The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About04/02/2015 Order of the Mason County Board of EquaUation Fl,ropeny Owncr: Steinar& Susan Urdadd Parcel-NI-alAbe-r(s): 32232-50-07007 Assessmi eWt Year: 2014 PelitionN-tunber: 331.2015 Ha ving considered the evidence presented by the parties in this appeal,the Board hereby: Z sustains F] overrules the detenuination of the assessor. Assessor's True and Fair Value BOE True and Fair Value Determination F-I Land $ 76,050 F] Land 76,050 R Improvements $ [] h-nproveinents F] Minerals $ F] Minerals El Personal-Propelty $ F1 Person,,!Plropelt-,,, $ This decision is based. on our finding that: The valuation placed on the property by the Assessor's Office is prestmiedto be correct, and can only be overcome by the presentation of clear, cogent, and.convincing evidence that the value is erroneous [RCW84.40.030(1)]. The Board's goal is to acquire sufficient, accurate evidence to support a determination of true and fair value for the purpose of uniformity and equalization of taxation within the county as defined by statute (RCW 84.40.030) and the Washington Administrative Code(WAC 458-12-301). The Appellant, Susan(Kathy) Urdahl,was present at the hearing. The Assessor was represented by PI-Al Franklin. The Board listened to the appellant's presentation in which she emphasized the apparent inconsistencies in assessed values of properties located within her neighborhood. The board heard her views concerning the apparent inconsistencies;however, she was reminded that in the opening comments, statement was given that assessment of other properties . . . may not be relevant or sufficient evidence to prove market value. The Board reviewed the information provided by the appellant as it related to a list of eight property listings in the area. The Appraiser presented five comparable sales and four listings within the market area. The comparable sales were presented on a regression analysis which indicated the current assessed value of$76,050 was within the range of the regression analysis. Page 2 Petition DTop.331.2015 Parcel No.32232-50-07007 ,,ad D Cded this day of �Prii 52015 Al K.—A?MeKibbin,Chairperson's Signature Clerk's Signatur-6 NOTICE This order can be appealed to the State Board of Tax Appeals by filing a notice of appeal with thein at PO Bo-x 40915, Olyimpia, WA 98504-0915, within thirty days of the date of mailing of this order. The Notice of Appeal foirn is available from either your county assessor or the State Board, To ask about the availability of this pieblication in an alternate format for the visually impaired,please call(3601705- 6715. Tehatypp-(T-110)users,pease call(360)705-67M FG-r tax assistance,call(360)534-1400. Distribution: Assessor a Pefitiazier e BOE File REV 64 0058 (2/16/12) Order of the Mason Count-y Board of Equal"tion Propefhy0v,ai-er: Barry& Jill Wild Parc-ell,lumber(s)- 42201-43-00040 Assessment,Year: 2014 Petition Nuirnber- 129.2015 Having considered the evidence presented by the par-ties in this appeal, the Board here-by: 1-1 sustains M overrules the detennination of the assessor. Assessor's True and Fair Value BOE True and Fair Value Determination F] Land $ 76,375 F] Land $ 74,125 F� Improvements $ 368,710 R Improvements $ 320,875 ❑ Minerals $ F1 Minerals $ P D c-rsonal Property $ F] D I ersonal IP-Doperty $ I This decision is based on o-ju finding that: The valuation placed on the property by the Assessor's Office is presumed to be correct, and carp only be overcome by the presentation of clear, cogent, and convincing evidence that the value is erroneous [RCW84.40.030(1)]. The Board's goal is to acquire sufficient, accurate evidence to support a determination of true and fair value for the purpose of uniformity and equalization of taxation within the county as defined by statute (RCW 84.40.030) and the Washington Administrative Code (WAC 458-12-301). Barry Wild,Appellant, was present at the hearing. The Assessor was represented by Mary Newhall and Phil Franklin. The Board reviewed the data submitted by the appellant and also data supplied by the Assessor's office. The Appellant provided no convincing evidence that the Assessor's revised value was in error. The Assessor recommended, after review, a land value of$74,125 and the improvement value at$320,875 for a total of$395,000. The Board overrules the old value of$76,375 for land and the improvement value of$368,710 to the values noted above at $74,125 for land and$320,875 for improvements for a total of$395,000. Page 2 Petition Noy 129.2015 Parcel i oP 412201-4v-00040 Dated this 2 id day of Apt it , 2015 RA 111 ibbiu,Chairperson's Signature Clerk's Signatu TILE This order can be appealed to the State Board of Tax Appeals by filing a.notice of appeal with them at pig Box 40915, Olympia,WA 95504-0915, within thirty days of he date of mailing of this order. The Notice of Appeal form is available fiom either your county assessor or the State Board. To ask about the availability of-Chis publication iii an alternate format fog-the visually finpaired,please cap(360)705- 6715. Teletype(TT B'")users,please call(360)705-6715. For ta,,assistance,call(360)534-1400. Distribution: Assessor e Petitioner a BOE File REV 64 0058 (2/16/12) Order of the Alason County Board of Equali7ation Property Ova,-ei: Ba€iy c�L jill Wild Farcel l -urnber(s)n 42201-43-00050 Assess-men Year: 2014 PetitionNur€giber; 130.2015 Having considered the evidence presented by the parties in this appeal,the Board hereby: 1-1 sustairps 0 over:rules the dete_ r-rination of the assessor. Assessor's True and Fair Value BOE True and Fair Value Determination ❑ Land $ 74,125 ❑Land $ 40,770 ❑ Improvements $ ❑ I provements $ ❑ Minerals $ ❑ Minerals � ❑ Personal Property $ ❑ Personal Property $ This decision is based on our findivng that: The valuation placed or,the property by the Assessor's Office is pres sed to be correct, and can only be overcome by the presentation of clear, cogent, and convincing evidence that the value is erroneous [IZCW84.40.030(1)]. The Board's goal is to acquire sufficient, accurate evidence to support a deter-rnination of true and fair value for the purpose of uniformity and equalization of taxation within the county as defined by statute (RC 84.40.030) and the Washington Administrative Code (WAC 458-12-301). Barry gild,Appellant,was present at the hearing. The Assessor was represented by Mary Newhall and Phil Franklin. The Board reconvened due to the error of improvements being placed on the wrong parcel. The Assessor lowered the value of the land to a recommended value of$40,770. After reviewing all data submitted and after discussion the Board overrules the original value of$74,125 and sets the land.value at$40,770. This was also agreed on by the appellant. The improvement value stays at zero since there are no improvements. Page 2 Petition NO. 130,E015 -Rar el No.4 201® 3 00050 d - r Dated this 2 n day or April , 2015 R.A.Y16Kibbin,Chairperson's Signature Cleric's Signatufe NOTICE This order can be appealed to the State Board of Tay Appeals by filing a notice of appeal with there at PO Box 40915, 013nnpia, WA 95504-0915, within thirty days of the date,of mailing of this order. The Notice of Appeal forlyc is available froin either your county assessor or the State Board. To ask about the availability of this publication i 3 an alternate format for the visually impaired,please call(360)705- 6715. Teletype(T T Y)usea-s,please call(360)705-6718. For tag:assistance,call(360)534-1400_ Distribution: o A-sessor @ Petitioner e BOE File REST 64 0058 (2/16/12) Order of the Mason C Board of Equalization Property Ov zer: Lalceni n, Fr aiak R,&r Patricia A Parcel Nuriiber(s): 32309-53--03037 Assessment Year: 2014 petition Nun giber: 72.2015 Having considered the evidence presented by the parties in this appeal,the Board hereby: ❑ sustains 0 overrules the determination of the assessor. Assessor's True and Fair Value BOE Time and.Fair Value Determination ❑ band 17,380 ❑ band $ 13,035 ❑ Improvements $ 28,690 ❑ improvements $ 28,690 ❑ Minerals $ ❑ Minerals $ ❑ Personal property $ ❑ Personal Property $ Tliis decision is based on our finding that: The valuation placed on the property by the Assessor's Office is presuried to be correct, and can only be overcome by the presentation of clear, cogent, and convincing evidence that the value is erroneous [RC 84.40.030(1)]. The Board's goal is to acquire sufficient, accurate evidence to support a determination of true and fair vahae for the ptu-pose of anifor-mity and equalization of taxation within the county as defined by statute (RC T 84.40.030) and the Washington Administrative Code (WAC 458-12-301). The Appellant was represented by Frank&Patricia Lakeman. The Assessor was represented by Mary Newhall. Access to the existing garage is only accessible through the owner's adjacent lots 35 & 36, as there is inadequate access area on the subject parcel. In addition, the appellant's statement under oath, noted that the drainage swale consumes approximately13%of the lot. The Board therefore overrules the Assessor's value and sets a land value at $13,035. The improvements are sustained at$28,690 as agreed upon by the appellant for a total of$41,725. Page 2 Pedderg No. 72.2015 Parcel NTo.321309-52-03037 Dated-dais 2 nd day of Apiil , 2015 R.A.WKibbin,Chairperson's Signature Clerk's SignaWe V NOTICE This order can be appealed to the State Board of Tax Appeals by filing a I-lotice of appeal with them at PO Box 40915, Olympia, XVA 98504-0915, within thifty days of the date of mailing of this order. The Notice of 6,13peal form is available from either your county assessor or the State Board. To asic about the availability of this publication in an ahem to format for the visually impaired,please call(3)60)705- 6715. Ti eleiype(TTY)users,please call(360)705-67133. For tax assistance,call(360)534-1400. Distribution. Assessor s Petitiorier a BOE File REV 640058 (2/16/12)