HomeMy WebLinkAboutBLD96-0442 - BLD Letters / Memos - 2/8/1989 MASON COUNTY
DEPARTMENT of GENERAL SERVICES
Courthouse Annex 1 N. Fourth & W. Cedar
P.O. Box 186 Shelton, Washington 98584
(206) 427-9670
building environmental health maintenance landfill parks&recreation fair/convention center planning sewer&water
February 8, 1989
CERTIFIED
Scott Woodward
2429 Laurel Street
Shelton, WA 98584
RE: Building Permit Applicaion No. 22814 dated September 29, 1988; addition
and alteration
Dear Mr. Woodward:
A STOP WORK ORDER was posted on the structure for the above referenced
Building Permit Application on February 8, 1989. The structure is in
violation of exceeding authorized work.
Please contact me between the hours of 8:00-9:00 a.m. (427-9670,
Extension 357) to discuss the violation. Your cooperation is appreciated.
Sincerely,
Wayne Krause, Inspector
DEPT OF GENERAL SERVICES
WK/jh
r
MASON COUNTY
DEPARTMENT of GENERAL SERVICES
Mason County Bldg. III 426 W.Cedar
P.O.Box 186 Shelton,Washington 98584
(360)427-%70
BUILDING PARKS& RECREATION FAIR/CONVENTION CENTER ADMINISTRATION
3igo4, - 51-000i7
So ees�s %tea c
June 6, 1996
-19
Scott Woodward
W 924 Delight Park Rd
Shelton, WA 98584
RE: Permit Application BLD96-0442
Dear Mr. Woodward,
In reviewing your application for the above permit there was
some question regarding exactly what your project entailed. Once
a determination was made that this was to be a garage addition to
an existing non-conforming house, another issue was raised.
Our file records indicate that in 1988 a permit was applied
for that included an addition and alteration. The records also
indicate that on February 8, 1989, a Stop Work Order was placed on
site and notification was mailed to you that the permit had been
rescinded due to exceeding authorized work. Photos in the file
show that there were several structural inadequacies noted at the
time that the Stop Work Order was posted. The file records do not
demonstrate that the permit was ever reinstated and therefore, any
work done after the Stop Work Order was posted is in violation.
The policy of the Mason County Building Department is to not r
permit any expansion or alteration to structures which are
considered to be "Existing Non-Conforming" . Since the residential
structure is there and exists in violation of the rescinded permit,
it has been classified as such. This department can not issue a
permit to allow for the proposed garage addition unless steps are
taken to bring the existing structure into compliance .
It would appear that there is also some question regarding the
septic system which is on site . This concern has been forwarded to
Kim Lincoln of the Environmental Health Department after speaking
with the initial inspector, Will Satak.
Page 1 of 2
Other notations in the file include a 1987 notice to you that
required either fill and riprap to be removed to the OHW mark or a
Substantial Development Permit for the placement of the fill and
riprap within the shorelines area.
As you can see, the parcel file has numerous issues which
appear to still be in violation. There are no records that
indicate any of the above items have ever been resolved and to
clear up the property file, a statement from each department would
need to be recorded in the file stating the violations have been
corrected.
If you should have any further questions, please contact me at
(360) 427-9670 ext 364 .
Sincerely,
e�N , (Cc F)'L,rvt_�
Mike Byrne
Building official
CC : Property File
Mike Clift, Deputy Prosecuting Attorney
Pam Bennett-Cumming, Department of Community Development
Kim Lincoln/Will Satak, Environmental Health Department
Rocky Nutt, Contractor of record
Page 2 of 2
� 6102 � y
DEC 2 8 1989
7L . � ,
o , � --14
��u u 1
-74
� 4-1� � .�- �- -
MASON COUNTY
DEPARTMENT of GENERAL SERVICES
Courthouse Annex I N. Fourth & W. Cedar
P.O. Box 186 Shelton, Washington 98584
(206) 427-9670
building environmental health maintenance landfill parks&recreation fair/convention center planning sewer&water
July 28, 1987
Scott Woodward
2429 Laurel
Shelton, WA 98584
Dear Mr. Woodward:
This letter is to confirm our previous conversations. I told you that
a Substantial Development Permit is necessary for the project which you have
embarked upon at your property on Lake Isabella.
Although the value of fill and riprap is less than $2,500 the project
is inconsistent with the exemption criteria found in the Shoreline Master
Plan. An exempt erosion control bulkhead would be located at the Ordinary
High Water mark. The filling and riprapping which you have done goes beyond
that which would be necessary to provide erosion control . In order to be
exempt from Substantial Development Permit requirements the fill and riprap
would need to be removed to the OHW mark.
I have discussed the situation with Barry Wenger of DOE and have his
backing on the information I have provided you. Fill must be removed to OHW
mark or a Substantial Development Permit applied for within the next 30
days. Thank you for your cooperation.
SincereI
Patti Miller Crow�lanner
DEPT OF GENERAL SERVICES
PMC/jw