HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEP2018-00028 - SEP Determinations - 7/31/2018 s
�r6°N Cot, MASON COUNTY (360)427-9670 Shelton ext. 352
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT (360)275-4467 Belfair ext. 352
Mason County Bldg. 8, 615 W.Alder Street (360)482-5269 Elma ext. 352
Shelton, WA 98584 www.co.mason.wa.us
/854 j
MASON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY SERVICES
DETERMINATION OF MITIGATED NONSIGNIFICANCE
(WAC 197-11-340)
SEP2018-00028
Description of This SEPA is associated with a request to reduce
Proposal: the buffer of a regulated stream for the
development of a proposed 2,439 sq. ft. kitchen
building on a 1.3-acre site zoned Rural Residential
5. The impacts of the buffer reduction will be
mitigated through a Habitat Management Plan,
with tree re-planting and stream enhancement.
Other associated site improvements include some
land clearing (Class IV-G Forest Practice); minor
remodeling of existing structures; relocation of
mechanical units; re-fencing; and re-landscaping.
Proponent: Watermark Estate Management Services
Location of Proposal: 6020, 6971, 6997 East State Route 106 & 51
East Waterwheel Place, Union, WA.
Parcel Number: 32233-50-00008; -00005; -90050; -00007
Legal Description: NE %, NW%, Sec 4, Twp. 19/20N., Rng 3W.,
W.M.
The Lead Agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probably significant adverse
impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW
43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed Environmental Checklist and other
information on file with the Lead Agency.This information is available to the public upon request.
Please contact Ron Buckholt at ext. 287, or rbuckholt@co.mason.wa.us with any questions. This
DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2).The Lead Agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days
from the date shown below, when the determination is final. Comments must be submitted to
Dept. of Community Development, 615 W Alder St, Shelton WA 98584 by 2/15/2019. Appeal of
this determination must be filed within a 14-day period following this final determination date,per
Mason County Code Chapter 15.11 Appeals.
Date: 2/1/2019
Ron Buckholt,Senior Planner
CONDITIONS
1. ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES
Archaeological or historical resources, such as ruins, sites, buildings, artifacts, fossils, or
other objects of antiquity that may have significance from an historical or scientific
standpoint, which may be encountered by the developer/contractor, shall not be
further disturbed. If the developer/contractor encounters any such artifacts, he/she
shall immediately stop work and notify Mason County and the Washington State
Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation. Failure to do so may result in civil
penalties.
2. HABITAT MANAGEMENT
Proponent shall adhere to all findings, recommendations and monitoring reports
outlined in the Habitat Management Plan received on November 30, 2018.
Furthermore, a financial surety, e.g. performance bond, per the estimated cost
calculation provided in said plan shall be posted at the time of building permit issuance.
3. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
Proponent shall adhere to Public Works - Loretta Swanson's stormwater conditions
stipulated in an email dated November 15, 2018.
4. GEO-TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Proponent shall adhere to the findings and recommendations stated in the Geo-Report
dated September 10, 2018.
5. HOURS OF OPERATION
Noise associated with this application shall not exceed what is allowed under Mason
County Code 9.36. Harvest operations shall start no earlier than 7:00 AM and shall end
before 8:00 PM on a daily basis.
I
6. SLASH ABATEMENT
This Forest Practice Application indicates that forest debris resulting from the proposed
logging operation may create an extreme fire hazard under RCW 76.04.600 and WAC
332-24-650. An extreme fire hazard could be created if one or more of the conditions
found in WAC 332-24-650 is located within 100 feet of the running surface of a public
road; or is within 500 of an existing structure and/or designated public use area, which
is not owned by the owner of the fire hazard area.
The land owner is fully liable in the event of fire, if he or she fails to appropriately abate
the hazard. Extreme fire hazards shall be abated by removing the forest debris, or by
other means approved by the Washington State Department of Natural Resources
(DNR).
SEPA Environmental Checklist Mason County Permit Center Use:
ZO(� -
❑ Single Family DNS: $385 SEP 06UZ8
❑ Other DNS: 0 to 9.99 acres: $630 Parcel#: �?Z�J� %� ' ellQ��J�
10 to 20 acres: $ 5 Da C'E�V E D
Over 20 acres: $94945
❑ DS/EIS: $2,525+70 Per hr JUL 312018
615 W. Alder Street
Purpose of checklist. &V iya-6
Governmental agencies use this checklist to help determine whether the environmental impacts of your
proposal are significant. This information is also helpful to determine if available avoidance, minimization
or compensatory mitigation measures will address the probable significant impacts or if an environmental
impact statement will be prepared to further analyze the proposal.
Instructions for applicants: tLielp1
This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Please
answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. You may need to consult
with an agency specialist or private consultant for some questions. You may use "not applicable" or
"does not apply"only when you can explain why it does not apply and not when the answer is unknown.
You may also attach or incorporate by reference additional studies reports. Complete and accurate
answers to these questions often avoid delays with the SEPA process as well as later in the decision-
making process.
The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of
time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal
or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your
answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant
adverse impact.
Instructions for Lead Agencies:
Please adjust the format of this template as needed. Additional information may be necessary to
evaluate the existing environment, all interrelated aspects of the proposal and an analysis of adverse
impacts. The checklist is considered the first but not necessarily the only source of information needed to
make an adequate threshold determination. Once a threshold determination is made, the lead agency is
responsible for the completeness and accuracy of the checklist and other supporting documents.
A. BACKGROUND[h_elp]
1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Loj
Union Washington Residences Site Improvement
2. Name of applicant: of elpl
Ray Nelson, Watermark Estate Management Services
3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: ihep]
Watermark Estate Management Services
10230 NE Points Dr, Suite 200, Kirkland, WA 98033
Contact: Ray Nelson, tel 425.576.3393
SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960)(MC version-non project portion omitted): 2016 Page 1 of 11
4. Date checklist prepared: Lle]
3/26/18, Revised 7/31/18
5. Agency requesting checklist: 1t)opl
Mason County, Washington
6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): if,eip]
Three phases in the years 2018, 2019, 2020.
7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with
this proposal? If yes, explain. ft1el
No additional plans besides what is described herein.
8. List any environmental information you know about that has been pree ar d o will be prepared,
directly related to this proposal. hel p A Stream Restoration Pl�n glo oggical Assessment
Wetland/Stream Delineation Report in support of in-stream work is to be prepared
Habitat Management Plan Section 404, Hydraulic Project Approval
Tree Removal and Retention Plan Section 401, Water Quality Certification
9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals
directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. Lhelpj
No applications for other proposals affecting the property parcels covered by this proposal are pending. An
application for a Boundary Line Adjustment directly related to this proposal is a deferred submittal that is pending.
10..List an�r gqovernment approvals or permits that will be needed forrour�ro�osal, if known; hel
Envlronmen al Permit, Bounda yy Line Adjustment,Shoreline Substantial Develop ent er It,Shoreline Variance,
Shoreline Permit, Forest Practices App, Building Permits and associated permits and approvals, Resource Ordinance Variance,
Grading Permit,Small Parcel Stormwater Mgmt Plan,Tree Removal Permit, NPDES Construction Stormwater General Permit
11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of
the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe
certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead
agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.)L,eip
The proposal consists of site improvement to a private residential vacation property on several contiguous parcels totaling
approximately 5.4 acres in area. The area encompassed by the project totals approximately 1.3 acres. Improvements include
remodeling of an existing one-story building and grounds with a change of use from household support to guest accommodations
(Guest Lodge), building of a new two-story building to be used for household support(Kitchen Building),addition of new driveway
access to the compound, relocation of mechanical units(from Guest House to Bunk House),addition of an exterior door and landing
(Toy Box),privacy fencing,and re-landscaping of a previously developed area.
The extent of earthwork will amount to about 5000 cubic yards.
12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location
of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if
known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the
site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably
available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to
duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. itjopl
Parcel #(s):32233-50-00008, -00005, -90050, -00007
6020, 6971, 6997 E State Rt 106; 51 E Waterwheel Place
Address: -00008:SUNNY BEACH PCL 1 OF BLA#04-59 SURVEY 30232-3.
Legal Description:1 OF BLA#04-60. -90050:SUNNY BEACH LOT:A OF SP#2986 PENDING BLA#18-09 AF#2092413.
-00007:SUNNY BEACH TR 4 NLY OF R/W&TAX892-A.
Twp/Range/Section and/or GPS IOcatlon:NE QTR OF THE NW QTR OF SECTION 4,TOWNSHIP 21 N,RANGE 3 W;
NE QTR OF THE NW QTR OF SECTION 4,TOWNSHIP 22 N, RANGE 3 W
SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960)(MC version-non project portion omitted): 2016 Page 2 of 11
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS hf eM
1. Earth
a. General description of the site hf elM
(circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, otheJ
Portion of site is nearly flat, portion is moderately sloped. Steep streambanks at parcel 32233-50-90050.
b. What is the steepest slope on the site(approximate percent slope)? hf gld
Apart from incised streambanks, 35 percent.
c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)?
If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any agricultural land of
long-term commercial significance and whether the proposal results in removing any of these
soils. hl e
Soils are generally poorly graded gravel with silt and sand, some with cobbles.
d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so,
describe. hf eM
No.
e. Describe the purpose, type, total area, and approximate quantities and total affected area of any
filling, excavation, and grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. hl e
2,500 cubic yards cut,2,500 cubic yards fill,5,000 cubic yards grading. The total proposed area affected by
grading is 25,900 square feet(0.59 acres). The source of fill will be from a Washington State Department of
Transportation(WSDOT)approved source for the specified material or source meeting WSDOT requirements.
f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. h[ eM
Some erosion within the project limits of work could occur during construction.
g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project
construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? i,ei
22 percent(approx. 52,000 square feet).This consistes of removal of about 3,400 sq ft and addition of
about 7,000 sq ft, making a net increase of impervious surfaces of approximately 3,600 square feet.
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: lktpj
Measures to be taken to prevent erosion include placement of temporary interceptor basin to
prevent runoff from flowing outside work area, silt barriers, sediment traps,and filter fabric catch
2. Air basin inserts. The construction entrance will also be stabilized to prevent erosion.
a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal during construction, operation,
and maintenance when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give
approximate quantities if kknowp hf yp-1
Some dust resulting from demolition and excavation activities and emissions from construction
equipment are expected. Occasional cooking-related emissions will occur after project completion.
b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so,
generally describe. jhel
None.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: hj m
Water hose spraying of demolition debris and excavated soil will be employed to keep dust production down.
during construction. An air filtration system will be installed to limit emissions from cooking activities.
SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960)(MC version-non project portion omitted): 2016 Page 3 of 11
3. Water
a. Surface Water: ii,_e(pI
1) Is there any surface water.body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-
round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and
provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. of eM
The property borders on a saltwater body, Hood Canal. A perennial fish bearing stream, Dalby Creek,
runs through the property and flows into Hood Canal, forming an associated wetland.
2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet)the described
waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Li The entire area of the project is within
200 feet of Dalby Creek, a portion of the project,consisting primarily of landscaping and a privacy fence,will require work within 200 feet
of Hood Canal and the wetland. In-stream enhancements will be implemented, including woody debris and habitat boulders,removal of
existing bank stabilization (rock,sand bags)and placement of streambed material to improve aquatic wildlife's upstream approach to culvert.
3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from
surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected.
Indicate the source of fill material. LLieipj Final quantities of fill material will be generated after additional analysis
and design,and will all be in support of in-stream enhancement to benefit fish populations. Materials used will be sourced from local
quarries,and will be specified to meet agency standards. Anticipated quantity of boulders and streambed material is less than 40 cu yds.
4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description,
purpose, and approximate quantities if known. 1neU
Some isolation of in-stream work areas may be necessary during implementation of the enhancement plan,
with temporary diversion of stream flow around the work area.
5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. Ihelpl
No.
6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so,
describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. Li,?iI
None.
b. Ground Water:
1) Will groundwater be withdrawn from a well for drinking water or other purposes? If so, give a
general description of the well, proposed uses and approximate quantities withdrawn from
the well. Will water be discharged to groundwater? Give general description, purpose, and
approximate quantities if known. fr,,Jpl
No.
2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other
sources, if any(for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following
chemicals. . . ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of
such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or
humans the system(s) are expected to serve. hI em
Domestic source sewage fluids from the 2 buildings will be discharged from septic tanks to a new septic drain
field. The system will be sized for 530 gallons per day to serve the "Guest Lodge" vacation lodging with 4
bedroom units (480 gallons) and the "Kitchen Building" providing household services (50 gallons).
c. Water runoff(including stormwater):
1) Describe the source of runoff(including storm water) and method of collection and disposal,
if any(include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other
waters? If so, describe. LL,ei Stormwater runoff from impervious surfaces will be collected in
biofiltration facilities where it will recharge the groundwater; overflow will route overland to Dalby Creek
or via pipe to release at a maximum flow rate of 0.02 cu ft/sec into Dalby Creek.
SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960)(MC version-non project portion omitted): 2016 Page 4 of 11
2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. JLgjPJ
Potential waste materials from vehicles in parking areas may settle out in the biofiltration facilities.
3) Does the proposal alter or otherwise affect drainage patterns in the vicinity of the site? If so,
describe.
No.
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water, and drainage pattern
impacts, if any:
Water quality impacts and flooding will be mitigated with biofiltration facilities and/or flow dispersion as
well as by planting and maintenance of native vegetation in areas of the construction project.
4. Plants ham]
a. Check the types of vegetation found on the site: hf el
X deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other cherry,horse chestnut, laurel,katsura tree,plum cultivar
X evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other
shrubs
X grass
pasture
crop or grain
orchards, vineyards or other permanent crops
X wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other
water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other
X other types of vegetation invasives
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? he
I
A number of trees will be removed. See Tree Removal and Reten ion Plan.
Invasive ivy and blackberry will be removed.
c. List threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site. hl eM
None known.
d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance
ve ettatlon on the g11te, if anVV ��eim��
Invasive ivy Nnd blackberry will be removbd from large areas of the stream buffer,and from portions of the shoreline and wetland
buffers. These areas will be re-vegetated with native trees/shrubs groundcovers. A formerly developed area will also be re-vegetated
with a mix of native/adapted plant species. (Sqe Habitat.Ma ageme t Plan)
e. List all noxious weeds and invasive species Known to be on or near the site.
English ivy and Himalayan blackberry are the primary noxious/invasive species (Class C noxious weeds).
Some Robert's geranium is also present(Class B noxious weed).
5. Animals
a. List any birds and other animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to
be on or near the site. Examples include: Iheipj
birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: hawk, eagle, heron, songbirds
mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: deer, river otter, small mammals
fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: salmon, trout
SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960)(MC version-non project portion omitted): 2016 Page 5 of 11
b. List any threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site. p2eu
Dalby Creek and other nearby streams may contain listed fish species (steelhead and chum), and Hood Canal,
adjacent to the property, also has a variety of listed marine mammals, turtles, and fish.
c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. hei-
Dalby Creek may be used by migrating anadromous salmonids. Hood Canal is also part of a
migratory bird corridor.
d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: JkM
The project includes extensive removal of Invasive species that provide no habitat value, and replacement with
native tree, shrub, and groundcover species that will provide an increase in wildlife food source and cover.
In-stream enhancements will improve habitat complexity and ease passage through culvert to benefit aquatic life.
e. List any invasive animal species known to be on or near the site.
None known.
6. Energy and natural resources
a. What kinds of energy(electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar)will be used to meet the
completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing,
etc.Lhelpi Propane gas will be used will be used for heating and cooking. Electric will be used
for all other needs.
b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties?
If so, generally describe. ftieipl
No.
c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal?
List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: lheiel
Use of building insulation and low-energy consuming lighting.
7. Environmental health
a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk
of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal?
If so, describe. [helpl
1) Describe any known or possible contamination at the site from present or past uses.
None known.
2) Describe existing hazardous chemicals/conditions that might affect project development and
design. This includes underground hazardous liquid and gas transmission pipelines located
within the .j project area and in the vicinity.
Y
None.
3) Describe any toxic or hazardous chemicals that might be stored, used, or produced during
the project's development or construction, or at any time during the operating life of the
project.
None.
4) Describe special emergency services that might be required.
No special emergency services will be required.
5) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any:
None.
SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960)(MC version-non project portion omitted): 2016 Page 6 of 11
b. Noise
1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project(for example:
traffic, equipment, operation, other)?Ln _�p]
Traffic noise from Hwy 106.
2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a
short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indi-
cate what hours noise would come from the site. al@M
Short-term noise creation during construction by operation of excavation equipment and power tools. Long-term noise
creation will be limited to vehicles moving between new building and compound during regular business hours.
3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: n[ elpl
Noise impacts will not be great enough to require special mitigation.
8. Land and shoreline use
a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties?Will the proposal affect current land
uuSes.on nearhh�j Qr adl�Iaeent pro erti ? If so, descril e heT Guest Lodge is currently used to provide household
support services for existing residential vatatlon A ound.Some services will he ated to the Kitchen Building,others to a remodeled
building(under separate SEPA). The Guest Lodge will instead be used for guest accommodations. The relandscaped areas will be used for
the enjoyment of the outdoors by vacationers. The other buildings associated with the project accommodate typical vacation property uses.
b. Has the project site been used as working farmlands or working forest lands? If so, describe.
No.
How much agricultural or forest land of long-term commercial significance will be converted to
other uses as a result of the proposal, if any?
None.
If resource lands have not been designated, how many acres in farmland or forest land tax
status will be converted to nonfarm or nonforest use? n( M
No farmland or forest land will be converted to nonfarm or nonforest use.
1) Will the proposal affect or be affected by surrounding working farm or forest land normal
business operations, such as oversize equipment access, the application of pesticides,
tilling, and harvesting? If so, how:
No.
c. Describe any structures on the site. nl em
There are various existing residential and accessory structures on the site. There is a privacy fence that
surrounds the entire compound. There is an existing culverted vehicular bridge and a wooden pedestrian
bridge over lower reach of Dalby Creek.
d. Will any structures be demolisf�ed? If s�, wh�t? hell
Demolition will consist o o Guest Lo ge an rep interiors acement of associated exterior retaining wall. Also,
a length of an existing fence will be removed. An existing abandoned concrete foundation will be removed.
e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? tjol
Rural Residential - 5 acres.
f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site?)hem
Designated to remain rural.
g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? L1,el
A portion of the site is within shoreline jurisdiction,and has been designated Residential by the Shoreline
Master Program.
h. Has any part of the site been classified as a critical area by the city or county? If so, specify.
jhelQ]
Dalby Creek and its estuarine wetland are critical areas.
SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960)(MC version-non project portion omitted): 2016 Page 7 of 11
i. Approximately how manyy people would reside or work in the completed protect?L,�i
The remodeled Guest Lodge will be designed to sleep eight persons.The Kitchen Building will house up to six
workers during vacation season operation,and usually less than that in the off season.
j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? hf eM
None.
k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: hf eM
None necessary.
L. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land
uses and plans, if any: )heir
The parcels affected are contiguous with other parcels making up a vacation compound.
The proposal is an enhancement of those [and uses.
m. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with nearby agricultural and forest
[ands of long-term commercial significance, if any:
None necessary.
9. Housing
a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-
income housing. Ii,ei�l
Vacation housing with 4 units provided in one existing building.
b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high,
middle, or low-income housing. fiielgl
None.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: lhei_p
None necessary.
10. Aesthetics
a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is
the pArinci al exterior building material(s) proposed?Lhei
The tallest Neigh of proposed buildings is approximately 2b eet to the roof ridge of the Kitchen Building.
The new Kitchen Building and remodeled Guest Lodge will have principally wood siding exteriors.
b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? het
Views from the south towards the Hood Canal across the proposed location of the Kitchen Buil ing are currently obscured by vegetation.
Views from buildings landward are from a high enough elevation to see the Canal over top of the proposed new building.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: hL ee ]
Existing and planted vegetation will provide some screening from adjacent areas.
11. Light and glare
a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly
occur? LiLeip Some artificial light would escape from windows in the evenings. There will be some
downward directed exterior lighting at night. No significant glare will be produced.
b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? [helel
Not likely.
c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? II)tJpI
None known of.
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: [lielp]
"Dark Sky Friendly" exterior light fixtures will be chosen where possible.
SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960)(MC version-non project portion omitted): 2016 Page 8 of 11
12. Recreation
a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? nei
The location provides water-related and other outdoor activities. Alderbrook Resort is located
next door to the compound.
b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. hei l
No.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation
opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any. fheio
Enhancement of recreational opportunities will be provided with addition of some trails. The conversion of the
existing Guest Lodge and surrounding grounds will also enhance recreational opportunities. The proposed
mechanical equipment relocation and sound buffering will decrease noise at outdoor recreation areas.
13. Historic and cultural preservation
a. Are there any buildings, structures, or sites, located on or near the site that are over 45 years old
listed in or eligible for listing in national, state, or local preservation registers located on or near
the site? If so, specifically describe. Lhe(p]
The Dalby Waterwheel, which dates from the 1920s, is located nearby the site and is locally
recognized as historic, and is also listed on the Washington Heritage Register.
b. Are there any landmarks, features, or other evidence of Indian or historic use or occupation?
This may include human burials or old cemeteries. Are there any material evidence, artifacts, or
areas of cultural importance on or near the site? Please list any professional studies conducted
at the site to identify such resources. iei j
None.
c. Describe the methods used to assess the potential impacts to cultural and historic resources on
or near the project site. Examples include consultation with tribes and the department of
archeology and historic preservation, archaeological surveys, historic maps, GIS data, etc. hI em
Washington Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation's online WISAARD application
was reviewed.
d. Proposed measures to avoid, minimize, or compensate for loss, changes to, and disturbance to
resources. Please include plans for the above and any permits that may be required.
No potential impacts have been identified.
14. Transportation
a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site or affected geographic area and describe
proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. hei
Highway 106 abuts the site to the south. Access to the property is to be from E Waterwheel Place,
a private road, which connects to Hwy 106, enters the property and dead ends on the property.
b. Is the site or affected geographic area currently served by public transit? If so, generally
describe. If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop?theipl
Route #2 bus running between Shelton and Belfair via Hwy 106 passes by the site. There is a
regular stop about 2 miles away in the town of Union.
c. How many additional parking spaces would the completed project or non-project proposal have?
How many would the project or proposal eliminate?Lhei
Parking space for 4 vehicles will be provided at the new Kitchen Building. The existing parking area
accommodating 4 vehicles at the Guest Lodge will be reconfigured with no loss to number of parking spaces.
SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960)(MC version-non project portion omitted): 2016 Page 9 of 11
d. Will the proposal require any new or improvements to existing roads, streets, pedestrian, bicycle
or state transportation facilities, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate
whether public or private). hel
Included in the proposal is an addition of a gate at the end of E Waterwheel Place leading to a new
driveway to access the compound property. Resurfacing of the existing road would be part of this.
e. Will the project or proposal use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of)water, rail, or air
transportation? If so, generally describe. L,eipl
No.
f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project or proposal? If
known, indicate when peak volumes would occur and what percentage of the volume would be
trucks (such as commercial and nonpassenger vehicles). What data or transportation models
were used to make these estimates? r,ei
No change to the number of trips. However, a limited amount of traffic will move from the main compound
entry off of E Beach Drive to E Waterwheel Place to access the Kitchen Building and the new compound entry.
g. Will the proposal interfere with, affect or be affected by the movement of agricultural and forest
products on roads or streets in the area? If so, generally describe.
No.
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: Lheipj
Traffic impacts are inconsequential as the volume is very low and will not increase, but only be relocated.
15. Public services
a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection,
police protection, public transit, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. ir,elpj
No.
b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. ll,eid
There are no direct impacts on public services.
16. Utilities
a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: Lheip]
electricity, natural gas water, efuse servic telephone,
sanitary sewer, septic system other
b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the
general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might
be needed. �heli All utilities currently provided to the Guest Lodge will remain,with the exception that the
connection to the existing sep If c system serving the compound will be transferred to a new septic drain field to be located near the
Guest Lodge. For the new Kitchen Building,water will be provided from PUD 1, Hood Canal Water System,via a new supply line
connecting to an existing line running through a utility easement on the Kitchen Building Parcel. Sewer will go to a new septic tank,the
liquids from which will be pumped to the new septic drain field near the Guest Lodge;propane gas supply will require a new tank;
telephone service will be an extension of the existing compound's system;electrical(new line)and refuse services will be provided by
the existing provider for the compound. Existing exterior mechanical equipment will be relocated from the Toy Box to the Bunk House.
SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960)(MC version-non project portion omitted): 2016 Page 10 of 11
C. SIGNATURE ,-�,;; i
The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead
agency is relying on them to make its decision.
Signature:
Crate Signed: 7/31/18
Print Name of Signee: Ray Nelson
If applicable, Position and AgencylOrganization: Owner's Representative
Date Submitted.
SE PA Environmental checkUsN JWAG M-11-860)i+,{C versfan.non project parryon omitted). 2016 Page 11 of 11