The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSPI2004-00028 - SPI Inspections - 2/8/2004 MASON cOUNTY PLA NNING DEPT. PRE-INSPECTION APPLICATION $205.00FeeR ured PLEASE.PRINT -- Applicant: . N 1: Owner: - - • p c 1. on1 Applicant Address: St S, k Zips$ '`-site Address City: ° day Owner Address: ► t C<n a cE ir.!+l- . STF 3 -1 A Qr/•3� - ---- o y Phone:_( _ - evening F� a++- �Il tJG stI gs! City: day Phone:_(� ) 1 Phone:_( [SL) GR►.j ls0 c.+II l�-i rbef�R� U1tJ��c1R�I .S ,1O4,0A/c 2 Parcel No. .�5'3-s9�- Parcel No. BA It Al /d b;�g��6/GGtt� owe S s �, RANI DMJ SAL TSC �, Plar��er Legal Description: S Ge ', Plan_.Type of Use______ SMP__.—Comp. 5 el 000 0 Water Body i . o NJCc 3, Purpose of Pre-Inspection : e a. 4. Use of Building: roplake❑ river❑ slope❑ saltwater 5. Do any of the following exist on or adjacent to p❑ otr he ❑ m❑strea seasonal creek❑ pond❑ wetland❑ seasonal runoff e.A lcj> a Directions to Site: et „ %' d ` to then Mason County must disclaim any errors resulting from deficiencies in the If the information is incomplete,'n reports remain valid only until development changes occur in the vicinity which original application. Pre-inspection p inspection, or the laws regulating development of the site change after the time o affect.the lot evaluated m this inspection. / Date: a `� 'k Applicant Signatur _�Pl°��c�,✓f rylusf s5 to-tf,e heck cow�wtu��F y lease check here: ��Sroccfr t. 9�GG - _--_ ,----. If you would like to be on site during inspection, p application to: Department of Community Development, Planning Division r 0 Return F13 11 1. P.O. Box 279 Shelton,WA 98584 - -- -- (360)427-9670 i MCCID - l`i �'-iN NO � Treasurer include a $205.00 check or money order payable to Mason County Please Date: When completed,this form becomes part of the parcel fie. Imes: k FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: Accepted by: Please illustrate below the proposed building site in relation to water&property MORE ON BACK SIDE ( � SRGNV.&MY ��St�prelnspection STA MASON COUNTY N. TF C ° DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT o Planning Division N s N z P O Box 279,Shelton,WA 985" N Y boy (360)427-9670 O, 186A Site Inspection February 25, 2004 KIM. SARAH. MD TRUSTEE 1317 MEDICAL DR STE 3 FEYETTEVILLE NC 28304 Case No.: SP12004-00028 Parcel No.: 121195700030 Project Description: RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT Dear Applicant Pursuant to your application,a site pre4nspection (SPI)was performed on your property. Below you will find comments made regarding the proposed development and its critical values. cases,setbacks for development from shorelines, steepIsla pastreams,f the omment listed t In some proposal;these setbacks are inc be included in your specific prop below. information is based on County and State regulations as they exist to date. These regulations This inform development of the subject property. may change and may affect the requirements for developm -9670,ext.286 if you have questions. Please contact me at(360)427 Sincerely, Scofanecker Land Use Planner Department Mason County Planning SP12004-00028 1 of 3 2/25/2004 SKe Inspection Case No.: SP12004-00028 2/25/2004 Comments: Pre-inspection for the Johnson's: The purposed of the pre-inspection was to evaluate issue cant shorelines related to possible future residential development of a lot. Rural Residential 5 zoning zoning designation.5foot front yard setbalckn and 20 setbacks for this zoning are a foot side and rear yard setback. The exception� t�ntth,s'case lots s de less than one acre and under 100 ft no yard setbacks are equal to 10% of the lot above gidthrade less than es feet. These setbacks are measured fromappurtenances, including heat tu such as roof overhangs, and other pumps etc. Front yard setbacks may bee uced a variance process to a minimum of 10 feet if necessary through an adminiwrat Other setbacks and buffers can app yhen critical areas are present such as streams, wetlands, steep slopes etc. The shoreline designation for the area is Rural. Property description: This small lot, roughly second growth trees 99 feet deep is well vegetated with m and under canopy vegetation. A green belt surrounds the property on the shore side. There is to constructan existing la single-family eared area o the rear of the property large eno g he West side of the residence. A small, type 5 stream runms ne are defined as seasonal, property into Case Inlet. Type 5 strea non-fish bearing streams, although the lower, tidally n flu n by portion of the stream likely gets some foraging, 9 he fis h thou h non were observed during the site visit. the hatur portion of the stream has a relatively short run due istoric development (paving) of the area. Much of the hydrology is supplied by surrounding storm et�ands,er features, which generally drain remaining pockets of forested w towards the shoreline and small ravine adjacent Ordinance, section property. Per the Mason County Resource 17.01.110, type 5 streams require a 75-foot vegetated buffer, plus 15-foot building setback (90-feet total) measured ne, which ever is ordinary high water mark or cfrom the hannel migration larger. Shoreline Master Shorelines I streProgram (SMP), the amsst UnderthisCounty shoreline setback in case would be or determined by an average setback sholreline� The home to the adjacent homes due to the extreme curvature of the East was measured at 67-feet from the shoreline est was measured at water mark (OHWM), and the home to t 41-feet from the OHWIM for an average shoreline setback of SPI2004-00028 2 of 3 2125/2004 Site Inspection Case No.: SP12004-00028 2/25/2004and 54-feet on the subject All obervhangs, decks,grade stru pumps etc. appurtenances including roof would need to be located landward of this shoreline A greater setback is required from the adjacent type5 stream est of the subject Property. associated with the small inlet to the Wrox mate the location of the Two measurements were taken to app e 5 stream. It g0-foot buffer/ setback from the OHWM of the typ appears that the go-foot buffer/ setback encumber 25 feet in width the majority of l the subject lot, leaving only approximately outside of the buffer/ setback whitadjusting ould be difficult to develop side yard setbacks. It appears that ' the subject lot without necessitatingOne of the next steps n ce from these evaluating stream buffer and setback standards. this property, however would be to develop of a professional site plan of the property with the assistance surveyor, identifying the location of the stream, shoreline andThrough required buffer and setbacks relative be morepaccur to property evaluated to this process the property determine whether there might be andlotto determine howfficint area to cmuch home without requiring a variance of a variance may be needed. Slopes: Slopes trend down towards the shoreline 15%, however and stream they from the front of the lot. Slop Y are marginal in terms of requiring geological in elevation es sight down to chnical evaluation, because the difference that any the beach area (8 - 12 feet approx.). it does not appear geological work would be necessary, however this may be partially determined by how close to slopes a structure would be proposed. No other critical areas were identified o ksitte. If you have any questions please feel free to call. Than y ou SP12004-00028 3 of 3 2/2512004 HARTSTENE POINTE MAINTENANCE ASSOCIATION A communitY on Harstine Island 202 Pointes Drive East Shelton,WA 98584 April 8,2004 Scott Longanecker Mason County Senior Planner 411 N. 5'St.,Bldg I Shelton,WA 98584 Dear W.Longanecker: of Lot 30 addition 10 at 789 E Chesapeake Dave, Regarding your pre-inspectioncould possibly clarify the property status. Hartstene Pointe,and the following information drain s stem installed when Hartstene Pointe�'"as developed Drive East into A planned storm y to carry rain water from 1970's,included large culverts design of the lagoon. This is not a natural stream ad, waasin o Puget by the the back of emptying run construction crew to serve the Purpose Hoping this will remedy any need for a variance request in order to build on the Property- Hoping Hartstene Pointe Maintenance Association Robert S.Rabourn Manager c: Jeff Geibel Wait Tupper Andrew Marzahl MASON COUNTY Shelton (360)427-9670 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Belfair (360) 275-4467 Planning Elma (360)482-5269 Mason County Bldg.1 411 N.5th P.O.Box 279 Shelton,WA 98584 April 12,2004 Robert S. Rabourn Harstene Pointe Maintenance Associatio 202 Pointes Dr E Shelton WA 98584 RE: Parcel# 12119-57-00030,789 E Chesapeake Dr. Dear Mr.Rabourn, I have reviewed your letter dated April 8,2004 along with other available maps and information. It is clear that this area was altered as a result of the site development which occurred in 1970's,however the overall morphology of the drainage and shoreline and other factors indicate that this drainage would still be regulated at minimum as a type 5 stream by the Mason County Resource Ordinance. The stream contains a natural open channel connected to a higher order surface water body. Although the road ditches were dry at the time of the site visit,the stream was still running,which indicates probable ground water discharge,which would be considered a natural source. An aerial photo from a 1940's soil survey of Mason County seems to indicate very similar morphology as currently exists,including a small channel in the same location. If it were clear that the stream was entirely man made and water supplied to the channel were only from road runoff it may be considered an unregulated drainage,however the information I have reviewed and observed indicates otherwise. Thank you for your time and attention. Sincerely, Scott n ecker, Senior Planner Mas unty DCD Phone 360 427-9670 ext. 286 Cc: Walt Tupper