HomeMy WebLinkAbout125-05 - Ord. Amending Capital Facilities Element of the Mason County Comprehensive Plan ORDINANCE NUMBER 125 - 05 AMENDMENT TO THE CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT OF THE MASON COUNTYCOMPREHENSIVE LAN AN ORDINANCE amending the Capital Facilities Element of the Mason County Comprehensive Plan, under the authority of Chapters 36 . 70 and 36 . 70A RCW . WHEREAS , the Washington State Growth Management Act (RCW 36 . 70A . 130) requires each county, including Mason County, to take legislative action to review and revise its comprehensive plan and development regulations to ensure that the plan and regulations continue to comply with the requirements of the Act ; and WHEREAS , as part of the public review process in workshops and public hearings before the Mason County Planning Advisory Commission and the Mason County Board of Commissioners , the Public Works Department, Utility and Waster Management and Parks Department, Facilities and Grounds Department, and the Department of Community Development have prepared changes to the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS , in October and November 2005 , the Mason County Planning Advisory Commission discussed proposed changes and additions to the Comprehensive Plan, and the Planning Advisory Commission members evaluated and passed motions to recommend approval of these proposed changes and additions ; and WHEREAS , the Mason County Board of Commissioners held a public hearing about the proposed changes and additions on December 5 , 2005 , to consider the recommendations of the Planning Advisory Commission, and the testimony and letters of Mason County staff and citizens on the proposed revisions to the Capital Facilities Element of the Mason County Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS , On December 13 , 2005 , the Mason County Board of County Commissioners reopened the public hearing and considered additional recommendations of Mason County staff. WHEREAS , based upon the staff report, text of the proposed revisions to the Capital Facilities Element of the Mason County Comprehensive Plan, and public testimony, the Mason County Board of Commissioners has approved the findings of fact to support its decision as ATTACHMENT A. Ordinance No . 125, 05 (continued) NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY ORDAINED , the Mason County Board of Commissioners hereby approves and ADOPTS the revisions amending the Capital Facilities Element of the Mason County Comprehensive Plan, as described by ATTACHMENT B . Effective date : This ordinance shall take effect immediately. Severability : If any provision of this ordinance or its application to any person, entity, or circumstance is for any reason held invalid, the remainder of the ordinance or the application of the provisions to other persons , entities , or circumstances is not affected . DATED this 13th day of December 2005 . BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MASON COUNTY, WASHINGTON ATTEST : �. MOT JayniEtamin, Chair rson Clerk of the Board APPROVED AS TO FORM : Lynda Ring Erickson ommissioner Pros cuti Attorney Tim Sheldon, Commissioner ATTACHMENT AMENDINGTHE CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT OF THE MASON COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE BE IT ORDAINED . Section 1 . The Mason County Board of Commissioners ( BOCC) makes the following findings . 1 ) Mason County has adopted a Comprehensive Plan pursuant to Chapter 36 . 70A . RCW , the State Growth Management Act ( GMA) . Mason County' s Comprehensive Plan includes provisions for continuing evaluation and review of the Comprehensive Plan and implementing regulations , and that it shall only be amended through established procedures ( Mason County Comprehensive Plan : Chapter I Introduction ; 1 -2 - The Growth Management Act Planning Process , Comprehensive Plan Amendments , p . k2 . 3 ) . 2 ) The GMA , RCW 36 . 70A . 1 30 (2 ) ( a ) ( iii ) , includes provisions for amending the capital facilities element of a comprehensive plan when occurring concurrently with the adoption of amendment of a county or city budget . Section 2 . General Procedural Findings . The BOCC makes the following findings regarding the Work Program and public participation aspects for amending the Comprehensive Plan : 1 ) The DCD gave the public until May 1 , 2005 to propose revisions to the Comprehensive Plan and development regulations related to the GMA compliance review . A summary of the 103 individual comments and suggestions , including staff recommendations for including or excluding these items from the 2005 Work Plan , is provided as an appendix to the 2005 Comprehensive Plan Update Review Work Program . 2 ) DCD published a 2005 Comprehensive Plan Update Review Proposed 2005-2006 Work Program Draft Project Clustering and Hearings Dates , with an accompanying staff report dated June 13 , 2005 . In that document , DCD recommended the 2005 Work Plan include review and analysis of Capital Facilities Element of the Mason County Comprehensive Plan 3 ) On June 19 , 2005 , the Planning Advisory Board ( PAC ) , following timely and effective public notice , recommended adoption of the 2005 Comprehensive Plan Update Work Program , as recommended in the aforementioned Work Program . 4 ) On August 2 , 2005 the BOCC , following timely and effective public notice , adopted the 2005 Comprehensive Plan Update Work Plan . CADocuments and Settings\tjm\Local SettingsUempTinal Draft findings of fact. doc Section 3 . Substantive Findings Relating to Text and Policy Amendments . The Board of County Commissioners makes the following findings with respect to the text and policy amendments to the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan : 1 ) On September 12 , 2005 , the Planning Commission held a work study session to review this Element update . 2 ) Staff from the Public Works Department , Utility and Waster Management and Parks Department , Facilities and Grounds Department , the Budget Director, and the Department of Community Development reviewed the draft document for consistency between other portions of the County Comprehensive Plan and for consistency between capital budget decisions and land use plans pursuant to RCW 36 . 70A . 120 , GMA- mandated Capital Facilities Plan Element components pursuant to RCW 36 . 70A . 070 (3 ) , and public participation requirements of RCW 36 . 70A . 020 ( 11 ) . 3 ) On November 7 , 2005 the Planning Advisory commission in a public hearing for consideration and additional public comment heard all of the proposed areas of review . The Planning Advisory Commission recommended adoption of the proposed amendment with revisions . 4 ) On December 5 , 2005 , the Mason County Board of County Commissioners held a public hearing about the proposed changes and additions and to consider the recommendations of the Planning Advisory Commission and testimony and letters of Mason County staff and citizens on the proposed revisions to the Capital Facilities Element of the Mason County Comprehensive Plan . 5 ) On December 13 , 2005 , the Mason County Board of County Commissioners reopened the public hearing and considered additional recommendations of Mason County staff. Section 4 . Conclusion . From the preceding findings , it is concluded that the amendment to the Capital Facilities Plan Element , dated December 13 , 2005 , should be adopted as proposed and moved by the Board the 2005 revisions to the Capital Facilities Element of the Mason County Comprehensive Plan . BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MASON COUNTY, WASHINGTON Chair, Boa of County Commissioners 0 . � 43 - c4 ) Date CADocuments and SettingsVirri .ocal SettingsJempTinal Draft findings of fact. doc ATTACHMENT December 13 , 2005 Mason County Comprehensive Plan - August, 1998 (updated in 2005) Capital Facilities Chapter CAPITAL FACILITIES VI - I INT UCTION Purpose The Capital Facilities Chapter contains the capital facilities element, one of the six elements required for Mason County's Comprehensive Plan under the Growth Management Act (GMA) (36 . 70A. 070 RCW) . This element provides an inventory of existing conditions and publicly owned facilities by quantifying capital facilities currently provided by Mason County or by other jurisdictions operating in the County. - - The chapter also contains goals and policies for the capital facilities operated by Mason County, except for transportation facilities, which are discussed in the Transportation Chapter. The capacity of the County facilities and the level of service they provide is discussed and compared with the County's desired levels of service . The " level of service" is an objective measure of how well services are provided to the public . Deficiencies and improvement needs are identified, improvement costs are estimated, projects are scheduled for six and 20- year planning horizons, and a six-year finance plan and possible financing options are discussed. Besides the City of Shelton, there are other public organizations and special districts which have capital facilities and taxing authority exist in the county. These include the school districts, hospital district, port districts, cemetery district, regional library system, and fire districts . These districts have their own governing body and capital facilities planning. The county coordinated the comprehensive plan with these bodies, through meetings, correspondence, and by providing draft of the comprehensive plan to these districts for comment. A list of these districts is provided below . VI 14 Mason County Comprehensive Plan - August, 1998 (updated in 2005) Capital Facilities Mason General Hospital Port of Allyn Port of Dewatto Port of Grapeview Port of Hoodsport Port of Shelton School District #42 School District #54 School District #68/137 School District #309 School District #311 School District #402 School District #403 School District #404 Fire Protection District # 1 Fire Protection District #2 Fire Protection District #3 Fire Protection District #4 Fire Protection District #5 Fire Protection District #6 Fire Protection District #8 Fire Protection District #9 Fire Protection District #11 Fire Protection District #12 Fire Protection District # 13 Fire Protection District #16 Fire Protection District # 17 Fire Protection District #18 Cemetery District #1 Belfair Water District #1 Public Utility District #1 Public Utility District #3 Organization and Contents The following section of this chapter, VI-2, includes a list of goals and policies that provides the direction for future capital facility decisions for Mason County. Subsequent sections, VI-3 through 8 , profile and analyze seven types of capital facilities in the County, as follows : ¥ Wastewater and Wastewater Utilities ¥ Solid Waste Utility ¥ Parks and Recreation Facilities ¥ County Administration Buildings ¥ Police and Criminal Justice Buildings ¥ Stormwater Management Facilities Sections 3 through 8 each includes a brief description of the existing systems and public entities that provide the facilities . An assessment of future facility needs is also developed for each category of facility. The last section of this chapter, V140, discusses financing for county owned and operated facilities for the six year financial planning period 2006 to 2011 . Facility Needs A number of methods can be used to determine Mason County's capital facility needs over the next six and 20-year GMA planning periods . As not all capital facilities require the same level of analysis to determine needed improvements, different analytical techniques can be employed to identify facility needs as long as they accomplish the goal of determining future VI. 1-2 Mason County Comprehensive Plan - August 1998 (updated in 200fl Capital Facilities need for the capital facilities . While the state Growth Management Act requires that level of service (LOS) standards be established to identify transportation improvements , the need for other capital facilities can be assessed using either LOS or planning level assumptions (WAC 365 - 195 -315 ) . The advantage of using LOS standards is the ability to quantify deficiencies and identify improvement needs . The LOS can also be used as a performance standard for concurrency by comparing the service level being provided by a capital facility against the quantitative LOS standard. The service is considered deficient if it does not meet the service level standard that the County has determined it wants to deliver to its residents and users . The LOS approach makes the most sense where there are easily quantifiable facilities or where the state has defined the standards , such as for sewer and water facilities . The less rigorous planning assumptions approach also has advantages . The capital facilities planning assumptions are not quantitative measures of facility need. Instead, they identify facility improvements based upon the need to serve growth and development anticipated in the land use element. This approach works best where identification of quantitative measures would be difficult, where there are no statewide standards, or where the necessary information or data to apply quantitative measures would be difficult or too time-consuming to obtain . Facilities such as parks and recreation and stormwater facilities might best be handled with this approach. Financing Facility needs are identified, and a six-year finance plan is developed, in section VI- 10 for the following County-owned-and-operated facilities . • Sewer • Water • Parks and recreation • Stormwater This section also includes the results of facility planning efforts completed by the County for County administrative buildings, police and criminal justice facilities , and solid waste facilities . Financing needs and options are included for these facilities as well . VI 1-3 Mason County Comprehensive Plan - August 1998 (updated in 2005) Capital Facilities Concurrence Manazement One of the Growth Management Act goals, referred to as " concurrency, " is the provision of infrastructure facilities and services to serve projected growth at the time such growth occurs, or within a reasonable time afterwards . This starts with identifying specific facility needs using the strategies previously discussed. Another important aspect of concurrency is the ability to monitor the development of infrastructure improvements to assess whether they keep pace with approved development . Concurrency management, as it is called, involves a set of land use and permit approval processes designed to ensure that facilities and services keep pace with growth . In some cases, development codes could be enacted to require that specific LOS standards be promulgated through the development of identified improvements . In other cases, restrictions to growth may be imposed until appropriate service standards for capital facilities are achieved. This might be the approach required for unincorporated areas within the City of Shelton Urban Growth Area (UGA), for instance. Land use applications for certain development proposals, in areas targeted for future growth, could have their approvals withheld pending concomitant development of appropriate urban service level facilities (e. g. , sewer facilities) . The municipality would be responsible for managing the concurrent development of these urban services. This can be accomplished by requiring that individual developers fund and implement needed improvements. Under this arrangement, the final tenant (e. g. , home buyer or building purchaser) would ultimately pay for the new facilities through a higher initial purchase price or through a periodic assessment. Mason County' s policies for concurrency management are contained in the following section, VI-2 . He14 Mason County Comprehensive Plan " April, 1996 (updated 2005) Capital Facilities VI GOALS AND POLICIES Introduction Mason County's Capital Facilities Element is guided by goals and policies for the preferred service philosophy of the County. Goals and policies are required as part of the Capital Facilities Element (RCW 36 . 70A) of the overall GMA Comprehensive Plan. Development Process Mason County evaluated it ' s existing facilities, it ' s future needs, it ' s costs, and the types and levels of services which it should require or provide in the county. The goals and policies listed herein are the result of this process . Policies listed under General Capital Facilities apply to all facilities addressed in the Capital Facilities Chapter. Facility-specific policies apply only to those facilities . General Capital Facilities Policies Land Use Manage land use change and develop County facilities and services in a manner that directs and controls land use patterns and intensities . CF401 Establish urban services that shall require concurrency under the GMA. CF402 Ensure that future development bears a fair share of capital improvement costs necessitated by the development . The County shall reserve the right to collect mitigation impact fees from new development in order to achieve and maintain adopted level of service standards . CF403 Extend facilities and services in a manner consistent with the following County-wide policies previously adopted in 1992 (see Section II-3 ) . CF404 County facilities shall be provided at urban or rural levels of service, as defined in the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan . CF405 Develop capital facilities within established urban growth areas (UGAs) to conform to urban development standards . CF- 106 Develop capital facilities within UGAs that are coordinated and phased through inter jurisdictional agreements . CF407 Coordinate and support other capital facility plans from special purpose districts, cities and towns, and other non-county facility providers that are VI924 Mason County Comprehensive Plan - April 1996 (updated 2005) Capital Facilities consistent with this and other chapters of the Comprehensive Plan, CF408 As the capital facilities plan is amended to reflect a changing financial situation or changing priorities, the land use chapter shall be reassessed on at least a biennial basis to assure internal consistency of the land use chapter with the capital facilities chapter and its six-year financial plan. Concurrency Establish standards for levels of service for County public facilities, and ensure that necessary facilities are available at the time new development impacts existing systems . CFm201 After adoption of this Comprehensive Plan and subsequent development regulations, level of service standards for each type of public facility shall apply to development permits issued by Mason County. CF-202 Adopt level of service standards and concurrency requirements recommended in this plan for wastewater/sanitary systems, water supply systems, transportation facilities , and Storm water management facilities . CFm203 Public facilities needed to support development shall be available concurrent with the impacts of development. The county shall establish development regulations which will establish procedures and requirements to assure that the concurrency requirements are met. CF-204 New development which has potential storm water impacts shall provide evidence of adequate storm water management for the intended use of the site. This policy shall apply in all areas of the county. CF-205 Building permits for any building necessitating domestic water systems shall provide evidence of an adequate water supply for the intended use of the building. Proposed subdivisions and short plats shall not be approved unless the county makes written fmdings that adequate provisions for potable water are available for each development site. This policy shall apply in all areas of the county. CFm206 Building permits for any building necessitating wastewater treatment shall provide evidence of an adequate sanitary sewer system for the intended use of the building. This policy shall apply in all areas of the county. Finance Develop a six-year finance plan for capital facilities that meets the recommendations of the comprehensive plan, achieves the County's levels of service, and is financially attainable. V12-2 Mason County Comprehensive Plan - April 1996 (updated 2005) Capital Facilities CF-301 Adopt a six-year capital improvement program that identifies projects, outlines a schedule, and designates realistic funding sources for all County capital facility projects . CF-302 For all capital facility projects, evaluate alternatives to programs , purpose, and service as a method to reduce capital facilities and associated operating costs . CF-303 Develop a public process that informs , notifies and allows participation on all capital facility proposals . Essential Public Facilities Facilitate the siting of essential public facilities sponsored by public or private entities within unincorporated areas when appropriate. CF401 Identify and allow for the siting of essential public facilities according to procedures established in this plan. Essential public facilities shall include group homes, state and local correctional facilities, substance abuse facilities, and mental health facilities . Work cooperatively with the City of Shelton and neighboring counties in the siting of public facilities of regional importance. Work cooperatively with state agencies to ensure that the essential public facilities meet existing state laws and regulations which have specific siting and permitting requirements . CF402 Review proposed development regulations to ensure they allow for the siting of essential public facilities consistent with the goals, policies and procedures established in this plan. Facility-Specific Policies Wastewater/Sanitary Sewer Assure that wastewater facilities necessary to carry out comprehensive plan are available when needed, and finance these facilities in an economic, efficient, and equitable manner. CF-501 Maintain a safe, efficient and cost-effective sewage collection and treatment system. CF-502 Require all new development within designated urban growth areas and rural activity centers to connect to existing or proposed public sewer systems . Public sewer systems are those owned and operated by any legally recognized municipal organization as a public utility. CF-503 Allow existing single-family homes with septic systems to continue using VI 2-3 Mason County Comprehensive Plan - April, 1996 (updated 2005) Capital Facilities septic systems that conform to existing standards . Replace deficient septic systems in a timely fashion. CF-504 Provide a septic system management and education program to protect groundwater quality and promote the proper care and use of septic systems . C&505 Eliminate any unlicensed point or non-point pollution sources associated with sewage transport and disposal . C&506 Monitor infiltration and inflow in major public systems through routine inspection. Conduct improvements to limit and reduce current infiltration and inflow. C &507 Encourage innovative approaches to onsite wastewater treatment . Water Supply Assure that water facilities necessary to carry out the comprehensive plan are available when needed, and finance those facilities in an economic, efficient and equitable manner. CF-601 Ensure that the supply and distribution of water in public systems is consistent with the Mason County Comprehensive Plan. C&602 Ensure that future water system expansions and service extensions are provided in a manner consistent with the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan. Where possible, those uses designated by the Land Use Element to require fire flow should be serviced by a Class A water system. Parks and Recreation Achieve level of service targets for park land and facilities that support County objectives and priorities . CF401 Identify and preserve significant geographic, historic and environmental features and other characteristics that reflect Mason County's natural and cultural heritage . CFm702 Increase park development within urban areas and develop a comprehensive system of multi-purpose trails throughout the County. C&703 Develop and adopt a realistic long-range schedule for park management, maintenance, and operation . Adopt a workable six - . year County capital improvement program (CIP) to be updated annuallyevefy-six -ye-a a;Lome a as a a . VI. 2-4 Mason County Comprehensive Plan - April, 1996 (updated 2005) Capital Facilities C =704 Update current 1991 Comprehensive Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan in 2006 4-9-96 to project future demands and needs ; define acquisition, leases, and development opportunities; draft financial implementation programs ; and be eligible for state and federal grants . Administrative Services Develop and implement a long-range program of expansion and improvement to accommodate the County's projected administrative staffing requirements . CF-801 Annually review the long-range facilities plan for buildings and space improvements to efficiently provide work space for projected staffing levels. Police and Criminal Justice Develop and implement a coordinated facility program among the departments and agencies that provide the County's police and criminal justice services . CF-901 Complete a strategic long-range plan for the effective and coordinated operation and management of all County police and criminal justice functions, including a full analysis of all space and facility needs required to support the plan. CF-902 Explore alternative funding sources for law and justice facilities and operations, including contracts for service with other agencies , and joint use of facilities . Stormwater Management Create a facilities strategy which preserves and supplements necessary natural drainage processes and other natural systems to minimize runoff impacts from development. CF4001 Investigate needs and means for implementing and maintaining a safe and cost-effective storm and stormwater collection system in identified problem areas . CF4002 Protect surface and ground water quality through state and local controls and public education on water quality issues . CF4003 Design stormwater systems to meet the approval standards prescribed in the Mason County Stormwater Management Ordinance. CF4004 Protect physical and biological integrity of wetlands, streams, wildlife habitat, and other identified critical areas . VI 2-5 Mason County Comprehensive Plan - April 1996 (updated 2005) Capital Facilities CF4 005 Maintain water quality within all Shoreline Management Act waterfront areas through careful design, operation, construction, and placement of public facilities . CF4006 Carefully control development in areas with steep slopes where surface water runoff can create unstable conditions . Maintain natural vegetation for slope stabilization . CF4 007 Public facility development shall minimize impacts to shorelines, preserving the natural stream environments where possible . CF4008 Comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) and state regulations . CF4009 Under no circumstances should hazardous waste be allowed to contaminate the groundwater, surface water, or sewer systems of Mason County. Dispose of hazardous wastes only in locations designated for that purpose . Solid Waste Ensure that garbage collection and recycling needs of the County are met in an efficient and cost-effective manner. CF4101 Manage a cost-effective and responsive solid waste collection system. CF4102 Manage solid waste collection methods to minimize litter, neighborhood disruption, and degradation of the environment. CF4103 Promote the recycling of solid waste materials through waste reduction and source separation. Develop educational materials on recycling and other waste reduction methods . CF4104 Work cooperatively with cities, the Washington State Department of Ecology, and the Mason County Health District to achieve an environmentally safe and cost-effective solution to the disposal of catch basin wastes and street sweepings . VZ24 Mason County Comprehensive -elan - April, 1996 (updated 2005) Capital Facilities . 3 WATER AND WASTEWATERUTILITIES Introduction The County owns and operates small water and sewer systems for the Ilarstene Pointe and Rustlewood communities , and the water system for Beard' s Cove community. In addition, the County operates a medium-sized wastewater collection system and treatment plant for the North Bay Case Inlet area. This area was defined through studies of the area contributing human sewage contamination to Case Inlet, and the system service area was set accordingly. In the smaller community-based systems, there is no planned expansion beyond the existing platted lots . These systems currently provide services to approximately 1200 customers, with the potential to serve an additional 100 . The North Bay Case Inlet system provides service to approximately 950 customers, with additional capacity to serve an estimated 400-850 additional equivalent residential units within the existing service area. The following "Water" and "Wastewater" sections provide project-level detail on the planned improvements necessary to meet state regulatory guidelines in the provision of water and wastewater services for these systems . Each project in each section is accompanied by a separate project sheet which provides a description and justification, along with a table depicting the estimated costs and funding sources for planning period 2004 through 2010 . Each section is followed by a summary table which provides overall costs and funding sources for each water and sewer system. Financing the planned utility improvements requires the use of grants, loans, and capital reserves . The specific combination of funds, and the availability of grants and loans, may affect user rates for each system as well as the timing on projects . The ability to initiate specific projects will be assessed annually based on the urgency of need, reserve funds available, and commitments from funding agencies to provide grants and/or loans . The decisions about whether or not to proceed with any planned project is the decision of the Mason County Board of Commissioners for consideration in the in the annual budgeting and rate-setting process . To the extent possible, projects will be funded through: 1 ) Rate revenues (capital reserves) 2) Grants ; 3 ) Low interest loans ; or 4) Some combination of 1 -3 above . Project costs shown in each section range in accuracy from + or — 40% to + or — 15 % . Each project cost sheet identifies the accuracy of the estimated costs shown, based on the following scale : • "Planning Level" — The least accurate of costs estimates, in the range of + or — 40% . Cost estimates at this level are usually based on a project concept and some assessment of relative scale, or annual program amounts commensurate with a level of activity sufficient to accomplish the intent of the program over time . VI . 34 Mason County Comprehensive Plan - April, 1996 (updated 2005) Capital Facilities • "Design Report" — Moderate accuracy, in the range of + or — 30 % . Based on design report evaluation of options and an assessment of project elements and associated costs . • "Engineer' s Estimate" — Most accurate estimate, in the range of + or — I 5 % . These estimates are based on a project design or significant completion of design work. Future System Development Included in the wastewater sections of this document are additional projects that are not associated with the existing County-owned utility systems . These projects represent efforts to provide utility services to areas which have been identified as problems with regard to density and water quality, but where no established systems are currently in place . There are two such areas where the County is currently investing resources in the long-term resolution of identified problems . Be fair Urban Growth Area The County is currently in the information gathering phase to determine the feasibility of providing wastewater collection and treatment for the Belfair Urban Growth Area and Hood Canal North Shore area. The analysis will provide refined options for potential sewer pipe alignments, cost estimates for collection and treatment, and options for project phasing. If the decision is made to proceed with the development of this system, the costs will be handled separately from the existing utilities, until project completion and rate revenues are generated to cover system costs . The project is expected to enter into the design phase in 20065, with project completion within three two years of the start date. Hoodsport Rural Activity Center The development of a sewer facility plan is currently underway for the Hoodsport Rural Activity Center. This plan will address options for collection and treatment of the more densely populated Hoodsport area. Here too, the funding for any recommended system development will initially be provided through grants and/or loans until there is an established rate base to provide payments for the system. VI. 3 -2 Mason_ County Comprehensive flan - April, 1996 (updated 20052 Capital Facilities 2006-2011 WATER & WASTEWATER UTILITIES Summary of Capital Expenditures by Fun (in thousands) WATER 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 TOTAL Hartstene Pointe410 10 10 10 10 10 10 60 Rustlewood -411 5 5 5 5 5 5 30 Beard 's Cove412 25 15 15 15 15 15 100 Total ® 40 30 30 30 30 30 190 Funding Grants : Loans : Rates : 40 30 30 30 30 30 190 Total : 40 30 30 30 30 30 190 WASTEWATER 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 TOTAL North Bay CI -403 25 55 260 260 75 75 750 WW Dev405 3000 17000 33000 450 0 0 53450 Hartstene Pointe-410 580 50 50 50 50 10 790 Rustlewood411 1270 0 0 0 0 0 1270 Total . 4875 17105 33310 760 125 85 56260 Funding Grants : 1000 15000 6000 0 0 0 22000 Loans : 3795 2000 27185 635 0 0 33615 Rates : 80 105 125 125 125 85 645 Total : 4875 17105 33310 760 125 85 56260 VI3 -3 Mason County Comprehensive Plan - April, 1996 (updated ZOOS) Capital Facilities 20W2011 Capital Facilities Plan Worksheet Parks , Utilities , & Waste Management Fund : 410 -Hartstene Pointe Sewer Project Name : Minor Facility and System Improvements Program Estimates : Planning Level Description : Annual improvements program for system facilities, buildings, and grounds . Projects may include small piping improvements, pump stations, lighting, exterior painting, and other general improvements. Justification : The treatment plant and system construction provided basic functionality, however the facilities and system need improvements from time to time to correct deficiencies and improve operational capabilities . Plant operations and system maintenance staff are not equipped to address these types of improvements in addition to the plant operations. It is also anticipated that the work can be completed professionally and more expediently through contracts with specialty firms . Estimated Project Costs (in thousands) 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 TOTAL Prelim Engineering Design Engineering Construction 0 10 10 10 10 10 50 TOTAL COST : 0 10 10 10 10 10 50 Funding Sources : Grants Loans Rates 0 10 101 101 10 1 101 50 TOTAL FUNDING: 0 1 101 101 101 10 1 101 50 VI . 34 Mason County Comprehensive Flan - April, 1996 (updated 20052 Capital Facilities 2006-2011 Capital Facilities Plan Worksheet Parks , Utilities , & Waste Management Fund : 410 — artstene Pointe Sewer Project Name : Infiltration and Inflow Removal Program Estimates : Planning Level Description : Annual program to reduce the flow of surface water and groundwater entering the collection system. Projects may include : system inspections, manhole replacements, pipe replacement, and manhole or pipe connection sealing and grouting. pipe, new or replacement valves and looping. Justification : Federal and state regulations require treatment systems to remove 85 % of the contaminants from flows coming to the treatment plant. When inflow and infiltration is excessive, the plant cannot achieve the required standard, resulting in potential permit violations . In addition, valuable plant capacity is used to treat flows which do not require treatment. Plant operational costs also increase with the excess flows due to infiltration and inflow. Estimated Project Costs (in thousands) 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 TOTAL Prelim Engineering Design Engineering 5 5 5 5 5 25 Construction 35 35 35 35 35 175 TOTAL COST : 40 40 40 40 40 0 200 Funding Sources : Grants Loans Rates 40 40 40 1 40 1 40 01 200 TOTAL FUNDING : 40 40 40 40 40 01 200 VI . 3 -5 Mason County Comprehensive Plan - April, 1996 (updated 2005) Capital Facilities 2006-2016 Capital Facilities Plan Worksheet Utilities & Waste Management Fund : 410 - Hartstene Pointe Sewer Project Name : Plant Outfall Extension and Operational Upgrades Estimates : Planning Level Description : This project will design and construct an extension of the existing treatment plant outfall between 2 ,000 and 2, 500 lineal feet beyond it ' s current location along with plant improvements necessary for the new outfall to function effectively (may include upgrades for pumping, electrical, and emergency power supply) . Justification : The surrounding shellfish tract near the existing outfall for the treatment facility is closed due to the potential hazards associated with water quality from a possible plant failure. Washington State Department of Natural Resources (DNR) permits the location of the existing outfall on sub-tidal lands which are controlled by the state. DNR is unwilling to renew the permit for the outfall given the affects on shellfish. In turn, the Department of Ecology cannot renew the state discharge permit without the necessary permit for the outfall location. . Therefore, the outfall must be relocated in order to continue plant operations at this location area. Estimated Project Costs (in thousands) 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 TOTAL Prelim Engineering Design Engineering 40 40 Construction 500 500 TOTAL COSTS : 540 540 Funding Sources . Grants Loans 540 540 Rates TOTAL FUNDING : 540 540 VI. 3-6 Mason County Comprehensive elan - April, 1996 (updated 2005) Capital Facilities 2006-2011 Capital Facilities Plan Worksheet Parks , Utilities , & Waste Management Fund : 403 - North Bay Sewer System Project Name : Minor Facility and System Improvements Program Estimates : Planning Level Description : Annual improvements program for system facilities , buildings, and grounds . Projects may include small piping improvements, pump stations, lighting, exterior painting, and other general system improvements . Justification : The treatment plant and system construction provided basic functionality, however the facilities and system need improvements from time to time to correct deficiencies and improve operational capabilities . Plant operations and system maintenance staff are not equipped to address these types of improvements in addition to the plant operations . It is also anticipated that the work can be completed professionally and more expediently through contracts with specialty firms . Estimated Project Costs (in thousands) 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 TOTAL Prelim Engineering Design Engineering Construction 10 10 10 10 75 10 125 TOTAL COST : 10 10 10 10 75 10 125 Funding Sources : Grants Loans Rates 10 10 10 10 75 10 125 TOTAL FUNDING : 10 10 10 10 75 10 125 VI . 3 -7 Mason County Comprehensive Plan - April, 1996 (updated 2005) Capital Facilities 2006-2011 Capital Facilities Plan Worksheet Parks , Utilities , & Waste Management Fund : 403 -North Bay Sewer System Project Name : Mobile Home Park Pump Station Improvements Estimates : Planning Level Description : Upgrade existing 3 HP pumps that pass solids with 5 HP submersible grinder pumps to improve the pump station performance and capacity. Justification : The existing pumps require additional maintenance and are subject to periodic clogging. They are also undersized to handle the increased flow due to expansion of the original sub-basin and unanticipated levels of infiltration and inflow. Estimated Project Costs (in thousands) 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 TOTAL Prelim Engineering Design Engineering 2 . 5 2 *5 Construction 12 . 5 12.5 TOTAL COST: 15 0 0 0 0 0 15 Funding Sources : Grants Loans Rates 15 0 0 0 0 0 15 TOTAL FUNDING: 15 01 01 0 01 01 15 VI . 3 - 8 Mason County Comprehensive Plan - April, 1996 (updated 2005) Capital Facilities 2006 -2011 Capital Facilities Plan Worksheet Parks , Utilities , & Waste Management Fund : 403 -North Bay Sewer System Project Name : Pump Station Overflow Reroute Estimates : Planning Level Description : Analyze options, then design and construct the piping and receiving basins to detain pump station overflows resulting from failures at the primary transmission line booster pumps . Justification : The current pump stations are situated near receiving waters that could be affected in the event of a pump failure and overflow. This project will analyze the options for routing this potential overflow to artificial detention ponds, rather than it reaching the surface waters where the effects would be much more pronounced. Design and construction are included in the costs following the initial analysis of options . Estimated Project Costs (in thousands) 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 TOTAL Prelim Engineering 45 45 Design Engineering 75 75 Construction 175 250 425 TOTAL COST: 0 45 250 250 0 0 545 Funding Sources : Grants Loans 185 185 370 Rates 0 45 65 65 1 01 01 175 TOTAL FUNDING: 0 45 250 250 1 01 0 1 545 VI . 3 -9 Mason County Comprehensive Plan - April 1996 (updated 2005) Capital Facilities 2006-2011 Capital Facilities Plan Worksheet Parks , Utilities , & Waste Management Fund : 403 -North Bay Sewer System Project Name : Treatment Plant Capacity Upgrades Estimates : Planning Level Description : Analyze the options for providing additional treatment plant capacity and provide engineering to design the improvements for construction in subsequent years . Justification : The existing plant maybe reaching design capacity for treatment in 2010 . This will require us to revisit the original sewer facility plan and address how we will maintain sufficient capacity for the twenty-year period beyond 2010. This project outlines the need for funding to conduct the analysis and design the next increment of capacity for the plant. Estimated Project Costs (in thousands) 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 TOTAL Prelim Engineering 65 65 Design Engineering Construction TOTAL COST: 0 0 0 0 0 65 65 Funding Sources : Grants Loans Rates 65 65 TOTAL FUNDING : 0 0 0 0 1 0 65 65 VI . 3 - 10 Mason County Comprehensive flan - April, 1996 (updated 20052 Capital Facilities 20W2011 Capital Facilities Plan Worksheet Parks , Utilities , & Waste Management Funds 411 — Rustlewood Sewer Project Name : Infiltration and Inflow Removal Program Estimates : Planning Level Description : Annual program to reduce the flow of surface water and groundwater entering the collection system. Projects may include : system inspections, manhole replacements , pipe replacement, and manhole or pipe connection sealing and grouting . pipe, new or replacement valves and looping. Justification : Federal and state regulations require treatment systems to remove 85 % of the contaminants from flows coming to the treatment plant. When inflow and infiltration is excessive, the plant cannot achieve the required standard, resulting in potential permit violations . hi addition, valuable plant capacity is used to treat flows which do not require treatment. Plant operational costs also increase with the excess flows due to infiltration and inflow . Estimated Project Costs (in thousands) 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 TOTAL Prelim Engineering Design Engineering 70 70 Construction 200 200 TOTAL COST : 270 0 0 0 0 0 270 Funding Sources : Grants Loans 270 270 Rates TOTAL FUNDING: 270 270 VI . 341 Mason County Comprehensive Plan - April, 1996 (updated 2005) Capital Facilities 2006-2011 Capital Facilities Plan Worksheet Parks , Utilities , & Waste Management Fund : 411 — Rustlewood Sewer Project Name : Treatment Plant Upgrades Estimates : Design Report Description : Evaluate treatment plant deficiencies . Design and construct improvements to address new water quality standards as well as rehabilitate aging plant systems . Improvements to include : influent headworks, solids separation, sludge treatment, effluent disinfection, remote system monitoring, and pumping capacities . Justification : The existing plant is over 30 years old, and many of the main components are worn to the point that rebuilding them would be more costly than replacement. In addition, regulatory expectations for treatment performance have increased since the original plant was constructed, requiring upgrades to the former treatment methods . Estimated Proiect Costs (in thousands) 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 TOTAL Prelim Engineering Design Engineering 155 155 Construction 845 845 TOTAL COSTS : 1000 1000 Funding Sources : Grants * Loans 985 985 Rates 15 15 TOTAL FUNDING : 1000 1000 VI A2 Mason County Comprehensive Plan ® April, 1996 (updated 2005) Capital Facilities 2006 -2011 Capital Facilities Plan Worksheet Parks , Utilities , & Waste Management Fund ® 405 - Wastewater Systems Development Fund Project Name ® Belfair Area Sewer Improvements Estimates ® Planning Level Description : Plan, design, and construct the sewer collection, transmission, and treatment facilities to serve the Belfair Urban Growth Area and the Hood Canal North Shore area. Treatment facilities may include localized facilities and/or transmission to other established facilities . Justification : Water quality in Hood Canal adjacent to the proposed sewer service areas is severely degraded and a declaration of severe public health hazard was issued by the Washington State Department of Health in March of 2002 . The primary contaminant for this portion of Hood Canal is fecal coliform, which has been attributed to failing onsite septic systems on the adjacent shorelines and upland areas . Estimated Proiect Costs (in thousands) 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 TOTAL Prelim Engineering Design Engineering 2000 500 2500 Construction 11500 18000 250 29750 TOTAL COST : 2000 12000 18000 250 0 0 32250 Funding Sources : Grants 10000 6000 16000 Loans 2000 2000 12000 250 16250 Rates TOTAL FUNDING : 2000 12000 18000 250 0 0 32250 VL343 Mason County Comprehensive Plan - April 1996 (updated 2005) Capital Facilities 2006-2011 Capital Facilities Plan Worksheet Parks , Utilities , & Waste Management Fund : 405 - Wastewater Systems Development Fund Project Name : Hoodsport Area Sewer Improvements Estimates : Planning Level Description : Plan, design, and construct the sewer collection, transmission, and treatment facilities to serve the Hoodsport shoreline area, from the Hoodsport Rural Activity Center to the north to the Skokomish Tribe to the south. Collection and treatment facilities may include local facilities and/or transmission to centralized facilities . Justification : Water quality in Hood Canal adjacent to the proposed sewer service area is being degraded due to nitrogen and fecal coliform, which has been attributed to failing onsite septic systems on the adjacent shorelines and upland areas . A wastewater management system must be established to ensure effective collection and treatment of this waste to avoid a declaration of public health hazard in the future . The development and redevelopment of legally existing lots within the study area is too concentrated given the proximity to Hood Canal and other physical and topographical characteristics . Estimated Proiect Costs (in thousands) 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 TOTAL Prelim Engineering Design Engineering 1000 1000 Construction 5000 15000 200 20200 TOTAL COST : 1000 5000 15000 200 0 0 21200 Funding Sources : Grants 1000 5000 6000 Loans 15000 200 15200 Rates TOTAL FUNDING : 1000 5000 15000 1 200 0 0 1 21200 VI . 344 Mason County Comprehensive Plan - April, 1996 (updated 2005) Capital Facilities 2006s=2011 Capital Facilities Plan Worksheet Parks , Utilities , & Waste Management Fund : 412 — Beards Cove Water Project Name : Distribution System Improvements Estimates : Planning Level Description : This program is designed to provide annual incremental improvements to the water distribution system to ensure its continued viability and integrity. Annual projects may include the following : addition and replacement of fire hydrants, replacement of small sections of pipe, new or replacement valves and looping, or well and pumping station improvements . Justification : Over the past two decades, maintenance activity for the water system has consisted primarily of leak repairs and service repairs or replacement . To ensure the continued performance of the system, it is necessary to replace key components as they wear out. These small projects for pipe replacement are beyond the current staff resources and much more efficiently performed by outside contractors . Finally, several of the fire hydrants on this system are in need of replacement and many need modifications to accommodate 4" stortz fittings . Estimated Prolect Costs (in thousands) 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 TOTAL Prelim Engineering Design Engineering 4 3 3 3 3 3 19 Construction 16 7 7 7 7 7 51 TOTAL COST : 20 10 10 10 10 10 70 Funding Sources : Grants Loans Rates 20 10 10 10 1 10 10 70 TOTAL FiJNDING : 20 10 10 10 10 10 70 V1 3 - 15 Mason County Comprehensive Plan " April, 1996 (updated 2005) Capital Facilities 2006-2011 Capital Facilities Plan Worksheet Parks , Utilities , & Waste Management Fund : 412 — Beards Cove Water Project Name : Minor Facility Improvements Estimates : Planning Level Description : This program is designed to provide annual incremental_ improvements to the existing water system facilities to ensure their long term integrity. Annual projects may include the following: storage tank exterior coatings, pump house structures, fencing, roofing, driveway surfaces, site electrical improvements, etc . Justification : In order to preserve the storage and pumping systems, we must maintain the facilities that surround them. If we do not pursue preventative maintenance on these facilities the costs to bring them up to an acceptable condition will be much higher. These facilities are also the publicly visible portion of our system, therefore, it is important that the facilities are kept in good condition. Estimated Project Costs (in thousands) 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 TOTAL Prelim Engineering Design Engineering Construction 5 5 5 5 5 51 30 TOTAL COST : 51 5 5 5 5 5 30 Funding Sources : Grants Loans Rates 5 51 5 51 51 51 30 TOTAL FUNDING: 5 51 51 51 51 51 30 VL346 Mason County Comprehensive elan - April, 1996 (updated 2005) Capital Facilities 2006 -2011 Capital Facilities Plan Worksheet Parks , Utilities , & Waste Management Fund : 410 - 200 Hartstene Pointe Water Project Name : Hartstene Pointe Minor System Improvements Estimates : Planning Level Description : This program is designed to provide annual incremental improvements to the water distribution system to ensure its continued viability and integrity. Annual projects may include the following : addition and replacement of fire hydrants, removal and replacement of asbestos-concrete (AC) pipe, new or replacement valves and looping, or well and pumping station improvements . Justification : Over the past two decades, maintenance activity for the water system has consisted primarily of leak repairs and service repairs or replacement. To ensure the continued performance of the system, it is necessary to replace key components as they wear out. In addition, the system ' s water mains are predominately made of AC pipe . When leaks occur, the crews may discover that larger sections of pipe need to be replaced rather than just the leaking section. These small projects for pipe replacement are beyond the current staff resources and much more efficiently performed by outside contractors . Finally, several of the fire hydrants on this system are in need of replacement and many need modifications to accommodate 4" stortz fittings . Estimated Proiect Costs (in thousands) 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 TOTAL Prelim Engineering 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 Design Engineering 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 Construction 8 8 8 8 8 8 48 TOTAL COST : 10 10 10 10 10 10 60 Funding Sources : Grants Loans Rates 10 10 10 10 10 10 60 TOTAL FUNDING : 10 10 10 10 1 10 10 60 VI .3 - 17 Mason County Comprehensive Plan - April, 1996 (updated ZOOS) Capital Facilities 2006-2011 Capital Facilities Plan Worksheet Parks , Utilities , & Waste Management Fund : 411 - 200 Rustlewood Water Project Name : Distribution System Improvements Estimates : Planning Level Description : This program is designed to provide annual incremental improvements to the water distribution system to ensure its continued viability and integrity. Annual projects may include the following : addition and replacement of fire hydrants, replacement of small sections of pipe, new or replacement valves and looping, or well and pumping station improvements . Justification : Over the past two decades, maintenance activity for the water system has consisted primarily of leak repairs and service repairs or replacement. To ensure . the continued performance of the system, it is necessary to replace key components as they wear out. These small projects for pipe replacement are beyond the current staff resources and much more efficiently performed by outside contractors. Finally, several of the fire hydrants on this system are in need of replacement and many need modifications to accommodate 4" stortz fittings . Estimated Proiect Costs (in thousands) 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 TOTAL Prelim Engineering Design Engineering 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 Construction 4 4 4 4 4 4 30 TOTAL COST : 5 5 5 5 5 5 30 Funding Sources : Grants Loans Rates 5 5 5 5 5 5 30 TOTAL FUNDING : 5 5 5 5 5 5 30 VL348 Mason County Comprehensive Plan " April, 1996 (updated 2005) Capital Facilities ® 4 SOLID WASTE UTILITY Introduction Mason County' s solid waste utility provides transfer and disposal operations for solid waste at four transfer station locations, and eight "blue box" drop off sites for household recyclable materials . The largest transfer facility is located outside Shelton on Eels Hill Road . Materials collected from the other smaller stations at Hoodsport, Union, and Belfair, are transported to the Shelton facility for shipping to Centralia, WA. From there, the material is long-hauled via railroad to Roosevelt Landfill in Klickitat County, located in Eastern Washington. Household hazardous wastes (HHW) are collected and disposed of by Mason County staff at the Shelton transfer facility. Residents in North Mason County can take their HHW to the Kitsap County transfer station. This arrangement is established through interlocal agreement and Mason County pays approximately $ 120 per customer for collection and disposal or materials from residents who take their materials to the Kitsap County facility. The Shelton transfer facility is located at the former Mason County Landfill. The current utility provides post-closure monitoring and capital construction in support of the closed landfill. The Shelton facility receives wastes collected by private and municipal haulers operating inside Mason County. The Belfair and Shelton transfer facilities are nearing capacity in terms of the tonnage they can effectively handle on a daily basis . Growth in the Belfair area and elsewhere in the County continues to impact operations at these facilities and capacity improvements will need to be addressed in the near future . The following pages provide details on specific projects proposed for the current capital facilities planning period. Proj ect estimates range in accuracy from + or — 40 % to + or — 15 % . Each project cost sheet identifies the accuracy of the estimated costs shown based on the following scale : • "Planning Level" — The least accurate of costs estimates, in the range of + or — 40% . Cost estimates at this level are usually based on a project concept and some assessment of relative scale, or annual program amounts commensurate with a level of activity sufficient to accomplish the intent of the program over time. "Design Report" — Moderate accuracy, in the range of + or — 30% . Based on design report evaluation of options and an assessment of project elements and associated costs . "Engineer ' s Estimate" — Most accurate estimate, in the range of + or — 15 % . These estimates are based on a project design or significant completion of the design work . VI 44 Mason County Comprehensive Plan " April, 1996 (updated 2005) Capital Facilities 2006-2011 SOLID WASTE UTILITY Summary of Capital Expenditures by Fund (in thousands) SOLID WASTE 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 TOTAL Solid Waste402 Fund 98 372 1272 1274 774 28 3818 Total : 98 372 1272 1274 774 28 3818 Funding Grants : 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Loans : 0 0 1000 1000 500 0 2500 Tipping Fees : 98 372 272 274 274 28 1318 Total : 98 372 1272 1274 774 28 3818 VL 4-2 Mason County Comprehensive Plan - April, 1996 (updated 2005) Capital Facilities - 1 Capital Facilities Plan Worksheet Parks , Utilities , & Waste Management Fund : 402 = Solid Waste Project Name : Minor Facility Improvements Estimates : Design Report Description : Annual program to ensure continued operational effectiveness of transfer station facilities and preserve existing assets . Improvements will include : road resurfacing, facility roof replacements, minor building modifications, storage or handling facility construction, or modifications to comply with regulatory requirements or preserve capacity. Justification : Normal operation of transfer station facilities requires ongoing facility improvements to existing fixed assets to maintain overall operational capabilities . Providing an annual program and funding to complete these improvements is more efficient from an administrative perspective and prudent in terms of ensuring the longevity of existing assets . Estimated Protect Costs (in thousands) 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 TOTAL Prelim Engineering Design Engineering Construction 21 22 22 1 24 24 28 141 TOTAL COST : 21 22 22 24 24 28 141 Funding Sources : Grants Loans Tipping Fees 21 22 22 24 24 28 141 TOTAL FUNDING : 21 22 22 24 24 28 141 irlo 4-3 Mason County Comprehensive Plan - April, 1996 (updated 2005) Capital Facilities 20W2011 Capital Facilities Plan Worksheet Parks , Utilities , & Waste Management Fund : 402 - Solid Waste Project Name : Belfair Household Hazardous Waste Facility Improvements Estimates : Design Report Description : Design and construct a facility to provide household hazardous waste collection services to north county residents . Justification : Currently north county residents must take their household hazardous waste to the Kitsap County facility. This service is provided through an interlocal agreement which costs $ 125 . 00 per visit. The costs are the same no matter what type of material is dropped off at their facility. Our own facility would save us considerable cost for disposal of less harmful materials such as motor oil or latex paints . Operation of a county-owned facility would allow us to tailor the hours of operation and types of material accepted to decrease these costs . Estimated Proiect Costs (in thousands) 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 TOTAL Prelim Engineering Design Engineering 4 4 Construction 56 56 TOTAL COST : 60 60 Funding Sources : Grants Loans Tipping Fees 60 60 TOTAL FUNDING : 60 60 VL 4-4 Mason County Comprehensive elan - April9 1996 (updated 2005) Capital Facilities Capital Facilities Plan Worksheet Parks , Utilities , & Waste Management Fund : 402 ® Solid Waste Project Name ® Shelton Household Hazardous Waste Facility Improvements Estimates ® Design Report Description : Expand storage capacity and improve handling area to improve efficiency and provide impervious surface area and necessary containment. Justification : Use of the facility has increased annually over the past several years requiring expansion and improvement of the existing facilities . Estimated Project Costs (in thousands) 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 TOTAL Prelim Engineering Design Engineering 2 2 Construction 15 15 TOTAL COST : 17 17 Funding Sources : Grants Loans Tipping Fees 17 17 TOTAL FiJNDING : 17 17 VI 4-5 Mason County Comprehensive Plan - April, 1996 (updated 2005) Capital Facilities 2006-2011 Capital Facilities Plan Worksheet Parks , Utilities , & Waste Management Fund : 402 - Solid Waste Project Name : County-wide Transfer Station Capacity Improvements Estimates : Planning Level Description : Plan, design, and construct enhancements to existing sites or new transfer station facilities to provide access to solid waste and collection of other wastes for the entire county. Justification : The existing facilities are reaching their capacity and in many cases they are also approaching the end of their useful life . A capacity analysis will be completed in 2005 in conjunction with the update of the Solid Waste Management Plan. This project will ensure the placeholder costs to implement the findings and recommendations of this analysis . Estimated Proiect Costs (in thousands) 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 TOTAL Prelim Engineering Design Engineering 350 350 Construction 1250 1250 750 3250 TOTAL COST : 350 1250 1250 750 3600 Funding Sources : Grants Loans/Bonds 1250 1250 750 3250 Tipping Fees 350 350 TOTAL FUNDING : 3600 VI. 44 Mason County Comprehensive flan - April, 1996 (updated 2005U Capital Facilities VT 4- 7 Mason County Comprehensive Plan - April, 1996 (updated 2005) Capital Facilities VI. 5 PARKS AND RECREATION FACILITIES System Description Recreational opportunities in Mason County include parks for day-use activities and overnight camping ; fresh and salt water areas for boating and other water sports ; facilities and equipment for sports and play activities; and wilderness areas and other open spaces for hiking, hunting, and horseback riding. Existing parks and recreation facilities in Mason County are available through a variety of public and private entities . Federal and state facilities include camping, boating, and day-use parks . The County-owned park system includes day-use and water access facilities, sports fields , and related recreational areas . Other agencies providing park and recreational resources include municipalities, port districts, and public schools . Some private recreational facilities are open to the public as well . County Park Facilities The County currently manages 18 park properties in Mason County two of which are undeveloped, and three others have large portions which are also undeveloped. Of the developed parks, two are large baseball/softball complexes, five provide saltwater access parks, two are located on freshwater lakes, and three provide upland day use and recreation facilities (see FIGURE vi. 5 - 1 ) . In addition to the day use facilities, the County also owns and maintains one above-ground skate park. The conditions of these facilities vary by location, however, significant investment in facilities has been made in the last two years from Real Estate Excise Tax proceeds (BEET 2). The capital plan for the next six years continues this trend of investment in park development and facility upgrades. The heavy use and demand from both county and non-County residents are particularly high during the spring and summer. In recent years, parks operated by Mason County have received substantial increases in visitors . Total visits increased 52 percent from 1992 to 1993 , from 180, 600 to 274, 500 annual visits . Nearly half of the total increase was at Sandhill Park, a sports park in Belfair. Sandhill's visitation increased by 230 percent, from 20,300 to 67,000 visits, due in large part to increased use of the park by local baseball, softball, and soccer leagues . Mason County Recreation Area, the largest baseball/softball complex has grown in use the last several years and is now recognized regionally as a preferred site for major tournaments . There are no facilities for overnight camping throughout the Mason County Parks system . The last county-wide park plan was developed in 1991 and subsequently updated in the late 1990s . Funding is being provided to develop a new county-wide parks plan in 2006 . The VL 54 Mason County Comprehensive Plan - April, 1996 (updated 2005) Capital Facilities previous plan recommended two sites for development as overnight camping facilities , Truman Glick Memorial Park and Mason Lake Park. Camping options will be examined in the long-term development plan being crafted for these and other park properties with large portions of undeveloped land . Inventory An inventory of all Mason County parks including federal, state, private, and County-owned parks is listed in TABLE vi. 54 . Also included are the number of acres and amenities available at each park location. The locations of parks and recreational facilities operated by the County are shown on FIGURE vi . 5 - I . VI 5-2 Mason County Comprehensive Plan - April, 1996 (updated 2005) Capital Facilities Figure VI. 5- 1 . --- Masson County IIIIIII_ IMF County Parks Jefferson IF 6 County - _ IN- Kitselp Comty x$ wAxiPjft t9Rf ' ' ' z A Yi in FF L"A �Fp z - ` "a i IF Eaa l l I IF Re4ffnd Hondyrolt1. inner t _ 2 r : cam, ! Co4llry Pala . -' `, D{#, /IGoamy.Rcads ON! Fee ef a �7afruya IJtyti; ,/�'.if Hiphu#ys t Inn5 diznn s r �.� r MS�erBeaos Nine ek, a ` Podoral land sce n.:! , G Y ( �. Ytif cent I Lein © olyrnpcfiaNulal FGlCit Grays Harbor x " "••• d qm rt Hiiicnel P!M County If woz I It N, Fee 0 5 �tr F i xa s Pt2rl.'E ?:OUrlty PtA�+�niB;, Un=U,Ca�xhf °kfi�ltiYxa�LD�snNh`-Y lWt1oGA It In _ _ Ft Fie t'o-.++r-tti+l!Ettuzm# *P^ g "S+ � RelgaKu we mNJrxJa . °' 1. .Er rr o r s l:n ' r x `d r+. wry ha is se Mttn ft AlnmLc unrtAe l +ere fi weye 16leNda $ snot ea andrydaasr r 'v e r rL nl ter=rla tf(mwrs mu-!. �uYli � ,m y _ ;� era - ikSam, L1%rnp Fv�'Y if ' tares' eltl gar amnJarea Wes r but » r - TVs Frtpw16 FmdvW Will AmQ111 . . • . , J fee I f. net j%IF x peG1AINa2ANe[riVAOY OG LMNLIi,' MY. _ J MI .wi MNnI /1' .era • B - � IA1 DfanC wre& xrbfF3nl�h. in"I void ft kk.ni .�-aM' X r x DI al a Rmyk{s rlyasalMn TYnlC+ea �+a +:. - t� la NlYlhfaf M tKa rtJrK FYetr :Te w,ww �xeyrb� �� t w�c e�'neatvm rtrnysiFF,+am,k.neaena Tp}Y!M rt nY�.x axtk£ydayiw bxM1mSM.Tux- N11 61; 9 i,m 7Wl�a9r>:IV'iwriwlwpaws dyryiCnd h, PApYia'n i%t'nklk'YEeKn eua W Is6Y11M 4a nu,WYiulbli Mr M�NCr - MwnGa'W F . " PYyIHn, 1W eN.C:U- tiMtt t.y Ike he Gi%t hi a hddae,l t»'eo' 1 Li itl a9ic Thurston Counlyn F mw,gD a ye 1 It}e y M! egtxecmmev.'+srndi.nucwraenwmne MI Draw 'mro-tI0111 rnomen+w F7 t�r .le 3 .16 aa.r - 1 . gpY�EViiz UI tic 4.4nmmIrli Jb nl lie 110I ew"I VI 5-3 Mason County Comprehensive Plan - April, 1996 (updated 2005) Capital Facilities TABLE vi.54 . Inventory of Parks (I Name of Facility I Acres I Amenities Available II Washington State Parks Belfair State Park 62 .77 (3 ,780 ft Camping : 134 tent sites, 47 utility sites, tidelands) primitive sites, wheelchair accessible trails trailer dump facility. Harstine Island State Park 310 (3 , 100 ft Currently undeveloped. Future tidelands) development plans include : day use area; walking/hiking trails; 50 camp sites. Harvey Rendsland Jiggs 8 Currently undeveloped; 1 ,905 feet Lake waterfront. Hoods port Trails 80 Natural area with trails . Hope Island 106 Currently undeveloped. Future ( 8, 540 ft tidelands) development plans include : trails ; picnic tables; rest rooms ; 6 to 8 camp sites; group camping for 150 people . Washington Water Trails site . Jarrells Cove 42 . 6 Camping: 20 tent sites ; group site for (3 ,500 ft tidelands) maximum of 64 people, 2 picnic shelters, facilities for handicapped, wheelchair accessible trails, marine pump out station, 2 docks providing 500 feet of moorage, 14 mooring buoys . Fee required. Lake Isabella 193 .75 Currently undeveloped. Future development plans include: full-service park, camping, picnic area, lake-front beach, rest rooms. Plans will be completed in the next 10 to 20 years . Lilliwaup Tide Land (4, 100 ft tidelands) Tidelands for public use . No facilities . Small shoulder area for parking. McMicken Island 11 .45 Currently undeveloped. Boater ( 1 ,660 ft tidelands) destination; clamming. Plans to develop include : 5 to 8 camping sites, composting toilet. VI9 54 Mason County Comprehensive Plan - April, 1996 (updated 2005) Capital Facilities TABLE VI.54 . Inventory of Parks (Continued) �I Name of Facility I Acres I Amenities Available II Washington State Parks Continued Potlatch State Park 56 . 95 Camping: 17 tent sites ; 18 utility sites ; (9, 570 ft tidelands) primitive sites. Underwater park, trailer dumn facilities. Schafer State Park 119 Camping: 47 tent sites, 6 utility sites, primitive sites, day use group area, trailer dump facilities S uaxin Island 31 A Closed indefinitely. Stretch Point 4 .2 Natural area. Day use only; 5 mooring (610 ft tidelands) buoys . No plans for future development. Twanoh State Park 182 Camping: 30 tent sites, 9 utility sites, (3 , 167 ft tideland) primitive sites, handicapped facilities, wheelchair accessible trails . Total 1208 .02 (38,027 ft tideland) Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife Aldrich Lake 0.5 Unpaved boat launch, parking for 15 vehicles. Benson Lake 78 . 8 Boat launch, beach access, parking for 100 vehicles . Cady Lake 1 .6 Unpaved boat launch, parking for 10 vehicles . Clara Lake 9 Unpaved boat launch, parking for 30 vehicles . Devereaux Lake 1 . 3 Boat launch, beach access, parking for 40 vehicles . Haven Lake 4. 1 Unpaved boat launch, parking for 50 vehicles . Island Lake access 1 Freshwater boat launch, toilets . Isabella Lake 1 . 6 Boat launch, parking for 20 vehicles. Lake Kokanee 44 Boat Launch, parking for 100 vehicles. Lake Limerick 0. 5 Boat launch, beach access, parking for 30 vehicles . Lost Lake 1 .3 Boat launch, parking for 40 vehicles . Maggie Lake 0 .4 Unpaved boat launch, parking for 15 vehicles . Mason Lake Boat launch, parking for 30 vehicles . VI. 5-5 Mason County Comprehensive Plan = April, 1996 (updated 2005) Capital Facilities TABLE v1 .54 . Inventory of Parks (Continued) Name of Facility Acres Amenities Available Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife (Continued) Panhandle Lake 20 Undeveloped. Panther Lake 3 . 8 Unpaved boat launch, parking for 30 vehicles . Phillips Lake 1 Boat launch, beach access, parking for 40 vehicles . Pricket Lake 0 . 5 Unpaved boat launch, parking for 30 vehicles. Skokomish River 64 30 . 6 feet of riverfront, shore access, parking for 20 vehicles . Spencer Lake 2 Boat launch, beach access, parking for 50 vehicles . Tahuya River 2 .9 4,400 feet of riverfront, parking for 10 vehicles. Tee Lake 3 . 6 Unpaved boat launch, parking for 20 vehicles. Twin Lake 3 . 6 Unpaved boat launch, parking for 15 vehicles . Union River 61 . 8 8 , 098 feet of riverfront, parking for 10 vehicles . Victor access to Forth Bay 5 Boat launch, pit toilets Wildberry Lake 10 Undevelo ed. Wooten Lake 1 Unpaved boat launch, parking for 60 vehicles . Total 318 .3 Washington State Department of Natural Resources Aldrich Lake Camp 24 1 ,700 feet waterfront, hand boat launch, 4 (approx.) picnic tables, 4 campsites, toilets, drinking water, lake stocked with trout, parking for 16 vehicles . Camp Pond Day use only Camp Spillman 10 800 feet waterfront, 6 camp sites, 4 group a rox. sites, toilets, drinking water. Elfendahl Pass Staging Area 5 11 picnic sites, self-contained RVs okay, toilets, drinking water Howell Lake 3 group sites, 10 campsites, hand boat launch, toilets, drinking water, parking for 20 vehicles . VI 5-6 Mason County Comprehensive Plan " April, 1996 (updated 2005) Capital Facilities TABLE vI.54 . Inventory of Parks (Continued) II Name of Facility I Acres I Amenities Available II Washington State Department of Natural Resources Continued Kammen a Canyon F2 cam sites toilets Mission Creek Trailhead 1 Parking for trail access Robbins Lake 1 . 1 175 feet waterfront, hand boat launch, 3 picnic tables, toilets . Day use only. Tahuya River Horse Camp 12 1 , 600 feet waterfront, 9 campsites, 2 (approx.) group sites, toilets, drinking water, 20 horse corrals . Toonerville 5 .7 570 feet waterfront, 4 campsites, 2 picnic sites, toilets. Twin Lakes 6 camp sites, 3 picnic sites, toilets, hand boat launch. Lake is stocked with trout. Melbourne Lake setting, 1 ,000 feet waterfront, 5 campsites, toilets. Lilhwaup 7 Stream setting, 500 feet waterfront, 13 campsites, toilets, drinking water. Public Tidelands #24 Water access only. Public Tidelands #33 Water access onl . Public Tidelands #34 Water access only. Public Tidelands #43 Road access, clamming. . Public Tidelands #44 a,b Road access, clamming, crab pot fishing. Public Tidelands #46 Water access only, clamming, oysters, shrimp pot fishing. Public Tidelands #47 Water access only, clamming, oysters. Public Tidelands #48 Water access only, clamming, oysters Eagle Creek Recreational Road access, clamming, crabbing. Tidelands Rendsland Creek Tidelands Road access, clamming . Total VI. 5- 7 Mason County Comprehensive Plan ® April, 1996 (updated 2005) Capital Facilities TABLE vi .54 . Inventory of Parks (Continued) II Name of Facility Acres Amenities Available �I United States Forest Service Brown Creek Campground 6 78 camp sites toilets . Hammy Hamma 5 Picnic area, 12 campsites . Campground Lower Lena Lake 6 Hike-in only, 40 camp sites, pit toilets. Campground Upper Lena Lake 7 Hike-in only, 14 camp sites, pit toilets . Campground Total 24 City of Shelton Parks and Recreation Department Brewer Park 0 . 3 3 picnic tables, curbside parking only. Callanan Park 6 .9 Lighted softball field with spectator stands, 7 picnic tables, 2 swings, 1 slide, rest room, foot trails across 4046ot natural depression, parking space for 30 vehicles plus additional parking along street. City Park 1 .75 Currently undeveloped. Eleventh Street Site 0 . 92 Deep well location with the potential to be developed into a city ark. Huff and Puff Trail 80 2 miles of j ogging trail and 20 incorporated exercise stations, drinking fountain and parking for 20 vehicles at trailhead. Kneeland Park 3 . 9 2 slides, swings, 1 merry-go-round, horizontal bars, 1 dome climber, 1 large sand box, 1 small log playhouse, a few rocking saddle mates, horseshoe pit, aging rest room and picnic shelter, deteriorated clubhouse, 10 picnic tables, 2 tennis courts in need of resurfacing, street parking for approximately 25 vehicles. Johnson Park 0 . 5 1 merry-go-round, 1 swing, single basketball backboard and substandard concrete court, street parking for approximately 10 vehicles . VI. 54 Mason County Comprehensive Plan - April, 1996 (updated 2005) Capital Facilities TABLE VI .54 . Inventory of Parks (Continued) Name of Facility Acres Amenities Available City of Shelton Parks and Recreation Department (Continued) Loop Field 4 2 tennis courts, softball field, soccer field, jogging trail along the perimeter, 1 picnic shelter, 5 picnic tables, rest room, parking for 100 vehicles . Oakland Bay Overlook 1903 Views of downtown Shelton, industrial waterfront, Oakland Bay, and the Olympic Mountains, historic band saw display with large log section and interpretive information, paved parking for 5 vehicles. Development plans for the next 2 years include : picnic area, rest rooms, kiosk, small shelter, additional parking, Pine Street Boat Launch 60 feet Crude gravel boat launch and a deteriorating wooden boat repair grid. Total 99 .3 Port of Dewatto Port of Dewatto 1 Camping: 11 with hook-ups, 19 tent sites; Campground 2 rest rooms; nature/hiking trails ; 23 picnic tables ; two picnic shelters;, 1 kitchen; fishing. Future plans to add more stoves and picnic tables, and to place gravel around kitchen. Fee re uired. Port of Shelton Sanderson Field 1 , 170 Flying: 5 ,000 feet of runway, tie downs, skydiving; rifle club; model aircraft society. Future plans to provide increased hangar availability, Oakland Bay Marina Boat moorage. Total 1170 VL 54 Mason County Comprehensive Plan - April, 1996 (updated 2005) Capital Facilities TABLE vi .54 . Inventory of Parks (Continued) Name of Facility Acres Amenities Available Port of Allyn Waterfront Park in Allyn 2 400 feet waterfront, moorage, dock (for up to 15 boats), picnic, gazebo, parking for 20 vehicles . Office building planned, Kayak Park 3 150 feet waterfront, small parking lot, picnic tables, portable toilet facilities . North Shore Ramp 1 .2 150 feet waterfront, boat launch with Belfair/North Shore floating dock, beach access, parking for 20 vehicles with trailers . Port of Hoods port Ingvold Grunvold 2 Dock, saltwater beach access, tidelands, 2 Waterfront Park portable rest rooms. Proposed future development includes an interpretive center and picnic tables . Mason County Latimer' s Landing overflow 2 .5 Primary use is to provide parking for parking area neighboring Latimer's Landing, parking for 20 vehicles . Foothills Park (Sport) 80 1 field which serve as baseball, soccer, and football fields; bleachers; rest rooms ; children's play area; parking for 50 vehicles . Latimer's Landing (Water) .59 Saltwater access boat launch for vessels no longer than 20 feet, parking for 10 vehicles, portable toilet, boat dock; additional parking available at neighboring Latimer ' s Landing overflow parking area. Mason County Fairgrounds 12 100 camp sites with hook ups ; additional (Picnic) space for tent camping, rest rooms and showers ; 30 picnic tables ; horse arena; 2 indoor kitchens ; natural area. Mason County Recreation 40 7 baseball fields which also serve as Area (MCRA Sport) soccer and football fields ; children's play area, bleachers, maintenance shop, user's storage facility, seasonal concession stand, 4 batting cage ; parking for 100 vehicles . This facility serves as the headquarters for the Mason County Parks Department. Fee required for field use . VI 540 Mason County Comprehensive Plan - April, 1996 (updated 2005) Capital Facilities TABLE vI.54 . Inventory of Parks (Continued) Name of Facility Acres Amenities Available Mason County (Continued) Mason Lake Park (Water) 17 . 36 1 .36 acres currently in use; freshwater access/boat launch for small watercraft no longer than 18 feet, dock, play area, rest rooms, 4 picnic table ; parking for maximum of 50 vehicles . The County owns 16 unused acres that can be used for expansion of the park (possible RV area) . Phillips Lake County Park 0 .4 Passive day use area, picnic area, located (Picnic) next to State of Washington Boar Launch with vault type toilets. Sandhill Park (Sport) 30 7 baseball fields, one soccer and football field, bleachers ; parking is available for 45 vehicles Shorecrest Park (Water) 2 . 8 320 feet waterfront, boat launch for vessels no longer than 16 feet, saltwater beach access, 3 picnic tables . Truman Glick Memorial 35 .46 Natural setting, creek, trails, picnic tables, Park (Picnic) covered group shelter, barbecue pit, vault toilets, RV area. Future improvements include : possible construction of group camping area and interpretive signage along trails. Union Community Park L92 Picnic shelter, children's play area; small (Picnic) baseball diamond, basketball court; rest rooms . Union Boat Ramp (Water) 0. 16 Boat ramp for access to Hood Canal, portable toilets, no parking, Hunter Park . 5 2 picnic tables, bus shelter Skate Park . 6 11 above ground ramps Walker Park (Water) 5. 04 Saltwater access to Hammersly Inlet, gravel beach, picnic tables, barbecues, rest rooms, shelter, children' s play area, interpretive center providing marine information; parking for 15 vehicles . Island Oakland Bay 80" T ?��xabitat preservation area Preservation Area and education center Watson Wildwood View 36 Undeveloped Total 272 . 23 VI 541 Mason County Comprehensive Plan - April, 1996 (updated 2005) Capital Facilities TABLE vi.54 . Inventory of Parks (Continued) Name of Facility Acres Amenities Available Mason County Public Schools Belfair Elementary Playground. Sandhill Elementary Playground. Hood Canal 2 baseball backstops, 1 football field, Elementary/Junior High bleachers , playground, track, parking for School 30 vehicles . Oakland Bay Middle School x Olympic Middle School x Pioneer Elementary 2 baseball backstops, covered play area, playground. Gra eview Elementary Playground Southside Elementary 1 baseball backstop . Bordeaux Football field, soccer field, playground, track. Evergreen Elementary Playground. Mountain View Elementary 5 baseball backstops, football field, soccer field, playground. Shelton High School 6 tennis courts, 2 baseball backstops, football field, soccer field, bleachers, 2 swimming pools, track, rest rooms. Mary M. Knight District 2 baseball backstops, 1 football field, bleachers, playground. North Mason High School 2 baseball backstops, 2 tennis courts, football field, soccer field, bleachers, playground, track. Private Facilities Open to the Public Shelton/Soudi Mason Soccer 14 6 soccer fields, 1 under development Park Glen Ayr Canal Resort 10 Adult-only RV park with hookups ; no tent camping, motel, 2 rest rooms, 2 showers, laundry facility, saltwater boat launch, beach access, tidelands, spa, fishing, clamrnin , oysters, dock. Lake Nahwatzel Resort 2 Camping: 12 utility sites, 5 sites without hookups ; 2 rest rooms, 2 showers , boat launch, freshwater beach access, nature/hiking trails, 8 picnic tables , restaurant, fishing, swimming, cabins . ICI 5-12 Mason County Comprehensive Plan - April, 1996 (updated 2005) Capital Facilities Name of Facility Acres Amenities Available Private Facilities Open to the Public Continued Minerva Beach RV Resort 20 Camping : 23 sites without hookups, 50 and Mobile Village sites with hookups ; 5 rest rooms, 6 showers, laundry facilities, boat launch, saltwater beach access, 60 picnic tables, driving range, scuba dive center. Rest-A-While RV Park and 15 Saltwater boat launch, moorage, dock, 70- Marina 80 camp sites with hookups (may be used for RVs or tents), 4 rest rooms, 4 showers, laundry facilities, beach access, clamming, oysters, fishing, boat rentals, nature trail, 60 picnic tables, 2 covered picnic areas with kitchen, concession stand. Future improvements include easier access to marina, and boat fuel. Theler Center unknown Wetlands rite retive trails Lake Cushman 602 .9 Camping: 51 tent sites, 30 utility sites, 2 primitive walk-in sites, group site with cooking shelter for maximum of 56 people, rest rooms with showers ; facilities for handicapped, boat launch, trailer dump facility. Total 663 .9 Other Olympic National Park - Picnic area, 50 camp sites, parking for 60 Staircase Campground vehicles. Tacoma City Light Saltwater 6 picnic tables, rest rooms, saltwater boat Park launch, saltwater beach access. Mike ' s Beach Resort Boat launch, SCUBA diving, cabins, camping, beach access for guests Robin Hood Village 16 RV sites, cabins, camping, beach access for guests COUNTY TOTAL 63,032 .27 VI 543 Mason County Comprehensive Plan - April, 1996 (updated 2005) Capital Facilities Facility Needs As part of the 1991 parks plan, a list of system deficiencies, future project and improvement needs , and costs was developed. The improvements identified incorporate LOS standards promulgated by the National Recreation and Parks Association (NRPA) . These standards and deficiencies will be revisited in 2006, with the development of the new county-wide parks plan . The previous standards are provided below are for park planning purposes and as targets to provide guidance to future capital decisions by the county. They are not intended to identify capital facilities which are necessary for development, and they are not intended to be used in the review of individual projects . Also shown below for comparison purposes are standards used by other counties similar in population size . These standards, shown in TABLE vi. 5 -2 , are important considerations for procuring funding from park and recreation resource agencies . This framework continues to provide the basis for developing a list of improvement requirements and project facility needs on a county-wide basis . In addition, the County recently developed a Master Trails Plan which provides policy guidance and direction in seeking additional trail development throughout the County. Further refinement of facility needs will occur with the development of the new parks plan and through the integration of the new plan with park standards, the Master Trails Plan, and ste- specific long-term development plans . A list of these facility needs, incorporating anticipated sub-regional growth, as developed for the previous parks plan is detailed in Section VI. 10, Finance Plan, along with potential finance options for these facilities . TABLE VI.5-2 . Level of Service Standards for Parks and Recreation Facilities Activity/Facility NRPA Average Standards of Existing Level Proposed Level of Standard Similar-Sized of Service Service C unties Softball field 1 /5 , 000 1 /3 , 000 1 /2,500 1 /52000 Baseball field 1 /500 1 /4, 500 1 / 1 ,400 1 /5 ,000 Soccer field 1 / 10,000 1/ 1 ,500 1 /2, 500 1 / 10,000 Tennis court 1 /2,000 1 / 1 , 830 Basketball court 1 /5 ,000 11500 Handball court 1 /20,000 1 / 1 , 500 Golf - 18 holes 1 /50, 000 1 /20, 330 Golf - 9 holes 1 /25 ,000 1 /7, 000 Pool - indoor — 1 / 10, 000 T1544 Mason County Comprehensive Plan - April, 1996 (updated 2005) Capital Facilities Pool - outdoor 1 /20,000 1 /25 , 000 Archery 1 /50,000 1 / 1 ,500 Target shooting 1 /50, 000 1 /50,000 Neighborhood park — 1 /6,000 Neighborhood park 1 -2 ac/ 1 , 000 2 .9 ac/ 1 ,000 Community park 5-8 ac/ 1 , 000 3 . 5 ac/1 ,000 Regional park — 1/2000 Regional park 5 . 10 ac/ 1 ,000 6 .7 ac/ 1 ,000 Recreation center — 1 /251000 Bicycle trails — .53 mi/ 1 ,000 Hiking uai *Is — 1 .22 mi/1 ,000 Horse trails — 3 .7 mi/ 1 ,000 Picnicking — 2 ac/ 1 ,000 Boating — 4 ac/ 1 ,000 Beach - swimming — 4 ac/ 1 ,000 YL 545 Mason County Comprehensive Plan - April, 1996 (updated 2005) Capital Facilities . 6 COUNTYAND ADMINISTRATIVE UL N S System Descraptzon Mason County owns several buildings, most of which are located in the City of Shelton, the County seat. These buildings are used to support general County functions such as internal management, health, public service, and general administration. Other buildings owned by the County include Memorial Hall, the Cooperative Extension Office, the Mason County Fair/Convention Center, the Central Shop , the Belfair Annex and the Belfair Shop . TABLE vi . 64 describes these sites . Locations of the facilities within the Shelton Campus are shown in FIGURE vi. 6- 1 . Memorial Hall is located in Shelton, a few blocks from the main campus area. The Mason County Extension Office is located about 3 miles north of Shelton, on the northeast side of Highway 101 , across from the Shelton airport. The Central Shop is located on Johns Prairie Road near Bayshore. The Belfair Annex is located on Highway 3 in Belfair and the Belfair Shop is situated on the north shore of Hood Canal about 3 miles from Belfair. Inventory Mason County' s administrative offices and departments housed in the buildings are listed in TABLE vi.6-2 . Also provided is a summary of current office area allocations for the County departments and departmental functions . Most of the County' s administrative offices are located in the Shelton Campus, a four- square-block section of the downtown area At this location, the County operates -from - 12 publicly owned buildings . These include the Courthouse, Jail, Juvenile Detention Facility, Building I, Building 11, Building III, Building IV, Building V, Building VI, Building VII, Building VIII, and Building IX. Other county administrative offices are located at Building X (Belfair Annex), Building XI (Cooperative Extension Building), and the offices at the Mason County Fairgrounds . VI 64 Mason County Comprehensive Plan - April, 1996 (updated 2005) Capital Facilities Facility Needs Facility needs are being developed through a space planning effort currently being updated by the County. This work is based on an assessment of agency needs related to growth in both the six- and 20-year planning horizons . While planning is continuing, the county has identified the space needs for County administration, law enforcement, and criminal justice facilities . Specific planned improvements for the first six-year planning period and associated financing are detailed in Section VI. 10, Finance Plan . Based on the "Space Standards Manual" published by the State of Washington Department of General Administration, 251 square feet are needed per employee. In addition, certain governmental sanctions have special requirements for facilities . Currently the county has a deficit in space. Significant additional space will be required over the next six and twenty years if the county is to offset that deficit and meet the future growth. The information is summarized in Table VI. 6-3 . Needs analysis and facility planning was done in 1995 and 1996 . The background information and analysis can be found in "Update to Mason County Space Needs Analysis for inclusion in the Mason County and Master Plan update, June 16, 1999 . " TABLE vI. 64 . Summary of Administration Sites II Area �I Site Square Feet Acres Shelton Campus 1699200 3 . 88 Memorial Hall 125000 0.275 Extension Office approx. 18,600 43 Fair/Convention Center not reviewed Central Shop - Shelton approx. 156,800 3 . 6 Belfair Annex approx. 5,400 0. 12 Belfair Shop approx. 61 ,000 1A VI &2 Mason County Comprehensive Plan - April, 1996 (updated 2005) Capital Facilities TABLE vi. 6-2 . Buildings and Space Allocations for Administrative Offices Area Department or Office (square feet) Building Assessor 29525 Building I Auditor 39228 Buildings I, XI, Courthouse Central Services - 99 Building I Administration Central Services - Maintenance 757 Building IX Clerk 19430 Building I Community Development 2 , 121 Buildings I, III County Commission 1 ,508 Building I District Court 29322 Courthouse Emergency Services 29176 Port of Shelton Cooperative Extension Office 29377 Extension Office Permit Assistance Center 19726 Building III Health Services 39299 Buildings II, III, IV Probation Services 1 ,383 Courthouse, Building VII Prosecutor/Coroner 3 ,535 Buildings I, VI, VII Public Works - Administration 49293 Building VII Public Works - Maintenance 13 ,230 Central Shop , Belfair Shop Equipment, Rental and 374 Buildings I, IX Revolving Fund ER&R Sheriff 5,386 Courthouse, Belfair Annex Superior Court 49371 Courthouse, Building VI Treasurer 29157 Building I, Courthouse VI 6-3 Mason County Comprehensive ! - April, 1996 (updated 2005) Capital Facilities Department Projections one Summary Sheet Current Projected Allocation Need Deficit / % Deficit Need Need sofa safe Surplus Surplus 2005 2020 Assessor 2 , 525 41662 ( 21137 ) ( 46 % ) 41662 5 , 994 Auditor 3 , 228 41074 ( 846 ) ( 21 % ) 51406 71404 Treasurer 21157 21664 ( 507 ) ( 1996 ) 21886 31330 Budget and Finance 303 444 ( 141 ) ( 32 % ) 444 666 Human Resources 99 444 ( 345 ) ( 78 % ) 444 666 Facilities and Grounds 941 31500 ( 21559 ) ( 7396 ) 51500 61500 Cnty . Comm . / Clerk of Bd . 11508F21664 332 ( 824 ) ( 35 % ) 2 , 554 3 , 776 Clerk 11430 ( 1 , 234 ) ( 46 % ) 3 , 330 4 , 662 District Court 2 , 322 , 926 ( 31604 ) ( 61 % ) 71536 81380 Superior Court 41371 71354 ( 21983 ) ( 41 % ) 9 , 376 11 , 970 Probation Services 1 , 383 31830 ( 2 , 447 ) ( 64 % ) 41274 51828 Juvenile Detention 31584 11 , 200 ( 71616 ) ( 68 % ) 14 , 200 24 , 000 Community Development 21121 21664 ( 543 ) ( 20 % ) 31774 4 , 884 Health Services 31299 51884 ( 21585 ) ( 44 % ) 61500 71882 Permit Assistance Center 21944 41884 ( 1 , 940 ) ( 40 % ) 51550 61438 Fire Marshal 187 222 ( 35 ) ( 16 % ) 444 888 Tourism and Recreation 11704 11410 294 121 % I , 632 11854 Board of Equalization 481 622 ( 141 ) ( 23 % ) 844 844 Public Works 41293 51764 ( 11471 ) ( 26 % ) 61288 61812 ER&R 12 , 829 20 , 626 ( 71797 ) ( 38 % ) 26 , 626 36 , 626 Sheriff 51386 10 , 110 ( 41724 ) ( 4796 ) 12 , 550 17 , 660 Adult Detention 17 , 605 43 , 000 ( 25 , 395 ) ( 59 % ) 49 , 000 58 , 000 Emergency Services 21176 21700 ( 524 ) ( 19 % ) 3 , 700 41900 Prosecutor 3 , 167 31308 ( 141 ) ( 4 % ) 41024 41745 Coroner 368 585 ( 217 ) ( 3796 ) 11800 1 , 800 Cooperative Extension 21377 31386 ( 11009 ) ( 30 % ) 31386 3 , 386 Total 82 , 788 154 , 259 ( 71 , 471 ) ( 46 % ) 186 , 730 239 , 895 He 64 Mason County Comprehensive flan - sl, 1996 (updated 2005) pital Facilities Figure IV. 64 Mason County Campus O BuIldlnai attRow dtY N. SM Street Commbslmna ODaunry ACmWaatm 7 9°dael endw,«pa Cason aunty Campus NS H n dm oor soucm Flw-a ey ... Tmaaa North O Bullditsa 2 410 N. 4th Strew WaurGwlry UAadea & Wow Manaaemont 3 BuIldina 3 Urvorfloor ® B O 40W- Cedar Sro Daft. Of CoMoMtY Dweiapnaa SulkIna Depa Plannlna DePlranam OYlllwua —� T y FIN Meand ��. i —� Lower float O2 - E:sNimnmmaN LleaFh S ® Buitdlna4 . .. . . . 3M N. 4N Saael Psrwat Haden Masan Cm ty - IntnatMna°ns JW FacBp' . VM1J SabOn Bundina B 5 521 W. Alder 9aoet Tarporay Sbaaa 6 Augxl aTy�— O Bulldlna6 • B 414 N. Sth Saeat Modulo Caaraom 3 Boats of EgUd alga Departments not on q Downtown Campus Bulidlrm t Sat N- 41h Sours Cormr EmemerrmrManaota ent P1O°OC 410 W. S4aln°sa PeM fled © BuIldina 8 Uwertlw FMrumunds 61s W. Alder Saret PVarcon SeMcw JSI FalrWomds Rod O Main Courthouse 1st Rom O wrenlle Detention Center O Jall taxfl� 4M N. 4lh Saws Dlctrkt Cast 317 N. 5th 9trart 411 K 41h Sr Plbw Woda Parks Department ShariS 2t00 E. Johns Pralde Rod a Mow Co VYClds O BuRdina 9 WSU Extension Offlee swerinrCout 4n N. Slh Saeat AudtodAceonana N 1t840 Highway 101 Food Nendla Cads ER a R AdmWsaatlm VI 6-5 Mason County Comprehensive Plan - April, 1996(updated 2005) Capital Facilities VI. 7 POLICE AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE FACILITIES Svstem Description The Mason County Sheriffs Office provides patrol and detective services to residents of unincorporated Mason County. The Mason County District Court, located in Shelton, handles all County jurisdiction cases . Mason County has a juvenile detention or lockdown facility. The County also has a severe shortage of jail space for adults, resulting in the early release of some offenders . Inventory Law Enforcement The County Sheriff' s patrol division has a staff of 30 persons, of which 7 are assigned to the detective division. The Sheriffs Office has a total staff of 92 . The staff includes 33 jail employees, 37 police officers, 16 support persons, and 6 administrative persons . Criminal Activity In 2004, the Sheriffs Office received 19 ,046 calls for service. The types of crimes reported in 2002, 2003 , and 2004 are shown in TABLE vi. 7- 1 . Overall, violent crimes account for approximately eight percent of the criminal activity in Mason County. There was a reduction in the number of violent crimes between 2002 and 2003 , followed by a substantial increase in 2004. The majority of crimes committed in Mason County are property. For the past several years, total calls for service have increased, thus limiting staff abilities to perform traffic enforcement duties . As a result, criminal traffic and infraction traffic citations issued countywide were 6, 068 in 2004, compared to 6,718 in 1992 . Jail Facilities The Mason County Jail opened in 1985 with capacity for 45 inmates . In 1989, capacity was increased to 51 , and in 1991 it was increased to 58 beds with floor space for 106 . In 1993 , the average daily jail population was 62. In 2004, the average daily jail population was 95 or 146% over capacity. VI. 74 Mason County Comprehensive Plan - April, 1996(updated 2005) Capital Facilities TABLE VI .74 . Violent and Property Crimes Committed in Mason County �I Years �I Crimes 2002 I 2003 I 2004 VIOLENT CRIMES Murder Mason County 3 2 2 Shelton 0 1 0 Rae Mason County 49 32 46 Shelton 18 17 12 Robbery Mason County 14 14 8 Shelton 9 9 11 Aggravated Assault Mason County 67 55 66 Shelton 21 30 23 Unincorporated Mason Coun Total 133 103 122 Shelton Total 48 57 46 Total Violent Crimes in Mason County 181 161 168 PROPERTY CRIMES Arson Mason County unknown unknown unknown Shelton 2 3 6 Burglary Mason County 662 646 676 Shelton 135 150 151 Larceny Mason County 1 ,1044 1 006 1071 Shelton 719 839 809 Vehicle Theft Mason County 236 219 244 Shelton 61 115 112 Unincorporated Mason County Total 1 942 1 871 1991 Shelton Total 917 19107 19078 Total Property Crimes in Mason County 2 ,589 2 ,978 3 ,069 TOTAL VIOLENT AND PROPERTY CRIMES Unincorporated Mason County Total 2 075 1 ,974 2113 Shelton Total 965 1164 1124 County Total 39040 39138 3 ,237 VI 7-2 Mason County Comprehensive Plan - April, 1996(updated 2005) Capital Facilities Courts The Mason County District courts handled 11 , 195 cases in 2004, mostly infractions and misdemeanors . Domestic violence and civil cases make up less than 13 percent of the District Court caseload. Mason County Superior Court handled 2 , 541 cases in 2004, with civil cases being the most common, followed by criminal actions, domestic cases, juvenile offender cases, and probate/guardianship cases, in that order. TABLE v1. 7-2 summarizes the caseload for the two courts for the years 2002 , 2003 , and 2004. TABLE vI.7-2 Mason County Court Cases II Case Type I 2002 I 2003 2004 (I Mason County District Court Infractions 4,213 59591 69574 Misdemeanors 2,278 2,980 39192 Domestic violence 296 293 258 Civil cases 1 ,011 19139 1 , 171 Total 75798 105003 11 , 195 Mason County Superior Court Criminal actions 503 475 531 Civil actions 1 ,020 1 ,146 19199 Domestic 322 337 368 Probate/guardianship. 212 185 192 Juvenile offender 261 214 251 Total 29318 29357 29541 Source: State of Washington; Courts of Limited Jurisdiction Annual Caseload Report VI. 7-3 Mason County Comprehensive Plan - April, 1996(updated 2005) Capital Facilities Facility Needs In 1996, the Facilities Steering Committee and the Criminal Justice Working Team, working with a consultant, assessed future County building needs . A report was issued j ointly by the Facilities Steering Committee and Criminal Justice Working Team in 1996, and updated in 1999 ("Mason County Space Needs Analysis for inclusion in the Mason County Master Plan update, June 16, 1999 " ) which identified four capital facility projects . Space needs are not determined by a simple set of standards but by a comprehensive approach to the criminal justice systems program needs . The projected cost of this plan and potential funding sources are incorporated in the finance plan contained in Section VI- 10 of this chapter. A summary of space needs for the next six-year and 20-year planning periods can be located on Table VI. 6-3 , in the previous section VI. 6 . He 74 Alason County Comprehensive Plan - April, 1996 (updated 2005) Capital Facilities VI. 8 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FACILITIES System Description Existing stormwater facilities in Mason County include both natural (streams) and manmade (pipeline) collection and conveyance systems . Storm drainage and flooding problems have increased in Mason County as a result of rapid residential and commercial development. Increases in the amount of impervious surfaces, such as rooftops, roads, driveways , and buildings, cause increased stormwater runoff. Forestry practices, such as logging, new roads, and construction, also increase runoff and downstream sedimentation. The County currently has no stormwater plan or utility. Stormwater is managed primarily through onsite control measures . Inventory As an important step in developing adequate stormwater control, Mason County has adopted a Stormwater Management Ordinance . This ordinance adopts by reference the latest edition of the Washington State Department of Ecology' s Stormwater Management Manual, with the exception of the Minimum Requirements chapter, for use in designing best management practices (BMPs) for new development and other improvements . The ordinance defines specific minimum requirements and other approval standards for development on all ranges of parcel sizes . Flooding problems in the Skokomish River watershed are being addressed in a Comprehensive Flood Hazard Management Plan. This plan defines a total program of river maintenance activities, valley creek maintenance measures, flood protection measures, and flood warning and emergency response procedures . Facility Needs Focused plans for specific problem areas may need to be developed in the future. These plans would integrate solutions to existing problems with the standards set out in the ordinance. The designated urban areas, in particular, need further study to assess if a stormwater utility and facilities are needed for future development. Such facilities have not been determined to be necessary within the six-year financial planning horizon. A comprehensive stormwater plan for county roadways is already scheduled for development, as is reflected in the six-year financial plan. The City of Shelton has prepared a Surface Water Drainage Utility Master Plan. That master plan identifies existing problems in the city and offers some recommendations for improvements . The city has scheduled some improvements based on the existing master plan, but the city also intends to update the plan VL 84 Mason County Comprehensive flan - April, 1996 (updated 2005) Capital Facilities within the six-year financial planning period . As previously discussed, a flood hazard study is currently underway in the Skokomish River watershed . Similar studies may need to be conducted in special areas of concern, such as Belfair. As future watershed studies are completed, the information would be compiled into the framework of a unified comprehensive stormwater management plan for the County. VI 8-2 Mason County Comprehensive Plan - Capital Facilities (NEW SECTION) V1: 9 PUBLIC WORKS FACILITIES Introduction Mason County Public Works is responsible for engineering, construction, operation and maintenance of approxiamtely 640-miles of county roads . Currently staff are housed on the Shelton campus, the Central Shop on Johns Prairie Road and the Belfair Shop . Building 8 , located on the Shelton campus, includes administrative services, accounting services, environmental services, engineering and construction services and geographic information services . The Information Services Section of Equipment Rental & Revolving Fund (ER&R) is located a block away in Building 9 . Road Maintenance and the Vehicle Maintenance Section of ER&R share the Central Shop facility located on Johns Prairie Road approximately 3 -miles north of Shelton. A small maintenace crew is located at the satellite shop in Belfair to service roads in North Mason County. Public Works has outgrown the Shelton campus facilities . The buildings located at the central shop are over 50-years old, overcrowded and inefficient. The vehicle maintenance shop lacks several modern amenities like insulation, womens restroom and building ventilation systems . A lack of sufficient storage facilities results in expensive road maintenance equipment being stored outside in the the elements . As a result, Public Works proposes to develop a master plan and construct a mult-use facility to house the entire department. This will result in better communication and coordination of the various sectons in the department. A shared multi-use facility will provide more efficent use of space and county resources . The Belfair Shop, however, will continue to operate as a satellite facility. Financing the planned multi-use facility requires the use of grants, loans, and county road funds . Project costs shown range in accuracy from + or — 40% to + or — 15 % . Each project cost sheet identifies the accuracy of the estimated costs shown, based on the following scale : • "Planning Level" — The least accurate of costs estimates, in the range of + or — 40%. Cost estimates at this level are usually based on a project concept and some assessment of relative scale, or annual program amounts commensurate with a level of activity sufficient to accomplish the intent of the program over time . • "Design Report" — Moderate accuracy, in the range of + or — 30% . Based on design report evaluation of options and an assessment of project elements and associated costs . • "Engineer' s Estimate" — Most accurate estimate, in the range of + or — 15 % . These estimates are based on a project design or significant completion of design work . vie 94 Mason County Comprehensive Plan - CaCital Facilities Capital Facilities Plan Worksheet Department of Public Works Fund : Project Name : New Public Works Facility and Vehicle Maintenance Shop Estimates : Planning Level Description : Site analysis and selection, space needs programming, master planning, funding and project delivery analysis, schematic design, design development, construction documents , bidding, construction, construction administration, project closeout. Justification : Public Works has outgrown the Shelton campus facilities . The buildings located at the central shop are over 50-years old, overcrowded and inefficient. The vehicle maintenance shop lacks several modern amenities like insulation, womens restroom and building ventilation systems . A lack of sufficient storage facilities results in expensive road maintenance equipment being stored outside in the the elements . A mult-use facility is needed to house the entire department. This will result in better communication and coordination of the various sectons in the department. A shared multi-use facility will provide more efficent use of space and county resources. Estimated Proiect Costs in thousands 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 TOTAL Prelim Engineering 80 20 100 Design Engineering 800 800 Construction 10,000 10,000 TOTAL COST : 80 820 10,000 105900 Funding Sources : Grants 1 ,000 1 ,000 Loans 8,000 8 ,000 Road Fund 80 820 1 ,000 12900 TOTAL FUNDING : 80 820 109000 1 10,900 VI 9-2 Mason County Comprehensive Plan - Auzust 1998 (undated in 2005) Capital Facilities He 10 FINANC E PLAN Introduction This section discusses Mason County capital facilities needs and related funding sources . As required under the Growth Management Act (GMA) a six-year finance plan has been prepared for the years 2006 to at least the year 2011 for those facilities currently, or to be, owned and operated by the County . The following facilities are included in the financial planning: ¥ Water and Wastewater Systems ¥ Solid Waste Management Facilities ¥ County Administrative and Law Enforcement Buildings ¥ Public Works Facilities ¥ Parks and Recreation ¥ Transportation Only County owned and operated facilities, except for the community-based wastewater systems for rural activity centers, are included in the finance analysis . Several alternatives have been suggested to deal with the problem of providing water and wastewater service in areas outside the existing utility service area in which growth is forecast. The service area for the solid waste utility is county-wide . The finance plan identifies reasonably reliable funding sources, and forecasts revenue and expenses to at least the year 2011 . Funding varies depending on the facility. The different financing methods, public or private, could have significant implications on the cost of utility service. Potential funding sources that could be used to fund unanticipated needs and shortfalls are also discussed . Financial Impact Overview The financial impact for capital facility improvements have been analyzed for the six year planning period. Information on transportation can be found in the Transportation Chapter. A summary of the six year improvement costs, revenues and financing is listed in Table 104 . The Table displays the cost by capital facility category. The total of improvement costs and expenditures is $ 110,310 ,400 . The total identified for revenues and financing is $ 110, 310 ,400 , VI. 104 Mason County Comprehensive Flan - Aygust, 1998 (updated in ZOOS) Capital Facilities Table 104 Counb� Owned and Operated Capital Facility Improvement & Finance Costs Years 2006 - 2011 Capital Facility Category Improvement Expenditures Finance/Revenues Costs Water Systems $ 190 $ 190 $ 190 Wastewater Systems $ 56,260 $ 56,260 $ 56,260 Solid Waste Management $3 , 818 $ 33818 $ 3 , 818 County Administration & Law $3 ,204 $ 3 ,204 $ 37204 Enforcement Buildings Public Works Facilities $360 $ 360 $360 Parks & Recreation $ 65723 $ 6,723 $ 6, 723 Transportation $423927 $42,927 $42,927 (Dollar figures in thousands) Conventional Water and Wastewater Systems The County owns and operates a combined water and wastewater utility which includes the water supply and wastewater treatment facilities at Harstine and Rustlewood, and the Beard's Cove water supply facility. There is no expansion in the service area of these utilities planned to accommodate new growth outside of their existing service areas . Information about system improvements needed to maintain acceptable levels of service for residents in the existing service area has been provided by the Mason County Department of Utilities and Waste Management. The County is also in the process of developing or examining community-based wastewater systems in the Belfair Urban Growth Area and its vicinity and in the Hoodsport area . Information provided in Table VI.44 and the facility worksheets which follow it summarize the planned water supply capital improvements over the next six years . Solid Waste Table VI. 4-2 -presents revenue sources and expenditure levels for Mason County solid waste services from 2006 to 2011 . Further detail is provided in the facility worksheets that follow the table . He 10-Z Mason County Comprehensive Plan - Auaust, 1998 (updated in 2005) Capital Facilities Municipal Buildings and Law Enforcement Facilities The Facilities Steering Committee and the Criminal Justice Working Team, working with a consultant, has assessed future County building needs . A report issued jointly by the Facilities Steering Committee and Criminal Justice Working Team in early January, 1996, has identified four capital facility projects . At this time, the Department of Facilities and Grounds proposes to fund and make necessary improvements over a number of years . Table VI. 10 -2 shows the 2006-2011 plan. Parks and Recreation The County has identified over the six year period large number of park and recreation improvements . The projects include improvements to existing parks and boat launches as well as the development of new ball fields . The total cost for these improvements are expected to be approximately $6 .7 million (see Table VI. 10-3) . Drainage Panagement Stormwater management for development in Mason County is managed by the county stormwater ordinance, flood hazards management ordinance, subdivision ordinance, and other regulations . The County does not have a formal drainage program or drainage comprehensive plan . Drainage facility improvements in the County are typically related to the roadway system. Table VIII. 5 -2 displays the improvement costs that are expected over the six year planning period. All improvements are related to roadway system improvements . Section VI- 8 has additional information on stormwater management. vz1O-3 Mason County Comprehensive Flan - Atiaust, 1998 (updated in 2005) Capital Facilities 2006-201 Capital Facilities Plan Worksheet Public Works Fund ® County Road, Federal and Local Grants Project Name : Public Works Property Improvements . Estimates : Planning Level Description : Develop selected sites at various locations across the County to better serve the maintenance requirements by such activities as : clearing and grading, installing wells and water systems , installing electric power to support site services, constructing equipment/materials storage buildings and facilities , paving storages sites , developing roads on the properties . Acquisition of individual properties will supplement existing property holdings to provide for uses such as sites for stormwater treatment facilities and disposal sites for ditch spoils, slide materials and maintenance or construction excavations . Justification : The changing requirements of road maintenance requires the expansion/upgrade of various facilities while the need to develop stormwater detention facilities and ditch spoil disposal sites require the purchase of property in specific locations . Estimated Project Costs (in thousands) 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total Preliminary Engineering 10 10 10 10 10 10 60 Design En ' g/Pro erty Ac . 20 30 20 30 20 30 150 Construction 20 30 20 30 20 30 150 Total Cost 50 70 50 70 50 70 360 Funding Sources : In house 50 50 50 50 50 50 300 Grants 20 20 20 60 Total Funding : 50 70 50 70 50 70 360 VI 104 Mason County Comprehensive Plan - August 1998 (updated in 2005) Capital Facilities Table VI . 10 -2 Mason County Facilities & Grounds Capital Improvement Program Revised Type 2006 Budget 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 Revenues/Resources Total Operations $- $_ $_ $_ Current Expense Fund $65, 000 $- $- $- $- $- $65 , 000 Interest ( REET 1 Fund ) $ 19 ,450 $ 19 , 839 $20 , 236 $20v640 $21 , 053 $21 , 474 $ 122 , 692 Debt Financing Proceeds $- $_ $_ $_ $_ $_ $_ REET 1 used for capital expenditures $636 , 655 $503 , 771 $ 502 ,408 $400 , 744 $403 , 769 $401 , 242 $2 , 848 , 589 Loan repayment Reserve for Rodeo $4 ,016 - - - - - $47016 Other Miscellaneous (Grant) $ 105 , 000 $ 105 , 000 Total Resources $ 830, 121 $523 , 610 $ 522 , 644 $421 ,384 $424, 822 $422 , 716 $3 , 145 ,297 Expenditures/Uses Charges for services $ 1 , 530 $ 1 , 607 $ 1 , 687 $ 1 , 771 $ 17860 $ 1 , 953 $ 10 , 408 Bond Debt Service $ 172 , 752 $ 172 , 003 $ 170 , 957 $ 169 , 613 $ 172 , 962 $ 170 , 763 $ l o029 , 050 Debt Financing Payments $ 105 , 839 $ 100 , 000 $ 100 , 000 - - - $305 , 839 Interfund Loan (ER& R) _ Capital Imprv/Bldgs 1 and 9 : $ 195 , 000 $ 195 , 000 Cap Imprv/Repairs existing facilities $250 , 000 $250 , 000 $250 , 000 $250 , 000 $250 , 000 $250 , 000 $ 1 , 500 , 000 Capital Improvement Elections Dept $ 105 , 000 - - - - - $ 105 , 000 Total Planned Expenditures $8300121 $523 , 610 $ 522 , 644 $421 , 384 $424, 822 $422 , 716 $3, 145,297 Estimated REET 1 Revenue $ 1 , 2801911 $ 1 , 537 , 093 $ 1 , 844 , 512 $2 , 213 , 415 $2 , 656 , 097 $3 , 187 , 317 REET 1 Charges $636 , 655 $503 , 771 $502 ,408 $400 , 744 $403 , 769 $401 , 242 Balance of funds available for projects $644, 256 $ 11033, 322 $ 1, 341 , 741 $ 1 , 812, 671 $2, 252, 328 $2, 786, 075 Total of funds not committed 2006-2011 $9, 870339332 VI. 10-5 Masv unto Comprehensive Plan - August, 1998 (updated in 2005) Capital Facilities Table VI . 10 . 3 PARKS CAPITAL PROJECT SUMMARY SHEET 2006-2011 Parks ® REET 2 351 Fund 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total for Plan Period Foothills County Park 0 85 , 000 700 , 000 800 , 000 0 0 17585, 000 Latimer's Landing Boat Launch 75 , 000 0 0 0 0 0 75 , 000 Latimer's Landing - Edna Mitchell 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mason County Recreation Area 625 , 000 150 , 000 0 100 , 000 0 100 , 000 975 , 000 Mason Lake County Park 20 , 000 0 0 807000 650 , 000 3007000 170507000 Sandhill County Park 190 , 000 857000 2757000 Jacoby Park ( Shorecrest) 10 , 000 107000 Truman Glick Memorial Park 0 0 0 0 Union Park 507000 0 0 50 , 000 Walker Park 257000 200 , 000 2259000 Harstine Island Park 0 0 0 Oakland Bay Park 125 , 000 1007000 50 , 000 275 , 000 Mason Lake Waterfront Park 8 , 000 307000 250 , 000 2887000 Community Playfield Partnerships Program - Annual 125 , 000 125 , 000 100 , 000 100 , 000 100 , 000 1001000 650 , 000 Small Projects/Safety Improvements Program - Annual 30 , 000 30 , 000 30 , 000 30 , 000 30 , 000 30 , 000 180 , 000 Trails Development Program - Annual 50 , 000 2501000 150 , 000 1507000 150 , 000 150 , 000 900 , 000 Water Access Improvements Program - Annual 20 , 000 20 , 000 207000 207000 20 , 000 20 , 000 120 , 000 Parks - Current Expense Fund 000 County-wide Parks Plan update 65000 65000 Total Expenditures : 1 , 418 , 000 1 , 075, 000 11300 , 000 1 ,2807000 950 , 000 700 , 000 69723 , 000 Resources - REET 2 Revenues : 19358 , 566 11250 , 000 173007000 173007000 11300 , 000 11300 , 000 798089566 Truman Glick Memorial Fund : 0 0 0 0 0 0 Current Expense Fund 65000 0 0 0 0 . 0 65000 V1. 104 Mason County Comprehensive Plan - August 1998 (updated in 2005) Capital Facilities Total Resources : 12423 , 566 1 , 250 , 000 11300 , 000 11300 , 000 1 , 3001000 11300 , 000 7 , 873 , 566 Shortfall (-) or Surplus (+) : 5 , 566 175 , 000 0 207000 350 , 000 600 , 000 11150 , 566 VI. 10- 7