The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSEP2007-00130 - SEP Determinations STATE �1 STATE OF WASHINGTON 17PLAW41NG DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY PO Box 47775 • Olympia, Washington 98504-7775• (360) 407-6300 January 28,2008 Mr.Ryan Crater Your address Mason County is in the Department of Community Development Kennedy- Planning Division G01dSborough PO Box 279 watershed Shelton,WA 98584 Dear Mr.Crater: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the determination of nonsignificance for the Nelson Addition of 6 Pier Piling project(SEP2007-00130)located at 540 East Cronquist Road in Allyn as proposed by Vern Nelson. The Department of Ecology(Ecology)reviewed the environmental checklist and has the following comment(s): SOLID WASTE &FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE: Al Salvi(360)407-6287 The applicant proposes to remove a structure(s)that may contain treated wood. Please refer to Ecology's publication"Focus on Treated Wood Exclusion," available at http://www.ecy.wa.ggv/pubs/0304038.pdf,for suggested best management practices and disposal requirements for treated wood. For additional information or clarification,please contact Dee Williams with Ecology's Hazardous Waste and Toxics Reduction program,at(360)407-6348. WATER QUALITY: Neil Caudill 360 407-7320 Q ( ) Erosion control measures must be in place prior to any clearing,grading,or construction. These control measures must be effective to prevent soil from being carried into surface water by stormwater runoff. Sand, silt,clay particles,and soil will damage aquatic habitat and are considered pollutants when discharged to waters of the state. Any discharge of sediment-laden runoff or other pollutants to waters of the state is in violation of Chapter 90.48,Water Pollution Control,and WAC 173-201A,Water Quality Standards for Surface Waters of the State of Washington,and is subject to enforcement action. During construction,all releases of oils,hydraulic fluids,fuels,other petroleum products,paints, solvents, and other deleterious materials must be contained and removed in a manner that will prevent their discharge to waters and soils of the state. The cleanup of spills should take precedence over all other work on the site. Proper disposal of construction debris must be on land in such a manner that debris cannot enter the Case Inlet or cause water quality degradation of state waters. All trenches, depressions,or holes created in the intertidal area shall be backfilled prior to inundation by tidal waters. All stormwater discharges must be constructed in a manner that will not cause scouring on the beach. a i~i� January 28,2008 Page 2 Ecology's comments are based upon information provided by the lead agency. As such,they do not constitute an exhaustive list of the various authorizations that must be obtained or legal requirements that must be fulfilled in order to carry out the proposed action. If you have any questions or would like to respond to these comments please contact the appropriate reviewing staff listed above. Department of Ecology Southwest Regional Office (SM: 08-0243) cc: Neil Caudill,WQ Al Salvi, SW&FAP Vern Nelson(Application) Leann Ebe,McDonald/Shoreline Solutions(Contact) I i ,I oN-STATE MASON COUNTY BPS c DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT o S°u �= Planning Division N T P O Box 279,Shelton,WA 98584 Z70 Y Doti (360)427-9670 1864 DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (WAC 197-11-340) SEP2007-00130 Description of Proposal REBUILD PRF AND ADD ADDITIONAL PILING Proponent: VERN NELSON Location of Proposal: 540 E CRONQUIST RD ALLYN Parcel Number: 122321400070 Legal Description: TRS 7 & 8 OF G.L. 2 E OF R/W & TAX 931* & 931-B* Directions to Site: Lead Agency: Mason County The Lead Agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed Environmental Checklist and other information on file with the Lead Agency. This information is available to the public upon request. Please contact Ryan Crater at ext. 577 with any questions. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2). The Lead Agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date shown below, when the determination is final. Comments must be submitted to Dept. of Community Development, P.O. Box 279, Shelton WA 98584 by 1/28/2008. Appeal of this determination must be filed within a 14-day period following this final determination date, per Mason County Code Chapter 15.11 Appeals. Authorized Local Government Official Date ON.srArF MASON COUNTY BPS c DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT It o S u f= Planning Division Z� °x Y y P O Box 279, Shelton,WA 98584 of o (360)427-9670 1864 DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (WAC 197-11-340) SEP2007-00130 Description of Proposal REBUILD PRF AND ADD ADDITIONAL PILING Proponent: VERN NELSON Location of Proposal: 540 E CRONQUIST RD ALLYN Parcel Number: 122321400070 Legal Description: TRS 7 & 8 OF G.L. 2 E OF R/W & TAX 931* & 931-B* Directions to Site: Lead Agency: Mason County The Lead Agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed Environmental Checklist and other information on file with the Lead Agency. This information is available to the public upon request. Please contact Ryan Crater at ext. 577 with any questions. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2). The Lead Agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date shown below, when the determination is final. Comments must be submitted to Dept. of Community Development, P.O. Box 279, Shelton WA 98584 by 1/28/2008. Appeal of this determination must be filed within a 14-day period following this final determination date, per Mason County Code Chapter 15.11 Appeals. ,La /v-!5�- Authonzed Local Government Official Date s Nelson Pier 2007 Europa Technologies ow We L L'etrolt Dr 31 Reach --- Island Grapeview ' Stir etch Wand Case Stretch Inlet S-2007NAVTEO 2C07 VapQui st Irc. REFERENCE: 2006-00530 APPLICANT: Vern Nelson PROPOSED: Remove 12 creosote pile; replace with 12 10" gaiv. steel pile. Add six new 10"gaiv steel pier support piles. AT: Case Inlet, Puget Sound, WA COUNTY: Mason STATE: WA SHEET: 3 OF 3 DATE: June 30, 2007 J � i s� f 3' i ` D1h0n l,O,dd/Ne� h CASE INLET 1 E CRONQUIST RD REFERENCE: 2006-00530 APPLICANT: Vern Nelson PROPOSED: Remove 12 creosote pile; replace with 12 10" gals. steel pile. Add six new 10" galy steel pier support piles. AT: Case Inlet, Puget Sound, WA COUNTY: Mason STATE: WA SHEET: A OF4 DATE: June 30, 2007 MASON COUNTY DCD (/ Sent SEPA tePZW-2--U 0!30 to(check all that apply6on �1$ M Skokomish Tribal Nation WA Department of Ecology Natural Resources Dept. Environmental Review Section ATTN: Marty Ereth PO BOX 47703 N 541 Tribal Center Rd. Olympia,WA 98504-7703 Shelton,WA 98584 MQuinault Indian Nation PIJ.S.Army Corps of Engineers ATTN: Mark Mobbs SEPA Reviewer PO Box 189 PO Box C-3755 Tahola,WA 98587 Se ttle,WA 98124 EP/Squaxin Tribal Nation WA Dept.of Fish and Wildlite Natural Resources Dept. ATTN: Margie Schirato(saltwater) 2952 SE Old Olympic Highway 2391 W Deegan Rd. Shelton,WA 98584 Shelton,WA 98584 r7 The Confederated Tribe of the Chehalis WA Dept.of Fish&Wildlife ATTN:SEPA Reviewer ATTN:Gloria Rogers(freshwater) 420 Howanut Rd. PO Box 695 Oakville,WA 98569 Elma,WA 98541 Shannon Soto WA Dept.of Transportation WA DNR,South Puget Sound Region Alana Hess,Development Review Engineer 950 Farman Avenue North P.O. Box 47440 Enumclaw,WA 98022-9282 Olympia,WA 98504-7440 Elizabeth Ellis City of Shelton WA DNR,Aquatic Resources 525 West Cota St. PO BOX 47027 Shelton,WA 98584 Olympia,WA 98504-7027 Office of Archeaology&Historic Preservation Boyd Powers ATTN:Stephanie Kramer WA DNR,SEPA Center P.O. Box 48343 PO BOX 47015 Olympia,WA 98504-8343 Olympia,WA 98504-7015 School District: a Olympic Region Clean Air Agency 2940-B Limited Ln. NW Mason Cty Public Works ATTN: Olympia,WA 98502 U�ago'n Cty Env.Health ATTN: Mason County Transit PO Box 1880 6j(Agent: Shelton,WA 98584 / j Applicant: �,eat"-)✓,' �CJ e � �>✓!�lC/� U�r,� �Jescs� 97 i e AV i60 J„ !�,�n�� S�t�1�( � WA o �K Q _rr MASON CO. SEPA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Nelson Addition of 6 pier piling 2. Name of applicant: Vern Nelson 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Applicant: Vern Nelson 540 E. Cronquist Rd Allyn, WA 98524 360-275-5724 Contact Person: Leann Ebe McDonald/Shoreline Solutions 9784 NE Lafayette Avenue Bainbridge Island, WA 98110 206-300-2678 Cell 206-842-7380 Hm leannm@mac.com 4. Date checklist prepared: August 6, 2007 5. Agency requesting checklist: Mason County, Washington 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Fall of 2007 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related or connected with this proposal are known at this time. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. None known. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No applications are pending for governmental approvals for other proposals. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. • Mason County: SEPA Determination, Shoreline Exemption, Building Permit • WA ST Dept of Fish &Wildlife- Hydraulic Project Approval (Revised) • U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Specific Project Information Form for replacement of up to 18 piling. 11. Give a brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the site of the project. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need the repeat those answers on this page. Proposal is to replace all existing pilings (12) that support the pier and float, and add 6 pier support piling for additional support and stability. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. The address of the proposed project is 540 E. Cronquist, Allyn, WA, Mason County. The legal description of the proposed project is: Section 32, Township 22N, Range 01 W B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other Gently sloping slo in tidelands. The area above the shoreline slopes gradually upward towards Conquist Rd. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? The slope of the bank at the water is about 300 down. C. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, and muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Upland soils are glacial till, a sandy-loam with gravel inclusions. Tidelands and underwater substrate consists of sand, gravel, and cobble. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. None. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. There is no filling or grading proposed as a part of this project. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. No. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? There will be no change in impervious surface coverage from existing conditions once the project is completed. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: It is not anticipated that construction will result in any erosion. 2. Air a. What type of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, and industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. During construction, the running of equipment will contribute some emissions in the area. Once construction is complete, the final project will not increase emissions above current use level. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. There are no off-site sources of emissions or odor that may will affect this proposal. C. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: The equipment used at the project site will pass all emission standards required by the state agencies. 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, and wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. The project is located in Mason County on the Western shore of Case Inlet. 2) Will the project require any work over, in or adjacent to (within 200 feet)the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Yes, the proposal involves drilling six new plies in the tidelands abutting the subject property. See the project plans for details. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. There will be no fill or dredge material placed in or removed from the surface waters. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. Existing surface run-off will continue to follow the upland slope to the beach. The proposed project will not increase runoff. b. Ground: 1 Will ground water be withdrawn or will wafter be discharged to un 9 � rg ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals... agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None. C. Water Runoff(including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff(including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow?Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Existing storm water surface run-off will continue to follow the slope to the beach. The proposed project will not increase runoff. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, or runoff water impacts, if any: None proposed. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: X deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other X evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs X grass X shrubs pasture _crop or grain _wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other _water plants: eelgrass, milfoil _other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? There will be no vegetation removed or altered as part of this project. C. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. No threatened or endangered plants are known to occur on the site. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Several native shrubs and trees exist along the shoreline and will not be removed. S. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals that have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring,shellfish, other. Bald eagles have been observed foraging in Case Inlet. A variety f waterfowl, including America coot, mallard and bufflehead have been observed in the project vicinity. Other birds that may occur and use the area include crows, kingfishers, gulls, great blue heron, and a variety of songbirds. A variety of resident and anadromous fish species may utilize the nearshore areas of the project, including chinook salmon, bull trout, flounders, sculpins &gunnels. b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Federally listed threatened or endangered species observed near the site include chinook salmon bull trout, bald eagles, and marbled murrelets. Several species of juvenile salmon may use the nearshore waters of the project area. There are no known spawning streams for chinook in the vicinity of the project. C. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Juvenile salmonids migrate along the marine nearshore areas. Although the site could be used by migratory waterfowl, no particular habitat characteristics make the site any more attractive to waterfowl than other Puget Sound nearshore locations. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: Project timing and conservation measures will be used to mitigate and minimize impacts to the listed species and their habitat. 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it wHI be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. The existing electrical utility supplying the upland structures will provide power to the proposed pier. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. The project would not affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties. C. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: No measures to conserve energy are included in this proposal. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion,spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. If a spill occurs the US Coast Guard, Washington Department of Ecology, WA Dept of Fish &Wildlife, and Foss Environmental Emergency Response Cleanup Team will be contacted. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: A hazardous spill management plan will be present on the construction barge. Spill cleanup and containment materials will also be on board. Included in the cleanup packets will be containment booms, materials designed to absorb petroleum produces, and plastic bags to be used for material transport. No measures to reduce or control hazards are assumed needed or proposed. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment operation, other)? There are no noise sources in the area that would affect the project. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, and operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from site. Noise impacts from operation of the construction equipment would be limited to weekday hours. This equipment will include a tugboat; barge mounted crane; and hand held power tools. All equipment will operate from a barge with the exception of hand held power tools which will be used in construction of the pier/ramp/float/boatlift. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, N any: To minimize impacts to on local residents most construction will be limited to between lam and 6pm during the workweek. However to accommodate work below water, some work may have to be done in the evening to take advantage of lower tidal levels. Construction would occur during the time of year when salmonids are least likely to be present. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The site includes one single-family residence. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. The site has not been use d for agriculture. C. Describe any structures on the site. There is an existing house and garage on the upland portion of the property. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so,what? No. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Rural Residential. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? 111- Single family residential g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Rural Residential h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. None known. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? No persons would reside or work in the completed project. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? The completed project would not displace any people. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: No measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts are necessary or proposed. I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and project land uses and plans, if any: The proposal is consistent with existing and projected land uses and plans. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Does not apply. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Does not apply. C. Proposed,measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Does not apply. 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? The tallest proposed structure is the float mooring piles with a height that varies from approximately 20'-22' above the tidelands, approximately 6' above MHHW. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? The views from adjacent properties will not be altered or obstructed. The end result will appear just as it is now except that the piling will be steel, not creosote. C. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Landscaping improvements and architectural plans have been designed to provide maximum aesthetic value to the project. 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce?What time of day would it mainly occur? The proposed project may have pier deck lighting that would be on during evening hours only. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No light or glare from the finished project would be a safety hazard or interfere with views. C. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? No offsite sources of light or glare affect this proposal. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: The proposed deck lights are low wattage and they have a cut prism designed to direct lighting downward to dock surface and would not create glare on adjacent properties. 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Waterfront recreation opportunities at the site include boating, swimming, and fishing and beach combing. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No existing recreational uses would be displaced. The proposed project would enhance the opportunities for the residents to access recreational boating and other water related activities. C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: No measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation are needed 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No such places or objects are on or next to the site. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. No landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance are known to be on or next to the site. C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: No measures to reduce or control impacts are assumed necessary or proposed. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe the proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The site is currently accessed from Cronquist Rd. Way. This will remain. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? No public transit. C. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Does not apply. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so; generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, would be needed or required. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. �0N'STgrFo MASON COUNTY o P A o N DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT F o TNU Planning Division i� N y A P O Box 279,Shelton,WA 98584 (360)427-9670 7864 REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION August 30, 2007 LARRY ROBERTS 540 E CRONQUIST ALLYN WA 98524 Parcel No.: 122321400070 Project Description: REBUILD PRF AND ADD ADDITIONAL PILING Dear Applicant: You have submitted a permit application (case no. SEP2007-00130) for proposed construction or development in the county. Upon review of your application, I require additional information to complete the permit review process. Therefore, review of your application will not proceed until the necessary information is provided (see the comment section of this letter for details.) Once the information is submitted and the application is complete, I will continue to process your application accordingly. If the additional information is not provided to the County within 180 days of this request, the application shall expire and no further action on the proposed development shall take place. Please contact me at (360) 427-9670, ext. 577 if you have questions. Sincerely, Ry Crarter Land Use Planner Mason County Planning Department i 8/30/2007 Page 1 of 2 SEP2007-00130 i i i f REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 8/30/2007 Case No.: SEP2007-00130 Comments: Due to the changes in the plans, your project requires the following: 1. Building permit 2. Mason Environmental Permit 3. Habitat Management Plan/Biological Evaluation 4. Substantial Development Permit 5. Pay for Hearings Examiners Fee. I 8/30/2007 Page 2 of 2 SEP2007-00130 The project occurs on the shores of Case Inlet where water transportation may pass by. The proposed project will not use rail or air transportation. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. No vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts. No measures to are necessary or proposed. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: Ire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. The project would not result in an increased need for public services. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. No measures are necessary or proposed. 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: 1 i natural ems, gas, water, refuse service,,telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. Private well water. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service and the general construction activities on the site or In immediate vicinity, which might be needed. No new utilities will be required for the completed project. Existing utility providers will supply pier with electricity and water. C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: od"4� Date submitted: -7