The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMEP2003-00041 Well Installation - MEP Permit / Conditions - 7/10/2003 �PyoN-c ATFo 4 MASON COUNTY �N DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY r o T Z DEVELOPMENT N � " goy Planning Division 1864 P O Box 279,QQS��hellt--on, 0WA 98584 MA��N% IRONMENTAL PERMIT July 23, 2003 ALAN STRANGE 700 E CATFISH LAKE RD SHELTON WA 985.84 Parcel No.: 321347590213 Issued: 7/23/2003 Case No.: MEP2003-00041 Proiect Description: Well installation in preparation for home construction in a wetland buffer (30 feet from wetland edge). In addition to well house constructed approximately 80 feet from wetland edge. The followinq critical areas are present on this property: Long-Term Commercial Forest xAquatic Management Areas Ch. 17.10.060; Ch. 17.01.110; Mineral Resource Lands Frequently Flooded Areas Ch. 17.01.066; Ch. 17.01.090; Inholding Lands Landslide Hazard Areas Ch. 17.01.062; Ch. 17.01.100; XWetlands Seismic Hazard Areas Ch. 17.01.070; Ch. 17.01.102; Critical Aquifer Recharge XErosion Hazard Areas Ch. 17.01.080; Ch. 17.01.104. This permit,with conditions, is granted pursuant to the Mason County Resource Ordinance (Chapter 17.01 MCC.) Nothing in this permit shall excuse the applicant from compliance with any other federal, state, or local statutes, ordinances, or regulations applicable to this project. This permit may be rescinded if the permitee fails to complete the project as proposed or fails to comply with the standards of this ordinance. � �J31d3 to I Mason Environmental Permit 7/23/2003 Case No.: MEP2003-00041 Conditions: 1.) All construction and demolition debris must be removed from the site after project comple' n. Proper disposal of construction debris must be on land in such a manner that debri n t enter or cause water quality degredation. x 2.) Temporary erosion control measures must be implemented to prevent water quality degradation of adjacent waters or wetlands. Silt fencing must be installed and maintained until u mz�r ation has become established. x 3.) All upland areas disturbed or newly created by construction activities shall be seeded, vegetat ive an equivalent type of erosion protection (silt fencing or straw matting). x .7, 4.) The aookant acknowledges that the project will be completed as proposed, so that the project will be conMwit all applicable standards of the Mason County Resource Ordinance.;)'—' /��((,� 5.) Approyjp�r,�iimensions and setbacks on submitted site plan. 6.) Silt fenci should be placed around the drilling site to prevent slurry from reaching the lake. 61CIV x 7.) Proper erosion and sediment control practices must be used on the construction site and adjacent areas to prevent upland sediments and slurry from entering shoreline waters. Erosion control measures must be in place prior to any clearing, grading or construction. These control measures must be effective to prevent soil from being carried into surface water by stormwater runoff. Any discharge of sediment laden runoff or other pollutants to waters of the state is in violation of Chapter 90.48 RCW Water Pollution Control and WAC 173-201 ater Quality Standards for Surface Waters of the State of Washington and is subjec oement action. x 8.) Disturbance to the wetland buffer should remain at the minimum extent possible. Areas disturW- c aring, grading or construction should be replanted with native vegetation. x------ ------------------------------------------- 9.) Construction vehicle access shall be limited to one route. Access points shall be stabilized to minimize erosion and disturbance to vegetation. No machinery shall be allowed fo of proposed well site towards shoreline. (�, � `� �,,,,�b�)a'��►s �araoo3 X 10.) Work m t be-done in the dry to helpprevent disturbance of unstable soil layers and uncontrollable mass wasting. 11.) All other necessary permits from Mason County,Washington State and/or Federal agencies that are required for this proposed development and construction must be obtained p ' r same development and construction. x �J 12.) Planning department inspection is required for verification of said conditions, please call, a few days pM W well installation for inspection. X—1 7/23/2003 2 of 2 MEP2003-00041 I �u1 North -- es Driveways --.0w-r'lans Shorelines -6e15tie System Topography Indicate Directional by(N,S,E,W,etc.) Proposed Improvements Easements In relation to plot plan Name if Flanking Street APPLICANT TO DRAW SITE PLAN BELOW: well -�� M' House Drainfield "S Driveway Electric Catfish to 130' Lake rd. 200' 90' Slap. lines Drainfield APPROVED 293' 10 140, MA -ON COUNTY DCD F LA1f' KING House Sf 1 E PLAIN REQUIRED TO BE ON SITE CHANGES SUBJECT TO APPROVAL 044 Well %y Date APPLICANT TO DRAW TOPOGRAPHY BELOW: Property is flat from Catfish Lake road West for approx 200 feet, then slopes West and North West down to the lake on approximately a 20 degree angle for the remaining 85-90 feet. See the slope in the Site plan Drawing above. ,I i i i� PERMIT NO.: ; C DATE RECEIVED:MASON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ��o-"`°t '-a3 s RESOURCE ORDINANCE (Chapter 17.01 MCC) 411 N. 5TH Street/P.O. Box 279, Shelton, WA 98584 ENVIRONMENTAL PERMIT APPLICATION MASON ENVIRONMENTAL PERMIT X CONDITIONAL USE ❑ VARIANCE ❑ The purpose of the Resource Ordinance is to protect Mason County's natural resource lands and critical areas and is under the authority of Chapters 36.32, 36.70A, 39.34, 58.17, 76.09, 84.33, 84.34 and 90.58 RCW. PLEASE PRINT 1. Owner: Alan Strange Owner Mailing Address: 813 Hanford Ave. Site Address: 700 East Catfish Lake Road City: Bremerton State:WA Zip: 98310 City: Shelton State_WA Zip:_98584 Lien/Title Holder: Same as above Phone:Daytime( 476-6658 360 710-2531 Address: Fire District#: City: State: Zip: Signature: 2. Parcel Number: 32134-75-90213 Legal description:TA 7 1—G 0Ec5_0 � Parcel Size: 1.25 acres 3. Directions to Site: Turn off Mason lake road on to Catfish lake road(private road)and continue around the lake. 700 east is the last undeveloped property on the lake before the Cull-de-Sac. 4. State what sections require a permit: In-Holding Lands,Chapter 17.01.062 ❑ Long-Term Commercial Forest, Chapter 17.10.060 ❑ Wetlands,Chapter 17.01.070 X Mineral Resource Lands, Chapter 17.01.066 ❑ Frequently Flooded Areas,Chapter 17.01.090 ❑ Aquifer Recharge Areas, Chapter 17.01.080 ❑ Landslide Hazard Areas,Chapter 17.01.100 ❑ Erosion Hazard Areas,Chapter 17.01.104 ❑ Seismic Hazard Areas, Chapter 17.01.102 ❑ Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas, Chapter 17.01.110 ❑ 5. Identify current use of property with existing improvements: Currently used as recreational. Power is on site with driveway access from road to lake. II! 6. Identify and describe the proposed project,including the type of materials to be used,construction methods,principle dimensions and other pertinent information(Attach additional sheets if needed): Proposed Proiect is a well installation in preparation for home construction. Well will be drilled approx 30-35 feet back from the lake edge(pond).approx.10 feet north of the south property line The well house will be constructed at approx.80-90 feet back from the lake. I 7 Any water on or adjacent to property: Saltwater ❑ Lake ❑ River X Pond X Wetland ❑ Seasonal Runoff ❑ Other t E 8. Will there be an alteration of a wetland and/or wetland vegetation area? Yes ❑ No ❑ Minor,will be restored 9' If septic is located on project site, include records. Connect to septic? ❑ Community Septic? ❑ Public Water Supply? ❑ Well? ❑ 10. Type of Job: New X Add ❑ Alt ❑ Repair ❑ Demolition ❑ Other Well installation This permit is granted pursuant to the Resource Ordinance(Chapter 17.01 MCC)and nothing in this permit shall excuse the applicant from compliance with any other federal,state,or local statutes,ordinances,or regulations applicable to this project,but not inconsistent with the Resource Ordinance.The permit may be rescinded pursuant to the event the permittee fails to comply with the conditions of this ordinance. MASON ENVIRONMENTAL PERMIT: $500.00/$300.00(with another permit) MASON CONDITIONAL USE ENVIR.PERMIT: $1,2000.00 MASON RESOURCE ORDINANCE VARIANCE: $1,200,00 REVISED: 03-12-03 HEARINGS EXAMINER: $200.00 1:\PLANNING\R&GPAC\ENVIRONMENTAL PERMIT APPLICATION Show the following on the site plan Lot Dimensions Flood Zones North Existing Strud'tures Fences Water Lines Driveways Drainage Plans Shorelines Septic System Topography Indicate Directional by(N,S,E,W,etc.) Proposed Improvements Easements In relation to plot plan Name if Flanking Street APPLICANT TO DRAW SITE PLAN BELOW: well House Drainfield I'S Driveway Electric 130' Catfish Lake rd. p �► zoo 90' Slope lines Drainfield 293' Lake Line 140' House 1 O� Well N APPLICANT TO DRAW TOPOGRAPHY BELOW: Property is flat from Catfish Lake road West for approx 200 feet, then slopes West and North West down to the lake on approximately a 20 degree angle for the remaining 85-90 feet. See the slope in the Site plan Drawing above. i i I i I I DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW FOR OFFICE USE ONLY COMMENTS Planning: Environmental Health: Building Plan Review: Occupancy Group: Fire Marshal: Other: Conditions: 011 ' I i TOTAL FEES: I i i Accepted by: Date: i {{ i 1/20/2004 Case Activity Listing 1:34:02PM Case#: MEP2003-00041 Assigned1V Done01 Activity Description Date l Date 2 Date 3 Hold Disp To By tlpdated`� , Updated By MEPA920 Miscellaneous Action 6/2/2003 None DONE DMJ DMJ 7/16/2003 DMJ Wetland delineation study submitted by applicant prior to applying for MEP. Wiltermood study(6-2-2003)determined that the shoreline of Catfish Lake on subject property was not a wetland per the Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual MEPA920 Miscellaneous Action 6/19/2003 None DONE 7/16/2003 DMJ Site inspection of subject property was done by DMJ and Department of Ecology wetlands specialist Anne Boehoh. It was determined by DOE that wetlands do exist along the shoreline at this property. Note letter dated 6-26-2003.Letter states,"'This wetland area is rated as a Category II wetland area,along with the other wetland fringe areas along this lake."The letter continues to explain,"Catfish Lake is not recognized as a shoreline of state because it covers less than 20 acres.Wolcott(1973)identifies this lake as covering 7.1 acres. When rating wetlands along the fringe of bodies of open freshwater less than or equal to 20 acres one is instructed by the Washington State Wetlands Rating system...to rate the entire area including all of the open water and any other wetlands that are contiguous with the open water together as one wetland. This means that those portions of the shoreline of Catfish Lake that support wetlands are all to be considered together for the purpose of the wetland rating.The area of the well and to berated includes the 7.1 acres of Catfish Lake plus the area of all of these wetland fringes." Boeholt 6-26-2003 MEPA010 Application Received 7/10/2003 7/10/2003 None DONE KS 7/10/2003 KS MEPA100 Planning Review 7/10/2003 7/16/2003 None DONE DMJ DMJ 7/21/2003 DMJ The proposed project entails installing a wellhead within 30-35 feet from wetland edge and a well house approximately 80 feet from wetland edge. Per the Mason County Resource Ordinance Wetlands Chapter,the proposed project activities are allowed,using the administrative review process per Section 17.01.070 D 1 a,e and f. Based on wetland studies,Wiltermood,DOE and Aquatic Restoration Consultants and discussions by staff with wetland consultants and DOE staff regarding Catfish Lake,although designated wetland,it was advised that subject property has Alderwood soils that are not classified as hydric per se. (See notes regarding classification of Catfish Lake as wetland above).The proposed well site consist of upland mixed conifeous deciduous forest with moderate dense shrub. With conditions determined by Wiltermood assessment and DOE assessment project will not have significant impact on shoreline and vegetated buffer of Catfish Lake. MEPA020 Issue(Print)MEP 7/23/2003 None DONE DMJ DMJ 7/23/2003 DMJ MEPA920 Miscellaneous Action 9/10/2003 None DONE DMJ DMJ 9/10/2003 DMJ Revised plot plan received with modification; drilling site of well will possibly moved north 3 0 feet. This would minimize impact on area by allowing ingress and egress of the drilling equipment without having to turan around in the zone below drill site and closer to shoreline.Revision approved. I Page l of 1 CaseActivity..rpt