The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutFPA2021-00016 Wetlands Assessment - FPA Reports - 1/20/2023 AUG z 4 2021 ABC SEPTIC DESIGNS&WETLANDS 6 1 5 W. Adder Street 4-02-2021 Baldwin Logging Inc Wetlands Assessment Parcel# 32014-32-90110 Address 0 E Agate Rd, Shelton,WA SECTION 14 TOWNSHIP 2ON RANGE 03 W Prepared for Baldwin Logging Inc P.O.Box 292 Salkum, WA. 98582 WETLANDS ASSESSMENT DONE BY ABC SEPTIC DESIGN& WETLANDS Don Haviland 167 DEEP CREEK RD CHEHALIS WA 98532 PHONE # 360-880-7716 E-mail wacaveman@hotmail.com ASSESSMENT INTRODUCT/ON ABC Septic Design & Wetlands did a wetland assessment 4-02-2021 on property located at OE Agate Rd, She/ton WA . This property has been used as forest land with no development. The property owner wounts to develope this property. In order to do the assessment to this property l re viewed se veral resources and found that the property had a N/F stream and hydric soils mapped on the property . At that time / did a on site assessment of the property to test for wetland habitat on or with in 300 feet of the property . The property was mostly undisturbed vegetation so l took my samples of the soils and vegetation in the wetland area on the north end of the property. S/TEA DDRESS AND DESCR/PION The site is located at 0 E Agate Rd, Shelton WA and in section 14 township 20N range 03W This property has a Mason County parcel number of 32014-32- 90110. This site is slope 2-5% to the north end of property. It is a 45. 99 acre parcel used as forest land and use code of[88 Resource-Designated Forest Land/ and the surrounding sites are eitherAg land, Forest land or single family residence. ASSESSMENT METHOD The assessment was done by usen the following ,books and web sites. The 2017 Pocket Guide To Hydric Soil Field Indicators The Munsell 1994 Edition Book Wetland Plants of the Western Washington & North western Oregon The 2016 Army Corp. Plant Index for the Western Mountains, Valleys.and Coast Region. Lewis County Parcel Maps USDA Web Soil Survey Washington DNR Wetlands of High Conservation Value Map When doing a wetland assessment the property must have the three parameters met within 300 feet to be considered a wetlands ,but if it dose not meet one of the parameters it is not considered to .be a wet/and. ABC SEPTIC DESIGN &WETLANDS Don Haviland Wetland Education and Certification Wetland Training Institute August 2018 completed training based in part on the U.S Army Corps ofEnginees Wetland Delineation Manual Technical Report Y 87-1{1987Manual] as provided for in the training materials developed in conjunction with Section 307/e} of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 for the Wetland Delineator Certification Program November 2019 completed training course Demystifying Wetland and In-Water Permitting in Washington State including Washington rating form,Sepa,Jarpa. October 2020 compeleted training course Using the Washington State Wetland Rating System 2014 in Western Washington from Coastal Training Program. I also consult with two retired wetlands delinators both with over 15 years of wetland experience. We have done both onsite for the first few assessments and since over the phone and Emails.I have been studying soils with a septic designer with 25 years experience since 2008,for the designing and installing of onsite septic systems. I passed my state designers test on 10-4-2019. PARAMETER #1 I/EGETATION Wetland vegetation is classified into five statuses and they are listed below OBL-Obligate Wetland=Highly likely to be in wet/a17d habitat >99% FA CW-Facultati ve Wetland=Most likely to be in wetland habitat 67-99% FA C-Facultative=can be in a wetland habitat 34-66% FACU-Facultative Upland=can be in a wetland habitat but will most of the time be in a non wetland habitat 1-33% UPL-Obligate Upland=Most likely to be in a non wetland habitat <19,61 This site has been Forest land and the vegetation is trailing blackberry,ferns, fir,red alder,big-leaf maple, red-cedar, vine maple,sedge, rush,skunk- cabage, creeping buttercups, hardhack, trailing blackberry, himalayan blackberry and scotch broom. The lots around it are some what the same vegetation and mainly FA or FACU plants but in the wetland area there are some FACW and OSL plants. This FACW and OSL vegetation does extend off this property to the other propertys to the west of this property. SOILS ASSESSMENT The soils are a Bellingham silt loam, Cloquallum silt loam, Indianola sandy loam and Shelton gra velly sandy loam and was somewhat consistent with maps . My sample sites were done in areas consistent with the rest of build site . The Bellingham silt loam is a poorly drained soil that is not very deep and does ha ve a hydric rating. This soil is very dark in color and the roots are small for the most part. The soil is high in clay content and at about 6-10" is modeled with gray and rust brown colors. This is hydic on this property in the wetland area. The Cloquallum silt loam is a moderately well drained soil with no hydric rating. This soil was medium brown in color with a little rock in the subsurface. This soil was deep enough that l did not hit modeling. This soil was not hydric on this property . The Indianola sandy loam is a somewhat excessively drained soil that has no hydric rating. This soil is a darker brown in color with medium brown in the second layer. This soil was excessi vely deep with no modeling. This soil was not hydric on this property. The Shelton gra velly sandy loam is a moderately drained soil with no hydric rating. This soil was medium ,brown in color with some rock in the subsurface. This soil was deep enough that l did not hit modeling. This soil was not hydric on this property. My sample sites were done to the depth of 0-18 inches and were very consistent 0-18" silt loam. The samples that were done in the wetland was modeled at 8-10" of the surface. My samples were done out side of the wetland except samples#1, #3 wasjust inside the edge of the wetland The wetland does extend off this property to the north and west. My sample sites are located on map #1. HYDROL OGYASSESSMENTT The site had no signs of saturated soil,ponding or high water table for a long period of time ecept in the wetland area. The wetland area shows signs of saturation for extended periods of time. There is a small non-fish stream that runs down the north-east property line. This stream starts straight across from the home site to the east of the stream and runs down that line till it goes into the county ditch then under sunset road to Puget sound. The stream does not go threw the wetland. The wetland is getting its water from springs ,between the logging road and the wetland. The site is mostly drained very well. The site is suitable for the proposed development. CONCLUSION After doing a onsite evaluation and online assessment of this site and concluded that a wetland habitat is located on this property l filled out the rating form and mapped the wet/and and buffer on map 1 A of the rating packet. The buffer for the wetland is 150' for forestry cutting of trees only or 225' for residential for no more than 1 home per acre. These buffers are based on the habitat score of 8 and Mason County codes for wetland protection . The development area would be up hill from wetland being the buffers proposed. This site is suitable for the de velopment proposed and will ha ve no adverse effect to the function of the wetland. Thank you Don Ha viland WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Western Mountains,Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: 0 E Agate Rd city/county: Shelton/Mason Sampling Date:4/02/2021 Applicant/Owner. Baldwin Logging INC State:WA Sampling Point:#1 Investigator(s): Don Haviland Section,Township,Range: 14 20N 03W Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): Slopping Local relief(concave,convex,none): None Slope(%):2-5% Subregion(LRR):A Lat:47.218 Long:-123.033 Datum: Soil Map Unit Name:Bellingham silt loam NWI classification: -Hydrlc i Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks.) Are vegetation NO ,Soil NO or Hydrology NO significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No Are Vegetation NO ,SoilYeS ,or HydrologyyeS naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) i i SUMMARY OF FINDINGS— Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features, etc. 1 Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No t led Area Hydric Soil Present. Yes X No Is the Sampled Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No t Remarks: i VEGETATION—Use scientific names of plants. ' 10X10 Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: 1 i Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) %Cover Species? Status ! Number of Dominant Species i 1 That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 4 (A) 2. Total Number of Dominant 3' _ Species Across All Strata: 4 (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species 1 OX1 O =Total Cover That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 100% (A/B) Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) ,.Spiraea douglasii 35% YeS FACW Prevalence Index worksheet: 2. - - Total%Cover of: Multiply by: 3. OBL species 65 o x 1 =65 4 FACW species 35% x 2=70 5 ;i yis . FAC species 35% x 3= 105 FACU species x 4= c Total Cover i Herb Stratum (Plot size: 10X10 ) UPL species x 5= Ranunculus repens;,,,.. 35% Yes FAC Column Totals: 135% (A) 240 (B) k 2.Lysichiton america 30% Yes OBL Prevalence Index =B/A= 1.77 3. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4. 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 5. s.SEDGES 10X10 2-Dominance Test is>50 X 3-Prevalence Index is ,.Carex amplifolia 35% Yes OBl- _ 4-Morphological Adaptationanon s'(Provide supporting 8- data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) g- 5-Wetland Non-Vascular Plants' 0• _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain) 11. 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must =Total Cover be present,unless disturbed or problematic. Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 1 OX1 O ) 1 Hydrophytic 2. Vegetation 135% =Total Cover Present? Yes X No Bare Ground in Herb Stratum Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys,and Coast—Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: #1 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color(moist) o Color(moist) o Type' Loc Texture Remarks 0-6" 10YR3-3 100% S/L many medium roots 6-18" 10YR6-1 80% 10YR3-3 20% S/C/L few fine roots 'Type: C=Concentration,D=De letion,RM=Reduced Matrix,CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pare Lining,M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': _ Histosol(Al) _ Sandy Redox(S5) _ 2 cm Muck(A10) _ Histic Epipedon(A2) _ Stripped Matrix(S6) _ Red Parent Material(TF2) _ Black Histic(A3) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral(Fi)(except MLRA 1) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _ Loamy Gieyed Matrix(F2) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _ Depleted Matrix(F3) _ Thick Dark Surface(Al 2) _ Redox Dark Surface(F6) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and _ Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _ Depleted Dark Surface(F7) wetland hydrology must be present, _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _ Redox Depressions(F8) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer(if present): Type: Modeled Depth(inches): 6 _ Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators(minimum of one required;check all that apply) Secondary Indicators(2 or more required) X Surface Water(Al) _ Water-Stained Leaves(B9)(except _ Water-Stained Leaves(B9)(MLRA 1,2, _ High Water Table(A2) MLRA 1,2,4A,and 413) 4A,and 4B) _ =sN X Saturation(A3) _ Salt Crust(B11) _ Drainage Patterns(B10) _ Water Marks(61) _ Aquatic Invertebrates(B13) _ Dry-Season Water Table(C2) _-S _ Sediment Deposits(132) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Cl) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) Drift Deposits(83) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) _ Geomorphic Position(D2) _ Algal Mat or Crust(84) _ Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _ Shallow Aquitard(D3) Iron Deposits(85) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) _ FAC-Neutrai Test(D5) _ Surface Soil Cracks(B6) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)(LRR A) _ Raised Ant Mounds(D6)(LRR A) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) _ Frost-Heave Hummocks(D7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes X No Depth(inches):surface Water Table Present? Yes No Depth(inches):) 11 Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth(inches):surface Wetland Hydrology Present? YesX No includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys,and Coast—Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Western Mountains,Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: 0 E Agate Rd city/county: Shelton/Mason Sampling Date:4/02/2021 Applicant/Owner. Baldwin Logging INC State:WA Sampling Point:#2 Investigator(s): Don Haviland Section,Township,Range: 14 20N 03W Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): Slopping Local relief(concave,convex,none): None Slope(%):2-5% ft Subregion(LRR):A Lat:47.218 Long:-123.033 Datum: Soil Map Unit Name:Bellingham silt loam NWI classification: HydflC j Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks.) i Are Vegetation No ,soil No ,or Hydrology No significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No Are Vegetation No .SoilYes or Hydrology Yes natural)y gy y problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) 1 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS— Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features, etc. ! Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No j Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X Remarks: ' VEGETATION—Use scientific names of plants. 1 OX1 O Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) %Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1' That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 3 (A) 2. Total Number of Dominant 3' Species Across All Strata: 3 4. (g) Percent of Dominant Species Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: _ 1 OX 1 O =Total Cover That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 100% (A/B) ) 1.Spiraea douglasii 35% Yes FACW Prevalence Index worksheet: 2. Rubus procerus 45% Yes FAC Total%Cover of: Multiply by: 3 OBL species x 1 = 4. FACW species 35% x 2=70 5. i yts FAC species 80% x 3= 240 FACU species Total Cover 1 OX 1.O x 4= = Herb Stratum (Plot size: } UPL species x 5= ,.Ranunculus repens 35% Yes FAC Column Totals: 115% (A) 310 (B) 2 ��~ Prevalence Index =B/A= 2.69 3. rt^7F. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4, r.. 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 5. 2-Dominance Test is>50% 8. X 3-Prevalence Index is 53.0' ?. _ 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting 8• data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) g• _ 5-Wetland Non-Vascular Plants' 10. _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain) 11. 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must =Total Cover be present,unless disturbed or problematic. Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 1 OX1 O ) 1. Hydrophytic 2• Vegetation 115% =Total Cover Present? Yes X No Bare Ground in Herb Stratum Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys,and Coast—Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: #2 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features � (inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) Texture Remarks 0-13" 10YR3-3 100% S/L many medium roots 13-18" 10YR6-1 80% 10YR3-3 200%/. S/C/L few fine roots 'Type: C=Concentration,D=De letion,RM=Reduced Matrix,CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. ZLocation: PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix_ Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': _ Histosol(Al) _ Sandy Redox(S5) _ 2 cm Muck(A10) _ Histic Epipedon(A2) _ Stripped Matrix(S6) _ Red Parent Material(fF2) _ Black Histic(A3) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(except MLRA 1) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface(fF12) _ Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _ Depleted Matrix(F3) _ Thick Dark Surface(Al 2) _ Redox Dark Surface(F6) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and _ Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _ Depleted Dark Surface(F7) wetland hydrology must be present, _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _ Redox Depressions(F8) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer(if present): Type: Modeled Depth(inches): 13 Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators(minimum of one required;check all that apply) Secondary Indicators(2 or more required) _ Surface Water(Al) _ Water-Stained Leaves(B9)(except _ Water-Stained Leaves(89)(MLRA 1,2, _ High Water Table(A2) MLRA 1,2,4A,and 4B) 4A,and 48) _ Saturation(A3) _ Salt Crust(B11) _ Drainage Patterns(B10) �. _ Water Marks(61) _ Aquatic Invertebrates(B13) _ Dry-Season Water Table(C2) _ Sediment Deposits(62) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) _ Drift Deposits(83) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) _ Geomorphic Position(D2) Algal Mat or Crust(B4) _ Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _ Shallow Aquitard(D3) _ Iron Deposits(85) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) _ FAC-Neutral Test(D5) _ Surface Soil Cracks(B6) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)(LRR A) _ Raised Ant Mounds(D6)(LRR A) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(117) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) _ Frost-Heave Hummocks(D7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Saturation Present? Yes No Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes NoX includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys,and Coast—Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Western Mountains,Valleys,and Coast Region Proiect/Site: 0 E Agate Rd city/coun . Shelton/Mason Applicant/Owner. Baldwin Logging INC sampling Date:4/02/2021 State:WA Sampling Point:#3 investigator(s): Don Haviland Section,Township,Range: 14 20N 03W Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): Slopping Local relief(concave,convex,none): rj% None Slope(%)2- : Subregion(LRR):A Lat:47.218 Long:-123.033 Datum: Sol Map Unit Name:Bellingham silt loam NWI classification: HydrlC Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No Of no,explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation NO .Soil NO or Hydrology No significantly disturbed? Are'Normal Circumstances'present? Yes X No Are Vegetation NO .SoilyeS ,or Hydrology YeS naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS— Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features,etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area Welland Hydrology Present? Yes X_ No within a Wetland? Yes X No Remarks: VEGETATION—Use scientific names of plants. 10X10 Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: 1 %Cover Species? Status ,.Alnus rubra 45% YeS FAC Number of Dominant Species 4 That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: (A) 2. 3. Total Number of Dominant 4 Species Across All Strata: 4 (g) Percent of Dominant Species Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:10X10 =Total Cover That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 100% (A/B) 1. Prevalence Index worksheet: 2. _ _ . Total%CoCovenorfs: Multiply by: 3. OBL species 0�-� x I=65 4, FACW species x 2= 5. i vrsr: FAC species 80% x 3= 240 4,a FACU species x 4= Plot size: Herb Stratum 10X1:0 Total Cover ( UPL species x 5= ,.Ranunculus repens: 35% Yes FAC Column Totals: 145% (A) 305 (B) 2.Lysichiton america 30% Yes OBL 3. -' Prevalence Index =B/A= 2.10 n�Bi:� 4. T _ Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 5. 1-Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation s.SEDGE 1 OX10 2-Dominance Test is>50% 7.CareX amplifolia 350/6 Yes B-L X 3-Prevalence Index is s3.0' _ 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting 8' data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 5-Wetland Non-Vascular Plants' Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must =Total Cover be present,unless disturbed or problematic. Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 1 OX1 O ) 1. Hydrophytic 2' Vegetation 145% =Total Cover Present? Yes X No °�Bare Ground in Herb Stratum Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valley s.and Coast—Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: #3 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) °/ Type Loc Texture Remarks 0-8" 10YR3-3 100% S/L many medium roots 8-18" 10YR6-1 80% 10YR3-3 20% S/C/L few fine roots 'Type: C=Concentration,D=De letion,RM=Reduced Matrix,CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. zLocation: PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': _ Histosol(A1) _ Sandy Redox(S5) _ 2 cm Muck(A10) _ Histic Epipedon(A2) _ Stripped Matrix(S6) _ Red Parent Material(TF2) _ Black Histic(A3) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral(Fi)(except MLRA 1) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) _ Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _ Loamy Gieyed Matrix(F2) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _ Depleted Matrix(F3) _ Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _ Redox Dark Surface(F6) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and _ Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _ Depleted Dark Surface(F7) wetland hydrology must be present, _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) Redox Depressions(F8) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer(if present): _ Type: Modeled _ __ - . Depth(inches): 8 Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators(minimum of one required check all that apply) Secondary Indicators(2 or more required) _ Surface Water(A1) _ Water-Stained Leaves(B9)(except _ Water-Stained Leaves(139)(MLRA 1,2, X High Water Table(A2) MLRA 1,2,4A,and 4B) 4A,and 4B) X Saturation(A3) _ Salt Crust(B11) _ _ Drainage Patterns(B10) . I _ Water Marks(61) _ Aquatic Invertebrates(B13) _ Dry-Season Water Table(C2) _ Sediment Deposits(132) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Cl) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) Drift Deposits(B3) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) _ Geomorphic Position(D2) _ Algal Mat or Crust(B4) _ Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _ Shallow Aquitard(D3) _ Iron Deposits(135) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) _ FAC-Neutral Test(D5) _ Surface Soil Cracks(136) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)(LRR A) _ Raised Ant Mounds(D6)(LRR A) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) _ Frost-Heave Hummocks(D7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth(inches):7— Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth(inches):Surface Wetland Hydrology Present? YesX No (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: Remarks: I US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys,and Coast—Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM-Western Mountains,Valleys, and Coast Region Project/site: 0 E Agate Rd City/County: Shelton/Mason Sampling Date:4/02/2021 Applicant/Owner. Baldwin Logging INC State WA Sampling Point: I Investigator(s): Don HaVlland Section,Township,Range: 14 20N 03W i O t Landform(hills(ope,terrace,etc.): SIO[1pinCq Local relief(concave,convex,none): None Slope(%):2-5/o j Subregion(LRR):A Lat:47.218 Long:- 123.033 Datum: t Soil Map Unit Name:Bellingham silt loam NWI classification: Hydric Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks.) l Are Vegetation NO ,Soil No or Hydrology No v 9 y gy significantly disturbed. Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No Are Vegetation No .SoilYes ,or Hydrology Yes naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS- Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features, etc. I Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area i Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X t Remarks: E i i [ VEGETATION-Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum plot size:1 OX10 ( } %Cover Species? Status , Number of Dominant Species .Alnus rubra 45% Yes FAC 3 That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: (A) i 2. Total Number of Dominant I 3. _ Species Across All Strata: 3 (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species SaplinglShrub Stratum (Plot size:10X10 =Total Cover That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 100% (A/B) ' ) 1.Rubus procerus 45% Yes FAC Prevalence Index worksheet: 2. Total%Cover of: Multiply by: 3. OBL species x 1 = 4 FACW species x 2= Erns FAC species 125% x 3= 375 5. _ FACU species x 4= 1 OX1,0- =Total Cover Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) UPL species x 5= 1.Ranunculus repens 35% Yes FAC column Totals: 125% (A) 375 (e) 2. ,vase= Prevalence Index =B/A= 3. 3. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4. ^T 1-Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 5' 2-Dominance Test is>50% 6. X 3-Prevalence Index is 53.0' 7. _ 4-Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting 8. data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 9. 5-Wetland Non-Vascular Plants' 10. _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain) 11. 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present,unless disturbed or problematic. 1 OX10 =Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) I' Hydrophytic 2. Vegetation 125% =Total Cover Present? Yes X No %Bare Ground in Herb Stratum Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains.Valleys,and Coast-Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color(moist) �°a_ rolor(moist) Type' I nc Tpxtura Ramarkc 0-16" 10YR3-3 100% S/L many medium roots 16-18" 10YR6-1 80% 10YR3-3 20% S/C/L many fine roots 'Type: C=Concentration,D=De letion,RM=Reduced Matrix,CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 'Location: PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': _ Histosol(Al) _ Sandy Redox(S5) _ 2 cm Muck(A10) _ Histic Epipedon(A2) _ Stripped Matrix(S6) _ Red Parent Material(TF2) _ Black Histic(A3) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(except MLRA 1) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) _ Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _ Depleted Matrix(F3) _ Thick Dark Surface(Al 2) _ Redox Dark Surface(F6) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and _ Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _ Depleted Dark Surface(F7) wetland hydrology must be present, _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) Redox Depressions(F8) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer(if present): Type: Modeled _ Depth(inches): 16" Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: _ Primary Indicators(minimum of one required;check all that applV) Secondary Indicators(2 or more required) _ Surface Water(Al) _ Water-Stained Leaves(139)(except _ Water-Stained Leaves(139)(MLRA 1,2, _ High Water Table(A2) MLRA 1,2,4A,and 413) 4A,and 4S) _ Saturation(A3) _ Salt Crust(B11) _ Drainage Patterns(B10) •h. _ Water Marks(61) _ Aquatic Invertebrates(B13) _ Dry-Season Water Table(C2) _.3 ' _ Sediment Deposits(62) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Cl) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) _ Drift Deposits(B3) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) _ Geomorphic Position(D2) Algal Mat or Crust(84) _ Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _ Shallow Aquitard(D3) Iron Deposits(135) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) _ FAC-Neutral Test(D5) _ Surface Soil Cracks(136) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)(LRR A) _ Raised Ant Mounds(D6)(LRR A) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) _ Frost-Heave Hummocks(D7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Saturation Present? Yes NoX Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes NoX (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys,and Coast—Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Western Mountains,Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: 0 E Agate Rd City/County: Shelton/Mason ApplicanVOwner. Baldwin Logging INC sampling Date:4/02/2021 State- WA Sampling Point#5 investigator(s): Don Hayiland Section,Township,Range: 14 20N 03W Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): Sloppinq Local relief(concave,convex,none): None Slope(%):15%-20% Subregion(LRR):A Lat:47.218 Long:-123.033 Datum: Soil Map unit Name:Shelton gravelly sandy loam Not Hydric NWI classification: Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation NO ,Soil No Are Vegetation NO Soil NO or Hydrology No significantly disturbed? Are`Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No or Hydrology No naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS— Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes NoX Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area i Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X • Remarks: t VEGETATION—Use scientific names of plants. 10X1 O Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: } %Cover Species? Status ,.Acer macrophyllum 35% Yes FACU Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 2 (A) 2.Alnus rubra 2% No � j 3.Thuia plicata 5 Total Number of Dominant 40% -Yes AC Species Across All Strata: (B) 4 _ Percent of Dominant Species 1 OX1 O =Total Cover That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 40% (A/B) Saplino/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: } 1. Rubus ursinus 30% Yes FACU Prevalence Index worksheet: 2. _ _ Total%Cover of: Multiply bv: 3. OBL species 20 ° x 1 = 20 4• FACW species x 2- 5. i Ytu FAC species 65°o x 3= T95 - == FACU species 95% x 4= 380 10X 10 =Total Cover Herb Stratum (Plot size: � UPL species x 5= 1. Lysichiton americar}LIm 20% Yes OBL Column Totals: 180% (A) 595 (B) `2• �:zs�- 3. Prevalence Index =B/A 4. = 3.30 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 5.FERNS 1OX10 _ 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation s 2-Dominance Test is>50% 7..Pteridium aquilinum 30% Yes FACU 3-Prevalence Index is 53.0' _ _ 4-Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting 8' data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) g• _ 5-Wetland Non-Vascular Plants' 10. _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain) 11. 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must =Woody Vine Strat (Plot size: �OX 1 O Total Cover be present,unless disturbed or problematic. um ) 1. Hydrophytic 2' Vegetation %Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 1800/0 =Total Cover Present? Yes No X Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys,and Coast—Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: #5 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inctb,g..$)___ —_Color fmoiatl °ln—_ Color/moist) % Type' Loc Taxtura RAma k 0-16" 10YR4-6 100% S/L many medium roots 16-18" 10YR4-6 80% 10YR6-1 20% S/C/L many medium roots 'Type: C=Concentration,D=De letion,RM=Reduced Matrix,CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': _ Histosol(Al) _ Sandy Redox(S5) _ 2 cm Muck(A10) _ Histic Epipedon(A2) _ Stripped Matrix(S6) _ Red Parent Material(TF2) _ Black Histic(A3) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral(Fi)(except MLRA 1) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) _ Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _ Depleted Matrix(F3) _ Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _ Redox Dark Surface(F6) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and _ Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _ Depleted Dark Surface(F7) wetland hydrology must be present, _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _ Redox Depressions(178) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer(if present): Type: Modeled —_ Depth(inches): 1 6° Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: _ Primary Indicators(minimum of one required-check all that apply) Secondary Indicators(2 or more required) _ Surface Water(A1) _ Water-Stained Leaves(B9)(except _ Water-Stained Leaves(B9)(MLRA 1,2, _ High Water Table(A2) MLRA 1,2,4A,and 413) 4A,and 41B) _ Saturation(A3) _ Salt Crust(B11) _ Drainaggt Patterns(1310) l _ Water Marks(61) _ Aquatic Invertebrates(1313) _ Dry-Season Water Table(C2) _ Sediment Deposits(82) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Cl) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) _ Drift Deposits(133) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) _ Geomorphic Position(D2) _ Algal Mat or Crust(B4) _ Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _ Shallow Aquitard(D3) _ Iron Deposits(B5) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) _ FAC-Neutral Test(D5) _ Surface Soil Cracks(B6) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)(LRR A) _ Raised Ant Mounds(D6)(LRR A) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) _ Frost-Heave Hummocks(D7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(138) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Water Table Present? Yes NoX Depth(inches): Saturation Present? Yes NoX Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes NoX includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys,and Coast—Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Western Mountains,Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: 0 E Agate Rd City/County: Shelton/Mason Sampling Date:4//02/2021 f Applicant(Owner. Baldwin Logging INC State: WA Samplino Point-�U invest,gator(s): Don tlaviland Section,Township,Range: 14 20N 03W Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): SlOpping Local relief(concave,convex,none):_None Slope(%):2-5% t Subregion(LRR):A Lat:47.218 Long:-123.033 Datum: j Soil Map unit Name:Shelton gravelly sandy loam Not Hydric NWI classification: Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation No soil No or Hydrology No significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No Are Vegetation No ,soil No or Hydrology NO naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS— Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features, etc. i Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes NoX Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X twiLthin ampled Area f Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X Wetland? Yes No X Remarks: VEGETATION—Use scientific names of plants. 10X10 Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) %Cover Species? Status 1. Pseudotsuga menziesii 80% Yes FACU Number of Dominant Species 0 2. That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: (A) 3. Total Number of Dominant 4 _ __ Species Across All Strata: 3 (B) Percent of Dominant Species SaolinolShrub Stratum (Plot size: 1 OX 10 =Total Cover That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 0% (A/B) ) 1.Mahonia nervosa 350% Yes FACU Prevalence Index worksheet: 2. _ _ Total%Cover of. Multiply by: 3. OBL species x 1 = 4. FACW species x 2= 5. ,vier FAC species x 3= FACU species 145% x 4= 580 10X1.0 =Total Cover i Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) UPL species x 5= Column Totals: 145% (A) 580 (B) 12. masa= 3. {i6 fc Prevalence Index =B/A= 4.0 4 T - Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 5.FERNS 10X10 _ 1-Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2-Dominance Test is>50% s.Pteridium aquilinum 30% Yes FACU — 7. 3-Prevalence Index is 53.0' 8' _ 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) g. _ 5-Wetland Non-Vascular Plants' 10. _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain) 11. 'Indicators of hydre soil and wetland hydrology must =Total Cover be present,unless disturbed or problematic. Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 1 OX1 O ) 1. 2 Hydrophytic Vegetation %Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 145% =Total Cover Present? Yes No X Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys,and Coast—Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point #6 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color(moist) a Color(moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks 0-18" 10YR5-6 1000/6 S/G/L many medium roots 'Type: C=Concentration,D=De letion,RM=Reduced Matrix,CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soiis3: _ Histosol(Al) _ Sandy Redox(S5) _ 2 cm Muck(A70) _ Histic Epipedon(A2) _ Stripped Matrix(S6) _ Red Parent Material(TF2) _ Black Histic(A3) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(except MLRA 1) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) _ Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _ Depleted Matrix(F3) _ Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _ Redox Dark Surface(F6) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and _ Sandy Mucky Mineral(Si) _ Depleted Dark Surface(F7) wetland hydrology must be present, _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _ Redox Depressions(F8) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer(if present): Type . Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Remarks: tit1 T HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators(minimum of one required;check all that apply) Secondary Indicators(2 or more required) Surface Water(A1) _ Water-Stained Leaves(139)(except _ Water-Stained Leaves(B9)(MLRA 1,2, _ High Water Table(A2) MLRA 1,2,4A,and 48) 4A,and 4R) _ Saturation(A3) _ Salt Crust(B11) _ Drainage Patterns(B10) Water Marks(61) _ Aquatic Invertebrates(B13) _ Dry-Season Water Table(C2) _.T _ Sediment Deposits(B2) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) , Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) _ Drift Deposits(B3) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) _ Geomorphic Position(D2) Algal Mat or Crust(84) _ Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _ Shallow Aquitard(D3) _ Iron Deposits(B5) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) _ FAC-Neutral Test(D5) _ Surface Soil Cracks(66) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)(LRR A) _ Raised Ant Mounds(D6)(LRR A) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) _ Frost-Heave Hummocks(D7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Saturation Present? Yes NoX Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes NoX includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: I Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys,and Coast—Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Western Mountains,Valleys,and Coast Region Project/Site: 0 E Agate Rd City/County-..Shelton/Mason Sampling Date:4/02/2021 Applicant/Owner. Baldwin Logging INC state:WA Samdinp Point#7 mvestigator(s): Don t-iavilanel Section,Township,Range: 14 20N 03W Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): Slopping Local relief(concave,convex,none):-None Slope(%):2-5% Subregion(LRR):A Lat:47.218 Long:-123.033 Datum: Solt Map Unit Name:CIOQuallum silt loam NWI classification: Not HydriC Are climatic f hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation No ,Soil No or Hydrology NO significantly disturbed? Are*Normal Circumstances'present? Yes X No Are Vegetation NO .Soil NO or Hydrology NO naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS— Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features,etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes NoX Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X Remarks: VEGETATION—Use scientific names of plants. 1 OX10 Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot sae: ) %Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1.Pseudotsuga menziesii 45% Yes FACU That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 2 (A) 2.Aln us rubra -30 Yes FAC Total Number of Dominant 3' Species Across All Strata: 5 (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot sae: 1 OX1 O =Total Cover That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 40% (AB) ) 1.Rubus ursinus 30% Yes FACU Prevalence Index worksheet: 2. _ Total%Cover of: Multiply by: 3 OBL species 2 o x 1=20 4. FACW species x 2= 5. ;I Vls^r FAC species 30 x 3=9— FACU species 105% x 4= 420 =Total Cover Herb Stratum (Plot sae: 10X10 ) UPL species x 5= }1. q 5i;.. Column Totals: 155% (A) 530 (B) 12. lo2se- Prevalence Index =B/A= 3.41 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4' ^T^ i-Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation S.FERNS 10X10 — s.Pteridium aquilinum 300/p Yes FACU — 2-DommanceTest >So% 3-Prevalence Index is 53.0' 7. SEDGES 10X10 — _ ons'(Provide a. Carex amplifolia 20% Y@s V BL 4 data n Rem aarksholoaldorpon a separate sheet)supporting 9• _ 5-Wetland Non-Vascular Plants' 10• _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain) 11. 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must =Total Cover be present,unless disturbed or problematic. Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 1 OX1 O ) 1. Hydrophytic 2- Vegetation 1550/o =Total Cover Present? Yes No X %Bare Ground in Herb Stratum Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys,and Coast-Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: #7 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features .finches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc Texture Remarks 0-6" 10YR4-6 100% S/L many medium roots 6-18" 10YR5-6 100% S/G/L many medium roots 'Type: C=Concentration,D=De letion,RM=Reduced Matrix,CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. Location: PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soiis3: _ Histosol(Al) _ Sandy Redox(35) _ 2 cm Muck(A10) Histic Epipedon(A2) _ Stripped Matrix(S6) _ Red Parent Material(TF2) _ Black Histic(A3) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(except MLRA 1) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) _ Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix(172) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _ Depleted Matrix(F3) Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _ Redox Dark Surface(176) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and _ Sandy Mucky Mineral(Si) _ Depleted Dark Surface(F7) wetland hydrology must be present, _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _ Redox Depressions(F8) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer(if present): Type. - Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators(minimum of one required:check all that apply) Secondary Indicators(2 or more required) _ Surface Water(Al) _ Water-Stained Leaves(B9)(except _ Water-Stained Leaves(B9)(MLRA 1,2, High Water Table(A2) MLRA 1,2,4A,and 413) 4A,and 48) _ Saturation(A3) _ Salt Crust(B11) _ Drainage Pattems(B10) _ Water Marks(B1) _ Aquatic Invertebrates(613) _ Dry-Season Water Table(C2) !.f _ Sediment Deposits(132) — Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Cl) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) _ Drift Deposits(B3) — Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) _ Geomorphic Position(D2) .— Algal Mat or Crust(64) _ Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _ Shallow Aquitard(D3) _ Iron Deposits(B5) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) _ FAC-Neutral Test(D5) _ Surface Soil Cracks(B6) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)(LRR A) _ Raised Ant Mounds(D6)(LRR A) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(137) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) — Frost-Heave Hummocks(D7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(S8) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No X�// Depth(inches): Water Table Present? Yes NoX Depth(inches): Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes NoX (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys,and Coast—Version 2.0 ABC SEPTIC DESIGN & WETLANDS 4-02-2021 MAP LIST Map # 1,1 A,1 B are from Mason county web maps Map# 2,2 A,2 B are from USDA web soil survey Map # 3 is from Washington DNR forest practiices SOIL DESCRIPION Soil descriptions are taken from USDAweb soil survey PROPERTY PICTURES Pictures #1-7 are look at wetland area. Pictures #8-12 are of the area from wetland to the south property line. WETLANDS ASSESSMENT DONE BY Don Haviland 167 DEEP CREEK RD CHEHALIS WA 98532 PHONE # 360-880-7716 E-mail wacaveman@hotmaiL com Mason County WA GIS Web Map ~— — It SW75et Roacr S- t S-3 !c"�Q -2 ( i S-4. �, ,Gy , t . 1601 bh4' M S-7 A to -- mf v z 7 E S-5 S-6 5/9/2021, 4:33:23 PM Q y��✓a,' 1:3,071 r�G� $ C✓C lG`'�^-Q 0 0.03 0.05 0.1 mi LIJ County Boundary /j LL,, 1 1 1 r--� b lk,c ;S � ' Lew l w�p i p`f� 0.04 0.06 0.16 km El Tax Parcels (Zoom in to 1:30,000) blwe ®OpenStreetMap(and)contributors.CC-BY-SA fMason County WA GIS Web Map Application Richard Diaz I Map data 0 OpenStreetMap contributors,CC-BY-SA i Mason County WA GIS Web Map S- S-4 .r � 1 F ;i f+ 3 s f �i � S l7 i �t n t i S-5 S-6 5/9/2021, 4:36:20 PM 1:3,071 0 0.03 0.05 0.1 mi County Boundary — Shorelines of the State 1---1 1 1— 1 1 r �—r ;i rL..1 Tax Parcels(Zoom into 1:30,000) — Unknown 0 0.04 0.08 0.16 km f ={ National Wetlands Inventory(Hyperlinked) — Waters with no type designation DNR Water Courses NHD Water Courses ®OpenSlreetMap(and)-r&b tas CGBY.SA Fish — Name /, — Non-fish -"- No Name A /—A Mason County WA GIS Web Map Application l J A Richard Diaz 1 Map data®OpenStreetMap contributors,CC-BY-SA i Mason County WA GIS Web Map 10 �asr R 25 � 5 r75 g0 Ei(i A� _ 90 q'"' 100 105 r„ 110 t75 pit 17_G T� 7J� 1 9� i J � S N c5' 4i �r R 3/24/2021,4:03:08 PM 1:3,071 0 0.03 0.05 0.1 mi County Boundary ® AE, ;—i —+—¢—r r r--r 0 0.04 0.08 0.16 km El Tax Parcels(Zoom in to 1:30,000) AE, FLOODWAY Contours 5 ft AO, a Op-SveetMap(and)contributes.CC-SYSA FEMA FIRM Map OPEN WATER, VE, Mason County WA GIS Web Map Application 141 V Richard Diaz i Map data 0 OpenStteetMap Contributors,CC-BY-SA Soil Map—Mason County,Washington (Baldwin Logging) N 49TC 49746D 497540 dY152(J 49T IQ) 49T787 49/8W 47^IS Ir N e+f i -' -?. '_ ---�. -' F' 17°13 1T N r`. 0 R o 0 47°1Z5VN t7 IZ SS N 46Tdt30 48746) 497590 49M 49M 4t117B0 49M 3 fn 3 Map Scalp—1:3260 f ptnted on A pa b (85"x 11):hem N 0 43 -- — 90 1tA 270 Fiat N0 Im 300 am 9W Mapm jmlion:Web!--*or Canej-wm*labm W6SB4 Edge*&LJTMZnne 1ON WGSB4 usDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 3/24/2021 � Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 3 Soil Map—Mason County,Washington (Baldwin Logging) MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION Area of Interest(ACI) y Spoil Area The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at Area of Interest(AOI) 1:31,700. p; Stony Spat Soils very stony Spot Warning:Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. Soil Map Unit Polygons Wet Spot Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause . > Soil Map Unit Lines misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil Other line placement.The maps do not show the small areas of © Soil Map Unit Points Special Line Features contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed Special Point Features scale. V Blowout Water Features Streams and Canals Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map Borrow Pit measurements. Transportation X, Clay Spot Ralls Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Closed Depression Web Soil Survey URL: Interstate Highways Coordinate System: Web Mercator(EPSG:3857) Gravel Pit US Routes Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator Gravelly Spot Major Roads projection,which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area.A projection that preserves area,such as the Landfill Local Roads Albers equal-area conic projection,should be used If more Q Lava Flow accurate calculations of distance or area are required. fe. Background Marsh or swamp Aerial Photography This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s)listed below. Mine or Quarry Soil Survey Area: Mason County,Washington Miscellaneous Water Survey Area Data: Version 16,Jun 4,2020 Perennial Water Soil map units are labeled(as space allows)for map scales Rock Outcrop 1:50,000 or larger. Saline Spot Date(s)aerial images were photographed: Apr 1,2016—Sep 27, 2016 Sandy Spot The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were Severely Eroded Spot compiled and digitized probably differs from the background Sinkhole imagery displayed on these maps.As a result,some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. Slide or Slip Pa Sodlc Spot NUSDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 3/24/2021 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 cf 3 Soil Map—Mason County,Washington Baldwin Logging Map Unit Legend Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI Bd Bellingham sift loam,0 to 3 1.7 4.7% percent slopes Cc Ctoquallum silt loam,5 to 15 6.9 19.3% percent slopes Ce Cloquallum sift loam, 4.1 11.6% moderately shallow over cemented fill,5 to 15 percent slopes le Indianola sandy loam,5 to 15 6.5 18.2% percent slopes Sf Shelton gravelly sandy loam,5 10.9 30.8% to 15 percent slopes Sg Shelton gravelly sandy loam, 5.5 15.4% 15 to 30 percent slopes Totals for Area of Interest 35.5 100.0°h USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 3/24/2021 WW Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3 2-6 3/24/2021 Forest Practices Application Mapping Tool(FPAMT) 0 8 0 Forest Practices Application Mapping Tool DNR Home(http://www.dnr.wa.gov� PARS Home(http://www.dnrwa.gov/programs-and-services/forest-practices/forest-practices-app practices) FP Rules(httpJ/www.dnr.wa-gov/about bboa I ractices-rules-and-b d anual-gi Map Themes Data Active 61) Legend i Search for Layers i x -- ---- — ---- S Puget Shun Activity Map ®Q Public Land Survey Townships • 8 Q Public Land Survey Sections • ®Q Map Registration Tics • I i Q Water Type Breaks(FP) • 8 Q DNR Roads • i ®Q Orphaned&Abandoned Roads(FP) • ®Q Trails&Railroads(FP) • ®Q WAUs • ®Q WRIA Boundaries • 16 ®Q Water Courses(FP) • a Q SOSEA Boundaries • ®Q Water Bodies(FP) • t ®❑Fire Shutdown Zones • R I 0 0 40-foot Contours • ®Q Tribal Cultural Resources Contacts • I a Q County Boundaries • °� 1 162 8 Q County Tax Parcels • a O City and Urban Growth Area Boundaries 11 i 0 300 600ft ` - - 1:9,028 3 httpsJ/fpamt.dnr.wa.gov/defaulLaspx# �/1 4 i l• 'tom i Ad x .- - - ��,.� srr �, �I, ..i it c -uy �� r�,rf` � �� is _ — �''- �: - - - — - 'i . - - - t` 4 .. - - �\ � _ ,. , -"L: � _ - Y '#. - .=�t�. � - _ ,jam-�^._ - - - +!�� - � . - _ _. - ._ "_ _�;-_ „ice: -_ _ r �:." _ _ - ' "fit `f 1 �_ l I5 d. �t'i _ - „', .. r�y{ �y1k rj � F ! �F• -.ck J � r :i 7 uf � � � d _ 1 h • t � ' «7_� _ � - }}lt • f - " ..IE� ,•. ��• . .� - �" .u' �.` _ . .. _ . .. _ - �• • 7•• - r• 1 •• • A• �' 1 1 • � • � Map Unit Description:Bellingham silt loam,0 to 3 percent slopes—Mason County,Washington Baldwin Logging Mason County, Washington Bd—Bellingham silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 2hjj Elevation: 0 to 490 feet Mean annual precipitation: 35 to 60 inches Mean annual air temperature: 50 degrees F Frost-free period: 150 to 210 days Farmland classification: Prime farmland if drained Map Unit Composition Bellingham and similar soils: 100 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Bellingham Setting Landform:Depressions Parent material:Alluvium, lacustrine deposits and loess Typical profile H1 -0 to 8 inches: silt loam H2-8 to 60 inches: clay Properties and qualities Slope:0 to 3 percent Depth to restrictive feature. More than 80 inches Drainage class: Poorly drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):Moderately low to moderately high (0.06 to 0.20 in/hr) Depth to water table:About 0 to 12 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Available water capacity.Very high (about 12.1 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 5w Hydrologic Soil Group: C/D Forage suitability group: Wet Soils (G002XN 102WA) Other vegetative classification: Wet Soils (0002XN102WA) Hydric soil rating: Yes Data Source Information Soil Survey Area: Mason County, Washington Survey Area Data: Version 16, Jun 4, 2020 USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 3/24/2021 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 1 Map Unit Description:Indianola sandy loam,5 to 15 percent slopes—Mason County, Baldwin Logging Washington Mason County, Washington le—Indianola sandy loam, 5 to 15 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol. 2hig Elevation: 0 to 300 feet Mean annual precipitation: 30 to 55 inches Mean annual air temperature: 48 degrees F Frost-free period: 190 days Farmland classfcation: Farmland of statewide importance Map Unit Composition Indianola and similar soils: 100 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Indianola Setting Landform:Terraces Parent material: Glacial sandy outwash Typical profile H1 -0 to 5 inches: sandy loam H2-5 to 28 inches: loamy sand H3-28 to 60 inches: sand Properties and qualities Slope:5 to 15 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Drainage class:Somewhat excessively drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat): High (1.98 to 5.95 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Available water capacity: Low(about 5.0 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3e Hydrologic Soil Group: A Forage suitability group: Droughty Soils(G002XN402WA) Other vegetative classification: Droughty Soils(G002XN402WA) Hydric soil rating: No Data Source Information Soil Survey Area: Mason County, Washington Survey Area Data: Version 16, Jun 4, 2020 USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 3/24/2021 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 1 Map Unit Description:Shelton gravelly sandy loam,5 to 15 percent slopes—Mason County, Baldwin Logging Washington Mason County, Washington Sf—Shelton gravelly sandy loam, 5 to 15 percent slopes Map Unit Setting !National map unit symbol. 2hn1 Elevation: 100 to 800 feet Mean annual precipitation: 50 to 70 inches Mean annual air temperature: 48 to 50 degrees F Frost-free period. 150 to 180 days Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance Map Unit Composition Shelton and similar soils: 100 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Shelton Setting Landform:Moraines Parent material: Basal till with volcanic ash Typical profile H1 -0 to 3 inches: very gravelly medial loam H2-3 to 27 inches: very gravelly medial sandy loam H3-27 to 60 inches: very gravelly sandy loam Properties and qualities Slope:5 to 15 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches; 25 to 36 inches to densic material Drainage class: Moderately well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat):Very low to moderately low(0.00 to 0.06 in/hr) Depth to water table:About 24 to 36 inches Frequency of flooding. None Frequency of ponding: None Available water capacity:Very low (about 2.2 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4s Hydrologic Soil Group: A Hydric soil rating: No Data Source Information Soil Survey Area: Mason County,Washington Survey Area Data: Version 16, Jun 4, 2020 USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 3/24/2021 �i Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 1 Map Unit Description:Shelton gravelly sandy loam,15 to 30 percent slopes—Mason County, Baldwin Logging Washington Mason County, Washington Sg—Shelton gravelly sandy loam, 15 to 30 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 2hn2 Elevation. 100 to 800 feet Mean annual precipitation: 50 to 70 inches Mean annual air temperature: 48 to 50 degrees F Frost-free period: 150 to 180 days Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance Map Unit Composition Shelton and similar soils: 100 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Shelton Setting Landform:Moraines Parent material: Basal till with volcanic ash Typical profile H1 -0 to 3 inches: very gravelly medial loam H2-3 to 27 inches: very gravelly medial sandy loam H3-27 to 60 inches: very gravelly sandy loam Properties and qualities Slope: 15 to 30 percent Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches; 25 to 36 inches to densic material Drainage class: Moderately well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat):Very low to moderately low (0.00 to 0.06 in/hr) Depth to water table:About 24 to 36 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Available water capacity:Very low (about 2.2 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4e Hydrologic Soil Group: A Hydric soil rating: No Data Source Information Soil Survey Area: Mason County,Washington Survey Area Data: Version 16, Jun 4, 2020 USDa Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 3/24/2021 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 1 Map Unit Description:Cloquallum silt loam,moderately shallow over cemented till,5 to 15 Baldwin Logging percent slopes—Mason County,Washington Mason County, Washington Ce—Cloquallum silt loam, moderately shallow over cemented till, 5 to 15 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 2hjq Elevation: 0 to 330 feet Mean annual precipitation: 50 to 75 inches Mean annual air temperature: 50 degrees F Frost-free period. 175 to 205 days Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance Map Unit Composition Cloquallum and similar soils: 100 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Cloquallum Setting Parent material: Silty lacustrine deposits with volcanic ash Typical profile H1 -0 to 9 inches: silt loam H2-9 to 32 inches: silt loam H3-32 to 36 inches: silty clay loam H4-36 to 60 inches: gravelly sandy loam Properties and qualities Slope: 5 to 15 percent Depth to restrictive feature:24 to 48 inches to densic material Drainage class: Moderately well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat):Very low to moderately low (0.00 to 0.06 in/hr) Depth to water table:About 18 to 36 inches Frequency of flooding. None Frequency of ponding: None Available water capacity: Moderate (about 6.5 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3e Hydrologic Soil Group: C Forage suitability group: Soils with Moderate Limitations (G002XN602WA) Other vegetative classification: Soils with Moderate Limitations (G002XN602WA) USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 3/24/2021 ;0_� Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 2 Map Unit Description:Cloquallum silt loam,moderately shallow over cemented till,5 to 15 Baldwin Logging percent slopes—Mason County,Washington Hydric soil rating: No Data Source Information Soil Survey Area: Mason County, Washington Survey Area Data: Version 16, Jun 4, 2020 USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 3/24/2021 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 2 Map Unit Description:Cloquallum silt loam,5 to 15 percent slopes—Mason County, Baldwin Logging Washington Mason County, Washington Cc—Cloquallum silt loam, 5 to 15 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol. 2hjn Elevation: 0 to 490 feet Mean annual precipitation: 50 to 75 inches Mean annual air temperature: 50 degrees F Frost-free period: 175 to 205 days Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance Map Unit Composition Cloquallum and similar soils: 100 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Cloquallum Setting Parent material: Silty lacustrine deposits with volcanic ash Typical profile H1 -0 to 9 inches: silt loam H2-9 to 32 inches: silt loam H3-32 to 60 inches: silty clay loam Properties and qualities Slope: 5 to 15 percent Depth to restrictive feature. More than 80 inches Drainage class: Moderately well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):Moderately low to moderately high (0.06 to 0.20 in/hr) Depth to water table:About 24 to 36 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Available water capacity: High (about 11.3 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3e Hydrologic Soil Group: C Forage suitability group: Soils with Moderate Limitations (G002XN602WA) Other vegetative classification: Soils with Moderate Limitations (G002XN602WA) USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 3/2412021 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 2 Map Unit Description:Cloquallum silt loam,5 to 15 percent slopes—Mason County, Baldwin Logging Washington Hydric soil rating: No Data Source Information Soil Survey Area: Mason County, Washington Survey Area Data: Version 16, Jun 4, 2020 USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 3/24/2021 �� Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 2 RA TING FORM SUMMA R Y ABC Septic Design & Wetland did a rating report 4- 02-2021 on property located at 0 E Agate Rd , Shelton Wa. This property has ,been used as a forest land with node velopment The de velopment site is mostly undisturbed. The property owner wounts to develope this property. In order to do the rating to this property I re viewed maped resources and found out that the property had non-fish stream and hydric soils mapped on the property . At that time l did a on site assessment of the property. SI TE ADDRESS AND DESCRIPION The site is located at 0 E Agate Rd,Shelton WA and in section 14 township 20N range 03W. This property has a Mason County parcel number of 32014-32- 90110. This site is slopped to the north end of property. It is a 45. 99 acre parcel with a use code [88 Resource-Designated Forest Land/ and the surrounding sites are either Forest land,Ag land or Single family residence . COWARDIN PLANT LIST Emergent class Carex ampl/folla=Bigleaf Sedge Ranunculus repens=Creeping buttercup Lys/chlton americanum=Skunk-cabbage Sp/raea douglasll=Hardhack Forest class Alnus rubra=Red Alder SOILS LIST Bd-Bellingham silt loam is a poorly drained soil with a hydr/c rating and is hydric in the wetland area. Soil color is 10YR3-3 0-6" and 10YR6-1 80916 10YR3-3 20916 6"-18". This is the soil in the wetland area and modeled or mixed at 6" The soil on the rest of the property is of the lighter color but not modeled. Ce/Cc-Cloquallum silt loam is a moderately well drained soil with no hydric rating and was not hydric on this property. The soil colors is 10YR4-6 0-18 le-Indianola sandy loam is a somewhat excessively drained soil with no hydric rating and was not hydric on this property. The soil colors /s 10YR5-6 0-18" Sf/Sg-Shelton gravelly sandy loam is a moderately well drained soil with no hydric rat/ng and was not hydric on th/s property. The soil colors /s 10 YR4-6 0- 18". HYDROLOGY The hydrology in the wetland is seasonal run off and saturation only. The seasonal run off is in one direction from the south to the north and is drying out this time of year We have had a little rain this spring ,but there is signs of saturation at the surface in the wetland area. The rest of the property is well drained and showes no signs ponding or a high water table. CONCLUSION After doing the property online review and the onsite assessment of this property l found that the property has a class 2 wetland with 8 habitat points. The wetland will need a 150/ ,buffer for tree cutting only. The wetland if developed will need a minimum 225' ,buffer. These ,buffers are ,based on the habitat score of 8 and Mason County codes for wetland protection . The wetland ,boundarys are flagged with pink wetland markers. The wetland is down hill from the development area. The property is suitable for development and will not adversely effect the function of this wetland. Thank you Don Ha viland Wetland name or number RATING SUMMARY — Western Washington Name of wetland (or ID#): Baldwin Logging E Agate Date of site visit: 4-02-2021 Rated by Don Haviland Trained by Ecology?X Yes No Date of training 10-20-2020 HGM Class used for rating Slopping Wetland has multiple HGM classes?_Y X N NOTE: Form is not complete without the figures requested (figures can be combined). Source of base aerial photo/map Mason/Ecology/DNR/WDFW OVERALL WETLAND CATEGORY 2 (based on functionsX or special characteristics_) 1. Category of wetland based on FUNCTIONS Category I—Total score = 23 - 27 X Score for each Category II—Total score = 20- 22 function based Category III—Total score = 16- 19 on three ratings Category IV—Total score = 9 - 15 (order of ratings is not FUNCTION Improving Hydrologic THabitat important) Water Quality 9= H,H,H Circle the appropriate ratings g= H,H,M Site Potential H ® L H ® L H U L 7= H,H,L Landscape Potential H ® L H ® L Q M L 7= H,M,M Value ® M L H M m ® M L TOTAL 6= H,M,L Score Based on 6= M,M,M Ratings 7 5 8 20 5= H,L,L 5 = M,M,L 4= M,L,L 3 = L,L,L 2. Category based on SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS of wetland CHARACTERISTIC CATEGORY Estuarine I II Wetland of High Conservation Value I Bog I Mature Forest I Old Growth Forest I Coastal Lagoon I II Interdunal I II III IV None of the above Wetland Rating System for Western WA:2014 Update 1 Rating Form-Effective January 1,2015 Wetland name or number Maps and figures required to answer questions correctly for Western Washington Depressional Wetlands Map of: To answer questions: Figure# Cowardin plant classes D 1.3, H 1.1, H 1.4 Hydroperiods D 1.4, H 1.2 Location of outlet(can be added to map of hydroperiods) D 1.1, D 4.1 Boundary of area within 150 ft of the wetland(can be added to another figure) D 2.2,D 5.2 Map of the contributing basin D 4.3,D 5.3 1 km Polygon:Area that extends 1 km from entire wetland edge-including H 2.1, H 2.2, H 2.3 polygons for accessible habitat and undisturbed habitat Screen capture of map of 303(d)listed waters in basin (from Ecology website) D 3.1, D 3.2 Screen capture of list of TMDLs for WRIA in which unit is found(from web) D 3.3 Riverine Wetlands Map of: To answer questions: Figure# Cowardin plant classes H 1.1, H 1.4 Hydroperiods H 1.2 Ponded depressions R 1.1 Boundary of area within 150 ft of the wetland(can be added to another figure) R 2.4 Plant cover of trees,shrubs,and herbaceous plants R 1.2,R 4.2 Width of unit vs.width of stream(can be added to another figure) R 4.1 Map of the contributing basin R 2.2, R 2.3,R 5.2 1 km Polygon:Area that extends 1 km from entire wetland edge-including H 2.1, H 2.2, H 2.3 polygons for accessible habitat and undisturbed habitat Screen capture of map of 303(d)listed waters in basin(from Ecology website) R 3.1 Screen capture of list of TMDLs for WRIA in which unit is found(from web) R 3.2,R 3.3 Lake Fringe Wetlands Map of: To answer questions: Figure# Cowardin plant classes L 1.1, L 4.1, H 1.1, H 1.4 Plant cover of trees,shrubs,and herbaceous plants L 1.2 Boundary of area within 150 ft of the wetland(can be added to another figure) L 2.2 1 km Polygon:Area that extends 1 km from entire wetland edge-including H 2.1, H 2.2,H 2.3 polygons for accessible habitat and undisturbed habitat Screen capture of map of 303(d)listed waters in basin(from Ecology website) L 3.1, L 3.2 Screen capture of list of TMDLs for WRIA in which unit is found(from web) L 3.3 Slope Wetlands Map of: To answer questions: Figure# Cowardin plant classes H 1.1, H 1.4 Hydroperiods H 1.2 1-B Plant cover of dense trees,shrubs,and herbaceous plants S 1.3 1-B Plant cover of dense,rigid trees,shrubs,and herbaceous plants S 4.1 (can be added to figure above) 1-B Boundary of 150 ft buffer(can be added to another figure) S 2.1,S 5.1 1-A 1 km Polygon:Area that extends 1 km from entire wetland edge-including H 2.1,H 2.2, H 2.3 polygons for accessible habitat and undisturbed habitat Screen capture of map of 303(d)listed waters in basin(from Ecology website) S 3.1,S 3.2 Screen capture of list of TMDLs for WRIA in which unit is found(from web) S 3.3 Wetland Rating System for Western WA:2014 Update 2 Rating Form-Effective January 1,2015 Wetland name or number HGM Classification of Wetlands in Western Washington For questions 1-7,the criteria described must apply to the entire unit being rated. If the hydrologic criteria listed in each question do not apply to the entire unit being rated,you probably have a unit with multiple HGM classes. to this case,identify which hydrologic criteria in questions 1-7 apply,and go to Question 8. 1. Are the water levels in the entire unit usually controlled by tides except during floods? XNO -go to 2 YES-the wetland class is Tidal Fringe-go to 1.1 1.1 Is the salinity of the water during periods of annual low flow below 0.5 ppt (parts per thousand)? NO-Saltwater Tidal Fringe (Estuarine) YES- Freshwater Tidal Fringe If your wetland can be classified as a Freshwater Tidal Fringe use the forms for Riverine wetlands. If it is Saltwater Tidal Fringe it is an Estuarine wetland and is not scored. This method cannot be used to score functions for estuarine wetlands. 2. The entire wetland unit is flat and precipitation is the only source (>90%) of water to it. Groundwater and surface water runoff are NOT sources of water to the unit. X NO-go to 3 YES-The wetland class is Flats Ifyour wetland can be classified as a Flats wetland, use the form for Depressional wetlands. 3. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? _The vegetated part of the wetland is on the shores of a body of permanent open water (without any plants on the surface at any time of the year) at least 20 ac (8 ha) in size; _At least 30% of the open water area is deeper than 6.6 ft (2 m). X NO -go to 4 YES-The wetland class is Lake Fringe (Lacustrine Fringe) 4. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? The wetland is on a slope (slope can be verygradual), The water flows through the wetland in one direction (unidirectional) and usually comes from seeps. It may flow subsurface, as sheetflow,or in a swale without distinct banks, The water leaves the wetland without being impounded. NO -go to 5 XYES-The wetland class is Slope NOTE: Surface water does not pond in these type of wetlands except occasionally in very small and shallow depressions or behind hummocks (depressions are usually<3 ft diameter and less than 1 ft deep). 5. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? The unit is in a valley,or stream channel,where it gets inundated by overbank flooding from that stream or river, The overbank flooding occurs at least once every 2 years. Wetland Rating System for Western WA:2014 Update 3 Rating Form-Effective January 1,2015 Wetland name or number NO-go to 6 YES-The wetland class is Riverine NOTE: The Riverine unit can contain depressions that are filled with water when the river is not flooding 6. Is the entire wetland unit in a topographic depression in which water ponds,or is saturated to the surface, at sometime during the year? This means that any outlet, if present, is higher than the interior of the wetland. NO -go to 7 YES-The wetland class is Depressional 7. Is the entire wetland unit located in a very flat area with no obvious depression and no overbank flooding? The unit does not pond surface water more than a few inches. The unit seems to be maintained by high groundwater in the area. The wetland may be ditched,but has no obvious natural outlet. NO-go to 8 YES-The wetland class is Depressional 8. Your wetland unit seems to be difficult to classify and probably contains several different HGM classes. For example, seeps at the base of a slope may grade into a rverine floodplain, or a small stream within a Depressional wetland has a zone of flooding along its sides. GO BACK AND IDENTIFY WHICH OF THE HYDROLOGIC REGIMES DESCRIBED IN QUESTIONS 1-7 APPLY TO DIFFERENT AREAS 1N THE UNIT (make a rough sketch to help you decide). Use the following table to identify the appropriate class to use for the rating system if you have several HGM classes present within the wetland unit being scored. NOTE: Use this table only if the class that is recommended in the second column represents 10% or more of the total area of the wetland unit being rated. If the area of the HGM class listed in column 2 is less than 10% of the unit; classify the wetland using the class that represents more than 90% of the total area. HGM classes within the wetland unit HGM class to being rated use in rating Slope+ Riverine Riverine Slope+ Depressional Depressional Slope + Lake Fringe Lake Fringe Depressional + Riverine along stream Depressional within boundary of depression Depressional+ Lake Fringe Depressional Riverine+ Lake Fringe Riverine Salt Water Tidal Fringe and any other Treat as class of freshwater wetland ESTUARINE Ifyou are still unable to determine which of the above criteria apply to your wetland, or ifyou have more than 2 HGM classes within a wetland boundary, classify the wetland as Depressional for the rating. Wetland Rating System for Western WA:2014 Update 4 Rating Form-Effective January 1,2015 Wetland name or number SLOPE WETLANDS Water Quality Functions - Indicators that the site functions to improve water quality S 1.0. Does the site have the potential to improve water quality? S 1.1.Characteristics of the average slope of the wetland: (a 1%slope has a 1 ft vertical drop in elevation for every 1 100 ft of horizontal distance) Slope is 1%or less points=3 Slope is>1%-2% points=2 Slope is>2%-5% points=1X Slope is greater than 5% points=0 S 1.2.The soil 2 in below the surface(or duff layer)is true clay or true organic(use NRCS definitions): Yes=3 No=0 X 0 S 1.3.Characteristics of the plants in the wetland that trap sediments and pollutants: 6 Choose the points appropriate for the description that best fits the plants in the wetland. Dense means you have trouble seeing the soil surface(>75%cover),and uncut means not grazed or mowed and plants are higher than 6 in. Dense, uncut,herbaceous plants>90%of the wetland area points=6X Dense,uncut,herbaceous plants>%of area points=3 Dense,woody,plants>%of area points=2 Dense, uncut,herbaceous plants>A of area points=1 Does not meet any of the criteria above for plants points=0 Total for S 1 Add the points in the boxes above 1 7 Rating of Site Potential If score is:_12=H X 6-11=M _0-5=L Record the rating on the first page S 2.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the water quality function of the site? S 2.1. Is>10%of the area within 150 ft on the uphill side of the wetland in land uses that generate pollutants? XYes=1 No= 0 1 S 2.2.Are there other sources of pollutants coming into the wetland that are not listed in question S 2.1? Other sources Yes=1 No=OX 0 Total for S 2 Add the points in the boxes above 1 Rating of Landscape Potential If score is:X 1-2=M _0=L Record the rating on the first page S 3.0. Is the water quality improvement provided by the site valuable to society? S 3.1. Does the wetland discharge directly(i.e.,within 1 mi)to a stream,river, lake,or marine water that is on the 303(d) list? X Yes=1 No=0 1 S 3.2. Is the wetland in a basin or sub-basin where water quality is an issue?At least one aquatic resource in the basin is on the 303(d)list. X Yes=1 No=0 1 S 3.3. Has the site been identified in a watershed or local plan as important for maintaining water quality?Answer YES if there is a TMDL for the basin in which unit is found. X Yes=2 No=0 12 Total for S 3 Add the points in the boxes above 4 Rating of Value If score is:X 2-4=H _1=M _0=L Record the rating on the first page Wetland Rating System for Western WA:2014 Update 11 Rating Form—Effective January 1,2015 Wetland name or number SLOPE WETLANDS Hydrologic Functions - Indicators that the site functions to reduce flooding and stream erosion S 4.0. Does the site have the potential to reduce flooding and stream erosion? S 4.1.Characteristics of plants that reduce the velocity of surface flows during storms:Choose the points appropriate 1 for the description that best fits conditions in the wetland.Stems of plants should be thick enough(usually>1/a in),or dense enough, to remain erect during surface flows. Dense,uncut,rigid plants cover>90%of the area of the wetland points=1X All other conditions points=0 Rating of Site Potential If score is:X 1=M _0=L Record the rating on the first page S 5.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the hydrologic functions of the site? S 5.1. Is more than 25%of the area within 150 ft upslope of wetland in land uses or cover that generate excess surface runoff? X Yes=1 No=0 Rating of Landscape Potential If score is:X 1=M _0=L Record the rating on the first page S 6.0.Are the hydrologic functions provided by the site valuable to society? S 6.1. Distance to the nearest areas downstream that have flooding problems: 0 The sub-basin immediately down-gradient of site has flooding problems that result in damage to human or natural resources(e.g.,houses or salmon redds) points=2 Surface flooding problems are in a sub-basin farther down-gradient points=1 No flooding problems anywhere downstream points=OX S 6.2. Has the site been identified as important for flood storage or flood conveyance in a regional flood control plan? Yes=2 No=OX 0 Total for S 6 Add the points in the boxes above 0 Rating of Value If score is:_2-4=H _1=M X 0=L Record the rating on the first page NOTES and FIELD OBSERVATIONS: Wetland Rating System for Western WA:2014 Update 12 Rating Form-Effective January 1,2015 Wetland name or number These questions apply to wetlands of all HGM classes. HABITAT FUNCTIONS - Indicators that site functions to provide important habitat H 1.0. Does the site have the potential to provide habitat? H 1.1.Structure of plant community:Indicators are Cowardin classes and strata within the Forested class. Check the 4 Cowardin plant classes in the wetland. Up to 10 patches may be combined for each class to meet the threshold of Y.ac or more than 10%of the unit if it is smaller than 2.5 ac.Add the number of structures checked. X Aquatic bed 4 structures or more:points=4X X Emergent 3 structures:points=2 X Scrub-shrub(areas where shrubs have>30%cover) 2 structures:points=1 X Forested(areas where trees have>30%cover) 1 structure:points=0 If the unit has a Forested class,check if.• X The Forested class has 3 out of 5 strata(cano py,py,sub-canopy,shrubs, herbaceous,moss/ground-cover) that each cover 20%within the Forested polygon H 1.2. Hydroperiods Check the types of water regimes(hydroperiods)present within the wetland. The water regime has to cover more than 10%of the wetland or X ac to count(see text for descriptions of hydroperiods). Permanently flooded or inundated 4 or more types present:points=3 Seasonally flooded or inundated 3 types present:points=2 Occasionally flooded or inundated X 2 types present:points=1 X Saturated only 1 type present:points=0 Permanently flowing stream or river in,or adjacent to,the wetland X Seasonally flowing stream in,or adjacent to,the wetland Lake Fringe wetland 2 points Freshwater tidal wetland 2 points H 1.3.Richness of plant species Count the number of plant species in the wetland that cover at least 10 ft . Different patches of the same species can be combined to meet the size threshold and you do not have to name the species. Do not include Eurasian milfoil,reed canarygrass,purple loosestrife,Canadian thistle If you counted:>19 species points=2 5-19 species points=IX <5 species points=0 H 1.4. Interspersion of habitats 2 Decide from the diagrams below whether interspersion among Cowardin plants classes(described in H 1.1),or the classes and unvegetated areas(can include open water or mudflats)is high, moderate,low,or none.If you have four or more plant classes or three classes and open water,the rating is always high. (:D (:O:) (*) ( 0*) None=0 points Low=1 point Moderate=2 points X All three diagrams in this row ++++ are HIGH=3points Wetland Rating System for Western WA:2014 Update 13 Rating Form-Effective January 1,2015 Wetland name or number H 1.5.Special habitat features: 3 Check the habitat features that are present in the wetland. The number of checks is the number of points. X Large,downed,woody debris within the wetland(>4 in diameter and 6 ft long). X Standing snags(dbh>4 in)within the wetland Undercut banks are present for at least 6.6 ft(2 m)and/or overhanging plants extends at least 3.3 ft(1 m) over a stream(or ditch)in,or contiguous with the wetland,for at least 33 ft(10 m) Stable steep banks of fine material that might be used by beaver or muskrat for denning (>30 degree slope)OR signs of recent beaver activity are present(cut shrubs or trees that have not yet weathered where wood is exposed) X At least X ac of thin-stemmed persistent plants or woody branches are present in areas that are permanently or seasonally inundated (structures for egg-laying by amphibians) Invasive plants cover less than 25%of the wetland area in every stratum of plants(see H 1.1 for list of strata) Total for H 1 Add the points in the boxes above 11 Rating of Site Potential If score is:_15-18=H X 7-14=M _0-6=L Record the rating on the first page H 2.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the habitat functions of the site? H 2.1.Accessible habitat(include only habitat that directly abuts wetland unit). 3 Calculate: %undisturbed habitat 700/p[(%moderate and low intensity land uses)/2]1 50/_ 85% % If total accessible habitat is: >1/3(33.3%)of 1 km Polygon points=3X 20-33%of 1 km Polygon points=2 10-19%of 1 km Polygon points=1 <10%of 1 km Polygon points=0 H 2.2. Undisturbed habitat in 1 km Polygon around the wetland. 3 Calculate: %undisturbed habitat70°74[(%moderate and low intensity land uses)/2]1 50/ 85% % Undisturbed habitat>50%of Polygon points=3X Undisturbed habitat 10-50%and in 1-3 patches points=2 Undisturbed habitat 10-50%and>3 patches points=1 Undisturbed habitat<10%of 1 km Polygon points=0 H 2.3. Land use intensity in 1 km Polygon: If 0 >50%of 1 km Polygon is high intensity land use points=(-2) <-50%of 1 km Polygon is high intensity points=0X Total for H 2 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Landscape Potential If score is:X 4-6=H _1-3=M _<1=L Record the rating on the first page H 3.0. Is the habitat provided by the site valuable to society? H 3.1. Does the site provide habitat for species valued in laws, regulations,or policies?Choose only the highest score 2 that applies to the wetland being rated. Site meets ANY of the following criteria: points=2 X It has 3 or more priority habitats within 100 m(see next page) It provides habitat for Threatened or Endangered species(any plant or animal on the state or federal lists) It is mapped as a location for an individual WDFW priority species It is a Wetland of High Conservation Value as determined by the Department of Natural Resources It has been categorized as an important habitat site in a local or regional comprehensive plan,in a Shoreline Master Plan,or in a watershed plan Site has 1 or 2 priority habitats(listed on next page)within 100 m points=1 Site does not meet any of the criteria above points=0 Rating of Value If score is:X 2=H _1=M _0=L Record the rating on the first page Wetland Rating System for Western WA:2014 Update 14 Rating Form-Effective January 1,2015 Wetland name or number WDFW Priority Habitats Priority habitats listed by WDFW`(see complete descriptions of WDFW`priority habitats,and the counties in which they can be found,in: Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife.2008. Priority Habitat and Species List.Olympia,Washington. 177 pp.http://wdfw.wa.gov/publications/00165/wdfw00165.pdf or access the list from here: httR://wdfw.wa.goy/conservation/1hs/list/) Count how many of the following priority habitats are within 330 ft(100 m)of the wetland unit: NOTE. This question is independent of the land use between the wetland unit and the priority habitat — Aspen Stands: Pure or mixed stands of aspen greater than 1 ac(0.4 ha). X Biodiversity Areas and Corridors: Areas of habitat that are relatively important to various species of native fish and wildlife(full descriptions in WDFW PHS report). — Herbaceous Balds: Variable size patches of grass and forbs on shallow soils over bedrock. — Old-growth/Mature forests: Old-growth west of Cascade crest-Stands of at least 2 tree species,forming a multi- layered canopy with occasional small openings;with at least 8 trees/ac(20 trees/ha)>32 in(81 cm)dbh or>200 years of age.Mature forests-Stands with average diameters exceeding 21 in(53 cm)dbh;crown cover may be less than 100%;decay,decadence,numbers of snags,and quantity of large downed material is generally less than that found in old-growth;80-200 years old west of the Cascade crest. — Oregon White Oak: Woodland stands of pure oak or oak/conifer associations where canopy coverage of the oak component is important(full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p. 158-see web link above). X Riparian: The area adjacent to aquatic systems with flowing water that contains elements of both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems which mutually influence each other. — Westside Prairies: Herbaceous,non-forested plant communities that can either take the form of a dry prairie or a wet prairie(full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p.161 -see web link above). Instream: The combination of physical,biological,and chemical processes and conditions that interact to provide functional life history requirements for instream fish and wildlife resources. X Nearshore: Relatively undisturbed nearshore habitats. These include Coastal Nearshore,Open Coast Nearshore,and Puget Sound Nearshore.(full descriptions of habitats and the definition of relatively undisturbed are in WDFW report- see web link on previous page). — Caves: A naturally occurring cavity,recess,void,or system of interconnected passages under the earth in soils,rock, ice,or other geological formations and is large enough to contain a human. — Cliffs: Greater than 25 ft(7.6 m)high and occurring below 5000 ft elevation. — Talus:Homogenous areas of rock rubble ranging in average size 0.5-6.5 ft(0.15-2.0 m),composed of basalt,andesite, and/or sedimentary rock,including riprap slides and mine tailings.May be associated with cliffs. X Snags and Logs: Trees are considered snags if they are dead or dying and exhibit sufficient decay characteristics to enable cavity excavation/use by wildlife.Priority snags have a diameter at breast height of> 20 in(51 cm) in western Washington and are>6.5 ft(2 m)in height Priority logs are> 12 in(30 cm)in diameter at the largest end,and> 20 ft (6 m)long. Note:All vegetated wetlands are by definition a priority habitat but are not included in this list because they are addressed elsewhere. Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 15 Rating Form-Effective January 1,2015 Wetland name or number CATEGORIZATION BASED ON SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS Wetland Type Category Check off any criteria that apply to the wetland. Circle the category when the appropriate criteria are met. SC 1.0. Estuarine wetlands Does the wetland meet the following criteria for Estuarine wetlands? —The dominant water regime is tidal, —Vegetated,and —With a salinity greater than 0.5 ppt Yes-Go to SC 1.1 No=Not an estuarine wetland SC 1.1. Is the wetland within a National Wildlife Refuge, National Park, National Estuary Reserve, Natural Area Preserve,State Park or Educational,Environmental,or Scientific Reserve designated under WAC 332-30-151? Yes=Category I No-Go to SC 1.2 Cat.I SC 1.2. Is the wetland unit at least 1 ac in size and meets at least two of the following three conditions? —The wetland is relatively undisturbed(has no diking,ditching,filling,cultivation,grazing,and has less than 10%cover of non-native plant species. (If non-native species are Spartina,see page 25) Cat.I —At least Y.of the landward edge of the wetland has a 100 ft buffer of shrub,forest,or un-grazed or un- mowed grassland. —The wetland has at least two of the following features:tidal channels,depressions with open water,or Cat.II contiguous freshwater wetlands. Yes=Category I No=Category II SC 2.0. Wetlands of High Conservation Value (WHCV) SC 2.1. Has the WA Department of Natural Resources updated their website to include the list of Wetlands of High Conservation Value? Yes-Go to SC 2.2 No-Go to SC 2.3 Cat. I SC 2.2. Is the wetland listed on the WDNR database as a Wetland of High Conservation Value? Yes=Category I No=Not a WHCV SC 2.3. Is the wetland in a Section/Township/Range that contains a Natural Heritage wetland? http://wwwl.dnr.wa.gov/nhp/refdesk/datasearch/`wnhpwetiands.pdf Yes-Contact WNHP/WDNR and go to SC 2.4 No =Not a WHCV SC 2.4. Has WDNR identified the wetland within the S/T/R as a Wetland of High Conservation Value and listed it on their website? Yes=Category I No=Not a WHCV SC 3.0. Bogs Does the wetland(or any part of the unit)meet both the criteria for soils and vegetation in bogs?Use the key below. If you answer YES you will still need to rate the wetland based on its functions. SC 3.1. Does an area within the wetland unit have organic soil horizons,either peats or mucks,that compose 16 in or more of the first 32 in of the soil profile? Yes-Go to SC 3.3 No-Go to SC 3.2 SC 3.2. Does an area within the wetland unit have organic soils,either peats or mucks,that are less than 16 in deep over bedrock,or an impermeable hardpan such as clay or volcanic ash,or that are floating on top of a lake or pond? Yes-Go to SC 3.3 No=Is not a bog SC 3.3. Does an area with peats or mucks have more than 70%cover of mosses at ground level,AND at least a 30% cover of plant species listed in Table 4? Yes=Is a Category I bog No- Go to SC 3.4 NOTE:If you are uncertain about the extent of mosses in the understory,you may substitute that criterion by measuring the pH of the water that seeps into a hole dug at least 16 in deep.If the pH is less than 5.0 and the plant species in Table 4 are present,the wetland is a bog. Cat.1 SC 3.4. Is an area with peats or mucks forested(>30%cover)with Sitka spruce,subalpine fir,western red cedar, western hemlock,lodgepole pine,quaking aspen, Engelmann spruce,or western white pine,AND any of the species(or combination of species)listed in Table 4 provide more than 30%of the cover under the canopy? Yes=Is a Category I bog No=Is not a bog Wetland Rating System for Western WA:2014 Update 16 Rating Form-Effective January 1,2015 Wetland name or number SC 4.0. Forested Wetlands Does the wetland have at least 1 contiguous acre of forest that meets one of these criteria for the WA Department of Fish and Wildlife's forests as priority habitats?If you answer YES you will still need to rate the wetland based on its functions. —old-growth forests(west of Cascade crest):Stands of at least two tree species,forming a multi-layered canopy with occasional small openings;with at least 8 trees/ac(20 trees/ha)that are at least 200 years of age OR have a diameter at breast height(dbh)of 32 in(81 cm)or more. — Mature forests(west of the Cascade Crest):Stands where the largest trees are 80-200 years old OR the species that make up the canopy have an average diameter(dbh)exceeding 21 in(53 cm). Yes= Category I No=Not a forested wetland for this section Cat.I SC 5.0.Wetlands in Coastal Lagoons Does the wetland meet all of the following criteria of a wetland in a coastal lagoon? —The wetland lies in a depression adjacent to marine waters that is wholly or partially separated from marine waters by sandbanks,gravel banks,shingle,or,less frequently,rocks —The lagoon in which the wetland is located contains ponded water that is saline or brackish(>0.5 ppt) during most of the year in at least a portion of the lagoon (needs to be measured near the bottom) Cat.I Yes-Go to SC 5.1 No=Not a wetland in a coastal lagoon SC 5.1. Does the wetland meet all of the following three conditions? —The wetland is relatively undisturbed(has no diking,ditching,filling,cultivation,grazing),and has less than 20%cover of aggressive,opportunistic plant species(see list of species on p. 100). Cat.11 —At least%of the landward edge of the wetland has a 100 ft buffer of shrub,forest,or un-grazed or un- mowed grassland. —The wetland is larger than 1/10 ac(4350 ftz) Yes=Category I No=Category II SC 6.0. Interdunal Wetlands Is the wetland west of the 1889 line(also called the Western Boundary of Upland Ownership or WBUO)? If you answer yes you will still need to rate the wetland based on its habitat functions. In practical terms that means the following geographic areas: — Long Beach Peninsula: Lands west of SR 103 — Grayland-Westport: Lands west of SR 105 Cat — Ocean Shores-Copalis: Lands west of SR 115 and SR 109 Yes-Go to SC 6.1 No=not an interdunal wetland for rating SC 6.1. Is the wetland 1 ac or larger and scores an 8 or 9 for the habitat functions on the form(rates H,H,H or H,H,M Cat.II for the three aspects of function)? Yes=Category I No-Go to SC 6.2 SC 6.2. Is the wetland 1 ac or larger,or is it in a mosaic of wetlands that is 1 ac or larger? Yes=Category 11 No-Go to SC 6.3 Cat.III SC 6.3. Is the unit between 0.1 and 1 ac,or is it in a mosaic of wetlands that is between 0.1 and 1 ac? Yes=Category III No=Category IV Cat.IV Category of wetland based on Special Characteristics If you answered No for all types,enter"Not Applicable"on Summary Form N/A Wetland Rating System for Western WA:2014 Update 17 Rating Form-Effective January 1,2015 Mason County WA GIS Web Map 1 � �.f R• Blue is Low to Moderate Disturbed K , ;► r. Purple is Undisturbed -� 4� I, 1 _ � r `' � '�►-_ �Ft 'a,.�,5 `,i1�jl �t yid�� ., t yf. 1 3/28/2021, 10:51:03 AM 1:12,286 0 0.1 0.2 0.4 mi County Boundary 0 0.15 0.3 0.6 km Tax Parcels (Zoom in to 1:30,000) Source: Esri, Maxar, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA,USGS,AeroGRID,IGN,and the GIS User Community Mason County WA GIS Web Map Application Richard Diaz I Earthstar Geographics I Mason County WA GIS Web Map 1A ° � PW p C l •,a A4 • � R Mi-1r � rr a4* A RRR •} a v s r s a( Ir 'Jr- .4Kff jump �`' ,,,fie. � r "� �'f'�a : _ ��"' r�■e � .�►♦ :,;�,,,./ r _ 14 - .i+ i• ',l• ,;tie ' . r`. w •r' OwAw a. ' • � � + /^ 4.. �, t!Irk T tv,a t Tr 3 f .4 • i r > `_aYy r ra V ` ♦i ,s�e_ 4 .t9la t Up l S-6 ! T a 4 INOC ,M Ir 5/9/2021, 4:30:52 PM 1:3,071 0 0.03 0.05 0.1 mi L County Boundary i i i '—+ 0 0 ill 0 0.04 0.08 0.16 km ❑ Tax Parcels (Zoom in to 1:30,000) rccf ,s G✓et�4.�� a -� /r/' / /� /�(� Source: Esn, Maxar, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, b(W G S G J v/ '—��W ��►+0Gi t /�w�T USDA,USGS,AeroGRID,IGN,and the GIS User Community,Esri,HERE, Garmin,(c)OpenStreetMap contributors,and the GIS user community Mason County WA GIS Web Map Application r— n Richard Diaz I Earthstar Geographics I Esri,HERE,Garmin I 3/24/2021 National Wetlands Inventory R� Y ti f1f.10 lip. Opt .��' � � `�rf .1 � � r.�' �� ;o� •r { � � it / el % £' r' -' .{ .. 1, ' -'. ! i 0; 0 f �� "�e ,� �R f,1K r• .R i� •.�. rr � t � � -r � r ., !t i. e 'f • . r 'y Rr • . ♦. t t. l . r r' 1 - '•- � r * ..-T 'i- j w 1' r , •♦ 6.�r� !' .. .,. t rt r T r � y i .` g. jr � /^� � '�� ' ° �[p f� y .+ �• ♦ }I T r t r y E9Fi;HE E,Garmi6, iPC G USDA FSA, GeoEye.-Maxar a 1:9,028 47.217 1 -123.028 https://www.fws.gov/wetlands/data/mapper.html 1/1 M 27, 2021 Baldwin Assessed Water/Sediment Water 40 Category 5 - 303d Category 4C Category 413 Category 4A Category 2 40 Category 1 Sediment ® Category 5 - 303d ® Category 4C ® Category 413 ® Category 4A v/i Category 2 ® Category 1 WO Improvement Projects 4P Approved In Development Sources:Esri,HERE,Gannin,Intertnap,increment P Corp.,GEBCO,USGS, Miles 0 0.05 0.1 0.2 DEPARTMENT OF FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN,Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan,METI,Esri China(Hong Kong),(c)OpenStreetMap contributors,and ECOLOGY State of Washington M 27, 2021 Baldwin Assessed Water/Sediment Water Category 5 - 303d Category 4C Category 46 Category 4A Category 2 Category 1 Sediment ® Category 5 - 303d ® Category 4C Category 4B Category 4A Category 2 ® Category 1 a 0 0 J J Sources:Esri,HERE,Garrnin,Interrnap,increment P Corp.,GEBCO,USGS, Miles 0 0.05 0.1 0.2 DEPARTMENT OF FAO, NIPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN,Kadester NL, Ordnance Survey,Esri Japan,METI,Esri China(Hong Kong),(c)OpenStreetMap contributors,and ECOLOGY State of Washington 3/28/2021 PHS Report Priority Habitats and Species on the Web y� rt� 3 y r " fir A rtIts • E � � - � � r YTS' � �• ' •.A � � ' � 1. Era - - ` _ f � �•. � � y } , ��I �� -. ice\ + A � T �'-• Report Date: 03/28/2021 PHS Species/Habitats Overview: 1/12 Li ingLD AU ID Medium Parameter -QjggQry. Waterbody Name WW IA WQ Improvement Projg&j UNNAMED CREEK 6943 47122D9H7 Water Bacteria 5 (TRIB TO HOOD 14-Kennedy- CANAL) Goldsborough UNNAMED CREEK 6944 47122D9I4 Water Bacteria 5 (TRIB TO HOOD 14-Kennedy- CANAL) Goldsborough Polychlorinated SQUAXIN,PEALE, 14-Kennedy- 36025 47122C817 Tissue Biphenyls(PCBs) 5 AND PICKERING Goldsborough PASSAGES 40976 47123DOGO Water Dissolved 5 GREAT BEND/LYNCH 14-Kennedy- Oxygen COVE Goldsborough 40990 47122D911 Water Dissolved 5 GREAT BEND/LYNCH 14-Kennedy- Oxygen COVE Goldsborough Dissolved CASE INLET AND 15-Kitsap,14- 42986 47122C8F5 Water S Kennedy- Oxygen DANA PASSAGE Goldsborough Dissolved CASE INLET AND 15-Kitsap,14- 42987 47122C8E4 Water 5 Kennedy- Oxygen DANA PASSAGE Goldsborough Dissolved CASE INLET AND 15-Kitsap,14- 42988 47122C8C2 Water 5 Kennedy- Oxygen DANA PASSAGE Goldsborough 43020 47122D8A4 Water Dissolved 5 CASE INLET AND 14-Kennedy- Oxygen DANA PASSAGE Goldsborough Dissolved CASE INLET AND 14-Kennedy- 43022 47122D8B1 Water 5 Goldsborough,15 Oxygen DANA PASSAGE -Kitsap 49030 47123DOF1 Water Dissolved 5 GREAT BEND/LYNCH 14-Kennedy- Oxygen COVE Goldsborough Polychlorinated CASE INLET AND 14-Kennedy- 52934 47122D8B1 Tissue Biphenyls(PCBs) 5 DANA PASSAGE Goldsborough 64721 47122D8D0 Tissue Polychlorinated 5 CASE INLET AND 14-Kennedy- Biphenyls(PCBs) DANA PASSAGE Goldsborough Dissolved CASE INLET AND 14-Kennedy- 66082 47122C8G5 Water Oxygen 5 DANA PASSAGE Goldsborough,15 -Kitsap Dissolved CASE INLET AND 14-Kennedy- 66084 47122C812 Water 5 Goldsborough,15 Oxygen DANA PASSAGE -Kitsap 66085 47122D8D1 Water Dissolved 5 CASE INLET AND 14-Kennedy- Oxygen DANA PASSAGE Goldsborough 66088 47122D8I2 Water Dissolved 5 CASE INLET AND 14-Kennedy- Oxygen DANA PASSAGE Goldsborough 66135 47122D9I8 Water Dissolved 5 GREAT BEND/LYNCH 14-Kennedy- Oxygen COVE Goldsborough 66263 47123BOF2 Water Dissolved 5 LITTLE SKOOKUM 14-Kennedy- Oxygen INLET Goldsborough 73408 47123COC2 Water Temperature 5 UNCLE JOHN CREEK 14- Kennedy-Goldsborough Search Results - 20 Matched Listings 1/1