Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRESTAURANT OFFICE BUILDING - SEP Determinations THORNTON LAND SURVEYING P. O. Box 249 GIG HARBOR, WASHINGTON 98335 1 lusiw�ss _ a33-9S« RtsIDINC. _ a38-3695 RESTAURANT: ALLYN, MASON COUNTY WASHINGTON LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 3 AND 4 IN BCOCK 72, EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE EAST 80.00 FEET THEREOF; LOT 5 TO 10, BOTH INCLUSIVE, BLOCK 72 WITH THE VACATED WEST 10.00 FEET OF SHERWOOD AVENUE ADJOINING SAID LOTS ON THE EAST. ALL IN THE PLAT OF TOWN OF ALLYN, MASON COUNTY WASHINGTON ACCORDING TO THE RECORDED PLAT THEREOF IN THE OFFICE OF THE AUDITOR FOR SAID COUNTY AND STATE, VOLUME 1 OF PLAT IN PAGE 17. TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN It is understood that the On-Site Sewage Disposal System is contingent upon careful construction in conformance with plans and specifications submitted by Thornton Land Surveying, Inc. to Mason County Environmental Health Department. 1 . I, the undersigned, my assigns and successors are aware the On-Site Sewage Disposal System drainfield has a limited life without reasonable care and maintenance. 2. That, Thornton Land Surveying, Inc. recommended using the Ecological Developers Incorporated Grease Extractor and Grease Extractor Sump (Model 800% N"= - -- -- -+ + r } 3. I agree not to hold the Mason County Environmental Health Department nor Thornton Land Surveying, Inc. liable in any event that the On-Site Sewage Disposal System fails to operate and agree to make any necessary repairs in conformance with the latest regulation of Mason County Environmental Health Department. SIGNATURE State of Washington ) County of -Pierce ) ss On this the y day of �yL , 1980, before me the _ undersigned Notary Public, personally app ared Al Sether, known -to' me to be the person whose name has been subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged that he executed the same for the purposes herein contained. In witness whereof, I hereunto set my hand and official seal. Thomas Morris J ., ,Notary Public TO: Applicant Irene Davis, Port of Allyn Glenn Gayton, Chief Civil Deputy, Department of Transportation Mason County Sheriff's Department Department of Ecology Richard Knight, F.D. #5, Allyn ofSocial & Health Services Dick Thompson, P.U.D. #3, MASON COUNTY Ae,t. ason County Health Department P.O. Box 490, Shelton Mason County Public Works Planning & Com- FINAL DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE Mason County, Fire Marshal munity Affairs Agency Description of proposal Construction of a restaurant/office building ( 7,000 square feet total). Proponent A M. Sether, Sether Construction P. 0. Box 218 Gig Harbor, Washington 98335 Location of Proposal Allyn adjacent to SR 3. Lead Agency Mason Regional Planning Council This proposal has been determined to not have 'a significant adverse impact upon the environment. An EIS is not required under RCW 43.21C.030 (2)(c) . This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Responsible Official James E. Connolly Position/Title Planning Director Date July 30, 1980 S i gnature � I � I I ' � r I i i July 25, 1980 TO: Planning Department FROM: Mason County Fire Marshal's Office - Victor D. Paolino i SUBJECT: Proposed Construction - Restaurant/Office Building Sether Construction The evaluation of Public Fire Proeection takes into account many factors, one of which is density. We feel that further development in the Lakeland Village area and the commercial strip in Allyn without the benefit of an approved hydrant system will severely impact on the ability of the fire protection district to provide adequate suppression services. This condition may adversely affect the cost of fire insurance in the area and the fire district's present insurance rating. This office recommends the following: 1. Reference: Fire Dist. #5 letter dated July 23, 1980, that a fire hydrant be provided " requested, its location by approval of the Fire Chief. 2. That the developer in this project participate in developing proposals to mitigate the area's fire control and suppression impacts. VDP:sh I it i I I I i i A fA i T � � >i+'.•se :4_ .9+'�r.$:� .:a�:' t k a��,` *uR�.v, t"' :fir,;„- XY" �+. X - � July lo, 1980 } To: Agencies with Environmental Review Status From: Mason Regional Planning Council Staff Re: Environmental Checklist Evaluation For: A. M. Sether Sether Construction P. 0. Box 218 Gig Harbor, Washington 98335 Project: Construction of a restaurant/office building (7,000 square feet - 2 stories). Location: Allyn, Washington, on State Highway 3. The following comments are made on the above referenced commercial project, see Section II of checklist. } (1) Earth (b)(c) Grading, paving and overcovering of the soil would result in change of ground surface relief. (3) Water (b) The proposal would result in changes in absorp- tion rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff, due to increased impervious surface area resulting from parking pavement and the actual building itself. Surface } water and storm water runoff should be contained on-site. (4) Flora (c) The proposal would result in introduction of new species of flora into the area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species. Landscaping and vegetative buffers to diminish usual impacts r , coming from the office/restaurant complex and its associated parking areas is recommended. Landscaping of this centrally located proposal will enhance the project and add to the pleasant Allyn community experience. (7) Light and Glare The proposal will result in light and glare from the building because the restaurant will 'most likely be open in the evenings. Increased traffic generated because of the project will increase light and glare on SR-3 which will affect surrounding residential uses along the traffic corridor. Parking lot and exterior building lighting will also add to impacts. � kry (8) Land Use The existing vacant grocery in Allyn in front of Lakeland Village Shopping Center is the site of the proposed restaurant/office complex. Linear mixed use development along SR-3 characterizes Allyn. The immediate site is already commit- ted to commercial development with the shopping complex behind the site providing a focus when driving through the community. A vacant lot and residential dwelling are directly south of the -A. E"C ;Es:_`!V E u i 1980 Glenn Gayton, Chief Civil Deputy, Date July 10, 1980 , Mason County Sheriff's Dept. Richard Knight, F.D. #5, Allyn / Dick Thompson, PUD #3, P. 0. Box 490, Shelton Mason County Health Dept. To: ' Irene Davis, Port of Allyn Mason County Public Works Dept. "Dept. of Transportation Fire Marshal -Dept. of Ecology - Planning & Community Affairs -Dept. of Social & Health Services Agency Re: Proposed Declaration of Non-Significance For: A. M. Sether, Sether Construction P. 0. Box 218 _Gia Harbor, Washington 98335 Project: Construction of a restaurant/office building - 7,000 square feet total. Mason County, upon reviewing an environmental checklist and other data within its files, is issuing a Proposed Declaration of Non-Significance for the above referenced project (copy enclosed) . Attached is an environmental checklist and description of the project. If there are no objections within 15 days to the proposed declaration, a final declaration of non-significance will be made on July 25, 1980 . Sin erely, James E. Connolly Mason Regional Planning Director Enclosures Introduction: The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Chapter 43, 21C, RCW, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both f'or' their owit'actions and when licensing private proposals. The Act also requires that an EIS be prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to help the agen- cies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major ; action. Please answer the following questions as completefy' as you' can,with the information presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe an. explanaCiori would be helpful to government decision makers, include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages -if necessary . You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are relevant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions will help all agencies involved with 'your proposal to undertake the required environmental review without unnecessary j delay. . The following questions apply to your total proposal, not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though com- pletion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow ail of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environ- mental review now, without duplicating paperwork in the future. NOTE: This is a standard form being used by all state and local Igenn cies i es n the State of Washington for various types of proposals. y of the questions may not a�pl , to your proposal. If a question does not apply, just answer it $no ' and continue on to the next question. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM I BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent A.M. Sether Sether Construction i... 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: PO Box 218 Gig Harbor, WA 98335 — - 857 121 3. Date Checklist Submitted 6/1Q/8� - 4. Agency Requiring Checklist Mason Regional Planning coune.il 5. Name' of Proposal, if applicable:Allyn WA 6. Nature and Brief Description of the Proposal (including but not limited to its size; general design elements,and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature) : Restaurant and cocktail lounge on upper floor (3500 sq, ft. Office spaces on lower floor- ( Q^ ft Parkinz areas and landscaping for above fan-11 it IPQ — NOTE: To cover the Envirovnmental Review, a check for $30, made payable, to the Mason Regional Planning Council, should accompany the Checklist at time of submittal. , -1- 7 . Location of Proposal (describe the physical. setting of the pro- posal, as well as the extent of the land area affected by arty' environmental impacts, including any other information n6ed4i- to give an accurate uncerstanding of th6 environmental sett� na\ of the proposal) : Gradual sloping vacant property ( 1401 x 240 1 ated at th SW corner of State Htway 14-A and Evans Ave. . in the Town of Allyn, Washington Sec 20, T22 RjW all in MAnn County. ._. ` 8 . Estimated Date for Completion of the Proposal: 4 to 6 months after hermits 9. List of all Permits, 'Licenses or Government Approvals Required for the Proposal (federal, state and local--including. rezones) : Mason County Health Dept. Mason County Building Dept. Permit 10. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or furi-'.: ther activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain: NO 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain: NO 12 . Attach any other application form that has been completed re- garding the proposal; if none has been completed, but is expec- ted to he filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: NONE IL, EN�TIRON�iENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes'' and "maybe" answers are required) Yes Maybe No (1) Earth. Will the proposal result in: (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? X (b) Disruptions, displacements, com- paction or overcoveririg of the soil? X (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief features? X (d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? X (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? X (f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in silta- tion, deposition or erosion which may • modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? Explanation: Site wil be regraded to accomedate building and parking areas Site drainage will be engineered . , -2- (2) Air. Will the proposal result in: Yes Maybe No (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? X (b) . The creation of objectionable odors? X (c) Alteration of a-ir movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? X Explanation: (3) water. will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in currents, or the course pr direction of water movements, in -either marine or fresh waters? X (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface dater runoff? X (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? X (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? X (e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? X (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception. of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? X (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct in- jection, or through the seepage off leachate, phosphates, detergents, waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? X (i) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? X Explanation: Runoff patterns will be changed at locations of building roof and hard surface areas on the site , -3- (4) Flora. Will the proposal result in: Yes Aiaybe No (a) Change in the diversity of Species, or numbers of any species of flora (in- cluding trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microf lora and aquatic plants) ? _, (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique,- rare or endangered species of flora? _x (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? . X (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? X Explanation: Some minor landscaping will be included on, the site (5) Fauna. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals, in- cluding reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or micro- fauna) ? X (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? X (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a X barrier to the migration or movement pf fauna? (d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? X $xplanation: (6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? X Explanation: (7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? X Explanation: Some exterior lighting on,_building and in parkingareas . -4- Yes Maybe No (8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? X Explanation: Property to now vacant and unused (9) Natural Resources. Will the pro- posal result in: (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? X (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? x Explanation: (10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? X Explanation: . (11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? explanation: dousing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? X Explanation: (13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: (a) Generation of additional vehictlar movement? X (b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? X -5- (c) Impact upon existing transportation Yes Maybe No systems? (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? X (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? X (f) Increase in traffic hazards to. motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedest- rians? X Explanation: Restaurant Ec Office Bldg. will cause a add Itional automobile_ traffic--an on r as required by existing ordnances (14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon,or result in a Alseed for new or altered governmental *..:jervices in any of the following areas: (a) Fire protection? _ (b) Police protection? X (c) Schools? (d) Parks or other recreational facilities? X (e) Maintenance of public facili- ties, including roads? X (f) Other governmental services?. X Explanation: Additional protection if needed will be determined by e appropriate agencies or authorities . (15) Erierg . Will the proposal result in: (a) Use of substantial amounts of .fuel or energy? _X (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the develop- ment of new sources of energy? _X Explanation: (16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: (a) Poi.=er or natural gas? X (b) Communications systems? X -6- Yes Maybe No (c) Water? (d) Sever or septic tanks? X (e) Storm water drainage? X (f) Solid waste and disposal? X Explanation: New systems will be entineered to meet the demands of the new buildings . -go—problems are anticipated .' (17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health) ? X Explanation: (18) Aesthetics . Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal re- sult in the creation of an' aesthetically offensive site open to public view? X Explanation: i (19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the duality or quantity of existing X recreational opportunities: Explanation: i (20) Archeological/Historical. the proposal result in an alter- ation of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, . object or building? X r- i Explanation: III. SIGNATURE I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance tiat it might issue in reliance upon this checklist s ould there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack ful disc sure on my part. Proponent: / -7- site. To the north is Lakeland Drive, a primary collector acces- sing residences in Lakeland Village Subdivision. A tire store and fire district #5 are sited to the north. The Jolly Tavern is directly accross the highway from the site. An addition of a restaurant/office will serve to attract more tourists and commuters to Allyn for meals while enjoying the charm of Allyn. An office building, assuming it shall be for professional uses, could be a community asset which would attract a stronger economic base in the area and enable the Allyn commun- ity to have the option of staying closer to home for professional services. (11) Population The Allyn community has a suitable population base to support the proposal. The Belfair - Allyn area has experienced growth increases of about 8% annually since 1974. (Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Company.) The addition of this office/restaurant will generate more people in Allyn while they use the services being provided. Depending on hours and type of restaurant and offices the population will vary. (13) Transportation/Circulation The Mason County Parking Ordinance requires 1 parking space/200 square feet for restaurants. Which equals 18 spaces for this 3,500 square foot restaurant. Professional offices require one space/150 square feet which equals 23 spaces for this 3,500 square foot office space. A minimum of 2 handicap spaces must be provided. A total of 53 spaces are necessary. The proposed site plan identifies 43 parking spaces. 6 of the 43 spaces are shown in a parking area which is used by the Lakeland Village Shopping Center, also. The existing site plan identifies 2 access points onto the site. The first is off SR-3. The second accesses to the existing private driveway to the Shopping Center. A more reasonable alternative to the SR-3 access would be to provide access off of Lakeland Drive thereby decreasing potential circulation bottlenecks and traffic hazards on SR-3. Re-design of the parking area would be necessary to enable this re-design to occur. The parking ordinance also requires on-site retention of surface water, paving and sight obscuring vegetative screening from residential uses as well as landscaping. Planting native shrub and tree species would enhance the visual appeal of the development and invite passerbys to stop and visit the complex. Especially important would be the type and design of landscaping adjacent to SR-3. It would be necessary to limit the height of buffering so as not to decrease traffic visability in the area, yet soften the visual parking impacts associated with the proposal. (14) Public Services The proposal will require fire flow and protection as well as police protection. Fire District #5 is located in Allyn and would answer any fire emergency. The Mason County Sheriff's Department would be answering to any police emergency. (15) Energy PUD #3 out of Belfair would be. providing electricity for this proposal. Water would be provided by Allyn Center Shopping Center System. A community septic tank drainfield sewage system would be utilized which would probably necessitate a community maintenance agreement.