilings 8" in diameter; 15. Pilings will be set into holes, filled with rebar then poured with concrete; 16. Pilings will be installed inside perimeter of dock with marine piling/roller holders; 17. Pilings will be sleeved with white plastic PVC sewer pipe; 18. Pilings will be topped with black piling caps; 19. Bolts will be installed in concrete pads; 20. Galvanized steel pipe will be used to construct floating dock landing; 21. Beams and joists will be 4" x 10' treated materials and will be bolted together with galvanized %" plate brackets; 22. 2"x 8" blocking will be used to strengthen dock, along with seismic strapping; 23. 24"' x 48" x 12" poly float drums will be installed under dock and secured with lag screws to provide floatation; i ti Gallimore—LOT 24 SOW Page 2 24. Dock will be picture framed (one board wide — 6") and decked with Timbertech composite decking same as fixed dock; 25. Decking will be screwed down with like color composite screws; 26. Outside perimeter of dock will be wrapped with Timbertech Tropical Walnut composite fascia; 27. Floating dock will have four(4) black corner bumpers; 28. Floating dock will be wrapped with heavy duty black dock edging; 29. Six(6) 8" safety cleats will be installed on floating docks as directed by homeowner; 30. Wrap floating docks with Timbertech composite fascia (vs. treated wood fascia); Miscellaneous Bouys: 31. Hand dig 2' x 2' x 2' holes. Pour concrete blocks, install rebar and add rebar eye hook for buoy chain; 32. Install buoys and chain; Rollers: 33. Install rollers on shore for removal of canoe, Lund, etc. 34. Construction debris removal and disposal; Uoensnd -Insumd KIM The above prices reflect a 3%cash/check discount.This discount is not valid for edit card Durchases.Add 3%to the total cost for credit card purchases. V5 1C VER; + --� KIMBER CONSTRUCTION, INC. 1-- -- P.O. Box 1450 McKenna, WA 98558-1450 360-458-4240 - Office 360-458-0533 - Fax LOT 23 - SOW Gallimore Family Trust Pamela Gallimore-Wong & David Gallimore, Trustees JOB: BULKHEAD FOOTING AND BUOY ANCHOR @ Division#2, Lot#23, 311 N Potlatch Drive N, Hoodsport, WA 98548 Item Description LABOR AND MATERIALS TO PERFORM THE FOLLOWING: #1 Bulkhead Footing: Footing for 1. Excavate(dig out)along toe of existing sixty(6C)foot bulkhead; Existing 2. Install forms for concrete footing; Bulkhead 3. Footing will be approximately three(3)feet deep,two(2)feet wide and sixty(60)feet long; 4. Footing will have rebar on 9"centers vertically; 5. Rebar will be bent 90 degrees and be pinned into existing wall; and 6. Rebar will also be set horizontally along footing; 7. Footing concrete will be poured via pump truck; 8. Concrete will be finished with brushed finish. 9. Bulkhead footing price may change if additional work is called for on plans from engineer; Buoy Buoy Anchor: Anchor 10. Hand dig 2'x 2'x 2' hole; 11. Pour concrete block; 12. Install vertical rebar; 13. Install horizontal rebar through galvanized mou t with eye hook for buoy chain; 14. Install buoy chain(does not include buoy); 15. Buoy anchor will be centered on lot 23 and out into lake approximately 90' which is approximately the 720'contour elevation; Debris: 16. Construction debris removal and disposal; 14 MASON ENVIRONMENTAL PERMIT($630 or$380 /other permit) Mason County Permit Center Use: ❑ CONDITIONAL USE($1520) MEP 20 - wQ -Y ❑ HABITAT MANAGEMENT PLAN REVIEW($445) Date Revd 3 ��0 MASON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Mason County Resource Ordinance(Chapter 17.01 MCC) ENVIRONMENTAL PERMIT APPLICATION i The purpose of the Resource Ordinance is to protect Mason C unty's natural resource lands and critical areas and is under the authority of Chapters 36.32, 36.70A,39.34, 58.17, 6.09, 84.33, 84.34 and 90.58 RCW. RECEIVED MAR 0 12016 `€o vVa Alder Street i PLEASE PRINT 1. PROPERTY OWNER Name: GALLIMORE FAMILY TRUST Mailing Address: P.O.Box 1707,Mercer Island,WA 98040 Work Phone: Email Address: Home/Cell Phone: Fax#: If an agent is acting for the property owner during the permitprocess, complete#2. 2. AUTHORIZED AGENT Name: Kimber Construction,Inc.Attn: Barb Sides Mailing Address: P.O.Box 1450,McKenna,WA 98558 Work Phone: 360-458-4240 Email Address: kimberconst@aol.com Home/Cell Phone: Fax# 360-458-0533 3. PROJECT SITE Site Address: 311 and 301 N Potlatch Drive N,Hoodsport,WA 98548 Parcel#: 423 50-00023 and 4230 -50-00024 Legal Description: Lake Cushman#2,Lots 23 &24 erections toSite: W on WA 119-N to approx.9 Vz mi Turn left staying on 119 for approx. 1.6 mi,Turn left on Mt.Church Dr.for.3 mi;Turn right on North Potlatch Dr N. 301 and 311 North Potlatch Dr N,Hoodport,WA will be on the left. See attached ma Attach a site plan showing the following: Lot Dimensions,Flood Zones,Existing Structures,Fences, Water Lines,Driveways,Drainage Plans,Shorelines,Septic System,Topography,Proposed Improvements,Easements,North Arrow,and Scale. Also draw a separate topography diagram. 4. State which section requires permit: ❑ Wetlands,Chapter 17.01.070 ❑ Long Term Commercial Forest,Chapter ❑ Frequently Flooded Areas,Chapter 17.01.090 17.10.060 ❑ Landslide Hazard Area,Chapter 17.01.100 ❑ Mineral Resource Lands,Chapter 17.01.066 ❑ Seismic Hazard Areas,Chapter 17.01.102 ❑ Aquifer Recharge Area,Chapter 17.01.080 X Fish& Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas, ❑ Erosion Hazard Area,Chapter 17.01.104 Chapter 17.01.110 ❑ In-Holding Lands,Chapter 17.01.062 5. Identify current use of the property with existing improvement Residential/recreational—SFR w/pier dock,floating docks,bulkhead and buoy 6. Identify and describe the proposed project, including the type of materials to be used,construction methods, principle dimensions, and other pertinent information(attach additional sheets, if needed): Please see attached SOW for project I 7. Describe why the action requiring this permit cannot be avoided. Existing dock structures were oversized and have tailed,needing to be replaced for safety. New dock structures will meet current Shoreline requirement for size. Existing bulkhead is in need of reinforcement by way of a footing to keep it from failing. 8. Will there be an alteration of a wetland and/or wetland vegetation area(circle one)? Yes No 9. Identify any surface water on or adjacent to property(circle one): Saltwater Lake Stream Pond Wetland Drainage Ditch 10. Identify existing septic/sewer connection(circle one): If septic is located on project site, include records. Connected to Septic Connected to Community Septic 11. Identify existing water supply(circle one): Public Water Supply Well LCMC Water Supply 11. Type of Job(circle one): New Add Alteration Repair Demolition Other: s; Barbara Sides,Kimber Const.Inc.Agent 10/20/2015 Print Name for Homeowner Signature Date I:ACommunity Development'..FAC`��iL-P 12evisedJune?f)tU _ y LU CDLau 1011i — t If- F { y I y r and a.co IF iaa s'` 'ram_ t S I' J Y '4n Tf'] fi { 7�"7 - (nJi ACy l r' �' P ! r err! fit i rory� (yi 1 f } Yr M T J >' ni T PI "f 1 rAWLja ! t f i acre t r "�'"- i} • J' mow. -�'"�i �a � ,� '�' 'd tom, "tu- �' +�� a` CA 76 LU f t W_ »t. j{{ s _ _ t4 r s a . v__. .__.__—_1___ ._..._. S I C o-- 1 oz