HomeMy WebLinkAboutGRD2005-00006 - GRD Permit / Conditions - 4/28/2005 LAND MO pIF MASON COUNTy
APP ►CA TI ON P PERMIT No_
GR
LICgNT Shell n 360 427.g670 Self, 360 205gOX 186-JrERMIT
Owner��,n r I ORMATIO426 W. APPLIC
Cailing AddreS t'al y 4467 Elma 360 WA 98,84 A TION
Y `> S T 482 526g
Phone , State dory e . Co IV TRACTOR INFattle 206 4s4-s968
Lien/?rfle Hot Contractor Na ORIWATION
Address der Other phI j� COde9�5,� Mailing Address
Cit r'� Lit yl
b U YI I
ENGIN Ph. f- 75-�Q State r? -r I� T
EER INFORM ntractor R�Other p ZtP Code
Name ATION Expiration 9. #
Address i h.(, r, ,•,7,�_� ,ter
� �F
PARCEL INFO Phone
Legal pescriptio MATION_12 di
Site Addres n a� 9it�a arc No 1 State
Directio s(Incluge street n
ns to site: 22 0 / 7 �ZiP Code
�n ame and tit
Will timber � -t-- 3 o Y �/ '--�v s p
fS be Fire
Lake Your Property within sold in Parcel District
n 200'of the Preparation? ( �ur'v
Bltlffs� River/Creek follow. es/No r
Soft Pond _ 9: BodyW -
compresslb ele/ soils �VVedanq ater(Name)
>rf'
TYPE OF -Seasonal Runoff Size ofarea to beExcavation Stream Saltwater
Descri cleared on slopes Filling E Slopes or
be Work
- E _ over 10o�Gradin9
Total size of
LAND MODIFICATION IIVFOR C Estimated am area
obict X 2
Yards U
Will fill be brow NATION 5O
NiII excavated brought on site?
>oes fill c materials If Yes, source
contain potential hazar n off e take r
as a soils report been
dour site? If yes, des in Z 2 YES
111 proposal re n Completed O materials? ation 3 NO
d work t in redirection of n site? I f yes -7
111 propose , include
11 quality ua k alter where stormany surface water de COPY.
'1 runoff q ntity or veto water runoff
the be collected/co Clty Of storm/ °r ground onto adjacent AQ
land be re ntrolied b ground water be ter enters Properties?
Planted upon Y interceptors altered? °r exits the site? O
e site the roposal result i completion9 curtain
within 20 n slopes steeperdrains 0 °f a designated
than or other collection de 0
9nated shoreline?hose currentl devices? p
RUCTIOPERMIT gECO Y On site?
OF C N WORK IS SUSP S NUS( VOID IF
ONTI ❑
ann ON is uOF WO K Its OR
ASAND NED FOOR CO"STRUCTIO
of this Proiect. ate and grants MEANS OF A P R A PERIOGRES OD OF N AUTHORIZED IS
AFFIDAVIT Acknowledgment of such es bvf Ma on CountNSPECr O180 NA The AT ANY IME q�MMENCEp W17HI Ictor Regis{rat certify
nify that 1 am exempt Y signature below access t°the above d r or agent on owner,.,THE WORK IS C So DAYS OR IF ?
requirements f Law RC W t 8.2�and°m the require scribed Pro behalf r OMMENCEp
onfor °f whit his am aware menu of PertY and ePrese th f
m C manor therewith-tPermit is issue are of the Co strut fares for ev the f }
Ig aPProvr No cha d and that ali CONTRACTOR'S MAR
e`1ew and t�
ages shall b work contractor in the AFFIDAVIT- f7r`t/(
e made without ordinance State of I certify that I am c ��
ante require Washi
and all work shall menu re ngton and that I urrer�t�, i
all be gulating the Urea�s I
be made done work f am aware o �a
Date without first o In Conform °r which this obtaining apprval ce therewith. NO cPermit is issued E
iY FOR OFFICIAL USE X hanges shall
aRTM Date E BEYOND THIS p0 Dar
,artmuNTgL REVIEW APPRp-SubmittalAmount Due INT e1
ED DENIED
�artment Receipt No.
CONDITION CODES _
DePartment
Fee
FEES
Site Inspection
Other
Pfe-Paid at Submittal
TOTAL FEES
MASON COUNTY6�00G-Da v(4
LAND MODIFICATION PERMIT
PERMIT NO.: GRD
Shelton 360 427-9670 Belli 360 275 4467 Elma I I APPLICATION
426 W.Cedar/P.O.Box 186,Shelton,WA 98584
APPLICANT INFORMATION Owner r 360 482�269 Seattle 206 464-6968
r�11JYl`' CONTRACTO
Mailing address ,q,,. 5tr '�-101� T�, R INFORMATIpN
City Contractor Na
Phone 71. ,r State Zip Code_ Marling Address �l �:-
Lien/Titl der LY l ft ►
-- -' Other Ph.( � CitY �t r
Address Ph. State
(�)2':5- Zip Code 40(r Other Ph.
Contractor Reg. # _ G
Expiration
ENGINEER INFO
Name RMATION
Address
Phone (�)
PARCEL INFO State
RMATION-12 digit Tax Parcel No. �Zlp Code
Legal Description I _
Site Address(include street na e / 2 S 7�-�
Directions to site: and city Fire District
Will timber be cut and sold in r E
Is your property parcel preparation? r
Lake p perty Within 200, Of the following: (Yes/No)
Bluffs River/Creek pond Body of Water(Name) _
Soft compressible soils Wetland�Seasonal Runoff
Saltwater
� Stream�SlOpeS or
TYPE OF JOB - Excavation
Size of area to be cleared on slop ss over vier g0%
Describe Grading
Work _� Total size of area
QG Estimated amount of cubic IY LU
Yards��_
LAND MODIFICATION INFORMATION
Will fill be brought on site? If yes, source � Y-
Will excavated # YES NO
materials be taken off site? ( 2- 2 q
Does fill contain If es, '43 O 17
Has a soils report potential hazardous materials? destination
p rt been completed on site? ❑ ❑
Will proposal result in redirection of an If Yes, include copy.
Will proposed Y ter or g water runoff onto adjacent Properties? ❑ 1]
Will work alter where storm water or 9
quality, quantity or velocity of storm/ground water be altered? p pertles? ❑ ❑
ground water enters or exits the site?
Will runoff be collected/controlled b ❑
Will the land be replanted upon com let on?ptors, curtain drains or other collection devices? ❑
Will the proposal result in slopes steeper than those current) o
Is the site within 200' of a designated shoreline? 0
Y n site? ❑
NOTICE: THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL&VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION ❑
CONSTRUCTION WORK IS SUSPENDED O
PROOF OF CONTINUATION OF R ABANDONED FORAUTHORIZED IS NOT COM
information provided is accurate aOnd grants employ OF A PERIOD OF 180 D MENCED DAYS e O ANY TIME AFTER THE WITHIN rep
DAgYu$d R I
inspection of this A PROGRESS INSPECTION. The owner or agent E owner's behalf, CO en s
protect. Acknowled employees of Mason Count WORK IS CO
gment of such is b Y access to the above described OWNER AFFIDAVIT-I certify that I am exempt from the re y signature below: property that t e"
P y and struc for2revie (jf�
the Contractor Registration Law RCW 18.27 and am aware of the 4 Vv5
ordinance re requirements of
fy that
requirements for which this permit is issued and that all work CONTRACTOR'S AFFID
Will be done in conformance therewith. contractor in the State of Washington)and that a�ware of the
first obtaining approval. No changes shall be ordinance re uirements regulating the work for Which�� �fs �a made without and all work shall be done in conformance therewith. No changes shall
g
X be made without first obtainin Permit is issued
9 ap roval all
Date X Je
FOR OFFICIAL USE Accepted by ND THIS POINT Date
Date BEYOND
BEYO Amount Due DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW A ED DENIED
Receipt No.
Building Department
Tanning Department CONDITION CODES
'ublic Works Department
'ire Marshal
rading Permit Fee FEES
an Review Fee Site Inspection
blic Works Fee Other
Ration Fee Pre-Paid at Submittal
TOTAL FEES ( )
:� 80
NNNNN N N Z00
Cot�11 Q v�i o v�i O ` ,
� o
� o �1 �
N n-
0 �
8
1
d
RECEIVED
MAR 2 Y 1005 �
6EJ,MR Ort�Cti
A 2
u�
O
A-bE-R C;ZE LANE
W o -lv OLlddv 0
� o A _!S NO 38 01 03dinc 3N Nv1 d ills
x m � 1hJ(14O NOStfb^J
-Z ,a !-
-� :i 's C j C''_
MASON COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Shelton (360) 427-9670
Planning Belfair (360) 275-4467
Mason County Bldg. 1 411 N.5th Elma (360) 482-5269
P.O.Box 279 Shelton,WA 98584
Earl Lincoln
P.O. Box 368
Belfair, WA 98528
September 20, 2004
Dear, Mr. Lincoln,
This letter is in follow up to Eric's concerns about having to leave pileated woodpecker habitat
(snag trees with evidence of woodpecker activity) on the portion of Unit 2 that is slated to be
cleared for a homesite. I've gone back and checked the regulations (Fish &Wildlife Habitat
chapter of the Mason County Resource Ordinance) and basically what it says is that all habitat of
the species listed in the ordinance are to be protected. If someone needs to destroy some habitat
(for good cause) then they must submit a Mason Environmental Permit (MEP) and a Habitat
Management Plan (HMP).
I understand that leaving these snags is a hindrance to the development of Unit 2. However if
you can't live with those snags on the building site, you will need to go through the MEP/HMP
process (which will probably end up recommending relocation of the snags).
I have discussed your case with my manager and this is all the latitude that I can provide you on
this issue. At this point the choice is yours as to which way to go.
Please let me know which option you prefer. Thank you.
Sincerely,
V I .QJL-4�
Michael MacSems
FPA Planner
Cc: Eric Hurd
--------- _
ichael MacSems - Earl Lincoln FPA- Status
Page 1
From: Michael MacSems
To: hurd@hctc.com- Lincoln, Earl
Date: 9/14/2004 5:04:44 PM
Subject: Earl Lincoln FPA Status
Earl & Eric,
Per Eric's call here is an update on the situation with your cutting permit:
I visited the site on September 9th, but haven't had an opportunity to get back to the review until today.
The geo-tech reports look to be pretty complete and I will forward them to Alan Tahja for review before the
end of the day. One might be able to argue that the geo-tech reports address your stormwater
requirements, I will let Alan decide if the documents are adequate in that respect.
I
While the geo-tech report provides building setbacks from the crest of the slope and allows you to cut
trees on the slope as long as the stumps remain in place, it is my job to overlay that information with your
FWHCA (streams) setbacks. You know that there is a Type 4 stream on Unit 2, but you might not be
aware that the "seepage" at the bottom of Unit 1 qualifies as a Type 5 stream.
Unit 1.-
It appears from your maps that you plan to log most of this parcel both for a home site and for views. That
is okay per your geo-tech report, but you need to leave a 75-foot (halo) buffer on the Type 5 stream that is
visible at the bottom of the lot. Before I can issue a SEPA determination this buffer needs to be flagged.
Before any flagging can occur I need to discover were the defined stream channel begins. Given
conditions on site this won't be easy, but if Eric is able to help me with the fieldwork it could save some
time. If you think I am wrong about a typed stream being on this unit, you are welcome to hire a qualified
biologist to make an independent assessment of the situation.
Unit 2
1 understand that you are only planning to log enough ground for a home site and that you will be
concentrating on the northwest corner of the lot. I need to make sure that your cut maintains a 100-foot
buffer on the stream. At this point I am resisting the temptation to ask you to hire a biologist to flag the
buffer and will instead attempt to flag the buffer myself. Although flagging this buffer will be difficult without
a rangefinder. I also observed Pileated Woodpecker habitat on Unit 2. 1 am hoping that the habitat snags
are outside of your cut area, but either way they will need to be left standing.
I will try to return to the site this week, but at this point I don't know which day it will be. If you have any
questions please e-mail me, or call me at ext. 571. Thank you.
Michael MacSems
FPA Planner
CC: MacSems, Michael
U MASON COUNTY
o N PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR/COUNTY ROAD ENGINEER
N Y Shehoq W"W ft 98594
DATE: March 31 S` 2005
INTER-DEPARTMENTAL COMMUNICATIONS
TO: Tami Griffey, PAC—Bldg Inspector
FROM: Alan A. Tahja, P/W- Co. Hydr. Engr. WO#BLD-05
SUBJ' Grading Reviews
NAME: Lincoln GrMdin �ldercreek Lane
GRD2005-00006
Tami,
The grading plan and geotechnical report prepared for the proposed Earl Lincoln grading o
Mason County Tax Parcel No. 12205-75-00030 have been received and reviewed b
Works. y Public
The grading plan and geotechnical report's site plan indicate different locations for the proposed
residence. The location of the final structure is at the applicant's discretion, but should be
p
required to implement the geologist's recommendations into the site's final designs. The
geotechnical report recommends a minimum 20' building setback from the "crest of the slope
(located west of the proposed building location)". P
requirement for permit issuance, and should be applied to anyslopeeon setback
ope ,rtya. made a
manmade, which exceeds a 30% slope. Lesser setbacks should be required o be supported ed by
engineering geologist's confirmation that the lesser setback is acceptable to him. Fills for the
proposed residence will need to comply with the geologist's recommendations for material and
geometry.
Because of the erodible character of the native soils, silt fences or other protective features
should be installed along the lower land disturbing limits prior to commencing clearing or
grading. Erosion and Sediment Control features need to be implemented during constructio
maintained until permanent site stabilization has occurred. n, and
Claimed grading quantities appear to be reasonable and their acceptance is recommended.
Please feel free to contact me at County extension 461 if you have any questions regarding th
comments, or if you feel any features need further discussion or attention. g g ese
Sincerely,
AZ n A. Tahja
File: H:kWPWrading�Lincoln_Aldez-creek Ln.doc
O
C7
N
o D
cCDn 0 O
CD n CA M
CD o r= rn m
�
r 0 0
G) m cmn
Can _> .ZO7 m n 0 r
XZ � nMDrriz
N D OO � COG) � 0 � �
v D
onz � M � z () :* m D
m z can x m °
Q
v' —+ � zm ° Z
D � � Nm D D m C�
CO ° w o D �
0 3 � cn r r O
o D m -n CTI r- 00 Q-
ni - * zp ,Cmj � OZ Mtn C
Cl) m 0 � a x D m p m rn n W Z
m 0 0 o = O zSoc zz0
Wc� � � � D ° D xZ � � mmmz
n a Q _ m `a v w C7 I- m CTIQ
� � ID
o o � CDm � mm Ill
cn v o . Z
a
y D v < m W CA -0 Q .
m m � r- O f
� „ X a O Z „ r- D v
Cl) rn
`° F T v o �
� n
r N CC)
O
-� n 0
v
_ = c, „ C
c
D Z
A ? W W W p M
Z, (O A A M N C) Cl) O
oN o 0 0 o frT1 0 ;o0 Z
o 0 o cri0 0 V, o D co m 0
0 W Ill
z O -� C <
CD � 0D zIrn'
3� x cn�' v> c° � � n G7 �
cn N c" cn
m a =_D fOn
"G)
N o o N 0)o = �a cn F m-
00) CD m 1p
Ill
Z
N N N N
�, o'o' O w c0 z D —I
O O>pN i O Cn Ul O M (D Cn
O <p Cp -�
O>O�O�O>O C/) -I C
0 0 o O O CD
O O M Z
o OC
0 .Z
Cn m
-� F
v � r
cD O D
D
O p
m
[A n
m �
-nm � �
m oU)
1 m m m m
x
° mD vim Wo.
- z x C < o =
m mmm '
D U) 0 o N PO
(D
z O
C7 N N O � rn
o
A )
N N O x v
O O
Co
U1 Ul O W N
0) cn m
N N
O w
N � N
CD I
O
o v (D N X O S x x
_ 7C cn
C) x m cD U) � o o D
°' - ODm
� o (D v (� - 5- °' = 0C
° �\m
C� Q °
cn o o O — i) �-<
4�
cn
° �Qo o cm
DO cn E D p m
0 � 0 � mn (DD 5 9 C 0 -iO� m n o OO o �(Qo 3 c - m D Oo ° � m n p �° coO Dw n E cp
Z cm
� m
a (D =- a M C(D 5 � Z
a) v c oQ -< m z - DFn 0 NCO o ° O cn O co Cn — T X a = o mZ� � o n o m Dcn (D 0
�C) (D O a O
cD c cD c Cto n ° m 3 Z' 3 O mc m O
n —I W a - Q cn CD
m m n O 0 OJzm D
m0 0c 0 x = 0
-0 o v a n I
mOc� p
m i aQ v' s � (Dm ni m 0zQrO —IZ
° o O mz -uQ O
o o m D G000cn o o m lD
(D co
a o m ? 3 p-0 Om mQ _ —
n
r m r
on o � o � z X � -0 zQ7
n = � O
o � � 5 O ° 3 0 a -� Z -� mC � z G) p
p' m O cn �� cD Om0 � Cn
o f � -,o (DD n _0 a) 0 _ �' z 0 0 -.-q 0
a�a0) o0 pc m�D DQ o za m <n o pr 800,
OTczo m
o- - o - o< 0 3a r= G7 O D
D g � O0- Zzm v - ZOx pni? � 0 ai � a o 5 (n (D ODDO0 -4
� o n) one .° z o OZOpm DOD
CD -3 c cD = o p z
° �_ a; -1 mcn � Z z
o ° O� ° � mZ � 0—cn� rcn(D o cn � �
0 E o � W D
0 3 E vco rZzm D
o 0 O rO W CO �
, a D - � mr-
n a) o n2 Co z O0
(D o 3 D W ' � -i
a0 0. s o Q�- 0 mO D CAD
o o a aw ° c�i� C/) 0 � �
m -0 m
n� pDmm
� � (n � _v5m � cn � �
cn c _= n) (n Cy r
co n Q � � Z � m r
5 �
70 D (D `° (D c� Z D o m Tt
O � cn � A CDCQ cn �7nO0 -fin
3 A o � N n � zS Z —I
as - �' � c - cn 000p G) D
cn
N (D CD �� ZZOM � Z
c CL 0 n
° CD
0O ° = Dmzz _n Do ( o N� m
j Q cn O n -< �
c co 0zn< D `D 0 > c O X = zm
m DD 0
`n F 0
o _
° C)
/ 7 \ / z o
/ $ ° °
\ /71 \ -0 / 2 # > es = 2 »
c $ / C \ $ \. / G/ /\ m / \ ± ^ J n m
m aD m f ° m E� / » M (D a \
m > c a m e 2
0 / ƒ Z \ \ (n E
m e e m 2 f G \ § E
& 0
/ / s & > 20 ° yg
= m = Sec = ® / 7
E oe 0 E o E m
\ _ ® 22 ± @.
2, 3 \ 2G2 = m /
mE 2ep & G e
� \ � � z / ® 2 \
/ 7 / / < > 2 ^2 \
R » � /09 7 c
\ / 2 / / / f / 7 ® / m
/ m J0 mmm n e \
ƒ / /c \ / x � x g \ \ 6
5 / f / ? / CT %
} . \ � \ � d% ) \
\
/ 5 � /\
\ / 9 °
] \ \ ¥ g / a a
7 Ao 02 5 _ &
\ \ C / \ > \ f
m j ¥ 95 = ƒ
cc7 $ $ f ° /
0 IDe =
/ \ \ /
C � ƒ / / / / \ /
J J=
w ° / / ƒ \ \ I
c 0 \ } / / /
\ k \ x / / ƒ ( \
/ 8
\ �
j � 0 e / � \
` / \ / / / CD \
ez �a
22 f a
\ / `2 / » )
(D CD % J /
z m a I r E _
CT (DC). / / / / 7
\ 2 . � m \ °
22 3
/ / / 9
( 0 \ / $ 2
\ \ / - <
R / § / / ƒ
t \ / \ _ /
PLn J \\ \ J
m =
co / § m & &
u a) 9 a / _0
0 ° 3 0
= I
CD \ ƒ E \
a) / + \ \
T
/ k 0
e 7