Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout03-10 - Ord. Amending Appendix C of Chapter VI Capital Facilities of County Comprehensive PlanoRDTNANcE NUMBER 03-to AMENDMENT TO APPEND|X C - CHAPTER Vl (CAP|TAL FAC|L|T|ES) OF THE MASON COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance 110-09 to further amend Appendix C in the Capitat Facitities etement (Chapter Vl) of the Mason County Comprehensive Ptan under the authority of RCW 36.704.130 and RCW 36.70A.70. WHEREAS, on December 8, 2009 the Board of County Commissioners adopted revisions to the Comprehensive Ptan, inctuding those contained within the Capitat Facilities element, in comptiance with RCW 37.704.130; and WHEREAS, the Capital Facitities etement as adopted dÍd not include current County budget information necessary to meet the guidelines set forth RCW 37.70A.70; and WHEREAS, the Capital Facilities etement as attached herewith inctudes Mason County 2010 Budget information in Appendix C and is appropriate for adoption in accordance with RCW 37.704.130. NOW THEREFORE, BE lT HEREBY ORDAINED, THE Mason County Board of Commissioners hereby approves and ADOPTS revisions to Chapter Vl (Capitat Facitities element) of the Mason County Comprehensive Plan as described by A]TACHMENT A. DATED this iLft day of January 2010. Board of Commissioners Mason County, Washington BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: , WASHINGTON Tim Shetdon, Commissioner Mason County Comprehensive Plan Auqust, 1998 - (updated December 8. 2009: January 12.2010\Capital Facilities Chapter Vl CAPITAL FACILITIES W - 1 INTRODUCTION Purpose The Capital Facilities Chapter contains the capital facilities element, one of the six elements required for Mason County's Comprehensive Plan under the Growth Management Act (GMA) (36.704.070 RCW). This element provides an inventory of existing conditions and publicly owned facilities by quantifying capitalfacilities currently provided by Mason County or by other jurisdictions operating in the County. The chapter also contains goals and policies for the capital facilities operated by Mason County, except for transportation facilities, which are discussed in the Transportation Chapter. The capacity of the County facilities and the level of service they provide is discussed and compared with the County's desired levels of service. The "level of service" is an objective measure of how well services are provided to the public. Deficiencies and improvement needs are identified, improvement costs are estimated, projects are scheduled for six and Z0-year planning horizons, and a six-year finance plan and possible financing options are discussed. Besides the City of Shelton, there are other public organizations and special districts that have capitalfacilities and taxing authority which exist in the county. These include the school districts, hospital districts, port districts, cemetery district Public Utility Districts, regional library system, and fire districts. These districts have their own governing body and capitalfacilities planning. The county coordinated the comprehensive plan with these bodies, through meetings, correspondence, and by providing draft of the comprehensive plan to these districts for comment. A list of these districts is provided as follows: vt.1 01.04.10 Mason County Comprehensive Plan Auqust, 1998 - (updated December8,2009;January 12,2010) CapitalFacilities Port of Allyn Port of Dewatto Port of Grapeview Port of Hoodsport Port of Shelton Mason Gounty Hospital District #1 Mason Gounty Hospital District #2 Fire Protection District #3 Fire Protection District #4 Fire Protection District #5 Fire Protection District #6 Fire Protection District #8 Fire Protection District #9 Fire Protection District #11 Fire Protection District #12 Fire Protection District #13 Fire Protection District #16 Fire Protection District #17 Fire Protection District #18 Southside School District #42 Grapeview School District #54 Elma School District #681137 Shelton School District #309 Mary M Knight School District #311 Pioneer School District #402 North Mason School District #403 Hood Ganal School District #404 Belfair Water District #l Public Utility District #l Public Utility District #3 Cemetery District #l Fire Protection District #1 Fire Protection District #2 Orqanization and Contents The following section of this chapter, Vl-2, includes a list of goals and policies that provides the direction for future capital facility decisions for Mason County. Subsequent sections, Vl-3 through 9, profile and analyze seven types of capital facilities in the County, as follows: . Water and Wastewater Utilities ' Solid Waste Utility . Parks and Recreation Facilities ' Gounty Administration Buildings ' Police and CriminalJustice Facilities . StormwaterManagementFacilities . Public Works Facilities Sections 3 through 9 each includes a brief description of the existing systems and public entities that provide the facilities. An assessment of future facility needs is also developed for each category of facility. The last section of this chapter, Vl-10, discusses financing for county owned and operated facilities for the six-year financial planning period 2010-2015. vt.2 01.04.10 Mason County Comprehensive Plan August, 1998 - (updated DecemberS,2009; January 12,2010)Capital Facilities Facilitv Needs A number of methods can be used to determine Mason County's capital facility needs over the next six and 2O-year GMA planning periods. As not all capitalfacilities require the same level of analysis to determine needed improvements, different analytical techniques can be employed to identify facility needs as long as they accomplish the goal of determining future need for the capital facilities. While the state Growth Management Act requires that level of service (LOS) standards be established to identify transportation improvements, the need for other capitalfacilities can be assessed using either LOS or planning level assumptions (WAC 365-195-315). The advantage of using LOS standards is the ability to quantify deficiencies and identify improvement needs. The LOS can also be used as a performance standard for concurrency by comparing the service level being provided by a capital facility against the quantitative LOS standard. The service is considered deficient if it does not meet the service level standard that the County has determined it wants to deliver to its residents and users. The LOS approach makes the most sense where there are easily quantifiable facilities or where the state has defined the standards, such as for sewer and water facilities. The less rigorous planning assumptions approach also has advantages. The capitalfacilities planning assumptions are not quantitative measures of facility need. lnstead, they identify facility improvements based upon the need to serve growth and development anticipated in the land use element. This approach works best where identification of quantitative measures would be difficult, where there are no statewide standards, or where the necessary information or data to apply quantitative measures would be difficult or too time-consuming to obtain. Facilities such as parks and recreation and stormwater facilities might best be handled with this approach. Financing Facility needs are identified, and a six-year finance plan is developed, in section Vl-10 for the followin g Cou nty-owned-and-operated facilities. . Sewer . Water . Parks and recreation . Stormwater This section also includes the results of facility planning efforts completed by the County for County administrative buildings, police and criminaljustice facilities, and solid waste facilities. Financing needs and options are included for these facilities as well. The section includes by reference the capitalfacilities plans for Grapeview, Hood Canal, North Mason, Pioneer, and Shelton School Districts, to facilitate orderly growth and coordination in the provision of future capital facility needs. vt.3 01.04.10 Mason County Comprehensive Plan Ausust, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12,2010) Capital Facilities Co n c u rren cv M a n aqeme nt One of the Growth Management Act goals, referred to as "concurrency," is the provision of infrastructure facilities and services to serve projected growth at the time such growth occurs, or within a reasonable time afterwards. This starts with identifying specific facility needs using the strategies previously discussed. Another important aspect of concurrency is the ability to monitor the development of infrastructure improvements to assess whether they keep pace with approved development. Concurrency management, as it is called, involves a set of land use and permit approval processes designed to ensure facilities and services keep pace with growth. ln some cases, development codes could be enacted to require that specific LOS standards be promulgated through the development of identified improvements. ln other cases, restrictions to growth may be imposed until appropriate service standards for capitalfacilities are achieved. Land use applications for certain development proposals, in areas targeted for future growth, could have their approvals withheld pending concomitant development of appropriate urban service level facilities (e.9., sewer facilities). The municipality would be responsible for managing the concurrent development of these urban services. This can be accomplished by requiring that individual developers fund and implement needed improvements. Under this arrangement, the final tenant (e.9., homebuyer or building purchaser) would ultimately pay for the new facilities through a higher initial purchase price or through a periodic assessment. Mason County's policies for concurrency management are contained in the following section, vt-2. VI.4 01.04.10 Mason County Comprehensive Plan Auqust, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12,2010) Capital Facilities lntroduction Mason County's Capital Facilities Element is guided by goals and policies for the preferred service philosophy of the County. Goals and policies are required as part of the Capital Facilities Element (RCW 36.704) of the overall GMA Comprehensive Plan. Development Process Mason County evaluated it's existing facilities, it's future needs, it's costs, and the types and levels of services which it should require or provide in the county. The goals and policies listed herein are the result of this process. Policies listed under General Capital Facilities apply to all facilities addressed in the Capital Facilities Chapter. Facility-specific policies apply only to those facilities. General Capital Facilities Policies Land Use Manage land use change and develop County facilities and services in a manner that directs and controls land use patterns and intensities. cF-l0t cF-102 cF-103 cF-í04 cF-105 cF-106 cF-107 Establish urban services that shall require concurrency under the GMA. Ensure that future development bears a fair share of capital improvement costs necessitated by the development. The County shall reserve the right to collect mitigation impact fees from new development in order to achieve and maintain adopted level of service standards. Extend facilities and services in a manner consistent with the following County- wide policies previously adopted in 1992 (see Section ll-3). County facilities shall be provided at urban or rural levels of service, as defined in the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan. Develop capital facilities within established urban growth areas (UGAs) to conform to urban development standards. Develop capital facilities within UGAs that are coordinated and phased through inter-jurisdictional agreements. Coordinate and support other capital facility plans from special purpose districts, cities and towns, and other non-county facility providers that are consistent with this and other chapters of the Comprehensive Plan. As the capitalfacilities plan is amended to reflect a changing financial situation or changing priorities, the land use chapter shall be reassessed on at least a cF-108 vt.5 01.04.10 Mason County Comprehensive Plan August, I 998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12, 201 0) Capital Facilities biennial basis to assure internal consistency of the land use chapter with the capital facilities chapter and its s¡x-year financial plan. Concurrency Establish standards for levels of service for County public facilities, and ensure that necessary facilities are available at the time new development impacts existing systems. CF-201 After adoption of this Comprehensive Plan and subsequent development regulations, level of service standards for each type of public facility shall apply to development permits issued by Mason County. CF-202 Adopt level of service standards and concurrency requirements recommended in this plan for wastewater/sanitary systems, water supply systems, transportation facilities, and Storm water management facilities. CF-203 Public facilities needed to support development shall be available concurrent with the impacts of development or within a reasonable time thereafter. The county shall establish development regulations that will establish procedures and requirements to assure that the concurrency requirements are met. CF-204 New development, which has potential storm water impacts, shall provide evidence of adequate storm water management for the intended use of the site. This policy shall apply in all areas of the county. CF-205 Building permits for any building necessitating domestic water systems shall provide evidence of an adequate water supply for the intended use of the building. Proposed subdivisions and short plats shall not be approved unless the county makes written findings that adequate provision for potable water are available for each development site. This policy shall apply in all areas of the county. CF-206 Building permits for any building necessitating wastewater treatment shall provide evidence of an adequate sanitary sewer system for the intended use of the building. This policy shall apply in all areas of the county. Finance Develop a six-year finance plan for capital facilities that meets the recommendations of the comprehensive plan, achieves the County's levels of service, and is financially attainable. CF-301 Adopt a six-year capital improvement program that identifies projects, outlines a schedule, and designates realistic funding sources for all County capitalfacility projects. CF-302 For all capitalfacility projects, evaluate alternatives to programs, purpose, and service as a method to reduce capital facilities and associated operating costs. I/4/2010 Mason County Comprehensive Plan August, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12,2010) Capital Facilities CF-303 Develop a public process that informs, notifies and allows participation on all capital facility proposals. Essential Public Facilities Facilitate the siting of essential public facilitiesl sponsored by public or private entities within unincorporated areas when appropriate. GF40l ldentify and allow for the siting of essential public facilities according to procedures established in this plan. Essential public facilities shall include group homes, state and local correctional facilities, substance abuse facilities, and mental health facilities. Work cooperatively with the City of Shelton and neighboring counties in the siting of public facilities of regional importance. Work cooperatively with state agencies to ensure that the essential public facilities meet existing state laws and regulations that have specific siting and permitting requirements. CF402 Review proposed development regulations to ensure they allow for the siting of essential public facilities consistent with the goals, policies and procedures established in this plan. Fa c i t itv-S pecifi c Po I i ci es Wastewate r/S a n i ta ry S ew e r Assure that wastewater facilities necessary to carry out comprehensive plan are available when needed, and finance these facilities in an economic, efficient, and equitable manner. CF-501 Maintain a safe, efficient and cost-effective sewage collection and treatment system. CF-502 All new development within designated urban growth areas and rural activity centers shall connect to existing sewer systems or provide a plan for connection to proposed public sewer systems when available. Public sewer systems are those owned and operated by any legally recognized municipal organization as a public utility. GF-503 Allow existing single-family homes with septic systems to continue using septic systems, except in areas where public sewers are being developed that conform to existing standards. Replace deficient septic systems in a timely fashion. 1 RCW 36.704.200(1) The comprehensive plan of each county and city that is planning under RCW 36.704.040 shall include a process for identifoing and siting essential public facilities. Essential public facilities include those facilities that are typically difficult to site, such as airports, [marinas, railroad systems], state education facilities and state or regional transportation facilities as defìned in RCW 47 .06.140, state and local correctional facilities, solid waste handling facilities, and in-patient facilities including substance abuse facilities, mental health facilities, group homes, and secure community transition facilities as defined in RCW 71.09.020. vt-7 01.04.10 Mason County Comprehensive Plan August, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12,2010)Capital Facilities Water Supply Assure that water facilities necessary to carry out the comprehensive plan are available when needed, and finance those facilities in an economic, efficient and equitable manner. cF-504 cF-505 cF-506 cF-507 cF-601 cF-602 cF-603 cF-702 cF-703 cF-704 Provide a septic system management and education program to protect groundwater quality and promote the proper care and use of septic systems. Eliminate any unlicensed point or non-point pollution sources associated with sewage transport and disposal. Monitor infiltration and inflow in major public systems through routine inspection, Conduct improvements to limit and reduce current infiltration and inflow. Encourage innovative approaches to onsite wastewater treatment. Ensure that the supply and distribution of water in public systems is consistent with the Mason County Comprehensive Plan. Ensure that future water system expansions and service extensions are provided in a manner consistent with the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan. Where possible, those uses designated by the Land Use Element to require fire flow should be serviced by a Class A water system. Create ways to use Class A reclaimed water for beneficial use to replace withdrawals form the community's fresh water aquifers. Parks and Recreation Achieve level of service targets for park land and facilities that support County objectives and priorities. cF-701 ldentify and preserve significant geographic, historic and environmentalfeatures and other characteristics that reflect Mason County's natural and cultural heritage. lncrease park development within urban areas and develop a comprehensive system of multi-purpose trails throughout the County. Develop and adopt a realistic long-range schedule for park management, maintenance, and operation. Adopt a workable County capital improvement program (ClP) every six years, to be amended as needed. Update current 2006 Comprehensive Parks and Recreation Comprehensive Plan in 2011 to project future demands and needs; define acquisition, leases, and development opportunities; draft financial implementation programs; and be eligible for state and federal grants. VI-8 01.04.10 Mason County Comprehensive Plan August, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12,2010) Capital Facilities Administrafive Seryrces Develop and implement a long-range program of expansion and improvement to accommodate the County's projected administrative staffing requ¡rements. CF-801 Annually review the long-range facilities plan for buildings and space improvements to efficiently provide work space for projected staffing levels. Police and Criminal Justice Develop and ¡mplement a coordinated facility program among the departments and agencies that provide the County's police and criminaljustice services. CF-901 Complete a strategic long-range plan for the effective and coordinated operation and management of all County police and criminaljustice functions, including a full analysis of all space and facility needs required to support the plan. CF-902 Explore alternative funding sources for law and justice facilities and operations, including contracts for service with other agencies and joint use of facilities. Stormwater Management Create a facilities strategy that preserves and supplements necessary natural drainage processes and other natural systems to minimize runoff impacts from development. CF-í001 lnvestigate needs and means for implementing and maintaining a safe and cost- effective storm and stormwater collection system in identified problem areas. CF-1002 Protect surface and ground water quality through state and local controls and public education on water quality issues. CF-1003 Design stormwater systems to meet the approval standards prescribed in the Mason County Stormwater Management Ordinance. CF-1004 Protect physical and biological integrity of wetlands, streams, wildlife habitat, and other identified critical areas. CF-1005 Maintain water quality within all Shoreline Management Act waterfront areas through careful design, operation, construction, and placement of public facilities. CF-í006 Carefully control development in areas with steep slopes where surface water runoff can create unstable conditions. Maintain natural vegetation for slope stabilization. CF-1007 Public facility development shall minimize impacts to shorelines, preserving the natural stream environments where possible. CF-1008 Comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) and state regulations. VI-9 01.04.10 Mason County Comprehensive Plan Ausust, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12,2010) Capital Facilities CF-í009 Under no circumstances should hazardous waste be allowed to contaminate the groundwater, surface water, or sewer systems of Mason County. Dispose of hazardous wastes only in locations designated for that purpose. So/id Waste Ensure that garbage collection and recycling needs of the County are met in an efficient and cost-effective manner. CF-ll0l Manage a cost-effective and responsive solid waste collection system. CF-1102 Manage solid waste collection methods to minimize litter, neighborhood disruption, and degradation of the environment. CF-l103 Promote the recycling of solid waste materials through waste reduction and source separation. Develop educational materials on recycling and other waste reduction methods. CF-1104 Work cooperatively with cities, the Washington State Department of Ecology, and the Mason County Health District to achieve an environmentally safe and cost- effective solution to the disposal of catch basin wastes and street sweepings. vt-10 01.04.10 Mason County Comprehensive Plan Auqust, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12,2010\Capital Facilities V'.3 WATER AND WASTEWATER UTILITIES Introduction The County owns and operates small water and sewer systems for the Rustlewood, and Beard's Cove communities. ln addition, the County operates a med¡um-sized wastewater collection system and treatment plant for the North Bay Case lnlet area. This area was defined through studies of the area contributing human sewage contamination to Case lnlet, and the system service area was set accordingly. In the smaller community-based systems, there is no planned expansion beyond the existing platted lots. These systems currently provide services to approximately 1200 customers, with the potentialto serve an additional 100. The North Bay Case lnlet system provides service to approximately 950 customers, with additional capacity to serve an estimated 850 additional equivalent residential units within the existing service area. The Belfair Water Reclamation facility is under design and is expected to be operational by late 2010. This Membrane BioReactor plant will treat sewage from more developed areas of the Belfair UGA to Class A reclaimed status. Future sewer extensions and plant upgrades will follow a schedule, which will provide service to the entire Belfair UGA by 2025. The following "Wated' and "Wastewate/' sections provide project-level detail on the planned improvements necessary to meet state regulatory guidelines in the provision of water and wastewater services for these systems. Each project in each section is accompanied by a separate project sheet, which provides a description, and justification, along with a table depicting the estimated costs and funding sources for planning period 2008 through 2013. A summary table that provides overall costs and funding sources for each water and sewer system follows each section. Financing the planned utility improvements requires the use of grants, loans, utility fees, system development charges, developer contributions, and capital reserves. The specific combination of funds, and the availability of grants and loans,will affect user rates for each system as well as the timing on projects. The ability to initiate specific projects will be assessed annually based on the urgency of need, reserve funds available, and commitments from funding agencies to provide grants andior loans. The decisions about whether or not to proceed with any planned project is the decision of the Mason County Board of Commissioners for consideration in the annual budgeting and rate-setting process. To the extent possible, projects will be funded through: 1) Rate revenues (capital reserves)2) Grants;3) Low interest loans; or4) developer contributions5) Some combination of 1-4 above. Project costs shown in each section range in accuracy from + or - 40o/o to + or - 15%. Each project cost sheet identifies the accuracy of the estimated costs shown, based on the following scale: w-11 01.04.10 Mason County Comprehensive Plan August, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12,2010)Capital Facilities . "Planning Level" - The least accurate of costs estimates, in the range of + or - 40%. Cost estimates at this level are usually based on a project concept and some assessment of relative scale, or annual program amounts commensurate with a level of activity sufficient to accomplish the intent of the program over time.. "Design Report" - Moderate accuracy, in the range of + or - 30%. Based on design report evaluation of options and an assessment of project elements and associated costs. . "Engineer's Estimate" - Most accurate estimate, in the range of + or -15o/o. Ïhese estimates are based on a project design or significant completion of design work. Future Svstem Development lncluded in the wastewater sections of this document are additional projects that are not associated with the existing County-owned utility systems. These projects represent efforts to provide utility services to areas which have been identified as problems with regard to density and water quality, but where no established systems are currently in place. There are two such areas where the County is currently investing resources in the long-term resolution of identified problems: Belfair Urban Growth Area The County has amended the Belfair/Lower Hood CanalWater Reclamation Facility Plan Supplemental lnformation to reflect the most recent population projections and the proposed service area boundary for the Belfair sewer project. The Department of Ecology in May 2007 approved the Belfair Facility Plan which outlines the development of an MBR facility adjacent to the UGA as the preferred action for treatment of sewage from Belfair Hoodsport /Skokomish Area A Tri-Party planning and implementation group that includes Mason County, Public Utility District #1 and the Skokomish lndian Tribe was formed in 2006 to improve water quality in the middle and upper reaches of Hood Canal. Sewer facility plans has been completed for the Hoodsport Rural Activity, the Potlach State Park Area and major portions of the Skokomish Tribal lands. The funding for any recommended system development will initially be provided through grants and/or loans until there is an established rate base to provide payments for the system. vt-l2 01.04.10 Mason County Comprehensive Plan August, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12,2010)Capital Facilities 2010-2015 Gapital Facilities Plan Worksheet Utilities, & Waste Management Fund: 403 - North Bay Sewer System Project Name: Minor Facility and System lmprovements Program Estimates: Planning Level Description: Annual improvements program for system facilities, buildings, and grounds. Projects may include small piping improvements, pump stations, lighting, exterior painting, and other general improvements. Justification: The treatment plant and system construction provided basic functionality, however the facilities and system need improvements from time to time to correct deficiencies and improve operational capabilities. Plant operations and system maintenance staff are not equipped to address these types of improvements in addition to the plant operations. lt is also anticipated that the work can be completed professionally and more expediently through contracts with specialty firms. Fundino Sources: TOTAL FUNDING: vt-|3 01.04.10 Mason County Comprehensive Plan August, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12,2010)Capital Facilities 2OaO-2015 Capital Facilities Plan Worksheet Utilities, & Waste Management Fund: 403-North Bay Sewer System Project Name: Treatment Plant Capacity Upgrades Estimates: Planning Level Description: Analyze the options for providing additionaltreatment plant capacity and provide engineering to design the improvements for construction in subsequent years. Justification: The existing plant may be reaching design capacity for treatment in 2010. This will require us to revisit the original sewer facility plan and address how we will maintain sufficient capacity for the twenty-year period beyond 2010. This project outlines the need for funding to conduct the analysis and design the next increment of capacity for the plant. The recent economic slowdown has negatively affected the growth rate and receipt of capitalfacility charges associated with new connections. Therefore this effort has been postponed until 2011 or beyond depending on the rate of recovery. TOTAL GOST: TOTAL FUNDING: vt-14 01.04.10 Mason County Comprehensive Plan August, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12,2010)Capital Facilities 2010-2015 Capital Facilities Plan Worksheet Utilities, & Waste Management Fund: 403-North Bay Sewer System Project Name: Basin Analysis and Developer Review Services Estimates: Engineers Estimate Description: Engineering services to assist staff in planning for future development and developer review Justification: The Allyn UGA will develop and grow. Currently there are many large lots that will be divided and platted. There are also many small lots that will be combined and developed. ln addition many of the rights of way and easements have been vacated and are now private property. This analysis will assist county staff with the identification of sewer system expansion needs within the UGA and with review of developer submittals as this growth occurs. Estimated ect Gosts n thousands TOTAL COST: Fundinq Sources: TOTAL FUNDING: w-15 01.04.10 Mason County Comprehensive Plan Auqust. 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12,2010) Capital Facilities 2010-20'15 Gapital Facilities Plan Worksheet Utilities, & Waste Management Fund: 412Beards Gove Water Project Name: Beards Cove Booster Pump Estimates: Planning Level Description: lnstallation of a booster pump to improve water pressure to residences near the water storage tank and provide additional fire flow to the entire community. Justification: Currently only the top 16.7 feet or 120,000 gallons of the 60'400,000 gallon Storage tank can be considered for usable storage. The total requirement for this system identified in the 2002 waler system plan is 250,050 gallons. That document identified fire flow as 500 gpm for 30 minutes or 15,000 gallons. That number has increased to 45,000 gallons under the code adopted by the county since the water plan was written. Technically the system is 150,000 gallons deficient on usable storage. The addition of a booster pump to provide pressure to all homes with an elevation within 57' of the storage tank base will allow for the use of the systems entire water storage capability and meet the system's storage requirements. Mason County will apply for a grant loan package to assist in funding of this project. TOTAL COST: TOTAL FUNDING: vt-16 01.04.10 Mason County Comprehensive Plan August, 1 998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 1 2, 2010) Capital Facilities 2010-2015 Gapital Facilities Plan Worksheet Utilities & Waste Management Fund: 41'l - Beards Cove Water Project Name: Beards Cove Water System Meter lnstallations Estimates: Planning Level Description: lnstallation of Water Service meters on all new and existing water service connections Justification: The Water Use Efficiency Rule requires allwater systems install service meters by 2A18. Although the rule allows twelve years to implement installation, the community will benefit by implementing the process as soon as possible. The community will benefit from meters by providing leakage data and allow billing based on usage. This plan is designed to fund this effort entirely through rates. The water rate must increase from 27 per month to 32 to fund the effort. in thousands TOTAL FUNDING: vt-17 01.04.10 Mason County Comprehensive Plan August, 1998-- (updated December 8, 2009; January 12, 2010) CaPital Facilities 2010-2015 Capital Facilities Plan Worksheet Utilities & Waste Management Fund: 411 - Rustlewood Water Project Name: Rustlewood Water System Plan Estimates: Planning Level Description: Develop a SmallWater System Plan Justification: There is currently no plan in place. To secure future public grants and loan funding for needed improvements to the system a SmallWater System Plan is required. TOTAL GOSTS: TOTAL FUNDING: vt-l8 0r.04.10 Mason County Comprehensive Plan August, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12,2010) Capital Facilities 2010-1015 Capital Facilities Plan Worksheet Utilities, & Waste Management Fund: 405 - Capital Development Fund Project Name: Belfair Sewer Development Estimates: Engineering Description: Design and develop documents required for constructing the Belfair Sewer Collection and Reclamation Facilities and provide construction management services. Justification: ln 2007 the County entered into an agreement with CH2MHill to design the Belfair Sewer Utility. The initial project will begin construction sometime in 2009 and should be completed sometime between late 2010 or early 2011. Extensions and expansion will continue until the entire Urban Growth Area is served. Much of the expansion of this system will be developer funded however it is typical for a utility to assist and support this effort. Estimated Gosts (in thousands 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 TOTAL Prelim Enqineerinq Design Engineering 1 500 1 500 500 250 100 '100 3750 Construction 15000 1 0000 3000 1000 200 200 28400 TOTAL GOST:r6500 fi500 3500 1250 400 400 33500 Fundino Sources: Grants 16500 11500 3500 1250 33500 Loans 200 Rates 200 400 TOTAL FUNDING:16500 11500 3500 1250 400 400 33500 vt-19 01.04.10 Mason County Comprehensive Plan August, 1998'- (updated December 8, 2009; January 12, 2010) CaPital Facilities 2010-2015 Gapital Facilities Plan Worksheet Utilities, & Waste Management Fund: 405 - Capital Development Fund Project Name: Hoodsport Sewer Design Estimates: Planning Level Description: Design the Hoodsport Sewer System Justification: The low oxygen levels in Hood Canal are partly attributed to the inability of onsite septic systems to reduce nitrogen. By conveying wastewater to a technologically advanced sewage treatment facility that can significantly reduce nitrogen, and apply the effluent upland, this project will reduce the human contribution of nutrients to the waters of Hood Canal. l-ioodsport will be the second of the three South Shore Hood Canal projects undertaken by the Tri-Party Group. TOTAL FUNDING: vt-20 01.04.10 Mason County Comprehensive Plan August, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12,2010) Capital Facilities 2010-2015 Capital Facilities Plan Worksheet Utilities, & Waste Management Fund: 403 - North Bay Sewer System Project Name: North Bay Biosolids Handling Estimates: Planning Leval Description: Biosolids Handling Facilities Justification: The treatment plant at North Bay has continued to experience increases in biosolids handling and disposal costs. By thickening and developing a composting operation these costs will be significantly reduced. Preliminary analysis shows capital cost recovery would be realized in three to four years. Estimated Pro Costs in thousands Fundinq Sources: TOTAL FUNDING: vt-21 01.04.10 Mason County Comprehensive Plan August, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12,2010)Capital Facilities VI.4 SOLID WASTE UTILITY lntroduction Mason County's solid waste utility provides transfer and disposal operations for solid waste at four transfer station locations, including household recyclable materials. The largest transfer ,facility is located outside Shelton on Eels Hill Road. Materials collected from the other smaller stations at Hoodsport, Union, and Belfair, are transported to the Shelton facility, where garbage is processed into containers that are trucked to Centralia, WA. From there, the material is long- hauled via railroad to Roosevelt Landfill in Klickitat County, located in Eastern Washington. Household hazardous wastes (HHW) are collected and disposed of by Mason County staff at the Shelton transfer facility. Residents in North Mason County can take their HHW to the Kitsap County transfer station. This arrangement is established through interlocal agreement and Mason County pays approximately $60 per customer for collection and disposal or materials from residents who take their materials to the Kitsap County facility. The Shelton transfer facility is located at the former Mason County Landfill. The current utility provides post-closure monitoring and capital construction in support of the closed landfill. The Shelton facility receives wastes collected by private and municipal haulers operating inside Mason County. The Belfair and Shelton transfer facilities are nearing capacity in terms of the tonnage they can effectively handle on a daily basis. Growth in the Belfair area and elsewhere in the County continues to impact operations at these facilities and capacity improvements will need to be addressed in the future. The following pages provide details on specific projects proposed for the current capital facilities planning period. Project estimates range in accuracy from + or - 40% to + or - 15o/o. Each project cost sheet identifies the accuracy of the estimated costs shown based on the following scale: . "Planning Level" - The least accurate of costs estimates, in the range of + or - 40%. Cost estimates at this level are usually based on a project concept and some assessment of relative scale, or annual program amounts commensurate with a level of activity sufficient to accomplish the intent of the program over time.. "Design Report" - Moderate accuracy, in the range of + or - 30%. Based on design report evaluation of options and an assessment of project elements and associated costs. . "Engineer's Estimate" - Most accurate estimate, in the range of + or -15%. These estimates are based on a project design or significant completion of the design work. vt-22 01.04.10 Mason County Comprehensive Plan August, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12,2010)Capital Facilities 2010-2015 Gapital Facilities Plan Worksheet Utilities, & Waste Management Fund: 402 - Solid Waste Project Name: Minor Facility lmprovements Estimates: Design Report Description: Annual program to ensure continued operational effectiveness of transfer station facilities and preserve existing assets. lmprovements will include: road resurfacing, facility roof replacements, minor building modifications, storage or handling facility construction, or modifications to comply with regulatory requirements or preserve capacity. Justification: Normal operation of transfer station facilities requires ongoing facility improvements to existing fixed assets to maintain overall operational capabilities. Providing an annual program and funding to complete these improvements is more efficient from an administrative perspective and prudent in terms of ensuring the longevity of existing assets. TOTAL COST: TOTAL FUNDING: vt-23 01.04.10 Mason County Comprehensive Plan August, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12,2010)Capital Facilities 2010-2015 Gapital Facilities Plan Worksheet Utilities, & Waste Management Fund: 402 - Solid Waste Project Name: Belfair Household Hazardous Waste Facility lmprovements Estimates: Design Report Description: Design and construct a facility to provide household hazardous waste collection services to north county residents. Justification: Currently north county residents must take their household hazardous waste to the Kitsap County facility. This service is provided through an interlocal agreement that costs $60.00 per visit. The costs are the same no matter what type of material is dropped off at their facility. Our own facility would save us considerable cost for disposal of less harmful materials such as motor oil or latex paints. Operation of a county-owned facility would allow us to tailor the hours of operation and types of material accepted to decrease these costs. Estimated P Gosts in thousands TOTAL COST: TOTAL FUNDING: vt-24 01.04.10 Mason County Comprehensive Plan August, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12,2010) Capital Facilities 2010-2015 Capital Facilities Plan Worksheet Utilities, & Waste Management Fund: 402 - Solid Waste Project Name: Household Hazardous Waste Facility lmprovements Estimates: Design Report Description: This facility serves the south end of the county by providing residential drop off of household generated hazardous wastes. The volumes of materials have been increasing annually, and the facility is both outgrowing its current structure and behind on needed safety improvements. Further, the changes in regulations in recent years and the near future will necessitate increased capacity. Justification: Due to policy changes at the state and national level, the facility itself is inadequate to meet the standards mandated. Since some of these changes are state priorities, state funding may be available. TOTAL GOST: Fundinq Sources: TOTAL FUNDING: vt-25 01.04.10 Mason County Comprehensive Plan August, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12,2010)Capital Facilities 20'a0-2015 Capital Facilities Plan Worksheet Utilities, & Waste Management Fund: 402- Shelton Transfer Station Project Name: Transfer Station System lmprovements Estimates: Planning Level Description: This facility serves as a hub for all the garbage in Mason County. When originally constructed in the early 1990's, throughput was a fraction of current levels. ln order to safely and efficiently serve the needs of the public and our commercial accounts, a second access road with a scale is needed. Other minor improvements and enhancements will be required to maintain the system over the next few years, such as road work, tip walls, and typical wear and tear. Justification: Over the past 15 years, the number of customers has grown dramatically, along with tons exported. Steps to improve customer safety, reduce wait times, and increase efficiency for commercial customers will allow the facility to postpone major construction for this planning period. Estimated P Gosts in thousands TOTAL FUNDING: vt-26 01.04.10 Mason County Comprehensive Plan Auqust, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12,2010) Capital Facilities 2010-2015 Gapital Facilities Plan Worksheet Utilities, & Waste Management Fund: 402- Belfair Drop Box Project Name: Belfair lmprovements Estimates: Planning Level Description: This facility serves the north end of the County by providing residential drop off of wastes and recyclables five days a week. Growth in the portion of the County is significant, and will likely increase at the current high rate for the near future. Minor improvements and enhancements will be required to maintain the system over the next few years, such as road work, tip walls, and typical wear and tear. A wholly new facility, with a scale and compaction equipment, may be necessary by the end of this planning period. Justification: Currently, our system is able to support the Belfair area. However, the current and projected growth may exceed the capacity of this facility in the relatively near future. Due to the location, it does not make sense to increase the tonnage without exporting directly to rail, or at least to rail containers. To do so, a new facility would be necessary. TOTAL FUNDING: vt-27 01.04.10 Mason County Comprehensive Plan Ausust, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12,2010) Capital Facilities 2010-2015 Gapital Facilities Plan Worksheet Utilities, & Waste Management Fund: 402 - Hoodsport Drop Box Project Name: Hoodsport lmprovements Estimates: Planning Level Description: This facility serves the north and west end of the County by providing residential drop off of wastes and recyclables two days a week. Growth in this portion of the County is occurring, and will likely increase in the near future. Minor improvements and enhancements will be required to maintain the system over the next few years, such as road work, tip walls, and typicalwear and tear. Justification: Currently, our system is able to support the Hoodsport area. However, the current and projected growth may exceed the capacity of this facility in the relatively near future, which can be addressed by simply increasing the days and hours of operation. TOTAL GOST: Fundino Sources: TOTAL FUNDING: vt-28 01.04.10 Mason County Comprehensive Plan August, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12,2010) Gapital Facilities 2010-2015 Gapital Facilities Plan Worksheet Utilities, & Waste Management Fund: 402- Union Drop Box Project Name: Union lmprovements Estimates: Planning Level Description: This facility serves the south end of the canal area by providing residential drop off of wastes and recyclables two days a week. Growth in this portion of the County is occurring, and will likely increase in the near future. Minor improvements and enhancements will be required to maintain the system over the next few years, such as road work, tip walls, and typical wear and tear. Justification: Currently, our system is able to support the Union area. However, the current and projected growth may exceed the capacity of this facility in the relatively near future, which can be addressed by simply increasing the days and hours of operation. TOTAL FUNDING: vt-29 01.04.10 Mason County Comprehensive Plan August, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12,2010)Capital Facilities VL5 PARKS AND RECREATION FACILITIES Svstem Description Recreational opportunities in Mason County include parks for day-use activities and overnight camp¡ng; fresh and salt water areas for boating and other water sports; facilities and equipment for sports and play activities; and wilderness areas and other open spaces for hiking, hunting, ORV use, and horseback riding. Existing parks and recreation facilities in Mason County are available through a variety of public and private entities. Federal and state facilities include camping, boating, and day-use parks. The County-owned park system includes day-use and water access facilities, sports fields, and related recreational areas. Other agencies providing park and recreational resources include municipalities, port districts, and public schools. Some private recreational facilities are open to the public as well. Mason County has adopted a Parks and Recreation Plan in November of 2006 and a Mason County Regional Trails Plan in March of 2008. Both of these plans are incorporated herein by reference. Gounty Park Facilities The County currently manages 21 park properties in Mason County two of which are undeveloped, and three others have large portions that are also undeveloped. Of the developed parks, two are large baseball/softball complexes, five provide saltwater access parks, three are located on freshwater lakes, and three provide upland day use and recreation facilities (see rtcunr u.5-1). ln addition to the day use facilities, the County also owns and maintains one above-ground skate park. The conditions of these facilities vary by location, however, significant investment in facilities has been made in the last two years from Real Estate Excise Tax proceeds (REET 2) and grant proceeds from the Recreation and Conservation Office. The capital plan for the next six years continues this trend of investment in park development and facility upgrades. The heavy use and demand from both county and non-County residents are particularly high during the spring, summer and fall. ln recent years, parks operated by Mason County have received substantial increases in visitors. Total visits increased 52 percent from 1992 to 1993, from 180,600 to 274,500 annual visits. Nearly half of the total increase was at Sandhill Park, a sports park in Belfair. Sandhill's visitation increased by 230 percent, from 20,300 to 67,000 visits, due in large part to increased use of the park by local baseball, softball, and soccer leagues. Sandhill Park received significant improvements in 2006 and use of this park has continued to grow. Mason County Recreation Area, the largest baseball/softball complex has grown in use the last several years and is now recognized regionally as a preferred site for major tournaments. The spike in fuel prices in 2008 and the global recession has also led to increased park use as people are staying closer to home to recreate. There are no facilities for overnight camping throughout the Mason County Parks system. The last county-wide park plan was developed in 1991 and subsequently updated in 2006. Camping options will be examined in the long-term development plan being crafted for these and other park properties with large portions of undeveloped land. Mason County developed a new vt-30 01.04.10 Mason County Comprehensive Plan August, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12, 2010) Capital Facilities county-wide parks plan in 2006, which includes analysis and recommendations to address recreation needs within the county. Camping by special use permit has been approved for Truman Glick Park and Foothills Park and Walker Park. Inventorv An inventory of all Mason County parks including federal, state, private, and County-owned parks is listed in tRale vt.5-1. Also included are the number of acres and amenities available at each park location. The locations of parks and recreational facilities operated by the County are shown on FtcuRE vt.5-1. Figure Vl.5-1 Mason County êounty Parks #@ Þ|NÊ. kraqlrà&Éù3¡D+cirlWfb:ùtriW1;dFd q¡¿&S!@br¡¿r:e.!Þh urìh.&d LaÉù( d æotr r! rs Þù r*Þ IlMrl hi= l*tr ôr.r4 4d k:dftdrid r* !:dsúc tu' tr.àra4+ tuÞ :È rø-üÍroñ&Æi53.r r.s.dÊ-**qkrå¡rqdÈ!l¡q rrúq.+.^ÈËtÞf rÞ È.1 f 4,o i4sll*Þ*¡ úrrr!p¡dr*Fdi*d,,-,ft b¡,srû#.rBi¡r tu,k!F üt@rÈ¡*¡.&.dr*h¡rs*{*Bf4¡@ sc ¡[rLdsübr o.l*]rt¡cr¡;¡rh.n? ¡r.kfr: ¡Hi6il4*#*.idE¡'jùr¡FÈH'orrFnÐ. ¡ffid¡sir!-Þ¡eFûl!îtkÞEr'*úq-r'ÉH*tx"e,tld!þhMrkl¡ùrl\wr¡¡r,k¡'.ù¡ vt-31 01.04.10 Mason County Comprehensive Plan August, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12, 2010) Capital Facilities I taer-e Vr.5-1. lnventory of Parks I Washington State Parks Belfair Sfafe Park 62.77 (3,780 ft tidelands) Camping: 134 tent sites, 47 utility sites, primitive sites, wheelchair accessible trails, trailer dump facilitv. Harstine lsland State Park 310 (3,100 ft tidelands) Currently undeveloped. Future development plans include: day use area; walking/hiking trails; 50 campsites. Hoodsoort Trails BO Natural area with trails. Hope lsland 106 (8,540 ft tidelands) Currently undeveloped. Future development plans include: trails; picnic tables; rest rooms; 6 to B campsites;group camping for 150 people. Washinoton Water Trails site. Jarrells Cove 42.6 (3,500 ft tidelands) Camping: 20 tent sites; group site for maximum of 64 people, 2 picnic shelters, facilities for handicapped, wheelchair accessible trails, marine pump out station, 2 docks providing 500 feet of mooraqe. 14 moorinq buovs. Fee required. Lake lsabella 193.75 Currently undeveloped. Future development plans include: full-service park, camping, picnic area, lakefront beach, and restrooms. Plans will be completed in the next'10 to 20 years. Lilliwaup Tide Land (4,100 ft tidelands)Tidelands for public use. No facilities. Small shoulder area for parking. McMicken lsland 11.45 (1,660 ft tidelands) Currently undeveloped. Boater destination; clamming. Plans to develop include: 5 to B camping sites, composting toilet. Potlatch State Park 56.95 (9.570 ft tidelands) Camping: 17 tent sites; 1B utility sites; primitive sites. Underwater park, trailer dump facilities. Schafer State Park 119 Camping: 47 tent sites, 6 utility sites, primitive sites, dav use oroup area. trailer dump facilities Squaxin lsland Name of Facilitv 31.4 Acres Closed indefinitely. Amenities Available Stretch Point 4.2 (610 ft tidelands) Naturalarea. Day use only; 5 mooring buoys. No plans for future development. Twanoh State Park 182 (3,167 ft tideland) Camping: 30 tent sites, 9 utility sites, primitive sites, handicapped facilities, and wheelchair accessible trails. Total 1208.02 (38,027 ft tideland) vt-32 01.04.10 Mason County Comprehensive Plan August, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12,2010) Capital Facilities Tnsle Vr.5-1. lnventory of Parks (Gontinued) Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife Benson Lake 78.8 Boat launch, beach access, parking for 100 vehicles. Cady Lake Clara Lake Devereaux Lake Haven Lake lsland Lake access 1.6 I 1.3 4.1 1 Unpaved boat launch, parking for 10 vehicles. Unpaved boat launch, parking for 30 vehicles. Boat launch, beach access, parking for 40 vehicles. Unpaved boat launch, parking for 50 vehicles. Freshwater boat launch. toilets. lsabella Lake 1.6 Boat launch. oarkinq for 20 vehicles. Lake Kokanee 44 Boat Launch, parkinq for 100 vehicles. Lake Limerick 0.5 Boat launch, beach access, parkinq for 30 vehicles. Lost Lake 1.3 Boat launch. parkinq for 40 vehicles. Lake Nahwatzel 2.0 Boat launch, parkinq for 10 vehicles, toilets Maooie Lake 0.4 Unoaved boat launch. parkinq for 15 vehicles. Mason Lake Boat launch, parking for 30 vehicles. Panhandle Lake 20 Undeveloped. Panther Lake 3.8 Unpaved boat launch. parkinq for 30 vehicles. Phillips Lake 1 Boat launch. beach access, parkinq for 40 vehicles. Pricket Lake 0.5 Unoaved boat launch. parkinq for 30 vehicles. Skokomish River 64 30.6 feet of riverfront, shore access, parking for 20 vehicles. Soencer Lake 2 Boat launch, beach access, parkinq for 50 vehicles. Tahuva River 2.9 4,400 feet of riverfront, parkinq for 10 vehicles. Tee Lake 3.6 Unpaved boat launch, parkinq for 20 vehicles. Twin Lake 3.6 Unoaved boat launch. parkino for 15 vehicles. Union River 61.8 8,098 feet of riverfront, parking for 10 vehicles. Victor access to North Bav t Boat launch, pit toilets Wildberrv Lake 10 Undeveloped. Wooten Lake 1 Unpaved boat launch, parkinq for 60 vehicles. Total 318.3 Washington State Department of Natural Resources Aldrich Lake Camp 24 (approx.) 1,700 feet waterfront, hand boat launch, 4 picnic tables, 4 campsites, toilets, drinking water, lake stocked with trout, parkinq for 1ô vehicles. Camp Pond Dav use onlv Camp Spillman 10 (approx.) 800 feet waterfront, 6 campsites, 4 group sites, toilets. drínkino water. Elfendahl Pass Staging Area 5 11 picnic sites, self-contained RVs okay, toilets, drinkino water vt-33 01.04.10 Mason County Comprehensive Plan August, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12,2010)Capital Facilities Name of Facility Acres Amenities Available Howell Lake 3 group sites, 10 campsites, hand boat launch, toilets, drinking water, parking for 20 vehicles. Kammenqa Canvon 2 campsites, toilets Mission Creek Trailhead 1 Parkinq for trail access Robbins Lake 1.1 175 feet waterfront, hand boat launch, 3 picnic tables. toilets. Dav use onlv. Tahuya River Horse Camp 12 (approx.) 1,600 feet waterfront, 9 campsites, 2 group sites, toilets, drinking water, 20 horse corrals. Toonerville 5.7 570 feet waterfront, 4 campsites, 2 picnic sites, toilets. Twin Lakes ô camp sites, 3 picnic sites, toilets, hañd boat launch. Lake is stocked with trout. Melbourne Lake setting, 1,000 feet waterfront, 5 campsites, toilets. Lilliwaup 7 Stream setting, 500 feet waterfront, 13 campsites, toilets. drinkino water. Public Tidelands #24 Water access onlv Public Tidelands #33 Water access onlv. Public Tidelands #34 Water access onlv. Public Tidelands #43 Road access, clamminq. Public Tidelands tt44 a,b Road access, clamminq, crab pot fishing. Public Tidelands #46 Water access only, clamming, oysters, shrimp pot fishinq. Public Tidelands #47 Water access onlv. clammino. ovsters. Public Tidelands #48 Water access onlv. clamminq. ovsters Eagle Creek Recreational Tidelands Road access, clamming, crabbing. Rendsland Creek Tidelands Road access, clamming. Total United States Forest Service Brown Creek Camooround 6 78 camp sites, toilets. Hamma Hamma Camooround 5 Picnic area, 12 campsites Lower Lena Lake Camooround 6 Hike-in only, 40 camp sites, pit toilets. Upper Lena Lake Camporound 7 Hike-in only, 14 camp sites, pit toilets. Total 24 Citv of Shelton Parks and Recreation Department Brewer Park 0.3 3 picnic tables, curbside parking only. vt-34 01.04.10 Mason County Comprehensive Plan August, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12,2010\ Capital Facilities Name of Facilitv Acres Amenities Available Callanan Park 6.9 Lighted softball field with spectator stands, 7 picníc tables, 2 swings, 1 slide, rest room, foot trails across 40-foot natural depression, parking space for 30 vehicles olus additional oarkinq alono street. Citv Park 1.75 Currentlv undevelooed. Eleventh Street Site 0.92 Deep well location with the potentialto be develooed into a citv oark. Huff and Puff Trail 80 2 miles of jogging trail and 20 incorporated exercise stations, drinking fountain and parking for 20 vehicles at trailhead. Kneeland Park 3.9 2 slides, swings, 1 merry-go-round, horizontal bars, 1 dome climber, 1 large sand box, I small log playhouse, a few rocking saddle mates, horseshoe pit, aging rest room and picnic shelter, deteriorated clubhouse, 10 picnic tables, 2 tennis courts in need of resurfacing, street parking for approximately 25 vehicles. Johnson Park 0.5 1 merry-go-round, 1 swing, single basketball backboard and substandard concrete court, street parking for approximately 10 vehicles. Loop Field 4 2 tennis courts, softball field, soccer field, jogging trail along the perimeter, I picnic shelter, 5 picnic tables, rest room, parking for 100 vehicles. Oakland Bay Overlook 1.03 Views of downtown Shelton, industrial waterfront, Oakland Bay, and the Olympic Mountains, historic band saw display with large log section and interpretive information, paved parking for 5 vehicles. Development plans for the next 2 years include: picnic area, rest rooms, kiosk, small shelter. additional parkinq. Pine Street Boat Launch 60 feet Crude gravel boat launch and a deteriorating wooden boat repair qrid. Total 99.3 Port of Dewatto Port of Dewatto Campground I Camping: 11 with hook-ups, 19 tent sites; 2 rest rooms; nature/hiking trails; 23 picnic tables; two picnic shelters;, 1 kitchen; fishing. Future plans to add more stoves and picnic tables, and to place gravel around kitchen. Fee required. Port of Shelton Sanderson Field 1,170 Flying: 5,000 feet of runway, tie downs, skydiving; rifle club; model aircraft society. Future plans to orovide increased hanoar availabilitv. Oakland Bav Marina Boat mooraoe. Total 1170 vt-35 01.04.10 Mason County Comprehensive Plan August, '1998 - (updated December 8, 2009;January 12,2010) Capital Facilities Name of Facilitv Acres Amenities Available Port of Allvn Waterfront Park in Allyn 2 400 feet waterfront, moorage, dock (for up to 15 boats), picnic, gazebo, parking for 20 vehicles. Office buildino olanned. Kayak Park .3 150 feet waterfront, small parking lot, picnic tables, portable toi let facilities. North Shore Ramp Belfair/North Shore 1.2 150 feet waterfront, boat launch with floating dock, beach access, parking for 20 vehicles with trailers. Port of Hoodsport lngvald Gronvold Waterfront Park 2 Dock, saltwater beach access, tidelands, 2 portable rest rooms. Port of Grapeview Fair Harbor Marina 5 Boat launch and parking area Mason County Latimer's Landing overflow oarkino area 2.5 Primary use is to provide parking for neighboring Latimer's Landinq, parkinq for 20 vehicles. Foothills Park BO 1 field which serves as a multiuse field; basketball court; rest rooms; children's play area; picnic tables: parkinq for 50 vehicles. Harvey Rendsland Jiggs Lake B Currently undeveloped; 1,905 feet waterfront. Latimer's Landing (Water) 3.00 Saltwater access boat launch for vessels no longer than 20 feet, parking for 10 vehicles, portable toilet, boat dock; additional parking available at neighboring Latimer's Landing overflow parking area. Renovated in 2008. Mason County Recreation Area (MCRA Sport) 4A 7 baseball/softballfields which also serve as soccer and footballfields; children's play area, bleachers, maintenance shop, user's storage facility, seasonal concession stand, 4 batting cage; parking for 100 vehicles. This facility serves as the headquarters for the Mason County Parks Department. Fee required for scheduled field use. Mason Lake Park (WateÐ 17.36 1.36 acres currently in use; freshwater access/boat launch for small watercraft no longer than 1B feet, dock, play area, rest rooms, 4 picnic table; parking for maximum of 50 vehicles. The County owns 16 unused acres that can be used for expansion ofthe park (possible trails, picnic area, and remote campino area). Phillips Lake County Park (Picnic)0.4 Passive day use area, picnic area, located next to State of Washington Boar Launch with vault type toilets. vt-36 01.04.10 Mason County Comprehensive Plan August, 1998 - (updated DecemberS,2009;January 12,2010) CapitalFacilities Name of Facilitv Acres Amenities Available Sandhill Park (Sport)30 7 baseball/softball fields, one multiuse field, bleachers; parking is available for 100+ vehicles; concession-restroom building; 4 fields and parking renovated in 2006; walking path around park. Jacoby Park (Water)2.8 320 feet waterfront, boat launch for vessels no longer than 16 feet, saltwater beach access, 3 picnic tables. Truman Glick Memorial Park (Picnic) 35.46 Natural setting, creek, trails, picnic tables, covered group shelter, barbecue pit, vault toilets, RV area. Future improvements include: possible construction of group camping area and interpretive signage alonq trails. Union Community Park (Picnic) 1.92 Picnic shelter, children's play area; small baseball diamond. basketball court: rest rooms. Union Boat Ramp (Water) 0.16 Boat ramp for access to Hood Canal, portable toilets. no oarkino. Hunter Park .5 2 picnic tables. bus shelter Skate Park .6 11 above qround ramps in Shelton Walker Park (Water)5.04 Saltwater access to Hammersley lnlet, gravel beach, picnic tables, barbecues, rest rooms, shelter, children's play area, interpretive center providing marine information; parking for 15 vehicles. Oakland Bay Preservation Area 80 Habitat preservation area and education center (currentlv u ndeveloped) Watson Wildwood View 36 Undeveloped Mendards Landibng Park 40 Recently transferred from the Port of Tahuya to County. Parks provices beach access, picnic areas, gazebo, portable toilet, access to DNR tidelands, small boat launch for kavaks and canoes Mason Lake Picnic Park .9 Undeveloped Harstine lsland 6.9 Undeveloped Theler Center 135 Wetlands interpretive trails Total 463.03 Mason Gounty Public Schools Belfair Elementarv Plavoround. Sandhill Elementarv Plavoround. Hood Canal Elementary/Junior High School 2 baseball backstops, 1 footballfield, bleachers, playground, track, parking for 30 vehicles. Oakland Bay Middle School X Olympic Middle School X Pioneer Elementary 2 baseball backstops, covered play area, playground. vt-37 01.04.10 Mason County Comprehensive Plan August, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12,2010) Capital Facilities Name of Facility Acres Amenities Available Grapeview Elementary Playground Southside Elementarv 1 baseball backstop. Bordeaux Football field, soccer field, playqround, track. Evergreen Elementarv Playground. Mountain View Elementarv 5 baseball backstops, football field, soccer field, plavqround. Shelton High School 6 tennis courts, 2 baseball backstops, footballfield, soccer field, bleachers, 2 swimming pools, track, rest rooms. Mary M. Knight District 2 baseball backstops, 1 footballfield, bleachers, plavqround. North Mason High School 2 baseball backstops, 2 tennis courts, footballfield, soccer field, bleachers, playground, track. Private Facilities Open to the Public Shelton/South Mason Soccer Park 14 6 soccer fields, 1 under development Glen Ayr Canal Resort 10 Adult-only RV park with hookups; no tent camping, motel, 2 rest rooms, 2 showers, laundry facility, saltwater boat launch, beach access, tidelands, spa. fishino. clamminq. ovsters. dock. Lake Nahwatzel Resort 2 Camping: l2 utility sites, 5 sites without hookups; 2 rest rooms, 2 showers, boat launch, freshwater beach access, nature/hiking trails, B picnic tables, restaurant. fishino, swimminq, cabins. Minerva Beach RV Resort and Mobile Village 20 Camping: 23 sites without hookups, 50 sites with hookups; 5 rest rooms, 6 showers, laundry facilities, boat launch, saltwater beach access, 60 picnic tables, driving range, scuba dive center. Rest-A-While RV Park and Marina 15 Saltwater boat launch, moorage, dock, 70-80 camp sites with hookups (may be used for RVs or tents), 4 rest rooms, 4 showers, laundry facilities, beach access, clamming, oysters, fishing, boat rentals, nature trail, 60 picnic tables, 2 covered picnic areas with kitchen, concession stand. Future improvements include easier access to marina, and boat fuel. Lake Cushman 602.9 Camping: 51 tent sites, 30 utility sites, 2 primitive walk-in sites, group site with cooking shelter for maximum of 56 people, rest rooms with showers; facilities for handicapped, boat launch, trailer dump facilitv. Total 663.9 vt-38 01.04.r0 Mason County Comprehensive Plan August, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12,2010)Capital Facilities Name of Facilitv Acres Amenities Available Other Olympic National Park - Staircase Campqround Picnic area, 50 campsites, parking for 60 vehicles. Tacoma City Light Saltwater Park 6 picnic tables, rest rooms, saltwater boat launch, saltwater beach access. Mike's Beach Resort Boat launch, SCUBA diving, cabins, camping, beach access for quests Robin Hood Village 16 RV sites, cabins, camping, beach access for ouests COUNTY TOTAL 63.167.27 Proiects The following pages provide details on spec¡fic Park projects proposed for the current capital facilities planning period. vt-39 01.04.10 Mason County Comprehensive Plan August, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12,2010) Capital Facilities 2010-2015 Capital Facilities Plan Worksheet Parks & Trails Department Fund Name: REET 2 Gapital lmprovement Program Fund Number: 351.000.000 594.80.41.1000 Planning351.000.000 594.76.63.1000 Development Project Name: Watson Wildwood County Park Estimates:Construction Level Description: Scope of this project includes planning/design and development services. Phase one is a master plan for the Park. Phase 2 would include development of a parking area, restroom, trails, and passive recreation. Park is 35 acres and was donated to the County. Development would provide infrastructure for public access Justifications: There is no current plan of record for this park site and is the only County Park between Allyn and the Pierce County Border. Site also has potential as a trailhead for a Regional Trail in the area. Estimated Gosts Funding Sources: Total Funding: vl-40 0r.04.10 Mason County Comprehensive Plan August, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12,2010)Capital Facilities 2010-2015 Gapital Facilities Plan Worksheet Parks & Trails Department REET 2 Capital lmprovement ProgramFund Name: Fund Number: Project Name: Estimates: 351.000.000 351.000.000 Union Boat Ramp Construction Level 676.80.41.1 I 00 Planning 594.76.63.1 000 Development Description: Scope of this project includes planning/design and development to renovate the existing County Boat Ramp in Union on Hood Canal. Justifications: Project listed as a high priority in the 2006 County Parks Plan. Project would enhance water access and boating Planning, Design Site Prep & Utilities/ Well Construction Eng ineerin g TotalFunding: vt-41 01.04.10 Mason County Comprehensive Plan August, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12, 2010) Capital Facilities Fund Name: Fund Number: Project Name: Estimates: 2010-2015 Gapital Facilities Plan Worksheet Parks & Trails Department REET 2 Gapital lmprovement Program 351.000.000 594.76.63.0500 Sandhill Park Renovation Construction Level Description: Scope of this project includes planning/design and development services to complete the renovation of Sandhill Park. Main work would include the renovation of fields #1, #2, and #3. New backstops, ADA access, irrigation, and complete field renovation would be included. Justifications: This project is listed as a high priority in the 2006 Park Plan. Plan recommended improving existing facilities before developing new facilities. Site Prep & Utilities/ Well Total Gosts: Total Funding: vt-42 01.04.10 Mason County Comprehensive Plan August, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12,2010) Capital Facilities 2010-2015 Capital Facilities Plan Worksheet Parks & Trails Department Fund Name: REET 2 Capital lmprovement Program Fund Number: 351.000.000 594.76.63.1700 Project Name: Estimates: Harvey Rendsland Gounty Park Planning and lmprovements Construction Level Description: Would involve completing a park plan to facilitate public access to the park and then the development of a parking area, picnic facility, passive recreation and support facilities. Justifications: This park was donated to Mason County in 2007 by Washington State Parks. ft provides water access to Jiggs Lake. Water access is the top priority in the 2006 County Parks Plan. Additional developed park space is needed on the Tahuya Peninsula. Site Prep & Utilities/ Well Total Funding: vt-43 01.04.10 Mason County Comprehensive Plan Ausust, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009;January 12,2010) Capital Facilities Fund Name: Fund Number: Project Name: Estimates: 2010-2015 Capital Facilities Plan Worksheet Parks & Trails Department REET 2 Gapital lmprovement Program 351.000.000 594.76.63.1400 Phillips Lake Gounty Park Construction Level Description: Scope of this project includes basic park improvements, including park amenities such as tree removal, picnic tables, park benches, trash containers, and signage. Justifications: This small park has had very little in the way of improvements and is needed. Planning, Design Site Prep & Utilities/ Well Funding Sources: Total Funding: vl-44 0r.04.10 Mason County Comprehensive Plan August, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12,2010)Capital Facilities 2010-2015 Gapital Facilities Plan Worksheet Parks & Trails Department Fund Name: REET 2 Capital lmprovement Program Fund Number: 351.000.000 594.76.63.1300 Project Name: Oakland Bay County Park Estimates:Construction Level Description: The Oakland Bay property was purchased jointly by the County and the Capitol Land Trust. Project scope would involve a two-phase development program for the park. The first phase would concentrate on public access facilities, the entry road, parking area, restrooms, and signage. The second phase would concentrate on trail development, environmental education facilities, and interpretative displays. Justifications: Project listed in the 2006 County Parks Plan as a high priority for implementation. Site Prep & Utilities/ Well Total Funding: vt-45 0r.04.10 Mason County Comprehensive Plan Auqust, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12,2010) Capital Facilities 2010-2015 Capital Facilities Plan Worksheet Parks & Trails Department REET 2 Capital lmprovement ProgramFund Name: Fund Number: 351.000.000 Project Name: Estimates: 594.76.63.1600 Menards Landing County Park Construction Level Description: This park was transferred from the Port of Tahuya to Mason County in 2006. Project scope includes improvements that would incorporate ADA access improvements, new picnic facilities, non-motorized watercraft improvements to the present launch site, and new park amenities such as park benches and garbage cans, Justifications: Project listed in the 2006 County Parks Plan as a priority for implementation. Estimated P ect Costs Site Prep & Utilities/ Well Total Funding: vt-46 01.04.10 Mason County Comprehensive Plan August, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12,201'A)Capital Facilities 2010-2015 Capital Facilities Plan Worksheet Parks & Trails Department REET 2 Gapital lmprovement ProgramFund Name: Fund Number: 351.000.000 Project Name: Estimates: 594.76.63.0300 Mason County Recreation Area (MGRA) lmprovements Gonstruction Level Description: Project scope would involve needed renovations and improvements to MCRA Park. The improvements include: new field lights, restroom renovation, irrigation improvements, drainage upgrades, new office, new bleachers, play equipment surfacing, asphalt, scoreboards, and concession building. Justifications: Project listed in the 2006 County Parks Plan for implementation. Site Prep & Utilities/ Well Funding Sources: vl-47 01.04.10 Mason County Comprehensive Plan August, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12,2010) Capital Facilities 2010-2015 Gapital Facilities Plan Worksheet Parks & Trails DePartment Fund Name: REET 2 Gapital lmprovement Program Fund Number: 351.000.000 594.76.63.0400 Project Name: Estimates: Mason County Boat Launch Renovation Gonstruction Level Description: Renovation of existing boat launch facility, including the boat ramp, dock, entry and exit road, and parking improvements. The parking would be improved and expanded, entry road widened, and restroom improved for ADA accessibility. Justifications: Park has not been renovated since initialdevelopment. Listed in 2006 Parks Plan for renovation and expansion. ADA improvements are needed, especially access to dock and restrooms. Site Prep & Utilities/ Well Total Funding: vt-48 01.04.10 Mason County Comprehensive Plan August, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12,2010)Capital Facilities 2010-2015 Capital Facilities Plan Worksheet Parks & Trails Department Fund Name: REET 2 Gapital lmprovement Program Fund Number: 351.000.000 594.76.63.0220 351.000.000 576.80.41.0220' Planning Project Name: Latimers Landing County Park Estimates:Construction Level Description: Scope of this project includes planning and design to develop 2.4 acres of undeveloped land at Latimers Landing into additional boat and trailer parking, and public access to Pickering Passage. -lhe 2.4 acres was purchased in 2008 to compliment the .59 acre Latimers Landing Boat Launch. Justifications: Project listed as a high priority in the 2006 County Parks Plan. Project would enhance water access and provide additional parking for boats and trailers. Funding Sources: TotalFunding: vt-49 01.04.10 Mason County Comprehensive Plan August, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12,2010)Capital Facilities Fund Name: Fund Number: Project Name: Estimates: 2010-2015 Capital Facilities Plan Worksheet Parks & Trails Department REET 2 Capital lmprovement Program 351.000.000 594.76.63.2000 Lake Nahwatzel County Park, Gonstruction Level Description: Scope of this project includes planning/design and development services to develop a future waterfront park on Lake Nahwatzel. Project would be completed in cooperation with Green Diamond Resource Company. Justifications: This project is listed as a high priority in the 2006 Park Plan because is addressed a parkland deficiency in western Mason County and also provides water access. vl-50 01.04.10 Mason County Comprehensive Plan August, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12,2010)Capital Facilities 2010-2015 Capital Facilities Plan Worksheet Parks & Trails Department Fund Name: REET 2 Capital lmprovement Program Fund Number: 351.000.000 594.76.63.0600 Project Name: Jacoby Park (Shorecrest) lmprovements Estimates: Construction Level Description: Project scope would involve implementation of Park lmprovement Plan based on Park Site Plan developed in 2008. lmprovements would provide more amenities at the park than what currently exist. Justifications: Project listed in the 2006 Gounty Parks Plan for implementation. Site Prep & Utilities/ Well vt-51 01.04.10 Mason County Comprehensive Plan August, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12,2010)Capital Facilities 2010-2015 Gapital Facilities Plan Worksheet Parks & Trails Department Fund Name: REET 2 Gapital lmprovement Program Fund Number: 351.000.000 594.76.63.1900 Project Name: Estimates: Goldsborough Creek Gounty Park Construction Level Description: Scope of this project would include the development of passive recreation facilities at a 9.4-acre park site along Goldsborough Creek. Project would include passive recreation amenities, primarily parking, restroom, trails, and passive recreation along the creek, park benches and picnic areas. [Note] Property not acquired as of 2009. Acquisition costs with RCO Grant are in an "alternate" position now. Can only be acquired with RCO grant. Justifications: Project listed as a priority in the 2008 County Regional Trails Plan and would also provide additional parkland in the western section of Mason County, which was listed in the 2006 Park Plan as an area of the County with a park and open space deficiency. Site Prep & Utilities/ Well Funding Sources: Total Funding: vt-52 01.04.10 Mason County Comprehensive Plan August, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12,2010) Capital Facilities Fund Name: 2010-2015 Gapital Facilities Plan Worksheet Parks & Trails Department REET 2 Capital lmprovement Program Fund Number: 351.000.000 594.76.63.0100 Project Name: Foothills County Park Estimates: Construction Level Description: Project scope would include working with the Port of Hoodsport to develop a Master Site Plan for Foothills County Park. Future development of the park via a partnership with the County and Port of Hoodsport would be likely. Justifications: Project listed in the 2006 County Parks Plan. Site Prep & Utilities/ Well vt-53 01.04.10 Mason County Comprehensive Plan August, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12,2010)Capital Facilities Fund Name: Fund Number: Project Name: Estimates: 2010-2015 Capital Facilities Plan Worksheet Parks & Trails Department REET 2 Gapital lmprovement Program351.000.100 594.76.63.0001 Park Development Partnership Program Construction Level Description: The Park Development Partnership Program provides matching grant funds to plan, construct, reconstruct, repair, rehabilitate and improve parks in Mason County. To be eligible for funding, community organizations and public entities must have an established a partnership. Public entities include, but necessarily be limited to: school districts, utility districts and cities. The public entity must submit the application. Justifications: Provides funds to improve parks in Mason County by promoting partnerships with community groups and public entities. Program would provide for one $50,000 project from 2010 to 2015. Site Prep & Utilities/ Well Total Funding: vt-54 01.04.10 Mason County Comprehensive Plan August, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12,2010) Capital Facilities 20'{'0-20'15 Capital Facilities Plan Worksheet Parks & Trails Department Fund Name: REET 1 Gapital lmprovement Program Fund Number: 350.000.000 Project Name: Trails Development Program Estimates: Construction Level Description:. Trail development program for Mason County. Justifications:. Begin lmplementation of a trail development program as per the County RegionalTrails Plan. Trails 2010-2015 Program of Work1) North Bay Trail2) Kennedy Creek Trail Extension3) Mason Lake to Twanoh State Park4l Menards Landing to Rendsland Park Estimated Pro Costs 2010 2011 20'12 2013 2014 2015 Total Planning and Design 75,000 75,000 150,000 Site Prep & Utilities/ Well Construction Engineering Construction 200,000 400,000 300,000 200,000 100,000 1,200,000 TotalGosts: Funding Sources: ln House 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 400,000 Grants 100,000 300,000 200,000 100,000 100,000 800,000 Loans Total Funding:200,000 400,000 300,000 200,000 100,000 1,200,000 vt-55 01.04.10 Mason County Comprehensive Plan August, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12,2010)Capital Facilities Fund Name: Fund Number: 350.000.000 2010-2015 Capital Facilities Plan Worksheet Parks & Trails Department REET I Capital lmprovement Program Project Name: Estimates: MCRA Office Renovation Construction Level Description: Convert old maintenance garage to a ground level office building. Justifications: Current parks office is 25+ years old and can only be accessed up a flight of stairs. Current office is not ADA accessible. Site Prep & Utilities/ Well Funding Sources: Total Funding: vt-56 01.04.10 Mason County Comprehensive Plan August, 1998 - (updated DecemberS,2009; January 12,2010)Capital Facilities 2010-2015 Capital Facilities Plan Worksheet Parks & Trails Department Fund Name: REET I Capital lmprovement Program Fund Number: 350.000.000 Project Name: Estimates: Goldsborough Greek Park Acquisition Construction Level Description: Acquire 9.4 acres on Goldsborough Creek in partnership with the Capitol Land Trust. Justifications: High priority for acquisition for use as trailhead site and County Park. High priority in both the Regional Trails Plan and the County Park Plan. ** County contribution would be proceeds from a land sale at Mason Lake. Site Prep & Utilitiesi Well TotalFunding: vt-57 01.04.10 Mason County Comprehensive Plan August, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12,2010)Capital Facilities Sysfem Description Mason County owns several buildings, most of which are located in the City of Shelton, the County seat. These buildings are used to support general County functions such as internal management, health, public service, and general administration. Other buildings owned by the County include Memorial Hall, the Cooperative Extension Office, the two buildings on Pine Street, the Mason County Fair/Convention Center, the Public Works Campus and the Belfair Public Works Shop. TABLE vl.6-1 describes these sites. Locations of the facilities within the Shelton Campus are shown in r¡cunr vl.6-1. Memorial Hall and the two buildings on Pine Street are located in Shelton, a few blocks from the main campus area. The Mason County Extension Office is located about 3 miles north of Shelton, on the northeast side of Highway 101, across from the Shelton airport. The Public Works campus is located about 4 miles north of Shelton, on the northwest side of Highway 101. The Belfair Public Works Shop is situated on the north shore of Hood Canal about 3 miles from Belfair. lnventory Mason County's administrative offices and departments housed in the buildings are listed in TABLE vt.6-2. Also provided is a summary of current office area allocations for the County departments and departmental functions. Most of the County's administrative offices are located in the Shelton Campus, a four-square block section of the downtown area. At this location, the County operates trom 23 publicly owned buildings. These include the Courthouse, Jail, Juvenile Detention Facility, Building l, Building ll, Building lll, Building lV, Building V, Building Vl, Building Vll, Building Vlll, and Building lX. Other county administrative offices are located at Building Xl (Cooperative Extension Building), the 3'd & Pine building (the Sheriff Office), the Public Works campus, and the offices at the Mason County Fairgrounds. Facility Needs Facility needs are being developed through a space planning effort currently being updated by the County. This work is based on an assessment of agency needs related to growth in both the six- and 2}-year planning horizons. While planning is continuing, the county has identified the space needs for County administration, law enforcement, and criminaljustice facilities. Specific planned improvements for the first six-year planning period and associated financing are detailed in Section V|.10, Finance Plan. Based on the "Space Standards Manual" published by the State of Washington Department of General Administration,2Sl square feet are needed per employee. ln addition, certain governmental functions have special requirements for facilities. Currently the county has a deficit in space. Significant additional space will be required over the next six and twenty years if the county is to offset that deficit and meet the future growth. The information is summarized in Table Vl.6-3. Needs analysis and facility planning was done in 1995 and 1996. The background information and analysis can be found in "Update to Mason County Space Needs Analysis for inclusion in the Mason County and Master Plan update, June 16, 1999." vl-58 01.04.10 Mason County Comprehensive Plan August, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12,2010) Capital Facilities TABLE V.6-1 Summary of Administration Sites Site Square Feet Acres Shelton Campus 169,200 3.88 Memorial Hall 12,000 0.275 Extension Office Aoorox. 18.600 Fairorounds Not reviewed 43 Belfair Public Works Shop Approx. 61.000 1.4 Public Works Campus 3'o & Pine Propertv 19,000 1.16 TABLE VI.6-2, Buildinqs and Space Allocations for Administrative Offices Department or Office Area (square feet) Building Assessor 2.525 Buildinq I Auditor 3,228 Buildinqs l, Xl, Courthouse Central Operations 99 Buildins l, Vll Clerk 1430 Courthouse Communitv Development 2,121 Buildinos l. lll Cooperative Extension Office 2,377 Extension Office Coroner 99 Buildinq Vl Countv Commission 1.508 Buildino I District Court 2.322 Courthouse, Buildinq Vlll Equipment, Rental and Revolvino Fund (ER&R) 374 Buildings l, lX, lll, Public Works Camous Facilities & Grounds 757 Building lX, Courthouse, 3'o & Pine Health Services 3.299 Buildinqs ll. lll. lV Permit Assistance Center 1.726 Buildinq lll Probation Services 1,383 Buildino Vlll Prosecutor 3,535 Buildinq Vll Public Works Camous Public Works Campus Public Works - Maintenance 61,000 Belfair Shop Sheriff 13,000 3'o & Pine Property, Belfair Sub- Station Superior Court 4,371 Courthouse, Buildinq Vl Treasurer 2.157 Buildins l, Courthouse vt-59 01.04.10 Mason County Comprehensive Plan Ausust, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12,2010) Cap¡talf ¡c{!!ç9 2007 Space Needs Update - Area Projections for primary space needs Summary Sheeú for departments not included in new Mason County Sñop facility Department Current Projected Allocat ion (s.f.) 2007 need (s.r.) Deficit (s.f.) Deficit ft"/"| 2012 need (s.f.) 2017 need (s.f.) Assessor 2,519 4,440 1,921 43%4,218 4,440 Auditor 3,407 4,074 667 16%4,296 4,518 Treasurer 2,481 2,442 -39 o%I,998 1,998 Budget and Finance / Risk Management 210 444 234 53%666 666 Human Resources 215 444 229 52o/o 666 666 Facilities and Grounds 7,096 3,500 -3,590 0%5,500 6,500 Board of Gounty Gommissioners / Central Operations 1,640 3,398 1,758 52%3,620 4,892 Clerk 1,277 3,508 2,231 64%4,618 5,728 District Court 2,925 7,664 4,739 620/o 8,774 13,162 Superior Gourt 5,090 12,400 7,310 59%16,600 21,200 Probation Services 4,745 4,608 -137 0%5,052 5,496 Juvenile Detention / Alternatives to Detention 3,408 9,400 5,992 64o/o 12,200 15,000 Sheriff 7,239 16,000 9,761 55%19,000 20,000 Adult Detention / Alternatives to Detention 19,315 55,000 35,685 65o/o 61,000 67,600 Prosecutor 3,533 4,468 935 21olo 4,690 5,406 vt-60 01.04.10 Mason County Comprehensive Plan August, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12,2010) Capital Facilities Coroner 294 744 450 61o/o 966 2,188 Gommunity Development - Planning 1,998 3,552 1,554 44%3,996 4,440 Community Development - Permit Assistance Center 3,681 5,550 1,869 34%6,216 7,'104 Community Development - Utilities and Waste Management 635 1,554 919 59%2,664 3,330 Public Health Services I,695 8,992 7,297 81%11,656 14,098 Parks and Trails 1,094 1,554 460 30o/o 1,776 I,998 WSU MC Extension 2,311 4,330 2,019 47%4,774 5,218 Total +/- 76.8(158,06 6 +l- 81,258 +l-5'l%183,94 6 215,64I vt-61 01.04.10 Mason County Comprehensive Plan August, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12,2010) Capital Facilities VI.7 POLICE AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE FACILITIES Svstem Description The Mason County Sheriffs Office provides police services including, patrol, traffic enforcement, service of civil process, jail operation and investigative services to the citizens in unincorporated Mason County. The Mason County Sheriff's Office currently has a total of 98 employees. Of those, 47 are commissioned officers, 30 are jailers, and2l are civilian employees. The Mason County Sheriff's Office currently serves 53,100 citizens covering an area of 961 square miles. The Mason County Sheriff's Office also covers over 900 miles of shorelines, 622 miles of county roads and nearly 115 miles of state highways. The Màson County Sheriff's Office will be taking over primary responsibility for traffic law enforcement and collision investigations on all county roads commencing July 1,2009. Accordingly the Sheriff's Office received authorizationfor 2 new positions to be dedicated to traffic enforcement on January 1,2008 and two more on July 1, 2008, providing for a total of 5 officers and a supervisor working traffic and investigating collisions. Criminal Activity The following table illustrates calls for service for the Mason County Sheriff's Office 2004 through 2007. 2004 190462005 221772006 200132007 200522008 19272 The following TABLE Vl.7-1 illustrates Mason County Crimes from 2003 through 2007. Figures for 2009 not yet available at the time of this update. vt-62 01.04.10 Mason County Comprehensive Plan August, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12,2010)Capital Facilities TABLE Vl.7-1. Mason County Crime 2003 through 2007 j., "a. : ,:, Murder ,',,i:'' ¡.Forcible rape 1i.,By force ..-Attempted '$obbery,..:.:...: l¡;Firearm 2003 2 32 2004 2 46 2005 b 26 2006 1 26 0 31 27 4 13 2007 42 4 27 5 20 6 24 2 $obnev M 15 13 iFirearm92576 r:-ffife,',,-,.,'. ", '. , 2 '0 .' ,, :'1 .. ' O " 1 i t:i. : li-Olherweapon ;ilnife, ,',, ...'O .', ,.ri' tr:::lS.::,,lir 19, -, t.8t '.' 2 3' : 12 I 43 47 ,. 27. . 26 124 149 173 153 31 39 64 56 78 65 . , .1',.p.0Q, ., ,..,,,i1 ¡Q7l!.-r.,,:; ,,1:;23.,,,,,.1 , 1;150 21g 244 29t6 256 2,509 '10,90 243 164 30 49 2391 191 273 ?.:Vehicle thèftl;" t. :i:Autos i,Trucks, buses :l; å19ther vehicles J:,1O1u,;:. . i'Unfounded ,. Cleared 2,337 2,508 3,019 196 197 ' 246 229 230 208 , 226221 VI-63 01.04.10 Mason County Comprehensive Plan August, 1993'- lupdated December 8, 2009;January 12,2010) Capital Facilities Traffic in Mason County 2007 Traffic lnfractions issued by MCSO Criminal Non Traffic issued by MCSO TotalTraffic Collisions responded to by MCSO TotalTraffic Collisions investigated by MCSO 827 373 710 215 Washington State Patrol (WSP) maintains records for all citations and collisions within Mason County. The Washington State Patrol has notified Sheriff Casey Salisbury that they will no longer investigate non-injury collisions on County Roads starting July 1, 2009. According to a Sheriffs Office analysis, the county for the county to take over the traffic accident investigations on county roads with the associated enforcement component, at least four deputies will be required. The Washington State Patrol cunently has nine troopers assigned to Mason County. Approximately 40 percent of all of the collisions in the county occur on county roads. Additionally, according to WSP statistics, they have been conducting about 4000 contacts per yearwith nine troopers on county roads, which accounts for about 40 percent of the totalWSP contacts in the entire county. This amount of contacts along with the collisions investigated takes up over 40 percent of WSP's time. ln 2006, there were 1,035 collisions in all of Mason County. Of those collisions, 383 resulted in personal injuries. There were 15 fatalities with 5 of those fatalities occuning on County Roads. A total of 307 collisions occurred on County Roads. From January 1,2007 to June 15,2007 , WSP has responded to a total of 1Q2 collisions on County Roads. Between 1993 and 2003 Mason County had the 4h highest Drinking Driver lnvolved (DDl) death rate in the state. During the same time period Mason County had the 6m highest traffic fatality rate in the state. Jail Facilities The Mason County Jail opened in 1986 with a population capacity of 45 inmates. ln 1989, capacity was increased to 51 , and in 1991 it was increased to 58 beds with floor space for 106. ln 1993 the average daily population (ADP) was 62. \n2004 the ADP was at 95 - 146% over capacity. The Direct Supervision Unit (DSU) opened on October 1, 2006, bringing the jail capacity up to 128 inmates. ADP for 2005 was 111, ADP for 2006 was 119 and ADP for 2007 was 113.7. Strategic Plan The Mason County Sheriff's Office has no current formalized strategic plan at this time; however, the creation of a formal strategic plan is currently being considered. Alternate Fu ndi ng Sources The Mason County Sheriff's Office continues to explore alternative funding sources including Federal Homeland Security Grants, Justice Assistance Grants, and grants from other federal, state, and private sources. Additionally the Mason County Sheriff's Office is committed to forming community partnerships with public and private agencies to more efficiently provide services and utilize facilities to maximum efficiency. vt-64 01.04.10 Mason County Comprehensive Plan Capital Facilities1998 - (updated December 8,2009; January 12,2010) Overall Facility /Veeds ln 2008, Foster ánd Williams conducted a space analysis to be incorporated in the Mason County Comprehensive Plan. According to this analysis, the Sheriff's Office will have a space deficit of 10,761 by 2012. However, not reflected in that analysis is the County's acquisition of a building located af 3'o & Pine in Shelton. lt is anticipated that the Sheriff's Office will moving from itJ current location into the 3'd & Pine building alleviating many of the department's spacing needs. Space Allocation Criteria Siandard space allocations methods do not apply to all areas of the Sheriffls Office because of the diverse functions found within the department such as training, locker rooms, K-9 holding, briefing room, interview rooms, public receptions, fingerprinting, criminalcomplaints, evidence procesling and others. Space for many of the above mission essential functions does not exist. Þlease noie that full time work stations are not required for each patrolman. However, four to six work stations for patrol are currently required. Storage Needs The mıst important need of the Sheriffs Office is that of evidence storage. Property taken in by the Sheriff's'Office, whether it's contraband, found property, stolen property, or safekeeping is held in trust by the Sheriff's Office. Therefore the Sheriff is responsible for its security, preservation, ôhain of custody as well as its return, sale or disposal in the same condition it was *h"n *e acquired it according to law. Currently evidence is stored in a vault in the basement of the courthouse, on the third floor of the courthouse and in buildings and containers at the impound yard at the county shop. Space allotted for evidence storage space is currently 2908 square feãt. tt is estimated Sheriff's Office evidence storage should be about 6000 square feet. This would allow for enough space to properly store and process evidence and should take care of evidence storage needs for at least the next 10 years. That space needs to include an 800 square ft space tfrãt ¡s heated and well lit for indoor vehicle processing. The evidence storage facility ideally would be all in one location to eliminate the need for transportation to remote locations for storage. Additionally the Mason County Sheriff's Office must have covered storage for it's three boats, two personalwatercrafts, light armored vehicle, ATV, skid car and trailer along with spare vehicles. Additional secure storage is needed for other training equipment, tactical equipment and ordinance that is not routinely issued to officers and needs to be in a secure location. Storage needs will continue to be revisited and it is anticipated that the Sheriff's Officè move to the 3'd & Pine will address many of them. Courts The Mason County District courts handled 11,195 cases in 2004, mostly infractions and misdemeanors. Domestic violence and civil cases make up less than 13 percent of the District Court caseload. Mason County Superior Court handled 2,541 cases in 2004, with civil cases being the most common, followed by criminal actions, domestic cases, juvenile offender cases, and þrobate/guardianship cases, in that order. TABLE vl.7-2 summarizes the caseload for the two courts for the years 2002,2003, and 2004. vt-65 01.04.10 Mason County Comprehensive Plan st, 1998 - (updated DecemberS,2009;12,2010)Capital Facilities TABLE vl,7-2 Mason County Gourt Cases Gase Type 2002 2003 2004 Mason County District Gourt lnfractions 4,213 5,591 6,574 Misdemeanors 2,278 2,980 3,192 Domestic violence 296 293 258 Civil cases 1,011 I,139 1,171 Total 7,798 10,003 11,195 Mason Gounty Superior Gourt Criminal actions 503 475 531 Civil actions 1,020 1,146 I,199 Domestic 322 337 368 Probate/quardianship 212 185 192 Juvenile offender 261 214 251 Total 2,318 2,357 2,541 Source: State of Washington; Courts of Limited Jurisdiction Annual Caseload Report Facílitv Needs ln 1996, the Facilities Steering Committee and the Criminal Justice Working Team, working with a consultant, assessed future County building needs. A report was issued jointly by the Facilities Steering Committee and Criminal Justice Working Team in 1996, and updated in 1999 ("Mason County Space Needs Analysis for inclusion in the Mason County Master Plan update, June 16, 1999") which identified four capitalfacility projects. Space needs are not determined by a simple set of standards but by a comprehensive approach to the criminaljustice systems program needs. The projected cost of this plan and potential funding sources are incorporated in the finance plan contained in Section Vl-10 of this chapter. A summary of space needs for the next six-year and 2O-year planning periods can be located on Table Vl.6-3, in the previous section V|.6. vt-66 01.04.10 Mason County Comprehensive Plan August, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12,2010)Capital Facilities VI.8 STORMWATER MAN AGEMENT Svstem Description Existing stormwater facilities in Mason County include both natural systems and built collection and conveyance. Existing systems generally handle runoff from State and County Roads and existing development. Run-off control is limited to new construction which is managed through requirements in 1992 Ecology Stormwater Manual. More stringent control is proposed for the Urban Growth areas and the Hoodsport RuralActivity Center by implementing the 2005 Ecology Stormwater Manual and Low-l m pact Development techniq ues. lncreases in the amount of residential and commercial impervious surfaces have increased stormwater runoff in the county. ln addition, forestry practices, such as logging, and new road construction, have also increase runoff and created sedimentation problems in a.number of the county's creeks and streams resulting in diminished water quality and loss of critical aquatic habitat. Stormwater runoff, erosion, sedimentation, habitat loss and flooding problems will likely continue in the County especially in the designated urban growth areas if strong control measures are not implanted. lnventoru Mason County has adopted a Stormwater Management Ordinance (Mason County Code Section 14.48). This ordinance adopts by reference the 1992 edition of the Washington State Department of Ecology's Stormwater Management Manual, with the exception of the Minimum Requirements chapter, for use in designing best management practices (BMPs) for new development and other improvements. The ordinance defines specific minimum requirements and other approval standards for development on all ranges of parcel sizes The City of Shelton has prepared a Surface Water Drainage Utility Master Plan. Their master plan identifies existing problems in the city and offers recommendations for improvements. Ïhe city has scheduled improvements based on the existing master plan; the city intends to update the plan before 2013. The county is in the process of adopting stormwater plans for the Belfair/Allyn Urban Growth Area, and the Hoodsport Rur:al Activity Center. A more general plan for the entire county is expected to be developed in 2009. The specific plans and the more general countywide plan will set the stage for the development of a utility that will implement programmatic and capital improvement projects to manage strormwater. Activities will focus on addressing flooding in the county, improving the water quality in South Puget Sound and protecting critical aquatic habitat. Strormwater programs and capital improvements will be lunched through direct developer contributions as new development occurs; grants and loans; a dedicated portion of the Real Estate Excise Tax (REET 2) collected by the county; and utility fees. Facilitv Needs Mason County continues the development of a comprehensive countywide Stormwater Management Plan. This planning process focuses on a review of existing stormwater policies and the County's stormwater regulations. ln addition, a review for regulatory consistency with vt-67 01.04.10 Mason County Comprehensive Plan Auqust, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12,2010) capital Facilities the County's CriticalAreas Ordinance (CAO) and Low lmpact Development (LlD) Standards will be completed. The plan addresses changing state, federal, and regional regulatory requirements. This includes the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Phase ll permit program of the Clean Water Act. This act controls water pollution by regulating point sources that discharge pollutants into waters of the state. Also, the plan will consider implementation of the 2005-2007 Puget Sound Conservation Plan as well as consider the adoption of the Department of Ecology (DOE) 2005 Stormwater Design Manual for Western Washington in areas of the County beyond the designated Urban Growth Areas. The plan will address evolving water quality needs affecting Hood Canal and South Puget Sound. Also the plan will delineate program objectives and capitalfacility needs and identify funding sources to implement required action elements. The County will begin community environmental education and training activities in the Belfair, Allyn, Shelton and Hoodsport areas. This program will expand to other areas of sensitive water quality in 2009 I 2010 and continuing throughout the county in later years. The identification of capital projects to address both regional strormwater problems and the need to retrofit existing development will complete during the planning process. Strormwater planning in the urban growth areas and water quality monitoring by the County's Environmental Health Section have identified needed capital projects. These projects will be address from revenues secured from grants provided by the state. Revenues generated by the utility will fund future capital facilities. Flooding problems in the Skokomish River watershed have been addressed in a Comprehensive Flood Hazard Management Plan. This plan defines a total program of river maintenance activities, valley creek maintenance measures, flood protection measures, and flood warning and emergency response procedures. Mason County adopted the Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance in August of 2008. vt-68 01.04.10 Mason County Comprehensive Plan August, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12,2010) Capital Facilities 2010'2015 Capital Facilities Plan Worksheet Public Works Fund: Storm Drainage System Development Fund Project Name: Storm Water Facilities Development Estimates: Development Level Description: Upgrading and construction of storm water facilities around the County will provide treatment and proper control of storm water, reducing the risk of property damage and contamination in our waterways. ln support of the new Storm Drainage Ordinances, Mason County will continue community education and training in the Belfair, Allyn, Shelton and Hoodsport areas. This program will expand to other areas of sensitive water quality continuing throughout the county in later years. The current Stormwater Management Plans for Allyn, Belfair and Hoodsport were adopted in 2007120Q8. The Countywide Mason County Program was adopted in 2009. The County will continue to expand the areas covered by the Storm Water Utility until all County areas are adopted. Justifications: The criteria for development of storm water facilities will be driven by the population and identified contamination of each area. The State of Washington has identified several areas within Mason Gounty where contamination is affecting the water quality of our bays and lakes. Estimated Project Costs 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total Project Manaqement 22,000 8,000 55,000 s5,000 55,000 55,000 250,000 Program Design & lmolementation 210,500 165,500 69,500 78,500 78,500 78,500 681,000 Storm Water Project Design & Construction 375,000 197,500 2l8,500 228,500 228,500 328,500 1,576,500 Total Cost:607.500 371,000 343.000 362,000 362,000 462,000 2,507,500 Funding Sources: ln House- REEï 82.500 82,500 82,500 20,000 20.000 20.000 307.500 Utility Revenues 25,000 25,000 200,000 300,000 300,000 400,000 1,250,000 Grants 500,000 250.000 50.000 50.000 50,000 50,000 950,000 TotalFundinq:607,500 357,500 332.s00 370,000 370,000 470.000 2.507.500 vt-69 01.04.10 Mason County Comprehensive Plan August, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12,2010) Capital Facilities GRANT DETAIL 2010 $ 500,000 New 1 Million $ grant 2011 $250,000 New 1 million $ grant ** Equals = $ 750,000 New 1 million $ grant Project #93 2012 $50,000 - Unknown source at this time. 2013 $50,000 - Unknown source at this time 2014 $50,000 - Unknown source at this time. 2015 $50,000 - Unknown source at this time. VI.7O 0r.04.10 Mason County Comprehensive Plan August, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12,2010)Capital Facilities 2010-2015 Capital Facilities Plan Worksheet Utilities, & Waste Management Fund: Stormwater Utility Project Name: Gritical Habitat Rehabilitation Estimates: Planning Description: preservation and enhancement of critical aquatic habitat including purchase of land or land conservation easement. Justification: The loss of critical aquatic habitat can be attributed to poor stormwater management. lmprovements to and enhancement of aquatic habitat along county creeks, streams, and in Puget Sound estuaries and shorelines will increase fish and shellfish populations. Estimated Gosts (in thousands 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 TOTAL Prelim Enoineerino 5 5 5 7.5 7.5 10 40 Environmental Enqineerino Desiqn 5 5 5 10.5 2.5 2.5 30.5 Constructioniincluding accruino critical land 56.5 56.5 56.5 169.5 TOTAL GOST:l0 10 l0 74.5 66.5 69 240 Fundino Sources: Grants/Loans 5 5 5 10 15 40 Developer contributions Rates Realestate Excise Tax (REET) 5 5 5 64.5 10 46.5 10 51.5 12.5 162.5 37.5 TOTAL FUNDING:10 l0 10 74.5 66.5 69 240 vt-71 01.04.10 Mason County Comprehensive Plan Ausust, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12,2010)Capital Facilities VI.g PUBLIC WORKS FACILITIES lntroduction Mason County Public Works is responsible for engineering, construction, operation and maintenance of approximately 640-miles of county roads. Currently staff are housed on the Shelton campus, the Central Shop on Johns Prairie Road and the Belfair Shop. Building 8, located on the Shelton campus, includes administrative services, account¡ng services, environmental services, engineering and construction services and geographic information services. The lnformation Services Section of Equipment Rental & Revolving Fund (ER&R) is located a block away in Building 9. Road Maintenance and the Vehicle Maintenance Section of ER&R share the Central Shop facility located on Johns Prairie Road approximately 3- miles north of Shelton. A small maintenance crew is located at the satellite shop in Belfair to service roads in North Mason County. Public Works has outgrown the Shelton campus facilities. The buildings located at the central shop are over 50-years old, overcrowded and inefficient. The vehicle maintenance shop lacks several modern amenities like insulation, women's restroom and building ventilation systems. A lack of sufficient storage facilities results in expensive road maintenance equipment being stored outside in the elements. As a result, Public Works proposes to develop a master plan and construct a multi-use facility to house the entire department. This will result in better communication and coordination of the various sections in the department. A shared multi-use facility will provide more efficient use of space and county resources. The Belfair Shop, however, will continue to operate as a satellite facility. Financing the planned multi-use facility requires the use of grants, loans, and county road funds. Project costs shown range in accuracy from + or - 4Qo/o to + or - 15%. Each project cost sheet identifies the accuracy of the estimated costs shown, based on the following scale: . "Planning Level" - The least accurate of costs estimates, in the range of + or - 40%. Cost estimates at this level are usually based on a project concept and some assessment of relative scale, or annual program amounts commensurate with a level of activity sufficient to accomplish the intent of the program over time. . "Design Report" - Moderate accuracy, in the range of + or - 30%. Based on design report evaluation of options and an assessment of project elements and associated costs. . "Engineer's Estimate" - Most accurate estimate, in the range of + or -15o/o. These estimates are based on a project design or significant completion of design work. vl-72 01.04.10 Mason County Comprehensive Plan August, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12,2010)Capital Facilities Fund: 2010-2015 Facilities Plan Worksheet - Public Works County Road Fund and Equ¡pment Rental & Revolving Fund Project Name: New Belfair Shop Estimates:Planning Level Description. The Shop will include a work staging area, vehicle maintenance bay, crews lunch/meeting room, restrooms & shower facilities, offices, vehicle and equipment storage and materials storage. Justifications: The current Belfair Shop is functionally obsolete, it is located in a residential neighborhood adjacent to Hood Canal and does not have it's own water source. The Shop is hooked up to the neighbor's well. Concerns have been expressed about the proximity of the material storage to the Canal. The site is woefully inadequate for the road maintenance services being provided to the north end of the County. The land trade for the North Mason School District's Sand Hill property was concluded in March of 2009, so there will be no capital outlay for the land and the shop will be in a much more appropriate location. Site Preparation Utility lnstall Total Fundinq: vt-73 01.04.10 Mason County Comprehensive Plan August, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12,2010) Capital Facilities 2010'2015 Facilities Plan Worksheet - Public Works Fund: County Road Fund and Equ¡pment Rental & Revolving Fund Project Name: Satellite Maintenance Yard Development Estimates: Planning Level Description: Public Works will be developing selected sites at various locations across the County to better serye the requirements of maintenance activities such as: clearing and grading, installing wells and water systems, installing electric power to support site services, constructing equipmenVmaterials storage buildings and facilities, paving storage sites and developing roads on the properties. Acquisition of individual properties will supplement existing property holdings to provide for uses such as sites for stormwater treatment facilities and disposal sites for ditch spoils and slide materials from maintenance or construction excavations. Justifications: The changing mandates and requirements of road maintenance necessitate the expansion / upgrade of certain facilities, while the need to develop stormwater detention facilities and ditch spoil disposal sites require the purchase of property in specific locations. GosEstimated ts 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total Preliminary Enqineerinq 10,000 10,000 10,000 10.000 10.000 10,000 60,000 Wdl Drilling Permits & Utilities Property Acquisition 20,000 20,000 30,000 20,000 30,000 30,000 150,000 Construction Enqineerinq Construction 20.000 20.000 30,000 20,000 30.000 30,000 150,000 Total Gost:50,000 50.000 70,000 50.000 70.000 70.000 360,000 Fundino Sources: ln House 50,000 50.000 50,000 50.000 50,000 50,000 300,000 Grants 20,000 20,000 20,000 60,000 Loans Total Fundinq:50,000 50,000 70.000 50,000 70.000 70,000 360,000 VI-74 01.04.10 Mason County Comprehensive Plan August, 1998 - (updated December 8,2009;January 12,2010) Capital Facilities 2010-1015 Gapital Facilities Plan Worksheet - Public Works Fund: County Road Fund and Equipment Rental & Revolving Fund Project Name: Pole Barn Structure at Shelton-Matlock Road Site Estimates: Planning Level Description: The County Road Fund owns property on Shelton-Matlock Road that is currently used as a fenced materials and equipment storage yard. The construction of a Pole Barn type Structure on this slte will help to facilitate the efficient deployment of crews and equipment to the south end of the County, particularly during snow and ice conditions. The price below reflects a fully enclosed metal structure. Justifications: Currently crews assigned to maintain, plow and de-ice the south portion of the Gounty must go to the Central Shop to get the equipment needed to respond. When doing scheduled maintenance in the south end, the crews end up using valuable working time traveling to and from the Central Shop transporting heavy equipment, vehicles, tools and materials needed for their work. One of the Public Work's long range goals is the placement of satellite maintenance yards in several locations in the county to improve response and efficiency. Estimated Project Gosts 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total Preliminary Enoineerino 7.500 7,500 15.000 Site Prep & Utilities 10,000 10,000 20.000 Construction Enqineerino 1,000 1.000 2.000 Construction 57,500 57,500 1 15,000 Total Costs:76.000 76,000 152.000 Funding Sources: ln House 76,000 76,000 152,000 Grants Loans Total Fundino:76,000 76.000 152.000 vl-75 01.04.10 Mason County Comprehensive Plan August, 1998 - (updated December 8,2009; January 12,2010) Capital Facilities VL 10 FINANCE PLAN lntroduction This section discusses Mason County cap¡talfacilities needs and related funding sources. As required under the Growth Management Act (GMA) a six-year finance plan has been prepared for the years 2010 to at least the year 2Q15 f or those facilities currently, or to be, owned and operated by the County. The following facilities are included in the financial planning: ' Water and Wastewater Systems (Appendix C) . Solid Waste Management Facilities . Gounty Administrative and Law Enforcement Buildings . Public Works Facilities ' Parks and Recreation Only County owned and operated facilities, except for the community-based wastewater systems for rural activity centers, are included in the finance analysis. Several alternatives have been suggested to dealwith the problem of providing water and wastewater service in areas outside the existing utility service area in which growth is forecast. The service area for the solid waste utility is county-wide. The finance plan identifies reasonably reliable funding sources, and forecasts revenue and expenses to at least the year 2015. Funding varies depending on the facility. The different financing methods, public or private, could have significant implications on the cost of utility service. Potential funding sources that could be used to fund unanticipated needs and shortfalls are also discussed. Fi nancial I mpact Overuiew The financlal impact for capital facility improvements have been analyzed for the six year planning period. lnformation on transportation can be found in the Transportation Chapter. A summary of the six year improvement costs, revenues and financing is listed in Table 10-1. The Table displays the cost by capitalfacility category. The total of improvement costs and expenditures is vt-76 01.04.10 Mason County Comprehensive Plan Ausust, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12,2010) Capital Facilities TaeLe 10-l Cou¡¡rv Owrueo Rruo OpeRnreo Cnplrnl Fnct¡-lrv lupRoveurnr & Flnn¡¡ce Cosrs Ye¡ns 2010-2015 ûH rue rsous¡uos) Gapital Facility Gategory lmprovement Gosts Expenditures Finance/Revenues Water & Wastewater Systems 43,744 43,744 43,744 Solid Waste Management 1,310 1,310 1 ,310 Stormwater Facilities 2,748 2,748 2,748 Public Works Facilities 826 826 826 Parks & Recreation 10,698 10,698 10,698 Total 59,326 59,326 59,326 vl-77 01.04.10 Mason County Comprehensive Plan August, 1 998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 1 2, 2010) Capital Facilities Water and Wastewater Svstems The County owns and operates water utilities in the Belfair and Rustlewood areas. The County also operates water treatment facilities for Rustlewood and Beard's Cove. There is no expected expansion in any of the service utility areas with the exception for the Belfair sewer. A 20 year plan has been developed for sewer expansion to serve the entire Belfair Urban Growth Area. A financial plan and rate structure has been developed to accommodate this growth. The Belfair Sewer Finance and Rate Forecast, Facility Expansion Map, and Phasing Program Map are incorporated into this Chapter as Appendix A. Facility worksheets provided in Section Vl.4 summarize the planned water supply and sewer system capital improvements over the next six years. Solid Waste Facility Worksheets provided in Section Vl.4-present revenue sources and expenditure levels for Mason County solid waste services from 2010-2015. Municipal Buildinqs and Law Enforcement Facilities Any necessary or proposed improvements to municipal buildings and law enforcement facilities are provided in the worksheets in Section Vl-7 for years 2010-2015. Parks and Recreation The County has identified over the six year period large number of park and recreation improvements. The projects include improvements to existing parks and boat. The total cost for these improvements are expected to be approximately $10.6 million (see Section Vl-5)' Stormwater Manaqement Mason County created a stormwater utility in 2008. The initial emphasis for Stormwater management will be placed on the Belfair/Allyn area. The utility outlines future expansion to other areas of the County with the whole county being included within the boundaries fo the utility by 2013. the County also adopted the 2005 Department of Ecology Stormwater Drainage Manual and Low lmpact Development Standards which will be enforced in the Belfair and Allyn UGAs first with the entire county being subjected to the requirements as water quality monitoring dictates. The following tables outline expected Capital projects in the stormwater utility in 2010-2015. vt-78 01.04.10 Mason County Comprehensive Plan August, 1998 - (updated December8,2009; January 12,2010) 9gptlg|leglf!9! APPENDIX A MeSOru GOUr,¡rY - BELFAIR SCWENING PROJECT FrNnNc¡nL nNo Rare Fonrcnsr - JuLv 8, 2008 Purpose The purpose of this document is to provide a current financial forecast for the Belfair sewer project, to support the County's efforts to receive GMA approval for the project. A financial forecast was prepared with the Wastewater Management Plan. Since completion of that document there have been significant changes to financial assumptions including additional service areas, updated capital costs, and additional secured grants. The County has existing sewer utilities with policies in place to support fiscally and financially prudent operation of those entities. This forecast presents a rate forecast that modifies some of those policy assumptions where it may bring the rate closer to an "affordable" range. Doing so may bring on financial risk, and so two forecast scenarios are presented here: a "conservative" scenario and an "affordability" scenario. ln the conservative scenario, the County's current policies continue to be used in the Belfair area. ln the affordability scenario, the County uses all policy options to make the rates as affordable as possible in the initial years. Data Sources and Assumptions The capital financing analysis uses capital costs, project timing, and capital inflation rate as projected and provided by CH2M Hill. Also provided were existing ERUs and new annual connections, projected O&M costs and estimated timing of capital spending. Each set of data was provided for four different phases including 1. lnitial Connection (this is the Core Service area evaluated in the Master Plan), 2. Old Belfair Hwy Connection, 3. New Kirk Road Connection and 4. Southern Connection. At the time of the forecast presented in the Master Plan, the County had secured $16 million in grants and $2.4 million in state loans (SRF). The County has since secured a total of $24 million in grants and has $3 million of state loans available. The forecast period includes 2008 through 2025. However, actual 2007 costs are included in the summary and financing analysis in order to consider total costs and total resources for the project. vt-79 01.04.10 Mason County Comprehensive Plan Auoust. 1998 - (uodated December 8. 2009; January 12,2010) Capital Facilities Gapital Costs The following table shows the capital costs, both in current dollars as well as inflated at 8% annually to the year of projected spending. Capital costs are scheduled to be complete before the first year of operation for each of the service areas. Table l. Gapital Cost Data 2007 2008 2009 20 2024 202 Cap¡tal Costs (2008 $) lnitial Connection Old Belfa¡r Hwy Connection New Kirk Road Connection Southem Connection Total Escalated Cap¡tal Costs $780,000 $4,500,000 $ 12,720,000 $20,000,000 $780,000 $4,500,000 $ 12,720,000 $000 $7,593,194 $3,785,000 $1,000,000 $6,486,825 $'1,850,930 11 I $1.183,057 s7.121.775 $3,713,16'1 I $4,053,085 $ 38,000,000 9,570,000 4,891,271 $ 53,644,328 $ 73.164,570$780,000 $4,500,000 $ 13.737.600 $ 23.328,000 The capital costs for the lnitial Connection are projected2Q0T through 2010, with year 1 of operation, 2011. This includes treatment plant costs for enough capacity to serve the four identified service areas (at the projected rate of growth), as well as the infrastructure planned to serve the lnitial Connection service area. Capital costs to build infrastructure to connect customers in the Old Belfair Hwy Connection are planned for 2Q14 through 2016 with first year of operation targeted for 2017 . The New Kirk Road connection is projected to begin service in 2020 with capital spending in the two years preceding, and the Southern Connection in2025 after infrastructure is built in2Q24. Gustomer Base The customer base is defined in Equivalent Residential Units (ERUs), and it is projected to grow at 5o/o annually. The Sewer Master Plan completed in 2007 forecasted growth at about 9% annually, though, the financial projections in that plan also used the more conservative rate of 5% annually. The customer base is defined with two types of service connections: existing and new. The analysis distinguishes between developed properties with existing permitted septic systems (as of Jan I 2008) and new connections since the sewer project has begun' The following table summarizes the annual ERU projection used in the forecast. Table 2. ERU and Growth Summary 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 201Ê 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 ERUs ln¡tial Connect¡on Old Belfair Hwy Connection Newkirk Road Connection Southem Connection Totâl 788 0 0 0 788 912 958 250 270 0 t9 00 617 648 00 00 827 869 210 230 00 751 0 0 681 0 0 0 681 715 0 0 0 7't5 1,006 1,056 1,109 1,164 1,223 290 310 330 350 370 4s 79 109 139 169 '1,653 1,783 Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance costs were provided in current dollars for the first year of operation for each service area. For rate projections, annual O&M costs are escalated at3o/o annually. The rate forecast separately calculates excise taxes on projected rate revenue, which are added vt-80 01.04.10 Mason County Comprehensive Plan August, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12,2010)Capital Facilities to these O&M costs for rate projection calculations. Table 3. Operations and Maintenance Projection 2ayt 2012 2013 2014 2o1E 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Annual O&M ln¡tìal Connect¡on $341,800 $341,S00 $341,S00 $341,800 $341,800 $341,800 $341,800 $341,800 $341,800 $341,800 $341,800 $341,800 $341,800 $341,800 $341,800 Old Belfa¡r Hwy Connect¡on 97,OOO 97,000 97,000 97,000 97,000 97,000 97,000 97,000 97,000 New Kirk Road Connect¡on - -- Total ssa1,e00 $3a1.s00 $3*,soo $341,s00 $341,800 $341,s00 $438,800 $43s,800 $438,800 $474,690 $474,690 $474,690 $474,690 $474,690 $48s,360 EscalatedAnnuato&M $373,494 $384,699 $396,240 $408,127 $420,371 $432,982 $572,534 $589,711 $607,402 8676,794 $697,098 $718,011 $739,552 $761,738 $802,226 The lnitial Connection begins 2011 with $341,800 of O&M, escalated from 2008 to $373,494. ln year 2025 when the fourth service area begins rece¡ving service, escalated O&M costs total $802,226. Capital Facilities Charge - CFC (conversion/connection charges) Calculation of a connection charge for the Belfair sewering project considers total project costs, 2025 customer base, secured grants toward funding the identified capital costs and reduction of unit costs to customers paying a ULID to fund a portion of their capital costs, Separate charges are calculated for conversions (existing development) and new development. ln order to distinguish the separate charges, the connection charge for existing development is referred to as a "conversion charge," while the charge for new development continues to be referred to as a "connection charge." The charges are calculated as three separate components of the total. One reason is so that if a developer chooses to build and finance particular infrastructure ahead of the County doing so, there is a clear dollar amount per ERU of credits that they may receive toward their connection charge, based on the type of project they are building and for how many ERU units. Another is to properly reflect the Old Belfair Hwy Connection ULID contribution and adjust their connection charge accordingly. And finally, it is done to provide an opportunity for existing development (as defined in the ERU section) to benefit from available grants toward reduction of their treatment unit cost. The total unit cost before adjustments is about $30,000 per ERU (using the number of ERUs projected in2025). The ULID-funded projects (in the Old Belfair Hwy Connection service area) are then deducted from the cost total. The ERU basis is also adjusted to recognize ERUs served by the ULID- funded projects. The number of ERUs served by the identified treatment costs through 2025 total 1,783. ERUs served by the trunk and collection costs after removing the Old Belfair Hwy Connection portion total 1,413. Capital Financing As discussed in the Master Plan, utility formation requires consideration of unique cash flow constraints. An existing utility has an existing revenue stream and some level of cash reserves to support capital financing and debt repayment. ln the case of a new utility, capital costs will be vr-g1 01.04.10 Mason County Comprehensive Plan August, '1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12,2010) Capital Facilities incurred preceding a revenue stream from a rate-paying customer base. Even use of grant funds requires approximately 60 days of financing since funds are dispersed on a reimbursement bas¡s. The capital financing analysis developed for this rate projection uses a mix of the County's funding and financing options to complete 2007 through 2010 capital spending preceding connection of customer base. The capital financing analysis considers use of the lowest cost funding options first and balances the total financing need with those that have a greater rate impact. The financing priority is as follows; 1. Secured grants (CTED), 2. Secured state loans (SRF), 3. Accumulated cash reserves [from CFCs or projected Real Estate Excise Tax (REET) funds] and 4. Revenue bonds. An exception to this priority list is that the County is planning to fund the Old Belfair Hwy Connection trunk and collection line costs with a ULID. The County would borrow funds to finance those costs, and they would be repaid through property assessments within the service area boundary. ln order to have funds available to finance the first 60 days of grant use, a combination of SRF and grant use is projected to fund capital costs for each of the four years of capital spending. Because SRF repayment begins the fiscal year after the first draw, debt service obligations are projected begin ahead of year one of operation and therefore require another County resource for repayment. The County has pledged $200,000 annually of REET monies from the General Fund beginning in 2009 to help fund the project. These funds allow the County to make SRF payments that are due ahead of the 2011 first year of operation. Without the REET funds, the County would not be able to utilize all lowest cost financing options first, but rather would need to issue revenue bonds and capitalize the interest for the period preceding utility revenue collection. Revenue bonds are needed to balance the net financing need after use of all available grants, state loans and any available cash reserves. Revenue bonds not only affect rates through debt repayment obligation, but also carry a security requirement, bond coverage. Bond coverage defines an annual minimum level of revenue the utility must collect. The coverage factor is a factor applied to the utility's revenue bond payment in each year of repayment. lt requires revenues be sufficient to make the bond repayment as well as an additional percentage of that amount. For example a bond coverage factor of 1.25 requires that rate revenue (along with any other eligible revenues) be sufficient to fund annual operating and maintenance expenses plus 125% of the revenue bond payment. Coverage will be discussed further with the rate projections. The following table summarizes planned annual financing of the capital costs for this project. Table 4. Projected Annual Gapital Funding Plan Cap¡tal Costs (2008 $) Prcjected Cap¡tal Funding Need ULID-Funded* Granl-Funded SRF Loâns Cap¡tal Reserues (CFC Rev, etc) Revenue Bonds Short-tem Financing Total Fund¡ng $780,000 $4,500,000 $13,737,600 $$$ 780,000 3,833,333 12,270,302 - 666.667 1.467.299 $ 23,328,000 $- 7,1 1 6,365 899,535 0 1 1,833,981 3,478,'t19 $ 13.737.600 $23.328.000 $ 7,593,194 $6,486,825 $ 1,850,930 $ 7,593,194 $6,486,825 $ 1,850,930 $7,593,194 $7 ,121,77s $ 3,713,161 '.'. 1,487,387 1,069,338 5,634,388 2,643,823___: -,-,-----:$7.121.775 $3,713.161$ 4,500,000 $ 4,053,085 $- $ 73,1 64,570 $ 15,930,949 24,000,000 3,033,500 6,609,81'1 20,112,192 3,478,119 $ 73,164,571 'Old Beffa¡r HW Conneclíon ællect¡onnrunk æsfs vt-82 01.04.10 Mason County Comprehensive Plan August, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12,2010) Capital Facilities The County is planning on a ULID to finance the Old Belfair Hwy Connection infrastructure costs, planned 1or2Q14 through 2016, totaling $9,570,000 in current dollars and $15,930,949 in projected future dollars. The County would issue debt for the projected $16 million total and repayment would occur through annual assessment revenue collected from the Old Belfair Hwy Connection properties. Secured grant funds are used 'from 2QO7 through 201Q, totaling $24 million. SRF loan proceeds are projected to be spent from 2008 through 2010. The balance of capital financing needed for the lnitial Connection period is $15,312,100. This consists of a projected $1 1 .8 million in conventional municipal revenue bonds and $3.5 million of short-term financing. The purpose of the short-term financing is to allow the County to use CFC revenue from conversions and new connections in 2011 to reduce the rate burden from debt repayment. Based on results of the connection charge analysis, an expected $4.1 million of CFC revenue is anticipated to be collected in 2011. Of that, $400,000 is planned to support existing annual debt service obligations, leaving $3.7 million available for project costs. Since capital financing is completed before customers connect, it is assumed the County could secure short-term financing for what could be repaid with the net available 2Q11 CFC revenue. This reduces the debt repayment obligation from rates. On July 5, 2008, the 2-year municipal bond yield was 2.75o/o. Assuming this interest rate and a 0.5% issuance cost, the County could realize debt reduction of $3.5 million by using the $3.7 million of 2011 CFC revenue. The following table shows a summary of total costs to finance and total resources used. Table 5. Summary of Gapital Financing 2007-2025 - Affordable Scenario Total Costs Current $ $ 53,644,328 Total Costs Escalated $ 73,164,570 Total Grants $ 24,000,000 TotalState Loans 3,033,500 TotalULlD 15,930,949 Total CFCs, other reserves 7,016,123 Total Revenue Bonds 23,183,999 $?3J64,5V The above capitalfinancing summary represents a rate scenario in which some level of available capital funds are used directly for debt repayment for rate relief, rather than reserved and available for cash-funding capital. The most conservative scenario does not consider capital revenues for debt repayment (with the exception of the short-term flnancing). They are reserved in the Capital Fund and used to cash-fund future projects, which would reduce the need for future revenue bonds. The following table shows the capital financing summary for the more conservative forecast, in which capital revenues are not utilized for debt repayment and are reserved in the Capital Fund to cash-fund future projects. vt-83 01.04.10 Mason County Comprehensive Plan August, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12,2010) Capital Facilities Table 6. Summary of Gapital Financing2007-2025 - Conservat¡ve Scenario TotalCosts Current $ TotalCosts Escalated TotalGrants TotalState Loans TotalULlD Total CFCs, other reserves Total Revenue Bonds $ 53,644,328 $ 73,164,570 $ 24,000,000 3,033,500 15,930,949 15,127,436 15,072,685 $ 73,164,570 The result is that no additional revenue bond borrowing is requ¡red after the lnitial Connect¡on financing and $15 million of :capital reserves fund the remainder of projected capital costs (with the exception of the ULID). Revenue There are four types of revenue considered to meet annual cash obligations. These include revenue from rates, interest earnings on the operating fund, and use of REET funds and CFC revenue toward debt repayment. ln order to provide the greatest level of rate relief, a scenario is provided that uses 100o/o of REET funds and $400,000 per year of CFC revenue (which represents about 70% of total CFC revenue initially, going to under 2Ao/o by 2025) toward annual debt repayment. The conservative alternative is that REET funds are used only for debt repayment that precedes utility operation. ln the remainder of the forecast, REET funds are reserved for cash-funding future capital. CFC revenue is also reserved for cash-funding future capital rather than supporting annual debt repayment obligations. REET funds and CFC revenue are also considered in the coverage calculation. The County's bond counsel has indicated that dedicated REET funds would be an eligible revenue for the coverage calculation and that the County could specifically write them in to a bond covenant as an eligible revenue source. The risk is the potential that the County will not collect sufficient REET funds to make the full $200,000 support to the utility in a given year. Similarly, due to the variable nature of revenue collection from CFCs, which are also subject to economic conditions, there is risk associated with including CFCs in the coverage calculation as eligible revenue. Typically, coverage is tested at a higher factor when including CFCs. The two scenarios vary in coverage calculation in that the conservative scenario tests coverage at a 1.25 factor and excludes REET funds and CFCs as eligible revenues and the scenario that targets affordability includes REET funds and75% (an element of conservatism within this scenario) of annual CFC revenue, though tests at a higher coverage factor of 1.50 The higher rate revenue need of the total cash and total coverage obligations becomes the basis for setting rates. Coverage is the driving factor in most years before the second service area begins operation. The total rate obligation, divided by the total ERUs in each year results in a monthly unit cost per ERU. Because this amount varies annually and typically trends down with ERU growth, operating reserves are managed to set a single rate for periods within the forecast. Sewer Connection Zone Characterization Initial Connection Zone: vt-84 01.04.10 Mason County Comprehensive Plan Ausust, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12,2010) Cap4q! fqg{lqq The area cons¡sts of scattered residential and the "core" commerc¡al corridor for the Belfair community. A majority of the commercial development is underutilized because of little organized infrastructure, espec¡ally sewers. The area is the most problematic for the contribution of pollutants to Hood Canal. The County has secured funds to construct a collection system and a Membrane BioReactor (MBR) treatment facility to serve the area along State Route # 3 which transverses the length of Belfair. Following the construction and commissioning of the NBR treatment plant all properties within 500 feet of the initial sewers lines will be required to connect to the Belfair sewer system. All on-site expenses incurred for connection will be borne by the property owner. Once connection occurs a monthly utility rate will be collected from each property. Old Belfair Highway Connection: The area is a larger urban density residential community north of the Belfair "core" commercial corridor. Many of the owner occupied structures are pre-and early posts World War ll stock. The structures use on-site systems as their method of sewage disposal. Because of older on- site systems, denser development patterns and high ground water tables the area likely contributing nitrates and fecal contamination to the canal. The area is low-to moderate income and financing large sewer improvements will be difficult without Federal and state assistance. The county will relay on grants and loans and County supported Utility Local lmprovement Districts (ULID) to develop sewers in the area. Newkirk Road Connection Zone: The area is divided into two sectors. The area to the north is vacant, larger parcels held by four developers. lt is planned and zoned for commercial and industrial development. The area to the south is comprised of vacant properties still in large parcels with a single owner. The land is planned and zoned for higher destiny residential development. There is current demand for the development of the northern area. The development of the sewer collection system to serve the northern area will occur as the MBR plant is developed at developer expense. The southern area will remain in large tracts until near the end of the UGA planning period. Southern Connection: The area is the most difficult to develop because of environmental constraints. There is some scattered low-density residential development but most of the land remains in large undeveloped tracts. Portions of the area will be impacted by the development of the Belfair by- pass. The properties will remain vacant until the later years of the planning period. vt-85 01.04-10 Mason County Comprehensive Plan Ausust, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12,2010) Capital Facilities vt-86 01.04.10 Mason County Comprehensive Plan Capital FacilitiesAugust, 1998 - (updated December8,2009; January 12,2010) vt-87 01.04.10 Mason County Comprehensive Plan December 8, 2009;Capital Facilities vt-g8 01.04.10 Mason County Comprehensive Plan August, 1998 - (updated DecemberS,2009; January 12,2010)Capital Facilities vt-89 01.04.10 Mason County Comprehensive Plan August, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12,2010) Capital Facilities APPENDIX ''8" * these costs are from Facility Plan Supplemental lnformation Transmission to Belfair Facility Items of Work and Material UGA Gravity Sewer Collection System 8" Gravity Sewer Pipe 0-6 Feet Deep B" Gravity Sewer Pipe 6-9 Feet Deep B" Gravity Sewer Pipe 9-12 Feet Deep 10" Gravity Sewer Pipe 0-6 Feet Deep 15" Gravity Sewer Pipe 9-12 Feet Deep 18" Gravity Sewer Pipe 6-9 Feet Deep 48" STD Precast Manhole Sanitary Sewer Service Connection Pump Station Electrical Service to Pump Station Pump Station Mechanical Equipment Wetwell Chemical Feed/ Electrical Building Odor Control Electrical Equipment Telemetry/SCADA Generator Fencing Site Work and Landscaping Erosion Control Valved and Vault Meter and Vault Total 6" Forcemain Grinder Pump 3" Forcemain 48" STD Precast Manhole RR Crossing Unit Unit Price Contingency 20% LF LF LF LF LF LF EA EA $85.00 $90.00 $100.00 $120.00 $200.00 $200.00 $5,000.00 $1,200.00 $10,000.00 $325,000.00 $80,000.00 $150.00 $60,000.00 $150,000.00 $35,000.00 $60,000.00 $5,000.00 $15,000.00 $3,500.00 $40,000.00 $20,000.00 $803,650.00 $50.00 $6,000.00 $35.00 $5,000.00 $25,000.00 $102.00 $108.00 $120.00 $144.00 $240.00 $240.00 $6,000.00 $1,440.00 $12,000.00 $390,000.00 $96,000.00 $180.00 $72,000.00 $180,000.00 $42,000.00 $72,000.00 $6,000.00 $18,000.00 $4,200.00 $48,000.00 $24,000.00 $964,380.00 $60.00 $7,200.00 $42.00 $6,000.00 LS LS LS SF LS LS LS LS LS LS LS LS LS LF EA LF EA 01.04.10 vt-90 Mason County Comprehensive Plan August, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12,2010) Capital Facilities Appendix C vt-91 01.04.10 Mason County Comprehensive Plan August, 1998 - (updated December8,2009; January 12,2010)Capital Facilities TvÞe Rmmfuuæø Aqlnnlq SslanÉ Rmlcqhüas# & Us ld lrþrid hn PdnìjFt pâdtu BdEir lnteñ.nd.Ldn l¡þF tP¡¡d frm B€fs¡r ãFdþ'e,trss hlrtund Chg tu seryhês Eøoú DcvdoÊ¡d Cøndl &phl¡mgovemilPÌdæt Oåþd Bry SóffiS Pþffi Oit 20t0 2011 2012 1,318,041 I 867,337 g 938,714460,300 483,315 s07,480.75 14.381 15,03.t.10 15,782.65 800,000 2013 2014 2015 $ 1,796,78û S 1,882,45e S 1,997,042 532,854-79 559,497.ã3 587,472.10 16,571.78 11,4æ.37 18,270.39 Rwlsedffiffi 8,800,369 3,130,920 97,4'17 800,000 79,358 12,908,065 s 39,6'79$ 39,679S - S $ - $ _ $ 1,832,381 S t,,to53ß, g 2,2A1,977 I 2,34Ê,2a7 $ ¿4Sg,3S3 ¡ 2r6o2,z8s 2,065 2,168.25 2,276.æ 2,330.50 2,510.02 2,635.52I 34,000 I 34,000 $ 34,000 $ 34,000 $ 34,000 $ 34,000 $ 200,000 PUO ß - Lyñ* Rd B'*nd E{dJoô h}d $ 144,5ø2 Á¡F tulþ Sblioî $ 100.000Rudaroodtumpsdbn $ 42,000ffiiwerD¡ffi-Rú¡næHðþr*2@ftdd $ 10,438 g€frii wat!@r w# Rúndìoñ s.y6bñ Hdpod&rerSFb¡ CitydSlfuRËbmlS*tr ldhñErndilu6 ld Edq Fwd &leÞ $ 20o,0oo s 200,000 $ 2oo,00o $ 200,ooo $ 2oo.00o $ 2O0,OO0s 100,000 s 100,000 s 100,000 g r00,oo0 $ 1oo,00o s 100.000 14,046 204,000 200.000 144,5A2 '1€Ð,000 42,0ÐO 10i438 1,200,000 600,000$ 132,039 $ 130,480 $ 12a,920 g 127,381 $ iz5,d01 s 125,e0i $ 770,402 I 965,044 S ¡188,6¡{8 $ 465,1s7 $ 463,751 g 4Ê2,311 E .fti2,4{¡7 I 3,28s,388$ 867.392 $ 938,714 $ 1,796.790 $ 1,882,4s6 $ r,sgz,oaz 5 z,t¿o,gae g g,62z,oze $ 1,83¿381 $ 1,405,362 $ 2,25.'l;977 ç 2,34;6,207 $ 2,,159,353 $ 2,602,78s S12,909,065 [.s Cdrl).gdþ aåh úñ@I FW6þt ûFBbCttyot*d@tot Rqtail S.w. ûbtc FyñmtK Itnttu wtutfvnûg hdsþtd, tu ,ø Sa&s fü Cr'rda br Rtñt Coøds ñI ød In h. W tuæ ffi ùê m Frr gi@ d g.dE b tha W d Sà|ffi N côñpt&d. ftúI þe n@ry þ rdißt ùpaød,t6 h M y6ß fo.hk rcørilo. There ís not " lgmtt .ffitd ttioagh the .Og pæes fo¡ fâ6e am@nts. Mason County Comprehensive Plan August, 1998 - (updated December8,2009; January 12,2010)Capital Facilities Mason County Comprehensive Plan August, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12, 2010) Capital Facilitieg 5148fl.ær4 &r¡0&æ10*¿&&&0 5¡qMrW99 lffit¡¡öE.F.dM@ tærtffi hþqþÞdpdss. ¡.tSOai.W ffi8ryÞtuds6 ¡&.8æ10 Rü¿tuFdV ¡s.7!aqoq Mc4iM ¡g.æ.9.@ dffihilwú# 3qì@6ú M¡dø4r@m.@tl|w¡ tt'I t 2elv 'oy sqao 1S.@ rc,m €7,603 er6It@t ?,æ5i tq@¡. 3q@ {.q : ':tn,i, Fo'!@g,s æ,P "qin,î ai"t,@ e8,5!O10ø 20q@d(@ s.m0 2!,@$0,@r.uo.maqsp1.w,6 1q@ 21qW,a,y æ,0go 1,1æ,fi 10,@ 17,@ æ,@s,@ 515p06 eì@ Æ,àra 7Ð"@ @,@ 26,bm æ,ffi 67i& lo,oo il,le*? ri* a,ø {!o,m : : æ,i. s,@ Îd¡dREflzãFtu¡ ¡ t,%4?ffilFdE¡h€ ¡ l¿lb,ærdb l:,eÞ.lal@ùgt tu A@ñq e OtfrË ø bñ5*s. f s 1ig€iß t 1,¡q736 ¡ ¡tl"r-:s t sÆ t 2{1rÉ ¡ 19,€ t ,,ft.zs ?q?ås¡ 6q93 4,ßt rt,sÉ.s 12æt 9æ5 'b3.eft.s?9 $r.sz¡ 37¿373¡ s,*i ¡*.mi o*,æi ,.n0.à,?,9¡ s.ør . ¡ - t - ¡ --:--; ïiiı; "'Y¡ :: :: !6¿ru: ! rzc,mi iËı;_¡-t.5.¡. ¡ .to,mr . ¡ p,ooci m.mi w.m1!q,7S! læ,7st . ¡ l7r@a tzs,o¡ ._; e;:ı;'t - s - ¡ 6.mr sim i ;ı.ü- t - . - s - ¡ _ ¡ æ.øoi áæ:"; .2& Slo,ø ! ¡â&0 t 2;79 a10.@ ¡ 10,& 5'¡"¡'9-i"t &i,Ä:r!t:.41 :ùt,r)*,l,Ã.*.s"¡ g.æ&611 Rtu.çWbns..76ß9S Mafit*rtuyffiø.tàæ& sffi@pdg76qøio südturÉrkFdßñ@tn*,Êd.@ J@*{tudg,?d,4.ø99 tmru*i¡ffifþ*g7â8¡üO Uí,ñ eir5gá74ÉÉ.m Wkrpd 991ßeiú ffirbyfrÈ5473,R1tæ PmhPd6á4.7àhr?æ Hry R¡nd;r kg,æ.&tm we;rsjhdk594JeeM hÀlMp*59a.?C6qgg utuh|¡ffisp!Ë4+1690 t{ffihdfrMSt0q&orQ TEÉódToÈ*æú€dåthF