Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
BLD2008-00606 Retaining Wall - BLD Permit / Conditions - 5/21/2008
Do 3 G CD 0 CD 0) o m 0 -�* D) � o � m yv m -„ CY) o o C ID fn r ,ZDj Cn _ O 7 n p n -4 0 QcD CD � M m m z a � co � r cn 2 * 1I —1 Z Dp ,X O ca -n �. r CCD C p O D Z a cn 3 O m ai 0 m m a, ° p _ 0— cn � � ZN00 o � O oD FWm � � c Z p v z � DrG� DZ n = ccnnc) OD OoOm � cn C ooywp � cn Z Do � mo Z N a � � o o rr- OXm m a n o C a S. Z o CD CD m m o Q o N N 7 O 00 a) 0 D z " n v �' o v o Z m v .. co CD� a 0 D cnz * m L000 � s� O _ m -0 -n CD m 3 3 a N 0 w 0 Cl) N Vl N O 0 0 0 O 0000 d m O con m O CD x O coO O D C r co H 9 O O CD 3 w W z CD ? ro r QN v m m m a C E 3 pm cn _� p D z < n w ; cnsp mw �oo D m cn Or o W W _ -0 -n m r Cl) n QQ m0 =a D T�= o z z m Ncc 0 r I,1 m m u' ;o 0 � D -< z " < -n m n T � m W U) K D CD m m W 0 mD n m CD �• a 3 as cn m � i3 o cn cQ CD -Zi cn CD °' fD c D > > � � C (D M03 m � z 00 m vCD o) uo, o Sty p = cn y a 'a C 0o ao cn cn N cn co .v c O O z N N .. z 0 O C) O O 3' m = C 00 00 C) C) z O -(pn 90 'm y �. O Qo D m cD K D X 0 ° d+ en 3 o D w wou 3 CZC °; ' m n -2cnm o :3 iv cn o ao ,�' < p p O (T O O -' ~ Q n n m = m 0 M v v CD D N;N-N;N r Om — 0) cn O 0)i O:O�0i0 ;a -N K N — cov CD m rn D D N N) " ' 7s ;o;o;o;o m N cnm to O x cv Z N N O x� 0 0'0'0 � ` 000 O w -.4 Ol 0)C) CO OD N W v 0) cn A W N N O O CD o CDo Oo � X � oD D cn -i =r0 CD rn 0_ � cr CD � o � m � o v (` _ 0 v O, In iCY) W n C �, (n ^ W 0 �+ W � < m ^ gin. o 0Q Roo j (D --p p Q (p i . n O 1 O O � (D� CD O (D n (n p' Q � .Z) � N � A, pO n d 0D e OO NQ CD h` 7Q 7 cn O. O O X LU DL CD X CD O n 7 - < NolD CD cn " n0 � (D W C� O O ((0n CD -0 7 (D CD Q (D Q (D (D C (D (D N CQ Q (n (n. 3 OW N OO CD cn OD (O a (n a 7 ( W O O O -. p " U - = CD D(D O 'an '-. (D O CD W W CD (O W (D 7 N o o C 0 CD= 0 O Cn - CD W : � 7 CD Q C (D (D 7 CD 7 0 O' O W (D -p (n Q W W .. .. .+ (n W In 7' W O W CCD p -' " N N cn Cr -n N (n Q � W : :3 O -w CD -p (D (a CD ((DD , C (D C Q C) In r2 �' W Q1 COD C CD 3 O (On (D W C=n �. C1 -p (��D 7 6 5. n � O 3 In o0 CDa) CD W O a m (D D a � CD y s C cn CD < X 1 0 CD : Q � O n cn W 3 (n (D (D <� noi � � 3nCD 03iaoi (n 3C = m Quo CD N CD 0 5 (D CDD lD O p (D C W O o �, O (D _O. Q CD Q p Q �. W O O CD 0 3 O W CD O W D 0 (A O 0 CD s � Q n C� C � �. pDQ � ocn CD o0 < 0CD o00 ooD 3 -o ° � a � cn � C CD 3 �' ? 6z 6m n O 7' O M N O< n n (� �`� O O" O Q v 3m 5O- <CD `n W �' O- W �' iD " - N• Q 0O coO N cn -0 (n m 7 CD C =_ W CD � LL z }, ��TI (A cr (3 n (D CD � Q W W (D � (D -0 �� W W •� � Cl) � cn o (n W � O '_ O O 0 3 a W CS (O � O T < -p o ~' mac O- CD m m °' tn �. (DCm � � $ O g CD O � a CD (n p O W d .�. O cn ;z '� O 3 = C Q -n a m `n Nv3m C0 cn CD� (oD o W 3 0 3 W r~ cn'CT Q W (A (n s - (DO m � W O (n Wa O (D p � � vap=r CD 3 Q cn CD Cr CD CD a WO O6 lD (D O v a 3 N 6 j CCDD O -p CD 0 (D � 0 0- �_ O -h O. O O O 0X � W Vl W C � 0 , W O ••a � (D � - (p' cr � a � W W n r cnn C(O O Q N (D O W � o CL y : a (n 3D � 0 Q -. n m6 -� 5 3 CD W ( = � W7 C0 :3 (n CD � W n � CO " ELC wW oN CD CD c c �CD oW0v o ti Q a c CD CD CD cn 0 CA � v 0 3 o n o = ter; - m C < -_" Wm3 W3m m o � - �, n CD' ^> � CD O 'Z -� °' 3 0 (n " o cn iv n C 07 W (D p (D " O N ° S CD 6 cn : M - W O 0 v -nc5 K 0m < W0) 0W (o W. � (D W 0 o n 3 Q � o CD O W p (p O W cn Q W O 0 cn CD N p O CD - (D -'a O 7 (D p O O n' p Q �' O CO 0 " (n 0 j j O � S CD - O O N O N v o (D Q o 3 T. Q' 3 p (n p 0 0 -{ (D W c o D CD -0 3 ^� co-0a W c W Q = =rCD 77, Cp � �� - 0 o CL 2' < o CD CD CL �. (o C, r C.0 00 7j rn N O O 90 C) 0 m 4\ < 0 D o D D — Con o D D - - � � > � O 1 -h lD n � s C O = Z �,c) � c\ ,, in d n) N \ia) Q N cn C "�'�cp N '-�"'. '�'� ` CD COD O C C '1 7 �. CD (D Cn fD w ° — ? fD C O cn 0 cn QO cD --a m to CD CL mo-0 x °�`� � � ° ° p. p -i o � � cn � ��' O N =+ Dj O � CO w p cD CD 0N CD O O � cn< CD N ' ap �' � v Ill _�_0 0 cn 07 7 O 0 O 3 Q 0 0 j N 3 Q S Zl O_ O 0 (% 0 O < 3 cn N CD C n x w CL N --.. N O Q"O 0 Q 0 (D cn Q C Q = n `� cn O = CD cD 3 0 lD cDCD n "O cD In 3 O N cn < 0 OM. ° 1 m C 07 C O 0 cD C O cp C CD w � O -� w 3 N-.cn cD n 00 Q a. '« O cp U p `� O w CD N Q 0 X 07 O � U) O fD (Sp N 3 —"O O 3 Q (D 3 CL p (� �. N « CD n wQ mw mCD om — � o co S Cl) CD �P = 0 _ ° 3 ° m c3 � � � cpwN m �= ° � T Hai 3 °' W� � cn � _. cn � Q o cn N cn cn cQ n ca cn r O a. O Q O N CD C ° - -� w Q cn 0 w w .. CDCD = Q 3 0 0 0 0 v m o' Q-6 O w � ° � . ° cD w 7c Z = O ° n .� n CD O CD = cD 0 ( � 3 1 ; � o m Qo m ° o -0 ? 6a � CD ? * o mmo aN a, l< a, C-v o< cn CD CL Q 0Q O -0 a m � CD :(Dwar 0 ni � w C CD CD �< Q w w O cn C Q " y y � c� O a. - =r CD Q cn w 3 Q 0 0 0 c w lD Q ° C) CD CD a n 3 w °) � � o cn ncn x o v ° o � � O CD (D CD CD � 7 O p- m 7 3 CCD =' co < x ° w CD �o 0 o CD CD 3 m � n m %< cD Z3 o m W CD c Cl cn :3CD N �' r: 0 `o CD 3 CD CA m 0 1 — CD 0 = w m 0.0 =r0 ch n j O- Q > j cD — � `< O 3 w w 3 w a CD o 3 N.v v o 0 ° m o' � cn — w O S � w X w O cp n O O cn " cnn -. g cn C l< O 0 O O O O c� C- -0 . w (D w w O - cr O ai O C 0 fl) �1 CD CD n C cD (D O -0 O \ O D O cn N CD .-. o cD 0 w �OL) r `< O cn W Z CD C cn .-. w CD N o a) n. CD N C N0 C� 0 � � �' Q o � o cn -, — Q O .< 0 3 � Q w .< fD CD O Mn' Q 0 ,-. p) j' p O cn 3 �' -. � Q v to N C 0 cn' Q (fl C w p (D CD w fD Q cn -a cn W m Z 3 3 cn ° —. CD C) .. CD -I cn (D Q F O O O' ca �, j Q 0 - 7 w w �, CD a)--0 fn cOD CD CD N o (Q w W fD cl a N 6 Q r. � w3 m _ 3 C Q oQ 3003 CD 0 d �_ C � 7 � � CDCL� lD Q CD con 3 3CDD w3 � D p Q vQ 0 =3— o a, No ? 0 T con moo" ° Q cn 0 n-0CD CD CD �. E D 0 :3 OL0 3 w cn � cn 0 " cn = ° O' fD .0 O C CD cn 0 cn - cfl 0 Q -� cn ° o co 0 CD 0 w m Q CD = — m � o � moo° � � m oa =3 CD 0 CD °) 3 z ° o 07 m �:3 w � .. cr3 � � ol< P- 3 v w CD CCD� � 3 �. � N - Z CD -0 � 3 � 0 c CD 00 � � o � 0 v :3 ca3io w CD CD O CD '- C 0 m =1 o o o no ? ? 0 p c° os v CO (D CD N (D �• 3 -u CD w w o Cl -• O 3'h CDn-"i 0I! n m C Q - cc m 0 - = 6 _ o 2 / ! SS / CD _ � < cr / 2 (DCD 3 d_ CD k o � � s8 �k / \ $ § CL § = R ; � Q < 8 = ° c J . >_ § o = m :mcc — m 7 § 8 & 2 k. A k � a / E En §_ & � � o / E ° � \ \ & \ f Co « o a / CD 0 / 2 k 2 / \ = @ CD J § m0j ƒ < & yam k § - Z m R \ D -0 / / m w :30 /� m ® � m /� ;k. G / CD CDk � \ ° E E / / 2 2 � CDc � \ :3 $ $ 2 > i = k a) CD E $ . m \ 7 (D to =3 JD / ƒ a \ R3 m � = E k / $ / £7 : § / _ — o E ZJ % \ CD / 0 CD] # \ / kg0 k \ Ea. k � � / 7 / CDkt ® J CL 0 \ k / q RE f / � CD J a 3 » 7 & CD 777 m 2Cc o agD % 3 cD E = o & :3 CD c 9 (A �, a cn & PL ƒ 7 \ £ k \/ k' a rR = E 2 R 2 51 \ ) 0 cr 7 @ \ » E E co o CONCRETE MECHANICAL MANUFACTURED HOME C) Footings/Setbacks Gas Piping By Ribbons 0 o Intenor Date By interior-Date By Date By M rnExterar Date ZJI f0 BY14)) Exterior-Rate B Set-up 0 Point Load/Isolated Footings INSULATION Date By C BG I SLAB INSULATION ,n Date By Data By FIRE DEPARTMENT D Foundation Walls / Floors Date By N Date 2 — q- lJ By I✓ Data BY DECKS F RAM I NG Walls Date By Date BY Data By PROPANE TANKS PLUMBING vault Date By ^ Date By OTHER Groundwork Attic Date By Type. Date By Date By D.w.v DRYWALL Type: Int.Brace Wall Date By IA Date By Date BY FINAL INSPECTION 0 m Water Line Fire Separation Nth Date BY Date By Date By O m 00 Pass or Request Inspect. c Type of Insp. Fail Date Date Done By Comments c CD M 5 ) z7 hd Lo)L- r v -tv c AIL fD (14 S 8 � !�/ILG�i �J�/l Jl K/ �GJ✓✓►ti i Q G rIlk N CD 113El ' FW al l r� 7 z-3 bo►L zr K 4 0 1/26/2010 Case Activity Listing 3:27:35PM Case#: BLD2008-00606 1� Assigned Done Activity Description Date 1 Date 2 Date 3 Hold Disp To By Updated Updated By BLDA010 Application Received 5/21/2008 5/21/2008 None DONE KKK 5/21/2008 KKK BLDB155 Letter of Incompleteness 6/18/2008 None DONE PBC 6/18/2008 PBC Your application proposes an engineered retaining wall in the vacated south half of 4th Street adjoining your property-which is-Lots 1-3,Block 53,Plat of Hood Canal Land and Improvement Company's Plat of Union City. Staff has researched the documentation associated to vacated rights of way,and your vacated portion specifically. This is to let you know that we are unable to approve any structure proposed in a vacated right-of-way. In order to review such a proposal,we would need an order from a court granting you clear title to the vacated section,unencumbered by any other rights and/or easements If,instead,you proposed the retaining wall within the boundaries of your parcels-lots 1-3,Block 53 of the above plat,the wall would need to meet setback requirements from the lot lines.The setback may be reduced administratively down to no less than 10 feet from the front(north)property line. Side yard setback could be reduced similarly down to 5 ft. Reducing the setback further would require a application for and approval of a Development Regulations Variance.This requires public notice and notification,public comment period,and a public hearing before the Mason County Hearings Examiner. Application does not guarantee approval. BLDA800 Documents Received 7/31/2008 None DONE KS 7/31/2008 KS ENGINEERING FORWARDED TO ARC.7/31/08 KS BLDB 110 Building Plan Review 5/21/2008 8/l/2008 None DONE ARC 8/l/2008 ARC ENGINEERING FOR WALL HAS NO DESIGN CALCULATIONS PROVIDED SHOWING LOADS FROM CARS ABOVE. CALLED APPLICANT ARC 6-5-08 RECIEVED ENGINEERING SENT TO CASE ARC 8-1-08 BLDA800 Documents Received 8/20/2008 None DONE MB 1/28/2009 DLC Complaint received,referred to Planning and Public Works Depts.,please see attached email under documents. Did not locate e-mail in documents. The referenced e-mail has been forwarded to case manager file. do 1.28.2009 BLDA200 HOLD 10/13/2008 6/24/2009 Hold DONE PBC 6/24/2009 PBC Copy of negotiated agreement is in file. DO NOT CANCEL,PERMIT PENDING OUTCOME OF LITIGATION Page I of 3 CaseActivity..rpt ArcIMS Viewer r�i � ��v_ �� ( � Page 1 of 1 , x 0 121ft 5 D C -1 CaA;N FG.-V-4- http://mapmason.co. ason.wa. s/we s a mason/Mapframe.htm 1/26/2010 i RECEIVED TAHJA ENGINEERING, Inc. PO Box 235, Hoodsport, WA 98548 JAN 19 2010 (360) 877-9512 426 W. CEDAR ST. Mason County DCD Building Department PO Box 186 Shelton, WA 98584 Douglas Moore 245 Brady Road Montesano, WA 98563 (360) 249-3958 Re: Concrete Retaining Wall Foundation Inspection Parcel No: 32232-50-53001 Mason County Case No.: BLD2008-00606 Retaining Wall I was contacted about a week ago by John from ARROW Construction who is constructing the concrete retaining wall at the Douglas Moore property at E 18 Tacoma St. in Union, Washington. John informed me that he'd completed the excavation for the retaining wall footing and was requesting my inspection of the foundation area. I visited the site around January 91h of this year and probed the bottom area of the footings and found what I considered unsuitable soils varying from 1 to 3 feet deep beneath the footing locations. I informed John and Mr. Moore that either a deeper foundation must be planned, or that the unsuitable soil must be removed and replaced with a Controlled Density Fill (CDF) upon which the foundation could be installed on. Acceptable CDFs include a lean (1 Sack Mix) Portland Cement Concrete mix, a high quality pit run gravel placed as structural fill, or a crushed rock or crushed gravel material compacted in place. John indicated their decision to employ a crushed rock or crushed gravel structural fill. I was contacted on this date by John who requested my inspection of the foundation subgrade in preparation of structural fill placement. I inspected the footing excavation on this date and consider it acceptable or as noted at the end of this report. Sincerely, Alan A. Tahja, P.E. ?' y� F WA Comments; � t w4 �;P0,t�s 4'GI TERM��1irt> S'10NAL E11 File: C:TrojectsWoorelRetaining Ftng lnsp 1 of 1 1/19/2010 RECEIVED TAHJA ENGINEERING, Inc. PO Box 235, Hoodsport, WA 98548 JA►N 2 6 2010 (360) 877-9512 426 W. CEDAR $T. Mason County DCD Building Department ?' PO Box 186 y WA r Shelton, WA 98584 Douglas Moore nr Y 245 Brady Road Montesano, WA 98563 (360) 249-3958 �s`SIDNAL E��l Re: Concrete Retaining Wall Foundation Inspection Parcel No: 32232-50-53001 Mason County Case No.: BLD2008-00606 Retaining Wall I was contacted about a week ago by John Gilliland from ARROW Construction who is constructing the concrete retaining wall at the Douglas Moore property at E 18 Tacoma St. in Union, Washington. John informed me that he'd completed the excavation of unsuitable material from the proposed retaining wall location and had completed replacing the removed material with a structural fill composed of large loose riprap, light loose riprap, riprap gabion rock and quarry spalls. John requested my inspection of the foundation area. I visited the site on January 22"d of this year and offer the following observations and/or recommendations; ************* I found the riprap structural fill to be well compacted and ready for footing forms and concrete placement. A drainage sub-drain was installed along with the riprap placement and will provide for adequate drainage of any water perched at the foundation bottom elevation. Everything looked good at this stage of the retaining wall construction, and I feel construction should be allowed to proceed in accord with the already approved construction plans for this project. Please feel free to contact me if there are any questions regarding this report, my observations or recommendations. Sinc rely, w UILDING Alan A. Tahja, P. . File: C:TrojectsWoorelRetaining Fing/nsp 2 1 of 1 1/22/2010 V TAHJA ENGINEERING, Inc. PO Box 235, Hoodsport, WA 98548 (360) 87�9512 Mason Count DCD E KEPI �N�N Building Department �� BR E` F 1�E RECEIVED PO Box 186 Pr�� JUN I CJW Shelton, WA 98584 MASON COUNTY Douglas Moore 245 Brady Road Montesano, WA 98563 (360) 249-3958 Re: Final Inspection Parcel No: 32232-50-53001 Mason County Case No.: BLD2008-00606 Retaining Wall & Stormwater Control Features I was contacted by John Gilliland from ARROW Construction who has substantially completed the site development features I design for the Douglas Moore property located in Union, Washington. The concrete retaining walls I designed appear to comply with the designs I produced, as does the stormwater control features I designed. Mr. Gilliland informed me during my site visit today that the stormwater management features he's constructed have performed as expected during the recent moderate rains. Because of the hillside constraints and elevation requirements of the modeled stormwater control features, the final tank location is open on the north side. Mr. Gilliland informed me that he's buried an ecology block in the level area south of the detention tank/vault, and secured the tank to the block with a minimum 5/8 inch diameter cable. The cable installation was not in my original design, but I feel provides an extra measure of safety against the tank dislodging from its intended location. I feel the features designed by me may be considered to be constructed as I intended and that I feel the work may be considered complete and acceptable. Please feel free to contact me if there are any questions regarding this report, my observations or recommendations. Sincerely, of WAsjyl l � o Al A. Zthja, P. _ �0i o to �. ISTEg�r'9 �ss'I�NAL File: C TrojectsWooreTinal Proj Insp2 I of 1 6/7/2010 TAHJA ENGINEERING, Inc. RECEWED PO Box 235, Hoodsport, WA 98548 yF�� .1 (360) 877-9512 Mason County DCD MASON COUNTY. Building Department PO Box 186 TO BE KEPT IN THE Shelton, WA 98584 PARCEL FILE Douglas Moore 245 Brady Road Montesano, WA 98563 (360) 249-3958 ARROW CONSTRUCTION Attention; John Gilliland Re: Final Inspection Parcel No: 32232-50-53001 Mason County Case No.: BLD2008-00606 Retaining Wall & Stormwater Control Features I met with Mr. Gilliland today to inspect the work completed at the Douglas Moore property located in Union, Mason County. I told John that I'd send him two copies of my report as well as the County and Mr. Moore. Please feel free to contact me if there are any questions regarding this report, my observations or recommendations. Sincerely, L AlanA. TahjaqP.E File:C:IPro'ectslMoore p l Ins Cvr Lttr I Of 1 6�7�2010 � I afSM MUST BE COMPLETED IN INK MASON COUNTY PERMIT i--'l._EASE PRESS HARD BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION n�(� 426 W. Cedar• P.O. Box 186, Shelton, WA 98,-584 Shelton (360) 427-9670 • Belfair (360) 275-4467 • Elma (360) 482-5269 On the web vvww.co.mason.wa.us APPLICANT INFORMATION CONTRACTOR INFORM j,TION ®v 1�s ocr'� Company Name f Owner Mailin Address Mailing n�� ss h�4 Qe�C !8 iC TAco�u�l g State Zip Code g Ad A tt.�9 Z City City—Wg1!2' Stated—Zip Code Phone Other Ph. Phone 360580 —ZpD_ Other Ph.3�� -'� Q—''qs� Contractor Reg. _ Exp. Lien/Title Holder `4— E Mail Address E mail address aN-P— Drivers Lic. # DOB Drivers Lic.#Mr1n�C�GS65/�� DOB D3�og SEPTIC /WATER SYSTEM INFORMATION - Connect t New�Septic fl.-- —�E >n Septic Z — Connect to Water System yes Name of Water System System Well Sewer System Name of Y Fire District PARCEL INFORMATION - 12 Digit Parcel No. + Legal Description t - l e -f C o Site Address (Please include street name, street number and city) ��� Directions to site Will timber be cut and sold in parcel preparation?Yes/ No Ri / Creek Pond Is property within 200' of Saltwater Lake_River es or BluffsS 15% Wetland Seasonal Runoff Stream P Is this permit submittal the result of a Stop Work Notice,Correction Notice or other enforcement action?Yes/No TYPE OF JOB - New Add Alt Repair Other "' i4`'} PRIMARY R SIDENCE ® SEASONAL o E Use of Building 5 escribe Work 2nd Floor No. of Bedroom No. of Bathrooms. Z—: Square Foo ge - 1st Floor" Other Sq. ft. 3rd Floor Basement Deck— Covered Deck Garage Attached __--- Detached Carport Attached Detached Model Year MANUFACTURED HOME INFORMATION - Make No. of Bedrooms No. of Bathrooms Length_Width—Serial No. Replacement Unit? Yes/ No Type of Heat Purchase Price $ Certification No. Installer Name OWNER/BUILDER Acknowledges submission of inaccurate information may result in a stop work order or permit revocation. Acknowledgement to re el t bs permit mit arnd to do the work as proposed ed it I am the n the appl cat on wner, owners legal declare that representative, have obtained the permissionf rdfrolmrall ork that I am entitle in the necessn the rt1e Inhavenobta is enedred from permiss on f from them toapply for this permit and conducttthe work Af Mason unty a this ccess The the abolication or the ve proposed i application, icn agent on ownnerbeah behalf is that theiew ind rmatinsp ction. This sdpermit/application becomes hull& void f wok ornauthor authorized is described property. for a period of 180 days. PROOF not commenced G ESS INSPECTION.INACTIVITY OF THIS PERMIT APPLICATION OF 180 DAYS WILL INVALIDATENVALIDIATEATHE APPLICATION.N OF O K IS B ruction work is suspended M OFAPROGR Date: — O caner/0... s Representative/Contractor (indicate which one) _ Accepted by:CA, " Date FOR OFFICIAL USE BEYOND THIS POINT NOTES DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW APPROVED DENIED _ -, Buildin Department Planninq Department Environmental Health Department Fire Marshal FEES Site Ins ection Buildin Permit Fee EH Review Fee Plan Review Fee Plannin Review Fee Plumbin & Base Fee Other Mechanical & Base fee State Fee Wood /Gas/ Pellet Stove Fee Pre-Paid at Submittal Violation Fee TOTAL FEES Valuation $ J ' MASON COUNTY PERMIT NO. BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION 426 W. Cedar• P.O. Box 186, Shelton, WA 98584 c�. Shelton (360) 427-9670 • Belfair (360) 275-4467 - Elma (360) 482-5269 On the web wvvw.co.mason.wa.us APPLICANT INFORMATION CONTRACTOR INFORMATION I � TI , _ Company Name Owner l c> a rear �� Mailing Address MailingAddress w x ,.,x ` I — t, �,+�� City State Zip Code City_s: t State '-4 Zip Code `�'- Phone Other Ph. - � Phone w i,0" 5 2) Other Ph. Contractor Reg. �_ Exp. I Lien/Title Holder ,, °,.1 ` `Yt` "' �" Email address , x' E Mail Address Drivers Lic.#t:oe ,,e jj-) » 6A DOB Ca, - . Drivers Lic. # DOB SEPTIC /WATER SYSTEM INFORMATION - Connect to New Septic__r—�,�Existing^Septic ` I Connect to Water System Ve S Name of Water System t f r Well Sewer System Name of Sewer System r •- �.. n, Fire District PARCEL IN ATION - 12 Digit Parcel No. 1 E+ S �s w Ya�� s s 'fitrF ila lh A5+� 9 tv � . 9�1 i Legal Description Y -a I l,cis Jg„-, 7"dc ;:4 L>,�.r r D. .� s,, a Site Address (Please include street name, street number and city) Directions to site"1 a Will timber be cutand sold in parcel preparation?Yes/ No River/ Creek Pond Is property within 200' of Saltwater Lake Wetland Seasonal Runoff Stream Slopes or Bluff—s>15% Is this permit submittal the result of a Stop Work Notice,Correction Notice or other enforcement action?Yes/No TYPE OF JOB New Add Alt Repair Othea 'a."',' PRIMARY RESIDENCE SEASONAL �] Use of Building =� ..` ? ; Describe Work , . . No. of Bedrooms No. of BathroomSquaCove�edgDeck t Floor Other 2nd FloSoq ft 3rd Floor Basement Deck— Garage Attached Detached Carport Attached Detached Model Year j MANUFACTURED HOME INFORMATION - Make No of Bedrooms No. of Bathrooms Length Width Serial No. Replacement Unit? Yes/ No Type of Heat Purchase Price $ j Certification No. Installer Name OWNER/BUILDER Acknowledges submission of inaccurate information may result in a stop work order or permit revocation. I Acknowledgement of such is by signature below. I declare that I am the owner, owners legal representative, or the contractor. I further declare I that I entitled to receive this permit and to do the work as proposed in the application. I declare that I have obtained the permission from all the necessary parties. If permission is required from any easement holder or any other party in interest regarding this application or the work proposed in the application, I have obtained permission from them to apply for this permit and conduct the work proposed. The owner or agent e owners behalf, represents that the information provided is accurate and grants employees of Mason County access to the above comes null & void if work or authorized construction is described property and structure for review and inspection. This permit/application be i not commenced within 180 days or if construction work is suspended for a period of 180 days. PROOF OF CONTINUATION OF WORK IS BY MEANS OFAPROGRESS INSPECTION.INACTIVITY OF THIS PERMIT APPLICATION OF 180 DAYS WILL INVALIDATE THE APPLICATION. caner/Owners Representative/contractor (indicate which one) FOR OFFICIAL USE BEYOND THIS POINT Accepted by.' _ Date _. NOTES DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW APPROVED DENIED 4 i I Building Department Plannin cl Department i Environmental Health Department Fire Marshal FEES BuildingPermit Fee Site Ins ection EH Review Fee Plan Review Fee Plumbin & Base Fee Plannin Review Fee Other Mechanical & Base fee State Fee Wood / Gas/ Pellet Stove Fee Pre-Paid at Submittal Violation Fee TOTAL FEES Valuation $ MASON COUNTY PERMIT NO. BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION 426 W. Cedar• P.O. Box 186, Shelton, WA 98584 Shelton (360) 427-9670 • Belfair (360) 275-4467 • Elma (360) 482-5269 On the web vNAv.co.mason.wa.us APPLICANT INFORMATION CONTRACTOR INFORMATION Owner " ` Company Name Mailing Address - Mailing Address Cit State Zip Code City State Zip Code y Phone Other Ph. Phone Other Ph. Lien/Title Holder Contractor Reg. # Exp. E Mail Address E mail address Drivers Lic. # DOB Drivers Lic. # DOB SEPTIC /WATER SYSTEM INFORMATION - Connect to New Septic - Existing Septic Connect to Water System Name of Water System Well Sewer System Name of Sewer System PARCEL INFORMATION - 12 Digit Parcel No. Fire District Legal Description Site Address (Please include street name, street number and city) Directions to site Will timber be cut and sold in parcel preparation?Yes/ No River/ Creek Pond Is property within 200' of Saltwater Lake Wetland Seasonal Runoff Stream Slopes or Bluffs Is this permit submittal the result of a Stop Work Notice,Correction Notice or other enforcement action?Yes/No TYPE OF JOB - New Add Alt Repair Other';' PRIMARY RESIDENCE ❑ SEASONAL ❑ Use of Building Describe Work � - No. of Bedroom No. of Bathrooms Square Footage - 1st Floor` 2nd Floor s 3rd Floor Basement Deck— Covered Deck Other Sq. ft. Garage Attached Detached Carport Attached Detached Model Year MANUFACTURED HOME INFORMATION - Make No. of Bedrooms No. of Bathrooms Length Width Serial No. Replacement Unit? Yes/ No Type of Heat Purchase Price $ p Certification No. Installer Name OWNER/BUILDER Acknowledges submission of inaccurate information may result in a stop work order or permit revocation. Acknowledgement of such is by signature below. I declare that I am the owner, owners legal representative, or the contractor. I further declare that I am entitled to receive this permit and to do the work as proposed in the application. I declare that I have obtained the permission from all the necessary parties. If permission is required from any easement holder or any other party in interest regarding this application w the work proposed in the application, I have obtained permission from them to apply for this permit and conduct the work proposed. The owner or agent on owners behalf, represents that the informaticn provided is accurate and grants employees of Mason County access to the above described property and structure for review and inspection. This permit/application becomes null & void if work or authorized construction is not commenced within 180 days or if construction work is suspended for a period of 180 days. PROOF OF CONTINUATION OF WORK IS BY MEANS OF A PROGRESS INSPECTION.INACTIVITY OF THIS PERMIT APPLICATION OF 180 DAYS WILL INVALIDATE THE APPLICATION. X Date. F owner/Owns Representative/Contractor (indicate which one) er Accepted b FOR OFFICIAL USE BEYOND THIS POINT y� NOTESDate DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW APP O D DENIED Building Department Planninq Department Environmental Health Department Fire Marshal FEES BuildingPermit Fee Site Ins ection EH Review Fee Plan Review Fee Plumbinq & Base Fee Plannin Review Fee Mechanical & Base fee Other Wood /Gas/ Pellet Stove Fee State Fee Violation Fee /llo �Nr' Pre-Paid at Submittal TOTAL FEES Valuation $ Z qd- ON S7gTF MASON COUNTY �P5 c DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT O A U �N s N Planning Division N Y ti P O Box 279, Shelton,WA 98584 of to (360)427-9670 1864 NOTIFICATION OF INCOMPLETE APPLICATION June 18, 2008 DOUGLAS MOORE 245 MONTE BRADY RD MONTESANO WA 98563 Parcel No.: 322325053001 Project Description: Retaining Wall. Dear Applicant: You have submitted a permit application (case no. BLD2008-00606) for proposed construction or development in the county. Upon review of your application, I .have determined that the contents of the application are incomplete or do not provide enough detail for review. Therefore, review of your application will not proceed until the necessary information is provided (see the comment section of this letter for details.) Once the information is submitted and the application is complete, I will continue to process your application accordingly. If the additional information is not provided to the County within 180 days of this request, the application shall expire and no further action on the proposed development shall take place. Please contact me at (360) 427-9670, ext. 287 if you have questions. sin c ly, Pam Bennett-Cumming Land Use Planner Mason County Planning Department 6/18/2008 Page 1 of 2 BLD2008-00606 • NOTIFICATION OF INCOMPLETE APPLICATION 6/18/2008 Case No.: BLD2008-00606 Comments: Your application proposes an engineered retaining wall in the vacated south half of 4th Street adjoining your property -which is - Lots 1-3, Block 53, Plat of Hood Canal Land and Improvement Company's Plat of Union City. Staff has researched the documentation associated to vacated rights of way, and your vacated portion specifically. This is to let you know that we are unable to approve any structure proposed in a vacated right-of-way. In order to review such a proposal, we would need an order from a court granting you clear title to the vacated section, unencumbered by any other rights and/or easementsc, * If, instead, you proposed the retaining wall within the boundaries of your parcels - lots 1-3, Block 53 of the above plat, the wall would need to meet setback requirements from the lot lines. The setback may be reduced administratively down to no less than 10 feet from the front (north) property line. Side yard setback could be reduced similarly down to 5 ft. Reducing the setback further would require a application for and approval of a Development Regulations Variance. This requires public notice and notification, public comment period, and a public hearing before the Mason County Hearings Examiner. Application does not guarantee approval. CIY- 6/18/2008 Page 2 of 2 BLD2008-00606 ' ,(8/18/2008) Mark Core Fw d: unresolved issues permit#BLD2008-00606 Page 1 - - - -- _ _ From: Mindi Brock To: Mark Core Date: 8/18/2008 9:27 AM Subject: Fwd: unresolved issues permit#BLD2008-00606 Attachments: unresolved issues permit#BLD2008-00606 Hi Mark Please see the attached email. I referred this to Pam B-C of Planning and also to Charlie Butros of Public Works. The permit, BLD2008-00606,for retaining wall has not been issued. I do not have a current enforcement case for this site,as no building dept. issues currently exist. See me if you have questions or concerns.Just so you know,there is a history with the complainant. I did not respond to the email as it has been referred to planning and public works. Let me know if you think I should get involved. Thank you Mindi Brock Building Department Code Enforcement Mason County Community Development �� 360427-9670 x 356 r \� mindib@co.mason.wa.us www.co.mason.wa.us „y� -t��" ��� ` G'C'>✓�i 1 /cC (8/20/2008) Mindi Brock- Re: unresolved issues permit#BLD2008-00606 Page 1 From: Mindi Brock To: Hood Canal Physical Therapy Date: 8/20/2008 12:04 PM Subject: Re: unresolved issues permit#BLD2008-00606 Hello Mary Thank you for your email regarding your concerns surrounding BLD2008-00606. I have referred the complaint to Public Works and to the Planning Dept.as the stormwater,vacations and setback issues must be addressed through those departments. If you see any work being done prior to any permits being issued, please refer them to me. Below is a list of contacts to the Departments referred to: Pam Bennett-Cumming, Planner 427-9670 ext. 287 ParnBC(@co.mason.wa.us Ryan Crater, Planning Code Enforcement ext.577 RyanCna co.mason.wa.us Charlie Butros, Public Works ext.450 CharlesB(@co.mason.wa.us Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions or concerns. Thank you, Mindi Brock Building Department Code Enforcement Mason County Community Development 360-427-9670 x 356 mindib@co.mason.wa.us www.co.mason.wa.us (8/18/2008) Mindi Brock- Unresolved issues permit#BLD2008-00606 Pagel From: Mindi Brock To: Charles Butros Subject: Unresolved issues permit#BLD2008-00606 Hello Charlie Attached is an email that should have gone to you. The building permit for the retaining wall (BLD2008- 00606) has not been approved by Planning due to setbacks. Could you please take a look at this site and make any notes under the permit?This should be addressed by Public Works anyway as it sounds like drainage issues exist on this site according to the complainant. Thank you, (8/20/2008) Mindi Brock- Fwd: unresolved issues permit#BLD2008-00606 Page 1 From: Mindi Brock To: Pam Bennett-Cumming Date: 8/18/2008 8:32 AM Subject: Fwd: unresolved issues permit#BLD2008-00606 Attachments: unresolved issues permit#BLD2008-00606 Hi Pam Did you get this email as well from Mary Nell Holden? I am going to forward this on to Public Works to address the drainage issues.This is not an enforcement case,so I will not be pursuing it as it is not currently in violation. Thank you Mindi Brock Building Department Code Enforcement Mason County Community Development 360-427-9670 x 356 mindib@co.mason.wa.us www.co.mason.wa.us (8/18/2008) Mark Core- unresolved issues permit#BLD2008-00606 Page 1 From: "Hood Canal Physical Therapy" <marynell@hctc.com> To: "'Mindi Brock"' <MindiB@co.mason.wa.us> Date: 8/17/2008 1:21 PM Subject: unresolved issues permit#BLD2008-00606 Good Morning everyone, This e-mail is our"going on the record"to let the county and property owners know our concerns about Moore's and DelPilar's management of seasonal runoff. The very northern aspects of lots 8 through 1 (traveling east to west) of Bock 53, Union Plat have always sloped to the west without interruption. A drainage ditch at the very northern edge of lots 3-1 has existed and successfully managed seasonal run-off, for the last 10 to 15 years. That ditch was installed by the owners of Northern properties (Bill Rice and Dutch Sweigart). We understand that times change, terrain changes, as a part of development. However, we have been stating since the beginning of construction of Mr. Moore's house, and especially since he brought in truckloads of fill that have remained piled, non-compacted, and non-supported, that there needs to be management of the drastically changed course of seasonal run-off, by the owners of the above stated lots. The water that used to flow westerly from the east aspect of lot 8 down through PortTownsend and then out to a creek, is now blocked by 4 feet high of unsupported fill at lots 3 and 4. This fill has been brought in by Moore, and according to the county was allowable under his building permit for the house. However, we have contended that this fill was and is a prelude to his plans for a retaining wall which require engineering. That funneled, copious, and forceful water has torn through our property between our two permanent structures. November 12th (before the infamous storm) and December 2nd the day of the infamous storm in 2007. Moore's attempt to manage that water was to put up a"temporary" berm which was at least 18 inches thick and sat on DelPilar's property and blocked their access to their driveway. DelPilar insisted that Moore take the land back to it's original grade. He did so, only in as much as it allowed access to the DelPilar's driveway. However, there continues to be unsupported fill, several feet high, on the west side of lot 4, covering the natural, westerly course of water, with a 12"catch basin protruding above ground, and a visible pronounced funnel/bowl directed at our back door which did not exist before. Moore has applied for building permit of a wall that travels from the east side of lot 3 through to PortTownsend. We have objected to his vacation and use of the old 'Ath street" because it literally touches our back porch. Our house was put in with an understood 15/30 foot set back(the very southern 15'to be easement—but for which we have paid taxes and maintained). Our appraisal showed all of 4th street to be in our property. Absolutely no papers or maps at time of closing referred to numbers of feet when referring -(W ._) -- - -p —_ _- --- ----- - -- ----- - -- 9 8/18/2008 Mark Core-unresolved issues ermit#BL_D2008-00606 Page 2 to the"middle of fourth street." We have affidavits from 3 neighbors who agree they always understood 4th street to be 30 feet wide, and to be split evenly between N/S, one(southern owner) believed 4th to be a"10 foot wide easement,"and noone ever believed any houses to have been placed at all on any part of 4th street. This has been our position from the very beginning. Moore was first denied a variance to his set back with concerns for ingress/egress. Then, for some reason (without having ever vacated and put into title the part of 4th street he believed to be his) he was given that variance. Nothing changed with the lay of the land and/or his proclaimed ownership of it, or obvious concerns about ingress/egress. We still, to this day, cannot see why the variance was granted. Nevertheless, he was granted a building permit of a house that had very obvious limitations for access, and no plans for that access on land that was inconsistently and nebulously defined as"unvacated 'right of way' ." That"putting the cart before the horse"with regards to his building has caused a cascade of events, disharmony in the neighborhood, and tremendous financial, emotional, and physical expenditure on the part of the property owners, especially the downhill/northern neighbors who stand to be most negatively affected by his poor development. We have noticed that the county has changed some requirements/procedures for things such as vacations, variances, etc during our stuggle with Mr. Moore. However, we still have an unresolved situation between neighbors building and planning (or lack thereof)which continues to put us at risk. The good news is that, due to code regulations, our neighbor is finally aware he must settle property lines before building. We have been initiating conversations about property line settlements since the Summer/Fall of 2005 -always to hear Moore say he"didn't want to pay tax on it" until he was forced to vacate it. Nevertheless, concerns about water management will still remain regardless of property line settlements. We are very happy to step out of the business of his development. Before we do so, we expect that property lines and set back issues will be clearly defined and finalized; and we want it very clearly stated on the record that the Natural Course of Drainage has been drastically and forcefully redirected by Moore's excessive build-up of land. The engineered drawings that he has submitted to the county only take into account a wall which starts at the east line and do not take into account the need for water management east of that line. These concerns need to be taken into consideration when giving Moore a building permit. There are no curtain drains, walls, culverts, ditches prepared to handle and redirect the water that Mr. Moore's built-up land forces backward and downward toward us. We have thorough drainage throughout our property; however the south side's water management, the ditch installed by Rice and Sweigart several years ago, and set back 30 feet from the house, has been covered several feet, by Moore's unsupported fill. We insist that the construction of Moore's driveway and wall follow the engineer's specs, and that he supply engineered plans for the management of water east of his property as it travels his expected easement through DelPilar's property, and safely directs the water away from all homes in the (8/18/2008) Mark Core- unresolved issues permit#BLD2008-00606 _ Page 3 area—after the property lines issues have been resolved. Again, Moore installed without professionals or a permit, a 12" catch basin (which protrudes above the ground) and 6"culvert(already under several feet of fill). The engineer's drawings call for a 24" basin with 12"culvert. We also require that any wall is reasonably and safely set back from the property line, since the line we have always been proposing is: 1st only 15 feet and uphill from our house, and 2nd defined by a long row of trees on part of that line. We look forward to settling property lines, living in our home with a comfortable and safe set-back, safe from water run-off, and someday having some harmony back in the neighborhood. Someone needs to pay attention to these concerns and insure that all safeguards are taken so that everyone's home, investment, and safety are protected. An obvious error was made many decades ago (leaving the south '/2 of 4th as"easement"without having ever been put in county or other written record how it was defined/used/etc), otherwise there wouldn't be three (four if Timm's are included) homes literally on 4th street and touching the"middle line."Again there was never mention of numbers of feet in any of our closing papers, and our appraisal photos(which were taken when the previous owners lived in the home and walked the property with the appraiser), show our southern line to have been at the very southern border of all of 4th street. One more time: Everyone believed 4th to be 30 feet wide, and the Rices in particular believed they owned all of it, with the following understanding: 1. That it could never be developed. 2. The southern 15 feet was easement to southern neighbors. 3. That they had always paid tax on all of 4th street. That is the reason our negotiations stop at 15 feet with at least a 1 to 2 foot set-back of the very base/toe of his wall. Moores drawings include slope so it's clear the wall will have to be back filled and how far back it will have to go. The drawing he has submitted will call for more than 600 cy fill. His current drawing protrudes twenty feet into the disputed property. Moore's drawings also fail to include our back porch which has always been a permanent part of our house and is literally on the 30 foot line making it 10 feet from his proposed wall. It seems we have to illustrate this scenario repeatedly whenever we are talking with people at their offices or over the phone, when a site visit(with us the downhill neighbors being included)would clarify any concerns. Anyone who comes to visit can see without pointing out, the uncomfortable proximity of his house to ours let alone the dangerous proximity of where he proposes to put his 8'tall, load-bearing wall with several hundred yards more fill. The wall we presented to him, over a year ago (April of'07), allows him as much if not more turn around space and considerably less fill than his very first proposed wall. His very first sketch was tiered and protruded 22 feet into the hill directly behind our house disturbing the hillside even more. This letter is being sent because it is nearing the close of the Summer season, Moore has continued to delay bringing closure to the property line settlement, and the unsupported hill of fill dirt remains a threat. He needs to settle property lines with us and with his east neighbors for easement. (8/18/2008) Mark Core- unresolved issues permit#BLD2008-00606 Page 4 There continues to be delay in the entire negotiation process which we have been encouraging since the Summer of 2005. Be that as it may, a risk to our property and investment remains due to haphazard building by our uphill neighbor. We have consistently stressed an even split of the 30 feet of 4th that has never been in any of the southern parcels' titles or tax records. The old"middle" of fourth literally touches our house as it does our neighbors to the west, and comes within 2 feet of the front door of our neighbors to the east. All building permits show 15/30, 20, 16 feet set-backs respectively. So negotiations with our southern neighbors have remained consistent. We will not settle for anything less than 15 feet of the disputed property. We have paid for engineered drawings for our southern neighbor, that accommodate that 15/15 split. However those drawings now require adjustments since he has changed the lay of the land with his unsupported fill, and drastically redirected the course of run-off. We have offered to pay a reasonable price for that property even though we have always believed it to be ours for decades, and it has never been in any southern properties' titles or tax records. However now, we have fronted thousands of dollars in attorneys fees because we were getting nowhere with one neighbor(Moore)who said he had to have"it all" because he"didn't know how much he would need"and neighbors east of him who have vacillated on agreements. Not to mention the hours spent researching building codes, public records, public works, attempted negotiations, and stressful days not knowing whether or not we will come home to a torn up hillside. Delays, stalling, and wavering need to stop so that we can move on. I'm writing this to let the county and the southern neighbors know what risk still remains should we enter another rainy season without closure. How any neighbor could think they could rightfully own property that has never been in their title, for which they have never paid taxes, and which literally encompasses their neighbors' obvious back yard and part of their neighbor's house, is beyond our comprehension. Nevertheless, we have been forced into this legal battle, we have played by the rules, we have always remained reasonable and fair; and we are now alerting neighbors to the risks due to their continued delay and lack of cooperation. And we ask that the county continue to uphold code requirements for resolution of property lines, and hold a site inspection of the land with us present before granting any permit for Mr. Moore's and DelPilar's wall/easement. Del Pilar will obviously have to go through the same vacation process so that Moores' access can be moved north/downhill up to 10 feet at the west side (and none at the east side) of DelPilar's into "4th"away from their lots. We have repeatedly acknowledged this and proposed reasonable settlements to no avail. We hope that this can be resolved quickly so that all processes will run smoothly, and a safe/solid wall and water management system can be built before the next rainy season. If our neighbors refuse to accept 15 feet boundary line with a 1-2 foot set back of the toe of the wall, then we will run into delays. This hillside is steep, the integrity of the land has been compromised enough (from Moore's clearcutting-'05, land cutting=06, construction=07, and unsupported fill), the water can be forceful, and we are at the greatest risk because we are merely feet away and downhill. MaryNell Holden Cc: Rob Johnson (8/18/2008) Mark Coreeunresolved issues permit#BLD2008-00606 Page 5 Pamela Bennet Cummings Bcc: Z9 J 74t (fni,-L./O,cT I,LI!/ m,,-/.f�� yeti 114� I--e L �/d 'r- l y SGr+Zc <a.✓/. 1 T_// r s bc�s74 TT f/l l>►�� cis I '9 rzs rug E�7 e-T J r 1 (i g a b s r z 7V- 253 - 63l - 6 7/ L64 u rz rvC_j._ gam r1✓� © Y�?// 1 A Mason County Planning Intake Checklist Owners ame: Ids OD Project: Date: Proposed uses) of ru ure(s) -t p r� Reviewed By: c Commercial Developm t: YE NO PLANNER: GBM TS �PBC H REC JMS Site Plan: North Arrow o Survey required in Allyn UGA - o AF# ' o Monuments Property Dimensions: i 1 X I_ Streets and Driveways Shown. Road name: _ Sri V dj-C 0&L-a nn a l� .� All rsting urn n tbacks and use "� I Location, ep is an D in-field hown with setbacks u e e r , ponds,shoreline, wetlands, natural or historic drainage, defined drainage di .Topography(slopes) 'qqpp -- rlo , �d MinimeA ::F: Structure Setbala (Direction/Setback): B� � LO R: Si: S2: � �3� Uther Easements tility arainage Easements: Yes No (if yes enter condition #5022) 7::O ,-a' Does site plan show landingr eats? o Variance applied for: Yes / parking-spaces allotted❑ County Access Permit Need condition #0010) / No , ❑ State Access Permit Needed (add condition #0020) EX►Sf-I ►mac Standard Conditions to be added to all Building pe its that planning reviews: #5019 and #0700 Site Access: Are there any impediments (dogs/gates that my restrict access to your site? Is the site clearly marked? How? Address e bn r Zonin : Name ❑ Other: C PI n: RUM Zoning; Rural ❑ RR 2.5 5 10 20 ❑ RT/RTC A Z nin : 0 RAC 0 R-1 ❑ R-5 ❑ HC 0 BI ❑ RMF ❑ Unknown ❑ R-1P ❑ R-10 ❑ LTA ❑ VC ❑ .Allyn UGA ❑ RC 1 2 3 ❑ Agricultural ❑ R-1R 0 PD 0 FR ❑ T 0 Belfair UGA ❑ RI 0 In-holding p R-2 ❑ PF ❑ MU ❑ MHP 11 Shelton UGA ❑ RNR ❑ LTCFL 0 R-3 0 POS 0 GC 0 BP ❑ Tribal Critical ❑ GC-Cl Areas: (streams ponds,shoreline, wetlands, steep slopes) Shoreline Desi na ion: G-.N q / ❑ Urban ❑ Rural ❑Conservancy ❑ Natural 0 Unkown Water Body(type of water if unnamed): SEPA: Yes/ �Un�known �� Flood Plain: YES/N Unknown ap# Aquifer Recharge: YES/ Unknown Map# Tags/Cases: RLC/SPI Case: --O 6-Year Dev. Moratorium: Y� Eagle Nest Tag: YES 0 Other YE 0 Revised: 02-07-2008 IAPLANNING\PAC\PLANNING INTAKE ev# Description Date TAKIA ENGIIVEERING,RVC. Re-Aligned Driveway Plan View Alan Tahja,P.E. Douglas Moore Moore II PO Box 235 245 Monte Brady Road Hoodsport, WA 98548 Montesano, WA 98563 Mason County Pncl No.: 32232-50-53001 (360)877-9512 (360)249-3958 2 of 6 i /LLJ 0 o v z W W o n 3 > p Qce I r �I o b s CAI a \ z I � SOS[ au►-1,Cuadold s o !:] a ,091 auil AVOdO d / b I O 404 4 co � p O Rev# Description Date TAHJA ENGINEERING,INC. Existing Driveway Plan View Alan Tahja,P.E. `� Douglas Moore Moore❑ PO Box 235 245 Monte oad HoodsPort, WA 98548 Bradyy Mason County Prc]No.: 32232-50-53001 (360)877-9512 Montesano, WA 98563 ° (360)249-3958 1 of 6 r I z � I V; / 3 c r 3 r � > I / L I (/ C I W r ' cu 0 � / 1 / 1 a � a c o I 091 aui- (ii3dOJd \ II c G I I � � I / I ,OSI aur"l ua oid 0 r � I � � o i �) WO , Rev i{ Description Date TAHJA ENGINEERING,INC. Re-Aligned Driveway Plan View + nY Alan Tabja,P.E. Douglas Moore PO Box 235 Moore ll 245 Monte Brady Road Mason County Pre]No.: 32232-50-53001 Hoodspor4 WA 98548 Montesano, WA 98563 (360)877-9512 (360)249-3958 2 of 6 CIO � u 3 , 3 U C y I O � 0 Q .OSI 361-1 /Qj;)dad o4I 0 / y C I � � i U / OSI aui-I a o d � d co b / , O � � Rev# Description Date TAIHA ENGINEERING,INC. Driveway Plan View-Existing Site Conditions Pl�Fa� Alan Tabja,P.E. Douglas Moore Moore II PO Box 235 245 Monte Brady Road Hoodsport WA 98548 Montesano, WA 98563 Mason County Prcl No.: 32232-50-53001 (360)877-9512 (360)249-3958 3 of 6 c U V Z 00 P �� �Wca CD w W a ,�o ? o cle 4w oO 4�0 N a � 0 c U K I C O co E I U � I U � U U I C � c m > 00 U I U LL] r I � C O X LL] I I \ � 1 _ A I �] F I 1 � I I In O C I I I I IQ I U g 1 C I � I I c C I c � c X I tl 1 I z Z I I Q OS �2 1c<U I Ucc, zee: .X Rev# Description Date TAH]A ENGINEERING,INC. Driveway Plan View Alan Tahja,P.E. Douglas Moore PO Box 235 Moore II 245 Monte Brady Road Hoodsport, WA 98548 Montesano, WA 98563 Mason County Prcl No.: 32232-50-53001 (360)877-9512 1'6 (360)249-3958 4 o c I U L ca ocz a` o c U C N r O U C cC N I co -!� U O � O M O C E c C13 a s coo E c vUi CO > Oo cn I Q U _ c � � O c � I U L I Q z I i -2 -�8 E ca y U! I U o ; N � On z ��p N Q L II U' 6 3 Rev# Description Date TAHJA ENGINEERING,INC. Driveway&Retaining Wall Cross Sections Roj.Fde Alan Tahja,P.E. Douglas Moore Moore➢ PO Box 235 245 Monte Brady Road Hoodsport, WA 98548 Montesano, WA 98563 Mason County Prcl No.: 32232-50-53001 (360)877-9512 (360)249-3958 5 of 6 ua m - a Fd 0 12 C � U N G y a 0 S 1 i aut-I /(vadOJd P A U `� N (V O O y t U M R z U � > LQ E: Q ________________________________ ____ au'-1 auatuase3 palEOe,� z u } o < 3 O 1 Q U C L U C d' H N t W E cv _] Q U S � 190 i Rev f{ Description Date TAHJA ENGINEERING,INC. 4, 6,&8'Tall Retaining Wall Details Alan Tabja,P.E. Douglas Moore Moore II PO Box 235 245 Monte Brady Road Hoodsport, WA 98548 Montesano, WA 98563 Mason County Prcl No.: 32232-50-53001 (360)877-9512 (360)249-3958 6 of 6 c c 0 r m 7 m 0 7 ¢ m o `gwci o 3 � "vim, yLIO 3 ° O O Y 0p 00 U U U @ @ C C U C y o ° 3v -o @ U U E _ — — U = = E E E 00 �O V > G E C� C D` N 3 60 00 2 L ° 333 D c 7z ro m LN (✓ .Q U U @ U m cc @ cc @ U Q. V N C o a� � e' 4; � 3 U C O — O U C @ > �n C @ U O ° U @ -n tt N 0 .D U — - U U a U "' N C U Lt_ > _ .— E — cm U cn f.�� c� U X C > U m N •C •C y .0 -CRr cc C C U cC th O E N C EC 0D @ U O O CID � . c � _0 o N OU — U U U @ U C_�0 Y _ E U C U _� U 00 U Y Y m 3 o w U ¢ 6o r THIS PARCEL INCLUDES RECORDS FROM THE AUDITORS OFFICE PARCEL # z� Lb 53,0 % AF# 19qW8b DOCUMENT AF# DOCUMENTAdaj AF# I O ID 3 DOCUMENT �q��a�r� AF# ,g '-I-g3D DOCUMENT &aitw aL� AF# DOCUMENT AF# DOCUMENT THIS MAY NOT INCLUDE ALL DOCUMENTS RECORDED ON THIS PARCEL