The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutDDR2006-00342 for BLD2006-01861 - DDR Application - 10/31/2006 i DID MASON COUNTY OCT 16 2006 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT MASON COUNTY 411 N. Fifth Street/P.O. Box 186, Shelton WA 98584 NTY 360.427.9670 ext. 352 Rec'd by Request for Administrative Variance for Reduction in the Required Setbacks ($90.00) For administrative review, the minimum variance on a setback request is 5 feet from the side yard lot lines and 10 feet for front and rear lot lines or any access easement. Request for further reduction requires a standard variance. Setbacks are measured from the furthest projection of the structure, including roof eaves. 2.6bb--� Applicant/Owners: eA-v i- oe:� U/ere" Mailing Address: o2/6 A'e'A-)Telephone : P \S90— 02-7�03,9 7 /&-s e- 364-- V-.,F9-9-'I47 City: State: Zip: PW rdV- If this reduction is tied to a building permit, please give permit case number. BLD Parcel Number(s): 961336.Sa 0601 O It 64(j Zoning k'R-,5 Site Address: 01, c� UJ Requested varianc ev Rear CSideYar (please circle all that apply) Requested setback variance: ZQ/ ft. r An illustrated site plan is required. Your site plan must show the following: north arrow, abutting street or easements, set backs to all property lines and existing buildings, slopes, surface water, wetlands, critical areas, septic, well and driveway. Show all proposed new development. The following circumstances must apply: FRONT AND OR REAR YARD REQUIREMENTS: 1) Existing lots of record as of March 5, 2002; You must meet one of the following: (Please circle all that apply) 2 One he following exists on the lot: a stee slopes wetlands, or streams present; soils that restrict building or septic development; c) lot width at the front yard line of no more than 50 feet; 8LeXiStin lotsie ofno more than one-fourth acreg improvementsofbuildings, eptic systems and well areas. ANNINGTACTORMS\DDR.doe Created on 03/07/2006 15:58:00 a SIDE YARD REQUIREMENTS: 1) Existing lots of record as of March 5, 2002; You must meet one of the following. (Please circle all that apply) 2-1 One of the following exists on the lot: qa- teM opes wetlands, or streams present; so restrict building or septic development; t t width at the front yard line of no more than 50 feet; t size of no more than one-half scre- xisting improvements of buildings,EF�� and well areas. Explain how these circumstances preclude a reasonable development proposal from meeting the setback standard for Rural Residential 2.5, 5, 10, or 20 zones. I A1,40TYiTY m��% ��> � Ld�c�z7��"�rr.* �ia•� $o iUW� T � T—, O FO,& �C/^o,u 7 .Co 7 ,41A'4- CD N CS AAII AJ lA 06wAl 7D 77/e X,0340&z>.utr o 44t/W .C41ee, 'rAIS AlIe4 /S -Me Dine X&VS 41ee Qv1e&Vw - C�i o�►�/Si�� C NSyd 1)/',f1AJ ri4Ld 2��a&J f"12�C7��c ® Preips&Z J /AeVG7v9e_ JOe't-f `IIjAeL eyae. &E Vexel e'&Xe TD / erlx-11A*/4jir ,d/-1A,64VA'Y, w/ss! To )Paxll ,S;9 aeryee .t/e 66vew- _M#AJ S` �,►�,5 ,NG S lb Y4*D 4AD*7 A/Ntd_ 7d Tht'"Ae ;� TZ Azre 45�j)_oe_�!�� Owner/Agent (please indicate) Signature and date Official Use Only Approved Date ('G 3/ b Denied Date Reason for denial: j IAPLANNINGTACTORMSWRAoc Created on 03/07/2006 15:58:00 I (1 1/1 612006)Charles McCoy III - Mr. McCo R. ~ , Page 1 l f From: Allan Eaton To: Charles McCoy III; Dave Clevenger Date: 11/16/2006 7:12 AM Subject: Mr. McCoy, Mr. McCoy, Dave Clevenger met with Mr Veirala ?, Haven Drive, to look at the proposed variance after our initial negative response . Public Works now has no objections or conditions for this request. I apologize if the transmittal of this information wasn't received by the appropriate personnel in the DCD. Thank You Allan Eaton Allan L. Eaton II Assistant Road Operations & Maintenance Manager Phone: (360) 427-9670 Extn. 784 Fax: (360) 427-8448 Email: AllanE@co.mason.wa.us Mail To: P.O. Box 1850 Shelton, WA 98584 i i i e I i RE: VARIANCE FOR 2161 HAVEN WAY This property has an easement across the front that provides access to two adjacent lots to the North of this property. The property is also in a depression that limits sight distance to the South and has a 90 degree comer on the North side of the property. There is an existing cross-culvert that exits on the North Comer of the property. Cars exiting the garage would have to back onto the county road. This variance would interfere with ROW maintenance,any future expansion,and would create a hazard to traffic traveling Haven Way. The set back along the North property line would not be a problem,but the variance and access along the county ROW are denied for the above stated reasons. David L.Clevenger f' Road Supervisor Dist.#2 Mason County Public Works fu d CKw 0 J'z C4. RE: VARIANCE FOR 2161 HAVEN WAY This property has an easement across the front that provides access to two adjacent lots to the North of this property. The property is also in a depression that limits sight distance to the South and has a 90 degree corner on the North side of the property. There is an existing cross-culvert that exits on the North Corner of the property. Cars exiting the garage would have to back onto the county road. This variance would interfere with ROW maintenance,any future expansion,and would create a hazard to traffic traveling Haven Way. The set back along the North property line would not be a problem,but the variance and access along the county ROW are denied for the above stated reasons. ' David L. Clevenger Road Supervisor Dist.#2 Mason County Public Works I I r R i E q t , o d CKw f to 2l� v 11 � C4 (11/1/2006)Ch are ll Holcomb Question Received from the Mason County Website- Page 1 From: <paulvierela@msn.com> To: <BarbarR@co.mason.wa.us> Date: 10/26/2006 10:15 PM Subject: Question Received from the Mason County Website- From: Paul Vierela Dept Sent To: Building Dept Message: RE: Denial of RAP 2006-00493 and DDR 2006-00342 Please Pass this to Chuck. Mr. Clevenger, I received the denial for the RAP in the mail this evening. I have additional information for you to take into consideration and wish to meet with you (if possible)at the property address at your first convienience to go over the below listed items. 1. After clearing the lot of interference and being able to take more accurate measurements, I find that the front lot line set back can now be increased to 13 feet along the ROW to NE Haven Way. Any vehicle backing out of this garage can easily back onto the existing easement access servicing the other two lots to the North and not be required to back onto NE Haven Way as discussed in your letter. 2. 1 disagree that this variance creates a traffic hazard. As it stands,the existing access to 2161 NE Haven Way provides very limited visibility to the South. The existing speed limit is 10 mph begining approximately 110 feet to the South of the existing access. This RAP actually allows for an increase in the line of sight distance(and reaction time)to oncoming traffic from the South and greatly improves visability and reaction time to oncoming traffic from the North. Additionally, the foundation of the garage is elevated. The structure will be to grade with NE Haven Way(as measured from the existing access). This in itself, improves the the North/South line of sight while exiting the garage. The depression discussed in your letter would not be a factor. 3. Assuming an increase of the front lot line variance by approximately three feet(13 feet overall)and the depth of the garage being 30 feet, I see no reason for this RAP to interfere with ROW maintenance or any future expansion. Vehicles will not be required to be parked in a manner which would cause any interference. 4. 1 am unable to shift the structure any further toward the rear lot line (West)due to the existing drainfield setback of 10\'. I can be reached at 360-286-9407 M-Th 8:00-5:00 and at home on Friday\'s at 360-277-0327. Sincerely, Paul G.Vierela (11/1/2006)Charell Holcomb- Fwd: Question Received from the Mason Count VVebsite- Page 1*'. From: Dave Clevenger To: Allan Eaton; Barbara Robinson; Charles McCoy III Date: 10/31/2006 6:25 AM Subject: Fwd: Question Received from the Mason County Website - Attachments: Question Received from the Mason County Website - Barb, Dave Clevenger met with Mr Vierela on 10-27-2006 about P/W denial of his variance.They came to a resolution and P/W now has no objection to this variance request. This correspondance is from Allan Eaton,Mason Co. P/W. II