HomeMy WebLinkAbout1994/07/18 - Lower Hood Canal CWD i
LOWER HOOD CANAL CLEAN WATER DISTRICT
JULY 18, 1994
ATTENDANCE: Mary L. Faughender, Commissioner
William O. Hunter, Chairperson
Laura E. Porter, Commissioner
The Lower Hood Canal Clean Water District meeting was called to order at 1:30 p.m.by Chairperson William
O. Hunter.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Cmmr. Porter/Faughender moved and seconded to approve the June 20, 1994 minutes as circulated. Motion
carried unanimously. F-aye; H-aye; P-aye.
PUBLIC HEARING-BOUNDARY DELETION OF WATER DISTRICT THAT DRAINS INTO CASE INLET
WATERSHED
The Board held a public hearing to consider deletion of any portion of the Lower Hood Canal Clean Water
District that drains into Case Inlet Watershed.
Wayne Clifford,Technical Administrator, reported on two areas,Trails End Lake and Alderbrook community,
which the public has raised concerns on.
He commented the Board could; 1) Remove Trails End Lake divisions 1 & 2 and the remainder of section 24
from the Clean Water District. This area is closely outside of the Lower Hood Canal watershed. Or; 2) The
Board could leave Trails End Lake community completely inside the Clean Water District.T They would receive
earlier services that would help protect their lake.
Cmmr. Faughender questioned if all of the Trails End subdivision would be in Case Inlet so it wouldn't be
splitting the subdivision in any way.
Mr. Clifford assured the Board it would not split the subdivision. Any parcels outside of the subdivision would
be in Lower Hood Canal Clean Water District.
Cmmr. Porter noted it would not follow Rasor Road, but the subdivision boundary.
Jack Hufer, President of Trails End Community Club, stated they would like to be put in the proper District to
which they are being assessed,in the event that further assessments be levied. They are all for the Clean Water
District.
Brenda Luther,Likkey Lane, questioned why they are included in the Lower Hood Canal Clean Water District
assessment when their septic system doesn't drain into Hood Canal. She also noted their well water is below
their septic field. They are drinking their well water which is tested and is fine. She questioned how this came
about.
Cmmr. Faughender noted her comments were more general and they will get to those questions.
Mr. John Stockler concurred with Mr. Hufer's comments.
Mr. Clifford reported on two options for Alderbrook community:
"i
LOWER HOOD CANAL CLEAN WATER DISTRICT
JULY 18, 1994 - PAGE 2
1) Leave the Alderbrook community inside the Clean Water District. The community is partially inside
the Lower Hood Canal Watershed and has a closer community connection to Hood Canal than to Case
Inlet.
2) Divide the Alderbrook community along Manzanita Drive since it shares both watersheds.
He concluded,a third option would be to remove Alderbrook from the Lower Hood Canal Clean Water District
and he couldn't come up with any rationale for that.
Cmmr. Porter asked for a clearer definition of the dividing line between the two watersheds for Alderbrook
community.
Chairperson Hunter referred to it as south of the Tacoma Power Line.
Mr. Clifford suggested the section line between Section 4 & 5 along Manzanita Drive and then directly across.
Chairperson Hunter noted he has received several calls from individuals who felt they should be in Case Inlet
drainage basin.
Cmmr. Faughender/Porter moved and seconded to close the public hearing for the boundary review. Motion
carried unanimously. F-aye; H-aye; P-aye.
Cmmr.Faughender/Porter moved and seconded to remove Trails End Lake Division 1 &2 and the remainder
of Section 24 from the Lower Hood Canal Clean Water District. Motion carried unanimously. F-aye; H-aye;
P-aye.
Cmmr. Porter noted this was a request from the community and it does geographically fall into a different
drainage, she doesn't see any reason not to support the request.
Cmmr. Faughender added the Board is visiting various community associations about the probability that the
County will be setting up a clean water district for Case Inlet and North Bay. He asked to be invited to the next
community club meeting.
The Board noted it is the intent to refund those who have paid who should be outside of the District.
The Board discussed that Alderbrook should not be split and should be left as it is currently within the Lower
Hood Canal Clean Water District.
CORRESPONDENCE
Correspondence was received from Timothy & Helen Lawhead;Eugene P. Carlson; and Ester K.Ackerman.
STAFF REPORT - SURVEYS COMPLETE YTD
Mark Tompkins, Program Manager, gave the year to date totals of the surveys completed.
Level 1 Inspections - 165
Level 1 Complete (Upland Sites) - 123
Level 2 Dye Test - 61
r
1 -
LOWER HOOD CANAL CLEAN WATER DISTRICT
JULY 18, 1994 - PAGE 3
June Report
Inspections - 70 Total
Level 1 Complete - 50
Level 1 Inspections - 19
Level 2 Dye Test - 1
PUBLIC COMMENT
Muriel Bowman noted she was present for her husband who is President of Lake Christine. She questioned why
they are in the Lower Hood Canal Clean Water District since they are 16 miles away from the Canal.
Chairperson Hunter responded the boundaries were drawn for the Lower Hood Canal drainage basin.All of the
Tahuya Peninsula,which she referred to,is in the Lower Hood Canal Drainage Basin. The District when created
encompassed that drainage basin.
Cmmr. Porter stated throughout Puget Sound one of the most serious pollution problems the state is facing is
non-point pollution. It is not the kind of pollution that comes from a large outfall, it is the kind that all of us
in little ways contribute to. Over the last few years the County has conducted some extensive studies about what
our non-point pollution issues are in several of the watersheds. Lower Hood Canal watershed was one of them.
The biggest non-point pollution issues found were the cumulative affect of all the septic systems, a portion of
which are not working and a portion which are working. In addition, there were a few concerns of non-point
pollution listed. She concluded that all of the septic systems within the watershed have the potential of
contributing to non-point pollution.
Ms. Bowman questioned about farm land being exempt.
Cmmr. Porter responded that property in the Skokomish watershed and in the west Hood Canal watershed are
separate watersheds which also need action. The County has opted to take action, one watershed at a time.
Ms. Bowman also noted it appeared most that live on the water are exempt and those that are away from the
water received an assessment billing.
Chairperson Hunter added no one within the drainage basin is exempt. If there are errors, the County would
like to be made aware, since the data used is what is used for property tax mailouts.
Cmmr. Porter asked if one of the Commissioners could come to the community club to explain the process.
Chairperson Hunter expressed again that he is open to attend the Maggie Lake community meeting or other
community meeting.
Al Adams, Chair of Lower Hood Canal Clean Water District, expressed it appears they need an explanation of
what a watershed is, which.would need to be shared at a community meeting.
Evelyn Bui,Lake Christine resident,questioned what authorization the Board has to make assessments. She also
inquired about exceptions for senior citizens or individuals with low income. She referred to exemptions she
receives on her property tax.
Chairperson Hunter commented the legislature passed legislation that when there was a closure of the water
there had to be created a clean water district. At that time a public hearing was held in Belfair and comments
were taken to establish the boundaries.
r•
r
LOWER HOOD CANAL CLEAN WATER DISTRICT
JULY 18, 1994 - PAGE 4
Cmmr. Porter added it would require a Constitutional Amendment which is beyond the County's ability at this
level.
Cmmr. Faughender expressed this is not isolated to Mason County. Other counties
The Board explained the$52 assessment is for those homeowners that have a septic system and tidelands. They
would be billed half the assessment if they only own tidelands.
The Board concluded that there have been discrepancies found and are being corrected as they are brought to
the County.
HEARING SET - SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATION
Ione Siegler, Director of Administrative Services, requested to set a public hearing for a supplemental
appropriation for the Lower Hood Canal Watershed.
She requested the Board approve a resolution setting a hearing on August 9, 1994 at 10:40 a.m. for a$325,030
supplemental appropriation for the enhancement and protection of water quality in the Lower Hood Canal
Watershed.
Cmmr. Porter/Faughender moved and seconded to adopt the resolution setting a public hearing on August
9, 1994 at 10:40 a.m. Motion carried unanimously. F-aye; H-aye; P-aye.
ADJOURNMENT
— The meeting adjourned at 2:15 due to no further business.
Respectfully Submitted,
Rebecca S. Rogers
LOWER HOOD CANAL CLE IWATER DISTRICT
r
William O. Hunter, Ch.' erson
M.L. Faughender;Commissioner
Laura E. Porter, Commi sinner